Shared posts

02 Nov 13:41

I Wished on a Monkey’s Paw and Now We’re Stuck with Biden vs. Trump Forever

by Kathryn Baecht and Katrina Baecht

October 2084

It’s time to confess. It’s my fault that every presidential election for the past sixty-four years has been Biden vs. Trump.

It started back in 2020. I was wandering masked and alone through an abandoned Costco parking lot, hoping to find a discarded packet of yeast, and consumed with worry about the possibility of Trump winning a second term when I saw it: a monkey’s paw.

A single finger remained open—the middle one. I picked it up, and the words flew from my mouth. “I wish for Biden to beat Trump!”

The finger slowly curled shut, a clap of thunder rang out from the sky, and a chill ran down my spine.

Lo and behold, that November, Biden won. Yes, Trump’s supporters attacked our nation’s capitol and tried to hang Mike Pence, but at least Biden was president.

I had almost forgotten about the paw when Trump and Biden became the nominees again in 2024. Still, it was weird. I mean, most of the country would rather listen to Lara Trump butcher more Tom Petty songs than endure another election in which these two argue about who’s better at climbing stairs. But, once again, Biden was victorious, despite Trump claiming activist ChatBots rigged all the voting machines.

When Trump and Biden kicked off campaigns for the 2028 election, the panic set in. People began to wonder, “How is this possible? Isn’t it illegal for Biden to have a third term?” and “Why isn’t at least one of these guys dead already?”

It wasn’t until after Biden won again that it finally dawned on me: it was the cursed monkey’s paw wish.

And so the story repeats every election cycle. I wished for Biden to beat Trump, and now he has, over and over for the last sixty-four years. Both candidates are now the walking dead. They have stiffened, blackened, and mummified, yet continue to run for president. Their aides trail alongside them, carefully retrieving any bits that fall off.

Each election cycle is a nightmare of Trump scandals, yet nothing disqualifies him. He’s been indicted in all fifty states. Russia finally released the Pee Tapes. He shot a golden retriever in the middle of Fifth Avenue. Plus, all the skin finally rotted off his feet, revealing that he never had bone spurs.

At his rallies, Trump calls Biden “Zombie Joe,” and the crowd chants, “Box him up! Box him up!” while a parade of doctors declare Trump “fit for office” and “partially alive.”

Every four years, Joe is our only hope, the sole politician who has ever beaten Trump and, therefore, the only candidate who can beat Trump. Sure, the economy is robust, social safety nets are still in place, and we are investing more than ever in infrastructure. But when Biden eats an ice cream cone, it falls right through his ribs and onto the floor. That doesn’t exactly scream “presidential.”

Will you find it comforting to know that, at the very least, Biden will always win? Or is it more dreadful to know that candidate Trump will never go away?

Is there a way to break the curse? I do not know. But in my final years, before I reach sweet death and an escape from this endless treadmill of Biden vs. Trump, you will find me wandering alone through abandoned houses, unkempt yards, and big box store parking lots, searching for another paw and just one more wish.

01 Nov 17:28

Paranoid parent checks child’s trick-or-treat haul for rainbow-coloured candies

by Derek Schultz

BELLEVILLE, ON ― In order to prevent anybody from slipping in something that might cause no end of imaginary harm to her daughter, local mother Jenna Bailey instructed her 8-year-old today not to eat any candy until she had come home and had it checked for rainbows. Dressed up in a traditionally feminine Halloween costume […]

The post Paranoid parent checks child’s trick-or-treat haul for rainbow-coloured candies appeared first on The Beaverton.

01 Nov 17:26

Best Costumes from Japan's "Mundane Halloween"

by Rain Noe

Japan's hilarious Jimi Halloween (jimi means "mundane") event is where participants dress up in "costumes" that illustrate boring everyday situations. There's a list of these on Twitter, and below are some of our faves from this year:

Person who was headed out but forgot something inside the home, is too lazy to take their shoes off so crawls back inside to retrieve it

Person trying to photograph something shiny but the reflection is preventing a good shot, so they improvise a way to block the light

Person who looks like they will be getting off at the next stop, meaning their seat will be available

Considerate boyfriend

Cashier forced to wear holiday-specific partial costume

Girl who is on the poster for "My Neighbor Totoro" but who never actually appears in the movie

Person who tries to reach for subway handle without taking eyes off their phone and misses

The person who has to hold the ribbons and scissors at ribbon-cutting ceremonies

Office worker responding to an emergency

Guy reading in bed who accidentally drops his smartphone on his face

Person who traveled to period costume event but forgot the wig

Person who wants to photograph their pets, but cannot reach their phone without disturbing the pets and thus ruining the shot

Person who gets their sleeve caught on the doorknob

Guy who missed the last train of the night

Person who makes it easy for restaurant workers to clean up

Person sitting in an aisle seat who is trying to see Mt. Fuji after hearing the captain's announcement

Person trying on eyeglass frames in a store but their vision is so poor they can't see what they look like in the mirror

Person who mis-poured the beer and must wait for the bubbles to go down

A parent trying to play Mario Kart

Politician who has been instructed not to tell the truth by his party, and his mind goes blank in the middle of the press conference as he realizes that the BS answers he's giving sound strange even to him

When the store clerk seems busy and hasn't gotten to you, so you pretend to be doing something on your smartphone so as not to put pressure on them

See More from Previous Years:

Jimi Halloween, Part 1

Jimi Halloween, Part 2

Jimi Halloween, Part 3

Jimi Halloween, Part 4

Jimi Halloween, Part 5

Jimi Halloween, Part 6

01 Nov 17:24

parents got a new cat they named lord montague and this morning i heard my dad in the other room say…

iputmilkinearlgrey:

parents got a new cat they named lord montague and this morning i heard my dad in the other room say “i would have to advise against that decision, my lord” followed by a crashing sound

01 Nov 17:24

saywhat-politics:

31 Oct 17:54

The Ghost Of

by Reza
31 Oct 17:29

Breaker Box

Any electrician will warn you to first locate and flip the house's CAUSALITY circuit breaker before touching the CIRCUIT BREAKERS one.
31 Oct 17:08

my company hosts a dove hunt and only invites men, moving a meeting for Halloween, and more

by Ask a Manager

This post was written by Alison Green and published on Ask a Manager.

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My company hosts a dove hunt and only invites men

I’m in finance and my company (with 5,200 employees) hosts an annual dove hunt for high net worth clients. Employees are included and it’s great opportunity to meet your clients and other employees, especially higher-ups, from other offices. I understood there are director level and up at this event.

The issue is my director sends out email invites individually to male employees but it appears he doesn’t invite female employees. Neither I nor or other female coworker in our office received an invitation, although we were asked to provide a list of clients who may be interested. Alcohol is also served at the clubhouse (the Dick Cheney hunting fiasco comes to mind, lol). Not all who go are interested in hunting; my understanding is they go to network.

I’m thinking so many things … guns and alcohol, most women left out. I’ve been with company for about 16 months so I don’t feel comfortable saying much to my director or even HR. I may feel more comfortable next year asking why didn’t I receive an invite. I believe we have ethics line I can call anonymously, but I don’t feel comfortable speaking up at this point and am wondering if I should let it go for now.

Excluding women and only providing a networking opportunity to men is sex discrimination and it’s illegal. If you’re up for calling your company’s ethics line anonymously, you should. Otherwise, at whatever point you do feel comfortable addressing it, you should point out that the company is exposing itself to legal liability by issuing invitations based on sex (to say nothing of the potential liability of mixing guns and alcohol, but I doubt you’ll be able to convince them on that one).

Also, organizing a work event — or any event — around killing animals for entertainment is disgusting. I’m assuming you must work in a region where lots of people are okay with it, but I can’t be the only one who would pull my business if I heard about this as a client.

2. Defining “hybrid”

I recently had a job interview for a hybrid position that perfectly matched my expertise. I came in confident, prepared, and excited. The interviewer and I really gelled, and everything went well. However, in the last few minutes, the interviewer mentioned that the expectation was to be in office four days a week. I thanked them for the information and replied that that isn’t something I’m looking for. We exchanged pleasantries, and I’m back on the job boards.

I’m currently in person three to four days a week and am looking to reduce that, but recognize in my field, I’m unlikely to ever be fully remote. But now I’m wary of “hybrid” positions, because I now realize it can mean anything from four days a week to a few times a month. Are there any general assumptions I can make when a role says “hybrid”?

Typically “hybrid” means you’re working from home at least one day a week, but I wouldn’t assume more WFH days than that until it’s explicitly discussed. (I’m sure there’s some company out there calling themselves hybrid when they mean even fewer WFH days than that, but generally it’s come to mean at least a day a week.) There could be other nuances to it to that you won’t know unless you ask, like that you’ll be expected to be in the office every day for the first four months until you’re trained, etc. So if it’s a deal-breaker for you, definitely ask at an early stage what it looks like it practice.

Related:
I apply for remote jobs … and then it turns out they’re not remote

3. Moving a meeting so people can go out on Halloween

Our office meeting is usually the first Wednesday of the month. The November 1st meeting is being moved to November 2. The reason … Halloween, so people can party that night. A lot of people work remotely so it doesn’t really apply since they won’t be in the office. I have an appointment with a client outside that I can’t change. Is this the path that office culture/protocol is going down? Is this a trend you’re seeing?

Don’t read anything into it about office culture or trends. It sounds like your office just wants to be considerate of people who have Halloween plans. And why not? It’s good to accommodate people’s schedules when they can, and if means they get better engagement at the meeting that’s a plus too.

4. Can suing my current employer harm my job search in the future?

I recently retained a lawyer after filing a discrimination and retaliation claim at my workplace. I didn’t jump to this in ego or anger; I worked with my company’s HR for several months prior but received no support. My company has a reputation for legal issues and I was told by many that the company doesn’t address issues until they’re forced — i.e., with outside legal action.

There is no question in my mind this company is not the place for me, and I’ll need to take some time to heal from this and find my next role. Is the company allowed to comment that this is ongoing if they get called for a reference? Or is there any way a prospective employer may find out that I could actively control? To clarify, I’m still working there for the time being, so could this happen after I leave as well?

Yeah, if they wanted to make your life difficult (while you’re there or afterwards), they could say something like, “I’m not permitted to comment due to pending litigation.” Actually, even if they’re not motivated by wanting to make your life difficult, they might say that because it’s probably true — their lawyer almost certainly doesn’t want them commenting on your performance to an outside party (especially off the cuff) while there’s pending litigation because something they say could be later used against them.

Since you’ve already got a lawyer involved, this is a great thing to ask them about. They may be able to negotiate how it gets handled.

5. Fantasy Football after firing

I was terminated on Friday, but I participate in a work Fantasy Football league with my previous coworkers. I would prefer to just remove myself from the league and move on, but that’s not an option (literally there is no way to leave after the draft unless you are removed by the commissioner). Do I ask to be removed? Do I just tank the rest of the season on purpose? Or do I stay in the league and try to win?

If your preference is to be removed, it’s highly likely that you can just email whoever’s coordinating it and ask to be removed. But if you want to stay in … well, it might be weird and it might not, depending on the circumstances around your firing and how your people in your company generally deal with stuff like that. If it’s going to be awkward for you or them, the more gracious move is to bow out. If you don’t think it’ll be awkward, I’d still send the coordinator a note to let them know you’re no longer there since they might prefer to keep it employees-only or have a precedent for what they do if someone leaves the company mid-season.

31 Oct 17:05

I had a panic attack over a Halloween decoration at work

by Ask a Manager

This post was written by Alison Green and published on Ask a Manager.

A reader writes:

I’m writing about a situation that just happened today at my office regarding Halloween decorations. (If this is helpful context, I’m a mid-level manager at a nonprofit).

A few members of my team brought in fun, low-key Halloween decor (think, purple construction paper bats and a few faux pumpkin heads), which I complimented. However, another colleague, who is slightly senior to me (and not in my department), brought in an absolutely terrifying “doll” that stood a few feet tall with a grotesque expression and dressed/styled like the girl from The Ring.

I suffer from automatonophobia—a severe case—for my entire life. I have managed it through therapy and can handle some triggers to a degree, but I was very uncomfortable knowing the doll was anywhere in our building.

The doll was originally hidden in a supply closet as a jumpscare but then was moved from office to office. I was “caught” twice by it in just 18 hours, let out a small (involuntary) scream each time, and immediately verbalized that I did not like the doll and to please keep it away from me. I was so distressed afterwards that I refused to leave my office for the rest of the day to eat or even to use the bathroom.

A sympathetic colleague warned me later that afternoon that the doll had migrated again to a very public area of our workspace. I asked the owner of the doll to come to my office to chat, so that I could privately request that he remove it from the building or at least from the public space. However, the doll’s owner didn’t know that was to be the topic of discussion and … you guessed it … came down to my office with the doll in hand.

After being on edge and close to tears all day, I had a full-blown panic attack — hysterical, loud sobbing and hyperventilating. My coworkers were deeply apologetic (this is well outside my realm of behavior in the workplace) and immediately removed the doll from the building once I explained my phobia. A concerned coworker filled in our boss (she works remotely) and she called me right away to check on me.

I’m worried now that this is becoming “a whole thing”! My colleagues are incredible people and I truly have no ill will towards them whatsoever, but am left with two questions I hope you can help me with:

1) Was it out of line to bring such a grotesque “decoration” into the workplace in the first place? I presume others were unsettled as well (though certainly not to the same degree).

2) How can I, as an ambitious woman who strives for professionalism, move past this deeply embarrassing moment of crazy-crying over a doll in front of my colleagues? Am I forever the hysterical doll lady now? What should I say to my coworkers about what happened (people down the hallway heard my screams and sobs and were undoubtedly disturbed)?

Oh no, I’m sorry.

As a general rule, people shouldn’t bring super macabre or frightening decorations into the workplace. Too many people are unsettled by it. I don’t think I’d say your coworker was out of line to bring in the doll, but it wasn’t wise or thoughtful. And really, once you said you were uncomfortable and asked for it to be kept away from you, that should have been a clue to everyone to stop using the doll to scare people. I’m more bothered that he kept it up after you said something than that he brought it in to begin with. (And he was really out of line to bring it with him when you asked him to come to your office later.)

As for how to handle it now: if your coworkers are at all decent people, their thoughts are probably mainly “Oh no, poor Jane, I hope she is okay, that was clearly awful for her” and not “wow, Jane is prone to hysteria and now I will have to worry that anything could set her off.” That’s especially true if they’ve worked with you a while; their experience with you will tell them that this was an aberration, not a thing that should now define you.

And sure, there could also be a bit of “Whoa — I had no idea doll phobias could be such a thing!” And that’s okay. If they didn’t know, now they do. There’s probably more than one person in your office who will be more aware of phobias as a result and that’s a good thing.

I do think it would be smart to talk to people who witnessed or overheard your panic attack with a brief explanation and apology for disturbing them and some reassurance that you’re fine and don’t expect it to happen again. (As always in cases like these, you’re not apologizing for having a phobia but for the disruption itself, and for general relationship-smoothing purposes.) This shouldn’t be a big thing — it’s just something like, “Hey, I’m sorry about the other day since it must have disturbed you. I’ve had a lifelong phobia of certain types of dolls. By definition phobias aren’t rational so I won’t try to explain it, but it’s not something that has ever come up at work before and hopefully it will never come up again.”

Really, though, the way you’ll get past this is to continue being the calm, professional person you probably were outside of this one incident. I get why you’re embarrassed — big unexpected displays of negative emotion or seeming to lose control are embarrassing when they happen at work — but people know who you are and will see who you continue to be. Keep being your normal self and you should not forever be the hysterical doll lady.

31 Oct 17:00

Local children not at all scared by haunted House of Commons

by Rob Ito

OTTAWA – The federal government’s attempt to entertain young Halloween visitors fell flat on its face this year, as almost no child has reported being scared by the main attraction: a Haunted House of Commons. “This whole thing blows. I can’t believe I spent $7 dollars to watch a bunch of people in ghost costumes […]

The post Local children not at all scared by haunted House of Commons appeared first on The Beaverton.

31 Oct 16:59

Is Buffy Ste Marie actually Indigenous? Six extremely white people weigh in

by TJ Dawe

A recent episode of The Fifth Estate brought Buffy Ste Marie’s ethnic identity into question. We sought the definitive word on the iconic singer’s heritage by asking six of the whitest people we could find. “As in, the vampire slayer? Did I miss the season when they established she’s Native?” Melissa Jensens, Calgary “God, I […]

The post Is Buffy Ste Marie actually Indigenous? Six extremely white people weigh in appeared first on The Beaverton.

31 Oct 16:55

Kamala Harris Wears Sad Little Bat Headband Alone At Desk For Halloween

WASHINGTON—Beaming as she entered the White House with a Walgreens bag full of spooky decorations, Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly wore a sad little bat headband Tuesday while sitting alone at her desk for Halloween. “Happy Halloween, everyone—come on by to trick or treat,” said the second-highest-ranking…

Read more...

31 Oct 16:55

CEOs Announce Plans To Be Total Fucking Freaks When You Run Into Them In The Bathroom

NEW YORK—Citing their complete lack of self-awareness and inability to read basic social cues, the nation’s CEOs gathered Monday to announce their plan to be total fucking freaks when you run into them in the bathroom. “Please note that we may make direct eye-contact and chat about random topics while standing next to…

Read more...

31 Oct 16:55

God Throws Celibate Monk Pity Wet Dream

THE HEAVENS—Admitting that His heavenly dictates had made the Franciscan friar suffer enough, God, Our Lord and Heavenly Father, reportedly threw celibate monk Roberto Nevastri a pity wet dream this week. “He’s been so good resisting temptation and respecting chastity over the past few decades that the least I…

Read more...

31 Oct 16:55

EPA Sets Cap On How Much Carbon Trees Can Absorb

31 Oct 16:54

Study Finds Drinking Children’s Blood No More Effective Than Regular Blood At Achieving Eternal Life

31 Oct 16:54

A blogger from China built a miniature cat house inside his wife’s pet store.

ilikeit-art:

A blogger from China built a miniature cat house inside his wife’s pet store.

The animals have their own elevator, mini-TV, forge, bedroom and even a full bathroom with running water.

31 Oct 16:50

31 Oct 16:49

thatsbelievable:

31 Oct 12:04

Graphite

https://www.oglaf.com/graphite/

31 Oct 12:03

Broncos Go On Winning Streak After Scooter Braun Begins Attending Every Game

DENVER—Crediting the 42-year-old music manager for the team’s remarkable and sudden success, the Denver Broncos were reportedly on a winning streak Monday after Scooter Braun began attending every game. “The Broncos have really turned things around, and it’s all thanks to Scooter, who’s apparently one hell of a good…

Read more...

31 Oct 11:59

Parents Explain Why ‘Bluey’ Is Too Woke

Bluey, an Australian cartoon about an anthropomorphic blue heeler puppy, has been repeatedly accused of indoctrinating children with a left-wing agenda. The Onion asked parents why they believe the popular children’s show is too woke, and this is what they said.

Read more...

31 Oct 11:59

Happy Person Must Either Be Stupid Or Evil

MANDAN, ND—Genuinely at a loss as to how else they could account for the smiling, seemingly contented individual, witnesses reported Tuesday that local happy man Leonard Olson, 36, must either be stupid or evil. “I’m not sure what that grinning fucker’s deal is, exactly—maybe he’s a completely corrupt and appalling…

Read more...

31 Oct 11:56

Philosophical Holdup

by Corey Mohler
PERSON: " "

PERSON: "Alright, fine, then give me that."

PERSON: "What...?"

PERSON: "You heard, me, give me all your wisdom, or i shoot!"

PERSON: "Okay, okay, fine... just don't shoot me!"

PERSON: "Oh my god, you are right. I only get one life, i shouldn't spend it doing petty crimes."

PERSON: "So what are you going to do? Live your dream? Become a veterinarian or something?"
30 Oct 17:54

my employee was excluded from a team-building event because of their weight — how do I make this right?

by Ask a Manager

This post was written by Alison Green and published on Ask a Manager.

A reader writes:

I think I messed up with a team-building event I organized and I am not sure what, if anything, I should do to correct the situation.

There is an adventure center about 30 minutes from the office where I work. Each year for the last several years (minus the Covid years) I have set up a Saturday event where my team spends the day doing the various activities that this center offers. This event is pretty popular with the team. Based on the advice I’ve seen on your site, I make it abundantly clear that it is entirely optional. We typically do brunch before heading to the center and then dinner afterwards. People are welcome to (and do) just join for one of the meals or just part of the afternoon at the center, really whatever combination of stuff they’re interested in.

Here’s where I may have messed up. One of the activities offered by the center is a zip-lining tour. I schedule one of these tours for the team each year when we go. However, there is a weight limit. It honestly didn’t even occur to me to question whether or not the members of my team are within the weight limit.

When we showed up to start the zip-lining, the people running the tour singled out one of our team members, Chris, and asked them if they were under the weight limit and then asked them to step on a scale to confirm. Chris has participated for the last several years and was never asked about their weight previously. However, they were not under the limit and were not allowed to participate. Chris confirmed that they wanted us to still go without them, and I am pretty sure they would have been even more upset if none of us had gone because they couldn’t go. I let them know that they could take my company card and do whatever other activity they were interested in if they wanted to. They ended up sitting in the car by themselves for the two hours the tour took.

After we were done, we went to dinner. I could tell Chris was trying to be positive but they also made a few comments about how they shouldn’t eat because they’re already too heavy. Mostly those comments were met with a pause and then a change in topic because no one knew what to say.

Today is Monday and Chris is more withdrawn and unhappy than they typically are. Obviously that could be related to something that happened in their personal life after the event on Saturday, but I would have no way of knowing that.

Should I have cancelled the zip-lining tour when we were told they couldn’t come? How should I have handled their comments about not wanting to eat? I don’t know if just moving past them was the right way to handle them. Should I check in with them today? Should I just let it go?

Also, most weighing on my mind, should I continue to do these events? Should we do part of them but not the zip-lining? Should I try to plan an alternative activity during the same time for anyone who doesn’t want to participate? That feels a lot like asking people to tell me their weight range, though I definitely would open whatever I came up with to anyone who didn’t want to zip-line, regardless of weight.

I just feel so bad and my heart hurts for them because I know they’re hurting.

Oh no, this is awful.

First things first, apologize to Chris privately. Make sure you do it in a way that doesn’t put any burden on them to reassure you that it’s okay or even to talk about it if they don’t want to. I’d say it this way: “I owe you an apology for this weekend. I’m very unhappy with the way the adventure center handled that and I plan to call them later today to find out how we can avoid anything similar in the future. I really value you as a part of this team, and I’m going to be personally responsible for ensuring that neither you nor anyone else here will be put in that position again.”

Then, call the adventure center! Talk to a manager about what happened and ask how to avoid it in the future. Maybe the answer is that whenever you schedule one of these days in the future, you ask ahead of time about any activities that have weight restrictions and make it clear the team will skip those. But ask. And make it clear they need to find a way to enforce weight-related safety rules without singling out and embarrassing someone in front of a group.

If you do schedule more events there in the future, there’s a good chance Chris will be uneasy about going. You shouldn’t single them out, but you could provide everyone with info on the activities ahead of time, including something like, “We’re signed up for X, Y, and Z. None of these activities limit participants by height, weight, or medical condition, but we’re cautioned that X does involve ____  (put any details here that you can imagine someone conceivably wanting a warning about; for example, being on your feet for an hour or something that could trigger a fear of heights). if you want to sit any of these out, we’ve arranged ____ as an option too (other stuff? cocoa in the cafe? put something here).” That way you’re not singling Chris out but still letting them know they’re safe participating this time. And it’s a good practice regardless, because you never know who might have a relevant physical restriction/fear/dislike — and circumstances change, so even someone who participated in the past might not be able to do all the same things next time.

There’s also a question about whether this is a good place to do team-building at all. I’d argue no! I know you say your whole team loves it, but (a) not everyone will speak up if they don’t, although of course it’s also possible all the enthusiasm is genuine, and (b) at some point someone won’t be able to participate (a new person joins your team / someone develops a condition they didn’t used to have / etc.) and you don’t want them to be the “reason” the rest of the team has to stop. However, in this case, if you never go back after years of doing it, I’m worried Chris will feel self-conscious about that, so it’s worth thinking about exactly how to navigate that.

As for what you should have done in the moment: Agggh, it’s tough. I lean toward thinking you should have asked for an alternate activity instead of the zip-lining once you found out Chris wouldn’t be allowed, but there’s a pretty strong risk they would have felt awkward about being the reason no one else could participate (although probably not as awkward as they felt sitting in their car for two hours, so it might still be the better option). Another option would be for you to stay behind with them and find something enjoyable for the two of you — but again, Chris was probably going to feel awkward regardless. Some people in their shoes would appreciate the show of solidarity from a manager sitting it out with them, while others would feel worse … so it’s a hard call to make without knowing Chris.

Responding to Chris’s comments about not wanting to eat when you went to dinner afterwards: That’s tougher. In normal circumstances (not these), comments like that put an unfair burden on the rest of the group to manage the person’s emotions about diet/weight/food, which isn’t reasonable to ask of colleagues. But in this situation, it’s pretty understandable that Chris was looking for some emotional support after being embarrassed in front of their work team. (And to be clear, I am not saying that weight is shameful or that anyone should feel humiliated by being over the weight limit for a physical activity! But we live in a world where a lot of people do feel that way, and we can be sympathetic to Chris for how it clearly made them feel.) I suppose if you could go back and redo it, you could maybe say, “I’m upset that that happened, and I’m going to call the adventure company on Monday. But meanwhile, please eat, we think you are awesome and they suck for handling it like that.” I’m not sure, though — that’s a tough spot for everyone at that point. I think any of you would get points for trying to be supportive, rather than just uncomfortably ignoring the remarks! (But you’re all human and it’s hard to know how to respond in the moment.)

For now, though, please do check in on Chris and assure them you’re on it and it won’t happen again.

30 Oct 17:48

Democratic Rep. Bowman Pleads Guilty For Pulling Capitol Building Fire Alarm

Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) pleaded guilty after being charged with falsely pulling the fire alarm at a congressional office building, a misdemeanor, before the House voted on a stopgap spending bill to fund the government last month. What do you think?

Read more...

30 Oct 17:47

Mother Defends Choice To Put Credit Card Number Into Website Virus.Crime

CONCORD, NH—Noting that at 73-years-old, she was more than capable of knowing a legitimate online store when she saw one, local mother Linda Jeffries defended her choice Monday to put her credit card number into a website with the URL virus.crime. “Well, let me guess, everyone is going to say I did something wrong,…

Read more...

30 Oct 17:47

Man Calls To Inform Previous Sexual Partners He’s Contracted The Curse Of The Pharaoh

WINSTON-SALEM, NC—His worst fears confirmed after an examination of his pubic region revealed a plague of genital locusts, area man Justin Frausto reportedly called several of his previous sexual partners Monday to inform them he had contracted the curse of the pharaoh. “Hey, Kaylie! Sorry for the bad news, but I…

Read more...

30 Oct 17:46

Israel Warns Gaza Still Harboring Hundreds Of Doctors

TEL AVIV—Explaining why they had continued airstrikes and launched a ground offensive in the Palestinian enclave, Israeli officials warned Monday that Gaza was still harboring hundreds of doctors. “It is repugnant to demand that Israel cease hostilities when there are still hundreds, if not thousands, of surgeons,…

Read more...

30 Oct 11:31

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Autocomplete

by Zach Weinersmith


Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
You catastrophic forgetter! You opaque box! You absolute Chinese room!


Today's News:

Nice book selection here on Barnes and Noble, with an especially good pick right at the bottom.