Shared posts

09 Dec 17:34

Idaho Official Ends Zoom Call with Health Board Because COVID Deniers are Outside Her House, Terrorizing Her Family: WATCH

by Andy Towle
James.galbraith

Idaho: where science goes to die

Diane Lachiondo

A Boise, Idaho health board official abruptly left a Zoom meeting called to vote on a revised public health order Tuesday because COVID deniers were outside her home terrorizing her 12-year-old son.

Said Diane Lachiondo before leaving the Zoom conference (video below): “My 12-year-old son is home by himself right now and there are protesters banging outside the door. I’m gonna go home and make sure he’s okay.”

Shortly thereafter, Boise mayor Lauren McLean called the board and asked them to end the meeting. According to reports there were also several hundred protesters gathered outside the Central District Health office.

KTVB reports: “Police later said in a news release that they had tips that some members of the crowd intended to disrupt the meeting by forcing their way into the building. One person was seen being led away in handcuffs. Police said the woman – later identified as 53-year-old Yvonne St. Cyr of Boise – had made her way inside the building and was arrested for misdemeanor trespassing after she refused to comply with officers’ demands that they leave the building. Police noted that the woman was stopped inside the building by a CDH representative, who placed the person under citizens arrest.”

Stream of the meeting. Interruption comes at 1:40.

The post Idaho Official Ends Zoom Call with Health Board Because COVID Deniers are Outside Her House, Terrorizing Her Family: WATCH appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.

09 Dec 17:19

“A damn stupid thing to do”—the origins of C

by Ars Contributors
As hard as it may be to believe, C was not simply born in wellworn paperback form.

Enlarge / As hard as it may be to believe, C was not simply born in wellworn paperback form. (credit: Bill Bradford)

In one form or another, C has influenced the shape of almost every programming language developed since the 1980s. Some languages like C++, C#, and objective C are intended to be direct successors to the language, while other languages have merely adopted and adapted C’s syntax. A programmer conversant in Java, PHP, Ruby, Python or Perl will have little difficulty understanding simple C programs, and in that sense, C may be thought of almost as a lingua franca among programmers.

But C did not emerge fully formed out of thin air as some programming monolith. The story of C begins in England, with a colleague of Alan Turing and a program that played checkers.

God Save the King

Christopher Strachey was known as the “person who wrote perfect programs,” as noted in a long profile from the journal, Annals of the History of Computing. It was a reputation he acquired at the Manchester University Computing Center in 1951. Strachey ended up there, working on the school’s Ferranti Mark I computer through an old King’s College, Cambridge, connection, Alan Turing.

Read 54 remaining paragraphs | Comments

09 Dec 17:09

U.K. says people with ‘significant’ allergies shouldn’t get Pfizer's Covid vaccine

by Helen Collis
James.galbraith

That's a bit of an issue

09 Dec 04:41

[David Post] Statistical nonsense at SCOTUS

by David Post
James.galbraith

GOP hackery knows no bounds

[The Texas AG's outlandish claims about the statistical unlikelihood of Biden's victory]

[THIS POST WAS UPDATED ON 12/9 HERE]

As co-Blogger Jonathan Adler has noted, the Texas AG is suing the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin over supposed election irregularities, and calling on the Supreme Court to exercise its original jurisdiction to hear the case on an expedited basis.

The filed motion and supporting documentation is posted here.  This little tidbit caught my eye:

9. Expert analysis using a commonly accepted statistical test further raises serious
questions as to the integrity of this election.

10.  The probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four Defendant States—Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—independently given President Trump's early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion, or 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000. For former Vice President Biden to win these four States collectively, the odds of that event happening decrease to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power (i.e., 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000^4). See Decl. of Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D. ("Cicchetti Decl.") at ¶¶ 14-21, 30-31. See App. 4a-7a, 9a. 11.

11. The same less than one in a quadrillion statistical improbability of Mr. Biden winning the popular vote in the four Defendant States—Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin— independently exists when Mr. Biden's performance in each of those Defendant States is compared to former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton's performance in the 2016 general election and President Trump's performance in the 2016 and 2020 general elections. Again, the statistical improbability of Mr. Biden winning the popular vote in these four States collectively Again, the statistical improbability is 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000.

Wow! What a bombshell this is!  Odds of Biden having won GA, PA, WI, and MI are 1,000,000,000,000,000 to the fourth power to 1!

For the mathematically disinclined, 1 quadrillion to the 4th power is 1 with 60 zeros after it. Long odds indeed!  It's about equivalent to being dealt several trillion or so royal flushes in a row.  There's proof of fraud for you!

Spoiler Alert.  It's total nonsense—I know it's early in the 2020-21 Term, but I'm putting the odds at getting anything more ridiculous in a SCOTUS filing at about 3 quadrillion to 1.

I have not read the cited declaration by Dr. Cicchetti; it is not yet publicly available anywhere, as far as I can determine.  The Complaint says it will be included as an Appendix in the (forthcoming) motion to expedite, and that will give more detail, I assume, as to how he arrived at this preposterous calculation.

But I do know a little about statistics, having taught it for many years, and I assure you:  there is no "commonly accepted statistical test" that will, or can, demonstrate that the odds of Biden winning these four states, given Trump's early lead, are so incredibly long.  It is a fantasy. As many, many people have pointed out, Trump's disappearing leads in all four states can rather easily be explained by an increased tendency of people using mail-in ballots to cast votes for Biden—something that was widely anticipated prior to the election, and which indeed seems to have come to pass.

This is flim-flammery of the highest order.  I look forward to parsing Dr. Cicchetti's analysis and filling you all in on the mistakes that he made.  Stay tuned.

08 Dec 23:27

Former Trump cybersecurity official sues Trump campaign over violent threats

by Laura Clawson
James.galbraith

Oh good

Christopher Krebs is one of the few Republicans to come out of the 2020 elections with integrity. Krebs, as director of the federal Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said that there hadn’t been significant voter fraud—that, in fact, these elections were “the most secure in American history.” For that, Donald Trump fired him.

Krebs didn’t shut up and go quietly, though. And for that, the response has been predictably vicious. Now, Krebs is suing the Trump campaign, one of its lawyers, and the right-wing news outlet Newsmax. The suit accuses the Trump campaign and lawyer Joseph diGenova of defamation and “intentional infliction of emotional distress,” and Newsmax of being an aider and abettor. 

In an interview on Newsmax, diGenova said Krebs “should be drawn and quartered,” and, as if that wasn’t enough, “Taken out at dawn and shot.” 

DiGenova, remember, spoke as a part of a movement that includes a lot of armed people parading around making threats, including a kidnapping plot against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. And his words contributed to a social media rampage against Krebs that, according to the lawsuit, left his 10-year-old child asking “Daddy’s going to get executed?”

“Threats like these will not stop me from speaking out,” Krebs said. “I will take the necessary steps to protect myself and my family.” That includes calling for a jury trial as he seeks money and punitive damages and for Newsmax to take down the diGenova video.

DiGenova previously tried to go the “no big deal, joking!” route so familiar to anyone who’s paid attention to inflammatory statements by Republicans in recent years. “This was hyperbole in a political discourse,” he said in a December 1 statement. Hyperbole in a violent political discourse. Here’s hoping Krebs wins a big enough judgment to make diGenova and his buddies think twice next time.

08 Dec 22:33

GOP clinches 2-2 deadlock for Biden FCC as Senate approves Trump nominee

by Jon Brodkin
James.galbraith

fucking GOP

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai and FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr stand next to each other in a Senate hearing room.

Enlarge / Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai and FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr, two of the FCC's three Republicans, talk before the start of a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on August 16, 2018. (credit: Getty Images | Bill Clark )

The Republican-controlled US Senate today confirmed a Trump nominee to the Federal Communications Commission, ensuring that President-elect Joe Biden's FCC will be deadlocked at 2-2 upon his inauguration.

The Senate voted along party lines to confirm Nathan Simington, a Trump administration official who helped draft a petition asking the FCC to make it easier to sue social media companies like Facebook and Twitter. Democrats say he is unqualified for the position.

"During his confirmation hearing even the most basic questions about FCC issues seemed to trip up Nathan Simington. It's clear he is wholly unqualified to help lead this agency," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) wrote on Twitter today.

Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments

08 Dec 22:33

Supreme Court sends Trump packing in Pennsylvania election challenge

by Joan McCarter
James.galbraith

thank god

Remember how Donald Trump specifically picked Amy Coney Barrett to make sure he had a friend on the Supreme Court to make sure he “won” the election? So much for that. With absolutely zero dissents, the court said, basically: “Nope, we’re not going to nullify the vote in Pennsylvania for you.”

how it started / how it’s going one hour later pic.twitter.com/sKYqAdQiIo

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) December 8, 2020

Officially, the court said, “The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied,” but same diff. Either way, Trump is still a big ol’ loser. To put the cherry and the icing on top: This was his 50th loss in court.

08 Dec 22:31

How Mitch McConnell might quietly make it easier to cripple Biden’s presidency

by Greg Sargent
McConnell might be setting up a new round of economic sabotage next year.
08 Dec 22:30

Fox News is using the coronavirus as just another cudgel to attack the libs

by Aaron Rupar
James.galbraith

Endless bad faith in the service of big business

Portraits of Fox News anchors are seen on the outside of the network’s headquarters.
Fox News’s headquarters in 2019. | Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images

They’d have you believe the ongoing humanitarian disaster is primarily an economic problem hurting business owners.

Fox News’s coverage of record-high US coronavirus case numbers and hospitalizations is a stark example of how the network’s “news” programming sometimes serves as news-adjacent propaganda for the right.

According to the Covid Tracking Project, the seven-day average of new coronavirus cases, hospitalizations, and deaths are all currently at record levels, with deaths exceeding 2,000 per day. But on Monday and Tuesday, Fox News’s coverage of the ongoing humanitarian disaster glorified resistance to public health measures officials have imposed in hopes of slowing the spread.

“There are many reasons to believe that lockdowns may have negative effects,” claimed Covid-19 contrarian Alex Berenson during a softball interview on Tuesday with America’s Newsroom host Sandra Smith.

Along similar lines, Monday’s edition of Outnumbered devoted an entire segment to a sheriff in California who says he won’t enforce the governor’s public health regulations.

“A lot of these governors are very focused using this power trip that they now have and shutting people down without giving them real evidence or real science to back it up,” opined Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich on the show.

Monday’s America’s Newsroom featured a friendly interview with an attorney representing a Staten Island bar owner who allegedly assaulted an officer who tried to enforce shutdown orders. Hours later, anchor Bill Hemmer interviewed a “frustrated restaurant owner” in Los Angles who said, “Yes, the numbers are spiking, but we knew that would happen in the winter, right? ... The solution that they’re giving is worse than the cure.”

“I thought you were excellent just trying to relay your story, your message,” Hemmer replied. (The same restaurant owner was interviewed on Fox News on Tuesday.)

Keep in mind that all of these examples come from Fox News’s daytime programming, which supposedly focuses on news, instead of the commentary of primetime hosts Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham. If anything, the commentary shows have been even more egregious — to cite one example, host Steve Hilton on Sunday said, “I want to see a lockdown rebellion.”

One data point illustrates Fox News’s broader framing. According to transcripts compiled by SnapStream, coronavirus “restrictions” were mentioned 28 times during the network’s programming on Monday, while “hospitalizations” were mentioned just eight times. And that point of emphasis was impossible to miss on Tuesday as well.

Ironically, if there’s any group that should be especially concerned about spiking coronavirus cases, it’s Fox News viewers, 53 percent of whom are older than 65, according to Nielsen Media Research. Public health officials have repeatedly warned that the risk of adverse outcomes advances with age.

But instead of doing the responsible thing and encouraging people to follow public health science (not to mention common sense) by recommending they avoid crowds and stay home until the situation is more under control or a vaccine is available, the message Fox News is sending its viewers is that the real problem is regulations hurting business owners.

That’s not to say that the pain business owners and their workers are feeling right now should be ignored. The economic situation is dire, and some economists expect things to get worse barring the unlikely approval of massive government aid. But the underlying problem is the coronavirus and the lack of federal help for those affected, not the fact that state and local governments are trying to slow the spread by discouraging people from spending time in places where they’re at risk.

You might recall that Fox News was widely criticized during the early days of the pandemic for downplaying its severity and promoting unproven, potentially dangerous miracle cures. Network hosts may not talk about hydroxychloroquine as much these days, but their effort to use the pandemic as a cudgel to own the libs is similarly irresponsible.

Studies have shown that consumers of misleading cable news coverage of the coronavirus are less likely to follow public health guidelines. By framing the pandemic as primarily an economic problem caused by liberal policies instead of a public health problem caused by a novel virus (and exacerbated by a shortsighted federal response), Fox News is not only endangering its viewers — it’s turning a dangerous virus that has now killed nearly 300,000 Americans into yet another culture war issue.

Correction: This piece originally said over 60 percent of Fox’s viewers were over 65. Fox News says it is 53 percent.

08 Dec 21:50

Trump admin failed to vet companies getting millions in federal dollars to detain migrant kids

by Gabe Ortiz
James.galbraith

if you're surprised...

A bipartisan Senate report has found that two companies with a laundry list of offenses were awarded nearly $60 million in federal contracts by the Trump administration to detain unaccompanied migrant children, CNN reports. Kids who come to the U.S. alone are transferred to a Health and Human Services (HHS) contracted facility until they can be placed with a sponsor. But the government could have actively endangered these kids due to a failure to properly vet two of these contractors, legislators said.

That incompetence includes a failure to “require either company to disclose prior adverse actions their respective state and local governments had taken against them,” and failing to “research the disciplinary history of either company,” the Senate report found. VisionQuest National, Ltd. and New Horizon Group Home, LLC, which did receive a portion of the grants before they were discontinued, have disturbing records including the loss of an operating license for one of the companies.

“New Horizon, which operated a residential facility in North Carolina for children requiring full-time care, had a running list of state violations, including ‘failure to hire necessary medical personnel,’” CNN reports Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations findings said. “Less than a year after state officials revoked the facility's operating license, HHS awarded New Horizon a grant for unaccompanied children in a new state facility.”

VisionQuest should have already been on the radar as well. In 2017, the company lost a contract with the city of Philadelphia after staffers at a facility in Philadelphia were found to have physically abused kids on their watch. “There, staff members had choked, slapped and injured children, and promised to ‘make life a living hell’ for them, according to state inspection records later obtained by The Philadelphia Inquirer,” Reveal reported last year.

Plans by VisionQuest to open a facility in California earlier this year were met with protests by community members, including Tony Cárdenas. “At this moment little to no information has been provided to the community,” he wrote at the time to HHS Sec. Alex Azar and unlawfully appointed acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf. “This is unacceptable.” The Los Angeles City Council then responded by unanimously passing a temporary measure blocking new private detention facilities within the city.

But apparently all of that was missed—or maybe just ignored—by the administration. Because of that track record, the companies now have difficulty opening facilities elsewhere. "This means that taxpayers have paid for facilities that will never open," senators said. The report said that while the contracts are now kaput, over $30 million has already been shelled out to the companies. “The department is now trying to recuperate those funds, but that's dependent on whether the grantees appeal and the results,” CNN continued.

The report said that HHS claims its addressing concerns, including “requiring disclosure of licensing issues and allegations of abuse.” Was … that not required before? Dear Lord. "Our bipartisan report found that the Office of Refugee Resettlement failed to exercise appropriate oversight,” Republican committee member Rob Portman said according to the report, “and wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on organizations that could not acquire state licenses to open the planned shelter facilities.”

08 Dec 21:42

Cloudflare, Apple, and others back a new way to make the Internet more private

by Dan Goodin
James.galbraith

Looks like a very good step forward

Cloudflare, Apple, and others back a new way to make the Internet more private

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images)

For more than three decades, the Internet’s most key underpinning has posed privacy and security threats to the billion-plus people who use it every day. Now, Cloudflare, Apple, and content-delivery network Fastly have introduced a novel way to fix that using a technique that prevents service providers and network snoops from seeing the addresses end users visit or send email to.

Engineers from all three companies have devised Oblivious DNS, a major change to the current domain name system that translates human-friendly domain names into the IP addresses computers need to find other computers over the Internet. The companies are working with the Internet Engineering Task Force in hopes it will become an industry-wide standard. Abbreviated as ODoH, Oblivious DNS builds off a separate DNS improvement called DNS over HTTPS, which remains in the very early stages of adoption.

The way DNS works now

When someone visits arstechnica.com—or any other website, for that matter—their browser must first obtain the IP address used by the hosting server (which at the moment is 3.128.236.93 or 52.14.190.83). To do this, the browser contacts a DNS resolver that typically is operated by either the ISP or a service such as Google’s 8.8.8.8 or Cloudflare’s 1.1.1.1. Since the beginning, however, DNS has suffered from two key weaknesses.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

08 Dec 21:29

Any Biden effort to ‘reach out’ to conservatives is doomed

by Paul Waldman
James.galbraith

Stop being so fucking naive

Democrats never tire in this task, despite the fact that it never works.
08 Dec 21:29

Trump-pushed military strikes tripled civilian casualties in Afghanistan

by Hunter
James.galbraith

Of course

Killing people is what Donald Trump does. It is his thing. It appears to be the only presidential task he truly enjoys doing—as long as it, as usual, requires little actual work on his part—and may be the only thing that brings him joy in life, other than basking in the adulation of sycophants.

Trump practiced calculated indifference in the early days of the national COVID-19 pandemic, in part because he and his staff believed it would continue to cause deaths primarily in non-Republican-held cities and states. Trump and his ally, Attorney General William Barr, did not just work to bring the federal death penalty back into use, but are executing federal prisoners at a rate not seen in modern American history. Trump has advocated for violence and deaths numerous times, against numerous targets, for numerous reasons. It is what he does.

Nobody will be surprised to know, then, that Trump's early move to loosen the rules of engagement in Afghanistan resulted in skyrocketing civilian casualties in that country. That was, like other expansions of state-sanctioned violence by the administration, The Point. Trump believed that the military was too tightly constrained by orders to avoid civilian casualties, and so scrapped those constraints.

The result, according to a new report, was a tripling in the number of Afghan civilians killed by U.S. airstrikes.

There are, of course, legitimate non-moral reasons for the military to want to avoid civilian casualties in the supposed war on terror. Even a population genuinely grateful for the routing of a violent and corrupt government will be considerably less grateful for each new incident of necessary violence inflicted on them; at some point, it becomes impossible for the occupiers to position themselves as "liberators" if they are seen as being just as indifferent to widespread death as the last cretins in charge.

Each civilian death breeds terrorism against the liberators. It would be more bizarre if it did not.

The line between military "effectiveness" and mass casualties is always vague. Under Trump, the military's more aggressive planners received permission to shove it in the direction of more civilian deaths in order to more intimidate their military opponents, this time with a rah-rah crew in the White House that showed not just indifference toward non-Americans, but active contempt.

As with every single other product of conservatism, it seems evident that the approach once again failed. It wouldn't be conservative if it wasn't glibly violent, willfully destructive, and a complete failure once put into practice. You would think that the movement's advocates would eventually begin to question beliefs that turn ruinous every time they are deployed, but those around Trump have spent their entire lives under the belief that expertise is heresy and book-learning is the domain of eggheads.

The belief, among Trump's archconservative and pointedly white nationalist crowd, is not that expanded military violence will lead to the successful pacification of a foreign nation. The belief is that violence is itself good and successful. The reasons for its deployment, whether in a park next to the White House or in the remote places of world, are worked out as circumstances require.

08 Dec 20:55

Arizona Republican Party sends increasingly alarming messages calling for sedition against the U.S.

by Walter Einenkel
James.galbraith

Is anyone surprised?

In the wee hours of Monday night into Tuesday morning, the Arizona Republican Party’s official Twitter account decided to walk directly into the world of Trump-driven sedition. Retweeting some #StopTheSteal account that wrote “I am willing to give my life for this fight,” the Arizona Republican Party responded: “He is. Are you?”

It was a dangerous rhetorical piece of work for the entire Arizona Republican Party to endorse by way of its Twitter account. But that wasn’t the nadir. A now-deleted tweet by the same account, but preserved by the internets, included a video from one of the Rambo movies where the jingoistic male superhero, Rambo, aims a loaded bow and arrow at point-blank range at a bad guy, with the quote: “This is what we do, who we are. Live for nothing, or die for something.” 

Official Arizona GOP Twitter account overnight: pic.twitter.com/lspQunuRGU

— Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) December 8, 2020

Arizona has officially declared that President-elect Joe Biden beat white supremacist in chief Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election. So far, every state except Wisconsin has certified Biden or Trump for the victory of their state. Biden will be the next president of the United States unless there is a successful coup d’etat. There is no other discussion to be had here. Sadly, this terrorist rhetoric by an official outlet of the Republican Party is not shocking at this point in time. The leaders of the GOP have moved from complicity to actively backing Trump’s fascist coup attempt to overturn the democratically elected Biden’s presidential victory.

08 Dec 20:54

[Josh Blackman] Proposed Bill in New York Legislature Would Mandate COVID-19 Vaccinations

by Josh Blackman
James.galbraith

Good. Time to make it mandatory

[There is no option to pay a fine rather than receiving the vaccination.]

Last month I wrote two posts about the precise holding of Jacobson v. Massachusetts. That case did not uphold the state's power to forcibly vaccinate a person. Rather, Justice Harlan's 115-year old opinion affirmed that the state could offer people a choice between paying a nominal fine and receiving the vaccine. Justice Gorsuch echoed my understanding of Jacobson in Diocese. And I haven't seen anything to the contrary written elsewhere. If you'd like to dive deeper, I discussed Jacobson on the Lawfare podcast.

Earlier this week, a bill was introduced in the New York legislature that would impose an actual COVID-19 mandate. It provides, in part:

. . . if public health officials determine that residents of the state are not developing sufficient immunity from COVID-19, the department shall mandate vaccination for all individuals or groups of individuals who, as shown by clinical data, are proven to be safe to receive such vaccine.

This bill does not say that the failure to receive the vaccination is a crime, which can be punished by a fine, or even incarceration. The statute says that the "department shall mandate vaccination." In this context, shall means must. To paraphrase the controlling opinion in NFIB v. Sebelius, "The most straightforward reading of the mandate is that it commands individuals" to receive the vaccine. There is no possible saving construction here. This bill authorizes the government to jab a person in the arm with a vaccine.

Jacobson does not provide support for this law. Again, the law at issue in Jacobson was not a true mandate. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's opinion in Commonwealth v. Jacobson "[i]f a person should deem it important that vaccination should not be performed in his case, and the authorities should think otherwise, it is not in their power to vaccinate him by force, and the worst that could happen to him under the statute would be the payment of the penalty of $5."

Diocese thankfully cleansed Jacobson from the judicial cannot with respect to lockdown cases. I hope judges do not lazily cite Jacobson in a future vaccination cases. If you want a precedent about the state forcibly performing medical procedures on people to promote the common good, look to Justice Holmes's opinion in Buck v. Bell. Justice Blackmun cited Holmes for that precise proposition in Roe.

And what about a Free Exercise challenge? The bill does include a "medical exemption," but it lacks any religious exemption. Would this rule still be one of general applicability? I need to give this issue some thought.

08 Dec 20:25

Senate Votes To Advance Nomination of Trump FCC Nominee

by msmash
James.galbraith

Fuck the GOP

The U.S. Senate voted Tuesday by a 49 to 47 vote to advance the nomination of a senior Trump administration official who has helped lead an effort seeking social media regulations to a seat on the Federal Communications Commission. From a report: The Senate is set to vote later on the nomination of Nathan Simington, a Commerce Department official, after U.S. President Donald Trump repeatedly urged lawmakers to take action. If Simington is confirmed, the FCC could initially be deadlocked 2-2 between Democrats and Republicans when Democratic President-elect Joe Biden takes office next month.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

08 Dec 19:41

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Suffering

by tech@thehiveworks.com


Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
If we could artificially enhance dolphin suffering, maybe we'd treat them better.


Today's News:
08 Dec 19:36

The Real Reason Americans Aren’t Quarantining

by Olga Khazan
James.galbraith

No shit people aren't quarantining lol. 200k+ cases a day and 3k deaths make that fairly clear

If you flew into Honolulu International Airport anytime after the start of the pandemic, you would have had a different experience from most Americans who have traveled elsewhere this year. In the days following your arrival, you would not be wading into the azure waters of Waikiki Beach. You would not be climbing the soaring crest of Diamond Head to gaze upon the Pacific Ocean. A noble sea turtle might be floating in the bay, ready to swim alongside you, but you would not be able to join him. You would be in your hotel room, where you would be ordered to stay for the next 14 days for the state’s mandatory coronavirus quarantine.

And Hawaii does mean stay. At one point, hotels issued visitors single-entry key cards.

In mid-October, the state announced that it would allow tourists to bypass its mandatory two-week quarantine by showing a recent, negative COVID-19 test upon arrival. But before then, people who emerged from six-hour flights from LAX would find themselves imprisoned in paradise. Some of them broke quarantine, and more than 200 were arrested. In April, the Hawaii attorney general’s special agents arrested a man while he was loading groceries from Costco into his car. They busted honeymooners in May after the pair went out to buy pizza. On the Big Island, police swept up 21 members of a “family with a leader” in June. In August, authorities charged a 69-year-old man who refused to sign the quarantine paperwork at the airport. In October, special agents arrested a couple for breaking their quarantine for the second time in two days, after their hotel snitched on them. All of the arrested tourists faced the prospect of a one-year jail sentence—which no one has served yet—or a $5,000 fine.

Americans who drive to, say, Cincinnati, and do not isolate in the days that follow do not risk arrest. Ohio, like Hawaii, has introduced a quarantine for people who have visited high-risk areas. But complying with Ohio’s restrictions is voluntary. In other states, you are “urged” or “asked” to quarantine, but no one will check that you did.

Even now, Hawaii has one of the strictest quarantine laws in the country. (Indeed, police arrested a couple in late November for knowingly boarding a flight to Hawaii while infected. And state senators are now recommending a two-test requirement for tourists—one before departure, a second upon arrival—plus a seven-day quarantine in Hawaii, even if both tests come back negative.) The state’s geographic isolation has helped and hurt its efforts to control the virus. On one hand, the state would be completely unequipped to deal with a coronavirus surge. There are no states nearby from which to borrow doctors or ICU capacity. The island of Kauai has just 15 ventilators. On the other hand, everyone enters Hawaii through its airports, which makes enforcing a quarantine easier there than in almost every other state.

This policy may seem a little harsh coming from a place associated with a relaxed “aloha” spirit. But when I called Hawaii Attorney General Clare Connors, she put it this way: “We need to take care of the health and safety of our people so that we can keep Hawaii safe for people who want to come when it is time to come again.” Or as Honolulu Mayor Kirk Caldwell sternly told CNN, “Aloha works both ways.”

There’s no national database of quarantine noncompliance, but in U.S. states other than Hawaii, quarantine violations rarely result in fines or jail time—or, really, any consequences at all, multiple experts told me. “Clearly, we wouldn’t have this type of community transmission if everybody was actually doing what they were supposed to be doing,” says Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Center for Health Security at Johns Hopkins University.

Yet quarantine compliance is essential for the combination of testing, contact tracing, and isolation of sick people to work. Simply telling people they’ve been exposed and letting them loose on the nation’s Outback Steakhouses is not sufficient. But persuading close contacts—people who spent significant amounts of time within six feet of someone who tests positive for COVID-19—to quarantine has been especially difficult, local health officials say, because these individuals might not be stuck in bed with COVID-19 symptoms.

[Read: Who should get the vaccine first—and last]

Though the CDC’s recent shortening of the quarantine period is likely to encourage more people to comply, it won’t solve all the country’s problems with getting people who might have been exposed to the virus to stay home. And until spring comes and Americans have broad access to the vaccine, quarantining is the main thing keeping us healthy. So why aren’t more Americans doing it?

Early in the pandemic, some states other than Hawaii did try to enforce their quarantine rules, arresting a handful of people after they were spotted by a neighbor or a police officer. But these crackdowns dropped off as case numbers swelled and public-health authorities struggled to keep up.

Public-health departments are reluctant to seem like bad cops—or cops at all. After the pandemic, they will have to persuade teens to wear condoms and hippies to get flu shots. Theirs is a soft power, and they’ve been hesitant to throw the book at quarantine breakers. Actual police officers, meanwhile, have bigger priorities than watching people sneak off to Target.

Hawaii created its quarantine law as a travel quarantine, stopping everyone at the airport. These types of quarantines are logistically easier to implement—they don’t require contact tracers—than medical quarantines, in which the state orders a certain individual to stay in isolation. They’re also subject to different legal rules: To medically quarantine a given person in many states, authorities have to issue a court order, not simply call and encourage them to isolate. “We’ve had a lot more nudges than real, enforceable orders,” says Wendy Parmet, a law professor at Northeastern University.

Hawaii is also unique in that it has no land borders with other states. In most states, stopping people at the border is impossible because people regularly cross state lines for work and other essential activities. “Imagine trying to actually enforce an interstate quarantine in the New York metro area. You can’t do it,” Parmet told me. Supposed state travel restrictions, she said, “are somewhat sad acts of desperation based on the lack of federal policy.”

Some other countries have imposed much tougher travel restrictions and quarantine policies. At one point, Greeks were required to text authorities to explain why they needed to go out. Norway quarantined its own citizens under threat of a fine or imprisonment. Most foreigners still can’t fly to Vietnam. All these countries have lower death rates from COVID-19 than the U.S.

Hawaii’s effort has been boosted by a unique citizen activist group called Kapu Breakers. Made up of 6,700 Hawaii residents and led by a former newscaster named Angela Keen, the group tracks down tourists who might be breaking quarantine, then forwards their information to law enforcement. In addition to scouring social media, they rely on tips from hotel concierges, taxi drivers, and others who could have contact with tourists who might be breaking kapu, or “sacred laws.”

Keen believes that Hawaii residents are on such high alert because of long-ago pandemics that came to the islands and killed large percentages of the population. “Generations of stories you hear, from great-grandparents, grandparents, parents, that the pandemics nearly killed off Native Hawaiians,” she told me. “So there is a great fear here of outsiders coming in and bringing it with them.” In the past century and a half, thousands of people, mostly Hawaiians, died of Hansen’s disease—known informally as leprosy—at Kalaupapa, Hawaii’s most infamous quarantine.

On the mainland, states cite a combination of COVID-19 denial, logistical hurdles, and funding and personnel shortages to explain why they haven’t been willing or able to enforce quarantines. One problem is the scofflaws: Some people stay inside for three or four days, then decide, “I’m bored with staying home,” Brenton Nesemeier, the field-services director for the North Dakota Health Department, told me. The health department sends people who are supposed to quarantine daily email surveys, but beyond that, it doesn’t do much to ensure that either infected people or their close contacts stay home for the entire quarantine period. About 40 to 50 percent of North Dakotans who come in close contact with infected people do not complete their quarantine, Nesemeier estimated.

Some states can’t quarantine people, because they have too many cases to trace. New Hampshire said in mid-November that it would stop conducting contact tracing for all new COVID-19 cases. In North Dakota, Nesemeier said the health department doesn’t have the manpower to reach out to close contacts of people who test positive. Instead, it relies on North Dakotans who have COVID-19 to call their own contacts. This system creates a new set of problems: The call might never happen, or the person on the other end of the line might not take a “stay home” suggestion from Uncle Roy very seriously.

Even if a North Dakotan wants to do the right thing, she might not be able to without going hungry or losing her job. Grocery delivery isn’t available in parts of the large and rural state. And because so many residents are considered essential workers, many employers ask close contacts to come into work even if they’ve been exposed to the virus.

[Read: The most American COVID-19 failure yet]

In fact, many COVID-exposed Americans who want to stay home and quarantine have an intractable problem: Their bosses won’t let them. Unlike the tourists traveling to Hawaii, most Americans aren’t attempting some sort of pandemic vacation right now—they have to work. (Hawaii’s essential workers, too, might have to go out in public when they prefer to stay home.) Public-health officials in several states have said that some people are neglecting to quarantine because they won’t get paid if they don’t go to work. “We hear people say, ‘I have to work; I have to have my income,’” says Ray Przybelski, the director of the Portage County Health and Human Services Department in Wisconsin.

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act granted paid leave to recover from COVID-19 to many Americans. But the law doesn’t cover everyone: Large companies aren’t included, and small companies can claim an exemption. Because of these exemptions, only 47 percent of private-sector workers have guaranteed access to coronavirus-related sick leave, according to an analysis by the liberal Center for American Progress. The U.S. is the only country out of 193 nations to exclude workers from sick-leave benefits based on the size of the company they work for, according to a recent UCLA study.

Conflicts over remote work and leave are the most common type of COVID-19 employment litigation in the U.S., according to a database compiled by the law firm Fisher Phillips. “We don’t really pay people to stay at home to quarantine,” Polly Price, a global-health professor at Emory University, says. But that’s exactly the problem: In a study in Israel, people were more likely to quarantine after exposure to COVID-19 if they were paid during their isolation.

Months into the pandemic, half of Americans didn’t know they might have the right to stay home with pay if they contracted the coronavirus. And even if they did, employers might have pressured them to come to work if they were no longer showing symptoms, says Vicki Shabo, a senior fellow on paid-leave policy at the New America Foundation. These protections expire at the end of December, setting up what Shabo calls a “public-health crisis.”

Employees are complaining about being forced back to work, but to no apparent avail. Through November 22, more than 600 people have filed complaints with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration mentioning issues at their workplace involving coronavirus quarantine, according to data from the Department of Labor. “After testing positive, employees are being scheduled and expected to work as long as they don’t show symptoms and [are] not placed in quarantine,” a worker at a Georgia taco restaurant complained in July. OSHA has formally inspected just 11 of the employers in these incidents. “Under the Trump administration, OSHA decided to do almost no enforcement,” says Debbie Berkowitz, the worker-health-and-safety program director at the National Employment Law Project. (In an email, a Department of Labor spokesperson said, “The claim that OSHA is not taking enforcement actions is patently false. OSHA is committed to protecting America’s workers during the pandemic, and has been working around the clock to that end.”)

America’s laissez-faire federal pandemic response has, in effect, treated each state like its own country. States have been responsible for their own restrictions and their own personal protective equipment and their own nursing-home protection plans. When it comes time to isolate sick people, though, it becomes painfully clear that states aren’t countries. Wisconsin can’t stop Iowans from driving into it. North Dakota doesn’t have enough health workers to trace all of its infected citizens. The governor can’t help you when your employer is—legally—dragging you back into the office.

Hawaii was an independent country before the U.S. annexed it and turned it into a state. And the reason Hawaii has been so ruthlessly effective at quarantine is that it in some ways still acts as its own country with its own border controls. The strategy has paid off: The state consistently has some of the lowest case numbers in the nation. As with so many other pandemic rules, Americans might not like quarantine, but it works.

08 Dec 19:34

[Jonathan H. Adler] Texas Is Attempting to Sue Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin Over the 2020 Election

by Jonathan H. Adler
James.galbraith

Fucking insane

[Embattled Attorney General Ken Paxton is the latest to ask the Supreme Court to intervene in the 2020 Presidential election results.]

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the 2020 Presidential election. Yet rather than seek SCOTUS involvement in pre-existing election cases, such as those filed by Pennsylvania legislators, the Trump campaign, or others, AG Paxton is initiating a suit of his own attempting to invoke the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction. This suit is, without question, among the most audacious legal filings of the 2020 Presidential election, and it is quite unlikely the Supreme Court will respond favorably to Texas's plea.

In this case, Texas AG Paxton has filed suit against four states–Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin–alleging that various changes to election rules and procedures in those states, combined with alleged fraud–"tainted" the election results in those states. Because this case is styled as a suit filed by one state directly against other states, the suit invokes the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction (as opposed to the Court's appellate jurisdiction). Accordingly, AG Paxton filed a motion for leave to file a Bill of Complaint, which is the way that a state asks the Supreme Court to hear a case brought directly against another state under its original jurisdiction, bypassing the need to first bring the case in a lower court.

The full filing, which also includes a Bill of Complaint, a Brief in support of the Motion to Leave, a Motion for Expedited Consideration, and a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order, raises the full panoply of constitutional and other claims that we have seen in 2020 Presidential election litigation thus far, and seeks to turn alleged election irregularities and statistical anomalies into constitutional violations. Only three attorneys are listed on the filings: AG Paxton, recently appointed First Assistant AG Brent Webster, and D.C. attorney Lawrence J. Joseph, who is listed as "Special Counsel" to the AG. [As noted here, there has been a great deal of turmoil in the Texas AG's office, leading to substantial turnover within the office.] Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins is conspicuously absent. (Perhaps Senator Ted Cruz will volunteer to argue in the unlikely event the Supreme Court takes the case, as he has in other election litigation.)

Texas alleges that the four defendant states violated their own laws in making changes to their election procedures and violated the constitution by authorizing or allowing differential treatment of different sets of voters within their states. Because these claims would not be enough, by themselves, to overturn the Electoral College results, the complaint seeks to shoehorn election fraud claims into the argument by alleging "voting irregularities . . . that would be consistent with the unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity protections in those States' election laws," and repeats a number of unfounded or unsubstantiated charges relating to missing USB drives and statistical disparities in election results. Failing to prevent such irregularities, Texas claims, contributed to the constitutional violations alleged. Specifically, Texas claims that by "taking—or allowing—non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors," the defendant states have violated the Electors Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Due Process Clause. The filings further ask the Supreme Court to prevent the defendant states from appointing electors based upon certified election returns and require the defendant state legislatures to appoint electors directly.

Article III of the Constitution provides the Supreme Court with jurisdiction to hear cases in which one state sues another in its original jurisdiction, but it does not always do so. Under current practice, states ask the Court for permission to file such suits—hence the Motion for Leave—and the Court does not always oblige. So, for instance, when Nebraska and Oklahoma sought to sue Colorado over the latter's decision to legalize marijuana, the Supreme Court refused to hear the case.

Here, Texas is not only asking the Supreme Court to hear the case, it is also asking for expedited consideration and extraordinary emergency relief, in the form of injunctions barring the defendant states from relying upon the election results to appoint electors and authorizing "pursuant to the Court's remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct a special election to appoint presidential electors." In effect, the suit is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to supervise the Presidential election in the four defendant states.

Setting aside the merits of the case for a moment, the Texas filing raises a range or jurisdictional questions. Among other things Texas has to overcome a range of obstacles, including standing and the political question doctrine, to press this suit. Texas claims it will be harmed if the allegedly unconstitutional actions within the defendant states determine the presidential election. Yet the Constitution provides that Congress is the ultimate judge of the Electoral College results. This is yet another reason why it is hard to see the Supreme Court accepting Texas's plea. Further, the standards for the sort of emergency relief Texas seeks are quite high–among other things, the party seeking such relief is supposed to show a likelihood of success on the merits–so it seems likely the Court will deny the various motions, hopefully without too much delay.

 

08 Dec 19:24

Pfizer's Vaccine Offers Strong Protection After First Dose

by msmash
James.galbraith

hallelujah

The coronavirus vaccine made by Pfizer and BioNTech provides strong protection against Covid-19 within about 10 days of the first dose, according to documents published on Tuesday by the Food and Drug Administration before a meeting of its vaccine advisory group. From a report: The finding is one of several significant new results featured in the briefing materials, which include more than 100 pages of data analyses from the agency and from Pfizer. Last month, Pfizer and BioNTech announced that their two-dose vaccine had an efficacy rate of 95 percent after two doses administered three weeks apart. The new analyses show that the protection starts kicking in far earlier. What's more, the vaccine worked well regardless of a volunteer's race, weight or age. While the trial did not find any serious adverse events caused by the vaccine, many participants did experience aches, fevers and other side effects. "This is what an A+ report card looks like for a vaccine," said Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale University. On Thursday, F.D.A.'s vaccine advisory panel will discuss these materials in advance of a vote on whether to recommend authorization of Pfizer and BioNTech's vaccine. Pfizer and BioNTech began a large-scale clinical trial in July, recruiting 44,000 people in the United States, Brazil and Argentina. Half of the volunteers got the vaccine, and half got the placebo. New coronavirus cases quickly tapered off in the vaccinated group of volunteers about 10 days after the first dose, according to one graph in the briefing materials. In the placebo group, cases kept steadily increasing.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

08 Dec 18:44

Cartoon: Corruption coddlers

by Jen Sorensen

If you are able, please consider joining the Sorensen Subscription Service!

Follow me on Twitter at @JenSorensen

08 Dec 17:42

Grilled About Trump’s Executive Order Prioritizing COVID Vaccine for Americans, Top ‘Operation Warp Speed’ Adviser Replies, ‘Frankly, I Don’t Know’ — WATCH

by Andy Towle
James.galbraith

GOP "governance"

Moncef Slaoui

The top adviser for the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed vaccine program says he doesn’t know anything about the executive order the president has promised to sign today prioritizing COVID vaccine for Americans first.

“Frankly, I don’t know,” said Chief Science Adviser Dr. Moncef Slaoui when asked about it by George Stephanopoulos. “And frankly, I’m staying out of this. I can’t comment.”

“You don’t know?” asked an incredulous Stephanopoulos. “But you’re the chief science adviser for Operation Warp Speed.”

“I don’t know exactly what this order is about,” Slaoui replied.

The post Grilled About Trump’s Executive Order Prioritizing COVID Vaccine for Americans, Top ‘Operation Warp Speed’ Adviser Replies, ‘Frankly, I Don’t Know’ — WATCH appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.

08 Dec 17:40

Trump Abandons Olympic Wrestler Dan Gable at Medal of Freedom Ceremony: WATCH

by Andy Towle
James.galbraith

endlessly pathetic and petty

Donald Trump walked out of a Presidential Medal Freedom Ceremony on Monday, leaving Olympic wrestler Dan Gable and his family standing in the room not knowing what to do.

The AP reports: “Gable is one of several sports figures to be presented the award during Trump’s time in office. Gable was a champion wrestler at Iowa State University, compiling a 117-1 record and winning two NCAA titles. During his six matches at the Munich Olympics, he went unscored upon. Gable would go on to an incredibly successful coaching career at the University of Iowa, where his teams won 15 NCAA titles.”

The post Trump Abandons Olympic Wrestler Dan Gable at Medal of Freedom Ceremony: WATCH appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.

08 Dec 17:27

Steakhouses, Hill bars and ski trips: GOP carries on amid the pandemic

by Sarah Ferris, Melanie Zanona and Daniel Lippman
James.galbraith

Of course they do. Breathe deep, motherfuckers.


It’s not just the White House flouting pandemic rules to mark this town’s schmooziest season.

Some corners of the GOP, including members of Congress, are refusing to let the coronavirus intrude on their holiday gatherings and in-person fundraisers — whether it’s on the slopes of Utah or in the steakhouses of Washington.

Meanwhile, discussions are underway about holding the Conservative Political Action Conference — a massive, yearly affair — in person early next year, according to multiple sources.

The event planning comes as the nation is battered by another brutal surge in coronavirus cases, prompting a fresh round of warnings from public health experts to hunker down and avoid group settings, particularly indoors. And it underscores the resistance by many in the GOP, led by President Donald Trump, to adjust to the new normal of the pandemic.

“It’s an honor to be invited to the White House for anything. It’s special and to see the decorations,” said pro-Trump commentator Harlan Hill. “I think it’s important that we go show that we support the president and that our support hasn’t wavered through the election fraud scandal.” He added that the White House is “taking all appropriate precautions” to keep people safe.

Another person who plans to attend one of the Christmas bashes at the White House added: “Why wouldn’t we? A lot of these things are going to be appropriately scaled and take proper precautions. But it doesn’t cancel the season.”

The majority of Washington's lavish holiday parties have, of course, been called off. And the Capitol physician has specifically instructed lawmakers to avoid dinners, receptions and other events. Given their frequent travel and interaction with other members on the floor — not to mention the age of many — members of Congress are at great risk of contracting and spreading the virus.

That warning came after an increasing number of lawmakers have tested positive for coronavirus in recent weeks, prompting congressional leaders in both the House and Senate to institute new health protocols on Capitol Hill. That includes canceling the weekly Senate GOP lunches, after gathering in person for months.

House Democrats and Republicans also recently scrapped plans for a new member’s dinner inside the Capitol just before Thanksgiving, switching to carry-out meals after facing backlash as both prepared to host indoor events.

Still, groups of dozens or more people have flocked to congressional hangouts such as the nearby Capitol Hill Club, where a group of Texas Republicans organized a meet-and-greet to honor their seven incoming freshmen members the week before Thanksgiving. (The Capitol Hill Club has implemented some precautions during the pandemic, including limiting the number of guests per table and contact tracing.)

GOP members have also gathered at swanky downtown restaurants. That includes a holiday party Monday night hosted by Rep. Billy Long (Mo.) in a backroom at Joe’s Seafood, an upscale surf ‘n turf restaurant near the White House, according to a person familiar with the plans. The same evening, Rep. Kevin Brady hosted a “small” dinner at the same restaurant for all the outgoing Texas Republicans, his office confirmed.

Brady “will be following all D.C. COVID-19 health and safety procedures and guidelines,” his spokesperson said.



At the Capital Grille last month, some Republican members on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee gathered for an indoor dinner, according to a source familiar with the event. Members were spread out among several tables in order to practice social distancing.

But one GOP lawmaker who was also at the restaurant that night, freshman Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.), tested positive for coronavirus just a few days later, highlighting the potential risks of dining together in closed spaces.

At Bullfeathers, another popular watering hole on Capitol Hill for lawmakers and staffers, a group of maskless patrons were seen packed together in a tight space while eating and drinking, according to a picture that went viral on Twitter last week. After a complaint, D.C.’s Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration said it was looking into the matter.

Not every event is a massive, maskless affair: Many of the festivities have been billed as a “socially distanced event” on invitations. Some have virtual options, including the Texas meet-and-greet at the Capitol Hill Club. And at least two in-person events — a “cigar and spirits” night in Old Town Alexandria hosted by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) and a breakfast fundraiser for Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) at the Monocle — were recently canceled as cases spiked in D.C. and beyond.

But a ski trip fundraiser in Utah scheduled for early next month, hosted by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Sen.-elect Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), is still on.

“Utah’s ski resorts are open. We are following all the state and county COVID policies. We will be skiing outdoors at socially distanced intervals,” Lee spokesperson Conn Carroll said of the event.

Many Democrats, and some Republicans, say in-person gatherings are reckless at a time when hospitals are running out of beds and some cities are running out of places to store bodies.

“I think it’s absolutely insanity and I think it’s dangerous, it’s irresponsible, it’s insane, and I think just by example, they’re going to cause more people to die because people will look at that and say, ‘Oh, it must be okay,’” said Sally Quinn, a longtime journalist and fixture in D.C.

The holiday party lineup is the latest example of the starkly different ways the two parties have responded to this year’s public health crisis.



The White House is planning to host over 20 parties for the holidays, according to the Washington Post, including a “congressional ball” on Dec. 10. Vice President Mike Pence, who leads the coronavirus task force, is also slated to throw a Christmas celebration at the Naval Observatory on Tuesday evening.

A spokesperson said that around 200 guests will mingle inside a tent that can hold 700 people in order to allow extra space for social distancing. Masks will also be required of attendees, the spokesperson added. Pence also hosted an in-person Hanukkah celebration as well, according to a person who received an invitation.

“The Vice President’s Residence is absolutely taking safety precautions,” said Kara Brooks, communications director to second lady Karen Pence.

One senior administration official said that the White House spread the parties out among multiple nights to allow for smaller guest lists and social distancing.

Yet at the State Department, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and his wife, Susan, reportedly invited hundreds of guests for various indoor holiday functions.

One day before one of the parties, the State Department was notified that a person tested positive who had recently spent time at the Blair House — the president’s official guest house — where the party is scheduled to be held, according to two State Department officials. The space was quickly being cleaned.

“As a vaccine is nearly ready for distribution it makes sense to avoid parties and just stay home. Therefore I will pass on those two events as much fun as they would be,” said one Republican lobbyist, who was invited to both the White House and State Department parties.

In contrast, Democrats in Congress have moved almost every public and private event to a virtual setting, from farewell gatherings for departing lawmakers to sparkling wine tasting fundraisers. Speaker Nancy Pelosi organized a livestream to view the annual Christmas tree lighting at the Capitol, where the public was not allowed to gather.

Meanwhile on Embassy Row — home to some of the most exclusive events in Washington — the celebrations have been largely shifted to outdoor spaces.

But at least one socialite, Sheikha Rima Al-Sabah, the wife of the Kuwaiti Ambassador, has been quietly criticized in D.C. social circles for recently hosting an indoor ladies’ lunch for around 10 people and other events, according to one person familiar with the event. The Embassy of Kuwait did not respond to a request for comment.

And others on the D.C. party circuit are skipping their annual celebrations.

“The time isn’t right and it just wouldn’t be very fun or safe right now,” said Ron Bonjean, a partner of ROKK Solutions who is known for throwing epic Christmas bashes every year. “We will be back soon, but the CDC would probably also seriously advise against clowns on stilts or the use of a flamethrower at the moment.”

Alex Isenstadt and Nahal Toosi contributed.

08 Dec 17:08

'We do not confirm or discuss confidential sources': BuzzFeed News slams ICE intimidation attempt

by Gabe Ortiz
James.galbraith

Ice must be torn down and rebuilt from the ground up

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency isn’t spending its final weeks under the Trump administration releasing detained people—including children and their families—as an emergency health measure amid the novel coronavirus pandemic, but instead issuing a subpoena attempting to force BuzzFeed News to reveal its confidential sources. Priorities.

“The subpoena appears to be an escalation of the Trump administration’s efforts to track down the identities of people who provide information to news outlets,” BuzzFeed News said. The report further said that ICE demanded BuzzFeed News not “disclose the existence of this summons for an indefinite period of time.” To which the only fitting response is, LOL.

ICE is apparently pissed off over Hamed Aleaziz’s reporting on Trump administration plans, including a draconian policy that would let mass deportation officers all over the U.S. bypass the immigration court system entirely and quickly deport undocumented immigrants who can’t  immediately prove they’ve lived in the U.S. for at least two years.

This is dangerous shit that everyone regardless of immigration status needs to be concerned over—and that ICE is clearly trying to keep as quiet as possible. The subpoena, issued by the ICE Office of Professional Responsibility, demands that BuzzFeed News reveal by Dec. 22 the internal documents obtained by the outlet, and who turned them over. In response, the BuzzFeed News editor-in-chief is telling ICE to shove it.

"BuzzFeed News emphatically rejects any requests for information about possible sources and methods of our reporting,” Mark Schoofs said in the report. “We do not confirm or discuss confidential sources, and this subpoena is an outrageous overreach by the federal government. It's fundamentally at odds with the US Constitution and will not have any impact on our journalism."

What’s astounding is that ICE is issuing this subpoena (as the Department of Homeland Security itself ignores legitimate congressional subpoenas) threatening First Amendment protections when it’s not just allowing the pandemic to burn through detention camps, but actively aiding it. Just days ago, a federal judge slammed the agency and a private prison profiteer for abhorrent conditions at a detention camp in California, saying that “[t]hese officials knew that they needed a clear and detailed plan to minimize the risk of an outbreak (and to contain an outbreak if one occurred), but nine months later they still have not created one.” 

ICE is also refusing to release children and parents detained at migrant family jails, not just cruelly keeping them locked up as it seeks to deport them, but keeping them locked up as COVID-19 is also hitting one such detention camp in Texas.

“Eight individuals at Dilley, including parents and children, have now tested positive, including an eight-year-old child, according to Allison Herre, the managing attorney of Proyecto Dilley, a project that provides pro bono legal services to families detained at Dilley,” Prism’s Tina Vasquez reported this month. “The attorney explained that the setup of the family detention center makes it a prime location for the virus to spread because families are in close quarters.”

ICE has every power and ability to release all of these people today if it wanted to. Instead, it’s focusing on attacking press and respected reporters like Aleaziz for reporting the facts. “This is an attempt to intimidate the press,” Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, said in a statement received by Daily Kos. “Without courageous sources, we would only know what the administration wants us to know about ICE’s conduct and misconduct. ICE must withdraw this subpoena immediately.”

07 Dec 23:04

The quiet member of Trump's 'elite strike force' legal team is also a monster

by Joan McCarter
James.galbraith

Yet another craven hack.

Jenna Ellis, the senior Trump campaign legal adviser who you can see smugly smirking behind just about any image of Rudy Giuliani, is also special counsel to the Thomas More society. That's a supposed national public interest law firm that focuses on "religious liberty" and regularly shows up in the Southern Poverty Law Centers’ "Hatewatch" for having pretty unChristian views toward, well, anybody but straight, white Christians.

Their interest in "religious freedom," for example, extends to voter suppression. The group, under a newly formed "Amistad Project" (and yes, they actually had the gall to name the effort after the ship and revolt of Africans who had been kidnapped and sold illegally as slaves in Cuba in 1839) has filed a lawsuits challenging the election in five states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The Thomas More Society has confirmed Ellis' involvement with the organization but maintains that they’re not coordinating at all with her and the campaign's legal efforts to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of voters by throwing out the election. The Washington Post speculates it is "a coordinated effort to flood the nation's courts with repetitive litigation that allows the president to claim the election results remain contested." Seems like a safe bet.

The project formed earlier this year, fighting in state courts across the country to—get this—prevent county election officials from taking federal grants to help them gear up for conducting safe elections during the pandemic. Because safe, free, and fair elections are apparently an assault on religious liberty. But no, they weren't coordinating with the Trump campaign at all in its efforts to suppress the vote. The group said so: "As a tax-exempt organization, the Thomas More Society doesn't support or endorse candidates, but when our election laws and even our constitution are under attack, we take action," the organization said in an October statement, bolstering Trump's attacks on mail-in voting.

Ellis, the background Trump lawyer, is on the "Leadership and Advisory Board" of the Thomas More Society, as well as special counsel to it. It's just a total coincidence, then, that the lawsuit the group is filing mirrors the Trump campaign's strategy of asking courts in states with Republican-controlled legislatures to let those legislatures toss the official election results and appoint their own Trump electors to the Electoral College. Really, though, she and the group keep saying, they're not coordinating at all. Thomas More Society President Thomas Brejcha told the Post that Ellis "has no association or involvement with our Amistad efforts" and that they're not "at all connected with the Trump Campaign."

Maybe she's not, but a retired defense intelligence official who sits on Trump's campaign advisory board named Tony Shaffer seems to be. He is both on the campaign team and showed up at a press conference the Amistad group had on Tuesday, calling himself its "lead investigator" in chasing down what they're calling voter fraud. But really, a spokesman for him says, the Trump campaign and Amistad Project are "not related," not at all. But he wouldn't answer whether Shaffer acted as a go-between.

The Amistad group claims to have shared their "voter fraud" evidence with the FBI, but apparently they didn't even convince Attorney General William Barr, who publicly stated last week that the department has found no evidence of widespread fraud. They're not going to find validation there. And, honestly, they should be sanctioned out of court. This is who they are: "a former Kansas attorney general barred from practicing law due to professional misconduct, and a Minnesota attorney who has advocated policies such as restricting the number of Americans who are not Christian or Jewish." Only the best people.

Those sanctions might be coming. Conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Brian Hagedorn rebuked the group's attempt to get the court to overturn the presidential election, calling it "the most dramatic invocation of judicial power" he had ever seen, writing: "This is a dangerous path we are being asked to tread." In addition to sanctions, the group is courting losing its nonprofit standing. Philip Hackney, a former IRS official, told the Post the Thomas More Society is "putting it's tax-exempt status at risk" for so clearly working with Trump in election litigation. "It certainly raises the question of whether they have engaged in a way that the IRS could find violated the law," he said.

Ellis is clearly the connection here, and apparently Tump's new favorite after he saw her on TV and he got the campaign to hire her. Senior administration officials told the Post that she eggs him on in his legal efforts. "The president would call her when the other lawyers would tell him no," one said. They also say she has been feeding him false evidence of voter fraud, and that the bizarre 46-minute speech he gave last week about the election was "a Jenna production." She's also told him the coronavirus-infected public meetings she and Giuliani have been having with Republican legislators are real and could help him overturn the election. "She's willing to say anything. Even as Rudy comes up with legal theories that are not able to be executed, she will think of a way to talk about it on television," one official said.

What she's not willing to do? "[S]he has not converted her allegations into legal briefs or appearances in court, where making false statements could have serious consequences." She's not a true enough believer to want to jeopardize her future in voter suppression.

07 Dec 23:00

The police shooting of Casey Goodson Jr., killed in Columbus, Ohio, explained

by Rachel Ramirez
James.galbraith

Straight up murder, yet again

Casey Christopher Goodson Jr., a 23-year-old Black man, was fatally shot by a SWAT deputy officer in Columbus, Ohio, on Friday afternoon. | Family of Casey Goodson Jr.

Goodson’s family say he was holding a sandwich when police shot him. Police say the shooting was “justified.”

More than 30 people showed up at a last-minute Saturday night vigil in front of the Ohio Statehouse to honor the killing of Casey Christopher Goodson Jr., a 23-year-old Black man who was fatally shot by a SWAT deputy officer in Columbus, Ohio, on Friday afternoon.

According to family members, Goodson was at the side door of their home, having just come back from a dentist appointment and carrying a Subway sandwich, when he was shot three times in the back by Jason Meade, a Franklin County sheriff’s SWAT deputy assigned to the US marshal’s office fugitive task force.

Law enforcement officers, however, tell a different story. They say Goodson drove by and waved a handgun at Meade. The officer then confronted Goodson, who was out of the car by then, and demanded that he drop the gun. When Goodson allegedly refused, the sheriff’s SWAT deputy shot him, according to the Columbus Division of Police.

 Family of Casey Goodson Jr.
Casey Goodson Jr.

“They are lying,” Kaylee Harper, Goodson’s sister, wrote in a Facebook post about the department’s claims. “My brother literally walked across the yard, walked into the back fence to get to the side door, had his Subway [sandwich] and [face] mask in one hand, keys in the other, unlocked and opened the door and stepped in the house before shooting him.”

Meade, a 17-year veteran, is currently not on duty; as of Sunday, he was waiting to be interviewed by the Columbus Division of Police Critical Incident and Response Team, which is leading the investigation.

The shooting comes during a monumental year of nationwide protests against systemic racism and police violence in the wake of the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. Protests calling for justice in Goodman’s killing are planned on Saturday, December 12.

“Our demand is that the authorities provide the family with answers for Casey’s death and that the officer involved be held accountable,” the family’s attorney, Sean Walton, said in a press release. “The family and the community demand swift justice for Casey Goodson.”

What we know about the police killing of Casey Christopher Goodson Jr.

As Goodson unlocked the door to his house on Friday afternoon, his 72-year-old grandmother and two toddlers — who were inside the house, near the door at the time — witnessed the shooting happen, according to the family’s attorneys.

But at a press conference on Friday after the incident, Peter Tobin, the US marshal for the Southern District of Ohio — without mentioning Goodson’s name — told a different story. (Goodson’s identity was not publicly confirmed until Sunday, more than 48 hours after his fatal shooting.) The fugitive task force had just wrapped up an unsuccessful search for a suspect that afternoon on Estates Place, where officers claim they saw Goodson drive by and wave a handgun at the sheriff’s SWAT deputy, Tobin said. While Goodson was not the task force’s target, he was the one who ended up shot, and was transported to the Ohio Health Riverside Methodist Hospital, where he later died.

The attorneys say the family does not believe Goodson would ever wave a handgun at officers. “Casey was 23 years old, he never had any type of crimes. He was good, he worked at the Gap, he loved his family,” family friend Heather Johnson told the Columbus Dispatch. “He just enjoyed being a big brother and enjoyed being with his family, he loved them very much.”

Tobin said a handgun was later recovered, but did not say from where. Authorities, however, did not mention that Goodson, who family lawyers said did not have a criminal background, appears to have been licensed to carry a concealed weapon. (Ohio does not prohibit the open carry of firearms).

Before the sheriff’s office even announced that the Columbus Division of Police Critical Incident and Response Team will conduct a “thorough and transparent investigation” of the shooting, Tobin had already called the shooting “justified.”

“It is troubling that authorities have already stated that they believe the shooting to be justified, prior to any investigation taking place and before any information has been released to the family,” Walton said in the press release. “At this point, witness testimony and physical evidence raise serious concerns about why Casey was even confronted, let alone why he was shot dead while entering his own home.”

Harper launched a GoFundMe online fundraiser for her brother’s funeral costs, which has already exceeded its $9,000 goal. Activists have followed with a list of demands for law enforcement: release body camera footage, show the police reports, allow for an independent autopsy report as well as an independent prosecutor investigation. A spokesperson for the sheriff’s office said they did not have body cameras, though the sheriff’s vehicles do have dash-mounted cameras; an autopsy will also be performed this week. Authorities have not offered any further details of their investigation.

“This is not an isolated incident. These are incidents where the police abuse their power and decide they are the judge, jury, and executioner,” an organizer with People’s Justice Project said during Saturday night’s vigil. “We’ve had time to rest and recuperate, and now we have to be out in the streets to support [Goodson’s] family, and tell the true narrative of what happened.”

A closer look at the state of policing in Ohio

Goodson’s death adds to a growing list of young Black men who have been fatally shot in the state of Ohio. In 2014, 12-year-old Tamir Rice was fatally shot by a white police officer while carrying a toy gun in Cleveland. In 2016, 23-year-old Henry Green was shot seven times by Columbus police. Later that same year, 13-year-old Tyre King — whose birthday would have been on December 7 — was also fatally shot while carrying a BB gun in Columbus.

The morning before Goodson’s fatal shooting, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine announced a new statewide minimum standard for law enforcement’s response to mass protests, in an attempt to “rebuild trust” between the community and the police after the summer’s racial justice protests. In September, Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther said he was upset with the lack of action taken after investigations into officer misconduct. The governor’s new standard includes limiting the use of force and weapons, such as prohibiting chokeholds or other vascular neck restraints, as well as “bias-free” policing.

“We must rebuild trust between the public and law enforcement, and these changes continue to build on Ohio’s work to improve community-police relations,” DeWine said in a press release. “To gain certification in the new mass protest standard, agencies must develop a policy that protects public and officer safety while also upholding the constitutional rights of expression, assembly, and freedom of the press.”

The summer’s protests against police violence also resulted in the passage of a slew of local police reform ballot measures, including one in Columbus that would create a new office of inspector general and a new citizen oversight panel, which Ginther promised to put in place by the end of the year.

But because the Franklin County Sheriff’s Office is not under the jurisdiction of the city of Columbus, Walton says “it is unlikely that actions by the [sheriff’s office] would fall under the citizen oversight board. The board will only have the power to review actions of the Columbus Divisions of Police.”

In addition, implementation of the ballot measure may still be difficult due to the Columbus police officers’ union contract. According to the city attorney’s office, without changes to the current union contract, the new commission could only be advisory, which means the decision-making during an investigation on police misconduct will remain in the hands of the police chief. That would only change if unconventional measures — like appealing to the state legislature to change laws that would fully open the door for police reform — were taken.

Family and activists say lack of transparency in the police killing of Goodson shows the need for better police accountability.

“Casey was a vocal supporter of civil rights, freedom, and justice for all,” said Walton. “As I have come to learn more about Casey, what stands out to me is how proud he was to protect his family and to show his younger siblings the right way to live. It is important that his name and legacy continue in a way that is befitting of his short yet powerful life.”

07 Dec 22:58

Uber abandons dreams of self-driving domination, sells self-driving unit

by Timothy B. Lee
James.galbraith

buh bye

A casually dressed man stands in front of a large automobile.

Enlarge / Aurora CEO Chris Urmson in front of an Aurora semi truck. (credit: Aurora)

Aurora, one of the nation's leading self-driving startups, will become the new owner of Uber's self-driving division, Aurora announced on Monday. In addition to turning over Uber's self-driving division, known as the Uber Advanced Technology Group (ATG), Uber will also pump $400 million into Aurora.

In exchange, Uber will get a minority stake in Aurora and Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi will get a seat on Aurora's board.

The deal allows Uber to unload a self-driving division that has struggled to regain its footing ever since an Uber ATG vehicle struck and killed a pedestrian in March 2018. Uber shut down its on-road testing for several months after that incident, and the program has faced lingering public skepticism ever since. It's not clear if the deal will lead to layoffs at Uber ATG.

Read 17 remaining paragraphs | Comments

07 Dec 20:08

Senate invites fringe, unscientific medical group to testify about COVID

by John Timmer
James.galbraith

Fucking idiots

Former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price was a member of the AAPS, an organization with extreme, unscientific views who keeps being asked to give testimony to Congress.

Enlarge / Former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price was a member of the AAPS, an organization with extreme, unscientific views who keeps being asked to give testimony to Congress. (credit: Zach Gibson / Getty Images)

On Tuesday, the US Senate's Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs will host a hearing on treatments for COVID-19. The four witnesses all have MDs, and three of them work at hospitals, suggesting that this is a case where the Senate will be receiving information from people with relevant expertise. It's the fourth witness, however, that suggests some of the testimony may go completely off the rails and raises further doubts that US politicians are taking a raging pandemic seriously.

Jane Orient has an MD and is the head of a serious-sounding organization called the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). But a quick look at the group's history shows that it has adopted positions—such as promoting chloroquine and opposing government vaccination programs—that make it a questionable source of COVID-19 information. And the AAPS actually has a long history of adopting extreme and fringe positions that run contrary to all evidence, in part because of its opposition to government involvement in anything. But because of these libertarian tendencies, the group has maintained a close relationship with conservative politicians.

Bad pandemic advice

It doesn't take much searching to determine that the AAPS has fringe views about the pandemic. In late April, evidence was developing that hydroxychloroquine, a malaria drug, wasn't effective against COVID-19, leading the FDA to scale back its emergency approval. Four days after that decision, the AAPS sent out a press release claiming that the drug "has about 90 percent chance of helping COVID-19 patients." That claim was false at the time—it was apparently based simply on counting any studies that saw any effect toward that 90-percent total. And subsequent studies have clearly indicated the drug is ineffective.

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

07 Dec 19:14

Trump's allies say Rudy Giuliani tested negative before his three-state swing, but might be lying

by Hunter
James.galbraith

Lay down with demented dogs...

On Sunday, infamous Trump "lawyer" Rudy Giuliani tested positive for, and was hospitalized for symptoms of, COVID-19. Like nearly all people in Donald Trump's close orbit, Giuliani has been contemptuous of pandemic safety measures like masks and social distancing. He has largely ignored those measures in recent weeks while flying all over the country to promote lawsuits seeking to overturn the United States elections on Trump's behalf, usually as a part of a cabal of like-minded Trump allies. Now we await news of the damage.

First up is Arizona. Last Monday Giuliani spent the better part of a day with hard-right Arizona lawmakers in an event promoting Republican conspiracy theories about election fraud. The day after, he privately met with the state House and Senate's top Republican leaders.

Giuliani was hospitalized five days later, which puts his Arizona trip well within the possible bounds of when he may have been contagious. Shortly after the news that Giuliani had tested positive, the Arizona state House and Senate were quickly closed down for a week. The buildings will remain off-limits; we can presume that state Republican leaders will now pursue testing with more diligence than they did mask-wearing, or not.

Arizona officials may have been quickest to respond to the news of a possible superspreader in their midst, but Arizona wasn't the only state in which Giuliani conspired with friendly state legislators last week.

On Wednesday Giuliani was in Michigan, where he regaled the Republican-held House Oversight Committee with election conspiracies. He wore no mask.

On Thursday Giuliani was in Georgia for another maskless rally-slash-conspiracy event with state allies. Democratic Georgia state senator Elena Parent is among those blasting Georgia Senate leaders for holding a hearing with Rudy and his coconspirators, telling CNN via an email that it was "reckless and irresponsible" to have "willingly endangered all of us to pander to Trump." The Washington Post reports that state Senate staffers who attended the hearing "have been instructed to work remotely until they get tested."

The obvious question, then, is whether Giuliani spread the gift of Trump-supporting COVID-19 to at least three Republican-governed state legislatures, or whether it was the mask-condemning Republicans of one of those three states that gave the virus to him for further dispersal around the country. So far, Team Trump is vigorously insisting that Giuliani put none of the three statehouses at risk, claiming that he "tested twice negatively immediately preceding" the trip.

The problem with that statement, of course, is that the Trump White House and Trump campaign infamously lie about everything, all the time. We only learned after Donald Trump's hospitalization for COVID-19 that his White House and physicians hadn't been testing him at all for the virus, after months of White House claims that he was being tested daily or near-daily or at least frequently—they simply lied, brazenly, about the testing. We can infer absolutely nothing from their similar testing claims here.

In the end, we will know who exposed who because the virus will tell us. Between zero and three Trump-allied statehouses will be experiencing a new pandemic outbreak, depending on when exactly Giuliani himself became infectious. It's impossible to feel much sympathy for any of these people; these state Republicans have been doing their level best to promote the spread of the virus and conspiracy theories both, and are only practicing the same contempt for safety that they advocate to their citizens.

As hospital care becomes more and more rationed across the country, though, it would take gall for any of them to show up demanding treatment for a disease they tried very hard to get. But that is Republicanism. Any assistance offered to you is socialism; any assistance demanded by us is our divine right.