Shared posts

19 Feb 21:10

Saudi Historian: Women Shouldn’t Drive Because They’ll Be Raped

by Rebecca Watson

To support more videos like this, go to patreon.com/rebecca!

Here’s the sort-of transcript:

A Saudi historian has gone on record as saying that women shouldn’t be allowed to drive because if they drive, their cars may break down. And if their cars break down, they can be raped.

This is a completely ridiculous argument to people living outside of Saudi Arabia, since women driving is a completely normal part of our daily lives, and the thought of stopping half the population from doing something that is seems as natural to us as breathing is absurd.

But if you think it’s ridiculous to stop women from driving because they might get raped but you think it’s cool to stop women from drinking alcohol or wearing particular outfits or saying certain things on the Internet because they might get raped, then have a seat, because you’re a giant hypocrite.

Saudis arguing that women shouldn’t drive because they might get raped is the perfect absurd argument to highlight the inherent absurdity of every other argument that pretends to be about protecting women but is actually about controlling women’s behavior in more and more severe ways, creating impossible standards that we can never meet in order to be perfectly unrape-able.

The absurdity becomes even clearer when the interviewer asked the saudi historian whether or not it was a potential problem that women may be raped by their male chauffeurs. He admitted that that was a problem, and suggested that the solution would be hiring foreign women to drive around Saudi women.

It’s a game women can never win: our rights are curtailed in the supposed interest of our safety, but we’re never actually made more safe. What happens to women every day in pretty much all societies around the world is a much more severe and dangerous version of what happens to people who travel on airplanes when they go through TSA. We’re offered the illusion of safety, but we’re never actually made any safer, we’re just forced to waste time taking off our god damn shoes when we’re already running late.

Imagine if the TSA decided you couldn’t fly at all, because you might be murdered by a terrorist on the plane. “Why don’t you just stop the terrorist from flying,” you may ask incredulously. The TSA agent shrugs and says that they can’t catch all the terrorists, so people should take personal responsibility and protect themselves by hiring a private jet. Though some TSA agents think even that is too risky, so you should probably just drive. But you might get raped so you should have someone else drive. Someone who doesn’t want to rape you.

Oh, dear, I’ve mixed up my analogies and now I have no idea how I’m getting to Chicago next month.

19 Feb 21:01

Utah Court Says Woman Can Sue Herself

by Kevin

You might not consider Utah the most progressive state, but it has become the first to grant its citizens a controversial right that many have long been denied, proving that the law does evolve. Utah has now become the first state to officially allow its citizens to sue themselves.

As the Salt Lake Tribune reports (thanks, Mark), a unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals ruled on February 15 that Utah law allows a decedent's heir and the personal representative of his estate to sue the driver who allegedly caused the accident that killed him. That wouldn't be unusual except that in Bagley v. Bagley, those are all the same people.

The two plaintiffs in this case—the decedent's heir and the personal representative of his estate—brought a wrongful-death claim and a survival action against the driver alleged to have caused the accident. Bagley finds herself on both sides of this dispute because not only is she her husband's heir and the personal representative of his estate, she is also the defendant driver whose negligence allegedly caused the accident.

That's right. She's all three parties on both sides of the case.

The court's opinion is pretty mindbending, as you might expect. I mean, how do you even discuss a case in which there's only one party who is two plaintiffs suing herself as a defendant? Well, the court sets it all up this way:

Barbara Bagley, acting in different capacities, appears as both the appellants and the appellee in this case.

Okay, hold up. Just to be clear, Bagley is the two plaintiffs and Bagley is the defendant that she (the two plaintiffs) is suing. The trial court ruled against Bagley the two plaintiffs and in favor of Bagley the defendant. So on appeal, Bagley the two plaintiffs is also Bagley the two appellants, and Bagley the defendant is also Bagley the appellee. Bagley is all the parties. So you could just as well say that Bagley is actually six people in this case (two plaintiffs, two appellants, one defendant, and an appellee), or that she is four people on one side and two on the other, and how many people she is depends on which court the case is in. Got it? Back to the court:

Barbara Bagley, acting in different capacities, appears as both the appellants and the appellee in this case. Bagley represents the estate of Bradley M. Vom Baur [who, confusingly, was not named "Bagley."] She also appears on her own behalf as Vom Baur's heir. We refer to these two roles collectively as Plaintiffs. Bagley is also the defendant and alleged tortfeasor ([and we will refer to that role as] Defendant). Defendant's interests in this case are represented by her insurance carrier.

Aha, insurance carrier. So here's what's going on: Bagley the personal representative of her husband's estate is suing Bagley the defendant who allegedly caused the accident. Bagley the heir of her husband has also joined as a plaintiff because she has an interest in the proceeds if Bagley the estate representative collects. Because Bagley the defendant has insurance, Bagley's insurer is representing her because it would have to pay the judgment to the husband's estate if Bagley (again the defendant) is found liable.

For killing the husband.

The legal issue is this: Utah's wrongful-death statute says a person's heir or personal representative can sue whoever caused the person's death when the death "is caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another." The defendant(s) argued, and the trial court agreed, that this means "of someone other than the heir or personal representative." That is, the heir or representative can sue as long as they didn't cause the death. But the plaintiff(s) argued that it means "of someone other than the decedent." That is, the heirs can sue as long as the decedent didn't kill himself. The Court of Appeals has now agreed with that.

After wrestling with this for a while (too long, really), I think the Court of Appeals is right. Seems like the statute can be read either way, but this way is closer to the plain language. The real problem, I think, is not the statute but the procedure.

There are two separate actions here, or should be. The first one is a contract action, because Bagley had an insurance policy that pays off if she accidentally kills someone while driving. (Intentional killings are an entirely different situation, as you would expect.) She did that. Pay up. The second one is an action by the husband's estate against the person who caused his death. Also not controversial. But here the two separate actions have been unnaturally joined in carnival-freak-show fashion by somebody's decision to make Bagley herself the estate representative. And that is where all the brain-hurtingness comes from. Appoint somebody else and I think most of the problems disappear, one way or another.

I notice that in footnote 4 of the opinion, the court states tersely that "The decision to appoint Bagley as personal representative of [the] estate is not before us on appeal." I have a feeling the judges wish it had been, or that they could get hold of whoever made that decision, at least.


Note: some of you may not know that "Autolitigation" in the category tags below refers to this sort of case—that is, not "auto[mobile] litigation" but a case where somebody sued or tried to sue himself or herself, intentionally or not. If you thought this was the first time somebody had tried it, (1) you misunderestimate the human race and (2) you might want to take a look at that section.

19 Feb 06:06

All You Need To Know About Race In America Happened To Me In 90 Seconds Today | VSB

It was 10:00am.

The Wife Person surprised me with tickets to the Cavs/Heat game yesterday, so we made the two hour drive to Cleveland, stayed overnight, and drove back early this morning. I took her directly to work, and drove back home.

“Home” for us is an old high school building that had been closed for a couple decades until it was purchased and redeveloped into lofts a few years ago. It’s located in one of Pittsburgh’s most awkward areas; a stretch of relatively underdeveloped area called “Uptown” that sits between downtown, Oakland (where the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University are located), the Hill District (Pittsburgh’s most storied traditionally Black neighborhood), and the South Side. The Consol Energy Center (home to the Pittsburgh Penguins) and Duquesne University are a mile or so down the street. The building itself sits on a block surrounded by boarded up properties. It’s also surrounded by gates; a key fob and a sensor are needed to get into the parking lot and the glass doors in the lobby.

At first glance, the layers of building security seem practical. The area does seem sketchy. But the space surrounding the building is so underdeveloped that the only consistent traffic besides the people living in the building are cars driving past it.

Anyway, it was 10:00am. I drove up to the gate, pressed the button on the key fob that opens it, and drove into the parking lot. As I entered the lot, I noticed a person on foot following me in. They had obviously been waiting by the gate for someone to let them in. I parked and got out of the car…and now this person — a 20-something White woman — was walking in my direction. She was wearing black sweats, a parka, and some black sneakers. She smiled.

Her: “Hey, I left my phone in my boyfriend’s apartment. Would you mind letting me in?”

Me: “Sure. No problem.

She waited as I grabbed the bags out of my trunk. We walked into the building together, making small talk about the cold. After we made it inside, she said “Thanks again” and presumably went to her boyfriend’s place. I walked down the hall to my place.

The entire situation took less than 90 seconds. But there were so many levels of racial, cultural, and even sexual context packed into that minute and a half that, instead of continuing to write in paragraphs, I’m just going to list them.

1. If she were me and I were her, I could not have done what she did. Actually, let me rephrase that. I could have done it. I could have stood by a gate surrounding a building in a somewhat sketchy neighborhood, waited for a car to drive up, followed that car — a car driven by a young White woman — into the parking lot, and then approached the woman as she got out of her car. But it would not have been smart for me to do it.

2. As I just stated, unless it was a dire emergency, I would not have done what she did. Which makes me think about all the things we (Black people, Black men specifically) choose not to do because we’re aware of how it might be perceived.

3. It also made me think of perhaps the most underrated and pervasive part of White privilege: freedom. Being a cute, 20-something White girl allows her a freedom from being considered a physical threat. Which gives you the freedom to do certain things that, if other people did them, might be considered threatening.

4. We (Black people) are also not immune to certain racially-tinged feelings about other Black people. As I write this, I’m asking myself if I would have reacted differently if, instead of some 20-something White woman I’d never seen before following and approaching me, it was a 20-something Black man dressed the same way (black sweats, a parka, and black sneakers) and needing to get into his girlfriend’s place. I want to say no. But, I’m not sure.

5. As we entered the building together, I made sure to keep a safe distance from her. No accidental contact that could be misconstrued as inappropriate, no joking/flirting, and no opening for her to joke/flirt with me. Now, there are some very obvious reasons for this behavior. I have a wife, I don’t know this woman, and the only thing I know about this woman is that she has a boyfriend.

But also…she’s a White woman and I’m a Black man. Since it’s late morning, there’s no one else in the lobby, and probably not that many people in the entire building. The safe distance is due to me knowing that if anything were to happen — accidental contact misconstrued as inappropriate, an innocent joke or comment or even look that made her feel threatened, etc — and it was her word against mine, I’d lose. Which is fucking crazy. She’s the one who approached and followed me. She’s the one who could be making up some story about some pretend boyfriend. And I’m the one who actually lives there. But I’d still be considered more of a threat to her safety than she is to mine.

Welcome to America.

19 Feb 05:57

bonitaapplebelle:After Jessica Williams declared that she does...





















bonitaapplebelle:

After Jessica Williams declared that she does not want to replace Jon Stewart, a journalist decided it to diagnose Williams with “imposter syndome” (the idea that a woman in a male dominated field doesn’t feel as if they’re not doing enough to be in said position) and this was Williams response.

http://thebillfold.com/2015/02/on-the-daily-shows-jessica-williams-the-latest-high-profile-victim-of-impostor-syndrome/

19 Feb 01:28

Skyline Wrapping Paper

by Honey

 photo citywrap5_zpsbnmydqc4.jpg

 photo 41100_skyline-wrapping-paper_zpsrx0sxdli.jpg

Super-sized sheets of wrapping paper printed with building facades from around the world. Wrap your gifts to create 3D buildings that come together to form mini skylines. Unique wrapping paper perfect for that special architect in your life. The best way to keep the pile of presents under the tree looking organised. Buy here.

 photo skyline-wrapping-paper-3_zpsilszzt0a.jpg

 photo 5f0e2bb1026edb5b24ea4dd00a718e3a_zpsd8k3zgcr.jpg

19 Feb 01:27

The difference between Engineers And Managers.

19 Feb 01:26

Your fancy zippers are forcing Chinese laborers into mind-numbing drudgery

by Andrew Huang
Screen Shot 2015-02-13 at 9.46.03 AM

Recently, a friend of mine named Akiba took me to visit his friend’s zipper factory in China. I love visiting factories: no matter how simple the product, I learn something new.

This factory is a highly automated, vertically integrated manufacturer. To give you an idea of what that means, they take this:

SONY DSC

and this:

and turn it into this:

In between the inputted material and the outputted product, however, is a fully automated die casting line. This line consists of a set of tumblers and vibrating pots that release and polish the zippers, along with a set of machines that de-burr and join the zipper’s puller to its slider. I think I counted less than a dozen employees in the facility and I’m guessing their capacity well exceeds a million zippers a month.

I find vibrapots mesmerizing. I actually don’t know if that’s what they are called — I just call them that. It looks as if the sliders and pullers are lining themselves up in the right orientation by magic, falling into a rail and being pressed together into that familiar zipper form, all in a single, fully automated machine.

 I’d like to imagine that most people, after watching a person join pullers to sliders for a couple minutes, will be quite alright to suffer the tiny bump on the tip of their zipper to save another human the fate of having to manually align pullers into sliders for eight hours a day. 

Yet despite the high level of automation in this factory, many of the workers I saw were manually separating zippers from the rail. This begs the question: Why is it that some zippers have fully automated assembly processes, whereas others are semi-automatic?

The answer, it turns out, is very subtle. When the pullers come around the rail, their orientation is random: some are facing right, some facing left. But the joining operation must only insert the slider into the smaller of the two holes. A tiny tab on the top of the zipper allows gravity to cause all the pullers to hang in the same direction as they fall into a rail on the left.

The semi-automated zipper design doesn’t have this tab; as a result, the design is too symmetric for a vibrapot to align the puller. Essentially, this tiny tab, barely visible, is the difference between full automation and a human having to join millions of sliders and pullers together. I asked the factory owner if adding the tiny tab would save this labor. His answer? Absolutely.

At this point, it seems blindingly obvious to me that all zippers should have this tiny tab, but the zipper’s designer wouldn’t have it. Even though the tab is very small, a user can feel the subtle bump and it’s perceived as a defect. As a result, the designer insists upon a perfectly smooth tab, therefore requiring manual orientation during production.

I’d like to imagine that most people, after watching a person join pullers to sliders for a couple of minutes, would be willing to suffer the tiny bump on the tip of their zipper in order to save another human the fate of having to manually align small pieces of metal for eight hours a day. I suppose alternately, an engineer could spend countless hours trying to design a more complex method for aligning the pullers and sliders. But the zipper’s customer probably wouldn’t pay for that effort and it’s probably net cheaper to pay unskilled labor to manually perform the sorting anyway. They’ve already automated everything else in this factory, so I figure they’ve thought long and hard about this problem, too. My guess is that robots are expensive to build and maintain while people are self-replicating and largely self-maintaining.

Of course, in reality it’s far too much effort to explain this to customers, and in fact quite the opposite happens in the market. Because of the extra labor involved in putting these zippers together, the zippers cost more and therefore tend to end up in higher-end products. This further enforces the notion that smooth zippers with no tiny tab on them must be the result of quality control and attention to detail.

My world is full of small frustrations like these. For example, most customers perceive plastics with a mirror-finish to be of a higher quality than those with a satin finish. While functionally there is no difference in the plastic’s structural performance, it takes a lot more effort to make something with a mirror-finish.  For all that effort, for all that waste, what’s the first thing a user does? Put their dirty fingerprints all over the mirror finish. Within a minute of coming out of the box, all that effort is undone.

This piece was originally published by bunnie studios and is republished with permission. We welcome your comments at ideas@qz.com.

19 Feb 01:24

Best Baked Sweet Potato Fries

by A Beautiful Mess

Best (Baked) Sweet Potato Fries (via abeautifulmess.com)Elsie has been really into sweet potatoes lately. So, of course, as soon as she leaves town, I decide I'm in the mood to make sweet potato fries. 

You can go ahead and give me the "Worst Sister of the Year" award. :)

Best (Baked) Sweet Potato Fries (via abeautifulmess.com)  Really though, I think it was Elsie who reminded me (once again) that I really love sweet potatoes. They have so much flavor, nutrition, and they are a way fun color. So, I decided to work on my baked sweet potato fries skills, and I have a method I'm excited to share with you. It's sort of a variation on my favorite baked fries method with some slight changes. You'll see. The good news—it's super easy.

How to make crispy baked sweet potato friesBest Baked Sweet Potato Fries, serves 2-3 as a side dish.

2 medium/large sweet potatoes 
1 tablespoon cornstarch
big sprinkle of cayenne (about 1/8 teaspoon)
big sprinkle of cumin (about 1/8 teaspoon)
2 tablespoons peanut oil (or canola)
salt, pepper to season
cilantro for garnish

First, peel the potatoes. Then cut them into matchsticks. Try to keep them all relatively the same thickness (different lengths is fine). This will help them cook evenly. 

Soak the cut potatoes in water for 15-20 minutes.

How to make crispy baked sweet potato fries I think they kind of look like carrot sticks at this point. :)

Drain and pat dry. In a large ziplock bag, toss the potatoes with the cornstarch, cayenne and cumin. If you find that you are all out of large ziplock bags, spend 2 minutes feeling annoyed with yourself for not checking before you went to the store, and then another 3 minutes being distracted by Instagram.

Actually, don't do that. That's just what I did. You can also toss them in a large mixing bowl. Then toss with 1 tablespoon of oil. Cover two baking sheets with aluminum foil and coat with the remaining tablespoon of oil. You may be able to use just one baking sheet, depending on the size. But if you're unsure, just use two so you're not crowding the fries (this will help them bake more crispy).

Bake at 450°F for 10-12 minutes. Then flip all the fries over and rotate the pans. Bake another 10-12 minutes. Then turn the oven off, open the (oven) door just a little and allow the fries to sit in there for another 5-6 minutes. 

Best (Baked) Sweet Potato Fries (via abeautifulmess.com) Season with salt and pepper and garnish with a little chopped cilantro. You can see I went ahead and took mine to the next level and made chipotle mayo. You can make this too by combining 2/3 cup mayo and one chipotle pepper in adobo sauce in a food processor or blender for a few seconds. Easy peasy. Enjoy! xo. Emma

Credits // Author and Photography: Emma Chapman. Photos edited with A Beautiful Mess actions.

19 Feb 01:24

See Russia's Tesla Tower through the eyes of a drone

by Mariella Moon
Russia's massive impulse generator that can shoot deadly 500 to 650-foot lightning bolts isn't exactly off limits, but it is tucked away near a forest, far from the usual tourist traps... for obvious reasons. Thankfully, Russia Today got permission t...
19 Feb 01:22

"A scene in Jennifer Lopez’s new film in which her character is given a supposed first edition of The..."

A scene in Jennifer Lopez’s new film in which her character is given a supposed first edition of The Iliad has prompted viewers to attempt to find their own first edition of an epic poem composed at least 2,000 years before the invention of the printing press.

According to books marketplace AbeBooks, since Lopez’s film The Boy Next Door was released in the US on 23 January, “The Iliad, first edition” has been its top search term, ahead of To Kill A Mockingbird. AbeBooks attributes this to a scene in the film in which Lopez’s character, a high-school teacher, is given a hardback copy of the book by the teenager with whom she is to go on to have a dangerous affair.

“Oh my God – this is a first edition? I can’t accept this, it must have cost a fortune,” she tells her admirer. “It was a buck at a garage sale – one man’s trash…” he replies.

“It appears people who have watched the film are trying to identify the actual edition handed to Lopez, which has dark yellow and blue boards. I cannot match the book seen in the movie to anything currently for sale on AbeBooks. It could be a movie prop and not even be a real book. It certainly appears to be an attractive book,” said AbeBooks spokesman Richard Davies.



- J-Lo sparks quest to find ‘first editions’ of The Iliad | Books | The Guardian (via dduane)
19 Feb 01:19

An Excited Cockatiel Adorably Runs in Little Circles to the Sound of Coffee Being Made

by Rebecca Escamilla

An excited cockatiel adorably chirps and runs in circles to the sound of coffee being stirred by its human companion in a 2006 video uploaded by Amy Lowry.

via reddit

19 Feb 01:18

Photo



19 Feb 01:18

A Tiny Northern Saw-Whet Owl Demonstrates Its Impressive Ability to Keep Its Head Still As Its Body Moves

by E.D.W. Lynch

A diminutive (and rather mad-looking) northern saw-whet owl demonstrates its remarkable image stabilization feature (really the vestibulo–ocular reflex) in this amusing short video. The video was posted in 2013 by Gene Jacobs of Raptor Services.

via Tastefully Offensive

19 Feb 01:17

ablacknation:Yo think about it Doesnt it make you question all...

Courtney shared this story from Super Opinionated.









ablacknation:

Yo think about it,

Doesn’t it make you question all the times mainstream media reported a death before social media and we all dismissed it because they played it off so nicely?

19 Feb 01:16

"If I look up “carrot” in the dictionary, most people will acknowledge I do not know all there is to..."

If I look up “carrot” in the dictionary, most people will acknowledge I do not know all there is to know about carrots and if I truly want to understand carrots, I should probably pick up a horticultural text book. We know that legal and medical terms are going to be, at best, simplistically represented and know we need to find a lawyer or a doctor if we want to know more. Anyone deciding to base their argument on, say, a philosophical concept or term using the dictionary is going to be laughed at at best, or automatically lose whatever argument they’re trying to make at least.

Yet the minute we move into a social justice framework, the ultimate authority changes. We don’t need lived experience, we don’t need experts who have examined centuries of social disparities and discrimination, we don’t need societal context. We don’t need sociology or history – no, we have THE DICTIONARY! That ultimate tome of oracular insight, the last word on any debate!

It’s patently ridiculous and you can see that by applying it to any other field of knowledge. But the privileged will continually trot out simplistic, twitter-style dictionary definitions as if they are the last word and the ultimate authority. No-one would drag out the dictionary to debate science with a scientist. But they’re more than willing to trot out a dictionary definition of racism over any sociological analysis. A dictionary is not the ultimate authority - they’re a rough guide for you to discover the simple meaning of words you’ve never heard before – not an ultimate definition of what the word means and all its contexts.



- Sparky at Womanist Musings. YES! (via flowerskss)
19 Feb 01:13

hestmord:reptilmastaren:Did you know that Moomin creator Tove...





















hestmord:

reptilmastaren:

Did you know that Moomin creator Tove Jansson illustrated J.R.R Tolkiens The Hobbit for the 1962 swedish edition? These are just a few of the illustrations in the book.

I love these and I’ve never seen so many in one place before also holy shit that spider

19 Feb 01:13

Come With Me, Tiny Car

funny-fail-gifs-trucks-car-towing

Submitted by: (via foxboro182)

Tagged: whoops , gifs , cars , truck , fail nation
19 Feb 01:13

the-real-eye-to-see:Tricky hedgehog

















the-real-eye-to-see:

Tricky hedgehog

19 Feb 01:11

cubebreaker: Stefano Boeri’s 'Bosco Verticale' towers have...

















cubebreaker:

Stefano Boeri’s 'Bosco Verticale' towers have opened in Milan, with each of the 113 apartments featuring its own beautifully landscaped balcony irrigated by greywater recycled through the building.

19 Feb 01:11

nonconcept: V+D SET, Mar Azul, Argentina by BAK Architects....













nonconcept:

V+D SET, Mar Azul, Argentina by BAK Architects. (Photography: Ines Tanoira)

19 Feb 01:11

"To date, ISIS has killed four Americans, a horrible tragedy for those people and their families. But..."

To date, ISIS has killed four Americans, a horrible tragedy for those people and their families. But since the idea of the group’s threat to America is at this point entirely hypothetical, we should be as specific as we can when we talk about that threat. Do we think they’re going to try to hijack planes or send agents here to set off bombs? And if so, what do we need to do to counter those threats that we aren’t already doing? If we’re going to expand our military involvement in the Middle East, is there a way to do it that won’t create more problems than it solves?

Those are simple, obvious questions, but so often they’re overwhelmed by people waving their arms and shouting “We’re all gonna die!” In the days and years after September 11, Republicans repeated that al Qaeda was an “existential threat,” a notion that was utterly insane yet seldom examined. And we certainly acted as though the very existence of the United States of America was indeed in question. Congress gave the federal government a slate of new powers to spy on its citizens. We created a surveillance apparatus of gargantuan size and scope. We deployed a network of secret prisons as sites for a program of torture. And we all got used to the idea that the War on Terror is forever.



- A couple of hundred thousand Americans die every year from preventable medical errors and the response from the government amounts to “Gee, that’s too bad,” but all it takes is a few videos of brutal executions 6,000 miles away to spur a wholesale reexamination of American foreign policy.
19 Feb 01:10

Photo









19 Feb 01:08

sixpenceee:Lake Sorvagsvatn located in Faroe Islands, between...



sixpenceee:

Lake Sorvagsvatn located in Faroe Islands, between Norway and Iceland. It is 30 meters above the Ocean.

19 Feb 01:02

Muslim commits any crime ever: THEY'RE A TERRORIST! ALL OF THEM ARE BARBARIC! CALL IT WHAT IT IS: TERRORISM!!!

Muslim commits any crime ever: THEY'RE A TERRORIST! ALL OF THEM ARE BARBARIC! CALL IT WHAT IT IS: TERRORISM!!!
Man who openly hates Muslims kills 3 Muslims execution style: Let's not call it a hate crime, why do we have to label everything? He was just evil, it doesn't matter that the victims were Muslim, they could have been Black, White, or green it didn't matter. This was about a parking dispute, nothing else.
19 Feb 00:57

"What is significant about fan fiction is that it often spins the kind of stories that showrunners..."

“What is significant about fan fiction is that it often spins the kind of stories that showrunners wouldn’t think to tell, because fanficcers often come from a different demographic. The discomfort seems to be not that the shows are being reinterpreted by fans, but that they are being reinterpreted by the wrong sorts of fans - women, people of colour, queer kids, horny teenagers, people who are not professional writers, people who actually care about continuity (sorry). The proper way for cultural mythmaking to progress, it is implied, is for privileged men to recreate the works of privileged men from previous generations whilst everyone else listens quietly.”

-

Sherlock and the Adventure of the Overzealous Fanbase by Laurie Penny  (via basilandtheblues)

I’ll always reblog this.

(via chase820)

whoop there it is

(via randomfandomteacher)

19 Feb 00:56

hartorotica: sandandglass: Bryan Stevenson on The Daily Show.



















hartorotica:

sandandglass:

Bryan Stevenson on The Daily Show.

19 Feb 00:54

"Ignorance is bad for everybody. It only lowers the collective IQ when lawmakers still push to teach..."

“Ignorance is bad for everybody. It only lowers the collective IQ when lawmakers still push to teach “intelligent design.” It similarly should never be a matter of any dispute that the Inquisition and the Crusades were bad ideas, and to take offense over pointing that out is inane. Likewise, these targeted, strategic attempts to force students – students who are intellectually sophisticated enough to take on college level coursework – to accept a propaganda-based curriculum is detrimental to critical thought as a whole. It should be absurd to promote any educational agenda that pushes jingoism as a lesson plan. It should never have gotten this far. And the reality of life in the 21st century is that we are sharing this planet with the rest of its inhabitants. It’s not just dumb and wrong to teach kids that we’re better than the rest of the world, and to attempt to conspicuously leave our past misdeeds from lessons — it’s bad diplomacy and it’s bad business. That’s not teaching exceptionalism; it’s teaching entitlement – not a useful quality on the global playing field.
 
There’s a profound insecurity at the heart of any agenda that presumes that if kids aren’t spoon fed a black and white fairy tale of our national greatness, they’ll have no pride or loyalty. Arrogance isn’t patriotism, and education isn’t indoctrination. And anyone who doesn’t comprehend that difference doesn’t just need a history lesson, he needs a dictionary.”

- Oklahoma’s demented fight against AP history.
19 Feb 00:52

wasbella102: U.S. Brooklyn Bridge, Manhattan, NYC, 1945        ...



wasbella102:

U.S. Brooklyn Bridge, Manhattan, NYC, 1945                    

19 Feb 00:51

It's now possible to map your home's WiFi signal in 3D

by Daniel Cooper
We already know that it's possible to map your home's WiFi signal in 2D, but that doesn't help if you're holding your phone above your head to get connected. Step forward YouTuber CNLohr, who appears to have developed a reasonably low-tech way to ana...
19 Feb 00:48

genderoftheday:Today’s Gender of the day is: A bouncing cockatoo



genderoftheday:

Today’s Gender of the day is: A bouncing cockatoo