Shared posts

01 Apr 14:58

You need Guts to lead a life YOU want…

by subra

When you are born in a big industrialist family, you have no problems, right?

Well no. Wrong.

There is just too much expectation. Imagine you are born in a Birla household. Your grandfather, father, uncles, everybody is into some business or the other. Your family functions are an extension of the corporate life. The current rain maker gets all the attention immaterial of what is the function. Life is not so easy as you think.

Cut to your age of 27. Tragedy in the family and you have just NOW inherited a company with a Net Worth of Rs. 4000 crore.

What to you do? You actually wish to sell it, raise Rs. 4000 crores, put it in a capital protected fund and live off the income.

Or give it to a fund manager and create a Rs. 20 crore income for your lifestyle.

You think you can do this? No.

As a community and as a country we put too much pressure on performance. If your father left you Rs. 4k crore, you should leave Rs. 40k crore….blah blah..blah.

So under that pressure you start attending office. You hate (HATE) going to office. You hate attending those meetings. You are an introvert and do not want everybody watching every move of yours.

What do you like?

Well you like photography, nature, painting.

You want to fund movies. You want to travel around the world. You have your set of friends.

You do not like the restrictions on food, on partying, on not finding time for your hobbies.

Your requirements are few. You are not turned ON by the turnover numbers. Or by the fact that a Central Cabinet Minister is using your Mumbai Guest house.

Do you really have a choice? No.

You still have to attend your family events. Here you are compared to your uncles, cousins, in laws,…..and well you have to hear all that..

DO YOU THINK YOU CAN WALK OUT SHRUG AND SAY ‘I WILL LIVE LIFE ON MY TERMS GO TO HELL’

NO. In an Indian situation, you will RARELY (if at all) see this happen.

So you will sit in a corner and keep sulking. Bad luck guys.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

01 Apr 03:19

losing money in equity markets? portfolio sizing and risk control…

by subra

More and more people want to invest in equities, but have no clue how. Then there are some who are so worried about volatility that they prefer putting money in banks and paying 30% tax on interest, but will not put money away EVEN IN A LIQUID fund!

Can you lose money in equities? Of course you can and will. Equity investing is about knowing YOURSELF, markets, companies in which to invest, knowing a few good equity investors, creating equity investing clubs and groups, and of course READING TONS and TONS and knowing how to apply. For most people investing means calling Kotak, Motilal Oswal, Icici direct, Hdfc securities, ….buying some share that the RM recommends and then hoping to make money. Hope, sadly is not STRATEGY. Many people who invest in equities do it just because ‘they want to earn a lot of money and that too fast’.

Well just too many people have no rules, limits, …and have no clue on how to invest in equities. These people can, should and do lose their shirt, pants and undergarments and deserve it. Completely.

Let us say you are a well qualified, sensible, boy or girl and wish to invest in equities. Well if you do not want to be an active participant, you could choose a mutual fund. If you do not trust fund managers (I trust only 5 out of the 100 odd that I would have met), choose an index fund – the cheaper (and lesser tracking error too) the better.

Ok, you are a little more adventurous. You wish to invest in direct equities. Now comes the challenge.

Let us say you are 31 years and wish to create a portfolio. You are a woman, earning Rs. 8 lakhs, and ARE NOT THE PRIMARY PROVIDER of the house. So you can take a little more risk than a man, WHO IS THE PRIMARY PROVIDER.

So let us say you have Rs. 10 lakhs to invest, and influenced by this site, you decide to put Rs. 8 lakhs in equities.

Rule No.1: NOT more than 80% of the SECONDARY earner’s portfolio will be in equities.

Rule No. 2: NOT more than 5% will be invested in ONE Company, as an initial investment. In case the share does well, we will LET it go up to 25% of one’s EQUITY portfolio. Anything in excess will be constantly sold off. Let us say you are able to add Rs. 20,000 to the equity portfolio every month, and this share is also going up every month, it will take a real long time to breach the upper limit (unless you have picked one diamond and all other duds!).

Rule No. 3: Industry diversification I will learn or copy from good fund manager’s portfolios, and I will buy only in group A, or B1. I will NOT touch a share in group B2, or T2T….even if Subramoney.com says these are future blue-chips.

Rule No. 4: I will keep a 25% trailing stop loss. Let me explain. You have bought Rs. 40,000 worth of Carborundum Universal (my examples are obviously from my portfolio, and my cost of this share is Rs. 3.59 per share, thanks to split and bonus, so if you want to copy me, go to 1990, or create your own portfolio). Suddenly the shares value falls to Rs. 30,000. You will do nothing. However on the day it falls below 30k, YOU WILL SELL. Knowing how to cut losses is as important as knowing how to let profits run.

Rule No. 5: I will review my portfolio on a quarterly basis. I HAVE NO business managing my own portfolio UNLESS I can beat the index. Clearly if you beat the index for one year, then second year, then 3rd year…you are doing well. If you do not beat it for the first 4 quarters – and are trailing by a huge margin, sell and go to a good fund house.

Now tell me with all these rules in place how much can you lose? Rs. 800,000 is the total investment, Rs. 40,000 is the maximum exposure to one stock, 25% is the trailing stop loss- so you can lose about Rs. 10,000. Your liquid net-worth is Rs. 10,00,000.

My dear girl, you can lose about 1% of your net-worth. Neither you nor your husband should lose sleep over this.

Once you get confident, take charge of your husband’s portfolio…and make sure that you invest about 60% of his portfolio – the other portion being in bonds, pf, ppf, some stupid lic policies, …and other debt instruments.

While calculating IGNORE your primary residence, and the loan that you have against it. Cars, golf kit, Asics, Adidas, Nike, Reebok, gold jewelery, Garmin 910, Trek mtb, Canondale Road bike are all expensive, but sorry they are expenses, NOT assets.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

31 Mar 09:46

Conceptual confusion. Very little credibility

by Hardeep S Puri

The release of “Your Voice, Our Pledge” the Congress Manifesto on 26 March 2014 provided an opportunity for students of Indian history, in particular the Indian National Movement to reflect on the state of play and sense of direction of India’s grand old party.  


Conceived in 1885 by Allan Octavian Hume and theosophist Annie Besant, the Party played a seminal role in the first five decades of the 19th century as a platform for India to rid itself of 190 years of colonialism. By any yardstick, the party is the heir to a great legacy irrespective of how its individual leaders may be viewed.


Admittedly, very few people read party Manifestos. And those that do in fact take the trouble of doing so, often experience a headache because the conceptual confusion and inherent contradictions such documents end up producing as a result of what is essentially a cut and paste effort.


Ten years is a long time in the life of a young nation and evolution of a polity. As India prepares to go to the poll in 2014 and the election is being fought on issues relating to governance and development, corruption and the paramount need to rejuvenate economic growth and create jobs, the Congress Manifesto merits careful examination.


The priorities that the country faced on the eve of Independence and six and half decades later are very different. The country’s population has grown from 350 million from 1945 to nearly 1.3 billion today. The country has moved from inward looking economic policies based on import substitution to more outward oriented postures with the advent of globalization and the first generation economic reforms. We have moved from what was derogatorily described as Hindu rates of growth to more respectable rates around 8% due to efforts by both the NDA and during the first phase of UPA-I till the world financial and economic crisis broke in September 2008.


Let us look more closely at the issue of subsidies, manufacturing, employment generation and corruption.


In a large economy like India’s, with hundreds of million people still living below the poverty line, it would be safe to argue that the State would need to continue using subsidies for a variety of reasons. The issue is to what extent and whose favour. A well known saying is that it is more efficient to teach a man how to fish rather than indefinitely supplying him fish to eat. Resources are limited and a subsidy is, in the final analysis, a charge on the state exchequer. Resort to subsidies on a massive scale apart from introducing inefficiencies on a massive scale will be counterproductive. The total amount of subsidies granted by the Central Government in 2003-04 was around Rs. 50,000 crores. The subsidy bill during the UPA’s ten years has already gone up to Rs. 2.7 lakh crores, an increase of 440%. The food subsidy bill alone in the last 10 years has gone up by 260% according to a recent report by a new government institution, the Independent Evaluation office. The Government spends Rs. 3.65 today to deliver Re. 1 worth of food and 57% of the subsidized food does not even get to the intended beneficiary!


It is important to underline that it is not the intent of helping the poor which is being questioned here. The question is whether resorting to large scale subsidies is the most effective way to help the poor. To label the debate as rich versus poor is an old device used by many to camouflage their interest to prevent an open debate.


Inefficient and regressive subsidies, which do not benefit intended beneficiaries, crowd out public and private investment. This investment could have been used to finance deserving schemes. In the UPA’s tenure, even as the subsidy bill has ballooned from 1.4% of GDP in 2004 to 2.6% of GDP in 2012 all in the garb of aiding inclusive growth, what has been achieved is just the opposite of what was intended. The Gini Coefficient, which is a measure inequality in a society, has gone up markedly from 0.325% in 2004-05 to 0.339% in 2012-13.


Acknowledging that resources are limited, the Manifesto says subsidies should only be given where absolutely necessary and only to the absolutely deserving. It forgets to mention that the UPA has increased this by 440 per cent to a whopping 2.27 lakh crore rupees. Then it goes on to introduce another absurdity, the introduction of sensible user charges. That is those willing to pay for better quality services like uninterrupted power and trains, will be taxed further. In short, further taxing of the middle class.


Another area where the Manifesto shows total conceptual confusion and virtually no credibility is in the area of manufacturing and the generation of employment. After 10 years of economic mismanagement, the Manifesto makes the astounding claim that the Indian National congress commits to 10% growth in manufacturing and increase in contribution of manufacturing sector share to 25% of the GDP. The implementation of the National Manufacturing Policy will enhance the share of manufacturing in GDP to 25% by 2022, it claims. Remember, the share of manufacturing as a percentage of GDP as a result of 10 years of UPA has come down to 16%! And, the next five years will take it up 25%? More likely, with the same actors in charge and continuing mismanagement, the share would come down and not increase as a percentage of GDP.


The Manifesto also announces detailed job agenda to create 10 crore jobs over the next five years. The target of 10 crore jobs over five years again carries no conviction. In the last 10 years, only 1 crore 20 lakh jobs were created. Apart from being unrealistic, the promise of creating 10 crore jobs with a land acquisition policy structurally designed to inhibit growth in manufacturing amounts to a claim which is dishonest and should be challenged as a deliberate attempt at misleading the electorate.


It is not surprising that given that this kind of conceptual confusion for a vision for the next five years, very few people took the Manifesto with any degree of seriousness. Bad economics and poor politics invariably go hand in hand.


On corruption, the most disappointing remark came from the Prime Minister while releasing the Manifesto. Acknowledging that corruption as an issue, he said corruption cannot be whisked or wished away from a developing economy. In other words, you first run the most corrupt government in independent India for a decade and then blame it on being a defining characteristic of a developing economy.


With its back to the wall, senior congressmen averse to fighting elections and the grand old party facing the prospect of registering its lowest ever Lok Sabha tally, which stands at 114 in 1999, it is not surprising that its leaders have started indulging in the disgraceful act of hurling invectives at its opponents. Choice of language such as Muat ka saudagar, khoon ki kheti and even the mild mannered Prime Minister wanting to be counted using unparliamentarily language sums up the picture and offers an explanation for the gloom.


Institutions are built assiduously, step by step. Institutions like political parties require a vision, a programmatic commitment to public service whose coordinates are anchored in morality. Vote bank politics at the expense of national security, use of intemperate language and unashamed rationalization of corruption on top of economic mismanagement have produced a crisis for the Congress, even bigger than 1977.

31 Mar 02:56

Teach your children all this…..

by subra

A few things that you should teach your kids:

1. Be responsible for your actions: When a kid runs and gets hurt, do not blame the bed, table or chair. Teach the kid that the table was stationary, it did not do anything, and the blame cannot be on the table.

2. Patience: the whole world will want the kid to do many things. Even the kid feels the power of ‘NOW’. Teach patience – make the kid wait for a bus, train, queues, – it actually helps relax when you know to internalize these things. You cannot ALWAYS find a ‘Ramu kaka’ who will buy your tickets. At least your children should NOT.

3. Everything has a Price, but Value is what YOU know to create out of it: Whether it is a Rs. 2000 doll with which she did not play or a Gym that you joined but did not go. The price was paid, but the value not drawn. And she could have a doll bought for her in class 2 which is STILL a favorite in class 12. That is super value. Exactly what happens later on in life while investing too.

4. Money has to be earned, it has to be respected, saved, invested, loved, and cared for. You may spend a lot or spend frugally, but ALL these steps are absolutely necessary. I know one businessman who keeps saying “I do not need money, my lifestyle is very simple’ – God hears him loud and clear – I have never known him to be COMFORTABLE with money. Immaterial of how much he has or needs. Funny.

5. Life is fair, we get what we deserve, and normally we are biased in our thinking.

6. Being rich and simple in this materialistic world is possible. It gives peace, and richness is a state of mind, not bank balance. Tell her that her heart should decide whether she is successful, not her excel sheet.

many more perhaps?

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

30 Mar 17:49

Financial Goals: Problems!

by subra

Many people do not have their OWN financial goals, so a cut n paste job has to be done. Which means you will HAVE to take the society’s goals and cut paste on YOUR life.

So let us take the GOALS that SOCIETY wants a BOY to have (sorry for the girl the goals are different)….

At 22 he should have got a nice Engineering degree from IIT (anything else is a compromise)

He should join IIM (A) i.e. assuming he cannot get into an Ivy League school, preferably Harvard.

At 27 he should get married to a nice girl from the same community, at 30 have a kid, at 33 repeat the performance.

He should have a nice big car, a nice house (size depends on the location, but a 3 bhk is a must, if it is 7 bhk, well you are more successful, great), and then he should retire at whatever age.

Clearly a guy will be judged on 2 dimensions – Academic and Professional is the first dimension and Family as the second dimension. There is no 3rd dimension allowed.

Now how does a financial planner deal with a kid who tells him the following:

I have finished my IIM A as per my parents wishes, and I think it is a useless degree. I do not want it. However it has got me a job that pays close to 2 million Rupees in a year. My father earned that when he was 54 years old.

Now what I want to do with my life?

Well I have the following goals:

See Various parts of Africa and South America by the time I am 30.

Work for a few years in the USA and see the whole of US by age 33.

Work for 4 years in the Gulf in an American Oil major and use the money to do some treks in Europe and use that experience to do some serious Mountaineering in the Himalayas.

If I get a like minded girl, marry her – and assume that she will earn and spend along with me. If we have a kid, great, or we will continue with Mountaineering and Cycling tours till we reach 40 years of age.

At age 40 take up a job in Europe, and see whole of Europe and at age 50 take up a senior management job in India. Hopefully hold it till I retire and then retire to a nice place in the South of India.

Now I am 24 and these are my goals.

How do you think a 49 year old financial planner will react?

His jaw will drop…imagine a 24 year old with no goals to buy a house, car, wife, parents, ….

The planner will run out of your house saying “Do not ask me questions outside the syllabus”….

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

30 Mar 17:48

“Mr Finance Minister Sir, 'the nation wants to know'... in an exit- interview with you?”

by Bindu Dalmia

As having been one of the strongest pillars of your government, who communicated with moderation and wisdom, and frequent sound-bytes, a rarity amongst the Trinity that ruled, I pose questions you have possibly introspected upon. However, having been one of the victims of the institutional damage your party inflicted from PMO downwards, you must have been constrained to follow the path of your judicious, professional, economic calling. Just how do you audit the performance of a regime when its tenure is up for review?

 

“Madam, I think you are wrong!” Is what an economist felt India's crew of. Illustrious stalwarts like the PM, Montek Singh and yourself ought to have “had the spine to tell Sonia”, when she insisted on her profligate populist schemes. The 'Mary Antionette economics' of welfare extravagance, has extracted a near ransom from an economy in deep debt & deficit, in order to keep afloat its BPL vote bank. The imprudence of political arithmetic, overpowering economic wisdom!

 

Sir, is Strategy 1 of the exiting crew: make it so ugly for the successive regime, so UPA looks pretty?!

 

As UPA retreats, it is with a near vengeance it leaves behind a legacy of an inflationary economy and near stagflation, as its parting gift to the successive regime. One that undoubtedly will stymie growth and entail rebuilding the nation from the ruins of a slowing economy, necessitate restoring the credibility of institutions, and cleaning up corruption. The known blunders of scams, welfarism, unstable policies, repatriation of black money from foreign shores, inflation etc has been amplified unsparingly in every media. I will deviate a little from the 'knowns', and reverently seek your views on some other salient points:

 

1) Window-dressing the national balance sheet. By off loading shares in ONGC, and taking in those profits to portray that you depart with an economy in good shape, is like borrowing from Peter to pay Paul! It only cosmetically glamourizes a looming deficit. “To control fiscal deficit, you ask PSU companies to declare hefty dividends on the one hand, and now you are asking for crossholding. But was this a way to raise in money and rein in fiscal deficit? Not a very comfortable situation to be in!” Was this a desperate move to try and keep the figure in check, because we have a downgrades sword still hanging on our head, Sir?

 

2) My personal objections to disinvestment and proceeds of privatisement have been that the gains have never gone to augment treasury, but to plug recurring losses\ leakages in the economy. Like the case of selling the fabled family silver. What then happens when that treasure chest diminishes\ dries up?

 

3) Your government leaves behind an unholy grail of graft, the provenance of its footprints reaching the PMO, pointedly nailing the offenders, but with atonement, punishment or remorse far from sight. Be that as it may, because of the prevailing mood of suspicion, a proactive CAG and apex court, acting as custodians\fiduciary to the countries interests, acted out of jurisprudence to revoke\put on hold infrastructure projects, coal allocations etc. Decisions that were imperative for the CAG and Supreme Court to impose,which need never have been necessary, had the FM and his ministry acted as vigilantes of the tax payers custodial finances. The CAG and judiciary had ceased to play ball with your government, placing implementation embargoes, that revoked contractual orders given out to mining and infrastructure companies to check foul play.

 

As an example, we have the 3rd largest deposits of coal, but supply is a monopoly of just one state owned company. Now if allocations are being questioned due to opaque procedures, stalled therefore by the Supreme Court to check-mate arbitrary contracts, that's the reason for hampering thermal power generation and depriving us of energy.

 

What has that impacted? Energy costs,out-of-whack! Not only are citizens suffering, but industry is bleeding. Sir, we have receded by nearly a decade, as these were man- made blunders, not an act of God like floods and quakes!

 

4) Economic growth is a function of macro world factors, and adjusting to its cyclicals, as also internal fundamentals. We mistook the flow of easy money from QE1,2&3, to be construed as our own growth, to get into a self congratulatory mode, as India being ahead of the curve! That inflow of money was, and will always be like the migratory bird in search of greener pastures! It was fleeting money, not coming out of intrinsic 'organic' growth, which is profits that accrue from a economy in vibrant health. Had you left the economy in good shape, job creation would not have grown at a meagre 2 per centover a decade, nor would India's income inequality doubled, as “10 per centof GDP rests with just 55 individuals today”. The Economist reveals a stark finding that “gross illicit outflows from India averaged $52 billion a year since 2007“, from the elitist few who gained from your policies!

 

5) NPA s of banks is a full-blown scam about to explode in the next regime. The mostly government-owned banking system is in a terrible state. The IMF has reported that banking sector loans to India’s ten largest conglomerates alone account for almost 100 percent of Indian banks’ net worth. Banks are unable to extend loans for even good projects and ventures. Banks come under the purview of the Ministry of Finance. What was the minister doing while the nation’s state-owned banking system was on this suicide mission? A fresh investment boom necessitates bank lending at a lower cost of capital. Sinking under bad loans, government lacks cash to recapitalise, a factoid you know better than us.

 

6) Each time the government fell short of revenue targets, draconian instructions were given to extort from the 'known' base of tax payers,which is 3 per centof the population, instead of widening the tax base with a tax friendly regime. If government revenues fell due to its inept handling of economy, by giving a tax-man a “target” like one given to a salesman, it implied that lower- bureaucracy was mandated to perform, by pleasing their bosses. This, in affect, was an implicit, covert call to extract from tax- abiding industry and citizens, by slapping fines and cases, to air-brush deficits. I extend this view to your governments retrospective tax amendments, that severely dented business confidence, as precisely an effort to extort taxes to make good your deficit.

 

7) By what parameters do you audit fiscal the performance of an exiting regime? By taking a 'mean' average of a 10year performance?! No Sir. Each years balance sheet counts. In which case your dismal performance gets camouflaged by a few good years! Or does one view it in its finality of how future-perfect it has left us?

 

8) Inflation has led to a decline in the rupee, which fell to all-time lows last year. Only recently has it started to recover, the credit for this goes to the Reserve Bank of India and its proactive policies under governor Raghuram Rajan.

Yes, “The nation wants to know..”! Was silence a virtue, or a passive endorsement of the rampant kleptocracy? Or was it a triumvirate pact of omerta, imperiousness and indifference? If these questions didn't warrant a reply, its prudence to offer an exit-interview, one that a resigning Servant of the People, as a minister, and custodian of the nations coffers, ought to offer before he departs. Provenance of guilt, the ultimate beneficiaries of serial scams must be known, traced to its origins through transaction trails, booked, punished, and the illicit exodus repatriated into the cycle of mainstream economy. A measure that would have given every tax payer a reprieve, undoubtedly!

 

Sir, we don't deserve to be incurring a 30 per centhighest slab of taxation, if it was not for the scale of national heist by a predator government. This is NOT linked to the force majeur events of global slow down as an alibi, as you would have us believe. Tax rates should have been reasonable, in view of inflationary pressures you unleashed. It was highly do-able! Instead, the 3 Wizards of finance, gave us an inflation highest in living memory, with no instrument to park earnings at a safe 'inflation+return'. That pains!

 

The records speaks for itself. At the Congress Raj finally and mercifully comes to an end, rarely has an exiting regime deliberately left behind a legacy of such damage due to its profligacy. What you leave behind is memories of hardship, fear& intimidation, not one of hope and encouragement. Thank your regime for liberalisation,but NO Thank You for eroding every gain of opening the economy and regressing Indians by a decade , Mr FM, Sir!

 

Follow me @BinduDalmia on twitter for more conversations on Indian socio-economic and political scenario, on the twists and turns of India in Quest of her Destiny.

30 Mar 17:44

Wealth: and the problems….

by subra

Earning money is far far easier than managing the money. Many inheritors have ruined the inheritance. The Birla clan in various portions has destroyed wealth, have they not?

There are just too many examples – here are 2 from the USA…Evelyn Adams won the New Jersey lottery not once but twice, in 1985 and 1986. All $5.4 million of winnings has since evaporated – mostly into Atlantic City slot machines. Relegated to living in a trailer in a trailer park, Adams said, “I wish I had the chance to do it all over again. I’d be much smarter about it now.”

William “Bud” Post won $16.2 million in the Pennsylvania lottery. He invested in a car and restaurant business. Within a year he found himself $1 million in debt and went on to declare bankruptcy. To make matters worse, his brother was arrested for hiring a hit man to assassinate him so he could claim the winnings for himself. “Bud” now lives on Social Security saying, “I wish it had never happened. It was a total nightmare.”

So all that talk about ‘I wish I had inherited a 2 million $ home or ..whatever..makes no sense unless YOU know how to manage the money. Alternatively knowing that YOU do not KNOW is very important, so that you do not squander it away like our two aforesaid heroes.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

29 Mar 04:13

Financial Literacy: why it will not happen anywhere

by subra

The greatest topic for discussion in financial circles – especially the elite ones is a) financial literacy and b) financial inclusion. In this article I am about to debunk the ‘financial literacy’ joke that goes around.

First of all it must be understood that any change can come ONLY and ONLY if society wants it, and leaders are willing to do it. Like a upper caste Raja Ram Mohan Roy who spearheaded the anti Sati movement. His OWN community was against him, but he still did it. Or Jyotiba Phule working for the upliftment of women in Maharashtra.

The average investor is happy in his state of bliss and is NOT seeking to become financially literate. Or if he thinks that by passing the exams like the ones conducted by NSE he will become literate, dear dear me, he is up against shit creek.

Let us start at the basics.

1. Who should be interested in financial literacy?
OBVIOUSLY the investor. Well he is not. He is busy watching IPL and T-20 world cup.

2. Who else should be interested in financial literacy?
The regulators like RBI, SEBI, and IRDA. It will mean they will have lesser frauds, and thus lesser headache – well this is what you thought, right?
Hell NO. The more the frauds the greater the work that the regulators WILL BE CALLED to do. More branches, more people, more budget, – see the drift? The regulator is interested in increasing his ‘kingdom’ and is no hurry to reduce frauds, cheating, etc. Unless of course Narendra Modi starts a system of imposing FINES on the bureaucrats PERSONALLY ….well this will not happen.

3. The manufacturers like mutual funds, banks and insurance companies?

Well at a superficial level yes, but if every customer became a Sucheta, Debashis, then the real lucrative products will not sell. So there is a little interest in financial literacy – enough that they come AND BUY financial products (current manufacturers cover about 10% of the population) BUT not too much that he/she ask questions about why, what and whether of a product.

The brokers, the real estate industry etc. are now happy that the REGULATION is not hurting them where it should, so they do not want a very ‘informed’ customer. Imagine a customer asking a broker for a MONTHLY p&l statement where the brokerage is shown separately!

So no the manufacturers do not want it.

4. What about the intermediaries?

Well the intermediaries are of 2 types – banks and IFAs. Banks obviously have no time and are interested in selling a myriad set of products – from loans to pensions. So it is easy to see a bank asking a client to invest in a pension plan which pays 8% while at the same time sell a car loan at 14%p.a. Obviously such games will go out of the window if the customer gets educated. So banks are out.

The IFA is in a precarious position – the client does not know what is the Value Add by the IFA. So there is no element of ‘relationship’ for the client to learn from the IFA.

So who is there to ‘teach’ the common investor the tricks of the trade? WELL NOBODY.

So if a person really wants to be financially literate, he has to learn it himself.

As they say when the need arises, the Guru appears.

Reading Subramoney is a good step towards financial literacy. However you need to realize that at the back end of Subramoney is a fat man trying to improve his fitness, relaxed and having financial freedom to be arrogant, has a terrible equity bias, hates people who do not wish to help themselves. He entertains, provokes, tickles, irritates, ridicules you on financial matters. Amongst all this if YOU can educate yourself, you are welcome. If you do not wish to read, change, accept, please be my guest. As they say in Arabic – Khalli Valli……

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

28 Mar 11:30

Further proof that we are predators: carnivores, meat eaters.

by Sanjeev Sabhlok

I chanced upon this short video. It shows that having eyes in the front is often a key characteristic of predators (for details also see this).

The owl is a classic example. Among the birds it is a pure predator. And this is how its eyes focus on prey:

Some birds can see the full 360 degrees. Many herbivores can also see almost 360 degrees, since they are designed to FLEE, not to ATTACK. 

You can see below one of our closest animal relatives (chimpanzee) hunting for a monkey which they EAT RAW.

Coupled with a lot of other evidence, this is CONFIRMATION that man is a predatory meat eater.

28 Mar 04:54

Estimating the size of corruption in India

by T T Ram Mohan
Everybody knows corruption is rife in India. Just how bad is the problem? The Economist attempts to quantify corruption in India using three methods:

The first is to tally the money made from scams, based on estimates from officials and investigators. (Our calculation uses realised profits, or the present value of anticipated profits. We use the low end of some official estimates.) The second approach, which is applied more widely in our new index of cronyism (see article), measures the relative performance of billionaires in industries, such as mining and property, that are prone to rent-seeking relative to those in other lines of business (see chart 1). A final method tracks the relative performance of an index of politically linked listed firms constructed by Saurabh Mukherjea of Ambit Capital, a broker (see chart 2). An average of the approaches suggests the gains from rent-seeking over the past decade peaked at about $80 billion. That is equivalent to 7% of the stockmarket’s value today. It is worth noting, though, that the share of GDP for the rent-seeking billionaires and the premium on politically connected firms are no longer what they were in the boom years.

Assuming bribes paid were 5-15% of money made by businessmen, the Economist estimates that total bribes paid would amount to $4-$12bn.  Presumably, this is over a decade. Translating into rupees, this amounts to Rs2400-7200 crore every year.
28 Mar 04:53

Diversification, Skewness and Adverse Selection

When I first read about the fascinating ‘Star Wars’ deal between Steven Spielberg and George Lucas, my reaction was that this was a simple diversification story. But then I realized that it is more complex than that; the obstacles in the form of skewness preference, adverse selection and moral hazard are strong enough to make deals like this probably quite rare.

The story itself is very simple and Business Insider tells it well. Back in 1977, George Lucas was making his ‘Star Wars’ film, and Steven Spielberg was making ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’. Lucas was worried that his ‘Star Wars’ film might bomb and thought that ‘Close Encounters’ would be great hit. So he made an offer to his friend Spielberg:

All right, I’ll tell you what. I’ll trade some points with you. You want to trade some points? I’ll give you 2.5% of ‘Star Wars’ if you give me 2.5% of ‘Close Encounters’.

Spielberg’s response was:

Sure, I’ll gamble with that. Great.

Both films ended up as great classics, but ‘Star Wars’ was by far the greater commercial success and Lucas ended up paying millions of dollars to Spielberg.

At the time when neither knew whether either of the films would succeed, the exchange was a simple diversification trade that made both better off. So why are such trades not routine? One reason could be that many films are made by large companies that are already well diversified.

A more important factor is information asymmetry: normally, each director would know very little of the other’s film and then trades become impossible. The Lucas-Spielberg trade was possible because they were friends. It is telling that the trade was made after Lucas had spent a few days watching Spielberg make his film. It takes a lot of due diligence to overcome the information asymmetry.

The other problem is skewness preference. Nobody buys a large number of lottery tickets to “diversify the risk”, because that diversification would also remove the skewness that makes lottery tickets worthwhile. Probably both Lucas and Spielberg thought their films had risk adjusted returns that made them attractive even without the skewness characteristic.

It is also possible that Lucas simply did an irrational trade. Lucas is described as “a nervous wreck ... [who] felt he had just made this little kids’ movie”. Perhaps, Spielberg was simply at the right time at the right place to do a one-sided trade with an emotional disturbed counterparty. Maybe, we should all be looking out for friends who are sufficiently depressed to offer us a Lucas type trade.

28 Mar 04:26

Supreme Court and the sealed envelope

by Raghu Krishnan

It is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done, observed Viscount Gordon Hewart, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, some 83 years ago. That is one of the most often-quoted judicial comments. Which is why one wonders why the contents of a sealed envelope should be considered confidential in the ongoing case being heard by the Supreme Court of India on the Justice Mudgal committee report on illegal betting and spot-fixing in the Indian Premier League (IPL), the biggest domestic T20 tournament in this country and perhaps in the world. Surely this is not a matter of national security which has to be kept confidential.


If the Mudgal committee indicted the BCCI president Srinivasan's son-in-law Meiyappan of illegal betting and spot-fixing, then where is the need for another report in a sealed envelope which has to kept confidential and which need not be revealed to the people of India who have a right to know? The only reasons could be that the contents of the sealed envelope are not hard evidence or that they are too sensitive. If the contents of the sealed envelope are not hard evidence, then how much credence should be given to it since some of those involved are prone to making wild allegations when it comes to cricket and match-fixing?


Take the other proposition that the contents of the sealed envelope are too sensitive to be made public. Why should it be kept a secret from the public since IPL cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be considered a matter of national security? Keeping the contents of the sealed envelope confidential only adds to the confusion and speculation. It has been known for well over a decade that Dawood Ibrahim, one of the prime accused in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts, has been running a global betting and match-fixing syndicate and that his henchmen have their fingers in every pie. Which could also include IPL.


The road to hell is paved with good intentions, goes another oft-quoted non-judicial saying. The alternative to conflict of interest surely need not be anarchy where no one knows who is in charge until a judicial decision is announced at the last moment. It was obvious that there was a conflict of interest even when the IPL was launched some six to seven years ago and when India Cements, the company of which the then BCCI secretary N Srinivasan was the CEO, was allowed to bid for and buy the franchise for the Chennai Super Kings (CSK). A petition had subsequently then been filed in the Supreme Court by another former BCCI president A C Muthaiah, alleging conflict of interest vis-a-vis the CSK franchise. What is ironical is that some of those who are currently leading a self-acclaimed crusade to clean up Indian cricket were till a year ago writing lengthy opinion pieces on the editorial pages of leading newspapers on how wonderful the IPL was.


The Supreme Court has proposed on March 27 that someone like Sunil Gavaskar function as the interim head of the BCCI so as to facilitate the holding of a thorough investigatory probe into IPL on the basis of the contents of the sealed envelope, In an interview with NDTV for whom he comments on cricket matters, Gavaskar was asked about the statement he made some 10 months ago that Srinivasan had done a lot for Indian cricket and for former cricketers. "Everyone is innocent until he is proved guilty," Gavaskar said, citing another oft-repeated judicial quote while stating that he was prepared to be the interim head of the BCCI if the Supreme Court wanted him to take on the responsibility.


Gavaskar also made two other points in his latest interview with NDTV when asked whether IPL should be suspended. He noted that when the original allegations of match-fixing in cricket were raised in 1999, no one had suggested that county cricket, Test matches or ODIs should be banned or suspended until the game was cleaned up. The game, he said, could continue even while the cleaning-up process was going on. Asked whether CSK and Rajasthan Royals (RR) should be suspended from the coming edition of IPL, Gavaskar noted that both teams had given immense pleasure to millions of fans.


However, if the IPL by-laws stipulate that a team can be suspended if its promoters or main officials indulge in acts that are detrimental to the image of cricket, then, of course, action should be taken against a franchise, irrespective of whether or not the team has won the tournament more often than its competitors. However, it makes little sense if a team is first suspended and then the final decision is announced that the franchise is not guilty.


Whatever decision had to be taken, should have been taken promptly. Whether the issue is one of conflict of interest or the Mudgal committee report, it serves no purpose if the process is unduly prolonged. Remember the BJP TV commercial which shows only one cricket captain appearing for the toss of a crucial match. Surely, IPL-reality need not follow TV-commercial art.

28 Mar 04:23

When should I start investing

by subra

Last week I was speaking to one of the bright kids I work with.

For practical purposes let us call him John Galt. This kid (25 years old) has just started earning a nice salary. He spends well but can put away a nice amount on a regular basis, but is not doing so. I asked him why, and he had a good answer. He hopes to start a business (perhaps) and cannot make up his mind about whether to, when to or…any of the other questions.

So he has decided to keep money in the Income bucket (bank fixed deposit) rather than a growth bucket (real estate, equities). Very sensible. Yesterday another girl around 30 years wanted a pension plan for herself. She is the wife of a very high income guy and can set aside a nice amount on a monthly basis from her income. While saving for retirement (this is called the accumulation phase for those who did not know).

Investing success is a function of 3 important factors –

starting early,
investing enough,
invest often,
do not withdraw, and save it from the taxman as long as possible.

Then of course aim for and get a reasonable rate of return. The math is pretty elementary. And compounding worked in the past, works in the present and will work in the future! Past performance in this case is a great indicator of future returns!!

The relationship between time, amount invested, frequency of compounding, rate of return, and the total corpus is purely mathematical! Clearly no brains are required – V = A*(1+r)^n. It is boring, clear, mathematical and accurate.

If you can control A, n and aim for a reasonable r, V is guaranteed.

The problem is that success requires discipline, and wealth creation should start early and be given a high priority early in one’s career. There is a beautiful calculator called ‘cost of delay’ calculator. I have no clue about how to put it on the site so …not being put up!

Suffice it to say if you are 23 years of age and you could save Rs. 10,000 a month, assuming a 9% p.a. you are going to have Rs. 26,37,200 LESS in your retirement account by the time you are 58 years of age. Quite expensive a delay?

Is it not? The magic of compounding rewards early starters. Delay may make it impossible to attain THE GOAL. After all like in driving – start early, drive safely and reach alive is good advice whether in driving or in investing. Do not try to make up in ‘r’ what you can do in ‘n’.

It is like starting late and driving fast.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

28 Mar 04:21

Post-May 16 combinations

by Bibek Debroy

On May 16, 1532, Sir Thomas More resigned as Lord Chancellor. More is famous as the author of Utopia. In common parlance, Utopia represents an ideal society that is never achieved. Indeed, for reasons that had nothing to do with the book, Thomas More was later beheaded. Whatever be the probabilities associated with these outcomes, on May 16, there will be four possibilities: (a) UPA-III, (b) NDA, (c) Third Front on its own, and (d) Third Front, propped up from outside by the Congress or BJP. In terms of growth recovery and economic policy, what do these four possibilities mean?


What is the Utopia towards which India will be headed? Manifestos are imperfect guides. Unless they belong to one of the communist parties, manifestos are strikingly similar. They aren’t product differentiators and are deliberately meant to be motherhood statements, difficult to pin down. You will be hard put to find specific positive lists (what will be done) or negative lists (what will not be done).


If something actually is on a negative list on a manifesto, that certainly means it is “no-go”. But something being on a positive list doesn’t make it a “go”. You may rightly identify policies introduced by the UPA and trace them back to the National Common Minimum Programme (NCMP) of May 2004. However, one can also pinpoint items from the NCMP that haven’t been implemented.


Therefore, let’s forget manifestos. Let’s also forget red herring of instability, potentially associated with (c) and (d). UPA was stable. Did that necessarily lead to policies most people regard as desirable? Note that there was support for those policies within the UPA. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have been implemented. So, the proposition about reforms being irreversible is also a red herring, unless one pins down what one means by reforms.


Forward Reforms?


As a generic template, reforms should be about reliance on market principles and reduction of government intervention. If that’s the definition, there was a reversal of reforms under UPA, more so under UPA-II. Witness intervention in a series of markets, not just land and labour. Reforms being irreversible has a benign sound to it, as if reforms mean forward movements alone. However, the Union government does have malignant powers and is capable of driving in reverse gear.


On May 16, there will be a Union government in Delhi and India is federal in character. Ipso facto, it isn’t a government that can introduce “reforms” without consulting the states. If one tracks what proponents of reforms expect after May 16, one will probably get a wishlist that includes FDI, privatisation, fiscal consolidation, tax reforms (DTC, GST), subsidytargeting, liberalisation of private entry in assorted sectors and repeal of some legislation (MGNREGS, FSB, LARR). Expectations need to be more nuanced. Subsidy-targeting cannot work without the states agreeing.


Ditto for tax reforms, where revenue compensation is an issue, apart from exemption removal and elimination of all local taxes (if it is proper GST). Tweaking legislation like MGNREGS, FSB and LARR is fine. But does one really expect repeal? Nor will liberalisation of private entry be oneshot and big-bang. Without privatisation and/or exemption removal, fiscal consolidation becomes a function of growth.


If one considers these constraints, that wishlist thus reduces to FDI and privatisation. Across the spectrum of (a) through (d), does one expect positions to be remarkably different? Even if one excludes UPA-III as a continuation of UPA-II, I doubt one can argue that positions on FDI and privatisation will be remarkably different across (b) through (d).


The Disease, Not the Carrier


The differentiator with the last few years is somewhere else, not in that wishlist of reforms. The malaise, more acute under UPA-II, has been undermining of PM/PMO, Cabinet and an administrative decision-making collapse. When we think of permutations after May 16, we focus on composition of Parliament and legislature. That may be relevant, but perhaps not as much as we think.


Third Time Unlucky


Similarly, if one is setting out a wishlist, I think one is asking the wrong question. After May 16, (a) through (d), will this executive collapse be reversed? That’s where (a) gets tarred with the UPA-I and UPA-II brush and one is sceptical. There is no reason to presume (c) or (d) will also be plagued by similar lassitude. Purely on that continuum, my ranking, in decreasing order of reviving administration, would be (b), (c), (d) and (a).


This doesn’t mean the wishlist is irrelevant. I think there will be incremental movement on tax reforms, decentralisation of schemes and tweaking of aforementioned legislation. In 2009, was there any reason to presume UPA-II would have found these abhorrent? Not really. If there is economic disenchantment with the UPA, that’s also because tar on the brush was thicker under UPAII and note that tar is also obtained from coal and petroleum, through destructive distillation.

28 Mar 03:39

Regulator: Speaks the language of the strongest player!

by subra

Amazing to see a pattern in the working of a Regulator…..one thing common to all the regulators is that they speak the language of the strongest player!

When SEBI was formed and it took charge of the mutual fund space, there was only ONE mutual fund – the UTI. So there was a tussle between SEBI and UTI, but not really nothing spectacular. Then SEBI brought in many Mutual fund laws – and all the schemes of UTI were also brought in under the purview of SEBI. At this stage the mutual fund industry was dominated by the UTI.

New mutual fund houses were born and they were just trying to establish themselves. EXACTLY at that time the UTI ’64 scam happened – 1998 or thereabouts.

Sebi brought in a rule in 2001 that only a person who had passed the ‘AMFI exam’ as it was then called could sell mutual funds. UTI said ‘please allow our existing agents to sell’ – SEBI said NO.

Cut to IRDA. Irda also said ‘all agents should have passed the exam’. LiC said ‘Our agents will sell without the exam’. Irda said ‘fine’.

This was a very big advantage for LiC – which did not suffer like UTI.

Cut to 2004. Hdfc Standard Life launched a Term Insurance plan along with Riders. These riders were very attractive for the customer. LIC felt threatened. IRDA changed the law to say that the Rider Premium cannot exceed the Main Policy premium. Simply because at that stage LiC did not have enough riders. I have no clue how much change has happened since then.

The ULIPs of 2004 had a clause by which you could do a tremendous amount of top up (I have such a plan). This allowed you to dramatically reduce the COST of the load – because the loads were only 1% of the top up.

So technically you could take a ULIP – with say Rs. 1 L premium (paid 8k per month), and sum assured Rs. 20L. Then you could top it up with say Rs. 3L – AFTER PAYING JUST Rs. 8000 as regular premium! The load on the regular premium was 40%, but on the top up only 1%. Thus your total costs came down dramatically.

Again since the most powerful player COULD not play the fund management game, this was also LOST TO THE CUSTOMER.

Of course nothing of this was told out loud…so people do not know why the changes happened. You could only speculate.

However for the observant, it was becoming clear..and like a Ex Journalist friend told me, I realised that “the Regulator speaks the language of the strongest player”….

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

27 Mar 03:13

Indian Rupee – Gainer among Losers

by Manisha Gupta

The Indian rupee is up more than 2% in the current quarter. The Indian unit at 8 month highs, is one of the best performers in the EM currencies, 2nd only after Indonesian Rupiah, holding ground even as the Dollar Index is holding steady around 80 vs the basket of currencies.


While there has been FII outflow from other Emerging markets, India has been a favorable destination attracting that money. The pre elections rally in Indian equity markets and the consistent FII inflows have supported the currency.


Reports that China Government would unveil stimulus measures after string of weak economic data has supported the EM atmosphere.


Also due credit is to the improving Indian economy which has improved investor sentiment. The CAD and inflation numbers are investor friendly. The optimism stays firm, even as US has hinted at ending the monthly bond buying program before the end of this year. India has seen FII inflow of near $3bln in debt and equity in current month and upwards of $8.5bln in India in 2014.


It is also being called the Pre Elections rally where the hopes of a stable and business friendly government after elections are supporting the market.


The big banks in the meanwhile are looking at further gains in the currency. Barclays and BoAML are predicting 59 in near term and HDFC expects Rupee appreciation upto 57 if elections go as predicted.


The rally could see a dent if investors see signs of political instability emerge after elections. Many people on street also say that they wont be surprised to see profit taking before elections itself.


The RBI measure have worked well too but then most of the measure taken are all near term, the money has come in short end, the last 5 years in policy and growth have been a concern and since it also is the election year, the next government will have to come and deliver.


Many call it the calm before the storm as the macro concerns have all but subsided. The environment is still fragile not just in India but globally.


There are concerns on the monsoon front, the food security and other subsidies still continue. Much of stability has been the result of FII inflows which need to sustain.


So while there are lots of factors to watch out for, as of now the markets have everything positive working for them and a break of 60 on the Rupee is still a big one to break.

27 Mar 03:13

Good advise or Bad advise?

by subra

When you get advice from somebody you are hardly in a position to tell whether it is in YOUR interest, right?

Well, here are some tips! When you go to any professional these days they make their advice sound very ‘professional’ sounding.

So what are the signals that you should look for?

1. You go to a dentist with a Rs. 750 budget and he gives you a Rs. 84,000 solution: Sure it is the Merc that he is suggesting, and your whole body is screaming against it, listen to your GUT. Say No. Maybe you need a simple solution, look for one. Looking for 30 year solutions makes no sense when you are 50 years old or for worse looking for 30 year solutions when you 84 years of age. The wood that burns you is not likely to appreciate the quality of the dentistry, right? LISTEN TO YOUR GUT.

2. The advice is from somebody who is NOT bothered about YOUR GOALS: If you get a running coach who is interested in making you run faster, and harder may not be the right coach for you. Face it, if you are an amateur runner and run for fun and your coach wants to showcase you as a ‘show off’ or ‘beta’ client – your goals do not match. Do not listen to him and injure yourself. This is poor advice!

3. The advice is not aligned with your life goals or ultimate vision: If you are a CA and have also done your MBA in finance, maybe you wish to be in equity research. It is possible that you get a sales job and your boss is advising you to do aggressive wrong sales, it is poor advice. This is largely taking a short term view and looking for short term success whereas your long term goals are not in tandem with what you are doing. Avoid such jobs. If you can afford it work for a lesser salary in a job that co-ordinates better with your long term vision!

4. The adviser is wrongly qualified: He is a friend who has experience, but is not qualified. I have seen Electronic engineers, Marine Engineers, CAs, doctors, handling their equity portfolios. Many of them have done a fantastic job of managing their portfolios. However it does not qualify them to give you advice simply because they may not know asset allocation, may not understand risk covers, may have been lucky with a few deals. Be careful – education helps while giving advice – empirical evidence is not enough. Good track record is fine, but not adequate.

Again there is another risk in GOOD TRACK RECORD which the adviser claims – he may or may not be telling you ALL HIS STORIES. If an adviser got WIPRO right as an investment in 1980 and was still sitting on a few of those shares and have a NET WORTH OF Rs. 300+ crores WITHOUT getting anything else right in his life. So if his track record is NOT in the public domain, well, to me, professionally speaking, HE DOES NOT HAVE A TRACK RECORD. Simple.

5. Your body feels wrong: When you feel somebody has a conflict of interest – a doc selling a particular action, an agent selling a particular product, …..scream and run away from the place. When you know that there is a conflict of interest, run away from there!

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

26 Mar 02:58

Feeling motivated when things are down

by Ashvini Kumar Saxena

How does an entrepreneur cope when the business is not doing well. They need to cope with “I told you so” brigade in addition to the stress caused by paying rent, handling customer apathy and facing many other problems.

This is the most vulnerable point in the life of an entrepreneur. This point onward, they start to question the decisions about starting their venture. They start telling themselves that life would be have been better in comforts of a secure job. They give in to noisy chatter in their brain which brings out flaws in their business that they never noticed.

But has anything changed ?

I doubt it because the entrepreneur sees seasonal dips in business which even big business suffer as permanent decline. But the brain perceives it differently ( and you would know what I am talking about). Entrepreneur may also enter into depression as a result.

Does it need to be this bad ? How do we manage our brain and stop the constant chatter that brings out the negativity.

Here are a few tips from my own experience

Distrust the thing brain is saying

Brain is fickle. Most of the time it leads us. We may be optimistic or gloomy based on our constitution. The first step then is to recognize that brain should not lead us. We own it and not vice versa. Brain loves chatter and feeds on it.

Allow your brain to relax, distract yourself or just laugh at the silly things it says. Soon you will find that you are worried lesser about what it says. One does not need a spiritual guru or self help books to make this work. Just some practice.

Follow your heart

Scientifically speaking, heart has no thinking center. It only pumps blood to the brain. But our pulse do race when we are excited. That is what made us start our venture in the first place. Had we thought only from brain, there would no entrepreneurship ( only suicidal entrepreneurs).

Listen to that part of the brain that makes our hearts beat faster. That is the reason we are where we are right now.

Ignore advices that don’t add value

Everyone you meet or know has some advice to offer based on their personal experience. While someone will say “good idea” and some will dislike it, only you can analyze if your idea is good.

This is not to discard the right advice but allowing only the advice that adds value to our business to reach us. Rest can be ignored.

Do research to get more knowledge

The only way to get smarter is to get more information and act on it. There are so many tools available for increasing our knowledge. Books helps expand our horizons.

Before we rely on advice from someone , it is a good idea to do some research yourself. We may not become an expert but we are not a novice either.

Give business some time to grow

I don’t think many businesses become success overnight. They need time and perseverance. There are seasonal dips  or long periods of inactivity

But when the world sleeps, entrepreneur was still burning oil ( that probably has negative connotations Open-mouthed smile). Patience is the best ingredient to hard work and when we are entrepreneurs , we need lots of it.

26 Mar 02:58

India’s Stake in Crimea

by TK Arun

India has a vital stake in supporting Russia that goes beyond friendship, solidarity with an old and valuable ally and stability of arms supplies: multipolarity of the world order. India is right to oppose sanctions against Russia over Crimea.


Crimea hosts the base of the Russian navy’s Black Sea fleet. It is of vital strategic interest. Would the US allow a similar situation to develop next to its border? The 1962 Cuban crisis was about a sovereign country, Cuba, deploying missiles supplied by its ally, the Soviet Union.


Cuba, as a sovereign nation that respects past treaty obligations to the extent of coexisting with a US base in Guantánamo, a part of its own territory, had the right to deploy defence mechanisms of its choice on its own territory. That did not mean that deploying nuclear missiles a stone’s throw away from the US mainland was an acceptable development for anyone with any interest in maintaining world peace.


The situation in Crimea is similar. Having an anti-Russian government control Crimea would erode Russian security and thus stability of the world order, in which the US has overwhelming military superiority but not total. It is in the interest of countries that seek autonomous space for their own development to shore up, not weaken, the countervailing poles of power that exist, such as they are.


This is the strongest reason for India, China and other such countries that neither receive nor cherish a place under the sprawling security umbrella of the mighty US have for supporting Russia in its current stand-off with the West over Crimea. In reality, this logic holds for all of Ukraine. So, what is intriguing in the current developments in Ukraine is Russia’s apparent willingness to make short-term gains in Crimea at the risk of alienating Ukraine per se.


For, unless a civil war in Ukraine in which Russia intervenes, attracting global opposition of a kind that would have real bite, unlike the growls of protest over Crimea, and brings up a pro-Russian regime, Ukraine has been handed over to the West. Once the current Crimean contretemps gets over, it is not unlikely that Putin’s success is written down as a Pyrrhic victory.


Common Roots


Ukraine, Belarus and Russia share a common cultural and historical heritage. In the 10th century, Viking Oleg established an empire called Kievan Rus, of which Kiev was the centre of power and whose realms embraced what today would be called western Russia, besides Ukraine, Belarus and parts of Poland and other regions that now fall in assorted east European nations. This flourished till the 13th century when Mongol hordes put paid to centralised authority.


Later, the centre of power shifted further east to Moscow, from which the next Russian empire grew. Vladimir, who embraced Christianity, replacing polytheistic Slavic paganism as the state religion across Russia, did so in Crimea.


The Red Army fought some of its fiercest battles with Hitler’s forces in Ukraine. Of the 20 million Soviet war dead at the end of the World War II, a sizeable contingent came from Ukraine. Strong bonds of history, culture and blood tie Russia and Ukraine together. Which is why the current bout of hostilities seems to be the result of particularly inept policy on Russia’s part.


The Tatars were a large presence in Ukraine, including Crimea, till they were forcibly exiled by Stalin, whom comrades of the CPI(M) still celebrate as a great master on the subject of nationalities and their peaceful coexistence. Some have returned, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and constitute sizeable minorities, as in Crimea.


Crimeans Creamed Ukraine


It is not clear whether they voted to join Russia or stay with Ukraine in the Crimean referendum of March 16. But there is little reason to doubt the validity of the vote that saw 96% of those voting choosing to join Russia. The international community has conveniently chosen to rule the referendum invalid. In any case, in Crimea, 76 per cent of the population voted in the referendum. There are no reports that any force was used to intimidate anyone into not voting. If there were any hint of anything like that, the world would definitely have heard of it. That means an overwhelming majority of Crimeans voted to join Russia.


Silent on Referendum


New Delhi, on its part, will not be keen to cite the right of a people to determine their own national affiliation or autonomy, thanks to Kashmir. You can’t say this particular right is good for the people of Crimea but wholly inappropriate in Kashmir.


Kashmir is another place where millennia of past historical and cultural association has not prevented the emergence of extreme alienation and where migration, forced and otherwise, has changed the composition of the population.


Migration raises questions over correspondence between the timeframe that is valid for determining national belongingness and the population that is called on to make the choice about belonging. But India’s case for siding with Russia is in terms of the world order it wants, not anything else.

26 Mar 02:49

The ancestors of the BJP senior BIGOT, Subramanian Swamy, must have been MONKEYS

by Sanjeev Sabhlok

A bigger DONKEY perhaps doesn't exist in India today. Turns out this joker is a SENIOR BJP leader. It is shocking that this is the kind of people who are not only getting into BJP but rising in its hierarchy. Of course, led by Modi.

The problem is that this is all very consistent now: The Togadias, the Swamys, the Rajeev Malhotras, the Modis. They want to DESTROY India and convert it into a nation where there is no freedom, no free thought, no possibility of peaceful growth and prosperity.

Someone asked me on FB: "don't you think Indian Muslims have Hindu ancestry."

MY RESPONSE

"So what? How does it matter to this ASS called Subramanain? DONKEY man. What is his ancestry? MONKEY."

Snippets first, then the fuller youtube video.

In this first snippet Swamy insists that BJP's agenda is to make the Ram Mandir, confirming what Togadia has been saying. 

In the following snippet, Swamy calls for disenfranchisement of Muslims who deny their ancestors were Hindus.

FULL INTERVIEW:

Looks like this JOKER has an extremely large following. 

With such "LEADERS" of BJP it might be better to just have the stupid socialists back again. It is NOT good enough that he has not been given a Lok Sabha ticket by BJP. That they even accept such a person is a huge issue.

In any event, the need for a liberal party couldn't be more pressing. 

 

25 Mar 02:58

Not Class Warfare, Optimal Taxation

by Greg Mankiw
Today's column by Paul Krugman is classic Paul: It takes a policy favored by the right, attributes the most vile motives to those who advance the policy, and ignores all the reasonable arguments in favor of it.

In this case, the issue is the reduction in capital taxes during the George W. Bush administration.  Paul says that the goal here was "defending the oligarchy's interests."

Really? As Paul well knows, there is a large literature in economics suggesting that an optimal tax system imposes much lower taxes on capital income than on wage income (or consumption).  I can personally attest that President Bush's economic advisers were well aware of this literature.

Note that when Barack Obama ran for President in 2008, he campaigned on only a small increase in the tax rate on dividends and capital gains.  He did not suggest raising the rate on this income to the rate on ordinary income.  Is this because Barack Obama also favors the oligarchy, or is it because his advisers also understood the case against high capital taxation?
25 Mar 02:51

EPF Interest Rate from 1952, How does EPFO earn to pay interest

by Kirti

0n 5th Mar 2020, EPF Rates were Slashed to 7-Year Low of 8.5% from 8.65% of 2018-19. From FY 2017-18, interest is being credited after Sep instead of Apr.  The EPF interest rate of India is decided by the central government with the consultation of Central Board of trustees. In the past several decades, the […]

The post EPF Interest Rate from 1952, How does EPFO earn to pay interest appeared first on Be Money Aware Blog.

25 Mar 02:49

The Investor and the Businessman….

by subra

The investor and the businessman – are the MOST important people in the economy! They go around looking for business opportunities and when convinced they put THEIR own money into a project. The project then becomes big, raises money from the public and generates more money for the economy.

Sadly for us in India, the Investor today means the FII, and businessman either means a crony capitalism expert or a foreign investor like Samsung, LG, Suzuki, Honda or a big Indian industrialist who is here to create NPAs. Look at big groups like Adag, Adani, GVK, GMR, SREI, …- none of them can raise money from the public. So they go to banks and raise HUGE amounts of money – and there is a good chance that they cannot repay a penny.

The small businessman is treated very shabbily by the bankers – surprised? Do not be. They get treated well only in co-operative banks and in private sector banks if they know the TOP management.

In fact many small businessmen I know (I call them small but all of them have net-worth in the region of about Rs. 15-30 crores, just to put things in perspective). Most of them pay at least 1% more in interest and other charges just because they are too lazy to change bankers or fight with the existing ones for a better rate.

One middle level borrower (with a CC limit of Rs. 1.5 crores) could not get a better rate from his existing Co-op bank. He moved to a Pvt sector bank, and got about 1% less. Actually the Pvt sector bank chased him – he had a brilliant Crisil rating (keeda, he did not need it, jlt he took it.

However most of the mid sized businessmen are reluctant to deal with a) bankers b) mutual fund advisers, c) insurance sales people d) CAs to file IT returns e) …..

the list is long..

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

23 Mar 03:10

Patriotism can’t flag now with a tricolour atop every roof

by Reshmi R Dasgupta

There may be 47 of them all over India courtesy Naveen Jindal, but the 207-ft high flagpole flying the Indian tirangaerected in New Delhi’s Connaught Place at the beginning of this month proved to be an eyeopener for this writer. And it all began with the fact that the sight of an Indian flag flying at night was oddly disconcerting, as we had been brought up with the convention of the flag being lowered at dusk.


The steel baron-turned-Congress MP has been the standard bearer — pardon the pun — of the right of all Indians to fly the national flag ever since he won a landmark case in 2002 related to the one atop one of his factories. Thanks to him we can all now fly our flag every day and not just on Republic Day and Independence Day as was the norm. Even his fellow MPs can wear them as badges while sitting in Parliament.


The Flag Code India is not by any means a widely disseminated or minutely-read document. More so since for the longest time, the flag was the preserve of the government —fluttering atop its buildings and vehicles — rather than on the homes and workplaces of the people of the country it symbolised. It was thought to be more a matter of protocol than a right of the patriotic population to display a secular icon.


When Jindal launched his project to erect “monumental flags” in 2009, it was of a piece with his overall proflag crusade. No surprise then that he got a special exemption from the home ministry to allow well-lit gigantic flags (over 100-ft high) to fly after dusk when the issue was still sub judice. Why the height caveat was given is unclear, but the illumination was similar to the US flag.


But then in 2010, the Bilaspur High Court decreed that flying the flag at night — hitherto thought to be a definite no-no — was not violative of the Flag Code India, the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act and the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act.


And in 2012, the Bombay High Court reiterated this in the “Amgonda Vithoba Pandhare vs Union Of India & Others” case. The huge change in attitude encapsulated in these two judgments should have got a lot more publicity.


And the fact that we can all now fly the flag at any time of the day all through the year should have led to thousands of well-lit saffron-whiteand-green flags on government buildings, especially as the sarkar had demonstrated such proprietorial interest in the national tricolour since Independence.


Yet, we have only 47 all-night flags. That too only gigantic ones, which only well-heeled flag devotees like Naveen Jindal can afford to put up. Let alone stuffy ministries and government-funded bodies, even Rashtrapati Bhavan with a President so willing to bring in new practices has not decided to add an illuminated tricolour to the great skyline of New Delhi’s Raisina Hill.


Interestingly, the US flag flies day and night on the White House since 1970. Two of the four flags on the Capitol Building in Washington DC have also fluttered through the night since World War I, out of convention rather than any rule. And the same norm is followed in obscure Taos Plaza, New Mexico, whose patriotic residents had nailed it to a pole in 1861 to prevent rebellious southerners from tearing it down.


The US flag flies 24×7 at seven other locations as per law: Fort McHenry, Maryland (from 1948), Flag House Square, Baltimore, Maryland (1954), Marine Corps War Memorial, Arlington, Virginia (1961), Lexington Battle Green, Massachusetts (1965), Washington Monument, Washington, DC (1971), any continuously open port of entry to the US (1972) and the National Memorial Arch, Valley Forge State Park, Pennsylvania (1975).


As the government has evidently not endorsed this freedom to fly the flag all day and night by example, the misconception that it is not allowed prevails. Even the home ministry’s height caveat — which remains by default though the Jindal exemption is no longer needed — is ahindrance to more Indians displaying their love and respect for the flag. Why only 47? Let a (well-lit!) billion flags fly 24×7.


 


 


 

22 Mar 04:19

Politically Inspired Technology - The AAP’s my.aamaadmiparty.org platform

by Pran Kurup

Very often, you find new technologies in search of a market. But in other instances, it is the reverse; new technology solutions are developed to address a specific need and then it turns out to be a winner. The rise of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has created some interesting opportunities for its young and technology savvy members to channelize their skills to solve pressing campaign problems. One of the primary goals of any political party involved in a campaign is to get access to data or information about its voters, its supporters, its members, its donors, etc. These “users” are scattered out across the globe and their identities are buried in various email systems, social networks and other Internet platforms. People from all over the world using a plethora of devices such as computers, phones, tablets, etc., to access and consume information, unwittingly leaving traces of their identity at most places. Then, in the physical world we have the age old technique of pen and paper based registration, hand written cheques, etc. 


How does a political party collate all this information and harness the true power of its support base and grow this over time? How does a party identify and target audiences with specific messages? How do you reach out to your volunteers for help? How do you cater to different language requirements in different states? How do you address relevant news to voters based on their profile and location? How do you target NRI news to the overseas audience? Ultimately, it’s about gathering data and intelligence and mining that to your advantage. With advancements in technology, there are plenty of commercial solutions out there that can assist with tackling this challenge. But trying to do things on a zero budget, while under extreme time pressure, but purely driven by sheer passion for a cause is an entirely different story.  


It is in this context that the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP) newly launched “my.aamaadmiparty.org,” an innovative, first of its kind platform, built entirely by volunteers, makes a great story. One can register on the portal using credentials from Google, Facebook, Live, and Yahoo! So to start with, the registration process is just a simple click. Once you register, you have choice of becoming a member, volunteer, donor, etc. Further, you have the ability to create your own personal donation link which you can then pass on to your friends through email, social networks, etc. When this link is passed around and your friends donate to the party via that link, you get to see and keep track of it. In other words, you are not just a donor anymore, you are a donation generating engine of sorts. You can sit within the confines of your home, office, or pretty much anywhere, and fire away this link and generate donations for AAP. You could even be more aggressive and bombard your network with reminders. This network donation facility is called “The Ripple” as it slowly but surely flows through consenting adults’ bank accounts and credit cards to fuel the dreams and aspirations of the Aam Aadmi.


In the true spirit of "Swaraj" these donations have been decentralized such that donors can actually donate to specific candidate at a constituency level. Further, the system has the ability to display targeted donations for specific candidates based on the user's profile information such as the constituency. For the die-hard AAP supporter, the system gives you the embed code that you could use to add your favorite candidate to your own personal website. 


Next, the system also gives you the ability to empower AAP to spread messages on your behalf on Twitter and Facebook. The portal can simultaneously fire a series of Tweets and posts on Facebook walls in a matter of minutes. This facility is rightly called the “Voice of AAP,”  because each registrant can choose to become a carrier of AAP’s message. Most importantly, technology is letting the AAP do things for you with minimal effort on your side.


A big part of technology is its ability to provide metrics. The portal keeps track of your efforts for you so you can actually put some value to your contributions to the AAP. The portal will be able to give you real time data about how you helped AAP - the donations you helped raise from your network, and the number of Facebook posts and tweets that were done on your behalf. 


What I have described here is only the tip of the iceberg. There is a whole host of things that can be done with this system and possible extensions, given the amount of data and intelligence that is available in just a few mouse clicks. 


One of the AAP’s biggest challenges after Delhi has been its inability to manage the huge groundswell of supporters and volunteers who desperately want to help the party. Today, AAP has a simple solution: join the network, and get to work or let the technology do some of the work for you instead!  


Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of this platform is that it was built and setup entirely by volunteers burning the midnight oil for months from across the globe. These folks have had several virtual meetings but never met in person. The biggest common factor that unites them is their love for the country and their firm belief in AAP’s dream for India. Never before in the history of Indian politics have IT professionals been inspired to such an extent. No matter which way this election turns out, the AAP surely deserve credit for inspiring and motivating techies around the globe. 

21 Mar 03:29

Financial reforms : What should the next government do?

by Ajay Shah
Think India Foundation is setting up a series of TV shows on various aspects of public policy. Percy Mistry, Rashesh Shah, Dhiraj Nayyar and I were on their Financial Policy show, which was shot in English and Hinglish. I was impressed at the quality of the show; I had not thought this possible on television. And, my new ambition is to speak in Hindi like Dhiraj does.

It will air on the coming weekend (22 and 23 March, Saturday and Sunday), as follows:

CNN IBN
Sat – 12pm & 8pm
Sun – 10pm

IBN 7
Sat – 10am & 8pm
Sun – 11am & 6pm

CNBC AWAAZ
Sat – 7:30pm
Sun -1pm

CNBC-TV18
Sat – 8:30pm
Sun – 8pm

ETV UP, ETV MP and ETV Bihar
Sat – 6pm
Sun – 5pm

ETV Rajasthan and ETV Urdu
Sat – 5pm
Sun – 5pm

21 Mar 03:28

Marriage….feedback post.

by subra

Rarely do I do a feedback so soon after a post has appeared…but I thought I needed to clarify, hence this post:

Rajesh on March 19th, 2014 at 11:04 pm e
Well said Praveen..

“she was now a married slave paying an EMI” — totally ridiculous.

I know of many cases where husband sponsored higher education of wife.. If they even mention it, whole world will pounce on him..

Also, I know 99% of cases, guys end up buying bigger house with fancy communities, wooden flooring,duplex houses as per the wife’s wish and struggling with huge EMIs, sympathy anybody?
such a hypocrite world.

My response:
IT IS NOT A HYPOCRITE WORLD RAJESH, YOU are being the hypocrite. You say something and do something. The world is not here to judge YOU or your wife’s behavior. You choose, you reap. Either have the guts to tell your wife YOU will not do what she wants you to do, or you do it. Once you do it, DO NOT CRIB.

PrAvEeN on March 19th, 2014 at 12:22 pm e
“she was now a married slave paying an EMI” – These so called words sometimes make the girls feel more then actually what they are contributing. (Women Empowerment words in RaGa terms :) )

For every one girl like this there are 1000′s of men who are working their ass off as more then slaves in shitty jobs for their family. But only girls get the sympathy :)

My response:

Millions of girls give up their careers, security, place of stay and move to a new EVERYTHING. They SURELY deserve more sympathy. Have not seen ANY man give up a career to look after HIS INLAWS (have one guy give up a career to look after his wife who was unwell). EMI response – separate post.

When a boy and a girl get married, the relationship starts on trust. Great, that is what it is supposed to be. However, there are some men who are out to exploit the situation, and there are some women too.

My take is simple. Till you do not trust each other FINANCIALLY and are not aware of each other’s financial and family reactions, keep your money separate.

The girl may want to give some money to her parents, siblings, etc. -if the guy interferes, it could be a problem. I am also against a GIRL PAYING the EMI of a house if HER NAME IS NOT THERE on that property. It is almost cheating.

The simple logic is efforts and money are to be shared. If the guy earns Rs. 15L and the girl earns Rs. 7.5L, maybe the expenses should be shared in the ratio of 2:1. Her efforts at cooking, cleaning, and housekeeping is anyway NOT BEING compensated.

Girls need to be careful, but boys too need to be vary. Do not be in a hurry to put your wife’s name in all your assets. Both of you need to think about all this before you MIX your finances. That is all.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

21 Mar 03:27

The Battle for Bengal

by Abheek Barman

A week is a long time in politics. Nine days after India’s Left parties herded 11 parties together to form a Third Front, the alliance has started to crumble. Jayalalithaa is willing to offer the CPM and the CPI one seat each in Tamil Nadu, not the six that they had asked for.

Getting seats out of Mulayam Singh in Uttar Pradesh will be tough and Naveen Patnaik is unlikely to oblige in Orissa. By the time polling starts on April 7, the Left could find itself contesting only its traditional states of Kerala, Tripura and Bengal.

Bengal’s 42 Lok Sabha seats make it the third largest in terms of electoral importance, after Uttar Pradesh’s 80 and Maharashtra’s 48. Andhra Pradesh also used to have 42 seats, but now it will have 17 in Telangana and 25 in Seemandhra.

Bengal is supposed to have decisively ejected the Left in 2011. The general expectation is that the Left will be decimated in the Lok Sabha elections in Bengal. Is that right?

Though Bengal practices electoral democracy, its politics is essentially undemocratic, involving a great deal of violence and coercion in rural Bengal. And Bengal is largely rural. Earlier, the CPM used to send out goons to capture entire areas – villages, mohallas, districts – in what is called ‘elaka dokhol,’ which loosely translates as turf capture.

By 2010, the Left started losing its goons, who migrated to the Trinamool Congress (TMC) sensing which way the wind was blowing. Once Mamata had her own army of goons, it was easy for her to use the CPM’s own tactics back on them, winning the state in 2011.

Dwaipayan Bhattacharyya and Kumar Rana, who analysed the 2013 panchayat polls in Bengal for The Economic and Political Weekly last year, used an innovative way to measure the degree of elaka dokhol going on in Bengal.

They took panchayat poll data and calculated the number of seats that had been won uncontested by the ruling party of the time. Coercion is more common in the small confines of panchayat polls rather than in the broad canvas of Lok Sabha elections. And any seat won without contest would mean that rivals had been forced to stay out.

What they found was illuminating. In 2003, when the Left won panchayats, they won 11% of all seats without contest. In 2008, when they won again, this number – and possibly elaka dokhol and intimidation – actually fell to 5%. By 2013, when the TMC swept panchayat polls, they number climbed back to 11%. So yes, Mamata is playing the Left’s own tune back to them.

People say that the TMC is extremely popular in rural Bengal, where they win big. This has huge regional disparities. The TMC indeed wins big in south Bengal, which is densely populated, heavily cultivated and has fewer Dalits and Muslims than rural Bengal’s average of 57%.

The coercion is also more intense in south Bengal. In the 2008 panchayat elections, the degree of elaka dokhol was spread more or less evenly across Bengal. By 2013, it had become concentrated in south Bengal, where the number of seats won without contest doubled from the 2008 figure in the same area.

In the western districts that are loosely called Jangalmahal, the TMC has expanded fast, after offering jobs and incomes to the poor of this area. During Left rule, this area was largely ignored and was the site of violent confrontations among the CPM’s goons and Maoists.

The TMC has little presence in the northern and central districts of Murshidabad, Malda and north Dinajpur, largely controlled by the Congress. And in four districts, Birbhum, Nadia, north and south 24 Parganas, the Left is no longer a pushover.

The Bengal Left has gone through a near-death experience after being wiped out in the 2011 elections. Has it learnt anything from the experience?

Abdur Rezzak Mollah, a plain-speaking, often blunt CPM leader recently said that it had become a party of managers, dominated by ‘Brahmins and Kayasths,’ who lorded over Dalits and Muslims. This is a thinly veiled barb at his bete noire, former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee.

On Wednesday, the Left front announced its candidates for all seats in Bengal. It got in 26 new faces, including more than 10 people who are less than 40 years old. Somewhat mysteriously, it also roped in Subhasini Ali, a former MP of Kanpur, to contest the Barrackpore seat. The seat is now held by TMC’s Dinesh Trivedi, a former railways minister.

So yes, the Left is trying to signal that it is intent on change. And, the 2009 Congress-TMC alliance that boosted the latter is no longer functional. Bengal will have a three cornered contest, with the Left, TMC and Congress squaring off against each other. Historically that helped the Left. But will it, this time?

20 Mar 04:58

Learning from Training…

by subra

A few days ago I did a training for a Wealth Management Company. Not too keen to mention client names..but it was a high quality client and had a lot of good, smart people.

One girl who knew about this blog and my book – she wrote a piece and wanted to know whether I would carry it. To me carrying anybody else’s post is quite ok, but just something which had never been done. She did not want her name, location, company name mentioned.
In normal circumstances I would have edited it – at least a little bit.

However this girl had done a decent draft..so here it is without any significant change – except for a comma or a full stop!

“At a lot of levels financial advising is like medicine. As a doctor you can advise, prescribe and then hope. A couple of decades ago perhaps the problem was less acute and some of us could make a living in advising / and trading in equities. Now things have changed. And changed quite a lot. There is Google and there are many more doctors, hospitals, quacks, websites, paid advertising, paid websites, chemists wearing a white coat….etc.
Suppose there is a client who has a messy equity portfolio and you clean it up, and introduce him to SIP. Is he happy…well initially yes. First few months perhaps.

In fact one client (now friend) opens his portfolio to all his friends and says…’S has grown my money to Rs. 3 crores – and that by doing SIP over long periods’.

He has risen from Senior Manager to Executive Vice-President and his SIP amount from Rs. 1500 in 3 funds to Rs. 200,000 spread over 4 funds. Yes this amount is far greater than his Provident fund. 10-12 years SIP, I think not a single month missed – but I could be wrong. However there are others who think they could have done better by timing. I sadly do not know how to do it. Also some of them read many books, websites, meet other consultants, advisers, wealth managers – and you can be sure some of them may influence them also. So some investors / customers may think they need to have more equities (especially in a boom) or should have more debt (when the index is 9k), or they should be repaying all their loans before they start investing. Sometimes data can be made to look good – after all 2003 -2010 real estate, gold and the Sensex all look the same!

Then there would be customers who may think that if money is needed on Monday, they could be in equity till Friday. Asking them to withdraw over a 6 month period is sensible -but can look STUPID in a rising market. Surely another adviser can rubbish that. All this could hurt the relationship. In most cases the solution lies in communicating with the customer – and hope that the customer means what he / she says. If he/she says they are preparing for a Marathon, you think stamina is important. However there are people who run the marathon – treating it like 42 sprints of 1-km each! – only a few Kenyans can manage that. So talk to the customer quite often – and deliver what they want.

Frankly asset allocation’s success is known only in hindsight. And hindsight is 20-20 for all of us. Including our clients. Unfortunately you invest in the present, and you review in the future. If you have got a client 24% return over a 10 year period (sorry you did the documentation and the market did the trick is what I mean) you think you have done a good job. However data can be created to show how by just one or two switches it could have been 42% (just 2 switches in 10 years, not too many is it?)…… And if the client says this to you …you can ask ‘But why did he not tell you in advance…your client tells you…”I did not ask’…hmmm the client is always right, is he not?

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

20 Mar 03:43

Why should I invest?

by subra

“Subra Sir, I am 24 years of age, why should I invest NOW? THERE is so much time to invest later on…”

Fair question. After all how many of us were saving and investing when we were 24? Not many I guess. Why preach what we did not do?

Simply because even we wish we knew!

Now that you know why you should SAVE, let us see why we should INVEST. The reasons to invest are of course the same as the reasons to save! You need to have money for Retirement, towards your other goals like buying a house, other assets like a car, pay for a vacation, pay for children’s education and marriage expenses, etc.

However, the most important reason for saving is to create a corpus. How to use the corpus is completely up to your choice, but creating the corpus is not much of a choice! Savings are nice if it is for small near term goals like making the down payment for a car or a house. However, if it is for a bigger goal or a goal that is say about 5 years away or 30 years away, that money HAS TO BE INVESTED.

Investments – assumes that the money is kept in volatile asset classes like equities, real estate, etc.

This obviously gives more volatile returns – and the assumption is that the returns will be greater than the inflation (called Real Returns) over a long period of time….

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.