Shared posts

10 Feb 17:24

Remember the "Three Audience Truths" Before Giving a Speech

by Patrick Allan

Giving a speech or presentation in front of others is pretty nerve-wracking. If you remind yourself of the “three audience truths” before you go up in front of people, however, you’ll give yourself an opportunity to calm down and focus on your message.

Read more...

10 Feb 17:22

Japan Internet company SoftBank's profit suffers over Sprint

TOKYO - Japanese telecommunications and Internet company SoftBank is reporting an 88 per cent drop in fiscal third quarter profit as it struggles to turn around its U.S. carrier Sprint.
10 Feb 17:19

The Top 10 Sales Conferences to Attend in 2016

by Peak Sales Recruiting

People attending top sales conference

Sales conferences can be extremely beneficial for sales teams – attendees are introduced to new strategies, hard-earned insights, and new connections from B2B sales world. In fact, SalesForce notes their past events have proven to increase sales productivity of attendees by 30%, increase marketing campaign effectiveness by 59%, and increase customer retention by 31%. While not all conferences can lay claim to results like these, the best provide the tools, resources and insights required for attendees to justify the cost of attendance.

In 2015 we laid out the steps on how to choose a sales conference that would produce a return on investment. Using that process, sales executives can determine which conference(s) from our list they and their teams should attend this year.

In no particular order, here are the top sales conferences of 2016:

1. Sales Conference 2.0

Date and Location • Boston: May 2, 2016
• San Francisco: July 18-19, 2016
• Philadelphia: November 14, 2016
Cost $325
Audience CEOs/CSOs/CMOs, VPs/Directors/Managers of Sales, operations, and marketing
Topics Leadership insight, sales-management challenges, alignment with marketing, sales enablement, sales strategy and executive, customer management, social selling, coaching, and sales effectiveness
Description This is a high profile series of events typically held in four of five different U.S. locations each year. The Sales 2.0 conference focuses on helping sales leaders leverage Sales 2.0 technologies and strategies to optimize operations, enablement, and marketing performance. A sales consultant from Oracle described the conference as “a fantastic experience”, expressing it had a tremendous impact on his network as he was able to meet various sales and marketing professionals. There are already a number of speakers confirmed to present at the Boston conference including executives from ConnectAndSell, Selling Power, and The Bridge Group.

2. Inside Sales Leadership Summit

Date and Location • Chicago: April 20-21, 2016
Cost $1,395
Audience Inside sales leaders
Topics Sales contests, best practices, outsourcing, social selling, future trends, driving sales performance, sales culture, optimization of performance, CRMs
Description The Annual AA-ISP Leadership Summit, which has earned the reputation as the inside sales conference of the year, returns for its eighth year with all new-presentations from over 70 of today’s most recognized inside sales experts. This conference is tailored to help sales leaders and their teams capitalize on some of the biggest sales trends of 2016 such as the latest tips, technologies, and proven best practices for solving some of this year’s toughest challenges and issues. In 2015, the Leadership Summit featured over 75 presenters with an audience of over 700 attendees, in addition to 50 exhibitors, who all came to learn, share, and network.

3. CRM 2016

Date and Location • Las Vegas: March 20-23, 2016
Cost $2,799 (All-Access), $899 (Workshop Only)
Audience Sales representatives, sales leaders, senior executives
Topics SAP CRM technology, processes, innovation, and analysis
Description The CRM 2016 conference is the premier event for SAP sales, providing attendees with detailed case studies and strategies proven to boost sales performance and drive pipelines. For sales professionals interested in developing CRM strategies that can be immediately applied, this conference could be ideal. The three-day event will include over 250 expert-led sessions, over 300 hours of education, and 22 dedicated networking opportunities. The CRM 2016 conference will include various speakers including executives from ECENTA AG, Accenture, and SAP Labs.

4. MarketingSherpa Summit

Date and Location • Las Vegas: February 22-24, 2016
Cost $1,495 (Two-Day Summit) and $1,990 (Three-Day Summit and Workshop)
Audience Marketers, sales representatives
Topics Email marketing, relationship building, networking using search and social, customer engagement
Description This conference represents a unique opportunity for sales and marketing representatives to learn from leading digital marketing experts on how to develop and maintain digital strategies. Although this event is primarily focused on marketing, salespeople are presented the opportunity to further develop their communication and digital-prospecting techniques with specialized guidance on subject lines, deliverability, and open rates. Morgan Spurlock, Academy Award-Nominated Director for the film, Super-Size Me, Charles Duhigg, NYT Best-Selling Author for book, The Power of Habit, and Dr. Leonard Mlodinow, Theoretical Physicist and Best-Selling Author, are among the lineup of ambitious and forward-thinking speakers.

5. LeadsCon

Date and Location • Las Vegas: March 15-17, 2016
• New York: August 22-24, 2016
Cost $795 (Conference only)
Audience B2B marketers, sales leaders
Topics B2B customer acquisition, lead nurturing, lead conversion, customer retention, driving revenue through email, converting on social, maximizing B2B trade show success, website optimization for lead generation
Description LeadsCon is the only conference devoted exclusively to B2B lead generation with a specific emphasis on lead acquisition, nurturing campaigns, and conversion optimization. This event presents opportunities for attendees to acquire proven ideas from industry experts that can be applied immediately to an organization’s marketing strategy. LeadsCon features several experts in B2B lead generation including Scott Brinker, Co-founder/CTO of Ion Interactive, and Stacy Durand, CEO of Media Design Group.

6. SiriusDecisions Sales Leadership Exchange

Date and Location • San Diego: February 24-25, 2016
Cost $2,195
Audience CEOs, senior sales executives
Topics Channel marketing and the pipeline, fueling sales teams, alignment, forecasting, sales effectiveness, enablement-to-revenue
Description The Sirius Decisions Sales Leadership Exchange is an opportunity for B2B sales leaders to learn from industry experts on implementing successful growth strategies and enhancing the productivity and performance of a sales force. This event allows attendees to connect with leading sales executives with insights on emerging sales trends and features various keynote speakers including Heather Cole, the Senior Director of Sales and Enablement Strategies, and Mark Levinson, the Service Director of Sales and Operations Strategies.

7. Topo Sales Summit

Date and Location • San Francisco: April 7-8, 2016
Cost $895
Audience Sales executives
Topics Sales leadership, sales development, sales technology, sales effectiveness
Description The Topo Sales Summit presents sales executives with the opportunity to learn best practices, patterns, and strategies for driving revenue growth from over 600 successful sales leaders responsible for more than $50 billion in revenue. Attendees include senior executives from companies such as Google, LinkedIn, Netsuite, Mulesoft, Ringcentral, and much more.

8. INBOUND

Date and Location • Boston: November 8-11, 2016
Cost $999 (Early-bird pricing ends April 15, 2016)
Audience Marketing and sales professionals, business owners, agency executives
Topics Inbound methodology, content, social media, email, lead nurturing, account targeting, web design and development
Description Hubspot strives to inspire, teach, and empower sales and marketing leaders to transform their business in its annual INBOUND conference. This event allows for attendees to learn the latest marketing strategies from presenters, enjoy networking events, sign up for training on content strategy, website creation, and inbound marketing basics and sales. In 2015, INBOUND had over 14,000 attendees, 170+ educational sessions, and 5 keynote speakers. Past keynote’s included Arianna Huffington, Seth Godin, Nate Silver, and Scott Harrison.

9. Dreamforce

Date and Location • San Francisco: September 15-18, 2016
Cost $999 (Early-bird special)
Audience Sales Professionals
Topics Sales cloud introduction, top pipeline management reports, sales secrets of the big guns, sales cloud and platform roadmap, forecast accurately with Salesforce Forecasting
Description Hosted by salesforce.com, Dreamforce boasts a 95% recommendation rate by its past attendees. This conference provides attendees with a week of idea sharing amongst peers, thought leaders, and industry pioneers. The innovation-focused event offers over 1,000 breakout sessions, sales-focused themes, reduced-cost salesforce.com training and certification opportunities, and a gala and benefit concert featuring the Foo Fighters. This year’s speakers include Marc Benioff, CEO of SalesForce, Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, Jessica Alba, Found of The Honest Company, and Susan Wojcicki, CEO of Youtube.

10. CEB Sales and Marketing Summit

Date and Location • Las Vegas: October 18-20, 2016
Cost $1,595 (Early-bird rate)
Audience Senior Sales and Marketing Executives from large enterprise organizations
Topics B2B sales trends and changes
Description This conference is designed to boost the participants’ knowledge, understanding and adaptability to the substantial changes B2B commercial teams are currently facing. With over 900 senior sales and marketing executives from large enterprise organizations across a variety of industries in attendance, this event emphasizes the importance of evolving the way sales leaders, reps and executives conduct selling activities. Past speakers, Nick Toman, Barry Schwartz, and Brent Adamson, will be returning as keynotes for the 2016 conference.

What sales conferences will you attend in 2016? Are there any that we didn’t list that deserve a mention? Let us know in the comments.

The post The Top 10 Sales Conferences to Attend in 2016 appeared first on Peak Sales Recruiting.

10 Feb 17:19

‘Flashing warning signs’: Canadian markets bracing for ‘dramatic’ Bank of Canada action — and a recession

by John Shmuel

OTTAWA • Recent moves in Canadian financial markets suggest that investors see increased odds of a recession this year and the potential for “dramatic action” from the Bank of Canada.

An ominous signal has been cropping up in the past month as corporate bonds and government of Canada bonds have seen their spreads widen, a move that usually precedes a recession. Meanwhile, yields on the five-year Government of Canada bond have begun creeping below the central bank’s overnight lending rate of 0.5 per cent. On Tuesday, they traded at roughly five basis points below that mark.

Canadian stocks are another area of weakness, with the S&P/TSX Composite Index once again slumping into a bear market on Tuesday. The TSX closed down 2.02 per cent, or 252.75 points, to 12,282.65, now down more than 20 per cent since the highs of September 2014.

“Looking at all the signals from the financial world there are a number of recession indicators that are flashing warning signs,” said Mark Chandler, head of Canadian fixed-income strategy at RBC Dominion Securities.

This is real, there is something going on here

The last time short-term bond rates inverted this far out along the curve was in the first half of 2015, which ended up turning into a technical recession — defined as two back-to-back quarters of economic contraction.

In a normal bond market, longer-dated bonds have higher yields as investors demand more compensation to lend money for an extended period of time. When multi-year bonds move below the overnight rate — the interest rate the Bank of Canada charges banks to lend to each other for a day — it means investors are expecting the overnight rate to go lower in response to a weakening economy.

Corporate spreads have also been widening in Canada for much of the last 12 months, but for the most part that was due to an increasing number of distressed energy companies. Chandler says that the widening has now spread to non-energy companies as well.

“This is real. There is something going on here,” he said. “Usually one of the most powerful indicators is widening of credit spreads, and that’s happening not just in the energy sector, but also more broadly.”

Canadian banks, among the most exposed companies to the domestic economy, have become one of the big drags on the TSX Composite Index. On Tuesday, the biggest banks, including the Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia, saw their shares dip more than two per cent.

Craig Basinger, chief investment officer at Richardson GMP Limited, notes that some Canadian stocks are now trading at “recession-type” valuations. The banks, for instance, trade in the single digits or close to it, with dividend yields creeping into the four and five per cent range.

Basinger said the pricing suggests investors are seeing more pain on the horizon.

“Yes, we could certainly see a bit of a recession here and yes, oil prices are below $30 a barrel again, but valuations have become compelling,” he added. “If we enter a recession, well, the prices are already there.”

Jean Levac/ Ottawa Citizen
Jean Levac/ Ottawa CitizenSal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, expects that the Bank of Canada will at least move to cut interest rates by 25 basis points to a post-recession low of 0.25 per cent sometime in the spring.

The warning signs in financial markets come as the Bank of Canada left its overnight lending rate unchanged during its policy announcement last month. Governor Stephen Poloz said that he was waiting to see the scale of stimulus from the federal government before making a move. The budget, which will outline stimulus details, is expected to land sometime in March or April.

The Bank of Canada also noted there are early indications that the non-energy segment of the economy is rebounding as low oil prices and a weak loonie make exports more competitive. Non-energy exports helped close the trade deficit down to $585 million in December, a surprise to economists who had expected the trade deficit to grow from $1.6 billion in November to $2.2 billion.

As well, January’s employment report showed that, while oil-dependent provinces such as Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador continue to bleed jobs, non-energy provinces are booming. Ontario has added 100,000 new jobs in the past 12 months, while British Columbia and Quebec have also posted healthy job gains.

“Growth remains positive outside the oil-rich provinces, supported by an upturn in exports and steadier consumer spending and home sales,” said Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets in the bank’s latest economic outlook released Feb. 5.

Still, Guatieri expects that the Bank of Canada will at least move to cut its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to its post-recession low of 0.25 per cent sometime in the spring.

Chandler of RBC said that investors should pay close attention to the bond market in the coming weeks. If short rates move off current lows, then it is likely the Bank of Canada will be less dovish. But an extended period of inverted yields could signal more drastic action.

“I think with such short-term rates — where we have five-year yields now below 50 basis points — in order to justify those for a prolonged period of time, the market is definitely pricing in high possibility of some pretty dramatic action by the central bank,” he said. “Whether it’s negative interest rates or potential for QE, it’s hard to justify the current yields without those expectations.”

jshmuel@nationalpost.com

twitter.com/jshmuel

10 Feb 17:19

Meet the Canadian who developed a ranking system for all 3,141 U.S. counties

by Barry Critchley

If nothing else the numbers are staggering — two million data points.

But that’s the outcome when you set out to the build the first of its kind in the U.S., a ranking system based on social and economic factors for all of the 3,141 counties in that country.

In all, the rankings, compiled in Canada, are based on 36 data inputs. There’s information on demographics; environment (including data on climate change and declarations of disaster); home ownership; real estate taxes; social indicators (including education and crime levels) and personal infrastructure (such as levels of police and teaching.) That information came from more than a dozen different government or government-related sources.

Known officially as The American County Review (ACRe), the work represents more than eight months of toil by John McLean, who for the past 23 years had focused his attention on bond analytics, bond pricing and developing bond indexes, initially at Scotia Capital and most recently with the Toronto Stock Exchange.

“There are 36 different measurements used for each county. We roll those up on an equal weight basis, and that’s how you get the top ranking within the state and [then] in the nation,” said McLean who developed the product to assist individuals and institutions make important living and investment decisions. 

McLean, who has filed a patent on his work, called the past eight months a “labour of love.” He said he developed an interest a few years back when he became aware of the information gaps that existed in the U.S. municipal bond market. The muni-market is huge – almost US$4 trillion outstanding – with many issues being done on a tax-exempt basis.

“It seemed that ratings on municipal bonds were often assigned but never reviewed or updated,” said McLean, who then set out to develop a unique and non-arbitrary risk assessment of issuers at the county level. (Apart from county government issuers, school boards, redevelopment agencies, school districts, and publicly owned airports and seaports also issue.)

News that the rating agencies “may not be on top of their game, and may not be doing their best,” surprised McLean. “I always thought there was a better way, an easier way and a more frequent way to measure than [that done by the] rating agencies which is very subjective.”

In other words, he would target the U.S. municipal market by developing a better model, by providing better services but do it in a manner that is transparent and open.

“By looking at all the different economic and social factors, that are not interpretative, you get a good picture of what’s going on,” he said. Such information could be used for both individuals and corporations to make decisions.

“It works both ways,” said McLean. “It’s not just a case of attracting attention in investment because you are ranked high. You are trying to get more information into the hands of people who make those decisions.”

So who is going to purchase McLean’s product? The data providers — Thomson Reuters and Bloomberg — are a possibility as are commercial real estate investors; muni-bond issuers, investors and ratings agencies. Another possibility is to use the information to develop so-called Smart Beta bond indexes. Meantime users can obtain a free look at some data on the website www.acredata.com.

So what are the three top ranked counties with above 100,000 populations? Hamilton (Ind.); Sumter (Fla.) and Weld (Col.).

bcritchley@nationalpost.com

 

 

10 Feb 17:18

Time-to-Value in Big Data Deployments | @CloudExpo #BigData #IoT #M2M

As enterprises work to take advantage of Big Data technologies, they frequently become distracted by product-level decisions. In most new Big Data builds this approach is completely counter-productive: it presupposes tools that may not be a fit for development teams, forces IT to take on the burden of evaluating and maintaining unfamiliar technology, and represents a major up-front expense. In his session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Andrew Warfield, CTO and Co-Founder of Coho Data, will discuss how enterprises can bring Big Data tools to a point of customer value. He'll cover core lessons about how to approach Big Data and how to be successful at winning from Big Data in your environment.

read more

10 Feb 17:18

After his company took a $2 billion haircut in one day, Tableau CFO explains why he's not changing course (DATA)

by Julie Bort

Tableau CFO Tom Walker

On Thursday, the darling of the big data enterprise software world, Tableau Software, shared some painfully disappointing news that sent its shares tumbling.

It expected a soft 2016 in both revenue and profits and the stock price got murdered. The company's stock lost about half its value in one day. 

On Tuesday at the Goldman Sachs Technology conference in San Francisco, Tableau CFO Tom Walker was asked to explain what the company plans to do to stop the share-price plunge, such as a stock buyback. Analysts have also been pressuring Tableau to focus more on profits rather than investing in growth.

His answer, in a word: nothing. 

Tableau now has 39,000 customers, 18,000 of them outside the US, and said it's still going to invest in more products for them, as well as building out its international offices and sales forces.

Here's what he said:

A stock buyback is not something that we’re announcing today. It is something that we would consider. This just happened over the last couple of days.

We think the company is well positioned to deliver on a huge market of analytics, even in a rough patch. And we think 2016 will be a rough patch of spending in IT, it is something that we will continue to invest in.

If you go back to 2008, when the company was considerably a lot smaller, we slowed everything down in 2009, including the development efforts. And that was the wrong thing to do because [if we didn't slow down] we could have accelerated our growth coming out of that. So in good times and bad we want to be prudent at how we look at this from a long-term perspective.

To recap: shares went from $81.75 with analysts predicting target prices of $100 and above, to below $40 on Tuesday, with average analyst targets of $74.

For instance, Morgan Stanley analysts who had been bullish on Tableau did a complete about-face. They downgraded the stock from overweight to equal-weight and slashed their target price from $125 to $55.

All this because Tableau lowered its earnings expectations to $830 million to $850 million from its previous guidance of $845 million to $865 million.

Plus, although the company did beat its fourth quarter earnings expectations, the beat was way softer than usual — just 1% over revenue expectations, compared to beating 7% to 17% in each of the last 6 quarters, notes Deutsche Bank's Karl Keirstead.

Not buying it

tableau softwareWalker also reiterated something Tableau said on the earnings call: IT companies just don't seem to planning on spending as much in 2016.

Investors in the space seem to share these concerns. Yesterday there was a big sell-off in other software-as-a-service companies, including Box, Zendesk, Workday, even the cloud granddaddy, Salesforce.

But some analysts are not buying the explanation that the whole software market is growing soft.

They think Tableau's problem is two things: Increased competition, notably from Microsoft. And problems with Tableau's own execution. 

"We are not seeing across-the-board macro-related weakness in the software sector, certainly nothing that would explain Tableau’s marked deceleration from 65% growth in 3Q15 to expected 27% growth in 1Q16," Deutsche Bank analyst analyst Keirstead says.

He suggest that Tableau is facing more competition (driving down prices), internal sales issues and, perhaps the fact that some companies are focused more on moving their IT to the cloud than they are in ramping up their big data projects.

Power BI   DashboardMeanwhile, Gartner came out with its annual look at the market. And while it still rated Tableau as a market leader ahead of Microsoft, it also said that Tableau appears to be struggling to support all the customers it rapidly signed and that some big customers may "have encountered some software limitations" with the product as they tried to roll it out to their employees.

Daniel Ives, an analyst at FBR has a more kind view of Tableau's situation, the company is going through "a painful transition from hyper-growth to a more normalized growth path" and investors just have to reset their expectations.

SEE ALSO: The CEO of one of Silicon Valley's hottest startups has suddenly resigned

Join the conversation about this story »

10 Feb 17:18

4 Tips to Make a Successful Marketing Video

by Erik Krass

Stream_BlogGraphics2016_MktgVideoTipsA marketing video is the best way to reach your audience and share your business. Visual content is much more appealing then print or text and can be easily shared by your target audience.

You don’t need a high-tech production department to make an impactful video, though. Check out these tips for creating a successful video campaign.

Charisma and Personality

The marketing world is constantly bombarding audiences with videos and campaigns. Therefore, it’s crucial to remember to stand out from competitors. Think about what you can do to make your campaign different from the rest. How can you be memorable and relatable?

One way to do this is to show some personality and charisma. Incorporate humor to stand out. Everyone loves a good laugh!

Be comfortable with your public speaking and camera skills. If your on-camera skills aren’t up to par and you aren’t relaxed with the camera, have someone else stand in instead. Audiences will be distracted by your discomfort and your message will be lost.

Be different!

The Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How

You’re familiar with your product. You know the ins and outs of it and have dedicated a large portion of time to it. Therefore, you may assume that others know the nitty-gritty about your business/product as well. You may forget to educate your audience about the simple factors of your business because they’re obvious to you.

It’s important to tell details of your product from start to finish, including those simple factors. Although they’re obvious to you, they may not be to those unfamiliar with your product.

It’s crucial to explain the who, what, when, where, why, and how of what you’re selling! This will help your audience feel comfortable with your business and aid in forming a deeper relationship.

Give an Incentive

In today’s digital age, we’re constantly bombarded with advertising, marketing, and media. If you think someone is going to sit through your three-minute video, you’re mistaken. Therefore you have to ask yourself what’s in it for the viewer.

Add some value to your video like a link to a promotion code or free trial. By doing so, you’ll make people want to share the video, thus spreading the word of your product.

Promote, Promote, Promote

So now you’ve made your marketing video campaign. Your video has combined the elements of personality and charisma, you’ve explained the ins and outs, and you’ve included some sort of incentive. Now what?

PROMOTE IT!

Yes, this step is obvious, but it’s also often overlooked.

Make sure that your video has an appealing and catching title and hashtags. There’ an infinite number of videos out there, so do everything in your power to make your video appealing so a viewer will want to hit the play button.

Feature your video on numerous platforms. YouTube is the most obvious, but don’t forget about social media!

Follow these simple steps and the results will end in your successful marketing video.

Marketing Health Assessment

10 Feb 17:17

4 Reasons You Will Lose Value In Your Startup, and How to Stop It

by Tallat Mahmood
Here are a few major roadblocks entrepreneurs need to overcome and advice on how to do so.
10 Feb 17:16

You Should Concentrate on Providing Value, Not Making a Sale

by Robert Terson
I once had an unusual beginning with a new Twitter follower–@evolutionfiles. He goes by the nickname Bear and is a branding, graphics-design, website-design expert, and all-around great guy. You can find him at www.evolutionfiles.com. As I always do with new Twitter followers, I sent Bear some personal direct messages thanking him for following and offering to help if […]
10 Feb 17:15

Ocado's tech chief gave us an inside look into how it plans to revolutionise the world with automation and robots (OCDO)

by Lianna Brinded

SecondHands_closeangleshot

Ocado isn't just an online delivery company — it is also one of Britain's most exciting tech firms.

The company posted an impressive  set of numbers earlier this month, with profits soaring 65% year-on-year and gross revenue rising by 15% to more than £1.1 billion ($1.5 billion.)

Meanwhile, it also creates a whole heap of technology that it can hive off and sell on to other businesses should it wish. Most of Ocado's technology centres around inventions that automate warehouses and logistics processes.

It's also for this reason that Ocado has been at the centre of takeover rumours by Amazon — although Ocado confirmed that this was speculation and there was no truth in it.

Meanwhile, Ocado is continuing to carve out some cutting edge inventions that are set to transform the logistics and communications sectors. Ocado's director of technology Paul Clarke gave us an inside look into the tech side of the business and hinted at what's in store for the future.

Paul Clarke1Business Insider: Ocado recently launched the wireless technology that fits into the wider Ocado Smart Platform [OSP: Ocado's e-commerce fulfilment and logistics cloud platform.] It seems like a rather simple and efficient idea but how long does it take to bring a concept like this into reality?

Paul Clarke: We've been working on this for some quite some time — around two years. But the way we start on it, like we do with all projects, is to build detailed mathematical simulations of the solution.  That's how we design the existing warehouses. We first model the idea so we can prove to ourselves that the idea could work and then obviously set about designing the technology.

BI: Ocado said the radio design within the OSP led to "a number of patents for this new technology" — how many patents usually get filed when creating something like this?

PC: Well, the only ones I can talk about is what [Ocado CEO] Tim Steiner referred to in our results this month, that takes us up to the end of 2015. There are 32 distinct innovations that we filed patents for, which led to 73 different patent applications. We continue to file new patents all the time and we've filed some at the beginning of this year. We will continue to do so — that's around the technologies for new warehouses and other projects.

BI: So what other project patents are we talking about here?

PC: To be honest, I can't talk about the nature of those, but there are certainly a lot of tech patents that go into the warehouses but they are not exclusive to warehouses. We are patenting tech that can be applied to different areas, beyond grocery fulfillment. Coming back to communications solutions [referring to the Cambridge Consultants radio tech,] we believe that the tech can be used far away from grocery fulfilment.

ocado patent 1BI: Usually tech companies file a number of patents but not every patent is accepted. So does Ocado hedge or factor in a level of attrition on these?

PC: The nature of the patent process for us is that the examiner looks at the filings and gives their view. You are able to refine your patent claims based on the feedback from the examiner. We remain confident that many, if not most, of all the patents will go through but we can't give an expectation on exact numbers. However, given the costs involved and the time involved, we wouldn't waste our time if we didn't have that good level of confidence in the novelty and innovation of the technology.

BI: Ocado has the ability to sell off the tech if it wants to, or license it out to other retailers, which is a big deal for Ocado's bottom line — who are you speaking to about this?

PC: Well, we're not selling anything off to be clear, the talks we are having with retailers are platform deals. We make the software and uniquely the hardware for automated warehouses and are able to provide both those bits — the software in the cloud and the associated technologies — to customers.

BI: So what other projects, or pieces of software or hardware, is Ocado working on with this in mind?

PC: The OSP is one of a number of big projects we are working on. It's just another one of the plates spinning, so to speak. We have a number of [projects] in research and development at the moment but not all are in the public domain just yet. One that is in the public domain is on the robotics side as part of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme.

We are also working on building two new automated warehouses that is built with the same OSP technology with the one in Andover due to go live in the near future — that's a big undertaking.

ocadoconveyor2BI: A lot of Ocado's technology centres around automation, robotics and artificial intelligence, in order to make logistics and warehouses more efficient. It feeds into the narrative at World Economic Forum this year that we are facing an environment where robots will take over human jobs. What's your response to this from the perspective of a tech chief?

PC: This gets talked a lot. We employ over 10,500 people in the UK and those people would not have a job with Ocado if [the company] didn't have a business model that was related to automation. Ocado is predicated on a business model of the use of automation and it is one of the key differentiators for us doing online grocery retail.

It allows us to grow and hire more people and more effectively. We are a net job creator because the business model we have allows us to even leapfrogged ourselves in terms of technological advancements. This isn't a question of automation taking away jobs, it's about automation creating business like ourselves that create jobs.

BI: Speaking of jobs and expansion, what kind of people Ocado's tech team made up of and what targets have you got in place to expand the number of staff working on technology.

PC: In Ocado technology, we have 750 engineers and IT specialists and we're looking to grow to 1,100 by the end of this year. This will happen in Hatfield in Britain, but we are also going to employ people in two development centres in Poland and at one development centre in Sofia, Bulgaria. We are also opening a centre in Barcelona. It's very much part of the strategy for continual growth.

ocadoBI: Ocado is clearly a huge tech company but the focus in hte press centres around the grocery delivery side, especially with those Amazon rumours. Do you think there is a misconception over the nature of Ocado being a grocery delivery company rather than a tech one?

PC: This is often misunderstood. Ocado is a retailer and a tech business and those two elements are fundamental and make us special.

As a retailer, we are driven to innovate for customer requirements and then on the tech side, we build it ourselves. Once we build it we put the technology back into our own retail businesses. It's a circle of technology, we create dogfooding. ["Dogfooding" is a term for when a company uses its own product to test and promote the product.]

If you are a retailer buying tech off the self, you have to hope it works. If you are a tech provider but don't use it yourselves, you throw it over the fence hoping it works.

Doing both bits is really part of something special.  We aren't the only company that does this but the scale of which we do it is a key differentiator for us.

BI: As you mentioned, Ocado isn't the only company that does this, as companies like Amazon create tech for their own warehouses too. What makes you guys different and why should customers come to you and not others for logistical tech needs?

PC: There are obviously similarities with some big companies who are building their own technology to use for their business, but I think we are building technology into a service to empower others businesses too. Doing it on the scale we are doing it is not easy. But we've seen how our technology has helped Morrisons develop their online business very rapidly and that kind of shortcut for existing grocery businesses online is generating value and interest from customers.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Martin Shkreli laugh and refuse to answer questions during his testimony to Congress

10 Feb 17:15

Don’t Let Outdated Management Structures Kill Your Company

by Vineet Nayar
feb16-10-dave-wheeler-project-management
dave wheeler FOR HBR

During a consulting engagement at a $50 billion conglomerate, I spoke with a young man who was worried about a potential project overrun. I asked if he had hit a stumbling block. “It really isn’t a big deal — I know we have the in-house expertise to solve this,” he said. “I just need to rope in some colleagues from another team.” “So what’s the problem?” I asked. “I’m waiting for my boss to give me the go-ahead,” he replied.

This company operates on a hub-and-spoke management structure, where significant decisions are referred to one’s formal boss rather than to whoever is best suited to make the call, regardless of hierarchical positioning. The management structure gave the company the ability to make decisions quickly in the early days. Now, though, it is slowing the organization down, due to its inherent inability to enable quick, cross-functional, collaborative decisions. (In this company, like so many others, most significant value creation now occurs through the work of cross-functional project teams.)

The management of this company has noticed this lag and asked for help answering a question: Does it need to review its management structure to enable better collaboration between individual teams?

In the hub-and-spoke model, each area is optimized to deliver results to and curry favor with the higher-ups (or, in the metaphor of hub and spokes, the center). In today’s fast-paced marketplace, teams that need to wait for a leader to weigh in have lost the game before they start. Leaders instead need to paint a vivid horizon that inspires self-propelling teams to forge ahead with real-time collaboration — then step out of their way.

That shift implies something really important about the changing nature of leadership. Kevin Martin, chief research officer of i4cp, says “Organizations must look at leaders through a different lens. Business skills and acumen…are now table stakes. It’s the ability to influence and drive collaboration across cultures, boundaries, and borders that has the greater variability on global leadership effectiveness.”

Obviously, the shift in leadership competence requires complementary shifts in organizational structure, decision-making processes, and performance-management systems. Instead of a hub-and-spoke system, picture a racing track where each driverless team can compete successfully on the basis of four fundamentals:

  1. Overlapping goals. Goals will have significant overlaps; each individual and each team understands that they are pursuing one collective organizational goal.
  2. Role linkages. Each individual, team, and function will play a distinct role in the race while also supporting each other’s roles. Every individual has to be clear about how the individual, team, and organizational roles are linked.
  3. Constant collaboration. At the foundation of this model is the fact that no one individual or team can win the race alone. They will win only if they play their roles to perfection and help others that they’re linked to.
  4. Continuous reinvention. Teams will continuously process new data, creating a landscape of learning and realignment across levels.

There are some early signs of a movement away from hub-and-spoke management. One of the central tools of that system was the ubiquitous performance review. Today, 6% of Fortune 500 companies are reported to have gotten rid of rankings, according to management research firm CEB. These companies include big names like Microsoft, Adobe, Gap, and Medtronic. Recently, Accenture CEO Pierre Nanterme told The Washington Post that his company, too, is getting rid of the annual performance review as of Fall 2016, terming the move a “massive revolution.”

The million-dollar question that my clients ask me now: Is all this change worth the risk? My response is simple: There is no alternative. You have to make this change if you want to survive.

10 Feb 17:14

The Evolution of B2B Sales and Technology Adoption

by Sean Burke

Innovation is sitting in your voicemail, inbox and LinkedIn in-mail

Isn’t it time you responded?

Do a Google search on buyer’s journey statistics and you’ll find almost 500,000 articles sharing statistics about how the buyer’s journey has changed. Your results probably look something like this:

Innovation is sitting in your voicemail, inbox and LinkedIn Inmail

If you believed all these stats, you would come to the conclusion that sales should just pack it in and call it a day. You’d think that buyers can do all the work on their own and salespeople have become an unwanted distraction that sits between the buyer and their ultimate decision.

Some may say a salesperson is a dinosaur. It’s true, the role of the salesperson has changed, but it’s not dying – it’s evolving.

Why you shouldn’t believe the buyer’s journey hype

Citing stats is too easy. It’s too easy for executives to read consulting company reports and convince themselves they must change their approach or die. However, the companies that will truly change your trajectory are not always big consulting firms, and they aren’t likely household names. The technologies that can give you a competitive advantage may not even be on your radar. So, as a buyer, think about these issues related to innovation:

  • Buyers don’t always realize they have a problem – they just accept the status quo because they know no other way.
  • Innovation happens fast – buyers aren’t always aware of the latest technologies and trends.
  • Buyers are often too busy to self-educate on new technologies, new processes, new methods of accomplishing goals that did not exist months or years before.
  • Innovative companies can’t just sell their product – they must also educate buyers on “the new way.”

At KiteDesk, we experience this issue each and every day. The companies we work with are market creators. They are building products for the future. They are solving problems their buyers don’t yet realize they have. They are disrupting the status quo; and therefore, causing a glitch in the buyer’s journey matrix.

Leaders need to realize the products

that will give them a competitive advantage are not

something they will ever find in a Google search.

Why?

Because, you get the same results as everyone else.

Bye-bye, competitive advantage.

Hello, level playing field.

Want to win? Accept Interruptions

It’s 2016 and my message to leaders who want to make an impact is: answer your inbound calls from SDRs from companies you know nothing about. Do your research on TechCrunch to see what companies are getting funded. Check out landscape graphics of emerging industries, like this:

Innovation is sitting in your voicemail, inbox and LinkedIn Inmail

The companies that are working to get your attention are doing so because they know:

  • You aren’t looking for them.
  • Inbound won’t work until there is a more defined market need.
  • There is a lot at stake, and they will do everything to get your attention.

If you are an SDR reading this, don’t stop trying. This article may help you open a few doors.

Buyers, if a company is investing resources to reach you, there is a damn good reason why. Usually, the reason is because there is a huge market opportunity they are addressing. Do yourself a favor and answer your email, respond to your voicemails, and reply to LinkedIn Inmails. Your next most important competitive advantage may be waiting on the other side.

Why Your Sales Process Needs a PRM

Understand the benefits of supplementing your sales process with a Prospect Relationship Management platform. This quick guide provides insight into how a PRM cuts down on time inefficiencies, makes effective use of your sales and marketing budgets, and maximizes sales efforts.

10 Feb 17:13

5 Steps to Increase Conversion Rates with Account-Based Marketing

by McKenzie Ingram

Account based marketing

What is account-based marketing? As Demandbase defines ABM: “It’s a set of principles that range from…

  • trying to engage large, named customers at a deeper level,
  • to pursuing new, high-value accounts that share similar size, industry or geographical characteristics with existing top-tier customers.”

Account based marketing

It’s a very logical response to the growing number of people involved in making a B2B buying decision. The main common characteristic of different aspects and applications of ABM is the focus on accounts, instead of on individual job titles or job descriptions alone.

Although account-based marketing has been getting a lot of attention in recent years, it’s not actually a new strategy. ABM was developed in the mid-1990s as a way for (mostly enterprise) marketers to distance themselves from mass marketing tactics and begin a more targeted approach.

As the strategy slowly gained traction, it became better-known and more likely to be employed in companies that don’t rank as enterprise. By 2015, SiriusDecisions reported that over 90% of B2B marketers believe that an account-based marketing strategy is a must-have; it also noted that only 20% of companies had actually implemented a strategy for longer than a year. Which begs the question:

Is ABM a fleeting buzzword, or is it here to stay?

Well, the Information Technology Services Marketing Association (ITSMA), a B2B industry expert for all things marketing, reports that ABM delivers the highest return on investment (ROI) of any B2B marketing strategy or tactic. Demand Metric also found that 60% of those who have employed ABM for at least one year attribute a revenue increase of 10% or more to its use.

Megan Heuer, Vice President and Group Director at SiriusDecisions said, “We’re in the early days of an important change in how B2B companies go about delivering on their revenue goals, and ABM is a critical aspect of this shift.” She added:

“What makes ABM so attractive right now is the way it combines insights for strategy and technology for execution. Marketing teams who understand ABM are in a powerful position to better align to what sales needs, and to make smart choices about the right actions to take and the right time to take them to grow high-potential accounts.”

Ready to take a closer look? Here’s a high-level overview of the five steps to plan and implement a successful account-based marketing strategy, and start creating more marketing-sourced leads.

1. Pick and Choose Your Highest-Value Accounts

Account-based marketing, in some sense, is the brainchild of sales and marketing alignment. The strategy is most successful when you choose high-value accounts that tie to key business initiatives and company goals.

Typical initiatives might be expanding into a new market, increasing market or wallet share, landing a major brand, etc. When you’re choosing your target accounts you’ll want to analyze factors such as industry, location, revenue, similarity to your best customers, technology stack, early-adopter tendencies, financial habits, and so on. You’ll need to target different buyers within an account, so take the time to build buyer personas, which will help you speak directly to those different buyers accurately.

“ABM is fast becoming the B2B strategy of choice because it truly aligns sales and marketing while focusing their teams on the highest value accounts,” says Peter Isaacson, Chief Marketing Officer at Demandbase. “I expect adoption to grow rapidly as companies that have made this switch have seen tremendous results by focusing their efforts on attracting, engaging, converting and measuring the accounts that are most likely to buy.”

ITSMA defines ABM as simply “treating individual accounts as a market in their own right.” Account-based marketing is highly productive partly because it’s highly focused attention. There is an attendant opportunity cost, which means it’s important to choose your accounts carefully. Don’t rush the process of choosing – and don’t make final decisions without input from sales.

2. Define Your Messages and Targeted Content

The secret sauce within any successful ABM strategy is highly customized messaging. To make things easier for yourself, start by taking an inventory of all of your existing content and mapping it to buyers’ profiles. By understanding which pieces of content benefit individual audiences, you’ll be able to fill in critical gaps and avoid creating excess content for your new ABM strategy. You can correlate your content directly to buyer personas, firmographics, and customer journey position, and use your content to speak directly to the targeted accounts’ needs, wants, struggles, and goals.

In some cases, the new research and persona creation may lead you to discover a new value proposition. You may find brand new ways that you can help your prospects – good for you!

3. Determine Which Channels Are Best to Reach Your People

For most companies, the sales cycle is getting longer. ABM strategies work best when you use a combination of channels to market to your targeted accounts. Treat each touch as an ongoing and continuing conversation with your prospect. The single most important thing: Keep your messaging consistent across all platforms. This buffs your trustworthiness and underscores your value proposition.

The channels to consider vary with your target accounts, but ones you might consider include:

  • Targeted display ads (this is a whole category unto itself; you can advertise to a range of named roles at a named company, and get one-off ads).
  • Email marketing campaigns
  • Live events
  • Social media
  • SEO/SEM

4. Get it Done

Before deploying your new strategy, make sure you set up measurements of success. This might be an increase in conversions from marketing-sourced leads, improved alignment between sales and marketing, or a higher response rate to campaigns. Remember that account-based marketing is all about quality, not quantity.

Once the pieces are in place, launch your new ABM strategy and take a vacation. (Just kidding, you’re not absolved of all of your marketing responsibilities … yet.)

5. Analyze and Adjust

This may be the most important piece – and next to targeting the correct accounts, it’s the one that will lead you to the most success.

It’s all about the data.

I can’t stress this enough. Make sure that you are leveraging tools that help you track your marketing efforts; measure the impact of each of your touches; and see which of your marketing activities are responsible for moving a lead down the funnel. The more data you can gather, the more you can adjust your strategy to optimize your success rates. Make sure you share these insights with your sales team!

data analysis

Last, but not least

Your target accounts’ needs and priorities will always be changing, just as yours are. Make sure that you continuously check the pulse on your messaging. This is not a one-size-fits-all kind of marketing strategy – quite the opposite. You’ll need to closely monitor the successes (and failures) of your ABM campaigns. The good news is, you’ll be able to measure real, tangible success.

If your ABM strategy is successful, you’ll see meaningful increases in website traffic from your targeted accounts, with more conversions and opportunities. These things translate directly into increased revenue. And, as marketers, doesn’t it feel good when that revenue increase can be tied directly to your marketing efforts? We think so.

10 Feb 17:13

Are You Making Enough Time for Your Buyer?

by PFPS

The 12 Dimensions of Trust represent the 12 ways a seller can build or erode trust with buyers. Each associated action creates a connection or causes a disconnection. Knowing about all 12 Dimensions of Trust empowers a seller who wants strong connections founded in trust. Not knowing leads to buyer mistrust and seller confusion.

dimensions of trustAvailability

“Seller makes time for needed conversations and listens without distractions” is a particularly difficult assignment for sellers. In an informal poll of sales trainers and sales managers, the question “why don’t more sellers ask more questions more often?” was answered over and over again with the responses “sellers don’t have time” and “buyers don’t have time.” But by not asking questions, sellers waste considerably more of their own time and the time of buyers as they present off-the-mark solutions and then regroup to make modified proposals and to overcome objections they should have anticipated and avoided.

Asking questions and listening actively to the responses is an investment of time, not a waste of time.

A seller who makes the time to conduct a thorough needs assessment and routinely checks in by asking follow-up questions builds trust and conveys availability and interest in the buyers’ needs. This doesn’t have to be laborious or time consuming. Just a few qualitycover for site 2015 questions can turn every sales call into a trust-building connection.

This blog post features an excerpt from the best-seller “DISCOVER Questions® Get You Connected.”  To learn more about how to connect with buyers and gain their trust, buy the full copy of this award-winning book from Amazon.com as a paperback or e-book.

The post Are You Making Enough Time for Your Buyer? appeared first on People First.

10 Feb 17:12

Don’t Call It a Comeback: The New Era of Newsletters

by Alicia Fiorletta

The email newsletter has been around since the dawning of the World Wide Web. Now, there are digital publications, newsletters and aggregation services to speak to a variety of audiences, topics and interests.

But do newsletters have a place in companies’ content arsenals? In my opinion, the digital newsletter has evolved into a new, more exciting medium. When crafted well and used effectively, it can have a powerful impact on prospect and customer engagement.

During my time at Retail TouchPoints (sister brand of Content4Demand), I’ve helped the marketing team build a comprehensive newsletter strategy. In addition to its weekly newsletter, Retail TouchPoints also has what we call a Digital Resource Center, an iteration of a newsletter that aggregates articles, content assets, survey reports and other resources. The combination of content and information varies from week to week, and each iteration has a different theme.

The Digital Resource Center is effective because the team taps into the hottest topics (and articles that have driven the most traffic) to come up with the newsletter’s core theme. We also include a short letter from the Editor-in-Chief and tailor delivery and subject lines based on our two key audiences: current subscribers and new members.

You may think that this newsletter approach is a reach if your organization offers say, IT services, retail software or any other B2B solutions or services, but think again. B2B organizations can create powerful newsletters if they provide a mixture of great content, resources and relevant messaging. Here are a few tips and best practices you should keep in mind if you are trying to refine your newsletter strategy or want to add a newsletter to your nurture toolbox in the near future:

1. Consider the newsletter an entry point: I receive a lot of newsletters on a daily basis. Some of them are full of compelling images, strong calls-to-action and a variety of great stories and resources. Others, for lack of better term, give the milk away for free. Meaning, they try to cram all the information and resources they can in a single newsletter without a call-to-action or link to the full piece. This creates a jumbled mess and headache for your subscribers. Look at your newsletter as an entry point to your branded content and resources. When crafting each newsletter, ask yourself: What do I want my buyer to achieve? What do I think they should learn today? What topics, blogs or resources will pique their interest? Use the newsletter as a way to drive people to your site, blog or another branded channel.

2. Include a powerful menu of articles and content assets: This brings us to our next, very important point. Always include a combination of articles, resources and assets. You don’t want to create a newsletter that just points your subscribers to a bunch of gated resources. We associate newsletters with great (and free) content. If you force folks to fill and re-fill forms to access resources, you’ll definitely annoy them. Instead, try and include just one or two gated resources, and then incorporate blogs and other un-gated resources.

3. Be sparing with company-focused information: Let’s be real…your followers will subscribe to your newsletter because they want to be in tune with relevant industry news and trends. So don’t overwhelm them with press releases, articles and resources focused on your solutions, services and products. Your newsletter should have the same editorial integrity as your social media accounts and your blog. It’s fine to include big news and developments (like a merger or acquisition, for example), but be strategic about which information to include and when.

4. Tailor experiences and content to your buyers: I know what you’re thinking…customizing newsletters for different audiences seems like a lot of work. But it honestly doesn’t have to be. Sometimes, it’s as easy as creating different subject lines and changing the order of the articles based on specific areas of interest. Or, if you’re trying to nurture a new audience/list, take cues from Retail TouchPoints and add a fun “welcome” letter to the top of the newsletter.

5. Have fun and show personality (when it’s appropriate): The most effective way to keep your subscribers engaged is to show some personality. That may mean adding more fun, themed blogs to your newsletter lineup, or it may mean having a special section of the newsletter dedicated to your employees, fun facts about the company or fun events your team held or attended. For example, does your company dedicate a day for the team to perform charity work? Do you reward employees with a one-week sabbatical to travel or learn a new skill? These are the elements that make your business special, and your followers want to get that new, more refreshing view of your team members!

6. Test, test, test: Again, this doesn’t have to be an arduous process. Try to A/B test different subject line styles. Do your followers respond better to personalized subject lines? Do they prefer a more professional tone, or do they like a style that’s more laid back? Do they gravitate to newsletters filled with images, or do they just want a concise, bulleted list of resources and information? These minor changes you can make to your newsletter design and marketing approach can help you learn more about your subscribers and, in turn, create more valuable newsletters!

We’re living in a world filled with news, resources and information. However, if you listen to your buyers, track their behaviors and offer a fun mix of content, you’ll become a go-to source for your customers and prospects.

10 Feb 17:12

Generate Sales Opportunities Through the Email Signature

by Leah Bell

This post was written by Dan Hanrahan of Sigstr

David

About Dan: Dan has spent over a decade starting, leading and growing technology businesses. His experiencespans technology recruiting, eCommerce and marketing technology, and he’s played key roles at companies like Brooksource, iGoDigital and ExactTarget. His latest business, Sigstr, makes it simple for marketers to take control of branding and marketing in the employee email signature.

 

As a sales manager, you need to empower your team to close more business and generate more meaningful conversations with prospective customers – all while ensuring they remain focused and uninterrupted.

In order to generate more sales opportunities, activity is key. Business opportunities are created by those who work hard to add value, build relationships, and hustle. Your team spends countless hours finding the right prospects. Then it’s about activity… calls, emails, direct mail, but for most, email remains our most frequent touchpoint. While we all want more meetings and face time, the fact is the average employee sends 10,000 emails annually.

28 emails per day, per person. It’s insane, but we email because it works and its efficient. So how can we get more out of every send? As sales managers, we can’t look over the shoulder of every rep before they hit send, but we can ensure an email closes with a branded call-to-action around our most compelling events and marketing content.

Throughout my career in sales and now leading a sales team as Founder and CEO of Sigstr, we’ve tested hundreds of various types of email signature campaigns and calls-to-action. The email signature is an amazingly powerful medium.

Not only can you enable your team with your best content, but you can ensure a branded professional close to every send.

Moreover, when a campaign appears in the email signature, you can bet the sender will take time to read and understand what is in her own signature.

Your sales team can generate more business and branding opportunities through relevant pieces of content that can be automatically added to their personal email signatures (think Gmail or Outlook). These personal, one-to-one email communications result in more opportunities to showcase your solution and, more importantly, be a helpful resource.

Here’s why your sales team should give email signature marketing a try:

sigstr

1. Sales Enablement: By including campaigns in email signatures that promote a specific piece of marketing content, such as a new customer case study, a relevant eBook, or a new webinar series, your sales team will have to keep up with the new content. They’ll need to understand the content well enough in order to speak adequately about the campaign to prospects and customers.

2. Consistent Brand: An email signature marketing platform, such as Sigstr, allows the administrator to set up a single signature template for employees which can include the signature appearance, social media information, formatting such as font and text size, as well as the marketing campaign such as the case study we mentioned above. Because the brand guidelines can be locked down and the marketing campaigns turned on and off by one administrator, no longer do you need to worry that your sales team members have an out-of-date signature, or one that doesn’t meet your company’s brand standards.

3. Engagement with Marketing: When marketing wins, sales wins. Sales teams that leverage marketing content through the use of their email signatures create alignment with their marketing departments. When marketing tools such as thought leadership pieces, events and webinars, case studies, and videos are shared with engaged prospects and customers via email signature campaigns, marketing content is exposed to a larger audience. Ultimately, the sales team benefits with leads and engaged opportunities.

4. Sales Productivity: When using an email signature marketing platform, there’s no need to interrupt salespeople to make updates to their signatures (at Sigstr, we recommend activating a new campaign every couple weeks, so this could be incredibly distracting if done manually). In fact, your sales team members can use Sigstr even within SalesLoft Cadence or other marketing automation tools. Instead of being distracted, your sales team can stay focused on prospecting and closing business while the administrator automatically updates the campaigns which appear in real-time, which no effort on your sales team.

The goal is to drive awareness and give something of true value to the reader – not just another sales pitch (which you can be sure the recipient will tune out – wouldn’t you?). Email signatures promoting marketing content engage prospects and customers by pointing them towards new, helpful resources. In doing so, your sales team is giving the reader more information that could be helpful to them as they’re searching for the right partner.

Check Out SalesLoft’s Rainmaker 2016 Email Signature Campaign:

We hope you can join us for the rise of the Sales Development Cloud at #Rainmaker16 on March 7-9!

unnamed

Through these campaigns, you can direct your recipients to a landing page that requires basic information such as name, email address, and company. By having them fill out a bit of information, you will generate more qualified leads.

Want a super easy way to start using employee email signatures to generate more sales opportunities and closed business? Sigstr can help! Click here to learn more about how, and start your complimentary 30-day trial.

The post Generate Sales Opportunities Through the Email Signature appeared first on SalesLoft.

10 Feb 17:11

The Science of Sales: How Insights are Transforming the Sales Process

by Conrad Bayer

Information and the insights that can be derived from data is changing the world in almost every conceivable way. There are many components to this transformation but the most basic are our new abilities to capture massive amounts of data instantly, using new, more powerful tools to analyze that data. The combination allows us to learn, understand and eventually master a growing field of subjects. There are very few industries that are exempt from this kind of change and the sales industry is no exception. Data and analytics is already changing how sellers sell and we are barely at the beginning of this transformation. We call this this trend the ‘science of sales.’

Great sales execution used to be about grit, determination and focus. Those qualities are still important but there is a new entrant for sales success — utilizing data and the insights it provides to fine-tune every aspect of your customer interactions. This is something that marketing has understood for years now. Marketing went through an analytics transformation 6 or 7 years ago when marketing automation platforms became mainstream. The idea was to track marketing campaigns and the elusive marketing lead with increasing precision. The logic is simple. If you can track and analyze your marketing leads, you can start to predict where you will find more revenue. Wonderful stuff if you are a consumer business or something very transactional where contact from a sales professional is unnecessary. In B2B environments, those leads would eventually get handed to the sales organization, relying on sellers more as artists than data scientists. This is all changing with the ability to analyze leads and results much deeper into the sales process.

The implication is that sales professionals and the sales process itself needs to change. More efficient processes, the ability to capture engagement data, and the reinvention of communication techniques are all the foundation of a new generation of sales professionals and a modern sales process. No more flying blind. One of the key trends leading this change is the type of data that is now available, real-time for the individual seller. It is based on external observations about your prospects — engagement data based on your prospects’ behaviors. This is quite different from the internally-focused data, like demographics and actions that has historically been stored in CRM systems.

So how do you get in front of this trend? There are 3 basic steps every organization needs to take in order to build greater intelligence into their sales process.

1. Clean your database

You must think of your contact database (probably within your CRM) as the core of your sales intelligence. If it’s a mess of old contacts and out-of-date information you are guaranteeing a slower sales process and a demoralized sales team. Your reps cost you real money in terms of the time they spend trying to work with contacts. It only makes sense that you spend the time and effort to make sure they have the best data possible. Secure a data validation firm to verify phone and email before any outbound calling campaign begins. An external administrative resource will cost far less and be more efficient than your reps. Keep your reps on the phones talking to real prospects and closing deals.

Clean contacts are the foundation for the next step which is implementing engagement scoring on your leads. As your sales reps interact with your leads, they will get some responses in the form of open messages, read content, perhaps even a reply. Those activities are an indication of their interest and need to be tracked and reported. High activity levels correlates with those prospects who are most likely to close. Conversely, low engagement aligns with those least likely to close. As a sales manager, you need to use that information to guide the daily activities of the sales team.

2. Unify your messaging

A data-driven sales process is not only about who opened your email and who didn’t, or who clicked and who didn’t. At the core, a data-driven sales process surfaces insights about the best time to reach your customer, or their communication channel preferences, or the issue related to your product that interests them most. And, it allows for flexibility and control of the content and messaging that is delivered to prospects.

The goal is to measure results. To do so, the messaging and content must be consistent so you can understand the impact, what works and what doesn’t, then make incremental improvements. This task can be simple and fun. We have customers that encourage their sales reps to create their own messages. They track results and the sales rep with the best results is rewarded. The organization rolls out the most successful messaging to the team and the process repeats itself, driving more prospects to the content that works best. New sales reps ramp quickly as they have the cadence and content that works from day-one. No more reinventing the wheel.

In larger organizations, this content might also come from your marketing team or a sales enablement team. Both of those scenarios are great as long as you are achieving the objective of standardizing the content. This approach has an additional benefit of allowing marketing to participate and measure their content in the last mile of the sales process. This will allow collaboration in new and productive ways which will benefit the organization and revenue goals.

3. Align your communication processes

Once you have a messaging and content strategy, it’s important to determine how you are going to communicate that information with your prospects in a way that engages and converts. This goes beyond the channel used to communicate with your prospects. Whether you use email, phone, or chat to open a conversation, random processes hurt your results the same way random messaging does.

A structured communication process doesn’t need to be complicated or rigid. The hardest part is making sure that whatever sales cadence you use is executed consistently across all sales reps and all contacts. And that there’s enough variation built into the process to allow your reps to flex when needed.

There might be a preset number of emails and associated calls or voicemails specifically created for each prospect profile, with specific timing for each delivery and different versions of content and offers tailored to the prospect’s needs and your systems should be built to support that process. Ideally, you have some type of automation tool to make this easier on your reps and a disciplined approach (automated even) to record all this activity data into your CRM system. This serves as the basis of the engagement index for the prospect.

The key is standardizing on the approach and then perhaps implementing some automation. Here is more on sales communication strategies.

Bringing it all together

These changes are not difficult and can be done incrementally. Start cleaning your data and contacts a hundred or a thousand at a time. Have a quick team meeting to select a small number of messages that you think are working and have the rest of the team start using them. Create a simple workflow of five emails and three phone calls to every lead and get the team to commit to doing it and perhaps providing some fun incentives (dinner reward, etc.) for those that do. You might already be doing some of this now. The next step however is the most important part. You have to track the effectiveness of all of these actions and then analyze the data as it starts to flow in. Again you will likely need some tools to help you do this effectively but the rewards are substantial and continuous. The business environment does not stand still. It is constantly evolving. What you think is working today may not work tomorrow. A data-driven sales process allows you to deal with reality and adapt into a sales organization that stands the test of time.

Download the free e-book to find out how to use new sales tools to make 2016 great.

10 Feb 17:11

20 Ways to Use Email to Automate Your Business

by Ryan Stewart

We’ve received almost 3,000 contact or consultation requests over the last year.

WEBRIS Goal completions

Up until a few months ago, managing this was a nightmare.

As a small business, I don’t have any sales people – I manage everything myself. What’s even worse, a large majority of these leads were garbage. I was spending all my time chasing down leads that if I got on the phone, were a complete waste of time.

I knew I had to make a change before I lost my f*cking mind. So, I turned to automation.

Long story short we’ve managed to automate lead qualification, follow ups and appointment scheduling to the point where all I have to do is wake up and check my calendar for appointments. It’s amazing.

I want to pass this feeling on to you.

The problem most face with automation is not knowing where to begin. If you have the process built out, you can automate almost anything.

In this post, I’m going to share with you 20 ways you can use email to automate parts of your business.

NOTE: This blog post is to serve as inspiration to understand the options available. I won’t be covering the various hooks, triggers and segmentation aspects needed to execute them.

1. Send product expiration notifications

  • A 5% increase in customer retention can increase a company’s profitability by 75% (Source)
  • If your product or service can be renewed or repurchased, trigger emails that automatically notify customers

Key takeaway: Use email automation to increase your customer retention and repurchase rate.

product-expiration notifications small

2. Abandoned shopping cart sequence

  • 68% of online shopping carts are abandoned (Source)
  • If visitors are logged in on your site, you can track abandoned carts Analytics and tie it to your email platform
  • When their cart is left with items in it, set an automated email (and follow up series) to remind them

Key takeaway: Don’t let people deep in your funnel slip away. Automate the purchasing process using email reminders.

Abandoned Shopping Cart

3. Increase the usage of your products

  • This automation series is particularly useful for companies who use free trials to show the benefit of their product (SaaS, info products, etc)
  • The goal of this campaign is to introduce the various aspects and benefits of your product while using a CTA to drive them to use
  • You can set this up as a standard drip automation campaign, or you can leverage behavior to segment your list

Key takeaway: Automate this process using email so you can focus on driving more leads.

Product Usage Email Automation

4. Cold email sales outreach

  • Companies engaging in targeted email outreach can experience sales increases of 15% or more (Source)
  • By gathering the right field inputs ahead of time (name, business name, function) you can automate highly targeted and personalized outreach (cold emailing)
  • We used to scrape large lists of digital agencies and send automated emails to inquire about partnering on services (it works)

Key takeaway: If you’re a startup, sales are tough to come by. But then again, so is your time. Use email outreach to help automate the client acquisition process.

cold sales email outreach

5. Inside sales automation

  • As previously mentioned, I was killing myself trying to respond to service inquiries
  • We set up a qualification and lead scheduling email funnel that’s completely automated
  • Each form submission (5 web forms) triggers a different automation sequence that drives the lead towards a phone consult

Key takeaway: Use email automation to qualify leads, save time and increase sales.

Inside sales automation

6. Meeting, webinar and event reminders

  • Webinars average a mere 25% attendance rate (Source)
  • People are busy, particularly if your webinar is in the middle of a workday
  • Simple auto reminders will help you push past the 25% attendance rate and maximize your lead generation efforts

Key takeaway: Use email automation to increase your webinar or event attendance rate.

Webinar event reminders

7. Unfinished form registration reminders

  • On average, more than half of people who begin filling out a web form will abandon it (Source)
  • The best way to combat this is twofold:
    1. Break form completions into stages – the first stage should always capture name and email
    2. Anyone who gives you name and email but doesn’t compete the entire form, send automated emails to remind them

Key takeaway: Set up your forms to collect name and email up front and use automation to decrease form abandonment rate.

Complete web form auto

8. New subscriber welcome series

  • So many marketers skip over the thank you email
  • -74.4% of subscribers expect a welcome email (Sources)
  • Those that receive a welcome email show 33% more long term engagement
  • Welcome emails generate 4x the open rate and 5x the click rates
  • Take advantage of the high open rate by sending special deals and coupons to drive immediate sales

Key takeaway: While basic, these emails are important. Set up a basic automation sequence to increase customer engagement.

Welcome Series Emails

9. Make sure to send sales receipts (eCommerce)

  • Email receipts have an open rate of 70.9% (Source)
  • When compared to the average eCommerce open rate of 18%, this is a HUGE opportunity
  • They just paid you – you have their trust. Take advantage of it!
  • Use automation to promote other products, build a social following, offer coupons or other high priority items

Key takeaway: Attach special offers to your sales receipts to drive repeat purchasing.

Sales receipts emails

10. Solicit feedback and get positive reviews

  • 92% of consumers check online reviews before purchasing (Source)
  • Use email automation to solicit reviews from happy customers and nurture unhappy ones
  • Fuseomatic uses the net promoter score (NPS) in an initial email to determine customer satisfaction
  • Based on the number (1 – 10) they select, they receive an automated follow up sequence to either drive reviews or nurture to improve satisfaction

Key takeaway: Use auto emails to increase your online reputation.

solicit-online-reviews-email

11. Email list re-engagement series

  • Email list quality decays over time
  • A Gmail rep stated they look for “evidence” that your recipients want your message (Source)
  • In other words, having a nonactive list will hurt your delivery rates

Key takeaway: Use automated sequences to reignite interest and cleanse your list.

Email List Engagement

12. Create native email content

  • Open rates average around 20%; link clicks average around 4% (Source)
  • By forcing people to your website to consume content, you’re cutting off a significant audience
  • Leverage automation to send out native content that lives only in email. This is an incredible way to nurture a list, build trust and increase link click through rate

Key takeaway: Set up automation sequences that distribute native content to maximize engagement.

Create native email content

13. Personalize content delivery based on behavior

  • Often times when list building, we get minimum fields (name and email)
  • To get to know our list, we can use content to better personalize future communications

Key takeaway: Leverage a simple newsletter with links to various pieces of content on our site, we can understand what people enjoy seeing and send better emails in the future.

Email Personalization Tips

14. Use in email behavior to personalize sales emails

  • Similar to content preference discovery, we can use behavior to better personalize emails
  • Trip Advisor sends out deals based on location (Source)
  • Their engine determines which email to send based on previous purchases OR in email behavior
  • If you click a link to view Austin deals, you get tagged with Austin preferences for further testing

Key takeaway: Leverage link clicks to segment your list and improve personalization.

Email Behavior

15. Send personalized messages

  • Birthdays, anniversaries and other data points are easy ways to build stronger relationships
  • By sending our short emails based on concrete dates, we can build better relationships with customers

Key takeaway: Use automation to build emotional connections with your customers (oh, and drive sales).

Birthday Email Automation

16. Send personalized product recommendations (eCommerce)

  • Make sure your CRM / platform track past purchases and maps them to customer emails
  • This will allow you to suggest intelligent product recommendations in the future
  • This works incredibly well in spaces like tech, where products decay over time

Key takeaway: Use automation to sent out personalized product recommendations.

Automate Product Recommendations

17. Automate customer billing and invoicing

  • Any way you can save time from having a human do a job, you’re saving money
  • We use automation to manage invoicing and re-billing so we don’t fall behind on receivables

Key takeaway: Use email to make sure you’re collecting money on time.

Automate billing and invoicing

18. Internal processes and workflows

  • Using remote workers is a great way to source diverse talent for your company
  • Keeping everyone on the same page and process is a nightmare
  • We use email automation for internal communication and project management purposes

Key takeaway: Leverage emails to increase productivity.

Automate Workflows

19. New customer onboarding

  • While this tactic is most leveraged by SaaS type companies, it’s effective for B2B as well
  • When we take on new clients, we leverage auto emails to collect campaign intel, employee interviews, get access to Analytics and schedule meetings

Key takeaway: Leverage email automation to remove the suckiness from on boarding new customers.

New Customer Emails

20. Lead nurturing sequences

  • Since is the most obvious one, I saved it for last
  • There’s nothing more powerful than a well synced lead generation campaign and automated email nurture sequence

Key takeaway: Never pay for traffic without an automation sequence to convert leads to customers.

Email Nurture Sequence

Wrapping it up

I’m hoping this list is getting the wheels in your head turning for how you can use email to partially automate your business. This is by no means an exhaustive list – if you’ve got anything you’d like to add, please leave it in the comments!

10 Feb 17:11

4 Elements That Drive B2B Direct Marketing Results

by John Coe

pixabay_five-elements-379106_1920

Do You Know the Basics?

Over the past few months, I have gotten a number of calls from individuals who are seeking new sales leads for their company. They range from marketing managers to sales managers, and even presidents of smaller firms. Usually their questions center on how to obtain a list of specific individuals who they feel might buy their product or service. Beyond that, they are not sure what to do with the list, other than just send an email or call them (rarely do they mention mail). We then get into a conversation about the issues of developing a lead generation campaign, and it becomes painfully apparent that few know the basics of how to develop a campaign that has even a small chance to generate leads.

So with that in mind, this blog is focused on the basics. If you’re an experienced B2B direct marketer, this is probably not for you. On the other hand, it’s always worth revisiting the basics, as we do forget them over time.

The 4 Elements of a B2B Lead Generation Campaign:

Much like a golf swing – if you don’t know the basics (stance, backswing, and downswing) you won’t hit the ball, and even if you do, it won’t go straight or far. With that in mind, here is a brief review of the four basic elements, and the relative importance of each as express in percentages:

1. Targeting and List Selection – 50-70% of success

The start of the process is targeting who is likely to want your product or service. First, start with companies by industry (4-digit SIC or 6-digit NAICS code) and number of employees by standard ranges (i.e. 1-10, 11-25, etc.) that you believe should be interested in your product/service. Secondly, determine the job functions and titles of the likely individuals who would be involved and/or responsible for making the purchase decision.

Sounds simple, right? Actually, it isn’t as easy as it may appear, as most companies have not profiled their customer and/or prospect base, and can’t identify the industry codes. If not done, the customer list should be sent out to a data vendor for profiling. In addition to this customer profile (which is a look in the rear view mirror), other market segments should be identified, especially if a new product or service is being marketed.

Once the “who” has been defined, then the task is to find a list that matches the target audience(s). This is where list research comes into play, and it’s a confusing B2B data world out there, as many potential list sources have popped up in the last 10 years.

Tip: Use a list broker or a consultant who already knows the B2B data world, as many mistakes are made by marketers who either think they know the business, or rely upon the pronouncements of the list vendors. B2B contact level data decays at a surprisingly high rate, so insure the source is accurate by testing a sample of 100 if the list vendor will provide it. They usually will if the resultant order is valuable to them.

2. Offer Strategy – 20-30% of success

The offer is simply, “why should I respond?” In general, there are three types of B2B offers, and they align to the buying process. They are:

  • Soft Offer – beginning of the buying process

This is information of value that focuses on the issue/problem that is addressed by your product/service coupled with no commitment asked of the recipient beyond their basic information (keep the form simple and short). Don’t promote the product/service in this soft offer, but rather focus on the problem or issue you can solve. This also positions your firm as a thought leader and increases creditability.

  • Nurturing Offers – middle stages of the buying process

A B2B buying process usually has 4-8 stages, and these offers are structured to keep the individual engaged as they move through it. By offering ongoing valuable information, you keep the lead interested. In addition, they will likely provide more information on themselves and their needs – this is called progressive profiling. At the end of each nurturing communication always offer the opportunity to move to the next step with a “hard” offer.

  • Hard Offer – obtaining commitment

Most lead generation campaigns are focused on properly qualifying the lead, so that handing off to the sales resource is now appropriate. The hard offers are typically based on experiencing the FAB’s of the product or service either via a demo, one-on-one webinar, phone call with a rep., or even a face-to-face call. This offer is termed “hard” as it commits the lead to an action closer to the sale.

If the lead generation campaign is focused on an actual purchase, then the hard offer is based on some form of deal – usually price or added value. Always have these offers time sensitive – nobody believes “limited quantity.”

Tip: B2B buying process is frequently not linear, so don’t assume potential customers progress in this way. Plus not everyone you initially communicate to is at the beginning of the buying process. Therefore, why not offer a soft, nurturing, and hard offer in the initial communication and allow the suspect to select the one that best matches their buying stage. This is called a self-qualifying offer strategy. The offer selected is likely more in line with where they are in the buying process.

3. Sequence and Frequency of Contact Media – 20-30% of success

In B2B, multiple contacts are affordable, as the price and margins allow for multiple communications to well-targeted suspects. At the beginning of the buying process only three DM media are both targetable and proactive (outbound) – email, mail, and phone. Social media can be included once the individual has responded and provided that information.

So the question is, how many communications, and in what sequence, should we send to suspects to generate an initial response? Depending on how well-targeted the suspect is and the revenue at stake, three communications generates the most cost efficient result. In the old days, mail/phone was the sequence. Today, email/phone has become the norm. Each one of these combinations is consider one communication attempt.

Tip: In several recent lead campaigns, we’ve found that a LinkedIn communication preceding either the mail/phone or email/phone sequence produces a much higher response rate – sometimes by a factor of 2 or 3.

4. Creativity – 10-20% of success.

You may be surprised that creativity is only worth 10-20% of success, and agencies will certainly dispute this. But considering the importance of the preceding three elements, creativity (copy and art) takes a backseat. This is lead generation, not branding.

In B2B, direct marketing copy leads the process, and finding a good direct marketing copywriter is almost as hard as going undefeated in the NFL. It is well worth the effort to not only search for one, but pay the fee, as the benefits more than justify the cost. The best B2B copywriter I know is Bob Bly. Remember when drafting messages and offers, relevancy to the individual tops all.

Tip: No creative should be started before the target audience is clearly defined. The target is at the “head” of the process.

To Sum Up:

Books have been written about lead generation, and this very short blog is intended just to lay out the 4 basic elements for success. Seek out B2B agencies or consultants to actually produce and manage the campaign, but if the budget does not exist to hire these experts, start out by doing it yourself. Good luck, as it’s not easy to obtain results in this over communicated and cluttered market place.

10 Feb 17:11

6 Website Tweaks to Give Conversions a Shove in the Right Direction

by Greg Miles

Website-tweaks-cover

You’ve developed your content marketing strategy, planned your publishing schedule and honed your writing skills. You’re cooking up hot content like Gordon Ramsay on Pancake Day, and it’s driving a ton of relevant traffic to your website.

That’s awesome.

For some reason though, conversion rates are low. You’ve been tripped at the last hurdle on your route to content marketing success.

This can be one of the most frustrating challenges content marketers face, and it’s often the last piece of the puzzle to be considered.

There are many reasons why website visitors might not be taking the actions you want them to take. There could be something fundamentally wrong (such as no demand for your product), but usually it takes just a few tweaks to give conversions a shove in the right direction.

Here are six ways you can optimize your conversion rates right now.

1. Write a compelling call to action

Perhaps the most obvious technique, it can have a substantial effect on the number of leads generated from your website.

Instead of using dull CTAs such as “sign up” and “click here,” you should opt for more creative and original choices that speak your customers’ language.

A bold CTA like this one championed by Dollar Shave Club is more stimulating than “Join Now,” while also prompting an immediate response.

Bold-CTA-Dollar-Shave-Club

It’s also a good idea to focus the CTA on the value the prospects will receive rather than the action they should take. Saying “get your free report” is more effective than asking visitors to “order your free report” because it highlights what the customer will gain, not the effort it will take.

Something as simple as the size or color of your call to action also can have a profound effect on conversions. Using a color that is different from your standard palette could do a brilliant job of drawing attention to the CTA button.

2. Add click triggers

Click triggers are bits of text that reassure visitors about their decision. It’s likely that some prospects will hesitate or doubt our offers, and click triggers could provide the little nudge they need to take the desired action.

Click triggers can generate trust in the vital moments running up to a conversion. They include:

  • Product ratings
  • Customer testimonials
  • Extra information about products such as “top seller” or “most popular”
  • Guarantees
  • Benefits, such as free shipping
  • Secure-payment icons
  • Transparency about next steps/set-up

Check out this example on Sprout Social’s home page, which reassures users about the simplicity of the process to follow:

Sprout-Social-homepage

3. Use an exit-intent pop-up

Pop-ups can be annoying. They often interrupt the natural flow of users surfing the web who close them before a single word of the message has registered.

But when used with apt timing, a pop-up can be your last-ditch effort to capture a visitor’s contact information.

Exit-intent pop-ups work by tracking the movements of users on a web page so that a special offer or opt-in form can be displayed when they show signs of leaving.

exitintent-forever-loop

This is a less interruptive and more effective way of engaging visitors with a pop-up. It can be used for any message you see fit, from discount codes to opportunities for visitors to subscribe to your blog.

4. Simplify forms

Filling out online forms can be a chore and the subsequent commands – fill out these boxes, give us your details, prove you’re not a robot – annoying.

You’ve spent so much effort attracting customers to your website and have successfully guided them to a landing page, it would be a horrific shame if they were to abandon your site at the last minute because of a time-consuming form.

You should make the process of converting as simple as possible for your customers. Using the minimum number of fields possible will increase your conversions – even though that means sacrificing some additional information about your leads.

At Bumbl we reduced our contact form from six fields to three and more than doubled our conversion rate.

Simplify-forms

With these changes we gather less information about our leads, but it’s totally worth it when you consider how many more leads we are generating.

5. Optimize for mobile

As Google research reveals, more people search on mobile devices than on laptop or desktop computers.


More people search on #mobile than laptop or desktop computers via @google #research @GregBumbl #SEO
Click To Tweet


Generally speaking, you should expect around half of your website visitors to be accessing your site from a mobile device. With that said, it’s crucial that your website and the whole conversion process are optimized for these consumers.

Loading speeds need to be up to scratch. Mobile connections are usually slower than desktop, and the longer people have to wait, the more likely they are to abandon your site.

In fact, Amazon found that if its page took one second longer to load, it would cost $1.6 billion in sales each year.

Don’t shoot yourself in the foot.

6. Remove distractions

Every option your landing page presents to visitors — other than the step you want them to take — eats away at your conversions.

Removing unnecessary links gives your users less opportunity to navigate away from your page. That includes anything from distracting images and sidebars, to unnecessary offers. HubSpot found that removing the navigation bar from landing pages can increase conversion rates by as much as 28%.

Less is more.

Remove-distractions

Final note

When making changes to the design or copy of your website, it’s important to A/B test elements to maximize conversions. That involves performing split tests to find which variation of an element yields the best results. You can use a tool such as Optimizely to run these tests. Simply:

  1. Decide what it is you want to tweak.
  2. Create two variations of it.
  3. Run both variations at the same time, distributing them evenly to visitors.
  4. Measure the results.
  5. Keep the winner and discard the loser.
  6. Repeat for new element.

Want to convert to CMI’s subscriber service? Sign up today to receive daily or weekly tips, trends, and insights about content marketing.

Cover image by SplitShire via pixabay.com

Please note:  All tools included in our blog posts are suggested by authors, not the CMI editorial team.  No one post can provide all relevant tools in the space. Feel free to include additional tools in the comments (from your company or ones that you have used).

The post 6 Website Tweaks to Give Conversions a Shove in the Right Direction appeared first on Content Marketing Institute.

10 Feb 17:11

Why Lazy People Make the Best Content Marketers

by Pamela Wilson

how to be a lazy content marketer

Traditional marketing and content marketing have something important in common.

In order to get the business results you want — more leads, sales, and profits — you have to do them consistently over time.

In traditional marketing, you don’t place one ad or send out one brochure and think your work is done.

And in content marketing, you can’t write five blog posts or record three podcast episodes and expect them to transform your profits.

If you want content to grow your business, you have to produce it regularly. I compared it to a hamster wheel here.

It’s a lot of work, and you have to keep it up. That’s why I recommend adopting the lazy person’s approach to content marketing.

Surprised? There’s a lot we can learn from lazy people.

Lazy people embrace systems that make their lives easier

I’m not one of those people who hops out of bed in the morning, ready to take on the day.

I’m more like one of those people who needs to avoid conversation or writing emails until I have at least one cup of coffee in me.

I wake up groggy and not completely with it. And I’ve learned to work around this with a little system.

In my kitchen, right where I can see it when I walk in, I have all my coffee gear set up in one place. The coffee, the fresh coffee filters, the mugs, and the sweetener options are all within a three-foot radius. When I wake up, I only need to press one button to start the process of making my first cup of coffee.

We can do the same thing with our content marketing.

Once we’ve determined what we need, we can set ourselves up with a content marketing system that minimizes friction and helps us fight any resistance we may feel toward creating content.

Mine looks like this (yours will be different):

  • Capture blog post ideas in an Evernote notebook (called “Blog Post Ideas,” of course)
  • Use mind-mapping software to work out the basic outline of my post
  • Once the outline is set, copy and paste post content into text editing software (I use Byword)
  • Turn off all distractions: email, notifications, anything that will pull me away from writing
  • Fill in the outline and polish until I have a first draft

I’ve used this system for years without change. More on that later.

Lazy people love shortcuts … that work

Sonia Simone has established that most business shortcuts are beneficial for the person who’s trying to sell them to you, but not for you.

“Just add water and serve” shortcuts are all over the web. You’ve seen them. They sound like:

  • “I’m going to hand over (for a price) my exact system for creating five-figure webinars.”
  • “We’ll give you all our templates: just plug in your information and get ready to cash in!”
  • “Discover how to build a six-figure business with my foolproof affiliate marketing system.”

When you see shortcuts like these, we recommend you turn around and begin running in the other direction.

But there’s a different type of shortcut that’s worth talking about. It’s the type of shortcut lazy people create to make their work easier. It includes actions like:

When you find content creation shortcuts that work for you, embrace them and make them part of your process.

Lazy people don’t reinvent the wheel each time they perform a task

I can only imagine how disastrous my mornings would be if I had to deal with a different coffeemaker every time I walked into my kitchen.

Instead of going from groggy to caffeinated within about five minutes, I’d spend 15–20 minutes wandering around my kitchen looking for the user’s manual and trying to figure out where to add the water and coffee grounds.

It’s the same with content creation.

Once you’ve found tools that work for you, resist the urge to try the latest shiny content creation tool.

Tools aren’t magical.

The magic comes from using them consistently over time.

Lazy people put effort where it counts and nowhere else

Let’s put lazy people on a psychoanalyst’s couch just for a moment, shall we?

What’s the true motivation behind their lazy approach to life?

My guess is that they want to expend the minimum amount of effort to get the maximum positive effect.

Lazy people want less work and more results.

A lazy person looks at what’s working and does more of it. And a smart lazy person looks dispassionately at what has not worked, and they stop doing it.

Their attitude is, “If I did my best but this tactic didn’t work, I’m not going to work harder to make it work. I’m ditching it and trying something else!”

Lazy people are starting to sound pretty smart, aren’t they?

Lazy people aren’t really lazy; they’re efficient

Here’s my theory if you haven’t already guessed it:

A lazy approach to content marketing is really smart.

That’s the theme of the book I’m writing right now — the lazy approach to content marketing.

I want to help you discover your own lazy approach to creating effective content so you can get maximum results from minimum effort.

Join me and Jeff Goins for Zero to Book

zerotobook-podcast

If you’ve thought about writing a book, you might be interested in my new podcast.

Jeff Goins is coaching me through the process of writing my first book.

Since I’ve never written a book before, I asked Jeff if he knew someone who I could work with as a coach.

Jeff volunteered himself (lucky me!) and had the brilliant idea to make the book coaching process available to the public for free in the form of a podcast.

If you want to hear a newbie (that would be me) ask an experienced author (that would be Jeff) all the questions a budding book author might have, tune in to Zero to Book.

I’d love to hear your ideas about this lazy approach to content marketing, too. Visit the comments and let’s talk.

The post Why Lazy People Make the Best Content Marketers appeared first on Copyblogger.

09 Feb 20:01

Oil prices tumble 7% as fears of record high U.S. stockpiles grow

by Barani Krishnan, Reuters

NEW YORK — Oil prices fell 7 per cent on Tuesday as equity markets remained weak, forecasts called for record high U.S. crude stockpiles to grow more, and the latest global energy demand outlooks did not look strong enough to eliminate the swelling glut.

U.S. gasoline futures fell to a 2008 low ahead of weekly inventory data expected to show crude and gasoline stocks growing to record highs.

Continuing weakness in equity markets also pressured oil. Wall Street’s S&P 500 index fell almost 1 per cent.

Sunday’s talks between Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi and his Venezuelan counterpart produced no tangible signs of progress on coordinated oil production cuts between OPEC and non-OPEC suppliers.

Oil prices were pressured further by weak demand outlooks issued by the U.S. government’s Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the Paris-based International Energy Information (IEA).

“The longs have withdrawn from the market and the sellers are back in full force,” said Gene McGillian, analyst at Tradition Energy in Stamford, Connecticut.

Brent crude was down US$2.34, or 7.1 per cent, at US$30.54 a barrel by 1:15 p.m. ET (1815 GMT).

U.S. crude fell US$1.45, or 5 per cent, to US$28.23.

U.S. gasoline futures fell 5 per cent and heating oil was down nearly 7 per cent.

U.S. crude stockpiles likely rose 3.6 million barrels in the week ended Feb. 5, said the latest Reuters survey ahead of data due at 4:30 p.m. (2130 GMT) from industry group American Petroleum Institute (API). The API data runs before official stockpile numbers on Wednesday from the EIA.

The EIA in a separate report on Tuesday said it has lowered its oil demand growth forecast for 2016 by 110,000 barrels per day and 2017 by 260,000 bpd.

That report came after another the Paris-based IEA said it did not expect global demand for oil to grow quickly enough to erase the overhang of crude any time soon.

The IEA, the West’s energy watchdog, cut its forecast for 2016 oil demand growth, which now stands at 1.17 million barrels per day (bpd) following a five-year high of 1.6 million in 2015, and reduced its estimate of demand for OPEC crude.

“The IEA report was a bearish blow, followed by the EIA report which sings from the same hymn sheet,” said Matt Smith, director of commodity research at energy data provider ClipperData.

The world’s largest oil trader, Vitol, said it expects global oil demand to grow by around 1 million bpd this year, down from last year’s rate 1.6 million bpd.

© Thomson Reuters 2015

09 Feb 19:54

5 companies that lost the most buying back their own shares

by CB Staff

Big U.S. companies have lost billions buying their own stock.

Nearly half the companies in a study of the Standard and Poor’s 500 index spent more on these buybacks than the shares are now worth. Combined paper losses from purchases in the past three years for these losers: $126 billion, or 15 per cent of what they paid, according to an Associated Press study based on FactSet data.

The companies with five biggest paper losses:

— IBM: – $9.8 billion

—Qualcomm: -$7.4 billion

— American Express: -$4.1 billion

— Exxon Mobil: -$3.9 billion

— Hess: -$2.9 billion

— Chevron: -$2.8 billion

The post 5 companies that lost the most buying back their own shares appeared first on Canadian Business - Your Source For Business News.

09 Feb 19:33

A Failure To Communicate In The World Of IoT, Part 2

by Mark Brooks

This is Part 2 of a two-part Q&A with Linden Tibbets, CEO and co-founder of IFTTT. For Part 1, click here

This post also appears on Wearable.ai, which interviews the innovators in wearable computing, IoT and AR. For inquiries, please email publisher Mark Brooks.

IFTTT is an automation service that hopes to bridge the gap between connected devices to create a more seamless experience. IFTTT (which stands for "if this, then that" and rhymes with "gift") allows users of connected devices and digital services to easily integrate them across platforms to better suit their needs.

IFTTT CEO, Linden Tibbets, explains how the newest developments to the platform hope to enhance their experience for both developers and the average Joe.

Mark Brooks: In February 2015, IFTTT split into two apps: IF, which focuses on automation, and DO, an app that allows users to easily trigger an action with the press of a button. How's this division helped simplify things? LT: We see this as the first step of many towards a more rich experience around recipes. The idea of recipes has always been that it could be much, much more than "if this, then that." It could be much richer and at the same time, for the user, it could be much easier to think about. They just need to think about if they want to do this thing or not;  whether that uses 2 channel or 200 channels should really be up to the developer to decide what that recipe can do.

That split between DO and IF allowed us to experiment with another type of recipe, a recipe that involves just a press of a button, and we have been really blown away by what people have been able to do with the DO button and DO apps.

It has really enforced that these apps themselves aren't necessarily where all the interaction is. In fact, almost 40% of the button presses that happen within the DO apps happen on the Android Widget and the iOS Today Stream Widget. That was a little bit surprising, but also really in line with the way we thought about the world, and that not everything was going to need to have an app. The way of thinking that you need an app for every single connected device and every single service is really going to be extinct here really soon, and we're going to start looking at new modes of interaction and new ways of making things happen in our world outside of just traditional apps.

MB: Are you finding DO is attracting more users that may feel intimidated by programming? Could this be a gateway app to IF?

LT: Yes, DO certainly has been more attractive to folks who may be a bit intimidated by programming. In fact, we are not setting out to build a programming language for consumers. We think that the idea of a recipe, at the same time it gets richer and more complex, can also get simpler for our general audience.

So we think people with a developer mindset that aren't intimidated by programming are going to continue to build increasingly richer experiences that recipes can represent, and most folk can just decide, Do I want to do this thing? Yes or No.

The Future is Bright

MB: You currently have hundreds of existing channels and recipes, with users publishing more every day, with so many new connected devices being introduced all the time, and no end in sight, how do you expect IFTTT to evolve to accommodate everyone? LT: This a problem that we are uniquely set up to really tackle. We want to keep things really simple and continue to streamline what using IFTTT and using recipes really means. We want to make it incredibly personal. As we have more and more channels and integrations on IFTTT, there is a better and better chance that those channels can represent the type of devices and services you uniquely use, that are different from someone else.

Our platform is well on its way to allowing developers to really understand what people are doing with their service and create recipes that meet some of those needs that people are trying to express today with simple versions of recipes. We are allowing developers to really go above and beyond IFTTT and DO to address those needs.

MB: There has to be a lot of coding and work that goes into keeping the various APIs working so these recipes will continue to work. This is obviously not cheap, but I don't see advertising on your site or even in the free software that you provide. How does IF currently monetize or plan to monetize in the future? LT: It's actually not a lot of work because of the platform that we've built. We have a developer platform that is still in private Beta, and developers are effectively building and maintaining those integrations for us. So we have really taken a corner on an exciting development, that developers have seen enough value out of being part of the IFTTT ecosystem that now they are doing that work and electing to really build and maintain and improve their integration on IFTTT over time.

That points directly to how we want to monetize. That developer platform is still in its infancy. We plan on heavily investing and making that platform the platform of the future. Not just the way that developers plug into and represent their brand on IFTTT, but really a way for developers to build seamless experiences across services, platforms, and devices. 

MB: What is your vision for the future and IOT and IFTTT's role in it? Where would you like to see IFTTT in 5 years time? In 10 years time?

LT: It's no longer profound to say that every single thing in the room you are in right now is going to be connected to the Internet in some way. How that's going to work and what that's going to look like is still anyone's guess, but it will happen. The Internet is going to jump out of our browser and into the real world sooner than we think.

What that represents is that each one of these connected devices and the services built around them is going to be built by a different company or some subset of different companies. The old way of thinking about software was to think about these vertical silos, and we've essentially surrounded ourselves with vertical silos. Some of those silos grew to encompass many vertical silos (like Google, Apple, and Microsoft), and what IFTTT is all about and the part we'd like to play is to allow developers to cut across those silos horizontally and integrate with both the data and the capabilities that each one of those vertical silos represents.

So when we talk about this idea of seamless computing and seamless experiences in the platform that IFTTT is working on, this is going to enable developers to build those seamless experiences and that's what we think the future is all about. A way for everyone to experience a future in which the Internet is both pervasive and friendly and works the way that people want it to.

Our team is incredibly excited about bringing the future about, and I think we are working on some really big and bold new ideas for that platform, for recipes, and for how it all fits together so that in 2016 we are going to deliver in a big way.

For interviews with the innovators in Wearable Computing, IoT & AR, subscribe to the Wearable.ai newsletter.

09 Feb 19:33

Are Nuclear Weapons 100 times Less Effective Than Supposed?

by noreply@blogger.com (Joseph)
  A guest article by Joseph Friedlander

Nigel B. Cook's Glasstone.Blogspot Blog has beautiful coverage of many nuclear topics here. http://glasstone.blogspot.co.uk/
Cook is a master researcher who digs up incredible piles of research on all topics nuclear and the following is digest of various writings of his gathered for easy access centered on the remarkable thesis that the effects of nuclear weapons, while literally awesome, have been exaggerated or misunderstood to an even greater extent, with perhaps very considerable military consequences.

I remember reading a Korean War history book that explained why the US didnt use atomic bombs in 1950-- there were only a few available, they needed to be saved for a European war, and they didn't want to ruin the perception of one bomb per city, two bombs to win a war.
Indeed a 1950 British study established that to equal World War 2 you would need 300 atomic bombs plus half a million tons in conventional bombs.  Even the USA did not have such an arsenal completely ready for use then.
In the popular picture of science fiction from around say 1946, 1951, 1956 and 1961-- updated of course with the then current version of futuristic weapons-- the mere employment of nuclear weapons either ends civilization or ends the career of the nations that use them as great powers.  Numerous novels portrayed pathetic burned out pockets of survivors isolated across great nuclear deserts.

That is so far from the actual military reality as calculated by Nigel B. Cook that we let these excerpts speak for themselves.
Does this mean nuclear war is a casual lark? No. No. No. But a science fiction scenario I cannot recall reading is, what if there was a massive exchange of ICBMS and while some failed most did not-- but they simply did not have the imagined effect and the great warring parties realized to their horror they were now in a nuclear AND conventional World War 3 with no obvious stopping point and sufficient remaining reserve capacity for mobilization for a decade long war full of shortages and sacrifices? I can't ever recall reading that in any story! 

(Some studies around 1951 of 'broken back war' touched on it but assumed A-bombs were as effective as the advertising and the post attack USA had problems keeping 20 divisions in the field in Europe. But what if the USA could draft as many riflemen as the Russians had in World War 2 and send them to Europe or Asia  in the midst of a tactical nuclear war that also was not as effective as advertised) What a nightmare struggle.

 Note that Nigel never states this himself but at least some scenarios derived from his data are compatible with that vision.

I have bolded particularly interesting details for the reader to notice below.

I should  emphasize that below the line is nearly all Nigel's work except for some connecting and classifying phrasework this writer added for clarity. Or Nigel is quoting other's work which is lost to the casual reader deep in the source pages at  http://glasstone.blogspot.co.uk/ 

Below this line it's mostly Nigel:
------------------------------------------

Nigel B. Cook has documented that even well-educated nuclear scientists have learned the wrong values for cratering (which has vast military consequences- since bunkers and silos are only killed by being in the crater.)  





Read the whole thing there (big page, may take some searching) and the significance is here 

= ---
http://glasstone.blogspot.co.il/2010/03/lifeboat-analogy-to-civil-defence.html

Herman Kahn points out in Appendix III of his 1960 book On Thermonuclear War that if the severe damage radius of a nuclear explosion is R and the missile Circular Error Parameter (CEP) distance (the radius from the intended target within which 50% of warheads fall) is C, then the probability of a target surviving nwarheads is simply S = (1/2)x where x = n(R/C)2. (Note that Kahn's formula assumes 0% survival chance for a direct hit, which is obviously incorrect for very hard buried targets like the bunker under the Kremlin which is reportedly deeper than the crater rupture zone depth for the revised crater dimensions law at high yields, but such deep targets can still be destroyed either by earth-penetrator warheads or by a repeated sequence of ground bursts in the craters formed by prior detonations.) Since R generally scales as only the cube-root of the bomb yield, it follows that for constant survival probability the payoff from a given increase in missile accuracy is larger than the effect from varying the weapon yield. Hence, many individual bombs each with smaller yields but improved accuracy are preferred to a fewer heavier higher-yield warheads, since they are more destructive to hardened counterforce targets (missiles in silos, underground enemy command posts, tanks, submarines, etc.) while producing less collateral damage to civilians since the amount of fallout radioactivity (unlike blast and cratering areas) scales directly with the yield.

Nigel's points--
Visions of vast firestorms and melted twisted girders may be greatly exaggerated except very near to ground zeroes.
http://glasstone.blogspot.co.il/2014/05/debunking-hardened-dogma-of-exaggerated.html
 (The Twin Towers collapsed, Nigel reminds us)  by heat from thousands of gallons of burning aviation gasoline running into the steel supports and turning them into putty.  Nuclear weapons at best deliver a brief match ignition to unshielded dry fire kindling, they don’t deliver the minutes of heating needed to dry out and ignite anything thicker than paper!  Beside the Thames, London air of around 80% humidity gives wood a moisture content of around 16%, entirely different from the dry Nevada desert where flashover did once occur in a wooden hut with just 19% air humidity at the 1953 Encore test.  Even in the 1953 Nevada Encore test, a large window had to be exposed to an unobstructed radial view of the whole fireball.

Nigel's points--
Even in Hiroshima reinforced concrete modern construction resisted blast and shielded from radiation far better than the wooden shacks making up much of the city.
http://glasstone.blogspot.co.il/2014/05/debunking-hardened-dogma-of-exaggerated.html
Hennessy ignored the 1954 Leader-Williams report on civil defence against the H-bomb, instead lists effects for the May 1953 Home Office predictions of casualties and house damage from a massive attack of 132 atomic bombs of 20 kt yield dropped on 39 British towns (CAB 134/942).  This is closer to the SLBM MIRV warhead yield today than the 10-20 MT H-bombs considered in 1954-5, which wouldn’t even fit by itself into a typical modern missile today, no matter how clever the weaponeer. Hennessy fails to make the most important point, which is the relatively few casualties per bomb, in his table on page 130, compared to Hiroshima and Nagasaki in wooden cities.  The 1953 study found that 35 Hiroshima-Nagasaki 20 kt atomic bombs would be needed to kill 422,000 people in London with WWII type civil defence evacuation of women, children and the disabled, and sheltering applied to all likely targets.  A similar total number of fatalities occurred with just 2 bombs in the Japanese wooden cities in August 1945, thereby suggesting that raw data from Hiroshima and Nagasaki exaggerates crude fatality rates by a factor of about 35/2 = 17.5, but Hennessy fails to mention this evidence for civil defence.  The total dead of 1,378,000 for the 132 nuclear weapons on 39 British towns and cities implies an average of 10,439 killed per 20 kt nuclear weapon, a very small fraction of the death toll per atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

In addition, the 132 atomic bombs study of 1953 shows that 12,326,000 houses are damaged to the point of being at least temporarily uninhabitable (17.5% of these are irreparable), in other words the 9 houses are made uninhabitable per fatality.  This signifies the relatively good survival of people compared to houses, and also the need for civil defence to set up emergency feeding, emergency shelter for the homeless refugees, etc.  Hennessy again makes no comment concerning this obvious inference.

Nigel's points--
Simply adding megatonnage without correcting for wasted vertical blast energy means that equivalent nuclear arsenals are not the equivalent of thousands of World War 2s, but only a few times the damage inflicted on Germany, Japan, Britain and France  (Possibly even less than the damage inflicted on Russia though Nigel does not state this.  If there is warning and sheltering and civil defense casualties might be 3% of those imagined) 
http://glasstone.blogspot.co.il/2014/05/debunking-hardened-dogma-of-exaggerated.html
Blast damage area equivalent megatons for destruction area and casualty comparisons (“equivalent megatonnage,” EMT) are proportional the product the the number of bombs and the 2/3 power of the yield of each bomb.  In WWII, 2.2 megatons distributed in 22 million conventional 10^-7 megaton bombs were therefore equivalent to 22,000,000(10^-7)^2/3 = 474 one megaton blast bombs, or 948 nuclear bombs each with a blast yield of 1 megaton (blast being 50% of the total energy of a nuclear explosion).  In other words, even a thousand megatons in a nuclear war would not be on a different scale to the 2.2 megatons of highly effective, dispersed small bombs in WWII.


In WWII, something like 2 megatons of TNT equivalent was dropped on Germany, but it in small bombs of about 100 kg TNT each. Since casualties or effects areas scale as the 2/3 power of yield (even fallout becomes less hazardous for higher yields because of the longer average delay time in arrival for any 1 hour reference dose rate level, allowing more decay while airborne), the 2 megatons in 20,000,000 separate 0.1 ton TNT or 10^(-7) megaton bombs has an equivalent nuclear megatonnage equal to:

20,000,000[10^(-7)]^(2/3)

= 431 separate 1 megaton bombs all dropped on cities.

That's to say, if WWII had been a nuclear war, the same destruction on Germany would have necessitated dropping 431 nuclear weapons each of 1 megaton yield on German cities.

So you see, when the proper scaling laws are applied, nuclear weapons are not so destructive. Put it another way, vague arm-waving propaganda exaggerates nuclear war to a very serious degree.


There is an immense blast collateral damage inefficiency of the nuclear bomb as compared to conventional weapons, due to the fact that blast damage areas due to peak overpressure are proportional to the two-thirds power of yield. E.g., a 1 kg TNT bomb is a thousand million times smaller in blast energy than a 1 megaton blast, but it produces equal peak overpressures over an area equal to (10-9)2/3 = 10-6 of that of a 1 megaton blast. Therefore, one million separate 1 kg TNT bombs, or 1 kiloton of TNT, is exactly equivalent to a single explosion of 1 megaton of TNT. This explains why the blast effects from a megaton bomb are approximately equal to a 1 kiloton World War II conventional bomber attack, with a hundred or more aircraft each scattering a few tons of TNT in small bombs over a large area target (so that there is little probability of severe blast area overlap, i.e. the wasteful "overkill" effect). But all nuclear weapons media propaganda ignores such facts, presenting a megaton explosion over a city as an unparalleled disaster, a thousand times worse than a large World War II . The very first edition of Glasstone's nuclear effects handbook, The Effects of Atomic Weapons, 1950, on page 57 has a section written by John von Neumann and Fredrick Reines of Los Alamos (it is attributed to them in a footnote) stating factually:

"... the structures ... have the additional complicating property of not being rigid. This means that they do not merely deflect the shock wave, but they also absorb energy from it at each reflection.

"The removal of energy from the blast in this manner decreases the shock pressure at any given distance from the point of detonation to a value somewhat below that which it would have been in the absence of dissipative objects, such as buildings."


This was removed from future editions. This isn't speculative guesswork: it's down to the conservation of energy. I emailed Dr Harold L. Brode and other experts about why it isn't included in American nuclear weapons effects manuals. Dr Brode kindly replied with some relevant and interesting facts about non-radial energy flows in Mach waves and the transfer of energy from the blast wave to flying debris (which, alas, travels slower than the supersonic shock front because the blast wind is always slower than the shock front velocity). It is true that the energy loss from the blast wave near ground level is partially offset by downward diffraction of energy from the diverging blast wave at higher altitudes. However, this downward diffraction process is not a 100% efficient compensator for energy loss, particularly for the kinetic energy of the air (the dynamic pressure or wind drag effect). The dynamic pressure (which in unobstructed desert or ocean nuclear tests makes the blast more hazardous for higher yield weapons) is an air particle effect not a wave effect so it does not diffract like a wave, and it is cut down severely when transferring its energy to building debris. Even if every house absorbs just 1% of the incident energy per unit of area incident to the blast, then the destruction of a line of 100 houses cuts the blast energy down to 0.99100 = 0.366 of what it would be over a desert surface. Basically, this chops down the collateral blast damage from large yield weapons detonated in cities and affects the usual scaling laws, making nuclear weapons even less dangerous than predicted by the textbook equations and curves.attack!


Nigel's points-- Proven measures and practical designs employed in England in the midst of shortages in 1941 could save over 90% of prospective victims.


The discovery of this table "duck and cover" effectiveness in air raids led to a revolutionary shelter design; the indoor Morrison table shelter of 1941. (For publication dates of these booklets, see T. H. O’Brien, Civil Defence, H.M. Stationery Office, 1955, pages 371 and 529.) It is the forerunner to the “inner core refuge” adopted for protection against thermal flash, blasted flying debris and fallout radiation in a nuclear war in the 1980 booklet Protect and Survive.


Above: the facts about the life-saving ability of the Morrison table shelter during aerial bombing in World War II Britain: it protects against the collapse of buildings regardless of whether that collapse is caused by TNT, a hurricane, an earthquake, or a nuclear bomb. A U.K. Government press release from November 1941,Morrison Shelters in Recent Air Raids, states:
“A report of Ministry of Home Security experts on 39 cases of bombing incidents in different parts of Britain covering all those for which full particulars are available in which Morrison shelters were involved shows how well they have stood up to severe tests of heavy bombing.

“All the incidents were serious. Many of the incidents involved direct hits on the houses concerned, a risk against which it was never claimed these shelters would afford protection. In all of them the houses in which shelters were placed were within the radius of damage by bombs; in 24 there was complete demolition of the house on the shelter.

“A hundred and nineteen people were sheltering in these ‘Morrisons’ and only four were killed. So that 115 out of 119 people were saved. Of these only 7 were seriously injured and 14 slightly injured while 94 escaped uninjured. The majority were able to leave their shelters unaided.”

The top set of instructions for building the Morrison shelter and using it as a table between air-raids are taken from the instruction manual for building the Morrison shelter, How to put up your Morrison “Table” Shelter, issued by the Ministry of Home Security, H.M. Stationery Office, March 1941(National Archives document reference HO 186/580), which states:

“The walls of most houses give good shelter from blast and splinters from a bomb falling nearby. The bomb, however, may also bring down part of the house, and additional protection from the fall of walls, floors and ceilings is therefore very essential. This is what the indoor shelter has been designed to give. Where to put it up, which floor? Ground floor if you have no basement. Basement, if you have one. ... Protect windows of the shelter room with fabric netting or cellulose film stuck to the glass (as recommended in Your Home as an Air Raid Shelter). The sides of your table shelter will not keep out small glass splinters.”


“The public outcry about conditions in the largest public shelters, often without sanitation or even lighting, and the appalling inadequacy of the over-loaded and ill-equipped rest centres for the bombed-out led to immediate improvements, but cost Sir John Anderson his job. ... His successor as Home Secretary, Herbert Morrison ...

“The growing reluctance of many people to go out of doors led the new Home Secretary to look again at the need for an indoor shelter… The result was the Morrison shelter, which resembled a large steel table … During the day it could be used as a table and at night it could, with a slight squeeze, accommodate two adults and two small children, lying down. The first were delivered in March 1941 and by the end of the war about 1,100,000 were in use, including a few two-tier models for larger families. Morrisons were supplied free to people earning up to £350 a year and were on sale at about £7 to people earning more. … the Morrison proved the most successful shelter of the war, particularly during the ‘hit and run’ and flying-bomb raids when a family had only a few seconds to get under cover. It was also a good deal easier to erect than an Anderson, and while most people remember their nights in the Anderson with horror, memories of the Morrison shelter are usually good-humoured.

“... A government leaflet, Shelter at Home, pointed out that ‘people have often been rescued from demolished houses because they had taken shelter under an ordinary table... strong enough to bear the weight of the falling bedroom floor’. I frequently worked beneath the solid oak tables in the school library during ‘imminent danger periods’ and, particularly before the arrival of the Morrison, families became accomplished at squeezing beneath the dining table during interrupted meals. ... Although the casualties were mercifully far fewer than expected, the damage to property was far greater. From September 1940 to May 1941 in London alone 1,150,000 houses were damaged ...”


- Norman Longmate, How we Lived Then - A history of everyday life during the Second World War, Pimlico, 1971.


Above: the British Mission to Japan in 1945 evaluated the nuclear explosion damage at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, producing a report called The Effects of the Atomic Bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki (linked here, 42.5 MB pdf file). The purpose of the British Mission was for ten British Home Office bomb damage scientists to directly compare the British bomb damage assessment criteria from German air raids upon British cities with conventional bombs to the effects of nuclear weapons. Page 6 states:

"Photographs in this report and elsewhere show great areas of destruction in which, rising here and there like islands, there remain reinforced concrete buildings showing few signs of external damage. There were in fact many reinforced concrete buildings in Hiroshima and a number in Nagasaki. ... These observations make it plain that reinforced concrete framed buildings can resist a bomb of the same power detonated at these heights, without employing fantastic thicknesses of concrete."



On page 8, the report finds that Japanese wood-frame houses collapsed out to a ground range of 2.0 km in Hiroshima (at this range, 50% of the wood-frame houses were subsequently burned out by the fire storm, due to the blast wave displacement of breakfast cooking charcoal braziers and flammable traditional bamboo/paper screen furnishings in the wooden houses; at 2.6 km only 10% were burned out and at 1.0 km about 90% were burned out) and 2.4 km in Nagasaki, while typical brick type British type only collapsed out to an average distance of 910 metres (at 1.6 km they were standing but irrepairably cracked, at 2.4 km they needed repair before habitation and there was minor damage from 3.2-4.0 km). Page 9 states:

"The provision of air raid shelters throughout Japan was much below European standards. ....."These observations show that the standard British shelters would have performed well against a bomb of the same power exploded at such a height. Anderson shelters [1.5 million of which were assembled in Britain by September 1939, each sleeping 6 people], properly erected and covered, would have given protection. Brick or concrete surface shelters with adequate reinforcement would have remained safe from collapse. The [indoor] Morrison shelter is [a steel table type shelter] designed only to protect its occupants from the debris load of a [collapsing] house, and this it would have done. Deep shelters such as the refuge provided by the London Underground would have given complete protection."


http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA328301


http://glasstone.blogspot.co.il/2010/03/lifeboat-analogy-to-civil-defence.html
John Newman had examined effects of fallout blown into a buildings, due to blast-broken windows, in Health Physics,vol. 13 (1967), p. 991: ‘In a particular example of a seven-storey building, the internal contamination on each floor is estimated to be 2.5% of that on the roof. This contamination, if spread uniformly over the floor, reduces the protection factor on the fifth floor from 28 to 18 and in the unexposed, uncontaminated basement from 420 to 200.’ But measured volcanic ash ingress, measured as the ratio of mass per unit area indoors to that on the roof, was under 0.6% even with the windows open and an 11-22 km/hour wind speed as reported in U.S. Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory report USNRDL-TR-953, 1965. The main gamma hazard is from a very big surrounding area, not from trivial fallout nearby! Hence, the gamma radiation that needs to be shielded is not that from fallout under your feet. Even if the roof is blown off a building, since 90% of the fallout gamma radiation dose is from direct gamma rays (not Compton effect air scattered gammas) any walls or indeed pile of rubble will shield the long range direct gamma rays which are coming to you almost horizontally. 'The Challenge - Why Home Defence?', to the Home Office 1977 Training Manual for Scientific Advisers:

'Since 1945 we have had nine wars - in Korea, Malaysia and Vietnam, between China and India, China and Russia, India and Pakistan and between the Arabs and Israelis on three occasions. We have had confrontations between East and West over Berlin, Formosa and Cuba. There have been civil wars or rebellions in no less than eleven countries and invasions or threatened invasions of another five. Whilst it is not suggested that all these incidents could have resulted in major wars, they do indicate the aptitude of mankind to resort to a forceful solution of its problems, sometimes with success. ...

'Let us consider what a nuclear attack on the United Kingdom might mean. It will be assumed that such an attack will only occur within the context of a general nuclear war which means that the UK is only one of a number of targets and probably by no means the most important. It follows that only part of the enemy's stock of weapons is destined for us. If the Warsaw Pact Nations constitute the enemy - and this is only one possible assumption - and if the enemy directs the bulk of his medium range and intermediate range weapons against targets in Western Europe behind the battle front, then Western Europe would receive about 1,000 megatons. Perhaps the UK could expect about one fifth of this, say 200 Mt. Let us assume rather arbitrarily that this would consist of 5 x 5 Mt, 40 x 2 Mt, 50 x 1 Mt and 100 x 1/2 Mt.

'An attack of this weight would cause heavy damage over about 10,000 square kilometres, moderate to heavy damage over about 50,000 square kilometres, and light damage over an additional 100,000 square kilometres. (Light damage means no more than minor damage to roofs and windows with practically no incidence of fire.) We can compare the heavy damage to that suffered by the centre of Coventry in 1940. This will amount to approximately 5% of the land area of the UK. Another 15% will suffer extensive but by no means total damage by blast and fire; another 40% will suffer superficial damage. The remaining 40% will be undamaged. In other words, four-fifths of the land area will suffer no more than minor physical damage. Of course, many of the undamaged areas would be affected by radioactive fallout but this inconvenience would diminish with the passage of time.

'Policy to meet the Threat

'The example just given of the likely severity of the attack - which is, of course, only one theoretical possibility - would still leave the greater part of the land area undamaged and more people are likely to survive than to perish. Government Home Defence policy must therefore be aimed to increase the prospects of the survivors in their stricken environment.'

'When a bomb is burst in the air the pressure wave is reflected from the ground, and since the reflected wave travells through air which has been compressed and heated by the direct wave, it tends to travel faster than, and to catch up with, the direct wave. When the reflected wave catches up with the direct wave the two join together to form what is called a Mach wave, and this accounts for a pronounced increase in range of damage.

'The duration of any particular feature of a blast wave varies approximately with the cube root of the power [power in common sense of energy release, not power in the physics definition of the rate of energy release] of the explosion. ... The familiar 500 lb. [230 kg] H.E. [high explosive] bomb of the last war contained about 1/15th of a ton of T.N.T. A nominal [20 kt] atomic bomb contains the equivalent explosive energy of 20,000 tons of T.N.T. The ratio of equivalent weights is therefore 300,000 to 1, and the ratio of the cube roots of these weights is about 70 to 1. The duration of the blast pressure from a 500 lb. bomb is about 1/100th second, so with a nominal atomic bomb it should be 0.7 seconds (actually the duration of the wave increases also with its distance from the source and at distances of 2 miles is about 1 second). Applying the same scaling law, the blast pressure from a [10 megaton] 500 x nominal bomb will last 5 seconds or more.


'These large differences in duration of the positive pressure phase for different sizes of explosion result in the mechanism of damage from an atomic or hydrogen bomb being quite different from that for an H.E. bomb. ... The ability of a suddenly applied blow to cause damage is determined both by the pressure and by its duration. In fact, it is the product of these two (known as the "impulse") which measures the damaging ability of the blast from an H.E. bomb.


'When a bomb is burst in the air the pressure wave is reflected from the ground, and since the reflected wave travells through air which has been compressed and heated by the direct wave, it tends to travel faster than, and to catch up with, the direct wave. When the reflected wave catches up with the direct wave the two join together to form what is called a Mach wave, and this accounts for a pronounced increase in range of damage.

'With the nominal [20 kt] bomb the pulse of thermal radiation from the fireball lasts for only about 1.5 seconds though most of the energy is radiated in about half a second; because it is so transient, this pulse has been called the "heat flash". With a 10 megaton bomb the thermal radiation lasts much longer and can hardly be described as a "flash"; it may persist for 20 seconds or more though most of its energy will be radiated in the first 10 seconds.



'People directly exposed to the heat flash from an air burst nominal [20 kt] bomb within 2.5 miles of ground zero would receive burns on exposed skin; even at a distance of 5 miles it would feel as though an oven door had suddenly been opened nearby. The nearer to ground zero the greater is the danger to life, and those directly exposed within 0.5 mile of ground zero [unshielded by white paper or anything opaque] would undoubtedly be killed because of serious burns, if not from other causes. Severe third degree burns (charring) would result up to about a mile, second degree burns (blistering) up to about 1.5 to 2 miles, and first degree burns (reddening) up to about 2.5 miles.

'It is relatively easy to gain protection, since [because atmospheric scattering of thermal radiation has been found to be trivial compared to absorption] one has only to be out of the direct path of the rays from the fireball. Complete protection from heat-burn could be achieved if everyone took cover [just get out of the fireball line-of-sight from windows and skylights]...

Effects of an air burst bomb on public utility services

'The effects of an air burst bomb, whether nominal or larger than nominal, on public utility services would be largely confined to damage above ground. Underground gas and water mains would be undamaged, except possibly where they were carried on bridges, or where they were fairly close to the surface and liable to damage by a collapse of neighbouring heavy masonry. Sewers too should be undamaged. Overground installations and services, such as gas holders, water pumping stations, electricity generating stations and sub-stations, overhead electricity, telephont and telegraph cables, buses and motor cars would be damaged more or less severely up to 1 mile or so from ground zero for a nominal [20 kt] bomb, and up to 8 miles for a 10 megaton bomb. Railway and tramway [street car] tracks would probably remain intact but might be affected by debris, overturned rolling-stock, adjacent fires, etc.

'It is not so easy to assess the chance of a continuing fire. A window of two square metres would let in about 10^5 calories at the 5 cal/(cm)^2 range. The heat liberated by one magnesium incendiary bomb is 30 times this and even with the incendiary bomb the chance of a continuing fire developing in a small room is only 1 in 5; in a large room it is very much less.

'Thus even if thermal radiation does fall on easily inflammable material which ignites, the chance of a continuing fire developing is still quite small. In the Birmingham and Liverpool studies, where the most generous values of fire-starting chances were used, the fraction of buildings set on fire was rarely higher than 1 in 20.

'And this is the basis of the assertion [in Nuclear Weapons] that we do not think that fire storms are likely to be started in British cities by nuclear explosions, because in each of the five raids in which fire storms occurred (four on Germany - Hamburg, Darmstadt, Kassel, Wuppertal and a "possible" in Dresden, plus Hiroshima in Japan - it may be significant that all these towns had a period of hot dry weather before the raid) the initial fire density was much nearer 1 in 2. Take Hamburg for example:

'On the night of 27/28th July 1943, by some extraordinary chance, 190 tons of bombs were dropped into one square mile of Hamburg. This square mile contained 6,000 buildings, many of which were [multistorey wooden] medieval.

'A density of greater than 70 tons/sq. mile had not been achieved before even in some of the major fire raids, and was only exceeded on a few occasions subsequently. The effect of these bombs is best shown in the following diagram, each step of which is based on sound trials and operational experience of the weapons concerned.

'102 tons of high explosive bombs dropped -> 100 fires

'88 tons of incendiary bombs dropped, of which:

'48 tons of 4 pound magnesium bombs = 27,000 bombs -> 8,000 hit buildings -> 1,600 fires

'40 tons of 30 pound gel bombs = 3,000 bombs -> 900 hit buildings -> 800 fires

'Total = 2,500 fires

'Thus almost every other building [1 in 2 buildings] was set on fire during the raid itself, and when this happens it seems that nothing can prevent the fires from joining together, engulfing the whole area and producing a fire storm (over Hamburg the column of smoke, observed from aircraft, was 1.5 miles in diameter at its base and 13,000 feet high; eyewitnesses on the ground reported that trees were uprooted by the inrushing air).

'When the density was 70 tons/square mile or less the proportion of buildings fired during the raid was about 1 in 8 or less and under these circumstances, although extensive areas were burned out, the situation was controlled, escape routes were kept open and there was no fire storm.'

'Hardening of personal transistor radios is theoretically possible and implies good design practice (e.g. shielding, bonding, earthing, filtering etc.) incorporated at the time of manufacture. Such receivers are not currently available on the popular market.'

http://glasstone.blogspot.co.il/2006/08/nuclear-weapons-1st-edition-1956-by.html

Above: the 1992 BBC broadcast attack on Herman Kahn’s civil defense facts by Adam Curtis, Pandora’s Box: To The Brink Of Eternity. The clip of Kahn saying:

"Even if you irrationally decide to go to war, that doesn't mean that you have to fight it in a wildly irrational fashion,"



is taken out of context: Kahn is referring to the lesson of Britain's decision to go to war with Hitler in September 1939. Because of the pathetic year-on-year rate of Britain's rearmament compared to Germany's after 1935, Britain was in the most feeble state to go to war at that time. Kahn's argument is Britain should rationally have decided to go to war in say 1934 and stopped Germany's illegal rearmament with minimal combat (Britain was still more powerful in 1934), or surrendered completely to the Nazi threat. By leaving war until 1939, Britain was either (1) deliberately allowing the Nazis to prepare better for war than Britain (remember that in 1939 America was neutral and there was not even any sight of lend-lease on the horizon) or (2) behaving irrationally. Britain was declaring war irrationally, having been duped by lying weapons-effects-exaggerating appeasers into not declaring war when it had a chance of winning without American help. This is the first thing you need to understand about Kahn's statement. The second thing is that even though Britain declared war at a time which was irrational (it should have done that earlier, when the ratio of British to German strength was higher), it did not fight the war in an irrational fashion, nor did Germany. Neither side immediately despatched 100% of their bombers filled with weapons of mass destruction like gas or germs to kill the other side, despite the appeasers' pre-war certainty that war would escalate instantly into mass destructions with a million casualties a month predicted in Britain.

This is Kahn's second point: even Hitler didn't immediately try to annihilate the world's population with his stockpile of mustard liquid contaminant or Nazi-discovered tabun nerve gas, of which thousands of tons were manufactured but never used by the Nazis because they didn't have enough gas masks to deal with mustard gas retaliation, owing to a rubber shortage. Kahn is following A. J. P. Taylor's The Origins of the Second World War standpoint on Hitler here; Hitler was a bigoted egotistical dictator, but so are most politicians at heart; most politicians are simply so inept that they fail to obtain enough power to corrupt them absolutely (a point long ago observed by 19th century historian Lord Action: “And remember, where you have a concentration of power in a few hands, all too frequently men with the mentality of gangsters get control. History has proven that. All power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely”). In other words, Hitler was not a unique thug; thugs are common. Taylor's point is that Hitler's 1930s propaganda was true to the extent that he was doing his best for the "Aryan" German. Hitler believed Britain wouldn't fight under any circumstances because that was what the leading British politicians and newspaper editors were saying when they exaggerated the effects of weapons and stated that Britain would be wiped out in war, so war was unthinkable. Kahn draws the lesson from this that war must never be unthinkable to the public again, if war is to be averted by unequivocal deterrence.

Curtis additionally gets the facts about Kahn wrong by claiming that Kahn's "flexible response" strategy was debunked by the Cuban missile crisis. Kahn makes it clear that "flexible response" was needed once the Soviet Union had a balance with America, not before that time. The Soviet Union was still behind America in 1962, so Kennedy could afford to promise massive retaliation in response to any missile being fired from Cuba in order to encourage Soviet caution with the missiles in Cuba. Massive retaliation would have been an empty promise if the Soviet Union had an immense stockpile of nuclear weapons in 1962. It didn't. Kahn had proposed flexible response for the late 1960s onwards.

Duck and cover simple countermeasures were ignored by Kahn


Kahn never really made the civil defense case effectively by getting to grips with the details of survival in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in different kinds of buildings, the effectiveness of "duck and cover", and the detailed scientific studies on nuclear weapons effects from tests remained Secret – Restricted Data until recent years. Politicians, policy makers, and even many nuclear weapons effect computation scientists are unaware of the vital data from Hiroshima, Nagasaki and nuclear tests  testshttp://glasstone.blogspot.co.il/2010/03/lifeboat-analogy-to-civil-defence.html


    

http://glasstone.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/russian-anti-terrorism-policing-world.html
The larger the explosion, the fewer casualties per unit energy release for similar conditions, because (1) the area of destruction scales up far less than in direct proportion to the energy released in the explosion, and additionally, (2) the larger areas of destruction for a larger explosion means an increasing average blast wave arrival time over the area of damaged buildings, therefore allowing on average more time for "duck and cover" between the flash and the blast and sound arrival.  Most blast casualties are caused by flying glass and other debris impacting on standing people who take no evasive action.  For 1 psi peak overpressure (flying glass from window breakage), at 1 ton of TNT yield (a V1 or V2 in WWII) you have only 0.4 seconds to respond to the flash before the blast arrives.  But for a tactical nuclear weapon such as neutron bomb of 1 kiloton yield you have 4 seconds to "duck and cover" which reduces collateral damage possibilities, and for a strategic nuclear weapon of 1 megaton on a silo or military command post, the public has 40 seconds to "duck and cover" before 1 psi blast arrives.  These laws of physics mean that smaller explosions cause many more casualties per unit energy than larger explosions do.  As the data table and graph above proves, there is experimental evidence to substantiate these laws of physics.  It is also easier to spend a few seconds lying flat to avoid blast winds and horizontally blasted glass fragments in a nuclear explosions, than to spend months doing so during the repeated conventional air raids, which are required to deliver the same amount of energy!  The longer duration of the blast for larger explosions blows debris further downrange, reducing the weight of material falling on simple improvised protection, such as table shelters.  Although a longer blast duration blast causes more damage to wind sensitive targets by bending tree stems and lightweight metal panels for a longer period of time, it has little effect on modern reinforced concrete buildings which require a minimum force for damage, irrespective of the duration of that force.  Likewise, a chair or rigid wall does not suddenly collapse after you apply a force to it for a certain period of time: there is no failure impulse criterion for such targets!  You must supply a force above a certain threshold for destruction to occur.  If the force (pressure multiplied by area) is below the threshold needed for destruction, no destruction will occur, regardless of the duration of the force. Propagandarists of fashionable groupthink always dismiss this evidence, and instead do a direct comparison of conventional and nuclear energy yields, as if it were valid: that is a massive exaggeration.  In addition, anti-civil defense propagandarists also deny that duck and cover becomes more credible as yield increases.  (Source: H. M. Government, Health and Safety Executive (Commission), Advisory Committee on Major Hazards, Second Report, 1979, Figure 3.)

In WWI, Britain's fired 170 million shells at German trenches, of which 1.5 million were fired in the brief barrage before the Battle of the Somme.  In 1917 alone, Britain produced 50 million shells containing 185 kilotons of explosive. In the Battle of Amiens, August 1918, the firing of 4,000,000 allied shells broke down German positions.  In a final push, devastation at a rate similar to nuclear war bombardment occurred when 943,947 shells were fired in a 24-hour period by the British Army on 28-29 September 1918,
resulting in the Armistice ending the war (source: Malcolm Pearce and Geoffrey Stewart, British political history, 1867-2001, page 296).  Altogether, from 1914-17 Britain fired 290 kilotons of high explosives in shells at German trenches:



The "equivalent megatonage" or equivalent to 1 megaton nuclear weapons, isn't just 0.29 megatons, but is immense because the area of destruction and thus casualties scale by only about the 2/3 power of energy, not directly with yield, and each average shell contained only 3.7 kg of explosive. Thus, the equivalent megatonnage of Britain's shelling in 1917 alone is:

50,000,000(3.7 x 10-9)2/3 = 120 separate 1 megaton nuclear weapons.  In the whole of WWI, the British Army fired 170 million shells, with equivalent damage to:

170,000,000(3.7 x 10-9)2/3 = 408 separate 1 megaton nuclear weapons.


(We can neglect the 50% blast partition of total yield in nuclear weapons, because that's also true for conventional explosive shells that are 50% explosive, 50% steel case by mass.)


Dr Ralph E. Lapp's 1965 book The New Priesthood (Harper, New York) on pages 113-114 gives an honest "equivalent megatonnage" comparison between conventional weapons and old high-yield megaton single warhead nuclear missiles (which have now been replaced with lower yield MIRV warheads) instead of following CND by claiming falsely that the energy equivalent of 1,000,000 tons of TNT kills the same number as a million separate tons of TNT in explosions of conventional weapons:

"A warhead for a Minuteman or Polaris missile costs about $1 million each. ... To produce damage comparable to that from a one-megaton bomb, some 8,000 'old-fashioned' bombs each containing one ton of TNT would have to be dropped uniformly over the same target area."


In other words, according to Lapp: 8 kt of conventional weapons = 1 megaton.  Using the two-thirds power of yield scaling, the equivalence is: 10 kt of small 1 ton TNT bombs = same area of damage as 1 megaton in a single bomb.  The American B-52 bomber has a payload of 32 tons, so it takes 313 sorties to drop 10 kt of TNT which (if the bombs are 1 ton each) is equivalent in damage area to a 1 megaton nuclear weapon.
 For solid direct evidence for the validity of this scaling law, whereby bigger bombs cause fewer fatalities per TNT ton of energy equivalent than smaller bombs, see the graphs linked in the earlier post here and the ease of protection against the increasingly delayed heat, fallout and blast arrival time over larger areas for bigger explosions, as proved here.  At the 1 psi peak overpressure range for shattered windows in a conventional 1 ton TNT air burst explosion, there is only 0.4 second available between the flash and the blast arrival, little longer than the blink reaction time for human beings.  Hence, for small bombs, you can do little.  But, contrary to BBC TV fiddled sound tracks on films of nuclear explosions, for a 1 kt bomb you have a full 4 seconds before 1 psi arrives, while for 1 megaton you have 40 seconds.  This effect reduces casualties.

In Vietnam, 7,662,000 tons of conventional bombs were dropped (according to Micheal Clodfelter's Vietnam in Military Statistics, 1995, page 225), which by this reckoning (10 kt of conventional bombs = 1 megaton of nuclear) is equivalent in terms of damage to a nuclear war of 766 separate 1 megaton explosions.


If you're worried that we haven't included fallout, don't worry: we didn't include the 113,000 tons of gas used in WWI in that calculation.  But seeing that gas wasn't used in WWII despite dire scare-mongering prior to the war - largely responsible for the appeasement policy that led to the war, according to Herman Kahn's analysis - there's no particular reason why nuclear weapons will be used to maximise fallout by high yield ground bursts near cities, rather than air bursts.  Likewise for the time-scale of the attack: in 1939 pundits were claiming that there would be an immediate all-out "knockout blow" lasting days, not six years of protracted war.  As Kahn argued, even a dictator like Hitler didn't fight WWII in the wildly irrational way that the consensus of expert opinion in 1939 predicted. 


 There's even less reason for a country to try to disarm itself by detonating every warhead it has within five minutes of a nuclear war starting.

Now consider WWII, where London alone received about 18.8 kilotons in roughly 188 thousand separate 100 kg explosives in the 1940 Blitz :


188,000(10-7)2/3 = 4 thermonuclear weapons, each 1 megaton.


The 1.3 megatons of conventional bombs dropped on Germany in WWII was likewise equivalent to:


13,000,000(10-7)2/3 = 280 separate thermonuclear weapons, each 1 megaton.


In total, 74.2 kilotons of conventional bombs were dropped on the UK in WWII causing 60,000 casualties, equivalent to 16 separate 1 megaton nuclear weapons, confirming the British Home Office analysis that - given cheap-type civil defence - you get about 3,750 casualties for a one megaton nuclear weapon.  Naturally, without civil defence, as in early air bombing surprise attacks or the first use of nuclear weapons against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, casualty rates can be over 100 times higher than this.  (For example, Glasstone and Dolan, in The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, 1977 point out that in Hiroshima the 50% lethal radius was only 0.12 mile for people under cover in concrete buildings, compared to 1.3 miles for those caught totally unprotected outdoors.  The difference in areas is over a factor of 100, indicating that the casualties in Hiroshima could have been reduced enormously if the people had taken cover in concrete buildings, or simple earth covered WWII shelters which offered similar protection to concrete buildings.)

About ten percent of the conventional bombs failed to detonated, creating a massive bomb disposal problem that slowed down civil defence in WWII, where the protracted air raids over many months progressively reduced shelter utilization in London, increasing the casualty rate.  In neither Britain nor Germany did the bombing of civilians lead to a clear defeat: the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey found that generally the outrage about being bombed offset the depression of morale from the devastation.  Strategic bombing of military manufacturing targets like ball bearing factories failed because the steel machine tools could easily withstand the blast and shrapnel.  Only the bombing of fuel and munition supplies (both of which will destroy themselves easily, once ignited) crucially helped to end the war: German production of aviation fuel fell from 156,000 tons in May 1944 to just 11,000 tons in January 1945, thus defeat. The point is:

Conventional weapons failed to deter two world wars, which were each the size of a substantial nuclear war (in terms of devastation and overall casualties).  Disarmament after WWI led to WWII.


If you're worried that we haven't included fallout, don't worry: we didn't include the 113,000 tons of gas used in WWI in that calculation.  But seeing that gas wasn't used in WWII despite dire scare-mongering prior to the war - largely responsible for the appeasement policy that led to the war, according to Herman Kahn's analysis - there's no particular reason why nuclear weapons will be used to maximise fallout by high yield ground bursts near cities, rather than air bursts.  

Likewise for the time-scale of the attack: in 1939 pundits were claiming that there would be an immediate all-out "knockout blow" lasting days, not six years of protracted war.  As Kahn argued, even a dictator like Hitler didn't fight WWII in the wildly irrational way that the consensus of expert opinion in 1939 predicted.  There's even less reason for a country to try to disarm itself by detonating every warhead it has within five minutes of a nuclear war starting.

Now consider WWII, where London alone received about 18.8 kilotons in roughly 188 thousand separate 100 kg explosives in the 1940 Blitz :


188,000(10-7)2/3 = 4 thermonuclear weapons, each 1 megaton.


The 1.3 megatons of conventional bombs dropped on Germany in WWII was likewise equivalent to:


13,000,000(10-7)2/3 = 280 separate thermonuclear weapons, each 1 megaton.


In total, 74.2 kilotons of conventional bombs were dropped on the UK in WWII causing 60,000 casualties, equivalent to 16 separate 1 megaton nuclear weapons, confirming the British Home Office analysis that - given cheap-type civil defence - you get about 3,750 casualties for a one megaton nuclear weapon.  Naturally, without civil defence, as in early air bombing surprise attacks or the first use of nuclear weapons against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, casualty rates can be over 100 times higher than this.  (For example, Glasstone and Dolan, in The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, 1977 point out that in Hiroshima the 50% lethal radius was only 0.12 mile for people under cover in concrete buildings, compared to 1.3 miles for those caught totally unprotected outdoors.  The difference in areas is over a factor of 100, indicating that the casualties in Hiroshima could have been reduced enormously if the people had taken cover in concrete buildings, or simple earth covered WWII shelters which offered similar protection to concrete buildings.)


About ten percent of the conventional bombs failed to detonated, creating a massive bomb disposal problem that slowed down civil defence in WWII, where the protracted air raids over many
months progressively reduced shelter utilization in London, increasing the casualty rate.  In neither Britain nor Germany did the bombing of civilians lead to a clear defeat: the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey found that generally the outrage about being bombed offset the depression of morale from the devastation.  Strategic bombing of military manufacturing targets like ball bearing factories failed because the steel machine tools could easily withstand the blast and shrapnel.  Only the bombing of fuel and munition supplies (both of which will destroy themselves easily, once ignited) crucially helped to end the war: German production of aviation fuel fell from 156,000 tons in May 1944 to just 11,000 tons in January 1945, thus defeat. The point is:

Conventional weapons failed to deter two world wars, which were each the size of a substantial nuclear war (in terms of devastation and overall casualties).  Disarmament after WWI led to WWII.

That's what you get when you don't even have a nuclear deterrent.  However, I don't see why we have to have the extremely expensive (£100 billion for a set of four) strategic nuclear Trident SLBM system.  Why not simply put some tactical (enhanced neutron) nuclear warheads on cruise missiles on our Astute class submarines (which now cost us only £747 million each) to deter Putin from sending massed tank invasions into Europe?  Then if Mr Corbyn has to press the button, he can rest assured that the 1 kiloton yield nuclear weapons at 500 m burst altitude over Mr Putin's tank column as it heads over a border will not cause any harm to civilians.  Sure, some cruise missiles might be shot down, but since Moscow has ABM, some Trident warheads will likewise be shot down.  As for Trident, where we use penetration aids like cheap decoy warheads to help the real ones get through the saturated ABM systems, we can send the neutron warhead-armed cruise missiles disguised by a salvo of non-nuclear cruise missiles (the non-nuclear warheads could contain electronic countermeasures to blind enemy radars with false signals or noise, and to target enemy missile launchers that can shoot down cruise missiles).  Some warheads will get through to do the job.
  
Note also that the widely-believed propaganda that the Spitfire and Hurricane fighter aircraft then being built were a wonderful contribution thanks to Chamberlain, is actually a lie.  Both aircraft were already obsolete compared to the German Me-109 when used in the Battle of Britain in 1940.  Thus the growing stockpile of Spitfiles in 1938 were not only outnumbered in quantity by Germany, but were also soon obsolete in quality.  Battle of Britain Tom Neil, author of Scramble, aged 95, shot down 14 German aircraft and won two DFCs in the Battle of Britain.  He has now debunked populist myths.  He joined the RAF in 1938 and was taught to fly using a 20 year old obsolete Tiger Moth so that when in 1940 when finally given charge of 249 squadron he failed in practice to hit any target flags with his first 30,000 rounds of ammunition, and then he found that German Me-109s had a larger engine than his Spitfires and could climb faster as well as higher, and also had better guns and more ammunition than Spitfires and Hurricanes. Britain won the Battle of Britain not because it had superior aircraft as hyped up wartime propaganda for the Spitfire claimed, but rather, it survived the German onslaught despite the fact that it had poorer aircraft: "We didn't win.  But we didn't lose."


Not only were Britain's Hurricane and Spitfire actually inferior to German Me-109, but they were outnumbered.  Germany had over 700 superior Me-109s and 227 Me-110s, compared to Britain's inferior 650 Hurricanes and Spitfires.  This disproves Chamberlain's claim.  It was civil defence evacuation and shelters that won the Battle of Britain when German bombers on 7 September 1940 stopped bombing RAF air fields and instead bombed cities.  By reducing casualty rates and panic, civil defence then gave the RAF the time for fighter attrition to cut the Luftwaffe down to size. 




If you liked this article, please give it a quick review on ycombinator or StumbleUpon. Thanks

Read more »
09 Feb 19:28

45 Phenomenal Email and Mobile Marketing Stats

by Tom Pick

Email remains the most effective digital marketing tool for both B2B and B2C marketers. But the majority of email activity now takes place on mobile devices, and not all marketers have effectively adapted to this rapid shift.

Those are just a couple of the findings in the nearly four dozen email and mobile marketing facts and statistics from 15 different sources compiled below. Five more key takeaways from this research:

Most popular activities on smartphones

Image credit: emailmonday

Email marketing works—for both sellers and buyers. Digital marketers rank email as their most effective marketing tactic, and say it has the highest ROI of any digital channel. It’s also the most effective digital tactic in B2B marketing, with nearly a third of B2B marketers saying it has the biggest impact on revenue. And 72% of U.S. adults prefer communication with companies to happen through email.

Personalized email subject lines: effective, but underused. For B2C emails, personalized subject lines increase the open rate by 41%, and lead to higher transaction rates and revenue per email. Yet only 35% of brands personalize their subject lines.

Mobile email marketing lags consumer adoption. Email is increasingly mobile. The number of mobile email users rose 22% last year and is projected to grow another 23% in 2016. In the second quarter of 2015, roughly two-thirds of emails were opened on mobile devices, with more than half opened on smartphones. Yet 51% have either no strategy for mobile email or only the basics for mobile email optimization in place.

Mobile advertising spending up through results are uncertain. U.S. marketers increased their spending on mobile advertising by 50% in 2015 over the previous year, and the share of budget dollars allocated to mobile marketing is projected to triple in the next three years. Yet most senior marketers say today’s mobile marketing effort perform poorly; 8 in 10 have difficulty tracking mobile ROI; and half of all clicks on mobile ads are accidental.

B2B mobile marketing growing but still small. The percentage of B2B marketing dollars devoted to mobile is expected to nearly triple by 2018but still account for only 14% of total spending. And while mobile use for B2B purchase research has jumped 91% in the past two years, more than three-quarters of global business executives still prefer to browse content on their laptops or desktops.

And now on to the 45 phenomenal email and mobile marketing stats and facts. Enjoy!

14 Email Marketing Stats and Facts

1. The number of email users worldwide is currently 2.6 billion and is expected to grow to over 2.9 billion by 2019. (MediaPost)

2. A large majority of U.S. adults — 72% — prefer communication with companies to happen through email. (MarketingSherpa)

3. Email is the only digital channel that outperforms old media standbys in terms of how consumers prefer communcations with companies — postal mail (preferred by 48%), television ads (preferred by 34%) and print media, such as magazines and newspapers, (preferred by 31%). Only 11% of people prefer mobile apps and just 7% prefer online video ads. (MarketingSherpa)

4. Email is the most effective digital marketing tactic for B2B marketers, with 31% saying it has the biggest impact on revenue. (MarketingProfs)

5. Across all age groups, email is the preferred method of commuicating with companies (with about three-quarters of consumers/buyers choosing this). However, while more than 60% of those aged 55 and older like to communicate with companies by postal mail, just 29% of millennials say the same. (MarketingSherpa)

6. Personalized email subject lines increase open rates–but the effect varies considerably across industries. Personalizing the subject line increases open rates for consumer products and services by 41%, versus 13% for B2B emails. (MarketingSherpa)

7. For consumer products and services, personalizing email subject lines also increases transaction rates by 49%, and revenue per email by 73%. (MarketingSherpa)

8. And yet–only 35% of brands personalize their email subect lines. (MarketingSherpa)

9. 46% of startups use email marketing. (TNW News)

10. Digital marketers rank email as their top marketing tactic, with 54% saying it’s their most effective channel and just 11% calling it the most difficult. Mobile marketing and SMS, however, ranked near the bottom in the same survey, with just 9% citing it as their most effective tactic while 34% viewed it as the most difficult. (TNW News)

11. Email is viewed as the most effective digital marketing tactic for customer retention purposes. But while 56% of marketers viewed email as an effective retention tactic, just 8% said the same for mobile advertising. (TNW News)

12. Direct marketers say email has the highest ROI of any marketing tactics. Mobile falls near the bottom of the list, however, below direct mail and just ahead of paid search advertising. (TNW News)

13. Asked about all the different devices they use to open and read emails, 93% of consumers use a laptop or desktop computer; 67% use a smartphone; and 42% use tablets. (Email Monday)

14. Asked why they unsubscribe from brand emails, 33% of consumers said they do so because mailings are too frequent. 24% unsubscribe because the content is repetitive and boring. (SocialTimes)

5 Mobile Marketing Stats and Facts

15. 57% of consumers will not recommend a business with a poorly designed mobile site. (Payfirma)

16. 61% of people have a better opinion of brands when they offer a good mobile experience. (Payfirma)

17. 73% of all the people on earth (5.2 billion) are mobile phone users. 40% of those (just over two billion) own smartphones. (Mary Meeker’s Internet Trends)

18. 44% of millennials use their smartphones’ camera or video functions at least daily; an astounding 87% use those features at least once per week. 76% share photos and video on social media. (Mary Meeker’s Internet Trends)

19. Mobile accounted 45% share of US organic search traffic in the first part of 2015 (based primarily on retail / B2C client data). The iPhone (18%) and iPad (12%) alone contributed a combined 30% of organic search traffic. (e-Strategy Trends)

7 Mobile Email Stats and Facts

20. Two-thirds of all U.S. emails were opened via mobile in the first quarter of last year. Half were accessed on smartphones, and 17% occurred on a tablet, with the remaining 33% being opened on your traditional desktop. (V3 Broadsuite Blog)

21. The number of mobile e-mail users is predicted to grow 22% in 2015 and 23% in 2016. (Email Monday)

22. 17% of marketers admit they have no strategy for mobile email, while 34% have the basics for mobile email optimization in place. Just 21% say they have an advanced mobile email strategy. (Email Monday)

23. A study of B2C (primarily retail) email campaigns found that in the first quarter of 2015, mobile opens (50.12%) have surpassed desktop opens (32.97%). What’s more, 36.6% of people make purchases on a desktop, while 49.3% of people make purchases on smartphones. (MarketingSherpa)

24. In the second quarter of 2015, nearly 68% of emails were opened on a mobile device, with 52% of those being opened on smartphones. The desktop saw just over 32 percent of email opens. (MarketingLand)

25. However–almost 53% of all conversions in 2Q15 were on the PC. Smartphones drove 29% of conversions and tablets 18%. (MarketingLand)

26. The iPhone is the single dominant mobile email reading device, but its users spend the least amount of time looking at individual emails. Mobile devices drive more opens but far fewer conversions (example: iPhone: 42% of opens, 18% of conversions). (MarketingLand)

8 Mobile Advertising Stats and Facts

27. The share of budget dollars spent on mobile marketing by B2B marketers is expected to nearly triple in the next three years, from 5% today to about 14%. B2C marketers plan to increase the portion of budgets spent on mobile from 8% today to about 20%–even though most senior marketers say today’s mobile marketing efforts perform poorly. (The CMO Survey)

28. Total online ad spending in the U.S. is $50 billion, of which $13 billion is spent on mobile ads. (Mary Meeker’s Internet Trends)

29. 8% of total U.S. ad spending is on mobile, though it accounts for 24% of all media consumption. Meanwhile, 18% of all ad spending is on print–which accounts for just 4% of media use. (Mary Meeker’s Internet Trends)

30. The media and entertainment industries have been aggressive with mobile marketing. Advertising on mobile devices accounted for nearly 54% percent of digital ad spending in the entertainment industry in 2015. Media brands devoted 51% of their digital advertising spending to mobile, with 51 percent. (V3 Broadsuite Blog)

31. And yet–when conducting research to help make significant business decisions, 78% of global business executives prefer to browse content on their laptop or desktop computers (vs. 7% for smartphones). (MarketingSherpa)

32. U.S. marketers increased their spending on mobile advertising by 50% over 2014 to $28.72 billion in 2015. (MediaPost)

33. Despite its projected growth, however, much of the impact of mobile marketing is still difficult to measure. Nearly eight in 10 U.S. marketers said they would increase spending on mobile if they could track return on investment (ROI) better. (MediaPost)

34. About 50% of clicks on mobile ads are accidental. (GoldSpot Media)

4 Mobile Shopping Stats and Facts

35. One in four mobile online shoppers in the US is over the age of 55. (Payfirma)

36. Mobile is projects to account for 25% of all U.S. online sales by 2017, and mobile devices will account for 30% of global retail e-commerce spending by 2018. (Payfirma)

37. 90% of those aged 18-35 have used their mobile device in store. (Payfirma)

38. Email marketing typically represents about 20% of retail traffic, and often a higher share of orders (25-30% for some retailers). While phones represent about 18% of orders, over 50% of emails are opened on phones. (MarketingSherpa)

4 Mobile Social Media Stats and Facts

39. Facebook and Twitter reported that mobile revenue in 2Q15 made up 76% and 88% of their total revenue, respectively. (MediaPost)

40. Marketers who use email in combination with social sharing can drive six times more revenue. Social sharing buttons have been shown to push click-through rates 158% higher. (MediaPost)

41. 189 million Facebook users are “mobile only.” (Cloudswave)

42. 27% of brand mentions on Twitter come from an iPhone and 18% come from an Android device. 21% come from a web browser. (Infini Datum)

3 B2B Mobile Marketing Statistics

43. 42% of B2B buying researchers use a mobile device during the B2B purchasing process. Mobile use for B2B purchase research has grown 91% in the past two years. (MediaPost)

44. 49% of B2B researchers who use their mobile devices for product research do so while at work. They’re comparing prices, reading about products, comparing feature sets and contacting retailers. They’re purchasing, too; purchase rates on mobile are up 22% in the past two years. (MediaPost)

45. 89% of B2B technology marketers say they use email to market their products. However, just 15% run mobile campaigns. (MarketingProfs)

09 Feb 19:27

4 Next Level LinkedIn Marketing Tips for SaaS Startups

by Andy Beohar

39200679_ml

LinkedIn has proven itself as one of the most effective platforms for generating leads and sales, and it’s easy to see why.

Combining all of the social connectivity features of other media platforms with a focus on users’ professional lives means being able to identify and directly connect with potential customers in positions or at companies who can use the service you offer. SaaS startups, in particular, can use LinkedIn to boost initial activity and interest, and it is a great platform for nurturing existing relationships, which is essential for SaaS companies.

Below, we share four SaaS marketing tips that startups can use to boost brand awareness and user engagement on LinkedIn and drive results:

  1. Join LinkedIn Groups

With LinkedIn, you can join groups related to your industry, which can be an effective way of both connecting with people who can use your service and determining areas for optimization. Keep in mind that LinkedIn groups aren’t the place for hard sells. We recommend making sure the content you distribute is related to industry happenings, and position yourself as someone who is a valid resource and engaged within the industry.

  1. Optimize Your Company Page
    Don’t fall into the habit of only describing your company’s functions on your page. Make content compelling and useful by explicitly stating what your company does to make a user’s life easier. Draw them in by mentioning problems your software solves, and how the ongoing service you provide will help them in the long-term.
  1. Have a Showcase Page
    LinkedIn Showcase Pages allow you to highlight your products and services individually. By creating unique Showcase Pages for elements of your business, you can target each particular product’s followers and interested parties. Particularly for SaaS companies, a Showcase Page allows you to created tailored content and distribute it directly to consumers interested in specific products and service.
  1. Maximize Your Content Production

LinkedIn is a great place to publish blog content since it makes sure that you are attracting eyes that can easily turn into conversions for your business. While it’s always a good idea to publicize your content across multiple platforms, maintaining a consistent presence on LinkedIn can help position you as thought leader within your industry. This is a great way for SaaS startups to show potential customers that you are an authority in your respected field, and that paying for your service will be well worth it.

09 Feb 19:27

Spring Clean Your Sales Approach

There’s a canal I like to run beside in the city of Ottawa that’s cleaned out twice a year. Before the winter season, the water’s drained and the litter removed so it’s smooth for ice skating. Once the spring thaw hits, the canal is flooded and more debris floats to the surface to be taken out ahead of boating weather. This cleaning process is what allows the canal to be fully enjoyed by residents and tourists alike. It’s also similar to how we run our businesses.

We all need to regularly spring clean our sales approach in order to function at our best. This means completing an inventory of how we interact with prospects and customers and getting rid of the strategies and selling tools that just aren’t working. After all, a key element of sales success is about accurately meeting the needs of our audience, which is hard to do if you’re surrounded by the clutter of outdated methods.

Here’s a Top 10 list of the most common sales issues I see when coaching and consulting clients. By spring cleaning your approach, you can avoid making mistakes that stand in the way of closing new deals and retaining great clients.

1. Continually selling to no-potential buyers

Many salespeople fall into this trap. They hold onto a long list of poor-quality leads in their pipeline simply because they believe there’s safety to be gained with padded numbers. But bad leads will always be bad leads and will only suck time and resources out of your day. Either you qualify them in your pipeline, or you spring clean and send that list of bad leads to the garbage bin.  

2. Sounding like a skipping record with old testimonials and references

Your testimonials must be current, compelling and credible! Prospects want to know if your products and services work in today’s marketplace — not the one from five or 10 years ago. This point applies similarly to references. You can’t reinforce your “social proof” in the eyes of prospects if your references can’t be reached, are retired, or simply shouldn’t be references at all. Case in point for that last item? Years ago I was with a company that sold software to Enron (very legally.) They were a great customer to work with at that time. Obviously, however, I couldn’t use them as a reference today!

So, the moral of the story? Find new references from your current clients. And do it regularly.

3. Appearing too ‘scripted” on calls

Be objective. Are you using “salesy” sounding language in your script? Do you resemble a radio ad or a telemarketer? Are you talking more than listening on your first call to a prospect? If you answered “yes” to any one of these three questions, you need to spring clean your approach and start over. By all means practice and know what to say to potential buyers, but make sure it becomes internalized so you can then focus on personalizing the dialogue for each prospect.

4. Not creating a buying vision

Effective sales conversations need to emphasize the results your buyer is looking for. Make sure these discussions utilize real-life success stories, case studies and business-use situations that create a vision for your customer of how your solution will be implemented successfully in their company. And, as mentioned in Number 2, spring clean the older materials and replace them with current examples.

5. Choosing only one marketing channel to reach customers

To get attention and be memorable in the eyes of prospects and clients, you need to implement an omni-media approach. As I discussed in Nonstop Sales Boom, you should spring clean your old methods and aim to be ubiquitous. From websites to social media, from paper-based marketing to face-to-face meetings, invest time in ensuring your message is loud and clear across a number of platforms. Each marketing channel is capable of contributing something unique to the buying experience of your customers.

6. Using cold calls as your primary lead source

You should shake your head about this one! Last year, only 3 percent of all sales were closed from cold calls. The other 97 percent? Those came from a range of sources, including client referrals, web inquiries, whitepaper/trial downloads, and live chat conversations. Spring clean your cold-call approach as your top lead generator. There are field-tested alternatives out there (including the ones I’ve mentioned) that will yield much better returns in less time.

7. Caving when your client wants a lower price

Trash this approach! Instead, emphasize the value of what you offer to your customer and provide options rather than discounts. Also, position yourself uniquely in the market so you have less direct competition.

8. Depending on your client for referrals

Asking clients, “Who do you know?” in order to score referrals should be scrapped immediately. That question almost always yields disappointing results because it’s not specific enough and puts the onus on the customer to do all the work. That’s why the most common answer you’ll hear is: “No one comes to mind right now, but let me think about it and get back to you.” Guess what? You’ll almost never hear from them again. Instead, try this approach:

“I would like to meet Randy Smith at the XYZ Company. Can you help me with an introduction?”

Or:

“I’d love to meet your VP of Sales. Can you help me with an introduction?”

And here’s one more winning approach:

“I’m going to be calling Randy Smith at the XYZ Company this week. Can I tell him we’re doing great business together?”

9. Ignoring your leads

In my experience, I’ve found the vast majority of sales leads aren’t ready to close until there have been as many as seven follow-ups. If you regularly make fewer attempts to touch base with potential buyers, spring clean this approach. Instead, increase follow-ups by investing in the ubiquitous, omni-media approach mentioned in Number 5. Keep track of every attempt with CRM software or at least a spreadsheet. Skip relying on just sticky notes or Outlook!  

10. Being unfocused

A few years ago, some salespeople could manage to eek out a living while being lazy — just sitting by the phone and waiting to take orders. In today’s economy, however, the only way to succeed is by being disciplined in how you work. It’s time to toss out those days without any scheduling and replace them with structured business hours in which prospect development and client contact are top priorities. Fill those empty blocks on your calendar with activities to build up your prospecting pipeline.

If you’ve been using any of the Top 10 poor selling strategies above, the chances are good your results are suffering. In today’s economy, what was five years ago no longer works. Sure, this message is a dose of tough love, but it’s necessary.

Make a decision right now to spring clean the methods that aren’t working for you. You can’t afford to be trapped any longer by a pile of business habits that prevent prospects from becoming customers — and new customers from becoming repeat ones! Look objectively at how you work and choose three things you can change right now. Down the road, when you measure your results, you’ll find you’ve generated a rather tidy new profit!

 

09 Feb 19:26

Guest Expert: Magnolia’s Dominik Steinacher on 5 Ways to Use Content to Create Leads and Increase Sales

How relevant is the content you provide to your customers? How much impact does your content have on your overall business model? These two questions should be on the mind of all savvy digital marketers, especially as content continues to be a driving factor in creating potential leads and prospects. With increased emphasis being placed on content, how can you ensure you're producing content th...