18 Jul 20:17
by noreply@blogger.com (Minnesotastan)
"The Fredericksburg [Virginia] Police Department released this body camera video of Officer Shaun Jurgens. Jurgens used a stun gun and pepper sprayed a man who was having a medical emergency May 4. Some audio was redacted to protect personal information of the driver."
Here's the
local newspaper's report of the settlement of the case:
Washington was unarmed, but police considered him a hit-and-run suspect after his car allegedly struck another vehicle and knocked down a road sign before coming to a stop at the intersection of Cowan Boulevard and Powhatan Street. ..
Washington’s lawsuit claimed he was in “obvious and critical need of emergency medical care” and never gave police a reason to believe he posed a threat. It lists the city, Jurgens, and Officers Matt Deschenes and Crystal Hill as defendants.
The suit claimed Deschenes and Hill held Washington at gunpoint for several minutes as he sat unresponsive in the driver’s seat of his stopped car. The officers asked him to show his hands and exit the car, but Washington could not do so because he had suffered from a stroke while driving.
According to the lawsuit, Jurgens arrived several minutes later and fired a Taser at Washington with no verbal warning, striking him in the face. Deschenes then holstered his firearm and opened the driver’s side door of Washington’s car, “further confirming” the suspect had no weapons. The suit said Jurgens sprayed a can of pepper spray into Washington’s face, drew his gun and shouted: “Get out the car or I’m going to [expletive] smoke you!”
The lawsuit says after Deschenes pulled Washington from the vehicle, the car rolled backward and a tire struck Washington in the foot as he lay handcuffed on the road. Hill then drove the vehicle off Washington’s foot, the suit said.
Discussion thread at the
Bad Cop No Donut subreddit. The YouTube discussion thread is even more critical.
18 Jul 20:06
by noreply@blogger.com (Minnesotastan)
There are more such photos at the
Find The Sniper subreddit.
Photo credits for these two to
Saurabh Desai and
via.
16 Jul 17:37
by noreply@blogger.com (Minnesotastan)
I enjoy finding movie DVDs with commentary tracks by directors and technical staff that explain how scenes were created.
16 Jul 17:17
by noreply@blogger.com (Minnesotastan)
Discussed at the
WhitePeopleTwitter subreddit.
14 Jul 21:48
by noreply@blogger.com (Minnesotastan)
You can see the tire. And the door handle.
Discussion thread.
Here's another one:
Via.
13 Jul 08:00
by noreply@blogger.com (Minnesotastan)
This isn't the ice-cream-licking. This is licking a tongue depressor.
The girl is ten years old - not a toddler or infant. When the mother posted the video online, she captioned it "Don't tell me how to run my life." And in the interview she says "I really didn't think anything of it."
For fox ache.
13 Jul 07:58
by noreply@blogger.com (Minnesotastan)
When I went to my doctor's office yesterday for my annual checkup, I noticed a change in the decor. And an explanatory sign on the wall.
13 Jul 07:55
by noreply@blogger.com (Minnesotastan)
From
techdirt:
Recently, the North Carolina State Board of Elections asked suppliers of electronic voting machines a simple question: who owns you?..
This seems like very basic information -- information the Board should know and should be able to pass on to the general public. After all, these are the makers of devices used by the public while electing their representatives. They should know who's running these companies and who their majority stakeholders are. If something goes wrong (and something always does), they should know who's ultimately responsible for the latest debacle.
It's not like the state was asking the manufacturers to cough up code and machine schematics. All it wanted to know is the people behind the company nameplates. But the responses the board received indicate voting system manufacturers believe releasing any info about their companies' compositions will somehow compromise their market advantage.
Hart InterCivic, a corporation that derives independent actual value from this information not being generally known or readily ascertainable and makes reasonable efforts to maintain the secrecy of this information, requests that it be designated as a trade secret pursuant to G.S. § 132-1.2(1)d. and G.S. § 66-152(3).
One of ES&S's subsidiaries (and there are at least 39 of those) -- Meritage Homes Corp. -- shuffled some securities ownership the same day the North Carolina election board asked it to provide information about the company's ownership. Maybe it's a coincidence. Or maybe ES&S was offloading a politically-inconvenient owner. Whatever the case is, it certainly doesn't look good.
More at the link, via
BoingBoing. Informed discussion at the
Technology subreddit.
Cartoon from
XKCD.