
Martha Rich

Martha Rich

Martha Rich
firehosemeanwhile, in Portland
Ducks meandering in the middle of the road interrupt a police chase and are captured in this dash cam video by the Portland Police Bureau in Portland, Oregon. Police officer Mark James stops the pursuit to escort the ducks out of the road.
firehosechrist
christ christ fuck shit aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
The team behind Google Glass defended its creation against against privacy worries in a Google I/O fireside chat with developers on Thursday. When asked what the privacy implications of Glass' head-mounted display and camera are, Steve Lee, Glass' product director, said the device was built to alleviate these concerns before it even shipped.
"Privacy was top of mind as we designed the product," Lee said, adding that he's proud of the way his team has designed Glass. Early prototypes covered a user's eyes rather than placing the display above the eye. But Google discovered quickly how important eye contact is to Glass, he said. "You'll know when someone with Glass is paying attention to you," Lee said. "If you're looking at Glass, you're looking up."
"If you walk into a restroom and someone's just looking at you — I don't know about you but I'm getting the hell out of there."
The built-in camera raises its own, unique set of privacy questions, the Glass team acknowledged. "If I'm recording you, I have to stare at you — as a human being. And when someone is staring at you, you have to notice," said Charles Mendis, an engineer on the Glass team. "If you walk into a restroom and someone's just looking at you — I don't know about you but I'm getting the hell out of there."
While Lee and Mendis were adamant in their stance that there will be no question when someone is snapping a photo or shooting video with Glass, the fact is that you can use on the headset without looking at someone. Your eyes can be pointed away, or even closed, if that's what you want to do. Still, Lee said that new social behaviors are arising as Glass is starting to get out into the world. "That's why taking a picture has clear social cues — raise your hand or speak to Glass," he said, adding that these are very clear signals to those around you that you're doing something with Glass. Lee also noted that whenever Glass' display is active, it lights up, not just for the user to see, but for observers as well. "Our design is to ensure the display is active when Glass is active," he said. "That will be part of our GDK and part of our policy, so apps won't be permitted that don't do that."
Developers have asked how secure Glass will be with photos, videos and other user data. The Glass Explorer Edition is currently easily hackable, to toy around with and load up experimental apps. So much so that in earlier sessions, some developers mentioned that they weren't wearing their headsets to I/O over security fears. Lee said that the device won't easily expose user data. "We take the trust and reliability of our software very seriously, so by design that's not intended," Lee said of hacking Glass.
Nilay Patel contributed to this report.
The tax breaks for 401(k) and similar retirement savings plans add up to $100 billion a year and will cost the government an estimated $429 billion from 2013 to 2017. That’s more than the mortgage interest deduction. These plans are also tempting targets politically, because 80 percent of their benefits go to the top 20 percent of earners, according to the Tax Policy Center. That’s why liberal-leaning groups, like the Pension Rights Center, say the plans’ tax breaks should be trimmed.
The test can be expensive. For people whose insurance does not cover it, the cost could be as high as $3,000, although some states offer coverage to women who meet certain criteria, such as having two “first-degree” relatives (mother, sister or daughter) with breast cancer or two “second-degree” relatives (grandmother or aunt) with ovarian cancer. Federal law requires insurers to cover testing for women in certain high-risk groups.
…
Even in high-risk patients, breast cancer is most often detected in stage 1, in which about 90% of women are cured. Detection of ovarian cancer, however, most often occurs when the disease is at an advanced stage; survival rates are far lower.
Jolie, 37, said she has delayed a decision regarding surgical removal of her ovaries, in part because ovarian cancer tends not to develop until a woman is in her late 40s or early 50s, even among those at high risk. Jolie’s mother, Marcheline Bertrand, died of the disease at age 56.
firehoseTW: rape
McGillvary was arrested at the Greyhound Bus Terminal in Philadelphia by members of the Philadelphia Police Department around 6:30 p.m. Thursday, Union County Prosecutor Theodore J. Romankow said.
“I am grateful for the overwhelming response and dedicated effort by the public and law enforcement that led to this arrest,” said Romankow. “I believe that everyone is a little safer with this person off the streets.”
…
According to the investigation, the two men met in Times Square in New York sometime last weekend, then returned to Clark before Galfy on Sunday morning drove McGillvary to a train station, where he boarded a train to Asbury Park.
The pair then exchanged text messages throughout the day, and McGillvary returned to the Clark area later on Sunday, authorities said. Galfy reportedly picked him up at the train station, and they then returned to his home for a second time.
Authorities said they believe Galfy was killed sometime Sunday night, but they’re not sure when McGillvary left the scene. But on Monday, McGillvary used his Internet connections to meet up with some “fans” in South Jersey who later that day brought him to a Haddonfield-area train station, where he indicated that he was heading for Philadelphia en route to Georgia, according to the investigation. Authorities say the fans are cooperating.
On Tuesday, McGillvary, posting under his Facebook moniker “Caleb Kai Lawrence Yodhehwawheh,” is believed to have penned a chilling and graphically worded account of being drugged and sexually assaulted several days earlier.
“What would you do if you woke up with a groggy head, metallic taste in your mouth, in a strangers (sic) house … and started wretching (sic), realizing that someone had drugged (and) raped (you?) What would you do?” the post read.
firehosedeserves own share
Good.
The BAA is inviting 5,633 runners who were unable to cross the finish line at this year's marathon back to run in the 2014 Boston Marathon next year.
In a press release today, they listed the eligibility as having at least crossed the half-marathon checkpoint when the race was stopped at 2:50 PM. They do not yet know what the total size of next year's field will be set at, but those invited back will be given the chance to be a part of that field automatically by using a non-transferable unique code that will be given out in August.
Those affected by this decision should already have received an e-mail letting them know that they were included.
This meeting was SO BORING you guys.
At a public meeting, MassDOT released some opinions on the McGrath Highway.
MassDOT has recommended that the McCarthy Overpass portion of McGrath Highway be grounded and the roadway developed into a Boulevard that reconnects East Somerville, Union Square and Brickbottom.
The recommended plan preserves continuity at Washington Street, while enhancing pedestrian and bicycle connections. The removal of the overpass will allow for wider sidewalks, bicycle paths, added green space that will help spur redevelopment and enhance existing uses along the corridor.
Now, if only we can figure out why there is an extensive McGrath rehab in progress when MassDOT intends to remove it.
firehoseaka Twerk Town




Just making sure people will feel welcome when they visit my Animal Crossing: New Leaf town.
We all need somewhere we can go and be happy and be ourselves and be silly if we want to. As the mayor here, that’s the kind of town I’m trying to build. There’s no judging here.
PREORDER Animal Crossing: New Leaf, AC:NL guide, upcoming games
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
firehosechrist
“Why don’t we get a couple of Marines,” he said. “They’re gonna look good next to us. Just ‘cuz I’ve got a change of suits, but I don’t know about our prime minister. There we go. [Gestures to press.] You guys, I’m sorry about.”
firehose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Video game publisher Electronic Arts had already suggested that its upcoming Star Wars games might not be coming to the Nintendo Wii U, but it looks like the situation is more dire than that. EA tells Kotaku that the company is not currently making any games for the Wii U, period.
"We have no games in development for the Wii U currently," spokesman Jeff Brown told the publication.
Though former EA CEO John Riccitiello actually appeared on the Nintendo stage at E3 two years ago to announce an "unprecedented partnership" for Wii U titles, the company claims its obligation is fulfilled, Kotaku reports:
Brown told Kotaku that that early run of EA games on Wii U represented EA delivering on its E3 2011 partnership.
Though EA is undergoing layoffs and financial troubles, and recently lost a CEO, the company is still a major video game publisher and the move doesn't sound good for the continued success of Nintendo's console. We're reaching out to Nintendo for comment now.
firehoselol
firehosechrist
For now, the only work around would be to enable Google Plus in your account with a minimal profile and remove these contacts from the Blocked circle.
Last December we wrote about The Sketchbook Project, a crowd-sourced library of sketchbooks based in Brooklyn. Starting in June, 4,500 sketchbooks from the library will touring the United States aboard the Mobile Library. If you’d like to submit a sketchbook to the project, here’s how to participate. The Sketchbook Project is run by the New York City-based Art House Co-Op.
photo and video via Art House Co-Op
submitted via Laughing Squid Tips
firehose'Credit to Google for their willingness to be misunderstood and portrayed as a loser even as they mine information Mark Zuckerberg can’t even dream of.^4
4. This is a tad hyperbolic; those ubiquitous “Like” buttons accomplish the same thing for Facebook'
Harry McCracken has a pretty good articulation of the conventional wisdom about Google+:
Google+ is exuberant. It’s fun to use. And yet I’m pretty positive I won’t spend remotely as much time in it as I will in Facebook. You might have already guessed why: My friends, family and acquaintances are all on Facebook, where they add up to a bustling community I enjoy being part of. More than any particular feature that Mark Zuckerberg and company have cooked up, it’s the people in my life that make Facebook, well, Facebook…
I don’t feel guilty about favoring the social network that feels more like an extension of my world. That’s Facebook. And since Facebook exists, I don’t have much of an incentive to pour more energy into Google+. The two services aren’t identical in particulars and emphasis — today’s Facebook seems to be built on the philosophy that everyone should share everything at all times, sometimes in an automated fashion, and Google+ isn’t like that at all — but ultimately, they scratch the same itch.
I don’t know much about itches, but I believe the conventional wisdom is wrong: from Google’s perspective, Google+ is not a social network meant to compete with Facebook. Rather, it’s an identity system that follows you everywhere.1
Think about it: what is more valuable? Inane chatter, memes, and baby photos, or every single activity you do online (and increasingly offline)? Google+ is about unifying all of Google’s services under a single log-in which can be tracked across the Internet on every site that serves Google ads, uses Google sign-in, or utilizes Google analytics.2
Every feature of Google+ – or of YouTube, or Maps, or GMail, or any other service – is a flytrap meant to ensure you are logged in and being logged by Google at all times.3
Google’s mission is ostensibly “To organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”
That was once true, but a better formulation today is: “To organize user information and make it universally trackable and marketable.”
Make no mistake, Google+ has been a massive success. Credit to Google for their willingness to be misunderstood and portrayed as a loser even as they mine information Mark Zuckerberg can’t even dream of.4
firehose"At the end of the day, there was a chip that they were interested in that they wanted to pay a certain price for and not a nickel more and that price was below our forecasted cost. I couldn’t see it. It wasn’t one of these things you can make up on volume. And in hindsight, the forecasted cost was wrong and the volume was 100x what anyone thought.”
lol
From an extended feature in The Atlantic:
Even Otellini betrayed a profound sense of disappointment over a decision he made about a then-unreleased product that became the iPhone. Shortly after winning Apple’s Mac business, he decided against doing what it took to be the chip in Apple’s paradigm-shifting product.
“We ended up not winning it or passing on it, depending on how you want to view it. And the world would have been a lot different if we’d done it,” Otellini told me in a two-hour conversation during his last month at Intel. “The thing you have to remember is that this was before the iPhone was introduced and no one knew what the iPhone would do… At the end of the day, there was a chip that they were interested in that they wanted to pay a certain price for and not a nickel more and that price was below our forecasted cost. I couldn’t see it. It wasn’t one of these things you can make up on volume. And in hindsight, the forecasted cost was wrong and the volume was 100x what anyone thought.”
This was certainly the XScale, which is ARM-based. There is no way an x86 chip could have fit in an iPhone (and there remains no way today).
The issue facing Otellini wasn’t just cost; rather, Intel saw themselves as a chip design company, and that meant their focus was on x86, the instruction set architecture (ISA) they invented. ARM was licensed, and that just didn’t fit with Intel’s image of themselves (they proceeded to sell XScale in 2006).
A few weeks ago, I wrote that Intel needed to change their identity:
It is into a climate of doom and gloom that Krzanich is taking over as CEO. And, in what will be a highly emotional yet increasingly obvious decision, he ought to commit Intel to the chip manufacturing business, i.e. manufacturing chips according to other companies’ designs. Intel is already the best microprocessor manufacturing company in the world. They need to accept and embrace their destiny.
Otellini is right. What a different world it would be had Intel followed this advice back in 2006.
Japanese chef Miki Nozawa was killed while on the German holiday island of Sylt after a fight over a meal sparked a fight between the cook and two disgruntled customers.
Nozawa, 57, died of a brain hemorrhage after the fight Sunday night, Sylt Chief Public Prosecutor Rüdiger Meienburg said.
Two men, 50 and 36, reportedly approached Nozawa in a club Sunday night after they had eaten a meal prepared by the chef earlier in the day, German paper Sylt Rundschau reported. The three men got into a physical confrontation around 2 a.m. Monday, which resulted in Nozawa’s fatal injuries.
Neither of the men has been arrested as police lack strong enough evidence to issue a warrant, Flensburg prosecutor Ulrike Stahlmann-Liebelt said.
firehosevia multitasksuicide: "http://achewood.com/index.php?date=02042008"

Bond Villains: Max Zorin and May Day.
1985.
firehosevia Russian Sledges
For all that's been said about the tremendous innovations of Google Glass, privacy concerns have only grown louder since the project's introduction last year. As Google's Explorer Edition continues its staggered rollout, Congress is finally seeking answers. The Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus today wrote a letter to CEO Larry Page asking the CEO to clear up once and for all "whether this new technology could infringe on the privacy of of the average American."
You'd expect a privacy caucus to be wary
"Because Google Glass has not yet been released and we are uncertain of Google's plans to incorporate privacy protections into the device," the letter reads, "there are still a number of unanswered questions that we share." The first question revolves around a sore spot in Google's history: the unauthorized collection of personal data from Wi-Fi networks by the company's Street View cars — which led to an $7 million settlement with US states and fines overseas. The caucus asks Page "how Google plans to prevent Google Glass from unintentionally collecting data about the user" without permission. Non-Glass wearers (i.e. those in the camera's path) are also addressed; Rep. Joe Barton and his colleagues request information on any "proactive" steps Google is taking to guard their right to privacy.
Potential facial recognition capabilities are also a concern; the congressmen want to know if Glass is (or will be) capable of recognizing individuals and whether the public will have a way of opting out of such analysis. Further, the caucus asks Google to detail the types of user information it's pulling in from Glass, along with any changes to Google's privacy policy that have been considered as Glass evolves into a consumer-facing product. Information pertaining to data protection and developer guidelines are also requested. Page has been asked to provide his response to the inquiry no later than June 14th.
firehosevia Al Deaderick: "WHAT"