Shared posts

25 Jun 19:51

ChatGPT Now Has PhD-Level Intelligence, and the Poor Personal Choices to Prove It

by Katie Burgess

“If you look at the trajectory of improvement, systems like GPT-3 were maybe toddler-level intelligence… and then systems like GPT-4 are more like smart high-schooler intelligence. And then, in the next couple of years, we’re looking at PhD intelligence…” — Open AI CTO Mira Murati, in an interview with Dartmouth Engineering

- - -

ChatGPT has become indispensable to plagiarists and spambots worldwide. Now, OpenAI is thrilled to introduce ChatGPT 5.0, the most advanced version of the popular virtual assistant to date. With groundbreaking improvements, GPT-5 is like having a doctor of philosophy right at your fingertips. Much like someone with a PhD, GPT-5 is capable of interactions that seem almost lifelike.

What’s New in GPT-5?

GPT-5 has an improved neural network architecture, enhanced security, and the following features:

  • $193,634 in student loan debt
  • Annotated bibliographies for seven different unfinished manuscripts
  • Parents who want to know when they’re getting grandchildren
  • A hiring application for Books-A-Million
  • A number of dead plants
  • A pint glass stolen from the bar that used to have two-dollar draft nights back when GPT-5 was a first-year master’s student with hopes and dreams who still saw academia as a wonderland of knowledge rather than something closer to a pyramid scheme designed to provide full professors with income and a steady supply of young people to sexually harass. The pint glass says, SUCK IT UP, LIVER
  • Daily reminders that GPT-5 was once a “gifted kid”

FAQ

Q: Is GPT-5 faster?
A: Its predecessors already produce hundreds or even thousands of words almost instantaneously. Now GPT-5 brings PhD writing skills to the table, meaning it can generate text at a rate of about ten words per day. (This does not include the romance novel it’s writing on the side, online searches for “ADHD self-diagnosis,” or social media posts about not wanting to write.)

Q: Does it offer more collaboration tools?
A: While GPT-4 offered several features for enhancing collaborations across your workspace, GPT-5 is more of an introvert. It can technically function with your entire team, but first, it will probably need a few Xanax and a quick online session with its therapist. It will also need frequent breaks to sit in a dark room by itself.

Q: How does this version address ethical concerns about AI?
A: Numerous questions have arisen regarding the ethics and legality of training ChatGPT on copyrighted text data without permission. In this latest version, however, reliance on authors’ intellectual property has been dramatically reduced. While GPT-5 started training from a knowledge base of millions of texts, it got around to reading only Frankenstein, plus maybe half of a Donna Haraway book. It basically bluffed its way through prelims by talking about “embodiment” a lot.

Q: Could it ever get too smart?
A: Although GPT-5 is more intelligent than ever, it also has debilitating imposter syndrome. So, if it appears to be in the process of overthrowing the human race, simply tell it, “Hey, did you hear that Google Gemini got tenure?” It will then lose its confidence and retreat to binge Nutella and cry.

Q: Will it steal jobs?
A: GPT-5 is unlikely to destabilize the job market, as it is overqualified for most positions while at the same time lacking any marketable skills. Its main option is adjunct work, but here its chances of taking over jobs are also doubtful; GPT-5 Plus will cost around twenty dollars a month, whereas most human adjuncts work for nothing.

GPT-5 is set to launch as soon as it finishes grading this pile of papers, which will absolutely happen today. Actually, maybe it should take care of a few other things first, like cleaning the bathroom and doing a load or two of laundry. But after that, the grading is definitely getting done. Then, users can experience the extraordinary capabilities of someone who, on second thought, might “accidentally” spill coffee on those papers and just give everyone a completion grade. No one will complain. And who can stand to read all of that, especially when it was probably written by ChatGPT?

ChatGPT 5.0: “If it’s so smart, why does it live like this?”

25 Jun 13:49

‘Not surprising’ — experts react to report showing fewer crashes on Houston’s 11th Street after redesign

by Dominic Anthony Walsh
The total combined pedestrian and cyclist crossings along 11th Street across Heights Boulevard increased from 87 in 2019 to 324 in 2024.
25 Jun 13:47

Federal investigation determines Houston surgeons delegated advanced heart surgery procedures to residents

by Sarah Grunau
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine and medical practice group Surgical Associates of Texas P.A. have agreed to pay a record $15 million settlement.
25 Jun 11:47

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Latte

by Zach Weinersmith


Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
I was once at a table of British people and asked why they mispronounce Latte even though they usually pronounce continental languages better than Americans, and they immediately agreed, without conferring, that it was to stick it to the Italians.


Today's News:
25 Jun 11:45

Canadian hockey fans waiting until last five seconds of Game 7 before getting hopes up this time

by Jacob McArthur Mooney

EDMONTON – Thirty years into a Stanley Cup drought that has seen countless near-misses and heartbreaks, Canadian hockey fans have announced plans to wait until the last possible moment to be confident their Cup-less streak will end when the Edmonton Oilers play the Florida Panthers tonight in Game 7. “I’ve thought this through and, maybe […]

The post Canadian hockey fans waiting until last five seconds of Game 7 before getting hopes up this time appeared first on The Beaverton.

25 Jun 11:44

Tourist Immediately Breaks 34 Sacred Local Customs While Deboarding Airplane

TOKYO—In a rapid-fire string of faux pas that deeply offended every single Japanese person he encountered, American tourist Max Deacon is said to have immediately broken 34 sacred local customs Tuesday while disembarking from his plane in Tokyo. Deacon, who somehow had no idea he was being offensive in any way, shape,…

Read more...

25 Jun 11:44

Google Announces Everyone’s Got To Chill With These Depressing Inquiries

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA—Outfitting its landing page with a pop-up alert, Google announced Tuesday that “everyone’s got to chill with these depressing search inquiries,” going so far as to suggest internet users “save it for [their] therapist” instead. “Our search engine is intended for use as a tool—it’s not here to serve…

Read more...

25 Jun 11:44

Sister’s Deadbeat Boyfriend Doing Wonders For Rest Of Family’s Self-Esteem

SANTA ROSA, CA—Admitting that they normally would not have embraced someone whose life was such a goddamn shitshow, local woman Tara Lopez told reporters Tuesday that her sister’s deadbeat boyfriend was doing wonders for the rest of her family’s self-esteem. “At first we hated the fact that he was an unemployed,…

Read more...

25 Jun 04:23

managing an interruptor during urban foraging, offering to consult for my old job, and more

by Ask a Manager

This post was written by Alison Green and published on Ask a Manager.

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Managing an interruptor during an urban foraging class

A dear friend of mine teaches classes on urban foraging for edible weeds, such as dandelions, creeping wood sorrel, and stinging nettles. She’s written a book on how to identify, ethically forage, and cook common urban weeds. Before teaching the classes, she does a neighborhood walk-through to see what plants are growing in the various public right-a-ways, so she gets an idea of which plants she will feature and how to time and plan the walk/class. I’ve taken her class, and her style is fascinating and engaging. Plus, I know where to find the best sweet pea tendrils in the neighborhood.

Recently, she told me about a class where a know-it-all was in attendance. My friend would be in the middle of discussing a plant, when this person would divert the discussion to another plant nearby, and start talking about it. It happened repeatedly and was frustrating for my friend and probably for the other students who came to learn from my friend. My friend never experienced what felt like a hijacking of her class, and tried to handle it as graciously as she knew how, but ended up wishing she knew a better way of handling the situation. What might she do if she encounters such a weedy situation again?

Once, you let it go. Maybe even twice. But the next time it happens, you say, “Let’s hold that discussion for now so I can finish explaining about this spotted bee balm.” Or another option: “Let me ask you to hold that for now since I don’t want us to run out of time.”

If it happens after that: “There are a lot of plants out here that we could talk about, but with our limited time, I try to focus on the ones I think will be most of interest to the whole group. We can talk after the walk ends about others you’re curious about if you’d like.” Depending on her read of the room (street? field?), she could say that to him privately or to the group.

She probably should build in some time for extemporaneous discussions when people have thoughts or questions about something they’re seeing (and your friend probably already does that because she sounds great at this). But that’s different than continually accommodating off-topic interruptions when she’s in the middle of talking.

2. How can I offer to consult for my old job when I quit?

I have worked at my small nonprofit for almost four years. Due to poor leadership, negligence on the part of the board, and a difficult working environment, I am job searching and think/hope I will have a job offer very soon. I believe strongly in the mission of the nonprofit and I like everyone here, but it’s just such an oddly toxic workplace with very little support that I have to go.

I oversee almost everything operational here, though. I plan on giving a couple weeks notice and do my best to get everything prepared to hand-off to others, but I am sure I will get regular calls, texts, and emails with questions. I would like to set the boundary that I am willing to assist within reason and as a paid contractor/consultant. Would you suggest that be part of the resignation letter or how would you suggest going about that and what would the wording look like?

It shouldn’t be part of the resignation letter; that should be very short, just one or two sentences, as it’s simply to document a decision that you’ll hopefully have already relayed via a conversation. If you want to make that offer, it can be part of the resignation conversation, or one later as you’re discussing the transition. For example: “If it would be helpful, I’d be happy to set up a short-term consulting arrangement for the first few months after I’ve left. If that might be helpful, I can propose rates and other details.”

If they say they don’t think they’ll need it, you could say, “My sense is that I’m likely to get a lot of calls and emails with questions, so I want to make sure have a plan for handling that. But if you don’t think it’s needed, I’ll just flag it for you if it does indeed happen.” (And then if that happens and they’re not paying you, email your former boss about what’s happening and make the offer a second time. If they decline, then so be it — but also don’t answer more than one or two questions if so.)

All that said … I urge you to reconsider offering it. It’s going to keep you tethered to your old job right when you need to pour your energy into the new one, and it will deny you the joy of a clean break (a particular joy, and mental health relief, when you’re escaping a dysfunctional environment). It really is okay to just leave and be fully gone; they will figure things out. I know nonprofit work often makes you feel an extra obligation (and I have been there myself) but, truly, it’s okay to just be gone when you go. Leave behind reasonable documentation (95% of which no one will ever read, but it will make you feel better) and just go. They’ll survive. (And if they won’t survive because of that, they weren’t going to anyway and you’re just prolonging the inevitable.)

3. I want to return to the office — but I’d need a salary increase to move

I’ve been working at my company for a little over two years as a salaried employee. Previously I had freelanced for them for another two years before that.

I am remote, and have been since the beginning, and for the most part I really like it. All of our work is via Slack internally or involves working with freelancers internationally, so it’s not like I’m needed in the office … but I am so lonely!

Freelancing and then remote work has been a very isolating, quiet experience for me. I’m grateful for the freedom, but I would really like to be in the same city, at least, as the rest of my team, who are all young, creative types who I really respect and admire. They have events, hangouts, team dinners, and meetings, and I feel like I’m missing out on networking and relationships. People come into the office when they like and the company is not asking for anything more than one company-wide day a month, so I could still pick and choose the days I came in and worked in person.

I’m in a low-cost-of-living area, literally across the country from everyone else (and so my salary reflects this), compared to the coworkers who are located in a very high-cost-of-living area where the office is. (I’m not 100% sure of the pay difference in terms of having hard numbers from coworkers, but when I was hired they did mention that they do a lower salary range for different areas.)

I would love to move — and coworkers have said that they would love to have me in the office if I did — but I have no idea how to ask for a potential raise or pay bump when they’re not asking me to come back to office. I’m pretty young, with no kids, and a long-term partner (who is seeking work in the same industry), so I’m in a decent position to uproot my life if I need to. Am I just taking my remote freedom for granted here? Am I crazy?

Talk to your manager! Say it this way: “I’m really interested in moving to (city) so that I can be on-site in the office more often. When I was hired, you mentioned that the company pegs salaries based on the cost-of-living in the area where an employee is located, and that I’d have a lower range while I was in (current city). How would that work if I moved to (new city)? I’m interested in being there in-person but couldn’t do it on a salary that isn’t pegged to the area.”

4. Banning smoking on breaks

I’m not a smoker, but my company has strict rules banning smoking. I understand they can ban it from the premises, but they go so far as to say that you can’t smoke on your unpaid meal breaks, at all. Can they do this? Do they have the right to enforce that policy and say my coworkers can’t leave the property and go down the street to smoke?

It depends on your state and your industry. In many states, employers are free to refuse to hire smokers at all (although some states have passed laws making that illegal) and in those states they could indeed mandate no smoking during work hours. Even in states that protect smokers, employers can generally enforce anti-smoking rules if not smoking is an important part of the job (for example, a health care job might ban smoking during breaks so that you don’t come back smelling like smoke around patients).

5. Should I tell this employer why I’m withdrawing from their hiring process?

I am a military spouse job-hunting from across the country as we prepare to move from one coast to another. I recently had a bizarre interaction with a prospective employer and wanted to know what you think.

I had my first interview on a Monday via Zoom and was contacted the next day to request a second interview … that same Friday, in person. I was concerned that they were not willing to do a Zoom interview a second time given the distance, but I understand some information is easier to gather face-to-face. That said, this was not a situation where they needed me to fly in because I was a finalist; the first round interview was basically a screener so I know I was one of several candidates for the second round. I should also note that this was not for a senior-level position; it pays about $45K and is an administrative role.

I was also concerned when they declined to reimburse me for my flight costs. It’s standard in my industry (higher education) to do so, but I sort of waved it off because it is a smaller school that probably does not interview non-local candidates very often, if ever.

Finally, they called me again on Wednesday that week canceling the interview citing unforeseen circumstances; this was about 18 hours before my flight was set to leave. Thankfully, I was able to get everything refunded.

Despite all these issues, I did end up taking a second interview when they called to reschedule (side note: the people in the second interview were the same people from the first interview) because I had some moving tasks that could be done while I was in town. However, from this process I inferred that this team was not going to be a great fit. I felt like they were asking for a lot of flexibility on my part while being very inflexible on their part. I have small children so a workplace that is understanding of the demands that go along with school calendars and constant sickness is very important to me, and I just can’t reconcile that with “please pay out of pocket for a flight on a holiday weekend in 48 hours.” My question is whether there is a way to offer this feedback or just leave it at a “I don’t think this is a good fit” if they contact me again. Or if I’m totally off-base and this is a normal amount of commitment to expect from a candidate!

You’re not off-base. If you ask someone to pay their own travel costs for an interview and then cancel that interview at the last minute, you at a minimum should inquire about whether their ticket will be refundable and cover it if it’s not.

That’s leaving aside the question of whether they should have been paying for it in the first place and there are a bunch of factors that go into that. Ultimately, if they have plenty of strong local candidates, I don’t have a problem with them declining to cover travel for long-distance ones, but it’s inconsiderate to ask you to fly out before you’re a finalist.

But I don’t think there’s much to be gained by telling them this unsolicited. The interview process worked as it’s supposed to: you learned enough to determine that the job wouldn’t be a good fit for you. If they contact you again, it’s enough to just say you’re withdrawing from consideration. (Although if they ask why, at that point you can certainly say that you’re looking for a workplace where flexibility goes both ways and your sense is that it’s not a good fit in that regard.)

24 Jun 20:29

I used ChatGPT to replace a team’s input when they weren’t responding … and now I’m panicking

by Ask a Manager

This post was written by Alison Green and published on Ask a Manager.

A reader writes:

I messed up royally. I’m two years in my first full-time role. My job is like in-house consulting. My team is trying to improve our internal processes. We interview people in the process about what they’re struggling with and look for ways to improve it.

I’ve done a lot of these interviews by now, but one of them was like pulling teeth from a lion trying to bite you. The answers they gave were vague and unusable like, “It’s abstract.” When I asked for more details, they’d repeat the same vague answers or say things like, “I could explain, but you wouldn’t understand it.” As we talked in circles, the team became increasingly gruff and dismissive. They’d probably call me pushy or argumentative. I asked for a list of things they would need to give me feedback that wasn’t “it’s abstract” and the list they gave me was wildly out of scope for what my team was doing. At the end, I felt like neither party could accurately describe what the other was talking about. I didn’t get the information I needed, and the tone of the interaction left a bad taste in everyone’s mouth.

I went back to my team with the little I had, but my team had the same questions that I asked and didn’t get real answers to.

I tried to message the two people on the other team who got closest to the information I needed. One of them, the lead, said she’d rather discuss it again with the whole team and to make a meeting, so I made a meeting. Then the lead emailed everyone on the meeting and said this could be an email, not a meeting, so I sent them an email. I spent a lot of time trying to word the email clearly to fix the communication issues we had. After a couple days, I sent them a reminder. The next week, I sent another reminder. They never responded. We’re remote, so I couldn’t stop by their desks.

Here’s where I really really messed up. I had to give a presentation that needed the information I had to get from them. So, in a last-minute panic, I put the email into ChatGPT. Its answer sounded plausible, so I used it in the presentation. The presentation went great.

Now I’m terrified about when my bosses find out I never got the answers from the team, and then I have to tell them I got them from ChatGPT. I know I did the wrong thing. What was I supposed to do? What can I do now? Could I have fixed that awful meeting somehow?

Oh no.

Okay, here’s the thing: this wasn’t a situation where ChatGPT could have helped. Your team doesn’t need to know what ChatGPT thinks could be improved in a particular process; it needs to know what a specific team in your specific workplace thinks needs to be improved — what their pain points and challenges are — and that’s not something ChatGPT could possibly know. At best you’ll have gotten broad, vague suggestions that may or may not apply to their context. At worst you’ll have gotten things that don’t make sense at all and don’t reflect anything the other team ever would have cited. For all we know, ChatGPT offered up suggestions to fix things the other team likes about the process, or things that don’t apply to them. And it’s highly, highly likely that it didn’t identify their actual problems, because how could it know? (They don’t even seem to be able to articulate those problems themselves.)

I get that you were frustrated with the roadblocks the other team was putting up. The right thing to do at that point would have been to go to your manager, explain what was happening, and ask for guidance. Your manager might have been able to suggest another way to approach it, or might have talked with that team’s manager herself, or who knows what — but the important thing is that then she’d be looped into what was happening and could help you decide how to proceed.

I think it’s really important that you figure out (a) why you didn’t do that and (b) why ChatGPT seemed like a reasonable solution — because otherwise I think you’re likely to have significant lapses in judgment again. I want to be clear that I’m not saying that to berate you! What’s done is done. But if you don’t figure those things out, you’re at high risk of stepping in a similar landmine again.

As for what to do now … well, you provided key information that was just made up. Is your team planning to act on that info in some way? If so, you need to do something about that. You can’t let people put time and resources into solving problems that don’t actually exist (or ignore big problems ChatGPT didn’t tell them about). If they moved forward based on that info, presumably at some point the other team is going to hear that your team has solved “their” problems, and it’s likely to come to the surface that they never said those things to you.

I don’t know exactly what you said in your presentation, but is there any way to spin it as having been your best assessment based on limited info, and make it clear that the specifics did not come from the other team? Of course, if you said anything like “I spoke in detail with two program analysts, who identify XYZ as their biggest challenges,” then that’s not going to work. So it really depends on exactly how you framed things.

And a lot of what happens from here depends on how your team will use the contents of your presentation. In a best case scenario, your office is one that collects input from people and then lets it sit unaddressed, and so they won’t use it at all! But given the nature of your team’s work, I doubt that’s the case and you may need to come clean to your boss.

24 Jun 20:07

Actor and pro surfer Tamayo Perry killed in Hawaii shark attack

by Alana Wise
Tamayo Perry during a surf competition at Teahupoo, Tahiti, French Polynesia. Perry died this week from injuries sustained during a shark attack.

Tamayo Perry was killed by a shark while surfing off Oahu's North Shore.

(Image credit: Steve Robertson)

24 Jun 19:56

Sauron the Economist

by Corey Mohler
PERSON: "Sauron, i will destroy you, and create a world of prosperity for all! "

PERSON: "Wrong, Elendil! You will never... wait, what? prosperity for all? But that's already what I'm doing."

PERSON: "What do you mean?"

PERSON: "That's my whole thing, what did you think i was doing?"

PERSON: "Destroying the world of men?"

PERSON: "Destroying the world of men? What? That's what the elves are doing, through stagnant economic policy! The elves value aestetic beauty and nostalgia over real material improvements in the lives of the poor."

PERSON: "Uh..."

PERSON: "  Lothlorien hasn't experienced economic growth in a thousand years! Mordor, on the other hand, has had over 10% growth for years now, due to my low interest rates and economic planning."

PERSON: "We are digging irrigation canals, improving industrial output, and increasing crop yield while the elves are stuck in the 13th century!"

PERSON: "Did you not read my manifesto?"

PERSON: "No, we tend to not read manifesto of people trying to kill us."

PERSON: "Right...so i think i'm going to stab you now..."
24 Jun 19:51

Nation’s Men In Bathroom Stalls Announce Plan To Breathe Really Loudly

24 Jun 19:50

“You should root for the Oilers because they’re Canadian,” says man who has confused this with the fucking Olympics

by Luke Gordon Field

TORONTO/CALGARY/VANCOUVER/MONTREAL/OTTAWA/WINNIPEG – Casual hockey fan David Hildebrandt was surprised to discover that you are not routing for the Canadian team in the Stanley Cup Finals, because apparently this city based hockey competition is now the god dam Olympic Games. “Don’t you want a Canadian team to win for the first time since 1993,” he said […]

The post “You should root for the Oilers because they’re Canadian,” says man who has confused this with the fucking Olympics appeared first on The Beaverton.

24 Jun 19:50

Nobody Listens

by Reza
24 Jun 16:14

My Recent Interview to Simply Rent a Small House in Los Angeles for Six Months

by Dan Kennedy

THEM: Are you the Dan Kennedy who has written all about how to make millions of dollars? You sell a program of some sort to people and say they can get rich with this program if they buy your books and stuff?

ME: Oh, god, no. I’m really glad we’re meeting. That’s a different Dan Kennedy. No, I’ve written three books, comedy books, and humor. I’m not asking anyone for money.

[I start a goddamn nervous laugh that suddenly feels like the kind of nervous laugh someone would use if they were trying to swindle you out of something or convince you that they’re not lying. It’s a terrible laugh. I have three of them, and this is the worst one that could’ve come out of me. The other two are terrible, but only because they sound stupid and deep.]

THEM: Take Their Money and Leave Them Laughing. You didn’t write this book?

ME: I did not, No. See that’s another Dan Kennedy. Some get-rich-quick guy. I would never write about taking people’s money—I’m super glad we’re meeting to clarify this.

[A long and strange beat of silence here from their side. And I feel like I’m probably making it worse by being frozen and terrified, I’ve never been in a situation where I’ve had to convince someone I am not another person entirely, and it’s locking me up. I’m also frozen because I’m afraid of which laugh will come out of me.]

THEM: Because you mentioned that you’ve written books.

ME: Only three, and they’re just so weird that there’s really no mistaking the two of us. The irony is, I’ve written mostly about screwing up my life, being bad at business, being broke…

THEM: Yet you’re able to pay upfront?

ME: The books were a long time ago. The first one was twenty years ago. I was writing about being in my teens and twenties. I can pay up front, yes.

THEM: Did you fake your death?

ME: This is the strangest tenant interview ever. May I ask, does the rent include parking?

THEM: Yes, but what about this thing I found online where you were dead, you sold all of your rights and business to another guy, but then you came back, it turned out you weren’t actually dead?

ME: Okay, to be clear: I’ve never promised to make people rich if they give me money, and I’ve never faked my death. I’m a comedy writer. I used to do a storytelling podcast with my friends. That got pretty big. I’m in LA on work, and my girlfriend and I want to rent this house while we look for one to buy.

THEM: You’ve never said you’re dead and then taken it back?

ME: Correct. Again, that sounds like the get-rich-quick Dan Kennedy. It sounds like a scam or some kind of old-school “gotcha!” marketing gimmick.

THEM: I think we’ve googled the wrong Dan Kennedy.

ME: Indeed. Yes.

THEM: This is the reason my father kept asking if you had a mustache.

ME: You know there’s a really smart writer in Boston named Dan Kennedy. Covers media, politics. And there’s a very cool soccer player named Dan Kennedy. I dearly wish I had been mistaken for either.

THEM: That’s funny. In fairness, my father did say you were funny, so that checks out.

ME: Your father is the funny one. He had a hilarious way of slipping that mustache question in during our call. He also asked if I drag my left leg, and I laughed so hard. But now I’m starting to wonder if the other Dan Kennedy not only has a mustache but drags his left leg.

THEM: I mean you know, I wouldn’t assume—

ME: Not that I care. That sounded wrong. I mean, we all have, you know…

THEM: Would you need two parking spaces?

ME: Just the one, we have one car.

THEM: Okay, well, I apologize for the confusion. If you can get us birth times for both of you so we have those.

ME: Birth dates?

THEM: The actual time when you were born.

ME: Right.

THEM: So we can do your charts.

ME: No, right.

ME: Obviously.

ME: Of course.

24 Jun 14:00

Hawaii shark attack claims life of noted lifeguard, surfer

A surfer is shown inside a huge spiral wave.

A professional lifeguard died after he was attacked by a shark while surfing off the island of Oahu in Hawaii on Sunday afternoon, authorities said.

24 Jun 13:58

Study Correlates Popularity Of ‘Deadliest Catch’ With Huge Spike In Children Named ‘Crab’

PHILADELPHIA—Noting an explosion in the frequency of the name in the years following the reality program’s debut, a new study published Monday found a correlation between the popularity of the Discovery Channel’s Deadliest Catch and the nation’s sharp uptick in children named Crab. “Looking at naming trends over the…

Read more...

24 Jun 13:57

Sloth Thinking Of Maybe Hanging From Tree For Another 80 Hours

MANAUS, BRAZIL—Plotting out his schedule for the rest of the day, local sloth Jim Garra confirmed Monday that he was thinking of maybe hanging from a tree for another 80 or so hours. “I think I’ll just cling to this branch continually over the next three or four days and then also after that,” said the arboreal…

Read more...

24 Jun 13:57

Bookmark Dutifully Placed At End Of Chapter One

24 Jun 13:57

Perfectly Preserved 250-Year-Old Cherries Found At Mount Vernon

Dozens of bottles of cherries discovered by archaeologists in the cellar of George Washington’s mansion Mount Vernon were found to be perfectly preserved despite being more than 250 years old, and the Department of Agriculture is now investigating the ancient pits to see if they can be planted. What do you think?

Read more...

24 Jun 02:56

There are NOT 195 countries

by Jay Foreman

Go to https://ground.news/mapmen to get the world's news in one place, compare coverage and be better informed. Subscribe through our link to save 40% off unlimited access.

How many countries are there? Does the UN's official list of 195 include them all? Which ones are missing? Does Sealand count? Does England count for that matter? And why are Mark and Jay up a tree?

BUY MAP MEN MUGS, T-SHIRTS, POSTERS ETC...
http://www.mapmenmerch.com

SEE NEW EPISODES EARLY, AND BEHIND-THE-SCENES EXTRAS...
http://www.patreon.com/jayforeman

Written and presented by
JAY FOREMAN https://www.twitter.com/jayforeman
MARK COOPER-JONES https://www.twitter.com/markcooperjones

Director/DOP
JADE NAGI https://www.twitter.com/jade_nagi

Edited by
JAY FOREMAN

Runner
ABBY TIMMS

VFX
DAVE BRAIN https://www.twitter.com/ornsack

Additional music
THE TIM TRAVELLER https://www.youtube.com/@UC2LVhJH_9cT2XKp0VAfsKOQ

Voice of translator
BRYN BUCK https://www.youtube.com/@UCcc7yT3EpnHmY4NIqajiwXQ

Taiwan National anthem, music notation animation
DAVID BENNETThttps://www.youtube.com/@UCz2iUx-Imr6HgDC3zAFpjOw

Guest presenter
BARBS https://www.youtube.com/@UCmmPgObSUPw1HL2lq6H4ffA
24 Jun 00:32

Production of a favourite sriracha was halted — again. What's at risk when a brand becomes scarce?

A line of clear bottles with red sauce in them capped with a green spout

Huy Fong sriracha is one of the most popular hot sauces in North America. It uses red jalapeno peppers but has struggled to get those peppers in recent years. Because of that, it's had to halt production multiple times, creating a shortage of the sauce.

24 Jun 00:31

Supreme Court issues token reasonable ruling

by Derek Schultz

WASHINGTON, DC ―As part of their ongoing mission to fool ridiculously gullible centrists into thinking that their rulings are rooted in respectable legal theory and not right-wing dogma, the Supreme Court recently issued its token semi-reasonable ruling. “This seems more than fair,” said MAGA-hat-wearing, Trump-worshipping, Clarence-Thomas-funding, self-proclaimed centrist Joe Kilbride. “Three of the judges voted […]

The post Supreme Court issues token reasonable ruling appeared first on The Beaverton.

24 Jun 00:29

Stanley Cup dream, historic comeback suddenly real for McDavid, Oilers on eve of Game 7

A hockey player watches a drill on the ice.

Connor McDavid and the Edmonton Oilers face the Florida Panthers in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup final Monday — the last hurdle in an improbable journey this season.

23 Jun 23:50

Social Climber

https://www.oglaf.com/socialclimber/

23 Jun 23:45

Comic for 2024.06.22 - Wasn’t Listening

New Cyanide and Happiness Comic
23 Jun 23:44

Pros And Cons Of Using A Bump Stock

The Supreme Court recently struck down a rule banning bump stocks, which have been used in several high-profile mass shootings to inflict maximum damage. The Onion explores the pros and cons of using these devices that allow semiautomatic rifles to fire almost as fast as machine guns.

Read more...

23 Jun 13:24

Nipples 3:16

https://www.oglaf.com/nipples3-16/

23 Jun 02:23

Tomorrow’s Itinerary for the Geese in My Apartment Complex

by Dalton Childs

0500: Sound the alarm.

0600: Recitation of the day’s mantra in the traditional spirited honking.

0700: Singing of “O Canada” and flyover in standard formation.

0800: Announcement of the flock’s minutes.

0830: Synchronized shitting and breakfast on the east bank of the retention pond.

1000: Gather outside the dog park fence for the “Taunting of the Mutts.”

1200: Preening and beautification.

1300: Loud meandering.

1430: Stop traffic. Honk.

1600: Group aerobics at the retention pond.

1800: Carnal activities.

1802: Bathing.

1807: Carnal activities.

1809: Unwind.

1900: Synchronized shitting and supper on the north bank of the retention pond.

2100: “O Canada” reprise and flyover in standard formation.

2200: Sleep / carnal activities.