Shared posts

10 Jul 01:22

Vous connaissez le Courrier du Hacker ?

by Seboss666

Carl Chenet est un acteur beaucoup plus impliqué que moi dans ce qu’on appelle encore la Communauté du Logiciel Libre, que ce soit via son blog, le site LinuxJobs pour les chercheurs d’emploi, et le Journal du Hacker dont j’ai déjà eu l’occasion de parler à maintes reprises, même si peu en détails. Il m’a recontacté récemment pour demander si je m’étais intéressé au Courrier du hacker; et si j’avais vu passer les annonces de loin, ça ne m’intéressait pas plus que ça. Pourtant, ça pourrait VOUS intéresser !

Au commencement, était le Journal du Hacker

Le constat de Carl, c’est qu’il n’existait pas de site à la Hacker News, site américain existant depuis fort fort longtemps, en langue française. En bon développeur et contributeur qu’il est, il a trouvé une base de code sur laquelle capitaliser pour lancer sont propre « Hacker News », d’abord appelé Journal du Pirate.

Le concept, ce sont les utilisateurs qui partagent les articles qu’ils trouvent intéressants, et peuvent voter pour augmenter la visibilité des articles postés par les autres, ainsi que les commenter. Le site de plus propose un flux RSS pour suivre les nouveaux liens, ce qui me plaît particulièrement puisque cette technologie est mon outil principal de veille. Il est donc vrai que je ne contribue que très peu, principalement par manque de temps, pourtant certains utilisateurs partagent volontiers mes articles dessus, et il n’est pas rare qu’il soit majoritaire sur Twitter en termes de sources de visites enregistrées par Matomo :

Ça c’est sur le mois de Juin 🙂

Ajoutez à ça un relai des articles sur Twitter, Diaspora* et Mastodon, et vous pouvez booster la visibilité d’un article de manière assez impressionnante. Le « JdH » va bientôt avoir cinq ans et son succès ne se dément pas, longue vie à lui 🙂

Le besoin de curation

Avec le succès grandissant, le nombre de liens quotidiens devient important, je ne lis pas tout, si le titre me plaît, soit j’ai le temps de le lire tout de suite, soit je le garde en « non-lu » dans FreshRSS le temps d’être à la cool (ou sur un écran confortable, plus que celui de mon smartphone). Mais ça fait encore beaucoup, et parfois, on aime avoir des outils qui feraient le tri.

Les votes sur le site sont déjà une forme de tri, mais ça casse un peu la temporalité, et un article sorti un peu trop tôt risque de ne pas être bien noté tout de suite, et quand sa pertinence sera totale, il ne sera pas remonté car trop ancien et déjà oublié, dommage. Cette notion de tri et de sélection, c’est ce qu’on appelle la curation.

C’est un peu ce que je fais déjà avec mes propres billets « Liens en vrac et en Français », pour ceux qui suivent le JdH il est évident que plusieurs des articles relayés ont été découverts par ce biais. Ça reste toutefois ma sélection, avec mes centres d’intérêts, et parfois une emphase volontairement mise sur un sujet en particulier quand le nombre d’articles le justifie. Et un point de vue unique n’est jamais bon pour nourrir un cerveau, ou plusieurs dans le cas d’une publication.

Carl opérait déjà lui aussi un début de curation, via ses propres billets de blog « Liens intéressants du Journal du Hacker », hebdomadaires, mais la diffusion n’est pas optimale, le blog n’a pas vocation à être un canal de diffusion prioritaire pour un contenu en lien avec le JdH.

Ah, cette bonne vieille newsletter

Le concept de newsletter remonte à loin, très loin, et même s’il a été dévoyé à des fins de marketing, de ciblage publicitaire honteux (qui n’a pas été agressé par un popup à l’arrivée sur un site vous demandant votre adresse mail pour recevoir des informations et/ou des bons plans par mail ?), il reste un outil qui s’avère particulièrement adapté pour l’exercice qu’effectuait Carl. Admirez plutôt : au lieu d’avoir à surveiller une publication sur un blog, vous recevez directement, dans votre boite mail, une sélection hebdomadaire des meilleurs liens du Journal du Hacker. En clair, vous n’avez plus à aller chercher le contenu, il vient à vous, et même si je n’en ai pas directement besoin, j’avoue que j’aime ce fonctionnement, qui me rappelle mon article sur les notifications.

Ajoutez à ça la possibilité de consulter les archives des précédents numéros sur un site web dédié, ainsi qu’un partage de ces mêmes archives sur les mêmes réseaux sociaux mentionnés plus haut, et vous avez là un outil très appréciable, et manifestement très apprécié si l’on en croit les chiffres remontés par Carl. Les archives sont notamment pratiques si on veut se faire une idée avant de s’inscrire, voire choper un ou deux trucs intéressants qui datent d’avant son inscription.

Mieux, je disais que le concept avait été dévoyé par les publicitaires, qui s’amusent à tenter de profiler un max et revendre les profils associés aux adresses, augmentant dès lors la probabilité de se faire inonder de merde dans sa boite mail. Ici ça n’est pas le cas, il n’y a donc aucun risque, le seul que vous aurez, c’est d’être hébergé chez Microsoft qui pourra facilement décider de placer le Courrier dans les spams, voire pire en quarantaine (et je peux vous dire que c’est merdique comme système, au boulot on a des mails clients qui finissent en quarantaine, on est prévenu que plusieurs jours après).

Ça ne coûte rien d’essayer, ni même de l’adopter

Pour l’instant je préfère continuer de fonctionner à ma manière, avec le flux RSS du JdH. Mais dans tous les cas, vous ne perdrez rien, ou vraiment pas grand chose à part du temps, à l’essayer si vous souhaitez aborder votre veille dans d’autres conditions : le mail sort généralement le vendredi, vous laissant le week-end pour découvrir les articles à la cool. Et la désinscription est aussi simple que l’inscription, pensez-y quand vous demanderez à un site X d’aller supprimer votre adresse et demander aux partenaires à qui elle a été vendue d’en faire de même… Un grand merci donc à Carl pour son implication à rendre notre consommation d’information plus agréable 🙂

PS : si vous cherchez encore le lien pour vous inscrire, autant que je le remette ici : Courrier du Hacker

09 Jul 04:09

L’argent saoudien afflue dans les universités américaines

Entre les dizaines de milliers de boursiers saoudiens, des programmes de recherche commandités par Riyad et de pures logiques de relations publiques, beaucoup d’universités américaines ont des liens financiers avec Riyad. Des liens qui sont de plus en plus critiqués.
09 Jul 04:08

En Afrique, “zone de libre-échange d’accord, mais sécurité d’abord  !”

Lors d’un sommet de l’Union africaine dimanche 7 juillet, les pays membres ont célébré l’entrée en vigueur de la Zone de libre-échange continentale africaine (ZLEC) qui doit favoriser le développement économique du continent. Pour ce journal burkinabé, c’est une avancée majeure mais des obstacles demeurent.
06 Jul 08:55

Attaques de pétroliers : l’Iran, coupable idéal mais peu probable

Dans le sillage de l’attaque contre deux pétroliers dans le golfe d’Oman, jeudi 13 juin, les autorités américaines ont rapidement accusé la République islamique. Mais la piste menant aux Houthis yéménites n’est pas à exclure, selon ce journal israélien. D’autant qu’elle arrangerait un peu tout le monde. 
05 Jul 10:47

This is the world’s largest patch of seaweed. And it’s growing in an unexpected place

Study seeks to solve the mystery of massive Sargassum bloom
05 Jul 10:46

Avec les migrants, l’Union européenne fait pire que les États-Unis

Didier “Ice” Iceman

Il faut le dire...le rio grande européen c'est la mer

La détention inhumaine d’enfants migrants en Amérique choque le monde entier. En Méditerranée, près de 600 naufragés ont déjà péri en six mois et les migrants retenus en Libye vivent l’enfer. Sans faire de vagues. Il y a urgence que l’Europe forme une coalition des volontaires pour mettre fin à l’horreur, écrit Der Spiegel.
04 Jul 18:53

Actualité : L'appel du confondateur de Wikipedia à boycotter les réseaux sociaux

by Corentin Bechade
© Nuthawut Somsuk/iStock Profitant de l'ambiance de défiance croissante envers les réseaux sociaux et les GAFAM, Larry Sanger, cofondateur de Wikipedia propose un boycott temporaire des réseaux sociaux ces 4 et le 5 juillet. L'appel repéré par Numerama a pour but de pousser le public à réclamer un réseau social décentralisé et respectueux de la vie...
03 Jul 14:32

Why Does Turkey Want S-400 Missiles?

by Guest
Didier “Ice” Iceman

Intéressant revirement

by Bulent Aras

Turkey’s decision to buy S-400 missiles from Russia has generated considerable debate in the country about the impact on Turkish-American and Turkey-NATO relations, Turkey’s change of international orientation, and possible harm to Turkish defense sector and economy. Given these risks, it’s not entirely clear why Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan wants to buy this weapon system. The reasons likely lie in the emerging state structure, the priorities of ruling coalition, the consolidation of Erdogan’s leadership, and the military turn in foreign and security policy.

Erdogan has control over all the state institutions of foreign and security policy. Presidential decrees designed the mechanisms of the new regime, including the foreign policy apparatus with its new councils and offices. The appointment of an ever-increasing number of non-career ambassadors to these offices and to top positions in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs reveals Erdogan’s strategy. In this new design, the day-to-day functioning of foreign and security policy remains in the hands of career bureaucrats while the ruling political cadres determines the future design and path of foreign policy. Erdogan is in a position to put all those institutions into use for a presidential foreign policy. With all these powers, he is the first civilian commander in chief in its true sense. He takes a military-realist or a hard power turn in foreign policy depending on domestic political rivalries, regional security challenges, and the international situation.

Erdogan’s military turn in foreign policy has been tested in Syria in a number of operations in the north to contain the Kurdish PYD-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and eliminate the Islamic State (ISIS or IS) along the nearby border. The Syrian conundrum taught two lessons to Turkish foreign policy makers. First is the need for a missile defense system given the difficulties of arranging help from allies. Second is an autonomous foreign policy line after the failure to persuade the United States not to cooperate with the PYD, which is an off-shoot of the PKK in Syria. The Kurdish factor has been decisive for Turkey’s domestic and regional trajectory during this period.

It does not make sense for Turkey to search for a military role in its region or beyond without a national defense system. The U.S. argument that NATO systems can cover Turkey has not been persuasive in Ankara. The dead end in the talks to buy Patriot missiles has been another disappointment on Turkish side. Turkey’s sudden strategic turn to Russia and its intention to cooperate with Iran in Syria, despite differences in policy lines, is the result of the desire to obtain missile system and build a multidimensional approach in foreign policy.

The military turn in foreign policy can be seen in three different initiatives. First are the military operations in Syria and Iraq with their counterterrorism narrative. The shift from strict military isolation to direct military intervention and engaging proxies is about the political control of the military and intelligence in Turkey. Second is the establishment of military bases outside the country. The military base in Qatar with possible naval capabilities and a military training base in Somalia are two examples. There are attempts as well to establish new ones, for instance in Sudan, with an eye toward opening up to new geopolitical opportunities to secure alliances and deter potential rivals.

Erdogan also wants to create an ambitious defense industry as an instrument for both military and economic development. Turkey wants to build up its own indigenous production capabilities to reduce dependence on others and acquire a customer base for its products. Turkey’s traditional defense exports were armored personnel vehicles. But now there are more complex Turkish products are on the market, such as frigates, attack helicopters, and armed uninhabited aerial vehicles.

Erdogan’s decision to buy the S-400 missiles despite the threat of U.S. sanctions, the cessation of the F-35 fighter jet partnership, and overall NATO discontent makes sense according to this hard-power shift in foreign policy. The Turkish leader will test the limits of the United States and the international community as he expresses his reservations with the U.S.-led liberal world order. But there is no evidence that he aims for a total divorce. According to Erdogan, the new foreign policy, with its elements of military brinkmanship, will raise Turkey’s regional and international profile to a new level. He does not think President Trump will impose sanctions on Turkey, but he has also not hesitated to warn of retaliation in the case of such sanctions. The S-400 test will ultimately be a reality check for the sustainability of Erdogan’s policy in the coming months.

Regardless of the evolutionary direction of this new policy, a strong presidential influence over foreign policy decisions will continue. In addition, the military and intelligence will play a role in the new line of policy with the support of the security establishment. Erdogan’s new ruling coalition with the Nationalist Action Party, which also has the support of Eurasianist groups, backs the emerging hard-power foreign policy. Turkey’s traditional Western orientation has become a thing of the past. The S-400 decision—with its political backing, dedicated institutional structure, and approval from the security elite—is a state policy. It’s not an easily reversible political choice.

Bulent Aras is a senior fellow at the Istanbul Policy Center in Istanbul, Turkey and a visiting professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

02 Jul 17:13

Libye - Violations des embargos par Haftar et Sarraj : comment faire appliquer la justice ?

by Arianna Poletti
Didier “Ice” Iceman

La france complice

Alors que les photos d'armes étrangères utilisées en Libye se multiplient ces dernières semaines, comme autant de preuves de violations flagrantes de l'embargo imposé depuis 2011, la justice internationale peine à se faire entendre, tandis que la justice libyenne a laissé se développer un sentiment d'impunité quasi total.
02 Jul 14:39

Actualité : Syndicats et associations du web vent debout contre la loi Avia

by Corentin Bechade
© SIphotography : iStock Déposée devant l'Assemblée nationale le 20 mars, la "loi Avia", ou plus exactement la proposition de loi visant à lutter contre la haine sur Internet, refait parler d'elle quelques jours avant son examen en séance publique. Dans un communiqué, trois regroupements d'acteurs du web s'interrogent sur "l'efficacité du texte" devenu...
02 Jul 09:20

Pakistan’s hopes for an energy pipeline with Iran evaporate

Didier “Ice” Iceman

la destabilisation est elle voulue

The shooting down of a US drone by Iran has had some unintended consequences for Pakistan. Desperate for more energy security, while its economy is in the doldrums, Pakistan was hoping to move forward on an energy pipeline with Iran through a third party. But, like the US drone, Pakistan’s hope for such a pipeline seems to have hit a major setback.

While Pakistani officials publicly maintain that there is little hope for an Iran-Pakistan pipeline, they have been quietly working with China and Russia in the hope that a third party can pull it off. But even those plans hit a roadblock after tensions between Iran and the US escalated.

The Chinese angle

Pakistan and China had signed a framework agreement on April 20, 2015, to award, without a bidding process, a contract to build a liquefied natural gas pipeline between Gwadar and Nawabshah pipeline and an LNG terminal. The contractor was to be China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). Exim Bank of China was to provide 85% financing for the project.

This was an alternate model to implement the gas pipeline project. CNPC was also to connect an 80km pipeline from Gwadar in Balochistan to the Iranian border if the US sanctions were lifted. “Now, CNPC is still interested in initiating work on this project,” an official said, adding that this is the only option that is available with Pakistan and Iran to implement the gas pipeline project.

But Dr Gulfraz Ahmed, former secretary of Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, said that Pakistan cannot afford to implement the project. “Pakistan is also facing problems with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). In view of this situation, it cannot afford to implement the project. It can ask Iran if it would implement the IP project after sanctions are lifted. India had been importing oil from Iran but stopped after the US waiver ended,” Dr Ahmed told Asia Times.

The former managing director of the state run gas utility Sui Southern Gas Company, Zuhair Siddiqui believes that pushing this project at this stage is likely to increase Pakistan’s political complications exponentially. Instead, he suggested that Pakistan look at other alternatives like LNG imports and the TAPI (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India) pipeline project.

In June 2017, then Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif visited Saudi Arabia for high-level talks. This was at a time when the diplomatic crisis between Saudi Arabia and Qatar was at its height. Saudi Arabia and its allies — Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain – announced the withdrawal of diplomatic ties with Qatar.

During the meeting, Saudi Arabia also put pressure on Sharif to shelve any economic and diplomatic relations with Iran and Qatar. There was also pressure to suspend the IP gas pipeline project. The LNG Gwadar pipeline, which was an alternate plan to connect with the Iranian pipeline, was also shelved.

With Pakistan’s economy in meltdown, Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman had promised a US$ 20 billion package for Pakistan. Part of this is a US$10 billion oil refinery in Gwadar, Balochistan. “Since Pakistan has a long border with Iran, the IP pipeline project should not be abandoned due to Saudi Arabia,” Ahmed said. He believes that the pipeline will bring a lot of economic benefits and energy security to Pakistan.

The Russian option

The second alternative is to divert the gas allocated for the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project to an offshore pipeline project being planned by Russia. The Russian firm Gazprom is conducting a study to build an offshore pipeline project from Iran to India passing through Gwadar.

Pakistan and Russia inked a memorandum of understanding in February this year to conduct a feasibility study to implement the US$10 billion offshore gas pipeline. However, even that option seems unlikely in the current scenario. In November, 2018, a team from Iran which included legal experts, arrived in Pakistan to discuss the execution of the gas pipeline project.

Naturally, the Iranian team was of the view that US sanctions would not affect the gas pipeline project. However, Pakistan feared being brought under US sanctions if it went ahead with the deal. The US has already warned Pakistan about its sanctions and asked it not to move on the gas pipeline following the sanctions imposed by the Trump administration.

The pipeline is slated to deliver 21.5 million cubic meters of gas per day to Pakistan.

Trump had announced the re-imposition of sanctions on Iran on May 8, 2018, when he signaled US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). He also threatened to slap secondary sanctions on foreign companies that do business with Iran.

Meanwhile, the Iranian delegation lobbied hard with Pakistan to implement the project. Iran, Pakistan and India were to be the key partners, while Russia was invited as an observer. However, Pakistan said that gas under IP gas pipeline project and the offshore gas pipeline would come from Iran and therefore, Pakistan should implement only one project. It could be either the offshore gas pipeline or the IP gas pipeline.

Iran had agreed to implement the offshore gas pipeline project. Under the new model, the gas volume allocated for the IP gas pipeline project would be diverted to the offshore gas pipeline project. Iran had agreed to follow this model and officials were of the view that they would be supporting this model.

Officials with the federal Petroleum Division said that Iranian team was scheduled to visit Pakistan on June 19, and these two options would be discussed. During the visit of Prime Minister Imran Khan to Iran in April, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani took up the matter with the Pakistani side, and officials of two sides had also held a meeting on this project. Iran had also offered Pakistan the opportunity to implement the project through a ‘third party’. However, nothing came out of these meetings.

Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, former Petroleum Minister, said that Pakistan could not implement the IP gas pipeline project even through a third party. “Pakistan will not be able to generate funds. Even old oil contracts were facing sanctions and India and China are facing disruptions and challenges in oil imports,” he said.

02 Jul 07:01

Côte d'Ivoire-France - Bombardement de Bouaké : l'ultime recours des familles auprès de la CEDH

by Jeune Afrique
La défense des familles des victimes du bombardement de Bouaké, qui avait fait dix morts en 2004 dans le Nord de la Côte d'Ivoire, compte saisir en dernier recours la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme (CEDH).
01 Jul 10:34

Vietnam and EU sign free trade deal

Didier “Ice” Iceman

Étonnant non?

The European Union and Vietnam on Sunday signed a long-awaited free trade, an agreement that pushes back against a rising tide of global protectionism and hailed as a “milestone” by Brussels.

The signing comes amid worldwide trade turmoil, with a dragging US-China row and Britain’s impending exit from the European Union casting a dark cloud over global growth.

It follows years of tough negotiations marred by Vietnam’s tarnished human rights record.

EU trade commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom called the deal “an important milestone” and a key step towards better co-operation with Southeast Asian economies.

“This is the most ambitious trade agreement that the EU has signed with a developing country,” she told reporters after the landmark deal was inked in Hanoi on Sunday in front of dozens of negotiators and diplomats.

The EU-Vietnam free trade pact will eventually see duties slashed on 99% of Europe’s imports from Vietnam.

Billed as a so-called next generation deal, it also includes rules around labour rights and environmental and intellectual property protections.

“We want to make sure that EU trade in this region has a positive impact so we have enshrined high standards,” Malmstrom said.

“It sends a very powerful signal that says ‘we believe in trade’,” she later told AFP.

The deal will come into force only once it is ratified, which could come by the end of the year if approved by lawmakers on both sides.

It is the second EU free trade agreement with a Southeast Asian nation after Singapore signed a deal with the bloc last year.

It comes on the heels of a watershed agreement on Friday between the EU and South American trade bloc Mercosur that will link 800 million people in what will be one the world’s largest regional commercial accords.

Rights woes

EU-Vietnam free trade negotiations kicked off seven years ago, and the EU has come under fire for not putting enough pressure on Vietnam to improve its dismal rights record.

The one-party communist state routinely jails activists and last year passed a restrictive cybersecurity bill that critics say is aimed at silencing dissent online.

Malmstrom said rights issues were raised throughout negotiations and the trade agreement would allow the EU to “engage rather than to isolate” Vietnam on human rights.

“I don’t think this trade agreement will solve these concerns but it creates a way to talk openly and frankly about them,” she told AFP after the signing.

The EU is pushing for better trade with Southeast Asian economies, who themselves are seeking multilateral agreements, especially as the United States has withdrawn from such deals under President Donald Trump.

The US president pulled out from the sprawling Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) soon after taking office, signalling Washington’s protectionist preference for bilateral deals.

The TPP has since been reborn as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, a watered down version of the original pact without the inclusion of the world’s biggest economy.

Vietnam was set to gain enormously from that deal, and has courted other trade partners to soften the blow.

“Vietnam sought to accelerate its negotiations… in this case [with] the EU, clearly as a way of diversifying their trade,” Stephen Schwartz, head of Asia Pacific sovereign ratings at Fitch Ratings, told AFP from Hong Kong.

Vietnam’s export-led economy has largely been buoyed by free trade, and open access to the European market is expected to boost its main deliveries to the bloc, namely textiles, shoes, smartphones and computer parts.

European countries are also eager to tap into Vietnam’s market of 95 million people and its mushrooming consumer class.

“The advantages we can get from [the FTA] will bring huge contributions to Vietnam’s exports and imports, Vietnam’s Trade Minister Tran Tuan Anh said Sunday.

Vietnam has seen some short-term gains from the US-China trade spat as some companies shift from China into its lower-tariff, cheap labour market.

But analysts warn that a weaker China or US could ultimately dent economies like Vietnam that largely rely on exports to the world’s two biggest economies.

With exports from Vietnam to the US soaring amid the trade spat, US President Donald Trump last week threatened to slap tariffs on the manufacturing hub, calling it “the single worst abuser of everybody.”

– AFP

30 Jun 05:37

Selfies, five times more deadly than sharks

Didier “Ice” Iceman

syndrome d'une éépoque

Selfies, which have become a global sensation in the last decade or so, have remarkably killed five times more people than shark attacks.

And the death toll has crept up incrementally each year as smartphones become more sophisticated and selfie-sticks increase the range at which people can snap themselves, prompting them to take bigger risks for the perfect shot.

Between October 2011 and November 2017, at least 259 people died taking selfies around the globe, according to India’s Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, compared to just 50 people killed by sharks in the same period.

While women take the most selfies, young men, who are more prone to take risks, make up three-quarters of the selfie deaths – in drownings, crashes, falls or shooting accidents.

India, with a population of more than 1.3 billion and 800 million cellphones, holds the record for the number of people dying in the act of photographing themselves, with 159 recorded so far.

That is more than half of the global total – and a testament of sorts to the nation’s love of group photos and its youthful population.

India has seen selfie-snapping groups of youths die when they were hit by a train or drowning when their boat sank at the moment they were clicking the shutter.

No selfie zones

The situation has become so dire that India has set up “no selfie” zones – 16 of them in the city of Mumbai alone.

The country came in far ahead of Russia (16 deaths), the United States (14) and Pakistan.

In Russia, people have fallen from bridges and high-rise buildings, shot themselves or even died while handling a land mine. Police issued a guide to “selfies without danger” in 2015.

In the United States, most of those involved in selfie deaths fatally shot themselves while seeking the perfect pose. A number of people have fallen to their deaths at the Grand Canyon.

Rescue services in Croatia used Twitter to ask tourists to “stop taking stupid and dangerous selfies” after a Canadian miraculously survived a 75-meter (250-foot) fall in the Plitvice Lakes region.

Bikini climber Gigi Wu was famous for her selfies. She died after falling in a ravine in Taiwan in January. Photo: Facebook

In January, Taiwanese social media celebrity Gigi Wu – known as the “Bikini Climber” for taking selfies on top of mountain peaks dressed in a bikini – died when she fell into a ravine in Yushan National Park. She was 36.

Inappropriate selfie spots

Even when they are not fatal, selfies can be extremely macabre.

In 2014, a Brazilian woman sparked rage online when she took a smiling selfie in front of the coffin of presidential candidate Eduardo Campos at his funeral.

Social media influencer Sueli Toledo also caused a stir online when she posted a picture on Instagram with the caption, “My look today for the funeral of a super friend.”

Selfies in places deemed sacred or hallowed – especially when they honor the dead – can also raise questions.

At the former Nazi death camp of Auschwitz in Poland, visited by 2.1 million people every year, museum staff do not hesitate to contact people who post selfies deemed to be inappropriate.

From Brazil to Vietnam and Germany, witnesses to traffic accidents have posted selfies at the scene of the crash – generally seen as gauche.

This shot taken on June 26 shows a tourist taking a selfie in front of Bangkok’s skyline from the Mahanakorn Skywalk observation deck, 314 meters above the ground. Photo: Vivek Prakash / AFP

More and more, selfies – even in tourist havens – are becoming a bit of a nuisance for locals.

Residents of the picturesque Rue Cremieux in Paris were so disturbed by the constant stream of selfie-snapping tourists outside their windows that they started their own Instagram account, clubcremieux, where they publish pictures of the most absurd posers outside their doors, skewering them with barbed captions.

The same thing happened in Hong Kong, where residents of the vast multi-colored Quarry Bay apartment complex put up signs banning photos.

In Brazil, several youths made a buzz on Facebook in 2017 when they posted smiling selfies taken among terrified bus passengers who had thrown themselves to the floor during a shooting.

Facing the mad frenzy of endless selfies, Vienna has launched a campaign for a digital detox.

The Belvedere Museum has put up a large copy of Gustav Klimt’s classic painting “The Kiss” near the original and added a giant red hashtag, so that visitors can take their selfie next to the facsimile and actually look at the real work of art.

Agence France-Presse

Also read: The global battle for selfie supremacy

29 Jun 11:19

U.S., Taliban representatives begin Doha talks in fresh bid to end war

by No Author
Didier “Ice” Iceman

Étonnant avec le discours de trump

A fresh round of talks between the U.S. and the Taliban began in Qatar on Saturday, just days after U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo ...
29 Jun 10:14

New solar technology could produce clean drinking water for millions in need

Didier “Ice” Iceman

Reste à trouver l'eau

Solar still produces 12 times the clean water of commercial versions
27 Jun 04:39

Russia-India-China will be the big G20 hit

Didier “Ice” Iceman

Mais ils ont des intérêts divergents

It all started with the Vladimir Putin–Xi Jinping summit in Moscow on June 5. Far from a mere bilateral, this meeting upgraded the Eurasian integration process to another level. The Russian and Chinese presidents discussed everything from the progressive interconnection of the New Silk Roads with the Eurasia Economic Union, especially in and around Central Asia, to their concerted strategy for the Korean Peninsula.

A particular theme stood out: They discussed how the connecting role of Persia in the Ancient Silk Road is about to be replicated by Iran in the New Silk Roads, or Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). And that is non-negotiable. Especially after the Russia-China strategic partnership, less than a month before the Moscow summit, offered explicit support for Tehran signaling that regime change simply won’t be accepted, diplomatic sources say.

Putin and Xi solidified the roadmap at the St Petersburg Economic Forum. And the Greater Eurasia interconnection continued to be woven immediately after at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Bishkek, with two essential interlocutors: India, a fellow BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and SCO member, and SCO observer Iran.

At the SCO summit we had Putin, Xi, Narendra Modi, Imran Khan and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani sitting at the same table. Hanging over the proceedings, like concentric Damocles swords, were the US-China trade war, sanctions on Russia, and the explosive situation in the Persian Gulf.

Rouhani was forceful – and played his cards masterfully – as he described the mechanism and effects of the US economic blockade on Iran, which led Modi and leaders of the Central Asian “stans” to pay closer attention to Russia-China’s Eurasia roadmap. This occurred as Xi made clear that Chinese investments across Central Asia on myriad BRI projects will be significantly increased.

Russia-China diplomatically interpreted what happened in Bishkek as “vital for the reshaping of the world order.” Crucially, RIC – Russia-India-China – not only held a trilateral but also scheduled a replay at the upcoming Group of Twenty summit in Osaka. Diplomats swear the personal chemistry of Putin, Xi and Modi worked wonders.

The RIC format goes back to old strategic Orientalist fox Yevgeny Primakov in the late 1990s. It should be interpreted as the foundation stone of 21st-century multipolarity, and there’s no question how it will be interpreted in Washington.

India, an essential cog in the Indo-Pacific strategy, has been getting cozy with “existential threats” Russia-China, that “peer competitor” – dreaded since geopolitics/geo-strategy founding father Halford Mackinder published his “Geographical Pivot of History” in 1904 –  finally emerging in Eurasia.

RIC was also the basis on which the BRICS grouping was set up. Moscow and Beijing are diplomatically refraining from pronouncing that. But with Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro seen as a mere Trump administration tool, it’s no wonder that Brazil has been excluded from the RIC summit in Osaka. There will be a perfunctory BRICS meeting right before the start of the G20 on Friday, but the real deal is RIC.

Pay attention to the go-between

The internal triangulation of RIC is extremely complex. For instance, at the SCO summit Modi said that India could only support connectivity projects based on “respect of sovereignty” and “regional integrity.” That was code for snubbing the Belt and Roads Initiative – especially because of the flagship China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which New Delhi insists illegally crosses Kashmir. Yet India did not block the final Bishkek declaration.

What matters is that the Xi-Modi bilateral at the SCO was so auspicious that Indian Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale was led to describe it as “the beginning of a process, after the formation of government in India, to now deal with India-China relations from both sides in a larger context of the 21st century and of our role in the Asia-Pacific region.” There will be an informal Xi-Modi summit in India in October. And they meet again at the BRICS summit in Brazil in November.

Putin has excelled as a go-between. He invited Modi to be the guest of honor at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok in early September. The thrust of the relationship is to show to Modi the benefits for India to actively join the larger Eurasia integration process instead of playing a supporting role in a Made in USA production.

That may even include a trilateral partnership to develop the Polar Silk Road in the Arctic, which represents, in a nutshell, the meeting of the Belt and Road Initiative with Russia’s Northern Sea Route. China Ocean Shipping (Cosco) is already a partner of the Russian company PAO Sovcomflot, shipping natural gas both east and west from Siberia.

Xi is also beginning to get Modi’s attention on the restarting possibilities for the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCMI) corridor, another major Belt and Road project, as well as improving connectivity from Tibet to Nepal and India.

Impediments, of course, remain plentiful, from disputed Himalayan borders to, for instance, the slow-moving Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) – the 16-nation theoretical successor of the defunct Trans-Pacific Partnership. Beijing is adamant the RCEP must go into overdrive, and is even prepared to leave New Delhi behind.

One of Modi’s key decisions ahead is on whether to keep importing Iranian oil – considering there are no more US sanctions waivers. Russia is ready to help Iran and weary Asian customers such as India if the EU-3 continue to drag the implementation of their special payment vehicle.

India is a top Iran energy customer. Iran’s port of Chabahar is absolutely essential if India’s mini-Silk Road is to reach Central Asia via Afghanistan. With US President Donald Trump’s administration sanctioning New Delhi over its drive to buy the Russian S-400 air defense system and the loss of preferred trade status with the US, getting closer to Bridge and Road – featuring energy supplier Iran as a key vector – becomes a not-to-be-missed economic opportunity.

With the roadmap ahead for the Russia-China strategic partnership fully solidified after the summits in Moscow, St Petersburg and Bishkek, the emphasis now for RC is to bring India on board a full-fledged RIC. Russia-India is already blossoming as a strategic partnership. And Xi-Modi seemed to be in sync. Osaka may be the geopolitical turning point consolidating RIC for good.

26 Jun 14:32

Hausse du CO2 : plus un problème de taille et poids que de carburant ?

L'objectif des 95 g/km de CO2 pour 2020 s'éloigne pour les constructeurs automobiles qui ont vu leur taux moyen augmenter en 2018, sous l'effet de la baisse du diesel. Pour l'agence européenne de l'environnement, plus que le basculement vers l'essence, c'est surtout la prolifération des voitures lourdes et toujours plus grandes qui font exploser la note.
25 Jun 08:03

Honda signs Alibaba to develop next-gen infotainment system

Didier “Ice” Iceman

intéressant accord... qui pose des questions

Honda Motor Co. has signed Chinese Internet giant Alibaba Group to develop its third-generation Honda Connect infotainment system.   Honda will tap Alibabas artificial intelligence to enable in-vehicle e-commerce and seamless home-to-vehicle connectivity for car drivers and passengers, the automaker said. 
24 Jun 08:42

Most Democratic Candidates Still Afraid to Criticize Israel’s Violations of Palestinian Rights

by James Zogby
Didier “Ice” Iceman

une surprise?

by James J. Zogby

The attitudes of Democratic voters toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have become decidedly more balanced in the past two decades. Favorable attitudes toward Palestinians are up while attitudes toward Israel appear to be in decline. While, overall views of Israel remain positive, substantial numbers of Democrats are opposed to Israeli policies – namely settlement construction and violations of Palestinian rights. Israel’s leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, is also viewed negatively by most Democrats.

These shifts in opinion have placed many Democratic presidential candidates in a bind – especially those who have served in Congress or as Governors. As conscious as they may be of their base’s changing mood, they have also been schooled not to alienate pro-Israel donors or cross Israel’s lobbyists, who can, if aroused, distract their campaigns with a barrage of protests.  

It was against this backdrop that I watched the results of a months-long New York Times’ project in which they interviewed 21 of the Democrats running for president on a range of foreign and domestic policy issues that will confront the next president. There were questions on Afghanistan, handguns, health care, immigration, and the death penalty.

Most intriguing to me was question #4: “Do you think that Israel meets international standards of human rights?” because it was deeply revealing about each of candidates’ principles, their understanding of, and readiness to deal with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

It was disturbing how few of the candidates appear to have given the matter any serious thought. With the notable exceptions of Senator Bernie Sanders, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and Congressmen Eric Swalwell and Seth Moulton, most of the elected officials stumbled about like frightened high schoolers being asked a test question for which they hadn’t prepared.

Only a handful found the inner strength to suggest that Israel, in fact, was violating human rights. Most respondents hedged their replies noting the challenges Israel faces or “Israel attempts meet human rights standards…but could do a better job. A few, Senators Kamala Harris and Michael Bennet, Mayor Bill de Blasio, and Congressman John Delaney, actually indicated that they believed that Israel was upholding human rights. Some, instead of addressing the question, shifted to a more comfortable critique of the failings of President Trump or Prime Minister Netanyahu – as if to suggest that problems began with these two leaders. 

Additionally, those who hedged their answers implying that Israel’s record was less than perfect offered, as their way out of appearing to be critical of Israel, something like – “Israel’s trying to do the right thing, but sometimes they fail and need our help.” Finally, other than the few that mentioned settlement expansion, most failed to consider other human rights violations that occur in the Occupied Territories. The only Democrat who did was Seth Moulton, who cited his earlier support for legislation calling for “not supplying Israel with weapons and goods if they do not uphold standards for the treatment of Palestinian kids in prison.”

As they awkwardly struggled to get out of the challenge foisted upon them, you could almost see the wheels spinning inside their heads weighing their need to assert their pro-Israel bona fides with the newly felt need to be relevant to the changing mood of the Democratic electorate. It was for many “a damned if they do, damned if they don’t” situation.

What became painfully clear was the extent to which most of the candidates, either because they were loath to offer any criticism of Israel or because they simply had no idea how to answer this question, found themselves forced to recall comfortable, though irrelevant, talking points.

The top of mind reply of a majority of the respondents was a variation of “Israel is our most important ally” or “Israel is a liberal democracy” – completely dodging the question asked. Equally off-topic was the support a majority of the candidates expressed for a “two state solution.”

You can read the transcripts of their comments, but far more interesting was watching their faces as they struggled to answer this simple question. First, there was the obvious discomfort at being called upon to talk about a topic they would rather avoid. Then, you could see them fumbling about trying to remember talking points and looking for a safety net. At one point, you can see the lights go on when they recalled the magical “two state solution” formula. It was as if at the end of a long and grueling half-baked answer to an unwanted question, they remembered “Ah ha! Two states – that’s the way out of this mess.” then without any connection to the question or anything they had said up until that point, they would shift into their comfort zone and say “we should be doing more to press the parties to negotiate a two-state solution” – end of answer and smile – as if they were saying “Phew! Did I get out of that one?”

What’s especially troubling about this “fall back” two-state solution answer, in addition to the fact that it had nothing to do with the question that was asked, is that most seemed to act as if just saying they supported two states absolved them of needing to say or do more – for this reason, I’ve come to refer to it as “the two state absolution.” The notable exception here was Congressman Julian Castro who acknowledged that settlement expansion made the goal of two states “harder.”

Most disappointing was the non-response of the usually thoughtful Senator Elizabeth Warren, who said that she would urge the Israelis and Palestinians to “come to the table and negotiate” and then “stay out of the way to let them negotiate,” as if that had never been tried before and as if the ascendancy of far-right in Israel isn’t hell-bent on doing everything they can to avoid an independent Palestinian state.

The bottom line is that most of the Democrats running for president have a long way to go to in dealing with Israel/Palestine. The reason is simple. Because of the pervasive presence and power of pro-Israel forces, elected officials have long taken a “hands off” approach to dealing with this issue. Many have learned that stepping “out of line” brings painful results – calls that tie up their office phones and angry emails that fill up their inboxes, leading them to avoid this issue like a disease. The result is what I called “willed ignorance.” They focus on “their issues” – the ones that got them elected and ignore those that can only bring trouble.  Therefore, they don’t receive or even request briefings on this critical question.

But the situation is changing. The evolving attitudes of the electorate – especially key blocs of Democratic voters and the disgust of many Democrats with Netanyahu’s policies and the Trump/Netanyahu “love-fest” – all point to the fact that this will not be the last time uncomfortable questions about Israel-Palestine will be asked. It’s time for those who hope to lead us to take the time to learn about this issue that has vexed every American president for 70 years.

24 Jun 08:41

Lebanon slams Trump administration’s Mideast peace plan

by Associated Press
Lebanon’s Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri has criticized the Trump administration’s $50 billion investment proposal, part of its Middle East peace plan, saying Beirut will not be “tempted” by money at the expense of the Palestinian question
24 Jun 08:30

Japan’s anime industry in crisis despite its popularity

by Sophie Laubie
Didier “Ice” Iceman

Les animateurs sous payés, c'est un mal récurent

Japan’s booming animation industry is in crisis — with low pay, long hours and a huge shortage of artists — just as its global popularity ...
23 Jun 04:58

2020 Tokyo Olympics puts spotlight on animal welfare

by Pauline Kitamura
Didier “Ice” Iceman

Mais il y a du travail

The International Olympic Committee sets procurement standards for materials used in conjunction with the games. One of these standards is sustainability, which was first established ...
23 Jun 04:54

Japanese government played hidden role in breakdown of Fiat-Renault deal

by Ania Nussbaum
Didier “Ice” Iceman

Quelle surprise mais c'est plus prudent

Concerned that a merger could harm Nissan Motor Co., the Japanese government played a role in the breakdown of talks between Renault SA and Fiat ...
22 Jun 04:17

Over 1,100 women rescued in China in 2018

Didier “Ice” Iceman

Le trafic humain.existe encore

More than 1,000 foreign women and children were rescued from more than 1,300 human traffickers between July and December last year in joint enforcement efforts by China and five neighboring countries, according to the Ministry of Public Security.

Between July and December last year Chinese officials joined hands with counterparts from Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam to combat illegal cross-border human trafficking and suspected sham marriages. The authorities successfully freed 1,130 foreign women and 17 children, most of whom had been abducted, bjnews.com.cn reported.

During the stated period, a series of operations were conducted and in 760 cases suspected traffickers were intercepted and 126 cases of sham marriages were identified.

A total of 1,332 alleged human traffickers were arrested, 262 of whom were foreign nationals.

Guo Lin, spokesperson for the Ministry of Public Security, said in recent years human traffickers from China and neighboring countries traffickers often attract victims by offering them jobs, travel trips or legal cross-border marriages. But, these women were then detained and ‘sold’ abroad.

One of the active and notorious sham marriage syndicates was busted by Chinese authorities together with officials in Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos.

Under the framework of the Mekong River sub-regional cooperation anti-trafficking process, the Chinese Ministry of Public Security strengthened law enforcement cooperation with police in Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, and Thailand.

As early as in October 2004, the six countries signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Cooperation against Trafficking in People in the Greater Mekong Sub-Region.

Officials say remarkable results have been achieved throughout the years with police jointly launching crackdowns to rescue victims of trafficking and arrest transnational criminals.

22 Jun 04:14

A dangerous confusion at the heart of Trump’s foreign policy

by Greg Jaffe
The president’s policy goals are murky, even as he triggers crises, raising the risk of conflict.
21 Jun 04:30

The Fog of Selling a War

by Paul Pillar
Didier “Ice” Iceman

De bonnes questions

by Paul R. Pillar

The “fog of war,” about which Carl von Clausewitz wrote, refers to the confusion and lack of knowledge of what an adversary is up to on a chaotic battlefield. Currently, those promoting or welcoming a war with Iran are using a different kind of fog. It should be easier to see through the current war-selling fog than it was to see what was happening on smoke-filled battlefields of Clausewitz’s time. It only takes a little effort to do so. But that effort cuts against some common human tendencies, including inattention, fear, and a desire for revenge.

Much of the current war-selling fog is remarkably similar to the selling of the Iraq War of 2003, in which the sales campaign depended on fear and an unthinking thirst for revenge after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The apparent failure to have learned lessons from that blunder reflects another common human tendency, which is to focus narrowly on events of the moment while losing sight of context, background, and history, even recent history. The recent sabotage of tankers in the Gulf of Oman has led to a preoccupation with the question of whether Iran was the perpetrator—as if the answer to that question would provide a ready-made prescription for a policy response, which it doesn’t—with less attention paid to the more important question of why Iran might do such a thing. The clear answer is that Iran is responding directly to the Trump administration’s unlimited economic warfare campaign, saber-rattling, and other aspects of its “maximum pressure” policy.

An analogue in the Iraq War case was the preoccupation with the question of whether Iraq had so-called weapons of mass destruction—as if the answer to that question should have been enough to determine the right policy toward Iraq, which it didn’t. Even if the Iraqi regime had possessed the feared weapons, the Iraq War would have been just as much of a civil-war-inducing, region-destabilizing mess as it in fact was. (Actually, it would have been even messier and bloodier, because Saddam Hussein probably would have used such weapons in response to the U.S. invasion.)

An even more direct analogue with the selling of the Iraq War is the effort to associate the targeted regime with undisputed bad guys such as terrorists of the al-Qaeda ilk. Here the fog consists of playing upon confusion over what some “link” or “connection” between a group and a regime really means, no matter how nebulous or outdated any such connections may be. The makers of the Iraq War were so successful in exploiting this part of the fog that they induced a large proportion of the American public to believe that Saddam had been directly involved in the 9/11 attack. The would-be makers of a war with Iran evidently were so impressed with this success that they have copied this part of the Iraq War playbook almost verbatim. They also are using the issue to perform an end-run around Congress by claiming that a post-9/11 resolution authorizing force against al-Qaeda would apply to a war with Iran.

The use of this page of the playbook is just as fraudulent in the case of Iran as it was with Iraq. There is no evidence of Iran being an ally or operational partner of al-Qaeda or of offshoots such as the Islamic State. To the contrary, Iran has been a target and victim of attacks by such groups, including attacks in the heart of Iran. Iran has been the leading source of support to the government of Iraq in combating one of the more destructive ramifications of the U.S.-led war there, which was the emergence of the Islamic State.

Perhaps the most authoritative word on this subject comes from al-Qaeda members themselves as recorded in declassified documents seized in the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. The documents date from 2004 through the week of the raid in 2011. The documents say nothing about any terrorist collaboration between Iran and al-Qaeda. They say a great deal about antagonism and mistrust toward Iran on the part of the al-Qaeda members.

The specific story those members tell involves fleeing from Afghanistan to Iran out of “necessity” after the fall of the Taliban. Iranian authorities initially let them stay temporarily, under strict conditions that prohibited any communications with jihadists elsewhere. When the jihadists violated those conditions, Iran’s policy switched to one of arrests and deportations. The policy evolved further after the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the resulting rapid rise of al-Qaeda in Iraq, the group that under a changed name and different leadership became the Islamic State. According to the al-Qaeda record in the documents, Iran detained their “brothers” as a “bargaining chip.” Among the detainees were members of bin Laden’s family, held to put pressure on bin Laden himself. When Iran finally began releasing some of the detained jihadists in 2009, it was, according to the al-Qaeda account, because of the pressure the group exerted in return on Iran, including “the threats we made” and the kidnapping of the Iranian commercial counselor in Peshawar, Pakistan.

Amid the fog of war-selling, contradictions get overlooked and individual assertions become part of the mix. Thus, administration spokespersons can express with a straight face concern about Iran possibly exceeding limits of the same nuclear agreement that the Trump administration has itself blatantly violated and unremittingly trashed. The administration can both assert that sanctions have tamed aggressive Iranian behavior and claim that, amid the current tensions in the Persian Gulf, Iran is more aggressive than ever. And as Joe Cirincione and Mary Kaszynski observe, today’s warhawks assert that “somehow Iran is so powerful that it is the source of all evil in the Middle East, yet so fragile that a small cruise missile attack on an Iranian civilian nuclear plant will cause it to crumble.” (Herein is another analogue to the selling of the Iraq War—if you liked that cakewalk, how about another one?)

And amid the fog, roaring illogic gets overlooked. When asked about Iran indicating that, after more than a year of the United States reneging on its obligations under the nuclear agreement, Iran may start exceeding some of the limits on low-enriched uranium, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declared, “This tells you how flawed the deal was, right?” The absurdity of that statement—attributing to an agreement a problem that directly results from a U.S. assault on the agreement—is breathtaking. But devoid of any context about what led to the current state of affairs, and how the agreement in question was working fine before the administration set about to destroy it, an utterance like Pompeo’s probably will sway some ill-informed minds.

As noted earlier, it does not require much effort to cut through this fog. It is up to editorial boards, other opinion leaders, and especially Congress to make that effort.

21 Jun 04:25

Caricatures politiques : « Le “New York Times” s’interdit tout débat »

Didier “Ice” Iceman

Ne pas débattre et a cause de ça pose des questiins

Michel Guerrin, rédacteur en chef au « Monde », revient sur la décision du quotidien américain de supprimer les dessins de presse de son édition internationale.
21 Jun 04:23

Under pressure, plane industry vows cleaner flight — someday

by Angela Charlton | AP
Didier “Ice” Iceman

Enfin pour l'aerien

Jet makers are trying to make flying less damaging to the planet but clean flying remains decades away
20 Jun 19:57

Guerre commerciale : le Vietnam dans la ligne de mire du Trésor américain

by Jean-Raphaël Chaponnière
Didier “Ice” Iceman

On continue les conneries

Avec la hausse des taxes douanières voulue par Trump sur les produits chinois s'amplifie un phénomène de fond : la délocalisation vers le Vietnam. Ce qui creuse le déficit américain avec ce pays. Pour l'instant, le locataire de la Maison Blanche ne dit rien. Mais à Washington, le département du Trésor surveille la tendance de près.