
new fav twitter
I’m completely out of the loop, and wasn’t aware that Robin Thicke has the song of the summer with his hit “Blurred Lines.” Until recently, I had only heard the song once. A while back, I saw the uncensored version, which features a number of naked and otherwise half-dressed women participating in various activities, but mostly prancing around to the delight of Thicke, Pharrell and T.I. I didn’t think much of it at the time.
(That’s the “fully” clothed version). And I didn’t think much of it because it seemed standard fare. For most male artists, the music video is an outlet for their hetero male fantasies. A naked woman walking in front of balloons plastered to a wall that read “ROBIN THICKE HAS A BIG DICK” didn’t even register as abnormal because, well, that’s pretty much the message of every music video I’ve ever seen a dude make.
But that’s sorta the problem, isn’t it?
Roxane Gay, writing for Salon, said: “In the wake of the criticism, Thicke is fairly unapologetic, saying, ‘Women and their bodies are beautiful. Men are always gonna want to follow them around.’ I guess that’s that. Men want what they want.” And as her headline “What men want, America delivers ” suggests, in our society whatever men want, they get.
That’s the danger of brushing aside this video and the potentially “rapey” lyrics, as I first did (a function of my privilege as a hetero man). It’s not about the nudity in and of itself, or that the three men in the video are indulging their fantasies, or that they even have these type of fantasies to begin with. It’s the idea that their fantasies are meant to be fulfilled, whether the other parties are willing participants or not. It’s about the fact that we bend over backwards (in some instances, literally) to accommodate hetero men’s desires for a sexual playground, and in turn deny anyone else the same pleasure. If everyone is focusing in on how to please hetero men, when are they afforded the opportunity to pursue their own sexual fantasies? And if hetero men become so accustomed to being the star, how resistant will they be if asked to play a supporting role in someone else’s show?
Thicke’s video is mostly playful, and wouldn’t necessarily classify as demeaning, but that doesn’t matter all that much because it still fits inside the narrative of “boys will be boys.” And if you’re not one of the “boys” there’s apparently nothing you can do about it except participate as the boys wish. The lines are clearly drawn here.
Fergus NoodleI can't believe she ate all that

















Fergus NoodleAMAZING!
I fukin love 14th century art art because everyone looks so shady and suspicious of ppl around them its AMAZING
or just like they know something u dont and oh my gdfuck i cant
I believe the highest point is reached in Simone Martini’s Annunciation
and the look of absolute hatred Mary and Gabriel exchange.
A 1962 letter from the NASA advising an aspiring female space explorer that they have no program for women astronauts “nor do we contemplate any such plan.”
Women and people of color are still under-represented in media–and progress has stalled.
The Texas House gave final approval to their terrible anti-choice bill, and it could be voted on in the Senate as early as Friday. Meanwhile Texans are getting thrown out of the hearings, and Santorum is getting into the battle, because that’s just what this drama needs.
“By slipping into the opposite gender’s role, we have become more equal.”
Good morning, and welcome to the worst story you’ve read all day even though it’s only 9am.
Earlier this week, we covered the story of the 11-year-old Chilean girl who is pregnant as a result of rape by her mother’s partner, and who is being denied an abortion because they’re not legal in Chile, even in cases of rape, incest, and to save the mother’s life. This case ticks all three of those boxes.
Raw Story reported yesterday that Chilean President Sebastian Pinera is praising the “maturity” of this little girl because she will not seek an illegal abortion. Everything about this story makes my heart hurt:
The conservative president of Chile praised an 11-year-old girl’s “depth and maturity” for continuing a pregnancy caused by repeated rapes by her mother’s partner. According to the Associated Press, President Sebastian Pinera made the remarks to the press in an attempt to explain why the victim is not being offered the option to terminate the pregnancy.
“I’ve asked the health minister to personally look after the (girl’s) health,” Pinera said. “She’s 14 weeks pregnant, and yesterday she surprised us all with words showing depth and maturity, when she said that, despite the pain caused by the man who raped her, she wanted to have and take care of her baby.”
… The 11-year-old girl herself gave a TV interview in which her face was obscured. In it, she said, “It will be like having a doll in my arms. I’m going to love the baby very much, even though it comes from that man who hurt me.”
The man who raped the girl has been arrested and confessed to serially sexually abusing her over the course of two years, since she was nine. Her mother shocked the country when she defended her partner, saying the relationship with her daughter was consensual.
Yeah, I just… I got nothing. All I can say is that my heart breaks for this little girl, and for any person living in a place where their right to decide what happens to their own body is repeatedly violated like this. This is what is looks like when anti-choicers get their way. The most vulnerable people get hurt, and then hurt again, and sometimes, they die.
On cable news, coverage of the Texas abortion restrictions has been light on medical experts. Via Media Matters: 
I think there’s something to be said for including political commentators in conversations about an issue that is so clearly political. I’m also grateful when advocates for reproductive justice are given a place at the table, since, again, this is a justice issue and not just a medical one. But I also want doctors, and public health experts – people who can explain why abortion bans are medically harmful and why forced vaginal ultrasounds are medically unnecessary. The more viewers know about that stuff, the better they can understand the politics of the situation. But based on these graphs, it looks like coverage of these issues is falling into the very same trap as the lawmakers themselves: a whole bunch of people who aren’t doctors sitting around talking about reproductive health.
Cross-posted at Montclair SocioBlog.
According to an op-ed in the Times, America is the global leader in broadband, with high speeds and great service. And it’s all because the government restrained “onerous” regulation and let companies like Verizon do what they want and charge what they want.
It was written by the CEO of Verizon, Lowell McAdam.
I pay Mr. McAdam’s company about $115 each month for my land line, wi-fi, and cable (all FIOS). Mr. McAdam compares the U.S. favorably with Europe, “where innovation and investment in advanced networks have stagnated under an onerous regulatory regime.” I asked a friend who lives in Paris what he pays for his FIOS phone, wi-fi, and cable. The monthly bill: 39.90€ ($52) or half of what I pay Verizon. Maybe there’s an upside to stagnant and onerous.
There’s nothing wrong with getting what you can afford, and it occurred to me that U.S. broadband is the best because we can afford more. Onerous regulations or no, most other countries are not as rich as the U.S. What if you looked at broadband and per capita GDP?
The OECD did just that with data from June 2012 (their several spreadsheets on this are here). The purple bars are broadband penetration and the bumpy red line is GDP per capita. Do you see a correlation?
Consider France: As of a year ago, the country had greater broadband penetration despite a lower per capita GDP than the U.S. ($35,133 vs. $46,588); that’s 25% more broadband on 33% less income and at half the cost to consumers.
If you re-rank the OECD countries factoring in per capita GDP, the line-up changes. Notably, the U.S. and Luxembourg drop well below the OECD average, despite being among the wealthiest countries.
Of course, not all broadbands are equally broad. Verizon sold me on fiber-optic with their assurance that it was dazzlingly faster than their DSL that I had been clunking along on. This graph breaks down broadband into its various incarnations.
The U.S. is slightly above average on all broadband, but when it comes to a high fibre diet, we are ahead of several other countries that have greater total penetration. On the other hand, the Scandinavian countries are ahead of us, as are, impressively, the Asian countries.
This is not to deny U.S. advances. TechCrunch summarizes more recent data from Akamai on these changes:
the U.S. is currently second in the price of broadband for entry-level users. The nation is also third in network-based competition, second in the fiber-optic installation rate, first in the adoption of next-generation LTE, ahead of Europe in broadband adoption, and doing quite well in Internet-based services.
Still, the U.S. lags behind other, less wealthy countries. InnovationFiles, using Akamai data for different variables, has a less congratulatory view.
The title of CEO McAdam’s op-ed is “How the US Got Broadband Right.” Given the content, I guess “We’re Number 13!” wouldn’t have been appropriate. Even “We’re Number Seven (Tied With Socialist Sweden)!” doesn’t quite have that affirmative zing.
Jay Livingston is the chair of the Sociology Department at Montclair State University. You can follow him at Montclair SocioBlog or on Twitter.You are silly to think that
- a) Your opinion on what is sexy should matter (to anyone but yourself).
- b.) What you find sexy is in an inherent biological “truth" that is uninfluenced by harmful and oppressive social standards.
- c.) That your expression of this “truth" is always right and welcome.
Blind sex positivism is not good.
maybe it’s just me, but for me, Tim Heidecker in a silent role (save, “I do,") in Bridesmaids was a shout-out to every hilarious woman who’s had to just play “the wife" or “the girlfriend" in a movie or sketch.
a thousand apologies if this was already discussed to death when ‘Smaids came out.
I always think this, yes
yeah, that was a beautiful role! i was SO STOKED that he only said “i do" and even when he could’ve had lines, he was just shown chuckling or smiling instead of saying anything. so nice!

I bought a sandwich cutter from China and I think the translation on the package is a bit off
It got real dark real fast
I will never tell my children that if a boy picks on them it means he likes them. I will teach my children that “Anyone who cares about you or loves you would never dream of hurting you. They would want to protect and nurture you.” End rape culture, stop nurturing abusive relationships, by teaching your kids differently.
This.