Shared posts

23 Apr 14:33

Netflix Surpasses HBO in U.S. Subscribers

Netflix Surpasses HBO in U.S. Subscribers:

parislemon:

Andrew Wallenstein for Variety:

Netflix reported 29.17 million domestic subscribers in the first quarter of 2013, surpassing HBO for the first time.

You see that fire? That’s all of our collective money burning holes in our pockets just waiting for HBO to unleash Go without a goddamn cable subscription.

Dracarys!

05 Apr 18:18

Battle of wits.

by bearing

H. and I were dismayed at some of our seventh- and eighth-graders' writing recently.  We thought we had mostly mechanics problems, but some careful probing of their paragraph-composing ability revealed that they needed a refresher course in constructing logical arguments.  

So H. spent some time working with them on syllogisms.  

You know the sort.  All men are mortal.   Socrates is a man.  Therefore Socrates is mortal.  (Although it turns out that there are lots more kinds that I never learned about in school.  Fortunately H. is on the case.)

"Might as well do it anyway," I theorized.  "It's the sort of thing that lots of people get in school.  Can't hurt.  Might help."

0404131345-00

Today H. gave them a copy of Vizzini's speech from The Princess Bride -- the one with the Battle of Wits over the iocane powder and the two cups of wine -- and challenged the kids to find and articulate as many syllogisms -- explicit and implicit, valid and not valid -- as they could.

 

It was a very fun lesson to overhear while I was making lunch.

 

Unknown

This is the kind of thing they came up with:

  • If you are strong, then you trust your strength to save you.  You are strong, therefore I can not choose the glass in front of you.
  • If you have been to Australia, then you are used to people not trusting you. You have  been to Australia. Therefore you are used to not being trusted.
  • If I can find out what kind of man you are, then it is simple.  This is not simple, therefore I can’t find out what kind of man you are.
  • Iocane comes from Australia and Australia is populated by criminals.  You obtained the iocane.  Therefore you are a criminal.

 

We were amused to discover that the entire battle of wits includes one incorrect assumption (that one of the goblets is not poisoned) but that Vizzini repeatedly comes to the correct conclusion anyway ("Therefore, I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me" and "Therefore, I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you.")

 

 

04 Apr 18:25

If You Believe It, You Can Be It (as Long as What You Believe Is Reasonable for You and Your Circumstances)

by noreply@blogger.com (Swistle)
Liz.teubner

I have a little postcard in my office, that has a picture of a bunch of slaves rowing a bot, and says : "Get Back To Work: You Aren't Getting Paid To Believe In The Power of Your Dreams". So obviously I will be drafting the titles in this post as beautiful framed etchings and embroider pillows for a baby nursery.

[Here's another one from the drafts file. After I wrote it, I thought, "I'll bet someone else has already done this, and better." So I was going to look around and find out. Then I lost the energy for that. Then I thought, "If I had to check everything I wrote to see if someone else had already said it, I'd never hit publish on ANYTHING, because EVERYTHING has already been said." So here it is.]

********

I am thinking of writing a new series of more realistic children's books:

- If You Can Dream It, You Are Among Many Others Dreaming the Same Thing, and Only a Few of You Will Do It So It Would Be Sensible to Have a Backup Plan, Maybe Something Like Business or Computers

- The Little Engine Who Could, Because Luckily His Design and Physical Components Met Those Specifications

- The Little Engine Who Couldn't, Because Despite His Constant Repetitions of "I Think I Can," It Turned Out Those Words Were Not Some Sort Magical Spell Capable of Overriding His Design and Physical Components

- You Can Be Anything You Have Been Born and Trained and Motivated and Had the Opportunity to Be!

- SOMEONE Has to Do the Jobs That Are Less Fun, Rich, and Glamorous, and I Don't See Any Reason It Shouldn't Be You

- All That Talk About Everyone Being Special and Unique and Bound for Greatness Can Be Filed With the Whole Santa Claus Thing. Oh, Oops, Didn't I Tell You About Santa Claus Yet?

- In This Economy, I'd Keep in Mind That We Always Need People Who Work With Pain and Death

- You are Not the Only One Dreaming of Being a Singer, an Author, or an Astronaut

- Believing and Dreaming Don't Actually Do Anything, So Get Good Grades and Maybe Take Some Extracurriculars

- What, Do You Think People DREAM of Some of These Other Jobs?
28 Mar 16:54

What "Gone Girl" taught me about slacking on the housework

by Lisa Schmeiser
Liz.teubner

Gone Girl was, at heart, a cautionary tale of what would happen if you move your spouse to the suburbs (...right?), but also what she says here

Yesterday, Jonathan Chait suggested that maybe women could get over their disgruntlement over doing more housework than their male partners by just ... well, by just doing less. Or as he put it:

Women in general just have higher standards of cleanliness than men do. People who care a lot about neater homes spend more time cleaning them because that makes them happy. And while I agree in general that domestic life requires more gender equality, the housework problem has a partial solution that’s simpler and more elegant: Do less of it.

Let us skip-hop around the stereotypes innately baked into the assumptions about hetero partnerships here and break down the risible assumptions in the passage above. Then I will explain how they tie into last summer's breakout novel, Gone Girl, which will eventually be used by time management consultants as an inspiring story about the power of a well crafted to-do list.

Young-Man-with-a-BroomWrong supposition the first: "Women in general just have higher standards of cleanliness than men do."

Tidiness and gender are not linked on the X chromosome. Your attitudes about order and cleanliness are likely shaped during childhood, and a lot of them are situationally based. If men's affinity (or lack thereof) toward housework were genuinely a sex-linked trait, they would not exhibit the kind remarkable adaptive behavior that leads to things like "men's participation in housework in U.S. families has nearly doubled in the past 40 years, and their amount of time spent on childcare has tripled."

Chait goes on to point out that people who clean more do it because neat homes make them happy, then suggests ...

Wrong supposition the second: "The housework problem has a partial solution that’s simpler and more elegant: Do less of it."

So rather than look at the reams of evidence noting that people in marriages with a more equitable division of household labor  are happier and saying, "Hey, I could keep the counter clean and keep my wife happy -- win-win," we have someone saying, "Suck it up, lady who is happy in a neat house. Sink to our standards."

In other words, what's a little lady-specific happiness in the face of not having to wipe down the booster chair after every meal?

This whole "You'll be happier if you just like what the guys like" argument reminds me of my favorite passage in Gone Girl, where one of the novel's central characters -- a Gen Xer like me who hit the dating pool right around the time noted public health researcher Jenny McCarthy burst into pop culture as the girl to date -- delivers a gimlet-eyed appraisal of what it means to adopt the male-approved "cool girl" personal:

Men always say that as the defining compliment, don’t they? She’s a cool girl. Being the Cool Girl means I am a hot, brilliant, funny woman who adores football, poker, dirty jokes, and burping, who plays video games, drinks cheap beer, loves threesomes and anal sex, and jams hot dogs and hamburgers into her mouth like she’s hosting the world’s biggest culinary gang bang while somehow maintaining a size 2, because Cool Girls are above all hot. Hot and understanding. Cool Girls never get angry; they only smile in a chagrined, loving manner and let their men do whatever they want. Go ahead, shit on me, I don’t mind, I’m the Cool Girl.
Men actually think this girl exists. Maybe they’re fooled because so many women are willing to pretend to be this girl. For a long time Cool Girl offended me. I used to see men – friends, coworkers, strangers – giddy over these awful pretender women, and I’d want to sit these men down and calmly say: You are not dating a woman, you are dating a woman who has watched too many movies written by socially awkward men who’d like to believe that this kind of woman exists and might kiss them. I’d want to grab the poor guy by his lapels or messenger bag and say: The bitch doesn’t really love chili dogs that much – no one loves chili dogs that much! And the Cool Girls are even more pathetic: They’re not even pretending to be the woman they want to be, they’re pretending to be the woman a man wants them to be. Oh, and if you’re not a Cool Girl, I beg you not to believe that your man doesn’t want the Cool Girl. It may be a slightly different version – maybe he’s a vegetarian, so Cool Girl loves seitan and is great with dogs; or maybe he’s a hipster artist, so Cool Girl is a tattooed, bespectacled nerd who loves comics. There are variations to the window dressing, but believe me, he wants Cool Girl, who is basically the girl who likes every fucking thing he likes and doesn’t ever complain. (How do you know you’re not Cool Girl? Because he says things like: “I like strong women.” If he says that to you, he will at some point fuck someone else. Because “I like strong women” is code for “I hate strong women.”)”

 Needless to say, the character concludes, men don't feel the need to reciprocate by spending a weekend binge-reading Bronte.

And I feel like this, "Learn to love a little squalor, lady!" argument is basically the Cool Girl pressure brought to domestic labor. Why should the men bother, amirite? Why can't you be cool about a mountain of dishes in the sink? Or visible crumbs in the carpet?

(I had to take a deep breath to even type those last two sentences.)

The entire "Just do less housework, duh" argument is so dismissive. It devalues the tidier partner's desires for a calm and orderly refuge, and it devalues the actual labor that housework entails.

And while I'm ranting, suggesting that the only reason women care so much about housework is we confuse the contents of a glossy magazine with reality is pretty damned dismissive too, especially when the concluding passage suggests that raising young slobs is an empowering message about achievement.

No, it's a message that you're not responsible for your own space or things, or for respecting the wants and feelings of people who share your home. And if you can't cultivate basic executive-function skills at home, where the stakes are comparatively low, where and how will you develop them?

Housework is not some shelter-based version of dressing up and playing princess, it's not an exclusively female phenomenon and it's not something that just goes away with a little rhetoric about equality.

Housework is, at its heart, about demonstrating a fundamental respect for yourself and your loved ones by valuing your shared stuff, your shared space and your shared time enough to take care of them as precious and limited resources.

If you can't cultivate an ethos of respect in the most intimate environments ... well, then, you've got bigger problems than whose turn it is to rinse the food out of the dish drain.

27 Mar 22:20

How climate change is affecting wine

by Jason Kottke
Liz.teubner

You guys. I knew it was bad, but this is getting SERIOUS.

Food and beverages where terroir is a big factor will be the first to be affected by climate change. This is already happening in the world of wine...wine production is happening in Denmark, French wines are changing flavors, and some places may become too hot to grow grapes at all.

As new frontiers for grape growing open up, the viability of some traditional production areas is under threat from scorching temperatures and prolonged droughts.

And in between the two extremes, some long-established styles are being transformed. Some whites once renowned for being light and crisp are getting fatter and more floral while medium-bodied reds are morphing into heavyweight bruisers.

(via @CharlesCMann)

Tags: global warming   wine