
firehose
Shared posts
me: where do you live?
vegan: I'm a vegan
Singles Now Outnumber Married People In America — And That's A Good Thing
Rory McIlroy tweets about 'simple things' while reading book about yacht
Rory McIlroy's tweet about his low-key relaxing evening also includes that coffee table book he's reading about the most expensive thing possible.
On its face, this tweet from Rory McIlroy is really sweet:
Home... lying on the sofa, NFL on the TV and a cup of tea! #simplethings #bliss pic.twitter.com/A3vCdqVV8j
— Rory Mcilroy (@McIlroyRory) September 15, 2014
McIlroy finished tied for second at the TOUR Championship Sunday, which earned him $708,000 to go along with the $2 million he made by finishing third in the FedEx Cup. That's all on top of the $8 million-plus he already earned on the season, but it's clear he's still a low-key guy who can entertain himself by relaxing and watching some football.
But wait, let's take a closer look:
Yup, Mr. Simple Things In Life is reading a book about chartering yachts. And not just any yachts -- the world's 100 finest! I mean, it could just be a coffee table book that sits there while Rory doesn't charter yachts, but hey, if I made more than $10 million this year, I'd probably be chartering some yachts. Don't hide it, Rory! We also wouldn't try to hide it. We'd be soliciting Twitter for yacht advice just to rub it in that we were chartering yachts instead of just reading books about it. But that's the difference between us and Rory McIlroy. (that and the golf skills thing.)
Last night's 'Doctor Who' might be one of its best ever
firehose'This was Moffat at his best, which is a tough thing to say lately.'
'This season has been less explicit and more demonstrative with its theme (all for the better, I'd say). The Doctor performs acts of heroism but is himself still that scared little kid that never fit in with his own species.'
"Question: why do we talk out loud when we know we're alone? Conjecture: because we know we're not."
For this season of Doctor Who, Ross Miller and Kwame Opam will be sounding off on each episode in a series of emails we'll be publishing on the site. This week it's "Robot of Sherwood" (warning: spoilers ahead). Check out our previous recaps: "Deep Breath," "Into the Dalek," and "Robots of Sherwood."
Ross
I'm watching the episode for the second time right now. A seriously interesting menace. Great work by all three leads — the Doctor, Clara, and Mr. Pink. Normally I'd rant about major continuity errors or try to talk about other great shows I'm watching, but this is one of those great standalone episodes that I'll probably watch years later on its own, absent of any season-long marathon.
The episode begins with the Doctor left alone in his thoughts — seemingly more of a trend this season than others. Instead of keeping Clara cooped up in the TARDIS, the Doctor seems to only pick up his companion when needed, which means we get to see a Clara grounded in reality, constantly revisiting a messy date with Danny Pink — née Rupert, which we know because the Doctor and Clara visit a young Rupert trying to solve the mystery of the boogeyman, with both of them nudging along his new "Dan the Soldier Man" name and identity.
Yes, the Pink coincidence is a bit much — the one where his great-great-grandson (presumably) is the last man alive at the end of time — but the episode takes its time to provide enough justification and tie up whatever loose ends. That being said, I'm not convinced Clara is the great-great-grandmother in this case. All it tells me is Pink will be a companion, and he'll find love on his adventures. Maybe it's Clara. Maybe it's some weird alien thingy that only passes down the mate's phenotypes, thus justifying why the two look exactly, exactly alike. Kudos to Samuel Anderson for playing both roles (someone attracted to Clara and a potentially distant relative who is neutral to the Clara, knows a lot about his family's history of time travel, but somehow has never seen a picture of her or notes any similarities to other family members okay I'm rambling now).
So Rupert's prey was probably another kid trying to scare him — he said no one entered the room, but he was also a scared kid hiding under the bed and also the Doctor entered the room unnoticed just fine. The writing in the cold open, as Clara suggests, is probably just the Doctor. And what did the Doctor see when the pressurized door open?
We don't know actually. Could be nothing. Could be a callback later in the season — a large plot device that takes people to the Promised Land. Either way? I ain't mad.
![]()
Kwame
I'm still kind of stunned at this episode. This was Moffat at his best, which is a tough thing to say lately.
Fear is the heart of this episode, even as the show has weaved that theme through the season so far. The Twelfth Doctor facing down a nigh-unknowable enemy that the Doctor himself effectively leads us to believe feeds on our fear. What if there was something that could hide perfectly until the very moment it wanted to be seen? he asks us. The very idea of that sort of gives you the willies right? Really in much the way an enemy like the Weeping Angels creates a powerful sense of dread. I really love that we're left unsure of what he sees when the airlock opens. It can go either way, creating a new enemy that relates to our new Big Bad in some way, or giving us a deep look at what really drives the Doctor to stare the unknown in the face.
But Clara? God bless you, Clara. This was your day. This season has spent about as much time deconstructing the heroism of the Doctor as it has building up Clara as his equal and — here, at least — his better. Nowhere is that more clear as her giving a young Doctor his whole understanding of how fear works and the ability to stand up to it. She (and Danny Pink, who I'll get to in a second) is tied up in the Doctor's life in a really unprecedented way, and we know more than ever that, more than the Doctor needing a companion, the Twelfth Doctor needs Clara. Like. Stay with me. Batman and Robin. That parallel is not going anywhere, kids. This Doctor needs Clara to let him face down the terrifying dark and let him know when there isn't anything to be afraid of.
As for Danny, we can only guess at his importance at this point, but we can now freely assume he's gonna be around for awhile. I'm actually willing to think that Orson might be a descendant of Clara's, since the Doctor makes that knowing line that Danny was pretending to not know who they were. Time travel runs in the family right?
All in all, bravo Moffat. This was the best episode of the season so far.
![]()
Ross
I'd go so far as to call this one of the best episodes of Doctor Who ever. There, I said it. Come at me, people.
I'm still not convinced Moffat can resist the bait-and-switch — that Clara isn't part of the Pink family line, and that she won't succumb to some untimely (pun) fate.
I like that, "deconstructing the heroism of the Doctor." Compared to this season, the themes of the Smith era were always in name only — "the Doctor must be forgotten (but not really)," "the Doctor's name is really important and should never be uttered (but it's okay if it does happen, really)." This season has been less explicit and more demonstrative with its theme (all for the better, I'd say). The Doctor performs acts of heroism but is himself still that scared little kid that never fit in with his own species.
What makes this episode so compelling to me, and not unlike "Midnight" or "Silence in the Library," is that the villain is ultimately never seen. It never needs to be seen, really. What makes "Listen" even more impressive is that we didn't ultimately need a tangible antagonist with a weird name to sell the narrative. Fear itself, the concept, was enough. It wasn't some space dust that caused crazy hallucinations of some alter-Doctor-ego a la "Amy's Choice." It was simply fear... a very human emotion we rarely ascribe to heroes.
The John Hurt archival footage was a nice touch and a callback to the barn (I had forgotten the connection, personally)... but it did lead me to a night of mad Googling and discovering this tidbit from Moffat on why-John-Hurt-why-not-Christopher-Eccleston.
Danny... two episode appearances, a look into his backstory, and a look at his future? I think it's fair to think Danny will be more of a Rory-style companion than, say, Mickey (Rose's ex-boyfriend who later became Martha's beau because... well, that one's the biggest mystery to me).
For you, dude:

Kwame
I'm down with that. For all its faults, this season seems really invested in incorporating a truly human element to its stories, even if things can get wild and crazy. We've known for ages that the Doctor is fallible, but the stakes have always been so high. Like, say, in "The Day of the Doctor." Here, his humanity can be found in his trying to face a human emotion and grappling with what it means to be this legendary, heroic figure. In that way, the stakes are really the risk of his failing to live up to that legend. When he commands Clara to wait in the TARDIS, when he says he doesn't take orders. He's really talking about who he's meant to be, not who he is. And when he finally acquiesces to Clara and does what he's told, he letting himself be imperfect.
I'm kind of forced to wonder: what would the Ninth Doctor have done with that... something... under Rupert's blanket? The Tenth? The Eleventh? I have a feeling the episode would have been much much different had we gotten a look underneath. Maybe it was a kid. Maybe it was something else. But you can't go around turning people to stone all the time.
It's really at this point that we can finally stop singing Capaldi's praises. He's good. He's really good. But Jenna Coleman and Samuel Anderson really brought it, and the three of them make for a really powerful trifecta. Especially with regard to Jenna and Sam's chemistry. I'm really excited to see where the rest of this season goes.
J.J. Watt Googled 'What do rich people buy?' after signing $100 million contract
Getting rich just raises questions.
Sunday's Texans broadcast alluded to some aftermath of J.J. Watt's record-setting $100 million contract with Houston we missed from last week:
And indeed, via The Big Lead, here's Watt himself confirming his search history after Houston's Week 1 win:
Maybe he bought some receiver gloves?
Oddly enough, we heard a similar story about Carlos Gomez after he signed his big deal with the Brewers and searched Google for "rich people conversations." Maybe the two can compare notes.
Ray Rice appeals indefinite suspension from NFL
firehose"Goodell, who has been heavily criticized over the last week over how he has handled his investigation in to Rice's domestic assault, will oversee the appeal. Rice could ask that a third party hearing officer be designated to the case due to potential bias on Goodell's part"
spear Goodell in the gut
Ray Rice appealed his indefinite suspension, as well as Roger Goodell's claim that the running back lied to him when presenting the facts of his domestic violence case.
UPDATE: The appeal is official:
Today, NFL Players Association formally filed an appeal of indefinite suspension of Ray Rice by the NFL.
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) September 17, 2014
Here's the statement from the NFLPA:
Today, the NFL Players Association formally filed an appeal of the indefinite suspension of Ray Rice by the NFL. This action taken by our union is to protect the due process rights of all NFL players.
The NFLPA appeal is based on supporting facts that reveal a lack of a fair and impartial process, including the role of the office of the Commissioner of the NFL. We have asked that a neutral and jointly selected arbitrator hear this case as the Commissioner and his staff will be essential witnesses in the proceeding and thus cannot serve as impartial arbitrators.
-- NFL Players Association
Additional information on this matter:
· The terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement require a hearing date to be set within 10 days of this appeal notice.
· Under governing labor law, an employee cannot be punished twice for the same action when all of the relevant facts were available to the employer at the time of the first punishment.
· The hearing will require a neutral arbitrator to determine what information was available to the NFL and when it was available.
***
Ray Rice will appeal the indefinite suspension that was handed to him by the NFL, according to sources speaking to Pro Football Talk. Rice was handed the suspension after video surfaced of him punching his then-fiancee Janay Palmer inside an Atlantic City casino elevator.
Rice will be represented by the NFL Players Association and a lawyer retained by Rice. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, who has been heavily criticized over the last week over how he has handled his investigation in Rice's domestic assault, will oversee the appeal. Rice could ask that a third-party hearing officer be designated to the case due to potential bias on Goodell's part, according to Pro Football Talk.
Rice will contend that he told Goodell the truth when the two met on June 16 to discuss the case. After the meeting, Rice was handed a two-game suspension, which was in line with the league's domestic policy at the time. In a letter sent to the NFLPA, Goodell explained his rationale for revising Rice's suspension to an indefinite period after seeing the video, saying, "This video shows a starkly different sequence of events from what you and your representatives stated when we met on June 16, and is important new information that warrants reconsideration of the discipline imposed on you in July."
Ravens general manager Ozzie Newsome has been adamant that Rice did not lie to the team when they spoke with the running back, and sources speaking with ESPN's Outside the Lines have said that Rice was also up front with the NFL, despite what Goodell contends.
Chargers upset Seattle - The Valley Dispatch
firehosePhilip Rivers is a mad, reckless god
Fox News |
Chargers upset Seattle The Valley Dispatch SAN DIEGO (AP) -- Antonio Gates had three touchdown catches and the Chargers controlled the tempo to keep Seattle's offense off the field in a 30-21 victory. NFL roundup. Gates' 21-yard catch late in the third quarter was epic, as the star tight end split two ... Gates' 3 TD catches carry Chargers to 30-21 upsetSFGate all 652 news articles » |
Tech Has A Depression Problem
firehosehttp://24.media.tumblr.com/0edc729b5351a10f93338abf9ffda142/tumblr_mmx1rxMvhs1rho9mqo1_500.gif
Mark Sanford Ex-Fiancée Surprised By Facebook Breakup
firehosethis fucking guy
Bernie Sanders Is Thinking About Running For President
firehoseBERNIE YES
Pope Marries Couples Who Have Cohabited, Had Children
firehoseAMAZING INNOVATION wow it's been a while since I used that one
Will you be at Rose City Comic Con? You may have answered this, but I couldn't find it.
firehoseoh dag :( :( :(
I wasn’t going to go, I have WAAAAAY too many cons and signings this year.
But because I will be in Portland at the best bookstore in the world, POWELL’S BOOKS on Friday, Dark Horse Entertainment has kindly sponsored me to be at the Rose City Con at their booth for two signings, SUNDAY ONLY (I will be at a wedding on Saturday).
So I will be at the Dark Horse booth for just two signings on Sunday. I don’t want to sound obnoxious but I expect it will be ticketed or capped pretty early so I suggest coming early so I get a chance to see you!
How did the Buccaneers lose on a clock run-off?
firehoseNFC South is the new NFC West
Mike Evans was injured against the Rams at the most inopportune time, and that's why the Buccaneers lost.
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers lost to the St. Louis Rams on a rarely-seen rule that requires 10 seconds to run off the clock if a player is injured on the trailing team within the last two minutes.
Mike Evans was shaken up with eight seconds remaining on the clock with the Bucs trailing, 19-17, in the fourth quarter. Tampa Bay was out of timeouts and trainers tried to get the rookie wide receiver off the field, but it was too late. Officials announced that 10 seconds would be taken off the clock, ending the game and any chance of a comeback.
The rule is covered in the NFL rulebook on how timing is handled withing the final two minutes of a half.
A team cannot buy an excess time out for a penalty. However, a fourth time out is allowed without penalty for an injured player, who must be removed immediately. A fifth time out or more is allowed for an injury and a five-yard penalty is assessed if the clock was running. Additionally, if the clock was running and the score is tied or the team in possession is losing, the ball cannot be put in play for at least 10 seconds on the fourth or more time out. The half or game can end while those 10 seconds are run off on the clock.
Watching a team try to drag an injured player off the field seems barbaric, but in this case the officials were correct.
"Give yourself license to pursue your idea. Get out of your own way. Ideas don’t have to be perfect."
- Matt Kirby, creator of Apples to Apples
Supreme Court ruling has wiped out 11 “do it on a computer” patents so far
There have been no less than 11 federal judicial rulings striking down patents as "abstract" since the US Supreme Court's June 26 decision in Alice v. CLS Bank.
It's a high number. The case was recognized as a big decision by commentators when it came, and what's happened since suggests the ramifications may be broader than first thought. Vox Media's Tim Lee (former Ars contributor) has an article rounding up the 11 rulings.
The list only highlights patents that have lost under Section 101 of the US patent law, which governs when a patent is an "abstract idea" that can't be patented. Section 101 wins are important to repeat defendants, because they're wins without going through discovery and hiring costly experts. However, some members of the patent bar see Section 101 as an overly blunt tool for weeding out bad patents from true innovations. Many of the patents being knocked out under 101 are "do it on a computer" patents that take everyday activity and add a lot of computer jargon.
Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments
Robots ask for change at omsi
| |
submitted by endomorphosis [link] [7 comments] |
Off-bussing thank you's. Portland has the politest bus riders in the world
firehoseuhh... we did it in boston.
Why do so many people here in Portland say "Thank you" when getting off the bus? Even if the driver can't hear I'll hear people saying that as they get off from the back door.
I've lived all over, and I've never seen anything like it. Are Portlanders taught that in kindergarten or something? Is it a city-mandated public school lesson?
They don't do it in San Diego, LA, San Francisco, Sacramento, DC, Phoenix, New Orleans, Houston, Dallas, Indianapolis, London, Amsterdam, Warsaw, Budapest, Bucharest, Bangkok, Berlin, etc.
[link] [133 comments]
Hey Portland, we host RockBand 3 Karaoke events, and this thief walked in and stole our Replica guitars that we need. (More info in comments)
| |
submitted by girlwithruinedteeth [link] [31 comments] |
comicsalliance: THE NAUGHTY KNOT: UNPACKING MARVEL...
firehose'Marvel editor Tom Brevoort was recently asked on Tumblr, “How could there not be an audience for [male pin-up] variant covers” like the ones Manara has drawn of female heroes — particularly given how many popular blogs are dedicated to male pin-up art. Brevoort responded, “Just because people will read something for free doesn’t mean that they’ll seek it out and pay money for it.”
Given how many artists on Tumblr derive income from male pin-up art, I’ve likened Brevoort’s comment to a man standing at an open bar and claiming no-one really likes alcohol. His reticence to acknowledge a paying audience for male pin-ups perfectly shows how superhero comics’ conservative instincts lead to a reflexive rejection of change.
But it’s also an attitude that doesn’t sit comfortably alongside Alonso’s claim that he doesn’t want to “run away from sexy characters.”
Sexy superhero characters are great, but if it’s all one type of sexy superhero character — say, only women, and only women that conform to a certain physical type — then that’s a problem. That’s perpetuating social values that treat women unequally based on their appearance.'

THE NAUGHTY KNOT: UNPACKING MARVEL EDITOR-IN-CHIEF AXEL ALONSO’S COMMENTS ON SEX APPEAL AND DIVERSITY
In an interview with The Telegraph’s Radhika Sanghani, Marvel editor-in-chief Axel Alonso offered some insights into how he regards the superhero comic industry’s treatment of female characters — and his own intentions towards diversity.
The interview is chiefly noteworthy for confirming what already seems apparent from recent changes in Marvel’s line-up, namely that Marvel understands and is responding to demographic changes in the marketplace. “We believe there’s an audience of women out there who are hungry for this [product] and we want to make sure they get it,” said Alonso. “This is affirmative action. This is capitalism.”
Capitalism is not the starry-eyed spark for change that many of us might wish for, but realistically it’s usually the most effective. Comics is a business — and a very risk-averse business at that. Despite being relatively agile among entertainment media, with quick turnarounds and minimal personnel, superhero comics tend to follow change rather than trying to lead it.
The good news is that Marvel sees a profit motive and is not averse to it. The conservative instincts of superhero publishers — with their attentions fixed on known brands and past glories — can easily lead to a reflexive rejection of anything that feels unfamiliar, such as the paradigm-spinning notion that women are people and not set dressing. It’s sad to say it, but it actually feels like a win just to have evidence that the industry isn’t sliding backwards.
I think Andrew Wheeler is a very smart man.
Raiders find a way to fumble twice, on the same play
firehosewelcome to oakland; welcome to football country
Ohkland...
Silly Raiders, multiball is for pinball — not football.
Seriously though, the Oakland Raiders should be forced to play with two footballs on the field at once. Just because. This is a continuation of Oakland's long-term plan: Revolutionizing the fumble game in the NFL.
Heck, even the Raiders know it's hilarious.
So um…James Jones made a great catch. Fumbled. Picked it up and gained more yards. Then fumbled again. Texans recovered.
— OAKLAND RAIDERS (@RAIDERS) September 14, 2014























