Shared posts

19 Apr 18:31

Mr Loophole is not just the go-to lawyer for celebs in motoring distress

by Marina Hyde

Legal antihero Nick Freeman can also advise on dressing to avoid rape

How is it possible that in almost eight years Lost in Showbiz has never highlighted the work of celebrity motoring lawyer Mr Loophole? It seems unfathomable that, despite the sheer volume of nonsense churned out, not once has LiS stopped its metaphorical tour bus outside the well-appointed Cheshire home of Nick Freeman.

In my defence, for a long time I didn't realise Nick was real, assuming he was just created by the Random Late Capitalist Character Generator, like "Trudie Styler" or the lady with the NHS boobs who organised a Thatcher death party. (If you're reading this, Romany Blythe, you're my best new sublebrity.)

But it seems that Nick actually exists. Beside a highly-coiffed photo, his website trumpets his work for "a string of high-profile celebrities", who have included Alex Ferguson (the Manchester United manager had diarrhoea), Caprice (cystitis), Jeremy Clarkson (nothing wrong "down there", but they couldn't prove it was him driving), Jimmy Carr, a tanked-up Steve McFadden and endless footballers. He has trademarked the name "Mr Loophole".

Only this week, Nick defended Girls Aloud's Sarah Harding on charges of using a mobile phone at the wheel and failing to stop for an officer. He explained that "the Range Rover bluetooth system works erratically" – not a dry sickbag in the house for that one, I imagine – and presented an argument the judge later summarised as amounting to Harding not being a mere "normal person".

"Won the battle, lost the war", was Nick's self-lacerating tweet on the verdict, much as if he had mishandled the Tet offensive, as opposed to got only half the driving charges against a pop star dropped.

But then, a celebrity in motoring distress is like the bat signal to him. Do imagine Nick deep in his underground Manchester base, receiving word that someone's black Range-Rover – the vehicular calling card of the arseoisie – has been snapped doing 117mph while they are half-cut or on the phone to their agent or something equally post-justice. "I needed to protect my reputation," he said of copyrighting Mr Loophole, "and the public."

Mm. It's a tough call, but I think my favourite thing about Nick is how he cloaks his work in the mantle of some perverse moral code, rather like Max Clifford. Much of what Max does, you will recall, is for a higher purpose. His 90s Tory sleaze exposes were a self-styled "personal vendetta" against that government's NHS policies. Nick appears to share much of the Clifford burden (a Yewtree call-up obviously excepted). Which is to say, many people misunderstand him. Nick insists you see him as some kind of legal antihero, dedicated to exposing flaws in police evidence gathering. "I'm highlighting the potholes," he says. "I'm not the man with the tarmac."

Perhaps it would help to consider him in the mould of troubled crusaders like The Punisher. And in many ways, Nick's is the classic superhero narrative. Aged 12, I imagine, he saw his parents brutally assaulted by a parking ticket, and the gut-twisting horror of that injustice made him what he is today. Sometimes, he still wakes up screaming, the look on their faces as they shrieked, "Why don't these council parasites get a proper job?" as fresh as it was that fateful day all those years ago. Justice doesn't yet have a new face, but it's certainly got a load of expensive hair products.

If I do have a cavil, it's the use of the "Mr" honorific in his superhero name. Lost in Showbiz would have preferred it if he'd gone with the definite article instead. "The Loophole" is much better than "Mr Loophole". Mr Loophole, in fact, may well qualify for the title of Worst Superhero Ever – outstripping even uber-nebbishes like Mintberry Crunch.

Yet to concentrate on a single aspect of Nick's work is to misunderestimate this renaissance man. After all, he is a much underrated thinker, and until last year enjoyed a position as columnist for the Manchester Evening News.

"I suspect there is a strong link between our ever growing obesity problem and litter," runs one Paul Krugman-esque outing. "I have yet to find an avocado and chicken sandwich container while out on a morning run or a salad niçoise for that matter."

But it is in the field of sexual politics that Nick is at his most surpassingly incisive. When he rings his energy provider twice, conflicting advice from a female call centre worker and a male one leads him to one conclusion: "Dare I suggest that women are frequently unreasonable when in positions of power and dealing with men?"

On rape, he warns that women need to "take responsibility" for how they dress. "As a red-blooded alpha male," Nick explains, "let me state unequivocally that I believe how a woman dresses (and behaves in that dress) tells a man what's on her mind." That said, he informs readers that his defence work has brought him into contact with "cases where those who have been dressed in a perfectly conventional way were still victims of this heinous crime." Key word: still. The way a woman dresses, Nick concludes, "can victimise men".

Unsurprisingly, it is to this kind of elastic mind that some celebrities on drink-driving or speeding raps seem instinctively drawn. And, happily, the medium of Twitter now allows Nick to speak that mind whenever he pleases.

"The day women got equal rights was the day they lost all their rights," runs a slightly opaque recent tweet. In another, I'm A Celebrity contestant Helen Flanagan was deemed to be "nice but very dim – setting the female cause back decades". I am not sure if Nick does the full set of isms, and a black person behaving irksomely on some reality TV show or other would be joshingly branded as setting the civil-rights cause back decades. I imagine he'll be getting in touch, though, so perhaps he could let me know then.

In the meantime, you might be wondering why we can't send such a treasure on permanent loan abroad. It's a thought that seems to have occurred to Nick, who imagines himself a fit with what he imagines to be America. "I would be a celebrity over there," he chuckled to an interviewer last year. "It's a different mental ethos. When you have a nice car in this country, people don't really like it. In America, they're like: 'Wow, how did you do that? Great, fantastic.'

"But," speculates Nick in a line somehow redolent of Basil Fawlty's inquiry as to whether there are palm trees in California, "I'm sure there are good lawyers in America."

Well, as Basil's guest replied: "They say Burt Lancaster had one, but I don't believe them."


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

14 Apr 11:12

Snippet from a gloriously unsuccessful news broadcast from BBC...



Snippet from a gloriously unsuccessful news broadcast from BBC Scotland. Almost perfect in its comic timing.

12 Apr 21:15

Grumpy Ygritte

03 Apr 19:30

Puppy Stampede

Puppy Stampede

Submitted by: Iron-man01

Tagged: gifs , puppies , horde , corgis Share on Facebook
31 Mar 20:03

My Little Katie gives rein to her inner centaur

by Marina Hyde

Kate Price clip-clops into our nightmares, providing us with one of those images that you just can't unsee

No, it's not a malarial hallucination: traces of Katie Price have been found in pantomime horsemeat.

Quite how madam entered the supply chain is unclear, although the logistics of this image have been obsessing Lost in Showbiz ever since it scorched its way on to my retinas earlier this week. I imagine she had to be attached to the rear part of the body, because those back legs aren't going anywhere, which would have meant My Little Katie being assembled in an empty press-launch venue, wouldn't it, before the hacks were invited to file in and behold her in all her static glory. I'm probably going to end up thinking quite a lot more about it – as will you, I fear – because it's one of those photographs you just can't unsee.

Yet what is it in aid of, you might inquire? Well, my psychoanalyst has advised me not to dig too deeply into the whys and wherefores of the image – apparently, sometimes it's better to manage nightmares simply by picturing oneself skating across their surface and off the other side. But minimal research reveals it to be something to do with Katie's range of equestrian clothing, now in its fifth year of sales.

As for the science bit, you may already know that there were lady centaurs in ancient mythology – kentaurides, they were called, and they get a run-out in works by Lucretius and Ovid, among others. "Now she would comb her glossy hair," writes Ovid of one of them in Metamorphoses, "now entwine it with rosemary, now with violets …" And now she would fashion it into a pink mane and use it to shift jodhpurs.

Anyway, there really is much to marvel at in the costume. Like how the hock joints on the hind legs of the "horse" have been reversed to mirror Katie's front legs. Like how that's the least unnatural thing about the whole get-up. I wonder if Katie's costumiers dream of graduating – or escaping, she might well hold them captive – to the Haus of Gaga, where they can work with materials like fillet steak instead of fun fur. If any care to get in touch, I can offer safe passage back through the looking glass.

Marina Hyde
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

27 Mar 20:36

Here comes the troll

by Kerry
Tim.emanuel

Jebus.

Bill from Florida and his bride, Mara, both electrical engineering majors, decided to infuse their passion for their field into their “Circuit and Swirls”-themed wedding, complete with invitations featuring actual LED-running circuits. In the DIY spirit of things, Bill posted a video and a how-to guide on his blog. (So far, so good.)

A month or so later, after Bill and Mara returned from their honeymoon, they found this handwritten manifesto — excuse me, concerned warning — in their mailbox. (Because apparently plain ol’ Internet bile-spewing via, you know, the Internet would have been a little bit too passive.)

Dear Bill and Mara, Hi there. My name is Andrew and I’m from the Internet. I came across y’all (and what appears to be y’all’s address) from a post on Wedinator. Looks like Bill posted this one himself…shocker. I’d like to point out early on here that I mean you no harm—but there are idiots on the internet who might. Moral of the story? Don’t put your home address on the internet. P.S.: ads on your videos about your wedding crap? Kindy trashy. Sure didn’t notice these until y’all started getting views in the thousands.  So, the fancy blinky invitations? Pretty cool, and kudos on the homebrew, but three words: OVER THE TOP. There is no call for this, it’s just for attention. Seriously.  Key Points:  How many people are going to keep and cherish these thing forever?  Seriously, No one cares about your damn wedding. Folks go to weddings for only a few reasons. Social obligations, food, Liquor. Looks like this is an expensive, extravagant shindig. How much did it cost? Who paid? Or financed? How many grocery trip, tanks of gas, or house down payments is that? Most people who have extravagant weddings could care less about actually getting married, they just want to be in a wedding.  You guys are really pretentious. Personal blogs are bad enough, but wedding/relationship websites are kind of disgusting.  Over 50% of marriages end in divorce. Think about this: if you would be satisfied with a brief chapel wedding without guests and a road trip for a honeymoon, then you’re really ready to marry. GOOD LUCK.

related: Cloudy with a chance of hate mail

 

26 Mar 22:54

Sproooooing

Tim.emanuel

I'm going to keep sharing cat pictures until someone else starts sharing stuff.

Sproooooing

Submitted by: Unknown

Tagged: gif , door stop , play , Cats Share on Facebook
25 Mar 23:19

Tune in at 6:53 for a dick cat being a dick. Via Tina



Tune in at 6:53 for a dick cat being a dick.

Via Tina

25 Mar 22:21

Bypassing Saudi human rights in the name of oil and jobs

by Jon Snow

Warning: you may find some of the descriptions in this blog distressing

Charles and Camilla are safely home from Saudi Arabia and assorted Gulf states.

They were in Saudi at a somewhat bumpy moment. The royal couple never got closer than a thousand miles from the “public killing grounds”, as they are somewhat candidly described.

Had they got a lot closer, they might have seen the blood drying from the execution of seven alleged robbers.

I use the word “alleged” because the UN and various human rights groups, including Human Rights Watch’s Middle East section, have argued that the trials of the men – some of whom were juveniles – conducted under sharia law, were deeply flawed.

The suspects were charged with being part of a gang of thieves in the Saudi town of Abha. There was no evidence that any of the accused had killed or injured anyone.

25 charlessaudi g w Bypassing Saudi human rights in the name of oil and jobs

Actually there may well have been rather less blood in the aftermath of the killings than usual. The death sentences were carried out, for the first time, by firing squad. The kingdom has run out of execution swordsmen, so it is no longer possible to disconnect the accused’s head from his or her body. It was a practice which led to a gushing of much blood from the severed neck.

In the same period, two of Saudi Arabia’s most prominent advocates of non violent reform – Mohammed Fahd al-Quatami and Abdullah al-Hamed – were jailed for 10  years apiece.

Charles and Camilla were not alone in bypassing human rights as a discussion point with their hosts. US Secretary of State John Kerry and America’s Attorney General Eric Holder were both in Saudi in recent days. They too decided not to raise human rights. I hate to use the phrase, but the per capita execution rate in Saudi is higher than in any other country on earth.

I have blogged before on the issue of Saudi-financed warfare. I have yet to be contradicted on the claim that there is not a British military boot in overt or covert action anywhere in the world, where the enemy is not in some way financed by Saudi interests.

Can it really be British jobs and a British thirst for oil that neutralise the reality that this just may be a state that it is perhaps unwise to retain as a ‘most favoured nation?’

Charles and Camilla were not alone in bypassing the matter.

Follow Jon Snow on Twitter

25 Mar 19:08

OkKitty

OkKitty

Lol by: Unknown

Tagged: okcupid Share on Facebook
24 Mar 21:21

Dude, I'm Trying to Eat, Put Away the Camera