Shared posts

22 Nov 20:45

Proposed law could allow authorities to charge protesters with "economic terrorism"

by Cory Doctorow

Portland Police In Riot Gear N17 Protest

Evan from Fight For the Future sez, "This is one of those bad ideas we just have to stop before it has time to spread. A GOP State Senator in Washington has proposed a law that would allow authorities to charge people and groups who engage in "disruptive" protests with "economic terrorism." It wouldn't just apply to vandalism or rioting. Broadly interpreted, this proposal could be used to slap felony terrorism charges and jail time on activists who engage in time honored free speech traditions like boycotts, picket lines, and civil disobedience. Right now, this is just a bad idea. Let's keep it that way before it becomes a bad law. Sign and share the petition here.

22 Nov 20:20

Anti-Nazi poster: Stop the Alt-Right!

by Cory Doctorow

axisposter-sm

Hugh sends us this "nice anti-Nazi poster from designer Arin Fishkin building on an illustration by Paul Sizer."

21 Nov 20:54

Not racist 

by Myner

21 Nov 20:52

Megyn Kelly: Pro-Trump TV Hosts Colluded With Him Beforehand To Appear Tough

by John Amato
Electrikmonkrjs

This is an FEC violation

Responding to Howard Kurtz' questions about her new book, Megyn Kelly said that TV hosts who supported Trump would collude with Donald beforehand to help give themselves credibility by making believe they were tough on him and called it "play acting."

On Fox News' Media Buzz, Kurtz asked, "Certain TV hosts were in the tank for Donald Trump, you say, to the point where 'they would arrange with Trump in advance to ask him certain critical questions or do certain hits on him so they would appear to have some credibility."

Kelly: "Yeah."

Kurtz: "Are you suggesting they were play acting?

Kelly: "Yes. It was acting."

Kurtz: "It was in more than one network, but you can't tell us who?".

Kelly: "No, because these were off the record conversations that I was privy to that I'm not at liberty to reveal. I'm not allowed to name the names, but trust me. This did happen and its been confirmed to me by more than one television executive."

I seem to remember that conservatives were outraged when they read unconfirmed leaked documents that alleged a Democratic operative gave a debate question to Hillary.

Kelly is verifying that staged interviews were given to Trump by TV anchors.

What does that remind you of?

Not to be forgotten from this interview is that somebody tipped off Trump about Megyn's first question during the debate she was moderating.

read more

20 Nov 18:30

Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA) Introduces Legislation To Stop Trump From Profiting Off The Presidency

by Sarah P
Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA) Introduces Legislation To Stop Trump From Profiting Off The Presidency

Trump is a grifter. A con man. A snake oil salesman.

He preyed on people's fears, fed them lies about how he alone could 'Make America Great Again,' about how the Clinton dynasty was all about pay-for-play and would be the most crooked administration ever.

Well, it looks like he was just talking about his own plans. See, Donnie has no intention of letting go of his businesses. He says he will have a "blind trust" but in actuality, plans to let his kids run the company while also having them work closely with him while he serves as (gack) President. He even went so far as to have his daughter sit in on a meeting just the other day with the Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan.

Conflict of interest, table for 1.

The government, now firmly in the slimy grasp of the GOP in all three branches, doesn't seem to care about this giant Ponzi scheme about to be unleashed on the American People in less than two months. They only see tax breaks, earmarks, special interests and their own personal bank accounts growing while the rest of us will only be hit with tax cuts, increased costs for goods and continued degradation of our quality of lives.

To put it simply, Donald Trump has allowed the Office of the President to be put on the market for sale. He has failed at casinos, steaks, water and a litany of other products, but the United States is something that he absolutely can sell. And sell it, he will.

read more

20 Nov 16:29

Hamilton cast vs Mike Pence

by Myner

Fuck Mike Pence

20 Nov 16:16

Art & history know no ‘safe space,’ and Hamilton owes Mike Pence no apology

by John Aravosis

Mike Pence got booed by the audience, and then schooled in democracy by the cast, while attending Hamilton the Musical last night in New York City. Which sent Donald Trump into an over-the-top Twitter tear this morning.

Authoritarians, you see, don’t like to be challenged.

Take, for instance, Donald Trump’s bff country, Russia. Near-dictator Vladimir Putin doesn’t stomach dissent, he squelches it. If you take on Putin, you’re lucky if you simply get beaten. You’re more likely to have your livelihood destroyed and be sent to jail on trumped-up charges. And if you’re really a thorn in Dear Leader’s side, he’ll simply have you killed.

Which takes us back to Donald Trump.

Trump has proven himself to have the emotional maturity of a turnip. Everything about the man screams for a decades-denied hug. New Yorkers, who know Trump best, say it always bothered the Donald that he was never really accepted into the city’s big-boy club of Richie Riches. Trump’s problem, you see, is that he’s (moderately) old money that acts like new. Trump is what southerners call “rich trash” — people who strike it rich, but never quite manage to get beyond their common-culture past.

The Trump family hit metaphorical oil while shooting possum in their backyard. And you can gild Trump Tower all you want; Jethro will always be a hillbilly.

Which takes us back to Hamilton. Putin, rather Trump, is demanding an apology because the blockbuster musical’s actors respectfully read a reverential statement to Pence, onstage, expressing their hope that the incoming Trump administration will work on behalf of all Americans, regardless of race, creed or orientation. (Pence also got booed by the audience on the way out, though the actors urged the audience not to.)

On hearing the news, Herr Trump ran to Twitter and lost it, claiming that Pence was rudely “harassed” by the cast and crew of Hamilton, and demanding that they apologize to the incoming VP.

trump-twitter-hamilton-2

Twelve hour later, unable to let it go, Trump tweeted again:

screen-shot-2016-11-19-at-6-46-59-pm

Then an hour, Trump deleted the tweet.

Before going any further, it’s worth reading, and fully appreciating, the cast’s words that so incensed Donald Trump:

“Vice President-elect Pence, we welcome you, and we truly thank you for joining us here at ‘Hamilton: An American Musical.’ We really do,” Dixon said to further applause. “We, sir, we are the diverse America who are alarmed and anxious that your new administration will not protect us, our planet, our children, our parents, or defend us and uphold our inalienable rights, sir. But we truly hope this show has inspired you to uphold our American values and work on behalf of all of us. All of us. Again, we truly thank you truly for (sharing) this show, this wonderful American story told by a diverse group of men and women of different colors, creeds and orientations.”

So what exactly did the cast and crew of Hamilton say to Pence that so affronted Donald Trump?

1. We are worried that your administration won’t protect us or our planet.
2. We worry that you won’t defend and uphold our inalienable rights, as defined and explained in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
3. We hope that our show inspires you to uphold America’s values.
4. On behalf of a diverse cast and crew, we thank you for joining us.

That’s about as nice a “rebuke” as any politician could ever hope for. In fact, it’s no rebuke at all. It’s a plea. An incredibly polite, deferential plea for the putative incoming #2 of our government (it’s still not clear if Bannon and Kushner will let Pence do anything more than mop the floors) to respect the American ideals that are the basis of Hamilton the musical and the man.

No, what so incensed Donald Trump isn’t the content of the words, it’s the fact that a ragtag collection of queers and colored people dared address the King at all.

Donald Trump is an authoritarian. He isn’t used to being challenged. And when he is challenged, he’s accustomed to using his adoring mob, or the threat of lawyers, to shut down even the whiff of opposition. Trump’s entire adult life has been one huge safe space, where money creates the false patina of a respect long denied.

But art, like history, has no safe spaces. The story of America is about common folks speaking truth to power. Two hundred and forty years ago, an immigrant to New York named Alexander Hamilton served as George Washington’s top aide in the War of Independence. Hamilton, like the rest of our nation’s founders and first citizens, chose to bow down before no king.

Hamilton’s spiritual descendants, at a show honoring his life and his ideals, chose not to spare our elected leaders from witnessing a people’s cry to breathe free. For that, they owe no man an apology.

red-donateWith the election of Donald Trump, AMERICAblog’s independent journalism and activism is more needed than ever.

Please support our work with a generous donation. We don’t make much on advertising, we need your support to continue our work. Thanks.

Follow me on Twitter & Facebook:

Follow @aravosis

19 Nov 17:09

CNN Commentator Reminds Us All: We Live In A Post-Truth Society Now

by Karoli Kuns

On yet another of CNN's interminable panels pitting liberals against conservatives this morning, Angela Rye dropped a truth bomb on the table just as former RNC director Doug Heye was working really hard to spin the Kentucky Ford plant lie Donald Trump tweeted last night.

When Ford made their announcement about how they were going to retool their Michigan plant for SUVs and move manufacture of the Ford Escape to Mexico, I wrote about it. At the time, I noted that UAW had been involved in the negotiations to keep the larger, more profitable vehicle production in the United States while moving the less profitable division to Mexico. It was no secret.

But Doug Heye actually tried to make it one in order to spin away from the clear reality that Donald Trump lied about having anything to do with saving auto manufacturing jobs.

"Now the Lincoln MKZ will be made [in Kentucky]," Hey crowed. That is a small victory. [Trump]'s not taking credit for the victory, per se, he's saying the President of Ford called him to say we are happy to work with you in a future administration at keeping jobs here."

Which is, of course, a formality many large corporations exercise when a new President is about to take office. I'm sure President Obama received similar telephone calls.

read more

19 Nov 17:08

Mike Pence Booed At Hamilton, Cast Sends Special Message

by Karoli Kuns
Mike Pence Booed At Hamilton, Cast Sends Special Message

Being VP-Elect has its perks, including scoring a couple of tickets to the hottest Broadway show going right now -- Hamilton. But even privilege can't protect from everything.

On his way into the show, he was booed by people in the audience, something that really seems to have upset New York Times' reporter Maggie Haberman, who tweeted this:

Funny how I never saw her care much about how a certain former Secretary of State or our current President has been treated.

After the show, the cast had a special message for the VP-Elect:

Here is the text of the statement:

Vice President Elect Pence, welcome.

read more

19 Nov 16:50

Rick Baldwin

19 Nov 16:49

This Critique of Fake Election News Is a Must-Read for All Democracy Lovers

by Jared Keller
Electrikmonkrjs

This election was won on lies. This is not democracy.

This story was first published in Pacific Standard

In the wake of President-elect Donald Trump's narrow upset victory last week, many journalists and critics have leveled a finger at Facebook, claiming the social network was partly to blame for the growing milieu of false and misleading "news" stories that only serve to insulate potential voters within an ideological cocoon of their own making.

As Facebook continues to influence voter behavior with each passing election, the rising tide of fake news poses an existential threat to conventional journalistic organizations. "This should not be seen as a partisan issue," sociologist Zeynep Tufecki observed in the New York Times on Tuesday. "The spread of false information online is corrosive for society at large."

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg flatly rejected the assertion that Facebook shaped the election. "Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99 percent of what people see is authentic," he insisted; of course, the remaining 1 percent of users still encompass some 19.1 million people. Despite Zuckerberg's denial, Facebook is now actively reassessing its role in distributing false information. And while the social media giant is taking tiny steps toward addressing the issue — excluding fake news sites from its advertising network, for one — it may take a renegade task force within Facebook itself to force how the company to truly understand its outsized influence on how Americans see the world at large.

Until technology companies cope with the structural sources of fake news, it's up to the American people to rethink their consumption habits. That's where Melissa Zimdars comes in. A communications professor at Merrimack College in North Andover, Massachusetts, Zimdar recently began compiling a list of "fake, false, regularly misleading and/or otherwise questionable ‘news' organizations" in a widely shared Google Doc of "False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and Satirical ‘News' Sources." It is a cheat sheet for media literacy in the Facebook age.

Zimdars' viral guide — which encompasses websites from the outright fake (nbcnews.com.com) to the ideologically skewed (The Free Thought Project) to the clickbait-inflected (the Independent Journal Review)—began as a media literacy companion for her students. She decided to open-source the list after encountering an outright falsehood at the top of her Google News feed: that Hillary Clinton lost the popular vote.

"It's a WordPress site! 70news.wordpress.com! And Google treated it like news!" Zimdars said when reached by phone on Tuesday. "That's when I decided to make this public." Pacific Standard spoke with Zimdars about fake news, Facebook, and the future of media literacy.

What inspired you to put this guide together?

I had been taking notes and making an unofficial list of questionable news sources to share with my students for the last few days, but I put in a lot of effort [on Monday]. The original impetus came from a general concern over the years about the sources students were using in their assignments or alluding to in their talking points. I say this not even as a reflection of where I currently teach; I've felt this way at every school I've worked at.

I strongly believe that media literacy and communication should be taught at a much younger age. Teachers don't normally approach this content until the college level, and students continually have trouble determining what aspects of an article and website to examine to determine whether it's actually something they want to cite or circulate.

There's a wide variety of sites on your list.

The first category is sites that are created to deliberately spread false information. The 70news.wordpress.com site that was at the top of Google News searches about election results is an example. We don't really know the intent of some false websites — whether they crop up to generate advertising revenue, or to simply troll people or for comedy purposes — but they all belong to one category: blatantly false.

The second category is websites or news organizations that usually have a kernel of truth to them, relying on an actual event or a real quote from a public official, but the way the story is contextualized (or not at all contextualized) tends to be misrepresentative of what actually happened. They may not be entirely false — there may be elements of "truthiness" to them — but they're certainly misleading.

The third category I've used included websites whose reporting is OK, but their Facebook distribution practices are unrepresentative of actual events because they're relying on hyperbole for clicks.

This category has caused the most controversy and, well, been taken as offensive to some publications. Upworthy wasn't happy about its inclusion on this list; neither was ThinkProgress, who I initially included because of its tendency to use clickbait in its Facebook descriptions. A number of websites—both liberal and conservative publications—have contacted me; one even threatened to file "criminal libel" against me, although I don't think they know what that means.

These websites are especially troubling because people don't actually read the actual stories — they often just share based on the headline. I had the Huffington Post on my list of 300 potential additions because they published an article on Monday with a headline that claimed Bernie Sanders could replace Donald Trump with a little-known loophole. The article itself was chastising people for sharing the story without actually clicking it, but so many people were sharing it like, "oh, there's a chance!" An effort to teach media literacy ended up circulating information that was extremely misleading.

How much of the rise of fake or misleading news sites can be attributed to structural changes in media consumption wrought by Facebook?

Facebook has absolutely contributed to the echo chamber. By algorithmically giving us what we want, Facebook leads to these very different information centers based on how it perceives your political orientation. This is compounded by the prior existence of confirmation bias: People have a tendency to seek out information they already agree with, or that matches with their gut reaction. When we encounter information we agree with, it affirms our beliefs, and even when we encounter information we don't agree with, it tends to strengthen our beliefs anyway. We're very stubborn like that.

I haven't studied this yet, but my assumption is that this trend toward fake news reinforces this confirmation bias and strengthens the echo chamber and the filter bubble. It's not just the media, but this weird relationship between how the technology works, this proliferated media environment, and how humans engage psychologically and communicatively.

Facebook is currently struggling with how to address these structural causes. What are some potential solution? I recently read a story about how a group of Princeton University students created an open-source browser extension that separates legitimate news sources from phony ones.

We definitely need media literacy from a young age, but that's a very delayed process. We can use technology to try to help the situation, but after I read that same article about the Facebook plugin, a reporter from the Boston Globe and I were trying to test it and it didn't seem to work. I'm glad it's open source; a lot of programmers had approached me about creating something that people worried about misinformation can actively work on.

But my concern is, ironically, because I'm going through these sources and passing judgment, that as we're doing this on a structural scale, what will be built as a check and balance for whatever method we end up using? How can some technology solution dynamic enough and reactive enough so that, if a website improves, or one that has a good reputation goes off the rails, it's able to adapt? What are the metrics by which we're categorizing news sources?

This seems like a good case for editors, which Facebook has been dealing with for some time.

Some people argue that part of this problem of fake news is inherently connected to editorial trends in mainstream journalism, from consolidation to a greater emphasis on corporate profits. Editing isn't inherently a safety measure of this technology, even if it's clearly necessary.

While tech companies grapple with structural issues, what needs to be done to engender media literacy in our classrooms and, I suppose, in our households?

It starts with actually reading what we are sharing. And it's hard! Look, I'm a professor of media and I've been guilty of seeing something posted by a friend I trust and sharing it. I've been complicit in this system. The first thing we need to do is get people to actually read what they're sharing, and, if it's too much trouble to do that, we're going to have serious difficulty getting people to look up and evaluate their sources of information.

One of the best things people can do is police websites that are spam or fake on Facebook. But when someone asked me about engaging with people, my advice was "do so with your own risk." I've had tons of trolls and hateful messages and comments since I made this Google Doc public. You have to be prepared to deal with that stuff if you're even going to try to course-correct misinformation on the Web.

So what, in an ideal world, is the solution here? What's the future you envision for a cheat sheet like yours?

I think librarians should rule the world! I've been approached by people about creating more durable and dynamic documents that can go through a rigorous process to determine how resources are included or excluded or categorized. It's like trying to index the entire Internet, and it feels impossible, but if we could start holding a few of the major sources of misinformation accountable, that would be important to me.

19 Nov 00:07

He doesn't really mean it

by noreply@blogger.com (digby)
He doesn't really mean it

by digby

He was just playing a part, right? And even if wants to do the things he says he wants to do, he can't really do them. So relax folks. He's no worse than anyone else.

I've been meaning to post this newspaper article from 1922 that's been making the rounds:




On 10 February 2015, the New York Times re-released the first article they ever published about Adolf Hitler, who was then the chairman of the Nazi party. The story, dated 21 November 1922 and republished in the Times' “First Glimpses” section, opened with this introduction:

On Nov. 21, 1922, The New York Times gave its readers their first glimpse of Hitler, in a profile that got a lot of things right — its description of his ability to work a crowd into a fever pitch, ready then and there to stage a coup, presaged his unsuccessful beer hall putsch less than a year later. But the article also got one crucial point very wrong — despite what “several reliable, well-informed sources” told The Times in the third paragraph from the bottom, his anti-Semitism was every bit as genuine and violent as it sounded.
This re-release was widely covered by other news outlets immediately after it was posted in 2015, with many of them suggesting or implying its description bore similarities to the political movement of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.

An excerpt from that 1922 article reads as follows:

But several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler's anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes. 
A sophisticated politician credited Hitler with peculiar political cleverness for laying emphasis and over-emphasis on anti-Semitism, saying: "You can't expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims. You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them."

This story was published early in both Hitler’s career and in the existence of the Nazi party itself, whose followers were then called ‘Hakenkreuzler,’ or ‘swastika wavers.' In November 1922, when this article was first published, Hitler had been Nazi party chairman for just over a year, and it had been only three years since he had delivered his first public political speech. Hitler’s failed attempt to overthrow the local government in Bavaria, known as the "Beer Hall Putsch," was one year away.

The Times reached out to Hitler for comment in 1922, which he declined, as described in the story:

“Herr Hitler regrets he is unable to meet you as he is leaving town on important business for several days,” was the answer received by The New York Times correspondent. His important business was going to Regensburg with three special trainloads of Munich admirers for the purpose of holding a series of reactionary inflammatory meetings and incidentally to beat up protesting Socialists and Communists with blackjacks if any dare protest, which is becoming increasingly rarer.

By the way, Trump has announced that he's resuming his rallies in a couple of weeks to "thank" all his supporters.
George Gigicos, the head of the Trump advance team, spoke to reporters in the lobby of Trump Tower in New York City Thursday, where he said their team is working on "the victory tour now." 
He asked Trump's former campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, who was behind him, to ask when the tour would be happening. 
She came forward to reporters and said, "'Thank you tour.' It's not a 'victory tour,'" to which Gigicos repeated, "Thank you tour." 
First on CNN: Donald Trump, Mitt Romney to meet this weekend
"Thank America tour," Conway said. 
Gigicos said the tour would be happening in "the next couple of weeks -- after Thanksgiving" and would focus on "the swing states we flipped over."

You know who else held big victory rallies?  


.



17 Nov 00:49

The NSA Chief Says Russia Hacked the 2016 Election. Congress Must Investigate.

by David Corn

Despite all the news being generated by the change of power underway in Washington, there is one story this week that deserves top priority: Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. On Tuesday, the director of the National Security Agency, Admiral Michael Rogers, was asked about the WikiLeaks release of hacked information during the campaign, and he said, "This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect." He added, "This was not something that was done casually. This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily."

This was a stunning statement that has echoed other remarks from senior US officials. He was saying that Russia directly intervened in the US election to obtain a desired end: presumably to undermine confidence in US elections or to elect Donald Trump—or both. Rogers was clearly accusing Vladimir Putin of meddling with American democracy. This is news worthy of bold and large front-page headlines—and investigation. Presumably intelligence and law enforcement agencies are robustly probing the hacking of political targets attributed to Russia. But there is another inquiry that is necessary: a full-fledged congressional investigation that holds public hearings and releases its findings to the citizenry.

If the FBI, CIA, and other intelligence agencies are digging into the Russian effort to affect US politics, there is no guarantee that what they uncover will be shared with the public. Intelligence investigations often remain secret for the obvious reasons: they involve classified information. And law enforcement investigations—which focus on whether crimes have been committed—are supposed to remain secret until they produce indictments. (And then only information pertinent to the prosecution of a case is released, though the feds might have collected much more.) The investigative activities of these agencies are not designed for public enlightenment or assurance. That's the job of Congress.

When traumatic events and scandals that threaten the nation or its government have occurred—Pearl Harbor, Watergate, the Iran-contra affair, 9/11—Congress has conducted investigations and held hearings. The goal has been to unearth what went wrong and to allow the government and the public to evaluate their leaders and consider safeguards to prevent future calamities and misconduct. That is what is required now. If a foreign government has mucked about and undercut a presidential election, how can Americans be secure about the foundation of the nation and trust their own government? They need to know specifically what intervention occurred, what was investigated (and whether those investigations were conducted well), and what steps are being taken to prevent further intrusions. 

There already is much smoke in the public realm: the hacking of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton's campaign. Also, Russian hackers reportedly targeted state election systems in Arizona and Illinois. Coincidentally or not, the Russian deputy foreign minister said after the election that Russian government officials had conferred with members of Trump's campaign squad. (A former senior counterintelligence officer for a Western service sent memos to the FBI claiming that he had found evidence of a Russian intelligence operation to coopt and cultivate Trump.) And the DNC found evidence suggesting its Washington headquarters had been bugged—but there was no indication of who was the culprit. In his recent book, The Plot to Hack America, national security expert Malcolm Nance wrote, "Russia has perfected political warfare by using cyber assets to personally attack and neutralize political opponents…At some point Russia apparently decided to apply these tactics against the United States and so American democracy itself was hacked."

Several House Democrats, led by Rep. Elijah Cummings, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, have urged the FBI to investigate links between Trump's team and Russia, and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid has done the same. According to various news reports, Russia-related probes have been started by the FBI targeting Americans associated with the Trump campaign. One reportedly was focused on Carter Page, a businessman whom the Trump campaign identified as a Trump adviser, and another was focused on Paul Manafort, who served for a time as Trump's campaign manager. (Page and Manafort have denied any wrongdoing; Manafort said no investigation was happening.)

Yet there is a huge difference between an FBI inquiry that proceeds behind the scenes (and that may or may not yield public information) and a full-blown congressional inquiry that includes open hearings and ends with a public report. So far, the only Capitol Hill legislator who has publicly called for such an endeavor is Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). On Tuesday, Graham, who was harshly critical of Trump during the campaign, proposed that Congress hold hearings on "Russia's misadventures throughout the world," including the DNC hack. "Were they involved in cyberattacks that had a political component to it in our elections?" Graham said. He pushed Congress to find out.

The possibility that a foreign government covertly interfered with US elections to achieve a particular outcome is staggering and raises the most profound concerns about governance within the United States. An investigation into this matter should not be relegated to the secret corners of the FBI or the CIA. The public has the right to know if Putin or anyone else corrupted the political mechanisms of the nation. There already is reason to be suspicious. Without a thorough examination, there will be more cause to question American democracy.

16 Nov 19:23

Political Zombies: Clinton Emails

by shelleyp
Political Zombies: Clinton Emails

Pity, for a moment, poor Judicial Watch. It has made its fame and fortune off the Clinton emails the last two years. Now that conservatives control Congress and the White House, what's a poor conservative head hunting organization to do?

Well, evidently race home to Mama, because Judicial Watch is continuing its Clinton email witch hunt. This, even though there's no profit or advantage to them doing so, other than a desperate clinging to an activity that gave it relevancy.

(And there's also the fact that turning its FOIA obsession on the Trump administration won't be generating a whole lot of income in the future, either.)

Judicial Watch isn't the only entity that has its fingers frozen in a rigid grasp on the same tedious pursuit. According to The Hill five House Committees are continuing their investigation of the emails. Probably for the same reason—desperately attempting to hold on to some relevancy in a world none of them predicted: where Trump would win the Presidency.

We are witnessing the death throes for the Clinton email investigations, to the chagrin of those who would use them for their own purposes.

16 Nov 19:16

NSA Chief: WikiLeaks Hacks of Democrats' Emails Were a "Conscious Effort by a Nation-State"

by Kanyakrit Vongkiatkajorn

The WikiLeaks release of internal emails from the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign constituted a "conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect," the head of the National Security Agency said Tuesday.

"There shouldn't be any doubt in anybody's mind," NSA Director Michael S. Rogers said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday. "This was not something that was done casually, this was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily." Rogers acknowledged in October that Russians were behind the hacks.

News that the DNC had been compromised broke earlier this June, when hacker Guccifer 2.0 released a trove of documents containing campaign emails and memos—most notably emails implying that the committee favored Clinton over Sen. Bernie Sanders during the Democratic primary. The release of the emails led to the resignation of DNC chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

WikiLeaks also published thousands of emails from John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chair. Though Russia was long suspected of being behind the hacks, US officials did not formally accuse the Russian government of orchestrating the cyber attacks until October. In November, just four days before the election, DNC officials told Mother Jones they had found evidence that the DNC headquarters may have been bugged and had submitted a report to the FBI.

Watch the video of Rogers' full remarks above.

15 Nov 21:17

Steve Bannon's Rise Caps the Triumph of “Yellow Journalism” over Traditional Media

by Paul Ratner

Much news on the Internet is very similar to the dangerous "yellow journalism" of history.



Read More
14 Nov 15:25

You really need to read Harry Reid’s blistering statement on Trump’s election

by John Aravosis

If you haven’t already, you really need to read Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid’s excoriating statement on the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States.

I hadn’t read the full statement until now. Wow.

Reid accuses Trump of “emboldening the forces of hate and bigotry in America,” and then goes to call Trump a “sexual predator.” Reid’s full statement is at the bottom of this story.

In response, Trump campaign chair Kellyanne Conway, seemed to suggest that Trump would have the Senator Democratic leader jailed — something Americans, until now, simply do not do.

by-default-2016-11-13-at-8-33-24-pm

Senator Reid responded to Conway:

“It only took five days for President-elect Trump to try to silence his critics with the threat of legal action. This should shock and concern all Americans.

“Trump has always used threats and intimidation to silence his critics. Now he wants to silence a discussion of the acts of hate and threats of violence being committed in his name across the country. Silencing this discussion normalizes hate and intimidates the victims.

“The facts are stark and shocking. Since Trump was elected, acts of hate against Muslims, Jews, women and people of color have spiked dramatically. The KKK is planning a parade to celebrate Trump’s victory because the KKK sees Trump as their champion. Today, a headline in one newspaper reads, ‘Popular neo-Nazi site urges readers to troll liberals into suicide,’ while another reads, ‘Post-election spate of hate crimes worse than 9-11.’

“But instead of rising to the responsibility of his office, Trump is hiding behind his Twitter account and sending his staff on TV to threaten his critics.

“If this is going to be a time of healing, Trump must take action immediately to stop the acts of hate and threats of violence that are being committed in his name across the country. Trump owes the nation leadership, not petty attempts to silence his critics.”

Amen.

Here is Reid’s earlier statement on Trump’s election — it’s deliciously cathartic:

Reid Statement on the Election of Donald Trump
November 11, 2016 | Press Releases

Washington, D.C. – Nevada Senator Harry Reid released the following statement about the election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States:

“I have personally been on the ballot in Nevada for 26 elections and I have never seen anything like the reaction to the election completed last Tuesday. The election of Donald Trump has emboldened the forces of hate and bigotry in America.

“White nationalists, Vladimir Putin and ISIS are celebrating Donald Trump’s victory, while innocent, law-abiding Americans are wracked with fear – especially African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Muslim Americans, LGBT Americans and Asian Americans. Watching white nationalists celebrate while innocent Americans cry tears of fear does not feel like America.

“I have heard more stories in the past 48 hours of Americans living in fear of their own government and their fellow Americans than I can remember hearing in five decades in politics. Hispanic Americans who fear their families will be torn apart, African Americans being heckled on the street, Muslim Americans afraid to wear a headscarf, gay and lesbian couples having slurs hurled at them and feeling afraid to walk down the street holding hands. American children waking up in the middle of the night crying, terrified that Trump will take their parents away. Young girls unable to understand why a man who brags about sexually assaulting women has been elected president.

“I have a large family. I have one daughter and twelve granddaughters. The texts, emails and phone calls I have received from them have been filled with fear – fear for themselves, fear for their Hispanic and African American friends, for their Muslim and Jewish friends, for their LBGT friends, for their Asian friends. I’ve felt their tears and I’ve felt their fear.

“We as a nation must find a way to move forward without consigning those who Trump has threatened to the shadows. Their fear is entirely rational, because Donald Trump has talked openly about doing terrible things to them. Every news piece that breathlessly obsesses over inauguration preparations compounds their fear by normalizing a man who has threatened to tear families apart, who has bragged about sexually assaulting women and who has directed crowds of thousands to intimidate reporters and assault African Americans. Their fear is legitimate and we must refuse to let it fall through the cracks between the fluff pieces.

“If this is going to be a time of healing, we must first put the responsibility for healing where it belongs: at the feet of Donald Trump, a sexual predator who lost the popular vote and fueled his campaign with bigotry and hate. Winning the electoral college does not absolve Trump of the grave sins he committed against millions of Americans. Donald Trump may not possess the capacity to assuage those fears, but he owes it to this nation to try.

“If Trump wants to roll back the tide of hate he unleashed, he has a tremendous amount of work to do and he must begin immediately.”

red-donateWith the election of Donald Trump, AMERICAblog’s independent journalism and activism is more needed than ever.

Please support our work with a generous donation. We don’t make much on advertising, we need your support to continue our work. Thanks.

Follow me on Twitter & Facebook:

Follow @aravosis

12 Nov 22:28

Joy Ann Reid Claps Back: Time To Cover Trump For Real

by Frances Langum

Joy Ann Reid opened her show with a review of who Donald Trump really is, and then she congratulated Trump voters for their win.

And then she told them what they have lost:

Now that I have told you what you won, Trump America, allow me to tell you what you've lost.

You've lost the morality card. No longer can the US go around lecturing the world about democracy, because, in our democracy, the person who got the most votes will not be president. Nor does the party that got the most votes control the House of Representatives. Again, we're required to accept this affront to democracy, because that's our system. But our acceptance doesn't make it any less democratic.

You have also lost the notion of an exceptional America. Because as it turns out, we're just another western nation falling into the ethno-national forces sweeping and swinging across Europe. We, as it turns out, are not so different after all.

You have also lost the right to moralize to Blue America about family values. We sincerely hope and pray that your daughters and your sisters and your wives and all women and girls are never disrespected the way that he has . When your sons and daughters ask you if little girls are as valuable as little girls or should emulate the values of the United States, we'll leave that to you to explain.

read more

11 Nov 20:16

Everyone Should Watch Samantha Bee's Segment On Donald Trump's Victory

by Edwin Rios

Who's to blame for Donald Trump's ascendance to the presidency?

"The pollsters? The strident feminists? The Democratic Party? A vengeful God?" Samantha Bee asked on Wednesday. "Once you dust for fingerprints, it's pretty clear who ruined America. White people." Behind her, the screen zoomed in on exit polling showing that 58 percent of white people voted for Donald Trump. "I guess ruining Brooklyn was just a dry run...If Muslims have to take responsibility for every member of their community, so do we," Bee said. 

Watch the whole clip above. 

11 Nov 20:15

Letter to my black daughter under a Trump presidency

by Maureen Herman

Image: Carla Sinclair

Hi Kid,

On Election Night, you went to bed crying, and this time, I couldn't fix it. Like half the country, you thought you would be going to bed with a Democrat and a woman as your president-elect. I wiped away a big, globby tear from the end of your nose, proud of you for caring so deeply. I said it was going to be OK. I explained that, "politics goes back and forth, and this year it just wasn't our turn. Remember when I was for Obama and you were for Hillary, and she lost the primary, but you ended up liking Obama?" Your thirteen year-old defiance broke through your tears, as you declared, "No, this is different!"

You then spouted off a litany of things I didn't know you thought much about:

"It's different because Donald Trump doesn't have the basic morals of everything our country stands for. He doesn't even have the morals of a normal person, or a normal Republican. It's not that the other side won. It's that the person who won is literally against half of the people in the country. He doesn't like Muslims, he doesn't like Mexicans, anyone who is LGBT, he definitely doesn't like women, or people of color. He doesn't like ME. It seems like he only likes people like himself -- white males. How can he be our president?"

He's our president because people voted for him and he won the election. I will be raising you under a Donald Trump presidency until you go to college in four years. But you're right, it is different. I admit I don't know how to talk to you about racism and sexism sometimes, because we haven't had to face it too much so far.

For most of your life, your president was an exemplary family man who treated his wife and daughters with love and respect and never talked about women in degrading ways. For the past eight years, your president had the same skin color as you, and he was raised by a single mom, just like you. His mother was white, and his father was black, just like you. Your skin color is a ridiculous things to even mention, except in our country, it matters.

As your mom, I find it so hard to teach you that something doesn't matter but at the same time matters so much. How do I tell you that Black Lives Matter when you can see on YouTube that they don't seem to? You will be driving in two years. I will need to teach you how to be arrested without getting hurt or even killed. As a white person, how do I tell you what to do when you are treated differently because of how you look? My parents never had to teach me that. I only have until you're eighteen to get this right -- when you're old enough to cast your own vote.

It's important to me that you know without a doubt that voting is not the only voice we have in our democracy. You asked about joining debate team at school the other day -- I say go for it. You should know how to defend the ideas you feel strongly about. It's also important to learn how to challenge the opinions of others with intelligence, calm, and respect. I know this is not what you see on TV these days.

Racist and sexist people may now feel empowered to express themselves more often and more angrily, now that they have a president they feel represents the same ideas. Racist and sexist things may happen in your life more often. You will hear things on the news, at school, and see things online that I can't shield you from. I have felt the hate from Trump supporters because of who I voted for. It scares me that so many of them will judge you because you are black, or think less of you because you are a woman.

You were three years old the first time you experienced racism, when I picked you up from preschool and you told me a girl said you were the wrong color. You wanted to know what the right color was. I awkwardly tried to explain a horrible truth to your sweet, innocent self, that some people hate others because of what color their skin is. I told you that there is no right or wrong color, but I didn't tell you that in America, that isn't really true. I was so upset driving home I could barely see. I spoke to your school after that incident. I didn't know what else to do.

I read to you a lot, and you loved to read. As you grew up, sometimes teachers and other parents would say how well-spoken and well-mannered you were, or how well you read. But there were times that it was not a compliment, but an expression of shock. They did not expect that from a black girl. I didn't say anything in those instances and I regret it. I didn't know how to confront that kind of racism. But we both need to learn.

I won't always be there when something happens, but I promise to protect you and stand up for you, no matter what, as best I can. I promise to listen when you tell me that you didn't get the apartment, the date, or the chance, because you are black, or that you didn't get the job, the promotion, or the salary, because you are a woman. I promise I will comfort you, but I also promise to teach you how to confront and change injustices effectively -- we will be learning as we go along, you and I.

I am sorry the world is like this. I couldn't change the result of the election, or fix the country with my vote. But I can control how I live my life. I will write, share my story and experiences, to help others understand the things I have learned and seen: that being homeless doesn't make you bad; being poor doesn't make you lazy; being black doesn't make you violent; having mental illness doesn't make you an outcast; being sexually assaulted doesn't mean you did anything wrong. We are people. Sometimes we are in crisis or pain, alone and lost, sometimes we need help, but we are all capable of coming through even the most hopeless of circumstances. I know because I did.

I've always been honest with you about my past, my mistakes and challenges, and some people think it is inappropriate. They think that I should hide it from you and be ashamed. I won't. It is one thing I am sure I did right so far as your mom. What I hear most often about you from teachers, parents, and friends -- going back to kindergarten -- is that you have so much empathy for others, that you will stand up to a bully, or befriend the new kid. That means you can put yourself in someone else's shoes, that you can see another side to things, that you can look at someone different from you with love in your heart. I am touched every time I witness it in you. I saw this when our Chicago Cubs won the World Series. I was so touched at your expression of empathy for the Cleveland Indians team and fans, because of how it must have felt to lost. You made me so proud to be your mom.

Having empathy is empowering, because it means you can vote with your life, every day. It is what I love about the Democratic Party. That is why I have been honest with you about who I am all your life -- because I wanted to show you that people can change, no matter who you are, that your life can change, no matter how bad it seems. Hiding reality from you would not prepare you for life, and your empathy tells me it was the right choice. It has broadened the vocabulary of your heart, to know the truth.

You know that homeless people are struggling people, not bad, because I told you about the time I was homeless. When you see a homeless person begging, you always ask if we can help. Sometimes we can't. You know that many homeless people have mental health conditions, because we talked about it when I told you I had depression, and what it was. You know I speak very openly about mental health to encourage those that are suffering to ask for help, because I suffered so needlessly for decades, not seeking treatment, because I was ashamed. You have seen me help others by speaking and writing about it. 

You know I am a recovering alcoholic and addict, because you have seen me go to meetings all your life. You have seen me work for prison reform. You understand that I do it to help people like me get help instead of given jail time. Now, you even know that I was sexually assaulted, because you asked how I got pregnant with you. That was a tough conversation, but we got through it, didn't we? It is not something to be ashamed of -- ever -- for either of us. I was amazed that you were able to see it from another perspective, too. You said that if that happened to you, you don't think you would make the same choice I did. 

You have an absolute right to make that choice, and always will, even if the law in our country changes, because of who Donald Trump will appoint to the Supreme Court. I will always work like hell to make sure you have that choice, because I know that no one can make that decision for you -- and never should. It was so hard I almost didn't survive it, and I only did because I had extraordinary support from family, and from the very government programs Republicans want so badly to cut. Standing up for these things are ways to vote with my life, with my passion, with my work, with what I do for others, what I stand up for, stand up to, and why. I have found that this is the most important way to make a difference, because there are problems, there are things to worry about, there is work to do.

So, when I said there was nothing to worry about, that's not really how I felt. I didn't tell you that I felt like Donald Trump and his supporters just came along and kicked over the sand castle that Obama and people like me had spent eight years building. I didn't tell you I felt upset, scared, hopeless, deflated, and unsure, or that I was afraid of what Donald Trump has brought into our homes and our lives that could hurt us. I didn't tell you I'm not sure I can protect us both from everything. I didn't want you to feel unsafe. I didn't want that happy-go-lucky anything-is-possible quality about you that I love so much to go away.

I'm writing this to keep telling you the truth, and to tell you that no matter how nervous I might get about things, I never give up, because again and again I have seen my life transform from the worst possible circumstances to ones beyond my greatest dreams. Sometimes the most terrible of things happens and we suffer. But I have found so many times, that out of these dark times, so often for me comes something amazing -- better than I'd ever dreamed. Sometimes I have to wait for it, and I always have to work for it. But when I look back, I find myself being grateful for times when it all seemed so hopeless, because that's when I found my passion, my purpose, and gave it my all.

Still, I must remind you that things do not always go our way. My job is to teach you to win with honor and grace, which is not what we are seeing from Trump voters right now, and how to lose with dignity and character. I remember when you helped me fill out my mail-in ballot a few weeks ago, looking up all the candidates and propositions together. It was the first time we really talked about politics like that, and we both felt very strongly about many things. We get one vote -- an equal say. We have a voice that contributes to the whole -- the whole city, state, and country. But if more people decide they feel differently than we do, we go along with it. If we can't go along with it, we need to help people understand why. There are other ways to be heard, to contribute, to change things.

Before you went to bed on Election Night, I told you one person can't change the entire country so easily. Apparently, you're getting a good civics education, because you rolled your thirteen year old eyes at me and said, "Mom, the House and Senate are red, too. Duh." Impossibility. Adversity. Defeat and despair. That's where change comes from, that's where seeds of greatness are born, and that is what you see in history.

That's why today, you are doing a project on Rosa Parks and not on the people who told her to move or called her names. She stood up against something that was wrong even though almost everyone else was saying it was right. It was probably the worst day of her life at the time, and look what came of it -- her legacy, her greatness, and all that it did to help so many after her. It's the same reason why we celebrated the Suffragettes this week, who fought so hard for a woman's right to vote. History is not kind to those who try to block progress. Their names are not celebrated and rarely remembered.

You want to be a surgeon someday. I hope that you not only realize your dream, but accomplish things you haven't thought of yet. My job is to give your life room to pursue your dreams, even during the times we struggle. That is the great promise of our country and it is still true no matter who is president. But it is also my job to teach you that we are not just what we do for a living. Our greatness is not measured by how much money we have. You are magnificent and worthy just as you are, no matter what anyone else says or calls you. Character is defined by how you treat others -- especially those who are different from you, who you disagree with, or who hate you. We do not yell at them, or call them names. I want the experience of having Donald Trump as your president to make you a better person, not angry, resentful, or mean. Those are the things you don't like about him, remember?

I promise to work to keep you safe, to keep you whole. You will see so many others, including Hillary Clinton, and others who lost, doing the same. You will see that people like us, we rise from defeat, we are nourished and inspired by it. We transform it into a unifying power. We always have. Now grab my hand. Let's go.

Love,

Mom

Maureen Herman, author and musician, is currently writing her first book, It's a Memoir, Motherfucker on Macmillan's Flatiron Books imprint, due in 2017. She was the bassist of Babes in Toyland from 1992 until 1996 and from 2014-August 2015. She lives in Los Angeles with her amazing daughter. She’s also known to be activist-y.

11 Nov 20:04

"Hitler's only kidding about the antisemitism" New York Times, 1922

by Cory Doctorow

nyt-1

"Several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler's anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes." (more…)

11 Nov 20:03

Lobbyists and Wall Street have taken over Trump transition team

by John Aravosis

It will come as a surprise to no one that, in spite of Donald Trump’s promises to the contrary, lobbyists and Wall Street are all over the Trump transition effort.

According to a Trump organizational chart obtained by Politico, top corporate lobbyists from tobacco, energy, insurance, and pharma are in charge of key elements of the presidential transition.

But first, let’s start with Trump’s likely choice for Treasury secretary — a Goldman Sachs alum from Wall Street. Yes, Wall Street will once again be in charge of the Treasury Department.

And now for the other lobbyists taking over the Trump transition:

A tobacco company lobbyist is in charge of finding staff and planning initial policy at Homeland Security.

A lawyer lobbyist, with clients including Visa, Big Insurance, Big Energy, GE, HSBC, PFizer, and PhRMA is in charge of Department of Labor.

A Dow Chemical, energy lobbyist is at the Department of Energy.

A beverage and corp insurance lobbyist is at Agriculture.

A former copper industry lobbyist is at Interior.

This is what you get when a Republican wins the presidency. Even when it’s a Republican like Trump, who claims to be anti-establisment. They lie. The worst of the worst will be taking over the the entire federal government. People like anti-LGBT hate group staffer Ken Blackwell, who is heading up all of domestic policy transition. Or Alt Right leader Steve Bannon to be White House chief of staff.

Elections have consequences. Very bad consequences. And at some point soon, you’re going to see why many of us were saying that “the lesser of two evils” is still pretty darn good. You haven’t experienced the greater of two evils. And now you will.

red-donateWith the election of Donald Trump, AMERICAblog’s independent journalism and activism is more needed than ever. Please support our work with a generous donation. We don’t make much on advertising, we need your support to continue our work. Thanks.

Follow me on Twitter & Facebook:

Follow @aravosis

11 Nov 16:55

Signal your opposition to racism with a simple safety pin

by Rob Beschizza

vintage-safety-pin-oversize-4-brass-tone-metal-horse-blanket-kilt-laundry-3934cba6cb537a05a15cae4fbc1d71a1

Following Brexit and the subsequent wave of racist abuses, Britons began to wear safety pins in public as an anti-racist statement.

"This is meant to be more than just a symbolic gesture or a way for like-minded people to pat each other on the back.

If people wear the pin and support the campaign they are saying they are prepared to be part of the solution. It could be by confronting racist behaviour, or if that is not possible at least documenting it.

More generally it is about reaching out to people and letting them know they are safe and welcome," she says.

Following "Trumpit" in the United States, racists are already feeling empowered, with many reports of abusive graffiti and plans afoot for a major Ku Klux Klan march.

Yes, wearing a pin is cheap and easy--as easy as changing an avatar, and just as potentially facile. But the outside world carries risks that the internet doesn't. To signal one's intent to shield people from violence, as far as one is capable, has consequences. It's meaningful and, hopefully, reassuring. Instead of a tiny normal safety pin, though, I'm going to wear a jumbo-ass five-inch safety pin like the one above, because I'm American now and we do things big.

5" safety pins can be ordered by the box on Amazon for a few dollars, as can 2" ones. You can even get them in tactical black: perfect for a shirt collar or lab coat.

10 Nov 17:57

Fantastic selfies from 1920

by David Pescovitz

vnipxbJR0302jRkcwpX5yRn7vW31AsZBlsefhCQ5ico

Famed photographer Joseph Byron holds the camera for a few group selfies in 1920. No selfie stick. No duck face.

More info on these shots here and here. (via r/OldSchoolCool)

mny65379

10 Nov 15:26

Russia reveals that it "was in contact" with Trump's campaign during race

by Rob Beschizza

Illo: Rob Beschizza  / Photo: Kremlin.ru

New that Trump's elected, those to whom debts are owed can start fucking with him. Took it all of a day for one to get started!

Russia said it was in contact with President-elect Donald Trump’s team during the U.S. election campaign, despite repeated denials by the Republican candidate’s advisers that any links existed. “There were contacts” before the election, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said Thursday, according to the Interfax news service. “We continue this work of course,” he said, without giving details of what the contacts were.

Bonus points to Ryabkov for the ostentatious ambiguity. It's like something from a 1970s Hollywood movie about a secret technology that makes Americans scared of radio waves in the 650nm range: “We continue this work of course.”

In The Guardian, a "pro-Kremlin political analyst" quoted as saying "maybe we helped a bit with WikiLeaks" is getting a lot of play, too. This fits the pre-election suspicions of U.S. intelligence, but that job title means he's just a blogger/pundit type.

10 Nov 05:28

I’m logical as hell and I'm not gonna take this! @spockosbrain

by noreply@blogger.com (Spocko)
I’m rational as hell and I'm not gonna take this! 

By Spocko

We can push back against bullies. But they don't just roll over. They fight back. They use dirty tricks. They have an enemies list. They are the Watergate burglars, people who use their power to harass and punish.  They use their power to get more power. When WE get in power and DON'T go after them, it means they get away with it.

If we fight them, they will go after us. We will prepare for it. When they do hit us, we USE that attack to gather more strength. Americans love the underdog. So much so that even the rich and powerful want to be the underdog. They always position themselves as the victim and want people to feel bad for them when they get their feeling hurt by someone calling them "fat cats."

Don't give up people! It's not about just "surviving" this, it's about seeing this as an opportunity for great things.

My friend Athenae has a piece about "surviving."
Women got the vote in no small part because Alice Paul starved herself in prison to ask rights of a Democratic president. Because Susan B. Anthony was beaten in the street. Because Ida B. Wells lived under daily threat of lynching. Those people didn’t “survive” something. That wasn’t their goal.
And a lot of them didn’t survive. A lot of them threw their bodies on the wheels and gave everything they had to stop what was happening.
America didn’t survive their losses. America is America because of their losses. Because of their sacrifices. Because of their heroism.

I'm not gonna take this! And neither should you.

Push for investigations.  Spending time on investigations isn't a waste of time if it uncovers actually lawlessness.

The right is going to govern for their buddy lobbyists. But there are now a lot of pissed off women and men whose lives are going to be destroying who have nothing left to lose. There are people whose lives were destroyed but the left didn't want prosecute.

If we are successful with investigations and prosecutions Trump might get credit, but justice will still be done, and don't we still want that? If we fail, then that is another thing that his supporters can see he failed in and lied about.

 For years I've noted that the things that upset the left aren't the same things that upset the right.  If you wanted to leak something that upsets his base you leak him calling them suckers or how he is planning to rip them off and laughing at them. You don't show how he cheated China, you show evidence of deals he cut with China and Russia that keep US jobs going offshore.

I wonder why oppo research people didn't leak stuff that would upset Trump's base? I think it's because they only thought about what would upset them as rational people. What would upset people who considered themselves moral?

People who believe they were looked down upon and picked on for being "normal" see themselves as victims.  You don't use the same message with all audiences. What works with one audience doesn't always work for another.

To satisfy the fact-based law side, look into all the hacking
  • Voting machine hacks
  • Personnel and financial records
  • Email and database hacks
If it's not the NSA taking our data, who is? 

Prosecute, Prosecute, Prosecute

The government didn't want to go after the state powers that hacked the Office of Personnel Management. or the massive JPMorgan Chase hack. But they do know who did it. They didn't act because they didn't think the foreign power would use it--widely. But evidence shows that data from hacks was used to assist in the DNC phishing attacks.

Look into voting machine hacks and the manipulation of social media. 
Examine the attacks on the US internet

There is a lot if data and hard evidence there. I've talked to tech journalists who have written about this in detail, but I've noticed that nobody in the political press have picked up on this. Partly this is because the government doesn't' want to talk about it. But now?

Did all of this have an impact on the election? Hell yes!

Did people in Trump's organization give aid and comfort to our enemies?  I think so, but let's find out for sure because there is a law about this in the constitution.

Imagine all the men and women who are privy to information they might leak. They were afraid of the consequences of leaking data before, imagine the consequences after Trump is in power.

The good news is the mainstream media just might take this seriously now. If they don't, we can, and screw them for not doing their job in the first place.

The media followed Trump around listening to his alternative reality instead of calling up the people who could provide info about Trump that would disgust EVEN HIS BASE.  Somewhere out there is a woman who was a 13-year-old girl with a story to tell about her and Trump. Are the allegations real? We don't know, but whatever it was, now it's a cover up.

Look into the voting suppression and voter intimidation with guns at polls
Then change the laws! We have evidence why it matters.

Look for violations of federal laws and prosecute people NOW, during the next 8 weeks while laws are still in effect. For people who think "It's a lame duck session, what's the point?" This work doesn't have to stop in January! It can intensify!

Remember this guy from Animal House? He's a fictional character but he didn't take it either! I'm a real person, based on a fictional character, but Star Trek and Spock inspired me. So let Bluto inspire you! After all, he became a senator!

I've modified his speech a bit to fit the moment. But the SPIRIT, the GUTS he talks about are what we need. And maybe this situation does require a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part. We've done it before and we can do it again.
LLAP
Spocko

Animal House, "I'm not I'm not gonna take this! (link to quote)
"What the f--k happened to the Progressives I used to know? Where's the spirit? Where's the guts, huh? This could be the greatest day of our lives, but you're gonna let it be the worst. 'Ooh, we're afraid to go with you, Spocko, we might get in trouble.' (shouting) Well, just kiss my ass from now on! Not me! I'm not gonna take this. Trump, he's a done man! Pence, done! Giuliani...

Kirk "Spocko's right. Psychotic, but absolutely right. We gotta take these bastards. Now, we could fight 'em with conventional weapons. That could take years and cost millions of lives. No, in this case, I think we have to go all out. I think this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part."

We're just the guys to do it...LET'S DO IT!

Animal House clip
10 Nov 00:29

Kremlin admits working with Wikileaks to get Trump elected

by John Aravosis

In a bombshell that is all too familiar to most of us, a Kremlin adviser admitted to CNN today that Russia worked with Wikileaks to get Donald Trump elected.

The report from CNN came in the context of a larger story that the Russians expect Donald Trump to be a much friendlier president to their needs in, and domination of, Ukraine and elsewhere.

Trump, you’ll recall, has refused to accept the US government’s determination that the Russians were trying to throw our election. And now Russia has admitted it.

What is there left to say. Our next president got elected in part because of a Russian intelligence operation.

God help us all.

red-donatePlease support our independent journalism with a generous donation. Help us defeat Donald Trump in November.

Follow me on Twitter & Facebook:

Follow @aravosis

09 Nov 21:16

A List of Pro-Women, Pro-Immigrant, Pro-Earth, Anti-Bigotry Organizations That Need Your Support

by Joanna Rothkopf on Jezebel, shared by Alan Henry to Lifehacker

Donald Trump has been a vocal advocate of sexual assault, Islamophobia, xenophobia, and violent racism. Early Wednesday morning, America voted to elect him our president.

Read more...

09 Nov 17:07

Rugged Luxury: Take Your Queen Bed On the Road In This Modern Camper

by SA Rogers
[ By SA Rogers in Technology & Vehicles & Mods. ]

tvan-mk4-trailer-main

If your camping style is somewhere in between sleeping under the stars and ‘glamping’ with all the comforts of home, Track Trailer’s MK4 ‘Tvan’ camper has your number. Designed to be towed behind standard trucks and SUVs, it’s basically a hotel room on wheels, packing a queen-sized bed, two kitchen configurations, air conditioning and a quick-erect tent to multiply the available space.

tvan-trailer-3

tvan-trailer-7

The latest in a series of Tvan designs, this camper trailer enables the most rugged of adventurers to go deep into the wilderness, and it’s gotten a thumbs-up from explorers of Australia’s most punishing desert landscapes. The Tvan is manufactured in Melbourne and has been around since the early ’80s, and features MC2 suspension, a riveted steel and aluminum cabin body, hot-dipped galvanized chassis, and a rear folding platform for the tent, which stows away in its own compartment.

tvan-trailer-4

tvan-trailer-5

tvan-trailer-6

The slide-out kitchen offers a surprising number of features, including four burners, a sink, counter space and three storage drawers, and it all packs up tight for travel, remaining secure even when you’re driving over rocky terrain. There’s an integrated windshield that deploys simply by raising it into position so windy conditions don’t blow out the flames on the range.

tvan-trailer-2

tvan-trailer

tvan-trailer-8

The cabin itself is substantial enough to block out noise, sun, heat, cold and wind, and when the tent is in use, it secures to the hard fold-out floor, keeping it up off the ground. The rear hatch is assisted by gas struts to make it easy to open and close, and the whole thing is aerodynamic, making it easy to tow.

VW Doubleback: Hacked Camper Van Unfolds into Huge Mobile Home

The recent comeback of modernized (and modified) mobile homes has seen many novel transformations of cars and trucks into various sizes of living space, but the Doubleback may have more secret ...

Telescoping Trailer: Expanding Teardrop Camper Triples in Size

The 3X trailer deploys with the push of a button, tripling its interior space in a matter of seconds, turning a cramped road can by day into an expansive set of rooms at ...

Bike Tire Tent: Compact Travel Shelter Wraps Inside Wheels

For the cycling nomad, this design uses space you never knew you had, and helps free up room in front-of-handlebar baskets or on above-back-tire racks for other uses in the ...

Share on Facebook

[ By SA Rogers in Technology & Vehicles & Mods. ]

[ WebUrbanist | Archives | Galleries | Privacy | TOS ]


09 Nov 16:56

Keith Olbermann: The Terrorists Have Won

by Frances Langum

He is on fire, as you might expect.

He congratulates the FBI on their coup against the United States government.

"The goals of those who attacked us on 2001, have finally found an outlet."

But listen up.

There will be a Resistance. It is us.