Shared posts

14 Jul 22:39

With Apple Pay Later, Apple may take another stab at the PayPal model

by Samuel Axon
James.galbraith

Good luck with that

Apple Pay on an iPhone and Apple Watch.

Enlarge / Apple Pay on an iPhone and Apple Watch. (credit: Apple)

Apple will continue to expand beyond traditional technology projects with a new feature the company is internally calling "Apple Pay Later," according to a new report from Bloomberg.

With Apple Pay Later, users making either retail or online purchases with Apple Pay will have the option of paying over time rather than entirely up front. Customers will not need an Apple Card (the company's recently launched credit card service) to take advantage of Apple Pay Later, according to the report.

Apple will offer two payment options. "Apple Pay Monthly Installments" will allow users to pay off a loan, with interest, in monthly installments. "Apple Pay in 4" will let users pay for purchases with four interest-free payments due every two weeks.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

14 Jul 21:02

Microsoft fails to provide Windows 10 VM images for developers

by Jim Salter
James.galbraith

Seriously. Someone at MS thinks that antitrust is no longer a thing

Image not found: why has it taken Microsoft five days (and counting) to upload fresh developer VM images for non-Hyper-V platforms?

Enlarge / Image not found: why has it taken Microsoft five days (and counting) to upload fresh developer VM images for non-Hyper-V platforms? (credit: Sean Gladwell / Getty Images)

Update 7:50 pm EDT: Access to the missing virtual machine images was restored several hours after this article published. The original story follows unchanged—we'll update it if we ever receive a response from Microsoft.

Original story 4:45 pm EDT: Microsoft typically makes Windows 10 Enterprise virtual machine images available to independent developers via its developer.microsoft.com portal. For some reason, that process fell through the cracks this month—images are available now for Microsoft's Hyper-V hypervisor but are conspicuously missing for competing hypervisors VMWare, Parallels, and VirtualBox.

Ars first became aware of this problem via impassioned tweets from Matthew Boyette, an Ars reader and independent developer whose workflow depends on these Windows 10 Enterprise VM images. The images themselves are decidedly ephemeral—they expire each month, requiring devs using the program to download new, refreshed images.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

14 Jul 21:01

Microsoft Threatens To Resurrect Clippy as an Office Emoji

by msmash
James.galbraith

Oh for fucks sake

Microsoft is threatening to bring back its loveable / annoying Clippy character. A post adds: The software giant claims it will replace the paperclip emoji in Microsoft Office with Clippy if one of its tweets gets 20,000 likes. The tweet has already passed 19,500 likes, so Clippy could be about to return as a more innocent emoji. Born in Office 97, Clippy originally appeared as an assistant to offer help and tips for using Microsoft Office. You either loved or hated its Groucho eyebrows and persistence, and Microsoft eventually killed off Clippy in Office XP in 2001.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

14 Jul 19:03

How the GOP crusade against vaccines could get even more dangerous

by Paul Waldman
James.galbraith

And they will

What if they come for routine immunizations kids need before starting school?
14 Jul 18:59

Meet the new tea party, same as the old tea party

by Greg Sargent
Vaccine derangement and valorization of insurrectionists act as a smokescreen for more powerful interests.
14 Jul 18:51

Review: Skyward Sword HD isn’t the 35th Zelda birthday gift we’d hoped for

by Sam Machkovech
James.galbraith

Well that's terrifying

  • If you'd like, you can pretend that Ghirahim (right) is the thirsty, corner-cutting Nintendo, and Link is an average fan, aghast at the shape Skyward Sword HD ultimately arrived in. [credit: Nintendo ]

Nintendo has never shied away from opportunities to touch up and re-release its most beloved video games. 1993's Super Mario All-Stars is arguably the industry's first "big" remaster project, while the Zelda series has been downright spoiled with the concept going back as far as a 1995 reimagining of the original Legend of Zelda for the Super Famicom's Japan-only satellite service.

In the intervening years, expectations for "HD" versions of older games have exploded, primarily because gamemakers have gotten better at this. And the Zelda series has excelled within this trend, too, as highlighted by Nintendo's top-to-bottom retouches of Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask for the now-discontinued Nintendo 3DS.

But if those games are examples of Zelda remasters at their best and most ambitious, then this week's Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword HD (a re-release of the 2011 Wii adventure game for the Nintendo Switch) is arguably the opposite.

Read 33 remaining paragraphs | Comments

14 Jul 18:45

CBP's corruption streak continues, after border agents busted for working with smugglers

by Gabe Ortiz
James.galbraith

Jesus christ

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has long been considered one of the most corrupt federal bodies in the nation, with a government commissioned report in 2015 noting that “arrests for corruption of CBP personnel far exceed, on a per capita basis, such arrests at other federal law enforcement agencies,” ProPublica reported in 2019. The department nevertheless continues to get billions upon billions in funding from Congress every single year.

CBP, true to form, has continued its crime streak. Daily Beast reports that a U.S. Border Patrol agent has admitted to conspiring with human smugglers for profit, allowing them to transport people across the border in exchange for $400 a person. The report said that messages reveal an informant asking the agent, Rodney Tolson, Jr., if he was “ready to make some cash.” Court documents say that the agent responded, “U know it,” the report continued.

“Tolson, Jr. caught the attention of internal DHS investigators back in 2019, when they saw Tolson on surveillance video waving an unidentified smuggler through a border checkpoint,” the report said. The plea agreement said that the agent would instruct smugglers on which lane to cross through, and at what time. “Two unnamed suspects cooperated with DHS to identify Tolson, who received his payments in the parking lot of a nearby Walmart.” Woof.

This isn’t even the most recent criminal incident involving a border agent. “Texas border agent helps smuggler sneak in cocaine—as other agents watched, feds say,” Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported this week. That report said that Border Patrol agent Oberlin Cortez Pena Jr. not only instructed a drug smuggler on how to hide his product in a backpack cooler, he suggested shifts when it would be best to try to cross. “The (agents) are all rookies,” he said about specified times, the report said. For helping smuggle 5 kilos of cocaine, Cortez Pena Jr. hoped to earn $1,000 bucks.

”Every year, approximately 250 CBP employees are arrested, many on suspicion of serious felonies; dozens have been jailed in recent years on corruption charges, including weapons trafficking and collaborating with Mexican drug cartels,” ProPublica reported in 2019.

Meanwhile, as border agents simultaneously commit grave human rights abuses that have included the forcible separation of children from their families at the southern border, Congress has punished the federal immigration department by throwing more and more cash at it year after year. American Immigration Council noted last year that CBP’s spending has tripled since 2003, from $5.9 billion, to $17.7 billion.

 The Biden administration’s first full budget request called for no overall reductions for CBP or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Senators Robert Menendez and Alex Padilla have since led a group of nearly a dozen Senate Democrats including Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders in calling on the chamber’s appropriations committee to decrease ballooned immigration enforcement and detention funds in the next fiscal year. “Congress must be explicit in its provision of funds for the kind of transformative change that is needed to repair and build an immigration system that is centered around community and welcoming, not on tearing families apart, undermining community safety, and destabilizing communities and workplaces through punitive enforcement measures,” they said

“As the parent agency of the Border Patrol and the country’s largest law enforcement agency, CBP has seen its budget skyrocket, despite operating without accountability or transparency and an alarming record of violence, corruption, and human rights abuses against migrants and U.S. citizens alike,” the Defund Hate campaign said. “In 2020, a government investigation revealed that CBP misspent emergency humanitarian funding explicitly provided for food and medical care for migrants on dirt bikes and enforcement-related expenditures.”

“Moving forward, resources should be invested in creating rights-respecting systems that welcome all newcomers and support the well-being of those who call the border region home,” the campaign continued.

14 Jul 18:45

Tennessee health official fired after state lawmakers get upset over her knowing state laws

by Hunter
James.galbraith

Pity it'll take so long for them to die off, and the collateral damage is a shame, but at this point...

In today's news from Tennessee, Republican state lawmakers have discovered a janitor closet in the capitol building that contains what janitors are calling a "mop sink" but which the statehouse's archconservative weirdos believe to be a "Muslim prayer sink" and—wait, sorry, it turns out that one's a few years old at this point. Let's start over.

In today's news from Tennessee, CNN reports that Republican state lawmakers forced the removal of the state's top vaccine official after that official noted in a public memo that, according to longstanding and settled case law, teens in the state ages 14 to 17 can receive medical care without parental consent and, therefore, are able to consent to being vaccinated against COVID-19 without parental consent.

The memo noting [checks notes again] a Tennessee Supreme Court case that decided the issue over three decades ago caused an apparent ruckus after an unnamed state fossil decided that Tennessee health official Dr. Michelle Fiscus was guilty of lookin' things up. According to Fiscus, after the memo noting What Tennessee's Actual Laws Are made it to social media, legislators began contacting the state health department about this apparent attempt to "undermine parental authority," after which the department fired her. Also according to Fiscus, the state's health department has halted vaccination outreach efforts rather than further anger the freaks the state's Republican voters send into the legislature.

Yes, the pandemic is ongoing. Yes, the pandemic is ongoing in Tennessee. Yes, teens remain at risk of death from the virus. None of this is nearly as upsetting to state lawmakers as the thought that a teenager somewhere in the state might be able to get vaccinated even if their QAnon-humping, anti-vax, in-this-house-we-die-for-Dear-Leader parents are trying to withhold the vaccine in order to score Internet Points in conversations with fellow Buck Turgidsons.

Once again, we're seeing what now seems to be an inevitable shift in the pandemic. It is becoming a Republican-spread disease, one that is being tamped out in heavily Democratic regions even as it runs rampant in Republican-held states. That dynamic is not likely to last, however; with each new outbreak, the odds of the virus mutating into something that can evade existing vaccines increases. Diehard Trump conservatives may be the incubators of the next pandemic phase, but will not be its only victims.

If you know a Tennessee teenager, or are perhaps vaguely aware of the presence of Tennessee teenagers, you might take this opportunity to remind them that they can be vaccinated against a deadly disease with serious long-term health risks for free, and without parental permission, because the state Supreme Court already decided that nearly two decades before they were even born. That said, they may not have the option for long. The typical behavior of the Mop Sink Mob when they learn that somebody, somewhere has been practicing unauthorized hygiene or reading from the Forbidden Tomes Of What Our Laws Is is to hastily pass new laws banning whatever it is that's sent them into the latest paranoid spasm. Tune in next week when the state's Republicans insist that nobody can be vaccinated without their parents' permission unless they are at least 70 years old and are on a first-name basis with the wait staff at their closest diner.

Tuesday, Jul 13, 2021 · 9:20:26 PM +00:00 · Hunter

SCOOP: Tennessee Department of Health halts all vaccine outreach to kids – not just for COVID-19, but all diseases – amid pressure from GOP. Staff ordered to remove the agency logo from any documents providing vaccine info to the public, per internal dox. https://t.co/PX0Rvpc6Ot

— Brett Kelman (@BrettKelman) July 13, 2021

13 Jul 22:59

10 ways to befriend a misanthropic cat

by Matthew Inman
James.galbraith

Seems a bit redundant lol

10 ways to befriend a misanthropic cat

This comic applies to people as well.

View on my website

13 Jul 22:19

Cartoon: UNC

by keefknight
13 Jul 21:19

Mitch McConnell says he's 'perplexed' by inability to get vast majority of U.S. vaccinated. Really

by Kerry Eleveld
James.galbraith

Bullshit

GOP Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday he is “perplexed” by the inability of the United States to “finish the job” of getting the vast majority of Americans vaccinated against the deadly coronavirus that has already claimed more than 600,000 lives nationwide. 

Asked if he had advice for right-wing pundits and GOP politicians who have vilified the vaccines, McConnell called himself “a huge fan” of vaccinations. “I’m perplexed by the difficulty we have in finishing the job,” McConnell offered. “We need to keep preaching that getting the vaccine is important,” he added, seemingly oblivious to the fact that members of his own party across the country are routinely stoking vaccine hesitancy among their followers as a way to score political points. In fact, contracting COVID-19 has now largely become a red-state, red-county problem due to low vaccination rates among GOP voters.

At last weekend’s CPAC conference in Texas, attendees actually cheered when extremist Alex Berenson celebrated the Biden administration’s inability to, as he put it, “sucker” 70% of U.S. adults into getting the lifesaving vaccine. Or as a pointedly macabre Esquire headline put it, “They clapped for death.”

One reporter at McConnell’s press conference did something unusual: She fact-checked him in real time.

“It isn’t all that perplexing. There are Republicans who are casting doubt on the vaccines,” she said, name checking GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, in particular. “That’s where this hesitancy is coming from—from members of your own party casting doubts on vaccines,” she added, asking McConnell what kind of conversations he’s had with members of his own party.

McConnell declined to say whether he’s had any conversations with Johnson or other Republicans about the host of baseless conspiracy theories they are pushing.

”I can only speak for myself,” McConnell said.

That’s exactly how we landed here in the first place—Republican politicians who have been completely unwilling to acknowledge or take any responsibility whatsoever for the (sometimes deadly) consequences of the actions of those in their own party. In fact, that’s exactly what Senate Republicans are trying to do right now as they turn an eye toward 2022—sweep Donald Trump under the rug as if he doesn’t exist after they gave him free rein to savage the country for four solid years.

MCCONNELL: I’m perplexed by the difficulty we have in finishing the job…we need to keep preaching getting the vaccine is important… REPORTER: It isn’t all that perplexing. There are Republicans who are casting doubt on the vaccines… MCCONNELL: I can only speak for myself. pic.twitter.com/Oq51pbfUMe

— JM Rieger (@RiegerReport) July 13, 2021

13 Jul 21:18

How Intel Financialized and Lost Leadership in Semiconductor Fabrication

by msmash
William Lazonick and Matt Hopkins, writing at Institute for New Economic Thinking: Why has Intel fallen behind TSMC and SEC in semiconductor fabrication, and why is it unlikely to catch up? The problem is that Intel is engaged in two types of competition, one with companies like TSMC and SEC in cutting-edge fabrication technology and the other within Intel itself between innovation and financialization. The Asian companies have governance structures that vaccinate them from an economic virus known as "maximizing shareholder value" (MSV). Intel caught the virus over two decades ago. As we shall see, with the sudden appointment of Gelsinger as CEO this past winter, Intel sent out a weak signal that it recognizes that it has the disease. In the years 2011-2015, Intel was in the running, along with TSMC and SEC, to be the fabricator of the iPhone, iPad, and iPod chips that Apple designed. While Intel spent $50b. on P&E and $53b. on R&D over those five years, it also lavished shareholders with $36b. in stock buybacks and $22b. in cash dividends, which together absorbed 102% of Intel's net income. From 2016 through 2020, Intel spent $67b. on P&E and $66b. on R&D, but also distributed almost $27b. as dividends and another $45b. as buybacks. Intel's ample dividends have provided an income yield to shareholders for, as the name says, holding Intel shares. In contrast, the funds spent on buybacks have rewarded sharesellers, including senior Intel executives with their stock-based pay, for executing well-timed sales of their Intel shares to realize gains from buyback-manipulated stock prices.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

13 Jul 21:17

A Few Excerpts from a Local Commercial Real Estate Report: "Good news is construction activity has all but stopped"

by Calculated Risk
James.galbraith

Yeah commercial real estate is in for a wicked readjustment

Voit Real Estate Services released their Q2 reports on Commercial Real Estate (CRE) in SoCal. Here are a few excerpts from the Orange County Office report:
"The Orange County office market struggled again in 2Q. It had already been slowing before the pandemic hit, and by virtue of the higher employee density and multi-tenant configuration of office product, the office sector was hit harder by COVID than other sectors. Vacancy and availability both moved higher, and net absorption remained in negative territory. Average asking lease rates were relatively flat, but they alone do not tell the full story, as landlord concessions have risen sharply and are not reflected in market metrics. Office tenants are still trying to sort out how to fold their workforces back into the office, and that has delayed decision-making regarding relocations and renewals.
...
The vacancy rate in Orange County rose to 13.76%, up 61 basis points in 2Q. That came on top of a 116-basis-point spike in 1Q. The increase was expected given how many moves have been put on hold to re-evaluate space utilization. Class A product is under the most stress. Vacancy in those buildings rose to 18.28% in 2Q, compared with 10.96% for Class B and just 8.75% for Class C.
...
Fewer relocations and an increase in short-term renewals significantly impacted net absorption in 1Q, and the same held true in 2Q. Net absorption was in negative territory again in 2Q, posting a net loss of 512,502 SF, after recording a loss of more than 1.2 MSF in the opening quarter. Consistent negative absorption points to a future increase in vacancy.
...
The good news is that construction activity has all but stopped for the moment, which gives the market a chance to reabsorb existing unoccupied space and clear off some of the lower-priced sublease space. Just 439,206 SF of office space was in the construction queue as 2Q ended, all of it in one project in Costa Mesa, The Press. Another 1.7 MSF of space is in the planning stage but is not expected to get underway until market conditions improve."
emphasis added
13 Jul 19:41

BMW abandons the i3, the car that could have birthed a bright electric future

by Tim De Chant
  • The i3's shape is a bit like Marmite: You either like it or you don't. [credit: Jonathan Gitlin ]

The BMW i3 has reached the end of the line. Two weeks ago, BMW confirmed that this is the last month the company will be making its quirky and often misunderstood electric vehicle for US customers. In doing so, the automaker acknowledged what many EV owners, enthusiasts, and observers have long believed: the company, which was once lauded as a leader in electrification, has squandered the last eight years.

I don’t say this lightly or without experience—I owned a 2014 BMW i3 for nearly five years. It was my first electric vehicle, and I loved it. Sometimes, I wish I hadn’t sold it. Other times, I’m glad I did. It wasn’t perfect, but it was unique and fun to drive, and it felt years ahead of its time.

The i3 was a polarizing car. Its upright, narrow body rolled on skinny tires, and its layered design was loved or loathed, depending on the customer. But no matter how you feel about the i3, it was a car made by a company with a clear vision of the future, pursued with tenacity and purpose. BMW pitched the i3 as the foundation of an entirely new line, and BMW could have seriously iterated on the design. There was talk in the early days of how easy it would be to simply drop a new carbon-fiber reinforced plastic body onto the brilliantly engineered aluminum chassis, creating a suite of models that would explore a wide range of electrified mobility.

Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

13 Jul 19:31

Is 'Futurama' The Next Great Sleep Hack?

James.galbraith

lol I have done this off and on for years. Love it.

By Carly Tennes  Published: July 12th, 2021 
13 Jul 19:24

Cartoon: Alito inconvenienced

by Jen Sorensen

If you are able, please consider joining the Sorensen Subscription Service!

Follow me on Twitter at @JenSorensen

13 Jul 19:22

Thanks Anxiety

James.galbraith

Seriously lol

what ARE nerves? we just don't know

13 Jul 00:13

GOP support for bipartisan infrastructure deal going wobbly

by Burgess Everett and Marianne LeVine
James.galbraith

Gee, who could have ever predicted that.


Jerry Moran is one of 11 Republicans who endorsed the Senate’s bipartisan infrastructure framework. He also has plenty of concerns about it.

The Kansas Republican said the idea of using increased IRS enforcement to generate some of the nearly $600 billion in new spending “has some red flags among Republicans,” who have openly worried about being targeted by the Biden administration. Moran’s also concerned his vote for a bipartisan bill could help kick off a massive subsequent round of spending by Senate Democrats on party lines.

“Part of the motivation is trying to make certain that we don’t spend $6 trillion," Moran said on Monday evening. If "this is lending itself toward that outcome then I would no longer be a yes at that point in time."

Moran isn’t alone. Another of the framework’s supporters, Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), said at the moment he is not 100 percent committed to voting for the bipartisan plan.

“We don’t know what’s in it yet,” Rounds said. “I’m favorably impressed with what’s been done, but we’re going to wait and look at the final thing. So there’s still a lot of negotiations going on.”

Comments by those two technically supportive Republicans illustrates that, after a two-week recess, GOP support for an aisle-crossing deal with President Joe Biden is soft. The bipartisan infrastructure deal that five Senate Republicans helped sell to Biden is under harsh scrutiny from the right, testing the support of GOP centrists who will be crucial to getting the bill past a guaranteed filibuster.

The core of support from five senators that directly negotiated the deal with Democrats and the White House is solid: Mitt Romney of Utah, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Rob Portman of Ohio. A second group of GOP senators who support the concept will be critical to actually passing the bill.

Those senators include Moran, Rounds, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Todd Young of Indiana, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Richard Burr of North Carolina. Several of them are close to Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who is undecided and could help sink it.

“The details will matter. I think a lot of our members are going to look at: How credible are the pay-fors, how large is this?” said Senate Minority Whip John Thune. “For our members, it’s really going to come down to whether it’s all put on the debt.”

As a group of moderates in both parties drafts the nearly $1 trillion legislation, conservatives are bombarding it with attacks for using increased IRS enforcement as a financing mechanism. And as the bipartisan framework becomes more real ahead of a Senate vote as soon as next week, more Republicans are growing publicly concerned that it would clear the way for trillions more in spending on liberal priorities and tax increases.

And many Republicans say that the bill’s financing system, which also includes privatization of infrastructure, unused coronavirus aid and leftover unemployment benefits, may end up scoring poorly with the Congressional Budget Office. Once the bill is drafted, the CBO will calculate the bill's projected cost and revenue — and many in the GOP think that the mix of money for the new spending will come up short.


Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), who tried and failed to clinch a separate infrastructure deal with Biden, said the bill’s finances “are a big question.” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said the bill’s funding mechanisms are “fundamental” to earning his support.

“There’s a big hole to fill, and what I’ve seen so far doesn’t indicate they’ve filled it,” Cornyn said.

Despite high hopes for finishing up the legislative text this week and a potential floor vote the week of July 19, the drafting of the bill is likely to go into next week.

In addition to the policy concerns, former President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked the deal and the Republican senators behind it — many of whom voted to convict him in his impeachment trial — accusing them of being “played with, and used by” Democrats. At least 10 Republicans would have to support the deal over Trump’s objections. Moran, who is up for reelection next year and has Trump’s endorsement, said he was not familiar with Trump’s opposition.

Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said Trump’s criticism of Republican senators “was a little bit misplaced.”

“The sense I got from his messages was that it was aimed more at Mitch to some degree, [and] calling the Republican senators weak for signing onto it,“ Cramer said.

Despite Trump’s attack on McConnell, Democrats suspect that the GOP leader is actually seeking to hamper their plans, particularly after he said he’s entirely focused on standing up to Biden’s agenda. McConnell said last week that there was a “decent chance” the bipartisan bill could come together but said it had to be “credibly paid for.”

If McConnell were to pull his party out of those talks, it would force Democrats to move their entire agenda through budget reconciliation. Portman gave leadership an update on the status of the bill during a closed-door leadership meeting Monday, according to an attendee.

“That’s really the test, whether they’ll stick with this,” said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin of his GOP colleagues.

Durbin said despite cries of foul from his GOP colleagues over Democrats’ plans to pass the rest of Biden’s agenda without the GOP, it’s a “fair” path to take. Republicans tried to use budget reconciliation twice during Trump’s presidency, cutting taxes successfully and falling short of repealing Obamacare in 2017.

Moran doesn’t see it that way. He joined the bipartisan efforts in part to blunt Democrats’ efforts at passing a party-line spending bill. And he’s prepared to walk away if it comes to that.

“I want to be involved and engaged in that effort, but I’m still troubled by … the statements of Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi,” Moran said. “It still doesn’t seem the right negotiating tactic to say: I’ll support a bipartisan plan only as long as I get a vote on everything else I want.”

12 Jul 23:44

It's hard to believe, but a sanctions hearing on the baseless Kraken-pot lawsuit was a disaster

by Kerry Eleveld
James.galbraith

That'll go well

It might be an understatement to say Monday's federal court hearing in the Eastern District of Michigan on whether pro-Trump lawyers should be sanctioned for filing a reckless election fraud lawsuit did not disappoint. In fact, it might have qualified as hysterically funny but for the fact that more than half of GOP voters now delusionally believe the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump due to the firehose of lies spewed by him and his so-called "elite strike force" team of lawyers.

In case anyone needs a visual for the way U.S. District Judge Linda Parker picked apart the fraud case filed last year by Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, and their co-counsel—Stefanie Junttila, Scott Hagerstrom, Julia Haller, Brandon Johnson, Donald Campbell, Howard Kleinhendler, and Gregory Rohl—just flash back to Rudy Giuliani's literal meltdown at a November press conference in which he claimed to have extensive evidence of systemic election fraud. For starters, here's a live tweet Monday morning from Daily Beast political reporter Will Sommer: "Probably not a great sign for Lin Wood and Sidney Powell in their election fraud sanctions hearing that one of their main lawyers appears to be crying."

That gives one a decent sense of how things went for Team Kraken: not great. If you're a glutton for punishment, you can treat yourself to loads of entertaining threads from analysts parsing the proceedings here, here, here, and here, among others.

The hearing kicked off with Wood, a staunch Trump loyalist who has spewed gobs of baseless election fraud nonsense, seeking to separate himself from other members of the pro-Trump legal squad. Wood tried to make the argument that he had no idea he had been included on the filing.

"I did not review any of the documents with respect to the complaint," Wood said. "I just had no involvement in it whatsoever," he added, saying he only found out his name was included after the complaint had already been filed. 

Powell then told Judge Parker she wouldn't have added Wood's name to the complaint without his permission.

"Might there have been a misunderstanding? That's certainly possible," Powell explained.

Oh, so Kraken-pot lead Sidney Powell didn't even get the cover page of the filing right? Parker said she would allow Wood to make a supplemental argument, but it was basically all downhill from there. 

The long and the short of it is that the Team Kraken did little-to-no vetting of the 960 affidavits they filed in support of their November lawsuit challenging Michigan's election results. 

At the hearing, Powell wielded the number as a point of pride. 

"The very fact that we filed 960 affidavits with our complaint shows extraordinary due diligence on our part," she told the judge, according to The Independent reporter Andrew Feinberg.

Judge Parker later framed one such affidavit, that of Jessica Connarn, as based on triple-hearsay—not exactly the building blocks of a killer legal case. 

Naturally, Kleinhendler denied it was hearsay, according to Courthouse News reporter Adam Klasfeld, saying he was "troubled" that Judge Parker believes it was.

"Oh really," Judge Parker replied. (Parker was just one of several judges who found the affidavit to be hearsay.). 

The Kraken-pot team also made a habit of interrupting and talking over the judge, flying in the face of the conventional wisdom that one might want to show respect for the judge presiding over one's fate in a case.

At one point, Donald Campbell cut off Judge Parker to express frustration his frustration at her handling of the hearing. "I'm sorry, judge, can I finish?" he asked.

In fact, Campbell managed to cross Parker several times during the hearing, according to The Washington Post. “It’s called a evidentiary hearing," he explained to her in one moment.

Later in the hearing, Park told Campbell, “I would caution you to not question my procedure. I’m here to question what you’ve done, sir.”

Campbell shot back, “But I am not a potted plant. I am not a potted plant. I will represent my client.” 

Well played, sir. 

Ultimately, Parker gave lawyers in the case 14 days to file supplemental briefs in the case. It's pretty hard to see how most of the defendants repair the damage they did to themselves. But Wood apparently decided he had to have the last word on the day.

"Immediately After ‘Kraken’ Sanctions Hearing, Lin Wood Posted a Video Snippet of Zoom Court. The Judge ‘Absolutely Prohibited’ Any Recordings." What the relevant local rules state: https://t.co/MTzEfPcmLN

— Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) July 12, 2021

12 Jul 20:59

Health officials rail against Pfizer’s push for COVID boosters—for many reasons

by Beth Mole
James.galbraith

Not a good look

Rows of small glass vials.

Enlarge / Vials of undiluted Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. (credit: Getty | BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI )

Pfizer has planned to privately brief US health officials on its case for COVID-19 booster shots, but US and global public health officials have not hesitated to publicly blast the idea, calling booster shots unnecessary at this time and unethical in the face of vast inequity in the global vaccine supply.

Pfizer and its vaccine partner BioNTech made headlines last Thursday with the announcement that it would seek authorization from the Food and Drug Administration in the coming weeks for a booster shot to its two-shot regimen. The companies suggest that a third shot will be necessary between six and 12 months after the second dose. During this window, immunity to the pandemic coronavirus declines, the companies say, particularly in the elderly. A third shot, they say, can boost antibody levels five to 10 times what is seen after the first two.

But health officials were quick to push back on the booster talk last week, and the responses have only grown more intense in the days since.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

12 Jul 20:59

Yet another Turning Point USA grifter is linked to brazen white supremacism

by Hunter
James.galbraith

The modern GOP, everybody

If you are blissfully unaware of the compulsively pro-Trump propaganda group Turning Point USA, it can be best described as "something Donald Trump's kids might create if they suddenly had to work for a living." Its most famous denizen is founder Charlie Kirk, who has made a name for himself primarily by tweeting things so bizarre and dimwitted that some of us are still pretty sure he's going to reveal, a year or two from now, that it was all an elaborate Borat-styled prank.

Mainly, though, the group of ultragrifters exists to sell the new Republicanism, meaning fascist-minded conspiracy theories, aimless boosting of whatever Dear Retired Leader is going on about, forming sketchy partnerships with the nation's most prominent perverts, defending virulent racism, and also they probably have a pizza sex dungeon or something. God only knows.

It's the second to last thing that's coming up again today. Turning Point USA advisory council member Rip McIntosh is under fire for publishing an unapologetically white supremacist essay in his would-be "personal newsletter," a newsletter that included Turning Point's own logo and fundraising pitch.

As reported by Talking Points Memo, the essay was an anonymously written screed bellowing that Black people are "socially incompatible with other races" and that the "experiment" to see if Black people could be civilized through slavery had failed. Not exactly subtle stuff. And it's very far from the first time Turning Point USA has had to distance itself from Klan-level white nationalism, white supremacy, antisemitism, and other sludge promoted by its top members. (TPM goes into at some length on that; we won't repeat the details here.)

Where we're at now, then, is Turning Point USA again refusing comment on a top figure sending out fundraising pitches attached to arguments for racist purge, the racist in question again himself blubbering that he's only lettin' folks ask questions, and so on. If it were an Onion article, it would be something like "How does our fascist propaganda outlet keep attracting all these Nazis?"

How are we supposed to react to this news? Eh. It's been blatantly obvious for a good long time that Turning Point USA is an explicitly fascist organization, and one that has long been cozy with the sort of white nationalist blubberers who have long tried to turn the stuff of neo-Nazi and militia rantings into mainstream conservatism. The organization only exists in its current state as publicity campaign for Trumpism, and the sort of Trumpism that revels in saying the most asinine possible things with what passes for a straight face.

It might be helpful if major news outlets were more consistent in describing to audiences just what the grifting group is. It's a troll farm. That's all it is. Conservative money goes in, and false but politically useful propaganda comes out. Conservative racists are gathered in, and apologia for white supremacy comes out.

So, ya know, maybe steer clear of asking them to weigh in on ... anything. Ever.

12 Jul 20:53

Microsoft discovers critical SolarWinds zero-day under active attack

by Dan Goodin
James.galbraith

jesus christ

A phone and the wall behind it share a solarwinds logo.

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images)

SolarWinds, the company at the center of a supply chain attack that compromised nine US agencies and 100 private companies, is scrambling to contain a new security threat: a critical zero-day vulnerability in its Serv-U product line.

Microsoft discovered the exploits and privately reported them to SolarWinds, the latter company said in an advisory published on Friday. SolarWinds said the attacks are entirely unrelated to the supply chain attack discovered in December.

“Microsoft has provided evidence of limited, targeted customer impact, though SolarWinds does not currently have an estimate of how many customers may be directly affected by the vulnerability,” company officials wrote. “SolarWinds is unaware of the identity of the potentially affected customers.”

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

12 Jul 20:35

'Smirking in an intimidating manner': Hate crime laws being used to promote police reign of terror

by Lauren Floyd
James.galbraith

Only in the cops' minds are they the minority intended for protection here.

A Utah woman could face up to one year in prison or a $2,500 fine after a cop deemed “stomping on a ‘Back the Blue’ sign” a hate crime, according to The Salt Lake Tribune. The 19-year-old woman, who wasn't named in the story, was at a gas station Wednesday in Panguitch when a Garfield County police officer conducting a traffic stop saw the woman. She was part of a group consoling a driver cited for speeding and she was “stomping on a ‘Back the Blue’ sign next to where the traffic stop was conducted, crumble it up in a destructive manner and throw it into a trash can all while smirking in an intimidating manner towards me,” according to an affidavit of probable cause obtained by The Salt Lake Tribune.

Although she told an officer the sign belonged to her mother, the officer said in the affidavit that she gave “inconsistent stories” about the flag’s origins. The cop told her the local Sheriff's Office supplied the signs and that “she had acquired it in our community.”

“Due to (the woman) destroying property that did not belong to her in a manner to attempt to intimidate law enforcement, I placed her under arrest,” the officer said in the affidavit, also obtained by the Deseret News. “Due to the demeanor displayed by (the woman) in attempts to intimidate law enforcement while destroying a pro law enforcement sign, the allegations are being treated as a hate crime enhanced allegation.”

The Civil Rights Act of 1968 was the first to establish as a federal crime attacking or threatening people on the basis of “race, color, religion or national origin.” President Barack Obama added to the list disability, gender, gender identity, and sexual orientation in 2009. State legislators have taken it upon themselves to add police protections to their hate crime statutes.

Pennsylvania didn't even include police officers as a protected group in its hate crime statute when Robbie Sanderson, a 52-year-old Black North Carolina resident, was arrested and charged with a hate crime for accusing police of being members of hate groups. Mary Catherine Roper, deputy legal director for the ACLU of Pennsylvania, reviewed affidavits stemming from four hate crime arrests in 2016, and in three of the four cases, the suspects used racial slurs to address officers of color attempting to arrest the suspects. In Sanderson’s case, he was accused of calling police “Nazis,” “skinheads” and “Gestapo.” Roper told The Appeal the cases are not what the hate crime statute was intended for. “This is criminalizing pure speech and that violates the First Amendment,” the attorney said.

“These people said awful things to the police, but they all were handcuffed and far from threatening,” Robbie added in an ACLU article. “We expect our police to be thick-skinned because their job is, by definition, dealing with people at their worst. That’s not an original thought—the courts have said so for years.”

And like all criminal laws, these sorts of enhancements - and in fact hate crime statutes more generally - end up getting used against the people they are supposed to protect. https://t.co/0udJd6tBZQ

— Rebecca Kavanagh (@DrRJKavanagh) July 10, 2021

Washington Post writer Rob Kuznia posed the question of who should be protected under hate crime law in an article on Sept. 10, 2019. "In California, a man is accused of a series of unprovoked attacks on homeless people. In Arizona, a Democratic congressman’s aide breaks the ankle of a Republican wearing a Make America Great Again hat. In Connecticut, a police officer has a brick thrown through his cruiser’s window; authorities say the suspect talked about hating cops," Kuznia wrote. "All are acts of violence, but are they hate crimes?" Even in 2019, before the demanded reckoning over police brutality in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder by a Minneapolis cop, the answer in an expanding number of states was yes.

“Seven states and the District now consider homeless individuals a protected group, for example. Five states do the same for police; at least four include political affiliation or political beliefs,” Kuznia wrote. Although Georgia protesters fought inclusion of police in a hate crime act that took effect last July, GOP legislators in the state followed up with separate legislation that went into effect in January and does in fact grant police the protection. Hidden in legislation appearing to simply rename an office in the state Department of Public Safety, is language that a “person commits the offense of bias motivated intimidation when such person maliciously and with the specific intent to intimidate, harass, or terrorize another person because of that person's actual or perceived employment as a first responder(...)"

Utah’s law goes far beyond Georgia’s, identifying 18 protected groups, including police, in its hate crime statute enacted in May 2019. The state’s hate crime law “enacts provisions relating to sentencing for a criminal offense committed against a victim who is selected because of certain personal attributes.” Legislators defined those attributes as: age, ancestry, disability, ethnicity, familial status, gender identity, homelessness, marital status, matriculation, national origin, political expression, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, service in the U.S. Armed Forces, status as an emergency responder, and status as a law enforcement, correctional or other peace officer.

Spoke to the #resistancepodcast about this earlier this year pic.twitter.com/SEvoklbXUl

— Olayemi Olurin (@msolurin) July 10, 2021

Kami Chavis, a Wake Forest University law professor and hate crime policy expert, told The Washington Post broadening the definition of a hate crime could jeopardize the original intent of the statutes, to safeguard marginalized groups. “When we start broadening those categories, it is almost like the exceptions swallow the rule,” Chavis said. “Our national history is bound up in racial discrimination. . . . When you start giving [protections] to every single vulnerable category, then it could have a negative effect.” 

RELATED: 'They're going to always feel intimidated by me': Georgia protesters fight 'Police Hate Crime Bill'

12 Jul 19:05

The latest CPAC lunacy shows why Democrats must get tougher

by Greg Sargent
James.galbraith

Seriously

Time to put Republicans on the defensive in the culture wars.
12 Jul 18:44

First It Was Sex Ed. Now It’s Critical Race Theory.

by Alex Samuels and Kaleigh Rogers
James.galbraith

Yup the GOP is hopelessly toxic

In the 1960s and 70s, conservatives were waging a war against what they considered an existential threat infiltrating America’s public schools. Pamphlets were circulated by the John Birch Society, a right-wing extremist group, declaring it a “filthy Communist plot.” And then-Governor Ronald Reagan of California decried it as a “moral crisis” that needed to be eradicated. What was poisoning the minds of America’s youth? Sex education.  

These days, sex ed is more widely accepted, especially following the HIV/AIDS epidemic (though conservatives have still managed to beat back more progressive school curricula when it comes to sexual health), but the Republican Party’s habit of identifying a bogeyman in America’s education system hasn’t wavered. 

Then it was sex ed. Now, it’s critical race theory.  

Critical race theory is a legal scholarship framework that has been around in academia for four decades and asserts that racism is systemic and embedded in many American institutions. But over the past few months, the term has been co-opted by Republicans as a catch-all buzzword to signify the perceived threat of anti-white indoctrination in American schools. This has motivated a slate of proposed legislation outlawing a wide range of teachings. Since the start of this year, at least six states have enacted bans on the teaching of critical race theory or discussions of racism in the classrooms, according to a Brookings Institute analysis, while almost 20 other states have introduced similar bills. Moreover, a handful of states, like Florida and Texas, have also successfully banned the teaching of the New York Times’s 1619 Project curriculum, which explores the central role of slavery in the development of the U.S. The project has been harshly criticized by conservatives who have accused its writers of recasting history through a racial lens. To be sure, the bills vary. Some bills mention critical race theory directly, while others only reference bans on “divisive concepts” or any teachings that imply “one race or sex is inherently superior.” But this concerted effort to limit what can be taught in our schools isn’t new — it’s the latest chapter in the GOP’s long-standing push to target curricula that goes against its political ideology.

Republican attacks on cultural issues within America’s public schools follow a familiar pattern. First, they’re usually in response to a vague idea of what might happen — that is, teaching sexual health might lead to more school-aged teenagers having sex (although there’s actually been a decline in the percentage of American high schoolers having sex since the early 1990s). Second, when there is a debate over teaching often taboo, complex social issues, like racism, evolution and sex, elected school board members can exert an outsized amount of control. Considering school board members are more likely to be white and are often partisan, Republicans’ political agenda can get a disproportionate amount of weight in school board decisions. And if the contemporary Republican Party has taught us anything as of late, it’s that “anti-wokeness” is political catnip for its base, so it’s unlikely that this crusade goes away any time soon. In fact, because critical race theory deals so explicitly with racism and discrimination, it has arguably animated the GOP base in a way that previous education battles haven’t.

Watch: https://abcnews.go.com/fivethirtyeight/video/racial-justice-protests-started-contemporary-culture-war-77883986

One of the oldest education battles revolves around the teaching of evolution. It’s one that until recently didn’t have clearly drawn partisan lines. After all, the most famous example of a legislative attempt to prohibit teaching evolution in schools was actually introduced by a Democrat: a 1925 Tennessee state law to ban teaching evolution in schools. That law was later challenged in a showy court case (complete with chimpanzees) that same year, where it was upheld, and ultimately not repealed until 1967. (It was also a Democrat who introduced a 1981 bill in Louisiana’s state legislature that mandated the teaching of “creation science” — which presents religious beliefs as alternative scientific theories — whenever evolution was taught. The Supreme Court has since banned states from requiring creation science to be taught, but it has remained a popular conservative cultural flashpoint.)

In the last two decades, Republicans at the state level have introduced over 100 bills aimed at undermining evolution, through tactics such as allowing teachers to “question” established scientific concepts. Most of these bills never go anywhere — a 2016 study found just six anti-evolution bills out of 110 introduced between 2000 and 2012 were enacted into law — but the fact that legislatures keep proposing them means one of the U.S. public education system’s oldest bogeyman is still alive and well.

An illustration of a red elephant that on the side reads “Make America Great Again”

related: How Trump Has Redefined Conservatism Read more. »

Similarly, sex education in public schools has long been a target of Republicans, although once it became clear that sex education programs actually help reduce the risk of teen pregnancy and STIs and delay the age when teens become sexually active, sex ed became more socially accepted. This means that Republicans opposed to sex ed have had to change their strategy to curtailing what’s taught. Sixteen states, for instance, require educators to “stress” abstinence education and do not require anything be taught about contraception, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that advances sexual and reproductive health and rights.21 Another popular strategy is giving parents the right to opt their child out of sex ed, or making sex ed opt-in to begin with.

And more recently, beginning in the late 2000s, a culture war clash emerged following the adoption of the Common Core State Standards Initiative — a set of K-12 academic standards that was aggressively pushed by the federal government. While the initiative was designed to promote a good education by giving students specific guidelines about what they should know, grade by grade, in subjects like math and English language arts, it faced fierce opposition from Republicans and Democrats alike. 

But around 2015, the Core standards became especially politicized by politicians on the right who thought curriculum standards should be left to local officials. For instance, when Donald Trump ran for the White House in 2016, his early ads argued that “education has to be at a local level.” And in 2018, Trump’s former Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos falsely declared the Common Core was “dead” — even though it’s up to individual states, and not the federal government, whether to ditch the Core standards.22

It’s clear culture war issues have always had a place in how Republicans think about education, but as Terry Moe, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank, told us, Republicans also used to advocate for more policy-focused solutions. He pointed to Republican-led initiatives like the No Child Left Behind Act, which, in part, sought to use standardized testing to help improve student achievement. These kinds of initiatives have since received their own criticism, but they represent a very different strategy than the one that currently dominates the Republican Party. 

“The Republican Party has really gotten further and further away from being a party of ideas about how to solve social problems — one of them being an education system that does not perform very well — and becoming a party of anger and resentment. That’s what they specialize in now,” Moe said. “They are, for the most part, fighting a culture war against the Democrats and trying to pander to their base.”

A poster that says “Culture War, feat. Charlie Kirk” surrounded by fake political buttons that say “Socialism Sucks” and “Culture War.”

related: How ‘Cancel Culture’ Became An Issue For Young Republicans Read more. »

In that sense, critical race theory fits perfectly into the Republicans’ agenda, as it’s a cultural bugbear that conservatives have co-opted to encompass a range of trends they think are unpopular with Americans. (One of the lead architects pushing the anti-critical race theory backlash, Christopher Rufo, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, has said as much.) This is particularly true for topics centered specifically around race. 

“They’re worried about what happens when a reckoning takes hold in their kids’ schools where their kids might learn some things about American history — or about themselves or people like them — that are uncomfortable truths,” said Hakeem Jefferson, a FiveThirtyEight contributor and professor of political science at Stanford University. “This is merely another example of white Americans using schools as sites of their racial political projects, which set out to maintain dominance and do so by way of not telling the full truth of American history.”

Many Americans still don’t know what the debate over critical race theory is really about at this point. Just 24 percent have heard “a lot” about it, 25 percent know “some” and 51 percent know little or nothing at all, according to a June Morning Consult/Politico poll. But tellingly, Republicans were more likely than Democrats to have seen, heard or read a lot about critical race theory, 30 percent versus 21 percent. What’s more, those Republicans familiar with critical race theory overwhelmingly dislike it — 78 percent have a negative opinion of it compared to 7 percent of Democrats. When asked to describe critical race theory in that same survey, one Republican respondent called critical race theory “a farce,” while another said it was a “Marxist proposal.”

Considering how much more exposure Republicans have had to it — a Media Matters analysis shows Fox News has mentioned critical race theory 1,300 times in less than four months, and a query of data on the social media tool CrowdTangle from researchers at Miami University and Wright State University found that the share of posts that mention critical race theory on the Facebook pages of local Republican parties has risen exponentially — the blowback among members of the GOP is not entirely surprising. It’s also not just the volume of coverage: The conservative media’s coverage of critical race theory is overwhelmingly negative, too, as it’s decried by some on the right as anti-white.

Republicans have long fought specters within education that they claim threaten the American way of life. The current blowback against critical race theory follows in that tradition, but it also represents a broader transformation of the GOP into a populist party focused on waging culture wars. Though it may seem like a misguided crusade-du-jour, the tumult around critical race theory is both a reflection of the Republican Party’s past — and a glimpse at its future.

Watch: https://abcnews.go.com/fivethirtyeight/video/republicans-happy-stoke-culture-wars-fivethirtyeight-politics-podcast-76546643

Watch: https://abcnews.go.com/fivethirtyeight/video/republicans-starting-make-climate-agenda-fivethirtyeight-politics-podcast-78546775

12 Jul 03:55

Mow Mow Mow

mow

12 Jul 03:54

You know that moment when you don't fully understand something?

by Matthew Inman
You know that moment when you don't fully understand something?

A comic about explaining things to other people.

View on my website

12 Jul 03:47

John Dean: Trump has set quite the trap for himself with lawsuit against Facebook and Twitter

by Aldous J Pennyfarthing
James.galbraith

Seriously...did no one tell him that he's opening up EVERYTHING for discovery?

Donald Trump is a different kind of beast. It’s been clear for some time that he’s completely untethered from the truth, and that his army of sycophants is dutifully orbiting Planet Bullshit right along with him. Trump tends to engage with the truth the same way he addressed COVID-19: just ignore it, the thinking goes, and it will disappear on its own. Or, like mixed vegetables, you can hide it in your hulking mound of mashed potato lies so your gape-mouthed troglodyte horde will never even know it’s there.

I sometimes wonder what it feels like to have no shame and absolutely no fealty to the truth. I don’t know about you, but I’d sure like to bask in Walter Mitty-like fantasies about myself—like how I’ve won prestigious-sounding, decidedly nonexistent awards and how Madonna was begging to date me at the height of her fame—but I’m constrained by consensus reality and the fact that I didn’t inherit $413 million from my dad.

Well, as COVID-19 proved to Trump that there’s also a limit to his lies, his latest cranial methane blast may end up being a comeuppance as well.

You probably saw that Donald Trump has decided to sue Facebook, Twitter, and Google for supposedly violating his First Amendment rights ... by enforcing their own terms of service. As lawsuits go, this one is pretty embarrassing. If lawsuits could walk up stairs with toilet paper stuck to the bottom of their shoes while their flaccid, flaxen shocks of corn husk hair decamped from their helmetless Darth Vader heads, that’s what this cosmic yak shart of a lawsuit would be doing right now. 

Unfortunately for Trump, lawsuits trigger depositions, and it’s very unlikely that he’ll want to sit for another one of these—especially since his Twitter and Facebook bans were directly tied to his actions on Jan. 6.

And people are noticing! First up, veteran broadcaster and frequent Trump critic Keith Olbermann:

This is the dumbest thing Trump has ever done. It’s wonderful. I remind you from personal experience that when you sue somebody you have to give a multi-day deposition on anything relevant to the topic…in this case, like your role inspiring the 1/6 Coup https://t.co/oUGBrWdgmN

— Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) July 7, 2021

For the nontweeters:

This is the dumbest thing Trump has ever done. It’s wonderful. I remind you from personal experience that when you sue somebody you have to give a multi-day deposition on anything relevant to the topic … in this case, like your role inspiring the 1/6 Coup

Not to be outdone, John Dean, the former White House counsel who famously flipped on Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal, quoted Olbermann’s tweet, making it clear that he’s very much looking forward to Trump’s deposition.

This should be a nationally televised deposition…. Please schedule it next week. Don’t move to dismiss, which would be the normal move. Make him deal with the trap he created for himself. He will lose on the merits! https://t.co/fg46WsEXKV

— John W. Dean (@JohnWDean) July 7, 2021

For the nontweeters:

This should be a nationally televised deposition….  Please schedule it next week. Don’t move to dismiss, which would be the normal move. Make him deal with the trap he created for himself. He will lose on the merits!

Of course, Trump’s clear dilemma is that one gets sworn in for depositions, so he can’t freestyle (i.e., lie his ocher arse off) like he normally does. He has to switch gears, and luckily, we have documentary evidence of how a Trump deposition would likely go.

Last September, Mother Jones obtained a copy of Trump’s deposition in the Trump University fraud case. If you’ve ever had a one-year-old with colic and chronic diaper rash pee in your face while screaming at you, you can probably skip this video. If not, it’s more than a little revealing.

Here’s Mother Jones’ summary of this squirmy spectacle:

Trump sat for this deposition in Trump Tower on December 10, 2015. The video shows him parrying with the lawyer for the plaintiffs, Jason Forge, over various issues, including false statements made by Trump University employees, and Trump’s own memory. Trump at one point griped, “It’s the most ridiculous lawsuit I’ve ever seen.” He claimed not to remember having boasted that he possessed one of the best memories in the world and repeatedly said he could not recall matters related to the case. He downplayed false and misleading statements presented by Trump University instructors as merely “hyperbole,” refusing to label them “false.” He even disavowed a passage from one of his own books in which he had assailed educational institutions for committing “fraud.”

Of course, Trump’s lawsuit has little chance of succeeding. It’s almost certainly a scam intended to separate foolish people from more of their money, and experts have universally panned it, claiming it’s a nonstarter. First and foremost, the First Amendment doesn’t apply to private companies. 

I’ve skimmed former guy’s complaint against Facebook and it’s every bit as stupid as you’d think it is.

— George Conway (@gtconway3d) July 7, 2021

There also seems to be an ulterior motive here, one that has nothing to do with a devotion to the Bill of Rights.

And there it is: Trump fundraising appeal off his lawsuit already out pic.twitter.com/4KUaokjezH

— Nick Corasaniti (@NYTnickc) July 7, 2021

But if Trump does go forward with the suit—and he might, considering how stubborn, narcissistic, and stone-cold stupid he is—he’s likely in for a world of hurt. Attorneys are not like OANN correspondents. They ask probing questions, and Donald Trump is among the most probe-able tubs of goo in the whole wide world.

So bring it on. There aren’t many things I can do faster than Donald Trump can lie, but popping popcorn kernels happens to be one of them. 

It made comedian Sarah Silverman say “THIS IS FUCKING BRILLIANT” and prompted author Stephen King to shout “Pulitzer Prize!!!” (on Twitter, that is). What is it? The viral letter that launched four hilarious Trump-trolling books. Get them all, including the finale, Goodbye, Asshat: 101 Farewell Letters to Donald Trump, at this link. Just $12.96 for the pack of 4! Or if you prefer a test drive, you can download the epilogue to Goodbye, Asshat for the low, low price of FREE.

09 Jul 22:52

Cheat-maker brags of computer-vision auto-aim that works on “any game”

by Kyle Orland
James.galbraith

impressive lol

  • A sample video shows how computer vision (running on an external computer) detects the enemy and calculates how far the mouse needs to move to target that enemy.

When it comes to the cat-and-mouse game of stopping cheaters in online games, anti-cheat efforts often rely in part on technology that ensures the wider system running the game itself isn't compromised. On the PC, that can mean so-called "kernel-level drivers" which monitor system memory for modifications that could affect the game's intended operation. On consoles, that can mean relying on system-level security that prevents unsigned code from being run at all (until and unless the system is effectively hacked, that is).

But there's a growing category of cheating methods that can now effectively get around these forms of detection in many first-person shooters. By using external tools like capture cards and "emulated input" devices, along with machine learning-powered computer vision software running on a separate computer, these cheating engines totally circumvent the secure environments set up by PC and console game makers. This is forcing the developers behind these games to look to alternate methods to detect and stop these cheaters in their tracks.

How it works

The basic toolchain used for these external emulated-input cheating methods is relatively simple. The first step is using an external video capture card to record a game's live output and instantly send it to a separate computer. Those display frames are then run through a computer vision-based object detection algorithm like You Only Look Once (YOLO) that has been trained to find human-shaped enemies in the image (or at least in a small central portion of the image near the targeting reticle).

Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments

09 Jul 20:17

There’s only one way for Democrats to beat back the GOP war on democracy

by Paul Waldman
James.galbraith

Seriously

Inspiring speeches won't do it, federal legislation is in semi-permanent limbo, and the courts are stacked against them.