For open kitchen layouts that blend into the entertaining and living areas (say, in a loft, for example) this idea seamlessly integrates the two: a kitchen island that's kitchen-ey on one side, and home design-focused on the other!
More![]() |
![]() |
firehosefuck your books
For open kitchen layouts that blend into the entertaining and living areas (say, in a loft, for example) this idea seamlessly integrates the two: a kitchen island that's kitchen-ey on one side, and home design-focused on the other!
More![]() |
![]() |
firehoseGoogle mocks their own bullshit redesigns, only I doubt they realize it
“How do we completely redesign and recreate something while keeping it exactly the same?”
Google has announced Gmail Blue, a significantly bluer version of the popular email client. “It’s Gmail, only bluer,” project manager Richard Pargo said in a video demonstrating the redesigned Gmail. After trying other colors like orange, brown, and yellow, the team settled on a nature-inspired blue.

The Philip K. Dick Award, for science fiction books originally published in paperback instead of hardcover, has been awarded to Brian Francis Slattery, for his book Lost Everything. Special citation was also given to Andri Snær Magnason's Lovestar. Huge congrats to them both!
firehosehrm
After years of puzzling over it, I think at last I understand the TSA's strategy for dealing with terrorism: make them laugh so hard they'll all have strokes or something.
Yes, it has publicly sought crack security personnel by advertising on pizza boxes, closed down an airport because of an unscreened baby, swabbed a 95-year-old man for explosives, got all concerned about holiday snow globes, and insisted that those who drive historical-canal-boat-pulling mules get high-tech biometric ID credentials, among many other acts of otherwise inexplicable stupidity.
But the true explanation didn't really dawn on me until recently, when I saw that a TSA agent at JFK "mistakenly shot himself and five other agents with pepper spray" because he thought the canister was a laser pointer and decided to horse around with it.
Hopefully this gag will take out al Qaida's current No. 3 guy without doing too much collateral damage.
The New York Post seems to have first reported this incident, which happened on March 26. According to the Post, the "bumbling TSA agent" found a small canister on the floor. Thinking it was a laser pointer, he tried to turn it on, thereby managing to incapacitate himself and five others as well as halting security checks at JFK for at least 15 minutes. The six were taken to a hospital "out of an abundance of caution," but were not injured. Surprisingly, no travelers were either exposed to the spray or accused of being responsible for the assault.
The TSA did, however, arguably lie to ABC News when it asked for a statement. "Officers were examining an abandoned item to determine its contents and to move it out of harm's way," said a spokesperson, "when it accidentally discharged."
First, as we have seen before, these people have no law-enforcement authority and are not "officers," although they do like to dress that way. Second, note how the sentence, especially the phrase "it accidentally discharged," puts all the blame on the item. Perhaps the agents had roped off and secured the area and were carefully examining the mysterious canister with state-of-the-art scanning technology before taking appropriate action?
"They were playing around with it," an airport official told the Post.
If you’ve spent any time perusing web forums you’ve encountered the phrase “RTFM” which stands for “Read the fucking manual.” This invariably offends the initial poster who, rightfully (IMHO), points out that if the documentation was clearer they never would have taken the time to register for a web forum and post their question in the first place. The problem with most documentation is that it only makes sense if you already know the answer. People who write documentation have a hard time putting themselves in the mindset of the people for whom the documentation is actually written.
This is not a trivial insight. I once attended a seminar by Penny Eckert who described a working class high school girl in Detroit. The girl was very bright and everyone thought she should attend college, but when asked about it she told Penny: “Everyone says I should go to college, but I don’t know how to go to college.” (Or something like that, this was years ago and my memory is notoriously fuzzy on the details.)
I thought of this again while reading this NY Times Op-Ed on the difficulty elite colleges have “recruiting the talented rural poor.” The author, Claire Watkins, points out that the military do a much better job. What’s the difference?
But the most important thing the military did was walk kids and their families through the enlistment process.
In Eckert’s seminar she pointed out that middle class students have an entire community of practice surrounding college admissions. They talk about the best schools with their parents, they discuss SAT exams with their classmates, they visit schools and have friends in college who share their experiences, etc. Poorer students frequently lack any of this.
Sure, they could RTFM and learn about this on their own from books, websites, etc. They’re the “talented” students, right? But the reality is that much of this only makes sense if you already have been socialized into the process. If you are on the outside looking in it can be difficult to know where to even start. The military understands this. Why don’t Ivy League colleges? Or is it perhaps a form of willful ignorance, a way of maintaining the myth that schools offer equal opportunity while continuing to reproduce privilege?
It is also something college professors might wish to keep in mind. How many times have you scolded students for not reading the syllabus more carefully? I often find that no matter how many times I explain something, my students are more likely to trust what their classmates say about the syllabus than what I’ve told them. (I can’t say for sure, but I suspect this latter problem might be particularly evident in Taiwan where senior students are referred to as elder brothers and sisters.) In such cases it isn’t enough to simply explain the syllabus once, but also to make students feel comfortable asking seemingly “stupid” questions about the syllabus throughout the year. I admit I’m not as good about this as I should be, but I try not to be the teacher who tells students to RTFS…
UPDATE: From another NY Times piece: “The results are now in, and they suggest that basic information can substantially increase the number of low-income students who apply to, attend and graduate from top colleges.”
|
From:
BirgirPall
Views:
585656
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
15180
ratings
|
||
| Time: 03:28 | More in Gaming |






Scanning electron micrographs of diatoms, microscopic algae that form the base of the food chain and produce 20% of Earth’s oxygen.
The beautiful base of the pyramid of biology, feeding our air, land and life.
firehoseworst televised sports injury in a while









AESTHETICS» penguin essentials book covers

by lucidentropy
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
The man allegedly provided fake documentation and 42,000 pounds of Muenster cheese was loaded onto his truck.
Mar 31st 2013 By: Lauren Davis






![]()





firehose"HBO programming president Michael Lombardo ... worries about the image quality of pirated copies"
maybe the most effective way to hurt the feelings of release crews
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
firehosefuck white meat
Charlie Rose steps into the kitchen of Momofuku Ssam to watch David Chang whip up some Korean fried chicken. Prepped an entire day in advance, the poultry is dipped into a batter containing vodka and beer (for its fast evaporating qualities), before it’s dropped into hot oil and twice fried. Talk of varying cooking times leads to a conversation about meaty preferences, where Chang reveals that he prefers dark meat and Charlie Rose white. Chang asks, “Charlie, how can we be friends now?” The two decide to make up and then sit down to eat.
During the interview Rose covers topics from staying true to the original, winning awards, and Chang’s rise to the top. When asked by Rose “How do you make sure that you don’t lose what brought you here?” Chang responds with a quip about needing to lose sometimes to move forward and his thoughts on cooking “getting back to basics.”
Watch the entire video above and hear Chang tell Rose why everyone loves them some fried bird, discuss his awards, and hear Charlie Rose say, “David Chang, I love your fried chicken and I love you.”
[via CBS]