If God created the world to display the fullness of his attributes, would he have been less glorious without creation?
Richbarbi
Shared posts
I Went to Lidl's Grand Opening in Virginia. Here's What I Learned. — Grocery Shopping News
Richbarbivtipne ze taky craze kvoli Lidlu :)
It finally happened! The European grocery chain Lidl opened its first nine stores in the United States yesterday (June 15). I got to go to one in Virginia, and I must say that I was super impressed and plan on returning again — and again.
Here's what I learned on my inaugural visit.
Reading the Book Acknowledgments
Richbarbina diplomovku :)
Written by:Justin Taylor
I know I am odd, but I almost cannot imagine reading a book and not wanting to read the author’s acknowledgments. Even in the most technical of books by the most erudite of authors, the acknowledgments serve as a reminder that the author is a human being, dependent upon the good graces of others to complete the long and lonely work of writing a publishable book.
Several acknowledgments through the years have made me smile. For example, Moisés Silva, after thanking several students and colleagues for reading a draft of the manuscript, made a tongue-in-cheek comment that pokes fun at the cliche about these people not being to blame for any errors that remain:
Of course, all of these friends expressed total agreement with everything claimed in this book, and they take full responsibility for any remaining errors.
B.M. Pietsch—whose fascinating dissertation turned book is actually a delight to read!—decided to have a little fun and blame the people in his life for the book he produced:
I blame all of you. Writing this book has been an exercise in sustained suffering. The casual reader may, perhaps, exempt herself from excessive guilt, but for those of you who have played the larger role in prolonging my agonies with your encouragement and support, well . . . you know who you are, and you owe me.
There are other acknowledgments that leave the reader—at least this one—with a sense of sadness:
I have seen more than one author’s preface include apologies to children who frequently asked during the writing of the book, “When is Daddy going to be finished?” This book has taken so long from start to finish that my children have all grown up and moved away during that time. Maybe they asked about it in former days, but they gave up long ago if they did.
My apology is aimed at others—at those editors, colleagues, family member, employers, students, and ultimately readers whose lives have been made at least somewhat uncomfortable by the book’s delay.
At least it finally got done.
Yikes! I felt guilty just turning the page to begin the book.
The other day I read John Piper’s “A Word of Thanks” in his new book, Reading the Bible Supernaturally: Seeing and Savoring the Glory of God in Scripture, which is a sequel to his book, A Peculiar Glory: How the Christian Scriptures Reveal Their Complete Truthfulness.
Having co-edited Piper’s Collected Works, I think I have read the acknowledgements in all fifty of his books. But this is a uniquely beautiful meditation on the meaning of gratitude as a writer enters his eighth decade of life.
The kind of thanks one feels at age seventy is not entirely the same as when one was forty. It is more obvious now that every minute of life is a gift. Every pain-free moment is a gift. Every memory of something read or thought, one more year’s gainful employment, each day’s renewal of energy, friends who have not yet died or moved away, hearing the doorbell, seeing words on a page, one more spectacular October maple in Minneapolis just outside my window—all gifts.
Of course, they have always been gifts. But the closer you are to saying good-bye to a friend, the more precious he feels. Don’t get me wrong. My thoughts are indomitably future-oriented. I’m not dead yet. In fact, nearing the end makes me feel more alive, not less. That could be owing to the smell of heaven blowing back into this world. For heaven is a very alive place. Or it could be the adrenaline of urgency with less and less time left to do more and more.
In any case, I am thankful for every day, and every gift. I love being alive. And I love writing. Some things you just feel made to do. I suppose that’s what Eric Liddell meant when he said, “God made me fast. And when I run, I feel his pleasure.” I’m not fast. In fact, the list of competencies that I don’t have is painfully long. Writing is not about being great. It’s about making something. Writing is my carpentry, my masonry, my culinary arts, my painting and sculpting and carving, my gardening, my knitting and crocheting and needlepoint, my coin collecting.
Writing is about the joy of creating—as Dorothy Sayers would say, sharing “the Mind of the Maker.” What an amazing thing: to make much of the Maker by making like the Maker. So I am thankful for the calling and the freedom and the pressure to write. I am thankful for Desiring God, where I work full-time, and where they expect me to write. They pay me to write. And they expect me to write what is true and what is beautiful. They hold me to it.
What a gift! The whole team is precious to me. And David Mathis, executive editor, stands out, because he reads everything I write, and his suggestions make it better. I thank God for David’s leadership of a great team of writers at Desiring God—Jon Bloom, Tony Reinke, and Marshall Segal. How can one not write with joy when surrounded by such thinkers and writers?
In one sense, publishing is secondary to my writing. If nobody wanted to read what I write, I would still write, because it’s how I see things, and how I savor reality. It’s how I learn. But the fact is that God has blessed me with an amazing partnership with Crossway. I love their vision, and they have been willing to publish my books. This is a gift to me. It’s much more than a business arrangement. It’s a camaraderie in Christ and in his global cause of glorifying the Father.
On the home front, the children are all grown and gone their ways. So only Noël and I (and the dog) are left. That leaves only Noël to celebrate in this paragraph. And what a gift she is! She has supported this calling to write from the beginning. She is a good writer herself. She is working on a biography of a missionary to China. God has been good to me in such a wife. I can’t imagine what life would have been without her. I said to her the other day, “I’m really glad you’re here to come down to from my study at the end of the day.”
Of course, behind all these gifts is the Giver. I thank God for Jesus, and for loving me in him, and for giving me his Holy Spirit, and covering all my sins. Noël and I look to him and say,
The Lord, our God, shall be our strength,
And give us life, whatever length
On earth he please, and make our feet
Like mountain deer, to rise and cleat
The narrow path for man and wife
That rises steep and leads to life.
This Is Why Some People Get Headaches from Red Wine — Food News
The world can be divided into two types of people: those who can guzzle down a bottle of red wine without any health repercussions and those who get a painful headache from just a single glass. The mystery surrounding the latter — why do some people get migraines from red wine? — involves understanding the effects of key substances found in a bottle of red.
This Beer-Themed Hotel Will Have Hot Tubs Filled with IPA — Travel News
Beer enthusiasts who have dreamed of a safe haven where they can relish and bathe in beer now have a destination to visit: Columbus, Ohio. Yes, Ohio's capital will soon be home to a craft beer-themed hotel called DogHouse. Forget Disneyland — you need to come here instead.
My Foreword to the New Book, “The First Days of Jesus”
Richbarbivyzera dobre a pekny cover
One New Testament scholar described the Gospel of Mark as a “passion narrative with an extended introduction.”[1] This is why Andreas Köstenberger and I coauthored The Final Days of Jesus: if you want to understand who Jesus is, you have to understand the most important week of his earthly ministry.[2] The Gospel writers, like Jesus himself, set their faces to Jerusalem and refused to look back (Luke 9:51, 53).
But Where Did It All Begin?
But something built into the human spirit wants to go back, to see how it all started. God himself, of course, begins the biblical storyline, “In the beginning” (Gen. 1:1). And the story of Jesus, as the preincarnate word, likewise starts, “In the beginning” (John 1:1).
Although we would never complain about how the Spirit of God chose to guide his inspired writers, we sometimes wish the narrative of Jesus’s first days would slow things down and add some more detail. Obviously we cannot add more chapters to the Bible. God has given us everything we need to worship him in a way that pleases and glorifies his great name and equips us for every good work (2 Tim. 3:16-17). But we can slow down. And we can go deeper. This is where Köstenberger and Stewart, gifted biblical theologians and New Testament scholars, can help us.
Familiarity Breeds Laziness
People say that familiarity breeds contempt, but when it comes to Bible reading, I’ve found that familiarity is more likely to produce laziness. I tend to skim when I already know the story. How many times in my life have I read or heard preached the following familiar words?
In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. And all went to be registered, each to his own town. And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling cloths and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the inn. (Luke 2:1-7)
We’ve heard it so many times that we assume we know what it all means.
But then we start to ask questions.
- Who was Caesar Augustus?
- When did he rule?
- Over what exact area did he rule?
- Why did he want all the world to be registered?
- Who was Quirinius?
- Is the Syria in this passage the same as the modern country of Syria?
- Don’t some Bible scholars say that Luke’s history about the timing of the census is inaccurate here?
- Why did Joseph have to go to Bethlehem instead of registering in Nazareth?
- How big was Bethlehem?
- Why did Mary need to go with him?
- And why doesn’t it say she rode on a donkey—is that in another account, or is that just what we’ve seen on TV?
- How exactly is betrothal different from engagement?
- Where is the innkeeper? A
- nd what kind of an “inn” was this—a cave, a room in a house, or an ancient hotel?
These are fourteen questions off the top of my head, and we’ve only covered seven verses. As we keep reading, the questions keep coming. Even though we’ve read or heard it dozens of times, it is humbling to recognize just how much we still don’t know.
The book you hold in your hands has no gimmicks or clever sales pitches. It won’t reveal a “gospel” you never knew. (If it did, you should throw it away [Gal. 1:8].) It doesn’t purport to finally disclose the secrets of Jesus’s childhood or what he did in Egypt. Instead, it takes us back to Scripture, the only infallible source of how God became man and dwelt among us.
I think you will find several benefits in reading The First Days of Jesus:
1. This book can help you slow down.
The biblical narrative contains details that you probably haven’t noticed before. These details reflect historical realities you probably didn’t know before. And these biblical and historical realities have implications for your life that you probably haven’t thought of before. Köstenberger and Stewart guard us from racing through familiar words and guide us in seeing what we have not yet fully seen.
2. This book can help you go deeper.
The incarnation—God become man—is a deep mystery. Pastor-theologian Sam Storms poetically captures some of the paradoxes at play:
The Word became flesh!
God became human!
the invisible became visible!
the untouchable became touchable!
eternal life experienced temporal death!
the transcendent one descended and drew near!
the unlimited became limited!
the infinite became finite!
the immutable became mutable!
the unbreakable became fragile!
spirit became matter!
eternity entered time!
the independent became dependent!
the almighty became weak!
the loved became the hated!
the exalted was humbled!
glory was subjected to shame!
fame turned into obscurity!
from inexpressible joy to tears of unimaginable grief!
from a throne to a cross!
from ruler to being ruled!
from power to weakness![3]
The wonder of the incarnation deserves a lifetime of thought, and this book is a faithful resource to prompt deeper reflection on the foundation of our salvation.
3. This book can help you make connections.
Even though the Bible devotes only four and a half chapters (out of 1,189) to Jesus’s first days, Köstenberger and Stewart show us that the incarnation is the hinge of redemptive history—with the Old Testament leading up to it and the rest of the New Testament flowing from it. Reading this book will help you see how the whole story line fits together.
C. S. Lewis once confessed that in his own reading, “devotional books” did not produce in his mind and heart the results they promised. He suspected he was not alone: “I believe that many who find that ‘nothing happens’ when they sit down, or kneel down, to a book of devotion, would find that the heart sings unbidden while they are working their way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil in their hands.”[4] You may want to contextualize away the pipe depending on your own preferences and convictions, but I think the advice is sound, and I found this to be the case when reading The First Days of Jesus.
This is not the dry-as-dust formula of dumping data and dates onto the pages of a book. This is not a book of theology void of history or a volume of history minus theology. It is a work of confessional theology rooted in historical investigation and devoted to a careful reading of Scripture, all designed to help us worship our God and Savior, Jesus Christ. I hope you find this book as meaningful and fruitful as I did.
Justin Taylor
Maundy Thursday, 2015
[1] Martin Kähler, The So-Called Historical Jesus and the Historic, Biblical Christ (1892; repr., Philadelphia: Fortress, 1964), 80.
[2] Andreas J. Köstenberger and Justin Taylor with Alexander Stewart, The Final Days of Jesus: The Most Important Week of the Most Important Person Who Ever Lived (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2014).
[3] Sam Storms, “The Most Amazing Verse in the Bible,” February 20, 2010.
[4] C. S. Lewis, “On the Reading of Old Books,” in God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics, ed. Walter Hooper (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1970), 205.
Endorsements
“This latest work on the incarnation and nativity is an excellent example of serious scholarship served up in a most readable manner. No birth in history had such prophetic preparation, which is a powerful, central theme in these pages that celebrate the start of the greatest life ever lived. This is a welcome antidote to the cheap sensationalism in recent books on Jesus that try to demolish every reason for regarding Christmas as ‘the most wonderful time of the year.'”
Paul Maier, Professor of Ancient History, Western Michigan University; author, In the Fullness of Time
“The First Days of Jesus is a revealing look at the earliest days of Jesus in Matthew, Luke, and John set against some of the skeptical takes on these passages. Add to this a taste of Jewish messianic expectation and you have a nice overview of the start of Jesus’s career and where it fits in God’s plan. Solid yet devotional, it is a great introduction to the first days of our Lord.”
Darrell L. Bock, Executive Director of Cultural Engagement, Howard G. Hendricks Center, and Senior Research Professor of New Testament Studies, Dallas Theological Seminary
“The First Days of Jesus combines Scripture passages, historical background, scholarly insight, and practical application to cast Christ’s incarnation in fresh light. Few tasks are more urgent than for today’s Christians worldwide to rediscover and deepen their connections with their origins. This book is a valuable resource for achieving that aim. Like the star of Bethlehem itself, this volume leads those who seek God to find him afresh in the events of Jesus’s historical appearance, the prophecies that preceded, the apostolic testimony that accompanied, and the social world that God split wide open when he sent his Son.”
Robert W. Yarbrough, Professor of New Testament, Covenant Theological Seminary
“Köstenberger and Stewart admirably unpack the birth narratives of Matthew and Luke along with that beautiful first movement of John’s Gospel against both the grand sweep of biblical history and the nitty-gritty details of first-century events and culture. The result may dismantle a few of your nativity-scene notions about the Christmas story even while building up your faith in and commitment to the Word become flesh.”
George H. Guthrie, Benjamin W. Perry Professor of Bible, Union University
“Köstenberger and Stewart provide for us a faithful and useful guide to the early days of Jesus. This book should serve well those desiring to learn about the early chapters in the Gospels and those who desire to preach and teach these narratives.”
Thomas R. Schreiner, James Buchanan Harrison Professor of New Testament Interpretation, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
“Written with exceptional clarity, The First Days of Jesus pays close attention to the key biblical texts on Christ’s nativity in an illuminating way. It deals briefly yet helpfully with critical scholarship and presents the events surrounding Jesus’s conception and birth in both a canonical and a chronological fashion. It addresses unashamedly the difficulties with these birth stories, tackling the problem of variant accounts, the use of sources, the nature of prophecy and typology, and much more. It challenges us readers to respond to the Word of God with the obedience of faith, like Mary did, and with praise, worship, and witness, as the shepherds did. I know of no other book that so masterfully weaves together these infancy narratives on so many fronts. I thoroughly enjoyed it and highly recommend it!”
Gregg R. Allison, Professor of Christian Theology, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
“There is more to Christmas than you may think. Cut through the layers of tradition and the fog of nostalgia, and discover the scandal of how it all started. The Bible has more to say about Jesus’s earliest days than you might expect, and this book is a reliable guide.The First Days of Jesus blends world-class scholarship with real-world concern for everyday Christians. Here attention to detail, in the text and in history, complements warm devotion and pastoral care.”
David Mathis, executive editor, desiringGod.org; pastor, Cities Church, Minneapolis, Minnesota
“In this accessible and reliable guide to how the Gospels present the early years of Jesus Christ’s life, Köstenberger and Stewart provide an exceptionally helpful study, informed by the best of modern scholarship. Drawing on what we know of the historical context, they expound with clarity both the meaning of the biblical text and its relevance for modern readers. In doing so, they enable us to grasp afresh how a detailed appreciation of Jesus’s first days contribute significantly to a deeper understanding of his whole life.”
T. Desmond Alexander, Senior Lecturer in Biblical Studies, Union Theological College, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
Introduction: Separating Fact from Fiction
Part 1: Virgin-Born Messiah
- The Long-Awaited Messiah: Son of Abraham, Son of David
- God with Us, Born of a Virgin
- Conflict between Two Kings and Two Kingdoms
- Exile, Holocaust, and Nazareth: Prophecies Fulfilled
Part 2: Light of the Nations
- Two Miraculous Conceptions
- God at Work Again at Last! Deliverance for Israel
- Israel’s Restoration
- The Humble King Is Laid in a Manger
- The First Witnesses: Shepherds
- Light of Revelation for the Gentiles: Further Witnesses
Part 3: Incarnate Word
- Preexistence: The Word Was God
- Witness: A Man Named John
- Incarnation: The Word Became Flesh
- Culmination: The Law, Grace, and Truth
- The King’s Rejection and Return
Epilogue
Appendix: Messiah Is Coming! Second Temple Jewish Messianic Expectations
Advent Reading Plan
McDonald's Is Rolling Out Its First Organic Hamburger — Food News
Richbarbisuper!
McDonald's will start serving two versions of an organic hamburger, dubbed "McB," in October. Besides making the patties from German and Austrian beef that's been raised organically with GMO-free feed, the burger will also have fancier toppings and a sunflower-seed bun.
A Third Way on Gender in the Church
Most public discussions of gender in the evangelical church are debates between complementarians and egalitarians. Those debating provide a spectrum of thought with egalitarian/feminist thinking on one end and patriarchal thinking on the other end (with complementarian thinking a little left of patriarchy). I used to think that the way to handle this in the church was with a new wave of complementarian thinking that pushed toward a Biblical position closer to egalitarian/feminist thinking but that still kept complementarian distinctions. If Patriarchy is a 1, Complementarian is a 2, and Egalitarian is a 9 or 10, I saw myself closer to a 5. I believe in distinctions in the ways the Bible talks of them, but I am thankful for the right to vote and the feminist work to say that women indeed have equal dignity and worth (and subsequent rights) as human beings.
However, I realize through discussions with others and my own ponderings that it doesn't work to think of this as a linear spectrum between egalitarian and patriarchal views. The answer to gender questions in the Church isn't to compromise between egalitarians and complementarians. The Biblical answer in my mind is a third data point that isn't on the line at all. We don't need to come back to a central balance on a see-saw. We need to get off the see-saw and build on a different platform altogether.
What is the better platform? Well, it helps to understand the foundations of complementarian thought. You and I can say it means this or that for us, but there were a specific group of folks who coined the term and wrote much about it at the time. Many of these leaders have deeply, positively influenced me by the way. The Council of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood rose out of these beginnings. I love the title they came up with for this movement, complementarian, because I love the emphasis on complementing genders. It emphasizes different genders, not always doing the same things, that bring different gifts to the table. But it also lends itself to genders working together, complementing and enhancing the gifts in the other. For a time, I wanted to embrace the name because I liked the concept of complementing genders, but the folks that chose that name have attached other things to the concept that I don't fully embrace, and I can't change that history no matter how much I like the essence of the name.
The focus on complementing genders that brought about the term complementarian in the late 80's/early 90's was based on Genesis 2 and was a reaction to Third Wave Feminism of the previous decades.
Genesis 2:18 Then the Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.”A better platform for understanding gender in the Church is found by starting with Genesis 1 (though it certainly includes Genesis 2) without reacting to any other teaching. Egalitarians react against patriarchy. Complementarians react against feminism. What if we stop reacting and just start acting? What if our doctrinal debates aren't zig zagged like the path of a pinball bouncing off of various pop ups and flipper bats? And what if Target can do whatever it wants with its boys' and girls' aisles because our children are discipled in their distinct but overlapping image bearing identities?
While Genesis 2 and 3 was the starting point of complementarians reacting to feminism, a better foundation starts as God does with Genesis 1. Genesis 2 expands Genesis 1. It zooms in on the particular creation of woman, but it FOLLOWS something else. Genders were first announced in Genesis 1.
26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”I'm not egalitarian. I'm not complementarian. I'm Imago Dei-rian. Just kidding – I'm not suggesting a new name. However, I am suggesting we go to a new platform for gender discussions and stop letting the egalitarian/complementarian spectrum be the starting point for discussion. We have old doctrines from Scripture to build upon found first here in Genesis 1.
Imago Dei
The Creation Mandate
But Genesis 1 and 2 were quickly followed by Genesis 3. Before we got to see Adam and Eve working together, fitting together as God intended to serve and protect God's creation, they sinned and much was lost. Our gender foundation then needs the Gospel and the Great Commission. Jesus comes to us and redeems all that was lost in the fall so that we can once again be “imitators of God” (Ephesians 5:1). Then He commissions His disciples to go and do it all again with the Great Commission.
Imago Dei
The Creation Mandate
The Gospel!
The Great Commission
These points of Scripture need to be the doctrinal foundation of any new structure on gender. Which is really just a very old structure that we have forgotten to let boys and girls play on together. Before God taught of the complementary nature of gender, He first taught us the unified nature of gender. Male and female were created IN HIS IMAGE. Male and female were tasked with the creation mandate. And when Jesus came to earth to redeem back all that was lost in the fall, He tasked His disciples with the great commission, as God re-dignifies His children by sending them off with His help once again to do His work in the earth. The disciples given this commission show us throughout the rest of the New Testament how much they valued women's integral role working beside them.
Phoebe was a patron of Paul and carried the book of Romans as an officer of the church.
Euodia and Syntyche labored side by side with Paul in the gospel.
Lois and Eunace passed down their faith generation by generation to the great benefit of Paul and the early church.
Priscilla labored with her husband to disciple the influential Apollos.
The same Apostle Paul who wrote of male-only elders and submission of wives to husbands also commended these women who blessed him by their co-labor with him on the same mission, the Great Commission.
As a math educator, I like two math visuals that help me think through this paradigm on gender. The first is a triangle. Imagine egalitarian and partriarchal views as the vertices at either end of the base, A and B. Complementarian thought is on the partriarchal end, point E, but not quite at the vertex. Thoughts on gender founded on Genesis 1 present a third vertex, point C, not on the baseline at all. It can be linked to that other line, but it adds a new dimension altogether.
The other math visual I like is the Venn Diagram. Envision male and female as two circles with overlapping parts. There is overlap, and there are distinctions. In the past, the debates on gender seem to argue for all overlap (egalitarian thinking) or all distinctions (patriarchal thinking). But what if we embraced a great big overlap that also allows for distinction, and place the diagram in the middle of a bigger background called the Image of God? In that paradigm, we can stop debating how much overlap and how much distinction, and instead say yes to both and focus on the context of what both the overlaps and distinctions are supposed to be working toward – the kingdom of God fully realized on earth through His image bearers.
Women should fight and women should teach. Men in the Kingdom of God NEED women to fight and women to teach. But women should Fight Like a Girl and Teach Like a Girl. Man must look at woman and say, “You bring many of the same things I bring to our shared commission by God to fill His creation and share the good news of King Jesus. But you also bring something unique, and I need it.” And woman should look at man and say, “I can help you with this burden. I can do many of the things you can do, but not all. And I bring something unique to our shared mandate to serve and protect God's creation in light of Jesus' sending of His disciples that you need. How can I help you in my home, in my church, and in God's coming kingdom in general?”
Man needs woman to bear God's image into the world.
Woman needs man to bear God's image into the world.
Don't react against feminism (complementarians). Don't react against patriarchy (egalitarians). Don't react at all. Act. Act as image bearers, male and female, jointly tasked with the creation mandate and reaffirmed by Jesus in the Great Commission.
Euodia, Syntyche, Phoebe, and Priscilla.
Helping Paul, Peter, Aquila, and Apollos.
They were joint image bearers reflecting God's reclamation of all that was lost in the fall as He commissioned them (and us) to disciple all nations. They did this within the parameters He instructed with respect to gender in the church and home.
May we inspire the next generation of disciples to live out their giftings in such a way.
10 Totally Heinous Crimes Against Salad That Need to Be Stopped — Crimes Against Food
Richbarbihaha totalna blbost ale vtipne
By now you may be familiar with the popular Internet meme, "women laughing alone with salad." If you're not familiar, the concept is easy to understand: Picture a stock photo of a woman all by herself, eating a boring-looking salad and laughing hysterically. Salad deserves better PR than this. Because honestly, laughing by yourself with a bowl full of raw vegetables should be outlawed. It's just wrong.
This meme sparked an investigation into other crimes against salad that are widespread on the Internet. I turned to a collection of stock photos to find the worst offenders. Prepare your eyes, my friends. No food deserves this kind of treatment – especially poor ol' salad.
God Never Grows Tired of Doing Us Good
John Piper:
God is never irritable or edgy.
He is never fatigued or depressed or blue or moody or stressed out.
His anger never has a short fuse.
He is not easily annoyed.
He is above any possibility of being touchy or cranky or temperamental.
Instead he is infinitely energetic with absolutely unbounded and unending enthusiasm for the fulfillment of his delights.
This is hard for us to comprehend, because we have to sleep every day just to cope, not to mention thrive.
We go up and down in our enjoyments.
We get bored and discouraged one day and feel hopeful and excited another.
We are like little geysers that gurgle and sputter and pop erratically.
But God is like a great Niagara—you look at it and think: surely this can’t keep going at this force for year after year after year. It seems like it would have to rest. Or it seems like some place up stream it would run dry. But, no, it just keeps surging and crashing and making honeymooners happy century after century.
That’s the way God is about doing us good. He never grows weary of it. It never gets boring to him.
Let those who desire my vindication shout for joy and be glad, and say evermore, “Great is the LORD, who delights in the welfare of his servant!” (Psalm 35:27)
—John Piper, The Pleasures of God: Meditations on God’s Delight in Being God, rev. ed. (Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 2000), 185.
Recommended: Schumacher’s Dear Committee Members
Richbarbitoto som neprecitala cela els a zda ze by to mohlo byt nieco sranda pre teba :) ako buduca profesorka mozno
As the academic year rolls back around, I usually end up reading a late-summer silly novel. Nothing eases the pain of being a grown-up with a job quite like a dose of Wodehouse –though Alexander McCall Smith and Jack Handey also work pretty well.
I need more from a late-summer silly novel than just a little amusement; I want a book that delivers an actual laugh every few pages, and this year I found one that delivered –Dear Committee Members, by Julie Schumacher.
It’s a short novel written completely in the form of academic letters of recommendation. Epistolary novels are always a bit of a stunt, but is there a genre of epistle with less literary promise than the letter of rec? I was drawn into this book by the sheer unlikeliness of the concept, but it only took a few pages to convince me I should read the whole thing.
All the letters are by one character, professor Jason Fitger. Fitger teaches creative writing at Payne University, to which he has assigned the unofficial motto “Teach ‘Til it Hurts!” And they’re all dated, so we know they span from September 3, 2009 to August 3, 2010. Here is the first voice we hear:
Dear Committee Members,
Over the past twenty-odd years I’ve recommended god only knows how many talented candidates for the Bentham January residency … Well, you can scratch all prior nominees and pretenders from your mailing lists, because none is as provocative or as promising as Darren Browles.
Mr. Browles is my advisee; he’s taken two of my workshops, and his novel-in-progress, a retelling of Melville’s “Bartleby” (but in which the eponymous character is hired to keep the books at a brothel, circa 1960, just outside Las Vegas), is both tender satire and blistering adaptation/homage. In brief: this tour de force is witty, incisive, original, brutally sophisticated, erotic.
Here is the oversharing (why does the committee need to know how long Fitger has been writing letters?), the inappropriately chummy tone (“god only knows how many”), and the lavish praise (tour de force!) that characterize all of his letters. But here already is also the specter of the unreliable narrator, the possibility that this is not a man we should believe either in his critical judgments or in his self-knowledge. Is the committee –are we the readers– supposed to believe that Bartleby-in-a-Vegas-Brothel is anything but the worst idea in the world for a long novel? Does Fitger believe it? Is this a joke?
And so a plot emerges. I admit I mainly enjoy this book as a collection of several dozen very funny letters, many of which can be read in isolation: the one where he tries to talk a paintball range into hiring one of his students; the one where he insults the way a company has spelled its name and predicts that his student will soon be running the place; the one where he veers back and forth between praising and condemning his tech support guy (“His approach to problem solving is characterized by sullenness punctuated by occasional brief bouts of good judgment”). But Dear Committee Members also unfolds the story of a tenured professor somewhat adrift. We overhear him during an eleven-month season in which he is reconnecting with his past (establishing or maintaining contact with several members of a formative grad school seminar) and trying to secure a future for a student (the Browles of the first letter, actually). It’s a good story, and Schumacher asks the reader to do just the right amount of work to reconstruct the events that drive it.
Fitger is a not a pleasant person to spend time with; he seems to have stalked in from some lost Updike novella with all the strengths (verbal dexterity, quick wit) and weaknesses (womanizing, narcissicism, entitlement) attendant on the middle-aged white profs that have anchored enough books to constitute a sub-genre. But he’s genuinely funny when he’s trying to be, and he’s often funny when he’s not trying to be, so we laugh with and at him by turns. And it’s a short novel, so we can bid him adieu before he cloys.
The book also develops a meditation on the character and meaning of recommendation letters. Fitger, it turns out, is in the act of failing to write his next novel, and instead is producing a voluminous amount of these letters. At one point in a letter of rec, he inappropriately overshares his statistics: “By recent estimate I have penned more than 1,300 letters of recommendation, many of them enthusiastic, some a cry of despair.” In fact, we meet Fitger near the end of a a 3-year relationship that started via letters of recommendation: his girlfriend works in the Student Services office, and wanted to meet him in person after reading hundreds of his letters of recommendation (“an odd sort of wooing, consisting as it had to of my praise for others”). This reminds me of the undertaker in Evelyn Waugh’s The Loved One who flirts with a make-up artist further down the “assembly line” by fixing large, pleasant smiles on the faces of the corpses. Fitger turns out to be the king of the recommendation letter. After one particularly warm commendation, he muses, “writing letters of reference such as this one allows me to reinhabit, if only fleetingly, the pensive, knock-kneed person I once was and to advocate for that former version of myself.”
Along the way we get several touches of academic life that are well observed. For example, Fitger tries to get something done without having to go through proper channels, in order to avoid “loathsome hours battling the kingdom of No.” He chronicles the slow death of his humanities department as resources are channeled to economics and the sciences, and he tries to launch his students out of that doom zone, usually by asking potential employers to recognize their skills:
Be assured: the literature student has learned to inquire, to question, to interpret, to critique, to compare, to research, to argue, to sift, to analyze, to shape, to express. His intellect can be put to broad use. The computer major, by contrasts, is a technician –a plumber clutching a single, albeit shining, box of tools.
Being Fitger, though, he can no more avoid insulting his addressee than he can avoid describing the glories of the English major in a self-congratulatory and self-serving way. But let’s admit that this, too, has the ring of truth. Many a doughty warrior for the humanities is primarily a guardian of self-interest. His observations about his place in the pecking order are accurate. But so are Schumacher’s oblique revelations of the professional self-pity that underwrites laments over the fate of the humanities.
Asked to recommend a department member to serve on a committee, Fitger warns that there simply isn’t anybody available, because of the rigors of academic life:
more than a third of our faculty now consists of temporary (adjunct) instructors who creep into the building under cover of darkness to teach their graveyard shifts of freshman comp…. the remaining two-thirds of the faculty, bearing the scars of disenfranchisement and long-term abuse, are busy tending to personal grudges like scraps of carrion on which they gnaw in the gloom of their offices.
Hey, cheery stuff! And it gets cheerier:
I fear we are the last remaining members of a dying profession. We who are senior and tenured are seated in the first car of a roller coaster with a broken track, and we’re scribbling and grading our way to the death fall at the top.
But Fitger’s very unreliability saves the day, or whatever can be saved of it. By the books’ end, he is ushered into something like clarity about himself, his situation at Payne, and the meaning of the events he is living through. There’s an important insight just under the surface of the deftly-crafted conclusion.
But read this book for the laughs. If you’ve lived the life of the academic recommender, you’ll experience recognition time after time in Dear Committee Members. I hope you don’t experience too much recognition of the world of Payne; just enough to get the jokes.
The post Recommended: Schumacher’s Dear Committee Members appeared first on The Scriptorium Daily.
Creative Video Overview of Genesis 1-11
From the new Bible Project:
You can find out more information here.
John McWhorter on the Best Way to Learn a Foreign Language at Home
Richbarbihahaha my uncle is a lawyer but my aunt has a spoon
Noted linguist John McWhorter once wrote:
For years, I have been amazed at how an obscure series of books published by the Assimil company in Europe can give the solitary learner a decent conversational competence in any language in just six months of home study, so cleverly are the lessons arranged to impart what is really needed to speak the language in real life.
In another piece, he explained further:
As a linguist, I get a letter or message about once a month asking me what the best way is to learn a foreign language at home. I always answer “The Magic Books,” by which I mean the wonderful Assimil series. I’ve been giving people Assimil sets for 20 years now. It’s the With Ease series you may have seen — Russian with Ease, Dutch with Ease, and so on.
These are some of my favorite Christmas gifts because they’re the only self-teachers I know that work. In just 20 minutes a day — if you do exactly what they tell you to with the books and accompanying recordings — then presto! You will be talking like, roughly, an unusually cosmopolitan three-year-old. No, you won’t be “conversing like a native” the way the ad copy says, unless you already are one, which would presumably make one’s use of the set somewhat peculiar. And, they can only give you so much vocabulary. But the magic is that you will be able to carry on a decent conversation, instead of just being able to count to 100 and say things like “My uncle is a lawyer but my aunt has a spoon.”
I did the German one a long time ago, and when I got to Germany and had finished explaining to a waitress that I didn’t want onions in my salad because they might make me throw up, a guy told me “You speak German better than anyone I’ve ever known who has only been here a week.” Or, after I did the Hebrew one, an Israeli said “Hey, you can actually talk!”
Both of these faintly hedged compliments were right on the nose. Fluent? Of course not, nothing can get you there short of speaking the language all day for months. But at least I could converse sparklingly with toddlers, while faking it well with everybody else, instead of quietly hoping somebody would ask me what kind of silverware my aunt had.
The With Ease books don’t get around much in the United States, actually. They’re translated from French originals, and are mostly sold in the United Kingdom. But they’re available online and in specialty bookstores, and they’re well worth the cost. Their pages even smell good. (One caveat: Unfortunately, the Arabic one is a complete wash-out, and so avoid it.)
The materials aren’t easy to find, but here’s what you can get through Amazon.