
Meet Simba, a german mountain dog. So majestic! #9gag

Meet Simba, a german mountain dog. So majestic! #9gag
Here is the latest:
It was not what Derek Nash expected to find in his 5-year-old’s school bag: A bill demanding a “no-show fee” for another child’s birthday party.
Nash said the bill from another parent sought 15.95 pounds ($24.00) because his son Alex had not attended the party at a ski center in Plymouth, southwest England.
Nash told the BBC on Monday he had initially accepted the party invitation, but later realized Alex was supposed to visit his grandparents that day. He said he did not have contact details to let the other family know.
The birthday boy’s mother, Julie Lawrence, told the BBC that her contact details were on the party invitation.
Nash says Lawrence has threatened him with small claims court but he has no plans so far to pay.
The link is here. And here is yet another account. I thank Drew for the pointer.
China started to lend massively to Venezuela in 2007. Since then it has lent more than $45bn, of which about $20bn is still outstanding.
That is from Ricardo Hausmann at the FT.
Stomp on the gas in a new Ford Mustang or F-150 and you’ll hear a meaty, throaty rumble — the same style roar that Americans have associated with auto power and performance for decades.
It’s a sham. The engine growl in some of America’s best-selling cars and trucks is actually a finely tuned bit of lip-syncing, boosted through special pipes or digitally faked altogether…
Fake engine noise has become one of the auto industry’s dirty little secrets, with automakers from BMW to Volkswagen turning to a sound-boosting bag of tricks. Without them, today’s more fuel-efficient engines would sound far quieter and, automakers worry, seemingly less powerful, potentially pushing buyers away.
There is more here, from Drew Harwell.
1. Toilet paper is shrinking, the size of the individual sheets that is. (That is probably the closest we will get to hyperinflation.) Does the average American really use 46 sheets a day? That sounds like an overstatement.
In contrast to this commodity, I usually want for food portion sizes — especially ice cream — to be downsized.
2. I say both men and women are understating their number of sexual partners. Contrary to what is portrayed in this chart, I postulate an American male average of about four. I do not agree with the common claim that American men will overstate their number of partners.
The pointer is via Rayman.
Here is an update from Japan:
Four years after the Bank of Japan set a 2 percent inflation target, price gains may still be coming up short, according to a survey of economists by Bloomberg News.
Consumer prices will rise an average 1.4 percent the fiscal year through March 2017, after failing to reach 2 percent — stripped of fresh food and a sales-tax boost — in any of the years since the goal was set, the median of 16 estimates shows. Governor Haruhiko Kuroda wanted to get there in about two years when he unleashed his record stimulus plan in April 2013.
Here are further data points from Krugman about other locales.
I am not seeking (today) to argue about liquidity traps, credibility, and the like. Clearly the Japanese central bank can influence inflation at least somewhat, and recall the BOE helped bring inflation in at over five percent but a few years ago. The ECB really could do much more. But my view is this:
1. Most countries have labor market incumbents with sweet real wage deals, deals which could not be renegotiated anew today because the world has seen a repricing of labor downwards for the wealthy countries.
2. Higher rates of price inflation would cut into those deals and thus high rates of price inflation are unpopular. Voters don’t quite understand the monetary economics here, but they have a vague sense that “inflation screws them.”
3. We are no longer at the point where two percent inflation is easy to achieve in Europe or Japan. Central banks are doubted. To achieve two, they would have to shoot for four, and thus announce a target of four. Few voters wish to hear this, and furthermore a credible stab at four percent inflation might in fact bring three percent inflation or maybe more. A non-credible central bank can indeed still debase its currency, yet the achievable targets are given by lumpy notches, not a smooth sliding scale. In the case of the eurozone, too high an inflation target is probably illegal as well, given the sole mandate of price stability.
4. We thus end up stuck having central banks which announce a target of two percent but undershoot it.
As for Japan, here is a clue from the same article:
While Kuroda’s campaign — which has seen the BOJ’s balance sheet dwarf that of counterparts relative to the size of the economy — has spurred bank lending to the biggest jump in two decades and seen the end of outright deflation, it has yet to spark pay rises big enough to secure the 2 percent CPI target.
“It’s necessary to create an environment where wages rise sustainably,” said Kinoshita…
This also helps explain why European QE would need to be shock and awe, why it won’t be, and why it won’t help that much after all, even though it is better than doing nothing. Few governments wish to boast they are lowering the real wages of their employed middle class citizens more rapidly than would otherwise be the case. Reaping some extra votes from the marginally unemployed is not going to swing the electoral calculus on that one.
Let’s not blame the policymaker or the journalist. I blame the economists who promote the notion that higher rates of inflation will boost rather than erode real wages. That’s going to leave policymakers — and voters — waiting for a long, long time.
Read the recent testimony of Robert E. Hall (pdf):
Most of the decline in participation occurred among teenagers and young adults. The finding that these effects tend to be larger in more prosperous families points strongly away from much of a role for rising influence of benefit programs, because these programs, especially food stamps, are only available to families with incomes well below the median.
Tinha uma grama no meio do caminho…
Opa! E já tem novo sorteio (comemorando o aniversário do mentirinhas) lá no facebook CLIQUE AQUI
O post Mentirinhas #762 apareceu primeiro em Mentirinhas.
Trata-se de um spin-off de Capitão América, centrado na vida da agente secreta Penny Carter, que após a segunda Guerra Mundial se recusa a limitar-se a seu trabalho burocrático na agência e passa a combater a alta espionagem e terríveis inimigos da nação.
Quando? 6 de janeiro
Onde? ABC

Um terrível vírus dizimou a humanidade no ano de 2049. Para reverter isso, a solução é voltar no tempo e destruir a ameaça antes que ela aconteça. Baseado no filme homônimo.
Quando? 16 de janeiro
Onde? Syfy

Baseada nos filmes de terror criados por Sam Raime, a série trará de volta Bruce Campbell lutando contra uma nova horda de mortos que ameaçam o futuro da humanidade.
Quando? 2015 em data não definida
Onde? Starz

Relembre o filme que deu origem à série:
Em um futuro próximo, a humanidade corre o risco de extinção devido ao aparecimento de um vírus letal. Como forma de salvar, ao menos, parte da raça humana, cientistas descobrem uma maneira de enviar um grupo de volta no tempo, cerca de 1/3 da população. O problema é que o experimento somente poderá ser realizado uma vez e não há retorno. Para ser eleito, a pessoa teria que ter menos de 65 anos, ser saudável e não ter antecedentes criminais. Duas regras, porém, deveriam ser respeitadas: não procurar os parentes no passado, nem jamais falar sobre o futuro. Porém, nem todos conseguirão cumprir com esta determinação.
Quando? 2015, sem data definida.
Onde? BBC

Há vida após a morte? É a pergunta que a doutora Kathryn Russo e o milionário Ivan Turing tentarão responder, ao investigar casos de feñômenos paranormais e toda espécie de manifestação sobrenatural.
Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? TNT

Do mesmo criador de The Walking Dead, o enredo conta a peregrinação do jovem Kyle Barnes, que desde criança sofre com uma misteriosa possessão demoníaca e decide trilhar uma jornada em busca de respostas e de uma maneira de se livrar deste fardo, mas se depara com uma trama que envolve o destino da humanidade. Será acompanhado em sua busca por um reverendo politicamente incorreto, bêbado e que crê que ele mesmo é um soldado de Deus na guerra contra o mal.
Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? Cinemax

Série fantástica, onde um grupo de jovens é exilado no reino de Hades e convivem com deuses, semideuses e monstros mitológicos. Um deles, se tornará um líder revolucionário capaz de fazer frente aos deuses do Olimpo.
Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? Syfy

Ambientada em uma galáxia distante, onde os habitantes do planeta Qresh colonizaram suas três luas, criando quatro mundos diferentes com com classes sociais díspares, o que gera um grande descontentamento. Assim, um grupo de mercenários chamados Killjoys são chamados para restaurar a paz.
Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? Syfy

Baseado na obra homônima de Susanna Clarke, a BBC traz uma trama de época com toque de sci-fi e fantasia. Ambientada na Inglaterra do início do século 19, em um mundo em que a magia existe, mas raramente é praticada, os protagonistas vão ajudar à Inglaterra na guerra contra a França.
Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? BBC One

O Demolidor
Proveniente do universo Marvel, Daredevil, título original, narra o surgimento do herói que fica cego em um acidente envolvendo radiação, mas que percebe ter seus sentidos super ampliados e, com suas novas habilidades decide combater o crime. É uma produção exclusiva da Netflix em parceira com a Marvel Television.
Quando? 01 de maio
Onde? Netflix
No elenco de Daredevil estão 1 – Charlie Cox (Matt Murdock), 2 – Vondie Curtis-Hall (Ben Urich), 3 – Bob Gunton (Leland “O Coruja” Owlsley), 4 – Elden Henson (Franklin “Foggy” Nelson), 5 – Deborah Ann Woll (Karen Page), 6 – Toby Leonard Moore (Wesley), 7 – Ayelet Zurer (Vanessa Marianna), 8 – Rosario Dawson (Claire Temple) e 9 – Vincent D’Onofrio (como o Rei do Crime).

Elenco de O Demolidor, da Netflix
Jessica Jones
Parte do pacote de séries da parceria Netflix e Marvel, trata-se de uma heroína que faz parte do grupo Os Defensores. Após um grande trauma, Jessica Jones decide combater o crime e ajudar outros heróis do grupo. Após a exibição de todas as séries previstas na parceria (Jessica Jones, Demolidor, Luke Cage e Punho de Ferro), a Netflix apresentará uma minissérie juntando todos eles em uma aventura da liga de heróis chamada Os Defensores.
Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? Netflix

I Zombie
Todo mundo quer sua fatia no filão dos mortos-vivos, novos astros do showbiz da TV mundial. Assim, o canal CW encomendou a sua própria série de zumbis. Baseada no universo dos quadrinhos DC, a trama conta a história de uma estudante de medicina que consegue um estágio com um médico-legista como subterfúgio para se alimentar de cérebros de vítimas de crimes. Ela necessita se entregar ao prazer macabro para conseguir manter sua humanidade e não se tornar de vez uma morta-viva. Porém, à cada cérebro consumido, ela também passa a herdar suas memórias e, para compensar seu vício, ajuda a desvendar seus assassinatos.
Quando? 17 de março
Onde? CW

Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? AMC
Confira o trailer da versão original:
Quando? Julho de 2015
Onde? NBC

Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? XBOX / Showtime

Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? TVE

Baseada na HQ homônima, cujos criadores também estão por trás desta adaptação, a trama é centrada na tripulação de uma nave abandonada à própria sorte nos confins do universo, que, ao acordar, não se recordam quem são, nem porque estão ali. As pistas de sua identidade e missão são reveladas aos poucos e uma trama de conspiração, traição e reviravoltas toma conta da nave à medida que vai se aproximando de destino.
Quando? 2015 em data indefinida
Onde? Syfy

Quando? 2015 em data não definida
Onde? Lifetime

Quando? 2015 em data não definida
Onde? Syfy

The most visible change is Audio Hijack's new audio capture interface. The terrific pipeline-style view of exactly how audio flows makes Audio Hijack 3 a snap to learn for veteran and rookie users alike. Different types of Blocks bring in audio from application and hardware sources (Source Blocks), adjust it with audio effects (Effects Blocks), then record it and send it out to speakers (Output Blocks). The fully customizable layout means users can configure the exact pipeline they need, to get the audio results they want.The app is organized into three sections, including Sessions, Recordings, and Schedule, and Session Templates let users complete common tasks quickly. It's possible to record multiple formats at once, or different sources in sync, and there are simple tools for accessing various audio effects.

"Passwords based on simple patterns on your keyboard remain popular despite how weak they are," said Morgan Slain, CEO of SplashData. "Any password using numbers alone should be avoided, especially sequences. As more websites require stronger passwords or combinations of letters and numbers, longer keyboard patterns are becoming common passwords, and they are still not secure."To get its list of the worst passwords in 2014, its fourth annual year of collecting password data, SplashData looked at more than 3.3 million passwords that were leaked across 2014. Passwords came primarily from users in North America and Western Europe.
Honoring the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. #MLK Apple http://t.co/ngqL0bym8y
— Tim Cook (@tim_cook) January 19, 2015
"I had the — just tremendous respect for both of them, and so I do," he said. "I look at them every day because I think for people — there’s still too many cases in the world and in the United States where there’s a class kind of structure or where voting or people are trying to convince each other that this other group of people don’t deserve the same rights. And I think it’s crazy, I think it’s un-American."Besides the web page refresh, Apple reportedly also is encouraging its employees to volunteer with a donation matching program, reports 9to5Mac. Instead of a paid day off, Apple is offering to donate an additional $50 for each voluntary hour worked by employees.
In certain configurations, the eye tracking system may persistently render the movable indicator wherever the user looks in the GUI. This rendering of the movable indicator may be accurate to the degree that the movable indicator becomes a stabilized retinal image with respect to the user's eyes. As such, the movable indicator may fade with respect to the user's perception of the GUI. In other words, the movable indicator may no longer be visible to the user. In such situations, it is desirable to restore the user's perception of the movable indicator to counteract this fading effect. Accordingly, the eye tracking system described herein may automatically alter the position, appearance, or both of the movable indicator so that it is no longer a stabilized retinal image and can be perceived by the user.A handful of older patents filed by the company have been released by the Patent and Trademark Office as of late, including a transforming home-button-to-gaming-joystick just last week. Like all other patents, the possibility of the eye-tracking tech showing up anytime soon in an Apple product is very slim, but is an interesting glimpse into the company's possible future nonetheless.
On a trip to Washington, D.C. last month, Apple CEO Tim Cook met with various senators to discuss a variety of topics, and Bloomberg points to the trip as a sign of the company's increased lobbying in recent years. “They’ve learned what others before them have learned -- that Washington can have a great effect on their business,” said Larry Noble, senior counsel at the Campaign Legal Center, a Washington-based non-profit that scrutinizes money in politics.Even with its increased spending in Washington, Apple still trails a number of other companies in the area. According to OpenSecrets.org, a website which tracks spending, from January through September 2014, Apple's $2.9 million in lobbying expenditures was well below that of Google ($13.7 million) and Microsoft ($6 million).
Tom VanAntwerp looks at political donations by the staff of the top-ten think tanks. Some findings:
Think tank employees overwhelmingly give to Democratic causes. Nearly 78% of all political contributions from think tank employees went to Democrats. 208 think tank employees gave a total of $452,589 to Democrats in 2012;
Discussions of bias via donor base don’t match actual employee partisanship.Comparing the most obviously ideological think tanks, employees of both Heritage Foundation and Center for American Progress gave vastly more to political groups than did employees of Cato Institute. While the Wikipedia discussion of Cato’s funders was over three times longer than the same discussion for either Heritage or CAP, only 3.5% of Cato’s employees made partisan donations compared to 8.7% for Heritage and 8.2% for CAP. The total amount Cato employees gave was also dwarfed by Heritage and CAP employees: $10,200 versus $76,653 and $100,747.
In another post, VanAntwerp shows that even though the staff at Cato don’t give very much to politicians and are not especially partisan by other think tank standards, media discussion’s of Cato’s funding and funders are far more common and extensive than that of any other think tank. My guess is that conservatives give Heritage a pass, liberals give Brookings, CAP, and Pew a pass but both liberals and conservatives are suspicious of Cato. Liberals think Cato is in bed with the corporations, conservatives think Cato is in bed with gays and marijuana users. Both sides think Cato is with the opposition and, as a result, Cato generates lots of media discussion about funding “bias.”
