Shared posts

10 Feb 06:36

Oscar Winners 2020: The Complete List

by Jim Vejvoda
The 92nd Academy Awards were held Sunday, February  9, 2020, wherein the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences announced their picks for the best films and artists of 2019 during a hostless ceremony broadcast on ABC. Although Joker lead the pack with 11 nominations, it only took home two (for Best Actor and Original Score) while Netflix only won two out of their 24 noms. No, Oscar night clearly belonged to Parasite, which became the first foreign language film to win Best Picture. Parasite was also the first South Korean film to win Best Original Screenplay, Best International Feature Film, and Best Director (for Bong Joon-ho). Our staff had overwhelmingly predicted that 1917 will win Best Picture, even though the majority of us stated their preference was that Parasite should win instead. (IGN named Parasite as the Best Movie of 2019, after all.) So needless to say there are a lot of happy IGN folks tonight!

The Oscar Winners 2020: The Complete List

Best Picture

  • Parasite (WINNER)
  • Ford V Ferrari
  • The Irishman
  • Jojo Rabbit
  • Joker
  • Little Women
  • Marriage Story
  • 1917
  • Once Upon a Time In… Hollywood
[widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=oscars-2020-igns-reviews-of-the-best-picture-nominees&captions=true"]

Directing

  • Bong Joon-ho, Parasite (WINNER)
  • Martin Scorsese, The Irishman
  • Todd Phillips, Joker
  • Sam Mendes, 1917
  • Quentin Tarantino, Once Upon a Time In… Hollywood
[ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/08/14/parasite-official-trailer"]

Actor in a Leading Role

  • Joaquin Phoenix, Joker (WINNER)
  • Antonio Banderas, Pain and Glory
  • Leonardo DiCaprio, Once Upon a Time In… Hollywood
  • Adam Driver, Marriage Story
  • Jonathan Pryce, The Two Popes
[ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/08/31/joker-review"]

Actress in a Leading Role

  • Renée Zellweger, Judy (WINNER)
  • Cynthia Erivo, Harriet
  • Scarlett Johansson, Marriage Story
  • Saoirse Ronan, Little Women
  • Charlize Theron, Bombshell
[caption id="attachment_2300273" align="alignnone" width="618"]Renée Zellweger in Judy. Renée Zellweger in Judy.[/caption]  

Actor in a Supporting Role

  • Brad Pitt, Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood (WINNER)
  • Tom Hanks, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
  • Anthony Hopkins, The Two Popes
  • Al Pacino, The Irishman
  • Joe Pesci, The Irishman
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="896"] Brad Pitt in Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood.[/caption]

Actress in a Supporting Role

  • Laura Dern, Marriage Story (WINNER)
  • Kathy Bates, Richard Jewell
  • Scarlett Johansson, Jojo Rabbit
  • Florence Pugh, Little Women
  • Margot Robbie, Bombshell
[caption id="attachment_230017" align="alignnone" width="720"]laura-dernmarriage-story Laura Dern, Marriage Story[/caption] [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=oscar-nominations-snubs-2020-all-the-major-misses-from-the-academy-this-year&captions=true"]

Adapted Screenplay

  • Jojo Rabbit (WINNER)
  • The Irishman
  • Joker
  • Little Women
  • The Two Popes
[ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/09/13/jojo-rabbit-review"]

Original Screenplay

  • Parasite (WINNER)
  • Knives Out
  • Marriage Story
  • 1917
  • Once Upon a Time In… Hollywood
[widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=oscar-record-holders&captions=true"]

Cinematography

  • 1917 (WINNER)
  • The Irishman
  • Joker
  • The Lighthouse
  • Once Upon a Time In… Hollywood
[ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/12/22/1917-how-you-make-a-one-take-war-film"]

Animated Feature Film

  • Toy Story 4 (WINNER)
  • How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World
  • I Lost My Body
  • Klaus
  • Missing Link
[ignvideo url=" https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/06/13/toy-story-4-review"]

Original Score

  • Joker (WINNER)
  • Little Women
  • Marriage Story
  • 1917
  • Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

Original Song

  • "(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again", Rocketman (Winner)
  • "I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away", Toy Story 4
  • "I’m Standing With You", Breakthrough
  • "Into The Unknown", Frozen II
  • "Stand Up", Harriet

Production Design

  • Once Upon a Time In… Hollywood (WINNER)
  • The Irishman
  • Jojo Rabbit
  • 1917
  • Parasite
[widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=the-history-of-comic-book-movies-at-the-oscars&captions=true"]

Film Editing

  • Ford v Ferrari (WINNER)
  • The Irishman
  • Jojo Rabbit
  • Joker
  • Parasite

Documentary Feature

  • American Factory (WINNER)
  • The Cave
  • The Edge of Democracy
  • For Sama
  • Honeyland

Documentary Short Subject

  • Learning To Skateboard In a Warzone (If You’re a Girl) (WINNER)
  • In The Absence
  • Life Overtakes Me
  • St. Louis Superman
  • Walk Run Cha-Cha

International Feature Film

  • Parasite (South Korea) (WINNER)
  • Corpus Christi (Poland)
  • Holy Land (North Macedonia)
  • Les Misérables (France)
  • Pain and Glory (Spain)
[ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/12/20/igns-best-movie-of-2019"]

Makeup and Hairstyling

  • Bombshell (WINNER)
  • Joker
  • Judy
  • Maleficent: Mistress of Evil
  • 1917
[ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/08/22/bombshell-trailer-1"]

Visual Effects

  • 1917 (WINNER)
  • Avengers: Endgame
  • The Irishman
  • The Lion King
  • Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

Costume Design

  • Little Women (WINNER)
  • The Irishman
  • Jojo Rabbit
  • Joker
  • Once Upon a Time In... Hollywood
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1322"] Little Women[/caption]

Animated Short Film

  • Hair Love (WINNER)
  • Dcera (Daughter)
  • Kitbull
  • Memorable
  • Sister

Live Action Short Film

  • The Neighbors’ Window (WINNER)
  • Brotherhood
  • Nefta Football Club
  • Saria
  • A Sister
[widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=the-weirdest-oscar-nominations-ever&captions=true"]

Sound Editing

  • Ford V Ferrari (WINNER)
  • Joker
  • 1917
  • Once Upon a Time In... Hollywood
  • Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
[ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/09/12/ford-v-ferrari-review"]

Sound Mixing

  • 1917 (WINNER)
  • Ad Astra
  • Ford v Ferrari
  • Joker
  • Once Upon a Time In... Hollywood
[poilib element="accentDivider"] Let us know your thoughts on the Oscar winners in the comments below!
10 Feb 06:34

4 Ways Parasite Made Academy Awards History

by Jesse Schedeen
Bong Joon-ho's Parasite is one of the big winners of the 2020 Academy Awards. Not only did the critically acclaimed film bring home multiple Oscars this year, it managed to make history in the process. Read on to see all the ways in which Parasite achieved new milestones for South Korean filmmakers at this year's Oscars ceremony. [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=best-reviewed-movies-of-2019&captions=true"]

Best Original Screenplay

Parasite took home an early win by beating out all challengers for Best Original Screenplay. In the process, it became the first South Korean film to win that award. It's all the more noteworthy achievement considering the Academy rarely nominates non-English language films in this category, much less gives them the top honor. For example, Alfonso Cuaron's Roma was the only non-English Language nominee in last year's Best Original Screenplay lineup, and it didn't win that category despite taking home the awards for  Best Foreign Language Film, Best Cinematography and Best Director.

Best International Feature Film

Parasite was a favorite to win the newly renamed Best International Feature Film category this year, and it didn't disappoint. It's now the first South Korean film to win that award. That may seem surprising given how robust the South Korean film industry is and how far this award (in its many varied forms) dates back in Oscars history. Prior to 2020, the category was known as Best Foreign Language Film, and Bong acknowledged and applauded the change during his acceptance speech. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/12/20/igns-best-movie-of-2019"]

Best Director

In one of the most significant moments of the ceremony, Bong became the first South Korean person to win the Academy Award for Best Director. Bong was clearly moved by the honor, while also admitting he assumed his time in the spotlight was over after accepting the Oscar for Best International Feature Film.

Best Picture

Parasite's hot streak continued through the very end, as it took home the top honor at this year's Academy Awards. Parasite is not only the first South Korean film to win Best Picture, but the first non-English language film of any kind to win that award. It's a real game-changer given the Academy's infamous track record in that regard. It's also worth noting that Parasite is the first film distributed by Neon to win Best Picture. Neon previously drew attention at the 2018 Academy Awards when I, Tonya's Allison Janney won Best Supporting Actress. Parasite was a popular pick in IGN's 2020 Oscar Predictions. Many writers wanted the film to win, but few expected it to actually take home the award. This is nothing if not a welcome surprise. To see why Parasite deserved all these accolades, check out our review of Bong Joon-ho's masterpiece and see why we picked it as IGN's best film of 2019. And find out all the winners from the 2020 Academy Awards here. [poilib element="accentDivider"] Jesse is a mild-mannered staff writer for IGN. Allow him to lend a machete to your intellectual thicket by following @jschedeen on Twitter.
09 Feb 07:18

Birds Of Prey: 20 Comic Book Easter Eggs And References You Probably Missed

Harley Quinn's big adventure is packed full of hidden comic book easter eggs and references. Did you catch them all?


The wait is over. Harley Quinn's brand new movie, Birds of Prey is now in theaters after a long and winding road through production--and it turns out, according to our own Birds of Prey review and review roundup, good things really do come to those who wait. Birds of Prey might actually be the best modern DC movie yet, bringing home an eccentric, addictively high-energy street-level Gotham City story populated by characters we absolutely loved.

But, of course, as with any comic book movie, it also came jam-packed with plenty of shout-outs, references, and Easter Eggs to the books it's based on. It even managed to weave in some DCEU shout-outs in there as well, for the fans looking for a bit more shared universe continuity mixed in with all the chaos. Want to see exactly how Birds of Prey ties into Suicide Squad? We've got you covered. Curious as to how The Joker figures in? We've got you there as well. But before you dig deeper into the meat and potatoes, check out these 20 references peppered in through the movie and see which you were able to catch.


1. Helena's backstory


Helena's backstory is pulled directly from her comic book counterpart, with the exception of Zsasz's involvement in her parent's murders.


2. Helena's Catholicism


During the flashbacks to her violent past, we see Helena in a church, praying with a rosary. In the comics, Helena is a devout Catholic who carries a rosary on her, even when in costume.


3. Bruce the Hyena


Harley's pet hyena is actually a two-for-one deal. In the animated series, Harley had two pet hyenas named Bud and Lou--get it? Because she's clown-themed and hyenas are famous for laughing? In Birds of Prey, there's only one hyena but his name is Bruce, the movie's only nod to Batman.


4. Ace Chemicals


Harley's tragic dip into a vat at Ace Chemicals (which she later blows up) is also pulled directly from the comics--or, well, some of them. Joker and Harley tend to have their origin stories shuffled around semi-frequently, but this is one of them.


5. Janus Corp


All around Gotham are signs for Roman Sionis's company, Janus, usually with the "J" blocked out so that it reads "Anus," get it? This is actually from the comics as well--well, minus the gag--though in the comics, rather than a real estate development company, Janus was a cosmetics empire.


6. False Facers


Roman's cronies arrive at the Booby Trap wearing their very own masks, a nod to their comic book counterparts, the "False Facers," or False Face Society, a mask-wearing cult that Roman once started.


7. Roller Derby


Harley's brief stint in roller derby was inspired by her solo comics in the New 52 era.


8. Harley's costumes


Most of Harley's outfits in the movie are street clothes, but during the Boopy Trap fight scene, Renee Montoya wears a bustier that's directly inspired by her Animated Series look. Similarly, Dinah pulls out Harley's Suicide Squad t-shirt (the white top that says "daddy's little monster," remember?) which Harley says still has sentimental value.


9. Dinah's mother


Renee was working with Dinah's mother, who was a police informant that wound up killed on the job. This is an extremely surface-level nod to Dinah's comic book past which is very, very complicated (seriously, it has a lot to do with various reboots merging Dinah and her mother into one character for a while) but appreciated none the less. In the comics, fighting crime is a family business for the Lances, and apparently it is in Birds of Prey as well.


10. Canary cry


Dinah's super-sonic scream is another comic book pull, and her one meta-human ability.


11. Dinah's musical career


It's slightly different in Birds of Prey, but the New 52 era of DC Comics actually reinvented Black Canary to be a singer in a punk rock band. We see echos of that idea here where she's a lounge singer for Roman's club.


12. Harley's backstory


Harley gives an abbreviated version of her personal history, including her time spent as an orphan, her stint as a psychologist in Arkham and so on. All of that comes directly from her animated series origins.


13. Captain Boomerang


Harley spots a wanted poster at the GCPD for a guy she happens to know: Captain Boomerang from Suicide Squad, who will be making a comeback alongside Harley in the James Gunn reboot.


14. Voted for Bernie


Harley's not exactly a topical gal, but one of the grievances that Roman has with her is that she voted for Bernie Sanders. Later, she tells Cass that she should never pay federal income tax, though, so we can assume Harley isn't exactly an informed voter.


15. "Bomb in your neck"


Harley briefly talks about surviving a bomb in the neck, an obvious nod to her time with the Suicide Squad which kept its members in line by implanting bombs in each of their necks. One wrong move and their heads would explode at Amanda Waller's say so.


16. Zsasz's scars


Birds of Prey's Victor Zsasz may not look that familiar to fans of modern Batman comics or shows like Gotham, but he still shares some major similarities. Before he tries to kill Harley, he explains that he gives himself a scar for each kill--they're not the neat, uniform tally marks that we see in the comics, but the ritual is definitely still the same.


17. Amusement Mile


The plan to meet up at the Booby Trap leads everyone to the abandoned Amusement Mile, a real location from Gotham City over in the comics. It's clearly seen some better days--but that's pretty par for the course for Batman's home turf.


18. Beat with a crowbar


After open season is officially declared on Harley, one of Roman's hired goons comes at her wielding a crowbar, which just so happens to be the now infamous weapon of choice Mr. J decided to use on Jason Todd, the Robin he murdered.


19. Looney Tunes


Harley and Cass camp out in her apartment watching Looney Tunes on TV while hiding from the cops--you know, in case you missed Harley's own personal Looney Tunes stylings, including her very Bugs Bunny "disguise" when breaking into the police station.


20. Puddin'


Harley's favorite nickname for Joker, "Puddin," gets a shoutout during her break up story. We wouldn't expect any less.


07 Feb 14:36

Star Trek Picard - Who Is Hugh, The Former Borg Drone?

We know that Star Trek: Picard will see a number of characters returning from other Trek series. Jean-Luc Picard's second officer aboard the Enterprise, Data, has already been shown to have a big influence, and Star Trek: Voyager's former-Borg crewmember, Seven of Nine, will play a role, too. In Episode 3, "The End is the Beginning," we saw another returning character from previous shows: Hugh, another former Borg who appeared on The Next Generation.

Hugh's presence on Star Trek: Picard seems like it has the potential to be a pretty big deal. He and Jean-Luc share the experience of being part of the Borg, but having been freed since then. And Hugh and Picard share another bond because of their experiences aboard the Enterprise. In a big way, Hugh changed Picard's perceptions of the Borg, and their meeting on TNG had profound effects on the way the Federation interacted with the cybernetic beings in later encounters. Picard might have destroyed the Borg for good, if not for Hugh.

No Caption Provided

Regaining Individuality

Picard first met Hugh in TNG Season 5, in an episode called "I, Borg." The Enterprise discovered a crashed Borg ship, with four of its five inhabitants dead. Hugh, then designated Third of Five, survived, and Picard chose to beam him aboard the Enterprise. Dr. Crusher saved the Borg's life, and Picard and the crew began to formulate a plan.

They knew the Borg would not leave any drone behind and would eventually return to find Hugh and the other Borg from the ship, to either reclaim them or destroy their bodies. Knowing that, Picard figured that it might be possible to send Hugh back with some kind of computer virus that would infiltrate the Borg Collective and, potentially, destroy it. He put Data and Geordi La Forge on the job of creating the virus, while Crusher continued to nurse Third of Five back to health. In the meantime, La Forge started spending time with the drone to study it and figure out how he might create a Borg-killing virus.

Things changed, though. The more time Crusher and La Forge spent with Third of Five, the more they started to consider him a person, rather than just another Borg drone. Cut off from the Collective, Third of Five started to develop individuality. Eventually, La Forge and Crusher named him "Hugh," and Hugh started to consider La Forge his friend. Even Guinan, who hated the Borg for attacking her people's planet and nearly wiping them out, found herself struggling with the idea of using Hugh as a weapon after meeting him.

With more and more of the crew questioning the morality of the plan to commit what was essentially genocide against the Borg, Picard finally felt he had to meet Hugh--and discovered that the young Borg was, in fact, an individual, and deserved to be treated with the respect that Picard and the Federation afford all life. Picard offered to let Hugh stay with the Enterprise crew, but Hugh opted to return to the Borg Collective, fearing the Borg would pursue him and threaten the Enterprise if it couldn't locate its missing drone.

No Caption Provided

Corrupted By Lore

About a year later, in Season 6, Picard and the Enterprise encountered some Borg who were attacking colonies and Federation outposts. Immediately, it was clear these Borg were different from the Collective the Enterprise had encountered in the past. They cared about their comrades, referred to themselves as "I" instead of "we," and generally gave signs of being individuals, rather than just pieces of a hive mind. Picard had speculated when Hugh returned to the Borg Collective that his individuality might get transferred to other Borg, and that that could be just as destructive to the hive mind as the virus the Enterprise crew had tried to create. Turns out, he was pretty close to correct.

In "The Descent" and "The Descent II," Picard and the crew discovered that this particular group of Borg was led by Lore, Data's evil twin android brother. After Picard, La Forge, and Deanna Troi were captured by Lore and his band, Will Riker and Worf discovered another group of Borg who had broken away from Lore's. Among those Borg was Hugh, who explained that, yes, his individuality had spread and thrown his Borg Cube into chaos.

Unable to deal with being individuals, they started fighting each other, until Lore found them and gave them a leader to follow. Lore said he'd help the Borg find perfection by becoming wholly artificial like he was, but didn't really know how to make that dream a reality, and so started experimenting on Borg drones with horrifying results. Realizing what Lore really was, Hugh and those like him hid out from the group loyal to Lore.

Eventually, Data defeated Lore once and for all and had him disassembled. Hugh was worried that the Borg would again fall into chaos without a leader, but Picard suggested that Hugh could be the one the individualized Borg followed. That's where the Enterprise crew left them--as a group of Borg who had become something different from the other drones in the Collective.

No Caption Provided

So Where Has Hugh Been?

We're not sure what happened to Hugh in the years that followed. Picard and the Enterprise crew encountered the Borg Collective again in Star Trek: First Contact, so Hugh's individuality apparently didn't transfer to the entire Borg species, just to those on his particular cube. When we meet Hugh in Star Trek: Picard, he's changed significantly--he's no longer a Borg drone, but instead has been returned to humanity, with most of his Borg implants removed.

Though we don't know how Hugh got from leading a group of Borg individuals to his role on the Artifact, we do know that he's using his knowledge of the Borg, seemingly, to help others. He leads the Borg Reclamation Project on the Artifact, the disabled Borg Cube that the Romulans are studying and salvaging on Star Trek: Picard. His work seems to focus on helping other former drones re-acclimate to society. We also know that, unlike Jean-Luc, Hugh has had a hard time adjusting to his life as a human. He suggests that people in society at large don't trust him because of his former life as a drone.

It seems very likely that, eventually, Hugh and Picard will reunite (along with Seven of Nine, another former drone, who we know will appear in the show later this season), and have a lot to talk about. The Borg continue to be an important element of Star Trek: Picard, and there are a lot of potentially big implications there for all of these characters. We can only guess what might happen if and when Picard and Hugh finally meet, but given their history, it seems like it'll be a pretty big deal as the story of Jean-Luc Picard's next chapter unfolds.

07 Feb 14:26

The Flash boss explains [SPOILER] and [SPOILER]'s surprising trips into the unknown

by Chancellor Agard

Warning: This article contains spoilers from Tuesday’s midseason premiere of The Flash, titled “Marathon.” 

Two members of Team Flash went on two surprising trips in The Flash‘s midseason return — and one of them wasn’t by choice.

Picking up in the wake of “Crisis on Infinite Earths,” the midseason premiere, titled “Marathon,” saw Iris (Candice Patton) learn that the mysterious organization she started tracking in the first half of the season is called Black Hole and is led by Joseph Carver, the current CEO of McCulloch Technologies.

“The biggest villain, really, of ‘Graphic Novel #2,’ we met that person: that’s Joseph Carver,” showrunner Eric Wallace tells EW. “We’ve seen what a bad guy he is already. It’s just the tip of the iceberg, the whole Black Hole story, and this conspiracy thriller aspect that we have going on. … Every week as the season goes on, we’re gonna see another layer of the onion peeled back of what being Black Hole really means, and it’s terrifying. Obviously, as you saw at the end of the opener, it directly affects Iris.” And Wallace is not wrong.

Toward the end of the hour, Iris had an epiphany and realized Carver’s missing wife, Eva McCulloch — who will be played by Efrat Dor (Mayans M.C., Sneaky Pete), as EW broke in November — was related to the Black Hole conspiracy. So, she broke back into McCulloch and started poking around Eva’s abandoned office, discovering a giant mirror in the process. While her back was turned, two silvery hands pulled Iris into the mirror, which wasn’t totally surprising given the fact Eva’s name is very similar to Evan McCulloch, one of the Mirror Masters in the pages of DC Comics. Yes, The Flash will definitely reveal where Iris traveled.

“You can’t have an Alice in Wonderland story without seeing Alice in Wonderland on the other side of the looking glass, and exploring the other side of the looking glass is a huge part of ‘Graphic Novel #2.’ It’s one of the most interesting and exciting parts,” says Wallace. “Without giving away too many spoilers, sometimes reality isn’t what you think it is. Perception of what you think is real doesn’t necessarily mean it’s real. So it’s very strange.”

Iris wasn’t the only one who went on a trip in “Marathon.” Elsewhere in the episode, Cisco (Carlos Valdes), who was conflicted about giving up his powers last season, decided to find his purpose by leaving Central City and catalogue everything that changed after “Crisis on Infinite Earths” and the creation of Earth-Prime. Don’t worry, though, Valdes isn’t leaving the show. His absence is only temporary and is a “practical” decision due to scheduling.

“He’s not going anywhere. He is an integral part of ‘Graphic Novel #2.’ We love Cisco, so it was just practical in that sense. I don’t want fans to think Cisco is leaving the show. It’s not that at all,” says Wallace. “What’s great is what he’s going to off to explore on this journey of self-discovery — and we don’t go on that journey necessarily; the journey more comes back to us with his return — actually informs the rest of his emotional arc for the rest of the season, which we will learn when he returns in a few episodes.”

Looking forward, Cisco will ask himself, “How can he help Team Flash and be a true hero without having his Vibe powers?” says Wallace. “We dabbled with that a little bit in ‘Graphic Novel #1,’ but it’s the hugest part of his journey in ‘Graphic Novel #2.'”

The Flash airs Tuesdays at 8 p.m. on The CW.

Related content: 

The Flash midseason premiere recap: Barry and Iris cope with life after Crisis The Flash boss warns that Barry isn’t prepared for ‘the real fallout’ of ‘Crisis’ ‘Crisis on Infinite Earths’ finale recap: Your memory will carry on ‘Crisis on Infinite Earths’ features surprise cameo from big-screen DC actor
06 Feb 14:36

Lab-grown heart muscles transplanted into a human for the first time

by Rachel England
Researchers in Japan have successfully carried out the world's first transplant of lab-grown heart muscle cells, in a move which could significantly reduce the need for heart transplants. To grow the heart muscle cells, the scientists from Osaka Univ...
06 Feb 14:36

Color-changing bandages detect and treat drug-resistant infections

by Christine Fisher
It may sound dramatic, but antibiotic resistance is one of the biggest threats to global health. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it's urgent that we change the way we prescribe and use antibiotics. One approach might be to use banda...
06 Feb 09:28

The Best Board Games for Kids

by Matt Thrower

Board games for grown-ups can sometimes be a bit straight-laced and boring, what with the focus on depth and strategy. So if you're a fan, you might be scratching your head over what kid-friendly games make good introductions. After all, most children love to game and aren't all that well served by the shelves of toy stores.

It's good, then, that there are lots of great games that are good enough to give hours of fun to children and discerning adults alike. A lot of them are dexterity games, which make up the bulk of this list, and no shame in that. Not only are they raucous entertainment, simple and quick, but they need a skill kids do better than thick-fingered adults.

The list below is divided up into age groups. For the very youngest, don't be afraid to let them get out your grown-up games with pretty pieces and let them play how they like. It develops imagination and familiarity. And once they're through with these, take a look at our best board games for beginners list to find entry-level games made for older kids and adults.

Board Games for Toddlers and Preschool-Age Kids

Go Away Monster

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fgo-away-monster1580849192479.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fgo-away-monster1580849192479_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39d82de4b035b46686defb%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnan%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Go%20Away%20Monster%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

It's hard to imagine a better first game than Go Away Monster, designed to teach basic turn-taking while reducing fear of scary things under the bed. Players alternate pulling cardboard shapes blindly from a bag. Most are bits of bedroom furniture, which you use to decorate your bedroom play mat. One, though, is a cute monster which the player must throw away while intoning the game's name.  It's a lovely little ritual that delights kids and less self-conscious adults too.

Orchard

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Forchard1580849287052.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Forchard1580849287052_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39d88ce4b0e6d43845e5d2%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnao%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Orchard%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

Another super-simple game for little ones, Orchard introduces a die and a jigsaw puzzle. Roll the die and take a matching fruit from the orchard, or two of your choice if you roll a basket. If a raven comes up, though, you must add a piece to the raven puzzle. Empty the orchard before the puzzle is complete for a co-operative win. With bright wooden fruits and the cheeky raven character, this is sure to capture lots of little imaginations.

Animal Upon Animal

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fanimal-upon-animal1580849349690.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fanimal-upon-animal1580849349690_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39d8cae4b035b46686defc%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnap%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Animal%20Upon%20Animal%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

Once kids have developed a little dexterity, at around age three, the wonderful world of stacking games opens up. Animal Upon Animal is a great place to start and is fine fun for adults too. A die roll decides who gets to choose an animal shape and who will stack it. Cause the pile to fall, and you must take some of the toppled animals: first to clear their pieces wins. It's the shapes that really make this game, a brilliant set of designs that open up a myriad of stacking options that reward clever play.

Board Games for Elementary School-Age Kids

Loopin' Louie

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Floopin-louie1580849491890.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Floopin-louie1580849491890_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39d958e4b035b46686defe%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnar%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Loopin'%20Louie%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

The next step up the dexterity game stack is this ridiculous slice of motorized mayhem. Louie sits in a weighted plane on a battery-powered boom, so he circles above all the player's precariously balanced chicken discs. Left alone he'll start knocking them off. So it's good each player has a lever to knock Louie away. Time it right and he'll smash right into someone else's chickens: unless they're fast enough to bash him right back at you. There are all sorts of fun licensed versions of this game around, such as Loopin' Chewie and Bobbin' Bumblebee.

ICECOOL / ICECOOL2

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Ficecool1580849575892.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Ficecool1580849575892_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39d9ace4b035b46686deff%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnat%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22ICECOOL%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

ICECOOL and ICECOOL 2 also use weighted pieces in a very different dexterity game. This time the weights are in penguins that you flick around, allowing you to make jumps, swerves and all kinds of trick shots. For most players, the aim is to leap and collect fish tokens pinned above doorways on the modular board, built out of the box itself. One though, the hall monitor, has to hunt down the naughty penguins for detention. Everyone takes a turn at being hall monitor in this fast, frenzied flicking game, and then most points wins.

Coconuts

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fcoconuts1580849698073.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fcoconuts1580849698073_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39da26e4b035b46686df00%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnax%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Coconuts%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

The titular nuts are irregular rubber spheres that players launch at a field of cups using a monkey shaped catapult. The aim is to land nuts in cups, but those tricky blighters bounce and roll in unexpected ways, adding to the chaos. It's a simple dexterity delight for the whole family, but there's more anarchy to enjoy if you also use the included cards. These cause players to have to make trick shots of various kinds, adding to the wow factor if one lands on target.

Pitchcar

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fpitchcar1580849754403.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fpitchcar1580849754403_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39da5ee4b035b46686df01%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnay%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Pitchcar%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

All the entries in this section are dexterity games, but Pitchcar is the one most likely to last well into adulthood. It needs a big, flat surface to play on. The pieces in the box allow you to build a variety of racing circuits, around which players have to flick little discs. First to the finish line wins. It's far trickier and more exciting than it sounds, with all sorts of techniques to master and thrilling pass shots to take the checkered flag. Various expansions add crazy track pieces like a jump or a loop the loop.

Board Games for Middle School-Age Kids

Shadows in the Forest

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fshadows-in-the-forest1580849830082.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fshadows-in-the-forest1580849830082_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39daaae4b035b46686df02%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnaz%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Shadows%20in%20the%20Forest%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"] This is one of those games with a premise so awesome it feels irresistible, even for adults. It's played in the dark, using an included LED lantern and a luminescent die. The board has several big cardboard trees on it that cast shadows and, in the darkness, the Shadowling players move their cute masked pieces. The Seeker player, meanwhile, moves the lantern, trying to catch Shadowlings in the light. Fellow players can rescue any so pinned, but only if they can find areas of shadow to reach the space, leaving them at risk of discovery. A brilliant idea, and a unique game.

Zombie Kidz: Evolution

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fzombie-kidz-evolution1580849889038.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Fzombie-kidz-evolution1580849889038_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39dae5e4b0e6d43845e5d4%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnb0%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Zombie%20Kidz%3A%20Evolution%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

At first, this seems too simple for this age bracket. Players move their characters over the school map, eliminating zombies. If they can meet and lock the gates against the zombie horde before being overrun, they win. But as each scenario is passed, the real magic of the game unfolds. This is a "legacy" style game for kids, where each game adds to a growing narrative. Your choices also make your copy unique with pens and stickers and unlockable envelopes of new rules and other content. It's a wild ride of imaginative customization that children will love.

Fireball Island: The Curse of Vul Kar

[poilib element="commerceCta" json="%7B%22image%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Ffireball-island1580849953145.jpg%22%2C%22styleUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fassets1.ignimgs.com%2F2020%2F02%2F04%2Ffireball-island1580849953145_%7Bsize%7D.jpg%22%2C%22id%22%3A%225e39db26e4b0e6d43845e5d5%22%7D%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fr.zdbb.net%2Fu%2Fbnb1%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Fireball%20Island%3A%20The%20Curse%20of%20Vul-Kar%22%2C%22store%22%3A%22Amazon%22%2C%22additionalInfo%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ourPick%22%3Afalse%7D"]

Some readers may find all their nostalgia buttons pushed by the words "Fireball Island." Well, it's back, it's bigger, and the volcano god Vul-Kar is badder than ever. Gone is the roll-and-move of the original for an action card system that adds strategy without complexity. But, really, what you're here for is the huge 3D plastic board around which red marble fireballs wreak havoc. It's a race to collect treasure and escape the island before the fire, or one of its many other perils, set you back too far. Silly, yet satisfying fun from yesteryear, given a spanking modern update.

06 Feb 08:43

Anyone with a camera and $5 can now have a license plate reader

by Igor Bonifacic
Automatic license plate readers (ALPRs), software that allows computers to separate and analyze license plates from camera footage, could soon become ubiquitous in American neighborhoods thanks to a company called Rekor Systems. On Thursday, the firm...
06 Feb 08:41

What happens if the internet’s most important law disappears?

by Daniel Cooper
Buried deep in the 1996 Telecommunications Act is a tiny clause that underpins everything we do online. It's often described as the 26 words that created the internet -- and with very good reason. Every email you send, social media post you make and...
05 Feb 11:36

Dyson patents a wearable air purifier that doubles as headphones

by Marc DeAngelis
If you use public transportation, you know just how gross the air can be. Commuters are constantly coughing and sneezing, which releases thousands of germs into the air. Taking a flight can be even worse, thanks to the recycled air. And that's not to...
05 Feb 11:31

An artist created Google Maps traffic jams by pulling a wagon full of smartphones

Here's an amusing story about an artist, Google Maps, and a wagon full of smartphones. Simon Weckert, an artist based in Berlin, Germany, has gathered a lot of attention with his latest Google Maps Hack. 99 second hand smartphones are transported in a handcart to generate virtual traffic jam in Google Maps. Through this activity, it is possible to turn a green street red which has an impact in the physical world by navigating cars on another route to avoid being stuck in traffic. #googlemapshacks The artist's website lists the experiment as a "Performance & Installation". The artist...

05 Feb 09:42

Star Trek: Picard Episode 2 Review

by Scott Collura
Full spoilers follow for this episode. Episode 2 of Star Trek: Picard, “Maps and Legends,” digs its shiny, Starfleet-issue heels into its central mystery as Patrick Stewart’s Jean-Luc continues to investigate the circumstances surrounding Isa Briones’s character Dahj, the android “daughter” of Data who was killed in the series premiere last week. Along the way, we also check in with Dahj’s twin, Dr. Soji Asha (also played by Briones), who’s hanging out on a decommissioned Borg cube and getting down with the bad boy Romulan Narek (Harry Treadaway). [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=star-trek-picard-photos&captions=true"] Indeed, mysteries abound, but fortunately for Picard he spent all those years on the holodeck re-enacting Dixon Hill detective stories, so he has a talent for this stuff. Unfortunately for us, though, in its second week Picard is starting to feel like it’s taking a long time getting anywhere. It’s like the warp core is down, and Geordi is nowhere to be found. Certainly the decision to keep Jean-Luc grounded in these early episodes -- earthbound and starship-less -- is essential to this version of the character, who walked away from that Starfleet life all those years ago. But as Picard works to figure out where Dahj and Soji came from, there’s a bit too much talk and not quite enough action, even by the standards of Stewart’s Next Generation, a series well known for its talk-it-out creed. Perhaps the problem is it sometimes feels as though the characters are talking at us rather than to each other, back-filling plot so we can keep up. That said, we do open on an exciting if tragic scene, as we flash back 14 years to the day the synths attacked Mars. The main synth portrayed here is apparently more primitive than Data, and certainly treated with far less respect than our favorite Enterprise ops officer ever was by his shipmates. But that’s not why the synths attack their masters, it seems; no, it looks like they received some kind of download immediately prior to the bloody revolt. The question, of course, is who reprogrammed the androids to commit the heinous attack? [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/picard-take-a-closer-look-inside-the-borg-ship"] Another enigma looming over the series is what exactly is going on at that Borg cube, which is run by the Romulans and, we learn here, disconnected (fortunately) from the Collective. It’s referred to as “the Artifact,” and treated as a sort of museum/research facility, but also one where Soji is de-Borging the Borg. Certainly her intentions seem good and genuine, but the fact that Narek is pretty clearly a bad guy (confirmed by the end of the episode) leaves her in the position of being one step behind the viewer, and that’s not a great place for a character to be for too long. At least Narek’s true nature is one mystery we’ve got figured out, even if she hasn’t. Meanwhile, Picard’s doing his Dixon Hill thing (but without the fedora) with an assist from the show’s second best character, Laris (Orla Brady), Jean-Luc’s housekeeper who also happens to be an ex-Tal Shiar (which is to say Romulan secret police). She does some computer-sleuthing in Dahj’s apartment that is worthy of Data and Geordi in their heyday for its level of technobabble, but we can forgive her for that if only because of her line “cheeky f#@kers.” I’ve never been a fan of modern Star Trek’s preoccupation with dropping swear words, but somehow it just works here. Thanks to Laris, Picard learns that Dahj’s twin is off-world, and so he visits Starfleet headquarters to ask for a ship… only to be turned down and taken down several notches by the CNC. It’s a pretty great scene all told, starting with the strains of Jerry Goldsmith’s score as Jean-Luc beams in to San Francisco, but culminating in a very un-heroic outcome for our hero as he’s told to do what he’s good at -- go home. [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=jean-luc-picard-the-first-duty-gallery-comic-con-2019&captions=true"] The Admiral also makes the case for Starfleet and the Federation’s side of the situation from 14 years earlier. Whereas last week’s episode painted Starfleet in a poor light, here things become a little more complicated. Would the Federation itself have fallen apart if they had diverted all their resources to the Romulan rescue? The needs of the many… We also get to meet Starfleet’s head of security, the Vulcan Commodore Oh (Tamlyn Tomita). The actress plays the part very well, breaking down the basic logic of the Picard situation with simple statements that are reminiscent of how Spock and T’Pring discussed their failed marriage attempt all the way back in “Amok Time” on The Original Series. And yet, not long after the Commodore is introduced to us, we learn that she is in fact being duped by her underling, Peyton List’s Lt. Rizzo (who’s secretly Narek’s sister!), which unfortunately cuts into Oh’s credibility, as well as our patience with her as a character -- as with Soji. And yet, we do learn that she was behind the plan to capture Dahj, even if killing the girl was a mistake on the part of Rizzo’s Romulan goons. But what’s the head of Starfleet security doing working with Romulans? Another mystery! [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/star-trek-the-history-of-the-borg-timeline"] Questions and Notes from the Q Continuum:
  • Whoever reprogrammed the synths to attack Mars did so on First Contact Day -- the holiday that recognizes when humans first met alien life. Surely this is not a coincidence.
  • “I never really cared for science fiction. I guess… I just didn’t get it.”
  • How many Early Grey references is too many?
  • It’s nice to see the use of holographic communications in this series, as it makes more sense than it did on Discovery, and in fact we learned in Deep Space Nine that Starfleet was beginning to utilize that tech more often.
  • The Federation computers do not use Majel Barrett-Roddenberry’s voice anymore. Sad emoji.
  • Riker, Worf, and LaForge all get namedropped!
  • Not only does David Paymer show up as Jean-Luc’s old buddy from his first command, the Stargazer (where he was probably the ship’s doctor), but he also tells Picard that his medical scans indicate that the illness that he was warned of all the way back in the Next Gen season finale may finally have caught up with him.
  • I love how the new Starfleet uniforms track with those seen in the alt-future of “All Good Things,” including the new combadge and the placement of the pips, but man do they seem to not be very well fitted.
  • We got another appearance by the Enterprise-D… and also the original NCC-1701!
  • Star Trek: Picard’s use of the word “galaxy” is a bit annoying, as technically the Federation should just be the Alpha and part of the Beta Quadrants at this point in Trek history, which is really like one-third of the galaxy. Unless, of course, something changed since we last saw Jean-Luc 20 years ago.
  • We finally got to meet Picard’s former First Officer Raffi (Michelle Hurd), but more on her next week!
05 Feb 07:28

Let's Talk About Picard's Parietal Lobe!

by Witney Seibold
Spoilers follow for Star Trek: Picard Episode 2. [poilib element="accentDivider"] In “Maps and Legends,” the second episode of Star Trek: Picard, our stalwart title character has a conversation with one Dr. Moritz Benayoun (played by reliable character actor David Paymer), an old friend from Picard's days aboard the USS Stargazer (his first command). Picard, thanks to the machinations of the series so far, wants to lead an off-world mission aboard a starship, and requires a doctor's medical clearance in order for Starfleet to give him any sort of command. Dr. Benayoun, however, sadly breaks the news to Picard that there might be something medically suspicious happening with the parietal lobe of his brain. [ignvideo width=610 height=374 url=https://www.ign.com/videos/2020/01/30/picard-whats-really-happening-on-the-borg-cube-spoilers] This mention likely set off alarm bells in the heads of Trekkies everywhere. Picard's parietal lobe, you see, was actually a major plot point in “All Good Things...,” the final episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. In that episode, Picard – very much in the vein of Slaughterhouse-Five – found himself “unstuck” in time, experiencing the present, the past (when he first took command of the Enterprise) and the future (as a retired admiral on his vineyard. Hm...) seemingly at random. In the “present” of “All Good Things...,” Dr. Crusher met with Picard in his ready room to announce that she, thanks to a specialized scan, located potential evidence of a rare and incurable brain disease called Irumodic syndrome inside Picard's parietal lobe. By the “future” of that episode – which falls in with the actual chronology of Star Trek: Picard – Jean-Luc had indeed been diagnosed, and his peers, Data and Geordi, were suspicious of his potentially disease-inspired raving about an “anti-time well” near the border of the Neutral Zone. Irumodic syndrome, we learn, causes the degradation of synaptic pathways, causing confusion, hallucinations, and eventually death. The first mention of Irumodic syndrome on Star Trek was in “All Good Things...,” and Picard says to Dr. Benayoun – when Benayoun brings up Picard's unnamed brain issues – that “I was told a long time ago that it might cause a problem eventually,” making a direct allusion to the scene where Dr. Crusher gave Picard his diagnosis. Benayoun says the issue could lead to one of a variety of syndromes. [caption id="attachment_2296147" align="aligncenter" width="1920"]Dr. Benayoun has bad news for Jean-Luc. Dr. Benayoun has bad news for Jean-Luc.[/caption] Picard's future in “All Good Things...” was, of course, merely speculative (it could have even been a fantasy concocted by Q), and the events of Star Trek: Picard have now directly contradicted it regardless. But that “I was told” line obviously refers to when Dr. Crusher gave Picard a diagnosis of an ailment in his parietal lobe that could lead to full-blown Irumodic syndrome somewhere down the line. And Dr. Benayoun has now confirmed it, mentioning that whatever crazy journey he plans on making should perhaps kill him before the brain ailment does. One of the symptoms of Irumodic syndrome, as mentioned above, was hallucinations. In “All Good Things...” Picard had occasional visions of jeering jurors that leaked into his brain from Q's kangaroo courtroom fantasy (Trekkies know the fantasy well). Back in 1994, I personally operated on the assumption that the “All Good Things...” hallucinations were inserted into Picard's brain by Q. But they could have easily been actual hallucinations Picard was having right there in his vineyard. [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=star-trek-picard-explaining-all-the-different-datas&captions=true"] The fact that Picard may actually have Irumodic syndrome (or something similar) in the continuity of Star Trek: Picard means that some of what we may be seeing is – dare we contemplate? – hallucination. Picard, usually a steely and clear-thinking leader may now be an unreliable narrator, and we, as viewers, now need to be vigilant in eyeballing cues as to what may or may not be real in Picard's eye. This would, of course, lead to an all-too-familiar narrative can of worms that we may or may not want to open. Are certain characters real? Is ANY of Star Trek: Picard real? Are we witnessing a fantasy/hallucination that Picard is having in his château? While these sorts of gotcha-just-kidding narrative tricks are usually cheaply employed (call it Tyler Durden syndrome), it could – could – be an ultimate nuclear-option-style “out” for the show's writers in case they end up clashing too much with established Trek canon (à la Discovery). That doesn't match with what came before? Uh... It was all a hallucination from Picard's Irumodic syndrome! At the very least, we now know that we need to be keeping an eye on Jean-Luc's brain health. For more on Star Trek: Picard, check out our history of the Borg, find out why Seven of Nine blames Picard, and get confirmation on which timeline Picard takes place in.
05 Feb 07:01

Arrow boss talks series finale, the episode he'd redo, and biggest writers' room debates

by Chancellor Agard

Warning: This article contains spoilers from the series finale of Arrow, which aired Tuesday night on the CW.

After eight seasons of Arrow, Marc Guggenheim’s work is done. And the co-creator of the CW superhero series, who wrote Tuesday’s farewell hour with showrunner and executive producer Beth Schwartz, is pleased to have delivered “an unconventional series finale by its very nature,” he tells EW.

The network-defining show’s swan song had a lot to accomplish: It had to integrate Arrow’s hero, Oliver Queen (Stephen Amell), into the story even though he died a couple of episodes earlier (shoutout to our old friend the flashback). It had to explain how Oliver’s death and the subsequent rebooting of the universe resurrected everyone who perished over the past eight seasons. It had to give Oliver and Felicity (Emily Bett Rickards) a happy ending (they wound up living happily ever after in a paradise dimension). And finally, it had to tie things up for every other character who was still alive and/or had come back from the dead. Looking back on the episode at a recent press screening, Guggenheim mostly likes what he sees.

“I’m proud of Diggle’s eulogy. That was hard to write but really fun to have written,” he says, referring to David Ramsey’s character. “You know, television history is replete with series finales that didn’t stick the landing, and I kind of feel like this one does.” That said, Guggenheim will never be completely satisfied, and still finds some quibbles as he watches it back with reporters. “I was watching the final five minutes with you guys I’m like, ‘Oh, I wish I fixed that sound thing,’” he says. Then again, that happens every episode.

Below, Guggenheim sits down with EW for a final in-depth Arrow chat and opens up about the episode he’d like to revisit if he could, the story lines that stirred the most debate in the writers’ room, what it was like crafting the finale, and more.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: To start, did you guys pitch Greg Berlanti your ending? How did he react?
MARC GUGGENHEIM: Yeah, we definitely pitched it to him. He was cool with everything. I don’t recall there anything specific , “Oh, you definitely need to do this” or “Here’s an idea for that.” It was more like, “Wow, that just feels really right.” You know, go with God, essentially. And so we did.

When we spoke way back in June for EW’s Arrow cover story, you said you’d just written the final scene after coming out of a meditation session that morning. Is that the same scene?
That’s the scene.

Did it change at all from then to now?
No. In fact, it’s pretty much word for word. On the day, Stephen and Emily may have used a different phrase here or added a phrase there, but literally it’s exactly the same scene, down to everything. It was amazing to actually get to watch it get to be shot.

Was the final scene of the show in inspired by how the Crisis on Infinite Earths comic ended, with Superboy, Alexander Luthor, and Earth-2 Superman and Lois Lane going off to live in a paradise dimension?
You know, probably subconsciously, yes. Because back in June I was rereading Crisis for the umpteenth time, so it was probably definitely milling about in my subconscious, because like I said, that scene literally came out of my subconscious. I meditate every morning, but I never come out of meditation with an idea or a scene or anything. This is the first and last time that’s ever happened to me. So I think a lot of things were roiling around in my head that particular morning.

The finale’s structure is surprising, because it starts with the documentary. Where did that come from?
It really started with a request I made to the postproduction team, which is I asked them for a reel of all the deleted scenes, including the deleted scenes that we haven’t released previously on home video. When I was watching that, I saw the scene that we shot for the beginning of 223 ; 223 was originally going to begin with Oliver imagining if things had gone differently in 220, and if he had been able to save his mother’s life. And the moment I saw that it solved a huge problem that we were wrestling with, which was: How do we basically tell the Arrow audience what happened in “Crisis” without it being overly expositional and relying on you to have seen “Crisis”? Showing it as opposed to telling it was checked off a huge box, obviously.

Then using that to kind of segue into the documentary, and using the documentary again as a device to tell the audience the information we need them to have — again, it’s one of those things that just felt right. That said, we wouldn’t have introduced the documentary concept just for this episode. You know, it was there because of 712, our 150th episode, as a device. So making use of it here to help just get out this exposition in hopefully an artful way just seemed right.

Were there any other scenes in the episode that were recycled deleted scenes?
No, actually there weren’t. The opening of Act 2, which is the recapitulation of the pilot — the scene on the lifeboat — was originally going to be the opening of the episode. The opening of the episode was going to be like, “Oh, we see the pilot and then we realize it’s a dream that Mia is having,” but then we saw that footage from 223 and that became the opening of the episode. Then I realized, “Oh, we can have our cake and eat it too,” which I always love to do, start Act 2 with the way I was going to start Act 1. Done and done.

Oliver’s been dead for two episodes now. At any point in the writing process did you wonder, “Should we have not killed him off so early?”
Actually, no. It’s funny, Arrow, more than maybe almost any other show I’ve ever worked on, has always been the hardest to break, and that’s never not been true. With the finale, after eight years, it doesn’t occur to us to be like, “I wish we hadn’t done that and then it would’ve been easier,” because we know that’s a fallacy. We know that even if we had, it would still be hard to break because that’s Arrow, that’s just the way it goes. I like — I always knew Oliver was going to die I always thought it would be in a series finale — the idea of him dying as part of this major event that relates to all of the other shows that this show spawned.

And I like it being part of “Crisis,” which is a bit of comic book history. Crisis had these memorable deaths of the Flash and Supergirl, and obviously we have The Flash and Supergirl, which everyone knows we’re not killing them. So again, it felt right. You know, that tends to be the single barometer, it’s our gut. That gut is validated and stress-tested by conversations in the writers’ room, debates in the writer’s room, conversations with the studio, the network, Greg. None of these ideas are just something Beth and I think of and we just immediately put into practice. We’re constantly testing them with all of our various partners, and there’s an army of people to discuss it with.

Looking back at the run of the show, what plot points created the most debate in the writers’ room?
I would say in season 4, the concept of the flash-forward — knowing that there was going to be a character who is dying, whether or not to even do that was a subject of debate. Who was in the box was a subject of debate. You know, we debated a lot whether or not to kill Moira at the end of season 2, in large part because we just love writing for Susanna so much.

It’s funny, I would say it was almost everything, quite frankly. It’s hard to come up with specifics that are particularly memorable because it’s just always been a part of our process. I think it’s good to discuss these things and also discuss, is it a good idea? Is it good for the show? Is it good for the characters? Does it make sense for the characters? I would say probably the worst or most controversial things that we’ve done are the ones that didn’t get stress-tested as much, and sometimes that shows.

Is there anything you wish you could redo or sharpen a bit?
I’ve been doing television for 20 years. There’s not a single episode of anything I’ve ever worked on I wouldn’t take back in a heartbeat. I’ll give you a specific example: I wrote 513, which was the “gun control” episode. I thought that we were taking a big enough chance just by raising the specter of the issue, no pun intended. Looking back on it, especially in light of the number of mass shootings that unfortunately happened after that episode aired, I wish I had gotten higher up on my soapbox. I had an opportunity and an audience, and I was trying to show both sides of the argument, and I wish I had basically come down hard on one particular side.

You’ve said that you always thought Oliver needed to die as the final piece of redemption for his murderous origins. What do you hope you captured or conveyed about the idea of redemption?
The thing that I’m most proud of, quite frankly, in the series is the fact that Oliver goes from being a spoiled rich a—hole to a mass murderer, to a father twice over, a husband, a public hero not hiding behind a hood, a former mayor. He goes on probably the most severe character journey of any character I’ve ever worked on because we had not just eight years — we really have 13 years of a story. But over those 13 years he grows and evolves as a human being, in a way that I’m really glad we got to tell that story.

What do you think you’ll miss the most about the show?
Well, certainly writing the show. I truly enjoy writing the show. It will probably be working with everybody. The collaborative process here has been so great, and there’s people involved in the show — in the writing and the production and the postproduction side and at the studio and at the network — who have been with this series since at least 102. Those are great relationships. I’m still going to stay in touch with everyone, but working day in and day out with them is a different thing, and I’m going to miss that.

Here’s a question I’ve had since 2014: After the season 2 episode “Birds of Prey” aired, you said you had a story line idea for Jessica De Gouw’s Huntress in season 3. Obviously, we never saw that. Do you remember what the story line was?
Oh my God, I’m completely blanking, because this was forever ago. I don’t remember. It’s possible that, knowing me, that idea became incorporated into the Arrow Season 2.5 comic that I was writing while we were doing season 3. But I will say we really actually wanted to get Jessica back for the series finale. There were a couple of actors who were either working on shows or working on movies where we couldn’t make the scheduling work out, and Jessica was one of them, which was a profound disappointment to me because we’ve been wanting to get her back ever since season 2.

But you got that nod in the backdoor the pilot.
Exactly, because I love that character and I love Jessica as an actress, and it’s just one of those things. You’d think with 22, 23 episodes a season you’d have all the time in the world, but you have all these factors that have to line up: Their schedule has to line up, you have to have the right story at the right time. Believe it or not, it’s a little bit more complicated than one would hope.

Did you watch any other series finales for inspiration?
Yes, I did, and now I’m trying to remember which ones they were. Definitely Star Trek: The Next Generation, because that is the gold standard of series finales. I am of course blanking on all the other ones. I will say that I, as a writer, have a lot more experience writing comic book last issues than series finales. I can’t speak for Beth, but I felt I was drawing a lot on that experience as a writer and ending a series of comic book runs more so than ending TV shows.

What did you take from having ended a comic book run and apply to writing this finale?
The challenge with ending a comic book series is very different because you’re not ending a series, you’re ending a run. My last issue of Blade was not going to be the last issue of Blade. My last issue of X-Men wasn’t going to be the last issue of X-Men. So the challenge there is basically in one issue, present your thesis statement of the series to the reader. The thing I struggled with was, because we knew so much going into the finale, what’s the thesis statement? What’s the theme that pulls all these things together? We know Diggle is going to find a green box, we know we’re going to have the biggest action sequence we’ve ever had, we know that it’s going to be Oliver’s funeral. We know all these pieces, but what’s the thing tying it all together? I was in the editing room watching a cut, and for the umpteenth time I’m watching the saga sell and he always says, “ home with only one goal: Save my city,” and that is when it clicked for me. It’s like, he has saved the city. That provided that thesis statement. It’s like if you’re doing Gilligan’s Island, they’ve got to get off the island. If you’re doing Star Trek: Voyager, they have got to return to the Alpha Quadrant. I realized, oh, Oliver has achieved his eight-year-long goal by virtue of the sacrifice he made in “Crisis,” and then that all tied together for me.

Is there anything else you want to add?
I’m very just appreciative of all the people who have supported this show. It’s gotten incredible support from the studio, the network. You know, everyone involved with the production has worked really given their all. We’ve always said, “This has never been an easy show to do,” and it’s always been a show where everyone involved is tap-dancing on the stage as hard as they can to get the sailors to throw money. And the sailors themselves, the fans, have really been amazing. Look, it’s obviously a very complicated fandom. There are some people who, quite frankly, are very rude and nasty, but they are a very small minority of people. They are also really eclipsed by the exponentially more number of fans who are just positive and gracious — not just to us, but to each other. I interact with them at comic book conventions, and they kept the flame alive. They’ve kept the show going and they’ve inspired us to keep the show going, and I’m really grateful to them.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

The Arrowverse lives on with The Flash (returning Feb. 4 at 8 p.m.), DC’s Legends of Tomorrow (Tuesdays at 9 p.m.), Supergirl (Sundays at 9 p.m.), Batwoman (Sundays at 8 p.m.), and Black Lightning (Mondays at 9 p.m.), all on the CW.

Related content:

Arrow bosses, star break down the series finale: The Green Lantern tease, final scene, and more Arrow star David Ramsey is excited to see someone new play Diggle one day ‘Crisis on Infinite Earths’ boss answers burning questions about Earth-Prime, Ezra Miller, and more
05 Feb 06:52

The Mandalorian season 2 will arrive this October, spin-offs teased

by Nick Romano

The Mandalorian, a.k.a. the misadventures of Baby Yoda, will have a long shelf life at Disney.

On the latest financial earnings call for The Walt Disney Company this week, CEO Bob Iger confirmed that season 2 of the live-action Star Wars series will premiere on Disney+ sometime this October and teased further spin-offs might be in the show’s future.

According to Iger, the future of the Star Wars franchise lies in the development of multiple TV series as he reaffirmed Lucasfilm will take a “hiatus” from theatrical Star Wars releases. Iger mentioned the “Rogue One prequel” (presumably the one about Diego Luna‘s Cassian Andor) is on the way and that Ewan McGregor‘s Obi-Wan Kenobi series is still on the docket. As for The Mandalorian, he said there’s “more coming” after season 2 with the “possibility of infusing it with new characters” and having those characters spin off in “their own directions.”

Praise be Baby Yoda!

The Mandalorian premiered on Disney+ in November and began the adventures of a lone Mandalorian bounty hunter (Pedro Pascal), known now by Dyn Jarren, as he fights to protect “the child,” a 50-something-years-young baby Force-sensitive creature that seems to be of the same race as Jedi Master Yoda.

Over the course of the first season, taking place after the fall of the Empire in Return of the Jedi, this unlikely pair came across a roster of characters, including Gina Carano as Cara Dune, Carl Weathers as Greef Karga, Ming-Na Wen as Fennec Shand, and Giancarlo Esposito as the villainous Moff Gideon. Given the surprise item in the latter’s possession in the finale, the chances of his return seem high. Some even have theories that iconic Star Wars bounty hunter Boba Fett discreetly popped up on the show already. The potential feels vast.

Iger further teased the debuts for Disney+ Marvel series Falcon and the Wilder Soldier and WandaVision. Starring Anthony Mackie and Sebastian Stan, the former will be released in August. The latter, bringing back Elizabeth Olsen and Paul Bettany, will premiere in December.

Disney released the first footage for these series, including a Tom Hiddleston-led Loki, during the Super Bowl.

Related content:

A new Baby Yoda figure is on sale and he’s life-sized Cuddle Baby Yoda, George Lucas must Adam Pally on his punchy Mandalorian scene: ‘Baby Yoda is a bit of a diva’
04 Feb 10:11

The ‘Good’ Bye: ‘The Good Place’ creator Mike Schur looks back on four seasons of magic and morality

by Dan Snierson

A heaven-sent comedy is ending a hell of a journey. The Good Place took the Soul Squad on the ride of their (after)life — and it proved to be enlightening for all. “Part of the pitch was ‘We’re not going to have philosophy in the margins,'” explains creator Mike Schur. “It’s the core of the show, and people are going to talk about books. We also have to tell a bunch of jokes and do a bunch of emotional stories, but it’s the thing that’s going to make the show special, if it works.” That Kant-do spirit paid off richly for the heady, brainy, loopy series, which followed Team Cockroach on adventures far and wide, from death to life to death, through time knives and Interdimensional Holes of Pancakes, and from places Good, Medium, and Bad. Along the winding way, the ambitious series earned a cult following, a Peabody Award, and seven Emmy nominations, including one for Outstanding Comedy Series. Here, Schur takes you inside the margins of the magic before The Good Place disappears for eternity with the unveiling of the one-hour series finale (airing Thursday at 8:30 p.m. on NBC).

The philosopher whom the writers spent the most time discussing

Schur considers it a toss-up between ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle or American philosopher/recently retired Harvard professor Tim Scanlon, who wrote the oft-referenced tome What We Owe to Each Other, which pops up on the show in several occasions. “In season 2, the show’s official position on ethics was most closely aligned with Aristotle,” he explains. “Aristotle was the philosopher who had a certain practice-makes-perfect thing. The way you get better at being ethical is by doing good things over and over. Scanlon talked about your happiness entirely dependent on your ability to make peace with those around you. His What We Owe to Each Other is a book about, ‘If you’re coming up with rules, you have to come up with rules that other people won’t reject. That’s the way you know it’s a good rule.'” Schur pays third-place props to 18th-century Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant “because Chidi was a Kantian. We spent a lot of time trying to figure out what Kant would say about human behavior, and mostly what he would say is, ‘You’re all doing it wrong, and you’re all terrible.'”

The most impenetrable work of philosophy you tackled

That honor is awarded to On What Matters by British philosopher Derek Parfitt, who was much smarter and more formed than that other Derek. “Parfitt died fairly recently and this book was his masterpiece,” says Schur. “It’s in two volumes. And volume 2 is twice the length of volume 1, which infuriates me . I wasn’t remotely close to reading all of it. It’s trying to propose a grand unified theory of all ethical theories. I’m staring at it right now; it’s taunting me from my shelf — and it is literally the reason that we made Chidi’s masterwork 4,000 pages long.”

The biggest ethical quandary that you faced

Oh, there was a whopper, indeed. Wanting to keep the season 1 finale’s game-changing twist that the Good Place was actually the Bad Place a secret, Schur decided to keep the circle of knowledge so tight, it didn’t include NBC executives at first, or even most of the cast. “We were lying to them every day,” he laments. “Kant would say, ‘Bad job, guys! You blew it.’ Ted and Kristen knew, but the other four didn’t; none of the directors and a lot of the crew didn’t know. We were basically keeping this very big secret from the people that we were the most closely intertwined in this creative endeavor. It felt bad all the time. It was an enormous relief when we finally got to tell them.”

The most difficult story line to bring to life

Schur points to the pair of episodes that kicked off season 3, with the Soul Squad getting a do-over on Earth. ‘The end of season 2 was, ‘Oh, Michael has an idea. We un-kill them, go into a different timeline and have them all be on Earth,'” he explains. “But now I need a way to get them all together. So it was a very, very complicated mechanism where he and Janet were spying on them and he figured out how to get Eleanor and Chidi together — he went down and posed the bartender and he planted the idea in our brain and then that led her to a YouTube video and then she flew to Australia.”

Of course, then he had to figure out how Michael could bring Jason (Manny Jacinto) and Tahani (Jameela Jamil) into the mix without repeating the tactic. “He had to first have Simone (Kirby Howell-Baptiste) and Chidi come to the idea of doing a study on people who’d had near death experiences and put that out into the world,” continues Schur. “There’s a passing reference —Tahani says, ‘How did you find me?’ And Chidi says, ‘I got an email from a professor I’ve never heard of named Charles Brainman who recommended you.’ So just the Swiss watch mechanism of all of the ways that he had to appear in different places and go back through the portal and use his old paperwork to sneak through the door again and get down and plant the idea in Tahani’s head — that took forever to figure out a way that he could do it that was reasonable and possible.  In our pre-production, we fell behind by a couple of weeks because it just took a really long time to work out exactly how that trap would be sprung by him.”

The special effect that was hardest to pull off

Of course, season 3’s “Janet(s)” episode was a chainsaw bear to pull off, given that almost everything in that episode is an effects shot, with Carden playing different versions of herself. But another episode in season 3 takes the (pan)cake: specifically the one involving the Interdimensional Hole of Pancakes, the extremely dangerous crossroads hub for all dimensions. “They’re just standing in an empty room and David Niednagel is doing literally every frame of that sequence,” says Schur. “The judge casually appears and walks across the room, but the room isn’t the room, it’s a swirling phantasmagoric display of weird, pancake-looking universe-y things. We were like, ‘Oh s—, how does she get there?’ And then we had the idea that as she takes steps, these mini-pancakes fly up underneath her and provide a little pathway. It was the kind of idea that you have and you’re like, ‘Oh, that’ll be really cool!’ And then David Niednagle’s head explodes because that’s going to take a lot of time — and computing power.

The place that you wanted to show viewers but were unable to do so

Call the Good Place subjective; one person’s ideal of paradise is another’s personal hell. So when Eleanor asks Michael if all neighborhoods were like 12358W, the architect explains that each neighborhood is different, from geography to population to climate. And Schur wanted to show one of these alt-heavens through a certain/only Medium Place resident. “We kept trying to figure out a way that Mindy St. Clair could visit another neighborhood that was distinctly different,” says Schur. “Eventually we abandoned it because the logic of it was too difficult to fit into the show, given the fact that she wasn’t actually in the Good Place…. That bummed me out. I thought it would be fun to go to see another neighborhood filled with, I dunno, ninth-century Vikings and just see them living it up in there in their personal paradise.”

The guest star whose role expanded beyond the original plan

Do you hear wind chimes ringing from an R-rated place? That can only mean the arrival of Janet’s cheery, glitchy, deformed creation Derek, played by Jason Mantzoukas. “Anytime Jason Mantzoukas is on the show, you know exactly what he’s going to do, which is be the world’s funniest living person,” praises Schur. “We brought Derek back more times than we would have if any other actor had played him. It became really enjoyable to know that there’s this insane, free-floating bizarro quasi-Janet in her universe. We were originally going to have him die at the end of his episode, but we decided to basically put him on ice, knowing even at the time that we’d figure out a way to bring him back. And then it was incredibly useful, because in that same episode where Jason and Michael went down to rescue Janet, in the logic of the world, someone’s got to be running this neighborhood. And it’s like, ‘Well, there is Derek. Maybe Derek can handle it.'”

The Jason joke that was simply too dumb to include

Jason Mendoza is the deliriously delightful dense deejay who wound up landing some of the show’s biggest laughs. (“Yo, you should listen to me. I came up with hundreds of plans in my life and only one of them got me killed.”) But as the writers brainstormed the depths of Jason’s dopiness, was there one punchline that felt too punchdrunk? “I was doing a rewrite of someone’s script and someone mentioned the word farm, and I wrote in a joke for Jason where he said, “What’s a farm?,” recalls Schur. “When we were going through the script, I was like, ‘Obviously we have to change this. This is insane.’ And the were like, “No! What are you doing? That’s hilarious!” And I was like, “I know he’s a total bonehead, but we can’t say he doesn’t know what a farm is. That’s not a person who’s uneducated or unworldly — that’s a person missing 12 years of his life because he has some disease.” But the room decided, against my will, that it was canon — even if it never got on the show — that Jason doesn’t know what a farm is. And just to troll me, every time someone wrote a script, they would write in a line where Jason expressed the fact that he didn’t know what a farm was. It drove me so crazy.”

The Tahani name drop that was too obscure to use

Schur has an answer to this question — but he decided to throw caution to the wind and put it in the show as the final absurd word on this joke paradigm. “There’s been this running joke forever of half of the people she mentions are her godfather — or godmother,” he says. “There was a joke that I always wanted to work in, but I was like, “It’s just too crazy, it’s too crazy, it’s too crazy.” But we finally did it in the second-to-last episode. The joke is they hear a chime and she says, ‘That chime is so soothing. It’s the most incredible chime I’ve ever heard. And that’s coming from someone whose godfather is the most famous clock in the world.’ At which point Chidi says, ‘Is Big Ben somehow your godfather?’ And then we just move on. That is the official capper to that name-dropping game: somehow or another, one of her godparents is actually Big Ben.”

The guest star that was a must-have

There were two actors in particular that Schur targeted from the beginning of the show, and both appeared in the final season. First up: Timothy Olyphant. “We were designing an episode where they really needed the Judge to pay attention to something and the Judge was refusing,” he recalls. “The pitch was always that Janet makes a Timothy Olyphant while the judge is in a real Timothy Olyphant phase. She’s bingeing Justified and she’s just watched Deadwood. So in the premiere of season 4, we laid in a thing where she mentioned that she’s finally watching Deadwood and she’s really excited about it. And then a little later we lay in a thing where she’s watching Justified. So at a key moment, they’re like, ‘We need her to pay attention to us, and the way they achieve it is by conjuring a Timothy Olyphant.’ So I called him and said, ‘Do you want to play yourself as a piece of eye candy for the judge?’ And he was like, ‘Absolutely.'”

The other idea for a guest spot — Lisa Kudrow — winked at a run of jokes laid into the first season. “There was a joke in the ‘What We Owe to Each Other,’ where Michael is talking about being a human and he says he’s really happy to have a friend,” says Schur. “He’s even watched all of the episodes of Friends. And he keeps making Friends references and asking, ‘How do they afford that apartment?’ So I was like, ‘You know who would be perfect to be on the show? Lisa Kudrow.’ And we just never found the right thing for her to do.” That is, until the second-to-last episode, when he asked her to appear as pleasure zombie Hypatia of Alexandria. “I asked her early on in this season if she could be on the show, and she said yes,” he says. “So we put in a bunch of other Friends references over the course of the season.”

The Parks and Recreation character that would be the most intriguing to bring into this world

Schur has intrigued fans by occasionally hinting that the world of The Good Place was intertwined with a previous creation of his, Parks and Recreation(Oh, hello, Lil’ Sebastian!) Despite all of the Parks winks, no Pawnee character was ever spotted in the afterlife. Which prompts the question: Who would have been best suited for a cross-over moment? “Of all the characters on that show, Ron had the most intense moral code,” opines Schur. “He was the most philosophical, even though he would’ve never wanted to admit that. Although an argument can be made for Eagleton Ron, played by Sam Elliott. It might’ve been fun to see how Ron would navigate the afterlife. But it’s hard not to say Leslie , because Leslie was the most intense of all the characters in trying to figure out the right solution to whatever problem was thrown her way. She also was a huge believer in the power of community and friendship, and that’s a huge aspect of the show.” And in case you were believing in a Dwyer power, here are Schur’s bittersweet thoughts: “It wouldn’t have been that interesting to bring in Andy because Jason is already here. But the two of them would have been very good friends. Like, they would have totally hit it off.”

The Easter egg that fans missed

Schur didn’t just drop in pops of Parks; all sorts of value-added laughs lurked in the details. What was a big small laugh that viewers didn’t seem to find? “The last we saw of Adam Scott’s character, he was on the bridge with the judge,” says Schur. “Trevor tries to suck up to her, and she flicks her finger and he explodes backwards and disappears into the void. Once or twice since, in a scene where the crew was walking on a bridge or someone was on one of those bridges in the interdimensional doorway system, we put him in the distant background, flying through frame. He’s very small, but you hear his voice going, ‘Whoaaa!’ like he’s been flying backwards for 10,000 Bearimies. No one has said to me ever, ‘Oh, that was really funny when you did that,’ which makes me think that far fewer people saw it then than I thought they would.”

The story line you’re proudest of

Schur makes mention of season 2’s “The Trolly Problem” (“it’s so visual and fun”) and season 3’s “Janet(s)” (“the idea of Darcy playing every character was floating around in my brain for a really long time”). But what holds special meaning to him is the saga of Eleanor in the season 2 finale, “Somewhere Else”; after her near-death experience, Eleanor resolves to become a better person, and slowly, her new zest for life weakens as her good acts on Earth are not immediately rewarded. “It’s just the struggle that she feels, as the world kicks her around,” he explains. “She’s complaining to a friendly bartender at her friendly neighborhood bar, and saying, ‘I’ve been good for eight months. What the hell, man? Why does all this bad stuff keep happening to me?’ And he says, ‘Well, this is moral dessert. You’re saying that if you do good things, you should get a reward. That’s not the way the world works. You don’t do good things because you’re going to get a reward. You do good things because that’s better than doing bad things.’ And that idea is so hard for me, and I think everyone, to hold in your head all the time. You shouldn’t get a cookie or a little prize for just being a nice person. That can’t be the way this works. I’ll speak for myself — it is very hard for me to think that way because you’re trained in various other aspects of your daily life that when you do good at a good job at something, you get a prize. Ethics and morality don’t work that way. That can’t be the reason that we are good because that’s a twisted incentive system, right? If it were the case that the person who did the best ethics got $1,000, then everyone would be doing it for the wrong reasons. It’s a corrupt motivation.

“I really liked the way that we broke that episode and executed that episode because Eleanor’s attitude towards ethics in general is basically mine,” he continues. “This stuff is hard. It’s hard to read. It’s hard for it to penetrate your brain. In that episode specifically, I related to her attitude, which is, ‘What happens if you do everything right and you still get kicked around what then? Then why should I keep doing it?’ And I’m with her. I feel that argument. I think that it’s not the flashiest episode we ever did, and it wasn’t the one that people will probably think of when they think of the show, but I really liked that story.

The most important ad-lib that made it into the show

Compared with Schur’s other shows, The Good Place featured little ad-libbing from the cast during filming. (Aside from Mantzoukas, that is. “We were just like, ‘Go nuts, man.’ We would write all his lines and then he would do his thing, which is goof around and say crazy stuff.”) But one burst of improv in the show’s most important scene — that season 1 finale reveal in which Michael confirmed Eleanor’s Bad Place hunch — became arguably the show’s signature moment. “Ted is a weirdly good improviser, and he would occasionally say things that were very much in the spirit of what he was supposed to say, but he had altered them,” says Schur. “I consider his evil giggle an ad-lib because it wasn’t written that way at all, and he just did it and it was amazing. It was written as a long beat and he just throws a temper tantrum. He yells at Eleanor and says, ‘You’re the worst. I hate you. Goddammit, you ruin everything.’ We did it eight or nine times that way, and it was always great and funny. I didn’t in any way suggest he try anything else, but I was just checking in with him, like, ‘How do you feel?’ And he said, ‘Can I just try something totally different?’ And I said, ‘Sure.’ And then the camera pushed in, he did that giggle, and it was a billion times better. So I was like, ‘All right, everything we just did is unusable. We have to do this eight times.’ So we did. But the take we used was the very first one he did. It was the original and best.”

The smallest most important joke that made it into the show

If you yelled “Bortles!” as you heaved a football or molotov cocktail, you’re correct. Schur credits Good Place writer-producer Joe Mande with bringing that gag to life — and keeping it alive. “Joe told Manny to do that in the first episode that he had a flashback in when he threw the Molotov cocktail at the speedboat,” recalls Schur. “It’s basically a voiceover because he’s saying it as the thing is flying through the air. I cut it, and Mande was like, ‘You can’t cut that. That’s so funny that he is saying ‘Bortles!’ the way people say ‘Kobe!’ when they take crazy basketball shots on the playground.’ And I was like, ‘I’m a pretty big sports fan, and I know who he is, but the Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback is not a person who should be referenced.’ And he was like, ‘Look, it sounds like a nonsense word. So people hear it and if they know who Blake Bortles is, they’ll love it. And if they don’t, they’ll just think he’s yelling something incomprehensible. It’ll fly right by.’ And I was like, ‘Joe Mande is a great writer. If he really wants this, I’m going to let him have it.’ And thank God I put it in, because then we got 50 other jokes out of it over the course of four years. Like him yelling ‘Portals!’ when he went through a portal.”

The puns that were too beautifully belabored to use

A clever pun is heaven for some, which may explain why the Good Place hosted prime time’s best wordplays. (Food establishments included Beignets and the Jets, Lasagna Come Out Tomorrow, and From Schmear to Eternity.) But during the creation process, some bon mots were just too good for this world, and died nobly on the cutting room floor. Schur punts this question to Good Place writer-producer Megan Amram, who was considered the show’s premiere punmaster. “That one is probably Salmon Bowl Lecter,” says Amram, “because it doesn’t sound that much like Hannibal and it’s also predicated on a thing called a salmon bowl, which is not a super relatable food that is available in every single place. So I feel like it’s a false premise for a pun, but I was very attached to it.” (Her other personal favorites that didn’t make the cut were Willy Lo Mein, We Ciabatta Zoo, and Udon Own Me.)

Did Amram feel pressure to one-up her word game as the seasons and puns piled up? “I hate puns and I don’t think they’re funny, but I do obsessively make them — like, pathologically make them,” she quips. “The reason that I pitched so many puns on this show is inextricably tied to Mike, rather than trying to do a good job at my job. For the amount of puns that he put into the show, his response to me saying them would always be some sort of sigh or angry look on his face. So I really mostly focused on trying to be an agent of chaos in the writers’ room and to elicit an annoyed look from my boss. But there are some other incredible wordplay people in the Good Place writers’ room, and I did feel like when we’d all be pitching on a pun name that there was some pressure on me that I really needed to perform, because that’s kind of all I was bringing to the table.” While that’s not true — she penned seven episodes of the series — check out this smorgasbord of options that Amran did bring to the table.

The most Ted Danson thing that ever happened on the set

It happened when the cameras weren’t rolling, it actually happened several times, and it involved… mariachi. “I don’t know why this summarizes him perfectly, but it does,” says Schur. “So, usually on a set, on Friday, the director or the writer will get a special food truck or a coffee truck to make specialty coffee drinks for the crew. It happens sometimes when there’s late-night shoots too. It’s a little treat to say thank you to the crew for working so hard all week. And in the season 1 finale, he was like, ‘Hey, for lunch today I’m having a mariachi band come.’ And I was like, ‘What are you talking about?’ And he’s like, ‘Ah, it’s a fun thing. I have a mariachi band come and they play music while the crew eats lunch.’ And I was like, ‘All right, man, you’re Ted Danson, do whatever you want.’ And this mariachi band came — and it was utterly delightful. It was just so fun. The whole crew eats lunch at the giant tables in this cafeteria and there’s a mariachi band playing and it’s so fun and festive. And everyone was like, ‘That was so cool! What in the world inspired you to get a mariachi band?’ He’s like, ‘I don’t know. I just started doing it a while ago and I just really love the music and it just seems to make everybody happy.’ So then it became this annual tradition, where at the last crew lunch of every season, he had a mariachi band come, and it became this thing that everybody looked forward to so much.”

Schur also makes note of a different impact that Danson — a champion of environmental issues and an Oceana spokesman — had on the show. “We commissioned an environmental report of our show, and in season 3 we were almost always on location,” he explains. “As a result, we used 30,000 bottles of water. It was heartbreaking to see that number. And Oceana’s main thing is, ‘We’ve got to get rid of plastic in the ocean. We can’t use plastic anymore.’ So we completely revamped our craft services and the way that we served water. We gave everybody these reusable bottles and we went from 30,000 bottles in season 3 to as close to zero is as a group of 150 people working for four months can possibly get. Ted didn’t ask for that. It was just his presence and his work with that cause that made us do the review of how much plastic we were using.”

The most Kristen Bell thing that ever happened on the set

The answer to that lies in the very last episode of the show. “There are several extremely emotional scenes in the finale,” says Schur. “There’s one that’s the most emotional, and she said, ‘I really want to have my kids here for that.’ And I said, ‘Are you sure? It’s going to be a pretty rough day,’ and she’s like, ‘No, that’s why I want them here.’ So her kids came in. We were setting up for this really emotional scene and she was sitting on the set and playing with their kids. I was just at a distance, watching them set up the lights, and then to my right was just Kristen and her kids. There was no one else around and they were just goofing around and being really silly and her daughters are adorable and they were just frolicking. And I was like, ‘Man, I don’t understand how she can do this. If I were an actor and I had to prepare for a scene that’s like this, the last thing in the world I would want is for my kids to be around, distracting me and jumping on me and attacking me.’ And I was like, ‘Well, she knows what she’s doing.’ Then she did the scene, and she was incredible, as she always is. And I was talking to her the next day and saying, ‘I was surprised and delighted to see that’s how you approach that.’ And she said that she found that the more emotional or intense a scene was — as long as it’s not dark; I don’t think she would have done this if it were Deadwood — her method of preparation is to goof around with her kids. And that is the weirdly perfect way to explain what kind of person she is — and what kind of actress she is.”

The feeling you want to leave viewers with when the credits roll on the series finale

Schur prefers to let the finale speak for itself for a while — as he has done after every season finale — but he notes that he wants viewers to feel like their four-season investment in the Good Place was rewarded with a satisfying conclusion, and one rooted in the message of the series. “There’s a theme of this show of hopefulness,” he says. “The show was about four people who were trapped in hell together, and time after time after time, either collectively or individually, they encountered an enormous obstacle and we’re faced with a decision: ‘Do we give up or keep trying?’ And that ultimately became the thing we were arguing for. We were arguing for trying. achieve ethical or moral perfection in your life, you’re gonna screw up a million times, and when you die, you’ll look back and say, ‘Yeah, I was screwing up until the very end.’ But this show is arguing that that doesn’t mean you don’t try to do the right thing. In fact, that means you try harder. You really have to just hope and believe that it’s worth doing, that it’s worth putting in the work.”

Whether his own points went up or down while working on this show

Funny, that concept is actually something with which he recently wrestled. “I did an event with Will Harper at WBUR in Boston,” says Schur, “and someone asked me a question that I’d never gotten before: ‘Do you think that in creating a TV show where you’re essentially putting a point value on and thus judging people’s ethical behavior, did that judginess cause your point total to go down?’ And that really melted my brain. I had never considered that. I totally think it’s a possibility — in the world where there are points systems. First of all, even daring to guess at the way the universe works is probably a bad idea, morally speaking, but also just the idea that I’m saying what I think or the show thinks is good or bad moral behavior, that’s pretty judge-y. That might mean that if you looked at my points graph over my lifetime, maybe I took a huge hit about four years ago.” He laughs, then adds: “I hope that’s not the case. I hope that the universe sees that I’m merely asking questions and arguing for better answers, and not actually trying to come up with my own.”

Related content:
Kristen Bell on The Good Place goodbye: ‘You will finally see what we owe to each other’

The Good Place creator on how — and why — the show changed its ultimate message

The Good Place creator Mike Schur on hiding the show’s biggest secret from the cast

04 Feb 10:09

The Good Place finale: Kristen Bell on the emotional 'tough-love ending'

by Dan Snierson

Warning: This story contains plot details from “Whenever You’re Ready,” Thursday’s series finale of The Good Place.

Farewell! Everything is fine. Sparkle on.

The Good Place put the good in goodbye, as NBC’s ambitious, ethics-laced, silly-faced comedy signed off Thursday night with an emotionally and spiritually charged finale that wrapped up four seasons of the Soul Squad’s upside down supercoaster afterlife adventures with satisfaction. While the core characters received fitting happy endings, there was a bittersweet finality to the proceedings. Not just because that’s what finales are supposed to do, but also because The Good Place — led by creator Mike Schur, who wrote and directed the episode — dared to imagine how the universe works once you died. (Sorry, but even paradise wasn’t eternal.) And so Team Cockroach went their separate ways, forever bonded, most of them dissolving into the ether from which they came, a journey complete but continuing on, at least in sparkling spirit.

Last week, reformed demon architect and aspiring human Michael (Ted Danson) and the Soul Squad devised a way to fix the Good Place, which had been stagnating with pleasure zombies, people numbed out by too many hundreds of thousands of years in perpetual bliss. The solution? A door through which souls could walk when they felt that they were ready, bringing a peaceful end to their journey, their energy returned to the universe. This week, several characters began metaphorically shouting “Portals!” Jacksonville deejay Jason (Manny Jacinto), who found love with human database Janet (D’Arcy Carden), made the leap after the perfect game of Madden; self-consumed socialite Tahani (Jameela Jacinto) had healed her familial wounds and thought she was ready, only to half-reverse course and become an afterlife architect to help other people. Ethics professor Chidi (William Jackson Harper) was the next to feel the itch, much to the fear of his soulmate/anarchic anchor/lone wolf-turned-pack leader Eleanor (Kristen Bell). She tried all sorts of international intrigue to get him to stay, but even she knew that true love was about letting go, especially when he turned to Buddhism and the ocean. (“The wave was just… a different way for the water to be, for a little while,” he explained.)

And so Eleanor searched for her own reason to feel complete, first helping the Medium Place resident recluse Mindy St. Clair (Maribeth Monroe) resolve to make human connections and take the afterlife test (to be administered by Tahani). But Eleanor’s true purpose was more appropriately fulfilled after persuading Judge Gen (Maya Rudolph) to transform Michael into the species that had long captured his imagination, sending him back to Earth in human form, bound for a hopeful but uncertain future. Eleanor then bid poignant goodbye to Janet in the forest, the final unknown in front of them, with Eleanor explaining that as a very wise not-robot told her, the true joy is in the mystery. And then she passed through the gate of branches, dissipating into floating particles in the universe. One such glowing particle touched down back on Earth, on the shoulder of a random dude in Arizona, prompting said fellow to remove a letter that he just threw in the trash and make that tiny extra effort to bring it to its rightful owner: Michael. Michael’s final words to his friendly neighbor, “I’ll say this to you, my friend, with all the love in my heart and all the wisdom of the universe: Take it sleazy,” fulfilling a quotidian wish from season 1 when he listed all the things he’d never get to do as a human.

Let’s brush our teeth with a cat, pour a cup of anti-matter, ride the groovy wave of love, wonder if ghosts are actually racist, and ring up a Bell — Good Place standout Kristen Bell — to glean some insight into the final forkin’ chapter, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever. Ever.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: The time knife really cut both ways on that finale, offering bursts of happiness and satisfaction, but also some brutal, bottom-lining, that’s-the-way-the-system-works sadness. Which concept hit you the hardest: That even in the forever after we wrestle with mortality or the great unknown? That the joy is in the mystery?
KRISTEN BELL:
The fact that once you have everything you’re striving so hard to earn, it’s still not enough. That what you need to earn is the acceptance of the complex internal decision to let go. It was so beautiful how they made everybody mush in the Good Place because it’s true. There’s one line that really sums it up. “A vacation is only so fun because it has an ending.” If everything were bliss, would everyone be happy? I don’t think so. Part of the drive and the passion is why it’s the journey, not the destination. And I was very happy with the tough-love ending that happened.

Chidi, man of great indecision, made the most important decision he ever made, and Eleanor heartwrenchingly begged him not to leave. And the capper was that he agreed to stay, although both of them knew it wasn’t cosmically right. Then she used the ethics knowledge she learned from What We Owe Each Other and explained how it was an unfair rule to try to make him stay. Then he heartwrenched some more when he gave the Buddhist waves speech. How many buckets of tears did you all shed while filming? What did you love about that sequence?
Enough buckets to make that Buddhist wave. That paragraph has been ringing in my head since I heard it in August. It is something that I want to say to my kids one day — the idea of us being the wave. It’s an incredible way to explain to someone that you have to let go and become whatever the world wants you to become. The hardest thing for me to shoot was on the Artists Bridge with Will , when I was asking him to stay because Eleanor had been emotionally healthy for so long. That was a bit of a back step and she knew it. But her impulses still brought her to beg him for selfish reasons, which is okay. I’m glad she came to her senses so quickly. And I’m also glad that she came to her senses by reading the works of other people. Human beings learn from stories; she learned from What We Owe to Each Other, and she was able to see the error of her ways. Shooting that scene, pleading with him on the bridge was probably the hardest thing I shot in the whole four years.

Speaking of Paris, you filmed there and in Athens. Are they into The Good Place in Greece and France?Shockingly, people were saying, “Oh, we watch The Good Place,” which was, like, blowing our minds.

What sticks out to you about those secret shoots?It felt like a senior trip right before you graduated high school. It was so much fun to go with everyone. We went for seven days. We shot all over in some of those beautiful locations. I think we might be the only people that have ever shot at the Parthenon at sunrise, on the Acropolis. It was breathtaking watching the sunrise come up. There were so many stray cats. I didn’t even know what to do with myself. But it was incredibly, beautifully humbling to feel so insignificant. I loved that feeling. There were so many people who tread on those stones before me. It made me feel oddly like a part of a team. Team Human.

And the man who chose to be human, Michael, therefore chose the path of the most uncertainty, a dream made possible by Eleanor. When Mike Schur told you that this was going to be Eleanor’s ultimate mission before she passed, what was your first reaction?That was my very favorite part of what he wrote in that final episode. The fact that Eleanor’s final mission is to give a gift to the person that has been there for her through and through, who was her enemy and then her frenemy, and finally one of her closest allies. The fact that she could use her weight with the judge to give him the ultimate gift just made my heart smile. And what made me even more excited was that Mary Steenburgen jumped at the opportunity to play his guitar teacher.

Nick Offerman also made a cameo. Was that the Parks’ wink that you were expecting?The Parks winks have been happening since we started the show, with Adam . There are tidbits all around the show, Easter eggs, but that was a real nice cherry on the cake that Nick came in and did that. And by the way, that speaks to some evidence as to when we say the show was just a delicious experience. Maya and Nick don’t just come back and do jobs for anyone. They come back to the world that Mike Schur creates because he hires wonderful people and he’s great to work for.

When Eleanor walks through the door of branches, we see her dissolve into sparkling particles, returned to the universe. One particle falls to Earth, prompting a man to bring that letter to its rightful owner: Michael. Are the many particles of the departed souls sprinkling down on people, sparking goodwill in an act of divine intervention?
I think everybody’s particles sprinkle down. The way they reevaluated how to get into the Good Place with these manufactured tests that once you got to the Good Place, you were allowed to celebrate being there as long as you want. Then you are allowed to end it. Then you become these tiny, sparkly particles that rain down on the people on Earth to give them an extra boost. Those are the tiny voices inside your head that say, “Don’t throw that person’s mail away. Just walk to their door. It takes two seconds and it probably will make their day.” I would love to believe that that’s what happens. That’s such a beautiful way of thinking about it. Because we are all one, right? We’re all part of each other. Whether we want to believe it or not. There’s something that connects us all. I would love to believe that people who die become sparkly particles that make the voices inside our head give us good guidance.

It softens the sadness that when these characters pass on, they’re ending their journey, but the memory lives on. The story has a definitive ending; the story goes on.Yes, it’s a beautiful example of paying it forward. You didn’t just walk through the door, you became something that helped someone else. And the major lesson here is you can be something that helps someone else your entire life if you choose to.

Who has the Chidi calendar? I feel like it should be you.No, you know what? I’ll give you one more appropriate try. It’s Will’s girlfriend. I was so proud of him because he doesn’t even like to talk about the fact that he’s ever taken his shirt off. But I’m on Team Will Take Your Shirt Off, and so is his girlfriend. He took it home and gave it to Ali, his wonderful girlfriend who’s also an actress, which is an amazing choice. That’s where the calendar should live.

Your most memorable moment sipping margaritas with D’Arcy in the Redwoods?That she could not stop crying. We were both crying a lot, but she was definitely crying more than me. And when someone cries more than me, I’m a little taken aback. Because normally I have that title. But D’Arcy, this ending really hit her hard. And Janet the robot cried quite a bit in the finale, which I love so much.

As you become untethered from the physical show, how will The Good Place continue to manifest in your essence?Ooh. I am taking some time to look inward, to be present for my family. I will keep up the friendships with these people and the crew. I know where all the camera guys have landed and on what shows. I know where the grips have landed. These friendships will be forever. As far as my life, I am hoping to affect people in a little bit more personal, intimate way. I think I’m going to take a step back from shooting anything for a while, be there for my kids, be there for my husband, do some charity work and affect the people directly around me.

So, fair to say that your points went up while making this show?
I certainly hope so. But look, I’m a very competitive game player, so don’t you worry — I’ll get them much, much higher.

For much more from creator Mike Schur on four seasons of The Good Place, head over here.

Related content:

Kristen Bell on The Good Place goodbye: ‘You will finally see what we owe to each other’ The Good Place creator on how — and why — the show changed its ultimate message The Good Place creator Mike Schur on hiding the show’s biggest secret from the cast
04 Feb 09:35

A sweet Good Place finale rescues a frustrating final season: Review

by Darren Franich

The Good Place was a nice show about nice people. The main characters were cursed to eternal punishment, but nobody watching thought they belonged in hell. Their sins were quirky, their souls cute. In the NBC sitcom’s generous and exasperating final season, even the demons revealed a softer side, pushing the hereafter toward a new era of Good-Evil collaboration. Everyone learned philosophy; everyone was stoked about philosophy!

I liked Thursday’s series finale, and I used to love the show. The season 1 twist remains a high point in recent TV history. Creator Michael Schur cleverly revealed that the neighborhood built by angel-seeming architect Michael (Ted Danson) was a friendly trap. He could have tortured Eleanor (Kristen Bell), Chidi (William Jackson Harper), Tahani (Jameela Jamil), and Jason (Manny Jacinto) for millennia. In season 2’s absurdly brilliant “Dance Dance Resolution,” he kinda did, rebooting his tormentees’ memory several hundred times.

Michael broke good. The gang destroyed the neighborhood. Then Schur wrote and directed the season 2 finale, “Somewhere Else,” the all-time best Good Place episode. It showed Eleanor getting a second chance at life. She became a better person. Time passed. Fun beckoned: casual disregard for fellow people, weekday hangovers, recyclables in the trash, the environment something for someone else to worry about. The Good Place always enjoyed building its cosmos. But “Somewhere Else” plumbed a deep well of human frailty: day after day, the same temptations, your good intentions spiraling to dull actualities.

After that, I worry this smart and sincere sitcom edged into painfully well-meaning escapism. People can get better, and they can make each other better: That was the underlying motto, and a worthwhile theme to explore. Didn’t “getting better” seem a tad simple, though? Eleanor was no longer some scuzzbucket struggling between the allure of weeknight shots and a poorly paid activist gig. Her whole job was going to Australia to fix herself. Then the central foursome became a crusading Soul Squad, flying around the world on Tahani’s infinite dime.

They wound up saving humanity, and the universe. The Good Place flirted heavily with philosophy and religion, but deep down I think it was a superhero story, complete with importance-announcing dialogue. Michael was “the greatest architect in existence,” Janet was “the most advanced being in the universe,” the lead ensemble became “the very best versions” of themselves.

Schur’s an optimist who believes the sweetness of his characters will be rewarded. His masterpiece Parks & Recreation wrapped on a success-for-everybody flash-forward: best-selling authorhood, mayoralty, a governorship, maybe a presidency? In that spirit, I think The Good Place cut some corners when it became a catharsis-of-the-week redemption procedural. A sisterhood was redeemed, a fractured mother-daughter relationship started to heal, old love was reformed through various amnesias. Like the philosophers say: You can’t save Donkey Doug, but at least you can save Pillboi. Actually, the finale revealed, you can save Donkey Doug. You can save everyone!

The cast was swell. D’Arcy Carden was an immediate discovery, making Janet a good-humored god thing evolving past omni-consciousness while falling believably hard for an apex Florida Man. Danson had whimsical fun as a reformed Michael, though a late flashback to his jailer days reminded you of his insidious charm. Harper sputtered splendidly, and Jacinto and Jamil played their single jokes (Jacksonville/namedropping) with aplomb. Bell’s acerbic steadiness counterbalanced an ever-busier plot.

Then came the final twist. In the Good Place, everyone was a purposeless zombie. The solution: Add a doorway to nothing-everythingness. Bring death back to death. The emotionally charged last episode, “Whenever You’re Ready,” had the flash-est forwards in TV history, following everyone (including offscreen Shakespeare) to a final state of grace. Jason scored his perfect Madden game. Chidi experienced profound joy with Eleanor. Tahani finally got along with her parents, and dedicated herself to learning the demi-godly profession of architecting. Eleanor loved Chidi enough to let him go and, umm, also saved Mindy St. Clare (Maribeth Monroe), sure, I can see that. Michael became a human, and his legal name was Michael Realman, god that’s funny. Janet was Doctor Manhattan, more or less, living forever in kamillion Jason kisses.

It was an eccentric finale: location shoots in Athens and Paris, crossovers with Parks & Rec and the Danson-Steenburgenverse. I doubt there will ever be another sitcom that openly references Kant so much, and I admire any show that ends with the entire cast joining together in the afterlife to enter a higher state of Deadness. (See also: Lost.) And, after two years of whiplashing plots, we watched the characters at rest. How sweet to see everyone say goodbye — and how transcendantly goofy that Jason spent eterna-time walking through a forest, waiting for Janet to swing by. Chidi’s journey through his own past felt personal. Bell dug deep as the last misfit toy left on the island.

I admire the ambitions of The Good Place, and I wonder what could have been. The series seemed anxious about portraying anything nasty enough to upset the smiley balance. It believed everyone was redeemable — and was unwilling to portray anything that came close to irredeemable. The least curable character was probably misogynist mediocrity Brent (Benjamin Koldyke), and even he saw a climactic uptick in his sacred Points. That was held up as proof of the theory (not entirely convincing) that the afterlife should become an infinite videogame of moral evolution. I wonder how many viewers are also watching the just-released final season of Bojack Horseman, which has its own tougher (and funnier) vision of guilt and past sins. (Bojack also has some Symbolic Door imagery, and wow, that door does not turn you into starspecks of good deedery.)

The Good Place wanted to fix the universe — and it did! All it took to rescue the broken souls of humanity was infinite time, infinite resources, and a helping hand from some former demons. Aspirational, no doubt. I preferred the spikier first half, when Danson’s smile was a lethal weapon, and the title was still one hell of a joke.

Series grade: B
Finale grade: B+

Related content:

Evil, the best show on network TV, wraps season 1 with a bleak twist Can Star Trek: Picard recover from its bafflingly bad premiere? Gwyneth Paltrow’s The Goop Lab is either unexpectedly moving or morally disgusting
02 Feb 08:30

Wizards of the Coast teams with ex-BioWare devs on a sci-fi RPG

by Igor Bonifacic
Magic: The Gathering creator Wizards of the Coast has shared new details about the video game studio it's building in Austin. The subsidiary is called Archetype Entertainment and its first project is a role-playing game set in a new sci-fi universe....
02 Feb 08:29

Fast Charge: It's over for the smartphone – we just don't know it yet

by Chris Smith

Feature stagnation, unjustifiable stratospheric pricing and rising issues with privacy, addiction and mental health spell doom for the smartphone. We’re entering an era of smartphone dystopia and its days on top are numbered.

Something is festering in the smartphone world and it’s time we had an honest chat about it. Amid all of the usual hype about the Moto Razr, Samsung Galaxy S20, and Apple’s iPhone 11 absolutely crushing it, there’s an elephant in the room few are acknowledging – it’s over for the smartphone, we just don’t know it yet.

After a decade of relentless growth and utter dominance, the not-so-humble handset has peaked, and the entire experience is as good as it ever needs to be. The pinnacle has been reached, be it in the context of power, speed, design, battery, cameras, display or apps. I’m not saying manufacturers shouldn’t chase perfection, but the wishlist has been exhausted.

Related: Best small phones 2020

Tangible improvements lessen with every generation. Gains are becoming increasingly minor. The megapixel race – a myth the first time around – is somehow a thing again. Once again consumers are being enticed with larger screens (6.9-inches!?) to compensate for true improvements. 120Hz refresh rates, which will only truly benefit a tiny fraction of the smartphone buying public, are already being pushed as the next must-have feature.

OnePlus 120 Hz Fluid Display image

In another other era we’d be talking about malaise and stagnation. In another era the next best thing may be along to replace it, as the smartphone swiftly did for the multitude of gadgets we once carried. The problem is no-one knows what the next big thing is, or whether there is one.

The ever-rising cost(s)

While the technological leaps have stagnated, prices have not. Instead of the best phones costing $1,000 (a fairly recent leap in itself), manufacturers are beginning to keep the very best specs behind a new elite tier of Pro and Ultra devices. Thanks largely to the presence of 5G modems, you can add another two hundred to your next upgrade. Samsung’s soon to be announced Galaxy S20 Ultra will cost at least $1,300, according to the latest rumours.

Those exclusive features are said to include a 108-megapixel main camera, 5,000mAh battery and a 10x optical zoom courtesy of a new periscope-style arrangement. The latter is very clever, but this is a feature the smartphone industry convinced us wasn’t important many years ago. So we stopped buying/carrying our dedicated compact cameras because phone pictures were good enough in most instances. Now the same industry wants us to get all excited about optical zoom.

Huawei P30 Pro periscope camera cross section

There’s just no North Star for the smartphone anymore. Bereft of truly ground-breaking innovation, manufacturers are now just changing the presentation, folding the screens in half, adding barriers to usage and charging even more money for the privilege. As I explained in an article last week, the advent of foldable phones isn’t driven by consumer demand. They don’t yet solve a single obvious pain point.

Existential crisis

This relative inertia at the very top is just one of a number of existential crises emerging that are bordering on the dystopian. There’s a growing realisation that our phones may be doing us more harm than good, an ever-widening love-hate relationship with these domineering devices.

Manufacturers are now selling phones for when you’ve had enough of your phone. Think about that. You’ve just spent $1,300 on the best technology available, yet buy another one to use on the weekends. That one costs $100 and acts like its 1998.

Related: 10 budget smartphones to escape your flagship

This represents a very real yearning for regression, which goes beyond the current affinity for retro nostalgia. It reflects a need to get away from these devices that for many of us steal time, sap motivation and have highly detrimental effects on our mental health.

As a result, tech companies are on the defensive. Those building the major operating systems and frontline apps are spending more and more time building tools to limit our usage.

Google now offers a PDF printout of a paper envelope for its Pixel 3a phones that, when placed over the phone (like the proverbial paper bag), will only enable you to use the camera and the phone app. What next? The Pixel 5 ships with a blindfold? It’s all very Black Mirror.

Apple continues to develop and improve Screen Time as part of its digital wellness drives. Admirable, some might say. But the app sends you a report each week that’ll likely make you feel guilty and inadequate if your phone usage goes up. It’s like the drug dealer simultaneously trying to wean you off, while lambasting you every time you experience a relapse. It’s messed up, man.

Many public spaces, like the well-regarded Samuel Smith’s chain of pubs is banning smartphone usage, in order to “protect public conversation.” Others are doing the same, marketing themselves as “digital detox” pubs. Phones have reached a tipping point where they’re in the same category as smoking.

They’re increasingly considered anti-social, detrimental and unwanted distractions from healthy activities. People are fed up with only ever having someone’s half attention. Maybe at 37, I’m just outdated, but I’m as guilty as anyone of this rampant smartphone overuse. I hate feeling beholden to this incredible hunk of metal, glass and plastic, yet as a guy living away from his home country, I clutch onto it like a lifeline. Just reading this piece back, feels like a cry for help. Just writing it convinced me to go and buy a book.

The ramifications for privacy have become catastrophic. There’s no putting that genie back in the bottle. We were all, especially journalists, asleep at the wheel, wowed by what smartphones could do. We have failed and continue to fail to do due diligence. Now even our everyday face-to-face conversations are instantly reflected in Instagram adverts. Where does it end?

These devices are so incredibly brilliant, so useful, so helpful and so beneficial in so many ways, that it’s almost sad to see it come to this, but the narrative has changed. Phones are no longer seen as a force for good. What comes next must change this. It can’t be just an AR headset from which there truly is no escape for the eyeballs and the mind. Any ideas?

Fast Charge is our weekly mobile-focussed column where we delve deeper into the world of smartphones, wearables and more. Find it on Trusted Reviews every Saturday morning.

The post Fast Charge: It's over for the smartphone – we just don't know it yet appeared first on Trusted Reviews.

30 Jan 09:42

Arrow's Finale Sets Up Huge Things for One Key Character

by Laura Prudom
This interview contains full spoilers for Arrow's series finale, "Fadeout" (read our review here). [poilib element="accentDivider"] Oliver Queen may have died during the Crisis on Infinite Earths crossover, but as Arrow's series finale proves, the Emerald Archer's story will continue to have ripple effects throughout the DC TV multiverse for years to come. Dead characters like Moira Queen, Quentin Lance, and Tommy Merlyn are now alive again thanks to Oliver's sacrifice; Team Arrow members John Diggle, Dinah Drake, Laurel Lance, and Rene Ramirez have new jobs and missions ahead of them; Roy and Thea are finally getting married; Mia Queen is safely back in the future and all teed up to star in a potential Green Arrow and the Canaries spinoff; and Oliver and Felicity can look forward to an eternity together. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2020/01/18/crisis-on-infinite-earths-crossover-review"] And even though Oliver's story is technically at an end, it doesn't necessarily guarantee that we've seen the last of him - he is the Spectre, after all. Below, Arrow executive producer Marc Guggenheim, showrunner Beth Schwartz, and star David Ramsey break down some of the biggest moments from the finale and the repercussions we might see in other Arrowverse shows like The Flash, Legends of Tomorrow, Supergirl, Batwoman, and the upcoming Superman and Lois spinoff.

Will John Diggle Become a Green Lantern?

In the final minutes of Arrow’s series finale, the show finally paid off a fan theory that has been years in the making. As John Diggle (David Ramsey) prepared to pack up his life in Star City and move his family to Metropolis following Oliver Queen’s funeral, he had a close encounter with some burning space debris, discovering a mysterious box in the wreckage that, when opened, emitted a bright green light… We didn’t get to see exactly what was in the box, but DC fans probably have their suspicions, especially since Arrow has been teasing a connection between Diggle and the Green Lantern mythology for multiple seasons now. Talking to reporters following a screening of the Arrow finale, Ramsey was coy about what the moment might mean for Diggle moving forward. “So he did get a green box and it was very exciting. I don't know what that means, but he does go to Metropolis and he got a green box, and we'll see… we’ll find out [what that means].” Arrow co-creator and executive producer Marc Guggenheim said they had to be purposefully vague about a potential Green Lantern connection because of an agreement the Arrow producers made with DC: “This was something that was worked out over a year ahead with DC Entertainment. We very specifically negotiated and discussed the parameters and I feel like to say anything beyond what we have shown you would violate our agreement with DC.” [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2020/01/15/crisis-on-infinite-earths-links-dc-tv-and-movie-universes-ign-now"] Ramsey admitted that it felt very exciting to be able to pay off the long-held fan theory that John Diggle is connected to Green Lantern John Stewart in some small way: “I think there's been a bit of a payoff, but we'll see what all that means. But I'm with Marc; anything [we say] beyond that I think is kind of violating these parameters that we've been given by DC that we have to honor. But I think we've done some justice to the six-year tease that we've had so far.” "David and I have actually talked a lot about Diggle's and David's post-Arrow future," Guggenheim teased. "We've got some really good ideas and I'm going to stand pat on that. I will also say David has become a remarkable director. So we're as interested in him behind the cameras we are in front." Fans will remember that back in April 2019, Arrow introduced Diggle’s estranged stepfather, General Stewart, while 2018’s Elseworlds crossover saw The Flash from Earth-90 (played by John Wesley Shipp) pointing out that it was odd that “John” wasn’t wearing his ring when he met Diggle, implying that the Diggle of Earth-90 was indeed a Green Lantern. For now, all we know is that Diggle and his family are headed to Metropolis, where The CW’s upcoming Superman and Lois spinoff will be set - so chances are good we might get a hint about Diggle’s destiny when the new Arrowverse series hits our screens next season. And don’t forget that HBO Max has greenlit (no pun intended) a new Green Lantern series that is also being produced by Arrow executive producer Greg Berlanti. In the meantime, Diggle will also appear in the February 4 episode of The Flash, although Ramsey told reporters that his presence in Central City won't be tied to that mysterious scene at the end of Arrow. FLA610b_0032b "There's a whole cast over there on the Flash that they're still recovering from Oliver's death. And part of the connection to Oliver is Diggle, obviously. And so Diggle's presence there serves as kind of that conduit, a way to grieve," Ramsey said. "But there's also a case, there's something to solve that's going on over there in Flash's world that Diggle's a part of. But in terms of what happened at the end of Arrow, following that over there on Flash, no, that doesn't happen. It is John Diggle over there as John Diggle and we're working on a case."

Oliver and Felicity's Happy Ending (and Why Felicity Wasn't in the Flashback Storyline)

The Arrow Season 7 finale set up a long-awaited reunion between Oliver and Felicity, although at the time we didn't know the context for why they had been separated. Schwartz revealed that they had known the vague plan for Oliver and Felicity's reunion since Season 7, but had figured out the exact beats of that emotional final scene between them in June 2019, when Guggenheim wrote it after meditating. "I meditate every morning and this one morning I came out - this has never happened to me before or since - I came out of the meditation with the entire scene in my head. Literally, word for word," Guggenheim said. "It just felt so right. And I very excitedly texted Beth, I'm like, 'I wrote the final scene, I've got to send it to you,' and of course, the big question was 'is Emily [Bett Rickards] coming back to be in it?' I'm like, 'well now she really has to because I really love this scene.'" [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=arrow-fadeout-photos&captions=true"] "We didn't even think of another ending," Schwartz admitted. "We didn't have a backup plan at all. We were just like, 'Emily needs to do this.' And luckily she did." Guggenheim did reveal that they had initially hoped that Rickards might be able to return for long enough to take part in the finale's flashback storyline, but the scheduling didn't work out. "The original plan was for it to be something with Oliver, Felicity, and Diggle, probably circa... right after episode 114 when Felicity was brought into the circle of trust. The problem was that Emily was only available to us for two days. And that meant basically if we had a third day with her we would have been able to tell that story," Guggenheim said. "Once that didn't materialize, we were like, 'okay, well our backup plan is do something post-105 after Oliver and Diggle have started working together, and just tell a piece of the story you didn't see, which is really the start of their relationship.' And I think ... as partners and, as Diggle says later, as brothers you see, as Oliver says, the proof of concept of what that relationship could be. And I think what was very nice and rewarding for us to see was how that and the eulogy speak to each other. And you really do see how much things have changed [between them]."

Why did Earth-2 Laurel Survive the Crisis Instead of Earth-1 Laurel?

Another emotional moment in "Fadeout" came from Earth-2 Laurel's reunion with a resurrected Quentin Lance, with the former Black Siren wondering why she still existed when the aftermath of the Crisis had brought back many of the people who were most important to Oliver, but not his version of Laurel. "We went back and forth on that a great deal. Truth be told, that was really driven by the spinoff. I think if we weren't doing a spinoff we probably would've gone a different way," Guggenheim said. "We had a lot of conversations ... basically which version of Laurel did we want on the spinoff? We've really fallen in love over the years with the Earth-2 version of Laurel. We love Katie's take on that character. We love writing for that character. We love the complexities of that character's moral seesaw. She's just always been a more interesting character to us. [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=crisis-on-infinite-earths-every-cameo-in-the-crossover&captions=true"] "In Seasons 7 and 8, she was really able to redeem herself," Schwartz added. "And we felt that that was such an important story for her character. She's come such a long way from murdering people all the time to becoming the hero she was at the end of Season 8 and will continue to be in the spinoff hopefully. So it just felt like we would shortchange her if we didn't really honor the growth that her character went through." But, Schwartz added, just because they established the rules of the resurrections, in that it's "the people who were important to Oliver that have come back, that doesn't mean we won't surprise you, if the spinoff goes, or on the other shows, if there's another character that might come back."

Will Stephen Amell Return to the Arrowverse as the Spectre?

Although Oliver sacrificed himself during Crisis on Infinite Earths crossover, that doesn't rule out a return at some point - as he says in the finale's opening voiceover, he's become something else.  [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/12/11/olivers-new-role-revealed-in-crisis-on-infinite-earths-part-3"] "The whole point of making him the Spectre was just to give us story opportunities because who knows what's going to happen in the future?" Guggenheim said. "And the one thing I always say, every time a character dies on any of these shows, it's like, we've got alternate realities; we've got time travel; we've got flashbacks, you name it. We have all these different devices - no one's ever really gone ... So, while I would always love to see Stephen back ... I think it would be how we brought him back and when? If we brought him back in the seventh season premiere of Flash, it would probably diminish this a bit. Fortunately we have some sway with those folks." "There's always an opportunity to cut to him and Felicity in the afterlife," Schwartz quipped. "Just hanging out." Read Marc Guggenheim's picks for the most pivotal Arrow episodes of all time: [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=arrows-best-episodes&captions=true"] [poilib element="accentDivider"] What did you think of the Arrow series finale? Share your thoughts below. [poilib element="poll" parameters="id=240f520d-32b1-4811-b0d7-7dd17217cf83"]
30 Jan 09:42

Arrow: Series Finale - "Fadeout" Review

by Jesse Schedeen
Warning: this review contains full spoilers for the series finale of Arrow! If you need a refresher on where we left off, here's our review for Season 8, Episode 9 and our full review of the Crisis on Infinite Earths crossover. [poilib element="accentDivider"] It's a strange experience writing the final review for a series that's been a part of my personal and professional life for eight years. Before Arrow existed, Smallville was the closest thing to a fully realized, live-action superhero universe on TV. Now we have a whole Arrowverse, one that keeps getting bigger and crazier and comic book-ier with each passing year. Oliver Queen changed a lot over the course of eight years, as did world around him. It's fitting that the series takes its final bow not by putting Ollie in the spotlight, but by examining how his crusade affected the lives of everyone around him. To be frank, Arrow didn't even necessarily need a series finale in the wake of Crisis on Infinite Earths. Ollie already made his grand, heroic sacrifice and finally achieved his goal of saving Star City. What more even needs to be said at this point? But in a way, that works to the benefit of "Fadeout." The hardest part is already over. There's really no way to unstick the landing, so the finale is less an epic climax to the series than it is a quiet epilogue and an opportunity to spend one last hour with old friends. Quite a few old friends, as it turns out. "Fadeout" shows us Lex Luthor wasn't the only one to manipulate reality and create a new Earth more to his liking. Ollie apparently tweaked Earth-Prime so that doppelgangers of nearly all the loved ones who died over the course of the series are now living in the reborn Star City. It's a clever twist that allows the series to end on a very upbeat and hopeful note despite, you know, everyone grieving for the dead main character. It says a lot about Ollie that he went through the trouble of giving all these people - his mother, Tommy, even poor, twisted Emiko - a second chance without trying to reclaim his own life. And perhaps most importantly, the method behind these "resurrections" dances around any concerns about cheapening their original deaths. Those deaths still happened, just in a universe that no longer exists. [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=arrow-fadeout-photos&captions=true"] It's great seeing so many familiar cast members back, including Susanna Thompson's Moira Queen, Colin Donnell's Tommy Merlyn, Katrina Law's Nyssa al Ghul and even Joe Dinicol's Rory Regan. The complaint with nearly all these returning characters is that we didn't get to see enough of them, but there's really only so much that can be expected of one episode. And certainly, writers Marc Guggenheim and Beth Schwartz knew their biggest priority had to be Emily Bett Rickards' Felicity. Season 8 has been able to coast by without Felicity up to now, but it would have been unthinkable to wrap up without bringing her back. Rickards delivers an emotionally charged performance to cap off her Arrowverse tenure, with Felicity juggling her grief over Ollie, her fear at losing William too and the profoundly strange sensation of meeting an adult version of her infant daughter. And fittingly, it all culminates in a sequence that finally reveals what became of 2040's Felicity at the end of Season 7. This episode is somewhat vague (intentionally, no doubt) as to whether Ollie still exists in Spectre form or is truly and completely dead, but all that really matters is he and Felicity finally get that happy ending they failed to achieve at the end of Seasons 3 and 7. If "Fadeout" does anything right, it's in passing the torch from Ollie to Diggle. David Ramsey really shines here as a man mourning his brother and struggling to decide what his purpose is in a world that no longer needs Team Arrow. The flashbacks help highlight that brotherly dynamic and show just how far the two have come since 2012. And happily, this episode implies we'll be seeing a lot more of the Diggle family beyond Ramsey's guest role in next week's The Flash. Their move to Metropolis suggests John and/or Lyla might be part of the supporting cast on Superman & Lois. And it sure seems like that John Diggle: Green Lantern fan theory has well and truly come to pass. The actual conflict in the finale is nothing terribly remarkable. Post-Prometheus, the idea of an old enemy from Season 1 returning to strike at Oliver Queen where he's most vulnerable seems a little redundant. But that subplot and the flashback scenes get the job done in terms of adding a little variety to the mix. You don't want to devote an entire hour to people crying in front of tombstones and statues, especially when James Bamford is directing. And there's something highly amusing about the very last villain in Arrow being named after the influential and infamously cantankerous comic creator John Byrne. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2020/01/18/crisis-on-infinite-earths-crossover-review"] While emotionally stirring in all the right ways, "Fadeout" does fall short in a few key ways. Anyone who's followed my Arrow reviews over the years probably knows what I'm going to say next. It's hugely disappointing that Manu Bennett's Slade Wilson never made a significant return appearance in Season 8. Slade is easily the best villain Arrow ever produced, and he only Reverse-Flash rivals him as the best Arrowverse villain of them all. The series will always feel irritatingly incomplete in that regard. We do get that early rehash of the pivotal Slade/Moira scene from Season 2 early on, but one has to assume Bamford and his team fudged the end result using archival footage rather than actually flying Bennett out to film a couple quick shots of being punched in the face. Otherwise, why not give Slade a meatier role and actually provide the character with the closure Season 6 never quite achieved? There are several possible reasons why Bennett never returned for Season 8 when nearly every other fan-favorite actor did. Maybe the scheduling never worked out. Maybe, as with Michael Rosenbaum's refusal to take part in Crisis, The CW was never able to provide Bennett with the compensation he felt he deserved. Or maybe Slade is just another casualty of WB's strange dislike of having multiple simultaneous versions of the same character. With Deathstroke playing such a huge role in Titans: Season 2, it could be that Bennett's return was never going to be an option. Whatever the explanation, the almost complete lack of Slade Wilson in the finale causes the series to end on a needlessly sour note. It's also strange how much the events of "Fadeout" seem to clash with last week's "Green Arrow and the Canaries." That episode revealed Dinah fled to the year 2040 after discovering no trace of her existence remains in 2020. How exactly does that gel with what we see here? There's also little sense of how and why Laurel comes to be in 2040. These glaring inconsistencies stand out all the more because this episode does reference William's kidnapping in "Green Arrow and the Canaries," so it's not as if the two hands aren't talking to each other. For these and other reasons, Arrow's final episode does stumble a bit as it crosses the finish line. There are a few too many loose ends that will probably have to be wrapped up in other Arrowverse series. But at least the core trinity of Ollie, Felicity and Diggle are given the sendoffs they deserve. Much as it has throughout its tumultuous existence, Arrow succeeds where it matters most. [poilib element="poll" parameters="id=240f520d-32b1-4811-b0d7-7dd17217cf83"]
30 Jan 09:33

Arrow Cast Reacts to Series Finale With Memories From Set

by Adele Ankers
Warning: this article contains spoilers for the series finale of Arrow and the finale of the Arrow-verse crossover Crisis on Infinite Earths. [poilib element="accentDivider"] After eight seasons and 170 episodes, Arrow faded to black in Tuesday's emotional series finale. While it may be the end of an 8-year journey for fans, it is also the end of a huge career chapter for the actors who helped to shape the series. Naturally, in the aftermath of the highly anticipated final episode, Fadeout, many of the stars took to social media to bid their heartfelt farewells. [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=arrow-fadeout-photos&captions=true"] Stephen Amell, who has starred as Oliver Queen on Arrow since the franchise began, reflected on his character's long, rocky journey to reach this point, referring to the end as "bittersweet." Katherine McNamara, who was promoted to a series regular for the DC drama's eighth and final season, reprising her role as Mia Smoak, shared multiple tweets to mark the emotionally-charged ending. She shared a few poignant behind-the-scenes photos from her time on set before signing off with a final tribute to her character and the rest of the team, who she thanked for "believing" in her and "entrusting" her with the storyline. After thanking the fandom for watching Arrow for the past eight years, Black Canary star Katie Cassidy shared a touching message about her time on the show, saying she has "so much love" for the cast and crew. Meanwhile, David Ramsey, whose on-screen counterpart is John Diggle, interacted with fans throughout the series finale. He revealed his favourite part of playing the character was acting with his castmates and that he felt "super nostalgic" filming in the Season 1 bunker for a final time, before concluding that he felt a mixture of emotions about the last episode. Ramsey also shared some favourite moments and memories from the show on his Instagram stories alongside a final snapshot to mark the end of the series. He captioned the image: "It happened..." Emily Bett Rickards, who returned to play Felicity Smoak for one last time in the series finale, shared a photo of the empty seats left behind by Amell and herself, writing, "Until the next one bud!" Elsewhere, Grant Gustin, who appeared in Arrow as Barry Allen aka The Flash, closed the curtain on the final series with a remarkable cast and crew photo, saying, "It takes an army to make a show like Arrow." White Canary star Caity Lotz retweeted a series of posts to honour the final episode. She also responded to a tweet from co-star Katie Cassidy, simply writing, "Sister" alongside a love heart emoji. Juliana Harkavy, who played Dinah Drake, aka Black Canary on Arrow since 2017, bid her own farewell to the series, though she refused to say "goodbye." Paul Blackthorne, who portrayed Quentin Lance in a regular role throughout the early seasons of Arrow, extended a shoutout to series star Stephen Amell, who he called a "legend." Arrow's Roy Harper, aka Colton Haynes, shared some cast photos from the set of the final episode, as he teased the exciting "Roy and Thea reunion." Katrina Law, Nyssa al Ghul on The CW series, thanked the fans for coming along for the ride, saying she felt "humbled to be a part of it." [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=arrows-best-episodes&captions=true"] In our review of "Fadeout", we recognized the episode to be an "imperfect but ultimately effective conclusion to a long-running superhero saga", which makes "excellent use of the series' two most critical supporting characters" Felicity Smoak and John Diggle. For more on the Arrow-verse, read this breakdown of some of the biggest moments from the finale, find out which episodes Marc Guggenheim identified as the most pivotal, and Stephen Amell's comments on the Crisis on Infinite Earths ending. [poilib element="accentDivider"] Adele Ankers is a Freelance Entertainment Journalist. You can reach her on Twitter.
29 Jan 09:09

How Picard Changes Everything for Star Trek

by Witney Seibold
Full spoilers follow for Star Trek: Picard Episode 1. [poilib element="accentDivider"]   Now that Star Trek: Picard is out in the world, Trekkies (c'est moi) are scrambling to discuss the new wrinkles in the Star Trek universe that the show has now introduced, and are eager to dissect how said wrinkles may or may not connect to the fabric of the franchise's history at large. And, boy howdy, has there been a lot to discuss. There are new questions about Data's android lineage (!), the state of the Borg, the operational ethos of Starfleet, and where AI technology might be 18 years after we last saw the Next Generation crew in action. Let’s dig into the biggest spoiler topics from the Picard premiere episode (read our review!) and how they’ve changed the world of Star Trek already. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/patrick-stewart-why-did-picard-leave-starfleet"]

Data's Legacy

Brent Spiner, reprising his role as Data, appears in Star Trek: Picard in dream sequences. In the first episode, Picard (Patrick Stewart) imagines himself to be playing poker with the android, discussing art, and having conversations like the ones they used to have decades previous. In those dreams, Data appears to be giving Picard clues as to the mysterious tenacity of his positronic brain, even after death, and the true nature of Dahj (Isa Briones), a mysterious young woman who may or may not be a synthetic life form herself. While Data died in Star Trek: Nemesis (2002), it was implied in that film that his legacy was to live on in the form of B-4 (also Spiner), a rudimentary prototype made by Data's creator. B-4 also appears in the Picard premiere, seen as body parts in a drawer. A clever android scientist (Alison Pill) explains that, while Data's memories and brain functions were uploaded into B-4's brain (as explained in Nemesis), the information didn't really take, and B-4 did not succeed Data. And, because of a mysterious attack on Mars by rogue androids (called Synths in Picard), all synthetic life forms have been banned by Starfleet. This may be a difficult ban to enforce in the world of Star Trek, seeing as Data and Geordi once created a sentient hologram of Moriarity from Sherlock Holmes entirely by accident. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/picard-all-the-different-datas-explained"] But the ban is in place, meaning there are no artificial beings in the time of Star Trek: Picard in quite the same way as we've seen in the past. The fate of Voyager's EMH has yet to be discussed, but we do know that holograms like him are now programmed to behave more like machines, as is demonstrated in the scene wherein Picard visits his archive; the Index hologram is cold and robotic and talks about how “humor” is a relatively recent addition to its programming. Data, however, will continue to loom large over Star Trek: Picard, as Dahj is something like Data's daughter. This is, no doubt, a direct allusion to Lal, the android daughter Data attempted to build in the Next Generation episode “The Offspring.” We don't know yet who created Dahj or why, but we do know, as of this episode, that only a tiny piece of Data's positronic brain needed to survive in order to replicate the technology that, essentially, made him alive. Evidently, android technology is such that only a single android “cell” is needed in order to “clone” an android. And Dahj has memories of Picard, too… somehow. So while Data may not play a direct role in Star Trek: Picard, he now may finally have the daughter he always wanted.

The Borg

This goes to a larger theme of the show when it comes to the relationship the human body and the life sciences have to artificial intelligence. It's revealed at the very end of Star Trek: Picard’s premiere that a mysterious cadre of Romulans has salvaged a Borg ship, and has been enacting a mysterious plot from deep within it. One supposes it wasn't going to be long before Star Trek: Picard was to address the Borg, and the show's creators went for broke in the very first episode. Picard, as we all likely know, was once assimilated by those cybernetic villains, and had their parasite-like technology working its way into his body and his brain. Picard, then, was once technically partly machine. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/star-trek-the-history-of-the-borg-timeline"] Data was a machine that longed to be human and Picard was a human that was forced to be a machine. Dahj is as close to human as a machine has yet become in Star Trek (from what we know; we don't spend a lot of time with Dahj before her assassination), so, from a thematic viewpoint, it makes perfect sense that Picard and Data -- both somewhere between humanity and the mechanical -- should be the ones to explore who she is. The last time we saw the Borg proper in the Trek series timeline (that is; not Seven of Nine, who will also appear in Star Trek: Picard) was in “Endgame,” the final episode of Star Trek: Voyager. In that episode a future version of Captain Janeway infected the Borg with a pathogen that essentially wiped out the entire species (and, yes, technically Janeway commits genocide). The remnants and debris of the Borg was not addressed, so it's entirely possible that defunct Borg ships are adrift everywhere in the Delta quadrant, ready to be picked up and repurposed by anyone enterprising enough to find and repair them. And, if Borg drones can be revived in a shadowy plot to cause an android uprising, you can bet that Star Trek: Picard will go there. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/why-seven-of-nine-blames-picard"]

The Romulans, the Supernova, and Picard's Retirement

And what about those Romulans? In the opening scenes of Star Trek: Picard, we see that Picard has been living with a pair of Romulan citizens (Orla Brady and Jamie McShane). These Romulans are without a home, as Star Trek: Picard is following an event seen in Star Trek 2009 (which, technically overlaps the Kelvin timeline of the reboot movies and the original Trek canon): the destruction of the Romulan homeworld by a supernova. It's explained in a news interview that Picard participates in that he was the one to aid in the rescue and relocation of some 900 million Romulans, having left command of the Enterprise in order to do so. Soon thereafter, however -- and partly because of the Synth attack on Mars which destroyed the ships that would’ve been used in the Dunkirk-like rescue operation -- the Federation changed their minds and ordered Picard to abandon the effort, as the Romulans were the organization's oldest enemy. Picard, objecting to the Federation's cold rejection of humanitarianism (Romulanitarianism?), bitterly retired. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/01/12/star-trek-the-picard-shows-timeline-explained"] There's not enough space here to explore the full history of the Romulan Empire. Needless to say, the last time we saw them, the Empire was not in the best shape, having crumbled after Shinzon's uprising in Nemesis, and then their sun going supernova. This means that all the Romulans we'll see on Star Trek: Picard are struggling refugees which Picard himself aims to protect. No points for recognizing the modern-day parallels to many 2020 governments’ treatment of refugees. This is classic Trek, using sci-fi to explore sticky modern politics, and it will play directly into who Picard is as a character. It also points to a dark downturn for the Federation, though. The Federation has traditionally lived by an ethos of inclusion and diplomacy. Even when faced with singular rogue enemies, Starfleet captains have always erred on the side of protecting and caring for them. Alliances and cultural exchange has always been more valuable to Starfleet than combat and power and domination. In turning their back on Romulan refugees, the Federation seems to have become more self-protecting. More selfish. Perhaps less diplomatic. You can be sure these themes will be explored in later episodes of Star Trek: Picard. [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=star-trek-picard-the-essential-treks-to-take-before-the-show&captions=true"] As a declaration of intent, the premiere of Star Trek: Picard seems focused and cohesive. Fans have only had one episode to get used to the new ideas above, but the show is well-anchored by Stewart's dignified performance and shows promise. Some are eager to see where this will go. What do you think of all of these revelations? Let’s discuss in the comments!
29 Jan 09:04

The Witcher Showrunner Shares Her Favourite Season 1 Deleted Scenes

by Adele Ankers
The Witcher showrunner and executive producer Lauren Schmidt Hissrich recently opened up about the deleted scenes that she wished she had kept in Season 1, both of which revolve around fan-favourite character Yennefer. In an interview with Pure Fandom, Hissrich admitted "so many scenes had to be cut from the final episodes", as she detailed two particular scenes that she regretted removing from the hit Netflix show - including one cut clip that championed female friendship through the women of Aretuza, and another that showed Yennefer meeting a young Triss Merigold for the first time. [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/12/20/the-witcher-game-vs-netflix-scene-comparison"] "We had a lovely scene in Episode 103 [Betrayer Moon] where Yennefer, Fringilla, and Sabrina all discussed how they felt about their transformations, and looking back, I wish we could have kept it," she told the outlet. "It was such a gorgeous example of female friendship, and it also would have served to ground Fringilla a bit more before she joined Nilfgaard. "We also filmed a scene of Yen meeting a very young Triss, who'd just arrived at Aretuza; it served to show how far Yennefer had come in her years at Aretuza, and created a sense of mentorship between these two sorceresses. Looking ahead at some stories unfolding in Season 2, I wish we still had those scenes! But I'm proud of what we accomplished." [ignvideo url="https://www.ign.com/videos/2019/12/21/the-witcher-season-1-ending-explained"] While Hissrich noted that the addition of these scenes may have helped viewers to understand some of the characters' motivations ahead of Season 2, it appears that the next chapter is already plotted out, as she revealed some of the fantasy elements we can expect to see in the upcoming season, including "a crop of new monsters, a new cost to magic, and new and unexpected pairings of our favourite characters." Hissrich previously revealed all the scripts for The Witcher Season 2 had already been written, though she told us that the pages are "living breathing things," which might go through some changes during pre-production. She also explained that the team are making sure they have "a lot of built-in cushion time" so they don't have to "cram anything in at the last minute," that's why we won't be catching up with Geralt and his comrades until 2021. [widget path="global/article/imagegallery" parameters="albumSlug=the-witcher-season-1-images&captions=true"] For more on The Witcher, check out our review of the first season and episode ratings, read our round-up of IGN staff reviews for additional insight, and find out why Netflix decided to adapt the books and not the games. [poilib element="accentDivider"] Adele Ankers is a Freelance Entertainment Journalist. You can reach her on Twitter.
29 Jan 08:57

A Vermont bill would bring emoji license plates to the US

by Igor Bonifacic
With their ability to add a dash of color and whimsy to a text message, emoji have become an indispensable part of our online interactions. Thanks to a new piece of proposed legislation introduced last week in the Vermont House of Representatives, th...
29 Jan 08:56

Avast packaged detailed user data to be sold for millions of dollars

by Christine Fisher
The popular antivirus program Avast has been selling users data to giant companies like Google, Home Depot, Microsoft and Pepsi, a joint investigation by Motherboard and PCMag found. Avast reportedly scraped data from its antivirus software and hande...
29 Jan 08:56

Billie Eilish proved anyone can access Grammy-winning gear

by Cherlynn Low
Singer Billie Eilish was on the Grammy's red carpet pulling Ellen Degeneres underwear out of a flowery bag when she got the news. A woman nearby, apparently having just gotten word, held up a phone to Eilish's face and said, "You just won Best Pop Vo...
29 Jan 08:51

Get ready to eat bugs if you want to live beyond 2050

by Andrew Tarantola
By 2050 there will be an estimated 10 billion humans living on this planet. Beyond that being a lot of mouths to feed, those folks will be, on average, wealthier than today's population, with a taste for the foods found in regions like the US and Wes...