Shared posts

30 Aug 05:55

EFF Throttles Notorious Patent Used to Threaten Public Transit Systems

by Rebecca Jeschke
Big Win in the Patent Office Curtails Troll's Lawsuit Campaign

San Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has throttled a notorious patent used to wrongfully demand payment from cities and other municipalities that use tracking systems to tell transit passengers if their buses and trains are on time.

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has drastically narrowed the patent owned by ArrivalStar after EFF filed a formal request to reexamine the patent's legitimacy with the help of the Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic at Berkeley Law. The ArrivalStar patent had been used as the basis for dozens of lawsuits against entities like the state of California, the city of Cleveland, and the Illinois Commuter Rail.

"This is an important victory for municipalities across the country that were faced with a tough choice: fighting an expensive lawsuit, paying ArrivalStar's settlement demands, or abandoning a public service," said EFF Staff Attorney Julie Samuels, the Mark Cuban Chair to Eliminate Stupid Patents. "We're gratified the patent office recognized that you can't patent something as obvious, broad, and vague as 'tracking something and notifying customers about it.'"

ArrivalStar had claimed its patent was based on an invention from 1999 and argued that many transit-tracking systems – as well as some package-tracking services – were infringing. But EFF and the Samuelson Clinic were able to show that as far back as 1992, public technical reports described a "Smart Bus system" that used the same methods described in the ArrivalStar patent. In the patent office's ruling, all but two of the patent's claims were struck down, fundamentally undermining any future attempts from ArrivalStar to use this patent to sue over transit-tracking systems.

"The ArrivalStar patent is an example of the current chronic misuse of software patents," said Jason Schultz, EFF Fellow and Co-Director of the Samuelson Clinic. "When the patent office issues a bad patent, it gives patent trolls a dangerous weapon to use against both small and large businesses – and in the end, consumers get fewer choices and higher prices. Even though we were eventually able to disarm this threat, a lot of damage was done in the meantime, and there are still a lot of bad patents out there."

EFF is currently working to bust a dangerous patent that a Texas company is using to shake down podcasts and podcasters like How Stuff Works and Adam Carolla, in addition to smaller podcasters. You can learn more about EFF's efforts to fix America's patent system at https://defendinnovation.org.

For the full decision from the USPTO:
https://www.eff.org/document/arrivalstar-patent-decision-uspto

Contact:

Julie Samuels
   Staff Attorney and The Mark Cuban Chair to Eliminate Stupid Patents
   Electronic Frontier Foundation
   julie@eff.org


Share this: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google+ Share on Identi.ca Share on Diaspora  ||  Join EFF
30 Aug 05:48

German Parliament Says No More Software Patents

by Adi Kamdar and Adi Kamdar

The German Parliament recently took a huge step that would eliminate software patents (PDF) when it issued a joint motion requiring the German government to ensure that computer programs are only covered by copyright. Put differently, in Germany, software cannot be patented.

The Parliament's motion follows a similar announcement made by New Zealand's government last month (PDF), in which it determined that computer programs were not inventions or a manner of manufacture and, thus, cannot be patented.

This is a welcome trend. Though there have been many proposals to limit the harmful effects of patent trolls in the United States, the discussion has stayed away from addressing a larger, root issue: the flood of software patents. While many in the U.S. are bogged down in discussions of demarcation between what is software and what is not, the rest of the world is taking bold action.

The crux of the German Parliament's motion rests on the fact that software is already protected by copyright, and developers are afforded "exploitation rights." These rights, however, become confused when broad, abstract patents also cover general aspects of computer programs. These two intellectual property systems are at odds. The clearest example of this clash is with free software.

The motion recognizes this issue and therefore calls upon the government "to preserve the precedence of copyright law so that software developers can also publish their work under open source license terms and conditions with legal security." The free software movement relies upon the fact that software can be released under a copyright license that allows users to share it and build upon others' works. Patents, as Parliament finds, inhibit this fundamental spread.

Just like in the New Zealand order, the German Parliament carved out one type of software that could be patented, when:

the computer program serves merely as a replaceable equivalent for a mechanical or electro-mechanical component, as is the case, for instance, when software-based washing machine controls can replace an electromechanical program control unit consisting of revolving cylinders which activate the control circuits for the specific steps of the wash cycle

This allows for software that is tied to (and controls part of) another invention to be patented. In other words, if a claimed process is purely a computer program, then it is not patentable. (New Zealand's order uses a similar washing machine example.)

The motion ends by calling upon the German government to push for this approach to be standard across all of Europe. We hope policymakers in the United States will also consider fundamental reform that deals with the problems caused by low-quality software patents. Ultimately, any real reform must address this issue.

Related Issues: 

Share this: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google+ Share on Identi.ca Share on Diaspora  ||  Join EFF
20 Aug 05:37

What Temperature Should You Keep Your Refrigerator Set At?

by Tessa Miller

Have you noticed your milk getting frosty? Meat spoiling quickly? It’s likely your refrigerator is set to the wrong temperature. The FDA recommends keeping your refrigerator at or below 40° F (4° C), and your freezer at 0° F (-18° C) to keep your food fresh longest and prevent foodborne illnesses. Here are some more…

Read more...

20 Aug 05:35

Patent Infringement Suit Includes Linking URLs In an Email

by Soulskill
An anonymous reader points out a report at Groklaw about another new lawsuit from patent firm Intellectual Ventures against Motorola Mobility (they have an earlier patent suit against Motorola underway already). The suit seeks damages from alleged infringement of seven patents, most of which involve wireless communications and Motorola's use of Android. One of the patents, US5790793, is "A method and system for sending and receiving Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) in electronic mail over the Internet." Intellectual Ventures' complaint (PDF) says Motorola product that implement MMS violate this patent. PJ at Groklaw thinks this is another patent attack on Android: "And guess where IV got these patents? Not directly from the USPTO. I'll give you a big hint. Some of them, from what I'm seeing, are from working companies. Don't they call that privateering, when active companies outsource their patents to trolls to do their dirty work? Why yes. Yes, they do. Can you guess one company in this picture? Someone helping Microsoft in its anti-competitive attack on Android and Linux, you say? Yes, one of the companies that seems to have transferred two patents to IV for its holy quest is Nokia, Microsoft's 'partner in crime', as I like to think of them. I know. You are shocked, shocked to know that patents are being used anti-competitively in a court of law."

Share on Google+

Read more of this story at Slashdot.



22 Jul 06:04

An Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion

by Ken White

Recently former employees of Bank of America filed declarations in federal court asserting that the venerable bank had instructed them to lie to lull homeowners seeking mortgage adjustments. This, the ex-workers asserted, was systematic:

Employees, many of whom allege they were given no basic training on how to even use HAMP, were instructed to tell borrowers that documents were incomplete or missing when they were not, or that the file was “under review” when it hadn’t been accessed in months. Former loan-level representative Simone Gordon says flat-out in her affidavit that “we were told to lie to customers” about the receipt of documents and trial payments. She added that the bank would hold financial documents borrowers submitted for review for at least 30 days. “Once thirty days passed, Bank of America would consider many of these documents to be ‘stale’ and the homeowner would have to re-apply for a modification,” Gordon writes. Theresa Terrelonge, another ex-employee, said that the company would consistently tell homeowners to resubmit information, restarting the clock on the HAMP process.

Worse than this, Bank of America would simply throw out documents on a consistent basis. Former case management supervisor William Wilson alleged that, during bimonthly sessions called the “blitz,” case managers and underwriters would simply deny any file with financial documents that were more than 60 days old. “During a blitz, a single team would decline between 600 and 1,500 modification files at a time,” Wilson wrote. “I personally reviewed hundreds of files in which the computer systems showed that the homeowner had fulfilled a Trial Period Plan and was entitled to a permanent loan modification, but was nevertheless declined for a permanent modification during a blitz.”

Former employees say they were rewarded with bonuses and gift cards to Bed Bath & Beyond.

Surely we can count on the criminal justice system to address such allegations of fraud, yes? Our investigators and prosecutors will focus on what is important — what is meaningful — and invest scarce government resources accordingly.

Right?

Well, no. Prosecutions from the mortgage collapse and its aftermath are scarce. However, you can count on the criminal justice system to punish people for menacing the likes of Bank of America with children's chalk.

In San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, through Deputy City Attorney Paige Hazard, are prosecuting Jeff Olson for 13 counts of misdemeanor vandalism. Olson wrote slogans like "Stop big banks" and "Stop Bank Blight.com" in children's water-soluble chalk on sidewalks outside of Bank of America branches in San Diego.

Bank of America exercised its right to petition the government for redress of grievances (in this case, the grievance that someone was writing mildly critical things in children's chalk on their adjacent sidewalks) by repeatedly demanding that Olson be prosecuted:

"Any updates on this," Freeman wrote in an email to Miles and Deputy City Attorney Nicole Kukas obtained through a public records request.

Two minutes later, Kukas responded. "Thank you for checking in on this case. It is still under review. I will give you an update by the end of the week."

No update came. Ten days later, Freeman was back on the case.

"Any updates on a filing?"

"I appreciate your patience," wrote Officer Miles just three hours after Freeman's message. "I will forward this to the City Attorney."

Then on April 15, Deputy City Attorney Paige Hazard contacted Freeman with the good news. "I wanted to let you know that we will be filing 13 counts of vandalism as a result of the incidents you reported."

Deputy City Attorney Hazard, in further exercise of prosecutorial discretion, wants to be sure that the criminal trial of Mr. Olson focuses on his danger to the community and his defiance of the interests of the People of the State of California and the City of San Diego, and not on mere fillips and irrelevancies:

Judge Shore granted Hazard's motion to prohibit Olson's attorney Tom Tosdal from mentioning the First Amendment, free speech, free expression, public forum, expressive conduct, or political speech during the trial.

Hazard had explained to the court that Bank of America should not have to suffer the grave costs of chalk removal from its adjacent sidewalks. After all, is there no justice?

Circumventing the rules, without permission, under the color of night, and now waiving a banner of the First Amendment, does not negate the fact that defacement occurred, a private business suffered real and substantial monetary damages, and Defendant is responsible.

Money that Bank of America spends asking its janitors to hose down the sidewalk is money it can't use to buy Bed Bath & Beyond gift cards for its employees who are top performers at defrauding mortgagees.

As we frequently discuss here, prosecutors enjoy astoundingly broad discretion to determine how people are charged and punished, and for the most part face no consequences for their actions. We're told such discretion, and such protection, is a necessary and reasonable component of the criminal justice system, and that we can trust the good judgment and good faith of prosecutors.

Consider Jan Goldsmith and Paige Hazard, and their exercise of discretion. Aren't you filled with warm feelings of trust and confidence in our system?

An Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion © 2007-2013 by the authors of Popehat. This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. Using this feed on any other site is a copyright violation. No scraping.

22 Jul 05:50

A Look At The Charges Against Edward Snowden

by Ken White

Sunday, as I write this, there are some reports that NSA-whistleblower Edward Snowden is seeking asylum from Ecuador, and that Hong Kong had rejected as procedurally deficient the United States demand for his provisional arrest under our extradition treaty.

Friday someone released the complaint cover sheet reflecting federal charges against Snowden. The cover sheet just shows what he's charged with; the affidavit in support of the complaint — the statement of the probable cause allegedly supporting the charges — remains under seal. (I've described the role of a criminal complaint in the federal criminal justice system.) The complaint was obtained fairly hastily, probably to support a request that Hong Kong provisionally arrest Snowden in anticipation of a formal extradition request.

Snowden is charged with three federal crimes: theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful communication of classified communications information with an unauthorized party.

He's charged with theft of government property under Title 18, United States Code, section 641:

Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof; or
Whoever receives, conceals, or retains the same with intent to convert it to his use or gain, knowing it to have been embezzled, stolen, purloined or converted—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the value of such property in the aggregate, combining amounts from all the counts for which the defendant is convicted in a single case, does not exceed the sum of $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Here's how the government describes the elements of that offense — that is, the things the government must prove:

There are six elements to the crime of embezzlement, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 641. These are: (1) a trust or fiduciary relationship between the defendant and the property owner; (2) the property taken falls within the statute; i.e., it must be government property . . . ; (3) the property came into the possession or care of the defendant by virtue of his employment; (4) the property belonged to another, in this case the United States; (5) the defendant's dealings with the property constituted a fraudulent conversion or appropriation of it to his own use; and (6) the defendant acted with the intent to deprive the owner of the use of this property.

Snowden's charged with unauthorized communication of national defense information under Title 18, United States Code, section 793(d):

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

The elements of 18 USC 793(d) are as follows — the government must prove that the defendant:

(1) lawfully had possession of, access to, control over, or was entrusted with information relating to the national defense; (2) had reason to believe that such information could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation; (3) willfully communicated, delivered, transmitted, or caused to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted such information; and (4) did so to a person not entitled to receive it.

Finally, the feds have charged Snowden with willful communication of classified communications information with an unauthorized party in violation of Title 18, United States Code, section 798(a)(3), which provides:

Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—

(3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government;

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

I don't find any published cases articulating the elements of Section 798(a)(3). Based on the plain language of the statute, it seems to require the government to prove that the defendant (1) knowingly and willfully [that is, not accidentally] (2) communicated or made available to an unauthorized person, (3) in any manner prejudicial to the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States, (4) classified information concerning communication intelligence activities of the U.S. or any foreign government. (Some might disagree that element (3) modifies all the possible ways to violate the statute.)

Note that the second and third charges both require the feds to prove that Snowden's release of information to the press was harmful to the United States. This puts our government in the position of attempting to prove that it is harmful to release accurate information about how it is spying on us, and how it is misleading us about spying on us.

Espionage charges usually describe someone with classified information leaking that information to powers hostile to the United States government.

We, the people, are those hostile powers.

A Look At The Charges Against Edward Snowden © 2007-2013 by the authors of Popehat. This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. Using this feed on any other site is a copyright violation. No scraping.

09 Jul 03:49

YouTube Plans to Put an End to Buffering by July 4th

by David Pena

youtube

How frustrating is it when your are watching a funny YouTube video, or listening to a song on YouTube, and it all of a sudden stops? You are met with that dreaded spinning wheel, that makes you want to head butt your monitor. I know I hate it, and it seems to be steadily getting worse. YouTube has a solution for us though, and they plan on implementing this solution hopefully by July 4th.

In the video below, Team Leader of YouTube’s Engineering, John Harding, points out just what it takes for us constant Youtube watchers to playback the videos we choose to view. There are many steps to the process and really we are only concerned with two factors; clicking the thumbnail, and watching the video. So they plan on changing the process which I will allow Mr. Harding to tell you in the video below. Glad to see they are helping improve our YouTube lives.

Source: New Media Rockstars

07 Jul 17:26

Breathe new life into Nexus 7

by Brooks Barnard

By now, I’m sure you’re all familiar with Dustin’s thoughts on the Nexus 7. But there’s another side to the story. I, for one, really like my Nexus 7. Mine still performs admirably for a one-year-old device. In fact, I even bought my dad one for Father’s Day. As far as I’m concerned, the Nexus 7 is still the best bang for your buck in the 7-inch tablet market.

Dustin’s post left me with a few questions. For one, why is my tablet still working? And, have I made a huge mistake in buying one for my dad? Then it dawned on me: I have had similar issues with my Nexus 7. But I figured out a way to fix them.

Boot and Root

Modding devices is a hobby of mine. I unlock the bootloader and root my devices from day one. It’s how I best enjoy the Android experience. For me, this has cleared up a lot of the issues other users have had with the Nexus 7. It’s unfortunate that the Nexus 7 has undergone a drop in performance in its stock state. Rooting may be an option for those of you who are unsatisfied with your device.

As always, we advise you to exercise caution when rooting your device. The process will void any warranty the device may still be under. (However, early adopters of the Nexus 7 are likely no longer covered, so what the hey).

In general, the Nexus 7 is very modding friendly. If you would like to try rooting your Nexus 7, I strongly recommend WugFresh’s Nexus root toolkit. The toolkit includes a step-by-step guide (which you should read before starting). It will walk you through each step of the bootloader unlock and root process. If you don’t like what you’ve done, the toolkit can also help you return your Nexus 7 to stock.

Please note that unlocking the boot loader will completely wipe your device. You will need to use an app like Helium to backup your data prior to rooting your Nexus 7.

LagFix (fstrim)

Note: This app DOES require rooting.

This suggestion comes to us from our readers! LagFix is an app available in the Google Play Store that aims to correct lag issues with the Nexus 7. According to the developer, “The source of the [Nexus 7 lag] problem is that internal storage is not trimmed when needed.” (You can find more information on XDA).

Custom Kernels

Note: This method DOES require rooting.

Back in February, around the time of the Android 4.2.2 release, I remember experiencing uncharacteristic lag with my Nexus 7. To fix this, I explored using a custom kernel.

In your day-to-day, you never directly interact with the kernel, but it’s extremely important to how your device operates. As Faux123, a popular kernel developer, eloquently puts it, “The kernel is the foundation in which everything else builds upon in any software system. The kernel is like the engine, electrical system and transmission of a car. The library, framework and apps are the body frame.”

Custom Kernels

Using custom kernels allows you to tweak your device in a variety of ways. You can overclock it, undervolt it, adjust sound and color settings. There’s tons of stuff you can change and break!

But, if you’re willing to try, there are a few highly recommended custom kernels for the Nexus 7 running Android 4.2. Franco.kernel has come highly recommended to me and is one I think is very easy to implement.  A free app is available from the Play Store that allows you to directly download the latest version of the kernel.  You can even flash it right there from the app without having to boot into your custom recovery.


The paid version of Franco.Kernel adds a nice user interface that aids in carrying out an unbelievable number of modifications within the app, without having to edit any code. If you’re not into overclocking or undervolting, the the free app should fully meet your needs.

I’ve been running CM10.1 with Franco.Kernel since February and haven’t looked back. My Nexus 7 may not be as snappy as the Nexus 4 or recently released flagship devices, but I have no complaints.

Franco.Kernel isn’t your only hope. The Nexus 7 has a huge development community behind it, so that means options. Dig around a little bit and see what kernel might be right for you. Make sure you backup your device prior to flashing a kernel in case you don’t like the end result. Don’t let modding stress you out; just have fun with it!

But I Don’t Want to Root!

Although rooting the device seems to have vastly improved my experience with the Nexus 7, some make the argument that you shouldn’t have to modify a device to enjoy it to its full potential. I hear you loud and clear, and I agree. In addition to a factory reset, there’s one more non-root method you can try.

Cleaning House

This method has made a difference for our very own Dima, new to Android And Me from DroidDog. Some users who are able to free up at least 3 GB of storage on the Nexus 7 have reported better performance from their devices. This may be attributed to ASUS using sub-par RAM in the device.

Obviously, this method is not ideal for owners of the original 8 GB Nexus 7. That device comes stock with just a smidge over 5 GB of available space as is. But, it may be worth a try if there’s a chance to breathe new life into your Nexus 7 without rooting.

Cleaning House

There’s no one trick that will rectify the issues you may be facing. This method did not work for Dustin, even after a factory reset, and is met with skepticism in many corners of the webisphere.

Hopefully Google gets it together and solves the issues that have been plaguing Nexus 7 owners. Because those of you who don’t want to root are right; you shouldn’t have to root a device to enjoy it. We loved it when it came out a year ago, and it still has some pretty respectable hardware under the hood. It should still be able to deliver. Maybe Android 4.3 will bring the optimizations we’re looking for.

Let us know your thoughts. Is it finally time to root your Nexus 7? Have you tried any of the methods mentioned here? How did they work out for you? Any other suggestions for Nexus 7 owners hoping to revitalize their device?

05 Jul 20:51

Don’t bet your life on averages

by MAC

How many times have you heard someone say, “the average gunfight only lasts 3-5 rounds” as justification for carrying a revolver or an automatic pistol that doesn’t have a double stacked higher capacity magazine?  Some will go even further down the road to absurdity by saying things like “typically the mere presence of a firearm will end a confrontation without a shot being fired” to further justify low capacity defensive arms.

Sub-compacts are comfortable for carry but they hold only a fraction of the rounds a larger service sized handgun holds.

Sub-compacts are comfortable for carry but they hold only a fraction of the rounds a larger service sized handgun holds.

You’ll also get the occasional contributor to the discussion that believes one hit with a .45 ACP is greater than 17 hits with a 9mm.  The .45, in their view, is capable of killing by striking a bad guy anywhere in the body with a single hit, it doesn’t matter if it’s the knee or the big toe — they’re gonners if they take a round of .45!

Let me address these two points individually then give you an example of why both trains of thought are not only flawed, but can potentially be fatal for you.

Averages are just that, an average taken from a sample set of data (rarely all inclusive) and then a middle ground is found through simple addition and division.  Let’s say in an average gunfight only 3 rounds are typically fired.  Some will take this to mean they only need 3 rounds in their defensive gun, so if they have 5 or 6 rounds they have twice as many as they’ll likely need.  That means a 5 shot XDs 45 or a 5 shot S&W Model 60 is ample firepower.  But is it really?

There’s one major flaw in this logic.  While it may be true the average gunfight only requires you to fire 3 rounds, there were a number of gunfights buried in that statistic that went well over 3 rounds fired. Some will have required 15 or more rounds to be fired before the exchange ended.  Sure, they weren’t all that common given the low 3 round average, but they did occur.

When has it ever been a good idea to base your level of preparedness on minimum standards?  In most other areas of life people rarely want to rely on preparing based on minimum requirements.  When you gas your vehicle up, do you only put in 1.5 gallons of gas because on average that’s all you need for your typical jaunt to Costco, or do you fill the tank up just in case?  And to think, if you run out of gas the worst that will happen is you’ll be stuck walking in the summer heat looking for some fuel to get home.  If you come up just one round short in a gunfight, the downside is not living to see the next sunrise.

The G-Code INCOG holster gives you the ability to tuck both your carry gun and a spare magazine inside your waistband.

The G-Code INCOG holster gives you the ability to tuck both your carry gun and a spare magazine inside your waistband.

Now, for those of you who think the .45 ACP is a death-ray and 1 round of .45 is better than 17 rounds of 9mm, you’ll want to read the following article very carefully.  Note that the officer was carrying a G21 (.45 ACP) and the bad guy soaked up 14 rounds including a hit to the heart, right lung, left lung, liver, diaphragm and right kidney and he was still alive and fighting until taking multiple head shots.  Well, even after taking multiple head shots he was still alive and made it to the ER where he later expired.

This chilling story told by Sergeant Timothy Gramins of the Skokie, IL Police Department should be a lesson to us all.

If you take Officer Gramins story and roll it into the national average you would likely still come up with an average of 3-5 rounds fired in a typical gunfight.  Do you see the problem with basing your survival strategy on minimum standards derived from statistical averages?  If you don’t, please read the article again.

Where Officer Gramins once carried a .45 and 47 rounds of ammo he now carries a 9mm and 145 rounds of ammo.  Sure, 145 rounds may be a little excessive, but it’s better to have and not need than to not have and want.

If you’re like me, you probably have more than one sub-compact carry gun that you regularly use.  In my case I carry either a Shield or a XDs 9mm in my daily summer travels.  I’ll be honest, often times I leave the house with only the 7+1 rounds my little pistols afford me.  I usually prefer to carry a G19 with 15+1 rounds, but in the summer the little sub-compacts have their appeal.  Going forward I plan to carry at least one spare magazine for my carry gun with me, if not two or more when possible.

That’s one of the reasons I’ve been looking at the Haley Strategic INCOG holster made by G-Code. It gives me the ability to tuck my carry gun and one spare mag inside my waist band for maximum concealment.  Look for a full review of a couple different INCOG holsters in the near future.

Our own Matt, who is a Sheriff, has a similar story.  I don’t think Matt has talked about this with you guys yet, but he too was involved in a shooting.  At the time of the shooting he only carried 25 rounds of .45 ACP on his belt and a S&W J-Frame .38 backup.  After his shooting and considering the consequences of running out of ammo, he switched to a 9mm service weapon and 70 rounds of ammo.  He also now carries a 30 round PMAG of 5.56 on his duty belt and a G26 back-up.

The moral to this story is two fold.  First, don’t base your self defense strategy on minimum statistical data.  Plan for the worst and hope for the best, your life may depend on it.  Secondly, if you still believe the .45 ACP is a death-ray, please re-read this story.

05 Jul 20:31

You Just Used Your Gun In Self-Defense…

by Matt

What You Can Likely Expect To Happen Next When The Cops Arrive


Disclaimer: since someone felt the need to mention this previously, I am not a lawyer, do not pretend to be a lawyer, nor do I care much for lawyers as a group as they tend to complicate simple matters (no offense intended toward any hat wearing urban gun enthusiast lawyers…). Nothing that follows should remotely be taken as “legal advice”.


So, that dreaded moment of truth comes, the one we all prepare for and most of us hope never comes, and you have to employ a firearm in self-defense or defense of another. The act of doing so, and the results of your actions, affects everyone differently. I’m not going to delve into all 31VprKQNSxLthe physical and emotional things you will go through after a shooting. There are many good sources for that information, my favorite being the book “On Killing” by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman*. The one thing that all defensive shootings will have in common is you, the shooter, having to talk to the cops about what happened.

The arrival of the cops after an incident where someone has had to employ their firearm will likely evoke a few emotions, both thankfulness that someone is there to help, and fear that your actions will be scrutinized. And I’m not going to lie to you; your actions will be very closely scrutinized, and not just by the cops, but also by criminal lawyers and civil lawyers and many other Monday morning quarterbacks like the media.

Before it gets to that point, the important part after surviving the gunfight is how you deal with the cops who respond. I cannot begin to pretend to know how every agency in every jurisdiction with all the various state and local laws will handle a situation like this, but I can tell you from personal experience, how my department and my coworkers have handled these situations.

First and foremost, when the cops arrive, make sure you are NOT holding a gun in your hands. Cops are just like everyone else, and when they see someone they don’t know holding a gun at the scene of a gunfight, they are going to get nervous. If your firearm is a long gun, ground it. If you have a holster for your handgun, make sure it is in it, otherwise ground it. Identify yourself as the caller/the homeowner/the victim, whatever is appropriate for your situation, and it cannot hurt to have your hands in the air.

The quality of the information the cops were given to got them there (a 911 call usually) will also determine how they approach you. If some stranger called that has no knowledge of you or the situation, you will likely be detained and handcuffed as they begin their investigation. If you or a friend, neighbor or someone with knowledge of what is going on made the call, you may get to skip the whole fun-with-handcuffs situation, but don’t count on it. Either way, you should not freak out when that happens, nor should you assume you are going to jail. The first step cops need to take when arriving at a scene of a shooting, defensive or otherwise, is to make the scene safe which usually starts by detaining whoever was doing the shooting.

You should expect the cops to at least temporarily take control of your gun. What happens to it later will obviously depend on the outcome of the situation. If shots were fired, but no one was hit, you may end up keeping your gun, but if you actually shot someone, you can count on that gun being unavailable for some time as it is now evidence in criminal case. If the person you shot dies as a result, your shooting will be determined a homicide (a legitimate self-defense shooting is still a homicide, but it is classified as a justifiable homicide) and getting your gun back will take even longer.

self-defense-with-gunThat said, if the cops ask you if they can take your gun, it is perfectly acceptable to tell them no. I was at a scene where a homeowner fired 1 round at a man breaking into his home. That man happened to be running from the cops at the time and as such, there were multiple cops in the area. The suspect was apprehended unharmed, and the homeowner who fired the round was contacted. His gun was unloaded and secured while we investigated what happened. In the end, it was determined that the shooting was legally justified, yet for some inexplicable reason, our lieutenant, who was otherwise a very squared away guy, wanted us to temporarily confiscate the man’s handgun. My partner and I tried to convince our Lt. otherwise but he was not going for it. We made sure to point out that we did not have legal cause to take it forcefully, so he instructed us to ask if we could keep it for safe keeping. The conversation went something like this: “We realize you just used your handgun for the very reason you purchased it, and you were perfectly justified in doing so. As such, we cannot take your weapon from you nor would we want to. That said, my boss wants me to ask you if you would like us to hold onto your gun for safe keeping. You are in no way obliged to do so (wink, wink, nod, nod).” Not so shockingly, he opted to keep his gun. Just remember, if the cops are asking you if they can take your gun, it is because they cannot legally justify taking it without your consent. Whether or not you allow them to is entirely up to you.

No matter the results of your shooting (someone shot or not), be sure you can justify your actions. As all states have different laws, and as such I cannot speak to specifics for every locale, but in the state in which I work, in order for a shooting to be justified, you (the shooter) have to be in fear for your life or the life of another, and that fear needs to be reasonable. I know other states differ on what justifies a defensive shooting. Make sure you know your state laws, and make sure you are able to carefully articulate your fears or justification when talking to the cops about the shooting.

As always, your questions and comments are welcome. Be safe out there.
Matt

* Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, a leading expert in self-defense and a Pulitzer Prize nominated author, has long done his “Bulletproof Mind” seminar for military and law enforcement personnel. It is a phenomenal seminar talking about self defense, defense against terrorism and what to expect from your mind and body after you have been involved in a life and death shooting. Absolutely,without a doubt, the best presentation like this that I have ever attended! He now offers much the same content, but directed at civilians, and is starting a tour soon. If you can, you should attend because mental preparation is just as important to surviving the gun fight as physical preparation is. For dates and locations, see sheepdogseminars.com

05 Jul 18:18

The Faulty Logic of Magazine Capacity Limits

by Matt

“High capacity” magazines are another arrow in the anti-gunners quiver of false arguments.

First, let me clarify, what they are trying to ban are not really “high capacity” magazines, they are standard capacity.  When a gun is designed to accept a detachable magazine, it is designed in a manner to accept a magazine capable of holding a certain number of rounds. Just because that number is higher than the number of digits one has on their hands does not make it “high capacity”. Secondly, the capacity of the magazine has absolutely nothing to do with the lethality of a firearm.  The lethality of a firearm is determined by the caliber of the weapon and the ballistics that results from the combination of the ammunition used and the barrel length; not by the number of bullets the gun has in it.

David Gregory breaking the law holding a banned 30 round AR mag

David Gregory breaking the law holding a banned 30 round AR mag

As a gun owner, a husband, a father, a citizen, a cop, and a gunfight survivor, I have to ask myself a few questions.  Where does this magic number of 10 bullets, or 7 in the case of New York, come from?  What gunfight/firearms/combat expert provided that number, and what was their basis for determining that number?  What makes the gun control crowd think that limiting magazine capacity to 10 bullets will have any effect of mass shootings? What is the logical basis for that argument? If a network reporter (David Gregory) can so easily break a “high capacity” magazine ban law on national television, what makes anyone even dream that it will stop someone with evil intentions?

For a well-trained shooter, it takes about a second or less to perform a magazine change and get back on target. For sake of argument, if I were someone intent of committing a mass shooting, and let’s say I limited myself to only the “magically less lethal 10 round magazines”, I am still going to bring as many magazines as I can carry so that I can continue my rampage as long as possible. During those 1-2 second intervals when I, the assailant, am changing magazines, are the victims of the assault supposed to rush me, the attacker? Or are they supposed to flee the scene? That short time frame is not sufficient for even a professional athlete to make a difference, let alone an average citizen who is soiling their drawers during what is likely the scariest thing they have ever encountered.

Sheriff Ken Campbell from Boone County, IN released an excellent video back on February 23, 2013 where he had shooters of various skill levels assist him in debunking the ridiculousness of magazine capacity limits, specifically addressing reload times and the “a good person could tackle the suspect” theories thrown around by the logic-lacking antis.

Will 10 round magazines stem the tide? No, and there is absolutely no evidence to even suggest it would. But what that limit will do is render a lawful, concealed carry (CCW) holder less able to defend themselves or others from an armed assault. See, while the person intent on perpetrating an attack has all the time in the world to prepare and gear up, because they know when they are going to strike, the CCW holder likely only has their sidearm because they are prepared for the what if, not prepared for battle like the armed attacker is. Why would you limit the good guy to 10 rounds to try and stop the bad guy who is going to be armed to the teeth?

That 10 round limit, or 7 for the unfortunate folks in New York, is completely ridiculous, and was clearly determined by someone who has never been in a gunfight. Unlike in Hollywood, when people are moving and shooting at you, and killing people around you, you tend not to be the most accurate shooter in the world and you might possibly miss a round or two. Additionally, unlike Hollywood, when a bad guy gets shot, they do not fly back 20 feet and become instantly incapacitated. Real bad guys have been known to soak up over a dozen rounds and live, and in some cases, continue to fight even though they are mortally wounded.

A recent incident in Georgia (January 4, 2013) is the perfect example of the stupidity of artificial magazine capacity limits. A mother saw an intruder breaking into her home, called 9-1-1, grabbed her gun and her 2 sons and retreated to a hiding area, and waited for the cops to arrive. The intruder broke into her home and began searching it. When he found the woman and her two sons hiding, she shot him 5 times from a few feet away, emptying her revolver. That intruder, who was shot 5 times in the face, neck and torso, got up, went back to his car and managed to drive away. Thankfully, considering her gun was now empty, once the intruder was shot, he decided to retreat. Thankfully there was not a second intruder. Townhall article about this incident.

In another, real life example of why someone needs more than 10 bullets in their gun, in August 2008, police Sergeant Timothy Grammins was involved in a shootout with a bank robber.  During the 56 second shootout, Grammins fired 33 rounds from his Glock 21 (.45 ACP), leaving him with only 4 rounds left in his last magazine at the end of the battle.  “At the core of his desperate firefight was a murderous attacker who simply would not go down, even though he was shot 14 times with .45-cal. ammunition — six of those hits in supposedly fatal locations.”  – Police One article “Why one cop carries 145 rounds of ammo on the job”

In fact, in the land of the banned “assault rifle” and the long standing 10 round magazine*, that law has routinely failed to prevent criminals from obtaining magazines exceeding that artificially imposed 10 round limit.  The most recent, excellent example of the inefficacy of that law is the June 7, 2013 shooting spree in Santa Monica, CA.  In that incident, the shooter, who was only 4 years old when “high capacity” magazines were last legally available in CA, had well over ten 30 round mags for his AR-15.

All of these incidents reinforce something that is so intrinsically basic to gun owners, it is difficult for us to see how others fail to grasp a few basic realities:
- Real world gun fights often require more than 10 rounds
- Gun laws only affect law abiding citizens
- Artificial magazine capacity limits are just like all the other gun laws, and only affect law abiding citizens
- Artificially limiting the good guys to only 10 rounds just aids the bad guys who don’t obey the laws

As always, your questions and comments are welcome.  Be safe out there.
Matt


* Magazines exceeding 10 round capacity have not been for sale in CA since 1994, when they were banned federally.  That federal law later expired in 2004, but California also has a state law that has been in effect since 2000 banning magazines over 10 rounds.

03 Jul 14:41

Garmin introduces Monterra; An Android powered GPS handheld

by Asad Rafi

It has been a long time since we saw anything from Garmin; one of the leading providers of GPS equipments in the world. Today, they officially broke the streak by introducing Garmin Monterra, an Android powered handheld GPS handheld device. It has all the functions of a smartphone, the only thing missing is a cell radio.

monterra

It’s a rugged GPS device, featuring specs like 4 inch touchscreen display, 8MP camera with an LED flash which you can use to shoot 1080p video with geo-tagged information, WiFi, Bluetooth, 6GB of storage with a microSD card slot, NFC, 3-axis compass, barometric altimeter, UV sensor, and as well as FM Radio. Last but not least, it has a GPS and GLONASS receiver, also it receives weather alerts from NOAA.

One of the most exciting features of the Garmin Monterra is that it can run on AA batteries as well, or you can just use the included Li-ion battery pack. With IPX7 waterproof rating, this phone can easily face any hard situation easily.

But hold your horses, as the price tag might shake you a bit. Garmin says that it will be available within next few months for $650, so this high-end GPS will cost you an arm or a leg. Anyway, are you a professional hiker or a traveler? Would you prefer buying one? Tell us about it in the comment box below.

VIA: AndroidPolice

The post Garmin introduces Monterra; An Android powered GPS handheld appeared first on AndroidGuys.

29 Jun 00:48

DIY Tip: Jack up your tablet’s volume with a Styrofoam cup

by Julie

icup

Gadgeteer reader Gary Henderson sent in a great tip for anyone who wants to increase the volume on their tablet without spending money on portable speakers or other accessories. All you need is a simple paper, plastic or Styrofoam cup and a pair of scissors or a knife. Cut a slot in the cup and then slide it over the speaker area of your device. Gary made it for his iPad, but it should work with most tablets depending on the location of the speakers. It works by the same principle that other non-powered sound amplifiers like the SoundBender, iPad Horn and the ElementCase Vapor Dock use. Gary’s “device” might not be pretty, but it’s practically free, so what more do you want? :)

Do you have a tip? Send it in and we might share it with your fellow Gadgeteer readers.

Tagged as: Speaker



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Affiliate software for Amazon Store websites | Android Forums | Wordpress Tutorials
25 Jun 06:27

How to Send the Contents of the Clipboard to a Text File via the Send to Menu

by Jason Faulkner

image

We have previously covered how to send the contents of a text file to the Windows Clipboard with a simple Sent To shortcut, but what if you want to do the opposite? That is: send the contents of the clipboard to a text file with a simple shortcut.

No problem. Here’s how.

Copy the ClipOut Utility

While Windows offers the command line tool ‘clip’ as a way to direct console output to the clipboard, it does not have a tool to direct the clipboard contents to the console. To do this, we are going to use a small utility named ClipOut (download link at the bottom).

Simply download and extract this file to a location in your Windows PATH variable (if you don’t know what this means, just extract the EXE to your C:\Windows folder) and you are ready to go.

Add the Send To Shortcut

Open your Send To folder location by going to Run > shell:sendto

Create a new shortcut with the command:

CMD /C ClipOut >

Note the above command will overwrite the contents of the selected file. If you would like to append to the contents of the selected file, use this command instead:

CMD /C ClipOut >>

Of course, you could make shortcuts for both.

image

Give a descriptive name to the shortcut.

image

You’re finished. Using this shortcut will now send the text contents copied to your Windows Clipboard to the selected file.

It is important to note that the ClipOut tool only supports outputting text. If you had binary data copied to your clipboard then the output would be empty.

Changing the Icon

By default, the icon for the shortcut will appear as a command prompt, but you can easily change this by editing the properties of the shortcut and clicking the Change Icon button. We used an icon located in “%SystemRoot%\System32\shell32.dll”, but any icon of your liking will do.

image

As an additional tweak, you can set the properties of the shortcut to run minimized. This will prevent the command window from “blinking” when the send to command is run (instead it will blink in your taskbar which is hardly noticeable).

image

Links

Download ClipOut Utility

    


25 Jun 06:22

Your Answers to Security Questions Should Be Random, Too

by noreply@blogger.com (Amber Gott)
At LastPass, we often reiterate the need for randomly generated passwords in order to increase your online security. A feature that often gets overlooked are the security questions that your sites and services may have you fill out as you register.

In theory, security questions are slightly more obscure, but still personalized questions that you create answers for, that will later be of help if you need to "prove" your identity when recovering access to an account or contacting a customer support team. However, the questions can create a security loophole. On top of the increased risk, if you're using a password manager to store your passwords, there's no reason you should have to go through the recovery process.

That's why we recommend "generating" your answers to your security questions, or creating falsified answers that you can then securely store in LastPass for reference. This ensures that security questions cannot be used against you should someone try to gain unauthorized access to one of your accounts - this is how Sarah Palin's email was hacked, and how other individuals have fallen victim to violations of their personal privacy.

It's easy to get started with random security answers when you're registering for a new site. When you're presented with a question, simply click the LastPass icon in your browser and select the "generate a secure password" option. You can click the "advanced options" box to customize the characters, and even make the password pronounceable:

You can then use the "copy" option to copy-paste the password into the answer field for the question, and submit the information on the site. Once you've saved that site to LastPass, ensure you've also pasted the generated password into the "notes" field in the edit menu for the site entry, indicating that it's the security answer for your account.
If you know you're using personal information for security answers, set aside some time to login to those accounts, generate a new "answer" with LastPass, and store the update in your site entry. Accounts for online banking, email, social media, and credit cards are all good places to start.


Have a question you'd like to see answered by the LastPass team in a blog post? Let us know in comments or send us a note at marketing[at]lastpass.com. If we choose your question, you'll get a Tshirt!
25 Jun 02:39

Google+ Hangouts Phone Calls for Desktop

by Mingo Allen II

google+ hangouts phone calls

 

We have all been there at one point or another. Your phone rings, but laziness overtakes you. You wish that there was a way for you to answer your phone without having to get up and drag yourself to go and get it. What if… What if there was a way for you to have your cake and eat it too?

I was in that exact situation 24 hours ago. I hear my phone ringing, and I know it’s a very close friend of mine who’s call I wouldn’t miss for the world, but in that moment laziness decides to be a dominatrix and strap me down to my comfortable chair. When I thought all hope was lost, my Macbook Pro started ringing, and I got a notification in the top right hand corner alerting me of the call, and it asked me if I wanted to answer. Figuring that Google+ Hangouts was meant for video chat, I broke loose of the bond to my chair and went to get answer the phone call.

The next day, it happened every time my parents called without fail. Therefore, about two hours ago, I sought to investigate the mystery of the Google+ Hangouts phone call. This is what I got:

 

Now unfortunately, because of the fact that the two speakers so close together caused this insatiable, high pitched whining noise, I had to remove the actual audio and add catchy electronic music instead. I held up the phone to show you that I was in fact making a call and was able to answer with my computer.

So if you want to try it out, the set up is simple. First, go to the Google+ Hangouts Plugin Page and download it for your respective OS. Then, download the Google+ Hangouts Desktop Chat Plugin as well. Finally, install Google+ Hangouts to your Android device. One last thing I want to note is that I also have my number set up with Google Voice, but seeing as how I haven’t used it in a while and it is currently not set up on my phone, I don’t thing that plays a part in the functionality of this feature.

What’s my take on it? On one end, I could be Johnny-come-lately about this and could be overly excited. Conversely, Google has been talking about SMS support for Hangouts sooner or later, and maybe this is one of those things deeply engraved in code that wasn’t disabled either by accident, or just to tease those who manage to find out how to use it. Nonetheless, it is cool, and it is well worth trying out, especially since everything you are using is Google derived.

So are you going to start making calls from your computer? Let us know in the comments below

22 Jun 04:24

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

by Alan Henry

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Dear Lifehacker,
Every time I go to the pharmacy, I'm confused. What's the difference between something like Tylenol and Advil? When should I use each one? What about sleep aids or cough medicines? Are generics okay, or should I spring for the brand name instead?

Sincerely,
Brand Skeptic

Dear Brand Skeptic,
The names and ingredients in common over-the-counter pain relievers and cold remedies can be confusing, so we don't blame you for asking. To break down the language and figure out whether there are any real differences between brand names and generics, we sat down with Dr. Daniel Weiswasser, a board-certified internist and pediatrician who's been in outpatient practice in Western Massachusetts for nine years. He's seen the brand names and the generics in action, and offered his expertise to the subject.

Which Pain Reliever Should I Use, and When?

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Although many people have their own method of choosing what pain reliever to take when, there's no cheat sheet for "use ibuprofen for x and y symptoms, and use acetaminophen or a and b symptoms." The real answer is that the most popular pain relievers are so similar that it doesn't matter, as long as you're using something that doesn't react badly with medication you're taking, affect a condition you already have (like high blood pressure or liver disease), and as long as you don't take too much.

The most popular pain relievers boil down to two families: ibuprofen/naproxen and acetaminophen. We'll get into each one in a moment, but both have their own pros and cons. In most cases, a doctor will tell you to try ibuprofen first (or naproxen if you want something longer lasting), and if there's an issue with it or there's a specific reason you should take acetaminophen, take that instead. Here's why.

Common Pain Medications and Their Brand Names

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

When you hit the grocery store to pick up something to soothe a throbbing headache or pulled muscle, you have tons of options. You might have a favorite, but if you're confused by terms like naproxen sodium or acetaminophen, here's a quick rundown of the most popular painkillers and their branded names. Obviously, these basics will help, but if you have any questions about which medication is right for you, don't hesitate to ask a medical professional who can assess your individual situation.

Aspirin

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Aspirin, also known as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), is widely available as a generic (sometimes called ASA, other times just Aspirin), and the active ingredient in brand names like Bayer, Ecotrin, Fasprin, and Anacin (Aspirin with caffeine added). It used to be popular for aches and pains, but as Dr. Weiswasser notes, Aspirin is rarely used for that at all anymore, in favor or more modern pain relievers:

I would point out that aspirin is typically not used for pain relief anymore; it's used more typically for its platelet inhibition, which leads to thinning of the blood, which is thought to reduce the risk of heart attacks in those who have had heart attacks already in the past (also known as "secondary prevention"). While many use aspirin to prevent heart attacks in the first place ("primary prevention"), there is some new data that aspirin increases the risk of a certain eye disease, macular degeneration, so the use of it for primary prevention is being called into question. (See this study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Internal Medicine) There's also some recent data suggesting that routine aspirin use reduces the risk of some solid cancers, like colon cancer. (See this study in The Lancet.)

Ibuprofen

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Ibuprofen is an NSAID (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug) pain reliever, is generally considered the best and most accessible for most day-to-day aches and pains. It's also used to bring down a fever. It's also an anti-inflammatory, meaning it reduces swelling. It too is widely sold as a generic just called "ibuprofen," but it's also the active ingredient in Advil, Motrin, Midol, Nurofen, Nufren, Caldolor, NeoProfen, Ibu and the original, Brufen. Most doses usually last 4-6 hours.

Ibuprofen (and really, any NSAID pain reliever) is not without side effects though. Dr. Weiswasser explains:

NSAID side effects include stomach upset and ulcers. Like their cousin, aspirin, they also inhibit platelet action, although to a lesser degree. They interfere with the cardioprotective effect of aspirin, may exacerbate heart failure, and may raise blood pressure. They can also worsen kidney disease.

Naproxen

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Naproxen is, by comparison, new to the party. It's available as a generic (Naproxen Sodium), but depending on where you live, it might be prescription-only. You may know it as Aleve, Anaprox, Antalgin, Apranax, Feminax Ultra, Flanax, Inza, Midol Extended Relief, Nalgesin, Naposin, Naprelan, Naprogesic, or Naprosyn. It's an NSAID, like ibuprofen, what means it offers the benefits (and risks) that ibuprofen does. The major difference though is that it lasts much longer. Dr. Weiswasser explains:

Without getting too technical, the only real difference between ibuprofen and naproxen is that naproxen has a longer half-life, i.e. it lasts longer. Specifically, naproxen's analgesic effects last about 7 hours whereas ibuprofen's are about 4-6 hours. The advice is typically that ibuprofen be taken no more than every 6 hours and naproxen no more than every 8-12 hours.

So, if you need long-lasting pain relief, or don't want to pop ibuprofen every 6-8 hours, try naproxen.

Acetaminophen (Paracetamol)

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Acetaminophen is a mild pain reliever, used for more minor aches and pains, and as a pain reliever in combination with other drugs. It's available as a generic under its own name, and is the active ingredient in brand names like Tylenol, Panadol, Anacin-3 (or Anacin Aspirin Free), Acamol, Tempra, Datril, Feverall, and Ofirmev, among others. You'll also find it in cough and cold remedies, used to soothe aches and pains while you get over a bad cough or runny nose.

It's not an NSAID, so while it has similar pain relieving properties, it doesn't have anti-swelling properties, although it is often used to bring down a fever. However, Dr. Weiswasser reminded us that acetaminophen overuse is the most common cause of acute liver failure in the United States, and it's important never to exceed the recommended dose. People who drink or have liver problems should avoid it entirely.

In general, Acetaminophen is ideal for people who don't need anti-swelling, who want to avoid the side effects of NSAIDs, or for whom NSAIDs don't work as well.

Combination Drugs (Like Excedrin)

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Combination or cocktail drugs that contain a combination of caffeine, acetaminophen, and aspirin (or alternatively, caffeine, acetaminophen, and ibuprofen) are often marketed as relief from migraines and tension headaches. Excedrin, one brand name of the type, is a combination of caffeine, acetaminophen, and aspirin. Generic "migraine medications" sold over the counter offer similar combinations, and when we asked Dr. Weiswasser about them, he noted that there's nothing about Excedrin or any other cocktail brand that's special that you couldn't make at home with the appropriate combination doses of their component pain relievers along with a strong cup of coffee.

That said, there's something to paying for the convenience of a pill, especially if you already have a headache and the last thing you want to do is the math to make sure you're not taking too much of any one component drug. Keep in mind however that because these combination drugs contain acetaminophen, aspirin, and/or ibuprofen, they come with the side effects and risks of each when taken improperly. Always follow the instructions on the label, and see a medical professional if you're tempted to do otherwise.

Generic vs. Brand Name Drugs

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

So now that you know what you want, which brand should you buy? That's pretty easy: Since all of these are available as generics, there's no reason to buy marketed brand names over their more affordable generics. Some brand names offer different tablet styles, like liqui-gels or gel-capsules (which can be absorbed more rapidly than tablets), and others coat their pills with sugar, add caffeine, or add other inactive ingredients. You'll have to decide whether those features are worth your money. As for the active ingredients, there's no difference between brand name and generic. We'd say save your money.

What About Other Over-the-Counter Medicines?

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Sleep Aids

Sleep aids can be even more confusing than pain relievers, mostly because their active ingredients are harder to say, more mysterious, and the generic versions are rarely marketed with their actual pharmacological names. The language barrier makes this a tricky issue, because people who would never buy brand name ibuprofen will make sure to pick up ZZZQuil over anything else, or swear by Unisom to help them fall asleep. There are two major groups of over-the-counter sleep aids:

  • Diphenhydramine, a strong sedating antihistamine, or in other words the ingredient in Benadryl or ZZZQuil that tends to make you so sleepy. It's still an antihistamine though, which also makes it an active ingredient in many allergy medications. You'll find this marketed as a sleep medication as a generic (but you'll have to flip over the package to see it), and as the active ingredient in ZZZQuil, Unisom, and Sominex.
  • Doxylamine is another antihistiamine. It's a short term sedative, and while diphenhydramine is the active ingredient in ZZZQuil, it's actually doxylamine that's in the original NyQuil. It's also available as a generic, sometimes side by side with diphenhydramine. It's even more confusing because Unisom uses doxylamine as an active ingredient in one formulation, but not the other. You could go to the pharmacy right now and find both, side by side on the same shelf, both labeled "Unisom." They may be different colors or in slightly different packages, but they'll be there.

Both medications can help you get to sleep, but to say they "treat insomnia" is a stretch. Dr. Weiswasser explains, and offers some alternatives:

According to most research, diphenhydramine does not improve insomnia, and it may cause sedation the next day (due to its long half-life). It can also lead to delirium, dry mouth, blurred vision, urinary retention, and constipation. [Ed note: You can read more about these side effects here for diphenhydramine and here for doxylamine.]

Some people use the herbal product valerian, which also has virtually no better impact than placebo, and it can injure your liver. Melatonin can be helpful for some and is generally well tolerated, so that may be worth a try. Because, like all herbals, it's not under FDA regulation, however, you can never really be sure exactly what you're getting.

Finally, it's worth noting that many people try to treat their sleep problems with alcohol, but alcohol-induced sleep is of poor quality and increases the presence of sleep apnea. Of course, you might also be hung-over the next day and can become dependent upon it.

If you choose to take a sleep aid, sticking to the label is extremely important, and if you're taking them to alleviate chronic insomnia, stop and see a professional. If your issue is poor sleep hygiene, we have some tips that can help.

Should buy the brand name, as in Unisom over the generic store-brand doxylamine succinate? No—like with pain relievers, there's little to no difference at all between them. There may be some inactive ingredients or formulations that make the sleep aid easier to absorb, but again, nothing that's really worth the extra money, especially not in this case.

Cough and Cold Medicines

What's the Difference Between Pain Relievers? Should I Buy Generic?

Much like sleep aids, many people will swear by Sudafed over the generic brand because they have anecdotal experience with the name. In reality, the difference is almost always perceived (for example, if the active ingredient in both is pseudoephedrine, there's no difference). When we asked about other medications people may be confused about, like cough and cold remedies, Dr. Weiswasser reminds us that regardless of the the medication we're looking to take, it's critical to read the label:

This is getting at a broader issue, which is that people should pay attention to "active ingredients" on labels and not brand names. Although people will swear otherwise, there should be no difference between the guaifenesin (which loosens phlegm) in Robitussin Chest Congestion or in the non-name brand version. Same for pseudoephedrine/phenylephrine (decongestants) and dextromethorphan (cough suppressant). Some of these medications are, however, formulated for more extended release, which can be an advantage, especially when trying to sleep.

Always Read the Label

So the next time you're standing in the cough and cold aisle with a sniffly nose, wondering if Robitussin Chest Congestion or Mucinex is the better option, flip the labels over and read the active ingredients. You'll find they're both guaifenesin, and should feel comfortable reaching for the generic. Robitussin (and many other brands) are well known for using different decongestants for different formulations, so always read the label for the type appropriate for your condition, make note of the active ingredient, then consider the generics.

This rule applies to cough and cold remedies, antacids and stomach relief medicines, laxatives, antidiarrheals, just about everything available over the counter. Like Dr. Weiswasser noted, the only real reason you may want to consider one brand over another, or a brand name over a generic, is because one of them is available in a form or formula that's easier to absorb and offers quick relief, has an active ingredient that doesn't interact with a medication you're taking or a condition you have, or if your doctor suggests one over another. Otherwise, save your money, buy generic, and read the label.

Dr. Daniel Weiswasser is a board-certified internist and pediatrician who's been in outpatient practice in Western Massachusetts for nine years. He offered his expertise with this feature, and we thank him.

Photos by Robert Kneschke (Shutterstock), Iakov Filimonov (Shutterstock), Sage Ross, Matt Robinson, Quinn Dombrowski, Zack Mccarthy, Michelle Tribe, Eleanor Ryan, and Adam Hertz.

22 Jun 04:15

S.H.O.V.E.L. Feeds You, Cuts Things, Opens Bottles, and Is Open Source

by Adam Dachis

S.H.O.V.E.L. Feeds You, Cuts Things, Opens Bottles, and Is Open Source

S.H.O.V.E.L. is yet another multitool, but it has a distinct advantage. It sports a spork for eating, a serrated edge for cutting things, a bottle opener for opening god knows what, and six feet of paracord for whatever your heart desires. Also, it's open source and you can make it however you like.

Perhaps you think the S.H.O.V.E.L. looks great as-is and you want to buy one for $10, but if you think it could use an improvement or two then you can take matters into your own hands. The creators of the S.H.O.V.E.L. decided to post the datasheet and CAD files on the product page so you can grab them and create your own version should theirs not suit you. But if it does, the S.H.O.V.E.L. doesn't cost much and makes for a pretty solid multitool.

S.H.O.V.E.L. ($10) | Spark Fun via Uncrate

22 Jun 03:53

The TSA Cover Up Scandal

by takingsenseaway

This is the girl.

I’ve received a few pieces of email about this story.

It’s about Mark Fraunfelder’s 15-year-old daughter being told to “cover up” due to the fact that a TSO made the moral judgement that the girl was inadequately covered in regard to her clothing choice. As always, the reason that this inappropriate behavior by a TSA agent comes to our attention is because the guy picked the wrong person to fuck with: Mark Fraunfelder, the father of the girl, is the founder of Boing Boing. If something gets posted on Boing Boing, there is always a damn good chance that it will go viral.

I occasionally heard TSA screeners saying things similar to “she should cover up!” while working at TSA, though the remarks I heard about teenage girls’ clothing choices were always made in private, off the checkpoint floor, not directly to the girl, as in this case. To my regular readers, I apologize for repeating myself, but I again direct everyone to another former TSA employee’s blog. She, the former TSA screener, says that as an employee for the TSA, she felt that a lot of girls should be embarrassed about the way they dress going through the airport. I quote:

A good deal of you should be embarrassed and humiliated. I have seen 12 year old girls dressed like Tijuana whores with mommy right next to them dressed the same way…

…this is the stuff you should be ashamed of and worried about TSA officers seeing.  This is what should make you feel humiliated.

You can read this former TSA employee’s blog post here. Of course, we all have opinions on what’s appropriate in regard to people’s clothing choices, and what’s not appropriate, based on various criteria. Most of us keep those opinions to ourselves, though. And if you’re a federal employee, voicing that opinion directly to the person is not only wrong, it is just plain stupid. Really, really stupid.

It’s such a stupid thing to have done that I believe that this was likely a case of a somewhat mentally unstable TSA screener who decided to get all Taliban on the girl. And yes, of course, the chances are fairly good that the screener was attracted to the girl, and projected his deviant desires onto the girl. (“I find you attractive, and I know that this feeling could potentially manifest itself into deviant behavior. I don’t know how to cope with this. So…cover up, you!”) But now we’re getting into the whole Freudian pocket-psychoanalyst thing. We’ll never really know what was going through his head. What we do know is that the TSA screener made a moral judgement regarding the girl’s clothing choice, voiced his opinion to her, embarrassed her, and is soon going to be out of a job.

He will very likely be terminated, most likely either within a week (if the employee has been with the agency for less than 2 years) or within about a month or two (if the employee is past the 2-year probationary period). They’re most likely running the security footage tapes back at LAX up in the manager’s office right about now, and preparing to bring the screener in for questioning, if they haven’t already. A post will likely go up on the official TSA blog fairly soon, first telling us that an investigation is being opened and that the TSA does not tolerate such behavior, and then, within a month or so, informing us that the screener has been terminated, and that he represented an anomaly in the TSA workforce.

I tried typing “15-year-old girl” into the TSA Policy and Statement Generator, and after just 4 clicks came upon an appropriate statement for their PR department in regard to this matter.

“Our track record is clear: since 9/11, not a single 9/11 has happened again. The news story currently going viral concerning a passenger’s 15-year-old-girl is not representative of our otherwise successful track record.”

I hope you’re using the Statement Generator, TSA headquarters. I’m telling you, it will save you guys a lot of time.

—-


22 Jun 03:49

Comic for June 21, 2013

Dilbert readers - Please visit Dilbert.com to read this feature. Due to changes with our feeds, we are now making this RSS feed a link to Dilbert.com.
22 Jun 03:49

Comic for June 20, 2013

Dilbert readers - Please visit Dilbert.com to read this feature. Due to changes with our feeds, we are now making this RSS feed a link to Dilbert.com.
22 Jun 03:48

Comic for June 18, 2013

Dilbert readers - Please visit Dilbert.com to read this feature. Due to changes with our feeds, we are now making this RSS feed a link to Dilbert.com.
22 Jun 03:47

Comic for June 16, 2013

22 Jun 03:46

Comic for June 14, 2013

22 Jun 03:46

Comic for June 13, 2013

22 Jun 03:45

Comic for June 12, 2013

21 Jun 19:22

Canon Direct Print and Scan V2 available for Android

by Steve Neill

It’s always nice when you can get out there, take some cool photos, and print them off on the go. Or that feeling when you need to scan in that quick piece of artwork, and bring it to the design studio to submit before to your boss before deadline, and you can do it in a jiffy. Unfortunately, PC owners tend to not get the good end of the stick on these quick tasks, so it’s with a great emphasis on portability that Canon brings it to Android.

canon

For people who are always on the go, Canon has developed this application that allows you to wirelessly print and scan images via your Android phone and the multifunction embedded application platform (MEAP) Canon device. By doing this, you can instantly send images from your phone to the actual printer itself.

To add whipped cream to the already exciting ice cream dish, you can also wirelessly print web pages from your phone as well, using the built in Canon Android Application. This nifty little process can help aid in things as small as pizza orders all the way up to flight tickets that require a printout with a barcode. By doing this, Canon claims that they’re making it easier to use your mobile device more and more like a personal computer.

From the application, you can also adjust paper size, color range, brightness/saturation/contrast, and how many pages you want printed out. We’d like to see more apps like this implemented in the future, as being able to wirelessly print out our stuff is a big bonus for us, since we’re always on the go. You can pick up the Canon Direct Print and Scan Version 2.0 Android application in the Google Play store now.

SOURCE: Canon

21 Jun 19:11

Civil Rights Under Fire: Emmy Award Winning Director Tackles Gun Debate

by Dusty Gibson

Kris Koenig didn’t set out to make a film about gun control.

As it turns out though, the former PBS documentarian and Emmy Award winning filmmaker is delivering a poignant statement on the national gun control debate in his new documentary, Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire.

Koenig, a U.S. Coast Guard veteran who grew up in a military family, was originally working on a film about California gangs, when a firsthand experience motivated him to change course in more ways than one.

“I was on a ride-along with a sheriff while studying the Norteño gang in northern California,” he said. “That’s when [the sheriff] asked if I had a carry permit…I soon discovered the challenges of obtaining a concealed carry license in California.”

After researching the subject, it was clear to Koenig that all California residents are not created equal when it comes to firearm ownership. That idea became “the genesis of this film,” and drove the director toward a new goal.

Just as he began work on his new endeavor the high-profile shootings in Aurora, Colo., and Newtown, Conn., shifted his focus altogether—Koenig originally focused his efforts on a more regional slant to gun control.

“I was immediately faced with the dilemma of re-focusing the film from regional and mechanical aspects of guns,” he said, “to the broader national discussion of guns in terms of civil rights.”

Koenig then began investigating events in American history that involved firearms, and with a keen eye for fact-finding, began to make connections to today’s gun control talking points. He used the National Firearms Act’s affect on civil liberties to provide a more tangible connection to DC vs. Heller, the Los Angeles race riots and Hurricane Katrina. The story began to come together.

“It took a long time to make this documentary; it was still at the editor just two weeks ago, because I hired a lawyer to go through and fact check everything in the film,” he said.

Next up was the ever-important task of finding a narrator. Koenig wanted a voice that would deliver a humble, yet articulate tone, and compliment the film’s objective analysis of Second Amendment rights.

“I saw Ice-T on a TV show one morning and immediately I knew he was the voice for the film,” Koenig said. Later that day he was eating lunch at a Mexican restaurant in Southern California with co-producer and editor Eric Katzenberg, when the topic of Ice-T stirred an idea.

“What are the odds of us getting Ice-T? I’d really love to get him,” Koenig asked his editor. In the middle of eating a taco, Katzenberg replied, “I know his agent real well. You want me to call him?”

Five days later, they were out in Las Vegas doing the reading with Ice.

“Ice’s stories and his music really fit the message I was targeting. His music career and protest song during the L.A. riot period connected him to that message,” Koenig explained. “He also connects us to an aspect of the population that we wouldn’t normally reach if he weren’t involved, and now we’re getting those folks interested in the film.”

As with every independent endeavor, Koenig’s film faced funding challenges throughout, but inspiration and support from unlikely sources kept things afloat.

“We started by maxing out our credit cards, then we went on to raise nearly $150,000 from two separate Kickstarter campaigns,” he said. “Once the film was almost complete, we sold a quarter of our share to investors to provide the money for distributing the content.”

Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire is now showing in AMC theaters on a limited basis, but those who want to bring the film to their town have a unique chance to make it happen.

Tugg.com is a new way for independent filmmakers to get their films out to the marketplace,” Koenig explained. “It’s done on demand and is similar to crowd sourcing; people sign up and say they want the film to come to their town, and then Tugg arranges a showing at a specific place and time. You need at least 40 or 60 ticket sales to get the film shown at that theater.”

The only thing that remains to be determined is how the mainstream media will react to Assaulted.

“We want [the media] to take a moment and watch it, and then get into a factual conversation not based around emotion,” Koenig stated. “Hopefully the recent events with the IRS and NSA will cause people to look at the government a little differently.”

Unlike controversial filmmakers like Michael Moore, Koenig’s vision for his film is simple and absolute. All that’s left now is for viewers to fill the seats and spread the word.

“My intention is that [Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire] will detach people from the emotional debate, and initiate a level-headed discussion about gun rights.”

Find a showing of the film in your area at the home page for Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire, or at Tugg.com.

Here’s a sneak peek at some of the people who make appearances in the film:

×

Director, Kris Koenig

Kris Koenig is an Emmy Award winning director and producer who delivers a poignant statement on the gun control debate in his new documentary,  Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire.

According to Koenig, "The idea that not all Californians are created equal, was the genesis of this film."

Alan Gottlieb, Second Amendment Foundation

Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation gives his perspective on the right to bear arms in the film. Representing one side of the gun control debate.

His foundation is on the front lines of the pro-gun movement.

Dan Gross, Brady Campaign, President

President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Dan Gross, discusses how he believes tighter gun laws can reduce violence.

The unique civil rights perspective of the film takes a level-headed approach to a debate which is usually clouded with emotion.

Koenig said, "We actually had a lot of cooperation from people on both sides of the argument."

Stephen Byrum, Historian

Historians and lawyers document the facts Koenig illustrates in the film.

Koenig explained, “It took a long time to make this documentary; it was still at the editor just two weeks ago, because I hired a lawyer to go through and fact check everything in the film."

Joann Guidos, Survivor of Hurricane Katrina

Joann Guidos explains how she defended herself and others during Hurricane Katrina.

The film addresses the civil rights perspectives of people who witnessed Second Amendment infringements.

Alan Samuel, Owner of Machine Gun Tours

The film examines the perspective of gun dealers, many of whom have been dramatically affected by recent anti-gun legislation.

Margot Bennett, Executive Director of Women Against Gun Violence

Margot Bennett from Women Against Gun Violence makes an argument for the other side of the gun control debate from a female perspective.

Ted Nugent

Famous rock star and hunter, Ted Nugent, is one of the most prominent gun rights advocates in the nation today. His presence in this film was a must.

Chris Cheng, Top Shot Champion

Top Shot season four champion Chris Cheng weighs in on his experiences as a professional shooter.

Gene Hoffman, Chairman of Cal Guns Foundation

Chairman of the Calguns Foundation protects the rights of Californians against some of the most oppressive anti-gun politicians in the country.

Kris Koenig Hard at Work

Koenig prepares his equipment while filming in New Orleans.

"My background is producing content dealing with scientific issues, so we approached the film like a scientific documentary," Koenig said. "The film is always fact-based, with 2-3 sources to back up that information."

Picture 1 of 11

Inside the Making of 'Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire'

 

21 Jun 19:06

W.V. Student Jared Marcum Faces Jail Time over NRA T-Shirt (UPDATED)

by G&A Online Editors
Jay McDaniel

This is utter nonsense! I hope that this boy is vindicated.

Back in April, we reported on the story of 14-year-old Jared Marcum, a West Virginia eighth-grader who had been suspended for wearing an NRA t-shirt to school.

As if the initial story wasn’t bizarre enough, Marcum is now faced with a fine up to $500 and up to a year in jail after being formally charged with obstructing an officer June 17, according to WOWK-TV in Charleston, W.V.

Check out the video from WOWK-TV.

On April 18, Marcum went to school wearing a shirt emblazoned with the NRA logo, along with a picture of an camo-finished AR and the phrase, “Protect Your Right.”

According to the Logan County School District’s dress code, students are forbidden from wearing anything that displays profanity, violence, discriminatory messages or sexually suggestive phrases. Garments that glorify alcohol, tobacco or drugs are also banned. Hunting rifles apparently fell somewhere in one of those categories, so a teacher told Marcum in the cafeteria to remove the shirt—and in doing so, raised his voice and caused a scene, according to Marcum. When Marcum refused, saying the shirt did not explicitly violate the school’s dress code, he was cuffed by Logan County (W.V.) Police, who charged him with disrupting the educational process and obstructing an officer.

“When the police came, I was still talking and telling them that this was wrong, that they cannot do this, it’s not against any school policy,” Marcum told The Associated Press. “The officer, he told me to sit down and be quiet. I said, ‘No, I’m exercising my right to free speech.’ I said it calmly.”

After serving a one-day suspension, Marcum returned to school wearing the same exact shirt—and he wasn’t alone, as about 100 other students also wore shirts with similar pro-Second Amendment phrases, none of whom faced disciplinary actions. Initially, Marcum and his lawyer, Ben White, thought the case would end there with charges being dropped, but that was not the case, as prosecuting attorney Michael White decided to move forward with the charges.

In court documents obtained by WOWK-TV, the arresting officer from the Logan County Police Department, James Adkins, claimed Marcum would not stop talking, which somehow hindered Adkins’ ability to do his job. However, Ben White said Adkins’ petition did not mention any threats or violent actions by Marcum.

“In my view of the facts, Jared didn’t do anything wrong,” he told reporters. “I think officer Adkins could have done something differently.”

Prosecuting attorney Michael White refused to answer questions on the case, as did the Logan County Police Department.

Now in the middle of a completely absurd prosecution, Marcum is getting some help from gun owners across the nation. The Gun Owners Foundation recently threw their support behind Marcum, offering to help pro bono.

“Usually, Gun Owners Foundation supports individuals appealing convictions on firearms charges that involve constitutional issues,” the foundation said in a press release.” But we think that Jared’s case warrants special attention, as it involves both First and Second Amendment freedoms.

“If we are not allowed to make pro-Second Amendment statements—all because somebody is offended—then we can count the days to when we’ll lose the freedoms enshrined in both Amendments.”

UPDATE (6/27): As if this story couldn’t get any goofier, prosecutors called for an emergency gag order hearing against Marcum and his father, Allen Lardieri, from speaking with the press about the case.

“It was for Jared’s better interest, is what I was told, which seems to be a bit odd to me,” Lardieri told WOWK-TV. “These are the same individuals that are trying to prosecute him, so as far as them knowing what is in his better interest, I have a lot of questions about that.”

Charlo Greene, the WOWK-TV reporter who originally broke the story and has been diligently covering it since, tried to file a petition against the gag order on behalf of the free press. When she and her camera crew showed up at the Logan County Courthouse, however, they were met with a hostile bailiff shouting at Greene and her associates, threatening to arrest them on obstruction charges—freedom of the press, indeed—before throwing them out.

Ultimately, prosecutors withdrew their motion for a gag order on the condition that they too be allowed to speak with the press—which so far, they have refused to do, treating Greene with more unwarranted hostility.

This story just gets weirder and weirder. As if bullying a 14-year-old kid wasn’t enough, Logan County officials apparently have a major issue with reporters just trying to tell the whole story—even when that reporter is trying to get prosecutors’ side of the story too.

We hope common sense eventually prevails in Logan County, W.V., but at the rate things are going, we’re not holding our breaths.

21 Jun 18:56

How to Survive a Tornado

by ITS Guest Contributor

Editor’s note: This post was written by Brett & Kate McKay and originally ran on The Art of Manliness.

How to Survive a Tornado

The flowers are growing, the birds are singing, and the storm clouds are gathering. Yes, it’s tornado season once again.

We had several thunderstorms here in Tulsa last month, and the tornado siren has already gone off three times (all of them in a single night), so preparing for a twister to come barreling through my neighborhood has been on my mind lately. Statistically, more tornados happen in May than any other month of the year.

With swirling winds that can reach up to 300mph, tornados are both fascinating and frightening. On average, 60 people die each year from tornado outbreaks, but in a particularly deadly year, like 2011, they can kill over 500. I’ve been through two big tornadoes during my time in Oklahoma that flattened entire parts of cities. It’s one of the most surreal and sobering things to see.

Tornado safety is pretty elementary – quite literally; if you grow up here in “tornado alley,” sometime during your grade school years a kindly local weatherman will probably show up at your school and teach you how to survive a twister. For me, Gary England was that kindly local weatherman. The man is a cult hero roun’ these parts. He’s calmly talked Oklahomans through tornadoes and severe ice storms for 40 years. Gary England is so beloved, there’s even a drinking game named after him.

Yet despite growing up in the panhandle state, I learned a surprising number of new things (as well as how advice has changed over the years) while researching this article. And if you’re a new arrival to the Midwest or Southeast, tornado survival 101 is something you should definitely take the time to learn. Also, just because you don’t live in a tornado-prone part of the country doesn’t mean this bit of lifesaving know-how doesn’t apply to you; tornados have occurred in all 50 states, and you never know when one might touch down on a 14,000-foot mountain or come roaring through the Big Apple.

Be Prepared

Before the storm clouds even gather, know exactly where you’ll take cover in your home if a tornado approaches, and store some padding materials in this designated “shelter” (we’ll talk about this more below). When you’re out and about at the stores and restaurants that you frequent, take note of where the bathrooms are and if shelters are available. If you live in an apartment or mobile home park, know what the tornado evacuation drill is and where you’re supposed to go for shelter if a tornado is imminent.

Since tornados can knock out power and utilities for several days, I also recommend having a 72-hour emergency kit at the least, and ideally, supplies for a longer period of grid-down as well.

Be Observant

Tornados can occur without warning any time of day, even if there isn’t a thunderstorm in the area. And if it’s nighttime, or there is heavy rain and clouds in the vicinity, you may not be able to see signs of a potential tornado. That being said, most tornados occur in the afternoon, and they are sometimes preceded by a few telltale conditions. Signs of a possible tornado include a pea-soup green sky and/or a low, dark cloud; spotting a wall cloud around here is always a cause for concern.

Wall Cloud

If a tornado is imminent, it may be accompanied by the following signs, provided by the NOAA Storm Prediction Center:

  • Strong, persistent rotation in the cloud base.
  • Whirling dust or debris on the ground under a cloud base — tornadoes sometimes have no funnel!
  • Hail or heavy rain followed by either dead calm or a fast, intense wind shift. Many tornadoes are wrapped in heavy precipitation and can’t be seen.
  • Day or night – loud, continuous roar or rumble, which doesn’t fade in a few seconds like thunder.
  • Night – small, bright, blue-green to white flashes at ground level near a thunderstorm (as opposed to silvery lightning up in the clouds). These mean power lines are being snapped by very strong wind, maybe a tornado.
  • Night – persistent lowering from the cloud base, illuminated or silhouetted by lightning — especially if it is on the ground or there is a blue-green-white power flash underneath.

Understand Tornado Warnings and Watches

A tornado watch means that conditions are present that make tornados possible over the next several hours. This doesn’t mean tornados are imminent, but it’s something to be aware of as you go about and plan your day.

A tornado warning means an actual tornado has been spotted descending from the clouds or on the ground, or that meteorologists have seen circulation in the storm on their Doppler radar. Many cities and towns located in tornado-prone areas have sirens that will go off when this happens. If you don’t live in a place that has tornado sirens, it’s especially important to check in with the local forecast periodically during a tornado watch. Also consider putting something like the tornado warning app from the Red Cross on your phone that will sound an audible alarm if a tornado warning is issued. (This is a good idea even if there are sirens in your area, if like me, you sometimes sleep through them.)

Now, the professional advice is that once there’s a tornado warning, you should seek shelter immediately. And that’s good counsel. Personally, because the sirens go off even when there’s only suspicious circulation, or when a tornado is on the ground 30 miles from where we live (the average warning time before a tornado hits is almost 15 minutes), as soon as I hear the siren, I flip on the TV to a local news station, as they give you blow-by-blow reporting of exactly what’s going on. In many cases, they even give specific neighborhoods or crossroads in which people should immediately take shelter. (It’s a good idea to have an emergency radio for updates in case the power goes out.) I watch to see if we’re in the twister’s path, and am ready to bolt for our below-ground garage if necessary.

Now this isn’t to say that you should be blasé about tornado warnings. It is easy to get that way when you live in a place where the sirens often go off without anything happening. But experts think that’s exactly why the death toll from the 2011 Joplin, Missouri tornado was so high; people figured it was another false alarm and kept driving along and going about their activities instead of getting to shelter. You have to treat every tornado warning like it’s the real deal.

Take Cover

No matter where you are when a tornado strikes, the biggest danger is flying debris. While you may think of getting sucked up into a funnel when you picture a twister, most tornado injuries and fatalities occur from debris that hits, impales, or lands on victims. As the twister rips buildings and homes apart and levels trees, it can turn 2X4s, bricks, and branches into deadly missiles. Here’s how to survive no matter where you are when a tornado touches down:

In a House

If you don’t have a dedicated storm shelter, the best place to take cover in a house (or anywhere else) is in the basement. If you don’t have a basement (and they’re not too common out here actually), head to an interior bathroom, hallway, or closet without windows on the lowest floor of your house; the more walls you can put between you and the wind, the better. If you live in a multi-story house, don’t position yourself under a large, heavy object that’s on the floor(s) above you – like a piano or refrigerator, if possible. It could come crashing down if the structural integrity of the house is compromised.

Safety in a house

Wherever you hunker down, try to cover yourself with a mattress or blankets, or crawl under a sturdy table or workbench to protect yourself from debris, including that which might fall on top of you. Experts even recommend donning a motorcycle, football, or bicycle helmet to shield your noggin. If you don’t have any extra padding, at least curl into a ball and cover your head with your arms and hands.

In additions to these precautions, you should also be aware of a few myths you might have heard that aren’t true:

  • Myth #1: If a tornado is coming, open the windows of the house to equalize the pressure inside it with the low-pressure eye of the tornado; otherwise, the house will explode. There’s no truth to this, and rushing around opening your windows could get you sliced up by flying glass, and cause the tornado’s winds to start lifting the roof off your house.
  • Myth #2: The southwest corner of a room/basement is the safest place to be. I actually heard this one growing up myself, but again, it doesn’t turn out to be true. It used to be thought that because tornados generally come out of the SW, they would blow debris to the NE. But the winds of a tornado will hit your house from all directions; no corner is necessarily safer than another.

In a Mobile Home

Get out! People are 15 times more likely to die in a mobile home than any other location. Even mobile homes with a tie-down system cannot withstand the strong winds of a twister. Take shelter in a permanent building if you can. If no other shelter is available, lie facedown in a ditch and cover your head with your arms and hands.

At a Business/Office

If you’re at your office, take shelter in an interior room or bathroom on the first floor — one that’s free, or at the least far, from windows. Crouch facedown and cover your head with your hands and arms. Another good spot is interior stairwells. Avoid taking elevators as they can get stuck if the electricity goes out.

“Long-span” buildings (think shopping malls, big box stores, theaters, and gymnasiums) can be particularly dangerous places to be during a tornado, as the roof is often only supported by the exterior walls; when the buildings reach a “failure point” they can completely collapse. Some of these buildings have dedicated storm shelters; if not, go to the lowest level and look for a windowless bathroom or storage room at the interior of the store. If such a place cannot be located, try to hunker down under something that might provide stronger support, like a doorframe, or under something sturdy, like theater seats, that will shield you from falling debris.

Outside

If there are no shelters around, lie flat in a low area of ground like a ditch or gully and cover your head with your hands and arms. Try to pick a spot away from trees and other potential projectiles.

On the Road

Your car is one of the most dangerous places you can be when a tornado strikes; the strongest of twisters can flip or pick up your vehicle and launch it hundreds of yards or wrap it around a tree. So if there’s a permanent building nearby, your best bet is to get out, get inside, and head for a place that matches the description given above; for example, at a fast food restaurant, take cover in the bathroom, or a walk-in freezer, if that’s available.

  • Myth #3: Taking shelter under an overpass or bridge is a good idea. An overpass can in fact turn into a dangerous wind tunnel as a twister approaches, leaving shelter-takers vulnerable to flying debris. The tornado may also weaken the structural integrity of the bridge or overpass, causing it to collapse. It’s also illegal to park under an overpass as it creates a dangerous traffic hazard; if the tornado doesn’t getting you, a speeding car might.

If there are no permanent shelters nearby, you may need to drive away from the storm. You might have heard that this kind of escape should never be attempted, but the NOAA’s Storm Prediction Center argues that it’s a viable option…if you’re smart about it. Only attempt to flee a tornado that is far away and not moving towards you. To gauge the tornado’s movement and direction, compare it to a fixed landmark like a telephone pole or tree in the distance. If it’s moving right or left, as opposed to remaining still and getting bigger, it’s not heading towards you. Drive off at a right angle from the direction it’s going. Basically you’re trying to put as many miles between you and the tornado as possible.

Tornado Path

If the twister appears stationary and gets bigger, it’s coming your way and you won’t likely have time to outrun it. When I was a lad I was taught that if a tornado is bearing down on you while you’re driving, it’s always best to get out of your car and lie down in a ditch or gully, since the twister could turn your vehicle into a deadly plaything. But recent studies have actually shown that most tornados aren’t capable of hurling your car through the air, and that staying inside it can be safer than getting out. There’s still some controversy over which option is best, however. (You can find a list of pros and cons here.) What the Red Cross recommends is getting off the road, parking the car, and slouching down as low in your seat as you can while still keeping your seatbelt on. Duck and lean away from the windows and cover your head with a blanket or coat if you have one.

If you see that there’s an area below the level of the roadway for you to go, you may decide to get out of the car, lie facedown there, and cover your head.

The Red Cross helpfully adds, “Your choice should be driven by your specific circumstances.” Good luck with that decision! And stay safe out there, men.

 

Editor-in-Chief’s Note: The Art of Manliness is a fantastic website dedicated to uncovering the lost art of being a man. It features articles on helping men be better husbands, better fathers, and better men. Check them out and be sure to subscribe!

Illustrations by Ted Slampyak