Deutsche Welle: Corona-Impfstoff: Milliardendeal per Handschlag. “Albert Bourla, Chef des US-Pharmakonzerns Pfizer, erklärt, warum er sicher ist, dass wir in absehbarer Zeit wieder ein “normales” Leben führen können. Außerdem erzählt er, was ein virtueller Händedruck wert sein kann.”

“In einem Interview erzählt Pfizer-Chef Albert Bourla vom ungewöhnlichen Beginn der deutsch-amerikanischen Zusammenarbeit: “Wir hatten anfangs keinen Vertrag. Wir (BioNTech-Gründer Ugur Sahin und Bourla, Anm. der Red.) haben gesprochen und uns gesagt: Wenn wir warten, bis wir einen Vertrag haben, verlieren wir Zeit. Und das sind Multi-Milliarden-Dollar-Verträge. Wir haben einen Handschlag per Zoom gemacht und angefangen zu arbeiten.”

Etwas Schriftliches habe es aber erst drei Wochen später gegeben, bis zu einem “ordentlichen Vertrag” dauerte es sogar noch länger: “Sie werden schockiert sein, wenn Sie hören, wann wir den endgültigen Vertrag unterzeichnet haben: im Januar 2021.”

Viel zu sagen gebe es dazu aber nicht: “Das ist eine Fifty-fifty-Partnerschaft.” Nur einmal wird Bourla etwas genauer: “BioNTech hat seine Werke, wir haben unsere. Wir legen alle Ausgaben, alle Einnahmen und alle Gewinne zusammen, und dann teilen wir.”

[…]

Auch erzählt Albert Bourla von seiner persönlichen Geschichte und vergleicht sie mit dem US-deutschen Joint Venture und dessen Erfolg. “Für diejenigen, die es nicht wissen: Ich bin wirklich Grieche”, so Bourla. Es bedeute ihm viel, dass “ein griechischer Jude und türkische Muslime, alle Einwanderer in verschiedenen Ländern, zusammenarbeiten, ohne einen Vertrag zu unterschreiben.”

Seine Herkunft, so der CEO, habe ihn gut vorbereitet auf die Herausforderungen, denen er jetzt gegenüber steht: “Ich war Jude in einem Land, in dem die Juden eine kleine Minderheit waren. Da lernt man, widerstandsfähig zu sein. Man lernt, dass man seine Identität, seine Andersartigkeit annehmen sollte. Ein Immigrant zu sein ist meiner Meinung nach die wichtigste Eigenschaft von allen.””

We set out on a multi-year journey to build our dream laptop - the Librem 14 - and today that dream is reality and is shipping.

The post Librem 14 Begins Shipping appeared first on Purism.

I sincerely hope this doesn’t happen as we’ve recently gotten one of these in the family (where most people have the older, iPhone 5 style SEs out of preference) and it is a much better phone than the “normal” overfat iPhone.

I still find my XS to be comically large and unwieldy, and in comparison the mini has an absolutely perfect form factor with a great display that actually makes it possible to use your phone one-handed again.

The pandemic has certainly had an impact on sales, and I’m pretty sure being sedentary also makes bigger devices more appealing (as you don’t have to carry them around), but anyone who values actual usability would be delighted if they had the chance to handle one for five minutes.

Jeff Jedras @jeffjedras
I'll just say that if the 55+ don't want their AstraZeneca jab, make it 40+ and I'll be down to Shoppers lickity sp… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Some mornings, I get up and read Stoic philosophy and a book of aphorisms. It used to be all mornings, and then most, but as Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds”.

However, it is another of Emerson’s quotations that I want to focus on in this post, one that’s been rolling around my brain for the last week or so:

People wish to be settled; only as far as they are unsettled is there any hope for them.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

‘Settled’ is an interesting word, with many meanings. You can, after all, settle an argument, settle a bill, settle down and raise a family, settle into an armchair, and settle your affairs. To my mind, each definition has an air of being responsible, grown up, ‘conservative’ (with a small ‘c’).

In my own life I’ve definitely felt the pull to be settled. I suppose I am settled, in many regards: we’ve lived in the same house for seven years now — longer than I’ve lived anywhere, other than the house in which I grew up.

For me, there is a balance to be had between being settled in one area of my life and being unsettled in others. Being unsettled is where the sparkley-eyed creative drive comes from, the thing that I can only describe as a ‘wonder factory’. Without that turbulence in my life, I become hollowed-out, an empty husk of a man counting down my days.

To what extent, though, is it up to me to unsettle other people? If I recognise in myself that a need to balance areas in which I’m settled and those in which I’m unsettled, how do I know when it’s appropriate to go about prodding others?

Perhaps, and I suppose this is my get-out-of-jail-free card, by writing about unsettling things, people can opt-in if and when they’re ready. Interestingly, two of my three recent side projects (extinction.fyi and privacy.garden) have been on the unsettling side of things.

Finally, it’s worth noting to myself that being settled in my home life allows me to do unsettling things at work. This is a note to future Doug that when I’m unsettled with things outside of work, it’s time to do more ‘settled’ things in work.

---

This post is Day 100 of my #100DaysToOffload challenge. Want to get involved? Find out more at 100daystooffload.com.

The post Unsettling first appeared on Open Thinkering.

Michael Gordon* explores a misconception about Kitsilano in the Seventies – that, in a reaction to what was felt to be ‘out-of-control overdevelopment’ (see West End), Kits was downzoned.  Not quite.

 

Many years ago, Vancouver’s Director of Community Planning advised me that the 1975 downzoning in Kitsilano to prevent highrise residential development was not a downzoning. Upon further researching this, I discovered to some extent he had a point.

In July 1964 Kitsilano, Fairview, Kerrisdale, Mt.Pleasant and other neighbourhoods had their apartment RM-3 zoning amended to encourage ‘tower in the park’ residential development up to 120 feet.** Previously, the maximum height was three to four storeys.  Subsequently in Kitsilano, only seven highrise residential buildings were built along with a variety of four-storey wood-frame apartment buildings.

The RM-3 zoning had encouraged large site assemblies because it was the only way to achieve the maximum density and height of 36.6 metres (or about 11 to 13 storeys). Density bonuses were given for large sites, low site coverage and enclosed or underground parking. (This zoning still applies in areas of Fairview and Kerrisdale.)  Small- and medium-sized sites were built to a lower density and three- to four-storey wood-frame construction.

Things started to heat up in Kitsilano in the 1970s when:

• There were social tensions related to the displacement by new development of residents who wanted to stay in Kitsilano.
• Condominium development became more prevalent than purpose-built rental.
• More affordable housing choices such as ‘shared’ houses, housekeeping units in houses, rooming houses and small older rental apartment buildings were replaced by condo development for higher income residents.
• Condominium developments occupying most of a city block were clearly for higher income people as they included a swimming pool, tennis courts, a sauna and other amenities.

These two highrise residential developments alarmed Kitsilano residents at 2445 West 3^rd and 2370 West 2^nd:

The one on the left on West 3rd was the last highrise built in Kitsilano (1976) and was a focus of significant opposition and public demonstrations, as documented in this Vancouver Sun article:

 

The ‘Carriage House’ got built and, clearly from their sales ads, was to be marketed for high-income residents – ‘a new lifestyle where leisure and luxury go hand in hand.’

 

Subsequent to the so-called ‘downzoning,’ 14 non-market developents were built or established in existing buildings for low- to moderate-income families, seniors and other households e.g. a person with a disability.

The maximum height was now four storeys which leant itself well to non-market courtyard family-oriented developments such as Helen’s Court Co-op on West 1^st Avenue, built in 1984.

 

So why was the 1974 zoning change with a reduction of height from 10- 12 storeys to four storeys in some respects not a ‘downzoning?’

First, non-market developments and purpose-built rental, which included lower and moderate-rent apartments, could still be considered at the same maximum floorspace density of 1.9 as was possible under RM-3, without assembling a large site.

Also, market development on small- and medium-size sites could still achieve the same density in four storeys that were built before under RM-3 (about 1.45 FSR in four storeys).

But clearly, large site ‘up-scale’  ‘tower in the park’ developments with tennis courts and a swimming pool were no longer supported.

_______________________

*Michael Gordon has worked as a planner for 44 years, including as a Senior Planner for downtown Vancouver (1992 – 2018).

**In 1961, the Architectural Institute of BC submitted to City staff a lengthy report recommending all the provisions that got incorporated into the RM-3 ‘tower in the park’ zoning. It was not until July 13, 1964 that Council approved an amended RM-3 applying to Kits, Kerrisdale, Mt. Pleasant, Fairview and other neighbourhoods. The new zoning reflected all that AIBC had recommended.

One phrase that has become a fixture on Apple device boxes and some Apple products is “Designed by Apple in California Assembled in China.” Those eight words may not mean much to the average Apple consumer, but they sufficiently sum up how a company now worth more than two trillion dollars became one of the largest sellers of consumer gadgets. A gradual change to Apple’s supply chain and product manufacturing apparatus is now underway. One byproduct of this change is an increasing number of Apple product boxes that no longer contain “Designed by Apple in California Assembled in China.” The change has implications for how Apple will approach product manufacturing in the 2020s.

Designed by Apple

Most analysts and pundits have landed on Apple’s custom silicon efforts as the defining source of the company’s success – the single-most important factor in explaining how Apple has been able to stand out from its peers. While Apple’s silicon prowess is undoubtedly a key differentiator for the company, the decade-long bet isn’t the fundamental reason why the company is where it is today. Instead, one has to look at the processes and culture that made Apple’s silicon efforts possible in the first place. 

Ultimately, Apple’s design-led culture is the single-most responsible factor behind the company’s ability to expand its installed base to more than a billion people. The relationships that Apple has formed with its customers aren’t just any connections but rather some of the strongest and most loyal connections in the corporate world. Apple placed a big bet on design (how we use products) and was proven right. Believing that technology is too powerful of a force to enjoy without acquired perception and natural intelligence made Apple an outlier. Other companies are now trying to emulate Apple’s design-led thinking and culture with varying degrees of success. 

In California

While those residing in the U.S. may not make much out of the “in California” component of “Designed by Apple in California,” Apple’s roots and heritage are intertwined with Silicon Valley. Apple can be described as a headquarters-centered company. Despite announcing major expansion plans in Austin, and new presences / expansion in in a handful of U.S. cities including Seattle (poach Amazon employees), San Diego (poach Qualcomm employees), Culver City (poach Hollywood talent), Pittsburgh (autonomous systems), New York (media and publishing), Boston (robotics), Portland (hardware-related efforts), and Boulder (possibly related to health-related efforts), everything comes back to Apple Park in Cupertino, California. Apple Park remains the sun with all of these satellite offices and campuses revolving around it.

Taking a step back from Apple in particular, the era when it was either Silicon Valley or bust ended years ago. However, that doesn’t mean Silicon Valley has been displaced as one of the most concentrated sources of innovation and new age thinking in the world. Recent attempts by some to paint other parts of the U.S. such as Miami and Austin as new Silicon Valleys may make for great tweet threads and blog posts, but for every person “fleeing” Silicon Valley, there are multiple people ready to be a replacement. 

Assembled in China 

The controversial part of “Designed by Apple in California Assembled in China” is “Assembled in China.” For some products, Apple has relied on “Made in China.” In recent years, Apple’s extensive ties to China regarding its supply chain and manufacturing apparatus have been labeled as major liabilities. Headlines and narratives are universally slanted against Apple’s approach to China, home to approximately 15% to 20% of Apple’s users. Many pundits want Apple to simply close up shop in China and abandon its users in the country.  

As relations between the world’s two economic powerhouses deteriorate, Apple has been described as being stuck in the middle. Of course, such a simplistic description lacks nuance. When it comes to China, Apple’s position is not nearly as perilous as western media wants people to think. Apple has been able to maintain its premium brand status in China and the brand remains heavily influential in China’s tech scene. It’s not outlandish to say that most non-iPhone smartphones sold in China are heavily “inspired” by the iPhone. The same can be said about wearables being “inspired” by Apple Watch and AirPods. 

In addition to a strong brand, Apple has a few key things going for it when it comes to its power standing and positioning in China. Being ultimately the driver behind the largest private employer in China means something. Not only are Apple products destined for sale in China made in China, but the country has been responsible for manufacturing Apple products sent to other countries. Being home to Apple’s supply chain and manufacturing apparatus gives China power and standing in its economic battle with the U.S. and increasingly other countries, including India. 

Not Assembled in China 

In December 2020, I ordered two HomePod mini speakers shortly after Apple unveiled the lower-cost speaker. One of my initial observations about the speakers materialized before opening the boxes. The back of the HomePod mini box did not contain the usual “Designed by Apple in California Assembled in China” phrase. Instead, the following was printed on the box:

“Designed by Apple in California Made in Vietnam.”

Rumors had pegged the new HomePod mini as being assembled in Vietnam. Even then, seeing Vietnam on the box was an eye-opener. Taking a step back from the HomePod mini, we see Apple embark on a broader move away from China for product manufacturing. The following products are currently, or will be, assembled outside of China.

• Vietnam: AirPods Pro, HomePod mini, AirPods (rumored), iPad (rumored), Mac (rumored)

• India: iPhone, iPad (rumored)

• Malaysia: Mac mini

• U.S.: Mac Pro 

(While the Mac Pro has been assembled in the U.S. for years, the device sells in such low numbers that it’s tough to say Apple has embraced U.S. manufacturing.)

A handful of countries in Southeast Asia are now in a position to manufacture Apple products. Some of this is due to governments increasingly accommodating foreign investment. Another factor is Apple’s long-time and vital business partner, Foxconn, showing a renewed effort to diversify its own business and footprint outside of China.

At the heart of this manufacturing transformation, one simple principle is guiding Apple: retaining power. By diversifying product assembly outside of China, Apple ends up pitting both governments and assemblers against each other. Apple stands to be one of the largest beneficiaries from increased economic rivalry between China, India, and Southeast Asia countries. Apple continues to take advantage of India’s more friendly and accommodating environment to bring a growing portion of iPhone production to the country. 

As for some of the finer strategy details found with Apple’s move, instead of announcing a big change like “we are moving all iPhone production out of China,” which western media has been demanding for years, Apple is taking the more practical and intelligent approach. The company remains careful not to disrupt its existing assembly apparatus. The vast majority of product assembly remains in China. Apple has looked outside of China to handle assembly for newer products that sell in much lower volumes relative to the iPhone. Such decisions involve a comprehensive examination of not just product assemblers (Foxconn, Pegatron, Luxshare, Wistron) but also the ability of key suppliers to work with the diversification efforts. Apple benefits from having resources and assets close to assemblers. 

Looking down the road, it is reasonable to expect a growing percentage of Apple products will be assembled outside of China. It is even likely that Apple will bring manufacturing back to the U.S. and we would be talking something much larger than the Mac Pro. Instead of iPhones and iPads being made in Alabama, Georgia, or Tennessee, it is more likely that Apple Cars will one day be produced in sprawling plants that are owned by third parties but contain Apple-owned machinery and equipment. 

Evolution

Apple is quietly and gradually showing us that the phase “Designed by Apple in California Assembled in China” will evolve. The company remains heavily invested in China, and that likely won’t change in the near term. However, by gradually diversifying product assembly into other countries, Apple ends up showing the world that its supply chain contains much more optionality than critics imagined. The battle between the world’s top economic powers for Apple’s business will be a key theme to watch in the 2020s.  

Listen to the corresponding Above Avalon podcast episode for this article here.

Receive my analysis and perspective on Apple throughout the week via exclusive daily updates (3 stories per day, 12 stories per week). Available to Above Avalon members. To sign up and for more information on membership, visit the membership page.

For additional discussion on this topic, check out the Above Avalon daily update from April 19th.

mkalus shared this story from Price Tags.

---

Michael Gordon* explores a misconception about Kitsilano in the Seventies – that, in a reaction to what was felt to be ‘out-of-control overdevelopment’ (see West End), Kits was downzoned.  Not quite.

 

Many years ago, Vancouver’s Director of Community Planning advised me that the 1975 downzoning in Kitsilano to prevent highrise residential development was not a downzoning. Upon further researching this, I discovered to some extent he had a point.

In July 1964 Kitsilano, Fairview, Kerrisdale, Mt.Pleasant and other neighbourhoods had their apartment RM-3 zoning amended to encourage ‘tower in the park’ residential development up to 120 feet.** Previously, the maximum height was three to four storeys.  Subsequently in Kitsilano, only seven highrise residential buildings were built along with a variety of four-storey wood-frame apartment buildings.

The RM-3 zoning had encouraged large site assemblies because it was the only way to achieve the maximum density and height of 36.6 metres (or about 11 to 13 storeys). Density bonuses were given for large sites, low site coverage and enclosed or underground parking. (This zoning still applies in areas of Fairview and Kerrisdale.)  Small- and medium-sized sites were built to a lower density and three- to four-storey wood-frame construction.

Things started to heat up in Kitsilano in the 1970s when:

• There were social tensions related to the displacement by new development of residents who wanted to stay in Kitsilano.
• Condominium development became more prevalent than purpose-built rental.
• More affordable housing choices such as ‘shared’ houses, housekeeping units in houses, rooming houses and small older rental apartment buildings were replaced by condo development for higher income residents.
• Condominium developments occupying most of a city block were clearly for higher income people as they included a swimming pool, tennis courts, a sauna and other amenities.

These two highrise residential developments alarmed Kitsilano residents at 2445 West 3^rd and 2370 West 2^nd:

The one on the left on West 3rd was the last highrise built in Kitsilano (1976) and was a focus of significant opposition and public demonstrations, as documented in this Vancouver Sun article:

 

The ‘Carriage House’ got built and, clearly from their sales ads, was to be marketed for high-income residents – ‘a new lifestyle where leisure and luxury go hand in hand.’

 

Subsequent to the so-called ‘downzoning,’ 14 non-market developents were built or established in existing buildings for low- to moderate-income families, seniors and other households e.g. a person with a disability.

The maximum height was now four storeys which leant itself well to non-market courtyard family-oriented developments such as Helen’s Court Co-op on West 1^st Avenue, built in 1984.

 

So why was the 1974 zoning change with a reduction of height from 10- 12 storeys to four storeys in some respects not a ‘downzoning?’

First, non-market developments and purpose-built rental, which included lower and moderate-rent apartments, could still be considered at the same maximum floorspace density of 1.9 as was possible under RM-3, without assembling a large site.

Also, market development on small- and medium-size sites could still achieve the same density in four storeys that were built before under RM-3 (about 1.45 FSR in four storeys).

But clearly, large site ‘up-scale’  ‘tower in the park’ developments with tennis courts and a swimming pool were no longer supported.

_______________________

*Michael Gordon has worked as a planner for 44 years, including as a Senior Planner for downtown Vancouver (1992 – 2018).

**In 1961, the Architectural Institute of BC submitted to City staff a lengthy report recommending all the provisions that got incorporated into the RM-3 ‘tower in the park’ zoning. It was not until July 13, 1964 that Council approved an amended RM-3 applying to Kits, Kerrisdale, Mt. Pleasant, Fairview and other neighbourhoods. The new zoning reflected all that AIBC had recommended.

When I’m not working or parenting or being an attentive dog owner, I’m taking pictures. I hesitate to call myself a photographer—I don’t have any particular projects, and nothing I do is especially systematic—but I’ve been taking pictures for the better part of the past decade, and I spend a lot of time thinking and reading about photography, studying the work of photographers I admire, and shooting my own photos. I’ve spent hundreds of hours in darkrooms, and I use a nice variety of cameras.

mkalus shared this story .

---

I hadn’t visited Indeed.com for years, but I had a job I wanted to post somewhere, so was seeking job posting sites, and at the same time learned that someone I knew was about to take a job in Portugal at a company called Teleperformance. She sent me a link to a YouTube video about the company, posted by the company itself.

Something about the video seemed suspicious in that “too good to be true” way, so I searched for reviews, and found a page on Indeed.com about Teleperformance. The reviews were indeed horrifying! They are in many languages, and I can only read French and English, but those were enough. It sounded like a nightmare of a job, attracting young people under false pretenses, paying them almost nothing, putting them up in terrible, moldy apartments, making women feel unsafe, making them stay for 9 months in order to get their flight refund…it went on and on.

But there were two other things I noticed. Indeed.com had pinned a positive review to the top of the page. Maybe they are paid to surface positive reviews? Unclear. And it explained a bit too much about the business, as if it were coming from the company itself. However, the other thing I noticed was that all of the positive reviews were completely without specifics.

You can hire bands of freelance reviewers on places like Fiverr to post positive reviews to Yelp, Indeed, Glassdoor, etc. Often these can be easily identified by their lack of specificity. If you removed all the non-specific positive reviews, Teleperformance would be left with just bad-to-terrible reviews.

Defrauding customers on review sites is also illegal. So I have reported the fraud here, but I am guessing that this particular company is not the only one stacking the deck. And they’re doing it with an assist from Indeed.com itself.

Here is where you can report fraud to the FTC. There is an ocean of this stuff, and obviously this report will get drowne in a sea of similar such reports. How can we get integrity back into the internet? Why can’t review sites maintain their integrity? Should we wipe the internet and start again? Sometimes I think we should.

Jason Kottke, kottke.org, Apr 16, 2021

This is mostly just a clip from a much longer New York Times article where Ezra Klein interviews science fiction writer Ted Chiang. There's some good stuff in the interview (for example: what would a comic where the superhero opposes the status quo look like?) but it being the Times readers might have trouble accessing it. The key point in the excerpt is expressed in the headline. "It’s not that technology fundamentally is about putting people out of work. It’s capitalism that wants to reduce costs and reduce costs by laying people off" (my emphasis). I know the two are often presented hand in hand, but it's not the case, and people like me, at least, spend a lot of time thinking about how tech can make people's lives better, safer and more secure.

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]

Everest Pipkin, Apr 16, 2021

I've seen this page a few times over the last week and thought I'd pass it along, noting that while I support the intent if not the execution (seriously - yellow on yellow as a colour scheme?). The intent is this: "to enable making entirely outside of closed production ecosystems or walled software gardens." It's basically a collection of 500 or so tools, both free and paid (though cheap). They run the gamut from the Unity 3D engine (and extensions) to simple Javascript tools to write interactive stories.

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]

Note: This blog post is co-authored by the awesome WSL dev Pierre Boulay. Thanks Pierre!

We’ve just shipped the 5.10.16.3 WSL 2 Linux kernel version to Windows Insiders which brings exciting new changes: Support for the LUKS disk encryption, and some long-awaited bug fixes. We’d like to seize this opportunity to highlight these improvements and show you how these changes land on your Windows machine no matter your Windows version.

New feature addition: Support for LUKS disk encryption

This kernel update adds support for LUKS disk format. Such disks can now we accessed using wsl –mount.

LUKS disks can be mounted through the following steps: (Refer to distro specific instructions to install cryptsetup if needed).

$ wsl --mount [disk-id] --bare
$ wsl cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdX my-device # Replace /dev/sdX with the block device path in WSL.
$ wsl mkdir /mnt/wsl/my-mountpoint
$ wsl mount /dev/mapper/my-device /mnt/wsl/my-mountpoint

The disk content can then be accessed by navigating to \\wsl$\<yourDistroName>\mnt\wsl (Replace with the name of your distro, any disto works). Please check the wsl –mount docs page for full instructions on how to mount a disk in WSL.

Bug fix: Clock sync

This new kernel version also contains a bug fix for a clock sync issue (Github Issue #5324). This issue causes the clock inside of your WSL 2 instances to be different than the actual time on your host machine. This bug was fixed entirely by changes inside of the Linux kernel itself that are present in this latest version.

Our kernel servicing process

These changes are very easy to get onto your machine, in fact it’s likely you won’t even notice that you are put onto the latest kernel version! We leverage Microsoft Update to ship this to you, and by hitting ‘Check for Updates’ in your settings, or just letting your computer update like normal, you’ll be kept up to date.

Microsoft Update delivers general updates to your operating system that don’t rely on giving a full update to your Windows build. These updates include things such as the latest virus definitions for Windows Defender, new graphics or sound card drivers, and now updates to your WSL 2 Linux kernel.

At Microsoft, the Linux Systems Group is responsible for creating the WSL 2 Linux kernel. You can read about this process at the ‘Shipping a Linux Kernel with Windows’ blog post. Once they have a kernel version ready, we test it internally to make sure it works on WSL 2 scenarios, and then ship it to Windows Insiders. The Windows Insiders audience is an invaluable group of people who use early preview versions of Windows, and so we recruit their help as well to get the first preview of new WSL 2 Linux kernels. Our release process is data driven, and once we’ve gained enough confidence on the quality of the new kernel, we expand its audience to further Windows Insider rings and then eventually to retail.

We publish our kernel version history to the Linux kernel release notes page on the WSL docs, and since the WSL 2 Linux kernel is fully open source we make sure to link to its source code as well.

Where to learn more and give feedback

For any WSL issues please file them at the WSL Github repo. If you’d like to learn more about WSL please check out the WSL docs, and if you have general questions you can follow me on Twitter @craigaloewen and WSL team members at this list. Happy coding!

The post Servicing the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) 2 Linux kernel appeared first on Windows Command Line.

mkalus shared this story from CTV News Vancouver.

---

by Scott

Kevin and I were speaking this morning about the merits and differences between physical and e-books. One thing that we both agreed on was that books with lots of photos or maps were ones that both of us felt we could only buy as a physical book. E-books are fine for a novel or some non fiction reading, but if you want to read poetry or see large format photos or paintings, then a physical book is simply the best. Introducing The Vintage Bicycle by Steel Vintage Bikes. 

The fabulous folks at Steel Vintage Bikes in Berlin have produced a book showing a collection of steel bikes they have restored over the years. With bikes ranging from 1927 to 1989, there will be bikes you've never seen along with technical elements sure to excite.

The majority of the bikes are racing bikes, but there are some randonneur and touring bikes mixed in as well. 48 bikes are showcased over 110 pages. You get one drive train side shot of each bike as well as a description of the bike and the builder and some more detailed shots.

This is a great book for someone who loves older steel bikes or perhaps someone looking for inspiration from the past. Hardcover, and printed in English.

Mathew Ingram, Columbia Journalism Review, Apr 15, 2021

As usual, many of the lessons here for journalism could also apply to education. Today we're looking at the role of journalism. There is no direct analogy between 'journalist as watchdog' and 'educator as whatever' but nonetheless the values we presume apply to education might no longer be relevant to the community at large. So this is an interesting approach: " The API study recommends they (journalists) consider reworking stories in order to broaden their appeal to people who belong to multiple groups - those who prefer order and have respect for leaders, those who feel the powerless deserve a voice, and so on." I won't say I totally agree with the outcome, but the thinking behind it seems solid.

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]

Despite Apple’s 2021 iPhones not being officially shown off yet, often-reliable analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has released an investor note that reveals new information about the tech giant’s 2022 lineup of smartphones.

First, Kuo says that Apple’s 2022 iPhone series will feature two 6.1 devices and two 6.7-inch smartphones, with the 5.4-inch mini-size being ditched, as first reported by MacRumors. With that in mind, the report says that Apple will still sell a 5.4-inch iPhone mini in 2021. According to several reports, Apple’s iPhone mini line hasn’t been selling as well as the company hoped it would — the small smartphone dream seems to be dead.

Kuo also says that Apple’s 2022 iPhones will feature a 48-megapixel camera in the higher-end ‘Pro’ models that will take iPhone photography “to a new level.” Other camera features include 8K video support and a focus on augmented reality/mixed reality (AR/MR) experiences. Finally, while a periscope lens is on the horizon, it won’t arrive until 2023 alongside an under-display version of Face ID, says Kuo, pushing back his initial prediction surrounding the technology by roughly a year.

Other 2023 iPhone line predictions include the possibility of a hole-punch style cutout for the lineup’s selfie camera.

With the official reveal of Apple’s 2021 iPhone lineup not set to happen until likely September, we’ll likely see countless rumours and speculation over the next few months leading up to the smartphones’ release.

Source: MacRumors

The post Apple to reportedly ditch 5.4-inch ‘mini’ size with 2022 iPhone lineup appeared first on MobileSyrup.

Why you shouldn't use ENV variables for secret data

I do this all the time, but this article provides a good set of reasons that secrets in environment variables are a bad pattern - even when you know there's no multi-user access to the host you are deploying to. The biggest problem is that they often get captured by error handling scripts, which may not have the right code in place to redact them. This article suggests using Docker secrets instead, but I'd love to see a comprehensive write-up of other recommended patterns for this that go beyond applications running in Docker.

Via The environ-config tutorial

This week my guest is Tod Maffin (LinkedIn) who I met while he was at the CBC, which came after doing a stint in Marketing, which was preceded by radio journalism … 

Music by Derek K. Miller

BTW…Tod tried the audio editor Hindenburg on the advice of our mutual friend Steve Dotto. From Tod’s suggestion I tried it too. Well, GarageBand might be fine for podcasts, but Hindenburg is better. I put this all together in GarageBand, exported to MP3 and wasn’t 100% happy with the sound. A lot of hiss and stuff in it. So I imported the MP3 into Hindenburg and, wow, even with an MP3 that I had already applied an EQ on and compressor…it sounded so much better. I also followed Tod’s suggestions for how to use the more manual I-really-should-take-a-class-on-this audio effects and … yeah this app is a big improvement.Hope you can tell the difference.

Hmm, maybe they’d sponsor the show so I can get a license to Journalist Pro.

Transcript

Tod Maffin on radio and podcasting

Tris Hussey:[00:00:24] Tod Maffin. Welcome to my ink stained fingers. And, uh, we’ve known each other.  

[00:00:47] How long?

[00:00:47] Tod Maffin:  Oh my gosh. Well more than 10 years, he’s more than 10 

[00:00:51] Tris Hussey: [00:00:51] years easily. Yeah. Yeah. 

[00:00:52] Tod Maffin: [00:00:52] W what year we are, you know, you get old when you’re kind of figure out the year. So I would probably say 15 years, I would guess I would guess 2006 is 

[00:01:01] Tris Hussey: [00:01:01] probably, yeah, that sounds about right.

[00:01:03] And that’s, and it’s when you were at the CBC, um, doing technology reporting. Um, and I think the last time I heard you talk was a Northern voice. Oh yeah. Okay. Probably in 2000. Nine. Yeah, maybe 2010. And you were giving a talk on podcasting. Yes. And I, and you were talking about how to do the Ira Glass sound, and if you want to get really close 

[00:01:28] Tod Maffin: [00:01:28] to the mic in lieu of original ideas, I just train people on this stuff I’ve been copying.

[00:01:34] Exactly. 

[00:01:35] Tris Hussey: [00:01:35] And I’ve always copied your I’ve. I shamelessly copy your style for, for top, for talking about tech and I love your new, your new podcast. It’s it? It is a, it is a, a quarter of a Milo walk. It is what it is. So it’s nice. I can know. I can be getting, I can listen beginning to end and, and I don’t have to go like, Oh, crud, I gotta, I gotta stop this.

[00:01:58] I’m not gonna be able to finish. So I thought we would talk today about this kind of, I feel like podcast. I mean, I’ve always loved podcasting because I’ve always loved radio. Not, not that I’ve ever been on the radio. I’ve always aspired to be on the radio. But you’ve, you’ve actually been like a radio journalist and had radio shows and, and now you’re doing, you know, digital media and podcasting.

[00:02:22] What did, what and why, what do you think happened with, like, why is this even now just sort of podcasting is like, everyone’s podcasting. Why do you see those interests? Yeah, I, uh, 

[00:02:33] Tod Maffin: [00:02:33] bear with me here, moving my, moving my stuff around. Um, You know, I think audio is, is a great medium. And, and one of the things that’s, I think in line with where we are as a people or a society for better, or for worse, is that we are continuing this trend of, of needing to multitask, you know, as time gets shorter.

[00:02:52] And I mean, this has been something that people have been talking about since the sixties is we always need to multitask, but you know, every, every couple of years it seems to get a little bit more multitasking in our work, especially now that we’ve been working from home and so on. So. You know, audio in that respect is kind of the ultimate medium, because even as you said, you know, you can be walking your dog at the same time as, as going for, as listening to a podcast.

[00:03:15] So, you know, I think that that’s, that’s really helpful for people is to be able to, to unlike YouTube or television, where you’ve got to kind of devote another, uh, another sensory organ, your eyes, um, to that it’s a little bit easier to absorb. And I think also the quality of podcasts. Um, is getting more refined.

[00:03:35] I never liked to say better because back in the early days, you know , when you were early in podcasting and so on, you know, there were really good podcasts and part of what made them good was that they were raw and unpolished. Yes, 

[00:03:50] Tris Hussey: [00:03:50] that’s a good, that’s a nice way of what called my podcast.

[00:03:53] Definitely raw and unpolished, 

[00:03:56] Tod Maffin: [00:03:56] but those are, I, you know, I think those are the best ones. I, there was a, um, there was a podcast of, uh, of a brother and sister in Toronto and they were quite young at the time. I think the brother was 11 and the sister was like 15 or something, but they had a great podcast.

[00:04:09] Um, and it was just kind of their life. And it was compelling as hell. Like, I mean, it was just, it was the kind of stuff. And, you know, we, we’ve gotten to a place in the past casting space now where podcasts are more polished and there’s narrative structures that have been developed through from screenwriting and so on.

[00:04:25] And so there’s, there are ways to make it compelling, but I feel like we’re, we’re missing some of those early days of people just. Throwing a microphone on, you know, you know, Mark, brevis our mutual friend who is in Ottawa and a phenomenal podcaster and writer in his own. Right. Um, he has kind of a private podcast, which I won’t share the name.

[00:04:45] Cause I don’t think, I think it’s just a private feed that the first family and friends where he just like every other day or so, he just turns on the mic and starts talking about like what he did that day and, and what his thoughts are generally. And. You know, sometimes it’s boring, but sometimes it’s like deeply profound.

[00:04:59] And so I liked that being in this space of sort of, I like those podcasts. 

[00:05:04] Tris Hussey: [00:05:04] Yeah. And I think that’s how I started. Um, it would be a little before we met, when I lived on salt spring Island. For those of you who do not know Canadian and British Columbia geography, salt spring Island is the center of these Gulf islands.

[00:05:18] That between the mainland in Vancouver Island, um, salt spring Island is famous as the, the last natural refuge of the North American hippie. And I would walk to town with a, I bought a cheap, cheap MP3 recorder, and I would walk to town. I called it my walkabout podcast, and you could hear all the traffic going by and the gravel crunching under my feet.

[00:05:41] And I loved doing it. And then I got to a point where I had so many episodes in the can that I wanted to master that by the time it was like, Oh, now it doesn’t matter. And I probably should’ve just fired them off and I probably would still be podcasting. Have the walkabout podcast may have named it have changed, but I probably would have been still doing it if I had just not worried about it as much.

[00:06:04] Yeah. So you, when, when did you. Seems like when you worked at the CBC and you, you were into radio and TV, when did podcasting start appealing to you? 

[00:06:20] Tod Maffin: [00:06:20] As a, as a really good medium day, one  day, one day one, literally the first time, literally the first time that I heard about podcasting, I thought this is, this is going to be huge.

[00:06:27] Um, because it did, as you sort of referenced, you know, I was in radio at the time I started my career in radio and then kind of went into marketing and then went back to CBC and am now back in marketing. I kind of, every, every decade I seem to alternate. Um, but my two loves have always been radio and technology and radio had not been a very technology heavy, uh, um, uh, medium at that point.

[00:06:51] You know, this was 2004, really when, when podcasting first sort of was developed or when the enclosure tag was added to the RSS feed spec, which enabled podcasting. And it was done by these two guys, uh, Dave Wiener and Adam Curry. And they, they threw the, those that tag in and. They called it podcasting. I think I’ve heard, I remember Adam saying once that he wished he hadn’t called it podcasting, it was named podcasting because at the time there was no iPhone, but there were iPods and you would listen mostly on an iPod.

[00:07:18] So that’s why it was called podcasting. But yeah, you know, I mean, I think that that part of it appealed to me because I could see that this would change the way we listen to radio and it would enable us to, to listen, you know, in a different slice, um, I used to call it vertical listening where traditional radio and television is horizontal.

[00:07:37] You think about the way that, uh, you know, an old school TV guide used to be, there were channels down the left and there was a time across the right. And if you wanted to listen or watch, you would basically listen or watch horizontally, you would stay on one channel and you would just kind of let that television station, if you were committed to a particular station brand and that television station would just drop stuffing at particular times.

[00:08:00] And it would be different content. You know, one, one show, one might be a newscast about fishing, and then they might do a show about, uh, for families and there might be a comedy show. And then there might be a late night newscast, you know, so lots of different topics, but all kind of in this one horizontal line.

[00:08:13] And I thought, wouldn’t it be cool if we could use this technology to, instead of listening horizontally to listen vertically by subject matter so that I could say, I am like really into alpaca breathing or whatever. And so find me. A collection of alpaca breathing content, and I don’t care what line it’s on.

[00:08:34] I don’t care what station it’s from. Just hop down those station lists until you can find enough material to package up a little newscast about alpaca breeding for me that I don’t think that technology has yet to come to fruition. I think we’ve sort of adapted podcasting to the traditional radio model, largely public radio model, which is fine.

[00:08:54] It’s compelling listening. Public radio produces some amazing stuff. Um, but I’m hoping that further down the line we’ll get into that kind of vertical listening, vertical style of listening, where we can say, you know, I have a very specific niche interest in, you know, like for instance, one of my interests is the JFK assassination.

[00:09:10] I have one of the largest collections of artifacts in the country around that. Yeah. 

[00:09:16] Tris Hussey: [00:09:16] We have to talk about that later, but 

[00:09:17] Tod Maffin: [00:09:17] okay. Fair enough. And, um, So I, you know, I, I, and I listened to podcast is a great one called black op radio. This guy has been doing it for literally 20 years out of his basement in new Westminster.

[00:09:27] He does this hour and a half show every single week about it. And, but I would love to be able to sort of listen to other stuff from, from various providers. So, you know, maybe we’ll get there. Maybe the technology will, will get us there. I don’t know. 

[00:09:37] Tris Hussey: [00:09:37] Yeah. I mean, the, the whole idea of verdict when you first said vertical listening or vertical watching, I thought, well, we have that.

[00:09:43] We have Netflix and we have other, we, we, you, you don’t have to. You don’t have to watch at a time. I mean, you, you and I are old enough to remember the times when, you know, we, the world would re rotate around when a show was on. Yeah. Right. Um, I think you, you probably remember. I remember the summer when the summer, when the big question was who shot Jr.

[00:10:11] Right in Dallas and it was the cliffhanger and their t-shirts and everyone, and the F and we, when we knew that knew that it was going to come on, I was too young to stay up that late. So I actually never got to see either the episode where Jr was shot or that what happened at when it came up. But I remember that was a thing.

[00:10:27] And like the last episode of MASH, uh, and all of those things that we, the world stopped. And now the world just listens when we feel like it. But then clubhouse came along and. I’m I’ve I’m still in. I’m like I’m ambivalent on clubhouse. I think it’s I love the idea. And it was like, you were talking about yesterday.

[00:10:49] How many co clubhouse clones are there? Did you say everyone has one?

[00:10:53] Tod Maffin: [00:10:53] Facebook’s working on one, Twitter is about to roll one out. Discord is rebranding. It’s sort of adaptive voice channels. LinkedIn has got one. Now every Spotify and Spotify bought an audio app to put themselves there.

[00:11:05] Tris Hussey: [00:11:05] Yeah. And I, the thing that, the thing that I don’t enjoy about clubhouse and I turned off almost on the notifications was unlike radio. It is a little too unstructured. And the, the it’s like for me, going into clubhouse and looking for something to listen to is like when you’re on a long drive in the middle of nowhere, and there is absolutely no good radio stations.

[00:11:32] And you finally just give up and listen to the sound of the sound of the road, grinding under your tires, because you just there’s nothing. Yeah. That’s what I feel. Clubhouse is 

[00:11:43] Tod Maffin: [00:11:43] podcast equivalent as well to that. And I don’t know if there’s a formal name, but I call them ramble casts, right? Where they are like three hour long podcasts that don’t actually have a point.

[00:11:52] You know, one of, one of my wife’s favorite podcasts is called crime writers on. Um, and it is, it’s about, uh, it’s these three or four, literally they, they write crime fiction crime, but they review these true crime, all the true crime podcasts. And when they’re actually reviewing it for the five or 10 minutes that they’re reviewing it, it’s really good.

[00:12:09] I’m really interested. But honest to God, they take it 20 minutes to even start the show. Like it’s, they’re talking about their cats and what they did that weekend and I couldn’t care less. And so I think clubhouse is kind of partially that, you know, because you could say it’s not structured. People are not.

[00:12:25] Professional hosts, not nor need they be, but you know, stick to a point. And then the other thing that sort of happened, unfortunately with clubhouse is that within a very short amount of time, um, sort of the self promoters of LinkedIn showed up. So all the realtors that want to promote stuff, or they’ve got a, uh, someone’s got an information product they’re selling a webinar and then training course.

[00:12:43] And so, you know, now, I mean, I haven’t opened clubhouse in two or three weeks, but the last time I looked at it, It was full of like how to 10 X, your Instagram following. And it’s like, the world doesn’t need it. 

[00:12:53] Tris Hussey: [00:12:53] We don’t need that. I, I, when you talked about some of these clubhouse clones, and I think about LinkedIn, I think especially about Spotify, because I, when I decided to relaunch this podcast, I, I didn’t, I’m going baby steps.

[00:13:08] So I’m, I’m hosting it on anchor.fm, which is free, but Spotify owns it. Yeah, and I would, I think it would be great to have a live podcast and everyone knows it’s live. And so like, there’s going to be like little to no post production, but you could it have that radio show feel and then be able to save it and listen to it later because one of the things I’ve.

[00:13:32] As annoyed me the most about podcast about clubhouse is when you know, there’s a really good session, but you just can’t make it for whatever reason or you hear about it too late, you pop in and you just don’t understand, like it’s, it’s like you’re being dropped into the middle of, uh, a radio play and you have no idea who the characters are or what’s going on.

[00:13:52] And it makes no sense al all

[00:13:53] Tod Maffin: [00:13:53] You know, this exists though, right? I mean, everyone sort of, there’s a lot of attention paid to clubhouse because it’s largely funded. And, and the first people who moved in were a tech investors. And so it got a lot of attention that way, but there’s been, there’s this website called blog talk radio that has been around.

[00:14:09] Oh yes. For a decade. 

[00:14:11] Tris Hussey: [00:14:11] Yeah. Yeah. I used to have a show on that. Remember Jim Turner and I used to have the professional bloggers podcasting thing on Bloodstock radio. Yeah, 

[00:14:19] Tod Maffin: [00:14:19] that’s literally clubhouse. It’s not as good. It’s just a little bit the technical, jeez, a little bit differently, right? It’s through the it’s through a web browser and then your guests can phone in.

[00:14:27] So not actually using their I-phones microphone for good, all that equal they’re phoning a phone line, but it was the same thing it was live. And then it would automatically package it up into an MP3 file and create a little podcast out of it. So, you know, the only thing that’s different about clubhouse is it’s cooler.

[00:14:40] You know, it’s an app now instead of a website. Um, and that’s about it. 

[00:14:46] Tris Hussey: [00:14:46] Yeah, that’s true. That’s true. Um, but I, I see, I mean, I see great potential, not for clubhouse specifically, but just as. Um, maybe it, maybe it is like we share this affection for, I used to listen to public radio all the time when I was in grad school.

[00:15:06] And I was reminded yesterday, listening to your show. And you were, you put in, you had an ad cause you’ve got sponsors, which is wonderful. Yeah. And I don’t mind listening to the ads by the way, because what I was, I was reminded of the way you did the ad. When, um, the, the last year my dad was alive and I was in grad school, I would drive.

[00:15:25] Two hours from our, our summer place on the Lake. Um, from, from there up to we’re at the university of Maine where I was going to grad school and I would, I would go, I would like leave school about Friday afternoon and spend the weekend with my parents and then drive back on Sunday. And I would listen to the red Sox games on am radio.

[00:15:45] And those announcers were great and how they worked in ads because the, like the, the example I always give, and this is totally made up. It was like, you know, it’s a beautiful day at Fenway, you know, evening settling in, you know, it’s, it’s. Quiet. It’s the wind is blowing and it’s cool, but it’s not, but it’s a night like this, that you really need a Budweiser Budweiser, the King of beers.

[00:16:07] And this is into this app and I felt that your ads had that. It was nostalgic for me the way you’re acting. Yeah. That that’s cool. And I enjoy it. I, I don’t know. That’s and are you still there?

[00:16:25] Tod Maffin: [00:16:25] Sorry. I muted myself immediate. I’m an idiot. That was not your end. Um, I caused it, so I hit the mute button on my mic.

[00:16:31] And then I forgot to turn it back on again. I think that, that, uh, yeah, sorry. I, I was going on rambling incoherently while I was muted. Now I’ve completely forgot what else? 

[00:16:43] Tris Hussey: [00:16:43] Well, the, this, okay. This is funny because every podcast I’ve recorded, something has gone wrong and I’m doing this at the end of every show.

[00:16:52] After we say goodbye, a little like MCU homage. So, this is what went sideways in this episode, it’s going to be like, so Tom had some really great points, but we’ll never know because he was muted. 

[00:17:04] Tod Maffin: [00:17:04] Yes, exactly. Story of my life. 

[00:17:07] Tris Hussey: [00:17:07] Um, so, um, maybe, maybe if we change topics, you’ll remember the other one and we’ll do this, or the add podcast rule, switch back.

[00:17:16] Um, you said like you and I have a passion for shared passion for technology and, um, have bounced around between, you know, I was, uh, I, I, I say it was a tech journalist, but I wasn’t really a journalist in the truest sense. I wrote about stuff for money. Um, and then you went to, you know, journalism marketing back to journalism.

[00:17:38] Now you’re back to marketing. What is, what, what has that journey been like for you? What is fuel that journey? Was, it was, it does passion for the, for marketing or just purely, Hey, I need, I need to earn a living. What is, what has been the thing? I, 

[00:17:52] Tod Maffin: [00:17:52] yeah, I don’t know that I, that I had any kind of strategy. I mean, my, my career path, my life has largely just sort of bumbled along, following my interests and hoping for the best, um, and probably missed out on some opportunities.

[00:18:05] I started my career in radio, um, in the Kootneys for a, uh, radio network called KBS, where you had to answer the phone by saying it’s great to be in the Kootneys. And it usually wasn’t. Yeah. So I was like 19 or 20 or something like that. And I worked in Creston, which is a tiny little town. I worked Monday to Friday there, uh, as the news reporter and then Saturday and Sunday, Saturday and Saturday and Sunday morning, I would drive to trail, which was about a two hour drive over ice.

[00:18:33] And do the weekend newscasts, um, from starting at four 30 in the morning until about noon. Then I’d go to the travel lodge, have a one-hour nap, and then I’d jump in the KBS Coca-Cola Kooteny cruiser. I’m sorry, and go cover like the bonds know, like I’m sure it broke every labor law, it was seven days a week, 14 hours a day, but it was great training for, you know, live radio and so on.

[00:18:56] And then, but technology has always been fascinating to me. Um, marketing has been fascinating to me and sort of the intersection between the two. So I’ve mostly just sort of followed. Follow my interests. I mean, I was very fortunate at CBC. Um, I was giving a lot of speeches at the time around sort of technology and where this new thing called the web was going to take organizations.

[00:19:19] And one of the companies that had hired me to, to present to them, um, cause I had started this pirate radio station on my computer at three. I was, I think it was through when amp somehow, but it was like a streaming radio station, you know, long before. Anyone cared about copyright and stuff. And I had three of them streaming and one was like, and it was called Todd radio, one Tod radio, two toddler do three.

[00:19:40] And one was like all Canadian music. One was all Canadian comedy and I forgot what the third one was. And CBC radio found out about it and asked me to present to them about what all this technology was and what the future of radio might look like. And so I did, I gave them, you know, a little bit of a presentation and at the end there was this Q and a session.

[00:19:59] And one of the producers there said, if you could have. Any job at a CBC, what would you do? And normally I would just blow that off as a joke, but I thought, well, maybe they’re serious. And I said, you know, I would love to host a national live radio show where it’s really live right, not live to the East coast.

[00:20:18] And then time delayed across the country. I mean, live to every time zone and interactive so that people could control how the show played out through chat room, webcams, whatever. And, uh, two weeks later, a national producer called and said, I’ve been assigned to your pilot. And that was the sort of how I got into CBC.

[00:20:38] And so that, that show, which they actually called Tod radio brand for two or three seasons. And then my career went in backwards at the CPCU. I started as a national host and I was a national producer. Then I was a columnist. Then I was a freelancer. Then I was out, you know, most people you’d go kind of go, would love to have you start at the beginning.

[00:20:53] Then 20 years later, you’re hosting a national show. I kind of did it backwards. But it’s, you know, it’s and, and public radio, I think yeah. Is, is such an interesting model for podcasting because it has the, the same, you know, largely the same kind of storytelling mechanisms, um, to capture people’s attention.

[00:21:09] You’ve got some time to kind of play stuff out, you know, unlike private radio, where I started, where everything is talking to a 62nd clock in am radio, when did sign for traffic, was Sarah. You know, that kind of stuff is you’ve got time to breathe. And that’s also what I like about podcasts. 

[00:21:22] Tris Hussey: [00:21:22] Yeah. Yeah, it is.

[00:21:24] That’s that storytelling aspect. Um, at some point I’m going to have a guest where we, we talk about purely podcasting as the new storytelling. There’s I I’ve, um, I, I, you know, used to listen to like, wait, will be gone days occasionally. And, and my, and my, my brain is completely. Blanked out on the F on the amazing Garrison Keillor.

[00:21:49] Nope, no note Stuart McLean. That’s who I was thinking of, of his, his Canadian weight. Cause you know, I’m an immigrant in Canada. The vinyl cafe was, was wonderful. And his stories. I still remember the defrosting, the Turkey in the drier. 

[00:22:00] Tod Maffin: [00:22:00] Yeah. That’s the one everyone remembers that one. 

[00:22:01] Tris Hussey: [00:22:01] Um, I remember a bunch of his other, his other work and I love those and I think, yeah, it’s podcasting gives, gives us this chance to delve in and give a story.

[00:22:14] I mean, I had originally. As I described this in the pre-show notes, I shared with people as I’m trying to make this a one Milo walk long podcast, which is a roughly 20 minutes, because that’s how long it takes me to walk my lo from the house round the long way around to go pick up my daughter from school.

[00:22:31] And yeah, I have, yeah, I think the only time I’ve ever done one Milo walk length is when I’ve been alone because everyone is too interesting. I cannot. I do not do not want to go like, yeah. Well, you know, Todd, we’re at 28 minutes. Uh, yeah. So shut up. No, that’s not how this works. That’s not how this works.

[00:22:49] Yeah. And, um, so tell me about your, your podcast reminds me of when I did a long time ago, I had to the WordPress one minute podcast, right? It was a tip I could explain to do in one minute that you could do in one minute in WordPress, how did you decide on the time format for your new. 

[00:23:08] Tod Maffin: [00:23:08] I stole it. I ripped it off from someone else.

[00:23:11] That’s that’s the truth. There’s this great, great podcast out there called the tech meme ride home. And it is about a 15 minute newscast, basically summarizing everything that day in the world of tech. So it’s very broad, you know, it’s all sorts of tech from smart cars to internet of things, to wifi technology, to microchips.

[00:23:32] It’s, it’s everything. But I love the format. It was like punchy, short 32nd news clips. It was like everything that you needed to know about in the world of tech that day. And I thought, well, I’ve got to find the digital marketing, social media equivalent of this. And I searched and I searched and it was clear that some people had started and tried, they’d made like three or four episodes and then fallen off the wagon and hadn’t updated it in ages.

[00:23:52] And I thought, well, why don’t I try it for a couple of weeks and see if it gets an audience. And it did. And it’s been going, we’ve been doing it for a year and a half now, every single Workday, every single weekday. So I think we are at episode 359. 

[00:24:06] Tris Hussey: [00:24:06] Now I’ll have to share. Yeah. This sounds about right. 

[00:24:10] Tod Maffin: [00:24:10] It’s in thethree fifties.

[00:24:10] Yeah. It’s in the three fifties for sure. Um, And it’s, you know, it’s certainly evolved. Um, you know, now we have good theme music that again, Mark Levis composed, actually. It’s great music. It’s really good. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Um, we have a music license so we can use other pieces of music. Um, someone on my, at my agency largely writes the big chunk of the script and does the sort of the first run of the edit.

[00:24:34] So, you know, it’s become a bit of a team effort now and, you know, to be honest, the goal, the long-term goal, because I still run, engage Q, which is a digital agency with five people in it. Lots of really great clients. Um, so a lot of my time is taken up with that, but my goal has been just like it was with the speaking circuit where about three or four years ago.

[00:24:51] I decided, you know, it’s time I’ve been doing speaking professional, speaking for money for 20 years now, you know, it was signed to wrap it up. I’m tired of traveling. Yeah. So about three or four years ago, I started to kind of scale back and do more on the, on the engaged queue agency side. So similarly with the podcast, that’s kind of the Seesaw I’m trying now is to, is to hopefully maybe in three or four years, Scale back the, uh, the agency, maybe sell it off somewhere, um, and just do this podcasting and, uh, and do Tik Tok.

[00:25:20] Tris, are you on tick-tock?

[00:25:22] Tris Hussey: [00:25:22]  No, I never even launched it. I don’t even have it installed. 

[00:25:27] Tod Maffin: [00:25:27] It took me 20 years to get 10,000 followers on Twitter. Yeah. Okay. And that’s what the benefit of giving keynote speeches to tens of thousands of people to being on national radio. It took me. It took me that long to get 10,000 followers.

[00:25:42] I’ve been on Tik TOK for a month and a half. I just crossed 20,000 followers. 

That’s 

[00:25:48] Tris Hussey: [00:25:48] that’s crazy. 

[00:25:49] Tod Maffin: [00:25:49] That is crazy. So, anyway, we’re doing so it, it, the, the podcast is about a eight to 10 minute long summary of everything in the world of digital marketing from social media to SEO, to online ads, to Facebook, everything that we can.

[00:26:02] Um, and then, so that gets put out on the feed. And then I go over to tech talk and I do a one minute version of the podcast. Cause that’s the max that you can do right now. So it’s a one minute newscast of the, it’s a one minute summary of the 10 minute summary. 

[00:26:17] Tris Hussey: [00:26:17] Do you like, do you like record it and then, you know, speed it up in garage band. So like you can hamster voice or 

[00:26:23] Tod Maffin: [00:26:23] scripted to be, it’s just basically one line per story, maybe two lines per story. And. Yeah. 

[00:26:29] Tris Hussey: [00:26:29] I don’t know. I don’t know if I could get into tech talk. I just, I have you downloaded 

[00:26:34] Tod Maffin: [00:26:34] the app and be very carefully tryst. Let’s be very careful because what you’re going to do, you’re going to go download the app.

[00:26:40] Okay. You’re going to get, is it going to ask you some interests that you have? You’re going to answer, honestly, you’re going to swipe, just give it 20 minutes to swipe through. If you don’t like the video, swipe up, get rid of it in 20 minutes. I promise it will have you nailed. It will have come down, but like Sheila’s stick, talk to feed is going to look completely different.

[00:26:58] It’s going to be singers. It’s going to be performance art. Yours is going to be, you know, WordPress, it’s going to be content writing. It’s going to be a copy. It’s it is so good. And here’s the thing is tick-tock used to be, especially back in this musically days, used to be teenagers doing dances and lip-syncing, and there, there is that there too as well.

[00:27:16] But my TechTalk feed because the algorithm has nailed me down so much. It’s figured out what I like. Mine is all educational. So I follow a couple of cooking feeds in there. I follow some digital marketers. Um, I follow this, this guy that is a demolition expert and he blows stuff up, but he talks about how he does it.

[00:27:34] And I used to be like every night I would watch an hour, an hour and a half of YouTube in bed. I’d read half an hour of Reddit. I don’t think I’ve opened my Reddit app in three weeks. Four weeks, maybe. I don’t think I’ve watched any more than two or three YouTube videos. I’m not proud of this by the way.

[00:27:50] I’m not 

[00:27:52] Tris Hussey: [00:27:52] in media consumption. Okay. Because see, my vision of tech talk is still, it was definitely stuck in the tweens doing dance, routines and philosophy as I can 

[00:28:03] Tod Maffin: [00:28:03] that’s there. But, but if you don’t like those, you just swipe away really quickly and it learns, it figures out how long you spend on each, on each video in the shorter amount of time you spend on it before you swipe it away, the less you like it.

[00:28:12] And I promise you, I promise you, dude, in 20 minutes, In 20 minutes, it will start feeding you stuff that you’re like, Oh, that was really interesting. Yeah. 

[00:28:19] Tris Hussey: [00:28:19] Okay. You’re you’re on, because I’m publishing this episode, this episode will be out week after next. So, and so that’s probably when I’ll be writing rewriting the show notes and things, and I’ll have this like, okay.

[00:28:33] So in the show, Todd challenged me to try tech talk and it’s either going to be man. He like, what is he on? That is no. This is stupid or okay. Yeah, I’m hooked. And now you’ll be seeing my ink stained fingers on technique. And I’ll show you how I fill up a fountain pen. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Oh, you mock 

[00:28:54] Tod Maffin: [00:28:54] me now. I mock you now, 

[00:28:58] Tris Hussey: [00:28:58] but Hey, this was okay as well.

[00:29:01] Weird before we wrap up. Cause we’re, we’re, we’re into an extended Milo walk now, um, Sheila is working on some, uh, some schoolwork kinds of things. And she’s reading these papers from the early parts of the century. It’s weird saying that about digital natives. And they were talking about a study that was done in the UK.

[00:29:23] And one of the, it was a 2010 paper. And I think you can relate to this. And th the, the, the researchers are asking people if they read blogs and the person’s response was no, I can’t imagine why anyone would be interested in what you’re reading about what people had for breakfast that morning, which if we turn back the clock to 2010, A lot of blogs were still yep, exactly.

[00:29:50] That this is what I had for breakfast. I took the dog for a walk and blah, and now here we are another decade later and I don’t, I don’t think we really blog really anymore. I don’t think people, I mean, there are blogs clear that people do, but I think we’ve, we’ve at least from the business side of, of the world we were 

[00:30:11] Tod Maffin: [00:30:11] writing.

[00:30:11] Yeah. I mean, part, part of it is Google’s fault because, you know, I mean, blog post became a mechanism for SEO placement. So Google killed the SEO value in them for the most part. But you know, also another big sort of thing was the RSS feed RSS feed to this day remains a brilliant technology that no one uses.

[00:30:28] Then nobody uses. Exactly. And so it used to be back in the day, all every single blog, every, every single, whether it was a blog where WordPress, you know, any of the early platforms, um, they all had an RSS feed. WordPress still does today, but now, you know, you go onto like a company site, like Facebook’s blog or Squarespace’s blog or something, and they have a blog format.

[00:30:48] Reverse chronological articles, but there’s no RSS D behind it. YouTube took its RSS feed away. You killed Google reader. Like why are you people doing this? Like it, I think, I think blogging and that format would S would have had it, uh, a little Renaissance moment, like cereal was for podcasting. If we’d have just honored the technology of the RSS feed and fewer and fewer content management platforms will spit out an RSS feed, you know, I give, I give hell to this.

[00:31:18] So for instance, you know, as, as part of our work, we cover the social platforms and updates on them. And so all of them, I pick on sprout social, because it’s the one that we use at the agency. So we know what the best they have a page on their website. They have a blog site on their website and on this blog site is their product updates, but there’s no RSS feed.

[00:31:35] And I said to them like, do you expect people to bookmark that page? And then just daily visit it? In the hopes that maybe you’ve updated, like what, like that’s the whole point of an RSS feed? 

[00:31:48] Tris Hussey: [00:31:48] I don’t know which in the connection between what we’re doing and the early mention of the birth of podcasting and the pod father.

[00:31:56] Um, our Curry. I remember seeing him at Nomex. Or something with Dave Weiner who was one of the fathers of RSS and how it all came together. Yeah. I can’t remember. I think it’s been over a year since I fired up an RSS reader and I do a lot more newsletters now, but that is your, your maybe RSS we’ll get a Renaissance.

[00:32:16] We’ll find a better way to, to pull it together. Cause I used to be when I was pro blogging, um, have like a thousand feeds. I follow. Yeah. And I would go through those, I don’t know, three, four, five times a day. Yeah. Reading all the new stuff. And it’s like, yeah, like to your point, do you actually expect people to come back to your website daily?

[00:32:36] Just on the off chance you might have maybe published something? Yeah, no, no, that doesn’t, that doesn’t work, 

[00:32:43] Tod Maffin: [00:32:43] please. Like, give me an emails. Like if you want first party data, fine. I’ll give you my email address. If you have to do it that way, but. Even that even that they’re not. And so as a result, we don’t cover them.

[00:32:52] We don’t cover their updates. Cause I can’t tell when they’ve 

[00:32:54] Tris Hussey: [00:32:54] updated anything right. Worth your time to go spend time. If like, if you’re not taking the time to help make it, bring the information to me and our information saturated world, I don’t have time to go seek it out. At least do that part for you.

[00:33:09] Yeah. Well, Todd, this has been, this has been fabulous because, um, I feel the one great thing about this restarting. The podcast is I’m getting to talk to all the people I’ve known for. A decade and reconnecting with them and kind of catching up with what folks are doing and listening to their, all their podcasts.

[00:33:29] Uh, and, uh, this, I think reinvigorating, maybe our shared love of technology has never gone away, I think, for any of us, but maybe getting to talk about it. It’s nice. 

[00:33:39] Tod Maffin: [00:33:39] Well, it’s always a pleasure talking to you and I I’m, I feel bad that it’s taken us, you know, whatever, it’s been eight or nine years to reconnect, but it’s always such a joy to see.

[00:33:48] The stuff that you’re involved in and the commitment that you have to your space, you know, it’s always been a space that you’ve really known well, and you’ve done, I think, such a great job in helping other people understand it and bring people into that circle. Um, it’s just such a pleasure reconnecting with you.

[00:34:03] Oh, 

[00:34:04] Tris Hussey: [00:34:04] well, thank you, Todd. Okay. Well, well now I’m blushing. Oh, thank you. Fiddle ed. So, uh, this has been an FA fabulous episode and maybe I will actually do a nice, like Todd. It’s been great chatting with you. Let’s keep in touch. Sure. 

[00:34:18] Tod Maffin: [00:34:18] Absolutely. 

[00:34:19] Tris Hussey: [00:34:19] Okay, good. Okay. That’s a good hour, Joe. I can end that. So, and, uh, we will oops.

[00:34:26] Bumped the mic. Okay. And so this has been another great, my ink stained fingers. So what went wrong in this week’s episode? Okay. Few things went sideways. First was Todd was a, and I were going to try Zencaster so we could see each other and record really cool. High quality audio. It didn’t look like it was recording because there was no wave form.

[00:34:48] It was hi mic. I think it was because his mic was too quiet because when we did the test, I still couldn’t hear anything. Well, so we switched to clean feed and then stop the video. Which led to the big problem, which was Todd had to cough. So he muted his mic as one is supposed to do. I muted my mic several times during the discussion, so I could have a sip of water, but then he made some amazing pithy mind altering a world changing point, which we’ll never know because he didn’t unmute his mic.

[00:35:25] Um, because we couldn’t see each other, I couldn’t be waving at him madly going, Todd, Todd, I can’t hear you. You, so there it is. I don’t know. Maybe the other thing was Todd didn’t have headphones and you can kind of hear a little echo of me in the background. Okay. It did a little better in the post processing, but there you go.

[00:35:45] It wouldn’t be an ink stained fingers without a blooper. Here’s the outro. You’re really like.

mkalus shared this story from DarkviperAU on Twitter.

---

I have quite a bit to say about the Teenage Engineering OP-1, but it’s been on my drafts folder for so long I need to revise a fair chunk of it.

But even though some other devices have tried to take it on, a decade of unique, truly original features is a lot, and it remains one of the most iconic “modern” synths. Kudos.

Cleaning and lubricating your bike’s chain can be kind of a messy process. But doing this can keep your bike rolling properly, and it will extend the life of both the chain and the drivetrain (that is, all the gears the bike chain touches).

When you need to carry your bike by car, you want to do it as easily and securely as possible. That’s why we recommend the Küat Sherpa 2.0 as the best option for carrying two bicycles, as long as your vehicle accommodates a hitch receiver.

After researching some 220 bike racks and testing more than 75, we’ve found that the Küat Sherpa 2.0 offers the best combination of solid construction, ease of use, light weight, and a reasonable price.

mkalus shared this story from Das Kraftfuttermischwerk.

---

Ich bin jetzt nicht der größten Fan von E-Bikes, unterstütze diese Idee der französischen Nationalversammlung allerdings dennoch voll und ganz. Die nämlich sieht vor, den Käufern eines elektrischen Fahrrads einen Zuschuss von bis zu 2.500 Euro zu zahlen, wenn sie im Gegenzug ihr bisheriges Verbrennerfahrzeug abwracken. Geiler wäre natürlich, wenn das auch für Bio-Fahrräder gelten würde – und konsequent wäre das allemal.

Die ungewöhnlich konzipierte Abwrackprämie ist Teil eines Maßnahmenpakets, mit dem die französische Regierung bis zum Jahr 2030 die Emission von Treibhausgasen um 40 Prozent – ausgehend vom Level des Jahres 1990 – reduzieren will. Mit der Abstimmung ist die Förderung noch nicht beschlossen, darf aber für die endgültige Lesung des Gesetzes als unstrittig betrachtet werden.

mkalus shared this story from iandunt on Twitter.

---

Hi, this is Mirko, co-founder and chairman at Datawrapper. Like you, I’ve spent the last year not going to an office, staying home most of the time, heavily reducing contact to others. Thankfully, there is an end in sight: COVID-19 vaccines are available now. I wonder, though: Do we appreciate enough that we are witnessing the fastest development of finding and producing vaccines in history, by far? Let’s explore history.

The COVID-19 vaccine marks a record: Never before was a vaccine found, tested, and licensed in such a short time.

The long struggle towards vaccines and public health

But getting to such a fast process took centuries. Historically, there were two main challenges: First building knowledge, then finding support. 

Medical knowledge formed slowly based on observation and experimentation, driven by pioneering women and men. Some of them never learned that they were right. Because through the centuries, with some regularity, their findings were often not accepted. Instead, they encountered a pattern of doubt, disbelief, and rejection. 

Only on occasion there were breakthroughs. One example: In May 1796, the English doctor Edward Jenner inoculated an 8-year-old boy with matter from cowpox and later tested whether the patient was now sheltered against the much more dangerous smallpox. This is how “vaccines” got their name, from the Latin word for cow (vacca). 

This particular insight – that some diseases could be prevented through a mild exposure – was known in China and Africa long before. As early as 1718, eighty years before Jenner, the British Lady Mary Wortley Montagu learned about the practice of preventing smallpox when visiting Turkey. “Despite resistance from the medical establishment,” she had her four-year-old son inoculated.

This pattern of slow discovery and even slower acceptance of new findings continued. In the 19th century, the world experienced several heavy outbreaks of Cholera, with millions of people dying.  

John Snow was a doctor in England who had experience treating patients from previous cholera outbreaks in the UK. In 1854, he tried something new. He collected data and created the now-famous “cholera map”. Based on his examination, he suspected that the disease occurred “when people ingested certain tiny particles in the water.” 

Remarkably, in the same year, in Florence, Italy, another scientist by the name of Filippo Pacini even discovered and named those “tiny particles.” He found a comma-shaped bacillus, which he described as Vibrio. 

He published his findings, but they were ignored. Even John Snow did not learn what Pacini found. As a result, it took another 30 years until another researcher named Robert Koch found the cholera bacillus for a second time. The first vaccine was used in 1885. 

Even then, the work was not finished. Cholera is complex. The need to improve the vaccines resulted in ongoing research. New findings sparked new efforts as late as in the 1980s and 1990s. 

And, amazingly, it took until 1965, 82 years after the death of Pacini, until he was credited for his work. That year, “Vibrio cholerae Pacini 1854” was adopted as the correct name for the cholera-causing organism. 

How many lives could have been saved if both medical knowledge and public support acceptance would have evolved faster? Because: Once vaccines are introduced, the number of cases usually falls significantly, sometimes to zero patients.

No guarantee for finding something

Looking only at the successes neglects the fact that in some other cases no vaccine has been found, despite long and intense research. Malaria, dengue fever, ebola and AIDS can not be cured entirely up to this day. 

Finding the causes of diseases and developing vaccines is an ongoing challenge. The development of several COVID vaccines in such a short time marks a notable advance.  But it was not an “overnight miracle”, because researchers had laid the foundations based on decades of work.

What is needed to do better? 

• Diseases have become preventable, ,,but globally 13,5 million children have not been vaccinated” (2018)
• Transparent, clear, and complete information is as important as the research. Only well formed information can help to overcome doubts,  to gain acceptance, and to counter misinformation. 
• We need to better organize the information we have. Today finding information is no longer the challenge; now it is to filter what is there to get to the core of what is correct and relevant.

One decisive act of John Snow back in 1854, was to remove the handle of a water pump in Broad Street, based on his observations and belief that contaminated water led to people getting ill. In England, up to this day, there is the “Annual Pumphandle Lecture”, by members of the John Snow Society. As a ritual, they remove and replace a water pump handle, as a symbol for the continuing challenges for advances in public health. 

Data choices

Historical data should be handled with care. The main challenge when looking at the history of diseases is that there is no consistent data. Usually, one can only find partial data for some diseases and some countries. Estimates are common and must be labeled as such. Show the trend. Show the gaps. Avoid the impression of accuracy through numbers with digits if much of what we have is based on estimates. 

Another challenge is the search for historical data. For many topics, such information is scattered, often partial, often just covering a specific period. There is work to do here – to better gather, structure and filter data already there. 

A great site demonstrating how this can be achieved is “Our World in Data”, initiated by Max Roser, providing “research and data to work against the world’s largest problems”. It is remarkable how many topics can now be investigated from a data angle there. The work done by the team at OWID – from finding to preparing and sharing the data – is invaluable. For the charts above, I used Our World in Data as a starting point.  

---

The history of vaccination is full of stories, of women and men who stubbornly asked for new answers. If you are curious to learn more about some of them, I can recommend the resources below. Next week, our basemap expert Anna will take us on a tour to Sweden with us. See you then!

Resources

• Timeline: History of vaccines: very rich source with many examples and sources
• Mapping Disease: John Snow and Cholera (Royal College of Surgeons of England)
• Robert Koch: One of the founders of microbiology (RKI)
• 8 women who made modern vaccines work (One.org)