Shared posts

11 Mar 04:49

Hackaday Links: March 10, 2024

by Dan Maloney
Hackaday Links Column Banner

We all know that we’re living in a surveillance state that would make Orwell himself shake his head, but it looks like at least one company in this space has gone a little rogue. According to reports, AI surveillance start-up Flock <<insert gratuitous “What the Flock?” joke here>> has installed at least 200 of its car-tracking cameras on public roads in South Carolina alone. That’s a serious whoopsie, especially since it’s illegal to install anything on state infrastructure without permission, which it appears Flock failed to obtain. South Carolina authorities are making a good show of being outraged about this, but it sort of rings hollow to us, especially since Flock now claims that 70% of the population (of the USA, we presume) is covered by their technology. Also, police departments across the country are in love with Flock’s service, which lets them accurately track the movements of potential suspects, which of course is everyone. No word on whether Flock will have to remove the rogue cameras, but we’re not holding our breath.

It looks like we’ll soon be writing the obituary we hoped would still be a couple of years away, as the chance that NASA will be able to reestablish meaningful communications with Voyager 1 seems to be diminishing with each passing day. We reported on the latest “flipped-bit glitch” back in February, but the problem dates back to November, when Voyager 1 started sending back gibberish instead of its usual payload of scientific data and spacecraft telemetry. The breakdown is thought to be caused by a corrupt bit of memory in the Flight Data System; NASA planned to resolve this by commanding the craft to switch back to a mode last used when it did its planetary flybys all those decades ago, but it’s not clear whether they ever did this or what the results were. We’ll assume the silence speaks for itself. We know that the entire Voyager program is long past the point of diminishing returns, and that the money NASA spends coaxing half-century-old hardware 24 billion kilometers away into producing results might be put to better use elsewhere. But then again, having something that far away to communicate with seems like an excellent way to develop the skills we’ll need as we expand humanity’s footprint further into the galaxy, so maybe it’s worth the expense. Just a thought.

Also in space news but a little bit closer to home, the mortally wounded Ingenuity helicopter may fly no more, but it still has work to do. Unlike another recent lander spacecraft, Ingenuity managed to stay on its feet after crashing into the Martian regolith, leaving its solar panel exposed to the Sun and keeping it powered up. That’s the good news; the bad news is that about the only thing it can do now is use its downward-pointing navigational cameras to watch the grains of sand and dust drift by in the wind. It’s valuable geological work, no doubt, but compared to soaring through the thin Martian atmosphere and breaking record after record, it seems a somewhat ignominious retirement. Lemonade out of lemons, anyone?

Nobody ever said being a Linux geek was going to be easy, but as those of us who have voluntarily defenestrated or depomified their computers can tell you, it’s not always an easy row to hoe. That’s especially true with content creation; while the Mac and Windows crowd can (usually) just plug and play, getting a Linux machine to cooperate with audio and video editing hardware and software can be a bit painful. Luckily, we have Venn Stone’s Interfacing Linux to help us out. Venn has spent the last decade or so building a Linux-based AV production studio and is now sharing the tips and tricks learned along the way, as well as building a community of like-minded content creators. If you refuse to worship at the altar of Redmond or Cupertino, this might be the place for you.

And finally, last week (fifth item) we noted the news that the US government is pushing programmers to eschew programming languages it deems to be “memory unsafe.” This basically boiled down to “C/C++ bad” because they lead to buffer overflow errors that can be exploited by malware. Now, the US National Security Agency — yes, that NSA — has come out with a helpful list of alternative languages, which have better memory-safety features and are totally not compromised in any way. Rust fans will be pleased, no doubt, as will Java programmers. We were a little surprised to see C# on the list, though, and we expect the inclusion of Ruby and Python will raise some eyebrows, with the latter no doubt drawing the ire of a certain Hackaday editor.

23 Dec 18:55

Photographer creates painterly masterpieces inspired by the old masters

by Clinton lofthouse

I would probably need an infinite number of counting beads to count how many times a photographer says they are trying to capture the master painters of old in their work. But one photographer embodies this style whilst infusing it with their own master touch more than any other. Meet Gemmy Woud-Binnendijk, one of the sweetest […]

The post Photographer creates painterly masterpieces inspired by the old masters appeared first on DIY Photography.

15 Mar 00:00

Not Today

Not Today

null

Submitted by: (via null)

13 Oct 01:13

How is DocuLex Different From Competitors?

by Alan Vollmar

How is DocuLex Different From Competitors?

In the field of document management, DocuLex is in a class by itself. The company has a steady and solid track record of over 17 years in business. We have been a pioneer in document management, offering the first Windows-based scanning/storage solution as well as the first 100 percent browser-based content management system.

Browser-based

Most competitors still aren’t browser-based, and, even if they are, the functionality available through the browser is only 10 percent to 20 percent. Basically, their system uses the browser as a “viewer.”

Complete functionality

DocuLex features the only document management system that provides every piece of functionality regardless of the number of users or size of the company.  Most competitors offer a basic package with limited functionality.  The customer ends up finding out that if they want to use the record retention module, or the workflow module, or even add one scan station, they must pay a fee for each of these modules.  We include every module and utility, as well as the API for each product/module.

Non-proprietary

DocuLex is completely non-proprietary in every way.  The majority of our competitors have a proprietary system that locks their customers in or holds them for ransom. They can use MS SQL and common file types, but when you dig into the database every document is saved as single page files with alphanumeric names that mean nothing.  Basically, you can’t get your data out of the system without paying a large amount to do it, or paying a service bureau to do the same.  Both are usually expensive. Once the customer is stuck, these companies will require them to upgrade to the most recent release — and they issue several releases a year to squeeze every dollar out of the customer.  DocuLex uses MS SQL, and everything we do is open source. We even have an export process built into the system, which lets customers get all of their data out of the system when they want without our help.  All files are named according to the request of the customer.

Complete document capture suite

The DocuLex offering includes a complete document capture suite. Our capture tools are more than enough for 95 percent of our customers.  Functionality includes OMR, OCR, ODBC, form recognition, zonal OCR, zonal barcode, and zonal blank detection.  For electronic capture we have plug-ins for MS Office, MS-Sent to, print driver, automatic email capture, and ODBC. Most other document management companies rely on third-party software companies to capture data, and they then manage the data. We also have connectors for these capture companies if customers want to use their software.

Custom capture tools

We have custom capture tools for multi-function copiers/scanners as well as stand-alone capture stations.  We worked with copier type VARS from the beginning, so we have functionality that most competitors lack. They historically sold their product through imaging VARS, and they focus on stand-alone scanners such as Fujitsu, Kodak, and Panasonic.  Our capture suite handles all of them

Complete browser scanning

We have 100 percent browser-based scanning built into Websearch. Any user who has a scanner and loads the driver for it can scan into the system without having any special software loaded on their computer.  Most of the competition sells by the scan station, and special software needs to be loaded and configured on the computer that is scanning.  Of course you pay for each scan station, $5,000 to $17,000 each!

Unlimited tech support

We offer unlimited technical support and include all upgrades with maintenance.  Most competitors provide support first through their reseller, which usually has limited knowledge and limited availability. Most companies included updates to the version they have only.  They charge the full fee to move a customer to the next full version.

Other key features that set DocuLex apart include:

  • No competitor has Email archiving
  • We have a true transactional workflow engine.  Most competitors charge at least $15,000 for it.
  • ARMA based record retention
  • Adobe form support
  • Shareportal: to share a group of documents for compliance
  • Audit log
  • Document level security

Given DocuLex’s experience, product, and customer service, we know you’ll agree we stand head and shoulders above the competition.

Doculex - Document and File Management Software