Apparently itâs sexism week in coverage of the Democratic presidential primary. Ha, just kidding: Like thereâs only one week when sexism rules coverage of anything Hillary Clinton is involved in. And no matter who you support in this primary, if you think that generally speaking it would be good if women could exist in public life on an equal basis, you should be angry about the kind of coverage weâre seeing.
And speaking of angry. According to the New York Times, in Thursday nightâs debate, Clinton appeared âtense and even angry at times,â while Bernie Sanders âlargely kept his cool.â Clinton âaccusedâ and âlobb[ed] her harshest assault yet,â displaying âferocityâ and âvitriol.â Sanders, meanwhile, appears from Jonathan Martin and Patrick Healyâs account to have been some manner of puppy dog. Maybe there was a difference in their demeanors, but think what a male candidate would have to do to draw that kind of language. Men get to be intense or passionate in reporter-speak. Women are sent straight to anger.
Then thereâs this, from the editor in chief at The Hill:
Letâs face it: raising your voice is part of political speaking. God knows Bernie Sanders deploys the raised voice with abundance. But with him it reads asâagainâintensity, passion, or, in the most critical case, cranky grandpa. Marco Rubio raises his voice, and it reveals his voice to lack resonance and be maybe a little nasal, but we donât hear about how thatâs a liability for him as a politician. Chris Christie? If reporters thought that when Christie raises his voice, he loses, heâd be a national jokeâif heâd ever been taken seriously enough for the nation to know who he was. But Hillary Clinton? Nooo, thatâs unacceptable and terrible and saying so doesnât even require explanation because we all get it.Â
Itâs a standard part of the political discussion to tear into Clintonâs voice and tone where youâd never, short of the Dean scream, mention a man in that way. MSNBCâs Morning Joe did a whole segmentâ on it the other morning, and by âon it,â I donât mean criticizing the inherent sexism, I mean Bob Woodward saying she should âget off this screaming stuff.â And the one other national level politician for whom a raised voice is as risky a proposition is Barack Obama. That should tell you something about power and the right to show anger.Â
Think what you want about Hillary Clinton. But until women in politics are allowed to display the same range of emotion and tone as men in politics, without journalists piling on about how unnatural and angry and unpleasant theyâre being, we have a serious problem.Â