Shared posts

14 Oct 21:41

A Fun Quiz on Military-Style Police Tactics

by Kevin

Today's Quiz:

You should find this one more difficult than the previous quiz.

Police did not carry out an aggressive, military-style raid to accomplish which of the following purposes?

    (a) To find the source of a parody Twitter feed

    (b) To check a bar for underage drinkers

    (c) To recover a large number of overdue library books

    (d) To enforce copyright law against a DJ

    (e) To check whether barbers had valid barbering licenses

    (f) To apprehend Tibetan monks who overstayed their visas

    (g) They did that in all these cases

I think it is worth considering this one for a moment, so I'm going to put the answer and further discussion after the jump below.

If you find it slightly terrifying that they did this (and by "this," I mean used a SWAT team or a gang of officers using similar tactics) for any of those purposes, congratulations, you are sane. The answer is (c): to my knowledge, a SWAT team has never been used to recover overdue library books, but I think that example is no less ridiculous than the others. And in every one of those other cases, police aggressively stormed the premises with guns drawn, wearing body armor and even masks, though they had no reason to think there would be any danger.

The Tibetan monks were here on a peace mission, for Christ's sake.

Well, not for Christ's sake, but you know what I mean.

The monk raid went down in 2006, and some of the other examples are also not that recent. Some were mentioned in this article by Radley Balko almost three years ago, for example, along with others involving such diabolical activities as unlicensed poker games and stealing fish from a botanical garden. As Balko's new book details, this trend has been getting worse and worse.

Developments over the past month provide some good news and some bad news.

Drebin
Not a great idea

The good news is that the Eleventh Circuit held on September 16 that it does in fact violate the Fourth Amendment to conduct an aggressive, warrantless raid on a barbershop to make sure everybody had valid barbering licenses. This one did not involve an actual SWAT team, but it did involve the storming of a barbershop by at least 10 officers, some of whom wore masks and bulletproof vests. They ordered all the customers out, handcuffed the barbers, and proceeded to ... check their licenses. They also searched the whole place just in case there was any "contraband" present. Results? Nothing. Not even an unlicensed barber.

After the barbers sued, the officers argued that they had "qualified immunity." That's a doctrine that protects an officer from liability unless the court finds the officer violated a "clearly established" right of which he or she should have known. The idea is to cut down on second-guessing officers who have made a tough decision in dangerous circumstances. Should it protect officers who held people at gunpoint to check their barbering licenses? Nope.

There is an exception to the warrant requirement for "administrative inspections" of regulated industries. (A similar justification is asserted by the TSA.) Plaintiffs conceded that this exception applied. But a warrantless search still has to be reasonable. See, e.g., U.S. Const. amend. IV (1791). This one wasn't. In the court's view, an armed raid of this kind "bears no resemblance to a routine inspection for barbering licenses," a conclusion that seems pretty solid.

The bad news is that, as the court pointed out, it has ruled the same way in similar cases at least three times during the past 20 years. "We hope that the third time will be the charm," it wrote. Yeah, us too.

Further bad news: the same week, an Illinois judge saw no problem with police raiding a home in Peoria in search of whoever was making fun of the mayor on TwitterTwo judges, in fact. First, one issued a warrant in this case, having been convinced there was probable cause to believe that someone at that address was committing "false personation of a public official," namely Mayor Jim Ardis.

That dastardly crime is a misdemeanor even when it isn't a parody protected by the First Amendment, which this likely was. And yet police detained five people, searched the home, and took every internet-capable device they could find. "They said there had been an internet crime that occurred at this address," said one of the detainees. An internet crime! Well, that's a perfectly good reason to go in hot, as long as you only bring internet guns. Also, note the past tense—the Twitter account had been shut down for weeks by the time this happened.

Ultimately, its creator wasn't charged because the prosecutor decided "false personation" can only be committed in person, not on the internet. (Why this decision was made only after the raid is an excellent question.)  But they did find some pot, so they're prosecuting one of his friends for that because war on drugs. The ruling linked above rejected that guy's argument that the charge should be dismissed because the raid was illegal. The Twitter user is now suing the city, with the ACLU's help, so there will be at least one more ruling on this case.

So far the only good news to come out of that incident is that the number of Twitter parody accounts mocking Jim Ardis has gone from one to eighteen.

14 Oct 21:36

I remember full-sized Snickers at Halloween

by Minnesotastan

Reposted from 2016 because this is my favorite Halloween cartoon ever.

And reposted again to add this link re shrinkflation affecting Halloween treats.

Our house will once again be offering children a choice between a minibag of chips or a rather nice seashell.  In recent years the choices have been about equal between the two.
14 Oct 21:34

In case you’ve ever wondered what human hands evolved for

by PZ Myers

Clearly, for grooming.

14 Oct 21:33

A useful illustration

by PZ Myers

Thank you, Ronald Reagan, for promoting the voodoo of trickle-down economics.

trickledown

14 Oct 21:32

General Harris instructs liberals to surrender on the home front

by PZ Myers

Sam Harris does it again, opening his yap and exposing his biases.

Liberals have really failed on the topic of theocracy. They’ll criticize white theocracy, they’ll criticize Christians. They’ll still get agitated over the abortion clinic bombing that happened in 1984. But when you want to talk about the treatment of women and homosexuals and free thinkers and public intellectuals in the Muslim world, I would argue that liberals have failed us.

Hell yes, I’m still agitated over any abortion clinic bombing. Shouldn’t we all be? I’m also agitated over female genital mutilation and shooting girls who want an education in Pakistan. I can be frustrated by all the onslaughts against modernity everywhere; I don’t treat it as a failure of liberalism that American women are fighting for their rights at home as a priority; I’m sure that almost all of them feel a sense of solidarity with women around the world, but in most cases they are far more limited in what they can do about Somalia than they are about taking action in their own back yard.

Libby Anne really rips into him for that stupid remark.

Violence against abortion clinics and abortion providers dates back to at least the 1980s and continues in the present. Eight doctors or clinic providers have been murdered, the last one only five years ago. In fact, the clinic that was bombed in the 1984 incident Harris mentions was bombed again in 2012—and completely gutted as a result. I hear of arson and death threats, and it shakes me. I’ve served as an escort at my local Planned Parenthood clinic. It can be very scary—for all involved. Women often have their license plate numbers recorded by anti-abortion protesters calling them “murderers,” and in some areas of the country doctors who perform abortions have to wear masks when entering clinics to protect their identities. Just recently a writer for the high-profile National Review called for hanging women who have had abortions.

Americans are facing a wave of oppression of women’s reproductive rights: there have been 230 restrictions enacted since 2011. The majority of abortion clinics in Texas have been shut down by entirely legal means, and Sam Harris wants to blame liberals for not doing enough to protect freethinkers in the Muslim world? The only way liberals have failed is in not being as obsessed with Islam as Harris…but since Harris isn’t a particularly good example of an individual with liberal ideals, you’ll have to forgive me if I say “so fucking what?”

I say we must fight the fights we can. It’s important to stand up for women’s freedom world-wide, but it’s futile and hypocritical if we can’t even do the same for women at home.

I think Libby Anne is right. Harris is using Islamic oppression as a pretext for dismissing serious concerns right here in the United States.

14 Oct 21:14

goose no like drone



goose no like drone

14 Oct 21:09

The Scalzi Gender

by John Scalzi

First some tweets, and then some commentary.

Today's dipshit tweet about me: "someday not far off we will recategorize these left wing scalzi-faced beta pseudo-men as a third gender"

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

I'LL GET MY OWN GENDER, PEOPLE. I don't know, that seems kinda awesome.

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

@scalzi For the Scalzi Gender Pronoun I nominate "Whee," and "Whim." As in, "Look at whim, rockin' at the party" and "Whee is cool!"

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

Also, now I want fan art of Scalzi-Faced pseudo men.

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

@scalzi masculine, feminine, scalzine

— Loewenheim Skolem (@loewenheim) October 14, 2014

@scalzi I tell ya, our 3rd gender bathrooms are going to be a hell of a lot cleaner too.

— Shon of the Dead (@shonrichards) October 14, 2014

Mind you, there's already more than two genders. So "Scalzi" would be an "n"th gender. BUT STILL LOOK MY VERY OWN GENDER

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

@scalzi Gosh. Even the MRA types are trying to dismantle the gender binary.

— Abigail Nussbaum (@NussbaumAbigail) October 14, 2014

The rules for the Scalzi Gender: Hey, wanna be Scalzine? Come on in! We've got pie!

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

The Scalzi Gender will accept you regardless of your position on pie, however (or cake, or bacon, or pineapple, or churros).

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

I mean, I went to bed last night secure in my own masculinity. But a chance for my own gender? To be secure in my own Scalzinity? SIGN ME UP

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

@scalzi A-whim a-whee A-whim a-whee A-whim a-whee A-whim a-whee In a gender, a mighty gender, The Scalzi sleeps tonight…

— John Kovalic (@muskrat_john) October 14, 2014

What is the sexuality of the Scalzi Gender? It varies, of course, but I'd say the most prominent is "Consenting whoo-hoo!"

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

I'll have to stop being a beta/gamma male, I guess. Does that make me the Alpha Scalzi? No, because that Greek alphabet shit is ridiculous.

— John Scalzi (@scalzi) October 14, 2014

humbly submitted proposal for the new @scalzi gender. .ai and .eps versions at http://t.co/Nj6cPdaftu pic.twitter.com/aWsmCryiXy

— Big and Scar-E (@SaintEhlers) October 14, 2014

There’s something both telling and sad about the sort of dude who literally thinks that a) impugning my masculinity is the worst possible thing they can say about me, b) that it’ll somehow lessen me if they do. On the former, meh. Given the ridiculous ideas that they have regarding masculinity, I’m happy not to meet their definition. On the latter, whatever. They’re idiots. I’m not inclined to care, outside of the opportunities it provides for pointing and laughing.

But I do think it’s useful to publicly mock their stupidity on such subjects, for the amusement and edification of others. I also think it’s particularly useful to mock their definition of masculinity and gender, and their baseline assertion that being male is the apotheosis of the human condition. It’s not; it’s merely one way to be. I’m okay with gender being more than binary; I’m okay with people having a gender other than mine; I’m okay with people shifting their idea of what their gender is over time. Because I don’t think one’s essential value is rooted in gender, and someone else’s gender is nearly always not my business anyway. I am for people being who they are, not who anyone else wants them to be, or demands them to be for their own selfish reasons. I’m for letting the world know that I think such a position is the most correct one to have. I’m for calling out people who try to make difficult for those who don’t conform to their own, usually bigoted, expectations.

Want to declare that because I don’t meet your pointless and stupid definition of “masculinity,” I should identify as another gender entirely? Awesome. I get to create a gender that doesn’t have your jackassedness riddling it front to back. The folks in my gender won’t be focused on being a “real man” or a “real woman” but on being “really me.” My gender will have all the best parties because we can do what we want, free of gender expectations! Because there are no gender expectations! My gender gets to love whoever they want! My gender gets to be whoever they want! My gender doesn’t care what you think my gender should be! My gender rocks. And it doesn’t need you, or care what you think of it.

If only it were as easy for people of every gender to be as free in theirs as I am in mine. Because of course that’s the thing: Even when these idiots declare me “not a real man,” it doesn’t change that I am always seen to be a “real man,” and that I get all the benefits that accrue to me for being biologically male, identifying as a man, and conforming to social standards for what both of those mean. The worst these dudes can do is be mean to me on the Internet. It doesn’t change anything about what I get from the world. And while I can mock them for it and proclaim the new Scalzi Gender in all its awesomeness, let’s just say that I know that it’s easy for me to do so, because in the end society has my back. Not everyone else gets to say the same. We need to be working on that.


14 Oct 07:42

sekahyyh: cardsofclow: decencybedamned: HELLO FANFIC AUTHORS IT’S TIME FOR A VOCAB...

sekahyyh:

cardsofclow:

decencybedamned:

HELLO FANFIC AUTHORS IT’S TIME FOR A VOCAB LESSON

  • wanton: sexually immodest or promiscuous
  • wonton: a type of dumpling commonly found in Chinese cuisines

YOUR CHARACTERS SHOULD NOT BE MOANING LIKE A CHINESE DUMPLING OKAY THANK YOU AND GOOD NIGHT

either way, things are sure gonna get

steamy

GET OUT

14 Oct 06:04

We live in a world ruled by fictions of every kind

by but does it float
The Bus by Paul Kirchner Title: J.G. Ballard Atley
14 Oct 06:02

[@kevinfarzad]

14 Oct 06:02

How to Understand Introverted People

14 Oct 05:52

"Copy Me" episode 3: "Early Copyright History"

by Cory Doctorow

Alex writes, "It features censorship, hangings, dissent and criticism, a whole bunch of state and church control, angry queens, sad Stationers, and, of course, our terrible culprit: the printing press." Read the rest

14 Oct 00:34

Wasting Time

by Xeni Jardin
Luke.stirling

Genius!

wasting-timeline

By John Atkinson of webcomic Wrong Hands.

13 Oct 23:58

Autism as "a disorder of prediction"

by Minnesotastan
From MIT News:
The researchers suggest that autism may be rooted in an impaired ability to predict events and other people’s actions. From the perspective of the autistic child, the world appears to be a “magical” rather than an orderly place, because events seem to occur randomly and unpredictably. In this view, autism symptoms such as repetitive behavior, and an insistence on a highly structured environment, are coping strategies to help deal with this unpredictable world...

“At the moment, the treatments that have been developed are driven by the end symptoms. We’re suggesting that the deeper problem is a predictive impairment problem, so we should directly address that ability,” says Pawan Sinha, an MIT professor of brain and cognitive sciences and the lead author of a paper describing the hypothesis in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week...

This hypothesized deficit could produce several of the most common autism symptoms. For example, repetitive behaviors and insistence on rigid structure have been shown to soothe anxiety produced by unpredictability, even in individuals without autism. “These may be proactive attempts on the part of the person to try to impose some structure on an environment that otherwise seems chaotic,” Sinha says.

Impaired prediction skills would also help to explain why autistic children are often hypersensitive to sensory stimuli...
More at the link.  I don't have the PNAS link, but it's a high-quality journal.
13 Oct 23:04

Watch 6 second-graders eat dinner at a $220-a-plate fancy NYC restaurant

by Xeni Jardin

For the New York Times magazine’s fall Food issue, the publication treated six second graders from P.S. 295 in Brooklyn to dinner at Daniel, a fancy spot where a seven-course tasting menu goes for $220 a person. (more…)

13 Oct 22:43

Wendys employee training video

by Mark Frauenfelder

Wendys is a popular restaurant chain that serves inexpensive ground beef sandwiches. Reportedly, all the employees know the catchy song in the official employee training video by heart and are known to sing it spontaneously as they go about their work. [via]

13 Oct 21:05

How bad was Christopher Columbus?

by PZ Myers
Luke.stirling

I know I have read this comic before. But I believe it recounts stories that are so horrific that they are slippery in my mind. At some unconscious level, I don't want to remember such horrible things, so the details very quickly fade away. They shouldn't though. It's always worth remembering how bad things can get, and how awful people can be. When you let history and popular culture gloss over such things, you just it easy for such things to happen again in the future.

This bad.

12 Oct 22:53

Wallpaper Download

12 Oct 22:51

fanoffandom: I actually applauded this post

















fanoffandom:

I actually applauded this post

12 Oct 22:50

rosannapansino: Borg Cube Cake - Video [ LINK ]





















rosannapansino:

Borg Cube Cake - Video [ LINK ]

12 Oct 22:46

Mãe papagaia com Alzheimer.

by Zanfa

Y1zCkQC

12 Oct 21:55

Why We Fight

12 Oct 21:41

Glenn Greenwald explains privacy

by Cory Doctorow

Alan writes, "Why privacy matters' is Glenn Greenwald's talk to TED in which he makes the argument that we are not obligated to make ourselves harmless; rather, we need to be able to express ourselves unwatched."

11 Oct 06:30

Deep Space area rugs

by Xeni Jardin
Int_HEIC0607A_01

I want one so bad my head hurts. Deep space rugs by Schönstaub. Read the rest

11 Oct 03:15

Study: more than 80% of waitresses report sexual harassment

by Rob Beschizza
Luke.stirling

This is as good a reason as any to resist a US-style tipping culture.

If it doesn't surprise you, that's the problem: "Since the workers depend on tips to make a livable wage, they 'must often tolerate inappropriate behavior from customers, co-workers and management,' the report said."
11 Oct 01:49

boyishdivision: goddessofmusic: elaran: livelikedolphins: una...





















boyishdivision:

goddessofmusic:

elaran:

livelikedolphins:

unapolagetically:

a guide to some common and/or popular australian birbs by your friendly neighborhood australian 

emus always seemed more psychotic than stupid to me

DO NOT ENGAGE THIS BIRD

Anything from Australia will onyl be nice to you only if you have food

except the cassowary, you stay the fuck away from those demons

11 Oct 01:38

Puppies

by Lunarbaboon

11 Oct 01:38

photos by Ezra Stoller
















































10 Oct 23:14

Behold! The Pizza cake!

by Cory Doctorow


The pizza cake started off as a thought-experiment, entered into a competition -- but now it is a reality that you can prepare at home (but probably shouldn't).

(via Neatorama)

10 Oct 21:50

Latvian bicyclists' brilliant demonstration of how bikes reduce traffic jams

by Joseph Stromberg

bike car

Let's Bike It/VK

In Latvia, as part of International Car Free Day, some cyclists went to a lot of trouble to tangibly demonstrate one huge difference between bikes and cars: the amount of space they take up on the road.

bike car 2

Let's Bike It/VK

These photos, which the European cycling group Let's Bike It posted to the social network Vk.com, show a group of bikers in Riga that strapped rickety car-sized constructions to their bikes to show how much space they'd take up if they were actually driving one.

bike car 3

Let's Bike It/VK

The implication here is pretty obvious: if those cyclists actually were in cars, they'd dramatically increase traffic congestion. On the other hand, getting people out of cars and onto bikes is one way of cutting it.

car bike 4

Let's Bike It/VK

The photos also call to mind a particularly well-known demonstration of the road space people in cars take up, in comparison to both bikes and buses.

In 1991, the German city of Münster commissioned a poster showing the amount of street space taken up by 72 people sharing a bus, riding bikes, or driving alone in cars. It's since been recreated several different times — most recently, in Canberra, Australia, by the Cycling Promotion Fund:

bike car 4

(Cycling Promotion Fund)