This trilogy is not speculative—it’s a bold briefing. If you’ve followed Part I and Part II , you already understand that Bitcoin was never just a currency. It was infrastructure masked as ideology, a sovereign-grade tool disguised as freedom. Now, in Part III, the mask is off. The 2025 Hashrate Shock wasn’t a market fluctuation—it was a detonation. A digital front line collapsed, and with it, the illusion of decentralization. From Iran’s nuclear-fueled mining vaults to China’s hydroelectric dominion at the Three Gorges Dam, energy has become the currency of control. North Korea doesn’t bother mining—it exfiltrates through Lazarus, embedding malware where diplomacy can’t reach. What you’re witnessing is the emergence of hashrate hegemony. Nations now mine policy, weaponize scarcity, and fund resistance in absolute silence. The old economic order wasn’t disrupted—it was outmaneuvered. And if Parts I and II laid the groundwork, then Part III delivers the reality: the battlefield is already active, encrypted, and sovereign. The game didn’t evolve, and the goal posts didn’t change. It was replaced.
2025 -The Hashrate Shock
In 2025, the world experiences a rupture that’s both physical and digital. A strike—surgical, silent, and strategically timed—hits deep beneath Iranian soil, targeting what at first appears to be a conventional underground nuclear facility. The blast registers on seismic monitors. Satellites catch the plume. But what follows is stranger, more telling than the explosion itself. Within minutes, the global Bitcoin hash rate plunges by 25%. Mining pools stagger. Blocks take longer to confirm. Traders panic. Markets convulse.
There is no official statement. No nation claims responsibility. The usual suspects in global diplomacy fall conspicuously silent. But inside intelligence circles, the chatter grows feverish. What was hit, according to multiple sources within Five Eyes and regional SIGINT nodes, wasn’t just a uranium enrichment site—it was something far more financially strategic: one of the most significant covert Bitcoin mining operations on the planet.
For years, Iran had deflected scrutiny by claiming its cryptomining was a domestic economic necessity—an energy sink for natural gas flare-off, a workaround for sanctions. But behind this public-facing narrative, it had developed a far more robust infrastructure. By diverting power from its nuclear grid and concealing ASIC farms beneath hardened facilities, Tehran had built what amounted to a sovereign mint—one not pegged to oil or dollars, but to hashpower.
The strike wasn’t about nuclear deterrence. It was about shutting down a financial engine disguised as a security threat. What the world witnessed wasn’t just a kinetic attack—it was monetary sabotage by missile. And in the sudden absence of Iran’s hashpower, the decentralization myth of Bitcoin began to fray, revealing how geopolitically centralized the system had quietly become. The message was unmistakable: the battlefield now includes kilowatt-hours, cryptographic throughput, and buried machines whose economic impact is no less strategic than warheads.
What does all this tell you?
This isn’t linear history—it’s strategic evolution. What began as a war over uranium has morphed into a battle over terawatts, tokens, and territory in cyberspace.
Bitcoin mining isn’t an economic afterthought—it’s a primary theater of power projection. And those who command energy in secrecy now possess the ability to distort markets, mask funding streams, and engineer artificial scarcity in what was meant to be the most transparent financial system ever conceived.
And perhaps that’s the most brilliant part of it all.
This core thesis is no longer theoretical—it is increasingly evident that Iran’s nuclear infrastructure serves a multifaceted, tightly integrated purpose that extends far beyond conventional enrichment. This is not merely a program aimed at military deterrence through the potential development of nuclear weapons. That narrative, while true on one level, conceals a far more sophisticated and dangerous strategic framework—one that merges physical sovereignty, digital finance, and economic asymmetry into a single, subterranean weapon system.
First, there is the undeniable function of deterrence. Uranium enrichment, acknowledged by the IAEA and fiercely contested through decades of sanctions and inspections, has provided Iran with a potent insurance policy against regime change. The lesson of Libya—where Gaddafi gave up his nuclear ambitions and was later overthrown—was not lost on Tehran. The implicit capability to produce atomic weapons ensures that any kinetic strike carries with it the risk of retaliation at a scale the West is reluctant to provoke. But beneath that umbrella of atomic ambiguity lies something more contemporary: a digital economy of resistance.
Iran’s nuclear energy facilities, particularly those located underground and shielded from aerial surveillance, are uniquely positioned to serve a second and more discreet function: cryptomining at scale. The country has repeatedly stated that it uses “flare-off” natural gas—wasted energy that would otherwise be burned off—to justify its mining operations. However, this narrative has been challenged by numerous reports, including leaked Iranian documents and public admissions that large segments of the national grid have been diverted to crypto infrastructure. In 2021 alone, Iran admitted to shutting down thousands of unauthorized mining farms to alleviate power outages, a statement that indirectly confirmed the deep integration of cryptocurrency mining within its energy network.
By embedding industrial-scale Bitcoin mining inside protected nuclear facilities, Iran gains two crucial advantages. First, it generates sanction-proof capital—uncensored, borderless, and resistant to seizure. This allows Tehran to fund its intelligence networks, its regional proxies, and its cyber operations through a financial system that is effectively beyond the reach of U.S. Treasury mechanisms. And second, it ensures operational security. Mining servers buried beneath hundreds of feet of reinforced concrete are not only impervious to drone strikes but also hidden from prying satellites and international inspectors.
Yet the third layer of this infrastructure is perhaps the most dangerous and least understood: economic leverage through engineered scarcity. By concentrating a significant amount of hashpower within nationalized, sovereign control, Iran gains the ability to manipulate global Bitcoin markets subtly. If such a state actor were to throttle its mining activity—either through power cuts suddenly, false-flag cyber incidents, or deliberate outages—it could induce sharp drops in hash rate, leading to slower block confirmations, transaction backlogs, and price volatility. The mere perception of instability in Bitcoin’s infrastructure is enough to spook markets, inflate prices, and create ripple effects across an increasingly crypto-exposed global economy.
Iran may not just be mining Bitcoin—it may be weaponizing it. The coins mined could be hoarded, strategically released to acquire foreign assets, or used in opaque peer-to-peer transfers to buy influence. And unlike traditional financial warfare, which relies on traceable SWIFT logs and interbank compliance, this method operates beneath the surface of the visible system. It is financial insurgency enforced by mathematics.
This is not conjecture. In 2021, the blockchain analytics firm Elliptic confirmed that Iran was generating hundreds of millions in Bitcoin annually, much of which was believed to be routed through overseas exchanges using obfuscation techniques. The U.S. Department of Justice has already linked crypto transfers to sanctioned Iranian entities, and Hezbollah has publicly acknowledged receiving cryptocurrency donations.
What emerges is a clear picture: Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is no longer merely a deterrent or a bargaining chip. It is a platform—a hardened, integrated system for military threat, covert funding, and global economic disruption. And in a world increasingly dependent on decentralized finance, that platform is not just strategic—it is sovereign power redefined.
THREE GORGES DAM
The strategic implications of China’s Three Gorges Dam extend far beyond its reputation as the world’s largest hydroelectric power plant. While publicly lauded as an engineering marvel and a cornerstone of national energy policy, its latent potential in the realm of digital finance—specifically cryptocurrency—has been vastly underappreciated. In reality, this megastructure represents a silent yet powerful tool in China’s broader economic arsenal, one that could fundamentally reshape global monetary power dynamics in ways few have dared to acknowledge.
Over the past decade, China has maintained a complicated relationship with cryptocurrency. While the government has enacted high-profile crackdowns on crypto exchanges and outlawed Bitcoin transactions within its borders, it simultaneously dominated global Bitcoin mining until 2021, at one point controlling over 65% of the world’s hash rate. Much of this mining was powered by hydroelectric stations in provinces like Sichuan and Hubei, precisely the regions fed by the Three Gorges Dam. The seasonal oversupply of electricity, particularly during the rainy season, was quietly converted into digital gold as mining farms absorbed surplus power that would otherwise go to waste. This practice not only optimized grid efficiency but allowed China to generate massive stores of cryptocurrency, despite, or perhaps because of, its public stance against it.
Cryptocurrency, particularly Bitcoin, is not merely a speculative asset. It is programmable capital—beyond borders, immune to sanctions, and untraceable when routed through decentralized exchanges or mixers. And in a world where economic hegemony is increasingly contested, the ability to accumulate and control such assets offers an unprecedented form of leverage. The Three Gorges Dam, with its massive generation capacity, provides the infrastructure to mine vast quantities of crypto without tapping fossil fuels or exposing China to environmental scrutiny. This isn’t just about profit—it’s about building a parallel store of wealth that can function outside the dollar-dominated financial system.
What makes this even more consequential is the volatility it introduces into global markets. Should China decide to weaponize its hidden mining capabilities—by cutting off power to a massive mining network overnight, for instance—it could induce a sudden drop in the global hash rate. Such an event would slow block confirmations, increase transaction fees, and potentially trigger panic selling or speculative spikes in Bitcoin’s price. In a financial system increasingly intertwined with crypto assets, such a disruption would ripple outward, affecting institutional portfolios, algorithmic trades, and even nation-state reserves. It is, effectively, a digital form of economic blackmail, with the dam acting as both the power source and the trigger.
The explosion of national crypto reserves in the past four years is no coincidence. Nations have witnessed the fallout from Western financial sanctions, the weaponization of the dollar, and the erosion of banking secrecy in offshore havens. They understand that in a world of escalating fiscal surveillance and political unpredictability, cryptocurrency offers a sovereign hedge—liquid, mobile, and resistant to interdiction. Venezuela has turned to its state-backed Petro. Russia has proposed using crypto to bypass SWIFT. North Korea has funded entire segments of its military budget through stolen Bitcoin. And Iran, sanctioned into economic isolation, has embedded mining into its energy infrastructure. Each state, in its own way, is preparing for a future where traditional monetary systems are no longer reliable weapons—or shields.
The Three Gorges Dam is thus more than a national symbol or an energy behemoth. It is a covert mint, a pressure valve for surplus power, and a potential switch for global market destabilization. In this context, cryptocurrency is no longer a fringe innovation or a libertarian fantasy. It is the emerging currency of geopolitical maneuvering, and the nations accumulating it are not doing so by accident. They are building war chests. Quietly. Relentlessly. In the shadows of dams, bunkers, and data centers. And by the time the world recognizes its significance, the infrastructure will already be complete.
If the Three Gorges Dam were ever taken out—whether by sabotage, warfare, or natural disaster—the consequences for China would be catastrophic, not just in terms of human and environmental toll, but economically devastating on a national and global scale. This isn’t merely a piece of civil infrastructure; it’s a linchpin in China’s energy grid, industrial output, and increasingly, its covert digital finance operations.
The dam supports tens of thousands of megawatts of power generation, feeding some of the country’s most industrialized regions. Its failure would trigger immediate blackouts across critical manufacturing hubs, paralyzing factories that sustain China’s export-driven economy and choking supply chains far beyond its borders. The economic ripple effect would be global, disrupting electronics, automotive, and rare earth industries already tightly wound around Chinese output.
The Three Gorges Dam also underwrites hidden strategic infrastructure—namely, state-affiliated and grey-zone Bitcoin mining farms that quietly absorb surplus hydroelectricity during peak seasons. These operations, although obscured behind regulatory crackdowns and public denials, form a significant part of China’s digital currency holdings and market influence. If the dam were lost, so too would be the mining capacity it feeds, stripping China of a discreet but potent mechanism of wealth generation, monetary hedging, and potential economic leverage.
Such a blow would not just be environmental or regional. It would be a decapitation strike against one of China’s most valuable multi-use assets—a blow to energy, industry, and the hidden machinery of digital statecraft all at once.
Bitcoin was always the strategy
The strategic implications of Bitcoin’s evolution from digital novelty to geopolitical instrument are only just beginning to surface, and the most capable state actors—those already isolated or constrained by sanctions—are exploiting its architecture with precision. What began as a decentralized experiment is now being treated by rogue and rising powers as a sovereign asset class, one backed not by gold or fiat, but by raw, convertible energy. Bitcoin is becoming a currency of power in the most literal sense: mined by megawatts, stored in ledgers, and wielded as a tool of influence, disruption, and deterrence.
Iran’s integration of cryptocurrency mining into its energy infrastructure is no longer a fringe development—it is now a state doctrine. By channeling energy from nuclear reactors and flare-off gas into Bitcoin mining, Tehran generates borderless capital immune to SWIFT blacklists or U.S. Treasury sanctions. These coins can then be funneled through unregulated peer-to-peer exchanges or privacy-enhancing protocols, bypassing traditional financial scrutiny entirely. The result is a war chest of untraceable funds capable of supporting proxy militias, intelligence operations, and cyber units, without ever touching a bank.
China, while publicly banning Bitcoin transactions and mining, remains deeply embedded in the ecosystem. It holds sway over key supply chains—from ASIC chip production to rare earth metals required for mining hardware—and continues to operate clandestine mining hubs in hydro-rich provinces like Sichuan. Even after the 2021 mining crackdown, hash rate recoveries and persistent network traffic suggest continued Chinese influence. The state’s dual posture—denial on the surface, dominance underneath—reflects its broader geopolitical strategy: to maintain plausible deniability while shaping the future economic infrastructure.
North Korea has taken a more surgical approach, leveraging Bitcoin not through mining but through theft, malware, and obfuscation. The Lazarus Group, under Pyongyang’s Reconnaissance General Bureau, has been linked to some of the largest cryptocurrency heists in history. From the $81 million Bangladesh Bank hack in 2016 to the more recent Axie Infinity breach, where over $600 million in Ethereum and USDC was stolen, North Korea has perfected the art of digital exfiltration. These operations fund weapons programs and bypass sanctions with ruthless efficiency—every satoshi stolen is another missile paid for without ever touching a dollar.
The strategic logic is simple: Bitcoin is not just a store of value—it is an energy-backed sovereign asset. In a world where financial flows are weaponized, crypto offers an alternative to the dollar-dominated system. It can serve as a substitute reserve currency for sanctioned states. It functions as a dark money generator when mined in state-controlled facilities and routed through anonymized mixers. And it can be used as an inflationary disruptor, with adversaries hoarding and dumping to destabilize crypto markets or induce speculative shocks.
What makes this battlefield even more volatile is its opacity. Bitcoin’s design allows for decentralization, but also for obfuscation. Mining operations powered by flare gas appear environmentally benign, blending into domestic grids under the guise of sustainability. When mining is relocated to fortified underground facilities—like Iran’s Natanz or Fordow complexes, which already house nuclear infrastructure—it becomes virtually invisible to both satellites and ground-based observation. Attribution becomes nearly impossible. A sudden drop in global hash rate could stem from a technical outage or a covert strike.
A cyberattack on a nation’s mining infrastructure now holds the same weight as a targeted strike on a refinery or a power plant. It may be more disruptive. By undermining hash power, an attacker can induce delayed block times, higher transaction fees, and widespread market volatility. In such cases, the line between cyberwarfare and monetary warfare blurs. An assault on Iran’s mining capabilities wouldn’t just cripple its financial inflows—it could rattle global crypto markets, ripple into institutional portfolios, and even impact central bank strategies experimenting with digital currencies.
What we are witnessing is the quiet emergence of a new kind of arms race—one where hashrate, encryption, and energy infrastructure converge to define financial sovereignty. Iran mines in silence beneath nuclear bunkers. China manages the hardware and manipulates perception. North Korea hijacks the flow itself, injecting malicious code and laundering the results. Each nation has found its own vector, but all are converging on the same realization: in the post-dollar world, value is not just stored in code—it is created, protected, and weaponized through it. And this time, the battlefield is a ledger, the bullets are algorithms, and the rules are still being written.
ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY
To understand the strategic trajectory of cryptocurrency in global geopolitics, one must begin with a foundational truth: all power, in every sense of the word, originates with energy. Whether in kinetic warfare, economic dominance, or information control, energy is the precondition—the raw force that underwrites sovereignty. This is no less true in the cryptographic realm. Bitcoin, often mischaracterized as a purely digital abstraction, is in fact grounded in physics. It is minted not through financial will or political consensus, but through the expenditure of measurable, convertible, scarce energy.
Critics who point to Iran’s relatively small contribution to the global Bitcoin hash rate—estimated at just 3–5% in public studies—miss the deeper architecture of the game. Hashrate maps rely on IP-based tracking, which can be easily obfuscated through VPNs, proxy nodes, and third-party relays. The history of Chinese mining itself proves this. Even after the official 2021 crackdown, China’s hash rate appeared to collapse in public indexes. Yet, months later, data from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance revealed that mining activity had not only persisted but rebounded, indicating a complex, resilient web of distributed operations cloaked beneath layers of misdirection. The real takeaway isn’t the percentage—it’s the opacity. Suppose China could hide a majority share of the global mining network behind regulatory theater. In that case, there is no reason to believe Iran, or any other sanctioned actor, cannot do the same—especially if mining is occurring inside hardened, subterranean energy facilities insulated from external observation.
The question of energy traceability raises another layer of complexity. Yes, Bitcoin mining generates heat, and large operations typically require air or liquid cooling systems that emit detectable thermal signatures. But this assumes conventional architecture. When energy is sourced directly from nuclear reactors, particularly in facilities built deep underground for secrecy and defense, much of that waste heat can be repurposed, dissipated across layers of subterranean infrastructure, or masked entirely by the same shielding that protects uranium enrichment operations from surveillance. Moreover, satellite thermal imaging is not an omniscient tool. Cloud cover, terrain, and shielding materials—combined with the scale of Earth’s surface—make it entirely plausible to hide mid-sized operations from detection, especially if co-located with facilities already designed to evade scrutiny.
As for the argument that Bitcoin is inherently transparent and traceable—that each coin is permanently etched into the blockchain, that laundering is visible and therefore preventable—this too is technically accurate, yet practically misleading. While every transaction is recorded, the identities behind the wallets are not. Sophisticated actors can layer transactions through mixing protocols, privacy coins, and smart contract-based swaps, making forensic tracing extraordinarily difficult. Chainalysis, one of the world’s leading blockchain analytics firms, has repeatedly acknowledged the evolving sophistication of laundering techniques used by nation-state hackers. North Korea’s Lazarus Group, for instance, has successfully moved hundreds of millions through mixer protocols like Tornado Cash and cross-chain bridges, exploiting the technical lag between blockchain transparency and law enforcement capability.
The larger picture here is not about isolated facts but about strategic convergence. The thesis that nations are using nuclear or hydroelectric assets to quietly mine cryptocurrency is not speculative—it is grounded in precedent and emerging pattern. From Iran’s public admission of state-sanctioned mining to Venezuela’s launch of a state-backed crypto (the Petro), from China’s manipulation of hydro flows to subsidize mining in Sichuan, to North Korea’s cyber-theft and laundering, the signals are clear: energy is being converted into digital assets, which are then weaponized as economic tools.
What is unfolding is a new form of sovereignty—one that detaches itself from traditional currency models and reattaches to the one resource no nation can fake: energy. In this framework, energy becomes crypto, and crypto becomes influence. It is not just a currency; it is leverage, liquidity, and lawfare all at once. This reconfiguration makes Bitcoin and its derivatives more than financial instruments. They are strategic vectors, capable of bypassing sanctions, destabilizing markets, and redrawing the boundaries of fiscal control.
The weaponization of electricity—converted into hashpower, transmuted into value, and deployed anonymously—is not a future scenario. It is already in play. The only reason it remains under-discussed is that its infrastructure is designed to be invisible, and its movements deliberately mimic the randomness of the network within which it thrives. But once viewed through the lens of energy sovereignty, the pattern becomes clear. Nations are no longer just storing power—they are minting it.
Hashrate Hegemony
And so here we are—standing not at the edge of speculation, but at the threshold of revelation. What was once dismissed as digital folklore or libertarian fantasy now exposes itself as the scaffolding of a new geopolitical reality. We are not theorizing about change; we are witnessing it in real time. The statecraft of the 20th century—defined by the hard steel of deterrence, oil-backed currencies, and overt shows of force—has been quietly replaced by something colder, more elegant, and far more elusive.
Power is no longer projected solely through armies or aircraft carriers. It flows through transformers, substations, and buried conduits feeding algorithmic mints humming below the surface. The nations that understood this first were not those celebrated for innovation or transparency. They were the sanctioned, the isolated, the ideologically estranged—states forced to innovate in silence. Iran, China, North Korea. They did not adopt crypto as a hobby. They reverse-engineered it as a sovereign weapon.
Energy has always been the spine of civilization. What we’re seeing now is the mutation of that truth. Nuclear reactors and hydroelectric behemoths are no longer just about domestic lighting or military deterrence. They are the engines of a new form of financial autonomy. They power machines that mine digital gold—Bitcoin—not as a commodity, but as a shield, a sword, and a state-controlled printer for a currency that cannot be frozen, cannot be sanctioned, and cannot be traced without a war chest of quantum computing and luck.
This is no longer about decentralization. That myth collapsed the moment hashrate concentrated in state-aligned megafarms and underground fortresses. The illusion that Bitcoin belongs to the people was the perfect cover story. In truth, it has become the reserve currency of the unaligned, the disenfranchised, and the quietly powerful. The Iranian facilities struck last week wasn’t just about enrichment. It was about minting. Taking it offline wasn’t a nuclear de-escalation—it was a financial decapitation. And markets felt it.
North Korea understood this before most. It didn’t need to mine when it could simply take. It weaponized code, infiltrated wallets, and stripped nations of their value one protocol at a time. China, master of duality, outlawed crypto in public while silently dominating the hardware and energy flows behind it. Iran, constrained by sanctions but rich in infrastructure, built a mint beneath rock and concrete, daring the world to try and trace its ledger through a blast door.
What we are witnessing is not the rise of cryptocurrency—it’s the dawn of hashrate hegemony. Power becomes crypto. Crypto becomes leverage. Leverage becomes influence. The model is no longer hypothetical. It is operational.
And here’s the final truth: when your economy can be mined in silence, when your resistance can be funded anonymously, and when your infrastructure is your treasury, then the old world order is obsolete. This is the crypto-nuclear age of covert power. You were never supposed to see it. But now that you do, understand that the battlefield is already built. It’s humming, encrypted, and sovereign. The goal posts of the game didn’t change. The game being played has.
It’s increasingly clear that what we’re witnessing in the mainstream narrative isn’t simply misdirection—it’s containment. The media isn’t distorting the truth to protect sensitive geopolitical strategy. They’re spinning outdated frameworks because the reality underneath is too complex, too disruptive, and too deeply encoded for the average person to process without breaking the illusion they’ve been conditioned to live within. The aim isn’t to deceive maliciously—it’s to preserve a system that was never designed for mass understanding. And now, as the financial architecture shifts beneath our feet, the reset isn’t coming to save anyone—it’s coming to reveal who was never meant to survive it.
That doesn’t mean it’s too late. That doesn’t mean the door is closed. But it does mean adaptation is no longer optional. We are moving into an era where comprehension is currency—where those who can decode, shift, and move with the new flows of power will not only endure but lead. This is why figures like President Trump have begun to speak openly about cryptocurrency, despite mockery from established institutions. His stance isn’t random. It reflects a more profound awareness that financial sovereignty in the next era will not be about bank accounts or GDP—it will be about who controls access to code, energy, and the flow of information.
The ridicule from intelligence veterans and media figures isn’t a sign of ignorance—it’s a reflex. Because when new paradigms threaten old hierarchies, those invested in the old order don’t fight the technology; they mock the messenger. But the signal is there, for those willing to see. This isn’t about coins or tokens. It’s about understanding the terrain ahead and refusing to be dispossessed by those who prefer the world remain illegible to the many.
There is still time, but not for much longer. Those who learn—who shed the fixed mentalities and discard the scripts—will move with grace into what comes next. The rest will call it chaos, not because it is, but because they were never taught the language of control.
So now you see it, not through speculation, but through architecture—intentional, encrypted, and already operational. What began as a digital experiment is now the primary lever of power projection in a world tilting away from legacy systems. Energy is the denominator, code is the language, and Bitcoin is the carrier signal of a new kind of sovereignty—one mined in silence, distributed without consent, and weaponized beneath every outdated assumption about what constitutes war, finance, and control. But if you’ve made it this far, know this: the game may have been replaced, but your agency hasn’t been erased. The future will not belong to the obedient—it will belong to those who see the ledger, understand its weight, and dare to write their entry into it. There’s still time to adapt. Learn the flows. Master the signal. Become fluent in energy. The sovereigns of this era will not be crowned—they will be decoded.
If you like my work, you can tip or support me via TIP ME or subscribe to me on Subscribestar! You can also follow and subscribe to me on Rumble and Locals or subscribe to my Substack. I am 100% people-funded. www.toresays.com
Digital Dominion Series is now on Amazon: VOLUME I, VOLUME II, and Volume III – and Pre-order for Digital Dominion Volume IV is now on sale.
The post IC SERIES| Iran’s Underground Economy: The Nuclear-Crypto Synthesis Behind Sanctions PART III appeared first on Tore Says.
It's long past due for a broader look into what happened in 2020 and the lie of 'the most secure [election] in American history.'
