An anarchist jailed since May on civil contempt for refusing to answer grand jury questions has asked a federal judge to free him, arguing that he has proved he will not cooperate.
Lawyers for Gerald Koch asked U.S. District Judge John F. Keenan in a motion filed Friday to release the 24-year-old college philosophy student from New York. Koch’s silence shows he has no intention of testifying in the future, the motion said. Koch’s lawyers said they believe the grand jury is investigating a 2008 bombing in Times Square, which targeted an armed forces recruiting center and caused no injuries. Koch is not a target of the investigation.
“Jerry’s spending Christmas in jail," said one of his lawyers, Moira Meltzer-Cohen. "He just has no value" to the bombing investigation. … "Hopefully the judge will acknowledge that. I see no reason he would doubt it. It seems abundantly clear, but the judge has virtually unreviewable discretion.”
Koch can be held on civil contempt for 18 months. But confinement is supposed to coerce testimony, not serve as punishment. His supporters have pointed to a similar case in Seattle, where two activists were freed after five months when a judge determined that they would never speak to a grand jury that was believed to be investigating property damage during a May Day demonstration.
Earlier this month, a federal appeals court upheld a civil contempt finding against Koch, ruling that the government “has made a convincing showing of its need to ask the questions at issue.” Meltzer-Cohen said Friday’s motion was the next step in lifting the contempt finding.
Koch has denied having “meaningful knowledge” of the crime. But he has refused to testify, claiming that grand juries such as the one in Manhattan are used to silence and surveil activist communities.
Many activists have rallied around Koch, with hundreds demonstrating outside the court during his contempt hearing.
In a declaration accompanying Friday’s motion, Koch wrote, “I can assert without any hesitation that there is nothing that will convince me to testify before this or any grand jury.”
“With each passing day, my sorrow at confinement deepens, but so does my conviction that I am doing the right thing.”
—————-
Although the Bill of Rights grant every American citizen the right to a fair trial and the right to remain silent, a Grand Jury Trial is specifically designed to erode a targets (in this case; Anarchists) civil rights in order to coerce them to comply.
A Grand Jury Trail differs from a normal trial because not only is it immensely secretive (sometimes victims don’t know why they are being prosecuted and aren’t given a charge), but it can legally suspend certain rights guaranteed by the Constitution. For example, if a Grand Jury grants a person immunity, their 5th amendment right to remain silent is non-existent. Meaning, if you refuse to speak, you will be imprisoned against your will.
In other words, a victim of the Grand Jury MUST speak at trial or face imprisonment. If the person granted immunity genuinely does not have any knowledge of the crime committed, their options are to either lie to avoid imprisonment, or stay silent and face jail time.
In a similar case in the Pacific NorthWest, Anarchists were targeted by the state for causing property damage during a May Day protests. But a Freedom of Information request confirmed that the secret Grand Jury trail begun on March 2nd.
That’s right, the trial begun two months before the crime was committed. If you’re not following, that is because the time of events doesn’t make any sense. How can a trial begin before the crime is committed? This obviously proves that the entire trial is just a political witch hunt.
But that didn’t stop the court from imprisoning three anarchists for refusing to speak. Fortunately, all the victims were eventually released.
Let’s hope the same happens for Gerald, to insure this, please spread the news by reblogging!