Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Shared posts
Commonwealth Fusion Makes the Physics Case For Its 400 MW Reactor
German court rules Google is liable for whatever Google’s “AI” generates
It’s just a ruling from a lower court, but it sets the stage for how European courts are going to deal with the question of who is liable for whatever slop “AI” generates.
The Regional Court of Munich hit Google with a temporary injunction barring the company from spreading false claims about two Munich-based publishers through its AI-generated search overviews (case no. 26 O 869/26). The court classified Google as a direct infringer because the “AI overview” is its own content, not just a list of search results.
Google’s AI overviews had falsely tied two publishing companies to scams, subscription traps, and shady business practices for certain search queries. According to the court, the AI mixed up information about other, genuinely sketchy companies with the plaintiffs and drew connections that didn’t appear in any of the linked sources. The publishers sent Google a cease-and-desist letter, but Google didn’t respond appropriately.
↫ Matthias Bastian at The Decoder
Google tried to argue it doesn’t carry any responsibility or liability for whatever slop its “AI” generate, but the German court does not agree. According to the court, “AI” overviews are not the same as regular search results, because they rewrite findings and just make shit up, thereby making claims that are nowhere to be found in any search results (or in reality in general). Furthermore, the court states that Google develops the “AI”, it runs it, it offers it to users, and Google alone controls its output, and as such, Google is liable for whatever their “AI” produces.
Google also tried to argue that users know not to trust anything an “AI” produces, which is hilarious considering how hard Google is pushing these tools, but the courts state that the ability of users to do further research does not absolve Google of liability. In addition, the court made it very clear that free speech protections absolutely do not apply, because the “AI” expressions are coming from an algorithm, not a person, and are above all an expression of Google’s business activities”.
In other words, if an “AI” tool generates false accusations and misleading statements, the creator of said “AI” is liable. With this ruling in hand, countless other people have a stronger case to make whenever Google or any other company tries to absolve itself from liability from slop just because a pachinko machine generated it.
Excellent news, and the only fair outcome.
'Super Mario Galaxy Movie' and 'Project Hail Mary' Combine for Best Box Office in 7 Years
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
IBM Scientists Unveil First-Ever 'Half-Mobius' Molecule
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
EV Battery-Swapping Startup That Raised $330 Million Files for Bankruptcy
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Japanese Devs Face Font Licensing Dilemma as Annual Costs Increase From $380 To $20K
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Denmark's Government Aims To Ban Access To Social Media For Children Under 15
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Why Signal's Post-Quantum Makeover Is An Amazing Engineering Achievement
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
iFixit Tears Down the iPhone Air, Finds That It's Mostly Battery
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Gemini AI Solves Coding Problem That Stumped 139 Human Teams At ICPC World Finals
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Dead Athena Moon Lander Seen Inside Its Crater Grave From Lunar Orbit
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Google Upgrades Open Source Vulnerability Scanning Tool with SCA Scanning Library
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Company Claims 1,000% Price Hike Drove It From VMware To Open Source Rival
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Raspberry Pi's $7 Pico 2 W Microcontroller Board Adds Wireless Connectivity
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Linux’s bedtime routine
How does Linux move from an awake machine to a hibernating one? How does it then manage to restore all state? These questions led me to read way too much C in trying to figure out how this particular hardware/software boundary is navigated.
↫ Jacob Adams
So this is a lot deeper of a dive than I expected, and it blows my mind just how complex sleep, hibernating, and waking a computer really is. Instinctively you know this, but seeing it spelled out like this really drives that point home – and this only covers going into hibernation. It also highlights how hard it must be for the developers involved to keep this working at all, especially on the wide variety of machines and hardware combinations Linux runs on.
It wasn’t too log ago that pretty much the only platform where sleeping and waking worked reliably was Mac OS X with its controlled, small hardware selection, so it’s kind of remarkable this works at all on Linux now. I haven’t had to worry about sleeping and waking with Linux for quite a while now, and it’s one of those things that “just works” so I never have to think about it. This definitely wasn’t always the case, though, and on both Linux and Windows I would just turn the whole feature off since it rarely worked reliably, especially on desktops.
I’m sure it still breaks for people, but for me, it’s been rock solid, and reading through the linked article, I’m even more amazed about this than I already was.
87% in New Poll Say Cost an Important Reason For Halting Studies
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
New Spectre V2 Attack Impacts Linux Systems On Intel CPUs
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Japanese Astronauts To Land On Moon As Part of New NASA Partnership
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Ethereum Foundation Under Investigation by 'State Authority'
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
DOJ Quietly Removed Russian Malware From Routers in US Homes and Businesses
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Sony's PS5 Enters 'Latter Stage of Its Life Cycle'
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Reddit Must Share IP Addresses of Piracy-Discussing Users, Film Studios Say
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Pope Francis Calls for Binding Global Treaty To Regulate AI
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Powell Warns Inflation 'Remains Too High'
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Chinese Billionaires Throw Weight Behind Private Sector Push
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Microsoft To Offer Some Free Security Products After Criticism
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Running PalmOS without PalmOS
A traditional PalmOS emulator requires a ROM: a binary object that contains the original PalmOS compiled and linked for the 68K architecture. When you run an application PRC in those emulators, everything is emulated down to the hardware layer, so the ROM thinks it is talking to an actual device. Therefore, as an emulator developer, your job is to provide an implementation of the CPU, memory, display, serial port, and so on, taking into accounting the low level differences between the myriad of devices that ran PalmOS back then. As long as your implementation of the physical layer is accurate, applications will generally run fine.
PumpkinOS also allows you to run binary 68K applications, but do not require a copyrighted PalmOS ROM. The short story is this: the developers of PalmOS devised a clever way to implement system calls (also used in other 68K systems, I think). They used a feature of the 68K CPU called trap. A trap is like a subroutine call, but instead of jumping to a different memory addresses depending on the system call, it jumps to a fixed address, passing an argument identifying the system call. PumpkinOS takes advantage of this fact and, whenever a trap is issued, it intercepts the execution flow, identifies the system call, extract the parameters and calls a native implementation inside PumpkinOS, bypassing a ROM altogether. It is very similar to the way PACE (Palm Application Compatibility Environment) was implemented when PalmOS 5 was introduced. If the 68K application plays by the rules and only calls the OS through system traps, never accessing hardware directly, it will also run fine on PumpkinOS. Now, if you want to know the long version of this story, keep reading.
Even more details about the inner-workings of PumpkinOS.
China Says It May Have Detected Signals From Alien Civilizations
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
New FSF Campaign Celebrates Smaller Steps Up 'Freedom Ladder'
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Blind People Won the Right to Break Ebook DRM. In 3 Years, They'll Have to Do It Again
Read more of this story at Slashdot.