Read more of this story at Slashdot.
firehose
Shared posts
Apple and Nokia Outraged That Samsung Lawyers Leaked Patent License Terms
'I Quit' Girl Lands Job Offer from Queen Latifa
Ministry’s Al Jourgensen co-creating comic ‘The Devil’s Chord’
Captain America in a turban - Salon.com
EnlargeA photo of the author (Credit: Fiona Aboud)
I settled on a rock in Central Park, the New York skyline behind me. A glassy new skyscraper neared completion in its stretch toward the skies. I was striking a few poses in my superhero costume when a young boy perched higher on a rock chimed in.
“Captain America does not have a turban and beard,” he said. He had a child’s curious tone. No malevolence.
“Why not?” I asked him. “I was born here. We could have a new Captain America who is Sikh or black or Hispanic.”
He thought about this. Finally, he conceded that yes, maybe a black or Hispanic Captain America would be OK. But his brain couldn’t make sense of it: Captain America in a turban? Captain America in a beard? He’d never conceived of such a thing before.
That’s exactly what brought me to this park on a beautiful summer day. To make fresh neural connections in our collective consciousness. To leave a new image on the hard drive of that boy’s mind.

The idea originated with Fiona Aboud, a photographer based in New York City. For seven years she has traveled the country capturing stills for “Sikhs: An American Portrait” project. I’m an editorial cartoonist, who has been documenting the thrills and travails of real-life Sikhs in the aftermath of 9/11 through illustrations made on my computer touch pad. One of those cartoons, created for my first trip to Comic-Con, featured a turbaned and bearded Captain America. It made a three-dimensional spark in Fiona’s imagination.
I was going to be Captain America for a day on the streets of the Big Apple.
Ex-NSA chief jokes about putting Snowden on a hit list, advocates “targeted killings”
A former National Security Agency director joked at a cybersecurity conference on Thursday that NSA-leaker Edward Snowden should be put on a kill list rather than a human rights award list.
"I must admit, in my darker moment[s] over the past several months, I'd also thought of nominating Mr. Snowden, but it was for a different list," Gen. Michael Hayden said at the Washington Post-sponsored event, according to The Hill.
Hayden later fielded a question about an upcoming investigation by journalists Glenn Greenwald and Jeremy Scahill into alleged NSA involvement with assassinations. He dismissed the idea and said that while the US does not conduct assassinations, it does conduct “targeted killings.”
Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments
8-year-old gets sexist kids' books yanked from bookstore
firehosevia multitasksuicide

Constance Cooper sez, "My 8-year-old daughter spotted some incredibly sexist kids' books in a bookstore, and got them removed by the management. Warning: looking at the section headings of the books may raise your blood pressure."
For boys:
Warning!
How to Survive a Shark Attack
How to Survive in a Forest
How to Survive Frostbite
How to Survive a Plane Crash
How to Survive in a Desert
How to Avoid a Polar Bear Attack
How to Survive a Flash Flood
How to Treat a Broken Leg
How to Survive an Earthquake
How to Survive a Forest Fire
How to Survive in a Whiteout
How to Survive a Zombie Invasion
How to Survive a Snake Bite
How to Survive If Your Parachute Fails
How to Survive a Croc Attack
How to Survive a Lightning Strike
How to Survive a T-Rex
How to Survive Whitewater Rapids
How to Survive a Sinking Ship
How to Survive a Vampire Attack
How to Survive an Avalanche
How to Survive a Tornado
How to Survive Quicksand
How to Survive a Fall
How to Survive a Swarm of Bees
How to Survive in SpaceFor girls:
Warning!
How to Survive a BFF Fight
How to Survive Football Trials
How to Survive a Breakout
How to Show You're Sorry
How to Have the Best Sleepover Ever
How to Look Your Best for a Party
How to Survive Siblings
Scary Survival Dos and Don'ts
How to Handle Becoming Rich
How to Keep Stuff Secret
How to Survive Tests
How to Survive Shyness
How to Handle Sudden Stardom
More Stardom Survival Tips
How to Survive a Camping Trip
How to Survive a Fashion Disaster
How to Teach Your Cat to Sit
How to Turn a No into a Yes
Top Tips for Speech-making
How to Survive Embarrassment
How to Create a Diversion
How to Survive a Crush
Seaside Survival
How to Soothe Sunburn
How to Pick Perfect Sunglasses
Surviving a Zombie Attack
How to Spot a Frenemy
Brilliant Boredom Busters
How to Survive Truth or Dare
How to Beat Bullies
How to Be a Brilliant Baby-Sitter
How my 8-year-old daughter got some sexist kids' books yanked from the bookstore (Thanks, Constance!) ![]()
TV: Newswire: John Mulaney's comedy pilot saved by Fox, given six-episode order
firehosea fate worse than not being picked up: getting picked up on the bound by fox
'First, the pilot script was rewritten at Fox’s request. Second— and unfortunately—both Elliott Gould and Nasim Pedrad are no longer attached.'

Mulaney, the rejected comedy pilot written by and starring John Mulaney, has been saved. NBC developed and passed on the Lorne Michaels-produced series earlier this year, but now Fox has picked it up and given it a six-episode series order.
A couple of changes have been made since NBC passed on the show. First, the pilot script was rewritten at Fox’s request. Second— and unfortunately—both Elliott Gould and Nasim Pedrad are no longer attached. Pedrad was going to leave SNL if the show was picked up by NBC, but it now looks unlikely that she’ll be able to get out of her contract there in time. Gould was to play Mulaney’s gay neighbor, but he’s apparently (and understandably) already made other commitments.
On a more upbeat note, both Mulaney and Martin Short are still on board. Mulaney will write, executive produce, and play a New ...
Read moreDrone reportedly plummets dozens of stories and crash lands on busy Manhattan streets
firehose'The Verge contacted FAA spokesman Les Dorr, but reached the following voicemail message: "I am out of the office due to a lapse in funding. Please call back after news reports advise a resumption of services for all federal agencies." '
A businessman walking through the East Side of Manhattan Monday was startled when a three pound helicopter drone crash landed a few feet from him. The man recovered a memory card from the downed craft
and passed it along to a local ABC News station, which broke the story of the accident this afternoon.
The man, concerned that he could have been injured by the falling drone, contacted local police, who told him that no law had been broken and did not pursue the pilot. FAA rules state, however, that hobbyist drones must fly below 400 feet and keep away from airports and heavily populated areas like city streets. The Verge contacted FAA spokesman Les Dorr, but reached the following voicemail message: "I am out of the office due to a lapse in funding. Please call back after news reports advise a resumption of services for all federal agencies."
Chris Anderson, founder of the drone company 3D Robotics and the online community for enthusiasts, DIY Drones, confirmed that this kind of flight was illegal. "The FAA has very clear guidelines on this, and such flying over built up areas is clearly in violation of those rules (and has been for decades)," said Anderson. "One of the things we created DIY Drones for was to inform people about such regulations and principles of responsible flight. But clearly the message needs to get out better."
The Verge has also reached out the NYPD for comment.
Comics Alliance Recaps 'Agents of SHIELD' Ep. 1.02: "0-8-4″ [Spoilers]
firehose"Camille throws the SHIELD agents to their deaths and shoots Coulson in the head.
No, she doesn’t! That would be an extraordinary thing to do."

Agents of SHIELD made a big splash last week. Indeed, it was the biggest network drama debut in four years. This was no doubt in large part thanks to the good will generated by Marvel’s blockbuster movies like Iron man and Thor. Unfortunately, despite the presence of Avengers writer/director Joss Whedon on the pilot, the episode could not match the confidence, charm or quality of the movies. We’re now two episodes in and forced to ask; can a show set in a superhero universe work without superheroes?
SPOILER WARNING.
The good news is, the second episode was an improvement over the first. The bad news is, it wasn’t a huge improvement. The show is still coasting on the audience’s affection for the movies rather than roaring on the strength of its own team. The characters are developing, but the Whedonesque dialogue still feels awkward on their lips, and aside from fan-favorite Coulson (Clark Gregg), none of them have the easy likeability of a Robert Downey, Jr.’s Tony Stark smirk or a Chris Hemsworth’s Asgardian bicep.

And the show’s cheap look continues to be an obstacle. There’s a shot in this episode of a plane landing that looks straight out of an episode of Gerry Anderson’s 1960s models-and-marionettes show Thunderbirds. Maybe it’s a tribute? Thunderbirds is this show’s clear cultural ancestor, after all.
Most of this episode takes place on the SHIELD plane, which means we’re going straight to a “bottle episode” — an episode shot on limited sets with limited guest stars. These are famously used to keep a show’s budget down, and one has to wonder if Agents of SHIELD’s parsimony is a bad sign. Surely a show spinning out of one of Avengers, one of the most successful movies ever made, was as safe a bet as a show could be? Is Marvel/ABC saving the budget for guest stars, like the one that made a cameo appearance in this episode?
More on that later; for now, let’s get to the recap proper.
“0-8-4″ opens with a flash-forward to events later in the episode, which is usually a sure sign that the story will take its merry time establishing stakes. The SHIELD wingy-carrier is heading for something called “The Slingshot” when it gets a hole blown in the side. Someone falls out, and Coulson looks likely to follow. Anyone who has seen Iron Man 3 (so, everyone) probably crosses their fingers at this point and waits for Tony Stark to show up.
That is not what happens. What happens is, we go back nine hours earlier (or one week earlier), picking up largely where we left off at the end of last episode. Skye (Chloe Bennett), the information-must-be-free hacker who seems singularly unsuited to being part of a covert information-must-be-controlled organization, is joining up with her moving boxes of crap, while Agent Ward (Brett Dalton) pouts about how unsuited she is. People talk a lot about Ward’s frowns in this episode, but those lips really only pout.

His clingy T-shirts and razor cheekbones aside, Ward is shaping up to be a bit of a drag, so I’m sad to say I completely agree with his incomprehension at the made-for-TV contrivance of Skye’s recruitment. Remember Coulson from the movies, who was the uptight foil to the likes of Iron Man and Thor? Whatever happened to him in magical Tahiti must have really made him relax, because that guy would surely never have brought Skye on-board.
Melinda May (Ming-Na Wen) also has objections to Skye’s presence, largely founded in the fact that she’s not combat-ready. This is a very good point, because May has pointedly said she doesn’t want to go back into combat, and Coulson doesn’t seem like he’s there to throw punches, so this is a specialist team that’s designed to only have one fighter. As we’ll learn later, the only people on this plane are these six people – they don’t even have any redshirts. Add all of this to the list of Coulson’s logistical implausibilities.
While Skye settles in to her tiny bunk in the beige-and-pleather student union decor of the wingy-carrier, the team flies to Peru to investigate an 0-8-4, “an object of unknown origin.” Coulson notes that the last one was “a hammer,” i.e. Thor’s hammer from the first Thor movie. One suspects there were in fact others following the events of The Avengers, but Coulson was dead, so, what does he know?
Peru — seen here as a dusty Los Angeles backlot and a green screen ziggarut — is home to an anachronistic discovery, a box with some lights and dials glued to it. Cheerful female nerd Simmons (Elizabeth Henstridge) suggests the item has been here for 1,500 years, but don’t expect an appearance by Kang the Conqueror. The capacious wide-beamed dig site looks like a storage locker rather than an ancient temple. If the agents are looking for anomalies, they might want to review the entire set.
Outside, Ward and May fight soldier dudes led by one Camilla Reyes (Leonor Varela), who appears to be one of Coulson’s former colleagues-with-benefits. That leads to a swift détente, but their problems aren’t over. There are rebels in the area, which Skye thinks is just awesome and Ward thinks is just terrible, and we all know this will lead them to make out at some point because nothing says sexual tension like disputes over Peruvian mining policies.
The rebels obediently show up when invoked, so Ward uses a fancy stick-in-the-ground device to knock the baddies off their feet. Aside from this one glimpse of flashy CGI, this is mostly an old-fashioned TV gun fight, with people standing back to back and going pew-pew-pew.
The SHIELD team and Camilla’s police dudes retreat to the big plane with macguffin in tow, and at this point there is essentially no more conflict driving the story so we’re told that the macguffin is very dangerous (and similar to the HYDRA tech from the Captain America movie) and everyone bickers. Sure, it’s obvious that the Peruvians are going to try to take the macguffin, because what else could possibly happen? But otherwise we’ve entered a bit of a dead zone in the episode. We’re really here to establish the interpersonal dynamics of the team, thus, everyone gets put in a box together.
Here are the interpersonal dynamics of the team: Ward is a hard-bitten loner who only looks like an underwear model, and he hates teams. Boo, teams! Fitz and Simmons are smart but insular nerds who don’t like being shot at. Boo, being shot at! Skye is a rebel who speaks truth to power, and she doesn’t like authority. Boo, the man! May is mysterious and doesn’t like people pointing out that she can kick all their asses. Boo… competence?

Skye and Ward try to work out their problems over booze. They talk some more about Peruvian social activism, which should obviously lead to hot rumpy-pumpy in an awkwardly small glass-walled bunk. A great day for “Skyward” fans (apparently that’s what those viewers are calling their “ship.” I’m on Tumblr. I know stuff.).
Coulson doesn’t have to hook up in a capsule because he’s lured Camille into his exotic boudoir of spy nostalgia. Sadly he doesn’t get lucky, and not because she found his weird collection of blood-spattered inspirational trading cards. Instead it turns out that, for the third time this episode, there’s a spontaneous outbreak of soldiers. Thus Camille’s dudes take control of the plane and the macguffin. Coulson asks when she decided to betray him, and she says it was “the moment I saw your team.” I’m not sure if she means that they’re too incompetent to be trusted, or if they’re just incompetent enough for her to take them down, but either way she thinks they’re incompetent. Team building is the theme and purpose of the episode.
Camille throws the SHIELD agents to their deaths and shoots Coulson in the head.
No, she doesn’t! That would be an extraordinary thing to do. She’s a police officer, not a super villain. Don’t get me wrong; the show could use a super villain. If Camille turned out to be Madame Hydra, I’d be doing backflips. Except, I wouldn’t, because Leonor Varela is not a nuanced performer, and I’m not nearly nimble enough to do backflips. But I would love to have Madame Hydra on this show, or, indeed, any super anything.
Despite the fact that there is no reason we should expect Camille and her people to coldly execute everyone, we’re given horrifically clunky expository dialogue to explain why she didn’t coldly execute everyone. “The reason I’m still alive is because you need me to verify the change of routes for your pilot when HQ calls in any minute now,” Coulson tells us, unprompted. Have we really reached the point where audiences can’t conceive of a villain who isn’t also gratuitously psychotic?
Meanwhile, in the cargo hold, the team bond over their imminent and unlikely demise. Agent Ward confronts his hatred of teamwork, Fitz and Simmons confront their fear of being shot at, and Agent May overcomes her hatred of… her own competence? It’s all very tidy. Even Skye manages to resist the urge to decry everyone else as tools of military-industrial complex, which is quite generous considering that they actually are.
This brings us up-to-date with the opening scene, as we discover that the thing that created the hole in the side of the plane in the beginning of the episode was the macguffin, deployed by Fitz and Simmons and their Snow White-themed heli-droids. Considering the macguffin is supposed to be fearsomely powerful, it’s a little sad that it’s just a laser gun. It didn’t even time travel! It just shot itself through a wall to get itself trapped in the ziggarut!

None of our heroes get sucked out of the hole in the side of the plane. Skye implausibly saves the day by blocking the hole with an inflatable life raft whose existence she discovered via the safety placard given to her before takeoff. This is the sort of solution that, even if Mythbusters told me it could work, even if Neil deGrasse Tyson assured me that the life raft wouldn’t just get sucked out, it would still feel so ridiculous that I’d refuse to buy it.
In the aftermath, Ward decides to train Skye as an asset, which is surely a euphemism. SHIELD shoots the macguffin into the sun, and everyone has a beer. Teamwork!
But Skye gets a text message from her hacker buddies asking for an update, and she tells them she’s “in,” And she looks unhappy about it. Conflict. After last episode I’d sort of assumed the hacker group was just Skye and her van. Maybe the text message came from her van? Maybe her van is Ultron?
That’s the end of the episode! But not really! The publicity has told us to stick around for the final scene of every episode (which is a thing I’ve been trained to do already by watching other television shows), and heavy hints were dropped that we should expect a Nick Fury cameo, because the whole point of a “surprise” like this is not actually to surprise us, but to ruin the surprise to stop us turning over.

So, yeah, Nick Fury (Samuel L Jackson) shows up and cracks some jokes about how in the span of two episodes Coulson has destroyed a very expensive set aeroplane. It’s pretty funny. It also serves to remind us that the show could be a whole lot bigger and broader and slicker. And assuming ABC/Marvel can’t afford to get Jackson back regularly, the show may have shot that bolt too early. I’m not expecting any of the Avengers to make an appearance so this may be the biggest cameo they land. Mind you, getting Robert Downey, Jr. to voice-over a CGI Iron Man wouldn’t be too tricky, and Jackson could come back. Anyone familiar with his IMDB page knows that he really does not discriminate against paychecks. Alternatively, appearances in Agents of SHIELD may already be covered by whatever existing deals these performers have made with Marvel, which would obviously be ideal.
Two episodes in, and Agents of SHIELD shows some signs of growth, but it’s not there yet. Not slick enough. Not nerdy enough. The audience that’s watching the show for the Avengers is going to shrink every week if the show can’t convert them into people who just want to watch Agents of SHIELD on its own merits. Bluntly speaking, it needs more merits. It needs the confidence to be as big and bold as a show set in a superhero universe can be.
Maybe next week?
Credit where it’s due:
“0-8-4″ was directed by David Straiton and written by Maurissa Tancharoen, Jed Whedon and Jeffrey Bell.
SHIELD, Nick Fury and HYDRA were created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. Captain America was created by Joe Simon and Jack Kirby. Iron Man was created by Stan Lee, Larry Leiber, Don Heck and Jack Kirby. The Marvel versions of Mjolnir and Asgard were created by Stan Lee, Larry Lieber and Jack Kirby. The Chitauri were created by Bryan Hitch and Mark Millar, based on the Skrulls created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. Tesseract technology is based on the Cosmic Cube, also created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. Phil Coulson was created by Mark Fergus, Hawk Ostby, Art Marcum and Matt Holloway for the movie Iron Man.
What your beer says about you
firehosewhat your beer says about you: you want to get drunk, but you also want to eat a loaf of bread while drinking seltzer
TV: Newswire: Ratings Roundup: Second episode of Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D. garners modest ratings, confirming it is indeed a Joss Whedon show

A Nick Fury cameo, anticipation for Thor: The Dark World, and the world-conquering success of The Avengers can’t disguise the simple facts about Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D.: It’s still a Joss Whedon show (Joss Whedon adjacent, at least), and by Nielsens’ Law of Transitive Ratings, it must therefore receive poor to middling ratings. Sure, 8.4 million total viewers and a 3.1 rating in the key demographic is nothing to sneeze at—for those kinds of numbers, Dads would… well, do something more demeaning than what Dads is already doing—but that rating among adults under 50 does represent a 34 percent drop from the show’s premiere. Of course, that number could always grow with the help of DVR, video-on-demand, and online viewings—five days after its debut, ABC estimated that 22.1 million people had watched the show’s premiere, which ...
Read moreMusic: Newswire: Paris Hilton slurs in a pool and Lil Wayne raps about butts and that's a song
firehosefuck Wayne

Earlier this year it was announced that Cash Money Records had signed former search engine result Paris Hilton, news that—in addition to the signing of, and subsequent releasing of a song and video by, Limp Bizkit—suggests that Cash Money Records is dying of cancer, and is determined to do as much evil as it can in the short time it has left.
Today came the first volley in that malevolent campaign in the form of a video teaser for “Good Time,” a song in which the wealthy bikini person writhes around in a pool of what is presumably some sort of fruit-flavored vodka, with the Red Bull Nymph asking repeatedly in her robot voice whether you’re having a good time at her glowstick-and-inflatable-dolphin party—because she’s having a good time, beep boop 1010101. She’s also feeling a bit tipsy, but that’s okay, because you ...
Read moreBOOM! Studios & 20th Century Fox Ink Deal By Which Comics Creators Earn Percentage Of First-Dollar Gross
firehosewow, what

20th Century Fox and BOOM! Studios have agreed to a first-look deal that guarantees creators will see a large percentage of any monies taken in from projects based on their work. Under the deal, BOOM! will get an unspecified amount of first-dollar gross (or box office, minus the split with cinemas) on movies adapted from its properties, which means the company gets a piece of the pie whether the movie ultimately makes a profit or not. Those earnings will be split 50-50 between the publisher and creators.
BOOM! CEO Ross Richie and Vice President of Development Stephen Christy — who served as editor-in-chief at Archaia, a graphic novel publisher BOOM! recently acquired — will serve as producers on all movie projects at Fox. Richie was a producer on Fox’s 2 Guns, a sleeper hit based on a BOOM! comic book created by Steven Grant and Mateus Santolouco, and Archaia had several projects in the works at Fox even prior to the BOOM! acquisition, including one based on Royden Lepp’s Rust.
“In an era where Jack Kirby doesn’t get paid for The Avengers, we are bringing the Jack Kirbys into the circle,” Richie told The Hollywood Reporter, likely referring more specifically to the Avengers litigation involving the heirs of Jack Kirby, since Kirby himself passed away in the 1990s.
Beyond the first-look and first-dollar deal, BOOM! will have free rein to go through Fox’s back catalog and reboot films as comics series — though certainly some Fox franchises such as Marvel’s X-Men won’t be available. The Alien and Predator licenses have been with Dark Horse for decades, and this deal may or may not speak to that. But if such film-to-comics projects do lead to new films, BOOM! will serve as a producer on those as well.
There is a belief among some Hollywood insiders that an “umbrella” situation like that of BOOM! Studios’ — where a single corporate entity owns or co-owns and manages the media rights of numerous comic books on behalf of creators — is a more attractive business partnership than dealing with disparate creators, co-creators and their occasionally arcane rights situations. The Hollywood Reporter specifically identifies Image Comics in this regard, saying, “Image Comics is a powerful force in the industry (it publishes The Walking Dead, among others), [but] the creators of its titles own their respective rights and there is no central hub to deal with, giving rights acquisitions an a la carte feel.”
There is of course a long-running discussion about the pros and cons of different creator ownership models within the comics industry with respect to major media exploitation, and the BOOM!/Fox deal with be sure to add fuel to that ongoing debate.
Not every first-look deal has worked out, of course. Dark Horse Comics had a first-look arrangement with Universal, which resulted in exactly one movie: R.I.P.D., which may have been the biggest flop of the summer. That deal has since expired.
The latest BOOM! Studios project to be in development at Fox (as a TV show) is Unthinkable, a spy/terrorism book created by Mark Sable and drawn by Julian Totinoer. BOOM!’s previous Hollywood deal was for Day Men not at Fox but at Universal, with whom the publisher does not have such an innovative deal but whose creators told CA they were satisfied with their arrangement.
Voyager 1 May Be Caught Inside an Interstellar Flux Transfer Event
firehoseVoyager keeps leaving the solar system beat
update: "If so, Voyager 1 hasn't yet left the Solar System after all"
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
PSA: Fox Tower Now Has Booze
firehoseeven the chain theaters

Here's what I saw this afternoon when entering downtown's Fox Tower 10 theater for a press screening of All Is Lost:
Back in May, we reported on the possibility of this happening, and the results, at least as far as selection goes, aren't bad—it's nice to see Regal Cinemas going for a couple of regional options on there. Unsurprisingly, the prices are in line with what you'd expect to pay at a Regal concession stand: Once you've shown your ID and been given a fluorescent orange wristband, you'll be paying $6 or $6.50 for a 12-ounce beer or $9 for a five-ounce wine.
Because I'm a sucker and because all I had for breakfast was a bagel Marjorie was kind enough to give me, I sprung for a liquid lunch of Guinness, and I was glad I did, because hey! Guess what movie about an old man slowly dying while all alone in the middle of the ocean makes you want to drink? All Is Lost!
The Honest Guide To The Craft Beer At Your Local Bar
firehoseperfect
Hands-on with Google’s latest acquisition: Flutter, a webcam gesture app
firehoseeverything is always watching beat
A company called Flutter has just announced that it has been purchased by Google. Flutter is a simple Windows and Mac OSX app that lets you control popular media players through a webcam. Just put your hand up to stop the media playback, or point your thumb right for "next" and left for "previous." It seems that few people had heard of Flutter (yours truly included) until Google took the company under its wing, but luckily the app is still available for download, so we snagged it and gave it a quick test. (video link) The app works fantastically well, and hand gesture detection is near-instant. It works with iTunes, Spotify, Rdio, VLC, Keynote, Winamp, Windows Media Player, and, with a Chrome extension, Youtube, Netflix, Pandora, and Grooveshark. Considering the length of that compatibility list, we suspect it's converting your hand signals into the standard media controls that adorn many keyboards. The homepage of the Flutter website has been replaced with the buyout message, but the original page is still up at https://flutterapp.com/home/. Navneet Dalal, Flutter's CEO, wrote to the company's users today:
When we started three years ago, our dream to build a ubiquitous and power-efficient gesture recognition technology was considered by many as just "a dream," not a real possibility. Since then, we have strived to build the best machine vision algorithms and a delightful user experience. Even after we launched our first app, we didn’t stop our research; your enthusiasm and support pushed us to continue to do better. We're inspired every day when we hear, for example, that Flutter makes you feel like a superhero—because any sufficiently advanced technology should be indistinguishable from magic, right? Today, we are thrilled to announce that we will be continuing our research at Google. We share Google’s passion for 10x thinking, and we’re excited to add their rocket fuel to our journey. We’d like to extend a special thank you to all of our users; your feedback and evangelism inspire us every day. Flutter users will be able to continue to use the app, and stay tuned for future updates.
The next question is, what will Google do with a webcam gesture app? The most obvious choice is that it will integrate the functionality into Chromebooks or Chrome itself. Flutter's hand gesture recognition could be a big differentiator and would keep the company a step ahead of the OEMs that are working to integrate Leap Motion's more frustrating hand gesture technology. With zero extra hardware required, it's much cheaper than Leap technology, too. Using Flutter's capabilities in Android could be another path for Google. Currently, Samsung has a similar feature in its smartphones called "Air Gesture," which lets you accept calls, switch music tracks, flip through pictures, and turn the screen on, all through gestures performed in front of the front-facing camera. If you're interested, you can try the latest edition to the Google Hivemind for yourself. The download is still up on Flutter's Web page.
Read on Ars Technica | Comments
Here Is The Short GOP Quote That Perfectly Defines The Shutdown
firehose“We’re not going to be disrespected,” conservative Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., [told the Washington Examiner]. “We have to get something out of this. And I don’t know what that even is.”
Silk Road Collected 9.5 Million Bitcoin - And Only 11.75 Million Exist
Tesla stock dips after video of burning Model S hits YouTube
firehoselol
Tesla investors displayed a bit of doubt on Wednesday, driving stock down after a YouTube video of its popular Model S sedan on fire circulated online. The video, shot near Seattle, marks the first time that a Model S has caught on fire, but Washington State Patrol told the Associated Press that the fire wasn't started by the car itself. Instead, the car seen in the video, which was first reported by Jalopnik, collided with some debris on Washington's Route 167 on Tuesday morning. The debris triggered the fire, but troopers were unable to locate the debris after the accident, State Patrol said. There were no injuries in the accident and the fire was contained to the front of the all-electric vehicle. Still, Tesla's stock took a 6.24 percent dip, falling $12.05 a share to a closing price of $180.95.
However, the stock decline is relatively minor — Tesla stock has jumped up more than 400 percent since the beginning of the year. Still, some investors are jittery at the sight of a burning electric car. For it's part, Tesla told Jalopnik that the Model S reacted to a Tesla says the Model S didn't start the fire
collision with a "large metal object" just as it was supposed to. "The car’s alert system signaled a problem and instructed the driver to pull over safely, which he did," Tesla explained. "No one was injured, and the sole occupant had sufficient time to exit the vehicle safely and call the authorities. Subsequently, a fire caused by the substantial damage sustained during the collision was contained to the front of the vehicle thanks to the design and construction of the vehicle and battery pack."
Tesla, of course, isn't the first car company to see one of its models go up in flames. Last year, General Motors was the subject of a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) investigation after one of a Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid caught on fire during a routine test crash. GM found that the cause of the fire was a battery pack that was punctured in testing, and it made enhancements to the Volt to prevent owners from running into the same issue. NHTSA later closed its investigation saying that it failed to find any systematic defects.
- Via seattlepi.com
- Source AJ Gill (YouTube)JalopnikUSA Today (Associated Press)
- Related Items car vehicle automobile automaker fire youtube ev electric tesla model s electric vehicles
Latest episode of PBS' Game/Show discusses male stereotypes
firehoseaaaaaaaaand shit goes downhill
The latest episode of PBS' weekly webseries Game/Show asks the question: Do video game stereotypes hurt men? Following a recent episode exploring sexism in gaming culture, host Jamin Warren returns to discuss growing body image issues and social expectations men face, as well as the ways video games relate to them.
This is the sixth episode in the entertaining Kornhaber Brown-produced webseries, which includes videos about violence in gaming and the "Let's Play" YouTube phenomenon. Each episode offers a fascinating look at the culture surrounding games and the "relationship between videogames and modern life." We recommend you find six minutes and 43 seconds to watch this week's episode; it's a good one.
Latest episode of PBS' Game/Show discusses male stereotypes originally appeared on Joystiq on Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
→ Yep, paid apps are dead
firehose"This isn’t the end of making money in the App Store — it’s just the end of selling mass-market apps for a few dollars up front from five screenshots alone."
thank god
Jeremy Olson:
I have been talking to a lot of the most successful app makers out there — who many would assume are millionaires off their top apps — and I’m hearing the same thing again and again: people just aren’t buying as many apps anymore. …
People are downloading more apps than ever before and there are still incredible opportunities. Developers who can adapt have an extremely bright future!
Exactly.
Since publishing that article, I’ve heard from tons of developers by Twitter and email. Almost all confirmed that their paid-app sales in 2012 and especially 2013 (so far) were much worse than the previous years.
Some reported switching from paid-up-front to free-with-IAP. All of these reported not only a huge increase in downloads (of course), but a substantial increase in revenue.
This isn’t the end of making money in the App Store — it’s just the end of selling mass-market apps for a few dollars up front from five screenshots alone.
Sengoku Batman Needs to Be a Series NOW
firehoseok, but that Gordon/batsignal is YES YOU DID IT. YOU DID IT amazing
How to quit in front of an audience of 11 million
firehose' “I see more millennials doing these antics because they are frustrated with corporate America and feel stuck in their jobs,” said Dan Schawbel, a 20-something expert and author of the new book Promote Yourself.
“It happens across various platforms like Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook,” Schawbel said. He immediately added, “The short term fame isn’t worth the long term elimination of job prospects.” '
...
'Williams thinks Shifrin, who hopes to land in Brooklyn, may attract a certain type of employer. If she’s seeking a creative position in a fun atmosphere, “She’ll get a job out of this.” '
hoobsplot already called her, bet you large dollars
fuck a hoobsplotter PMed me today through LinkedIn to try to get me to pitch my current employer on hoobsplot
There must be 50 ways to leave your bad job and 50 millennials preparing to exit publicly and plaintively on social media.
The latest danced her way onto YouTube to the Kayne West song “Gone.” Marina Shrifin, who worked for Taiwanese animator Next Media Animation, explained via captions that she had sacrificed “my relationships, time and energy.” Her “I quit!” dance video has been seen more than 11.2 million times and is featured in a growing number of articles and blogs.
She joins a growing list of workers who quit publicly, using social media or email, bound to go viral. Groupon co-founder’s Andrew Mason announced his firing in a candid cheeky memo that he posted online, an agency social media manager wrote “F this job” on her client’s Facebook page, and a worker in Toronto sent a long resignation letter to every Whole Foods staffer calling the place a “faux hippy Wal-Mart.”
“I see more millennials doing these antics because they are frustrated with corporate America and feel stuck in their jobs,” said Dan Schawbel, a 20-something expert and author of the new book Promote Yourself.
“It happens across various platforms like Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook,” Schawbel said. He immediately added, “The short term fame isn’t worth the long term elimination of job prospects.”
That’s not necessarily true for the Shifrin, who describes herself as a struggling comic/babysitter/novelist on Twitter. “Does anyone want to help read 3,000 emails?” she asked her followers, which she received following her public exit. Earlier she tweeted, “Maybe I can get a job AND A MAN out of this video.”
Dozens of others also have posted their “I quit” messages on YouTube. Most draw a few hundred or a few thousand views, but the video titled “Joey Quits” of a hotel worker handing in his resignation has over 4 million views. After sneaking in and throwing a resignation letter at his manager, Joey and his “bandmates” break into song.
“They [millennials] know how to use technology and they know how to broadcast technology. And they’re more likely to take a risk” than someone who’s 45 and has a mortgage and two children, said Nicole Williams, LinkedIn’s career expert and author of career books.
The problem for those staging dramatic endings: Your future boss likely will consider you a “loose cannon” or someone who could easily quit loudly again, said Williams.
“Because the platform is so mass, you’re telling the world at large that this company sucks,” she said. Yet, you’re also changing the perception of yourself based on what you post or dance. It’s likely some will see you as a bad-mouther, or as disrespectful and unprofessional. A future boss will think, ‘Why would I take a risk on this person…who is acting unprofessionally?’”
Another problem, Williams noted: “The second and third and the fourth video have to be even more dramatic to garner some attention.”
“The more people try and make these videos, the less press the videos will get because they won’t be newsworthy,” added Schawbel.
And depending on your farewell message, you could get sued or even arrested. Or maybe your boss will just create his own video showing the world the swimming pool and the happy people who still work at the video animation shop where you were once was employed.
To be sure, a few farewell stunts may pay off. A border agent in London wrote his farewell on a cake to pursue his dream job: running a cake business called Mr. Cake. His brother’s tweet went viral and drew attention to his new business.
Williams thinks the Shifrin, who hopes to land in Brooklyn, may attract a certain type of employer. If she’s seeking a creative position in a fun atmosphere, “She’ll get a job out of this.”
Follow Vickie on Twitter @WorkingKind. We welcome your comments at ideas@qz.com.
Microsoft Surface can support SNES emulation Super Mario Kart
firehoseSurface RT, actually
considering the controller support, HDMI out, and firesale price...

By Emily Gera on Oct 03, 2013 at 7:58a
Microsoft's Surface tablet is capable of supporting SNES emulators, as revealed in a video by YouTube user Sean Ong later publicized on the official Surface Twitter account.
The video shows off Nintendo's Super Mario Kart being played on the Microsoft platform. After downloading the Super Nintendo app from the App Store, Ong shows how he is able to use an Xbox 360 controller with a standard Microsoft adapter to play the classic Nintendo game.
A Microsoft representative retweeted the video on the company's official Twitter account, with the comment: "Make the most of #Surface."
Tap for more stories
Beagle Howling in Slow Motion Sounds Like a ‘Jurassic Park’ Dinosaur
firehoseYES
YES
EXCELLENT USE OF SCREWED AUDIO
YES
A beagle howling in slow motion sounds like a dinosaur from Jurassic Park or some other fierce beast in this video by Jonathan Nemargut.
submitted via Laughing Squid Tips
Which Senators And Congressmen Have Refused Their Pay During The Shutdown?
firehoseSen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.): The senator said Tuesday evening on CNN that he will continue accepting his salary and plans to "spend it and tithe it" as he always has.
Cantor, McCarthy, and Reid are putting theirs in escrow, which, lol
--
Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.): A senior aide said that "Any days that federal workers do not get paid, Sen. Ayotte will donate her salary to a New Hampshire charity."
Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.): He said Tuesday on Facebook that "Those who make the laws should have to live by those laws. So as a result of partisan bickering and gridlock, I will be donating my salary for the duration of the government shutdown to local charities until the Senate and President agree to negotiate with the House and we are able to work together to find a solution and reopen the government."
Rep. Ami Bera (D-Calif): He will decline his pay because "Congress should lead by example and put people before politics,” he said in a statement. “If Congress can't do its job and put the American people first, then they certainly shouldn't get paid during a crisis that they are causing. We must stop the finger-pointing, start acting like adults, and make Washington work for the people again.”
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio): His office said in a statement that the senator "will not accept his federal salary accrued during the government shutdown and will instead donate it to charity. In 2011, Brown pledged to forego his salary in the event of a government shutdown. Following the 1995 shutdown, Brown donated his salary to various charities in his then-House District." He will donate his salary this time to the Ohio-based Honor Flight Network.
Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.): "No small business would pay someone who refuses to do their job,” Buchanan said in a statement Tuesday. “So why should Senators or House members be paid for failing to fulfill one of their most basic responsibilities? They shouldn’t.”
House Majority Leader Eric I. Cantor (R-Va.): He plans to place his pay in escrow for the duration of the shutdown, according to a spokeswoman.
Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W. Va.): She has asked that her pay be withheld until the shutdown is over. "After the shutdown, she will donate that period of pay to charity," a spokesman said.
Sen. Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.): The senator plans to donate pay earned during the shutdown to a Delaware charity, a spokeswoman said.
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.): On his reelection campaign Facebook page, Castro said he would give up his pay in the event of a shutdown. "I hope you will ask Senator Ted Cruz why he refuses to give up his pay during a shutdown he pushed for," he added. (Cruz is among those lawmakers who have said they will refuse their pay.)
Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.): He plans to donate his salary to charity if federal workers aren’t paid retroactively once the shutdown ends, according to local news reports.
Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.): “The American people sent us to Washington to do a job,” he said in a statement. “If we cannot live up to that obligation, we should not be taking a paycheck, a paycheck that is funded by the taxes paid by our fellow hardworking Americans. If the federal government is shut down Members of Congress should not get paid, and we should not be held to a different standard when it comes to Obamacare, either.”
Sen. Christopher Coons (D-Del.): A spokesman said Tuesday that the senator is "going to send the Treasury a check for the salary he is paid during the shutdown."
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.): A spokeswoman says the senator "will not be paid during the federal shutdown. He donates to charity and does not believe a government shutdown should necessitate charitable contributions, compassion for fellow man should."
Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho): He will donate any pay earned during the shutdown, according to local news reports.
Rep. Steve Daines (R-Mont.): He will donate his salary during the shutdown to the Big Sky Honor Flight, his office said Tuesday.
Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.): This lawmaker from the Land of Lincoln said Tuesday via Twitter that "As long as the government remains shutdown, I will not accept a paycheck - I urge all Members of Congress to join me."
Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.): The freshman lawmaker said via Facebook on Wednesday that he plans to "donate the portions of his Congressional salary received during the government shutdown to charity."
Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash): “For as long as this unnecessary shutdown occurs, hundreds of thousands of public servants will be working without pay," she said in a statement Tuesday. "When sequestration began earlier this year, I returned 8.2% of my salary back to the Treasury, and for the duration of this shutdown, I will return the remainder of my personal salary as well."
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) - ''I don't believe we should be paid until this is resolved and I have requested that my pay be withheld,'' he said on Twitter, including an image of his formal request.
Rep. William Enyart (D-Ill.): He said late Tuesday that he is "donating my pay for the duration of this senseless shut-down to a food bank in Southern Illinois and call upon my colleagues in Congress to do the same."
Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.): The senator first told a Wyoming reporter on Monday that he will return his earnings to the U.S. Treasury.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.): A spokesman says the senator "will donate her salary during the shutdown to the Consortium of Catholic Academies."
Rep. Randy Forbes (R-Va.): He sent a letter Wednesday asking that his pay be withheld for the duration of the shutdown.
Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.): He said in a statement Tuesday that “Until Congress ends this irresponsible shutdown, I will donate my pay to charity.”
Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.): A spokeswoman said the lawmaker "is focused on reopening the federal government and will not be paid until that job is done and the shutdown is resolved."
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii): She said last Friday that "If a common-sense agreement is not reached, our hard-working troops, law enforcement and other essential personnel will continue to report for duty while receiving no pay, leaving their families at home with nothing but uncertainty. I sincerely hope a government shutdown does not occur, but if no deal is struck by next Tuesday, then Members of Congress should not be exempt from its very real, tough consequences."
Rep. Pete Gallego (D-Tex.): The freshman lawmaker said Monday, "I will be donating my salary to an organization that helps military men and women who are injured while serving their country. They have sacrificed — Congress should heed their example." On Saturday he also introduced the "Shutdown Member of Congress Pay Act," which would — you guessed it — withhold lawmaker pay in the event of a shutdown.
Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.): He is declining compensation during the shutdown "and will contribute those wages to the U.S. Treasury for debt reduction," a spokeswoman said.
Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.): In a 40-second YouTube video statement, he said "I shouldn't get a congressional salary while other federal employees are denied the ability to go to work. I'm going to take my salary during the government shutdown and donate it to the Wounded Warrior Project."
Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-N.M.): She plans to donate her salary to charities that help "military veterans avoid homelessness," a spokesman said.
Sen. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.): A spokeswoman said Tuesday that she plans to donate the pay she makes over the course of the impasse.
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah): The senator is "going to donate his paycheck to the LDS church," a spokesman said.
Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.): “During the shutdown of the federal government, I will donate my salary to a charity in North Dakota," she said in a statement. "Right now, federal workers across North Dakota and the country who chose to work in public service have been forced to go without pay – including my Senate staff. It’s only fair that I not receive a salary during that time as well."
Rep. John Hoeven (R-N.D.): The senator plans to donate his shutdown-era pay to charity, a spokesman said.
Rep. Randy Hultgren (R-Ill.): He said he'll revoke his salary "until Congress passes and the President signs an acceptable solution to fund the federal government."
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.): The wealthiest member of Congress, his staff said he already donates his entire congressional salary to charity.
Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.): She posted a picture on her Facebook page of the letter she sent to House officials requesting that her pay be withheld.
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.): An aide says that the senator "will have his salary withheld until the federal government re-opens."
Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.): The freshman lawmaker formally requested Tuesday that his pay be withheld during the shutdown.
Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-Wash.): On his Facebook page, he said he would give up his pay "for the duration of a government shutdown. I am dead set against a shutdown because it will have serious effects on our economy and because many people rely on services provided by federal agencies. The fact that some in Congress would risk a shutdown in order to score political points demonstrates why Congress is currently held in lower regard than head lice."
Rep. Ron Kind (D-Wis.): He wrote on his Facebook page Tuesday that "As long as furloughed federal workers go without pay, I will not take my own salary."
Sen. Angus King (I-Maine): The freshman senator has decided to place his earnings in an escrow account "and will only accept it if federal employees who work during the shutdown are also ultimately compensated for their work," a spokesman said. "In the event they are not, Senator King intends to donate his pay to charities in Maine."
Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.): He announced Tuesday that "he has elected to have his pay withheld until the federal government reopens," a spokesman said.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.): The senator "is giving her pay during the government shutdown to the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, since lifesaving NIH medical research is being slashed during the shutdown," a spokeswoman said in an e-mail.
Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho): He will have his pay withheld during the shutdown, according to local news reports.
Rep. Leonard Lance (R-N.J.): He formally requested Tuesday that his pay be suspended until a new spending bill has been passed.
Rep. James Langevin (D-R.I.): The lawmaker will donate his pay to charity in the event that federal employees are not paid retroactively for days lost. If that happens, Langevin "will be splitting his earnings between the Rhode Island Community Food Bank and the Rhode Island Good Neighbor Energy Fund," a spokeswoman said.
Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-N.J.): He took to Twitter on Monday to say that "As US Constitution prohibits immediate changes in Members' pay, I've requested my pay suspended if #shutdown occurs."
Rep. Jim Matheson (D-Utah): He plans to defer his pay during the shutdown, according to local news reports.
House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.): He is planning to place his pay in escrow for the duration of the shutdown, according to a spokesman.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.): A spokesman said the senator "will not be keeping her salary. She will be writing a check to give it away."
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.): In a statement, the Senate GOP leader said "the effects of this completely unnecessary shutdown will have a real impact on my constituents. And I will donate my paycheck to charity for as long as Senate Democrats deprive hardworking Americans of their paychecks during this completely unnecessary shutdown.” An aide said he plans to donate compensation earned during the shutdown to Wayside Christian Mission in Louisville.
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.): He announced he won't accept his pay in a statement sent to constituents Tuesday.
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.): One of the wealthiest members of Congress, he plans to donate his shutdown-era earnings to the March of Dimes, a spokesman said Wednesday.
Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.): He is donating his pay over the course of the shutdown, according to his office.
Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Fla.): The freshman lawmaker plans to "donate his paycheck to a local veterans service organization," according to his office.
Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Tex.): He also posted a photo on his Facebook page of his request to have his pay withheld.
Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-Tex.): “As long as the shut-down continues, I will not accept my pay," he said in a statement Tuesday. " I will be donating my entire pay for the length of the government closure to veterans’ service organizations (VSOs) in El Paso." He added that "In order to continue to serve El Paso, my offices will remain open, but at a reduced capacity. I will continue to use my Facebook page to keep you posted.”
Rep. Gary Peters (D-Mich.): He announced last week via Twitter that he would donate his pay during the shutdown to charity.
Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.): A spokesman says he has begun returning compensation earned during the shutdown to the U.S. Treasury. A wealthy entrepreneur, he donated his entire salary to charity until this year, when he began returning his pay to the Treasury to pay down the debt.
Rep. Scott Peters (D-Calif.): He said Tuesday that he will donate pay during the duration of the shutdown to charity, because "“I do not believe that the leadership failure of the Republican majority can subject 800,000 workers to furloughs, and countless Americans to service delays and closures, while I collect a paycheck.”
Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio): A spokeswoman said he plans to donate his pay during the shutdown to charity. "He is reviewing options now," she said.
Rep. Trey Radel (R-Fla.): On Twitter Tuesday he said, "Today I asked NOT to be paid until the government reopens. #governmentshutdown"
Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.): The senator will forgo his salary if federal workers are not paid, but a spokesman wouldn't say where he would donate the funds, according to local news reports.
Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.): The Senate leader plans to put his shutdown earnings into an escrow account, a spokesman said.
Rep. Scott Rigell (R-Va.): He plans to donate salary for the duration of the shutdown to the Wounded Warrior Project, according to aides, who note that he already gives back 15 percent of his salary to the U.S. Treasury to help pay down the federal debt.
Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho): He will donate any pay earned during the shutdown, according to local news reports.
Rep. Keith Rothfus (R-Pa.): The freshman lawmaker sent a letter to House officials on Monday requesting that his pay be withheld in the event of a shutdown.
Rep. Ed Royce (R-Calif.): He sent a letter on Tuesday asking that his pay be suspended "as long as the government remains shutdown."
Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.): He announced about a week ago that he plans to donate his pay earned during the shutdown to charity.
Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.): In response to a Twitter callout by The Washington Post, Schneider said via Twitter that "I will be returning my paycheck until Congress finds a sensible solution to this harmful shutdown."
Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.): He told constituents in a statement that "I firmly believe that if Members of Congress fail to perform their most basic duty in passing a budget, then they do not deserve to be paid. It is in that vein that I will be donating the congressional salary I collect during the shutdown to a local Oregon charity to be named later. It’s time for Congress to get its act together.”
Rep. Allyson Schwartz (D-Pa.): A spokesman said that she plans to "go without her paycheck during the government shutdown" and is working to determine where she will donate the earnings.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.): The senator said via Twitter Wednesday that she's "Donating my salary to NH Food Bank during shutdown. Congress needs to come together, get gov’t working again."
Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho): He will have his pay withheld during the shutdown, according to local news reports.
Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.): During a House floor speech he said he would defer his pay because "members of Congress are no better than anyone else."
Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.): The senator said Tuesday evening on CNN that she will donate earnings during the shutdown to charity.
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.): The freshman announced Monday that he would refuse his pay "until federal employees who must work during the shutdown are paid."
Sen. Patrick Toomey (R-Pa.): The senator said in a statement Wednesday that “As long as furloughed federal employees are not getting paid during this shutdown, I will refuse my paycheck too.”
Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.): The senator "will donate his salary to a charity that helps New Mexicans hurt by the shutdown and the sequester," according to a spokeswoman.
Rep. Ann Wagner (R-Mo.): On her Facebook page, she said "As a result of partisan bickering and gridlock, I have waived my salary for the duration of the government shutdown because Congress didn’t get the job done. Those who make the laws should have to live by those laws, and I will continue to fight for the people of Missouri’s 2nd District."
Rep. Tim Walz (D-Minn.): He plans to donate his pay "to local food banks" and said in a statement that "Hardworking families are suffering because of the uncompromising, reckless attitude of a few rigid ideologues in Washington. That isn’t right and it isn’t fair."
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.): An aide said the senator will "contribute his salary to the Federal Employee Education & Assistance Fund."
Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio): The freshman lawmaker plans to donate his shutdown earnings to the Wounded Warrior Project and Cincinnati’s Freestore Foodbank. “I can't accept a salary while veterans and government employees are left empty-handed. It’s not appropriate and it’s not fair," he said in a statement.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.): The senator plans to donate his salary to charity if federal workers aren’t paid retroactively once the shutdown ends, according to local news reports.
Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.): In response to a callout on Twitter by The Washington Post, Wittman said via Twitter that he would "donate my salary to charity for every day the government is shut down."
Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.): The Bluegrass State lawmaker has donated his entire annual salary to Louisville-area charities since he came to Congress in 2007, aides reminded us on Tuesday.
Others who have said they will refuse their pay:
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)
Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.)
Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.)
House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio)
Rep. Niki Tsongas (D-Mass.)
Rep. Marlin A. Stutzman (R-Ind.)
Rep. Randy Weber (R-Tex.)
Rep. Todd Young (R-Ind.)
Rep. Ron Barber (D-Ariz.)
Rep. John Barrow (D-Ga.)
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.)
Rep. Colleen Hanabusa (D-Hawaii)
Rep. Bill Johnson (R-Ohio)
Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.)
Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.)
Rep. Robert Pittenger (R-N.C.)
Rep. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.)
Rep. Bill Flores (R-Tex.)
Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-Fla.)
geekymerch: (via Picard Face Palm Meme Cookie Cutter by...
firehoseattn: OMGKW
Film: Movie Review: Gravity
firehose'Cuarón’s camera may seem weightless as it floats through the digital cosmos, but his clunky dialogue weighs Gravity down a bit. Were the film as all-action, little-talk as Kubrick’s 2001—a milestone impossible not to think of when watching ships and humans dance balletically through space—one could take it as a pure sensory experience. But Cuarón obliterates the dreadful quiet with lots of stilted banter between his stars, forcing a simple, existential survival story to double as a parable about overcoming trauma. Much of that burden lies on Bullock’s shoulders: While Clooney gets by on charisma, flashing pearly whites through the glass of a space helmet, his co-star is slightly ill equipped to carry what is essentially a twofer. Cuarón saddles her character with a pained backstory, meant to lend the events a psychological bent. All it really does is give the characters too much to gab about. (When Bullock tells Clooney that she could “get used to” the absence of audio, it’s hard not to wish she’d clam up and let the audience be engulfed by that great hush.)'

Of the countless thrillers set in the terrifying vacuum of outer space, how many actually maroon their characters outside in the vast, unforgiving darkness, where the greatest threat to their lives aren’t dog fights or hostile extraterrestrials but simply drifting off into nothingness? Gravity, Alfonso Cuarón’s first film in seven years, does just that: George Clooney and Sandra Bullock play astronauts stranded in zero-g after their ride is wrecked by the debris from exploded satellites. Low on oxygen and cut off in their communications with NASA, the two float in the general direction of shelter, struggling to keep their grip on each other and not go careening into the cold, silent void. Lighting their way during this treacherous journey is the majestic glow of planet Earth, always in sight, taunting them with its seeming proximity.
That’s a terrifically elemental premise for a movie, one that Cuar ...
Read more











