
firehose
Shared posts
Japan’s Coming of Age Day had the fewest number of new adults since 1968

In Japan, turning 20 is cause for a national holiday. Since 1948, the country has held Coming of Age Day to celebrate when 20-year-olds gain the right to vote, as well as buy cigarettes and alcohol.
But this year, Japan’s demographic problems cast a shadow on the festivities with the smallest coming-of-age cohort since the government began tracking birth data in 1968—only 1.2 million Japanese were born in 1993 and turned 20 in time to celebrate the holiday, down from a peak of 2.46 million in 1970.
The numbers reflect one of Japan’s biggest challenges: its elderly population is outpacing the number of young people. As of Dec. 1, there were an estimated 6.18 million people between the ages of 20 and 24, but 7.66 million between 70 and 74.
And so the faces of young men and women who presented themselves in suits, kimonos, and other garish outfits at ceremonies throughout the country on Jan. 13 were just another reminder of how quickly youth fades.











Bell Labs, Now Devoid of Life | Eero Saarinen | Via At its peak,...






Bell Labs, Now Devoid of Life | Eero Saarinen | Via
At its peak, thousands passed through its massive, light-filled atrium. Today, Bell Labs Holmdel stands empty, all of its 1.9-million-square-feet utterly without life. An iconic example of the now-disparaged office park, the campus in central Jersey, was shuttered in 2007 and vacated soon after. Years later, it remains in an abandoned, if not unkept state. The grounds are cared for, the floors swept clean, and the interior plantings trimmed, however haphazardly. (That’s saying something; in the laboratory’s heyday, plastic shrubbery filled its glorious central hall.)
For zombie fans, it isn’t much of a stretch to imagine the luckless protagonists of the Walking Dead holed up here, fenced off from the rest of the world by six-story high glass walls. (Alternatively, it would make a great lair for the Governor.) Of course, in such a scenario, it’s plausible that the virus capable of raising the dead would have originated inside the lab itself. As is often noted, the building is as highly prized by scientists as it is by architects. It was here, in Saarninen’s quarter-mile fortress, that has housed some of the last century’s most significant scientific discoveries.
inja-y-ddraig: inkfromtheoctopus: The Adventures of Prince...

The Adventures of Prince Achmen.
1926. German.
The oldest surviving animated film in history.Nonono, you don’t understand how AWESOME this movie is
because it’s not done by a big production firm, or someone with a name as big as Walt Disney, no
the writer and “mind” behind this film was a WOMAN
yes, my dear tumblr peeps, the very first trick animator in the world was a young German woman who had an idea, and enough friends and time to make a feature-length animated film. And it took her three years
because the way this movie (and some shorter works she actually did before Die Abenteuer des Prinzen Achmed) are done is really, really complex. You see those leaves, and the hair of the figures? Yes.
That’s hand-cut paper.
Lotte Reiniger - that’s her name, my friends - always loved the art beind the Chinese shadow puppetry, and after she heard a lecture by Paul Wegener (famous vor the early movies Der Golem and Der Student von Prag) about the possibilites of animated movies, she wanted to combine these two things.
And guys, how she combined it…
Most of the puppets and scenerey she made all by herself. Her friends set up a special table that was lighted from underneath, and in the later movies she would even change the colours of the background mid-scene to change the atmosphere. Above it was a camera, shooting photos of the scenes that she moved milimetre for milimetre for those 16 pictures per second she needed for her movie.
Which makes Die Abenteuer von Prinz Achmed not only the first animated feature-length movie, but also the first stop-motion movie.
This is a most fabulous film… have been fortunate enough to catch it both on German TV and here at home.Just exquisite. Must DVD it when it runs next.
wickedlydeeper: thepoliticalfreakshow: These Grandfathers...
These Grandfathers Getting Married Might Be The Best Thing You See Today
The New York Times first posted this video of two men who had been together since the Vietnam War, adopted a baby, became grandfathers, and finally got married.
Lewis Duckett and Billy Jones have been together a long time.
Via nytimes.comBut they had to be careful, and wrote in code so their relationship was kept secret.
Via nytimes.comLOVE IS LOVE IS LOVE
Russia refuses visa to US journalist David Satter; writer banned from country for ... - Washington Post
Economic Times |
Russia refuses visa to US journalist David Satter; writer banned from country for ... Washington Post MOSCOW --- Russia has refused to allow a U.S. journalist and writer to return to Moscow, an indication that authorities are clamping down on criticism despite recent gestures aimed at burnishing the country's image before the Winter Olympics open Feb. 7. UPDATE 2-Russia expels US journalist critical of PutinReuters Russia defends expulsion of veteran US reportergulfnews.com Moscow Claims US Journalist 'Grossly Violated' Visa-Entry RulesVoice of America Forbes -NBCNews.com (blog) -Fox News all 107 news articles » |
The PC's Death Might Also Mean The Web's Demise
Johnny Depp Rumored to Have Met With Marvel About "Doctor Strange"
Daimler Wins as US Supreme Court Rejects Human-Rights Suit (1) - Businessweek
Daimler Wins as US Supreme Court Rejects Human-Rights Suit (1) Businessweek The U.S. Supreme Court gave multinational companies a stronger shield against lawsuits, throwing out a case against Daimler AG (DAI) over a company unit's alleged collaboration in torture and killings in Argentina. The justices unanimously said the parent ... and more » |
Stuff No One Asked For: Pizza Hut by the Slice
AP
Like a bad hair stylist, Pizza Hut has decided to give you something you didn't ask for: A single slice of Pizza Hut pizza. Two of the pizza chain's restaurants, one in Nebraska and one in Rhode Island, will begin to offer pizza by the slice on Tuesday, testing out a new format idea borrowed from New York City's finest (and not-so-finest) pizzerias.
"We're seeing the trends for quick and ready products," Carrie Walsh, Pizza Hut's chief marketing officer, explained to the AP. The "quick and ready products" she is referring to is quick serve joints like Chipotle, which can give you an inexpensive made-to-order 1 lb. food comas burrito in just minutes. In October, The Wall Street Journal reported that Chipotle's profits jumped 15 percent. That kind of money is obviously something companies want, especially Pizza Hut's parent company, Yum Brands Inc., which had its 11-year profit growth streak snapped in the same month Chipotle revealed its good fortune.
Things are going so well, in fact, that the Mexican chain is getting into the pizza biz. They recently launched a spin-off restaurant called Pizzeria Locale, that offers custom-made pies that can be cooked and served in under two minutes.
So in order to keep up, Pizza Hut and other brands think the key is offering better, "quick and ready" fast food like its pizza by the slice. Little Caesar's has found some success with their "Hot and Ready" pies, full pizzas that are cooked in bulk for customers who want to walk in off the street and take out without ordering ahead of time. It's not just pizza either. McDonald's unveiled a build-your-own-burger concept in Orange County, California, and KFC created a KFC Eleven, a more up-scale fried chicken restaurant with menu items like garlic-infused smashed potatoes and a promised "Mexican food" night.
However, Pizza Hut's pizza by the slice makes you wonder if it's tapping a dry well. Why would you need pizza by the slice when you have already have the option of personal pan pizzas (invented years ago by Pizza Hut) and breadsticks and chicken wings and the bottomless salad bar and... what were we talking about again?
According to Pizza Hut, the company will continue to test the concept throughout the year and then figure out how or if they should proceed.
Stolen Flintstones car returned to Sacramento comics store
Earth’s devastating supervolcanoes powered by density differences

Devastating supervolcanoes can erupt simply due to changes that happen in their giant magma chambers as they slowly cool, according to a new study. This finding marks the first time researchers have been able to explain the mechanism behind the eruptions of the largest volcanoes on Earth.
Geologists have identified the roots of a number of ancient and possible future supervolcanoes across the globe. No supervolcano has exploded in human history, but the rock record demonstrates how devastating any eruption would be to today’s civilization. Perhaps most famous is the Yellowstone supervolcano in Wyoming, which has erupted three times in the past two million years (the last eruption occurred 600,000 years ago).
These giant volcanic time bombs seem to explode once every few hundred thousand years, and when they do, they throw huge volumes of ash into the sky. At Yellowstone, the eruption that happened two million years ago ejected more than 2,000 km3 of material—enough to cover Los Angeles in a mile-thick layer of ash.
Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments
wandrlust: Portland Building, Portland, Oregon, 1982 — Michael...

Portland Building, Portland, Oregon, 1982 — Michael Graves
What is considered to be the first large scale postmodern building is also "one of the most hated buildings in America".
Fred Armisen and Carrie Brownstein’s Portlandia derives its namesake from the sculpture work Portlandia (1985) that is perched imposingly above the building’s entrance. It is also featured in the opening credits.
In the film Paranoia a blackboard is shown with some pseudo-code...


In the film Paranoia a blackboard is shown with some pseudo-code written on it.
The pseudo-code is actually from a 1975 academic paper titled Finding all the elementary circuits of a directed graph [pdf].
836 Days without Cassandra Cain
Cassandra was last seen in Batman: Gates of Gotham Issue #5, on October 1st, 2011. It has been 836 days since then.
Or 2 years, 3 months, 13 days.
Urgh.
That feels awful.
Chefs Preview Surface Tension-Based Cocktail Garnishes
firehoseattention
important science
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Documentary trailer for Fantastic Four movie Marvel wanted to forget
In 1994, monster movie maker Roger Corman made a $2 million adaptation of The Fantastic Four, was never released in theaters for obvious reasons. But now the documentary DOOMED! The Untold Story of Roger Corman's The Fantastic Four will show you the lunacy that is this creation, and all the bananas behind-the-scenes goings on. Watch the trailer now.
"The real marriage of true minds is for any two people to...
firehosevia Snorkmaiden

"The real marriage of true minds is for any two people to possess a sense of humor or irony pitched in exactly the same key, so that their joint glances on any subject cross like interarching searchlights."
— Edith Wharton, A Backward Glance
People Are Teaching Themselves To Ignore Crippling Back Pain
How the NSA Threatens National Security
Secret NSA eavesdropping is still in the news. Details about once secret programs continue to leak. The Director of National Intelligence has recently declassified additional information, and the President's Review Group has just released its report and recommendations.
With all this going on, it's easy to become inured to the breadth and depth of the NSA's activities. But through the disclosures, we've learned an enormous amount about the agency's capabilities, how it is failing to protect us, and what we need to do to regain security in the Information Age.
First and foremost, the surveillance state is robust. It is robust politically, legally, and technically. I can name three different NSA programs to collect Gmail user data. These programs are based on three different technical eavesdropping capabilities. They rely on three different legal authorities. They involve collaborations with three different companies. And this is just Gmail. The same is true for cell phone call records, Internet chats, cell-phone location data.
Second, the NSA continues to lie about its capabilities. It hides behind tortured interpretations of words like "collect," "incidentally," "target," and "directed." It cloaks programs in multiple code names to obscure their full extent and capabilities. Officials testify that a particular surveillance activity is not done under one particular program or authority, conveniently omitting that it is done under some other program or authority.
Third, US government surveillance is not just about the NSA. The Snowden documents have given us extraordinary details about the NSA's activities, but we now know that the CIA, NRO, FBI, DEA, and local police all engage in ubiquitous surveillance using the same sorts of eavesdropping tools, and that they regularly share information with each other.
The NSA's collect-everything mentality is largely a hold-over from the Cold War, when a voyeuristic interest in the Soviet Union was the norm. Still, it is unclear how effective targeted surveillance against "enemy" countries really is. Even when we learn actual secrets, as we did regarding Syria's use of chemical weapons earlier this year, we often can't do anything with the information.
Ubiquitous surveillance should have died with the fall of Communism, but it got a new -- and even more dangerous -- life with the intelligence community's post-9/11 "never again" terrorism mission. This quixotic goal of preventing something from happening forces us to try to know everything that does happen. This pushes the NSA to eavesdrop on online gaming worlds and on every cell phone in the world. But it's a fool's errand; there are simply too many ways to communicate.
We have no evidence that any of this surveillance makes us safer. NSA Director General Keith Alexander responded to these stories in June by claiming that he disrupted 54 terrorist plots. In October, he revised that number downward to 13, and then to "one or two." At this point, the only "plot" prevented was that of a San Diego man sending $8,500 to support a Somali militant group. We have been repeatedly told that these surveillance programs would have been able to stop 9/11, yet the NSA didn't detect the Boston bombings -- even though one of the two terrorists was on the watch list and the other had a sloppy social media trail. Bulk collection of data and metadata is an ineffective counterterrorism tool.
Not only is ubiquitous surveillance ineffective, it is extraordinarily costly. I don't mean just the budgets, which will continue to skyrocket. Or the diplomatic costs, as country after country learns of our surveillance programs against their citizens. I'm also talking about the cost to our society. It breaks so much of what our society has built. It breaks our political systems, as Congress is unable to provide any meaningful oversight and citizens are kept in the dark about what government does. It breaks our legal systems, as laws are ignored or reinterpreted, and people are unable to challenge government actions in court. It breaks our commercial systems, as US computer products and services are no longer trusted worldwide. It breaks our technical systems, as the very protocols of the Internet become untrusted. And it breaks our social systems; the loss of privacy, freedom, and liberty is much more damaging to our society than the occasional act of random violence.
And finally, these systems are susceptible to abuse. This is not just a hypothetical problem. Recent history illustrates many episodes where this information was, or would have been, abused: Hoover and his FBI spying, McCarthy, Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement, anti-war Vietnam protesters, and -- more recently -- the Occupy movement. Outside the US, there are even more extreme examples. Building the surveillance state makes it too easy for people and organizations to slip over the line into abuse.
It's not just domestic abuse we have to worry about; it's the rest of the world, too. The more we choose to eavesdrop on the Internet and other communications technologies, the less we are secure from eavesdropping by others. Our choice isn't between a digital world where the NSA can eavesdrop and one where the NSA is prevented from eavesdropping; it's between a digital world that is vulnerable to all attackers, and one that is secure for all users.
Fixing this problem is going to be hard. We are long past the point where simple legal interventions can help. The bill in Congress to limit NSA surveillance won't actually do much to limit NSA surveillance. Maybe the NSA will figure out an interpretation of the law that will allow it to do what it wants anyway. Maybe it'll do it another way, using another justification. Maybe the FBI will do it and give it a copy. And when asked, it'll lie about it.
NSA-level surveillance is like the Maginot Line was in the years before World War II: ineffective and wasteful. We need to openly disclose what surveillance we have been doing, and the known insecurities that make it possible. We need to work toward security, even if other countries like China continue to use the Internet as a giant surveillance platform. We need to build a coalition of free-world nations dedicated to a secure global Internet, and we need to continually push back against bad actors -- both state and non-state -- that work against that goal.
Securing the Internet requires both laws and technology. It requires Internet technology that secures data wherever it is and however it travels. It requires broad laws that put security ahead of both domestic and international surveillance. It requires additional technology to enforce those laws, and a worldwide enforcement regime to deal with bad actors. It's not easy, and has all the problems that other international issues have: nuclear, chemical, and biological weapon non-proliferation; small arms trafficking; human trafficking; money laundering; intellectual property. Global information security and anti-surveillance needs to join those difficult global problems, so we can start making progress.
The President's Review Group recommendations are largely positive, but they don't go nearly far enough. We need to recognize that security is more important than surveillance, and work towards that goal.
This essay previously appeared on TheAtlantic.com.
Music Review: Sharon Jones & The Dap-Kings try to Give The People What They Want
In the past year, Sharon Jones’ fairy-tale music career—the commanding soul dynamo of the retro-fabulous Dap-Kings was once a Rikers Island corrections officer and obscure session singer—hit a bump. The 57-year-old was diagnosed with bile duct cancer, which necessitated the removal of a tumor and chemotherapy. Naturally, Jones tackled her disease with the same kind of tenacity and pluck she displays fronting the Dap-Kings. For example, the caption of her Facebook photo standing next to other bald bandmates: “Finally I fit in..#baldband.”
Her diagnosis pushed the release of the Dap-Kings’ fifth album, Give The People What They Want, from August 2013 until now. But it’s not as if the group’s music has ever been time-sensitive; in fact, although much more upbeat than 2010’s I Learned The Hard Way, this new record doesn’t deviate from the Stax- and Motown-indebted music of the Dap-Kings’ previous albums. While the band has been criticized in ...
The Daily Dot - Why does the man behind 'Doctor Who' and 'Sherlock' still have a job?
firehose'Moffat is happy his wife is no longer the size of “a boat," because her pregnancy was a scary time in his life that left him “pretty frightened” and “disgusted.”
Moffat is happy he was able to hire Karen Gillan to play Amy Pond. He thought Gillan was “wee and dumpy,” but it turns out she’s “5'11" and slim and gorgeous.”
Moffat is happy he was able to “[shag] his way ’round television studios like a mechanical digger” and still wind up with a successful television career, married to one of the most powerful producers in the industry.
Moffat is happy Sherlock Holmes isn’t asexual, because there’s “no fun in that.” Of course Sherlock’s not gay, either, because “he wouldn't be living with a man if he thought men were interesting.” And although John and Sherlock are “definitely a love story,” Moffat doesn’t see why it should be “weirdly sexualized.” Moffat is happy he can write only the most interesting, innovative, entertaining relationships into his shows—straight ones.
Moffat is happy that while women may fuss about equal treatment, deep down all they want is to “be the one.” The one to “melt that glacier,” the one who “knows what men like,” the one who has a “a crush on the Doctor.” He’s happy because he knows this secret about women.
Moffat is happy because he knows he can keep “dumping the slightly needy girlfriend by palming her off on a copy” of his hero. It’s brilliant, because after we’ve gotten her out of the picture, we can laugh at her!
Moffat is happy because his own Sherlock Holmes fanfic is the bestest Sherlock Holmes fanfic EVER. It’s unique and original, unlike all those other Sherlock Holmes fanfics, especially that one on CBS where “Sherlock [isn’t] Holmes in any sense other than he's called Sherlock Holmes.”
Moffat is happy because the BBC just let him choose another white dude as the next Doctor, and he got to make that Helen Mirren joke about how he’d “like to see a man play the Queen,” and nothing happened.
Moffat is happy that even though “women are needy” and spend all their time “out there hunting for husbands,” he still writes them so well. After all, he wrote Coupling!
Moffat is happy that he has given British entertainment such sweeping diversity, like when he made his only gay character fall in love with a man, or when made sure his only two black characters got married to each other, or when he gave us all a complex array of three different women who fell in love with the Doctor because they were “impressionable young girl[s].”
Moffat is happy that he does not have to listen to criticism, because criticism is “defamatory” and anathema to his creative vision, and also it usually comes from
a) dumb people
b) amateur psychologists
c) nerdy, needy fans obsessed with little details no one else cares about, like why someone who regularly rends space-time suddenly can’t rend space or time.
Moffat is happy he doesn’t have to deal with a female Doctor. He knows “we don’t care” about a TARDIS full of women and their feelings and backstories.
Moffat is happy that bisexuals “probably don’t even watch” his shows because they’re off “having far too much fun” getting laid. If they were watching, he’d have to make them characters or something, which would be weird, because his gay characters are “going through a phase” anyway, like Irene Adler was before she met the man who could turn her straight.
Moffat is happy because sometimes he knows his characters so well it’s like they’re speaking for him. Like when Sherlock asks Mrs. Hudson, in the final episode of season 3, “What exactly is the point of you?” Or when Charles Magnusson says in the episode’s opening scene, “The whole world is wet for me.” Steven Moffat is happy the whole world is wet for him, ready and eager for his stories. Steven Moffat knows he’s the best ride we’ll ever have.
Moffat is happy because when he goes to Comic-Con, he is a god, and it’s good to be in a place where he can truly feel like an inspiration to all those other younger, marginalized geeks—where he can stand as the living embodiment that if you work hard and sleep with a lot of people, you too might one day be able to write your “red-blooded male” fantasy of a hot redhead “flirting with herself.”
Moffat is happy that although he’s unfortunate enough to live in “a culture” with such “a huge, unfortunate lack of respect for anything male,” he can do his part to level the playing field for blokes like himself—men who just want to make the world a better place.'
Tokyo Metro: Trains of the Passnet Companies Collectible...

Tokyo Metro: Trains of the Passnet Companies Collectible Farecard
Not a transit map, but too darn cute to not share with you.
From the same series of collectible Passnet cards as this nifty Tokyo Metro map, this card shows an adorably stylised train for each of the (22!) rail companies that participated in the Passnet program.
(Source: Rob Ketcherside/Flickr)
Dr. Luigi review: easy medicine
By Ben Kuchera on January 13, 2014 at 11:00p
| Game Info |
| Box Art N/A |
| Platform Wii U |
| Publisher Nintendo |
| Developer N/A |
| Release Date 2013-12-31 |
There are two kinds of Nintendo sequels — the follow-ups that take chances with their source, and the sequels that collect previous mechanics and repackage them, neatly, presentably.
Dr. Luigi would be the latter.
Released in 1990, Dr. Mario combined a proven formula with a unique aesthetic. Players had to match multicolored pills with like-colored viruses, and making a four-segment line of the same color either horizontally or vertically caused that row to disappear. The game was easy to understand and play, and has been ported or sequel'ed to almost every Nintendo device since.
The inevitable Wii U follow-up stars Luigi taking up the other family business. Dr. Luigi sticks to the original formula, but it offers a series of small tweaks and updates. Taken together, it builds a satisfying, customizable collection of puzzle games — even if it all feels a little too safe.
Dr. Luigi's focus is still classic pill-dropping and color matching game play. As each level starts, you're presented with a playing field full of color coded viruses. Luigi will throw out a pill composed of one or two colors, and it's your job to match four of any color horizontally or vertically to clear the appropriately-hued virus.
The classic game, offered in the Retro Remedy mode, is only the beginning. "Operation L" offers pills that enter the field shaped like the letter L. That small addition caused big changes to my strategy. Every pill forced me to look at the horizontal and vertical implications of each move. Planning ahead isn't just encouraged; it's now mandatory. Mistakes are much harder to fix.
Meanwhile, the returning Virus Buster mode became one of my favorite ways to play. In Virus Buster, you guide pills onto viruses on the Wii U GamePad with the stylus while tapping each one to change its orientation. Using the GamePad is a more direct, intuitive way to control the game — but soon two pills are dropped at once, and then three. This puts much more pressure on the player at a much faster pace, and I found it tricky to keep a game going longer than a few minutes at a time.
Add the ability to adjust the speed of the pills, or to show an outline of where each pill will rest before you drop it, and you have a game mode that can challenge veteran players while still giving players the option of adding a few training wheels. So many modern puzzle games offer a singular way to play; Dr. Luigi looks back at a time when puzzle games were expected to offer multiple options for a wider range of players.
This customization is a recurring theme. The game's core strength is the ability to roll your own dramatically different experience by adjusting any of the many simple options in the menus. I found I was easily able to twist the game to suit my skill level, or to provide myself fresh challenges. I found the stock modes a little dry, so I'd advice players to experiment and bend the game to your will.
In multiplayer, difficulty and speed can also be handled discretely for each person, allowing you to have a good time against friends and family with different skill sets.
The new and returning game modes and Nintendo's welcoming presentation and polish make Dr. Luigi a solid follow-up to the series. But Nintendo is at its best when it shakes up classic formulas, and Dr. Luigi never reaches the heights of other recent offerings from the company.
Wrap Up:
Dr. Luigi is content with safety over invention
Dr. Luigi doesn't have any wheels being reinvented, and there are no major overhauls to what was enjoyable about Dr. Mario. There's nothing here on the level of a cat-suited Mario or even a flying go-kart. After a year that showed Nintendo straying from their comfort zones and confidently iterating on sacred cows, it's a bit of a letdown to see Dr. Luigi make so little forward progress.
Dr. Luigi was reviewed using retail code purchased on the Wii U eShop. You can find additional information about Polygon's ethics policy here.
About Polygon's Reviewsthefingerfuckingfemalefury: vejigante: comicberks: Red...




Red She-Hulk and her big-ass sword.
My OTP!
Red She Hulk/Big Ass Sword is so totally TRUE LOVE :D
Marshawn Lynch caused yet another earthquake during Seahawks-Saints
firehose"How do we know this is due to Seattle's fans? Maybe it's just Rob Ryan angrily stomping after his team's failure?"

The Seattle Seahawks' fans keep shaking the earth when Marshawn Lynch does stuff.
You might have also known that during this year's first Seahawks-Saints matchup, the Seahawks fans caused another earthquake.
Well, during Saturday's Seattle-New Orleans Divisional round game, Qwest Field once again made the ground shake. Seismologists put additional sensors around the stadium -- for practice observing earthquakes and to study how large structures shake -- and sure enough, they got the results they wanted when Marshawn Lynch sealed the game again. From the Seattle Times:
"This signal looks bigger than the one three years ago," said John Vidale, director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network at the University of Washington, "but we don't know yet."
Seismologists will need a few days to be sure, he said.
Here's what their sensors looked like:
Excellent. Seattle crowd caused another earthquake after Marshawn Lynch touchdown run pic.twitter.com/gmsXpBsLWT http://t.co/AH28NsMaPh
— pourmecoffee (@pourmecoffee) January 14, 2014
A) We need sensors on every stadium in the league. We need to know who our most seismically active fanbase is. We can detect our loudest fans with a simple decibel meter, but we need this technology to find which of our fans jump -- and, umm, weigh -- the most.
b) All three Seahawks quakes have been caused when the team is playing against the Saints. How do we know this is due to Seattle's fans? Maybe it's just Rob Ryan angrily stomping after his team's failure?
c) You can check out all the sensor activity from the game at the PNSN site.





















