Shared posts

08 Dec 17:30

My New Boyfriend’s Penis Had a Big Surprise for Me. Please Advise.

by Jessica Stoya
27 May 21:42

MOTU Villain Hordak Maquette Coming From Tweeterhead

by Jeremy Konrad

MOTU baddie Hordak is getting a new 1/5th scale maquette from Tweeterhead. The statue will come with a wired fabric cape, his staff, and in two versions. The standard comes with his standard head portrait, while the Tweeterhead exclusive will include a classic She-Ra style head. Hordak will stand 21 inches tall and comes posed on a Fright-Zone themed base as well. Tweeterhead is continuing the line of MOTU-themed statues started by Sideshow with this line, starting with the leader of The Evil Horde. You can check out both versions of the statue below.

MOTU Villain Hordak Maquette Coming From Tweeterhead
Hordak Statue. Credit Tweeterhead

"There's so much bad to be done!" – Hordak

Tweeterhead Presents the Hordak "Legends" Maquette! The 1:5 scale line originally established by Sideshow, Tweeterhead is bringing back these "Legends" by starting out with everyone's favorite leader of the Evil Horde himself, Hordak! The Hordak Maquette measures close to 21" tall when fully assembled – figure, base, and staff. This polyresin statue comes with his iconic monster portrait clad in his black, crimson and grey costume with a removable fabric cape. Standing atop the horrific Fright-Zone themed base, Hordak is getting ready to exact revenge on Skeletor, He-Man, and conquer all of Eternia!

MOTU Villain Hordak Maquette Coming From Tweeterhead
Credit Tweeterhead

The "Tweeterhead Exclusive" comes with an additional classic "Robot" style portrait with everything else advertised. Both versions of the Hordak Maquette will retail for $475 USD, and ready for Pre-Order this Thursday at noon pst!"

MOTU Villain Hordak Maquette Coming From Tweeterhead MOTU Villain Hordak Maquette Coming From Tweeterhead

As stated above, both versions of this Hordak statue go on sale tomorrow at 3 PM EST/Noon PST. Both versions will run $475 a piece, and with that being the case you would be foolish to not just order the exclusive version. Hopefully this means we can get a bunch of new MOTU related characters in this scale, the Sideshow line was pretty great, and it was sad to see it go.

The post MOTU Villain Hordak Maquette Coming From Tweeterhead appeared first on Bleeding Cool News And Rumors.

13 Sep 23:14

Gay Maryland Couple Sues State Department for Denying Citizenship to ‘Out-of-Wedlock’ Daughter

by Towleroad
Roee and Adiel Kiviti an their children.

Immigration Equality, Lambda Legal, and pro bono counsel Morgan Lewis have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department for refusing to recognize the citizenship of the daughter of married U.S. citizens Roee and Adiel Kiviti, a gay couple.

Lambda Legal explains: “Roee and Adiel Kiviti are a same-sex couple who married in California in 2013. They had their daughter Kessem via surrogacy in Canada in February 2019. Because only Adiel has a biological connection to Kessem, the State Department is disregarding Roee and Adiel’s marriage and treating Kessem as ‘born out of wedlock,’ meaning she must have a biological relationship to a U.S. citizen parent who has resided in the U.S. for five years. This requirement is not meant to be applied to the children of married U.S. citizens. Even though both of Kessem’s fathers are U.S. citizens, Adiel falls one year short of the residency requirement, and the State Department completely disregards Roee as her father.”

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court of Maryland.

Said Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, Senior Attorney at Lambda Legal: “Kessem was born to two dads. By refusing to recognize Kessem as a U.S. citizen at birth, the Department of State seeks to erase her family ties and to disrespect Roee’s and Adiel’s marriage. This is not only unlawful, it is also cruel and un-American. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that same-sex couples are entitled to the same constellation of benefits linked to marriage as different-sex couples. The government cannot refuse to recognize Roee’s and Adiel’s marriage, nor Kessem’s citizenship at birth. We will fight for the dignity of all LGBT families.”

Added Aaron C. Morris, Executive Director of Immigration Equality: “This is a fight for marriage equality. It is a fight for the fundamental right of citizenship. By refusing to recognize their rights as a married couple, the State Department is treating Roee and Adiel as second-class citizens and treating Kessem as if she is not a citizen at all. The administration has made abundantly clear it will ignore the law and Constitution. We will not stand for it.” 

Lambda Legal adds: “The Immigration and Nationality Act states that children of married U.S. citizens born abroad are U.S. citizens from birth so long as one of their parents has resided in the U.S. at some point, but the State Department routinely denies that right to same-sex couples and their children. While different-sex couples are automatically presumed to both be parents of their children, same-sex couples are subjected to invasive questioning about how they brought their child into their family. Because one parent is not a biological parent, they are treated as if they are not married, and their children are not recognized as citizens unless the biological parent can meet additional criteria”

Said plaintiffs Roee and Adiel Kiviti: “The focus here is our little girl whose rights are being infringed upon by our government. Every parent wants to protect their child, to give them assurances of tomorrow, and this policy isn’t letting us do that. Our daughter will know her story. She will know how she came into this world, she will know about all of the loving people who helped us become a family, and she will know how her parents fought for her rights and for the rights of other families.”

The lawsuit follows a similar suit filed in July by Immigration Equality, Lambda Legal, and pro bono counsel in the Northern District of Georgia against the U.S. State Department. That lawsuit was filed on behalf of another same-sex couple, Derek and Jonathan Mize-Gregg, whose daughter Simone was not recognized as a U.S. citizen under the discriminatory policy.

The post Gay Maryland Couple Sues State Department for Denying Citizenship to ‘Out-of-Wedlock’ Daughter appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.

28 Jun 17:59

REPORT: Trump Seeks Advice On Naming Mike Lee To SCOTUS, Worries About Senate Seat Getting Flipped

by Joe Jervis

Bloomberg reports:

President Donald Trump has asked advisers their opinions about nominating Utah Senator Mike Lee to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court, according to three people familiar with the matter. Trump thinks Lee would be easily confirmed by the Senate, but the president has expressed concern about keeping his Senate seat in Republican hands, one person said. All of the people spoke on condition of anonymity to describe private deliberations.

He has been assured the seat will remain safely Republican, the person said. Trump complained that he was told the same about the Alabama Senate seat held by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who wound up replaced by Democrat Doug Jones. Trump is actively considering other candidates. Brett Kavanaugh, a judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, is said to be another top contender.

Back in March, Lee reintroduced the so-called First Amendment Defense Act, which would make it legal nationwide to refuse to serve LGBT citizens based on “sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction.” His bill, which has not yet been reintroduced in the House, currently has 22 GOP Senate cosponsors.

The post REPORT: Trump Seeks Advice On Naming Mike Lee To SCOTUS, Worries About Senate Seat Getting Flipped appeared first on Joe.My.God..

06 Dec 13:13

Christian school defends decision to fire teacher for being gay

by Nick Duffy
A school has defended its decision to dismiss a teacher for being gay.
17 Nov 13:45

Adam Woodward Bares Nearly All On British Soap 'Hollyoaks'

by Karim Shah

Handsome 25-year-old actor Adam Woodward appears on the British Channel 4 soap opera, "Hollyoaks."

And on a recent episode of the series, the fit actor bared nearly everything.

Check out the photos:

The Manchester based fellow previously appeared on the UK TV series, Emmerdale, and in an as yet unreleased horror film called Brood Parasite.

Enjoy these snaps from his Instagram:


Nothing says cool like running tights...

A post shared by AJ Woodward (@adam.j.woodward) on


Filming starts next week for guest lead in a soap. Breaking out the Clark Kent geek glasses #filming #acting #actor #TV

A post shared by AJ Woodward (@adam.j.woodward) on

H/T: Attitude



14 Aug 14:59

Finally that queer Asian lead we’ve been waiting for in ‘Before I Got Famous’

by David Reddish
Available on Apple TV, Amazon Fire and Roku.
30 Mar 13:01

Wolves in the hen house: Look who Texas recruited to promote its bathroom bill

by Alex Bollinger
The Lt. Governor insists that asking the Family Research Council to promote a bill to limit bathroom access to the gender on one's birth certificate is not transphobia.
29 Sep 19:14

John Stamos and Glen Powell Strip Down and Hit the Showers on ‘Scream Queens’ – WATCH

by Sean Mandell

john stamos naked

On last night’s Scream Queens, actors John Stamos and and Glen Powell stripped down–and apparently oiled up–for a steamy shower scene.

Stamos and Powell play rich and handsome doctors on the second season of Ryan Murphy’s horror spoof series.

In the scene, Stamos explains the “Dateable Guy Checklist” to Powell and Powell tries to intimidate Stamos with his manhood.

screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-8-20-55-am screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-8-11-54-am

As EW notes, Stamos took to Twitter on Tuesday night to talk about the filming of the scene:

“Well yeah, it could have been awkward. It was pretty awkward, but Glen is so damn funny. I at least wore a G-string or something, but he wore a very tiny… a medium-sized sock,” Stamos said. “We laughed a whole lot. We did a lot of pushups; he likes to do pushups. He likes a lot of oil, there’s a lot of oiling up. I swear we ran out of oil on that scene.”

Stamos also posted a more revealing photo of him and Powell covering their members with a Dick’s Sporting Goods sign.

He wrote on Twitter, “‘I think our wieners just touched, accidentally.’ (was it really an accident  @glenpowell ??”

Watch the scene, below.

[h/t Just Jared]

The post John Stamos and Glen Powell Strip Down and Hit the Showers on ‘Scream Queens’ – WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.

12 May 19:13

What is Donald Trump even running on anymore?

by Dara Lind

His “Muslim ban” shift sells out his core constituents.

This is an awkward thing to admit: I actually took Donald Trump at his word about something.

Not much, mind you. Just two things. As much as he might flip-flop with abandon, and lie with ease, about most campaign issues, I figured that two things would remain: He would promise to build a border wall and make Mexico pay for it, and he would promise to ban Muslims from entering the US "until we figure out what's going on."

But the minute he sewed up the GOP nomination in early May, he started showing signs of softening on the Muslim ban — telling interviewers that it was "just a suggestion", that "it hasn’t been called for yet." By June 14, in a speech after the mass shooting in Orlando, the ban would apply to "areas of the world where there is a proven history of terrorism against the United States, Europe, or our allies."

By late June, the Trump campaign officially admitted that President Trump wouldn’t ban Muslims from entering the US unless they came from one of the "terror states." A few days later, Trump spokeswoman Katrina Pierson was insisting that the candidate had never called to ban all Muslims at all.

Of course, that is exactly what Trump did. Explicitly and repeatedly. For pete's sake, it was the focus of his very first television campaign ad.

It's not that I'm surprised Trump is lying about something. (If I were, I should probably be either checked for memory loss or fired.) But I'm really surprised that one of the two things I thought he'd never back down on is one of the first things that, as he "pivots" to the general election, he's signaling a willingness to move away from.

And I'm left to wonder: Who is Donald Trump even running as anymore?

Trump has successfully marketed himself as a bold, un-PC truth teller

It is clear to me that Donald Trump accidentally fell into a serious presidential run. The truest statement you can make about his campaign for the Republican nomination is that he micromanages his communications strategy — his marketing — and leaves his staff and surrogates scrambling to fill in the rest, if it gets filled in at all.

He flip-flops with abandon (on issues like taxes) and breaks gleefully with GOP orthodoxies (like George W. Bush "keeping us safe") because, as much as anything, he just doesn't give a damn about policy.

Donald Trump
Policy, feh, who needs it?

But for all this, he managed to stumble onto a constituency. His comments about Mexicans during his campaign speech did exactly what political communications consultants tell their clients to do. It provoked the opposition (liberal and mainstream media) and galvanized a base: people who felt repulsed by immigration and oppressed by "political correctness."

That wasn't Trump's base when he said it. But it became his base. And that base has stuck with him throughout the campaign, as the rest of the Republican Party failed to find an alternative to him and then talked themselves into more or less actively supporting him.

Trump's willingness to speak bluntly on delicate subjects is core to his appeal. When I spoke to Trump voters in the northern suburbs of Boston, it was the most common theme I heard. "A lot of things that American families say behind closed doors, he's willing to say out loud," one Trump supporter told me.

And the particular truths they cherish Trump speaking are about immigrants and Muslims. When one Trump supporter told me Trump was "actually saying things that we probably would not be comfortable doing ourselves," I asked him what sort of things he meant; his reply was, "The whole thing with the Muslim issue. That we should be screening them. I support that."

I figured that Trump understood that. I figured it was why his campaign always seemed one step more developed on immigration than it was on any other issue. I figured that's why those had been the issues he featured in his primary ad. (For more on Trump's proposed Muslim ban and its history, read our previous coverage.)

Even when Trump put a wrecking ball to a core pillar of his candidacy last month by agreeing to accept outside funding in the general election (after months of saying that he was uniquely trustworthy because he didn't let anyone give him money), I was amused but not alarmed — Trump's supporters care about his independence, sure, but not as much as they care about Trump's "hard truths."

A man at a Trump rally waves a sign that says "I'm ready to work on the wall" Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images

With the "Muslim ban" no longer a Muslim ban, Donald Trump is running for office promising to do exactly one thing: to build a wall on the US-Mexico border and make Mexico pay for it.

Except that Trump has already signaled, on a couple of occasions, that he only needs the wall built along about half of the border — which is barely more security than his Republican competitors were calling for or, for that matter, than the US has now.

With five months left in the campaign, what else might Trump promise to do, or even try to do, once elected president? What is he asking his voters to trust him for? What is left to Donald Trump?

A "negotiating" stance is an easy way to avoid commitment — but avoiding commitment diminishes the Trump brand

In fairness, Trump has been admirably forthright about the flexibility of his policy proposals. He's said over and over again that he's a dealmaker, a negotiator, and that therefore any policy he proposed should be taken no more seriously than an opening bid — a "suggestion."

Many of the Trump supporters I talked to either weren't aware of this or didn't care. They believed fervently that Trump's bluntness meant he was unusually sincere. "He's not a politician. He's not a smooth talker. What he says is what he's going to do," one said. "There's a lot of similarity between Trump and Reagan," said another, "because they say what they're going to do and they do it."

That's not necessarily Trump's fault. As the candidate himself likes to say on the stump (albeit referring to immigrants, not to himself), "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in."

It's not at all clear that Trump is actually backing off his Muslim-ban proposal so much as bringing it in line with the rest of his policy proposals: an opening offer to get someone (Congress? other countries? Paul Ryan?) to the table and hash things out.

That saves Trump's skin with political reporters who care about policy: The best way to avoid getting accused of flip-flopping is never to say anything specific enough to be reversible. But that's not the constituency Trump cares about anyway, or else he would, you know, flip-flop less.

donald trump 2011 book (Trump)

But the thing about being a "negotiator" is that you don't cut a deal just to cut a deal. That's a good way to cut a lot of bad deals. It is, in fact, exactly what Donald Trump is accusing President Obama of when it comes to his 2015 nuclear deal with Iran.

When you negotiate, you can't just have an opening bid in mind. You have to have a closing one, too. And while Donald Trump is just speaking out of a best-business-practices playbook when he refuses to tell anyone what his actual goals are in negotiation, because he doesn't want to tip his hand to the competition, at this point there is simply no way of knowing what he would actually go into a negotiation hoping to get out of it, what his top priorities and deal breakers for America would be.

If the Muslim ban isn't that, what is?

This gets to the other problem with the "negotiation" framework. There are plenty of Donald Trump supporters who don't think of the Muslim ban as a policy promise first and foremost; they think of it as an uncomfortable truth about the danger of the modern world. They support Donald Trump because even when the Republican "establishment" wants him to stop speaking out about these truths, he refuses to do it.

That’s not about policy as much as it is about communications. And communications is what is most important to Trump anyway. But over the last couple of weeks, it appears that the political insiders — the Republican establishment — have finally taken over the Trump messaging machine.

Trump’s Twitter account has started to read like a campaign account (at least sometimes). He gave an entire speech about Hillary Clinton without calling her "Crooked Hillary" once.

The candidate still overrules his handlers to let reporters tag along with him on a golf course, and the things he says over 18 holes might sound like vintage Trump — but they’re not. Trump still goes on Sean Hannity’s show and talks about how Muslim Americans aren’t assimilating, but he’s not willing to back it up with action. In other words, he’s taking one of his boldest, harshest truths, and treating it as something that might not be such a big deal after all.

It is, quite literally, an act of political correctness.

Watch: Islamophobia in America goes much deeper than Donald Trump.