Shared posts

05 Dec 00:11

instantfrost: fireandshellamari: savannahalexandraart: savanna...



















instantfrost:

fireandshellamari:

savannahalexandraart:

savannahalexandraart:

You know Dasher, and Dancer, and
Prancer, and Vixen,
Comet, and Cupid, and
Donner and Blitzen
But do you recall
The most famous reindeer of all

Rudolph, the red-nosed reindeer!!


  I can finally post what I’ve been working on all through the month of November! I did all of Santa’s reindeer as  retro-y/pinup/centaur ladies!! I had a lot of fun with this ;3; 


I’ll be putting these up on my redbubble tomorrow! 

Reblogging for the morning people! I posted this kind of late last night.

I adore retro pinup stuff, THE FACT THEY ARE REINDEERTAUR MAKE IT BETTER.

How do I say thank you for something I didn’t even know I needed so badly until I had it.  

04 Dec 23:36

Male privilege & a basket of tampons

lindentreeisle:

gallagherwitt:

Years ago, a friend went to a party, and something bothered him enough to rant to me about it later. And it bothered me that he was so incensed about it, but I couldn’t put my finger on why. It seemed so petty for him to be upset, and even more so for me to be annoyed with him.

Recently, something reminded me of that scenario, and it made more sense. I’ll explain.

The party was a house party. One of those parties people throw if they’re renting a good-sized house in college. You know the type—loud music, Solo cups of beer, and somebody doing something drunk and stupid before the end of the night.

At some point, my friend had occasion to use the bathroom. When he went into the bathroom, he was disgusted to see that the hostess had left a basket of feminine hygiene products on the counter for guests to use if needed.

Later, when my friend told me about it, he wrinkled his nose and said, “Why would she do that? Guys don’t want to see that!”

When I suggested that she was just making them available in case a woman needed them, he insisted that they could be left in the cabinet or under the counter. Out of sight, anyway.

I wish I’d had, at the time, the ability to articulate what I can now.

To me, this situation is, while relatively benign, a perfect example of male privilege.

A man walks into the bathroom and sees a reminder that women have periods. And he’s disgusted. He wants that evidence hidden away because it offends his senses. How dare the hostess so blatantly present tampons and pads where a man might see them? There’s no reason for that!

A woman walks into the bathroom and sees that the hostess is being extra considerate. She gets it. She knows what it’s like to have a period start unexpectedly. The feeling of horror because she’s probably wearing something she doesn’t want ruined—it is a party after all. The sick embarrassment because someone might notice, especially if she’s wearing light-colored clothes, or worse, sat on the hostess’s white couch. The self-conscious, semi-nauseated feeling of trying to get through a social event after you’ve exhausted every avenue to get your hands on an emergency pad or tampon, and you’re just hoping to God that if you tie your jacket around your waist—you brought one, right?—keep your back to a wall, clench your buttcheeks, squeeze your thighs tightly together, and don’t…move…at…all—you might get through the evening, bow out gracefully, and find an all-night convenience store with a public restroom.

Or maybe she came to the party during her period, but didn’t bargain for her flow to suddenly get that heavy. Or she desperately needs a tampon, but her purse is in a room where a couple is not to be disturbed. Maybe she doesn’t know the hostess well enough to ask if she can use one. Or she doesn’t know anyone at the party well enough to ask. Or she figures she can make do with some wadded up toilet paper or something.

Whatever the case, she walks into the bathroom, and she hears the hostess saying “Hey, I know what it’s like, and just in case, I’ve got your back.”  She sees someone saving her from what could be a minor annoyance or a major embarrassment.

The hostess gets it. The woman who just walked into the bathroom? She’s either going to see that the person throwing the party is super considerate, or she’s going to be whispering thanks to Jesus, Krishna, and whoever else is listening because that is a basket full of social saviors.

But to the guy who wrinkled his nose, it’s still offensive that those terrible little things are on the counter, reminding his delicate sensibilities that the playground part of a woman is occasionally unavailable due to a gross bodily function that he should never have to think about.

In the grand scheme of things, it’s a tiny thing. It’s a tiny annoyance for the man, and a more significant but relatively tiny courtesy for the woman. After all these years, my friend has probably forgotten, but I never have.  As a woman whose life is partially governed by a fickle uterus that can ruin an evening faster than a submerged iPhone, his story has stuck with me.

How can you be so offended by a small gesture that has zero effect on you, but could make such an enormous difference to the person who needs it?

It occurs to me now that this is a small but effective illustration of how men and women see the world. It’s part of the same thought process that measures a woman’s value through her bra size and her willingness to have sex with him—that everything about us is displayed or hidden based on how men perceive them or what he wants to get from us. Unattractive women should be as covered as possible, while attractive ones shouldn’t be hiding their assets from male eyes (or hands, or anything else he wishes to use).

A woman who isn’t smiling is an affront to him because it detracts from her prettiness, despite the fact that there might be a legitimate reason for her not to smile (or more to the point, that there isn’t a legitimate reason for her to smile). Her emotional state is irrelevant because she’s not being pretty. It’s the line of thinking where a man blames anything other than cheerful sexual consent on the woman being a bitch, being a lesbian, or—naturally—being on her period. Everything we do, from our facial expressions to our use of hygiene products, are filtered the lens of “how it looks to a man.”

It’s the line of thinking where a small gesture from one woman to another, an assurance that someone else understands and will help her without question or judgment, a gesture which could save a woman’s evening from being ruined, is trumped by a man’s desire to see an untainted landscape of pretty, smiling women with visible cleavage and vaginas that never bleed.

And people wonder why we still need feminism.

This is actually an amazing idea I hadn’t though of.  (And apparently it has the bonus side effect of showing which of your male friends are whiny pissbabies.)

04 Dec 23:17

ninjarobotclone: fuckyeahjupiterascending: TIME magazine has published its Top 10 Worst Films of...

ninjarobotclone:

fuckyeahjupiterascending:

TIME magazine has published its Top 10 Worst Films of 2015 list, and it is - suffice to say - profoundly eccentric. Featured alongside generally liked and (relatively) decently reviewed fare such as Minions and Age of Adaline, Jupiter Ascending comes in at #4. Here’s the write-up:

The Wachowski siblings’ commitment to telling original stories at a grand scale is admirable. Unfortunately, this time, they got perhaps a little too grand, and certainly far too original. This story of a cleaning lady who is genetically predestined to become queen of the universe has everything: Channing Tatum as a genetically spliced dog-man, the most elaborately overdone costuming since the heyday of Queen Amidala, Eddie Redmayne giving the sort of manic performance we’ve come to expect from a late-in-life Pacino. It’s overstuffed fun, but the lack of coherence, character development, or common sense make it a bit of an endurance test, too. 

I didn’t realise that elaborate costuming, genetically spliced dog men, Pacino-esque acting, and fun were so bad before. I can only thank TIME magazine for enlightening me.

(But seriously, this write-up is bizarrely positive and apologetic given that it’s for a film that’s meant to be the fourth worst movie of the year. The whole list is deeply strange, as much for its omissions as what it includes.)

TOO ORIGINAL LMAO

ORIGINALITY IN STORYTELLING, TRULY THE WORST SIN

04 Dec 22:09

In wake of mass shooting, Marco Rubio wonders why we're not talking about 'bomb control' instead

by rss@dailykos.com (Hunter)

It's been a long time since we've been able to refer to anyone in the Republican Party as the smart one. In his pouting would-be analysis of the San Bernardino mass murder, Marco Rubio demonstrates why he will never be that guy.

“When this first came out– without knowing anything about the case — the first thing [the left] started talking about was gun control,” Rubio said. “I don’t hear anybody talking about bomb control. They put bombs and left bombs behind on the scene of attack, intending to kill even more people than they did with guns.”

Two things. First, we have bomb control. You are not allowed to own a bomb, or carry a bomb on your back while visiting your neighborhood Chipotle. Not even if you claim you need a bomb for self-protection, or because you're afraid there are other people out there with other bombs who might try to bomb you first. We’re not stupid, after all. You cannot buy ready-made bombs at Walmart, because Walmart is not allowed to sell ready-made mass murder devices. Even those Americans that are permitted to own and operate bombs (for example, for excavation purposes) face very, very tight state and federal regulations and restrictions; as for the rest of us, outside of military service we are allowed to be in personal possession of a mass-murder-sized bomb approximately never.

Perhaps because America has bomb control, our nation faces no epidemic of bomb-related mass murders. There are some—most in recent decades perpetrated by radical far-right groups against government targets or as part of anti-abortion extremism—but we do not have bombs going off on a daily basis in cities around the nation, the bodies piling up in our trauma centers and in our morgues while our politicians wonder what, if anything, should be done. That would seem to offer at least some evidence that our "bomb controls" are, despite the continued ability of some very small band of lunatics to create bombs despite the obstacles we have thrust in their way, working.

The second obvious point: These murderers did not bomb 14 people to death while wounding 17 others. They shot them. That is why "the left" is talking about guns, the legal things used to once again commit an act of mass murder in America, rather than bombs, the illegal things which once again were not. You. Stupid. Git. [sorry-fingers slipped]

It is true that the murders brought bombs with them—and those bombs did not work. They did not work because actual, tightly regulated bombs are strictly controlled, and almost impossible to buy off-the-shelf, so murderers seeking to use bombs must make them themselves. And bombs are hard to make. And very, very often do not work, because they are hard to make. Despite reports of multiple bombs being prepared by the murderers in San Bernardino, none of them appears to have detonated, and none of them injured anyone. The freely purchased guns, however, appear to have worked perfectly.

So I think we would all be very, very happy to talk about gun control as an adjunct of bomb control. If bomb control has been so successful, that would seem to indicate a fine path for reducing mass murder via guns as well. All we have to do is regulate guns like we regulate bombs. You can't buy them without a license. You can't get a license without a background check. And training. And even if you have a license and training you can't buy them except through tightly controlled dealers and a federal system for tracking every last pound of approved, registered, regulated material, because only a lunatic would argue that people be allowed to wander around random American neighborhoods with implements of mass murder dangling from their shoulder.

Yep, let's do that. Let's compare gun control to bomb control, Mr. Rubio. Let's all do that right now.

04 Dec 18:18

thelepidopteragirl: necrobiologist: By the way, a cautionary tale If you find a bunch of bones...

ThePrettiestOne

Amateur tip, don't touch bones. Not until you're a pro. You wanna make sure you get paid for that kind of thing.

thelepidopteragirl:

necrobiologist:

By the way, a cautionary tale

If you find a bunch of bones that are A: untouched and B: supernaturally clean, there is definitely a reason for both of those things. Sometimes that reason is ants. Sometimes those ants are fire ants. Sometimes those fire ants have made a nest over the entire three meter area around those bones

Sounds like someone had an adventure with fire ants

04 Dec 18:03

autism problem #374

ThePrettiestOne

why do those words I said in that order not make you understand what I'm saying?

Asking for help with wording things, but not getting anything that conveys what you were trying to say, and not being able to word why what they said wasn’t what you were looking for.

04 Dec 17:47

I Was Trolled and Fat-Shamed by One of My Male College Students

I Was Trolled and Fat-Shamed by One of My Male College Students:

professorfangirl:

“I cried for my student who had, by 4 a.m., enough hate in his heart to locate the syllabus with my phone number on it, hit *67, call me, and express his misogyny and male entitlement in a freakishly lucid voice.”

04 Dec 17:21

coerulescens: acatnamedhercules: tubofgoodthings: obscuruslupa...





coerulescens:

acatnamedhercules:

tubofgoodthings:

obscuruslupa:

doriandawes:

gunslinger:

She would break them over her knee ala Bane in Knightfall.

Buffy would absolutely destroy those assholes and have time to make a snarky remark about it.

Bonus points of she takes them out with pies.

Remember the s5 finale when Buffy threw that guy off the tower without even breaking stride? It’d be like that

I once described SPN as “Buffy but if you replaced every character with Riley” so needless to say it wouldn’t even be a close fight

BUFFY BUT IF YOU REPLACED EVERY CHARACTER WITH RILEY.

04 Dec 15:02

roachpatrol: littlepinkbeast: so a lot of fantasy settings do the thing where there’s one or two...

roachpatrol:

littlepinkbeast:

so a lot of fantasy settings do the thing where there’s one or two or maybe three human societies, all based on European cultures unless they’re bad guys, and then the non-human cultures are all based on non-European cultures, like orcs will be loosely based on Mongols and there’ll be an animal race with superficial Native American trappings.  And for many reasons this can get really annoying.

But what if we turn it around?  There’s an awful lot to explore if we stick a different angle on it.  I want to see a thing where the human kingdoms are based on, say, imperial Mali around the time of Mansa Musa and the Mughal empire, and then maybe the orcs are based on pre-Roman Gaul, and the marauding beastfolk raiders look like Polish winged hussars, and your secretive-and-xenophobic but wise-and-spiritual elves or whatever are based on all the most alien and unfamiliar bits of medieval Catholicism.

can you even fucking imagine how insufferable a bunch of catholic elves would be

04 Dec 15:00

autism problem #375

ThePrettiestOne

~~A Memoir

trying to mask the symptoms of your autism as being really eccentric becuase you dont know how others will feel about you being autistic

04 Dec 15:00

"Here’s some common sense for you. I want gun ownership to be as boring and annoying as car..."

Here’s some common sense for you. I want gun ownership to be as boring and annoying as car ownership. I want you to go to some Department of Weapons and sit for hours. I want folks who own guns to prove their skill, their mental and physical health, and to be licensed and reviewed over the years just as happens with our driver’s licenses. You earn the right to own and drive a vehicle; earn the right to own and use a gun.

I also want a voluntary federal buyback program for firearms, with hunting weapons and vintage/historic weapons exempt. I want the sale of weapons to be even more tightly controlled than the sale of Xanax and other controlled substances. I want advertising for firearms to be as regulated as DTC (direct to consumer) advertising for pharmaceuticals (“May cause shortness of breath, long-lasting boners, etc.”) We can do all of this. It’ll create jobs, believe it or not: regulators, educators, enforcers.

It will not end murder. It won’t end rape or robbery either. It WILL make it harder to commit those crimes. There will be a black market for guns as there is for any coveted item in a capitalist society. (And I’m not anti-capitalism, btw. I’m a big fan! Sorry, hippies. I do love you guys, by the way, you’re very nice people with good instincts.) Continuing education credits for gun owners should be required, just as they are with medical professionals. When you have a greater ability to take a human life you have a greater responsibility to prove your fitness to wield the tools that may create that end.

And that’s how the fuck you well-regulate a goddamn American militia.



-

Sara Benincasa

(via

sarabenincasa

)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What Sara said.

(via tereshkova2001)

04 Dec 14:58

hobbitkaiju: shinelikethunder: So the thing about that moment near the beginning of Cap 2 where...

hobbitkaiju:

shinelikethunder:

So the thing about that moment near the beginning of Cap 2 where Natasha pulls up in a fucking sweet Corvette–

–well, first of all, I love that Natasha likes driving ridiculous dick cars, because she is clearly having fun with it.

But anyway, I love that the running scene ends with Steve climbing into a totally overkill Corvette driven by a girl who is five foot three inches of pure don’t-underestimate-me badass, because that is Steve. That’s what Steve is. That’s why Steve repeatedly lapping Sam and lampshading it is hilarious instead of mean.

Steve Rogers is a scrappy, sickly little runt behind the wheel of the world’s most souped-up muscle car, and he’s having fun with it, but he’s always uncomfortably aware of the distinction between people complimenting him and people admiring his sweet ride.

I LOVE THE COMPARISON BETWEEN STEVE’S NEW BODY AND NAT’S CAR, THIS IS EVERYTHING I NEVER KNEW I WANTED IN CA:TWS ANALYSIS

04 Dec 14:50

"To sum up, [Mark Zuckerberg’s] money is not going to a charity, but to his own LLC, which will let..."

ThePrettiestOne

Some interesting points raised.

To sum up, [Mark Zuckerberg’s] money is not going to a charity, but to his own LLC, which will let him evade tax by moving his private assets into a foundation. See, Zuckerberg doesn’t need massive tax benefits to do whatever he wants. He can just do whatever he wants. But he will get those tax benefits and estate planning benefits and he will be able to give up his stock while holding onto power over his company.

As Michael Maiello in his Daily Beast piece reveals, “when we pay people like Zuckerberg to fund their own foundations, we are really helping the rich and coddled few even as we thank and honor them for their charity.”



- What No One Is Telling You About Mark Zuckerberg Donating 99% Of His Fortune To “Charity” | Says (via america-wakiewakie)
04 Dec 13:44

Never attack an enemy’s self esteem

evilsupplyco:

Never attack an enemy’s self esteem – no one needs this sort of non-sense in their life. You are a villain. Either do your job as a professional or excuse yourself from the conflict.

04 Dec 06:43

Photo



04 Dec 06:42

confessionsofabollywoodgirl: Priyanka Chopra in Filmfare 2015...

ThePrettiestOne

I've got my new James Bond!











confessionsofabollywoodgirl:

Priyanka Chopra in Filmfare 2015 Photoshoot

04 Dec 06:41

Politely Exit an Unwanted Conversation by Giving a Specific Excuse

by Patrick Allan
ThePrettiestOne

Oh, I'm so sorry, I honestly didn't realize I had absolutely no interest in anything you have to say. You guys take care, now, I'll catch you later!

Whether you’re at a work party, convention, or some other social event, knowing how to slip away from a dull conversation is an invaluable skill. The trick to giving a good excuse is all in the specifics.

Read more...











04 Dec 06:39

gifsboom: No no no, I fits here so I sits here!

ThePrettiestOne

OK, now make the cat like eight times that size.



gifsboom:

No no no, I fits here so I sits here!

04 Dec 06:36

madisontdaw: i-cant-believe-its-no-homo: little-sub-princess: ...



madisontdaw:

i-cant-believe-its-no-homo:

little-sub-princess:

esilanaaurora:

Perfect

I’m not crying you’re crying

I always say I’m not a romantic but than I see videos like this and I’m like, what are these drops of water dropping from my eyeballs?

I fucking love this so much. This is so important oh my god yes.

04 Dec 06:33

How People With Autism Fake It - EXPATLOG

ThePrettiestOne

Mind you, the whole "leave you eating lunch alone" is the optimal result for me.

How People With Autism Fake It - EXPATLOG:

sinshine:

I feel like a fraud whenever I discuss my Asperger’s, because here I am, this put-together, functioning, articulate woman who expects people to believe her when she says she’s autistic. “You don’t look autistic.” They tell me brightly, half compliment, half reassurance. But really… how could they possibly know?

They don’t see my brain seize up and shut down when I drive a route I haven’t taken before, even if I’ve been driven there a hundred times by someone else.

They’re unaware I work so hard to suppress the physical symptoms of a hair-trigger fight-or-flight response – the thudding heart, tunnel vision, and inability to process external stimuli that must be subdued before I get to the checkout girl, the receptionist, the client I’m meeting – that I give myself headaches and stomach pains.

They don’t see (or feel) the anger and frustration when yet another stupid, clumsy move results in a spill, a breakage, a bruise.

They have no clue the reason they haven’t run into me for a couple of days is because I’ve been holed up, burnt out, empty of the strength needed to be out in the world.

They don’t hear the voice in my head shouting, “noooooo” as I agree to playdates, meet-ups, coffee…

How could they know anxiety is my constant companion?

Don’t misunderstand me, it’s not that I dislike people (well, not all of them anyway), or don’t enjoy company, a good chat, a chance to ‘connect’ with another person. If we bump into one another and spontaneously get together for coffee, chances are I’ll come away feeling ‘lifted’, happier afterwards than I was before.

But The Prospect… the tabled encounter with time beforehand to imagine all its possible versions, the lulls in conversation, the mis-hears and missed meanings, and multiple opportunities for misstep in the minefield of social proprieties… that’s what does me in. The stage fright. I feel sick just thinking about it.

My best defence is to take the other extreme, to not let myself think about it, navigate it in real time and see how it goes. But this takes a concentrated effort, and leaves me drained afterwards.

Seriously, don’t try and tell me everyone feels this way when faced with human interaction.

A piece in Slate the other week asked why some kids with autism seem to grow out of it. The article appeared to contradict its tagline when it quoted clinical psychologist Catherine Lord, an autism expert at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City saying, “There’s just no evidence of that at all,” and surmising either most of those children had been misdiagnosed and never had autism to begin with, or that they continued to have autism with less obvious symptoms.

Duh! Of course their symptoms grow less obvious. We all learn to censor ourselves as we age. How many adults do you see farting audibly with unabashed impunity in public spaces? You don’t need a PhD to know children take their cues for cultural values, normality, even accent, primarily from their peers, constantly shoe-horning emergent personalities into a socially palatable mold. Funny looks and snide comments provide clues for working out what’s cool and what will leave you eating lunch alone.

04 Dec 06:29

Photo





04 Dec 02:17

#is100enough: how many cases of antichoice violence, threat & incitement do you need to admit clinic violence is real?

#is100enough: how many cases of antichoice violence, threat & incitement do you need to admit clinic violence is real?:

stfuprolifers:

@ClinicEscort dedicated a lot of time in providing 100 citations to anti-choicers to force them to acknowledge that anti-choice clinic violence is real. At the end, they admit they haven’t revealed all of it. Because yes, there are hundreds of other acts of violence done by anti-choicers. But anti-choicers keep trying to compare the murder of actual people to aborted fetuses. I dare anyone who really believes the two can be equated to go up to any one of the victims’ loved ones and tell them you think the loss of their family or friend is equal to a terminated pregnancy.

04 Dec 01:15

renew-leverage: Hardison witnessing Nophie for @cyanidegamer.







renew-leverage:

Hardison witnessing Nophie for @cyanidegamer.

04 Dec 01:14

Photo









03 Dec 23:59

lee jordan: so here on potterwatch we managed to get an exclusive interview with the dark lord himself!

lee jordan: so here on potterwatch we managed to get an exclusive interview with the dark lord himself!
lee jordan: voldy, i gotta say, its an honour
fred weasley on helium: thank you lee, and may i say for the record that i am a massive butthead
lee jordan: you heard it here first folks, the dark lord is in fact a butthead
03 Dec 23:47

orchardsultan: thetremblingofmyhand: makeitearlgrey: momir-vig...



orchardsultan:

thetremblingofmyhand:

makeitearlgrey:

momir-vig:

flavoracle:

arabella-strange:

zombres:

vampiredarkavenger:

And he was the inspiration for Zorro who became the inspiration for Batman.

#women invented all your favorite genres

Actually, the first person to ever have their name associated with an original written work was Enheduanna, a Sumerian princess and priestess born in 2285 BC.

In other words, the FIRST AUTHOR IN HUMAN HISTORY was a woman.

#just thought you should know

And wasn’t the first recorded novel series written by a Japanese woman?

Yeah, the first modern novel was The Tale of Genji written by Murasaki Shikibu.

Who run the world… 👑

03 Dec 23:41

trebled-negrita-princess: onyxslaughterhaus: loptrcoptr: kurtw...



trebled-negrita-princess:

onyxslaughterhaus:

loptrcoptr:

kurtwagnermorelikekurtwagnerd:

bradmajors:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

josswhedons-twittermantrum:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

ohgodhesloose:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

cakelikeowen:

zooophagous:

masterkittens:

Saying you child is your “kid” is an insult to goats everywhere.

I’ll insult moms everywhere. Fight me Pam.

Fuck you, Barbara 

You want to do this now, Helen?

Oh it is on Brenda

Eight o clock after the PTA meeting, Joan

Uhm, my kids will be going to bed at 8, Sandy, because unlike SOME mothers I put my children to bed at a responsible time!

Don’t you bring my kids into this, Janet

You’re right Sandy, we shouldn’t bring your C- average kids into this. We should, however, bring your 2013 Honda Odyssey that reeks of failure and cigarettes from your midnight affairs with the mail man.

At least I have a man touching me, unlike SOMEONE I know. When was the last time Frank so much as looked at you, Jackie?

C-Carol, you’ve gone t-t-too far!

NONE OF YOU ARE INVITED TO THE CASSEROLE POTLUCK! That includes you, Cynthia…


03 Dec 23:41

sassydirewolf: Jessica Jones + text posts

















sassydirewolf:

Jessica Jones + text posts

03 Dec 23:40

Maddy Myers has an excellent take on the resulting—if small—fandom for Kilgrave following Jessica Jo

by Katharine Trendacosta

Maddy Myers has an excellent take on the resulting—if small—fandom for Kilgrave following Jessica Jones. “Although I may not fully understand the fandom surrounding Kilgrave, I do understand the general desire to reclaim a bad experience or experiment within a fictional or virtual space.” Read the whole thing here.

Read more...










03 Dec 23:04

shockingblankets: Civil War





shockingblankets:

Civil War