Shared posts

18 Mar 14:44

‘The Queen vs. Texas’ Revisits the Battle over Lone Star Drag  

by Kit O'Connell

When the drag queen known as Hermajestie the Hung reached her breaking point, she transformed into the Joker, becoming the scourge of patriarchy, homophobic lawmakers, and anti-transgender bigots everywhere. 

“She’s that queen that’s just had enough,” Hermajestie told the Texas Observer. 

In reality, The Queen vs. Texas—a new short film recently screened at the South by Southwest (SXSW) film festival in Austin— isn’t exactly a supervillain origin story, but it does depict the transformation Raemonn James, better known as “Hermajestie,” undergoes as she applies her drag makeup to become a queered-up version of that mischievous comic book character. 

She’s dressed up for a performance of Vanguard, the drag troupe she led from 2020 until she left the state in 2023, in the wake of a flood of anti-LGBTQ+ laws passed by the Texas Legislature. In a way, the 15-minute film also depicts James’ Joker-like political transformation, as the former Texas resident realizes how unbearable and unlivable the cultural landscape has become for her, her child, and her partner.  

“The seriousness of not taking anything seriously that is so iconic about the Joker character, that energy resonates with me,” James told us. “Why are we taking these bozos seriously? These politicians, [these] criminals … Why are we taking them seriously? Why are we playing their games? … The character seems to have a very good understanding that the real joke is reality.” 

(The Observer profiled James and the Vanguard drag troupe in the September/October 2023 issue of our magazine.)

Codirectors Emil Lozada and Raemonn James/Hermajestie the Hung Courtesy of Emil Lozada

The Queen vs. Texas had its origins when codirector Emil Lozada, who most often creates short films about the environment, became a fan of the weekly drag performances. One night, he and his wife brought along his father and sister, visiting from his birthplace in England.

“Rae actually picked on us because we were sitting up front,” Lozada recalled with a laugh. “She was drilling us with questions, but I think we passed the test!”

That good-natured heckling helped convince him that there was something special about James which he wanted to capture in a documentary. In all, he would spend about five months following James in 2023, documenting several drag performances and following her to three protests against anti-drag bills at the Lege. At one point, James wears a jacket emblazoned with the words “Fuck Fascism” as she chants in the Capitol and marches through the streets of downtown Austin.

“Violence runs our society and fear of violence, fear of being violated, fear of being stripped away from your family and thrown into forced labor (jail or prison)—it is what it is,” she said. “Just because it’s become normal to us doesn’t mean that we should not be outraged.”

We’re also given an intimate glimpse into the home life James shares with her partner and their child—the family that James ultimately moved out of Texas in order to protect, even though it meant the end of the Vanguard drag troupe (other drag queens now manage a weekly performance night instead).  

“Whenever legislators are writing laws about how they think drag queens should not be around children, it completely ignores the very real fact that some drag queens have children,” James said. “It showcases how stupid they are but also, I guess it showcases how little they know. People who are trying to ban drag shows have never been to a drag show.”

During our interview, Lozada and James both agreed it took months of building trust before she’d allow him to film these very personal scenes of their day-to-day life, which show heartwarming but prosaic scenes of the family relaxing together on a playground, or James’ child playing backstage.

“Just because you’re a very handsome white man with a sexy accent and a camera doesn’t mean that I’m just gonna let you in my bedroom,” James quipped. “He definitely had to earn his way.”

After SXSW, Lozada plans to circulate the film to other festivals in the hopes of ultimately finding a home for it on a streaming service. In an email sent after we spoke, Lozada told me he hopes the film inspires people to support nonprofits that fight against anti-LGBTQ+ laws but also to support their local drag shows too.

“Having spent time behind the scenes and witnessed the immense amount of effort poured into each performance, my love and appreciation for this art form has greatly deepened,” Lozada wrote. “Performance art serves as a pivotal medium for conveying messages of love, justice, and activism, with these performers playing a crucial role in shaping a world where everyone is celebrated for being their authentic selves.”

James added, “In all of my artistic endeavors I aim to inform, empower, and emancipate. This 15-minute documentary short film presents the passions, problems, and power of a local queer community determined to make every space a safe space to exist freely.”

Correction: This article has been updated to correct some details related to the film.

The post ‘The Queen vs. Texas’ Revisits the Battle over Lone Star Drag   appeared first on The Texas Observer.

15 Mar 21:14

What I Think It’s Like Working at a Company That Makes Condoms

by Anthony DeThomas

EMPLOYEE: You see any good penises lately?

SECOND EMPLOYEE: It’s Tuesday. So, yes.

EMPLOYEE: Me too. Our whole job is to look at, then discuss penises at a professional level.

SECOND EMPLOYEE: Yes, we’re just professionals who study penises and then have meetings to discuss what we learned about the penises so we can make a better product for penises. Five days a week, 260 working days a year.

EMPLOYEE: Speaking of which, today I’m giving a presentation to our coworkers, who are also penis professionals. I’ll be sharing all of the new things we’ve learned recently about the experience of sex from the perspective of the penis.

SECOND EMPLOYEE: Is the one employee who works in the Vagina Department going to be there?

EMPLOYEE: Unimportant. What are you working on today?

SECOND EMPLOYEE: More research on lambskin and how it fits on different types of penises.

EMPLOYEE: Remember how we discovered that you can use the skin from a lamb to cover a penis?

SECOND EMPLOYEE: Yeah, that was a wild project. Very aggressive timelines. Tons of lambs and penises. I’m really proud of that work.

EMPLOYEE: Our work is the type of thing you can talk about openly with mixed company, such as during dinner with your in-laws, when chatting with a neighbor, or when you’re catching up with parents of children that go to your kid’s school.

SECOND EMPLOYEE: Definitely. I discuss my career working with penises with my father-in-law all the time. He’s one of those technical types of guys who likes discussing cars, sound systems, and the various trajectories of the penis that the skin from a lamb is designed to accommodate during sex.

EMPLOYEE: My dad loves talking about my work with penises too. There must be something about that generation, because they sure do love penises.

SECOND EMPLOYEE: Don’t we all in this line of work? Why else would we dedicate the majority of our lives to the study of penises and penis mechanics?

EMPLOYEE: It’s sure not for the health insurance.

SECOND EMPLOYEE: For me, it’s really about leaving a legacy and doing something that my children and my family can associate me with for the rest of their—hey, look, a penis.

15 Mar 17:48

Kamala Harris Discovers Classified Document Revealing She’s Android Created By DNC

WASHINGTON—Her mind spinning as she poured over the sheaf of papers, Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly discovered classified documents Friday revealing that she is an android created by the DNC. “Wha—no, it can’t be,” said Harris, whose mouth hung open in shock, too horrified to scream after accidentally…

Read more...

15 Mar 17:48

Pro cowboy Marty Yates beats Loop 610 traffic by riding horse to Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo

by Adam Zuvanich
Yates, a 29-year-old calf roper from Stephenville, won his tie-down roping semifinal on Wednesday night after arriving at NRG Stadium on horseback. The performance earned him $3,000, a spot in Sunday's event finals and a measure of fame on social media.
15 Mar 17:47

Famous Works of Irish Literature as Limericks

by Amanda Lehr

The Picture of Dorian Gray
by Oscar Wilde

A young man of beauty and grace
Tries to shield his good name from disgrace.
He looks like a saint
While he withers in paint,
But he still finds himself losing face.

Dracula
by Bram Stoker

A solicitor pays his respects
To a count whom no surface reflects,
And who moves to the UK
To follow his outré
Desire to suck on some necks.

Ulysses
by James Joyce

A lass who keeps raising her dress
Is awash with erotic distress.
’Spite her wandering womb,
Should she keep Leo Bloom?
Why yes, she says, yes she will, yes.

“A Modest Proposal”
by Jonathan Swift

A man caused a hullabaloo
By posting this practical view:
Economics call for
Irish babes of the poor
To be served to the rich as ragout.

Sherlock Holmes
by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

The world’s most proficient detective
Has deductive techniques most effective.
(Though his Watson stays close
With an opium dose
Lest Holmes hit him with an invective.)

The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe
by C. S. Lewis

Four children go looking for glory
In this sweet portal fantasy story.
Through a wardrobe they’re drawn,
Where they meet a faun and
A leonine Christ allegory.

(Though one brother, brimming with spite,
Takes the White Witch’s side in their fight.
He sells out his siblings
So he can keep nibbling
His portion of Turkish delight.)

Normal People
by Sally Rooney

A Sligo-born laddie and lass
Are close, yet divided by class.
Are they truly peers?
By turns, each one fears
That they’re naught but a hot piece of ass.

Waiting for Godot
by Samuel Beckett

Two gents who are meeting Godot
Are anxious that he’ll never show.
So, they wait, and they wait
Till the hour grows late
And

15 Mar 13:42

Study Finds Sexual Satisfaction Highest Among Nerds Covered In Lipstick Marks With Glasses Askew

PHILADELPHIA—In a new study published Friday in the latest issue of the International Journal Of Sexual Health, researchers found that among the human population, sexual satisfaction ranked highest among nerds covered in lipstick marks with their glasses askew. “This phenomenon appears across the globe and in all…

Read more...

15 Mar 13:42

Phillies To End $1 Hot Dog Days Citing Rowdy Fan Behavior

After 25 years, the Philadelphia Phillies are ending $1 hot dog night after fans took to hurling the concessions onto the field last year. What do you think?

Read more...

15 Mar 13:41

Kohler Unveils Powerful New Toilet Capable Of Flushing Handgun

KOHLER, WI—After the product reportedly tested well in focus groups throughout the United States, plumbing-fixture manufacturer Kohler unveiled a powerful new toilet Thursday that, according to marketing materials, is capable of flushing a handgun. “We built our GlockSense smart toilet with enhanced features that…

Read more...

15 Mar 08:09

what’s the most Machiavellian thing you’ve seen or done at work?

by Ask a Manager

This post was written by Alison Green and published on Ask a Manager.

A few years back, we talked about Machiavellian things we’ve seen done at work — self-serving schemes or manipulation that you watched being carried out (or carried out yourself!).

The stories were amazing, including someone who pretended to be Canadian for months in order to get a day off for Canadian Thanksgiving, someone who submitted his awful boss’s resume to a bunch of recruiters (it worked and the boss left for a new job), and someone who learned that if she occasionally showed up to work without makeup , her boss would insist she must be sick and make her take the day off (paid).

Let’s do it again. We’re looking for stories of underhanded machinations, double-dealing, and conniving in the workplace.

15 Mar 08:01

Convince Me

by Reza
14 Mar 22:58

Chicago Temporarily Stops Dyeing River Brown For St. Patrick’s Day

14 Mar 22:58

New Dispensary Promises Customers Tantalizing Taste Of The Forbidden Fruit That Is Marijuana

CLEVELAND—Attempting to draw in passersby with that rarest leaf from faraway lands, a new dispensary opened in the area Thursday, promising customers a tantalizing taste of the forbidden fruit that is marijuana. “O, could it be? A merchant whose wares are that seductive and most taboo of herbs?” said local man Jason…

Read more...

14 Mar 22:58

Backpedaling Aaron Rodgers Meets With Sandy Hook Parents To Brag About How Fast Achilles Healed

FLORHAM PARK, NJ—Revealing that he had taken time to reflect on the dangerous and harmful conspiracy theories that he had spread about the tragic mass shooting, backpedaling Aaron Rogers met with the parents of Sandy Hook victims Thursday to brag about how fast his Achilles healed. “It’s’ been a long, hard road since…

Read more...

14 Mar 22:52

Woman Arrested For Stealing $28,000 In Gas With Rewards Card

A Nebraska woman was arrested for double-swiping her gas rewards card for months, taking advantage of a glitch that allowed her to get almost $28,000 worth of gas for free. What do you think?

Read more...

14 Mar 21:21

If you’re lamenting the fact that you used to be able to shoot through a 500-page novel in like a…

prokopetz:

prokopetz:

If you’re lamenting the fact that you used to be able to shoot through a 500-page novel in like a day when you were in middle school and now you can’t, it’s worth bearing in mind that a big part of that is because when you were in middle school, your reading comprehension sucked. Yes, mental health and the stresses of adult life can definitely be factors, but it’s also the case that reading is typically more effortful as an adult because you’ve learned to Ponder The Implications. The material isn’t just skimming over the surface of your brain anymore, and some of the spoons you used to spend on maximising your daily page count are now spent on actually thinking about what you’re reading!

Reading as a kid: “I can tell that this is supposed to be an emotionally moving ending, but I genuinely cannot remember who two-thirds of these characters are.”

Reading as an adult: *reads a paragraph* *pauses* *reads the same paragraph again* *flips back and re-reads the preceding page to make sure you didn’t misunderstand something* *stares into space for ten minutes as the Implications sink in*

14 Mar 21:20

shu-of-the-wind: lockedharrow: weirdreindee...

shu-of-the-wind:

lockedharrow:

weirdreindeer:

Tom Cox
@cox_tom
Almost certainly the best thing I was ever told about owls was when I met an owl handler and he told me that the wild owls in the sanctuary where he worked worried about the tame show owls there and sometimes stopped by to leave them shrews and mice as presents.ALT

i used to work for a nature center and we would constantly have wild owls come and call out to the owls in their cages and try to 1.) get them to follow them or 2.) they were looking for a mate

in the spirit of this post: when you live in areas with wild horses, the number one culprit for horse theft is actually other horses, because the young stallions that get chased out of the herd wanna start their own, and oh, look, look at all those cute mares in just,,,,a fenced off grassy area,,,how easy would it be to lure them over the fence,,,like some four-legged yodeling pied piper,,,

i think about this a lot

14 Mar 17:38

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Underwear

by Zach Weinersmith


Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
Later this turns out to be foreplay.


Today's News:
14 Mar 17:38

Staff Relies On Corporate Team-Building Skills While Disposing Of CEO’s Body

DES MOINES, IA—Noting that they already felt closer as a result of the exercise, employees of local company Alpa Solutions relied on their corporate team building skills Wednesday while disposing of their CEO’s body. “It was amazing from start to finish—we felt empowered to work together and go above and beyond as we…

Read more...

14 Mar 17:35

House To Vote On TikTok Bill This Week

This week, House Republicans are pushing a vote on a bill with bipartisan support that would require TikTok’s Beijing-based owners, ByteDance, to divest their stakes from the company or else the app will no longer be available to American users by Sept. 30. What do you think?

Read more...

14 Mar 17:35

Quiz: Are You A Sociopath?

Do you lack empathy, attempt to control others, exhibit impulsive behavior, or lie about all those things to seem normal? Take our quiz to find out if you are a sociopath.

Read more...

14 Mar 17:28

Boeing Whistleblower Found Dead In Car Amid Depositions

Former Boeing employee John Barnett was found dead in his car from an apparent “self-inflicted gunshot wound” on the day he was set to be cross-examined about allegations he’d made regarding the company’s grave safety breaches on the production line. What do you think?

Read more...

14 Mar 17:28

Hitman Keeps Trying To Upsell Client On Dissolving Target’s Corpse In Vat Of Acid

VIENNA—In an apparent attempt to persuade his customer that the additional fees would pay for itself in peace of mind, sources confirmed Thursday that local hitman Vincent Klein kept trying to upsell his client on dissolving the target’s corpse in a vat of acid. “It’s, like, I get it for some things—definitely,…

Read more...

14 Mar 17:27

I See You, Report Sources Looking Through Empty Paper Towel Roll

SISSETON, SD—Following an enunciation that emphasized each syllable of the word “peekaboo,” sources looking through an empty paper towel roll announced Thursday that they see you. “I spy with my little eye…someone who is you!” said the squinting sources, who later repeated the phrase “I see you” with the paper towel…

Read more...

14 Mar 17:27

Owner Of Shuttered Hermit Crab Kiosk Probably Retired To Private Tropical Island

COLUMBUS, OH—Pleased to see his years of hard work had finally paid off, sources confirmed Wednesday that the owner of the shuttered hermit crab kiosk at the mall had probably retired to his own private tropical island. “Good for him,” said one of the sources, who smiled wistfully as they imagined the now fabulously…

Read more...

14 Mar 17:27

Airbnb To Ban Indoor Security Cameras

Amid concerns about privacy in vacation rentals and public spaces, Airbnb released a statement saying the company will no longer permit indoor security cameras to be installed in rental properties, an update to its previous policy, which allowed cameras in common areas so long as their presence was disclosed to…

Read more...

14 Mar 17:24

Republicans will no longer get to handpick their judges when they sue Biden

by Ian Millhiser
Matthew Kacsmaryk sits in a government hearing.
This man is no longer one of the most powerful policymaking officials in the United States. | Courtesy of the Senate Judiciary Committee

The federal judiciary’s new rules target “judge shopping.” That’s terrible news for Matthew Kacsmaryk and other partisan judges.

Plaintiffs hoping to reshape federal or state policies will no longer be allowed to choose which judge will hear their case, at least in federal court. A new policy announced Tuesday by the Judicial Conference of the United States, a government body that sets policy for federal courts, targets rules in some federal courts that the conference said “risked creating an appearance of ‘judge shopping.’”

At least in the short term, this policy is a massive victory for the Biden administration — and, indeed, for anyone who believes that federal and state policies should not rise and fall based on one outlier judge’s partisan views.

Texas’s Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, for example, has been very aggressive in bringing lawsuits that challenge Biden administration policies before right-wing judges who have then issued sweeping, nationwide orders blocking those policies — sometimes on highly dubious grounds that are reversed, months later, by the Supreme Court.

Among other things, this practice turned Matthew Kacsmaryk, an obscure advocate on the Christian right appointed by former President Donald Trump to the Northern District of Texas, into one of the most powerful government officials in the entire country. Because Kacsmaryk is the only federal trial judge in Amarillo, Texas, any case filed in Amarillo was automatically assigned to him.

The Judicial Conference’s new policy is unlikely to strip Kacsmaryk, or any other judge, of jurisdiction over any case currently on his docket. But it does place significant new limits on litigants’ power to choose which judge will hear any new case that they file in the future.

How cases are assigned to judges in federal courts

The federal judiciary is divided into 94 different geographic districts, which normally encompass either all or part of a state. In many districts, newly filed cases are assigned randomly. So, for example, if a plaintiff files a lawsuit in a district with three Democratic appointees and three Republican appointees, they would have an equal chance of drawing a judge from either party (although some judges are partially retired and have a lighter caseload).

Some districts, however, have used different rules to assign cases — and one very notable example is the United States District Court of the Northern District of Texas. That district, like some others, is subdivided into multiple “divisions,” some of which only have one sitting judge. Any civil case filed in one of these Northern District of Texas divisions was automatically assigned to one judge: Kacsmaryk.

It didn’t take long for lawyers representing Republican causes generally, and the religious right in particular, to figure this out. Kacsmaryk’s courtroom became a magnet for lawsuits attacking federal policies, and he proved to be a rubber stamp for nearly any court order that a conservative litigant asked him to issue.

Among other things, he attempted to ban the abortion drug mifepristone (a decision blocked by the Supreme Court) and ruled that a father had a constitutional right to limit his daughters’ access to birth control. He attempted to neutralize a federal law prohibiting health providers from discriminating against LGBTQ patients, and he’s currently presiding over a trial brought by anti-abortion activists seeking up to $1.8 billion from Planned Parenthood based on frivolous claims that the organization defrauded Medicaid.

So what does the new policy do?

According to the Judicial Conference, the new policy concerns “all civil actions that seek to bar or mandate state or federal actions.” It does not apply to all lawsuits, but it does apply to any in which the plaintiff seeks either a “declaratory judgment” saying that a federal or state policy is invalid or “any form of injunctive relief” changing such a policy.

In these cases, “judges would be assigned through a district-wide random selection process.” So, a case seeking to block a federal policy that is filed in Amarillo would be randomly assigned to one of the 11 active judges or one of the six senior judges who sit in that district. It would not be automatically assigned to Kacsmaryk.

A spokesperson for the Judicial Conference of the United States confirmed via email that this new policy applies “to all 94 US district courts.”

The Judicial Conference did not explain why it decided to hand down this new policy now, but members of both parties have long complained about judge shopping — a problem that also arises in apolitical cases.

The press release announcing the new policy, for example, points to a November 2021 letter from Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) and then-Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) that “raised concerns about a concentration of patent cases filed in single-judge divisions.” It also notes that Chief Justice John Roberts expressed concerns about judge shopping in patent cases in his 2021 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary.

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) has also introduced legislation seeking to curb judge-shopping.

Over the long term, the Judicial Conference’s new policy is likely to benefit both Democrats and Republicans. So long as the Supreme Court is controlled by Republican appointees, however, it is likely to be more of a boon for Democrats: The Court’s GOP-appointed majority normally moved very swiftly to block lower court decisions that targeted Trump administration initiatives, while it has often left decisions blocking Biden administration policies in place for months.

The policy will prevent litigants challenging federal and state policies of all kinds from handpicking judges that they know will rule in their favor, but it will not be a panacea against all litigants shopping around for favorable judges. There will still be districts where the judges were appointed mostly by Democrats or mostly by Republicans — the Northern District of Texas is still overwhelmingly Republican, for example — and litigants will no doubt continue to choose districts based on where they think they will receive a favorable hearing.

Federal appeals courts (and the Supreme Court) are ordinarily supposed to defer to the factual findings reached by trial judges. So a litigant who can choose their trial judge gains a lasting advantage even if the case is appealed.

The policy also does nothing to protect against litigants who choose where to file a case based on which appeals court will eventually hear it. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which hears federal cases arising out of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, is dominated by Republican appointees closely aligned with the MAGA movement. So Republicans like Paxton can still benefit from this right-wing court, even if they can no longer ensure that all of their trials will be heard by judges like Kacsmaryk.

Still, this is a significant policy change — one that will quell at least some concerns that federal litigation is a rigged game.

13 Mar 05:29

“I didn’t get that job because I have a dick!” says man who just is a dick

by Alix Markman

CALGARY – Local man Peter Johnson claims he was rejected from a job he applied for because he has a dick, when sources confirm that he is, in fact, simply a dick. “They’re discriminating against me for being a man,” says complainant Peter Johnson, high-fiving several cops as he walked down the street carrying an […]

The post “I didn’t get that job because I have a dick!” says man who just is a dick appeared first on The Beaverton.

13 Mar 05:29

Breaking: New Brunswick and Nova Scotia NOT the same place

by Lindsay Ellis

Moncton or Sydney – This is a high priority announcement to all Canadians. In a surprise that has floored the nation, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia are NOT the same place! The confusion can be found in the fact that they were once the same place. They split in 1784, when the people of New […]

The post Breaking: New Brunswick and Nova Scotia NOT the same place appeared first on The Beaverton.

12 Mar 22:49

can I threaten legal action to get a better job offer?

by Ask a Manager

This post was written by Alison Green and published on Ask a Manager.

A reader writes:

TLDR: I was given a lowball job offer. I said it was less than my previous total comp, which it was. I was asked my previous salary and, stupidly, gave it. Asking salary history is illegal in the nearest city and that may or may not cover me. Can I use the threat of legal action to negotiate a better offer?

I was laid off. I applied for a job at a nearby company a friend works at. The interview process was really fast, less than a week from initial submission to final interview. I thought I killed it. My friend on the inside agreed. But after the final interview it took three whole weeks to get an offer. Apparently the CFO had to sign off on everything personally and had a big backlog.

The initial offer was less than I had been making at my previous job and I made the mistake of saying it like that. The in-house recruiter asked what I was making and I am bad at thinking on my feet, so I told her. This job is in a suburb of Philadelphia, and Philadelphia has the Wage Equity Ordinance making it illegal to ask salary history. If you read the law itself, it looks like I’m covered because the company has employees and an office in Philly. But if you read an official FAQ, it doesn’t cover you if the job location is outside Philly, which this is.

Can I use the threat of legal action to negotiate a better offer? I didn’t give a number for what I’m looking for. The recruiter ran off to get a new number based on my history. But I want a higher offer since my last salary lost $10,000 in two years from raises not keeping up with inflation. Also, I have experience now in a technology which my prior employer said they would have given me a higher title for if I had had that coming in.

I was thinking about saying, “We don’t have to get lawyers involved and let your manager know, if..”

It’s a bad idea!

First and foremost, you don’t appear to actually be covered by Philadelphia’s law. The city’s FAQ on the law says it only applies to positions located within Philadelphia, which this job is not. (There are some exceptions to that, such as if you’d be spending a lot of time in the city, but I’m assuming you would have mentioned it if those applied.)

If you’re not covered by the law, you don’t have any standing to threaten legal action.

But even if you were covered, “we don’t have to get lawyers involved and let your manager know” is a bad approach. First, this isn’t really a legal battle; you’d simply be reporting them to the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations. More importantly, you’re tying together two things that don’t necessarily belong together. Yes, they shouldn’t ask candidates about salary history (if indeed you were covered under the law), but they had already made you an offer without having that info, and you volunteered info about your previous salary as a negotiation point. They might have still been in technical violation when they asked you to elaborate (it’s not fully clear from the info on the city’s website), but introducing that information and then threatening legal action when they engaged with you on it won’t make you look like you’re operating in good faith.

It’s also unlikely to work. Most likely, they’ll be put off by the threat and just tell you that their original offer — the one they made without any info about your salary history — is firm.

Even if it worked, though, it’s unlikely to be in your best interests. They made you an offer that was presumably within their salary structure for the role and the team. Let’s say you successfully threaten them into offering more. What are the chances you’re going to find it easy to get raises there in the future versus having your salary stagnate because they don’t want it to get even more out of sync with others doing similar work? If you have to threaten an employer into offering you more, you’re better off just concluding that they don’t pay what you want … rather than embedding yourself into a company that you believe underpays (and which will presumably continue to underpay and resist raising your salary in the future).

To be clear, I am not saying we shouldn’t hold companies accountable for following the law. And I hate that workers considering holding companies legally accountable need to factor in whether it will get them labeled overly adversarial or so forth. But in reality, you do — and in this case you’ve also got to consider whether making threats over it will get you the outcome you want or just poison the well.

All that said, if you think they violated the law, by all means report them to the agency charged with handling it! But using it to try to negotiate more money isn’t a good strategy.

12 Mar 22:47

is it reasonable to leave without notice when my company lets employees go without notice?

by Ask a Manager

This post was written by Alison Green and published on Ask a Manager.

A reader writes:

I am a senior software engineer at a mid-sized company. My team became part of this company through an acquisition three years ago. Within the first year of the acquisition, our product managers (“Joey” and “Chandler”) were let go as a “business decision.” Joey and Chandler were subject matter experts who shared the PM role along with their other duties. Of course the company is within its rights to reduce costs by letting personnel go, but they were locked out of their computers and told that they had been let go with absolutely no notice. We lost access to irreplaceable knowledge and expertise in the middle of a development cycle, and we permanently lost access to important documentation, as we had not even been fully integrated at that point.

After nearly a year without a product manager, we were allocated 50% of “Rachel’s” time. Rachel had also come in via acquisition (of a directly competitive project). It took several months to get her up to speed. Then, in the middle of specing out a brand-new large, shiny feature set, she was (yes, you guessed it) let go without notice. I had literally just gotten out of an hour-long meeting with her, working through the complicated new functionality we would need to implement.

These losses were upsetting and demoralizing for the entire team. For my part, as the lead developer, I did my best to keep the team calm and on track. I have a lot of political capital at this job and relatively little worry about being let go. I have made my concerns known to my managers. I have been fully invested in making this transition work, in part to help take care of my team and in part because I am invested (emotionally, not financially) in the success of the product.

Our division manager (“Monica”) announces personnel changes by putting a meeting on our calendar with anywhere from 0 to 15 minutes of warning. Two days ago, one of Monica’s meetings popped up on my calendar, and we were informed that one of our senior software engineers (“Ross”) was being let go (business reasons) and that he would be replaced with multiple off-shore workers (which means that our team is actually growing and being supported, according to Monica, even though our new “resources” share exactly zero hours of business day overlap). Again, this happened with no notice. Ross was locked out of his systems and informed that it was his last day.

I know this is the end of the road for me. It is time for me to leave, and the sooner the better. My question is twofold, I guess:

First, would it be wildly unprofessional of me to announce my resignation without notice? I doubt I will look for a job in the same sector, so I’m not necessarily concerned about references. I don’t want to be overly petty, but I feel that they have been abundantly clear that they consider their employees to be fully fungible “resources,” so why should they need notice? (I know I’m being petty, here, but is it overly petty?)

Second, my leaving will likely cause additional resignations. How much notice should I give my team? I don’t want to alarm anyone before my plans have firmed up a bit, and I don’t want to put them in the spot of needing to keep secrets from other team members or managers.

Does your company give severance to employees who are let go with no notice? I’m guessing they do — and if that’s the case, you resigning without notice isn’t really comparable.

It’s pretty typical for companies not to provide advance notice when they lay people off, instead substituting severance pay in place of notice. There are a lot of reasons for that, including that having laid-off employees still at work can make things harder for remaining employees and delay the process of figuring out how to move forward, and sometimes people who are being laid off are too angry or upset to effectively do their jobs (and you could argue that it’s unkind to expect them to). But severance pay means they continue getting paid for a while.

Now, if your company doesn’t offer severance and they cut off people’s income with zero notice the day they’re laid off, then sure, you absolutely have  the ethical standing to leave without notice yourself. That said, it still might not be advisable since it’s the kind of thing that often comes up in reference checks and can give a new company pause. (And even if you move to a new industry, they’re likely to check references from recent past jobs.) You might decide you’re okay with that outcome! Most of the time, though, it makes more sense to give two weeks notice so it doesn’t come back to bite you later. (Exceptions: if you’re being treated egregiously or you have the kind of F-you money or professional options that negate any real consequences to you or there are extenuating circumstances, like a health crisis you need to deal with.)

And really, I think your point would be missed! Your employer isn’t going to think, “Oh, this is what happens when we lay people off with no notice. Lesson learned.” They’re just going to think, “Wow, Phoebe is unprofessional” and then move on. Again, that doesn’t mean you can’t do it. But it’s probably not going to send the message you want.

As for whether you should give notice to your team, even if you don’t give notice to your employer … you don’t need to. People leave jobs; people should always assume their coworkers could be thinking about leaving. Plus, if you share it, you risk it getting around to people you didn’t intend to know, and you risk putting your colleagues in awkward positions, like if they’re in a meeting about plans that are dependent on you a few months down the road and they know you won’t be there.

I also wouldn’t assume people will definitely leave just because you leave. Maybe they will! But people often overestimate that sort of thing. Either way, hearing about it a couple of weeks ahead of time isn’t likely to appreciably help them. If you do want to help them, leave behind documentation to aid them in taking over for you even without the transition time a notice period normally provides.