Shared posts

22 Oct 05:40

Unnecessary wars

by John Quiggin

I’ve written a lot here about the disaster of the Great War, and the moral culpability of all those who brought it about and continued it. It’s fair to say, I think, that the majority of commenters have disagreed with me and that many of those commenters have invoked some form of historical relativism, based on the idea that we shouldn’t judge the rulers (or for that matter the public) of 1914 on the same criteria we would apply to Bush, Blair and their supporters.

It’s fascinating therefore to read Henry Reynolds’ latest book, Unnecessary Wars about Australia’s participation in the Boer War, and realise that the arguments for and against going to war then were virtually the same as they are now. The same point is made by Douglas Newton in Hell-Bent: Australia’s leap into the Great War . He shows how, far from loyally following Britain into a regrettably necessary war, leading members of the Australian political and military class pushed hard for war. In Newtown’s telling, the eagerness of pro-war Dominion governments helped to tip the scales in the British public debate and in the divided Liberal candidate. I don’t have the expertise to assess this, but there’s no escaping the echoes of the push towards the Iraq war in 2002 and early 2003, when this blog was just starting out.

The case against war was fully developed and strongly argued in the years before 1914, just as the case against slavery was developed and argued in the US before 1861. Those who were on the wrong side can’t be excused on the grounds that they were people of their time.

The only defence that can be made is that those who were eager for war in 1914 had not experienced the disaster of the Great War and its consequences. The failure of today’s war advocates to learn from this disaster makes their position that much worse. But the same is true of anyone defending the warmakers of 1914 on any grounds other than that of their ignorance.

18 Oct 16:59

Dragon’s Heart.



Dragon’s Heart.

15 Oct 01:29

archiemcphee: The approach of Halloween is the perfect time to...





















archiemcphee:

The approach of Halloween is the perfect time to check out some of the latest awesome optical illusions created by Japanese art student Hikaru Cho, aka Chooo-San (previously featured here). Chooo-San uses nothing but acrylic paint to transform herself and others into impossibly altered people, including cyborgs, animal/human hybrids, human dolls, and people who look like dreams come to life, with flowers faces or bodies disintegrating into a swam of butterflies.

image

Chooo-San’s analog creations are a response to the overuse of technology in artwork. “I guess I was a little sick of everyone making pictures with their computers,” she told Daily Mail, “and wanted to see how far I can go without those technologies such as Photoshop.”

Follow Chooo-San right here on Tumblr at @hikaruchoofficial to check out more of her outstanding artwork.

image

[via My Modern Met]

14 Oct 17:26

archiemcphee: Dr. Seuss + Taxidermy = The Secret Art of Dr....



















archiemcphee:

Dr. Seuss + Taxidermy = The Secret Art of Dr. Seuss Collection

Over 80 years ago Theodor Seuss Geisel created a series of awesome sculptures based on his own fantastical creature designs, his very own Collection of Unorthodox Taxidermy.

“The original works utilized actual remains of lions, rabbits, and deer that died at the Springfield Zoo where his father was a director. Geisel used these ears, antlers, and shells to form realistic copies of his 2D fictional characters and asked his wife Audrey Geisel to wait until after this death to reveal his works to the public. Audrey stayed true to his wish and waited until 1997, six years after his death, to begin commissioning the sculptures.”

17 resin casts of those original pieces, along with rare paintings and drawings, are currently part of a traveling exhibition entitled If I Ran the Zoo, showing at the LaMantia Gallery in Northport, NY from November 12th to the 27th, 2016.

Click here for additional information.

image

[via Colossal]

12 Oct 16:49

Adrian Grey-Turner, 1955-1986

by Harry

(This is an updated version of something I posted 10 years ago, on the 20th anniversary of my friend’s death)

About 33 years and 3 weeks ago You and Yours had one of those “off to University” shows, helping parents and about-to-be new undergraduates to understand what the first few weeks of University was going to be like.[1] Although fitting the latter category, I only listened because at the time You and Yours was among my regular listening. One comment struck me, and has stayed with me ever since. A woman in her thirties, commenting on Fresher’s Weeks, said that “in that first week of college you meet people who will be your friends for the rest of your life”.

I was skeptical. And it turned out to be untrue for me. I’m in much closer touch with several friends from secondary school than anyone from college (I did meet CB sometime in 1984, but only for a few minutes, and not again till Sept 12, 2001, so he doesn’t count). My first day at Bedford College was spent almost entirely with a girl who decided the next day to leave (not, I hope, because she spent the first day with me, but because she was trying to escape her home town of Egham, to which my college suddenly announced it was moving). I’m still in touch with two other people I met that week, but I’ve seen them each only once in the past ten years, and have spoken to one of them only a few times more.

But it was also that week that I met Adrian.

On the Wednesday the first year Philosophy students had some sort of meeting with our course tutors, after which we all sat together in the student coffee area. They all seemed so sophisticated and worldly to me, with the exception of the old Etonian who had come straight from school. The most striking was a slender balding man in a lumberjack shirt with a very generous mustache. He was poring over the student union handbook, commenting on the various student groups, all of them named the “something Soc” (which, of course, afforded an opportunities for lame witticisms – I presume the Methodists set up their group solely in order to be able to call it the “Meths Soc”, and the footballers displayed remarkable ingenuity—for footballers— with their “Soc Soc”). Adrian suddenly complained, very loudly, about the absence of a Christian Temperance Soc, and asked whether any of us would be willing to set one up with him.

It was, of course, a wind-up, and an absurd one at that, from a man who did look as if he had just walked out of Village People (it turned out that in fact he’d just walked out of Poison Girls, but, though a sort of fan, that would not have occurred to me). But it fooled the more provincial of us, some of whom believed him while others (like me) were just very puzzled.

He was older than most of us – just turned 27 – and had a life outside of college. At 18 he’d gone straight to Cambridge from Winchester to do English, and dropped out to become a kind of bohemian, gay musician in Brighton (where else?). His band, The Dandies, had been labeled punk by the music press because, as he joked, someone at the NME liked them, and for the NME the word “punk” meant “anything someone at the NME likes”. Later I heard some of the recordings, which were quite far from punk – more like glam rock done by musicians who grew up with classical music. For all I knew then glam was all like that (its only more recently that I’ve come to like it).

I’ve no sense of how we became friends, but it must have been very early in the year, because by the second term seeing him and hanging out (not that I would have used, or even known, the term ‘hanging out’ at the time) was a fixture of my day. Like me he studied hard, but unlike me he had a flair for the subject; he immediately got why problems were interesting, and why arguments did (or didn’t) work; so studying didn’t dominate his, already well balanced, life. He lived in 23A Theobalds Road, which had until recently been largely occupied by leading members of the IMG, and was right opposite Holborn police station.[2] It was through him, in fact, that I met CB that time, CB being a friend of one of Adrian’s housemates. I hung out there a lot, far more than anywhere else.

He had beautiful eyes, and a delightful leer, which he occasionally turned my way. I never really learned to be open with people, especially men, but I was more open with him than any other man till much later in life. He was flip and serious at the same time; tolerant of what he saw as nonsense, but not taken in by anything. He was left-wing, and gay, but thought the idea (almost pervasive at the time) that there was any association between gay rights and more traditionally left wing concerns was risible; he was gay and politically left but not politically gay. We never discussed same-sex marriage because…. well, it was absurd to discuss it. As absurd as discussing the fall of the Berlin Wall, or the prospect of a Sinn Fein/DUP collaboration in government would have been. We never really discussed homophobia, weirdly, though I did experience it myself for the first (and last) time, because my eccentric dress and close friendship with Adrian marked me out as presumably gay at a small college where homophobia would now (if the college still existed) be more or less absent, but then was pretty much the norm (particularly noticeably, dare I say, with the wittily-named Soc Soc).

The best of many stories: On the very day we started, our college announced that it was closing, and merging with Royal Holloway College in Egham (hence the departure of the Egham girl after day one). About half way through our second year a kind of college-closing reception was held for selected students and faculty to meet with our college patron, the Queen Mother. Most departments, sensibly, invited their 3 or 4 top students, but the Philosophy department, being democratic and (I suspect) republican, put a notice on the board asking interested students to put their names in a hat. I showed Adrian the notice, thinking he’d find it funny; instead of which he looked imploringly at me and said “Can we go? Please?”, rather as my elder daughter did a decade ago when she heard there was a Bob Newhart concert coming up. We put our names forward and, of course, were picked out of the hat, being the only students politically incorrect enough to have put our names in. We received the invitations a week or so ahead of time, which contained, on the back, the following instructions:

Her Majesty requests that staff and students attend the function wearing their ordinary working clothes.

Naturally we got wet feet at once, and went to our department chair, Mark Sainsbury, to secure a promise that, if we did attend, we should not actually have to meet or talk to her maj; he kindly agreed, pointing out that he wasn’t too thrilled about going either, but that it was the sort of thing one was expected to do. Relieved, we agreed to go.

And, it turned out, that we were the only truly loyal subjects she had. Adrian attended in leather jacket and jeans. I, well, did not look like I was out of Village People, more like a tramp (American: bum) with a skinhead cut; I wore only second-hand clothes at the time, with the exception of my shoes which were usually well-worn and often holey plimsolls. Every other attendee was, of course, dressed to the nines; even the Union president (now a Baroness) with her goth haircut had bought a brand new outfit, of the kind that later became mandatory for New Labourites (which I guess she became!). Having made it through security, after being given a very skeptical eye (until we pointed out the instructions on the invitation!) we made a bee line to the Philosophy table where, I hope Mark won’t mind me saying, he and Adrian drank a good deal of the free booze (I was strictly TT, so nothing for me).

The QM was about an hour late, of course, so there was ample time for my two companions to cheer themselves up. When she arrived she was hurried from table to table by our college President and the Union President. Until they got to Philosophy, where the QM (who was a midget) began an odd conversation with Mark Sainsbury (who is a giant) about whether philosophy got enough public support (they both agreed it didn’t). She was peering over his knee at me and Adrian all the time, while the college President was colluding with her minders in trying to move her along, lest she notice the eyesore that we constituted (I suspect it was me, not him, that they were trying to avoid). After a couple of minutes, shaking off one of her minders, she said directly to Mark: “And who are these people? I would like to talk to these people, they look interesting.”

I’ve never discussed it with him, but I presume something like the following reply went through his head:

No, your majesty, you can’t talk to them, they’re a pair of reprobates, one of them a flaming queer and the other a scruffy lefty, but they’re the only students we could get to come, and we only managed that by promising them they wouldn’t have to actually meet you.

and decided, sensibly, that discretion was the better part of valour. She was duly introduced, and immediately started telling us how important she thought it was for people to be studying philosophy:

Adrian: “Oh, no it isn’t. It’s interesting, but it’s not at all important, its quite unimportant”

QM, “ Oh no, I don’t agree, we need people to think about what the meaning is of life and why we are here”

Adrian, “Ah, but you see philosophy isn’t about the meaning of life, it’s about the meaning of meaning, and of words, and how arguments fit together, really, its not what you think”

The conversation continued in that vein for about 10 minutes, Mark Sainsbury occasionally trying to interject in support of his monarch, and I being too bemused to say much, knowing, in addition, that one wasn’t often going to be in a position of witnessing two of the most charming people in human history having a ridiculous disagreement about the value of philosophy. For, to my complete dismay, and it still pains me to admit it, she was, as everyone has always said, utterly charming (less so than Adrian, but he set the bar absurdly high) and she clearly liked him enormously (a count in her favour, though, I suppose, it didn’t really mark her out!). After she moved on, the journalists who follow these people around, descended on us, wanting every detail of how it was that Adrian managed to hold her attention for an unprecedented amount of time, especially when she was already so far behind schedule, and what they talked about.

A few days later the college magazine devoted part of its front cover to a lovely picture, which I wish I still had, of the diminutive royal discussing philosophy with a scruffy skinhead, a tall philosopher, and a flaming queer. Someone put it up on the Phil department noticeboard with a short-lived, and rather generous, caption: “We’re the only people in the room who don’t want to be here; how do we get out?”

Shortly afterward Adrian arrived excitedly to the student cafeteria telling me his news. A band that he regularly played with had invited him to join as a permanent member. It would mean giving up college, because of the touring. He was delighted, but he didn’t do it. I never knew quite what decided him against; I think that it was a genuine enjoyment of student life and the work we were doing. After graduating he signed on for a MA course at Birkbeck, and I suspect that he would have stayed in Philosophy and been successful if he’d lived.

An aside. It was during this time (in that refectory) that he coined the phrase I’d like to be my epitaph. I’ve spent much of the past 10 years in committee meetings and Board meetings, often saying things that no-one else is saying, and finding (to my surprise) that this does not seem to lead people to stop asking me to do the work (indeed, quite the reverse!). During a conversation about what we might do in the future, one acquaintance said he could see me becoming a Labour MP, at which Adrian just said “No, I see you sitting around in rooms, saying sensible things”. Pretty much every meeting I am in, and certainly every one where a decision of consequence has to be made, I remind myself of that, and hope I live up to it.

Sometime in the Autumn of our third year Adrian failed to turn up for lectures for about a week. There were just three of us who never missed, so I figured something was wrong. No-one had phones in those days (and I’m not just talking about mobiles), so I trudged round to his house and rang the doorbell. Then I rang again, and rang again, and waited for maybe 10 minutes. Eventually an emaciated figure opened the door, barely recognizable as my friend. I helped him up the four flights of stairs, and apologized over and over again for getting him out of bed. It was 1984, I was 21, and AIDS was still a foreign, if frightening, disease in those days; I had no idea that what he had might be fatal. He got back to strength after a few weeks, and finished the year thanks, in part, to an incredibly high protein diet. It didn’t occur to me, or to those of his friends I knew will, how bad things were going to get. My guess is that he did know, perfectly well, what was going on, pretty early on.

About Aids. Recently a close college friend, who Adrian knew through me, told me that shortly after I left England she was with a group of her college friends in London, and saw Adrian (whom they all knew, of course) across the street. She skipped through the traffic to hug and kiss him (despite knowing her only a little, he completely adored her, which frankly shows he had better judgment than I did). When she returned they all berated her for kissing someone who was gay, because ‘what if he has Aids?”. Which, of course, he did.

One of my happiest memories of my college days is the two weeks of our Finals in June 1985; I’d arrive at his house early in the morning, we were both well prepared, he was openly nervous, we walk up to Bloomsbury for the exams, then have lunch together at his house (usually with assorted housemates teasing us; often his rather pugnacious steady boyfriend would sit with us encouragingly), and, if there was an afternoon exam, saunter back. In my memory the sun always shone. He got a First, after a viva. I learned this from an indiscreet Mark Sainsbury, into whom I bumped right outside the British Museum one day; he had just heard the results himself an hour earlier, told me mine, and then after I had, with staggeringly uncharacteristic nerve asked Adrian’s result, the one I really cared about, he told me. I ran down to Theobalds Road, and spent two hours completely failing to convince Adrian he had a first.

And then, after finals, the casual freedom that 15% graduate unemployment and a low-consumption lifestyle allowed us. Adrian, along with many other friends and acquaintances, attended my Miners Strike-related trial for assaulting a police officer. Mark Sainsbury appeared as a character witness, and his comment that “Brighouse was one of our two finest students, whom we presented to the Queen Mother when she visited the college” drew breaths of horrified disillusion from the assorted Trotkyists in the crowd [3], along with Adrian’s loud cackle of laughter. Adrian’s behavior on my conviction was exemplary; knowing that I would be tempted to refuse to pay the fine (I wasn’t guilty, after all), but knowing too that not paying was absurd, since it would only make a political point in a match that had already been lost hands down, he walked straight into the back office and paid the fine himself (I repaid him later, courtesy of my proud great uncle Dewi).

I went to my graduation ceremony mainly to see him there; and last saw him in December 1985, the night before I left the UK for California. He came to a farewell party some friends held in Abberbury Road. The last time, I suppose, that I was really, truly, English. I wrote to him a good bit, but he was one of several poor correspondents. The reason was clear when his only letter to me arrived in October 1986, just two days before another letter from a mutual friend telling me he had died. His letter was a long and funny rumination on domestic life in London after the defeat of the left, but had a restrained sadness that alerted me that things might not be well. Our friend’s letter devastated me. I wandered around in a kind of fog for days, until the man who is now my brother in law but was then just another graduate student, told me to forget the expense and call my friend to talk about Adrian; we spoke for an hour and a half, which must have cost at least $50, except that it mysteriously never showed up on the phone bill.

Adrian has haunted me. I would have endless conversations in my head with him, composing letters never to be read. I would guess that I thought of him every day for 16 years. During my stint at the Institute of Education I passed the spot where we would meet before the Birkbeck intercollegiate lectures every time I went to work, and occasionally I ate lunch, alone, in ULU simply to remember him. It is not entirely a tribute to him that I did this; somehow in death he became a focal point of my homesickness. Not an unhappy one; my actual thoughts of him were much more cheery than maudlin, and still are. But when, at long last, my homesickness evaporated, so did my daily thoughts of him. It was as if a fog had lifted, and his ghost with it.

But not completely gone. I still think of him often; I regret the rest of the life he didn’t have; I wish he knew my children and my wife (who is not easily charmed, but would have completely fallen for him) and especially as my oldest has grown and envies stories of my youth I wish I could send her to stay with him for a month; I delight on the rare occasions I hear a Poison Girls song he was involved with; and the compilation of his recordings that was released for a benefit event after his death is an essential part of my music collection—as is a collection of The Dandies that his best friend sent me after reading the earlier version of this on CT. Once in a while I see a kid round here with a Poison Girls T-shirt (what’s with that; isn’t it like someone of my generation wearing an Al Bowlly T-shirt?) and I smile.

And I wanted to write something about him. Things being as they are there’s a chance that some of our readers knew him; attended classes with him, taught him; maybe one of you was even a fan of The Dandies. If so, I hope you are glad to be reminded of a lovely person who taught me, and perhaps you, so much about how to love life (something I have not excelled at, but have done better than I otherwise would). No-one told me the exact date of his death at the time, but it was October 12th or 13th according to my calculations from the letters I was sent, and I always chose to remember him on the 12th—which his sister has subsequently confirmed was the day. 30 years ago today , exactly. He’d be 61, approaching old age, which is inconceivable. And, just as the woman on You and Yours said, I know that we’d still be friends. I wish it had been not just for the rest of his life, but for the rest of mine, too.

And update:
Thanks to Facebook, one picture of the Dandies (Adrian’s the flamboyant one…). If I ever figure out how to upload the picture with the queen mum, referred to above, which also came my way today, I will, even though I. personally, look absurd in it:
dandies

And, final update, here’s the magazine cover photo….
queen-mum

[1] Yep, You and Yours has been around that long, and, yep, I was pathetic enough to listen to it as a teenager. I don’t anymore.
[2] Isn’t it bizarre that we lived in what are now multi-million pound homes? I just looked up a squat in Kentish Town where I once lived, now estimated as being worth 2 million sterling.
[3] They weren’t a figment of Tom Watson’s imagination back then.

05 Oct 20:22

Weaknesses

by Reza

weaknesses

29 Sep 17:23

gdb

by sharhalakis

by simonbitdiddle

20 Sep 17:10

emmajiqrubini: “Dream a little Dream of me..” Genderbent...













emmajiqrubini:

“Dream a little Dream of me..”

Genderbent Morpheus from Neil Gaiman’s Sandman.  I was so happy I was finally able to pull off this cosplay at DragonCon this year! At least a year of planning, 15 yards of tulle, and a whole lot of love went into this cosplay.  This series was one of the first comics I ever read, and it remains one of my favorites.

Costume designed and made by me.  Photos by my dad, edited by me.

19 Sep 19:23

The Pagan Wild Men of Europe

by MessyNessy

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0006_krampus

Slightly terrifying, right? Not the sort of crowd you want to run into alone, in an empty field, with the sounds of chanting coming from the woods yonder. But don’t worry, they only come out at Christmastime to haunt the innocent souls of children. You see, while the rest of us are celebrating the most magical time of year with red-nosed reindeers and tinsel-covered everything, in most Austrian Alpine towns, it’s tradition for the men to dress up as Krampus, a horned figure described as “half-goat, half-demon”. Ancient folklore warns of the horned beast who punishes naughty children and squabbling families who lose their festive spirit.

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0009_krampus

In the winters of 2010 and 2011, photographer Charles Fréger journeyed through 19 European countries, documenting the various pagan rites he encountered along the way. Dressed in bear heads and bell, behaving like beasts, he called them the “Wilder Mann.”

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0013_mamuthone

Mamuthones, typical of the carnival of Mamoiada in Sardinia.

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0033_kurenti

Kurentovanje is one of Slovenia’s most popular carnival events. Its main figure, known as Kurent or Korent, was seen as an extravagant god of unrestrained pleasure and hedonism in early Slavic customs. In today’s festival, groups of kurents wear traditional sheepskin garments and are believed to “chase away winter”. Being a kurent was at first a privilege offered only to unmarried men, but today, married men, children and women are also invited to wear the outfit.

 

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0039b_mechkari

Mechkari costumes of the bear handler in Prilep, in the region of Pelagonia, Macedonia.

 

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0039_nevesta_djolomari

Bearded Djolomari of Macedonia.

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0042_babugeri

The Bulgarian Babugeri, to scare away evil spirits.

 

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0044_surovichkare

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0045_surovichkare

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0050_surovichkare

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0056_survakari

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0057b_survakari

Survakari, Bulgaria

 

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0063_dziady_smigustne

Old-Slavic pagan traditions held on the Easter Monday in Poland include symbolic acts of purification after the wintertime and the evoking of fertility for the arrival of spring is performed by throwing water on people from the community.  The symbolic ancestors, dziady, wear costumes made of woven straw and masks of sheep skin. They can’t reveal their real identity or talk, and only murmur, whistle and hoot. They usually carry small baskets, into which they get small offerings such as food, or are greeted with a sip of vodka. They perform ritual dances and pull small pranks by each house they stop by.

 

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0078_juantramposos

Juantramposo, a mischief-maker, appears on Mardi Gras in Alsasua, Spain. The festival ends with all the participants taking part in a celebratory dance.
 
charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0084_gallarones

The Gallarones, Spain

 

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0099_bard_pelzmartle

On Christmas Eve in Germany, Pelzmärtle appears in the village of Bad Herrenalb with the Christkind (Baby Jesus) to scold naughty children and rap them with a stick. The straw costume is sewn on to the wearer.
 
charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0104_strobaren

Strohmann at Carnival in Germany.

 

charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0114_shnappviecher

Schnappviecher the snapping beast on Shrove Tuesday.

 
charles_freger_wilder_mann_2010-2011_0139_cerbul_in_corlata

Stag on New Year’s Day in Romania.

Charles Ferger is an expert at sourcing out the world’s most interesting subcultures. I suggest you check out his website here.

You can also buy his book on Wildermann here.

This article The Pagan Wild Men of Europe was published by Messy Nessy Chic.

13 Sep 22:55

Should You Eat That?

13 Sep 22:19

Recognising racism

by John Quiggin

Back in 2004, I wrote that

There is only one real instance of political correctness in Australia today and that is that you are never, ever allowed to call anyone a racist.
This was one side of an unspoken agreement among mainstream politicians, the other being that no one would ever make a statement that was overtly and undeniably racist (this was the central content of “political correctness” in its normal usage). Both the use of overtly racist language and the use of the term “racist” in political debate put the speaker outside the Overton Window. The official debate was undertaken in terms of “dog whistle” coded appeals to racism on one side and euphemisms such as “prejudiced” or “racially charged” on the other. The peace was maintained by the fact that the political class as a whole shared a broad neoliberal[^1] consensus in which marginal differences over economic issues were central, and where social/racial issues were primarily seen as a way of motivating the base to vote the right way.

With the rapid rise of tribalism on the political right this tacit agreement is breaking down.

While tribalism (roughly, an identity politics of solidarity with “people like us”) need not, in principle, imply support for racism (I plan more on this soon), the distinction is a fine one, and has broken down completely in practice. There are at least two reasons for this:

  • Political tribalism throws up demagogic leaders like Trump, Farage, and (in Australia) Pauline Hanson, whose appeal relies, in large measure on their rejection of political correctness, that is, on their willingness to appeal openly to racism.
  • The centrality of migration to current political debate, inevitably bringing race issues to the forefront.

For the same reasons, it seems clear that overt racism is going to be a significant part of politics for the foreseeable future. Individual demagogues like Trump may (or may not) flame out, but the existence of a large base of support for overtly racist policies and politicians is now evident to all, and the agreement that kept this base from having its views expressed in mainstream politics has now broken down.

In response to this it’s necessary to recognise racism as a substantial, if deplorable, political tendency. First, and most obviously, that means abandoning euphemisms, explicitly naming racism and, even more, naming people like Trump and Hanson as racists.

More importantly, identification of policies, parties and politicians as racist needs to be the start of the analysis, not the end. It’s important to recognise that there are different strands of racism, often intertwined in the same political groups, and to distinguish their approaches and potential appeal. To give just a few examples, there’s

  • “Scientific” racism epitomized, in the modern period, by The Bell Curve
  • “anti-PC” racists, focused on the demand for consequence-free expressions of racist sentiments
  • “separate but equal” segregationists, overlapping with
  • supporters of racist immigration policies

Even more importantly, it’s important to take racist arguments seriously and respond to them, rather than regarding the fact that they are racist as putting them beyond the pale of serious discussion. As with climate science denial, we might wish that to be the case but it isn’t. On the other hand, also as with climate science denial, there’s no value in engaging with racists.

The problem is to discuss the issue in a way that influences those who can be persuaded, both on the merits of specific issues and on the need to dissociate themselves from racists. That includes people who might be sympathetic to some racist arguments such as “foreigners are stealing our jobs”, but are also open to an explanation of how neoliberalism hurts workers. Again as with climate science denial it also includes professional centrists in politics and the media who need to be pushed out of their preferred position of evenhanded superiority.

There’s lots more to be said on this, and doubtless it will be said in comments, so I’ll leave it at that.

[^1]: As usual, I’m relying on the “three-party analysis” of contemporary politics I put forward here.

07 Sep 17:46

sciencefictionworld: “Kaybor Gate” by Alex Ries.



sciencefictionworld:

“Kaybor Gate” by Alex Ries.

01 Sep 18:05

Isochrone map of Melbourne trains and trams, c.1920

by dennyshess


Isochrone map of Melbourne trains and trams, c.1920

01 Sep 17:54

Light Art Comes to Life: Dancing Animated Gifs by Lucea Spinelli

by SA Rogers
[ By SA Rogers in Art & Photography & Video. ]

light art 10

Beams of light dance, jump, squiggle, scatter and interact with each other as if they’ve taken on a life of their own in a series of animated light art gifs by New York City-based photographer Lucea Spinelli. Abandoned school buses, public park benches, playgrounds, glass jars and human bodies become the settings for surreal, almost ghostly scenes calling to mind the common superstition of supernatural beings affecting electricity.

dancing light art 2

dancing light art 1

dancing light art 7

In fact, all that seems to be missing from some of these animations is a proton pack from Ghostbusters, as the clusters of light created by Spinelli take on the movements of autonomous beings. Spinelli takes still shots of moving light using long exposure methods and then strings them together to create these animated sequences.

dancing light art 3

dancing light art 5

“In her project phötosgraphé, Lucea Spinelli creates long exposure photographs that afford us a view into the unknown,” reads the statement on the artist’s website. “For the duration of the open shutter the lens becomes a canvas upon which Lucea paints with light. The illuminated forms she creates interact with spaces and objects in a wa that evoke the unseen – such as spirit, dreams and metaphor – within the everyday.”

dancing light art 6

light art 8

light art 9

“Often staying in the dark for long hours and relying on muscle memory alone, the process reflects ritual as a necessary part of interacting and evoking the unseen aspects of our reality. Thus by using a medium is commonly used to mimic reality, to suspend it, Lucea invites us to push beyond the bounds of visual perception to explore other ways of knowing. Finally, by stringing sequences of these long exposure photographs together into an animated gif, the light forms are literally brought to life as they dance across the forever looping frame.”

Animated Still Lifes: 7 Relaxing Cinemagraphic Illustrations

Reclining in the space between the extremes of sped-up, movie-style GIF files and traditional, immobile paintings, this artist brings lazy scenes of everyday reality to life. Rebecca ...

Wi-Fi Visualized: Signals Translated to Ghostly Light Orbs

Translated into glowing orbs of light with a rainbow of colors representing signal strength, these visualizations of wi-fi signals are like Victorian spirit photography for the modern age. Luis ...

Painting with Light: 15 Long-Exposure Light Art Photos

Words, ghostly forms and streaks of ethereal light take shape when photographers move a light source around in a frame while taking a long-exposure image. Variously known as light art, light ...

Share on Facebook

[ By SA Rogers in Art & Photography & Video. ]

[ WebUrbanist | Archives | Galleries | Privacy | TOS ]


24 Aug 18:37

unexplained-events: Night Terrors Night Terrors is an...



unexplained-events:

Night Terrors

Night Terrors is an augmented reality horror survival game that is being developed for smart phones. The game scans your surroundings and builds an internal map to determine how best to scare you as you wander around in search of a young girl in need of rescue. The game utilizes your flash and camera while you have your headphones plugged in for the audio.

You will walk around your surroundings while coming face to face with various supernatural or creepy things such as ghosts, clowns, spiders, and demons. We don’t know if the game contains jump scares as of yet since it is still seeking funding on indiegogo.

You can help fund it HERE and watch the trailer HERE

23 Aug 22:59

twinpeakscaptions:

12 Aug 23:46

This Tool Lets You Send Stranger Things-Inspired Light Bulb Messages

by Patrick Allan

Netflix’s new show Stranger Things is one of the biggest hits of the summer (we’re big fans ourselves ). Here’s a neat tool that lets you communicate secret messages to all your friends from the “Upside Down.”

Read more...

12 Aug 23:46

Generate your own fantasy map

by Nathan Yau

Fantasy map

Martin O’Leary made a Twitter bot, Uncharted Atlas, that posts automatically generated fantasy maps. Recently, he described how these maps are generated and how you can do it yourself, complete with a step-by-step clickety explanation and Python/JavaScript code for the backend.

Tags: fantasy

10 Aug 18:19

jtojto: Barb Trapper Keeper



jtojto:

Barb Trapper Keeper

08 Aug 21:28

Magical Photographs of Fireflies from Japan’s 2016 Summer

by Johnny
2016 summer firefly selects - spoon and tamago (1)

photo by 365March (Yu Hashimoto) | click images to enlarge

Each year when summer comes along, we all look forward to different things. Some of us head to the beach, others to the mountains for camping. Some look forward to the epicurean delights like watermelon and ice cones. But for a select group of photographers in Japan, Summer signals the arrival of fireflies. And for very short periods – typically May and June, from around 7 to 9pm – these photographers set off to secret locations all around Japan, hoping to capture the magical insects that light up the night.

One thing that makes these photographs so magical is that they capture views that the naked eye is simply incapable of seeing. The photographs are typically composites, meaning that they combine anywhere from 10 to 200 of the exact same frame. That’s why it can look like swarms of thousands of fireflies have invaded the forest, when in reality it’s much less. But that’s not to discount these photographs, which require insider knowledge, equipment, skill and patience.

Fireflies live for only about 10 days and they’re extremely sensitive. They react negatively to any form of light and pollution, making finding them half the battle. Here, we present to you some a selection of our favorites from the 2016 summer season.

2016 summer firefly selects - spoon and tamago (2)

photo by fumial

2016 summer firefly selects - spoon and tamago (4)

photo by Yasushi Kikuchi

2016 summer firefly selects - spoon and tamago (5)

photo by soranopa

2016 summer firefly selects - spoon and tamago (6)

photo by miyu

2016 summer firefly selects - spoon and tamago (8)

photo by hm777

2016 summer firefly selects - spoon and tamago (7)

photo by hm777

06 Aug 17:51

Photo



03 Aug 22:44

Emotion vs. Logic



Emotion vs. Logic

03 Aug 06:38

kateordie: Help me









kateordie:

Help me

01 Aug 06:03

gameraboy: Moai Terminator by (ben chen)

01 Aug 05:04

The Truth

by Reza

the-truth

27 Jul 21:55

deep-space-mining-ship: DEEP SPACE.



deep-space-mining-ship:

DEEP SPACE.

27 Jul 00:12

"I have serious qualms with Hillary Clinton and with the Democratic Party, but I have more than..."

I have serious qualms with Hillary Clinton and with the Democratic Party, but I have more than qualms with Donald Trump — I have grave concerns. Maybe you don’t have undocumented friends. Maybe you don’t have Muslim friends. Maybe you are not in the Black Lives Matter movement. And maybe because you are disconnected from those three groups, you don’t really see and feel the threat that Trump poses to them, but it is very real.


We all have to make choices here. I am choosing to follow Bernie’s lead in supporting Hillary Clinton. I am sure it is exponentially harder for him than it is for me or for you, but I trust this man. He knows that we only have two real choices for President. It’s either going to be Clinton or Trump. Period.


You can vote for Jill Stein. You can vote for Gary Johnson. You can write in Bernie. You can sit out and not vote. You can vote for Deez Nuts, but know this, because of the way our system is shaped right now, either Clinton or Trump will become President of the United States and your vote or no-vote will all play a role in who gets elected.


If you know me at all, you know that I have nothing but love and respect for each of you who want to change this system once and for all. I do too — badly. After this election, I will do everything in my power to explore and expand our options. I am not satisfied with where we are, but with everything in me, I am convinced that President Trump will be a problem that we all regret way more than President Clinton.



-

KING: To stop Donald Trump, I’ll be voting for Hillary Clinton

Shaun King speaking truth.

25 Jul 17:39

Mad

by Reza

mad

21 Jul 01:14

larhunter: rosanaiarusso: “no”-Eleven from Stranger...



larhunter:

rosanaiarusso:

“no”-Eleven from Stranger Things

Rosana, killin’ it as always

Stranger Things is the best thing, ever.

20 Jul 22:54

mymodernmet: Interview: Portraits of Medieval Knights...