And the one character with a downward spiral is held and supported by the rest until he's able to put the brakes on his descent and lets the rest of them lead him back up.
concept: a TV show with a dark, tragic, fucked-up beginning that steadily gets happier and lighter and more hopeful as the seasons go on, the narrative arc premised on healing and growth instead of a âgrittyâ downspiral, the challenges faced in each season finale leaving the characters in a progressively better place. nobody queer dies, and the worst things we ever see after season 1 all happen in flashbacks to events preceding the now.Â
My entry for the first week of Month of Love, âHeroes.â Of course I had to do a piece for the first hero I remember loving, Alanna of Trebond, Olau and Pirateâs Swoop from Tamora Pierceâs Song of the Lioness quartet, who almost certainly (alongside Aerin from the Hero & the Crown) instigated my lifelong love of kick-ass warrior women.Â
Iâd been meaning to do some pieces for the series once I had some free time anyway, so this was a good excuse!
I wonder if they have a leverage support group in prison for the people the crew has sent to jail. A bunch of old CEOS yelling at each other.
â THEY WHERE CONSULTANTS â
In that case, I look at the consequences of each outcome, and I vote against the one that I believe is worse.
In that case, I look at Clinton as slightly regressive but mostly status quo, and I look at Trump as an absolute catastrophe at every level.Â
In this hypothetical case, I would vote for Clinton, because I want the swing state to NOT go to Trump.Â
Non-hypothetically: while Iâm not enthusiastic about Hillary Clinton as president, I know that my real choice will be between her and Trump. In that case, I not only want Trump to lose, I want him to lose in an historic, humiliating, record-breaking landslide, and I want him to take as much of the Republican party down with him as possible.
Gandhi has been historically the most aggressive character in Civilization due to an original bug in the first game that caused him to go all-out once he reaches democracy. They just kept the thing going ever since.
To further explain this bug, because I was chatting with mothmonarch about Civilization and other strategy games last night and I never got around to explaining this fully, but I love this story:
Gandhiâs AI in the original game had its aggression set to the absolute minimum (0 on a scale of 0 to 10, I believe, I may have this wrong but the basic idea Iâm about to explain is accurate, as far as I can tell). Adopting democracy lowers an AI civâs aggression by 2 points, so when someone who is fully peaceful loses two points of aggression, they should still be nice and polite, right?
Except this is an old DOS game, and so computer math is in place. What actually happened was that Gandhiâs aggression level ticked backwards two steps, from 0 to 255. On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.
And thatâs the story as I recall it, but again I may have gotten some details wrong, so feel free to correct me! After that, as the original poster said, the devs loved the bug so much that they just kept it in as a running joke!
âOn a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.â
I about pissed myself laughing at this.
Yes, this is a âcomputer mathâ thing. Specifically this is a âsigned v unsignedâ thing. Specifically-specifically this is a problem called underflow. (There is also overflow.)
Everything in computers is represented by bits, ones and zeroes. So letâs say the aggression level is represented by eight bits, as in the example given above. 00000001 is Aggresion Level 1. 00000010 is Aggression Level 2. 00000011 is Aggression Level 3. And so on.
So if we wanted to take Aggression Level 1 (00000001) and subtract two from it (00000010) what does that look like?
Well, due to how we need to represent negative numbers in computerland, using Oneâs Complement for example, 00000010 is now 11111101. (Just flip all the 1s to 0s and all the 0s to 1s.) Oneâs Complement is a simple inversion on a number to show itâs negative. So now itâs 00000001 + 11111101. This results in 11111110, which is the Oneâs Complement of -1.
Which is great if this number is stored as âsigned.â Storing a number as signed tells the computer that hey, 11111110 should be considered -1. So if you do math with this, itâs -1.
But if itâs unsigned. Oh, if itâs unsigned. Then suddenly -1 is actually 254. Because itâs just bits, you see? You have to tell the computer what to do with the bits. And if you tell the computer âthese bits are unsignedâ then the computer will trust you and quickly ruin your life.
Thank you for letting me use my degrees on tumblr dot com.
So one day a dwarf is talking to a human and finally realizes that when humans say woman, they generally mean âperson who is theoretically capable of childbirthâ because for whatever reason, humans assign social expectations based genital differences. (What a fucked up culture, the dwarf thinks.) But hey, better communication! So the next time the dwarf introduces theirself, they say, oh, by the way, I am what you call a âwoman.â
And the trade negotiations just stop. They just stop cold. The tall people insist on speaking to the man, they insist on talking to the lady dwarf about all sorts of irrelevant bullshit, like recipes and childrearing and perfume
so the dwarf goes back home, enraged
and is like âBTW guess what happened, weâre all just going to be men forever now as far as the tall ones are concernedâ
and everyone is justly horrified at this barbarism but they all agree to do whatever it takes to squeeze those tall bastards for all the resources they are worth
and the dwarves get surlier, and the trade agreements less generous
and the tall people are all âwhat a miserable and greedy raceâ
but really theyâre just still nursing a grudge about how goddamn backwards and sexist the tall people are
because their best negotiator, one of their sacred cave people, got snubbed the instant she said she was capable of childbirth - and a mortal insult like that can never be forgiven
Just as an additional thought, we hear that women dwarves generally stay within the mountain and are a protected, guarded subset of the dwarves. Thereâs not many of them, so thereâs an implication that women dwarves are too precious to be allowed out.
But what if this too is a mistranslation? What if the dwarves were talking to the Men and when asked âwhere are all your women?â they hit a wall. They whisper amongst themselves, and eventually come back with a question, âWhatâs a woman?â The Men are incredulous.
âWhy, the members of your race that bear children, of course!â
More dwarven whispering.
They reach the conclusion that Men mean dwarves who are currently pregnant. Well! Of course those dwarves are currently safe within the mountain, well cared for and generally loathe to travel until the child is born. The Men take this to mean that all dwarven women are discouraged from traveling, and that their primary purpose is childbearing. Dwarves find this a satisfactory outcome, especially with the way Men treat their women, and so even when the misunderstanding becomes clear to them they never correct it.
I had never thought to put it in these words before, but Iâm just going to sit here and blink slowly while I process how Willis just summed up at least half my moral qualms with Christianity in a single comment.
i like to think of myself as a mirror universe c.s. lewis
I hate that social media has commodified performative grief and outrage to the point that every fucking person thinks that every tragedy that happens needs to be addressed by them, personally. I hate that thereâs an expectation that everyone make some grand statement and that if you donât do it, you must be heartless or hate the victims. Weâre not all celebrities or politicians. Not every voice needs to be heard at all times. The world probably doesnât NEED anyoneâs take if it doesnât contain new information. Processing things silently isnât bad and it doesnât make anyone a bad person and I honestly much prefer it to a lot of the self-serving bullshit you see when something awful happens in the world.
I fall into that trap. Most people do. Itâs shit and it produces a lot of shit sentiment. âWHY ARENâT PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT THIS?!â is my least favorite sentence in the world right now. Most people, when it comes to tragedy, have nothing to say. Most uninvolved people, in these circumstances, should say less.