Backers are either angry or sad, some decided to take action to #savePebbleCore! Since the announcement by Pebble that Kickstarter backers…
|this sunny photo was taken in downtown houston, tejas. any houstonians in our reader-base? |
Thomas Hawk | Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)
Pebble is ceasing all hardware operations. We are no longer manufacturing, promoting, or selling any new products. Active Pebble models in the wild will continue to work. ...
Backers will get refunds for any unfulfilled rewards. After a successful crowdfunding campaign, we were excited to bring Pebble 2, Time 2, and Core to the world. We’ve since shipped every Pebble 2 possible, but can’t say the same for the remaining rewards. Pebble Time 2, Pebble Core, and Pebble Time Round Kickstarter Editions will not go into final production.
In a cryptic press release sent out today, Ryan Cash, co-founder of Toronto-based mobile developer Snowman, announced Alto’s Odyssey, the sequel to Alto’s Adventure, one of last year’s most critically acclaimed mobile titles.
“Long before Alto’s Adventure had even been released, we started working on an idea for what might come next. Today, we’re finally ready to announce it: Alto’s Odyssey,” said Cash in a statement to MobileSyrup.
— Alto's Adventure (@altosadventure) December 7, 2016
Little is known about what seems to be the next entry in the Alto series beyond a cryptic “2017” launch date listed on the game’s official website.
Earlier this week Snowman revealed it’s set to be the publisher and “creative partner” of a title called Distant, currently in development by an Australian indie developer Slingshot & Satchel. Snowman is also working on Where Cards Fall through a partnership with another studio called The Game Band.
Slack has announced a strategic partnership with Google Cloud in an effort to facilitate deeper integrations with Google services on its platform.
According to a report from TechCrunch, the additions include new bots for notifications and support for Google’s recently launched Team Drives, document previews, and permissioning.
Google Drive is one of the most popular Slack integrations, with a Google Drive file imported into Slack 60,000 times a weekday. Slack will work with Google developers to build further integrations.
One of the new integrations include a Google Drive Bot that will post comments and requests for access into Slack, and Slack will allow users to preview Google Drive files within the platform. Slack will work with Google Team Drives, and files shared in Slack will automatically be uploaded to Team Drives.
The news comes at a time that Slack is facing increased competition from Facebook and Microsoft. Amid Microsoft’s announcement about its Slack competitor, Teams, Slack published a full-page open letter to Microsoft welcoming the competition.
The new Google integrations will be rolled out over the first half of 2017.
This story was originally published by BetaKit.
After several months of speculation from a variety of sources, Bloomberg has weighed in on Samsung’s upcoming Galaxy S8 smartphone, corroborating many of the rumours we’ve heard in the past few weeks.
According to unnamed sources with “direct knowledge of the matter,” the Galaxy S8 will feature an “all-screen” design with a bezel-less display that features a virtual home button hidden in the lower part of the phone (think: Xiaomi’s recently introduced Mi Mix concept phone).
Samsung will reportedly release two S8 variants — a 5.1-inch model and a 5.5-inch model. However, both models will feature wraparound, ‘edge’ displays.
On the processor front, some S8 units will ship with Qualcomm’s recently announced Snapdragon 835 SoC, while other units will include one of the company’s Exynos processors. If history is any indication, then Samsung will likely ship the Qualcomm variant to the U.S. and Canada, while it sends the Exynos variants to European and Asian markets.
On the software front, meanwhile, the S8 will ship with the company’s new voice assistant. Built upon technology developed by Viv Labs, a startup made up of some of the people that worked on Siri, the feature will be “significantly differentiated” from other personal assistants on the market, according to Bloomberg‘s sources.
Samsung reportedly plans to release the S8 sometime in March, following its usual cadence of announcing new S family iterations at Mobile World Congress.
However, the company may push the release date back one month to April to allow more time for safety testing. Following the disastrous Note 7 recall, Samsung has implemented more stringent testing procedures.
One last thing to note is that Bloomberg does not mention whether or not the S8 will include a 3.5mm headphone jack, which seems to suggest the rumour earlier in the week about the S8 dropping the headphone jack could be untrue.
Why hasn’t the Internet of Things become a thing?
Trust me—the name isn’t helping. What does “the Internet of Things” even mean? Our household objects do not have their own internet. There’s no little Twitter for thermostats, or Facebook for waffle irons.
Oh, there’s an infinitude of networkable “smart” products available—lights, thermostats, coffee makers, security cameras, door locks, sprinklers, robot vacuums, smoke detectors, microwaves, pool cleaners, baby monitors, bike locks, shower heads, crockpots, coffee mugs, soccer balls and basketballs, bathroom scales, bikes, and rolling luggage. All of it networked, all of it connected to apps on your phone.
There is not, however, a corresponding rush of people buying this smart stuff.
Sure, some early-adopter techies have installed smart thermostats and light bulbs. The Nest thermostat, for example, programs itself by observing what time you come and go, and the Honeywell Lyric uses your phone’s GPS to know when you’re approaching the house, and get it heated or cooled in advance. You can also adjust your home’s temperature and lighting from a phone app.
But mass adoption of IoT? Nope, not yet. I can count the number of people I know who own, say, an internet-connected mattress on zero fingers.
The industry’s rush to Thing-ize every ever-loving household object, no matter how silly, isn’t helping much with the category’s reputation. The following are actual products:
Upon discovering that a remote control came with our new TV in 1979, my mom said, as I recall: “Why does anyone need this? Is it so hard to walk six feet to change the channel?”
That seems to be the public’s response to IoT devices: “Why do I need this thing?”
And also: “Am I really going to open an app to turn my lights on?”
And also: “What about security? The more entry points I offer to hackers on the internet, the easier I am to hack!”
You may recall that last month’s massive internet outage—of Twitter (TWTR), Reddit, Netflix (NFLX), Airbnb, and Spotify—was made possible by a weakness in IoT webcams made by a Chinese company called Hangzhou Xiongmai Technology.
But here’s the thing: Most people (and most reporters) who use the term “Internet of Things” are talking about consumer products. And sure enough: IoT adoption in consumer products isn’t what you’d call white hot.
There is, however, a second IoT universe where these technologies make a lot more sense: Industrial and commercial uses.
A typical corporate building is made up of systems: security systems, fire/smoke/water-alarm systems, heating/cooling systems, lighting systems. If they can be made to communicate intelligently, both with each other and with building managers, they can provide a huge boost in convenience, savings, safety, and environmental payoff.
At this very moment, gas companies are installing sensors on remote pumping stations in Alaska, so that their engineers can monitor the machinery’s health with an app instead of driving out there for inspection. Tire companies are embedding sensors into their tires, and sharing the collected data to trucking companies to save fuel and money. Sensors in municipal water utilities can predict when machines will fail, so they can be fixed before disaster strikes. Predictive maintenance, it’s called.
Some people call this realm IIoT, the Industrial Internet of Things. In business, it’s not about not getting up off the couch to flip a light switch. It’s about efficiency, data, interconnectedness of systems—and big, big money. According to Accenture, corporations will be spending $500 billion a year on these technologies by 2020.
Usually, new technologies seep into the corporate world through the back door, when employees bring their personal technologies and devices into the workplace (see: smartphones, social media). But in the case of the Internet of Things, it looks like industry will lead the way.
You may not be completely sure why anyone needs to build sensors into, write an app for, and generate data from a waffle iron.
But in the commercial world, when the “things” in question are big, expensive, dangerous, and mission-critical pieces of equipment, the “why” of sensors, data, and apps is screamingly clear.
David Pogue, tech columnist for Yahoo Finance, welcomes non-toxic comments in the Comments below. On the Web, he’s davidpogue.com. On Twitter, he’s @pogue. On email, he’s email@example.com. Here’s how to get his columns by email.
There's much to dislike in this Safran Foer emission about the distractions of technology. All of it really. It's the usual novels versus screens stuff. This struck me particularly:
"But then a funny thing happened: we began to prefer the diminished substitutes. It’s easier to make a phone call than to make the effort to see someone in person. Leaving a message on someone’s machine is easier than having a phone conversation – you can say what you need to say without a response; it’s easier to check in without becoming entangled. So we began calling when we knew no one would pick up. Shooting off an email is easier still, because one can further hide behind the absence of vocal inflection, and of course there’s no chance of accidentally catching someone. With texting, the expectation for articulateness is further reduced, and another shell is offered to hide in. Each step “forward” has made it easier – just a little – to avoid the emotional work of being present, to convey information rather than humanity."
I notice he chose to write that in a national newspaper and didn't seek me out to tell me directly. Just, I suppose, because it was easier to do that, to just type it and send it to a newspaper, rather than to do the emotional work of seeking out every single Guardian reader and telling them in person. He's not even called me up and told me. I've been in all day, I've checked all my messages. Nothing. It's disappointing.
Could consciousness be as simple as n=2ⁱ-1?
“Many people have long speculated that there has to be a basic design principle from which intelligence originates and the brain evolves, like how the double helix of DNA and genetic codes are universal for every organism,” says lead researcher Joe Tsien from Augusta University in Georgia.
“We present evidence that the brain may operate on an amazingly simple mathematical logic.”
Last year, Tsien published a paper describing his “Theory of Connectivity”, in which he put forward the idea that groups of neurons, called neural cliques, come together in pre-wired ways to process thought and knowledge.
Essentially, it’s a framework for arranging the brain’s billions of neurons.
Tsien says these cliques then assemble to form functional connectivity motifs (FCMs), which could represent all the potential variations in human thought.
The harder we need to think, the hypothesis goes, the more cliques are required to make up that FCM.
For his latest study, Tsien put his Theory of Connectivity and FCMs to the test, using electrodes implanted at specific points in the brains of mice and hamsters to monitor neuron activity.
Sure enough, his team was able to predict the neural cliques that formed in response to certain scenarios, such as the arrival of food or the presence of a threat. Depending on the scenario, the animals’ neurons arranged themselves in very predictable groups.
In one test, four different foods were placed in front of a group of mice, and the researchers watched as the neurons grouped together instantly. They were even able to identify different clique formations depending on what combinations of foods were presented.
“For it to be a universal principle, it needs to be operating in many neural circuits, so we selected seven different brain regions and, surprisingly, we indeed saw this principle operating in all these regions,” explains Tsien.
These cliques appeared almost immediately as the food appeared, which suggests that they’re somehow ‘pre-wired’ during brain development.
At the centre of Tsien’s hypothesis is the formula n=2ⁱ-1, where 'n’ is the number of connected neural cliques, '2’ indicates whether the neurons are receiving an input or not, 'i’ is the information being received, and ’-1’ is accounting for multiple possibilities.
Tsien says this formula is enough to predict FCM grouping.
“This equation gives you a way to wire the brain cells in such a way to turn seemingly infinite possibilities into organised knowledge,” he said.
Sounds like neural networks, at some level.
Please understand that I am not mad at you because Clinton lost. I am totally unconcerned that you and I have different ‘politics.’ And I don’t think less of you because you voted one way and I another.
No, I think less of you because you watched an adult mock a disabled person while addressing a crowd and still supported him. I think less of you because you saw a candidate spout clear racism day after day and still backed him. I think less of you because you heard him advocate for war crimes and still thought he should be given the reins of government. I think less of you because you watched him equate a woman’s worth to where she landed on a scale of 1 to 10 and still got on board. I think less of you because you stood by silently while he labeled Mexicans as criminals and Muslims as terrorists.
It wasn’t your politics I found repulsive. No, it was your willingness to support someone who spouts racism, sexism, and cruelty almost every time he opens his mouth. You sided with a bully when it should have mattered most, and that is something I will never be able to forget.
So in response to your post-election expression of hope, no, you and I won’t be 'coming together to move forward.’ Obviously, the president-elect disgusts me; but it is the fact that he doesn’t disgust you that will stick with me long after the election.
Jonathan Chait makes the case that David Brooks and other moderates that form the ‘Center’ failed the country by not accepting Barack Obama as the near-ideal centrist they were nominally looking for, and through that enormous, aggravated, and unimaginably stupid error of judgment, they allowed the extremists to hoodwink America and blow a huge hole in our country’s future [all emphasis mine]:
Jonathan Chait, David Brooks and the Intellectual Collapse of the Center
Of all the failures that have led to the historical disaster of the Trump presidency, perhaps the least-remarked-upon is the abdication of responsibility of the American center. Those of us with moderate inclinations need an effective center as a brake against extremism. When one party veers too far from the center, the center joins the opposing party, until the extreme one can be coaxed back into the mainstream. David Brooks calls for a rejuvenation of the center under the Trump presidency. But Brooks himself is the perfect encapsulation of why the center has proven so hapless, allowing itself to enable extremism rather than prevent it.
The premise of Brooks’s column is that there needs to be space “between the alt-right and the alt-left, between Trumpian authoritarianism and Sanders socialism.” This is a terrible way to conceptualize the political map. First, it distorts the ideas of the two sides, equating a small-d democrat like Sanders (who merely proposes more regulation, taxes, and spending) with Trump, who — as Brooks concedes — is authoritarian. And second, it distorts their power. Sanders remains a left-wing outlier among his party, while Trump is the dominant force within his.
But even if you accept this very strange notion of the political alignment in Trump’s Washington, it raises a question Brooks is not prepared to answer. If his objection on the left lies with the “Sanders socialism,” then isn’t there an appealing centrist lying to the right of that? A moderate who favors market-oriented solutions that bring together business and labor, who welcomes empiricism, and is willing to compromise? A politician who has led the Democratic Party for the last eight years and, in fact, is still the sitting president of the United States right now?
One might think so. But Brooks spent the last eight years defining the center as something Obama was not. It didn’t matter that Obama supported a health-care plan first devised by Mitt Romney, or a cap-and-trade plan endorsed by John McCain. Brooks nestled himself into the territory between Obama and the angry, no-compromise Republicans who were shutting down government and boycotting all negotiations with the president. If Obama endorsed the policies Brooks preferred, he would simply pretend that Obama had not proposed them. Indeed, one of the most common genres of David Brooks column was a sad lament that neither party would endorse policies that in fact Obama had explicitly and publicly called for.
If Obama offered a deal to raise taxes through tax reform while reducing entitlements, Brooks would write a sad column about how nobody was willing to raise taxes through tax reform while reducing entitlements. If Obama favored education reform, an infrastructure bank, and more high-skill immigration, Brooks would write a sad column about how nobody favored those things. When Obama supported market-oriented health-care reform, Brooks opposed it as an extravagant government takeover. Then later he wrote a sad column about how “we’d have had a very different debate if we knew the law was going to be a discrete government effort to subsidize health care for more poor people” rather than “an extravagant government grab to take over the nation’s health-care system.”
The effect of all this commentary was not to empower the moderate ideas Brooks favored, but to disempower them. Brooks was emblematic of the way the entire bipartisan centrist industry conducted itself throughout the Obama years. It was neither possible for Obama to co-opt the center, nor for Republicans to abandon it, because official centrists would simply relocate themselves to the midpoint of wherever the parties happened to stand. The well-documented reality that the parties were undergoing asymmetric polarization was one they refused to accept, because their jobs was to be bipartisan, and it is difficult to get a man to understand something if his salary depends upon not understanding it.
The centrists could have played a role in braking the growing extremism of the Republican Party. It would have meant telling the country that there was now one moderate, governing party and one extremist faction, and parking themselves with the moderate party until such time as the dynamic changed. They could not do it. If there’s not much of a center left to stop Trump from trampling democratic norms, it is because the centrists abdicated their responsibility and destroyed themselves.
Their unwillingness to accept Obama is staggering. Was it because he’s black? Or did just being a nominal Democrat disqualify him? At any rate, they threw him under the bus, and we all have to pay the price, and it will be costly.
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
- W B Yeats, The Second Coming
Having done the delete-social-media-account dance again, I’m without Twitter and Facebook. And still feeling really really good about that. But, I miss being part of an extended community of interesting people who share ideas quasi-synchronously. A social network, as it were.
So. I’ve been looking at some of the alternatives. I don’t think any of them are “there” yet, but they each provide an opportunity to explore different aspects of community and software design. When looking at these alternatives, I’m trying to learn about how the design of software affects what people actually do with it. I’m also aware that much of the difference, when compared with twitter or facebook, is due to novelty and freshness – there are no trolls there (yet), and everyone who is exploring the platforms is doing so because they care and are interested and interesting. So, not apples-to-apples. But, still, there is much to learn by actually using these things. That’s the only way I know of to really learn what these things mean.
A wonderful microblogging platform, built by Ben Werdmüller and Erin Richey. It’s kind of like a twitter-on-steroids, or a simplified blogging platform. It works well, and is really geared to either single-author sites or central community sites. I threw a copy on my Reclaim Hosting server, to see how that might work. There are a handful of people kicking the tires there. Come play, if you want to, and if you’re not a troll or spambot.
It can also handle federation – if you run your own Known site, you can set that site up to cross-publish to a Known community site. But it’s one-directional – you may need to go to the community site to see responses. Federating posts seems to throw an error message on the “sending” site, but the posts appear to get through regardless. So, partially federated. Partially distributed. But, because people need to [remember|want] to come back to the central site, it’s often tumbleweeds… But, when comment threads take off, they seem deeper than twitter threads.
Known has been going for awhile now, starting as IDNO. I’ve been running a site, as well as a few others – most notably Grant Potter, who has jumped right into using Known as a write-once-publish-elsewhere tool.
Thanks to an initial suggestion by Scott Leslie – This one feels the most twitter-like1. Lots of edu-folks are there already, so it might have some legs… It already feels like less of a tumbleweed-collector, with more people playing with it and posting more often. There are some new things with the UI design – longer posts (500 characters!) – and this seems to be changing what the posts/toots are. Longer @response chains. Posts that are sometimes like tiny blog posts – and so fewer tweetstorms of 20-part posts as seen on twitter.
Open source, LAMP software. Easy to install. Not ready for prime time. Fully federated. Fully distributed. The UI is… unpolished. The code sometimes throws PHP errors, but seems to work anyway.
I haven’t used this one yet – it’s a cleaned-up implementation of GNU Social.
Every time I let myself fall into the “hey! let’s play with some of the options for ___” thing, I give my head a shake. Who has time for this? I sure don’t. Why not just wait until the dust settles and then start poking at what’s left? Because it’s important to explore this stuff before things start to ossify. Waiting for the dust to settle is the easy route, but it also abdicates any sense of responsibility to help shape or refine the tools we will all end up using. And these tools are clearly now a major part of discourse and communication in general, meaning I’m just not comfortable leaving it to silicon valley to define things for me.
I think it’s important that we all have the ability to easily install and manage our own tools if they are to be important to us, and that the safest and most reliable way to do that is with a fully distributed and federated model that lets everyone choose how their tools will behave and who will have access to them, their content, and data about themselves.
I plan to poke around with these, and likely others, over the next few months. I have no idea what (if anything) will come of that.
|mkalus shared this story from jwz.|
These lightweight aluminum lights lock to your handlebars and seat post with custom security bolts, and are guaranteed to last forever - If they're ever stolen, broken or water damaged, Fortified will replace 'em! Swap batteries on the go with removable, rechargeable USB batteries. 150 lumens in the front perfectly illuminates city streets, while 30 lumens in the rear keeps drivers alert. If you're looking to fully illuminate the darkest suburban paths and urban alleyways, try the Boost version with 300 lumens in the front and 60 lumens in the rear to keep drivers at a distance.
They're relatively difficult to steal... The screws are pentalobe with a post: obscure but not unheard of. After the first theft, I "fixed" that by filling up the screw head with superglue. The most recent crackhead managed to steal half of the light, which isn't really going to work out so well for them.
They're bright and the batteries last a pretty long time. My only real complaint is that they turn on with a single tap, so often passing strangers using the same bike rack as me manage to turn them on accidentally, and I regularly come out to discover a dead battery.
|mkalus shared this story from thenutritionwonk.|
The AWSpalooza took me to Vegas for four nights, with thirty thousand or so other cloud-heads. Herewith notes and sparkly Vegas pictures.
The numbers tell the story: from 12K to 19K to 32K, and I don’t see any reason it’ll slow down. While the organization and logistics were formidable, obviously the work of seasoned pros, we’re getting close to the limit of what those venues can bear. I’m pretty relaxed about life, but had a couple of little claustrophobia flashes, when the crowds overfilled those huge hallways.
I took along the
it’s good at sparkly things and Vegas has lots of those.
There are upsides: I ate like a horse and drank like a fish, but I bet I lost weight from the miles and miles (not a figure of speech) of walking from hotel to venue to venue. 24 hours away from the show, my feet are starting to feel less like undercooked hamburger.
There are two big tribes: First, the cloud natives, tiny to huge, who’ve never really thought of any other way to do computing. Then the much larger tribe just getting their toes in the water and figuring out what they’re going to have to change to get the public cloud’s upsides in cost and security and availability and durability.
The second group is bigger. I was talking to a guy from a British bank that sent fifty people for a crash course in the future. But he told me there was still a strong No-Cloud-Here faction, some in corner offices. “I can out-wait them” he said, “but in the meantime we have to get ready.”
Evil flower horse.
I like to start the customer meetings (each day had many) with a question: “What’s not working? Tell us about your pain points.” And they laugh but then the ice is broken and you get a good talk going right away about the things that matter.
So we sat down with this one big insurance company (you’d recognize the name) and I asked the question; they looked surprised and started talking about the problems with monolithic legacy Java and lingering RPG and DB2 in corners of the business. I’d mixed up my briefing docs and hadn’t realized they were just starting the cloud migration, didn’t really have much in production yet. So I was embarrassed and apologized, but they said “No, this good, let’s keep going.” And actually it was, we learned things that they were going to have to watch out for and also some low-hanging fruit they can win with in the short term.
When I was at Google, we couldn’t keep any — by the time IO rolled around every year, the press and bloggers knew pretty well what we were going to release. I’m not sure it did any damage, but it was irritating as hell.
Dark towers are so 20th-century.
AWS is a tight ship, relatively; we managed to surprise the audience with a couple of things, this year and every year. I totally don’t know why; if you listen to the AWS announcements, it’s obvious that customers have been looking at the new products, so the number of people who know is not small.
I helped launch the new AWS Step Functions product. My role was small — flipping a couple of GitHub repos public, pushing a Ruby gem, publishing a spec — but enough to get me into the Launch War Room in a hidden corner of the conference.
Getting all the service pieces live on the net in sync with their keynote debut is not unlike a ten-player eight-dimensional chess match; I’ve never seen anything like it. I guess I have to be careful of giving away secrets here; suffice it to say, it was pretty groovy.
I gave a session to an audience of a thousand and change; my first public appearance as an Amazonian, on my second anniversary here. It wasn’t as much fun as I had berating audiences about privacy in the time between Google and Amazon, but I do like speechifying.
re:Invent is speaker-friendly. At Java One, your talk was ripped out of your hands and edited by “professionals” who didn’t understand the difference between 1010 and 1,010. At Google IO, you got to keep your own talk, but you had to rehearse with, and get it approved by, Developer Relations people (like me) who ruthlessly stamped out bullet lists.
For re:Invent, they had professional editors, who were smart and helpful about style and branding correctness, but otherwise got out of the way. If there’s a re:Invent in your future, I strongly recommend getting a talk accepted; the Speaker Work Room is a haven of quiet conversation, free food, and strong Internet.
If I still have this job, it’ll be hard to not go. I think people who are building into the cloud — even if, like me, they don’t like Vegas and don’t like crowds — should too.
|mkalus shared this story from TorrentFreak.|
Two weeks ago and seemingly out of the blue, popular private music tracker What.cd went offline. French military police targeted some of the site’s infrastructure at hosting provider OVH and the site responded by deleting itself.
The news came as a huge disappointment to the site’s users and the wider torrent community as a whole, but French police weren’t done yet.
In a follow-up action, French Gendarmerie targeted Zone-Telechargement (Download Zone), the country’s largest pirate site and 11th most-visited website in the region overall. That site went down too, closely followed by affiliated DDL site, DL-Protect.
Behind all of these actions is SACEM, the Society of Authors, Composers and Publishers of Music. This industry group has a mandate to collect and distribute royalties while protecting the copyrights of its members. And according to its general secretary, they’re only just getting started.
In an interview with French news site Le Monde, David El Sayegh said that SACEM and the police hadn’t “just woken up” to pirate sites operating in France. The actions against both What.cd and Zone-Telechargement were the result of a “long process and meticulous work.”
The SACEM chief said the investigation into the two million direct download link Zone-Telechargement began two years ago in partnership with another local anti-piracy outfit. It turned up a lot of useful information.
“We filed a complaint in 2014, joined by ALPA (French Association for the Fight against Piracy). This process was to identify accounts, assets, servers and advertising agencies. It’s always quite a complex and sophisticated system, they are large investigations,” he said.
“There were many advertisements on the site, often pornographic. [Zone-Telechargement] generated at least 1.5 million euros in sales per year, with offshore accounts located in Malta, Cyprus and Belize.”
David El Sayegh said that rightsholders were looking at damages of more than
75 million euros but the operators of the site were no longer resident in France. That didn’t stop their arrests, however. Seven people were arrested on Monday in France and Andorra, with police there calling the action ‘Operation Gervais‘.
“The two administrators, arrested by international mandates, had left France to settle in Andorra. Large seizures of assets were carried out: luxury cars, real estate, and savings accounts,” he said.
The Gendarmerie confirmed the seizure of 450,000 euros and two cars and said that the men, both aged 24, were “repeat offenders.” Authorities in Andorra confirmed that 250,000 euros across several accounts had been frozen.
“We are looking at a case of counterfeiting for profit, on a large scale,” El Sayegh continued. “These people do not pay taxes, they do not pay the rightful rightsholders, they do not respect anything. They have developed a very organized and sophisticated mechanism to voluntarily operate outside the law.”
With the site targeted in France and its operators arrested in Andorra, the operation spread further afield. SACEM says that servers were also seized in Germany and as far away as Iceland, a country often associated with high levels of privacy.
Of course, the recent shutdowns were very unpopular with users, but El Sayegh said that the law is on SACEM’s side.
“These are counterfeit business activities, these are people who have grown rich on the backs of creators. They make millions without paying one euro to creators. They are thugs who should not have the compassion of one person, and who will answer for their acts before justice.”
But while harshly criticizing site operators, El Sayegh tone was a little more moderate when speaking of their users. He asked them to consider how creators are to earn a living in the face of piracy but suggested that they’re only chasing the bigger fish.
“The challenge is mainly to stop those who trade works. But the objective above all is to attack the evil at its source, and the administrators of the pirate sites,” he said.
Other unnamed targets are also in SACEM’s sights. However, it seems unlikely that many sites will continue their stay in France following the events of the past couple of weeks.
What do activists, journalists and plain old-fashioned citizens need to know about online privacy in the Trump era? I wanted to ask the smartest people I could find for their advice — and you can read the results in my latest piece for The Christian Science Monitor’s Passcode.
It’s crucial to start thinking in these terms, for reasons I map out in the story:
“Eight years of George W. Bush followed by eight years of Obama have allowed Trump to inherit a powerful surveillance state,” says Eva Galperin, global policy analyst for the digital advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). “He is likely to turn that surveillance on American citizens, especially people of color, Muslims, and his political enemies.”
Google says it’s aware of a strange issue experienced by Pixel users in which their camera apps lock up and produce glitchy photos.
In a statement issued to MobileSyrup, a Google spokesperson said, “The Pixel team is aware of the reports and actively working on a solution to the issue. We’ll update you as soon as we have more information.”
The issue, first reported by Pixel User Community member Mike Fox on October 27th, causes some Pixel and Pixel XL devices to malfunction when users go to take a photo. In some situations, the camera app will lock up and show purple and pink lines. While Google has yet to confirm what’s causing the bug, there seems to be some relation to poor cellular connectivity.
Since Fox first posted about the bug, the thread he started has been flooded with countless other users retelling their encounters with the same problem. A number of Pixels owners got a replacement from Google, only for their replacement phone to start locking up again.
We’ll continue to follow this story as it develops.
Just a few months after reportedly making its own plea for a buyout, Twitter has announced it has acquired Yes Inc.
Yes is an app maker started by Keith Coleman in 2014 with the goal of connecting users through apps. Prior to that, Coleman was a director of product management at Google.
One of its products includes Frenzy, a social app that simplifies the process of make plans with friends, with a goal of helping its users plan events in seconds while generating critical mass and conversation.
Other apps includes the photo and video filtering app WYD, the playdate coordinator Let’s Play and an app that lets users see who’s free at the moment, Heyo.
With Twitter’s primary focus being on real-time interactions that take place between parties anywhere in the world, it’s easy to speculate about the social media company’s interest in Yes. With its recent emphasis on facilitating cross-border conversations about specific events and themes through products like Moments, the relationship is clear.
In addition to acquiring the company, Twitter also brought Coleman on as the vice president of product. It’s not clear whether Yes’ employees will be joining Twitter also.
The specific terms of the deal have not been disclosed, but all Yes apps will be shut down in a few weeks time. Therefore, it’s likely that former members of Yes will be brought up to Twitter’s product team.
It’s important to note that just months ago, Twitter announced that it would be accepting bids for its own acquisition, and while many names were thrown around, ultimately nothing transpired.