Shared posts

21 May 15:12

AT&T Homepage Mistakenly Warns Users of a Non-Existent Data Breach

by Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai

On late Monday, AT&T warned visitors on its website of a “data incident” with an ominous banner at the top of the company’s homepage, according to people who visited the page at the time.

“You may be affected by a recent AT&T data incident. Check if your accounts are impacted,” the message said.

The banner linked to a confusing and incomplete FAQ, which also contained a link to a site where users could enter their number to check if they were affected. We tested the tool with one AT&T account and found that it was not affected.

On Tuesday morning, the banner was gone. But the page it linked to, was still live. And people on Reddit and other social media sites were a bit worried.

The page contained a lot of the usual boilerplate language companies use when a data breach happens, but it didn’t actually contain any details.

“Has the incident been contained? TBD” reads one question.

“How many customers were impacted?” reads another question. “We’re still looking into this, but it looks like about [X] customers were affected. We’ll be sure to let them know.”

But an AT&T spokesperson told Motherboard in an email that there's no reason to worry. This was all a mistake.

“We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience,” the spokesperson said. “A message was inadvertently posted to our website during routine testing. The message was quickly taken down.”

Have a tip about a data breach? You can contact this reporter securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, OTR chat at lorenzofb@jabber.ccc.de, or email lorenzo@motherboard.tv

Regardless, the boilerplate FAQ is an interesting peek behind the curtain at how companies prepare for data breaches, and at how they pre-plan their apologies: "We apologized to all who were affected, and we've taken appropriate steps to help prevent this from happening again," the page said.

False alarms from big companies about cybersecurity incidents are not uncommon—especially this week. On Monday, Gmail sent security alerts to several users telling them someone was logging into their accounts. That, too, was a false alarm.

On one hand, AT&T deserves praise for having a placeholder data breach page ready to go in case of a data breach. On the other, it’s embarrassing that the test page and banner went live by mistake, alarming some users.

Listen to CYBER, Motherboard’s new weekly podcast about hacking and cybersecurity.

20 May 23:08

Slack just changed its stock ticker weeks before it's expected to go public. Instead of 'SK' Slack wants to be 'WORK'

by Becky Peterson

Stewart Butterfield

  • Slack updated its direct listing paperwork on Monday with a new ticker symbol.
  • The company will go public on the New York Stock Exchange with the ticker "WORK." It previously filed to list shares under the ticker "SK."
  • Slack is expected to go public in a direct listing in the upcoming weeks.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Slack is not a public company yet, but it's already gotten tired of its stock ticker. 

In an updated version of its direct listing paperwork filed on Monday, Slack revealed that it has dumped the proposed "SK" stock ticker it had settled upon a few weeks ago. Instead, in a dramatic pivot, the workplace collaboration company will makes its public market debut with the more descriptive ticker symbol "WORK."

Slack is expected to go public through a direct listing on the New York Stock Exchange in the coming weeks.

It's not clear why Slack swapped stock tickers. Representatives for the company could not immediately be reached for comment.

With this update however, Slack will join a cohort of public enterprise tech companies whose tickers reveal more about the company than just their name. Salesforce trades under the ticker "CRM," which stands for content relationship management. CRM is the type of software Salesforce started out selling, though it has since expanded to other areas.

Another is Atlassian, which trades under the ticker symbol "TEAM." Slack and Atlassian are partners, and Atlassian holds a stake in Slack. Together, they are TEAM WORK.

While Slack may be associated with WORK by the many people who use the office messaging platform to communicate with colleagues, the platform has proven to be useful for social communications as well.

Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield shares a relationship Slack channel with his girlfriend, Away cofounder Jen Rubio. It was on that Slack channel that Rubio condemned Butterfield's fake Twitter proposal.

SEE ALSO: Cofounders Jen Rubio and Steph Korey built online luggage retailer Away into a $1.4 billion company in just 3 years. Next up, it wants to be a 'travel brand.'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I tried $600 smart glasses and learned why they haven't replaced smartphones yet

20 May 21:27

'What is Google Duo?': Everything you need to know about Google's cross-platform video chat app, including how to use it

by Dave Johnson

Google Duo

  • Google Duo is a simple video chat app published by Google.
  • There are versions available for both iPhone and Android, so you can chat regardless of what kind of phone the other party has.
  • Duo's "Knock Knock" feature lets you see live video of the caller before you accept the call.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Google Duo is a simple video chat app that works on both iPhone and Android devices. Introduced by Google in 2016, it is one of several chat and video apps offered by the search company.

Duo is unique from other past and present Google video and chat apps (like Hangouts and the now-shuttered Allo) in that it is designed to be a fast and easy one-to-one video chat app like Apple's FaceTime. But because it's cross-platform, Android and iPhone users can video chat with one another.

duo 1 copy

What you can do with Google Duo

Users don't need to log into their Google account or create any new usernames or passwords to use the Google Duo app. Duo is based on phone numbers, so you can call people from your phone's contact list. If you want to call someone who isn't a Duo user, Duo knows that and offers to send a text message inviting them to install the app.

The app has a number of other convenient features as well. It automatically switches between your cellular network and Wi-Fi, for example, and takes advantage of Wi-Fi to work in 720p high definition, when possible. And if the person you are calling doesn't answer, you can leave a video message for them. You can also record short pre-recorded messages to send to select contacts, and you can choose to make audio-only calls as well.

Perhaps the most notable feature that Duo offers, though, is called "Knock Knock." Knock Knock lets the recipient of a call see a live preview of the caller before needing to accept the call — so you can see who is calling you, what they look like, and even where they are before you choose to answer. Google also provides the ability to turn off Knock Knock if you prefer not to use it.

Recently, Google has updated Duo to support group calls with up to four people. This hasn't been released worldwide, but in the US, the app now features group calling.  

For most users, you need to install Google Duo to begin using it. You can install Google Duo for the iPhone or Google Duo for Android. Some Android models, though, such as Pixel, Nexus, and Android One phones, now come with Duo preinstalled like FaceTime on iPhones.

How to use Google Duo

Google Duo is a very simple app to use. After installing the app, follow the setup instructions by entering your phone number and then entering the confirmation code that is texted to you. Then you can make a call.

1. Start the Google Duo app.

2. By default, you make a video call. If you prefer to make a voice-only call, tap the phone icon.

3. Tap "Search contacts or dial number."

4. Tap the name of the person in your contacts whom you want to call. If the person isn't in your contacts, enter their phone number instead.

duo 2

5. If your contact already uses Duo, the number will dial. If not, Duo will offer to send a text message inviting them to install Duo.

You can also make a group call. To do that, tap "Create Group" and tap up to three people and tap "Done." Then tap "Start" to make the call.

SEE ALSO: How to turn off or limit Google Assistant on your Android device, if you don't want it listening to you all of the time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 9 simple ways to protect your data that don't take much time, but could have huge security benefits

20 May 21:04

This is a crippling blow: What Google's decision to cut ties with Huawei means for the Chinese tech firm

by Shona Ghosh

Sundar Pichai

  • Google has banned Chinese tech firm Huawei from accessing some updates to Android, the most widely used mobile operating system in the world.
  • Huawei is the second-biggest phone maker in the world behind Samsung, and the restriction is probably a death knell to its smartphone business outside China.
  • Unless Google u-turns, Huawei will have to create its own Android fork without critical Google apps and services, or build a fully proprietary alternative.
  • Even if Huawei puts a backup plan into reaction, user confusion and suspicion is a huge and possibly fatal blow to its international consumer business.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Google has just dealt one of the biggest smartphone makers in the world a crippling blow.

The company has revoked Chinese tech giant Huawei's Android license, meaning the firm is now limited to using Android Open Source Project (AOSP), the barebones and Google-free version of Android. The move follows the Trump administration effectively barring Huawei from doing business with US firms.

The sudden change means new Huawei phones won't have access to the most popular Google apps and services, and Huawei will only be able to push Android security updates once they're available on AOSP, according to reports from Reuters and The Verge.

As yet, neither Google and Huawei have explained the precise implications for future phones. Google stated on Twitter that existing Huawei users will still continue to access Google's Play Store, and the app store's built-in malware protection.

But from what we do know at this stage, it looks like Google and the US have dealt a fatal blow to Huawei's smartphone business outside China. Here's why:

Huawei is dead outside of China without the world's most popular app store

pixel 3 xl google play store

Huawei doesn't offer Google services in China, where the search giant is largely banned. But outside of China, Huawei's now-revoked Android license allowed the company to offer popular Google apps and services and, most importantly, Google's app store on its phones. And Huawei's international business is huge, with 49% of its first-quarter phone shipments going to markets outside China, according to Canalys figures cited by CNBC.

Google's Play Store is the biggest app store in the world and, along with Apple's App Store, the only real way for legitimate app developers to market and distribute their apps. Android users are particularly reliant on the Play Store because Android apps are more likely to be malicious thanks to the open nature of the ecosystem. Going through the official app store gives users access to Google's built-in malware protection, Play Store Protect, and makes it less likely they'll download something nasty.

The change to Huawei's license means the company will no longer be able to offer the Play Store on new phones.

Huawei can always try and create its own app store, but similar efforts from other manufacturers have been almost universally unsuccessful. Samsung offers its own apps, including the much-panned smartphone assistant Bixby, through its Galaxy Store but, according to Statista, it doesn't offer anywhere close to the same number of apps as Google.

Huawei is also dead without Google services

gmail

Huawei has lost access to some of the most popular Google services, and that includes Chrome, Gmail, and YouTube, according to Reuters.

Chrome is the world's most popular mobile browser, according to StatCounter, with almost 60% of the market. Gmail has more than 1.5 billion active users, while YouTube has 2 billion users.

In short, a substantial percentage of the world's population rely on Google services in some way or another. Huawei's business inside China likely won't be affected but, as mobile analyst Francisco Jeronimo noted, Google services are a huge driver for Android phone purchases internationally. It's unlikely Huawei can continue its massive growth outside China without access to those services.

Huawei's backup operating system isn't ready

Richard Yu

Huawei executive Richard Yu said in March that the company was relying on a plan B in case it was locked out of the US. Yu said at the time that the company had "prepared our own operating system" for its phones, tablets, and laptops. According to local news reports, the alternative OS has been in the works since 2012.

Having a backup plan is smart, given Google's tight control over Android and the ongoing trade war. But if there really is a backup operating system, there is no sign of it and nor is it clear that Huawei can really create an ecosystem to truly rival Android.

It also isn't clear whether app makers would be keen to create apps for yet another system.

Again, there is precedence here. Samsung created the Tizen operating system, but it has failed to disrupt the dominance of iOS and Android. Nokia likewise created a forked version of Android called the Nokia X platform, which replaced Google's services with alternatives or duplicates, which lasted only a few months.

Consumers are now confused about whether to buy Huawei devices at all

The first consumers knew of Google bowing to US pressure over China was a Reuters story on Sunday night, citing sources who said that Google had revoked Huawei's Android license. Google and Huawei frantically followed up with official statements suggesting current device owners would be unaffected for now.

But the story will cause massive consumer confusion, and that will be bad for business. Even a cursory search for "Huawei" on Twitter shows users frantically asking whether they should return their devices, and worrying their phones will be useless. That's bad news for sales, given Huawei has just released its flagship P30 series to the market.

Google's actions also now mean Huawei's smartphone business is being impacted by separate security concerns over its telecommunications equipment business for the first time. As yet, suspicions that Huawei installed backdoors into its kit hadn't split over into its smartphone business in a major way and the company's market share continued to shoot up. That will likely change thanks to the US and Google.

SEE ALSO: Here's why the US is terrified of one Chinese company controlling the world's 5G networks

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This London handbag company has recycled 175 tons of fire hoses into fashion accessories

20 May 18:00

Google Glass is graduating from Google's moonshot division with the launch of its second-generation enterprise product (GOOG, GOOGL)

by Nick Bastone

GlassEE2_3QFloating_Smith_Frames

  • Google Glass for businesses — known as the Enterprise Edition — announced its second-generation product on Monday, and said that the team has moved from the tech giant's moonshot factory, X, into Google. 
  • Glass project lead Jay Kothari wrote in a blog post Monday that the division spun out of X to "meet the demands of the growing market for wearables in the workplace." 
  • A Google spokesperson told Business Insider on Monday that the Glass team will now sit within the AR & VR team at Google.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Google Glass for businesses — known as the Enterprise Edition — announced its second-generation product on Monday, and said that the team has moved from the tech giant's moonshot factory, X, into Google. 

Glass project lead Jay Kothari wrote in a blog post Monday that the division spun out of X to "meet the demands of the growing market for wearables in the workplace." 

"Over the past two years at X, Alphabet's moonshot factory, we've collaborated with our partners to provide solutions that improve workplace productivity for a growing number of customers," Kothari wrote. "Now, in order to meet the demands of the growing market for wearables in the workplace and to better scale our enterprise efforts, the Glass team has moved from X to Google." 

A Google spokesperson told Business Insider on Monday that the Glass team will now sit within the AR & VR team at Google. The move was effective with the launch of Enterprise Edition 2 on Monday. 

Read more: This is a crippling blow: What Google's decision to cut ties with Huawei means for the Chinese tech firm

Glass Enterprise Edition is used by workers in a number of fields, including warehouse logistics and manufacturing. The Glass team touts that its technology can help workers work more efficiently, like pulling up checklists, viewing instructions, or sending inspection videos without needing to use their hands. 

"Glass is not a hip way to hang apps in front of [the worker's] eyeballs, but a tool — as much a tool as her power wrenches," author Steven Levy wrote about the original Enterprise Edition glasses back in 2017.

Google says its second-generation enterprise glasses features a more powerful central processing unit (CPU) to deliver a faster user experience, as well as an improved camera and increased battery life. Enterprise Edition 2 is also built on Android, the company says, making it easier for businesses to integrate existing systems and develop new applications for the product. 

Original Google Glass prototypes were built for consumers and made available for fans and journalists back in 2013. Amid rocky reception to the quirky headsets — and, some fears about its ability to secretly record video — Glass shut down its beta program in early 2015 and was moved internally from the moonshot factory (then called Google X) to a division of its own within Google, run by the then-head of Nest, Tony Fadell. 

Google Glass for consumers was never again made available. Instead, the company announced in January 2017 that it would bring its computing headset back, but this time for workers. Glass Enterprise Edition was first launched within X. 

Monday's announcement marks the second "graduation" for a Glass product from X to Google. 

SEE ALSO: Google dramatically severed ties with Huawei — here's what that means for you

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: If you're going to see the 3-hour-long 'Avengers: Endgame,' plan your bathroom break wisely. Here's what can happen if you hold your pee too long.

20 May 16:36

FCC Ignores History, Plans To Rubber Stamp T-Mobile/Sprint Merger

by Karl Bode

The FCC today announced the agency will approve T-Mobile’s $26.5 billion planned acquisition of Sprint, despite widespread condemnation of the deal by consumer groups, unions, and antitrust experts. These critics have repeatedly noted how a reduction in overall major telecom competitors almost universally results in higher rates and worse overall service.

In a press release issued Monday morning, the Ajit Pai FCC proclaimed that the industry’s latest megamerger would result in better broadband for Americans.

“The construction of this network and the delivery of such high-speed wireless services to the vast majority of Americans would substantially benefit consumers and our country as a whole,” the FCC claimed.

To get regulatory approval, T-Mobile and Sprint claim they’ll deploy a 5G network that will cover 97% of the US population within three years of the closing of the merger and 99% of Americans within six years. The FCC said the companies had also promised not to raise prices for three years, and would divest ownership of prepaid wireless operator Boost Mobile.

But even with these conditions, experts say the deal isn’t likely to drive the benefits the FCC promises. There’s not a consumer group in America that supports the merger; in large part because global telecom history repeatedly shows that when you reduce the overall number of major competitors, prices inevitably rise due to decreased competition.

“None of these supposed benefits would offset this merger’s many harms,” Matt Wood, general counsel of consumer group Free Press, told Motherboard via email.

“Even T-Mobile’s own economists admitted that this deal would raise prices,” Wood said. “It’s not just the post-merger T-Mobile that would be able to charge more, but AT&T and Verizon too. Everyone will pay more if this deal goes through.”

In Ireland, for example, studies have shown that the reduction of overall competitors from four to three resulted in significantly higher prices for consumers and businesses alike. The same story has played out in Canada, where the reduction of major competitors to just three carriers has resulted in some of the highest mobile data prices in the world.

Here in the States, regulators blocked AT&T’s attempted merger with T-Mobile in 2011, stating the deal would harm competition, raise prices, and eliminate significant jobs. In 2014 regulators again blocked a proposed union by Sprint and T-Mobile for the same reasons. The companies hope the third time’s the charm courtesy of the Trump administration.

Industry watchers doubt whether Pai’s FCC would enforce conditions given the agency’s unwillingness to stand up to major carriers on a litany of subjects, ranging from the foot-dragging on implementing robocall tech, casual treatment of consumer location data, and repair delays in the wake of hurricanes in both Florida and Puerto Rico.

“Does anyone really believe that this FCC, which has asked nothing of the big mobile companies for over 2 years will require the companies to abide by these commitments?” former FCC lawyer Gigi Sohn told Motherboard via email.

The FCC’s full-throated support of the deal was no surprise given Ajit Pai’s cozy relationship with industry. But reports suggest that the Department of Justice has been significantly more skeptical of the companies’ promises. Several state attorneys general have also said they may sue to thwart the anti-competitive deal even if federal regulators approve it.

While Sprint and T-mobile have repeatedly claimed their superunion will create jobs, unions say that’s historically not what happens in the wake of such consolidation as redundant retail and support positions are inevitably eliminated. The Communications Workers of America (CWA) union has predicted the deal could eliminate as many as 30,000 positions in the US.

“Trusting Sprint and T-Mobile with American jobs is like trusting a vampire at a blood bank,” the union said last February.

Facing immense opposition, T-Mobile and Sprint have spared no lobbying expense in their quest for regulatory approval.

The companies cozied up to the Trump administration first by quietly hiring former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, then by dramatically ramping up executive patronage of Trump’s DC hotel. The company has also hired former FCC Commissioners including Mignon Clyburn and Robert McDowell in a bid to seal the deal.

While Sprint and its Japanese owner Softbank have repeatedly tried to claim Sprint can’t survive without such a deal, consumer groups say there’s any number of companies eyeing the wireless space (ranging from Comcast to Dish Network) the company could merge with that wouldn’t result in the elimination of a direct competitor.

Wood noted that much of the dysfunction tied to the broken US telecom market is directly attributable to mindless merger mania. For example Comcast’s terrible customer service, slow speeds and high prices are directly attributable to the relentless industry obsession with growth for growth’s sake.

But much like a purgatorial version of Charlie Brown and Lucy football, it’s a lesson America never quite seems to learn. More often than not, history indicates such deals are accompanied with a litany of promises that rarely, if ever, materialize. You’d be hard pressed to find a single consumer advocate that believes the T-Mobile Sprint union will be any different.

19 May 16:18

5G is coming to Denver, and it’s not just for smartphones: It could mean super-fast internet at home, too

by Aldo Svaldi

Starry, a Boston technology company, launched a 5G broadband service in Denver late last month, one it promises will bring, for the dollar spent, much faster and more reliable broadband services to thousands of people living in apartments and condos.

“There is so little choice of internet-only service out there,” said Alex Moulle-Berteaux, the company’s chief operating officer. “Many of our subscribers are cord cutters.”

Starry is targeting those frustrated with the slower and sometimes spotty DSL service from CenturyLink and the faster, but more expensive and entangled packages from Xfinity. It is bringing a third option to the table, 5G wireless.

Michael Ciaglo, special to the Denver Post
Starry Internet Denver general manager Stephan Andrade talks about their antenna on top of the Point 21 apartments that delivers 5G internet to residents using the existing wiring in their building Monday, May 13, 2019 in Denver.

For those in reach of the signal, the network provides a minimum speed of 200 Megabits per second (Mbps), up and down, for a flat $50 a month, without caps on data usage, no equipment charges and no long-term contracts. Moulle-Berteaux said the company has speeds that are five times as fast.

Starry represents a “fixed” use of 5G. It places a device or beam connected to the fiber network high on a tall building. The wireless signal is targeted at receivers on multi-family buildings within a mile. Although the company eventually plans to reach single-family homes in the suburbs and business users, it is focused on apartment and condo dwellers.

“This is primarily an urban solution, optimized for density,” Moulle-Berteaux acknowledges.

Most people will first access 5G through new mobile devices on upgraded cellular networks. Those upgrades are now underway in Denver, and the technology should be much more widely available next year.

Denver is on the list of 30 cities where Verizon said it will roll out its 5G Ultra Wideband service this year. While Verizon won’t give a specific date for when the mobile service will go live, its crews are moving fast to upgrade and expand the network. And they will keep going after the initial launch later this year.

“I would say it is an intensive deployment, but it isn’t anything where people would notice it any more than all of the other construction going on,” said Eric Fradette, director of system performance for Verizon in Denver.

In Chicago and Minneapolis, the two cities where Verizon has launched 5G, download speeds are coming in at 450 Mbps with a maximum of 1 Gbps. By contrast, 4G LTE was capping out at 100 Mbps.

“We are very early on in this technology. It will continue to evolve and get faster,” said Fradette.

Denver isn’t in the first round of cities where AT&T and Sprint are deploying 5G, so their Colorado customers will have to wait. T-Mobile, which is merging with Sprint, said it has the spectrum to cover all of Denver. It plans to roll out its network nationwide in 2020, when more devices will be available to consumers.

“Verizon is putting on a masterclass in how NOT to launch 5G,” T-Mobile chief technology officer Neville Ray wrote in a blog post. “They’ve sacrificed customer experience in a rush to claim a first and they still won’t detail where they have 5G coverage, but they have no problem charging more for it.”

Verizon will charge $10 more a month for the 5G option for customers with unlimited data plans. Most of its rivals either haven’t disclosed plans or said they won’t upcharge for the service, at least not at first.

Kevin Ribbens, general manager of Best Buy in south Denver, said the electronics retailer received the first device that can handle the new technology, the Galaxy S10 5G, in its store last week.

Another phone, the LG V50 ThinQ 5G, is expected out later this spring. Verizon is also selling an attachment that upgrades the Motorola Moto z3 to work with 5G.

“The early adopters are always excited for the new techs and its potential,” said Ribbens. But he adds most people don’t know what is coming or how it could transform mobile computing.

One piece of advice. Don’t buy a 5G device until the nearby network is upgraded. Downtown areas are expected to get 5G service first, and then the suburbs, and eventually more rural areas. When 5G isn’t available, the new devices will default to the next best option.

Related Articles

Promises of 5G

New technology often comes packaged in hyperbole that needs to get unwrapped, and 5G is no exception. 5G simply stands for the fifth generation of cellular technology.

It is an upgrade from 4G LTE. In that regard, it isn’t unlike getting the latest version of Windows or iPhone, said Kevin Gifford, research professor in technology, cybersecurity and policy at the University of Colorado Boulder and a specialist in wireless technologies.

Although 5G can operate on lower, middle or high frequencies, most providers are deploying it at much higher frequencies on the radio spectrum, which the government has made available via licenses. Use of the very high millimeter wavelength is what is expected to change the game.

That higher frequency allows much more information to travel at much higher speeds with smaller gaps, or latency, in the signal. Ten times faster on the top end is a common refrain, and the potential is there for more, a lot more.

“It will be insanely fast,” Gifford said.

Comcast, the nation’s largest internet service provider, provided an average speed of around 105 Mbps in the U.S. last year and CenturyLink was down around 23.32 Mbps, according to Speedtest. Starry is starting out at 200 Mbps and Verizon’s version of fixed 5G, called Verizon Home, is clocking in at 300 Mbps and up to 1 Gbps.

5G providers, because they aren’t stringing cable in the ground or on poles, have a cost advantage. Moulle-Berteaux estimates Starry can build out its initial network in Denver for under $5 million, a small fraction of what incumbents would need to get fiber ever closer to customers and boost their speeds.

The speeds promised with 5G are so fast that there are few applications that can make use of the capacity. But it will only be a matter of time before developers find ways to “slurp” up the data.

“Bandwidth is a resource. It is like gold or oil, and you can never get enough. If it is there, we will use it,” said Gifford.

Among the early uses expected are in virtual reality, augmented reality and gaming. Pokemon Go lovers haven’t seen anything yet. But there are more practical applications, like helping firefighters navigate burning buildings wearing virtual reality goggles that show them a floor plan and feed information on temperatures.

“It opens up many more worlds for people to have,” said Fradette.

Michael Ciaglo, special to the Denver Post
Starry Internet employees stand next to their antenna on top of the Point 21 apartments that delivers 5G internet to residents using the existing wiring in their apartment building Monday, May 13, 2019 in Denver.

Smartphones, for example, made applications like Lyft and Uber both possible and popular. With faster cellular speeds, those applications could map out in real-time where drivers are as they approach a pickup point. Here’s a sense of the difference: 5G can transmit such huge amounts of data at such a high rate of speed, it will allow the cars to drive themselves.

Gifford said that 5G offers a solution to the “stadium problem” that has long plagued communication networks. How do you handle 75,000 people in a confined space cramming the network with calls and social media photos?

The new 5G service will allow more than 1 million devices to connect per square kilometer, he said. A stadium is no problem, and neither is a home filled with multiple devices connected to the internet, from the doorbell, to the thermostat, to the light switches and the major appliances.

The new networks will have much less latency or lag time. That means video calls won’t jerk or jump. And if latency dips below 1 millisecond, that would allow for remote surgeries, Gifford said. Doctors in Denver could run surgical equipment in a rural hospital hundreds of miles away and not miss a beat.

Trade-offs

Using higher frequency waves comes with some trade-offs. Like a sprinter, millimeter wave 5G isn’t in it for the long haul. And it is a weakling. Don’t ask it to push through brick walls and penetrate the steel and glass of high rises.

“Your hand can block it, your window can block it, rain effects it,” said Ed Fox, chief technical officer of MetTel, a communications solutions provider.

Michael Ciaglo, special to the Denver Post
Starry Internet Denver general manager Stephan Andrade holds a Starry WiFi router that delivers 5G internet to residents using the existing wiring in their apartment buildings Monday, May 13, 2019 in Denver.

In short, 5G can show up at the doorstep, but it can’t easily move around the house, apartment or office building on its own. Signals need to go through a router or through the existing wiring and that can create bottlenecks.

“Current Wi-Fi doesn’t have the data rate that 5G has,” Gifford said. But protocols are being upgraded, and the gap is expected to narrow.

Because of the shorter distances that the waves can travel, a lot more equipment is needed to get the signal closer to customers. While 5G can piggyback on the existing cellular system, providers will need to put up a lot more antennas and poles at a lot more locations to reach everyone.

That is resulting in pushback in San Francisco and other cities, where critics have derided the equipment installations as ugly and ubiquitous and have attempted to get permits revoked.

The technology is more cost-effective and works better in cities where populations are concentrated. That means it could further deepen the digital divide as rural areas are about to catch up to what will soon be outdated broadband speeds.

And cable providers like Charter and Comcast aren’t standing still. Comcast Xfinity offers speeds of 2 Gbps in Denver, both up and down, but it doesn’t come cheap at $299.95 a month. In some areas, download speeds of 1 Gbps are available for $89.99 a month. Upgrades are expected to allow cable providers to get up to 10 Gbps.

Fox also said there are some unrealistic expectations on how quickly and widely 5G will be implemented. Phoenix recently sought proposals to help link its fleet of vehicles using cellular technology. But officials considered putting the request on hold until 5G came out.

“We basically said you will be waiting a long time. Thirty percent of your routes don’t get service with the current wireless technology,” he said.

Gifford estimates it could be three to five more years before the outlying suburbs like Golden get full-fledged mobile 5G.

The ability of the network to take in massive amounts of data will require more places to process it and more storage capacity to hold it. MetTel is building a data center in Denver toward that end, Fox said.

The faster speeds also mean that pulling down an application on a server in the cloud a thousand miles away won’t cut it anymore. Applications and software will need to be nearby. The cloud will fade away, replaced by a new paradigm, “the edge.”

5G means things are not only going to get faster but closer, a lot closer, Fox said.

17 May 21:35

HPE is buying Cray for $1.3 billion

by Ron Miller

HPE announced it was buying Cray for $1.3 billion, giving it access to the company’s high-performance computing portfolio, and perhaps a foothold into quantum computing in the future.

The purchase price was $35 a share, a $5.19 premium over yesterday’s close of $29.81 a share. Cray was founded in the 1970s and for a time represented the cutting edge of super computing in the United States, but times have changed, and as the market has shifted, a deal like this makes sense.

Ray Wang, founder and principal analyst at Constellation Research, says this is about consolidation at the high end of the market. “This is a smart acquisition for HPE. Cray has been losing money for some time but had a great portfolio of IP and patents that is key for the quantum era,” he told TechCrunch.

While HPE’s president and CEO Antonio Neri didn’t see it in those terms, he did see an opportunity in combining the two organizations. “By combining our world-class teams and technology, we will have the opportunity to drive the next generation of high performance computing and play an important part in advancing the way people live and work,” he said in a statement.

Cray CEO and president Peter Ungaro agreed. “We believe that the combination of Cray and HPE creates an industry leader in the fast-growing High-Performance Computing (HPC) and AI markets and creates a number of opportunities that neither company would likely be able to capture on their own,” he wrote in a blog post announcing the deal.

Patrick Moorhead, principal analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy says HPC is one of the fastest growing markets and HPE has indicated it wants to stake a claim there. “I’m not surprised by the deal. Its degree of success will be determined by the integration of the two companies. HPE brings increased scale and some unique consumption models and Cray brings expertise and unique connectivity IP,” Moorhead explained.

While it’s not clear how this will work over time, this type of consolidation usually involves some job loss on the operations side of the house as the two companies become one. It is also unclear how this will affect Cray’s customers as it moves to become part of HPE, but HPE has plans to create a high-performance computing product family using its new assets in combination with the new Cray products.

HPE was formed when HP split into two companies in 2014. HP Inc. is the printer division, while HPE is the enterprise side.

The deal is subject to the typical regulatory oversight, but if all goes well, it is expected to close in HPE’s fiscal Q1 2020.

15 May 17:15

Here's every single new emoji we're getting this year

by Kevin Webb

2019 emoji

  • More than 50 new emoji will be made standard in 2019, based on a list from the Unicode Consortium.
  • Many of the new emoji are tied together by the theme of inclusivity, introducing symbols for deaf people, blind people, and people in wheelchairs.
  • While Unicode made the new emoji official in March, they're just starting to roll out to devices now. 
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

More than 50 new emoji will become standard in 2019, based on the final list approved by the Unicode Consortium. Unicode is responsible for defining which emojis make onto all platforms, including iPhones, Android devices, and computers.

Many of the new icons are tied together by the theme of inclusivity, introducing emoji for deaf people, blind people, people in wheelchairs, and those with prosthetic limbs. This year's update will allow users to choose the race and gender of both people when choosing an emoji that features a couple. Unicode first introduced support for skin color in 2015, but users were limited to heterosexual emojis for couples, and could only select couples with the same skin tone.

While there are 59 distinct new emoji, variations for skin tone and gender make for a total of 230 individual images. A March update to Unicode made the emoji usable online, but each company will choose when to introduce its own version of the new emoji. 

The new emoji rolled out to Samsung devices starting in August, arrived on Google's Pixel devices in September, and will likely roll out to iPhones sometime in October after iOS 13. 

Here are the new emoji coming soon, with images from Emojipedia:

SEE ALSO: The creators of 'Pokémon Go' are launching a Harry Potter game later this year. Here's everything we know so far.

Yawning



Pinching Hand (with skin tones)



Ear with hearing aid (with skin tones)



Deaf man (with skin tones)



Deaf woman (with skin tones)



Mechanical arm



Mechanical leg



Man with probing cane (with skin tones)



Woman with probing cane (with skin tones)



Man in motorized wheelchair (with skin tones)



Woman in motorized wheelchair (with skin tones)



Man in manual wheelchair (with skin tones)



Woman in manual wheelchair (with skin tones)



Man standing (with skin tones)



Woman standing (with skin tones)



Person kneeling (with skin tones)



Woman kneeling (with skin tones)



People holding hands (gender inclusive, with skin tones)



Guide dog



Service dog



Orangutan



Sloth



Otter



Skunk



Flamingo



Garlic



Onion



Waffle



Falafel



Butter



Oyster



Beverage box



Maté



Ice cube



Hindu temple



Manual wheelchair



Motorized wheelchair



Auto Rickshaw



Parachute



Ringed Planet



Diving Mask



Yo-Yo



Kite



Safety vest



Sari



One-piece swimsuit



Briefs



Shorts



Ballet shoes



Banjo



Diya lamp



Axe



Probing cane



Drop of blood



Adhesive bandage



Stethoscope



Chair



Razor



White heart



Brown heart



Orange circle



Yellow circle



Green circle



Purple circle



Brown circle



Red square



Orange square



Yellow square



Green square



Blue square



Purple square



Brown square



14 May 22:36

Bitcoin clears $8,000 as its monster year rolls on

by Jonathan Garber

bitcoin

  • Bitcoin on Tuesday topped $8,000 a coin for the first time since July.
  • The cryptocurrency has now gained 119% this year. 
  • One analyst attributes this year's surge to more people using the network.
  • Watch bitcoin trade live.

Bitcoin is having a monster year. 

The cryptocurrency was trading up more than 3% near $8,065 a coin on Tuesday morning, at its best level since July. Bitcoin has now gained 119% in 2019 and has a market capitalization of $142 billion, according to CoinMarketCap.com

This year's start is a big reversal from 2018, which saw bitcoin's value plunge to nearly $3,000 a coin from nearly $14,000. At its 2017 peak of almost $20,000, the digital coin commanded a market cap of more than $327 billion.

While there are many theories as to the reason for bitcoin's revival, such as its being viewed as a safe haven and there being an exodus from alternative coins, Mati Greenspan, a senior market analyst at eToro, says the reason for they cryptocurrency's comeback is clear. 

"There are literally dozens of reasons for bitcoin to be surging right now but the important thing to remember is the main driver of this rally is increased adoption," he told Business Insider in an email. "Plain and simple."

Greenspan says all you need to do is look at the past 24 hours for evidence. He specifically pointed to Microsoft announcing the adoption of the bitcoin blockchain for online security, the Spend app unveiling plans to bring crypto payments to major retailers, and HTC saying it's building a phone to run a bitcoin full node.

On top of that, bitcoin futures are seeing record volume at the CME Group. The brokerage TD Ameritrade in December introduced the trading of bitcoin futures, and the rivals Fidelity and E-Trade have plans to bring crypto trading to their platforms later this year.  

"More people are using the network," Greenspan added, "and that's translating into higher prices."

Bitcoin

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Tesla has a mini Model S for kids that costs $600, and this family bought it to teach their child about driving electric

14 May 22:29

Google’s combining all its travel planning features under a site called Trips

by Natt Garun

Google is combining its travel-related products — the mobile Google Trips app, Google Flights, Google hotels search, and more — under a singular landing page aptly called Trips. Now when you visit google.com/travel, you’ll first find Trips which lets users plan their travel by searching a destination to find options for flights, hotels, travel guides, or vacation packages. And once you’ve booked your trip, whether through the Google tool or not, you can use Trips to see all the booking receipts to outline your itinerary, confirmation codes, and travel information and present them alongside weather reports on your travel dates.

Breadcrumbs of Trips had been scattered through various Google products over the past months but...

Continue reading…

14 May 22:26

Agent Assist, Powered by Talkdesk iQ

by BethSchultz
By Sheila McGee-Smith
CCaaS provider unveils intelligent advisory tool that provides agents with data-driven, real-time action advice.
13 May 19:58

Slack aims to be the most important software company in the world, says CEO

by Kate Clark

Slack this morning disclosed estimated preliminary financial results for the first quarter of 2019 ahead of a direct listing planned for June 20.

Citing an addition of paid customers, the workplace messaging service posted revenues of about $134 million, up 66% from $81 million in the first quarter of 2018. Losses from operations increased from $26 million in Q1 2018 to roughly $39 million this year.

In addition to filing updated paperwork, the Slack executive team gathered on Monday to make a final pitch to potential shareholders, emphasizing its goal of replacing email within enterprises across the world.

“People deserve to do the best work of their lives,” Slack co-founder and chief executive officer Stewart Butterfield said in a video released alongside a live stream of its investor day event. “This desire of feeling aligned with your team, of removing confusion, of getting clarity; the desire for support in doing the best work of your life, that’s universal, that’s deeply human. It appeals to people with all kinds of roles, in all kinds of industries, at all scales of organization and all cultures.”

“We believe that whoever is able to unlock that potential for people … is going to be the most important software company in the world. We aim to be that company,” he added.”

Slack, valued at more than $7 billion with its last round of venture capital funding, plans to list on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “SK.”

The business filed to go public in April as other well-known tech companies were finalizing their initial public offerings. Following Uber’s disastrous IPO last week, public and private market investors alike will be keeping a close-eye on Slack’s stock market performance, which may determine Wall Street’s future appetite for Silicon Valley’s unicorns.

Though some of the recent tech IPOs performed famously, like Zoom, Uber and Lyft’s performance has served as a cautionary tale for going out in poor market conditions with lofty valuations. Uber began trading last week at below its IPO price of $45 and is today down significantly at just $36 per share. Lyft, for its part, is selling for $47.5 apiece today after pricing at $72 per share in March.

Slack isn’t losing billions per year like Uber, but it’s also not as close to profitability as expected. In the year ending January 31, 2019, Slack posted a net loss of $138.9 million and revenue of $400.6 million. That’s compared to a loss of $140.1 million on revenue of $220.5 million for the year ending January 31, 2018. In its S-1, the company attributed its losses to scaling the business and capitalizing on its market opportunity.

Workplace messaging startup Slack said Monday, February 4, 2019 it had filed a confidential registration for an initial public offering, becoming the latest of a group of richly valued tech enterprises to look to Wall Street. (Photo by Eric BARADAT / AFP) (Photo credit should read ERIC BARADAT/AFP/Getty Images)

Slack currently boasts more than 10 million daily active users across more than 600,000 organizations — 88,000 on the paid plan and 550,000 on the free plan.

Slack has been able to bypass the traditional roadshow process expected of an IPO-ready business, opting for a path to Wall Street popularized by Spotify in 2018. The company plans to complete in mid-June a direct listing, which allows companies to forgo issuing new shares and instead sell directly to the market existing shares held by insiders, employees and investors. The date, however, is subject to change.

Slack has previously raised a total of $1.2 billion in funding from investors, including Accel, Andreessen Horowitz, Social Capital, SoftBank, Google Ventures and Kleiner Perkins.

13 May 19:57

Apple's surprise defeat in the Supreme Court is bad news for Tim Cook's turnaround plan (AAPL, SPOT)

by Troy Wolverton

Apple CEO Tim Cook delivers a keynote during the European Union's privacy conference at the EU Parliament in Brussels, Belgium October 24, 2018.

  • Apple's loss at the Supreme Court could ultimately hobble its services business.
  • The court ruled that a case over the fees Apple charges on app sales could go forward, a move that could eventually force Apple to reduce them.
  • Those fees comprise the biggest portion of Apple's services business — and a significant chunk of its total gross profit.
  • Apple has been touting its services business as the engine of its future growth.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Thanks to the Supreme Court, Apple now has a big problem with its attempt to reinvent itself as a company that sells services.

The court on Monday ruled that an antitrust case against the iPhone maker involving the commissions it charges on apps sold through its app store could proceed, rejecting Apple's efforts to dismiss the suit. The ruling increases the likelihood that Apple will lose the long-running case or ultimately be forced to settle it on unfavorable terms. In either case, the Supreme Court's decision makes it more likely that Apple is ultimately going to have to reduce its App Store fees.

Unfortunately for Apple, the App Store is a linchpin of the services business that CEO Tim Cook is betting the company's future on.

As Apple's iPhone sales have started to decline, it's been touting its services as the driver of its future growth. These services include its iCloud storage service, its deal with Google that makes the tech giant's search engine the default one on the iPhone, and Apple Music. And in March, the company unveiled a slew of new offerings, including a new streaming-video service and a subscription game service.

The court ruling endangers Apple's App Store cash cow

Despite this growing catalog of service offerings, Apple's App Store remains the biggest part of its services business, providing about a third of that businesses' revenue, according to Wall Street analysts. What's more, Apple's App Store alone will account for 12% of the company's total gross profit this year, KeyBanc Capital Markets forecast in March. That's a remarkable figure, given that Apple's entire services business accounted for just 16% of the company's total sales in the first six months of its current fiscal year and attests to just how profitable the App Store is for the company.

But the Supreme Court ruling puts that cash cow at risk of being slaughtered.

The case revolves around how consumers get apps on their iPhones and the fees Apple charges for sales through its App Store. Apple has designed the iPhone so that, basically, the only way to get apps for it is to go through its App Store. The company charges a 30% commission on most app store sales; for apps that charge subscriptions, Apple takes a 15% cut after the first year.

The plaintiffs in the case allege that those commission rates are higher than they would be in a competitive market. They say that they and other consumers have overpaid for their apps as a result because those fees get passed on to them in the form of inflated prices.

The case isn't the only threat to Apple's App Store fees

The court's ruling was narrow. The justices didn't decide whether Apple had a monopoly, whether it was abusing it, or what the penalty would be for doing so. Instead, they simply ruled the consumers had a right to sue Apple and their case could proceed.

But that ruling is a significant setback to Apple because it increases the likelihood that the case will actually go to trial. And it's not hard to see how that could be a big problem for Apple.

It shouldn't be too hard for the plaintiffs to show that Apple has a monopoly on the distribution of iPhone apps. It also shouldn't be too difficult for them to show that the fees Apple charges makes those apps pricier than they would otherwise be. One has to look no further than Spotify, which charged $3 more to customers who signed up for its service through Apple's app store than those who subscribed through its website. Spotify has said it did that to cover the cost of Apple's fees. And Spotify isn't the only company plaintiffs can point to that had similar pricing practices.

In other words, there's a good chance that Apple will lose the case on its merits.

But even if it doesn't, the company's App Store fees are already coming under pressure. Spotify filed a complaint against Apple with European Union's competition regulators, making similar charges. Meanwhile, it and a growing number of app developers have decided to opt out of Apple's fees entirely by directing customers to sign up for subscriptions through their own websites.

Read more: Apple's App Store fees are coming under increasing pressure from Spotify, Netflix, and regulators. Cutting them could lower its earnings by 10% next year.

All this could well mean that Apple is going to have to reduce its app store fees in a significant way sooner or later. Such a move would reduce its revenue and profits. Worse, though, it would likely sully its services story.

SEE ALSO: Here's why Apple's coming streaming video service won't rescue it from plunging iPhone sales

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This London handbag company has recycled 175 tons of fire hoses into fashion accessories

12 May 04:09

9 predictions from old sci-fi movies that actually came true

by Dave Johnson

I hdkGsK

  • We looked at some of the best sci-fi movies in history to see what kinds of predictions they made about technology and the world.
  • Many predictions are hilariously inaccurate, but some have proven eerily correct decades later.
  • Memorable movies like "Blade Runner," "The Terminator," and "2001: A Space Odyssey" predicted modern-day tech like military drones and cell phones.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Not all science fiction films age well, and often the predictions they make are hilariously misguided.

1987's "The Running Man," for example, contended that in the year 2019, we'd be watching battle royale-style murder on live television.

2019 is also the year that "The Island" predicted human clones would be farmed like cattle for their organs — and that film hit theaters a mere 14 years ago.

But some classic sci-fi films made rock-solid predictions that proved eerily accurate decades later. Movies such as "Blade Runner," "The Terminator," and "2001: A Space Odyssey" are all worth revisiting for the modern-day technology they predicted.

Despite some great contenders from the last decade or two, we established the drinking age rule for this list: We looked only at movies that were 21 years or older (so tough break, 2002's "Minority Report").

Here are nine predictions from old sci-fi movies that actually came true.

SEE ALSO: 11 of the coolest Easter eggs you can find in cars today

DON'T MISS: I compared the meatless Beyond Burger with a beef burger from Shake Shack — and I know which burger I'd rather eat

Space travel — 'Le Voyage Dans La Lune,' 1902

It's hard to make the case that any particular work of fiction predicted the general concept of space travel. Jules Verne may well have been the first person to write about it in any sort of modern, technological way with his 1865 novel "From the Earth to the Moon," but since then, countless films have featured travel to the moon or beyond.

Even so, "Le Voyage Dans La Lune" deserves special mention. With the movie camera barely 10 years old and the first cinema still three years away from a grand opening, French filmmaker Georges Méliès made a 13-minute, special effects-laden movie about explorers who travel to the moon in a cannon-propelled space capsule.

It's remarkable for many reasons. The subject matter is inventive, the visual effects are charming and downright iconic, and the conceit of firing a rocket out of a canon is not as far-fetched as it might seem to viewers accustomed to Space X launches.

In fact, the "space gun" — ballistically firing a satellite into orbit from the equivalent of a giant canon — has been explored for decades. In the 1960s, under the auspices of Project HARP, the Navy used a 100-caliber gun to fire 400-pound projectiles into suborbital trajectories that reached a height of 110 miles. So the idea, though impractical, is far from crazy.

No, we're unlikely to ever fire people into space from a canon. But "Le Voyage Dans La Lune" certainly ignited viewers' imaginations and paved the way for Neil Armstrong and Apollo 11.



Robots — 'Metropolis,' 1927

Though relatively unknown to mainstream movie audiences, sci-fi fans will have no trouble recognizing the iconic 1927 film "Metropolis."

From the vantage point of 2019, this film isn't easy to watch, since it's a silent, black-and-white film that runs well over two hours. (Though if you're so inclined, you certainly can watch Metropolis in its entirety on YouTube.)

And Metropolis broke a lot of fresh ground, including the first on-screen depiction of robots. In the film, an inventor with an uncanny 1920's resemblance to Doc Brown crafted a metallic humanoid robot who is then "reskinned" to resemble Maria, a character in the film.

Today, we take the inevitability of robots — and even human-like androids in particular — for granted. But as novel as this was at the time, today we are virtually overrun with increasingly realistic androids.

In 2014, Japan saw the debut of "Kodomoroid," a robot newscaster, and Osaka University's Professor Hiroshi Ishiguro has unveiled an android named Erica who is startlingly realistic. At the same time, robots like Boston Dynamics' Atlas and Honda's Asimo demonstrate that walking, running, opening doors, and even gymnastics are on the robot menu.



Earbuds — 'Fahrenheit 451,' 1966

Ray Bradbury's iconic novel "Fahrenheit 451" has long been required reading for high schoolers everywhere, and François Truffaut tried his hand at making a film version in 1966.

Firemen never took on the role of starting fires, but that conceit wasn't intended to be taken as a prediction — it's a satirical parable. But there is a fascinating piece of technology in this film that sagely predicts the rise of earbuds and the modern earbud culture.

In "Fahrenheit 451," "seashells" are described as "thimble radios tamped tight, and an electronic ocean of sound, of music and talk coming in, coming in on the shore of her unsleeping mind." In 1966, the most personal audio available was the transistor radio. And though headphones existed, they were large and bulky affairs. Bradbury and Truffaut envisioned a world with tiny, thimble-sized earbuds that played private audio — both music and talk.

It wouldn't be until 2001 and the first Apple iPod that people started wearing seashells, submersing themselves in music and podcasts just like the film depicted.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider
10 May 18:41

While Trump Complains About Facebook Takedowns, Facebook Is Helping Trump Take Down Content He Doesn't Like

by Mike Masnick

You might have noticed in the last week or two that President Trump has suddenly jumped on the silly bandwagon suggesting that internet platforms like Facebook and Twitter don't have a right to kick people off of their platforms. There have been a bunch of misleading tweets he's made, but we'll just post this one that kicked it all off:

In it, Trump says:

I am continuing to monitor the censorship of AMERICAN CITIZENS on social media platforms. This is the United States of America — and we have what's known as FREEDOM OF SPEECH! We are monitoring and watching, closely!!

Of course, "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" in the American context only applies to the government interfering with the rights of people to express themselves, and has no bearing on companies choosing to kick off people who it finds problematic. Indeed, part of the 1st Amendment is that it provides the platforms -- as private entities -- the right to determine who they associate with and who they don't.

But a new Wired article suggests that there's a striking contrast here, in that Facebook has someone who is quick to respond and to shut down the accounts of those designated by Trump's government as undesirable. It's difficult not to read this as somewhat hypocritical. The issue relates to another story we discussed last month, in which the Trump White House declared Iran's IRGC a "foreign terrorist organization." The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, is basically Iran's military/security/law enforcement wing -- and this is the first time that a governmental organization has been declared a foreign terrorist organization in the US. And Facebook immediately accepted this claim from the White House and banned any related accounts:

The day after Trump’s move, Instagram, a Facebook property, blocked the accounts of high-ranking Revolutionary Guard officers. And the next week The New York Times reported that Fishman had said Facebook would have zero tolerance for any group the US deems a terrorist organization.

In short, at the same time as Trump is incorrectly referencing the 1st Amendment with regards to Facebook's private moderation decisions, his own White House is effectively able to dictate to Facebook what accounts need to be taken down:

So basically Trump can tell Facebook to de-platform any part of any foreign government—including, presumably, an entire foreign government—and Fishman, along with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, will reply with a crisp salute? Under Facebook’s current policy, that would seem to be the case.

Wired's Robert Wright asks Facebook's "global head of counterterrorism policy," Brian Fishman, to defend this, and Fishman basically says "I'm just following orders"

When I asked Fishman to justify this policy, he said it’s designed to keep Facebook on the right side of the law, which prohibits Americans from providing “material support” to any group deemed a “Foreign Terrorist Organization.”

But, I replied, the law goes on to spell out the things that would constitute “material support,” and none of them sound much like “letting these groups post on your social media platform.” Fishman said, “I’m not a lawyer. I’m a policy guy.”

You can understand why Facebook might wish to avoid falling afoul of material support for terrorism laws (though the few attempts to hit social media companies with this law have all failed miserably), but the end result is this bizarre situation in which the President is whining about blocking accounts on Facebook (which are actions by a private company in which the government has no say), while his own government is using its (questionable powers) to have accounts banned on Facebook (which potentially do have more actual 1st Amendment implications).



Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
10 May 18:35

Denver just became the first city in the US to decriminalize magic mushrooms. Here's what they do to your body and mind.

by Erin Brodwin and Shayanne Gal

mushrooms shrooms 2x1

In a slender and surprising victory for supporters of hallucinogenic or "magic" mushrooms, the psychedelic drug better known to scientists as psilocybin, Denver, Colorado yesterday voted to decriminalize the drugs.

Once portrayed as illegal ways to "drop out" or "tune in," psychedelic and semi-psychedelic drugs like psilocybin and ecstasy are beginning to turn into federally-regulated medicines. Part of the reason: scientific evidence is building that the substances may have the potential to help staunch symptoms of psychiatric diseases that are difficult to treat with existing therapies. Those diseases include severe depression, for example.

Here's how psilocybin impacts the brain and body and produces its effects:

how magic mushrooms affect the body and brain denver psychedelics

SEE ALSO: Evidence is mounting that psychedelic drugs can help treat diseases. Here are the most promising uses.

DON'T MISS: Why psychedelics like magic mushrooms appear to kill the ego and fundamentally transform the brain

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A recent Harvard study found men who wore boxers had about 25% more sperm than those who wore briefs

10 May 05:47

With the Pixel 3A, T-Mobile just proved how broken the RCS Chat rollout has become

by Dieter Bohn

The Pixel 3A and Pixel 3 are coming as officially supported and sold phones on T-Mobile.

The Pixel 3A and Pixel 3 support the next-generation texting protocol called the Universal Profile for RCS (or Rich Communication Services, or Chat).

T-Mobile supports RCS.

But the Pixel 3A and Pixel 3 won’t have RCS chat on T-Mobile’s network. How is this so broken?

When Google first revealed its plans to support RCS Chat on Android back in April of 2018, I wanted to believe that it could move quickly to replace SMS on Android phones. RCS Chat is still not an end-to-end encrypted communication service, but at least it would provide better chat features like read receipts, group chats, and higher-quality attachments.

Pixel phones do support RCS on...

Continue reading…

08 May 21:27

Slack to live-stream pitch to shareholders on Monday ahead of direct listing

by Kate Clark

Slack, the ubiquitous workplace messaging tool, will make its pitch to prospective shareholders on Monday at an invite-only event in New York City, the company confirmed in a blog post on Wednesday. Slack stock is expected to begin trading on the New York Stock Exchange as soon as next month.

Slack, which is pursuing a direct listing, will live stream Monday’s Investor Day on its website.

An alternative to an initial public offering, direct listings allow businesses to forgo issuing new shares and instead sell directly to the market existing shares held by insiders, employees and investors. Slack, like Spotify, has been able to bypass the traditional roadshow process expected of an IPO-ready business, as well as some of the exorbitant Wall Street fees.

Spotify, if you remember, similarly live streamed an event that is typically for investors eyes only. If Slack’s event is anything like the music streaming giant’s, Slack co-founder and chief executive officer Stewart Butterfield will speak to the company’s greater mission alongside several other executives.

Slack unveiled documents for a public listing two weeks ago. In its SEC filing, the company disclosed a net loss of $138.9 million and revenue of $400.6 million in the fiscal year ending January 31, 2019. That’s compared to a loss of $140.1 million on revenue of $220.5 million for the year before.

Additionally, the company said it reached 10 million daily active users earlier this year across more than 600,000 organizations.

Slack has previously raised a total of $1.2 billion in funding from investors, including Accel, Andreessen Horowitz, Social Capital, SoftBank, Google Ventures and Kleiner Perkins.

08 May 21:26

Facebook is loosening its ban on crypto ads as rumors swirl about its blockchain project (FB)

by Rob Price

David Marcus

  • Facebook is loosening up its ban on crypto-related ads.
  • Advertisements on the social network about blockchain technology and industry news will no longer require pre-approval.
  • The company clamped down on blockchain and bitcoin-related ads a year ago amid a wave of scams.
  • The change comes as the company is rumoured to be preparing to announce its own cryptocurrency to power payments.

Facebook is relaxing its ban on crypto-related ads.

On Wednesday, the social networking giant announced that it was loosening its rules around blockchain and digital currencies. Some types of ads will remain banned, or, at the very least, require pre-approval. But users will now be able to run ads "related to blockchain technology, industry news, education or events related to cryptocurrency" no approval required, Facebook said.

The change comes 16 months after Facebook first banned all ads for bitcoin, cryptocurrencies and ICOs amid a wave of scams and shady schemes in the industry. It subsequently allowed some ads related to the tech, but only if they were pre-approved.

And the change of heart arrives as rumours swirl about Facebook's own ambitions in the crypto space, and news leaks out about the efforts of its secretive blockchain team.

On Wednesday, Bloomberg came out with a new report that said the company could announce its own cryptocurrency to power payments in the third quarter of 2019, and that project head David Marcus (former PayPal president) is quietly building a 50-strong team comprised in part of ex-PayPal employees.

Facebook has thus far stayed mum about the direction its blockchain team is taking, and it was conspicuously absent from F8, Facebook's major developer conference, earlier this month.

On the ads side, Facebook says it will still require pre-approval for advertisements that directly promote cryptocurrencies or cryptocurrency exchanges, and that ads for ICOs (initial coin offerings, a form of crypto-powered fundraising) will remain banned. 

"We're committed to preventing misleading advertising on our platforms, especially in the area of financial products and services. Because of this, people who want to promote cryptocurrency and closely related products like cryptocurrency exchanges and mining software and hardware, will still have to go through a review process," the company said in a blog post announcing the change.

"This process will continue to take into account licenses they have obtained, whether they are traded on a public stock exchange (or are a subsidiary of a public company) and other relevant public background on their business."


Do you work at Facebook? Got a tip? Contact this reporter via encrypted messaging app Signal at +1 (650) 636-6268 using a non-work phone, email at rprice@businessinsider.com, Telegram or WeChat at robaeprice, or Twitter DM at @robaeprice. (PR pitches by email only, please.) You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.


Selected stories:

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Mark Zuckerberg outline Facebook's new 6-principle approach to privacy

08 May 04:21

1 Million Species Are Threatened with Extinction Thanks to Humans, UN Report Says

by Becky Ferreira

Human activities have put as many as one million other species at risk of extinction, according to the first comprehensive United Nations report on global biodiversity.

The report, a summary of which was released on Monday, emphasizes humanity’s devastating impact on the natural world, which is accelerating extinctions at an unprecedented rate in human history. People have altered or destroyed three-quarters of land environments, two-thirds of marine habitats, and 85 percent of the most important wetland regions. This leaves few areas unaffected by human activities such as agriculture, commercial fishing, industrial pollution, and urbanization, according to the report.

Meanwhile, the environmental effect of these activities—human-driven climate change—has disrupted the habitats of 47 percent of flightless land mammals and 23 percent of threatened birds. Ecosystems that are particularly sensitive to warmer temperatures, such as coral reefs, could be virtually wiped out worldwide over the coming decades.

This ongoing extinction event is an obvious tragedy for the lush variety of life on Earth. But it is also an ominous trend for human civilization, which depends heavily on global biodiversity for sustenance and survival.

"The loss of species, ecosystems, and genetic diversity is already a global and generational threat to human well-being,” Sir Robert Watson, a leading atmospheric scientist who led the report, said in a statement.

“Protecting the invaluable contributions of nature to people will be the defining challenge of decades to come,” Watson added.

Produced by the UN’s Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), the report exceeds 1,500 pages and compiles findings from 15,000 scientific and international government studies.

The full report will be released later this year. In the meantime, a summary of the conclusions was approved by representatives of 109 nations at an IPBES Plenary meeting that took place last week in Paris, France.

In addition to input from more than 450 researchers, the report incorporates valuable perspectives from Indigenous Peoples and local communities.

“Recognition of the knowledge, innovations and practices, institutions, and values of Indigenous Peoples and local communities and their inclusion and participation in environmental governance often enhances their quality of life, as well as nature conservation, restoration, and sustainable use,” the summary said.

While the results of the report are harrowing, the IPBES team laid out possible solutions to mitigate the rapid loss of species and livelihoods worldwide, such as curbing greenhouse gas emissions, designing better waste disposal systems, and switching to more environmentally friendly diets.

“We have already seen the first stirrings of actions and initiatives for transformative change, such as innovative policies by many countries, local authorities, and businesses, but especially by young people worldwide,” said Watson.

Youth movements, such as the Extinction Rebellion or the recent school strikes protesting climate change inaction, have helped raise awareness of the colossal environmental problems caused by humans, and the threat they pose to future generations.

Whether you are eight or 80, the dire UN report report should be a wake-up call about the real and immediate danger life on Earth faces.

Get six of our favorite Motherboard stories every day by signing up for our newsletter .

08 May 01:26

'What is Google One?': Everything you need to know about Google's paid storage service

by Devon Delfino

google one

  • Google One is essentially the paid version of Google Drive storage — if you needed more space in Gmail, for example, you could get it through a paid subscription to Google One.
  • Those who don't mind compressing their files won't need to upgrade, since Google doesn't have a storage cap unless you opt to save the original file size for your media.
  • Monthly costs range from as little as $1.99 to as much as $299.99, depending on the amount of storage space you need.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Introduced in May 2018, Google One is the type of product that may have escaped your attention — that is, unless you're on the cusp of going over your Google Drive storage limit, or have already done so.

For those who are curious, or are simply in need of more storage space, here's a breakdown of what Google One is, what it comes with, how much it costs, and how to sign up for it:

What is Google One?

Google One is a paid subscription service that can be tacked onto a Google account. It allows users to expand their storage beyond the usual 15 free GB, which includes: Gmail, Google Drive and Google Photos. (But keep in mind that this limit only applies to those who opt out of compressing their files to fit the "high quality" size standards — otherwise you already have free unlimited storage, which means you won't need to upgrade at all.)

Other perks of Google One

Those who get Google One have access to Google experts, who can help with any Google-related questions, like how their products work. Signing up for Google One also gives you the option to add up to five family members to your expanded storage plan (without any additional cost, and without sacrificing privacy), which is ideal for those looking to split costs while taking advantage of their plan's perks.

On that note, Google says those who sign up will also, "Enjoy extra benefits from other Google products, like Google Play credits, special hotel pricing, and more." It also notes that, where available, subscribers can get up to 40% off select hotels — provided they book while signed into their Google account. And those with certain qualifying Metro by T-Mobile plans are eligible for automatic backups for media taken on an Android device.

What Google One costs

There are several pricing levels, depending on your storage needs. Those can be paid monthly, or annually (which provides subscribers with a small discount compared to the monthly billing option). Here's how those costs shake out: 

  • $1.99 per month: 100 GB
  • $2.99 per month: 200 GB
  • $9.99 per month: 2 TB
  • $99.99 per month: 10 TB
  • $199.99 per month: 20 TB
  • $299.99 per month: 30 TB 

Those who opt to take advantage of the family plan can either set up a family payment (which would mean a single person would be responsible for any payments made through the group account; they could also set up purchase approvals and get notifications when purchases are made), or they could set up separate payments.

How to sign up for Google One

Those interested in signing up for the service should go to one.google.com, or download the Google One app (which is available to those with Android 5.0 and up).

To become part of an existing family group, the "family manager" will need to send you an invitation to join, either via text or email. To qualify for that, you'll need to have a Google account, live in the same country as the family manager, and not have switched families (or be a member of another Google family group) within the last 12 months.

Related coverage from How To Do Everything: Tech

SEE ALSO: How to turn Google SafeSearch on or off

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 14 problems that can make touch screen laptops infuriating

08 May 01:26

HBO Digitally Erased That Coffee Cup from 'Game of Thrones'

by Becky Ferreira

Forget the Iron Throne. The object that attracted the most intense scrutiny in the latest episode of HBO’s Game of Thrones was a disposable coffee cup casually placed in front of Emilia Clarke, who plays Daenerys Targaryen on the show.

HBO copped to the sloppy mistake with the above statement, which is more troll than explanation. But despite the light humor, an HBO spokeswoman confirmed on Tuesday that the cup has been digitally edited out of the scene.

While nobody can blame Daenerys for wanting a hot drink after a Long Night, fans still enjoyed roasting the show for the screw-up. As Motherboard’s Matthew Gault pointed out, the cup could have been easily edited out by a VFX artist before the episode aired to millions of eagle-eyed viewers. But it took a tidal wave of memes and jokes to prompt HBO to erase the cup from the scene.

This is not the first time that Game of Thrones had to remove a controversial prop from an episode. During its first season in 2011, the show used a model resembling George W. Bush for one of its severed heads-on-pikes. Game of Thrones creators David Benioff and DB Weiss said it was not a political statement, but that it just happened to be a fake head that was readily available.

HBO apologized for the “unacceptable, disrespectful” prop and erased it from DVD versions of the show. However, the Bush head is still visible for a brief moment in the streaming version of the season one finale, “Fire and Blood.”

The brouhaha over the coffee cup is also reminiscent of the reception of the recent Sonic the Hedgehog movie trailer, in which the title CGI character was widely criticized for odd design choices.

Animators will now redesign Sonic before the release of the movie in November, suggesting that on-the-fly editing is becoming a commonplace part of film and television production.

Get six of our favorite Motherboard stories every day by signing up for our newsletter.

07 May 22:58

18 signs we're in the middle of a 6th mass extinction

by Aylin Woodward

dead fish

The phrase "mass extinction" typically conjures images of the asteroid crash that led to the twilight of the dinosaurs.

Upon impact, that 6-mile-wide space rock caused a tsunami in the Atlantic Ocean, along with earthquakes and landslides up and down what is now the Americas. A heat pulse baked the Earth, and the Tyrannosaurus rex and its compatriots died out, along with 75% of the planet's species.

Although it may not be obvious, another devastating mass extinction event is taking place today — the sixth of its kind in Earth's history. The trend is hitting global fauna on multiple fronts, as hotter oceans, deforestation, and climate change drive animal populations to drop in unprecedented numbers.

These alarming extinction trends are driven by one key factor: humans. According to a 2014 study, current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than they would be if humans weren't around. A summary of a United Nations report released last month put it another way: "Human actions threaten more species with global extinction now than ever before," the authors wrote.

That report, which assessed the state of our planet's biodiversity, found that up to 1 million plant and animals species face extinction, many within decades, due to human activity.

Read more: Insects are dying off at record rates — an ominous sign we're in the middle of a 6th mass extinction

Other recent research has led to similar conclusions: A 2017 study found that animal species around the world are experiencing a "biological annihilation" and that our current "mass extinction episode has proceeded further than most assume."

Here are 18 signs that the planet is in the midst of a sixth mass extinction, and why people are primarily to blame.

SEE ALSO: So many animals are going extinct that it could take Earth 10 million years to recover

Earth appears to be undergoing a process of "biological annihilation." Up to half of the total number of animal individuals that once shared the Earth with humans are already gone.

A 2017 study looked at animal populations across the planet by examining 27,600 vertebrate species — about half of the overall total that we know exist. They found that more than 30% of them are in decline.

Some species are facing total collapse, while local populations of others are going extinct in specific areas. That's still cause for alarm, since the study authors said these localized extinctions are a "prelude to species extinctions."



More than 26,500 of the world's species are threatened with extinction, and that number is expected to keep going up.

According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, more than 27% of all assessed species on the planet are threatened with extinction. Currently, 40% of the planet's amphibians, 25% of its mammals, and 33% of its coral reefs are threatened.

The IUCN predicts that 99.9% of critically endangered species and 67% of endangered species will be lost within the next 100 years.



According to the UN report, the number of species threatened with extinction could be closer to 1 million.

The UN report estimated that 40% of amphibian species, more than 33% of all marine mammals and reef-forming corals, and at least 10% of insect species are threatened. The authors also found that more than 500,000 land species already don't have sufficient natural habitat left to ensure their long-term survival.



Insects are dying off at record rates. Roughly 40% of the world's insect species are in decline, according to one study.

A study published earlier this year found that the total mass of all insects on the planet is decreasing by 2.5% per year.

If that trend continues unabated, the Earth may not have any insects at all by 2119.

"In 10 years you will have a quarter less, in 50 years only half left, and in 100 years you will have none," Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, a coauthor of the study, told The Guardian.



That's a major problem because insects like bees, hoverflies, and other pollinators perform a crucial role in fruit, vegetable, and nut production. Plus, bugs are food sources for many bird, fish, and mammal species — some of which humans rely on for food.

Another recent study published in the journal Nature Communications looked at 353 wild bee and hoverfly species in the UK, and found that one-third experienced declines between 1980 and 2013.

The study authors noted that the geographic ranges of bee and hoverfly species declined by 25% — that's a net loss of about 11 species per square kilometer. The primary cause was a reduction in the pollinators' habitats.

The recent UN report calculated that projected declines in the populations of wild bees and other pollinators could put up to $577 billion in annual crop production at risk.



Insects aren't the only creatures taking a hit. In the past 50 years, more than 500 amphibian species have declined worldwide — and 90 have gone extinct — due to a deadly fungal disease that corrodes frog flesh.

A recent study in the journal Science described the spread of chytridiomycosis, or chytrid fungus, and how quickly it has wreaked havoc on frog, toad, and salamander species around the world.

Humans have enabled the fungal disease to spread further than it otherwise could have, in large part because of the global wildlife trade.

According to the study authors, amphibian deaths associated with chytrid fungus represent the greatest recorded loss of biodiversity attributable to any one disease.

Another study published in the journal Current Biology noted that amphibians overall — not just frogs — are among the most highly threatened groups of animals, with at least 2,000 species estimated to be in danger of extinction.



The loss of even one species could also cause an "extinction domino effect" to ripple through an ecosystem, causing the entire community to collapse.

A 2018 study published in Scientific Reports predicted that scientists are likely underestimating how many species are vulnerable to extinction.

"Failing to take into account these co-extinctions therefore underestimates the rate and magnitude of the loss of entire species from events like climate change by up to 10 times," study co-author Corey Bradshaw said in a press release.

The research suggested that the loss of one species can make more species disappear (a process known as co-extinction) by causing a sudden shift in a system. For example, a species of flower could not survive without the pollinator it relies on.

"Co-extinctions are often triggered well before the complete loss of an entire species," the study authors wrote. 



A 2015 study examined bird, reptile, amphibian, and mammal species, and concluded that the average rate of extinction over the last century is up to 100 times higher than normal.

Elizabeth Kolbert, author of the book "The Sixth Extinction," told National Geographic that the outlook from that study is dire. It means 75% of animal species could be extinct within a few human lifetimes.



In roughly 50 years, 1,700 species of amphibians, birds, and mammals will face a higher risk of extinction because their natural habitats are shrinking.

By 2070, 1,700 species will lose 30% to 50% of their present habitat ranges thanks to human land use, a 2019 study found. Specifically, 886 species of amphibians, 436 species of birds, and 376 species of mammals will be affected and consequently will be at more risk of extinction.



Koalas are already "functionally extinct," meaning the population has declined so much that it no longer plays a significant role in Australia's ecosystem.

According to experts at the Australian Koala Foundation, only 80,000 koalas are left on the continent. The animals are struggling to survive in the face of deforestation, changing weather, and severe droughts.



Logging and deforestation of the Amazon rainforest is of particular concern when it comes to looming extinctions.

Roughly 17% of the Amazon has been destroyed in the past five decades, mostly because humans have cut down vegetation to open land for cattle ranching, according to the World Wildlife Fund. Some 80% of the world's species can be found in tropical rainforests like the Amazon, including the critically endangered Amur leopard. Even deforestation in a small area can cause an animal to go extinct, since some species live only in limited, isolated areas.

Every year, more than 18 million acres of forest disappear worldwide. That's about 27 soccer fields' worth every minute.

In addition to putting animals at risk, deforestation eliminates tree cover that helps absorb atmospheric carbon dioxide. 



In the next 50 years, humans will drive so many mammal species to extinction that Earth's evolutionary diversity won't recover for some 3 million years, one study said.

The scientists behind that study, which was published in 2018, said the planet will need between 3 million and 5 million years in a best-case scenario to get back to the level of biodiversity we have today.

Returning the planet's biodiversity to the state it was in before modern humans evolved would take even longer — up to 7 million years.



Some paleobiologists suggested an even longer time frame for the planet's recovery from a mass extinction: 10 million years or more.

A study published in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution reveals that it took around 10 million years for Earth's biodiversity to rebound from the mass extinction that wiped out the dinosaurs.

"Biodiversity losses won't be replaced for millions of years, and so when you imagine extinctions in coral reef ecosystems, or rain forest ecosystems, or grasslands, or wherever, those places are going to be less diverse essentially forever, as far as humans are concerned," Chris Lowery, a co-author of the study, told Business Insider.



Alien species are a major driver of extinctions.

A study published in February found that alien species are a primary driver of recent animal and plant extinctions. An alien species is the term for any kind of animal, plant, fungus, or bacteria that isn't native to an ecosystem. Some can be invasive, meaning they cause harm to the environment to which they're introduced.

Many invasive alien species have been unintentionally spread by humans. People can carry alien species with them from one continent, country, or region to another when they travel. Shipments of goods and cargo between places can also contribute to a species' spread.

Zebra mussels and brown marmorated stink bugs are two examples of invasive species in the US.

The recent study showed that since the year 1500, there have been 953 global extinctions. Roughly one-third of those were at least partially because of the introduction of alien species.



Oceans absorb 93% of the extra heat that greenhouse gases trap in Earth's atmosphere. That kills marine species and coral reefs.

Last year was the oceans' warmest on record, and scientists recently realized that oceans are heating up 40% faster than they'd previously thought.

Higher ocean temperatures and acidification of the water cause corals to expel the algae living in their tissues and turn white, a process known as coral bleaching.

As a consequence, coral reefs — and the marine ecosystems they support — are dying. Around the world, about 50% of the world's reefs have died over the past 30 years.



Species that live in fresh water are impacted by warming, too.

A 2013 study showed that 82% of native freshwater fish species in California were vulnerable to extinction because of climate change.

Most native fish populations are expected decline, and some will likely be driven to extinction, the study authors said. Fish species that need water colder than 70 degrees Fahrenheit to thrive are especially at risk.



Warming oceans lead to sea-level rise. Rising waters are already impacting vulnerable species' habitats.

Water, like most things, expands when it heats up — warmer water takes up more space. Already, the average global sea level is 5 to 8 inches higher than it was in 1900, according to Smithsonian.

In February, Australia's environment minister officially declared a rodent called the Bramble Cay melomys to be the first species to go extinct because of human-driven climate change — specifically, sea-level rise.

The tiny rat relative was native to an island in the Queensland province, but its low-lying territory sat just 10 feet above sea level. The island was increasingly inundated by ocean water during high tides and storms, and those salt-water floods took a toll on the island's plant life. 

That flora provided the melomys with food and shelter, so the decrease in plants likely led to the animal's demise.



Warming oceans are leading to unprecedented Arctic and Antarctic ice melt, which further contributes to sea-level rise. In the US, 17% of all threatened and endangered species are at risk because of rising seas.

Melting ice sheets could raise sea levels significantly. The Antarctic ice sheet is melting nearly six times as fast as it did in the 1980s. Greenland's ice is melting four times faster now than it was 16 years ago. It lost more than 400 billion tons of ice in 2012 alone.

In a worst-case scenario, called a "pulse," the glaciers that hold back Antarctica's and Greenland's ice sheets could collapse. That would send massive quantities of ice into the oceans, potentially leading to rapid sea-level rise around the world.

Sea-level rise threatens 233 federally protected animal and plant species in 23 coastal states across the US, according to a report from the Center for Biological Diversity. The report noted that 17% of all the US's threatened and endangered species are vulnerable to rising sea levels and storm surges, including the Hawaiian monk seal and the loggerhead sea turtle.



If nothing is done to address climate change, one in six species is on track to go extinct.

An analysis published in 2015 looked at over 130 studies about declining animal populations and found that one in six species could disappear as the planet continues to heat up.

Flora and fauna from South America and Oceania are expected top be the hardest hit, while North American species would have the lowest risk.



A new study found that almost 40% of the world's primates will be at risk of extinction due to extreme weather events associated with a warming planet.

According to the study, which was published in the journal Nature Climate Change, 38% of primate species — including orangutans, monkeys, and gorillas — are vulnerable to droughts and tropical cyclones. 



Previous mass extinctions came with warning signs. Those indicators were very similar to what we're seeing now.

The most devastating mass extinction in planetary history is called the Permian-Triassic extinction, or the "Great Dying." It happened 252 million years ago, prior to the dawn of the dinosaurs.

During the Great Dying, roughly 90% of the Earth's species were wiped out; less than 5% of marine species survived, and only a third of land animal species made it, according to National Geographic. The event far eclipsed the cataclysm that killed the last of the dinosaurs some 187 million years later.

But the Great Dying didn't come out of left field.

Scientists think the mass extinction was caused by a large-scale and rapid release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere by Siberian volcanoes, which quickly warmed the planet — so there were warning signs. In fact, a 2018 study noted that those early signs appeared as much as 700,000 years ahead of the extinction.

"There is much evidence of severe global warming, ocean acidification, and a lack of oxygen," the study's lead author, Wolfgang Kießling, said in a release.

Today's changes are similar but less severe — so far.



There's still some debate about whether we're truly observing a sixth mass extinction.

Scientists still argue about whether the Earth is truly in the midst of another mass extinction. Smithsonian paleontologist Doug Erwin, an expert on the Great Dying, says we're not there yet, according to The Atlantic.

But Kolbert told National Geographic that "by the time we have definitive answers to that question, it's possible three-quarters of all species on Earth could be gone."

Already, there is consensus on one aspect of the extinction trend: Humans are to blame.

According to a 2014 study, current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than they would be if humans weren't around.

"There are very few, if any, extinctions that we know about in the last 100 years that would have taken place without human activity," Kolbert said.



The recent United Nations report may have ended the debate.

According to the report, 75% of all land on Earth and 66% of oceans have been significantly altered by people. More than 85% of global wetland area has already been lost, and more than 79 million acres of primary or recovering forest disappeared between 2010 and 2015 alone.

This disruption and degradation of animals' natural habitats is undoubtedly accelerating the rate of extinctions, the report authors said.

Hugh Possingham, chief scientist of The Nature Conservancy, told Business Insider that the disappearance of so many species will "fundamentally affect the global economy and the health of every human being." 



07 May 04:32

Microsoft is going to ship a full Linux kernel in Windows 10

by Tom Warren

Microsoft has surprised many in the Linux developer community in recent years. Surprises have included bringing things like the Bash shell to Windows, or native OpenSSH in Windows 10, and even including Ubuntu, SUSE Linux, and Fedora in the Windows Store. Microsoft is now going even further, with plans to ship a full Linux kernel directly in Windows 10.

“Beginning with Windows Insiders builds this Summer, we will include an in-house custom-built Linux kernel to underpin the newest version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL),” explains Microsoft program manager Jack Hammons. “The kernel itself will initially be based on version 4.19, the latest long-term stable release of Linux. The kernel will be rebased at the designation of new...

Continue reading…

06 May 18:50

Apple has bought more than 20 companies since November, but we only know about 6 of them (AAPL)

by Becky Peterson

Tim Cook

  • Apple has acquired 20 to 25 companies in the past 6 months, CEO Tim Cook told CNBC on Monday.
  • At that rate, the popular electronics companies has bought a new company every two to three weeks.
  • But most of those acquisitions have been kept on the down-low, and many from the past 6 months haven't been announced.
  • Read more stories on the Business Insider homepage. 

Apple has bought 20 to 25 companies in the past 6 months, according to CEO Tim Cook— but you probably haven't heard about most of them. 

Cook's disclosure came during an interview with CNBC on Monday, in which he said the company mostly acquires for talent and intellectual property. He said that Apple buys a new company every two to three weeks on average.

Among those 20-plus acquisition is Apple's December purchase of Platoon, a startup that works directly with musicians to produce and distribute their work. In March, Apple reportedly acquired a API development startup called Stamplay.

But there are at least 14 Apple acquisitions unaccounted for. 

Given Apple's market cap of $952 billion, most acquisitions the company makes are too small to be materially consequential, which means Apple doesn't have to disclose its purchase or any information about the buying process.

Here are the Apple acquisitions since November that we know about:

The company has $225 billion in cash and securities on its balance sheet, according to its most-recent earnings, which makes Apple is one of the most cash-rich enterprises in tech. It also means Apple has a lot opportunities and incentive to spend.

But unlike tech giant IBM which spent $34 billion on Red Ha,t or SAP which spent $8 billion on its acquisition of Qualtrics, Apple historically hasn't bet the farm on big deals.

Some of Apple's big acquisitions in the past include its $400 million purchase of Shazam in 2017 and its $3 billion acquisition of Beats in 2014, but M&A of that scope are few and far between.

Do you know which 20 to 25 companies Apple acquired in the past six months? We want to know more. Contact the author at bpeterson@businessinsider.com or DM her on Twitter if you have more information about Apple's M&A habits.

SEE ALSO: This investor explains how she helped Ring through a crisis before Amazon bought it for $1 billion — and says it's a good argument against mega-investors like SoftBank

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Mark Zuckerberg outline Facebook's new 6-principle approach to privacy

06 May 18:50

Microsoft Build 2019: the biggest news from the developer conference

by Chris Welch

See what’s ahead for Windows 10, Azure, Office 365, and more

Continue reading…

06 May 18:49

Satya Nadella says the 'brilliant jerk' phenom in tech 'is done,' but it isn't (MSFT)

by Julie Bort

Satya Nadella developers conference

  • Microsoft was one of the original "brilliant jerk" tech cultures.
  • But Satya Nadella has done a lot to overhaul the company's culture.
  • Nadella became CEO five years ago, but has worked at Microsoft for decades, through those early culture years.
  • He says that that kind of culture is over and that super smart programmers who behave badly to others are no longer tolerated.
  • That's a great ideal. It's not true yet.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Microsoft was one of the original "brilliant jerk" tech cultures. Its genius founderBill Gates has mellowed over the years and is now known for being a thoughtful philanthropist. But even he recently admitted that some of his past behavior toward people that worked at Microsoft was "over the top."

He was referring to his tantrums. And that culture of the impatient tantrum-ing jerk behavior filtered throughout the company. We've heard of stories over the years of male division heads warring with each other, trying to take each other down, well into the Steve Ballmer era of the company.

When Nadella took over as CEO Microsoft in 2014, one of his missions was to shut that nonsense down. He led a giant round of layoffs, flattened the organization (getting rid of middle managers), and ditched the company's controversial stack-ranking employee review system. Stack ranking is a system in which employees are compared against each other instead of against their own goals. Today, all managers have diversity as part of their bonus-earning goals. It's not a hiring quota but they are expected to build and maintain diverse teams.

In a recent interview with Wired, Nadella was asked about diversity and inclusion at the company.  

He said that the days of turning a blind eye to "brilliant jerks" who mistreat their teammates are long gone.

"That's done," he told Wired. "In 2019, to succeed, I hope anybody joining this industry starts by saying, 'I want to be great by honing my skills but I want to create energy around me where people of all genders and ethnicities can contribute.'"

And yet, earlier this year news came to light of how some Microsoft women still felt stymied in their careers. The uproar caused others to jump into discussion forums and decry some of the company's efforts to hire more women, minorities and other people from under-represented groups.

And it's not just women and minorities who wind up at the other end of such jerk behavior. Business Insider just talked to a newbie male programmer who got into programming after serving in the military. He was thrilled to join Microsoft and quickly quit the company after dealing with such behavior that threatened to immediately tank his career, he told us.

Microsoft's is such a big and important company that its culture has ripple effects across the industry. Nadella deserves kudos for taking this on, telling programmers that being kind to your coworkers is expected behavior. Unfortunately, anecdotal evidence indicates that even in 2019 this kind of behavior is far from over.

SEE ALSO: 57 startups that will boom in 2019, according to VCs

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Facial recognition is almost perfectly accurate — here's why that could be a problem

06 May 18:47

IBM scored a key cloud deal that gives it more credibility in a market that CEO Ginni Rometty believes will be worth $1 trillion (IBM, VOD)

by Benjamin Pimentel

IBM Virginia Rometty

  • IBM says it has signed a five-year, multi-million cloud, AI deal with Vodafone Idea, one of India's biggest telecom operators.
  • The agreement gives Big Blue a chance to highlight its AI and cloud capabilities, which is important because it's widely seen to be lagging far behind the market-leading Amazon Web Services. 
  • The deal also helps IBM stake its claim in hybrid cloud computing, a market that IBM CEO Ginni Rometty believes will be worth $1 trillion — and that she believes IBM is poised to lead. 
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

IBM is poised to establish a bigger footprint in a major market after signing a five-year deal with Vodafone Idea, one of India's largest telecom operators. The multi-million dollar deal could also give Big Blue a much-needed boost in an arena where it's struggling to catch up with more dominant rivals: cloud computing.

IBM will help Vodafone Idea build a hybrid cloud network with AI capabilities to better serve the telecom company's roughly 400 million customers, the tech giant said Friday.

Under the agreement, Vodafone Idea would be able to build "a more agile platform" by leveraging IBM's artificial intelligence automation and hybrid cloud technology, Steve Canepa, general manager of the company's media and entertainment team, told Business Insider.

"This is a strategic transformation of their architecture to allow them to become more efficient in getting their work done," he added.

IBM's struggle in cloud

It's an important win for Big Blue. While historically dominant powerhouse in corporate technology, IBM has lagged rivals in the important and fast-growing cloud computing services market. The public cloud services market, with total vendor revenue of $95 billion in the second half of 2018, is dominated by Amazon Web Services, with 12.2% market share and Microsoft, with 10.2%, followed by Salesforce, with 6.8%, Oracle, 3.5%, and Google, with 3.2%, according to analyst firm IDC. IBM is in 6th place, with 2.75%, by IDC's reckoning. 

"They did not invest early enough," IDC analyst Deepak Mohan told Business Insider. "It took time for them to get their message right."

But IBM launched a cloud offensive recently by touting a hybrid strategy that enables companies to run their networks across both a public cloud and a private data center. Earlier this year, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty predicted the company will become the biggest player in the hybrid computing market, which she projected will eventually be worth $1 trillion — a key reason, she says, for the company's big $34 billion purchase of software company Red Hat. 

The Vodafone Idea deal underscored this new cloud push, which also highlights a key component of IBM's hybrid cloud strategy: Watson, IBM's AI technology. Earlier this year, IBM announced the wider deployment of its AI offering with Watson Anywhere, which allows for the use of the technology on any cloud a user would like

The India deal also features IBM's Cloud Private offering — software applications that enable companies to manage their networks across both public clouds and private data centers.

Hybrid Cloud Strategy

"Hybrid's certainly been a strong aspect of the new IBM positioning, particularly with the focus on IBM Cloud Private and Watson Anywhere," IDC's Mohan said. "They took a while to consolidate internal assets and offerings, and branding, around a common cloud message. It seems to be slowly coming together now."

Analyst Roger Kay of Endpoint Technologies Associates echoed this point, telling Business Insider: "The company is bringing to bear a lot of the capabilities it has been touting as the forward-looking businesses, where it wants to make its mark."

Michael Brook, chief technology officer of Pitchly, a content services platform, said the deal highlighted IBM's bid to become more competitive in a tough market.

"With competition biting at its heels, IBM has had to find ways to differentiate itself in the market, and hybrid cloud and AI are its two biggest bets," he told Business Insider.

Still,  IBM faces a challenging road ahead in a highly-competitive market, he added: "Underlying it all, IBM is in a very undesirable place. It is building technology first and seeking application of its technology second, and it is heavily reliant on its existing brand to push its business forward."

Telco, tech partnerships

The Vodafone Idea deal also underscores the push toward more partnerships between telcos and tech companies.

In January, IBM also unveiled an alliance with Vodafone in which the two companies will collaborate to develop new technologies and services for adapting to AI, 5G and other major technology trends. Vodafone Idea is part of a partnership between Vodafone Group and Aditya Birla Group in India.

The alliance underscored the need for telecom companies to forge partnerships to be successful in embracing and maximizing the benefits of cloud computing, according to IDC.

"Telcos must partner," IDC analysts said in a research note. "This venture fits the blueprint. … Telcos must partner if they want to address the full breadth of cloud services opportunities, combining their networks and access to hyperscale platform providers with partners' infrastructures and additional capabilities. This venture enables Vodafone to accelerate its own digital transformation."

Read More: IBM CEO says Big Blue will be No. 1 in new trillion-dollar cloud market

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The Karlmann King is a $2 million enormous ultra-luxury SUV built upon a Ford F-550

06 May 16:42

Inside Microsoft’s surprise decision to work with Google on its Edge browser

by Tom Warren

Microsoft and Google engineers are now working closely together

Continue reading…