Shared posts

23 Apr 13:38

Cheaper bandwidth or bust: How Google saved YouTube

by Ron Amadeo

Archive.org/Ron Amadeo

A gallery of YouTube's homepage design over the years. This homepage from 2005 kind of looks like Google. YouTube put search front and center with featured videos listed below.

10 more images in gallery

YouTube, the Web's de-facto video service, is turning 10 this year. The site has become so indispensable that it feels like a basic part of the Internet itself rather than a service that lives on top of it. YouTube is just the place to put videos, and it's used by everyone from individuals to billion-dollar companies. It's obvious to say, but YouTube revolutionized Web video. It made video uploading and playback almost as easy as uploading a picture, handled all the bandwidth costs, and it allowed anyone to embed those videos onto other sites.

The scale of YouTube gets more breathtaking every year. It has a billion users in 61 languages, and 12 days of video are uploaded to the site every minute—that's almost 50 years of video every day. The site just continues growing. The number of hours watched on YouTube is up 50 percent from last year.

It's easy to forget YouTube almost didn't make it. Survival for the site was a near-constant battle in the early days. The company not only fought the bandwidth monster, but it faced an army of lawyers from various media companies that all wanted to shut the video service down. But thanks to cash backing from Google, the site was able to fend off the lawyers. And by staying at the forefront of Web and server technology, YouTube managed to serve videos to the entire Internet without being bankrupted by bandwidth bills.

Read 40 remaining paragraphs | Comments








22 Apr 22:34

The new Muppet Show could be just like The Office, but with puppets

by Bryan Bishop

We knew that ABC was working on a new version of The Muppet Show, and now EW has some details on what the project might be like. The pilot presentation for the new series, which in a meta twist revolves around the Muppets' own efforts to reboot their show, is said to be a mockumentary in the style of The Office or 30 Rock. Not only that, but the logline for the show refers to it as a "more adult" Muppet show, that will dive into the personal lives, relationships, and ups and downs of the individual creatures themselves.

A "more adult" Muppet Show

The on-again, off-again, frog/pig love affair of Kermit and Miss Piggy was a dramatic staple of the original Muppet Show, but Jim Henson's creation was largely a comic variety show other than...

Continue reading…

22 Apr 16:09

This is What a 343x Camera Zoom Would Be Like

by Michael Zhang

In addition to the megapixel war, major camera companies are also engaging in a new superzoom war with their latest compact cameras. We recently shared the incredible reach of the 64x zoom on the Canon SX60 and the 83x zoom on the Nikon P900. If we ever somehow get to the point of 343x zooms appearing in cameras, the video above shows what that would be like.

zoom

Photographer Daniel Taylor created the simulation with a Canon 550D, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Canon 50mm f/1.8, Canon 100mm f/2, and Skywatcher ED80 600mm f/7.5 telescope.

He shot photos of the same scene at 11mm, 16mm, 50mm, 100mm, and 600mm, and then composited the images into a smooth “zooming in” video using Adobe After Effects. What resulted was the above video that simulates a camera zoom going from 11mm on the wide end to 3780mm on the other — a 343x zoom.

(via Daniel Taylor via Reddit)


P.S. This type of zoom would be approaching the realm of our April Fool’s Joke this year.

22 Apr 02:37

Why It's Sometimes Okay to Eat Chicken That's Pink After Cooking

by Melanie Pinola

You cut into your fully-cooked chicken and see pink. Panic time? Throw it back in the oven? Not necessarily.

Read more...








22 Apr 02:36

Sci-fi satire Galaxy Quest on its way to becoming a TV show

by Bryan Bishop
Andrew

This has the potential to be fantastic.

In 1999 a movie called Galaxy Quest satirized sci-fi television shows and the obsessive fans that follow them, and now it's on its way to becoming a TV show itself. Deadline reports that Paramount Television is putting together a series based on the film, which followed the cast of a Star Trek-style show that found themselves confronted with real alien creatures.

Tim Allen played a surrogate Shatner in the film

The gag of the movie was that the otherworldy visitors had picked up Earth's television broadcasts traveling through space and thought the Galaxy Quest show was actually a documentary instead of fiction. Looking for help with an intergalactic problem, the aliens travel to a sci-fi convention to recruit the cast — which included...

Continue reading…

20 Apr 14:31

Op-ed: Why the entire premise of Tor-enabled routers is ridiculous

by Ars Staff

Ars recently reviewed two "Tor routers," devices that are supposed to improve your privacy by routing all traffic through the Tor anonymity network. Although the initial release of Anonabox proved woefully insecure, the basic premise itself is flawed. Using these instead of the Tor Browser Bundle is bad: less secure and less private than simply not using these "Tor Routers" in the first place. They are, in a word, EPICFAIL.

There are four possible spies on your traffic when you use these Tor "routers," those who can both see what you do and potentially attack your communication: your ISP, the websites themselves, the Tor exit routers, and the NSA with its 5EYES buddies.

It's true that these devices do protect you against your ISP. And if your ISP wants to extort over $30 per month for them to not spy on you, this does offer protection. But if you want protection from your ISP, just use a VPN service or run your own VPN using Amazon EC2 ($9.50/month plus $.09/GB bandwidth for a t2 micro instance). These services offer much better performance and equal privacy. At the same time, if your ISP wants to extort your privacy, choose a different ISP.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments








20 Apr 13:20

Corporations now spend more lobbying Congress than taxpayers spend funding Congress

by Ezra Klein

Well, this isn't good:

Corporations now spend about $2.6 billion a year on reported lobbying expenditures – more than the $2 billion we spend to fund the House ($1.16 billion) and Senate ($820 million).

Those numbers come from political scientist Lee Drutman, author of the book The Business of America Is Lobbying, who notes, over email, that they've fallen slightly out of date. In 2014 the House's operating budget was $1.18 billion, and the Senate's operating budget was $860 million. That pays for, among other things, all congressional staff. Add in the funds for the Congressional Budget Office and the Congressional Research Service — the two most important agencies meant to inform members of Congress about the issues corporate America is lobbying them on — and you've added another $150 million to the tab.

Which is to say, Drutman's point stands: businesses* are spending more money lobbying the House and Senate than taxpayers are spending running the House and Senate and informing its members. And that should scare you, for two reasons.

Problem #1: how Congress outsources its thinking to lobbyists

Good news, though! It is for rent. (Melina Mara/the Washington Post via Getty Images)

Lobbying, to most people, looks like bribery. And there's certainly an element of bribery — the lobbyist who refuses to contribute to the reelection campaign isn't going to get a meeting, much less an ally. But after the bribery comes the lobbyist's real job: persuasion.

No legislator wants to feel bought. What they want to feel is convinced. It's the lobbyist's job to give them that feeling —to make them feel like they're casting the right vote, not just the vote they were paid to cast.

Lobbying thrives on ignorance and apathy. No member of Congress can be expert on all the issues that cross his or her desk. But members of Congress can be expert, or at least think they're expert, on some issues. Those are the issues where lobbying is hardest — and least effective. Lobbyists can't make Republicans vote for Obamacare or Democrats vote for Paul Ryan's budget. Their sorcery rarely works on issues ruled by ideology.

But their spells are powerful when cast upon obscure subparagraphs, technical amendments, and legislation that will never make headlines. It's in that vast gap between how many issues members of Congress — and their staffs — can know and care about, and how many issues they're being asked to vote on, where lobbying is most powerful. And there is so, so much money in that gap.

The way it will work is that an obscure tax break that neither the congressman nor his staff has ever heard of will be set to expire. Neither the congressman nor his staff will have any particular opinion as to whether the tax break should be renewed. But the congressman will get a request for a meeting from a lobbyist who has been a big supporter of his campaigns. It'll only take 20 minutes, the lobbyist promises — no big deal.

And you know what? The lobbyist will make a good case for keeping that tax break. The lobbyist, after all, was hired because she is good at making cases. She will walk in prepared, knowledgeable, charismatic. She'll know how the tax provision will affect businesses in that member's district — maybe she'll even have brought some business owners from the congressman's district along. Hell, she might even know the congressman already, or have worked for him in the past (more on that in a minute). Corporate America is buying a lot of talent with that $2.4 billion.

But even if the lobbyist makes a bad case, the congressman may never realize it. Congress has a very limited amount of money with which to inform itself. Corporate America has vastly more money with which to inform Congress. It's easy to make an argument sound good when no is arguing the other side.

That's what those numbers show: the forces of corporate lobbying have much more money to "inform" Congress than Congress has money to inform itself.

This wasn't always true, Drutman writes. The corporate lobbying budget only began regularly exceeding Congress's operating budget in the early 2000s. But the gap has been widening since then, and that's good news for lobbyists, who are at their best when they're making arguments that no one is even bothering to check, much less rebut.

Problem #2: money makes the door revolve

Remember this handsome devil? (Tom Williams/Roll Call/Getty Images)

The Center for Responsive Politics found that more than half of members of Congress who left the body after 2010 are now lobbying, or have lobbying-related jobs.

The fact that corporations spend more lobbying Congress than Congress spends on itself is a disaster — it means there's a massive pay gap between the people serving in Congress and the people lobbying Congress, and everyone working in Congress knows it. What's worse, they know how to fix it. As one frustrated congressman wrote:

Congress is no longer a destination but a journey. Committee assignments are mainly valuable as part of the interview process for a far more lucrative job as a K Street lobbyist. You are considered naïve if you are not currying favor with wealthy corporations under your jurisdiction. It's become routine to see members of Congress drop their seat in Congress like a hot rock when a particularly lush vacancy opens up.

That pay gap opens space for corruption to ooze through the system. Lobbyists try to get members of Congress, and their staffs, thinking about a high-paying lobbying job as early as they possibly can — sometimes years before they actually leave the Capitol. What they want is for members of Congress and their staffs to treat every day on the Hill as a job interview for the lobbying gig they want when they leave the Hill. As disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff wrote in his memoir:

I would say a few magic words: "When you are done working for the Congressman, you should come work for me at my firm."

With that, assuming the staffer had any interest in leaving Capitol Hill for K Street—and almost 90 percent of them do, I would own him and, consequently, that entire office. No rules had been broken, at least not yet. No one even knew what was happening, but suddenly, every move that staffer made, he made with his future at my firm in mind. His paycheck may have been signed by the Congress, but he was already working for me, influencing his office for my clients’ best interests. It was a perfect—and perfectly corrupt—arrangement.

This matters because relationships matter. Remember, lobbying is about persuasion. And no one is more persuasive than your friend, or your former colleague. Lobbying firms know that sending fresh-faced kids six months out of Princeton to lecture a member of Congress about agricultural subsidies probably isn't going to end well. What they want to do is send the staffer that member of Congress spent six years working with — a person that member of Congress actually respects, actually listens to, actually likes — to talk to him about agricultural subsidies.

That's why it's so valuable for lobbying firms to hire former members of Congress and ex-congressional staffers. It's not just that those relationships help the lobbying firms get in the door; it's that those relationships help the lobbying firms be persuasive once they're in the room.

The solution nobody likes: spend more money on Congress

Think this'll be enough, oh hallowed legislative body? (George Marks/Retrofile/Getty Images)

It's easy to read all this and want to regulate the problem out of existence. Rep. Rob Blum, a Republican from Iowa, is pushing a bill banning members of Congress from lobbying their ex-colleagues for life.

But as Andrew Prokop argues, that kind of legislation probably won't work. In addition to potentially being unconstitutional, it'll just replace lobbying with shadow lobbying. So long as there's a huge gap between what Congress knows and what it needs to know, and between what Congress pays and what lobbying pays, this space between will fill with corruption.

Which means the real solution is to reduce the size of those gaps. It means, in other words, that we need to pay members of Congress and their staff more, and give Congress more money to build up its own informational resources. As Drutman writes, we need to "invest more in government by giving government, especially Congress, the resources to hire and retain the most experienced and expert staff."

Since no one likes Congress, no one likes the idea of giving Congress more money. But spending about $2 billion annually on an organization that collectively controls around $4 trillion in annual spending is a recipe for disaster. The less of our money we spend on Congress, the more of our money lobbyists are going to convince Congress to spend on their clients.

*Similar points apply to lobbying by unions and advocacy organizations. But the magnitude of their spending is simply much lower. "For every dollar spent on lobbying by labor unions and public interest groups, large corporations and their associations now spend $34," writes Drutman. "Of the 100 organizations that spend the most on lobbying, 95 consistently represent business."

WATCH: 'How the rich stole the recovery in one chart'

16 Apr 01:30

Magic Lantern Pulled ‘Unfunny’ April Fool’s Prank that Put Blue Screen of Death on DSLRs

by Michael Zhang
Andrew

Ha! this is awesome. People need to chill the freak out. 1) Magic Lantern is a free project created by hobbyist developers 2) IMHO any "professional" shouldn't rely on a custom firmware for paying gigs. If you use it, great, but have a backup.

bluescreenofdeath

Magic Lantern is being slammed online after pulling an “unfunny” April Fool’s Day prank that gave DSLR owners a fake “Blue Screen of Death.” The message on the screen contained phoney technical details and informed users that their camera was “bricked.”

Developer Vladimir Ivanov wrote about his experience with the prank in a lengthy blog post. After diving into the code, he discovered that a Magic Lantern developer had added a “joke mode” to the firmware that randomly displays the error message to users on April 1st.

“What?! Joke mode? Seriously?” he writes. Ivanov calls Alex “the developer who spoiled the evening of April 1st, as well as my mood and nerves. It was not funny.”

One user who experienced the prank turned to the Magic Lantern forums on April 1st, saying that they needed help and that their Canon 60D had shown the blue screen several times. “How can I fix it?” they ask.

The screen one Russian photographer saw... in a country that doesn't "observe" April Fool's Day.

The screen one Russian photographer saw… in a country that doesn’t “observe” April Fool’s Day.

This guy's error screen wasn't even blue.

This person’s error screen wasn’t even blue.

The backlash against Magic Lantern has begun. There’s a heated discussion about the prank over at Hacker News.

“Well this is depressing. I was always meaning to install ML, now I’m not sure I can trust the developer for doing something so stupid and not feeling and contrition for it,” one commenter writes. “Holy %$! that’s bad. If you’re paid to take photos, roll up to a gig with all the gear you tested yesterday, and get this…good god,” says another.

What Magic Lantern is supposed to look like.

What Magic Lantern’s custom firmware is supposed to look like.

In the Magic Lantern forums, the whole thing has turned into an argument of sorts.

“Haha, this is all really f*ing funny, but I spend a lot of time perfecting my photos, some of which are once-in-a-lifetime photo opportunities. I don’t need Magic Lantern developers PURPOSEFULLY f*ing up my photos as a practical joke,” writes one photographer.

Some of the responses are unapologetic and reminders that Magic Lantern is simply a popular free project created by hobbyist developers.

“How about a 1000% refund of the purchase price of ML? I will pay that to you personally, let me know where to send the check,” one member responds. “This is where you are totally mistaken. This is not a professional project. It is not intended to be a professional project. This is a spare time, hobby project that is just for fun. There are all kinds of disclaimers to this end.”

So, if you’ve been planning to play around with Magic Lantern, just be aware that you may find some interesting “easter eggs” packaged in the software on April Fool’s.

(via Hacker News via Boing Boing)

13 Apr 15:59

Often, I send my clients a white PNG version of their logo to be used as a watermark or on dark...

Andrew

10/10 - people never read readme's

Often, I send my clients a white PNG version of their logo to be used as a watermark or on dark backgrounds, and I get this reply. Every. Single. Time.

Client: The white logo files don’t have anything in them.

Me: Are you viewing them on the white background of your folder?

Client: Yes.

Me: Did click on it or open it?

Client: No.

Me: The reason you’re not seeing it is because you’re trying to view white-on-white. Try clicking to highlight.

Client: Thank you! This fixed it.

I have no idea how they think that I “fixed” their file by asking them to click on it. I’m now including a “READ ME FOR ALL LOGO QUESTIONS.txt” along with deliverables. 

I’m guessing 10/10 clients won’t read it.

10 Apr 16:09

The opening music to Star Wars is totally different in the new digital releases

by Kwame Opam
Andrew

I'm so sad that Star Wars is losing the 20th Century Fox fanfare - the Star Wars theme just won't feel the same without it.

With the release of the entire Star Wars film saga on digital platforms today, fans are noticing a peculiar change even before the movies start. The 20th Century Fox fanfare, which has played before each release since 1977, has been changed to something a little less iconic.

Continue reading…

10 Apr 15:39

Spirit Lords is like an adorable Diablo for your phone

by Andrew Webster
Andrew

Oh great, this is exactly what I need (I'll totally still play it - I can't get enough! haha)

I've spent far too much of my life zoning out in front of action RPGs like Diablo and Torchlight. Click, click, click; kill bad guy, collect loot, repeat. It's a familiar cycle, one that keeps me coming back, but lately my mouse clicks have been replaced by taps on a touchscreen thanks to Spirit Lords, a new mobile game that boils down the essence of Diablo into something you can play while riding the bus.

Just like Diablo and its like, Spirt Lords is about little more than slaying monsters and gathering sweet new gear. You'll venture through a series of progressively challenging dungeons, each filled with twisted lizards and golems to kill. Clearing out a dungeon will earn you experience, money, and new armor and weapons, which makes...

Continue reading…

09 Apr 18:36

Exclusive: Google is close to making Android Wear work on the iPhone

by Dieter Bohn

Google is working on getting its Android Wear smartwatch platform to work with the iPhone, and it is close to finishing the final technical details, according to a source close to the development team. If Google released it and if Apple allowed it on its platform, it would put Android Wear smartwatches directly in competition with the soon-to-be-released Apple Watch for the first time.

In its current state of development, Android Wear works along with a companion app on the iPhone and supports basic functions like notifications — as you can see in the photo below. As it does on Android, on the iPhone Android Wear also supports Google Now's ambient information cards, voice search, and other voice actions. It should also support some more...

Continue reading…

09 Apr 13:22

Famous novelist Salman Rushdie gave To Kill a Mockingbird 3 stars on Goodreads

by Kelsey McKinney
Andrew

Sounds like this is Tom's kind of guy.

btw, I'd rate To Kill a Mockingbird a two-star book. That's right, I said it.

Salman Rushdie has a way with words, but he's not so great with star ratings.

The esteemed British Indian novelist, whose work has won numerous awards and provoked controversy, stirred up heated discussion with his posts on the book-centric social networking site Goodreads.

On Goodreads, people share what they are currently reading and give books they've finished a star rating. They also have the option of writing a brief review. Both can be viewed by anyone who follows a given user. That was what Rushdie didn't quite understand when he started giving brutally low ratings to some of literature's most beloved works.

Harper Lee's Pulitzer Prize–winning To Kill a Mockingbird got only three stars. Lucky Jim, Kingsley Amis's award winning first novel, which Time declared one of the 100 best novels published since the magazine's inception, received a single measly star. Only a few novels, including F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Evelyn Waugh’s A Handful of Dust, were deemed worthy of a perfect five-star rating.

Almost immediately, Rushdie's followers on Goodreads questioned his judgment.

Rushdie, it turns out, thought the ratings were private. He responded by writing on Goodreads that:

"I’m so clumsy in this new world of social media sometimes. I thought these rankings were a private thing designed to tell the site what sort of book to recommend to me, or not recommend. Turns out they are public. Stupid me. Well, I don’t like the work of Kingsley Amis, there it is. I don’t have to explain or justify. It’s allowed."

He later told the Independent: "I was just fooling around, experimenting with the site. Pls don’t take [the ratings] seriously." But the ratings, if Rushdie really did think they were private, might be some of his most honest expressions of opinion about literature.

"What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist," Rushdie wrote in his 1988 novel Satanic Verses. Rushdie's expression here is certainly honest, if accidental. It's a helpful mistake, in that it reminds us no art is universally loved.

No one should have to explain or justify not liking a book — even if the person who doesn't like that book is a world-famous author himself.

07 Apr 21:19

Joss Whedon says there won't be a post-credit scene after Age of Ultron

by Kwame Opam
Andrew

WTF

So much for the shawarma. Despite it becoming a tradition in Marvel Studios' films, Joss Whedon now tells Entertainment Weekly that there won't be a post-credit scene after the credits roll in Avengers: Age of Ultron. "There is nothing at the very end," he said. "And that’s not a fake-out. We want people to know so they don’t sit there for 10 minutes and then go: ‘Son of a bitch! I’ll kill them!’"

Kevin Feige clarified that there will be a mid-credit scene, however, meaning there may be new developments to tease. "There will be a short, epilogue-like scene that pops up shortly after the credits start," he said. Fans will remember that in the last Avengers film, Thanos made his first appearance during the credits. Feige hinted that there...

Continue reading…

07 Apr 01:10

Bayesian survival analysis in A Song of Ice and Fire

by Allen Downey

This post originally appeared on Allen Downey's personal blog.

Last fall I taught an introduction to Bayesian statistics at Olin College. My students worked on some excellent projects, and I invited them to write up their results as guest articles for my blog.

One of the teams applied Bayesian survival analysis to the characters in A Song of Ice and Fire, the book series by George R. R. Martin.  Using data from the first 5 books, they generate predictions for which characters are likely to survive and which might die in the forthcoming books.  

With Season 5 of the Game of Thrones television series starting on April 12, we thought this would be a good time to publish their report.

Bayesian survival analysis in A Song of Ice and Fire

By Erin Pierce and Ben Kahle

The Song of Ice and Fire series has a reputation for being quite deadly. No character, good or bad, major or minor is safe from Martin's pen. The reputation is not unwarranted; of the 916 named characters that populate Martin's world, a third have died, alongside uncounted nameless ones.

In this report, we take a closer look at the patterns of death in the novels and create a Bayesian model that predicts the probability that characters will survive the next two books.

Using data from A Wiki of Ice and Fire, we created a dataset of all 916 characters that appeared in the books so far. For every character, we know what chapter and book they first appeared, if they are male or female, if they are part of the nobility or not, what major house they are loyal to, and, if applicable, the chapter and book of their death.  We used this data to predict which characters will survive the next couple books.

Methodology

We extrapolated the survival probabilities of the characters through the seventh book using Weibull distributions. A Weibull distribution provides a way to model the hazard function, which measures the probability of death at a specific age. The Weibull distribution depends on two parameters, k and lambda, which control its shape.

To estimate these parameters, we start with a uniform prior.  For each alive character, we check how well that value of k or lambda predicted the fact that the character was still alive by comparing the calculated Weibull distribution with the character's hazard function. For each dead character, we check how well the parameters predicted the time of their death by comparing the Weibull distribution with the character's survival function.

The main code used to update these distributions is:

class GOT(thinkbayes2.Suite, thinkbayes2.Joint):

def Likelihood(self, data, hypo):
"""Determines how well a given k and lam  predict the life/death of a character """
age, alive = data k, lam = hypo
if alive:
prob = 1-exponweib.cdf(age, k, lam)
else:
prob = exponweib.pdf(age, k, lam)
return prob

def Update(k, lam, age, alive):
"""Performs the Baysian Update and returns the PMFs of k and lam"""
joint = thinkbayes2.MakeJoint(k, lam)
suite = GOT(joint)
suite.Update((age, alive))
k = suite.Marginal(0, label=k.label),  lam = suite.Marginal(1, label=lam.label)
return k, lam

def MakeDistr(introductions, lifetimes,k,lam):
"""Iterates through all the characters for a given k  and lambda.  It then updates the k and lambda distributions"""
k.label = 'K'
lam.label = 'Lam'
print("Updating deaths")
for age in lifetimes:
k, lam = Update(k, lam, age, False)
print('Updating alives')
for age in introductions:
k, lam = Update(k, lam, age, True)
return k,lam

For the Night’s Watch, this lead to the posterior distribution in Figure 3:

The distribution for lambda is quite tight, around 0.27, but the distribution for k is broader.

To translate this back to a survival curve, we took the mean of k and lambda, as well as the 90 percent credible interval for each parameter. We then plot the original data, the credible interval, and the survival curve based on the posterior means.

Jon Snow

Using this analysis, we can can begin to make a prediction for an individual character like Jon Snow.  At the end of A Dance with Dragons, the credible interval for the Night's Watch survival (Figure 4) stretches from 36 percent to 56 percent. The odds are not exactly rosy that Jon snow is still alive. Even if Jon is still alive at the end of book 5, the odds that he will survive the next two books drop to between 30 percent and 51 percent.

The credible interval closely encases the data, and the mean-value curve appears to be a reasonable approximation.

However, it is worth considering that Jon is not an average member of the Night's Watch. He had a noble upbringing and is well trained at arms. We repeated the same analysis with only members of the Night's Watch considered noble due to their family, rank, or upbringing. There have only been 11 nobles in the Night's Watch, so the credible interval as seen in Figure 5 is understandably much wider, however, the best approximation of the survival curve suggests that a noble background does not increase the survival rate for brothers of the Night's Watch.

When only noble members of the Night’s Watch are included, the credible interval widens significantly and the lower bound gets quite close to zero.

The houses of ASOIF

The 90 percent credible intervals for all of the major houses. This includes the 9 major houses, the Night’s Watch, the Wildlings, and a "None" category which includes non-allied characters.

90 percent credible interval for Arryn (Blue), Lannister (Gold), None (Green), and Stark (Grey)

90 percent credible interval for Tyrell(Green), Tully(Blue), Baratheon(Orange), and Night’s Watch (Grey)

90 percent credible interval for Martell(Orange), Targaryen (Maroon), Greyjoy (Yellow), and Wildling (Purple)

These intervals, shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8, demonstrate a much higher survival probability for the houses Arryn, Tyrell, and Martell. Supporting these results, these houses have stayed out of most of the major conflicts in the books, however this also means there is less information on them. We have 5 or fewer examples of dead members for those houses, so the survival curves don’t have very many points. This uncertainty is reflected in the wide credible intervals.

In contrast, our friends in the north, the Starks, Night’s Watch, and Wildlings have the lowest projected survival rates and smaller credible intervals given their warring positions in the story and the many important characters included amongst their ranks. This analysis considers entire houses, but there are also additional ways to sort the characters.

Men and women

While A Song of Ice and Fire has been lauded for portraying women as complex characters who take an a variety of roles, there are still many more male characters (769) than female ones (157). Despite a wider credible interval, the women tend to fare better than their male counterparts, out-surviving them by a wide margin as seen in Figure 9.

The women of Westeros appear to have a better chance of surviving then the men.

Class

The ratio between noble characters(429) and smallfolk characters (487) is much more even than gender and provides an interesting comparison for analysis. Figure 10 suggests that while more smallfolk tend to die quickly after being introduced, those that survive their introductions tend to live for a longer period of time and may in fact outpace the nobles.

The nobility might have a slight advantage when introduced, but their survival probability continues to fall while the smallfolk’s levels much more quickly.

Selected Characters

The same analysis can be extended to combine traits, sorting by gender, house, and class to provide a rough model for individual characters. One of the most popular characters in the books is Arya and many readers are curious about her fate in the books to come. The category of noblewomen loyal to the Starks also includes other noteworthy characters like Sansa and Brienne of Tarth (though she was introduced later). Other intriguing characters to investigate are the Lannister noblewomen Cersei and poor Myrcella. As it turns out, not a lot noble women die. In order to get more precise credible intervals for the specific female characters we included the data of both noble and smallfolk women.

While both groups have very wide ranges of survival probabilities, the Lannister noblewomen may be a bit more likely to die than the Starks.

The data presented in Figure 11 is inconclusive, but it looks like Arya has a slightly better chance of survival than Cersei.

Two minor characters we are curious about are Val, the wildling princess, and the mysterious Quaithe.

Representing the survival curves of more minor characters, Quaithe and Val have dramatically different odds of surviving the series.

They both had more data than the Starks and Lannisters, but they have the complication that they were not introduced at the beginning of the series. Val is introduced at 2.1 books, and so her chances of surviving the whole series are between 10 percent and 53 percent, which are not the most inspiring of chances.

Quaithe is introduced at 1.2 books, and her chances are between 58 percent and 85 percent, which are significantly better than Val’s. These curves are shown in Figure 12.

For most of the male characters (with the exception of Mance), there was enough data to narrow to house, gender and class.

The survival curves of different classes and alliances of men shown through various characters.

Figure 13 shows the Lannister brothers with middling survival chances ranging from 35 percent to 79 percent. The data for Daario is less conclusive, but seems hopeful, especially considering he was introduced at 2.5 books. Mance seems to have to worst chance of surviving until the end. He was introduced at 2.2 books, giving him a chance of survival between 19 percent and 56 percent.

The survival curves of different classes and alliances of men shown through various characters.

Some characters who many wouldn’t mind seeing kick the bucket include Lord Walder Frey and Theon Greyjoy. However, Figure 14 suggests that neither are likely meet untimely (or in Walder Frey’s case, very timely) deaths. Theon seems likely to survive to the bitter end. Walder Frey was introduced at 0.4 books, putting his chances at 44 percent to 72 percent. As it is now, Hoster Tully may be the only character to die of old age, so perhaps Frey will hold out until the end.

Conclusion

Of course who lives and who dies in the next two books has more to do with plot and storyline than with statistics. Nonetheless, using our data we were able we were able to see patterns of life and death among groups of characters. For some characters, especially males, we are able to make specific predictions of how they will fare in the next novels. For females and characters from the less central houses, the verdict is still out.

Our data and code are available from this GitHub repository.

Notes on the Data Set

Most characters were fairly easy to classify, but there are always edge cases.

  1. Gender - This was the most straight forward. There are not really any gender-ambigous characters.
  2. Nobility - Members of major and minor Westeros houses were counted as noble, but hedge knights were not. For characters from Essos, I used by best judgement based on money and power, and it was usually an easy call. For the wildlings, I named military leaders as noble, though that was often a blurry line. For members of the Night’s Watch, I looked at their status before joining in the same way I looked at other Westeros characters. For bastards, we decided on a case by case basis. Bastards who were raised in a noble family and who received the education and training of nobles were counted as noble. Thus Jon Snow was counted as noble, but someone like Gendry was not.
  3. Death - Characters that have come back alive-ish (like Beric Dondarrion) were judged dead at the time of their first death. Wights are not considered alive, but others are. For major characters whose deaths are uncertain, we argued and made a case by case decision.
  4. Houses - This was the trickiest one because some people have allegiances to multiple houses or have switched loyalties. We decided on a case by case basis. The people with no allegiance were of three main groups:

    — People in Essos who are not loyal to the Targaryens.

    — People in the Riverlands, either smallfolk who’s loyalty is not known, or groups like the Brotherhood Without Banners or the Brave Companions with ambiguous loyalty.

    — Nobility that are mostly looking out for their own interests, like the Freys, Ramsay Bolton, or Petyr Baelish.

07 Apr 01:10

Infographics Show How Long It Takes to Binge-Watch 81 Different Shows

by Kristin Wong
Andrew

An interesting list of TV shows. Any additions/subtractions?

We all love a good binge-watching session, but it’s a time consuming luxury. Neilsen has released a few infographics showing how long it takes to watch the entirety of 81 popular TV shows.

Read more...








06 Apr 13:53

Indiana pizzeria raises $500,000 after saying it wouldn't cater a gay wedding

by Amar Toor
Andrew

I really don't see how refusing to serve someone would be "standing up for your faith."

A crowdfunding page in support of Memories Pizza, the Indiana pizzeria that drew criticism this week for saying it wouldn't cater gay weddings, has raised nearly $500,000 in 24 hours. A GoFundMe page was set up this week after the restaurant's Yelp page was flooded with negative reviews.

Continue reading…

06 Apr 13:51

The First Ever Phantom 4K 1000FPS Drone Footage

by Michael Zhang
Andrew

Ok, this is pretty sick.

Crashing and destroying your drone is painful on your wallet, but it’s not usually the cost of a house. The video above is different. It’s documents the first ever drone flight to involve a Phantom 4K camera mounted to an Aerigon UAV.

“The title of this will either be ‘The most technical advanced drone camera flight of all time,’ or ‘The quarter-million-dollar crash’,” says one team member.

The project was done by the Brain Farm Cinema team based out of Jackson, Wyoming.

The Phantom Flex 4K weighs 14 pounds without a lens or viewfinder attached, so it’s far too heavy to be carried by most of the popular drones used by casual photographers and filmmakers. By partnering with the drone manufacturer Intuitive Aerial, however, the team was able to put together an Aerigon that was up to the task. It’s a combination that’s a “cinematic game changer,” they write.

rig

Using the camera and drone combo, Brain Farm captured super slow motion shots of a truck driving through puddles in rugged terrain.

phantom4k

“The result is what you see here: The world’s first aerial footage shot from a UAV with a Phantom Flex4k,” writes Brain Farm. “The world of options this technological combination will open up is about to break the ceiling of possibility in digital cinematic storytelling.”

(via Brain Farm via Engadget)

06 Apr 13:46

East Texas judge who oversaw 1,700 patent cases joins biggest IP law firm

by Joe Mullin
Andrew

He may not have done anything wrong at all, but it sure looks shady.

US District Judge Leonard Davis said this week he's going to leave the bench to join Fish & Richardson, a large law firm focused on intellectual property.

Davis, who has presided in the Eastern District of Texas since 2002, has one of the most active patent dockets in the nation and has presided over some of the biggest technology lawsuits of the past decade. Corporate Counsel magazine reported this week that he has handled more than 1,700 individual IP cases as a judge. Before becoming a judge, he worked for 23 years in private practice.

Statistics for 2013 showed 263 new patent cases being assigned to Davis, about one-sixth of the 1,700 patent cases that were filed in the district, the busiest in the nation. Only four other judges, three in Delaware and one in East Texas, had more patent cases assigned to them.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments








05 Apr 12:05

THX Updates ‘Deep Note,’ the Spooky Sound It Plays Before Movies

by Peter Kafka
It's kind of like the old one, but this one goes to 11.
02 Apr 20:56

Microsoft’s Office Lens app turns your iPhone or Android phone into a powerful scanner

by Tom Warren

Microsoft is bringing one of its impressive Windows Phone apps to iOS and Android today. Office Lens is effectively a portable scanner in your pocket, allowing you to capture pictures of whiteboards, documents, and receipts to save and edit them digitally. While many apps like Scanner ProScanbot, and even Evernote already exist, Microsoft’s unique offering here is Office integration.

Office Lens will covert images into Word and PowerPoint files, and even PDF documents. If you take a picture of a document then Word will preserve the layout of the paper document and use optical character recognition (OCR) to convert the image into text. You can also do the same with business cards to generate contacts on a phone. If you’ve taken a photo...

Continue reading…

01 Apr 18:17

This mechanical exoskeleton makes walking more efficient

by Arielle Duhaime-Ross

For the first time, researchers can improve the way humans walk without using an external power source, according to a study published in Nature today. A boot-like exoskeleton that fits into a regular running shoe reduces the energetic costs of walking by about 7 percent. In short, it makes walking less tiring without resorting to a battery pack or a motor  — something that could really come in handy for people who have trouble walking, or military personnel in remote areas.

Continue reading…

01 Apr 18:16

Watch Strong Bad answer an email for the first time in almost six years

by Jacob Kastrenakes

Homestar Runner has been coming back here and there over the past year, and today we're finally getting a proper return for one of its biggest stars: Strong Bad. For the first time in almost six years, a Strong Bad Email segment has been released on Homestar Runner's site — the last email segment was released in October 2009. The segment is well aware of how much time has passed and takes cracks at new technology — like smart appliances — and the dated technology that was around when the series last updated. Mostly, though, the segment is about the extent to which Strong Bad dislikes internet jokes on April Fools' Day. We've all been there.

The return of Homestar Runner began this time last year. On April 1st, 2014, the site released...

Continue reading…

01 Apr 13:19

At last, all-day breakfast is coming to McDonalds

by Matthew Yglesias
Andrew

what the what?! I love McGriddles, and if I could get them any time, I don't know what I'd do with myself.

McDonald's is getting ready to make customers' dreams come true by bringing all-day breakfast to franchises around the country.

BREAKING: McDonald's franchisees vote to approve all-day breakfast offering in 14,300 U.S. restaurants starting on Oct. 6 - DJ • $MCD

— CNBC Now (@CNBCnow) September 1, 2015

This is an idea that's so good people have suggested it constantly. And historically, McDonald's has answered that it simply doesn't work logistically — there isn't enough griddle space to do breakfast and lunch service at the same time, so things need to be set up for one or the other.

But McDonald's is in trouble lately, especially in its US home market, as newer and better casual restaurants crowd into the market. So the chain is right to be looking at new options. And breakfast is a smart place to look. But if the company's new CEO is really serious about refocusing on food, I have a radical suggestion to fix the logistical problem: ditch the burgers.

Egg McMuffins (esp. with sausage) are delicious

Tastes great, more filling. (McDonald's)

The basic state of the McDonald's menu is this: It has the best breakfast sandwiches in the world (egg McMuffin or egg McMuffin with sausage, depending on your mood), while the hamburgers are not the best in the world.

When fancy chefs try to craft a "highbrow" or "gourmet" egg McMuffin, they invariably end up creating something inferior to the original. Because the original is perfect.

McDonald's lunch sandwiches are "meh" at best

Okay, I guess. (McDonald's)

The burgers just aren't like this. Even at the chain's peak, nobody seriously thought those were the best burgers in the world. In terms of ground beef patties, McDonald's has always been selling convenience and price more than actual food. Reasonable people can disagree as to whether the best fast food burgers are at Shake Shack or In-N-Out or Five Guys or Smashburger, but nobody thinks McDonald's is in the number-one position. Nor are its chicken products any good compared with what's on offer at Popeye's or Chick-fil-A or even Wendy's.

Stick to what makes you great

Saying McDonald's should simply offer its breakfast menu all day is too simplistic. The french fries, for example, are fantastic — much like the breakfast sandwiches. And since the fries go in the deep fryer rather than on the grill, there's no conflict here. The weird apple pie thing is also amazing.

The point is that there's no need to be dogmatic about breakfast or lunch. The key thing is to be dogmatic about excellence. That means using the grill for the breakfast items at which McDonald's excels, rather than for the lunch sandwiches that are mediocre at best.

Eater Interview: Anthony Bourdain loves In-N-Out Burger

01 Apr 13:08

Teens hit with child porn charges after tweeting their group-sex video

by David Kravets
Andrew

Wow, this is crazy. On one hand, I agree with the police chief - these kids shouldn't be making and distributing this stuff, and they should be punished. But on the other hand, should they be forever labeled as Sex Offenders for one stupid mistake they made as teenagers? Maybe not.

Four suburban Illinois teenagers were being held Tuesday on child pornography charges for allegedly producing a group-sex video of themselves and posting it to Twitter.

The youths, whose names were not released because of their age, include a 15-year-old girl and boys 14, 15, and 16. They were arrested Friday and charged with distributing child pornography online.

"The child pornography offense that was charged is in place for a reason, because we don't want to accept that type of behavior as a society. So I think it's making a strong statement, and I think it's important to do so to send the message to others: that kids shouldn't be involved in this type of behavior, and hopefully this will serve as a deterrent," Joliet Police Chief Brian Benton said.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments








01 Apr 12:58

Microsoft launches MS-DOS mobile to reboot its struggling smartphone efforts

by Tom Warren

Microsoft is going back to the basics for a joke at the expense of Windows Phone today. What do you do when your smartphone operating system has less than three percent market share worldwide? Reboot. While the software giant isn’t quite dramatically rebooting all over again, it has genuinely launched an MS-DOS mobile app for Windows Phone as part of an April Fools’ Day prank. It’s one of the more elaborate efforts we’ll likely witness on the most irritating and trivial day of the year.

Just like the real MS-DOS, you navigate around by typing in DIR to list available apps and using the CD command to enter into directories. I must admit, it’s rather fun and nostalgic. If you manage to navigate to the programs folder there’s a camera.exe...

Continue reading…

30 Mar 20:44

Furious 7 has no business being as good as it is

by Alex Abad-Santos
Andrew

I'm so excited for this movie!

Dom (Vin Diesel) and Brian (Paul Walker), the heroes of Furious 7, gaze upon an exotic, expensive demon of a car whose owner has stashed it in a Abu Dhabi skyscraper. Dom's eyes glimmer with sadness.

"There's nothing sadder than locking a beast in a cage," he says.

It's one of just a few quiet scenes in the film. (It's almost immediately followed by explosions and the car flying from skyscraper to skyscraper.) But it's an important one, because it crystallizes the Fast & Furious franchise's credo: these movies don't believe in cages of modesty. They're beasts, every second filled with kinetic, hulking action. Furious 7 is the ultimate realization of this.

Rating


4

Set in the aftermath of 2013's Fast & Furious 6, Furious 7 introduces Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham), the franchise's most lethal villain yet. The meaner older sibling of the sixth installment's villain, Deckard has his sights set on the people responsible for putting his baby brother in the hospital. Dom and his friends have to find him to save their own lives.

Furious 7 is all flash, a mindless exercise in grandeur and spectacle. The writing is flabby and disposable in parts. Many scenes consist of quick cuts between tense facial expressions, pedals being stomped, and levers being flicked. And the acting is silly at several points.

But it's perhaps the most fun I've had, and possibly will have, at the movies in 2015.

Furious 7 is in on its own joke

The film's greatest achievement is recognizing the cultural niche the franchise has created for itself — a sweet spot that exists between camp and destruction porn. Director James Wan and his cast know that people don't come to Fast & Furious movies for nuance. Audiences want to be bludgeoned with action sequences, silly lines, and strangely stereotypical but highly stylized representations of other countries.

Furious 7 delivers.

Start with the film's globetrotting ways. The Middle East features camels and women strutting around to bumping, vaguely Arabic trap music. Tokyo is all neon glow and women strutting around to bumping, vaguely Asian trap music. There's not much the world can agree on in Furious 7, except for trap music.

Every line is crafted as a nod to the ridiculousness of the franchise. In an early scene, Dom explains how he grew a racing festival from scratch. Naturally, the racing event is called "Race Wars" and features a cameo from rapper Iggy Azalea. Race wars, Iggy Azalea, and Vin Diesel — this is all in the film's first 20 minutes.

Every actor's personality is hyper-amplified. Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) is 500 pounds of muscle in a 200-pound body, constantly flexing. Letty (Michelle Rodriguez) is always emotionally torn, her face permanently sharpened into a pensive pout. Deckard is an unstoppable, stoic villain whose punches break bones. Roman (Tyrese Gibson) and Tej (Ludacris) are only around to make jokes.

Each actor knows his or her role, and executes it clinically. And the chemistry the cast members have suggests they really enjoy one another's company. It genuinely seems like everyone is having fun hanging out — something you don't often see in other movies.

The chase scenes are sublime

By this point, every Fast & Furious movie can execute a chase scene with clockwork precision.

Each film opens with an over-the-top, ridiculous action sequence, hell-bent on topping the previous installment's big opener. (Furious 7's features cars being dropped by parachute onto a mountain, then gliding onto the road.) Then each film transitions to a balletic series of car formations, complete with precise weaving. And then there's the finale — a mind-blowing, last-minute save that — even though you see it coming a mile away — still makes you want to howl at the moon.

Sound is so important to these scenes. From the growling rev of an engine to the crunch of rubber on rock, lots of attention is paid to what is being pumped into the audience's ears. And when the film's sound drops out, it can lead to moments of perfect humor, silliness even. When that caged beast of a car that so saddened Dom floats gracefully between two towering skyscrapers, you're left staring at something so completely ridiculous in a complete vacuum of sound. All you can do is chortle at the spectacle.

Wan, perhaps best known for horror films like Insidious and The Conjuring, is on his game in Furious, choreographing slick, seat-thumping sequences pressed up against picturesque settings. He has a steady, power-packed style. He smashes us into the driver's seat, drawing the action in closer and closer, tight enough to see the tiniest of ticks on the speedometer, before he slowly unwinds, nudging us to soak in the sheer magnitude of what's happening.

Furious 7 might just make you cry

The strangest thing about Furious 7 is how the movie deals with Paul Walker's real-life, tragic death. It's difficult to go into the movie and not think about where the franchise will go without one of its beloved stars.

Seeing Walker play Brian, the role that made him famous, one last time is jarring on its own. But it also seems as if the film's actors, screenwriter (Chris Morgan), and director crafted this film specifically as a goodbye to their friend.

After Walker's death, it was reported that the script underwent massive rewrites. It's unclear how much of the story was changed. That said, every scene, every bit of dialogue, every exchange underlines one theme: this movie is about the importance of family.

Shaw kills for his brother. Dom would do the same. Brian is starting his own family and has to choose between being a father and risking his life. And the core group has to figure out whom to trust and whom to let into its inner circle.

I found myself lingering on the small glances Walker and Diesel share, or the way Ludacris, Gibson, and Walker laugh together. There's real beauty there — something that can't be faked.

It all makes you wonder how the franchise will continue without the actor. No formal announcement of a Fast & Furious 8 movie has been made, though Diesel recently hinted there might be another film coming. That would make sense — this is one of the most successful franchises in history, and Furious 7 looks like it'll be another huge hit.

But without Walker, the next film would be missing a big chunk of its soul.

The chemistry between Walker and his costars, his friends, gives this muscled sledgehammer of a film some surprisingly gentle moments that you'll think about hours later. And there's a strange sorrow that unfolds while you're watching, knowing this was the last time these friends were all together. By the end, you're hoping for just a few more minutes with this family, even if they aren't zipping around, being dropped from planes, or driving cars from skyscraper to skyscraper.

WATCH: 'Waiting 9 hours to see Furious 7 at SXSW'

30 Mar 19:48

What liberals could learn from Ted Cruz’s flat tax

by Dylan Matthews
Andrew

Thoughts on consumption-based taxes?

Ted Cruz has developed a reputation as the most conservative of the major 2016 Republican presidential candidates, but he hasn't taken many specific policy positions to earn that moniker. One exception? His longtime support for a flat tax.

The flat tax dramatically lowers the top tax rate and exempts capital gains and dividends from taxation. It's astonishingly regressive: the rich pay far less, hedge fund managers and private equity types like Mitt Romney would pay literally nothing, and while the exact rate varies from plan to plan, it's certainly not going to be as low as 10 or 15 percent, meaning the plan would likely raise taxes for middle-class people currently in those brackets.

Cruz's flat tax proposal, as you would expect, drives liberals crazy. "It's a fiscal fantasy for people who wish the US existed as it did before FDR was president," writes Wonkblog's Matt O'Brien. "It's not an agenda for anyone who's interested in governing the country as it is today."

But liberals should take at least some of the ideas in the flat tax more seriously. Just as a monomaniacal obsession with growth has made conservative tax policy into a regressive disaster, an obsession with progressivity above all else is becoming an anchor on progressive tax thinking. It's easy to come up with a flat tax–like plan that's not crazily regressive but still benefits the economy, and the result would be substantially better than most of the tax plans Democratic politicians promote.

The problem with America's tax code

When thinking about tax policy, you first have to ask what you ultimately want the taxes for. Sometimes — as with alcohol or carbon taxes — the tax does good in and of itself by deterring people from bad behaviors. But mostly you want taxes to pay for worthwhile programs, and liberals in particular need a tax policy that can raise a substantial amount of money to fund a large welfare state. And the experience of most European social democracies is that to do that, you can't just soak the rich. You need broad-based consumption taxes, such as value-added taxes (VATs), that everyone pays.

In his book Growing Public, economic historian Peter Lindert notes that high-budget welfare states in general tax investment income less and consumption more. His argument is that European social democrats realized that income taxes of the scale they'd need to fund a comprehensive welfare state would have a deleterious effect on growth, and that the only way to sustainably pay for universal health care, generous education and pension systems, and so forth is to move toward more broad-based, pro-growth tax schemes.

Which brings us back to Ted Cruz's flat tax.

What liberals miss about flat taxes

Yeah, get excited day trader, the flat tax means no more income taxes for you! (Shutterstock)

The term "flat tax" is mostly misleading. It makes people think the flat tax is just an income tax, but with one rate instead of many. It's not, really. Rather, it's a kind of consumption tax — very similar to a VAT of the kind social democracies depend upon.

VATs work by taxing the difference between what a company paid on materials to make a product and what it sells that end product for: the value added, in other words. As the Tax Policy Center's Len Burman explains, the corporate tax side of a flat tax is just a VAT that also lets companies deduct the cost of wages. Individuals then pay taxes on those wages themselves.

Economists tend to find that consumption taxes are better for the economy than income taxes, because income taxes discriminate against savers.

To see why, imagine you make $50,000 in wages and there's a flat 20 percent tax on all income. You'd pay $10,000 in taxes on your wages. That leaves you with $40,000.

Now you've got a decision to make: do you want to take $5,000 of the $40,000 you have left and invest it, or do you want to take that $5,000 and spend it on a really awesome television? If you invest it and make money off the stocks, then the thing you bought with your money — the profits those stocks made for you — will get taxed again. If you just buy the TV, the government doesn't tax you a second time.

Under standard economic models, eliminating this double-taxing of savings promotes investment and thus boosts economic growth. And it's not just conservatives and libertarians arguing this; a highly influential model by Anthony Atkinson and Joseph Stiglitz, both noted lefties, gives this result. A widely cited 2001 paper by David Altig, Alan Auerbach, Lawrence Kotlikoff, Kent Smetters, and Jan Walliser estimates that switching from income taxation to consumption taxation boosts growth in the long run by 1.9 to 9.4 percent, depending on how you do it.

The empirical evidence is murkier. UC Berkeley's Danny Yagan found that the 2003 dividend tax cut — meant to reduce double taxation of savings, just like consumption taxes — didn't do anything to help the economy. But a recent paper by Tulane's James Alm and the IMF's Asmaa El-Ganainy found that in 15 EU countries, increases in VAT rates decreased consumption and boosted savings — exactly the result you get from the models. The matter isn't open and shut, but at the moment the weight of the evidence suggests consumption taxes are preferable for growth. That gives credence to Lindert's argument that to raise taxes enough to fund a welfare state without hurting growth too much, you need to move to consumption taxation.

Taxing consumption can be progressive

A child in Stockholm enjoys the bounty produced by Swedish social democracy. (Christian Science Monitor/Getty Images)

The problem with consumption taxes is that they're usually regressive. VATs are sales taxes: they make everything more expensive by a set percentage, and because poor and middle-class people spend more of their incomes than the rich do, the end result is that the VAT hits them more than it does the rich. But there are a variety of ways to tax consumption without making the poor worse off.

The simplest way would be to do take a flat tax but make it not, y'know, flat. Recall that the main feature of the flat tax is its business component — again, it's like a VAT that subtracts out wages. It's totally possible to pair that with a progressive tax on wages, rather than a flat tax on wages. The result is still a consumption tax, but it's a progressive one.

This idea — known as the X tax and originated by the late Princeton economist David Bradford — has been promoted in recent years by the American Enterprise Institute tax expert Alan Viard, who along with Robert Carroll wrote an excellent book outlining a detailed X tax proposal. The 2001 simulation by Altig et al. found that replacing the income tax with an X tax would be better for growth then even the flat tax.

The big problem with the X tax is that it doesn't touch capital income. Mitt Romney wouldn't pay a thing. So, alternatively, you could simply amend the income tax so that all savings is tax-deductible. This would effectively turn the income tax into a consumption tax, and do it in a way that makes sure capital income still gets hit.

But the most reliable way to make a consumption tax progressive has nothing to do with the tax itself and everything to do with what the money it generates is used for. Europe's flat VATs are not themselves progressive, the way an X tax or personal consumption tax are, but they pay for transfer payments that are larger, relative to income, for lower- and middle-class people than for the rich. The overall system is progressive even if the tax isn't.

What will be liberals' flat tax?

graetz tax plan

Columbia law professor Michael Graetz's Competitive Tax Plan is one way to introduce a VAT without making the tax code less progressive. (Amazon)

So there's a way to change the tax and transfer system so that it's still progressive but doesn't punish savings, and the change would likely boost economic growth. Why aren't Democratic politicians jumping all over this?

They flirt with the idea occasionally. Then–House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) stated that a VAT was "on the table" for funding health-care reform in 2009. President Obama expressed openness to the idea in 2010 after his adviser Paul Volcker signaled support. Volcker's comments provoked Congressional outrage, and the Senate voted 85–13 to condemn the idea as "a massive tax increase that will cripple families on fixed income," but all but one of the 13 senators opposing that move were Democrats.

But years of Republicans promoting flat taxes and sales taxes have left a residual distrust for consumption taxation among liberals. More to the point, supply-siders' insistence that marginal tax rates are the main determinant of the course of human history has done a lot to discredit, among liberals, the idea that taxes have much of an effect on growth at all.

That's fair so far as the recent debates in American tax policy go: the idea that cutting the top tax rate from 39.6 percent to 35 percent could boost growth by any significant amount is nutty, as are claims that big tax cuts like Ted Cruz's or Marco Rubio's would boost growth so much they'd pay for themselves. But the result of the backlash is that progressivity has become the only criterion by which many left-of-center people judge tax proposals, and more credible cases that tax reform could boost growth are ignored. That's really too bad, especially for those who want a dramatically larger welfare state. Realistically, that increase has to be paid for, and consumption taxes are the obvious way to do it.

To quote Paul Krugman, "if I can trade a somewhat regressive VAT for guarantees of decent retirement and universal health care, I’ll take it."

Correction: This post originally said that all 13 senators opposing an anti-VAT amendment were Democrats. Twelve were; the 13th was then–Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH).

WATCH: 'Taxes don't have to suck'
30 Mar 16:47

The internet took the album away, and now it's giving it back

by Micah Singleton

For decades, the album was the primary form in which music was delivered to the masses. But ever since Apple introduced iTunes back in 2001, the album has been on the decline. When online piracy ravaged the music industry, music revenues went from $14.7 billion in 1999 to $7.7 billion in 2009, according to the RIAA. While the $0.99 single kept some money flowing into the industry, it changed the way we experienced music. Singles are cheaper to buy and quicker to make than a full album, and that shifted the mindset of labels and artists toward focusing on making more radio-friendly songs instead of focusing on complete albums.

But now we’re in the middle of another shift — digital music sales declined 13 percent in 2014 while streaming...

Continue reading…

29 Mar 18:19

You can now play Super Mario 64 in your browser

by Andrew Webster

Super Mario 64 is still an amazing game, but nearly 20 years after it first launched on the Nintendo 64, it looks pretty dated. But with a little love, it can look amazing. Computer science student Erik Roystan Ross recently decided to remake the first level of the game while experimenting with the Unity game engine, and the results are impressive — the game looks almost as good as more recent games in the series, like Super Mario 3D World on the Wii U. And you can even play the remake in your browser right here — but don't expect to see the rest of the game rendered in HD. "I currently do not have any plans to develop this any further or to resolve any bugs, unless they're horrendously game-breaking and horrendously simple to fix," says...

Continue reading…