Shared posts

13 Nov 16:15

Rosetta Mission Lands On Rubber Ducky Comet [Update]

by Sarah Fecht

Update 9, 2:35 p.m.

A press briefing reviews what scientists currently know about Philae's condition:

  • It landed, and it landed in the right place.
  • The lander has power onboard, and it has been communicating with ESA mission control via radio waves.
  • The scientific instruments are working, and they're already sending back data, which scientists need more time to analyze. 
  • Philae's harpoons did not fire, "so the lander is not anchored to the surface," said Stephan Ulamec during today's press briefing. ESA isn't sure exactly what the situation is on Comet 67P. "Did we just land in a soft sandbox and everything is fine although we are not anchored ... or is there something else happening?"
  • Fluctuations in the radio waves emitted by the lander could indicate that the lander bounced when it touched down. "So maybe today we didn't land once, we landed TWICE!" Ulamec joked. 
  • Because of the orientation of the comet and the spacecraft, ESA won't be receiving more data from Philae for several hours. The next updates will come tomorrow at 11:00a.m.

Update 8, 1:29 p.m.

BusinessInsider is reporting that at least some of the screws on Philae's feet have dug into the soft surface of the comet. 

ESA is about to begin a media briefing on the live webcast. Check back here for more updates!

Update 7, 12:58 p.m.

Here's what Philae saw on its approach, from about two miles above the comet's surface. The lander appears to have been right on target. 

.@ESA_Rosetta See for yourself! ROLIS imaged #67P when we were just 3km away! Glad I can share. #CometLanding pic.twitter.com/b6mcid2fsn

— Philae Lander (@Philae2014) November 12, 2014

To learn more about Philae's landing site, check out this awesome 3D visualization by Sketchfab.

Update 6: 11:50 a.m.

Uh oh. Though ESA confirmed that Philae has touched the comet's surface, now they're saying that the harpoons may not have fired to anchor it to the surface. Says ESA: "Without this anchor we cannot with 100 percent certainty state that we are landed on the comet and that we’re fixed on the comet... Everything is proceeding normally." Now mission scientists are determining what their options are to re-fire the harpoons.

I’m on the surface but my harpoons did not fire. My team is hard at work now trying to determine why. #CometLanding

— Philae Lander (@Philae2014) November 12, 2014

The thrusters that would have pushed Philae toward the surface, to help out in the anchoring process, were also found to be broken yesterday. If the harpoons can't be re-fired, the lander may have to rely on its screw-tipped feet to try to dig into the surface. 

Update 5: 11:40 a.m. 

NASA planetary director James Green comments on the Rosetta mission's success:

How Audacious! To dare to land on a comet! … The solar system is mankind’s. This mission is the first step to take it. It’s our. Let’s learn about the environment we’re in. It’s these steps that will lead us beyond this planet and on to Mars, and out into the solar system. … It’s our destiny to move off this planet, and this is the kind of step that we must do. 

Update 4: 11:29 a.m 

ESA solutes Star Trek's Captain Kirk.

.@WilliamShatner touchdown confirmed for away team @philae2014, captain!

— ESA Rosetta Mission (@ESA_Rosetta) November 12, 2014

Update 3: 11:04 a.m. 

Touch doooooown! Mission control confirms that the lander has reached the surface. ESA scientist: "Philae is talking to us ... We are on the surface."

Touchdown! My new address: 67P! #CometLanding

— Philae Lander (@Philae2014) November 12, 2014

Hugs all around at ESA mission control.

Update 2: 10:54 a.m. 

As ESA stands around wringing its hands and wondering whether the 10-year, $1.7 billion journey was worth it, we are playing this song in the background:

T-minus five minutes (approximately) until we know for sure whether Philae landed safely!

Update 1: 10:35 a.m. on November 12

Philae has probably landed already, but we won't know for sure for another half-an-hour or so -- because that's how long it takes for feedback from Philae, which is 31 million miles away, to reach ESA headquarters. This xkcd comic aptly illustrates the intensity as mission control waits with bated breath.

Original Post:

Rosetta's 220-pound lander is on its way to the "rubber ducky" comet -- right now.

Since August, the Rosetta mission has been dancing around a comet that's 31 million miles away from Earth, preparing to land. Finally, at 4 a.m. this morning, the orbiter and the lander separated. Philae is now dropping toward the comet, and it is expected to settle on the comet's surface at 11 a.m. EST. If the landing is successful, it'll be the first manmade object to ever touch down on a comet. Once there, it'll study the composition of this space-traveling rock to learn more about the early solar system and whether comets could have seeded life on Earth.

As it drops, Philae is taking some initial measurements of the comet's dust and gas, and it's also snapping some photos. Here's the first one that was tweeted from the European Space Agency's Philae Twitter account, of the orbiter's underside:

.@philae2014’s first postcard just after separation – it’s of me! #CometLanding Credit: ESA/Rosetta/Philae/CIVA pic.twitter.com/OXJwGunL3V

— ESA Rosetta Mission (@ESA_Rosetta) November 12, 2014

Meanwhile, the view from the orbiter shows that Philae's legs have deployed successfully.

I see you too @philae2014! Here you are in my OSIRIS camera - legs out! #CometLanding pic.twitter.com/hmnfe2AkN2

— ESA Rosetta Mission (@ESA_Rosetta) November 12, 2014

It could be a rough landing, and the BBC reports that Philae's thrusters, which were meant to help anchor it on the comet's surface, were yesterday discovered to have malfunctioned. Fortunately, ESA thinks they can pull off the landing anyway. We'll keep you posted as we learn more about this epic landing! Meanwhile, you can watch the ESA's livefeed of the event here:

13 Nov 16:11

CyanogenMod introduces Scramble PIN layout

A known weakness of touchscreen PIN entry is that you leave fingerprints, so it's easy for someone holding your phones to tell which numbers you pressed (not their order, but it doesn't take too many tries to guess it). CyanogenMod has provided a solution - scramble the digits on the keyboard! This way the position of your fingerprints doesn't give away which numbers were pressed since each time the numbers are in different positions. This does mean you can't just rely on muscle memory to enter the PIN, but security protocols are rarely pleasant. Unfortunately, it seems that this feature will land on the proprietary version of CyanogenMod that powers the likes of OnePlus One. It's not clear if it will make it to the open-source distribution. Such an option is already available via an Xposed module - Xblast Tools - but that one is paid and (obviously) requires Xposed. Jailbroken iPhones have CodeScrambler for an identical feature. If you know of a solution that works on an unmodified phone, drop a line in the comments. In related news, CyanogenMod 12 based on Android 5.0 Lollipop is already in the works. Source |...

13 Nov 15:35

Final Score: Assassin's Creed Unity

by Josh Hawkins

Assassin’s Creed Unity has finally released across all platforms and it’s time to sit back and figure out if Ubisoft’s trip into 18th Century France is a hit success or not. We’ve taken the liberty of rounding up the hottest scores around to help you decide… is the newest installment of Assassin’s Creed as revolutionary as Ubisoft hoped?

Shacknews: 7/10

  • This is everything I've come to know about Assassin's Creed. It's a great story wrapped in a more confusing story, some satisfying stealth action, and mechanics that leave me banging my head against the wall. It's Assassin's Creed, warts and all.”

Eurogamer: 7/10

  • As the seventh major instalment in the series, though, not to mention the first designed for new console hardware, Assassin's Creed Unity feels like a missed opportunity. Going back to basics at this point may have resulted in a less substantial game than recent years have led us to expect, but it might have delivered a more satisfying one. As it is, mild improvements in traversal and combat are quickly overwhelmed by the creaking systems onto which they have been grafted. Revolutionary Paris is one of the most beautifully realised environments in a series that has had its fair share of them, but the game you play doesn't really do it justice.”

Gamespot: 7/10

  • Not all of Unity's more progressive touches are for the best then, but you might spend more time noticing what's old than what's new. The terrific city atmosphere of Paris, the focus on parkour, and the incentives for performing stealthy assassinations, all these things hint at a game that's trying to return to its roots after branching out so wildly in its past two iterations. Yes, Unity is the most ACII -like of the series since, well, ACII, and while it never really hits the dizzying heights of Ezio's jaunt through 15th century Italy, Unity's similarities are comforting enough to take the edge off its less-than-successful changes.”

Joystiq: 2.5/5

  • Assassin's Creed Unity is the best and worst of Assassin's Creed. It's hard not to appreciate everything that it gets right, and you'll have a good time if you can wrangle some friends for co-op, but it's impossible to ignore where Unity falls tragically short.”

Destructoid: 7/10

  • “…it struggles to make its own mark on the franchise outside of the new French Revolution setting. If Ubisoft fixes the glitches, Assassin's Creed: Unity will be a much stronger game, even if the ceiling is a bit lower in general. Unity’s potential is not as strong as some of the better entries in the series, but it's good enough for existing fans to continue the journey.”

IGN: 7.8/10

  • The scope is stunning, the customization is satisfying, and the multiplayer touches upon some really ambitious ideas. But the lack of a strong main character or interesting take on the Assassin’s Creed universe costs it momentum and excitement, and the persistent control problems are still a thorn in its side.”

Polygon: 6.5/10

  • The ingredients are all here for a spectacular new standard for the series on Sony and Microsoft's new machines. But in the quest to build something that looked and sounded "next generation," Ubisoft Montreal failed to fix the problems that have accumulated over so many annual releases. Combined with an uninspiring story, and a long list of considerable technical problems, Unity falls short of the fresh start Assassin's Creed needs.”
13 Nov 15:13

What Is ‘Thor: Ragnarok’? How Marvel’s Phase Three Movie Will Shake Asgard

by Russ Fischer

what is thor ragnarok

Dead gods, cyborg clones, and the end of Asgard — Ragnarok could be a big deal. Marvel recently announced that the third Thor movie, Thor: Ragnarok, is due for release in July 2017, with Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston returning to reprise their roles of Thor and Loki. But what is Thor: Ragnarok, exactly?

“This is a very important movie for us in Phase 3,” said Marvel’s Kevin Feige when announcing the movie. “We plan on taking Thor to another level. It picks up where we leave Thor in ‘Avengers: Age of Ultron’ and impacts everything that comes after.”

So what are the events that will impact Thor and Asgard, and impact the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe going forward into Phase 3? A couple different comics storylines give us some big hints. Below, we’ll explore Thor: Ragnarok in detail. 

Note that there are many spoilers here for various comic book stories, and also for Thor: The Dark World.

There’s also a healthy amount of speculation below. We know that Thor shows up in Avengers: Age of Ultron, and we know that Heimdall (Idris Elba) and Loki (Tom Hiddleston) also make an appearance. We don’t know if Thor will show up again until Ragnarok, and given that Hemsworth only has a couple more films in his contract after Age of Ultron, Marvel may need to make them count.

***

thor-ragnarok-asgard-destroyed

What Is Marvel’s Version of Ragnarok?

This is pretty complicated, as many modern Marvel stories tend to be. Ragnarok has come and gone from Asgard multiple times, but for our purposes the most recent iteration seems like the most important. The backstory features Thor inheriting the Odinpower after Odin basically dies during a battle with the fire demon Surtur. Puffed up with this power, Thor goes a little bit crazy, extending the rule of Asgard to rule of Earth, and spends a couple hundred years as an all-powerful and not-at-all cool deity. Eventually he basically said “oops!” and traveled back in time to wipe out that whole storyline.

So, as Thor gets back to Asgard, a variation on the quest from Lord of the Rings is playing out. The mold that created Mjolnir still exists, and could potentially be used to make other serious weapons. The dwarves who originally forged Mjolnir are carrying the mold around, seeking to throw it into the void between worlds. They nearly succeed, but Loki intercepts the mold. Loki has new weapons made, and with a force of powerful allies he attacks Thor and friends. In the first attack Mjolnir is broken, and the subsequent war basically destroys Asgard.

thor-mjolnir-shattered

What Does Ragnarok Mean for Thor?

Possession of the Mjolnir mold and the weapons spawned from it gives Loki an almost impossible advantage over all other Asgardians, and he’s also got Surtur on his side. So Thor goes in search of a greater power: the full wisdom of Odin. That’s not so easily attained, however. To get it Thor plucks out both eyes and ultimately hangs himself from Yggdrasil, the world tree, to attain the full wisdom of his father.

Thor learns that a set of powerful beings, Those Who Sit Above in Shadow, have manipulated the Ragnarok cycle for aeons, feeding off the energy it creates. By causing the cycle to repeat over and over, Those Who Sit have cheapened and debased the sacrifices and achievements of Asgardians, essentially keeping them from their glorious deaths.  Thor seeks to break the cycle, and to do so must sacrifice himself.

thor-ragnarok-dead

Just Be Honest — Does Thor Die Here, Or Not?

Yeah, he does. Well, kinda. Maybe? OK, not really. His actions kind of destroy all of Asgard, and leave him technically in limbo, basically floating in a void. Keep in mind that the Marvel Comics version of Thor is much more dependent upon the idea that Thor is occasionally bound to a human man, too, and that ends up being the key to his escape from the void. So he comes back in the comic stories, but there’s a pretty good story set up to kill off Thor. Or at least this version of him.

***

Now that we’ve set out some comic-based background, let’s get into some other details about an alternate Thor, the Odin of the MCU, and other characters who could appear.

Continue Reading What Is Thor: Ragnarok? >>

The post What Is ‘Thor: Ragnarok’? How Marvel’s Phase Three Movie Will Shake Asgard appeared first on /Film.

11 Nov 16:54

Amazon surprises everyone, announces the Echo

by Jason Lund
amazon-echo

The people at Amazon must have been bored today.  Out of the blue they announced the Amazon Echo.  The Echo is a do it all gadget, that combines a voice controlled personal assistant and bluetooth speaker.  While this seems like an unlikely combination, the Amazon Echo looks like something that almost anyone could find a use for.

Once setup, you use a “wake word” to get the Echo going.  You can follow the wake word with just about any command you want.  You can ask questions, set reminders or alarms, play music and even add items to your shopping lists.  Amazon says you can even talk to the Echo when you have music playing.  It will be interesting to see where Amazon takes the Echo from here.  If it is successful, will Amazon let us order stuff over the Echo?

If you are interested in an Echo, you need to request an invitation from Amazon.  If you are given an invitation it will come in the next few weeks.  The Echo will cost $199 for non-prime customers and $99 for prime members.  You can request an invitation here.

Source Amazon

The post Amazon surprises everyone, announces the Echo appeared first on AndroidGuys.

11 Nov 16:23

All corners come out fighting after Obama supports net neutrality

by Chris Merriman
All corners come out fighting after Obama supports net neutrality

The cable industry will sue, the protestors will protest. Situation normal.


11 Nov 06:43

Here's How We'll Touch Down On A Comet This Week (We Hope)

by Sarah Fecht

Philae's Descent
An artist's interpretation of what the November 12 landing will look like.
ESA/ATG medialab

About 31 million miles away from Earth, the Rosetta spacecraft is circling a rubber ducky-shaped comet and getting reading for touchdown. On November 12 at around 4 a.m. EST, the orbiter will release the Philae lander, which will become the first manmade object ever to touch down (or maybe crash) on a comet.

It will be a challenging landing. Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko is small, with a diameter of about 3 miles by 2 miles, leaving little room for error. And it’s a lot weirder in shape than scientists ever imagined. The landing site is not flat, and it’s surrounded by cliffs and potentially hazardous boulders. Making matters more difficult, the spacecraft is so far away that the 28-minute communications delay means the whole ordeal will basically have to take place on autopilot.

Here’s how the historic landing is expected to go down:

Philae Separate From Orbiter.
(Artist's interpretation)
ESA/ATG

1. Separation

The orbiter will swoop from its altitude of 18 miles down to 14 miles above the comet’s surface. From that height, it will maneuver into position above the landing site. When the time is right, the orbiter will open a hatch and activate two motors that will push the lander out in a sort of celestial birthing.

2. Descent

When it’s leaving the orbital womb, Philae will be traveling at about eight inches per second. After that, it won’t really be able to steer itself or control its speed—mission scientists just have to hope the orbiter had good aim. "We need a certain amount of luck to end up in a nice spot," Paolo Ferri, head of mission operations, told the BBC.

The descent to the comet’s surface will take about seven hours, during which Philae will be taking pictures of the comet and orbiter, and sampling the dust, gas, and plasma around it.

Philae Anchors In.
(Artist's interpretation)
ESA/ATG

3. Anchors Away

As it nears the surface, Philae’s legs will unfold from its body.  Touchdown will take place at less than three feet per second, or about walking speed here on Earth. Then, because the comet’s gravity is so low, the lander will have to utilize a variety of mechanisms to anchor itself in. As it reaches the surface, thrusters will push the lander down as two harpoons will shoot out and dig into the icy dirt. Screws on the lander’s feet will then twist into the soil for additional safety.

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

4. Getting Down To Business

Once it’s secure, the first thing Philae will do is snap a panoramic picture of its surroundings and beam it back to Earth. Then the spacecraft’s real job begins. Over the course of six months or so, the lander will study the comet’s internal structure using radio waves, and it will drill down into the dirt to learn about its water and carbon content. And as the comet’s elliptical orbit brings it nearer to the Sun in the spring of 2015, Philae will measure the dust and ice that vaporize from the soil.

Landing on a comet is risky business, but the ultimate goal is pretty cool: Rosetta will help scientists learn more about what conditions were like when the solar system was forming, and whether or not comets could have seeded life on Earth. 

11 Nov 06:43

White House Pushes To End Internet Throttling Threat

by Dan Moren

Protest at the White House for Net Neutrality
Protest at the White House for Net Neutrality

The flow of bits into and out of your house has become no less important than electricity or water, and if President Obama gets his way, they'll be treated in much the same way. Today, the nation's chief executive put forth a statement on the hot-button issue of net neutrality, coming down firmly in favor of a free and open Internet.

In his written statement, the president urges the Federal Communications Commission to adopt explicit rules that will prevent any internet service provider or mobile network from blocking or throttling content, including accepting any sort of payment for higher speeds—the so-called "fast lane" approach.

President Obama's not mincing words about the necessity of net neutrality, either. "Abandoning these principles," he said a video accompanying his statement, "would threaten to end the Internet as we know it."

The FCC tried before to enforce net neutrality, in 2010, a move that was struck down by a D.C. Circuit Court earlier this year—not because the court believed that such rules were unnecessary, but rather because the way the FCC attempted to put those rules in place was not kosher, given the current classification of broadband services.

To remedy that, the president is now asking the FCC to reclassify broadband as a Title II service under the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which would place it in the same category as broadcast services like television. Previously, broadband Internet has fallen under Title I, which instead treats it like a phone carrier. "In plain English," said the president, "I'm asking them to recognize that for most Americans the Internet has become an essential part of everyday communication and everyday life."

As an independent agency, the FCC is not obliged to follow the White House's suggestions, but as the president points out, the American public has also submitted nearly 4 million public comments about net neutrality.

Such a move by the FCC would make sure that the balance of power on the Internet doesn't shift to those who control the infrastructure. These rules have led to deals such as the paid-peering arrangements between Netflix and cable providers like Comcast and Verizon, ensuring that the video streaming service benefits from faster connections. It also favors incumbent companies—such as Netflix—that have deeper pockets and can afford to make those deals, making it difficult for newer, smaller, and potentially more innovative competitors to get off the ground.

Larger companies will no doubt lobby against the president's proposed reclassification, since it will place greater strictures upon their business. Expect them to argue their support for the way things are now, which more or less let them operate with impunity. But neither the president nor the American consumer seems content to let the Comcasts have their way.

11 Nov 06:43

Virgin Galactic Crash May Lead To New Regulations For Private Spaceflight

by Loren Grush

Investigators at the SpaceShipTwo accident site
For the past decade, private spaceflight companies have enjoyed very few limitations surrounding the testing and operation of their technologies. It’s all thanks to the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act, which was passed by Congress in 2004 to restrict the Federal Aviation Administration from introducing any design or operational regulations on commercially built spacecraft. That means as of now, private companies really only need to obtain a testing permit, provide certain safety-related information, and adhere to a few other standards to get their vehicles off the ground.

Well, it looks like the crash of Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo on October 31 may change all that -- meaning government regulations for private spaceflight may be on their way. For now, the FAA is waiting on the results of the accident investigation before it makes any official regulatory changes. But the agency hinted at modifications to come in a recent statement to Bloomberg News:

However, we will look to utilize any and all available platforms to leverage lessons learned that will result in increased safety. We know that spaceflight is inherently risky and we expect that valuable lessons will be learned from these unfortunate events that will lead to increased safety and help this industry continue to evolve.

The idea behind the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act was to help spur the growth of a very young commercial spaceflight industry. Free of government hindrances, private companies would have the room they need to be creative and innovative with their designs, helping the industry to grow at a faster pace. There was also an unspoken assumption that test pilots, much like mountain climbers and other thrill seekers, know what they’re getting themselves into, negating the need for too much red tape.

"The first death has now occurred, and the FAA will likely revisit the need for regulations, if any."

Yet this regulation-free environment wasn’t meant to last forever. In 2012, Congress extended the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act to last until October 1, 2015, with no plans to keep it going after that. Overall, the measure was intended as a freeze on regulations, contingent on the fact that no pilots died or suffered serious injury during spaceflight testing. And as the MIT Technology Review points out, that line has now officially been crossed.

“The moratorium [was supposed to] be in place until a certain date or the event of the first death,” Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, editor-in-chief of the Journal of Space Law tells the Technology Review. “Unfortunately, the first death has now occurred, and the FAA will likely revisit the need for regulations, if any.”

Michael Alsbury, a pilot for Scaled Composites, died during a test flight of Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo over the Mojave desert on October 31. The SpaceShipTwo is a suborbital space plane eventually meant to take passengers to the edge of space for a hefty fee.

The National Transportation Safety Board is currently looking into the cause of the accident, but it may be months before the agency has a definitive answer on what happened. According to a statement from Virgin Galactic, the vehicle’s engine and fuel tanks were found intact, indicating the crash wasn’t caused by faulty hardware. Instead, the NTSB is focusing on the SpaceShipTwo’s feathering devices, which are used to shift the spacecraft’s wings into reentry position. It is thought that Alsbury unlocked the feathering feature too early, resulting in the separation of the wings and vehicle mid-flight.

While more regulations may sound potentially debilitating, it does indicate a positive transition for commercial space companies. Private spaceflight is no longer considered to be in its infancy, and a more regulated industry indicates that these technologies are moving into the mainstream. In the realm of commercial airflight, the FAA requires companies to prove that the chances of their airplanes failing is 1 in a billion. Making those kinds of odds standard for spacecraft would mean that taking a ride to space wouldn't be an extreme sport, but a safe mode of travel.

[MIT Technology Review, Bloomberg]

11 Nov 06:42

Kitty DNA Shows Cats Have Evolved To Learn From Treats

by Francie Diep

photo of Samantha J. Kitty lying on her back
Samantha J. Kitty, Domesticated Cat
Evan Kafka via Suzanne LaBarre

A cat can't tell you much about its history (mrow?) but its genetics can. Today, an international team of geneticists is publishing the most thorough read yet of the DNA of a domestic cat. This is the first time scientists have read the cat genome carefully enough to tease out details about how evolution—and humans—have changed them.

The team found evidence that a combination of evolution and human selection favored genes that give cats distinctive traits. These include sharp senses, a love for meat, and even the ability to learn (some) tricks in return for treats. The research follows on the first cat genome sequencing effort, which was published in 2007. This latest read used genetic material from the same purebred pet, a female Abyssinian named Cinnamon. For some parts of the analysis, Cinnamon's DNA acted a stand-in for all domestic cats', while in other parts of the analysis, the researchers also sequenced more pet cats, as well as wildcats.

Among the kitty genes favored by natural selection are more than a dozen ones for sharp hearing and eyesight. For example, cats have an eyesight gene that's similar to an eyesight gene in humans. The cat version, however, has small tweaks that scientists think help cats see better at night than people are able to.

Polar bear genomes bear similar markers of selection for fat-digesting genes.

Cats also seem to have more genes related to digesting fat than other carnivores do, which is important for their super-meaty diets. (Scientists call cats, including wildcats, hypercarnivores.) Cats even have genes that may help them avoid heart disease from their high-fat diets. Polar bear genomes bear similar markers of selection for fat-digesting genes.

To look for the genes influenced by human selection, the researchers analyzed DNA pooled from 23 pet cats, including Cinnamon. They compared the domestic cat DNA with DNA from four wildcats. Among the feline genetic traits that people seem to have chosen are ones that influence how the cat brain responds to rewards. Yep, that means kitty treats! Mice that are missing the mouse versions of some of those genes are poor at learning with food rewards. Perhaps when people first brought cats into their barns and homes, they chose the ones that were more motivated to do things for people in return for tasty tidbits.

In addition, domestic cats have genes that control how their brains develop when they're embryos. These are similar to embryo-brain-development genes found in domestic horses, farmed pigs, and other tame animals. The wild relatives of these animals have different versions of those genes. In their paper, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the cat-genome researchers wrote they support the "domestication syndrome" hypothesis. The hypothesis argues that most domesticated animals have this altered brain development while they're embryos. The early-stage brain changes are what give them the seemingly unrelated traits of tameness, including smaller ears, docility, and different coloring from their wild relatives, or so the hypothesis goes.

So when you go home to cuddle your kitty tonight, give him some treats (to train him to enjoy your snuggles). Then tell him he's practically as fierce as a polar bear… although he bears the same marks of domestication as many of his brethren in the animal kingdom, which people have tamed for their own uses over the last 10,000 years.

11 Nov 06:39

USDA Approves A Genetically Modified Potato With Possible Health Benefits

by Francie Diep

photo of a cut Russet potato and an uncut one
Ordinary Russet Potatoes
Photo by ZooFari, released into the public domain

There's a new Mr. Potato in town. This weekend, the U.S. Department of Agriculture approved a few new genetically modified potato varieties for farmers to grow commercially. There are genetically modified versions of the popular Russet potato and the Atlantic potato, the New York Times reports.

When fried, the new potatoes, called Innate potatoes, produce less of a chemical called acrylamide. Acrylamide appears in some starchy foods when they're cooked at high temperatures. It's most abundant in French fries and potato chips. It also appears in tobacco smoke. Scientists think acrylamide raises people's risk for certain cancers, but it's not clear how much acrylamide people to have to eat to raise their risk for cancer… so it's not clear how much eating Innates would lower their risk, the New York Times reports. Innate potatoes also bruise less than non-GMO potatoes, a quality that farmers and shippers prefer.

The potatoes are part of a newer generation of genetically modified crops that:

  1. are made by a newer genetic technique called RNA interference, and
  2. are made with traits that consumers may want, not just farmers and shippers.

Previously, genetically modified crops in the U.S. were created with qualities that benefit farmers and shippers only, such as being Roundup Ready. (Outside of the U.S., researchers have developed GMO crops to help combat malnutrition.)

Another GMO crop of the new style that's close to approval is the Arctic apple. Arctic Grannys and Arctic Goldens are modified so that they'll stay white longer after being sliced. Both Arctic apples and Innate potatoes get their improved qualities from genes taken from other varieties of their own kind. That is, Innate potatoes have added gene fragments taken from other cultivated and wild potatoes, while Arctic apples have added apple genes. That contrasts with today's most popular genetically engineered crops, which get their new qualities from genes taken from different species, such as bacteria.

Companies are hoping GMO-wary shoppers will find their same-species-only products more appealing… but that remains to be seen. Both have faced loud resistance from anti-GMO groups.

[New York Times]

11 Nov 06:37

Belkin and Mr. Coffee want to brew your first pot via WiFi

by Billy Steele
Belkin is no stranger to home automation, introducing several products in that vein through its WeMo line. We already put the company's Crock-Pot through its paces, and now there's a WiFi-enabled coffee option, too. The Mr. Coffee smart coffee maker...
11 Nov 06:37

Pirate Bay co-founder Peter Sunde released from prison

by Jon Fingas
Authorities can't keep the entire Pirate Bay crew under lock and key, it seems. Just days after the arrest of Fredrik Neij, Peter Sunde has been released from prison; he spent only five months behind bars rather than the originally intended eight,...
10 Nov 15:16

Funeral director commissions Rolls-Royce Phantom hearse

by Christofer Lloyd







10 Nov 15:14

(via the-heavy-metal-viking)

10 Nov 15:10

LOL: A Mom Explains Christopher Nolan’s ‘Inception’

by Angie Han

Inception

In the four years since Inception has come out, we’ve seen roughly a half a million infographics and perhaps another half a million thinkpieces attempting to explain Inception. Still, you’ve probably never seen it broken down and analyzed quite like this.

Filmmaker Joe Nicolosi got his mom to watch the sci-fi mind-bender and then tell him “what she thought happened, and who she thought it happened to.” He then illustrated her version of the story for the rest of us to enjoy. What do Matt Damon, the NSA, and a mole have to do with the plot of Inception? Watch Inception Retold By Mom after the jump to find out.

What Nicolosi’s mom’s summary lacks in accuracy, it more than makes up for in adorable mom-ishness. This is probably exactly how my mom would explain Inception, too. Christopher Nolan‘s film isn’t terribly difficult to follow if you’re paying attention, but I guess it’s a different story if you find it “so tedious” you need to walk around, check your phone, and take some breaks.

The best part is how Nicolosi’s mom never quite figures out that it’s Leonardo DiCaprio, not Matt Damon, who plays the lead, even after correctly identifying DiCaprio as the guy from Titanic. She actually says at one point that Inception “wouldn’t have been the same” if DiCaprio had starred. I can’t wait to see what she makes of Nolan’s Interstellar in a few years.

Nicolosi’s mom previously retold The Matrix, which she didn’t seem to like any better. (Her version involves a guy on a computer named either Moshimo or Mustache, and the question of whether Neo is gay, straight, or bi.) Nicolosi’s other famous Internet videos include the Super Mario Bros.: The Indie Film trailer and HELL NO: The Sensible Horror Film.

Revisit The Matrix Retold By Mom below.

The post LOL: A Mom Explains Christopher Nolan’s ‘Inception’ appeared first on /Film.

10 Nov 15:09

Matt Damon Confirms He’s Returning As Jason Bourne

by Germain Lussier

Matt Damon Jason Bourne

It was a rumor, it was confirmed, now the man himself has made it official. Matt Damon has finally confirmed that yes, he’s returning to play Jason Bourne in a 2016 film directed by Paul Greengrass. Read the official Matt Damon Jason Bourne quote below.

E! News got the Matt Damon Jason Bourne scoop, but it didn’t seem like something that was supposed to happen. Ben Affleck mentioned that Damon was returning to the role at a Project Greenlight event, so instead of deny it, Damon said the following:

Yes, next year [we'll shoot it]. It’ll be in 2016 when the movie will actually come out. Paul Greengrass is going to do another one and that’s all I ever said. I just needed him to say yes.

If you head to that link, you can watch a video of the exchange too.

Basically though, this is exactly what we’ve known for years. Damon has long said he’d return to the franchise if Paul Greengrass came back to direct. Latino Review then heard he and Greengrass were coming back, though producers denied it. Deadline followed with a confirmation in September, saying the 2016 slot initially slated to be a Justin Lin directed Bourne film starring Jeremy Renner, was taking a back seat. The question now is, will Renner’s character appear in this Greengrass/Damon film? Initially the news was that the Renner side of the franchise was going to continue in tandem with the Damon films, leading to a showdown/crossover sometime down the road.

Damon will next shoot The Martian for director Ridley Scott. If Bourne is set to shoot in the Fall, he’d likely be able to fit another movie in the middle such as the recently announced Alexander Payne film, Downsizing.

The Bourne franchise has grossed over $1.2 billion worldwide, with each installment crossing the $100 million mark at the domestic box office. A return to the roll for Damon is a sure fire hit for Universal.

The post Matt Damon Confirms He’s Returning As Jason Bourne appeared first on /Film.

10 Nov 15:08

Neil deGrasse Tyson Interstellar Comments: Is It More Scientifically Accurate Than Gravity?

by Peter Sciretta

Neil deGrasse Tyson Interstellar

Update: We have updated with video of Neil deGrasse Tyson talking about the scientific accuracy of Interstellar.

Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson has been critical of Alfonso Cuaron’s Gravity in the past, and in particular, some of the film’s scientific inaccuracies. He even narrated a 9-minute long Everything Wrong With the movie Gravity video. So what did Tyson think of Christopher Nolan‘s Interstellar? The Cosmos host took to twitter to praise some of the film’s ambitions and scientific accuracy. Hit the jump to read the Neil deGrasse Tyson Interstellar comments.

First of all, Tyson was quick to remind his followers that his tweets should not be considered a review or even an opinion:

“REMINDER: Never look to me for opinions on new films. All I do is highlight the science one might or might not find in them.”

cosmos black hole

Neil deGrasse Tyson Interstellar Comments

Update: Neil deGrasse Tyson appeared on CBS News to talk about the scientific accuracy of Interstellar. Here is the video:

Here is a list of Neil deGrasse Tyson’s comments on Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar, each of which are prefixed with “In Interstellar…” (WARNING: potential spoilers for Interstellar follow)

  • Experience Einstein’s Relativity of Time as no other feature film has shown.
  • Experience Einstein’s Curvature of Space as no other feature film has shown.
  • Relativity. Gravity. Quantum. Electrodynamics. Evolution. Each of these theories is true, whether or not you believe in them.
  • And in the real universe, strong gravitational fields measurably slow passage of time relative to others. GPS satellites, located farther from Earth’s center than we are, keep faster time than do our clocks on Earth’s surface. GPS Satellites are pre-corrected for General Relativity, allowing them to beam us the accurate time for Earth’s surface.
  • You enter a 3-Dimensional portal in space. Yes, you can fall in from any direction. Yes, it’s a Worm Hole.
  • The producers knew exactly how, why, & when you’d achieve zero-G in space.
  • You observe great Tidal Waves from great Tidal Forces, of magnitude that orbiting a Black Hole might create
  • All leading characters, including McConaughey, Hathaway, Chastain, & Caine play a scientist or engineer. Of the leading characters (all of whom are scientists or engineers) half are women. Just an FYI.
  • They reprise the matched-rotation docking maneuver from “2001: A Space Odyssey,” but they spin 100x faster.
  • On another planet, around another star, in another part of the galaxy, two guys get into a fist fight.
  • There’s a robot named KIPP. One of the Executive Producers, a physicist, is named Kip. I’m just saying.
  • If you didn’t understand the physics, try Kip Thorne’s highly readable Bbook “The Science of Interstellar”. If you didn’t understand the plot, there is no published book to help you.
  • They explore a planet near a Black Hole. Personally, I’d stay as far the hell away from BlackHoles as I can.

And speaking of getting to close to a Black Hole, Neil deGrasse Tyson talked about this topic in 2008:

You can follow Tyson on Twitter.

The post Neil deGrasse Tyson Interstellar Comments: Is It More Scientifically Accurate Than Gravity? appeared first on /Film.

10 Nov 15:08

Interstellar Timeline Chart Explains Christopher Nolan’s Theory Of Space-Time Relativity

by Peter Sciretta

Interstellar Timeline Chart

/Film reader and artist Dogan Can Gundogdu created an infographic which visually explains the timeline of Christopher Nolan‘s Interstellar. While I’m not sure Interstellar needs a chart explaining the chronology of the story like Nolan’s earlier film Memento, that didn’t stop many artists from creating such infographics to explain the tired levels of Inception — which I still think is very easy to understand without additional aids. Gundogdu’s Interstellar Timeline is a well designed beautiful flowchart explaining how everything went down, taking into consideration Einstein’s theory of relativity and space-time distortion. Hit the jump now to check out Dogan Can Gundogdu’s Interstellar time-line for yourself.

Interstellar Timeline Chart

Interstellar Timeline Chart

You can find more from Dogan Can Gundogdu, an animator and founder of Frametale Visual Arts, at dogancangundogdu.com.

The post Interstellar Timeline Chart Explains Christopher Nolan’s Theory Of Space-Time Relativity appeared first on /Film.

08 Nov 22:20

StarCraft 2: Legacy of the Void details revealed

by Steven Wong

At the Blizzcon 2014, lead designer Dustin Browder revealed a first trailer and look at StarCraft II: Legacy of the Void. Being released as a stand-alone game, Legacy of the Void concludes the StarCraft II trilogy in a big way. The Protoss have amassed their forces and are ready to retake their homeworld. At the same time, all three races (Protoss, Humans, and Zerg) must band together to defeat the Xel'naga, an ancient race that's rising back power. 

While using Protoss forces, players will be able call down fire from The Spear of Adun, a massive battle cruiser that's always in orbit. It has the power to wipe out entire armies at the touch of a button. In other exciting news, the Lurker will be making a comeback. New gameplay includes Archon modes, where two players work cooperatively using the same base and armies, so players can have a truer sense of having eyes everywhere all the time to react to threats and exploit opportunities.

Another new mode includes Allied Commanders, which is an objective based co-op experience. Players team together and assume the roles of powerful commanders from the StarCraft saga. Each commander has different abilities and upgrades, which benefits their armies in unique way. Player work together to fight their way through different scenarios and level up their commanders while doing so. 

In competitve multiplayer, the Protoss will be outfitted with a new weapon called the Disruptor, which uses enemy spikes to tear apart ground forces. Terrans will have new abilities like Tactical Jump, which allows Battlecrusiers to teleport to anywhere on the battlefield. 

The official release window was announced, but we're hoping that Blizzard is aiming for the early half of 2015.

08 Nov 22:13

Living with the Polar Bear

by RJ Evans

Our global climate is changing? That isn’t really a question for the Inupiat people of Northern Alaska.  The ice is retreating and as it recedes ever further that lives the polar bears living in the area with a challenge: adapt or perish.

Yet what is the perspective of the local people about the future of the polar bear? The answer may surprise you in this short film by Possberg Media.

08 Nov 22:11

Could Jared Leto Play the Joker?

by David Konow

Another Joker reinvention could be around the corner with Suicide Squad








08 Nov 22:03

Final Cast Revealed For Quentin Tarantino’s ‘The Hateful Eight;’ Read New Plot Description

by Germain Lussier

Demian Bichir

Quentin Tarantino has finalized the cast for his next film, The Hateful Eight. We already knew almost all of them: Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell, Tim Roth, Michael Madsen, Bruce Dern, Walton Goggins, and Jennifer Jason Leigh. Now two new names have been added. Yes, Channing Tatum is one of them. The other is Demian Bichir, the Oscar-nominated star of A Better Life and current star of The Bridge.

Below, find out who each actor is playing and read the official press release about The Hateful Eight cast.

Deadline broke the latest casting news before The Weinstein Company sent out the following press release. It has all the roles each actor is playing and a full, detailed plot description. Also of note, it pretty much confirms Tatum does not have a large role.

The Weinstein Company (TWC) announced today that an incredible list of top acting talent has come on board to star in Academy Award winning writer/director Quentin Tarantino’s upcoming post-Civil War western, THE HATEFUL EIGHT. The Hateful Eight are: Academy Award nominee Samuel L. Jackson (DJANGO UNCHAINED) as Major Marquis Warren, Golden Globe nominee Kurt Russell (ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK) as John “The Hangman” Ruth, Golden Globe nominee Jennifer Jason Leigh (MRS. PARKER AND THE VICIOUS CIRCLE) as Daisy Domergue, Emmy nominee Walton Goggins (Justified) as Chris Mannix, Academy Award nominee Demian Bichir (A BETTER LIFE) as Bob, Academy Award nominee Tim Roth (RESERVOIR DOGS) as Oswaldo Mobray, Michael Madsen (RESERVOIR DOGS) as Joe Gage and Academy Award nominee Bruce Dern (NEBRASKA) General Sanford Smithers. Also, Channing Tatum (FOXCATCHER) has signed on for a role in the project. This will be Leigh, Bichir and Tatum’s first film with Tarantino, while the rest of the cast has worked with him in the past. THE HATEFUL EIGHT is the eighth feature for the filmmaker, whose last film DJANGO UNCHAINED earned him an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay and grossed over $425 million worldwide.

In THE HATEFUL EIGHT, set six or eight or twelve years after the Civil War, a stagecoach hurtles through the wintry Wyoming landscape. The passengers, bounty hunter John Ruth (Russell) and his fugitive Daisy Domergue (Leigh), race towards the town of Red Rock where Ruth, known in these parts as “The Hangman,” will bring Domergue to justice. Along the road, they encounter two strangers: Major Marquis Warren (Jackson), a black former union soldier turned infamous bounty hunter, and Chris Mannix (Goggins), a southern renegade who claims to be the town’s new Sheriff. Losing their lead on the blizzard, Ruth, Domergue, Warren and Mannix seek refuge at Minnie’s Haberdashery, a stagecoach stopover on a mountain pass. When they arrive at Minnie’s, they are greeted not by the proprietor but by four unfamiliar faces. Bob (Bichir), who’s taking care of Minnie’s while she’s visiting her mother, is holed up with Oswaldo Mobray (Roth), the hangman of Red Rock, cow-puncher Joe Gage (Madsen), and Confederate General Sanford Smithers (Dern). As the storm overtakes the mountainside stopover, our eight travelers come to learn they may not make it to Red Rock after all…

Written and directed by Tarantino, THE HATEFUL EIGHT is produced by long-time Tarantino collaborators Richard N. Gladstein, Stacey Sher and Shannon McIntosh. Harvey Weinstein, Bob Weinstein and G. Mac Brown are THE HATEFUL EIGHT’s executive producers, and Coco Francini and William Paul Clark are associate producers.

Presented in glorious 70mm, THE HATEFUL EIGHT will be released by TWC in 2015. The film marks a continuation of the long-standing relationship between the celebrated filmmaker and the Weinsteins, who have collaborated on all of Tarantino’s films, from RESERVOIR DOGS through DJANGO UNCHAINED.

“Any actor who jumps on board with one of Quentin’s films is in for a wild and rewarding ride,” commented Bob and Harvey Weinstein, TWC Co-Chairmen. “We couldn’t be any more thrilled with the fantastic group of performers we’ve assembled for THE HATEFUL EIGHT – some perennial fixtures in his movies and some newcomers – and can’t wait to kick off the shoot in Telluride.”

The post Final Cast Revealed For Quentin Tarantino’s ‘The Hateful Eight;’ Read New Plot Description appeared first on /Film.

08 Nov 22:03

Interview: ‘Interstellar’ Writer Jonathan Nolan: Real Space Exploration Is “Fucking Done, We Peaked!”

by Peter Sciretta

Jonathan Nolan

A couple weeks back I got a chance to talk to Jonathan Nolan, the brother of filmmaker Christopher Nolan and co-screenwriter of Interstellar. Jonah started developing Interstellar as a project for Steven Spielberg to direct, before getting sucked into the television world showrunning Person Of Interest for Bad Robot. Jonathan has also been making the transition into directing, helming the pilot of the HBO/Bad Robot television adaptation of Michael Crichton’s Westworld (which we talk about briefly). Read all this and more in our Jonathan Nolan interstellar interview, after the jump.

Jonathan Nolan Interstellar Interview

Peter Sciretta: Hey, how’s it going?

Jonathan Nolan: Going well. How are you doing?

ZZ3036CE4C

Question: I’m doing good. Okay, so I’m primarily interested in how this project has evolved over the years. ‘Cause this has been a project long in the making. I first heard about this in I think June 2008 when Spielberg first got this idea from the Caltech talk. How did you get involved and what was that original pitch that Spielberg presented to you?

Nolan: I presented it to him. He and Linda Obst and Kip Thorne, Linda’s great friend, Kip Thorne, who’s a legend in physics over at Caltech. Steven had wanted to do a science exploration film that was grounded in good physics. He wanted to get it right. No huge flights of fancy. More real, authentic. They had been working for several months fleshing out the ideas, you know, in general terms and looking for a screenwriter. So I came in and sat down with Steven. And he wanted to do a contemporary space exploration film. I said, Steven, if it was a contemporary space exploration film, it would be about 15 minutes long. And it would consist of the they all go in to the Appropriations Committee and quietly die, right? We don’t do that anymore. It’s fucking done. We peaked. In the years when the anthropologists come down, they’ll find a little polyester flag in the Moon and they’ll say, fuck, they almost made it. Right?

ZZ1A643F49

Question: Yeah.

Nolan: Like they got so far. So that was 2006, 2007, so it was a somewhat misanthropic take on it. Probably not a great way to pitch it. But so I said, well, you know, it has to be set in the future. It has to be set in a future in which you understand, because that’s the case and anyone who’s looked into a realistic science and space exploration understands that we don’t do it anymore. It’s done. The Apollo missions were before we were kids and it’s over. But that’s not readily apparent to people. So you have to set it in a moment in the future in which that is readily apparent to people. And it’s clear. So it was great fun working with Steven for a couple years on the project. And hammering out a script.

interstellarbig.jpg

Question: So that was always the pitch that like it was set in the future where resources are, were our future’s looking bleak?

Nolan: Absolutely. I mean, look the reality is we stopped going to space because we’re too fucking wrapped up in whatever narcissistic bullshit, you know, as a sort of a collective. I mean, look, there’s an awful lot of things that still need to be fixed here on Earth, right? You know, problems that never seem to go away. Poverty, disease and a lot of stuff that we turned our attention to that is a good thing. We’re also just kind of sucked in the bullshit. I was talking downstairs, I grew up in Apollo space travel, we were promised jetpacks and fucking teleportation and instead we got fucking Facebook and Instagram. That’s a bummer.

But we don’t think of it in those terms. We think of ourselves as being the most magnificent, amazing universe ever and if we wanna go back to the Moon, sure, we could. It’s like no, those guys are all dead or retired. We’re not going back to the Moon. And if we wanted to, we’d have to spend billions of dollars and it would take years and years and years. We’re just done. We’re not doing that. We’re out of that business. And so people  don’t think in those terms. We had to set the movie in the future in which that was abundantly clear.

Interstellar Kip Thorne

Question: Yeah. And the whole idea always had a wormhole of some kind?

Nolan:
Yeah, absolutely. That was one of the things that they, that Kip, you know, Kip’s field is gravitation. Wormholes are a gravitational phenomena. Or imaginary gravitational phenomena as the case may be. And so the reality is if you wanna do a grounded space exploration film, one of the first things you have to do is throw out, you have to have a wormhole. Right? Because if it’s in a remotely contemporary timeframe, we don’t have a technology that could get us any further than our own solar system. Right? I mean, we’re packets of water and protein. We’re extremely fragile. Right? And if we travel in a spaceship for any longer than about a year of interstellar space, we’d be so fried with radiation that there would be nothing left of us. So we, you know, we’re not going anywhere. That again, boring movie, right?

So you have to have a wormhole in order to, you need a shortcut to take you to a what’s nice about a wormhole is that it’s not only a shortcut, you know, by nature of the fact that a wormhole could not exist without some higher order of intelligence putting it there. The existence of one, this is one of the things I was fascinated by in the project, the very fact that the wormhole exists suggests…

interstellar wormhole

Question: That someone’s trying to take us somewhere.

Nolan: Yeah.

After the jump, Jonathan Nolan talks about directing Westworld, Christopher Nolan’s contributions to the script and more.,

Continue Reading Jonathan Nolan Interstellar Interview >>

The post Interview: ‘Interstellar’ Writer Jonathan Nolan: Real Space Exploration Is “Fucking Done, We Peaked!” appeared first on /Film.

08 Nov 21:52

‘Iron Sky The Coming Race’ Trailers: Zombie Jesus Goes Scarface and Adolf Hitler On A T-Rex

by Peter Sciretta

Iron Sky The Coming Race Trailer

Update: A new promo teaser has been released for the Iron Sky sequel, Iron Sky: The Coming Race. While the first Iron Sky The Coming Race trailer showed Adolf Hitler riding a T-Rex, the new promo teaser shows a zombie jesus breaking free from the cross and going on a machine gun rampage. Seems like the filmmakers behind Iron Sky are selling the movie on fun ridiculous politically incorrect imagery not for the easily offend-able,  and I’m fine with that. Watch both clips after the jump.

Iron Sky The Coming Race Trailer – Zombie Jesus

The original story from November 7th 2014 follows:

Iron Sky The Coming Race Trailer

I have to admit that the trailer for Iron Sky got me excited, but for some reason or another I have never actually seen the film. The concept looked so ridiculously fun and pulpy, with the Nazis setting up a secret base on the dark side of the moon in 1945 where they hide out and built a space fleet to return in 2018 and conquer Earth. But it doesn’t seem like I missed much as the 2012 Finnish-Australian-German film was not liked by both critics and moviegoers alike (6.0 user rating on IMDb and 36% critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes). But the film was an international cult hit, spawning a comic book prequel (Iron Sky: Bad Moon Rising), a video game (Iron Sky: Invasion), a board game (Iron Sky: The Board Game), and a feature film sequel, Iron Sky: The Coming Race.

And now like the original film, the filmmakers have released the Iron Sky The Coming Race trailer, a promo trailer for a film which doesn’t yet exist. The sequel is hoping to film in 2015 with a budget of $15 million (about $5 million more than the first film) and the project is currently on Indiegogo trying to raise the $500,000 they need for pre-production. So you can now “make history” and pre-buy the 2016 movie now and help it get made.

The Iron Sky: The Coming Race trailer promises that “Nazis on the moon was just scraping the surface” and “the ugly truth about mankind is about to be revealed”. What could this truth world be?  Set twenty years after World War III, the survivors must fight against Adolf Hitler & his army of dinosaurs. Thats right, Hitler rides his own Tyrannosaurus Rex into battle in the new film. Watch the Iron Sky The Coming Race trailer below.

Iron Sky The Coming Race Trailer – Hitler T-Rex

Just like the original Iron Sky trailer, I’m impressed with the visual effects and insane concept of this independently funded science fiction film. I feel like this is the sort of thing that crowdfunding was made for — insane independent projects that otherwise would not get made in the standard Hollywood or international film system. And sure, this is the type of pulpy concept that The Asylum does on a regular basis, but somehow these guys are able to create a more polished film with good effects.

Iron Sky The Coming Race

The post ‘Iron Sky The Coming Race’ Trailers: Zombie Jesus Goes Scarface and Adolf Hitler On A T-Rex appeared first on /Film.

08 Nov 21:51

‘Warcraft’ Movie Characters Revealed at Blizzcon [Images]

by Russ Fischer

Warcraft movie characters

We haven’t seen much at all from the new Duncan Jones movie Warcraft, but at Blizzcon today the gates are opening on some of the film’s story. We’ve known most of the cast of the film, which includes Ben Foster, Travis Fimmel, Paula Patton, Toby Kebbell, Rob Kazinsky, Dominic Cooper, Daniel Wu and Clancy Brown. Until today we weren’t certain about most of their characters beyond the fact that Foster would play Medivh. Now we know roles for all the major players, and we’ve even got early renders of a couple of them in character. Meet the Warcraft movie characters below.

These shots come from our friend Reza Lackey, who is at Blizzcon today, where Duncan Jones is presenting Warcraft to fans of Blizzard’s original game series.

IMG_8814 IMG_8813 IMG_8812 IMG_8811 IMG_8810 IMG_7294 IMG_5010 IMG_4412 IMG_1958 IMG_1952

The Legendary Twitter feed has been filling in details:

  • Dominic Cooper is King Llane Wrynn, beacon of hope to the city of Stormwind during a time of darkness.
  • Ben Foster is Medivh the “Guardian”, a mysterious, reclusive protector with formidable power.
  • Robert Kazinsky is Orgrim, destined to wield the Doomhammer, heroic Orc weapon, as the right hand of Durotan.
  • Paula Patton is Garona, a strong-willed survivor who must decide where true loyalty lies.
  • Toby Kebbell is Durotan, Chieftain and defender of the Frostwolf Clan.
  • Ben Schnitzer is Khadgar, a gifted young mage on a daring search for the truth.
  • Clancy Brown is Blackhand “The Destroyer”, one of the most feared and titanic warchiefs among the Orcs.
  • Ruth Negga is Lady Taria, Queen of Stormwind at King Llane’s side. His great love and most trusted counsel.
  • Daniel Wu is Gul’dan, supreme Orc ruler fueled by a dark magic that even he cannot control.
  • Travis Fimmel is warrior Anduin Lothar, a hero who has sacrificed everything.

Warcraft is set to be released in 2D and 3D on March 11th, 2016.

Legendary Pictures’ WARCRAFT, a 3D epic adventure of world-colliding conflict based upon Blizzard Entertainment’s globally-renowned universe, is directed by Duncan Jones (Moon, Source Code) and is written by Charles Leavitt and rewritten by Duncan Jones.  The producers are Charles Roven, Thomas Tull, Jon Jashni and Alex Gartner.  Stuart Fenegan, Jillian Share and Brent O’Connor serve as executive producers.  Blizzard’s Chris Metzen co-produces.

 

The post ‘Warcraft’ Movie Characters Revealed at Blizzcon [Images] appeared first on /Film.

08 Nov 14:51

Blizzard Finally Announces New Game: Overwatch

It's the studio's first new franchise in 17 years.
08 Nov 14:51

Blizzard Reveals New StarCraft II Expansion

The new expansion is called Legacy of the Void.
06 Nov 22:04

FBI shuts down black market website Silk Road, arrests its owner (again)

by Richard Lawler
Just over a year after the feds shut down the original Silk Road, an online marketplace that offered anonymous drug and gun sales, they've apparently done the same to its successor. The FBI shut down Silk Road 2.0 and arrested its alleged founder,...
06 Nov 22:03

Corporate Fraud Drives Zalman to Bankruptcy

by E. Fylladitakis

This month is not starting very well for technology enthusiasts. Most of us have fond memories of Zalman, a company that has been producing advanced cooling solutions since 1999. Some are old enough to remember the fan-like CNPS6000 Socket 370 coolers and the first Reserator liquid cooling kits. Zalman was one of the pioneers of low-noise cooling solutions, in an era when stock coolers were noisy enough to drive people insane. Unfortunately for us all, on November 3, 2014 the company filed a bankruptcy protection request in the Seoul Central District Court.

Zalman did not fall victim to recession, competition or even bad corporate management. The whole story is long, complicated, obscure and yet unconfirmed, so unfortunately we may never learn all the details of it. To summarize, Zalman apparently was part of an allegedly very well designed and planned multi-billion dollar corporate fraud.

Zalman is a child company of the robotics manufacturer Moneual. According to The Korea Times, Moneual failed to repay their (massive) export bonds that matured on October 20, 2014, and ultimately filed for bankruptcy. Ever since that incident, Zalman's stock price also began a quick downfall. However, the numbers just do not add up - Moneual has been repeatedly reporting major profits, with their 2013 annual report being nearly 1.2 billion dollars in sales and over 100 million dollars in profit. The local authorities naturally became very suspicious and initiated investigations, the preliminary reports of which indicate that there is evidence of a well-designed corporate fraud.

Long story short, Moneual allegedly acquired Zalman in 2011 as part of their master plan. They forged Zalman's export and accounting documents, greatly overstating their export and income reports, in order to become eligible for huge bank loans. What is even more interesting is an article posted by the Korea JoongAng Daily, where an employee claims that most of the employees knew that the company was a sham but, despite the unearthly profit reports of the past few years, no government officials raised an eyebrow.

During that time, Moneual received about 620 million dollars in loans from several Korean banks and another 275 million dollars as export credit from the Korea Trade Insurance Corp, making the owners of Moneual richer by nearly 900 million dollars, money that will likely never be repaid. They have been arrested and, alongside many top- and mid-level executives of the company, are now facing prison time. Unfortunately, the architects of this fraud may not receive what punishment they deserve; the CEO of Moneual has U.S. citizenship and his brother has Canadian, and there's some concerns that Korean law could face trouble prosecuting them.

Unfortunately, we have little confirmed information on the matter but, from the looks of it, no one from Zalman was involved in this fraud. Depending on the court's decision, there is the possibility that Zalman will be granted bankruptcy protection and severed from Moneual's control. However, even if that happens, Zalman will certainly not have the capabilities they used to and will most certainly struggle to compete on a global scale.