Shared posts

07 Jun 03:50

YES, MA'AM!

by Melissa McEwan
iconic image of Hillary Clinton on an airplane wearing sunglasses and looking at her phone, to which I've added text reading: 'Voting rights 4 all plz share & RT'
Hillary Clinton ain't messing around:
Saying there is a sweeping effort underway across the country to disenfranchise people of color from voting, Hillary Clinton called for universal, automatic voter registration for every citizen when they turn 18, at a speech at Texas Southern University in Houston, one of the largest historically black colleges in the nation.

"I think this would have a profound impact on our elections and our democracy," she said.

People would be able to opt out of being automatically registered under the proposal, Clinton said. She also called for the adoption of an early voting standard of at least 20 days before an election across the country, along with increased availability to online voter registration and reduced waiting times on election day.

...Clinton also sought to connect the life of Barbara Jordan, who was the first woman and first African American woman ever elected to represent Texas in the House of Representatives, and her fight for the Voting Rights Act, to the current climate, where she said the law has had its "heart ripped out."
Damn. And in case that wasn't enough for you, she explicitly called out the Republican conspiracy to disenfranchise voters and named names:
Clinton called out some of her likely Republican opponents by name, accusing them of launching a "crusade against voting rights" and for "fearmongering about a phantom epidemic of election fraud"...

[S]he condemned laws that she said suppress voting, particularly among minorities and young people and called out GOP lawmakers for "systemically and deliberately trying to stop millions of American citizens from voting."

"What is happening is a sweeping effort to disempower and disenfranchise people of color, poor people and young people, from one end of our country to another," Clinton said...

"Here in Texas, former governor Rick Perry signed a law that a federal court said was actually written with a purpose of discriminating against minority voters," Clinton said. "He applauded when the Voting Rights Act was gutted. And said the lost protections were outdated and unnecessary."

"But Governor Perry is hardly alone in his crusade against voting rights," Clinton added. "In Wisconsin, Governor Scott Walker cut back early voting and signed legislation that would make it harder for college students to vote. In New Jersey, Governor Chris Christie vetoed legislation to extend early voting. And in Florida, when Jeb Bush was governor, state authorities conducted a deeply flawed purge of voters before the presidential election in 2000."
She also "denounced the Supreme Court's 2013 ruling" on voting rights.

Well HELLO, Madam Candidate!

I forgot how much I loved when Hillary Clinton goes medieval on the Republicans. "Fearmongering about a phantom epidemic of election fraud." Beautiful.

I really like this proposal, too, by the way. I'm generally not a fan of "opt-out" measures, but, the thing is, voting is a right. It isn't something to which we should be having to opt in.

Also: Adoption of a national early voting standard: A+. Increased online voter registration: A+. Reduced waiting times on election day (presumably including longer voting hours): A+. Rolling back provisions that make it harder for people to vote: A+.

Someone pass Clinton a note that we should make Election Day a national holiday, too!
07 Jun 03:28

tohdaryl: daryltohblogs: thranduilland: lucid-luck: I want one of those scenes in a dude bro...

tohdaryl:

daryltohblogs:

thranduilland:

lucid-luck:

I want one of those scenes in a dude bro film where “tomboy” chick has to wear a dress to go undercover or whatever, but instead of the guys drooling as she walks down the stairs, they’re like “k. U need to stop. Go put the cargo pants back on. You look super uncomfortable and awkward in that. Brutus, you go be the fake prostitute.”

I’m just imagining this super ripped guy called Brutus being like ‘YESSS!!! I’VE ALWAYS WANTED TO BE THE FAKE PROSTITUTE!! Now is my time to shine!!’

image
image
image
image
image

so I got inspired… and had to make a comic….

07 Jun 01:43

Photo









06 Jun 23:36

anexpansionlikegold: I’m so uncomfortable with the idea that you’re suddenly a woman once you have...

anexpansionlikegold:

I’m so uncomfortable with the idea that you’re suddenly a woman once you have your period. I was nine when I got my period. You know what else happened when I was nine? Some guy at the local waterpark grabbed my ass. A fully grown adult did this. To a nine year old. And when I said, “don’t” he laughed and told me to change into something other than a two piece bathing suit. I was nine.

Please stamp out the myth that girls “mature” earlier, that there are definite physical passages that mark “womanhood” and thus, sexuality. Let little girls be little girls or I’ll come after you

06 Jun 22:04

faxmachine: I think the reason why the phrase “I’m not like most girls” annoys me so much is...

faxmachine:

I think the reason why the phrase “I’m not like most girls” annoys me so much is because women have been conditioned to feel like they have to disassociate themselves from the female gender to be recognised as an interesting human being and if that isn’t fucked up then I don’t know what is

06 Jun 22:04

Photo



06 Jun 15:37

HOW I DISCOVERED I AM WHITE

fishnbanjos:

temporaryforevers143:

pussy-and-pizzza-x:

melodic-melanie:

chubbyconsequences:

angel-of-death-2015:

intersectionalism:

By renegademama (Janelle Hanchett)

RENEGADE MOTHERING

When I was 14 or so, I asked my grandmother why we didn’t have a “white club” at school. I don’t recall her response, but I do remember feeling particularly smug and vaguely angry that there was a “Latino” club and a “Chinese” club but not a “white” club.

Oh the unfairness! Oh the disparity! Why do we celebrate their heritage but not ours?

And I didn’t think about race again, at least not much, until I dated an African American man in college and a stranger whispered “nigger lover” in my ear one night as he walked by us in a grocery store. Disgusting.

I figured he was a strange exception of horrible racist creature. He was, after all, approximately 97 years old. (Well, 70, but he appeared 97 to my fresh young eyes.)

And then, a few months later, when my boyfriend’s roommate took me aside and asked why I have to “take a good black man who was in college,” when so many black men were incarcerated. I concluded she was crazy. And mean.

She hurt my feelings. Poor Janelle.

Beyond these few moments, and a couple others, I didn’t really think about race. Well, I thought about how people made arguments “about race” when clearly they were not. I mean why do they make race an issue? It’s obviously not.

Oh yeah, I had America all figured out: If ya work hard, you get ahead. And if you don’t get ahead, it’s because you made bad decisions. And if you get arrested it’s because you’re breaking the law, and people who break the law are more likely to be black. Obviously. That’s why they’re always getting arrested. (How’s that for some cyclic logic?)

I knew this to be true because:

  1. America was awful to black people but that was fixed during the Civil Rights movement;
  2. Therefore, we are all on equal footing now and if you don’t succeed it’s because you aren’t trying.

I learned it in school. It was fact. School teaches the truth.

And then, graduate school, and Professor Lee.

Oh, shit.

“Not all white people are white supremacists, but all white people benefit from white supremacy.”

WHAT THE WHAT?

She made us repeat it like a mantra. At least 3 times. I read Tim Wise’s White Like Me (I have mixed feelings about him now, but I digress) and bell hooks and David Roediger’s Wages of Whiteness and learned how our economic systems benefit from racism and we read about thehistory of American immigration laws (have you ever read them?) and colonialism in the Philippines and elsewhere (yes, America has colonies but we call them “territories”), and we read about redlining and white flight (ever wonder how black people ended up in urban centers?), and we read some DuBois and Omi & Winant and literature by people of color and all of the sudden I realized I had been fucking lied to.

I understood America through white eyes. I understood the world through the mainstream, polished glasses of a nice clean history of “we used to be bad now we’re not the end.”

Go team.

I discovered I was white.

“Not all white people are white supremacists, but all white people benefit from white supremacy.”

She wanted us to see that as individuals, not all white people are bigoted. But she also wanted us to see that every white person – whether they are bigoted or not – benefits from the racially structured hierarchies in America. They benefit from racism.

Yes. Even me. Even though I am not “racist.”

How? And she explained whiteness. She explained that “white” is the standard. White is the background against which difference is measured.

In other words, it’s “white” until further notice. It’s “white” until proven otherwise. It’s “white” or it’s the “other,” and it has nothing to do with actual numbers, percentages of “minority” population. It has to do with power. It has to do with the culture of power. What do I mean? If a comedy film features a white family, it’s a comedy. If it features a black family, it’s a blackcomedy.

Think about it.

White is the standard. And I’m white. Therefore, I am standard, and that benefits me.

When I walk into a room, I don’t fear that I’m representing my whole race. I have never acted badly then thought to myself “Oh shit, I sure hope they don’t hate all white people now.”

Or, in other words, even though pretty much every Columbine-type-school-kid-murderer is white, I’ve never developed a distrust for white, socially awkward high school kids.

A few do not represent the whole.

“Privilege is passed on through history.”

Whatever. I grew up POOR!

But then I thought about how, in the late 1940s, my grandmother was the first woman editor of the University of Washington’s newspaper. After she graduated, she and my grandpa bought and ran small newspapers in northern California. The family business they built employed my family members for 40+ years.

In the late 1940s, black people were not allowed to sit in the front of the bus.

How can I deny that my grandparents’ access to education and economic success did not materially affect me in a positive way, directly, through my father? I thought about the loans my parents were able to take with financial backing from my grandparents, and how that benefitted me. My life. My quality of life. The neighborhoods we lived in. The schools we attended. My cultural knowledge.

“Why don’t we have ‘White History Month?’”

Because White History Month is every month other than February, asshole.

Oh, shit indeed.

“The culture of power determines which version of history is told and retold.”

Prior to the Women’s Rights Movement, women were stuck in the home while men went to work and supported them. But then women were liberated and able to get jobs working outside the home.

Right?

WRONG. White, middle to upper class women were “stuck in the home.” Women of color have ALWAYS “worked out of the home.” In fact, the women of color were probably working in the homes of the white women about which our history is written.

So one of the most oft-repeated, trusted narratives about American history erases the history of women of color. It is dead fucking wrong. It isn’t even kind of right. They are erased. Non-existent. Unseen.

They are Chapter 10. They are a chapter that ends with “but then Martin Luther King, Jr., and all is well.”

They are Chapter 10. I am chapters 1 through forever, and every day I cash in on that fact, whether or not I support the systems making that happen for me.

I realized the reason I had never thought about race was because I was of the privileged one, because I didn’t have to, NOT BECAUSE RACIAL DISPARITY DIDN’T EXIST. I didn’t have to think about race because I was having a fundamentally different life experience than people of color. But I could ignore them, because of my privilege.

I was able to hang out in meltin-pot, “post-racial” land was because the structures of that society allowed (and encouraged) me to “not see race” while continually feeding me narratives about “equality,” “multiculturalism,” “color-blindness” and “ghetto urban lifestyles.”

I spent a lot of time in graduate school in the library, writing at a computer. Like, hours. Whole days. When I had to pee, I would ask the person sitting next to me to watch my stuff so I didn’t have to pack it all up and carry it down the hall to the bathroom. I did it a 100 times.

Once I looked over at the person next to me and my first thought was “Oh you can’t ask him. He’ll steal your stuff.

He was a young black man wearing a gray hooded sweatshirt.

I was sickened at myself. I was horrified at my response. There was absolutely nothing different about him than the 100 other people I didn’t hesitate to ask, except he was black.

I realized that not only do I benefit historically and presently, every day, from the color of skin, I have also internalized cultural narratives regarding blacks and whites that manifest whether or not I support them.

“Hey, would you mind watching my stuff for a minute?”

But what now?

Does it mean my grandmother’s accomplishments are less badass? Nope. Does it mean I do not “deserve” success? Nope. Does it mean that I am a bad person? Nope.

It means that we live in a highly racialized society rooted in a history of discrimination and that we have a long way to go. It means that I have had an advantage over people of color. Yes, always. Yes, no matter what. Because even if you’re poor and white you can join the culture of power by learning the walk and talk. But you can’t change your skin color.

From the day I was first introduced to this “other story,” I couldn’t get enough. Not because I’m some sort of saint or conspiracy theorist, but because I was curious. I was interested out of a sense of shared humanity. And I was fucking angry that I had been swindled. I wanted the truth. Or, I wanted a fuller picture. I wanted more sides.

That, my friends, is pathetic in its privilege.

I learned in graduate school what every person of color knows through life experience. I learned in graduate school that we weren’t “fixed” during the Civil Rights movement.

But when this information was presented to me I felt a sense of relief, because I think deep down I always knew something was terribly wrong, but I couldn’t put my finger on it.

I don’t understand the white rage I keep reading on the internet.

Just another dead thug.

He got what he deserved.

Run over the protestors. They’re making me late for work.

STOP PLAYING THE “RACE CARD.”

I don’t understand it. What’s at stake, people? What’s at stake in accepting that racism exists? Or even entertaining the thought? Are people really so stupid they can’t fathom that other people might be having a different experience than they are? Is it really that hard to comprehend that something can exist EVEN THOUGH YOU DON’T PERSONALLY SEE IT?

(Although you’ll see your privilege if you’re willing to examine your life honestly.)

Why the hell are people so unwilling to listen?

Let’s think about this for a moment. A whole community of people are saying this exists. Data shows racial disparities in economic, education, justice, and healthcare systems. Basically, ALL OVER THE PLACE. Unarmed black boys and men are killed without recourse. Repeatedly. The comment sections of these crimes are riddled with assholes shouting “Good. One less loser.”

But people still claim “Racism doesn’t exist.” But here’s the thing: The only way you can discount the words, lives, efforts and voices of hundreds of thousands of people is THROUGH THE RACISM YOU CLAIM DOESN’T EXIST.

You can only ignore them if they’re aren’t worth hearing.

You can only ignore them if they’re liars. If they’re just looking for a handout.

If they’re not human like you.

You can only ignore them by using the very narratives you claim aren’t happening.

And let’s be honest, we can only ignore them because it’s easy, because we’ll never have to walk a day in their shoes, and it’s just so much more pleasant to turn away, look away, focus back on our lives.

But the sand is getting skimpy and our heads are showing. At this point, if we’re not part of the solution we’re part of the problem.

I’m using my voice to talk to you. I’m using my voice to talk to my kids. But it isn’t enough. We’re looking for places to volunteer. I’m looking for actions I can take.

We’re at a crossroads. This cannot go on. We’re crushed under the weight of hatred, history, silence, violence, bullshit media and the insidious defense of systematic unequal distribution of resources, and at some point, none of us will be able to breathe.

It feels small and pathetic to be one person in this mess. I feel stupid and vulnerable and slightly insane to be writing this here, now. But fuck my feelings. Fuck feeling uncomfortable. Fuck the nonsense that keeps us quiet and content and cozy in our little post-racial dreamland.

They can’t breathe, and I’m breathing just fine.

And that is precisely the problem.

image

FUCKING SPREAD THIS TRUTH AND GIVE THAT PERSON A MEDAL DAMMIT

Share!!!!

WHY DOESNT THIS HAVE MORE NOTES?????

Wow….can this please make it over to white tumblr

READ IT ALL

AMAZING essay. 

05 Jun 22:22

Photo



05 Jun 22:20

wittywhim:missharpersworld:anyone who says cats aren’t...





wittywhim:

missharpersworld:

anyone who says cats aren’t affectionate is a liar

anyone who says cats aren’t affectionate are simply not treating cats right

05 Jun 21:46

eatingcroutons: copperbadge: yolandaash: amuseoffyre: spanishskulduggery: mynamesdrstuff:enjolor...

eatingcroutons:

copperbadge:

yolandaash:

amuseoffyre:

spanishskulduggery:

mynamesdrstuff:

enjoloras:

Excellent history fact to remember;

Niccolo Machiavelli and Leonardo Da Vinci, most likely at the behest of the Borgias, once conspired to steal a river.

That’s right folks. They planned to change the course of the Arno River so that they could steal it from Pisa and make Florence accessible by sea. 

Please take a moment to imagine that.

Please. 

‘So we just divert the -’

‘Don’t worry they won’t notice a thing’

100% better than National Treasure.

This should be a wacky bromance heist film. We need more wacky historical heist films.

copperbadge seems like something in your wheelhouse

I wish dearly that I knew enough about the INCREDIBLE COMPLEXITIES of Italian History to write this, because I for fucking sure would. Are you kidding me, Machiavelli the ambitious, driven chess master and Leonardo da Vinci, the flighty engineer who used to dress his pet lizard up like a dragon.

Hello yes I am 10,000% here for Machiavelli/Da Vinci fic

05 Jun 19:27

mediamattersforamerica: It’s time to end the right-wing myths...



















mediamattersforamerica:

It’s time to end the right-wing myths about the so-called “dangers” of accommodating transgender students. They’ve never been true, and they only make it harder to create safe and welcoming school environments for ALL kids.

05 Jun 11:30

Anxiety attacks aren’t always hyperventilating and rocking back and forth

ugly-bread:

Anxiety attacks can take different forms, such as:

  • Unpredictable bouts of rage or irritability
  • Nit-pickiness (obsessive behavior, which may be a part of OCD), and even a hypersensitivity to disarray, chaos, or any sort of change
  • Fast-talking, stuttering, stumbling over words
  • Not talking at all
  • Sitting rigid, staring into space, almost seeming “zoned out”

Understanding the way our or other’s anxiety works can help to decrease the stigma and help to calm a person faster and get them out of that state. These are just a few, but it gives an idea of the range in which attacks can come.

05 Jun 11:28

"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a..."

“We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.”

- Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis
04 Jun 22:59

youngbadmanbrown: contaminatedbreastcheese: when i was little, i didn’t really understand...

ThePrettiestOne

I think I'm twice removed at this point.

youngbadmanbrown:

contaminatedbreastcheese:

when i was little, i didn’t really understand genealogical terms (because with africans, everyone is either your aunt, uncle, or cousin, even if they’re not–even if they’re not related to you), and even though i had no problem with figurative language, i had a literal streak that reared up when confronted with english words i didn’t understand

and so for a long time i assumed that a relative “once removed” was a person who had been banished from the family at some point for some horrible misdeed or disrespect, but had re-entered after making amends and regaining their honour

I love this

Notes for future conlang development

04 Jun 18:50

The US school system’s treatment of black kids is a national scandal

The US school system’s treatment of black kids is a national scandal:

newwavefeminism:

from the article:

Research shows that black males are disproportionately more likely to be placed in special education and classified as mentally retarded and emotionally disturbed.

They are also more likely to be placed in segregated placements, more likely to be educated in poorly performing schools and more likely to be referred to the juvenile justice system for infractions that occur in school. Research shows that black males are disproportionately more likely to be placed in special education.

They are also the least likely to be provided the positive supports and the assistance that they need in order to succeed.

None of this is new.

fact: about 70% of the students in my substantially separate classroom are black males. 

True story time:  I used to work reception for a clinic that did free & Medicaid/Medicare mental health care for kids and families.  And one time I was filing and my favorite socialworker there, M, was making notes in a file and getting more and more upset visibly.

I asked if she was okay, and M, who was a totally sweet, kind, patient, kind of hippy-dippy lady in flowy flower print dresses and a headband slammed her pen down on the file and gestured to it, and she said “this kid is a genius.  This kid is an actual, certified genius by every test you give him – as long as those tests are given to him by someone he trusts and cares about.  Anything his mom does – genius.  Anything I do, genius.  And the school has given him an IEP that is… criminal. Because he tests low to them, because they’ve treated him like he’s worthless since kindergarden, and he may be eight but he knows exactly what they think of him.”

And she started to cry.

This moment has stuck in my head so vividly because there was nothing she could do. She had science and test scores to back her up, she had her own degrees and education and an involved parent who cared… and she couldn’t do anything to help this kid. The school had decided his mom was a liar and his social worker was a do-gooder busybody who couldn’t be trusted, and this kid was just getting condescended to at best and shit on every goddamned day by the people who were supposed to be educating him.

I don’t know what happened to that kid, but I remember my old school district.  I’m willing to bet he went from badly-run elementary school to shoddy, poorly-funded middle school to oversized, overpopulated and poorly-funded high school and maybe he finished, maybe he didn’t.  But from what M told me, this was the kind of kid who could grow up to be a poet laureate or a neurosurgeon or a silicon valley mogul or a supreme court justice, literally whatever he wanted, as long as he was given a chance.

And he never, ever was.

Now due to confidentiality rules I can’t say for certain this little boy was black – M would never have told me his name – but I can tell you that at least 90% of our clientele were black, latino, or both, so.

04 Jun 16:08

zenpencils: FRIDA KAHLO: Strange Like Me

04 Jun 16:06

paracomart: drovie: drovie: Today at therapy was really hard....



paracomart:

drovie:

drovie:

Today at therapy was really hard. I was sitting here crying, and generally being miserable, when I felt a nudge at my knee. I looked down to see that Zeus, my service dog, was doing his job… and brought me a potato.

it is very hard to cry with a gift of potato.

Remember this? I’m having a rough time right now. Zeus has a solution.

image

That would be an empty pill bottle, the *correct* pill bottle, a bottle of embossing powder, and two, TWO potatoes.

Oh my goodness, what a delightful creature.

04 Jun 14:02

kingofcyberspace: winona laduke



kingofcyberspace:

winona laduke

04 Jun 13:38

sandandglass: Last Week Tonight s02e15







sandandglass:

Last Week Tonight s02e15

04 Jun 13:37

"In the United States, access to tampons and pads for low-income women is a real problem, too: food..."

“In the United States, access to tampons and pads for low-income women is a real problem, too: food stamps don’t cover feminine hygiene products, so some women resort to selling their food stamps in order to pay for “luxuries” like tampons. Women in prison often don’t have access to sanitary products at all, and the high cost of a product that half the population needs multiple times a day, every month for approximately 30 years, is simply, well, bullshit.”

-

- The case for free tampons (via stuffmomnevertoldyou)

You know, I don’t think I’ve ever heard anybody suggest that toilet paper or paper towels in public bathrooms shouldn’t be free.  We’d consider it outrageous if that very basic necessity were to be missing, or provided only for purchase.

And yet.

(via animatedamerican)

04 Jun 02:13

elia-nebula: princeowl: the worst thing you can say to someone is ‘you’re too sensitive’ because...

elia-nebula:

princeowl:

the worst thing you can say to someone is ‘you’re too sensitive’ because that’s basically saying ‘you feel things more deeply and fully than I do and this inconveniences me because now I have to be more mindful of my own actions’ 

you’re not too sensitive, the world is just callous and stubborn. sensitivity doesn’t make you weak and callousness doesn’t make you strong. 

I needed these words, thank you

04 Jun 02:08

shazampanic: i don’t understand people who complain about “sj bullshit”/“political correctness gone...

shazampanic:

i don’t understand people who complain about “sj bullshit”/“political correctness gone wild” in comics? 

you’re literally reading a bunch of stories about heroes who fight for the greater good of all humankind? you are reading about literal Warriors for Justice. like, complaining when wonder woman gives a speech about treating women with respect? that’s the point of her character. that’s who she is. the punching is second to the respecting women bit. 

how in the hell can you go around saying “yeah, i want my violent bloody fights for justice, with a little less, you know, justice?” you want to see superman punch a nazi in the face, but you don’t want superman to be doing it to protect a jewish character because that would be ‘too preachy’? 

how do you not feel like a batman villain when you complain about too much justice motivating the violence. how do you not realize you sound like the joker when you say “i want more graphic, bloody violence, but can you put less justice, compassion, and kindness in the reasoning for it?”

04 Jun 01:58

Mad Max: Fury Road + Popular Text Posts



















Mad Max: Fury Road + Popular Text Posts

03 Jun 19:22

themercuryjones: ralphspoilsportmotors: salon: Bernie Sanders...











themercuryjones:

ralphspoilsportmotors:

salon:

Bernie Sanders perfectly sums up why elites love apathetic voters

REGISTER! VOTE!

And why every apathetic voter who thinks they are making some sort of statement by not voting is actually supporting the very people they think they are making a statement against.

03 Jun 19:05

g*psy is a racial slur

misdiagnosed-ghost:

g*psy is not a synonym for boho, hippie, fashionable, interesting, wanderlust, or anything else in that vein. 

It is a RACIAL. SLUR. If you are not Rromani, do NOT use it. It’s really that simple. We travel because we are forced to. Not because we want to. Many live in forced poverty. If you are not a member of our race, STOP USING A SLUR THAT IS DIRECTED AT US.

03 Jun 18:55

sandandglass: The Daily Show, June 2, 2015





















sandandglass:

The Daily Show, June 2, 2015

03 Jun 16:11

robochai: I thought that this might be helpful to talk about....





robochai:

I thought that this might be helpful to talk about.

Keep reading

03 Jun 16:09

salon: 1. He is not running against Hillary Clinton“I’m not...



salon:

1. He is not running against Hillary Clinton

“I’m not running against Hillary Clinton,” he said. “She’s a candidate, I’m a candidate, and I suspect that there will be other candidates. The people in this country will make their choice.” His socialist platform is “one that resonates” with the American people, and he believes he can effectively appeal to them no matter who his opponent is, or how large her war chest is. But, as he’s said, he’s engaged in “a real struggle against the billionaire class.”

2. Yes, we did say “socialist”

Twice now, actually, because not only is Senator Sanders not afraid of the word, he openly embraces it. Earlier this month, he freely admitted that he wanted to make America “more Scandinavian” — by which he meant, a democratic country with a socialist backbone when it comes to healthcare, education, and retirement. “If you see the transfer of 99 percent of the wealth to the top one-tenth of the one percent,” he’s said, “you’ve got to transfer that back.”

3. President Sanders would overturn Citizens United

“The major issue of our time is whether the United States of America retains its democratic foundation or whether we devolve into an oligarchic form of society where a handful of billionaires are able to control our political process by spending hundreds of millions of dollars to elect candidates who represent their interests,” he said last September. The best way to do that, he said, is to overturn Citizens United, because “freedom of speech does not mean the freedom to buy the United States government.”

4. Senator Sanders is about as anti-corporate a candidate you can imagine this side of Noam Chomsky

He has proposed what would, in essence, be a “Wall Street sales tax,” and his opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership is based on the fact that only “[m]ultinational corporations that have outsourced millions of good-paying American jobs to China, Mexico, Vietnam, India and other low-wage countries think this is a great deal.” Whereas “every union in this country…opposes this agreement that will wipe out jobs and depress wages.”

5. And about those unions…

Senator Sanders’ top five campaign contributors since 2009 are all unions, and 69 percent of the money he receives from political action committees comes from union PACs. “I’m not going to use a super PAC,” he’s said, and the facts bear him out. He has one, but it hasn’t raised any money for his presidential bid to date.

6. He believes public education — all of it — should be free

From elementary to middle, through high school and into community college or a university, Sanders believes that education should cost the student nothing. It’s not merely a personal investment, he believes, it’s a public good — and as such should be funded by the public. “These are not utopian ideas,” he’s said. “They are not radical ideas. They are fairly commonsensical ideas that can happen when you have a government that is directed by the people themselves and not by wealthy powerful corporate interests.”

Read the full article

03 Jun 15:50

karnythia: becausedragonage: makingfists: It’s like this… You’re fourteen and you’re reading Larry...

karnythia:

becausedragonage:

makingfists:

It’s like this…

You’re fourteen and you’re reading Larry Niven’s “The Protector” because it’s your father’s favorite book and you like your father and you think he has good taste and the creature on the cover of the book looks interesting and you want to know what it’s about. And in it the female character does something better than the male character - because she’s been doing it her whole life and he’s only just learned - and he gets mad that she’s better at it than him. And you don’t understand why he would be mad about that, because, logically, she’d be better at it than him. She’s done it more. And he’s got a picture of a woman painted on the inside of his spacesuit, like a pinup girl, and it bothers you.

But you’re fourteen and you don’t know how to put this into words.

And then you’re fifteen and you’re reading “Orphans of the Sky” because it’s by a famous sci-fi author and it’s about a lost generation ship and how cool is that?!? but the women on the ship aren’t given a name until they’re married and you spend more time wondering what people call those women up until their marriage than you do focusing on the rest of the story. Even though this tidbit of information has nothing to do with the plot line of the story and is only brought up once in passing.

But it’s a random thing to get worked up about in an otherwise all right book.

Then you’re sixteen and you read “Dune” because your brother gave it to you for Christmas and it’s one of those books you have to read to earn your geek card. You spend an entire afternoon arguing over who is the main character - Paul or Jessica. And the more you contend Jessica, the more he says Paul, and you can’t make him see how the real hero is her. And you love Chani cause she’s tough and good with a knife, but at the end of the day, her killing Paul’s challengers is just a way to degrade them because those weenies lost to a girl.

Then you’re seventeen and you don’t want to read “Stranger in a Strange Land” after the first seventy pages because something about it just leaves a bad taste in your mouth. All of this talk of water-brothers. You can’t even pin it down.

And then you’re eighteen and you’ve given up on classic sci-fi, but that doesn’t stop your brother or your father from trying to get you to read more.

Even when you bring them the books and bring them the passages and show them how the authors didn’t treat women like people.

Your brother says, “Well, that was because of the time it was written in.”

You get all worked up because these men couldn’t imagine a world in which women were equal, in which women were empowered and intelligent and literate and capable. 

You tell him - this, this is science fiction. This is all about imagining the world that could be and they couldn’t stand back long enough and dare to imagine how, not only technology would grow in time, but society would grow. 

But he blows you off because he can’t understand how it feels to be fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen and desperately wanting to like the books your father likes, because your father has good taste, and being unable to, because most of those books tell you that you’re not a full person in ways that are too subtle to put into words. It’s all cognitive dissonance: a little like a song played a bit out of tempo - enough that you recognize it’s off, but not enough to pin down what exactly is wrong.

And then one day you’re twenty-two and studying sociology and some kind teacher finally gives you the words to explain all those little feelings that built and penned around inside of you for years.

It’s like the world clicking into place. 

And that’s something your brother never had to struggle with.

This is an excellent post to keep in mind when you see another recent post criticizing the current trend of dystopian sci-fi and going on about how sci-fi used to be about hope and wonder.

No. It used to be about men. And now it’s not.

Specifically white men. And I say this because a lot of the feminist sci fi centers white women & replicates the racism of classic sci fi. Not to mention the weird fetishization of POC on display in other spec fic like urban fantasy.

03 Jun 13:02

gameblogpunktch: motherfuckinoedipus: saxypone: fuchsiamae: d...



gameblogpunktch:

motherfuckinoedipus:

saxypone:

fuchsiamae:

dextronoms:

bitches-im-balin:

bigbigtruck:

krudman:

I love this

“you come here often?”
“DWARVEN CRAAAFTS”

“hey baby did it hurt when you fell from heaven-”

“FAVOR THE BOW, EH? I’M A SWORD MAN MYSELF”

“hey let me buy you a drin-”

“LET ME GUESS: SOMEONE STOLE YOUR SWEET ROLL?”

“hey gorgeous-”

“I LIKE SHORTS! THEY’RE COMFY AND EASY TO WEAR!”

“hey beauti-”

“SOMETIMES, I DREAM ABOUT CHEESE”

”are you an angel becau-”

”Talos the Mighty! Talos the unerring! Talos the unassailable! To you we give Praise! We are but maggots writhing in the filth of our own corruption! While you have ascended from the dung of mortality, and now walk among the stars! But you were once man! Aye! And as man you said, “Let me show you the power of Talos Stormcrown, born of the North, where my breath is long winter. I breathe now in royalty and reshape this land which is mine. I do this for you, Red Legions, for I love you.”  Aye, love! Love! Even as man, great Talos cherished us. For he saw in us, in each of us, the future of Skyrim! The future of Tamriel! And there it is, friends! The ugly truth! We are the children of man! Talos is the true god of man! Ascended from flesh, to rule the realm of spirit! The very idea is inconceivable to our Elven overlords! Sharing the heavens with us? With man? Ha! They can barely tolerate our presence on earth! Today, they take away your faith. But what of tomorrow? What then? Do the elves take your homes? Your businesses? Your children? Your very lives? And what does the Empire do? Nothing! Nay, worse than nothing! The Imperial machine enforces the will of the Thalmor! Against its own people! So rise up! Rise up, children of the Empire! Rise up, Stormcloaks! Embrace the word of mighty Talos, he who is both man and Divine! For we are the children of man! And we shall inherit the heavens and earth! And we, not the Elves or their toadies, will rule Skyrim! Forever!”

it got better.