Shared posts

04 Oct 21:27

Ron Johnson still insists Jan. 6 wasn't all that bad

by Joan McCarter

Embattled Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson is saying things out loud and in public again, which is always a very dangerous thing for the Republican to do. Speaking Tuesday morning at the Milwaukee Rotary Club, Johnson told the crowd that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was not an “armed insurrection.”  

“To call what happened on Jan. 6 an ‘armed insurrection,” I just think is inaccurate,” Sen. Ron Johnson says at Milwaukee Rotary Club just now. Johnson argued few weapons were confiscated but protesters “did teach us how you can use a flag pole” pic.twitter.com/28E3W7G3eg

— Natasha Korecki (@natashakorecki) October 4, 2022

Note Johnson’s parsing there, where he references a hearing where he asked an FBI official how many firearms had been confiscated at the Capitol on Jan. 6. That was on March 3, 2021. Jill Sandborn, assistant director of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division, said that to her knowledge, “we have not recovered any on that day from any other arrests at the scene at this point,” Sanborn said. “But I don’t want to speak on behalf of Metro and Capitol Police.”

Since March 3, 2021, we’ve learned a lot more about that. Like the fact that Christopher Michael Alberts was, in fact, arrested by the D.C. police on Jan. 6 for carrying a pistol without a license, possession of a firearm on Capital grounds, and other charges, and was charged the day after the riot in U.S. District Court. Since then, the Jan. 6 committee has released audio of police radio transmissions from Jan. 6: “Three men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15s… at 14th and Independence,” one officer reported. “White male… stock of an AR-15,” another officer reported. “Green fatigues… Glock-style pistols in their waistband.” Yet another radioed “Elevated threat in the trees… American flag face mask… weapon on the right-side hip.”

But since the month after the attack, Johnson has been stubbornly insisting the insurrection wasn’t armed, that it wasn’t that violent, that it wasn’t that dangerous.

Let’s get Mandela Barnes to the Senate, and kick Ron Johnson to the curb.

That’s despite the bombshell testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, a top aide to Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, that the Secret Service knew there were armed people at the rally ahead of the attack, and warned Trump. “I don’t f-ing care that they have weapons,” Trump said, per Hutchinson. “They’re not here to hurt me … Take the f-ing mags away… Let my people in, they can march to the Capitol from here.”

So, yeah, that would be an armed insurrection, even if you don’t inaccurately define “armed” as just firearms, as Johnson does. However clever he thinks he is with his flag pole quip, the insurrectionists came prepared to do bodily harm.“(C)ommon things were used as weapons, like a baseball bat, a hockey stick, a rebar, a flagpole—including the American flag—pepper spray, bear spray,” US Capitol Police Sgt. Aquilino Gonell testified to the committee in July. The rioters also had knives and stun guns, stolen police riot shields, and a lot more, as detailed in this thread.

Add: Tomahawk ax Zip ties

— Scott MacFarlane (@MacFarlaneNews) July 8, 2021

Campaign Action

Johnson’s been repeating the lie that the insurrection was not armed and implying it was therefore not violent or no worse than Black Lives Matter protests, since a month after the attack. In February, 2021 he told conservative talk radio show host Jay Weber “This didn’t seem like an armed insurrection to me.”

“I mean ‘armed,’ when you hear ‘armed,’ don’t you think of firearms? Here’s the questions I would have liked to ask. How many firearms were confiscated? How many shots were fired? I’m only aware of one and I’ll defend that law enforcement officer for taking that shot. It was a tragedy, OK? But I think there was only one.”

A spokesperson responded to a media question about Johnson’s latest bullshit, arguing that Johnson was taken “completely, 100% out of context” because, before that, he said, “I condemn all violence. I condemn all riots.” Sure. But Johnson changed that context when he suggested that the Capitol attack wasn’t all that violent because there weren’t firearms. Which is also a lie.

The spokesperson added, obnoxiously, “When protesters during January 6 used a flag pole, all of a sudden the types of objects they’d [Black Lives Matter protesters] been using all summer were now considered part of an ‘armed’ insurrection. He is in no way condoning this action. He’s commenting on the hypocrisy of the situation.” He is also perpetuating the lie that the insurrection wasn’t violent and wasn’t serious.

Nonetheless, when it comes to his own involvement in the would-be coup, Johnson knows it’s serious enough he’s got to try to cover his ass. And his story there has been, let’s say, evolving. He’s gone from saying, “I had nothing to do with 6 January,” to explaining that he only spent “a couple seconds” trying to get a slate of fake electors to Vice President Mike Pence. “I had nothing to do with the alternate slate,” Johnson said. “I had no idea that anybody was going to ask me to deliver those. My involvement in the attempt to deliver spanned the course of a couple seconds.”

Now he’s admitting that he exchanged text messages with one of Trump’s attorneys both before and after trying unsuccessfully to put that fake electors slate in Pence’s hands. Now, he says, “the entire episode lasted about an hour,” and “You can’t even call it participation, I wrote a couple texts.” He’s been maintaining that he had no idea what was in the package he was supposed to be handing off to Pence, just that Trump’s attorney wanted him to do it. “What would you do if you got a text from the attorney for the president of the United States?” Johnson said. “You respond to it.”

Johnson should be investigated fully for his role in the attempted coup. He probably won’t be. He should be expelled from the Senate along with all the other co-conspirators. None of them, including Johnson, will be kicked out by their colleagues.

So it’s up to us. Let’s get this guy out of there.

Trump and his followers proved on Jan. 6 how dangerously close they came to overturning our democracy. Help cancel Republican voter suppression with the power of your pen by clicking here and signing up to volunteer with Vote Forward, writing personalized letters to targeted voters urging them to exercise their right to vote this year.

Help defeat Ron Johnson and expand our Democratic majority. Chip in $3 to help Mandela Barnes, John Fetterman and Cheri Beasley.

RELATED STORIES

04 Oct 21:02

Trump personally packed classified documents, tried to get attorney to lie about what he took

by Mark Sumner
James.galbraith

He needs to be indicted and taken into custody ASAP

Not only did Donald Trump steal hundreds of classified documents from the White House and cart them off to his Mar-a-Lago club, it now appears that he personally selected and packed documents that were returned to the National Archives in January. Then, Trump tried to convince an attorney to lie and say there were no more. The attorney refused.

Almost every day brings more information about Donald Trump’s theft of classified documents, and just as often, that information underscores one simple truth: If anyone else had done what Trump has done, that person would be in jail. Trump has already been held above the law, just in the kid-glove handling, the slow proceeding, and most of all, in the failure to indict him on criminal charges.

The latest round of information has made it absolutely clear that Trump knew he had material so sensitive that others shouldn’t look at it, and it makes it clear that Trump not only lied to the National Archives about what was still in his possession, he attempted to get his attorney to sign his name to that lie. 

But perhaps most important of all, the National Archives says it still doesn’t have everything that should be there, making it clear that Trump is still in possession of illegally-obtained property.

Campaign Action

As The Washington Post reported on Monday, it wasn’t Trump staffers who put together the 15 boxes of documents that were turned over to a contractor for the National Archives in January. Trump packed those boxes himself.

The actual transfer of the material to the archives was handled by attorney Alex Cannon, but Cannon was well aware that the boxes might have contained classified material. As a result, he refused to look to review the contents, and also ordered other aides involved in transferring the documents not to look, as none of them had clearance.

Not only is this possibly the first time in this whole affair that anyone seems to have expressed some concern about the handling of classified material, it also punches a truck-sized hole through one of Trump’s excuses. Because, if Donald Trump believed he had actually declassified this material, he forgot to tell the attorney he put in charge of returning it to the archives

In February, after the boxes made their way to the archives, an attorney from the archives asked Cannon a very reasonable question: Is that all? When asked to attest that Trump had returned all the documents, Cannon refused. 

Cannon’s refusal to declare everything had been returned soured his relationship with Trump, people familiar with the matter said. Cannon, who had worked for the Trump Organization since 2015, was soon cut out of the documents-related discussions, some of the people said, as Trump relied on more pugilistic advisers.

That first box of documents contained 184 classified documents. It also contained some of the empty folders and loose cover sheets that would be found in the later search at Mar-a-Lago. That obvious mishandling of classified materials, the way the documents were intermingled with other records, and Cannon’s refusal to attest that Trump had returned everything were part of what made the archives immediately contact Trump in an effort to find what remained.

But it wasn’t just that the archives asked Cannon to attest, and he refused. As The New York Times reports, Trump pressured Cannon to put his name on a claim that he knew was a lie.

Shortly after turning over 15 boxes of government material to the National Archives in January, former President Donald J. Trump directed a lawyer working for him to tell the archives that he had returned all the documents he had taken from the White House at the end of his presidency, according to two people familiar with the discussion.

Not only were there at least 25 boxes of material sitting in storage at Mar-a-Lago when Trump told Cannon to make this claim, but there was also a box of classified material in Trump’s personal office and more classified documents in his desk drawer. It’s difficult to find an explanation for this other than that Trump instructed his attorney to lie in order to cover up a crime.

But there is still another issue, one that still isn’t solved. As CNBC reports, when the archives put together the contents of those boxes, the folder Trump provided in June, and the results of the July search by the FBI, there are still missing items known to be in the White House at the time of Trump’s departure. 

Among the missing are some of the most famous documents from Trump’s time in Washington. That includes the letter left for Trump by President Barack Obama and Trump’s “love letters” to North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. Also missing were at least two boxes of presidential records that Trump was keeping in his personal quarters. On Monday, the agency released 11 pages from their communications with Trump, in which they sought these records and expressed concern over Trump’s well-known habit of shredding documents, including those he was required by law to keep.

Also on Monday, the DOJ released some of the findings of the filter team as part of the ongoing “special master” issue. That team was charged with reviewing the over 11,000 documents taken from Mar-a-Lago and sorting those that might be protected by attorney-client privilege. Of that material, a total of 802 pages were initially thought to be of a legal nature that might be protected. However, Bloomberg reports that ultimately only 300 pages of material were found to be covered.

Donald Trump and his allies showed how close they were at overturning the last election, and now Republicans have put more voter suppression in place. For this election, we need you to volunteer with Election Protection—a nonpartisan effort to help voters exercise their constitutional right.

04 Oct 20:06

Former GOP strategist hammers Mitch McConnell for staying silent amid Trump’s racist attacks on his wife

by Towleroad
James.galbraith

GOP bravery at its finest

646120 origin 1
646120 origin 1
Published by
Raw Story

By Matthew Chapman On MSNBC Monday, former Republican strategist Tara Setmayer uncorked a furious rant against Republican officials who sit by and take abuse from former President Donald Trump. She had particular venom for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), whom Trump attacked with an apparent death threat coupled with a racist attack on his wife days before — but who has not spoken up in any way to defend himself or his family. “Donald Trump also went after Mitch McConnell’s wife in an insane tweet over the weekend, with an ethnic slur that is completely unacceptable,” said Setmay…

Read More

04 Oct 19:05

With five-year offshore comment period set to close, a reminder that wind is a better bet than oil

by April Siese
James.galbraith

The numbers are quite encouraging

There are just two days left for the first public comment period on the five-year offshore oil and gas plan proposed by the Biden administration. The plan includes 11 total oil and gas lease auctions, with 10 in the Gulf of Mexico and one off the coast of Alaska. Already, hundreds—if not thousands—have made their voices heard and pushed back against the plan, which was released a day after the prior five-year plan had run its course. That means there’s no present policy in place to allow for more offshore oil and gas lease auctions to continue, but if this latest plan does get adopted in its current iteration, it will spell climate disaster.

It’s not just a matter of opposing the five-year plan; as much as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provides crucial funding to reach net-zero goals, it includes provisions tying offshore wind development with fossil fuel leases as well as provisions for onshore fossil fuel development tied to solar development. Per the plan, “DOI’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) may not issue a lease for offshore wind development unless the agency has offered at least 60 million acres for oil and gas leasing on the outer continental shelf.” Some of the five-year plan’s lease auctions could satisfy this requirement, but that doesn’t guarantee there will be much development, nor will it guarantee that polluters will be able to satisfy National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) criteria.

Campaign Action

There’s a lot still up in the air in the days ahead for offshore oil and gas lease sales and development, but one thing is clear: Putting the future of offshore activities in the hands of fossil fuel companies is clearly the wrong bet. A recent Center for American Progress (CAP) report makes that abundantly clear:

“Offshore wind has proved itself to be the most efficient and cost-effective use of [Outer Continental Shelf] leasing acreage. The benefits for the domestic economy to taxpayers, and to workers and energy consumers, are unmatched by offshore wind’s crude oil and natural gas counterparts—the environmental, health, and financial costs of which are a drain on livelihoods and monetary resources. Publicly owned ocean resources should be leased in a manner that results in the greatest returns to the taxpaying public. Wind energy offers a greater return on investment for the public and increases revenue as well as social value.”

CAP’s analysis found that “the average acre from an offshore wind lease sale brings in nearly 12,500% more revenue for taxpayers than one acre of oil while providing enough electricity to drive an electric vehicle almost 65 times farther than a gasoline-powered vehicle.” The research organization also found that offshore wind lease sale bids are significantly higher than in the oil and gas sector and, in turn, generates more energy once developed and online. Offshore wind produces 40.8 megawatt-hours per acre of energy compared to just 34 megawatt-hours for natural gas.

There’s still a lot in play that could allow oil and gas development to move forward, but there are also ways to show the Biden administration that fossil fuels are the wrong move for our future. Opposing the proposed five-year offshore oil and gas leasing plan may be the first step in this battle to bring a more just transition without the country stuck being beholden to polluters.

04 Oct 17:54

Cyberpunk 2077 Sequel Project Orion Confirmed By CD Projekt Red

by msmash
James.galbraith

Model it on the anime and youll have something fantastic

CD Projekt Red just announced a Cyberpunk 2077 sequel, currently codenamed Project Orion. The developer tweeted its long-term development plan Tuesday, sharing that Project Orion will "take the Cyberpunk franchise further and continue harnessing the potential of this dark future universe." From a report: Adam Kicinski, CD Projket's president and CEO, said in a video published to YouTube that the next three games in the developer's pipeline are based in The Witcher franchise, meaning that Cyberpunk 2077's sequel is well off in the future. He called the sequel an ambitious title that will require expanding CD Projekt's more than 1,200 person studio even further; the studio will open a new hub in Boston, which will focus on Project Orion alongside its Vancouver location as CD Projekt Red North America.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

04 Oct 17:53

Musk Proposes To Proceed With Twitter Deal at $54.20 a Share - Bloomberg

by msmash
James.galbraith

Quite the capitulation. I'd love to know which evidence from discovery prompted this turnaround.

Bloomberg News reports: Elon Musk is proposing to buy Twitter for the original offer price of $54.20 a share, Bloomberg News reports. Musk made the proposal in a letter to Twitter, according to the people who asked not to be identified discussing confidential information.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

04 Oct 17:52

We have to save the world from Kevin McCarthy. No, really

by Joan McCarter
James.galbraith

Yeah a GOP House would be terrible for the country

Since Jan. 20, 2021, House Republicans have been plotting what they would do after the 2022 midterms, with historical precedent favoring them to retake the House. Their fever dreams are full of impeaching President Joe Biden and anyone and everyone in the cabinet for anything or everything, bogus investigations, and even defunding the FBI.

That’s all ridiculous and time-consuming and really detrimental to the nation, because while they’re doing all that, stuff that needs to be done is being ignored. But a few things they could do—and are already plotting—are downright dangerous. Like potentially refusing to raise the debt ceiling unless Biden unilaterally surrenders to them.

That’s the thing that’s got “GOP leaders, congressional aides and business groups” in a lather, according to Axios, fearing the “nightmare scenario” of a Speaker Kevin McCarthy who has absolutely no control over his caucus of conspiracy theorists. One former GOP House member told Axios that former Republican Speaker John Boehner “was convinced of the necessity [of raising the debt limit] and was willing to twist arms. I just don’t know about a Speaker McCarthy.”

Everything is too important to let Kevin McCarthy get anywhere near making decisions about. Help us keep the House out of his hands, to save the world.

Campaign Action

Part of the problem is that McCarthy is weak; he’s just not up to standing against the dangerous extremists in the GOP caucus. The other problem is that he’s pretty damned dim. It is entirely possible that McCarthy has absolutely no grasp of how things like global financial systems work, and what happens when the biggest player steps out and refuses to pay its debts. Maybe he thinks the catastrophic outcomes have been overstated.

Maybe he thinks it’s just Democratic propaganda, even when it’s explained in very simple, short words. Here’s Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen spelling it out when Republicans were making threats in November 2021:

“In a matter of days, millions of Americans could be strapped for cash. We could see indefinite delays in critical payments. Nearly 50 million seniors could stop receiving Social Security checks for a time. Troops could go unpaid. Millions of families who rely on the monthly child tax credit could see delays. America, in short, would default on its obligations.”

As of now, the next time we bump up against that ceiling looks to be about a year from now, in the fall of 2023. The man who decided back in 2011 that taking the debt ceiling hostage was a good idea is playing coy now, having unleashed that monster on the world. Asked about it by Axios, whether it “will indeed be among the first orders of business he’d raise with a Speaker McCarthy, McConnell smirked.”

The thing about McConnell, though, even then, was that it’s a hostage you can take, one “that’s worth ransoming,” but not one to actually shoot. That’s a distinction that the new order of Republicans, in the thrall of Trump, won’t necessarily make. Or understand. Or care about. But McConnell unleashed this on the nation, and here we are. Even though team McConnell is frantically trying to revise the history.

Rohit Kumar, McConnell’s former deputy chief of staff during the 2011 debt limit fight and now PwC’s national tax services co-leader, countered: “Thinking that you can credibly threaten the full faith and credit of the federal government in exchange for some collateral demand is just wish casting.”

Collateral damage was precisely what McConnell was going for, up to a point. Now that he’s unleashed this thing, he doesn’t have the power to rein it back in. He can talk to McCarthy all he wants about not actually shooting the hostage, but that doesn’t mean it’ll take. Particularly when McConnell’s on the losing side of the GOP civil war, with you-know-who poised to be running for the White House again and agitating against him.

All of which means Democrats have to hold the House. For all sorts of very good reasons, Democrats need to keep the House and Senate both.

It sucks that we have to be the ones to save Kevin McCarthy and the world from Kevin McCarthy, but that’s the way it is.

We have an even shot at keeping our House majority, but only if enough Democrats turn out to vote. Click to start writing Postcards to Democratic-leaning voters in targeted House districts today.

RELATED STORIES

This week on The Downballot we check in on Pennsylvania, where Republican Doug Mastriano has called for "40 days of fasting and prayer" to save his ailing campaign for governor; dig into ad spending numbers that show Democrats airing far more spots because they aren't relying on super PACs; and recap the dispiriting results of Italy's general election, which saw the far-right win for the first time since Mussolini.

04 Oct 17:51

As Herschel Walker’s son erupts, the GOP has only itself to blame

by Greg Sargent
James.galbraith

*popcorn*

What the crisis facing Walker's campaign says about the Trumpified GOP.
04 Oct 05:21

It looks like Herschel Walker paid for girlfriend's abortion before he decided to become 'pro-life'

by Walter Einenkel
James.galbraith

This is just delightful

Since he was tapped by the world’s most self-absorbed rich kid Donald Trump to run for Senate in Georgia, Herschel Walker has been nothing if not the worst candidate in the world. On every issue, Walker is a failure. He is a clearly incompetent public figure, lacking in decency and in the self-reflection needed to lead people beyond his very spotted past. That past includes secret children and very frightening moments of domestic violence. It is tough to see why Georgians would want Walker representing them when the considerably more impressive incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock is already doing a solid job.

Late in the day on Monday, the Daily Beast dropped an explosive report. According to reporter Roger Sollenberger, Walker got a woman pregnant some time in 2009, told her to get an abortion, then reimbursed her $700 after she had the procedure. 

RELATED STORY: Herschel Walker says forget about him holding gun to his wife’s head because Jesus

The report says that the woman who made this claim to the media outlet was able to supply receipts for the abortion and the payment from Walker. The Daily Beast was also able to corroborate her story with a witness who was aware of what was happening with the woman at the time and took care of her after the procedure. Asked why she was coming forward now, she said she couldn’t deal with his perverse stance on abortion now. Walker has said that there should be no exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother in any abortion law he would sign off on. The woman told the Daily Beast, “I just can’t with the hypocrisy anymore. We all deserve better.”

Here’s Walker in May

Asked Wednesday if he wanted a more total ban on abortion than the six-week prohibition passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature, Mr. Walker was unequivocal.

“There’s no exception in my mind,” he told reporters after a campaign speech in Macon, Ga., at the Georgia Sports Hall of Fame. “Like I say, I believe in life. I believe in life.” He did not single out exceptions for rape, incest or the life of the mother specifically, but he said repeatedly that he wanted no exceptions.

The Daily Beast says Walker’s camp has called the story false, but the evidence seems pretty clear-cut.

As Herschel Walker says it's not true and he's going to sue The Daily Beast over @SollenbergerRC's incredible story about him paying for a former girlfriend's abortion, Erick Erickson is out here saying everyone already knew Walker did that and people can change. pic.twitter.com/QW1qmgJrZW

— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) October 3, 2022

The Daily Beast’s politics editor tweeted this out:

I can tell you we stand behind every word and feel very solid about the story.https://t.co/ryvGywheAX https://t.co/t8kZaFs1Rc

— Matt Fuller (@MEPFuller) October 3, 2022

Oh my.

RELATED STORIES:

Herschel Walker says he ‘found out’ he was Black when his company became a minority-owned business

Herschel Walker now admits having second son. Wait, third son. Oh, and a daughter too?

Herschel Walker cosplays as a sheriff and gets hilarious blowback

04 Oct 00:24

Black holes can’t trash info about what they swallow—and that’s a problem

by Ars Staff
James.galbraith

Yes it is ;)

Black holes can’t trash info about what they swallow—and that’s a problem

Enlarge (credit: Aaron Horowitz/Getty Images)

Three numbers.

Just three numbers—that’s all it takes to completely, unequivocally, 100 percent describe a black hole in general relativity. If I tell you the mass, electric charge, and spin (i.e., angular momentum) of a black hole, we’re done. That’s all we’ll ever know about it and all we’ll ever need to describe its features.

Those three numbers allow us to calculate everything about how a black hole will interact with its environment, how objects around it will respond to it, and how the black hole will evolve in the future.

Read 31 remaining paragraphs | Comments

03 Oct 23:33

FCC Threatens To Block Calls From Carriers For Letting Robocalls Run Rampant

by BeauHD
James.galbraith

hallelujah

The Federal Communications Commission is threatening to block calls from voice service providers that have yet to take meaningful action against illegal robocalls. The Verge reports: On Monday, the FCC announced that it was beginning the process to remove providers from the agency's Robocall Mitigation Database for failing to fully implement STIR/SHAKEN anti-robocall protocols into their networks. If the companies fail to meet these requirements over the next two weeks, compliant providers will be forced to block their calls. "This is a new era. If a provider doesn't meet its obligations under the law, it now faces expulsion from America's phone networks. Fines alone aren't enough," FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statement on Monday. "Providers that don't follow our rules and make it easy to scam consumers will now face swift consequences." The FCC's orders target seven carriers, including Akabis, Cloud4, Global UC, Horizon Technology Group, Morse Communications, Sharon Telephone Company, and SW Arkansas Telecommunications and Technology. "These providers have fallen woefully short and have now put at risk their continued participation in the U.S. communications system," Loyaan A. Egal, FCC acting chief of the enforcement standards, said in a Monday statement. "While we'll review their responses, we will not accept superficial gestures given the gravity of what is at stake."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

03 Oct 17:01

‘Call a crackhead’: John Kennedy throws out the dog whistle, goes full GOP in new racist ad

by Rebekah Sager
James.galbraith

More GOP racism

Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana is a blustery turncoat with a fake Southern drawl and a bent for MAGA conspiracies. He’s also a racist who has no qualms about blowing a dog whistle in politics—even when he’s ahead in the polls.

Kennedy recently released a TV campaign ad calling out crime in his state. He blames its “woke leaders,” code for Black or progressive, and criminals he calls “crackhead[s],” also code for Black.

“A mom should not have to look over her shoulder when she's pumping gas. I voted against the early release of violent criminals, and I opposed defunding the police. Look, if you hate cops just because they're cops, the next time you get in trouble, call a crackhead.”

RELATED STORY: ‘I hate a black f**king Democrat,’ white North Carolina sheriff says before firing Black staff

I know the difference between criminals and their innocent victims. pic.twitter.com/RKhHJEefpv

— John Neely Kennedy (@JohnKennedyLA) September 30, 2022

Campaign Action

Of course, Kennedy isn’t stupid—although he tries to sound as if he is. He knows perfectly well that the term “crackhead,” which came to use during the 1980s crack epidemic and the early War on Drugs, led to the incarceration and vilification of millions of Black Americans, as The Associated Press reported.

According to Salon, during an interview on Fox News, Kennedy ticked off a list of ways to decrease crime in his state. He called for more cops on the streets, higher salaries in our “woke environment,” better support by “woke” leaders for law enforcement, and for citizens to “avail themselves of the Second Amendment” and arm themselves.

As for adding more police, Kennedy is all in. The number of cops under New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell is under 1,000, but it has never been double that—the number Kennedy called for in his Fox interview.

Kennedy’s ad is something straight out of the Republican playbook used most famously by President George H. W. Bush. When Bush campaigned in 1988, an ad he ran against his Democratic rival Michael Dukakis meant to convey Dukakis as soft on crime featured convicted murderer Willie Horton.  

Bush alleged Dukakis was a politician who supported furloughs for prisoners or weekend pass allowances—specifically, the kind of pass that allowed Horton to kidnap a couple, then stab the man and rape his girlfriend. The ad set the tone for the “tough on crime” era, per The Takeaway.

As the midterm elections fast approach, it isn’t just Kennedy who went out to blow the whistle. Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson has pulled out all the stops. Running against Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, a Black Democrat, according to The Philadelphia Inquirer, Johnson ran an ad calling Barnes “different” and “dangerous” and sent out a mailer with a deeply more chocolate-looking Barnes, just to make sure voters got the point.

Supporters of Mandela Barnes held a news conference outside of the Republican Party’s Milwaukee office yesterday to accuse the party of airing racist ads against Barnes and darkening his image in a campaign mailer. https://t.co/VWcwc5g4D9

— Dan Shafer (@DanRShafer) September 22, 2022

The Inquirer additionally reports that the GOP has additionally jumped in on the Pennsylvania race, implying that John Fetterman’s tattoos, which mark his time as mayor of Braddock, Pennsylvania, as possibly gang-affiliated.

As for the reality of crime in Louisiana, locals in New Orleans claimed the police force has failed to step up. One example took place in late July, when a woman made a call to New Orleans Police as she witnessed a rape in New Orleans’ French Quarter.

The Washington Post reports that a woman called 911 and explained that she was seeing a young woman being raped on the street. A New Orleans deputy constable was suspended in August for lack of his lack of response. But the woman alleged that she saw two more New Orleans Police officers drive past the scene, and both failed to assist her.

Silas Lee, a Democratic pollster in New Orleans, told NOLA.com that Kennedy “wants people to think he can be the person they can count on to ensure public safety,” but when it comes to maligning the “defund the police” movement, Kennedy fails to understand its meaning entirely.

“It actually means funding alternative services such as mental health programs or job training that will reduce crime. [...] The research I’ve done nationwide shows that whites and Blacks support funding the police but want alternative sources.”

In a statement sent to NOLA.com from Luke Mixon, one of Kennedy’s Democratic rivals, he says, “We have to address violent crime. [...] We do that by funding our police departments. Sen. Kennedy voted against $350 billion in funding for local police departments. To paraphrase Sen. Kennedy, watch what people do, not just their embarrassing one-liners.”

 ​​​​

Democrats can build a blue wave if we get out every voter. Click here to find out all the ways you can help in the last days before Election Day.

03 Oct 16:41

The Supreme Court Is On The Verge Of Killing The Voting Rights Act

by Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux
James.galbraith

Yeah this will be bad

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court Is On The Verge Of Killing The Voting Rights Act

By Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux

Americans Celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. Day

Samuel Corum / Getty Images

The beginning of the end for the Voting Rights Act started more than 30 years ago. On Oct. 4, the end of the end is likely to begin.

This term, the Supreme Court is hearing a case about whether Alabama’s newly drawn congressional maps violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race. In a seven-district state, the new maps included only one majority-Black district even though the state has a population that is more than one-quarter Black. The groups challenging the maps say that because it would be relatively easy to draw a map with two majority-Black districts, the state is legally obligated to do so. But Alabama Republicans countered by arguing they don’t have a requirement to use the plaintiffs’ maps, because creating a second majority-Black district would violate other race-neutral criteria used in redistricting.

The justices’ ruling could have implications that go far beyond Alabama, potentially neutering what remains of the Voting Rights Act — a seminal piece of legislation that is ostensibly permanent yet constantly imperiled. 

The current Supreme Court justices, under Chief Justice John Roberts, might strike the final blow against the Voting Rights Act, whether it’s in this case or a future one. But they didn’t strike the first blow. According to a FiveThirtyEight analysis of Supreme Court cases involving the Voting Rights Act, most of the first 20 years of decisions interpreting the law went in a liberal direction.26 That changed in the late 1980s, when more right-leaning justices joined the bench and, not coincidentally, more and more of decisions overall started to go in a conservative direction. Of the seven Voting Rights Act cases that the court has heard in the Roberts era, only one had a liberal outcome. “Starting in the 1990s as the court’s composition changed, the court has been cutting back or refusing to expand Section 2 in virtually every case it’s had,” said Richard H. Pildes, a constitutional law professor at New York University.

Outcome of Supreme Court rulings related to the Voting Rights Act from 1965-2021 under each of the past four chief justices — Chief Justices Warren, Burger, Rehnquist and Roberts — that went in a liberal or conservative direction.
Outcome of Supreme Court rulings related to the Voting Rights Act from 1965-2021 under each of the past four chief justices — Chief Justices Warren, Burger, Rehnquist and Roberts — that went in a liberal or conservative direction.

Now, the Roberts court could be poised to continue that trajectory by fundamentally altering the way that Section 2 operates. Up until now, the court has taken the perspective that, in order to comply with the act, states are in some situations required to take race into consideration as the primary factor in the redistricting process. Alabama Republicans are now arguing that it’s discriminatory to prioritize race over other traditional redistricting techniques, such as having compact districts, contiguous boundaries or avoiding crossing county or town boundaries. Several experts, including Pildes, told FiveThirtyEight that a ruling that sides with Alabama would be a radical departure from previous interpretations of the law and would likely free states to draw congressional or state legislative maps where minority voters have less political power relative to their numbers.

In that sense, the outcome of this case could be very similar to a 2013 ruling in which the Roberts court gutted another section of the Voting Rights Act, freeing a group of states with histories of discrimination against minority voters to change their election laws without federal approval. In the years afterward, those states shuttered thousands of polling places, intensified their voter purges and changed voting laws in other ways that disproportionately affect minority voters.

When it was passed in 1965, two crucial sections of the Voting Rights Act — Section 2 and Section 5 — tackled the problem of race-based voter suppression. Section 5 was proactive, trying to stop discrimination before it occurred by requiring states with a history of discrimination to run any changes to their election laws by the federal government in a process that was known as “preclearance.” 

Section 2, on the other hand, was designed to handle discrimination after it happened. It works as an enforcement mechanism for the Fifteenth Amendment, which says that the right to vote can’t be denied or limited on the basis of race. Effectively, it gave minority voters another avenue to bring voter-suppression claims to the courts. Crucially, that applies to the redistricting process since it forbade states from drawing district lines in a way that diluted racial minorities’ votes. According to Jesse Rhodes, a political science professor at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst who has written on the history of the Voting Rights Act, the law was designed to provide “an equal opportunity for [minority voters] to elect candidates that represent them and wield power in proportion to their numbers.”

Over the past few decades, Section 2 has primarily been used as a weapon against a practice known as racial gerrymandering — where lawmakers spread minority voters across state and federal legislative districts, or pack them into districts, in a way that made it impossible for those groups to elect the candidates of their choice. (We previously reported on how Section 2 reshaped North Carolina as part of “The Gerrymandering Project.”) In many ways, the case in Alabama is a textbook example, according to Franita Tolson, an election law professor at the University of Southern California. “A decade ago, we would have said that this is a clear Section 2 violation,” Tolson said. “African Americans didn’t get the number of seats they were entitled to. Very straightforward.” The panel of lower court judges who heard the case earlier this year — which included two Trump appointees — agreed.

But several experts, including Tolson, told me that they don’t expect the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority to take this tack. That’s because the court has grown increasingly hostile to the Voting Rights Act over the past few decades. The timing is not a coincidence. Roberts, who has been chief justice since 2005, has been critical of the law — and Section 2 — since he was a young government lawyer in the 1980s. 

But it goes beyond Roberts. In February, five of the conservatives voted to restore Alabama’s congressional map — the one with only one majority-Black district — for the 2022 election after the map had been overturned by the lower-court panel. Roberts dissented, saying that the lower-court judges had applied the law correctly. But he added that the Supreme Court’s previous cases “have engendered considerable disagreement and uncertainty regarding the nature and contours of a vote dilution claim,” suggesting that he may be open to rethinking the scope of Section 2.

Since Roberts was sworn in, the Supreme Court has ruled on seven cases involving the Voting Rights Act, according to our analysis of data from the Supreme Court Database. In five of those cases, the ruling went in a conservative direction. One of the other cases was a complex opinion where the median justice, Anthony Kennedy, joined the court’s liberals to overturn one congressional district in Texas, saying that it had unconstitutionally diluted Latinos’ votes. In the other “liberal” outcome, the court ruled in a 2008 case involving a Texas utility district that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act wasn’t unconstitutional. Five years later, it eviscerated the preclearance requirement in another case, Shelby County v. Holder. That 2013 ruling didn’t invalidate Section 5 altogether, but it did reject the formula that Congress used to determine which jurisdictions were subject to preclearance, saying that it relied on outdated data.

A ruling in favor of Alabama in this case would have a different — but still significant — impact. In the short-term, it would mean that there are fewer majority Black districts in Alabama and Louisiana, where a similar court case is unfolding. The justices could go further, too, if they fully side with Alabama’s argument in the case. One analysis found that if other states used the “race-blind” approach that Alabama is advocating for, the total number of majority-minority districts would be substantially lower. The analysis also found that in the South, where this approach would have the biggest impact, a race-blind map would benefit Republicans.27

That isn’t the way the Voting Rights Act has been interpreted up until now. “The court has accepted the principle that if the use of race is necessary to comply with the Voting Rights Act, then it’s constitutional to use race to do so,” Pildes said. But this case could be an opportunity to revisit — and significantly revise — the Voting Rights Act’s requirements. And that could end up reducing minority voters’ electoral power.

CORRECTION (Oct. 3, 9:17 a.m.): An earlier version of this article implied the oral argument for the case about Alabama’s redistricting map will take place on Oct. 3. It is happening on Oct. 4.

03 Oct 15:41

Facebook shares continue to tumble, prompting whispers of a stock 'death spiral'

by Aldous J Pennyfarthing
James.galbraith

Couldn't happen to a more deserving company

Many users ditched Facebook last year after watching company whistleblower Frances Haugen’s chilling 60 Minutes interview and realizing the kid who pulled the legs off flies every day in the cafeteria in third grade doesn’t actually have special insight into the impact of mRNA vaccines on the human endocrine system. 

At first when I stopped using Facebook, I wondered what could possibly replace photos of marginal acquaintances’ Panera bread bowls in my already hollow and trivial simulacrum of a life. But I managed—and you can, too, if you ever take the plunge.Speaking of plunge, that’s exactly what Facebook’s stock has been doing lately.

As CNBC notes in a recent story on Facebook’s—erm, Meta’s—travails, the company’s market cap, which was $1 trillion at this time last year, has since shrunk by two-thirds, and the stock is at its lowest point since January 2019. In fact, the stock has been the fifth-worst performer on the S&P 500 index this year.

Facebook’s business was built on network effects — users brought their friends and family members, who told their colleagues, who invited their buddies. Suddenly everyone was convening in one place. Advertisers followed, and the company’s ensuing profits — and they were plentiful — provided the capital to recruit the best and brightest engineers to keep the cycle going.

But in 2022, the cycle has reversed. Users are jumping ship and advertisers are reducing their spending, leaving Meta poised to report its second straight drop in quarterly revenue. Businesses are removing Facebook’s once-ubiquitous social login button from their websites. Recruiting is an emerging challenge, especially as founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg spends much of his time proselytizing the metaverse, which may be the company’s future but accounts for virtually none of its near-term revenue and is costing billions of dollars a year to build.

While Facebook appears to be at an inflection point that could presage either continued good fortune or an eventual trip to the Big Tech boneyard, the company’s recent reversal of fortune actually has some analysts predicting a Meta stock “death spiral.”

“I’m not sure there’s a core business that works anymore at Facebook,” said Laura Martin, a senior analyst at the asset management firm Needham. Granted, Martin is the only analyst among 45 tracked by FactSet who’s attached a “sell” rating to the stock, but such a dire outlook must seem strange to observers who’ve witnessed years of robust growth.

In fact, signups may have peaked, with the number of active users in the U.S. and Canada actually falling in the past two years, from 198 million to 197 million. The platform is being pressured by competition from younger-skewing apps like TikTok, and it's looking increasingly like baby boomers sharing Comic Sans-embroidered memes about drinking straight from garden hoses is not the business model of the future.

“I don’t see it spiraling in terms of cash flows in the next few years, but I’m just worried that they’re not winning the next generation,” Jeremy Bondy, CEO of app marketing firm Liftoff, told CNBC.

Meanwhile, Facebook is attempting to staunch the bleeding with a short-video add-on called Reels, which is intended to compete directly with the surging TikTok, though the company has acknowledged difficulties in monetizing the feature. But it’s a shift in focus that appears to smack of desperation.

“[Zuckerberg] wouldn’t be hurting its revenue at the same time he needs more money, unless he felt like the core business wasn’t strong enough to stand alone,” said Martin, the Needham stock analyst. “He must feel he has to try to move his viewership to Reels to compete with TikTok.”

Of course, one reason Facebook’s fortunes may look less bright than they used to is the considerable stigma the company carries. Haugen’s testimony was something close to seismic, and it blew the lid off the company’s outsized greed and cynicism. 

Facebook’s role in getting Donald Trump elected in 2016 was bad enough, but according to Haugen, the company as a rule has observed few ethical guardrails. 

In her October 2021 congressional testimony, Haugen detailed the company’s perverse greed as well as the harm it knowingly caused to the world’s democracies and some of its most vulnerable citizens.

“During my time at Facebook ... I saw that Facebook repeatedly encountered conflicts between its own profits and our safety,” Haugen said. “Facebook consistently resolved those conflicts in favor of its own profits. The result has been a system that amplifies division, extremism, and polarization—and undermining societies around the world. In some cases, this dangerous online talk has led to actual violence that harms and even kills people. In other cases, their profit-optimizing machine is generating self-harm and self-hate—especially for vulnerable groups, like teenage girls. These problems have been confirmed repeatedly by Facebook’s own internal research.”

Of course, Facebook’s stock could still rise from here. It’s not like it’s Truth Social, the core business model of which appears to be tricking Marjorie Taylor Greene into giving them all her money. For example, in the mid-‘90s, Apple’s stock was in a ditch and people openly wondered if the company would survive. We all know what’s happened since. On the other hand, when was the last time you checked your MySpace?

If Facebook does eventually die, few of us will mourn. And after what the company has done to democracy, it would look a lot like a mercy killing.

Mercy for everyone but its investors, anyway.

Check out Aldous J. Pennyfarthing’s four-volume Trump-trashing compendium, including the finale, Goodbye, Asshat: 101 Farewell Letters to Donald Trump, at this link. Or, if you prefer a test drive, you can download the epilogue to Goodbye, Asshat for the low, low price of FREE.

03 Oct 15:38

Cartoon: The latest outrage

by Tom Tomorrow

As always, if you find value in this work I do, please consider helping me keep it sustainable by joining my weekly newsletter, Sparky’s List! You can get it in your inbox or read it on Patreon, the content is the same.

03 Oct 00:22

How one New York county went from fighting measles to battling polio

by Shannon Young
James.galbraith

So fucking fix it


ALBANY, N.Y. — Four years after finding itself in the middle of the nation’s worst measles outbreak in decades, Rockland County is back in the spotlight for polio — resurrecting another disease the U.S. thought had been conquered.

In late July, the county, which is located just north of New York City, drew national attention after confirming that an unvaccinated resident, who developed leg paralysis, had contracted the revertant polio Sabin type 2 virus, the first confirmed case in the U.S. in nearly 10 years.

A few weeks later, polio was detected in wastewater supplies in New York City and on Long Island — prompting local, state and federal health officials to race to avoid a repeat of the measles surge while Covid-19 and monkeypox continues to spread in New York.

The battle continues on all health fronts.

“On polio, we simply cannot roll the dice,” state Health Commissioner Mary Bassett stressed as she urged New Yorkers in September “to not accept any risk at all.”

Gov. Kathy Hochul declared a public health emergency in early September, and it sparked high-level talks among top Biden administration officials concerned about the virus' potential spread across the nation.

But with a statewide polio vaccination rate among 2-year-olds of less than 80 percent — not including New York City (where that rate for kids under age 5 is 86 percent) — and an even lower rate in Rockland County, officials are faced with a familiar task: convincing vaccine-hesitant people to get the shots.

A county fighting multiple viruses



In Rockland County, which has a population of 339,000, local health officials have been working with the state Department of Health and the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention to identify ZIP codes with high rates of unvaccinated or undervaccinated residents, who face the most risk for contracting polio.

The county had a polio vaccination rate among 2-year-olds of just 60 percent as of August — one of the lowest in the state, according to data from the New York State Immunization Information System. Some ZIP codes in the county fared even worse, with at least one — 10952, which spans parts of Monsey, Kaser and Airmont — having a toddler polio vaccination rate of just 37 percent. (Rates are calculated based on children who have received three polio immunizations by age 2.)

State health officials said vaccination rates are generally higher by the time children enter school, with nearly all adults vaccinated against polio. They said they did not have data on adult vaccination rates in New York.

Rockland County Health Commissioner Patricia Schnabel Ruppert said officials have informed physicians in at-risk ZIP codes of the patients in need of polio shots and, in some cases, worked with providers to send letters to individuals encouraging them to get themselves or their children vaccinated, or up to date on polio vaccinations.

“We have found that is really the best way to notify them [and] have them feel comfortable,” she said in an interview. “They can come to our immunization clinic here at the health department, they can go to their own providers, federally qualified health centers. Between all of us, we’re increasing our ability to provide vaccinations to those who need it: children and adults.”

Since identifying the case of paralytic polio in July, Rockland County has administered more than 5,000 polio vaccines, the bulk of which went to individuals under age 4. And a total of 25,766 polio vaccine doses were administered to individuals under age 19 in Rockland, Orange, Sullivan and Nassau counties from July 21 to Sept. 25 — up more than 26 percent compared with the rates among that age group in those counties in the same period of 2021, according to the health department.

Despite that uptake, Ruppert said, misinformation and vaccine skepticism continue to pose challenges.

“At every level, we’re working on plans to engage the community more. The health education side, the disease control side and increasing surveillance, wastewater — whatever we need to do in the short and long term — and improve vaccination rates. We also work on correcting misinformation,” she said, adding that “the anti-vaxxers definitely have had a foothold here.”


It’s a playbook that borrows strategies deployed during the measles outbreak, in which the state reported more than 400 cases in Rockland, Orange, Sullivan and Westchester counties — including 300-plus in Rockland County, alone — between October 2018 and October 2019. New York City’s 11-month outbreak, meanwhile, resulted in 650-plus measles cases from October 2018 to September 2019.

Many of those cases were reported in the state's Orthodox Jewish communities, though some were also found in Wyoming County's Mennonite community and among other groups that often oppose vaccines.

Former state Health Commissioner Howard Zucker, who worked with Ruppert and others to stem the measles outbreak, told POLITICO that the emergence of another major communicable disease in Rockland County and surrounding areas is particularly concerning.

“You have a situation with polio in the same counties that three, four years ago had a measles outbreak: two diseases where vaccines are incredibly effective in preventing illness,” he said in an interview. “The fact that the wastewater is positive for the virus says clearly, there’s not enough people immunized against polio in these counties. The message that vaccination prevents disease has not resonated broadly enough despite strong public health efforts.”

Ruppert acknowledged that Rockland County health officials “probably lost some of that headway [they] had made” on vaccination rates following the measles outbreak as response to Covid-19 forced health departments to refocus efforts on the pandemic.

With Covid finally on the decline in New York, the county had planned to work with the state on vaccination audits at schools and day cares this past spring, as part of a larger campaign to increase vaccination rates, Ruppert said. Those plans were again upended once polio hit.

“Now it’s all hands on deck,” she said.

Rockland County Executive Ed Day said the county is working with the state Department of Health this fall to ensure schools are complying with vaccination requirements — an issue which he and others argued takes on new significance as polio spreads in New York.

The 2018-2019 measles outbreak sparked heated debate in Albany as state lawmakers voted to outlaw religious exemptions to the state’s school vaccination mandate, which requires immunization against polio. That law, however, has faced compliance issues since it took effect.

School audits on vaccine compliance are expected to begin as early as November, a timeline which Day said gives districts enough time to ensure compliance with the vaccination requirements. Those found in violation could face fines of up to $2,000 per violation.

“If there’s any winks and nods going on because a parent comes in with a note and there’s no follow up by the school, that’s not good enough, and we will fine the school,” said Day, a Republican and one of the most vocal proponents of the 2019 law to end religious exemptions. “There’s no religious exemptions. Medical exemptions have to be supported by documentation. If a school decides that they don’t want to pursue it, they’ll be fined.”

Testing the wastewater



Although the coronavirus pandemic has presented challenges for public health officials beyond the immediate Covid response — including lagging childhood vaccination rates, medical workforce shortages and a rise in anti-vaccine rhetoric — it has also offered some benefits.

The renewed focus on public health during Covid led to an influx in federal funding and widespread adoption of new disease surveillance technology, like wastewater monitoring — a tool rarely used prior to the pandemic that’s now helping track polio’s spread in New York.

Nearly every county in New York is monitoring wastewater for Covid, but fewer than 10 — which are located primarily downstate and on Long Island — are using such systems to look for polio. (New York City is conducting its own wastewater monitoring for poliovirus.)

“Our focus began where the individual case of paralytic polio was identified (Rockland County) and the surrounding areas because of what we know about how polio spreads, and these efforts will continue and expand,” Jeffrey Hammond, a spokesperson for the state Department of Health, said in an email.

Kimberly Thompson, a polio expert and president of Kid Risk, a nonprofit that works on public health issues, told POLITICO that the value of wastewater monitoring may be greatest in communities with low polio vaccination rates, including the Hasidic Jewish community in New York, Amish communities, minority populations without access to care and communities with significant pockets of people who oppose vaccines.

“Despite the ‘test everything’ culture that emerged during Covid-19, testing purely for the sake of testing implies real costs and does not necessarily lead to actionable information,” she said.

As of Sept. 23, the state Department of Health reported 69 positive wastewater samples of concern, 62 of which were genetically linked to the individual case of paralytic polio in Rockland County. That includes 37 samples collected in Rockland County, 16 collected in Orange County, eight collected in Sullivan County and one collected in Nassau County. New York City health officials in August, meanwhile, reported finding poliovirus in sewage samples.


The samples, some of which were collected as far back as this spring, suggest polio may have been spreading undetected for several months in New York, the CDC noted in an August report. And while only one case has been confirmed, health officials warn that there could be hundreds more as only about one in 200 people will become paralyzed.

Sarah Ravenhall, executive director of the New York State Association of County Health Officials, said the limited polio surveillance is due, in part, to a lack of testing capacity for wastewater samples. Currently, counties using their wastewater systems to monitor for polio send samples to the state, which in turn sends them to the CDC for sequencing. County health officials are working with the state on a plan to expand surveillance to other counties.

“We would love to see expansion of that testing, availability of testing in New York state so that we don’t have to send it down to the CDC,” Ravenhall said. “This wastewater detection is really important in our ability to know where the disease is.”

State health officials said limited capacity at the federal level for the testing has led to New York’s targeted approach to wastewater monitoring for polio.

The county health officials association had also pressed Bassett to declare polio an “imminent threat to public health” — as it has for Covid and monkeypox.

Bassett officially named polio an imminent public health threat on Wednesday, triggering increased reimbursement for local health departments’ response efforts. That declaration covers poliovirus response activities undertaken from July 21 through Dec. 31.

The statewide emergency disaster declaration for polio, which Hochul issued on Sept. 9, also offers some support to local health officials, such as allowing certified emergency medical technicians, midwives and pharmacists to administer polio vaccines.

Ravenhall, however, argued that more must be done to ensure local health officials don’t have to rely on emergency declarations or other actions for funding to adequately respond to outbreaks.

“That imminent threat to public health, while it’s incredibly helpful and desperately needed, it is still only 50 percent of the costs related to those activities,” she said.

“In addition, we’ve received a lot of federal funding, but we call that a ‘boom -and-bust’ cycle of funding: that grant may end in three or five years. So what happens to the staff we’re hiring? And how do we retain them? On top of that, there’s restrictions on how to use the funding. We’re looking for disease agnostic funding.”

Erin Banco and Megan Messerly contributed to this report.

02 Oct 22:05

Florida GOP lawmakers request hurricane relief after state GOP votes to strike down FEMA funding

by Towleroad
James.galbraith

How about no.

645770 origin 1
645770 origin 1
Published by
AlterNet

By Meaghan Ellis Florida Republican Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott recently called on Senate leaders to approve more disaster funding in the wake of Florida’s devastation due to Hurricane Ian. According to Axios, the lawmakers’ request is important because of their previous stance on Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding. “Several members of Congress from Florida previously voted against a short-term spending bill that includes aid for disaster relief,” the news outlet reported. READ MORE: ‘Fact-check me’: Donald Trump Jr. touts ‘firearms’ training in rant against pre-hurricane …

Read More

01 Oct 06:58

GOP hypocrisy: When DeSantis sought the very relief post-Ian he denied Hurricane Sandy victims

by Dartagnan
James.galbraith

If only there were consequences

Once upon a time (2013, to be exact), a nasty little first-term Congressman named Ronald DeSantis decided he wanted to make a big, big statement in order to ingratiate himself with a group of fellow conservatives that called themselves the Tea Party. In a gesture that foreshadowed what would later become his trademark “LOL, let’s own the Libs” strategy, on the day after he was sworn into office, DeSantis voted to deny $9.7 billion in relief to New York and New Jersey residents whose lives had been ravaged by one of this nation’s most destructive national disasters: the “Superstorm” known as Hurricane Sandy.

As reported at the time by Steve Contorno, writing for the Tampa Bay Times: "This 'put it on the credit card mentality' is part of the reason we find ourselves nearly $17 trillion in debt," was how DeSantis justified voting against the aid.

But that was before DeSantis became the current governor of Florida and the embodiment of Republican hopes to succeed the erratic and volatile Donald Trump; before he raised his national profile with a deliberate series of callous, racist, and homophobic political stunts in an effort to demonstrate his rightful heirship to that throne; and—most importantly—before his own state of Florida was soundly thwacked head-on with a disastrous hurricane whose destructive path has left in its wake an as-yet unmeasured toll on residents unfortunate enough to find themselves in its crosshairs.

On Wednesday, DeSantis officially requested 100% federal cost share and a major disaster declaration for all 67 of Florida’s counties in the wake of Hurricane Ian. In addition to “federal assistance programs for individuals,” DeSantis has requested funds for repairing not just “emergency” infrastructure but public works and buildings damaged by the flooding over the long term.

Collectively, this is the same type of relief he voted to deny victims of Superstorm Sandy.

Like other Republicans who voted against aid to Sandy’s victims, DeSantis has fumbled for an explanation about his original vote against the Sandy aid after it became apparent that similar natural disasters occurring in red states would continue to demand federal funds, on a more or less recurring basis. His excuse, as Contorno reported, was that such appropriations were ”different than the disaster package for Sandy, which he said was loaded with projects that weren't emergency-related.” 

That was a lie then, and it remains a lie today. The majority of that $9.7 billion package for Sandy relief, as Contorno explains, “went toward a bailout of the National Flood Insurance Program so people who had their homes destroyed by Sandy could be paid, or to fix infrastructure, like train lines, damaged by the storm.” 

RELATED: We need to drastically rethink what recovery looks like as the climate crisis worsens

Faced with nagging accusations about hypocrisy, DeSantis regrouped and reframed several months later, complaining that the Sandy relief bill had been filled with “extraneous stuff” and, in a new twist, blaming New York’s state government for being fiscally irresponsible for failing to properly insure buildings that had been destroyed by Sandy.

As reported in 2013 by Douglas Jordan, for the St. Augustine Record, then-Rep. DeSantis said: 

"You also had the New York state government coming into Congress saying, 'Hey, look at all these buildings that got damaged.' And we asked, OK, what is insurance picking up on this? And they said, 'Well, we didn't insure them, we didn't think they'd ever be a problem.' So, in that situation, we want to help people, I think, as the last line of defense, but you don't want to basically reward them for not doing the responsible thing.”

“Not doing the responsible thing,” huh. Gee, I wonder how many buildings in Kissimmee were underinsured as of last week? 

Before anyone accuses me of trying to make political hay out of a disaster, my point is this: It’s very easy to try to turn the provision of emergency aid into a statement of so-called morality to score political points when you’re not the one suffering through the disaster. Some might even compare it to the kind of callous, self-interested disregard someone who, let’s say, denied the efficacy of social distancing and masking regulations during an unprecedented pandemic, and lied about his own state’s fatality rates, might exhibit.

But DeSantis needn’t worry. His state will doubtlessly get the money it needs from President Joe Biden’s FEMA and the Democratic Congress. And he can continue to preen through his vetted and rehearsed appearances and pretend he’s some sort of hero, safe in the knowledge that the damage to his state will be repaired.

RELATED: Ron DeSantis admits to Hannity that he is 'thankful' for President Biden's help with Hurricane Ian

It’s just too bad he couldn’t extend that courtesy to the citizens of New York and New Jersey when they needed the same help.

01 Oct 06:56

GOP solution school shootings? Mental health. GOP response to mental health help to schools? No

by Joan McCarter
James.galbraith

no shit

Ask any Republican lawmaker what their solution to gun violence is and they’ll say “mental illness,” particularly when it comes to school shootings. Here’s Mitch McConnell after the Uvalde, Texas, massacre, saying that Congress needed to “target the problem,” and the problem isn’t guns, it’s “mental illness and school safety.”

McConnell didn’t touch the topic of guns. When he says target the problem, he specified it’s “mental illness and school safety.” @LEX18News pic.twitter.com/K5DCOlCqdV

— Karolina Buczek (@Karolina_Buczek) May 31, 2022

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott specifically argued that a lack of mental health care resources was the cause of the Uvalde massacre. “What I do know is this: We as a state, we as a society, need to do a better job with mental health. Anybody who shoots somebody else has a mental health challenge, period.”

Okay, say Democrats. Let’s do something about mental health in school. On Thursday, House Democrats passed the Mental Health Matters Act, written specifically to try to address the mental health crisis in schools to help students, families, and teachers who have all been harmed by the COVID-19 pandemic. One Republican, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA), voted with Democrats to pass the bill.

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), said his legislation is intended to address the ripple effect of student mental health concerns through the school community. “Educators have been forced to play an outsized role in supporting and responding to students’ mental health needs, leading to increased depression and trauma among educators, their students, and the families and the community. However, our schools do not have the specialized staff necessary to respond to the increased prevalence and complexity of students’ mental health needs,” he said.

“Simply put, the Mental Health Matters Act delivers the resources students, educators, and families need to improve their well-being,” DeSaulnier added.

Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), the ranking member on the Education committee who once tried to strip the word “shooting” from a bill about school shootings, didn’t just say the bill isn’t necessary; she said the “country would be better off without” it.

Somehow, it seems like Republicans don’t truly care about the mental health of young people. Go figure.

RELATED STORIES

30 Sep 23:04

'Unmoored by disarray': AP investigation reveals that Texas AG Ken Paxton's office is a corrupt mess

by Aldous J Pennyfarthing
James.galbraith

Texas doesn't give a fuck. They'll continue to let this clown run amok because he's a loud public bigot. That's all they need.

Less than a month and a half out from the November midterms, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton still holds a narrow lead over his Democratic opponent, civil rights attorney Rochelle Garza, despite a criminal indictment for securities fraud hanging over him like the Dull Cheese Knife of Damocles.

In fact, Paxton’s favored to win, after easily dispatching his top GOP opponent, George P. Bush—whose father, Jeb!, left the mighty Bush dynasty gawping like a beached carp shortly after he entered the “Puppet Show and Jeb Bush” phase of his presidential campaign.

You’d think someone like Paxton, who’s been under criminal indictment for seven years, would 1) not be the top law enforcement official of one of the nation’s largest states; 2) assiduously avoid further (alleged) lawbreaking; and 3) not hook hitch his wagon to an oily manatee fart with his own demonstrated penchant for perfidy.

RELATED: A gutless Ken Paxton tries to preen after bravely fleeing from a court's process server

But if the past several years have shown us anything, it’s that Republican politicians can be as criminal, corrupt, incompetent, and slovenly as they want, and if anything, their voters will reward them for it. Can you chip in $3 or more to these progressive orgs fighting voter suppression in Texas ahead of the midterms? 

A new Associated Press deep dive into Paxton’s AG office reveals a litany of serious problems that should give all Texas voters pause—even those who currently find themselves trapped in a weird personality cult led by a mediocre reality TV host.

Associated Press: 

[A]s Paxton seeks to fend off legal troubles and win a third term as Texas’ top law enforcement official, his agency has come unmoored by disarray behind the scenes, with seasoned lawyers quitting over practices they say aim to slant legal work, reward loyalists and drum out dissent.

An Associated Press investigation found Paxton and his deputies have sought to turn cases to political advantage or push a broader political agenda, including staff screenings of a debunked film questioning the 2020 election. Adding to the unrest was the secretive firing of a Paxton supporter less than two months into his job as an agency advisor after he tried to make a point by displaying child pornography in a meeting.

Most alarmingly, the AP report notes that Paxton’s staff was recently forced to drop human trafficking and sexual assault cases because—no kidding—they misplaced one of the victims.

Eight people were indicted last year in a series of cases collectively referred to as “Operation Fallen Angel.” The indictments stemmed from allegations that the accused had forced teenage girls to “exchange sexual contact for crystal methamphetamine.” Six of the accused are now free because of the AG office’s errors, while one is being held on other charges and another died in jail.

“It’s absolutely broken. It’s just broken. You don’t do it this way,” Republican District Attorney Dusty Boyd, who handed the case over to Paxton’s office, told the AP. “I made the mistake of trusting them that they would come in and do a good job.” 

Boyd claimed staff turnover in Paxton’s human trafficking unit contributed to the dysfunction, which led to four cases being dropped because they were “unable to locate the victim.”

“For Pete’s sake, you’re the AG’s office. You can’t find the victim?” said Boyd. “The culture is broken.”

RELATED: Ken Paxton signs 'bill of rights' filled to the brim with transphobia and hate

In addition, the AP report notes:

  • A prosecutor quit in January after his supervisors tried to get him to withhold evidence in a murder case.
  • Another attorney resigned in March, in part over “growing hostility toward LGBTQ employees.”
  • In 2020, the FBI opened a criminal investigation into Paxton, over accusations that he’d abused his office to help a wealthy donor who’d employed a woman with whom Paxton had had an extramarital affair. Eight of Paxton’s top deputies quit or were fired after bringing the case to the FBI.
  • After that mass exodus, Paxton hired an attorney who’d donated $10,000 to help him fight his overripe indictment, as well as a former ice cream company owner named Tom Kelly Gleason whose father contributed $50,000 to Paxton's legal defense fund.
  • Gleason was fired less than two months after joining Paxton’s team because he displayed child sexual abuse videos during a work presentation. Three sources told the AP that “Gleason displayed the video—which one of them described as showing a man raping a small child—in a misguided effort to underscore agency investigators’ difficult work. It was met with outrage and caused the meeting to quickly dissolve.” One source noted that Paxton’s top deputy, Brent Webster, told other staff members not to talk about the incident.
  • Another Paxton employee, Bill Turner, said he quit after he was asked not to turn over evidence to the defense in a murder prosecution. “We had a difference of opinion on the ethical obligations of a prosecutor and I didn’t feel like I could continue working in that environment,” said Turner.
  • Paxton has also been accused of abusing his office for his own political benefit. In a resignation letter, Assistant Attorney General Jason Scully-Clemmons accused the AG’s office of “directing prosecutors to prioritize political considerations.” Other sources the AP talked to said that prior to the March primaries, Amber Platt, another Paxton deputy, “convened a meeting to ask about upcoming cases that would help Paxton’s reelection prospects.”
  • In May, Jonathan White, chief of the election fraud section of the AG’s Special Prosecutions Division, invited his employees to a screening of 2000 Mules, convicted felon Dinesh D’Souza’s goofy film that elevates thoroughly debunked conspiracy theories about the 2020 election. Astute readers will recall that Paxton himself aided Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn a free and fair election, filing a risible “equal protection” case that the Supreme Court ultimately refused to consider. 

Meanwhile, the office appears to be understaffed, with the number of assistant attorneys general in the criminal prosecutions division down more than 25% from two years ago. The group that deals with financial and white-collar crime was cut by more than half.

Oh, and Paxton has also been running away from process servers like a low-rent Josh Hawley. 

RELATED: Texas judge tosses ICE guidelines, following lawsuit from Texas' corrupt attorney general

Sadly, that brimming barrel of bad deeds is unlikely to sway Texas voters, who, after all, have elected Sen. Ted Cruz twice. But that doesn’t mean he’s a shoo-in! The election is still close, and Garza could use the help if she’s going to roust this (alleged) lawbreaker from his roost.

Let’s do what we can to put this old steer out to pasture as he waits another eternity for justice to finally find him. If the law doesn’t punish him, maybe the voters finally will.

Click here to find out how you can help get out the vote in the Lonestar State, no matter where you are!

Check out Aldous J. Pennyfarthing’s four-volume Trump-trashing compendium, including the finale, Goodbye, Asshat: 101 Farewell Letters to Donald Trump, at this link. Or, if you prefer a test drive, you can download the epilogue to Goodbye, Asshat for the low, low price of FREE.

30 Sep 20:35

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Hemingway

by tech@thehiveworks.com


Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
Tolkien ends up in Heaven but is secretly disappointed Valhalla wasn't available.


Today's News:
30 Sep 20:32

Judge Cannon shows the courts have been politicized far beyond SCOTUS

by Paul Waldman
James.galbraith

Yep, hopelessly corrupted

The legitimacy crisis isn't just about the Supreme Court, and a Trump judge's latest gift to the president who appointed her shows why.
30 Sep 18:55

Rewritten OpenGL Drivers Make AMD's GPUs 'Up To 72%' Faster in Some Pro Apps

by msmash
James.galbraith

Hallelujah. This has been a weakness for a long time

Most development effort in graphics drivers these days, whether you're talking about Nvidia, Intel, or AMD, is focused on new APIs like DirectX 12 or Vulkan, increasingly advanced upscaling technologies, and specific improvements for new game releases. But this year, AMD has also been focusing on an old problem area for its graphics drivers: OpenGL performance. From a report: Over the summer, AMD released a rewritten OpenGL driver that it said would boost the performance of Minecraft by up to 79 percent (independent testing also found gains in other OpenGL games and benchmarks, though not always to the same degree). Now those same optimizations are coming to AMD's officially validated GPU drivers for its Radeon Pro-series workstation cards, providing big boosts to professional apps like Solidworks and Autodesk Maya. "The AMD Software: PRO Edition 22.Q3 driver has been tested and approved by Dell, HP, and Lenovo for stability and is available through their driver downloads," the company wrote in its blog post. "AMD continues to work with software developers to certify the latest drivers." Using a Radeon Pro W6800 workstation GPU, AMD says that its new drivers can improve Solidworks rendering speeds by up to 52 or 28 percent at 4K and 1080p resolutions, respectively. Autodesk Maya performance goes up by 34 percent at 4K or 72 percent at the default resolution. The size of the improvements varies based on the app and the GPU, but AMD's testing shows significant, consistent improvements across the board on the Radeon Pro W6800, W6600, and W6400 GPUs, improvements that AMD says will help those GPUs outpace analogous Nvidia workstation GPUs like the RTX A5000 and A2000 and the Nvidia T600.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

30 Sep 18:55

Conservative CPAC calls on Republicans to disavow ‘left-leaning’ companies

by Towleroad
James.galbraith

But that's cancel culture, that they hate? Or they only hate when they're experiencing the consequences of their actions.

644283 origin 1
 
Published by
Reuters
 
644283 origin 1

By David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A leading U.S. conservative group is pressuring Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives to shun “left-leaning” corporations that take stances on social issues such as abortion, election reform and LGBTQ rights, in exchange for its endorsement for party leadership positions.

As House Republicans began rolling out their campaign agenda for the Nov. 8 midterm elections, the influential Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, called on the lawmakers to pledge not to meet with executives and lobbyists from companies that “have been hostile to policies that help all Americans.”

“This is the Republican Party’s moment to declare independence from corporate special interest money that flows from left-leaning large publicly traded companies,” CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp said in a Sept. 22 letter sent to more than 200 House Republican lawmakers.

The letter, based on the expectation that Republicans would regain control of the House in November, represents the latest push by the political right to reset the Republican Party’s once close relationship with corporate America since Donald Trump’s presidency.

Recent months have seen politicians, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a potential 2024 White House candidate, strip Walt Disney Co of its self-governing status, after it opposed a new state law limiting discussion of LGBTQ issues in schools.

Republicans also expressed anger after companies, including Citigroup, Levi Strauss & Co and Amazon.com Inc, said they would pay for employees who lived in states where abortion has been banned to travel out of state to obtain the procedure.

The CEOs of banks, including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Wells Fargo took a grilling in Congress on Thursday over their companies’ having taken stances on social issues.

“I can’t help but observe that when banks do weigh-in on highly charged social and political issues, they seem to always come down on the liberal side,” said Republican Senator Pat Toomey during Thursday’s hearing.

CPAC represents a movement of Trump-led conservatives that has steadily gained influence within the Republican Party in recent years. But it was unclear how much sway CPAC might wield in internal House Republican politics.

GROWING CAMPAIGN

Republicans in Congress and across conservative-led states have railed against companies for taking what they see as “liberal” stances on environmental, social and governance issues.

Schlapp said companies have “colluded” with Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration to “silence” conservatives, promoted “lies” about voter ID laws, withheld support from conservatives who back “fair elections,” paid travel costs for employee abortions and promoted “radical gender theory.”

That came as Republican leader Kevin McCarthy and members of his caucus sought to unify their party’s focus on their “Commitment to America” agenda, which is intended to offer voters solutions to social and economic ills ranging from inflation and high energy prices to crime rates and border security, which Republicans blame on Democrats.

The agenda, formally unveiled on Friday at an event in Pennsylvania, makes no mention of “left-leaning” companies but puts a priority on abortion restrictions, voter ID laws, reining in Big Tech and keeping transgender women out of women’s sports.

Control of the Senate is up for grabs in November. Nonpartisan election analysts see Republicans as set to erase Democrats’ 221-212 House majority. Doing so would give them the power to block Biden’s legislative agenda and to launch potentially politically damaging investigations into his administration.

Democrats’ fortunes have improved in recent weeks. A national Reuters/Ipsos poll concluded on Sept. 12 found that 37% of Americans would prefer to vote for a Democratic congressional candidate, with 34% preferring Republicans and 15% still undecided.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the chamber’s top Democrat, denounced the Republican agenda on Friday as an “alarming new extreme MAGA platform threatens to criminalize women’s health care, slash seniors’ Medicare and raise prescription drug prices, and attack our free and fair elections.” MAGA is an acronym for Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan.

(Reporting by David Morgan; editing by Scott Malone, Jonathan Oatis and Aurora Ellis)

30 Sep 18:42

Goldman Sees US House Prices Falling 5% to 10%

by Calculated Risk
James.galbraith

like every other asset

Today, in the Calculated Risk Real Estate Newsletter: Goldman See US House Prices Falling 5% to 10%

Excerpt:
The recent weakness in the housing market, combined with mortgage rates close to 7%, have led to some downwards revisions to house price forecasts. For example, from Goldman Sachs economists today:
Our G10 home price model suggests sizable nominal home prices declines from the peak of around 15% in Canada, 5-10% in the US, and under 5% in the UK. … We view the risks to these estimates as tilted to the downside
emphasis added
This is a significant downgrade from Goldman’s “stall” forecast from just a few weeks ago. ...

Real House PricesIt now appears house prices are falling even though inventory levels are still historically fairly low (by measures of active inventory or months of supply). ... Here is a look at existing home months-of-supply (inverted, from the NAR) vs. the seasonally adjusted month-to-month price change in the Case-Shiller National Index (both since January 1999 through July 2022). Note that the months-of-supply is not seasonally adjusted.

The last three months are in black showing a possible shift in the relationship.
There is much more in the article. You can subscribe at https://calculatedrisk.substack.com/
30 Sep 17:48

Way too many Republican secretary of state candidates are getting ready for the next coup attempt

by Laura Clawson
James.galbraith

This will end badly

Secretaries of state are almost always the top elections administrators in their states, giving them a crucial role in upholding the basic tenets of democracy across the United States. That hasn’t exactly been a secret before this year, and Republicans in those roles have repeatedly made it more difficult to vote or purged voter registrations. Abuse of power has been frequent. But 2022, building on two years of Donald Trump spreading his Big Lie, threatens to take that to a whole new level.

There are 17 states in which the 2022 elections will determine whether Trumpian election deniers become secretary of state and gain the ability to subvert elections and gut voting rights. Daniel Nichanian and Camille Squires have the details at Bolts. 

Can you chip in $3 to elect Democratic secretaries of state in the key battleground states of Colorado, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, and Nevada?

RELATED STORY: Over half the country will be asked to vote for Republican election deniers in November

Secretary of state is on the ballot directly or indirectly—in eight cases where a newly elected governor will appoint someone to the job—in 35 states. So the fact that an election denier could end up taking office in 17 of them shows the Republican Party’s embrace of Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election and undermine democracy.

Republicans who have insisted that the 2020 election was decided by fraud, tried to overturn its results, or refused to say that it was legitimately decided, are nominated for secretary of state in these states:

  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • Connecticut
  • Indiana
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Nevada
  • New Mexico
  • South Dakota
  • Vermont
  • Wyoming

In Wyoming, Trump-endorsed election denier Chuck Gray is the only candidate on the ballot, so he’s guaranteed a win. In Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Vermont, on the other hand, these candidates have slim chances—but the fact that Republicans nominated them remains worth talking about.

But Arizona, Michigan, and Nevada are critical battleground states. If their top election administrators are ready to do whatever it takes to prevent Democrats from winning—or to prevent Democratic wins from being put into effect—that could tip a presidential election.

Additionally, in some states, the secretary of state is chosen by the governor or the legislature. Legislatures are more complicated, but we know that in these states, the Republican gubernatorial nominees are themselves election deniers who would be likely to appoint someone with the same views to be secretary of state:

  • Florida
  • Maryland
  • New York
  • Pennsylvania
  • Texas

Again, it’s unlikely that this will come to pass in New York. But in Pennsylvania, Doug Mastriano is running in large part on Trump’s Big Lie, and he’s repeatedly made it clear that his choice for secretary of state would be with him on that. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis has already appointed Cord Byrd as secretary of state, so we know that DeSantis’ choice for top elections administrator is someone who “has refused to say whether he believes the 2020 election results were legitimate, and he has amplified false rhetoric about widespread fraud.”

This week on The Downballot we check in on Pennsylvania, where Republican Doug Mastriano has called for "40 days of fasting and prayer" to save his ailing campaign for governor; dig into ad spending numbers that show Democrats airing far more spots because they aren't relying on super PACs; circle back to the J.R. Majewski stolen valor scandal, which prompted the NRCC to cut him loose; and recap the dispiriting results of Italy's general election, which saw the far-right win for the first time since Mussolini.

But even in states where Republicans haven’t nominated people who outright want to steal elections for members of their party, they’ve nominated people who want to make it harder to vote, especially if you’re a member of a group that tends to vote for Democrats. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, for instance, drew praise from Democrats for refusing Trump’s demand to “find 11,780 votes” to overturn his state’s 2020 election results. But he’s been a champion of Georgia’s restrictive new voting policies, including making it harder to vote early or by mail and prohibiting groups from giving water or food to voters waiting in Georgia’s notoriously long voting lines. Pretty much the best-case Republican these days is one who wants to keep Democrats from voting, but is reluctantly in favor of counting their votes once cast.

It's critically important to elect Democrats to lead state election administration. Can you help?

RELATED STORIES:

Video surfaces of Doug Mastriano leading prayer for Congress to disregard 2020 election results

The GOP nominee for Arizona secretary of state is an Oath Keeper

30 Sep 15:57

Judge again sides with Trump in Mar-a-Lago documents fight

by Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney
James.galbraith

There is no end to the hackery.


The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s challenge to the FBI’s seizure of documents from his Florida estate again sided with the former president Thursday in the ongoing showdown with the Justice Department.

U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon issued an order extending the timeline of an outside review Trump demanded of the documents and other materials the FBI seized from Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach on Aug. 8 as part of an investigation into alleged unlawful retention of classified materials and other government records as well as obstruction of justice. She also overruled some of the procedures proposed by the independent reviewer, senior U.S. District Court Judge Raymond Dearie, whom she appointed to the role at Trump’s request.

Cannon, a Trump appointee based in Fort Pierce, Fla., essentially adopted a slower timeline proposed by Trump’s attorney for the document review to be conducted by Dearie, who is based in Brooklyn. Under Cannon’s new order, the review and her handling of any objections to Dearie’s rulings will almost certainly stretch into the new year.



In addition, Cannon rejected Dearie’s plan to require Trump to say at the outset of the review whether he believes the FBI’s inventory of seized materials is faulty, either by omitting items that were seized, including items that were not seized or both. Trump has repeatedly suggested, without offering evidence, that the FBI planted evidence at his home during the court-ordered search.

“There shall be no separate requirement on Plaintiff at this stage, prior to the review of any of the Seized Materials, to lodge ex ante final objections to the accuracy of Defendant’s Inventory, its descriptions, or its contents,” Cannon wrote.

Under Cannon’s ruling, Trump will be allowed to raise such concerns later in the process. Cannon also wiped out Dearie’s plan to break the documents into sets and handle objections on a rolling basis. Instead, there will be one deadline — which is likely to arrive in early November — by which Trump’s side must state which specific documents it believes are subject to attorney-client privilege or executive privilege as well as which he believes qualify as presidential records or personal records under the terms of the Presidential Records Act.

Prosecutors had initially asked for the review to be completed by mid-October, while Trump had proposed a mid-December timeline. Cannon’s ruling aligns with Trump’s preferred schedule, contemplating Dearie finishing his work by December 16. She would then take up objections by either side to the special master’s rulings in a process that seems destined to spill over into 2023.

The order Thursday is Cannon’s first significant move in the process since last week, when a federal appeals court sharply rejected her decision to initially include about 100 documents with national-security classification markings in Dearie’s review. DOJ had argued that Trump had no legitimate claim to those records and that withholding them from DOJ during the review would harm efforts to probe whether the documents had been improperly accessed by unauthorized recipients.


The appeals court overrode Cannon’s refusal to restore DOJ’s access to those documents and made clear it viewed her reasoning as deeply flawed.

The back-and-forth over the mechanics of the process over the past couple of weeks has also surfaced some disagreements and apparent friction between Cannon, who has spent less than two years on the bench, and Dearie, who has spent more than 36 years as a federal judge and was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

Trump’s side offered up Dearie as one of two preferred picks for the special master job. The government proposed two other choices, but acceded to Dearie.

The volume of materials involved in the review remains murky. Cannon earlier referenced about 11,000 documents, but Trump’s lawyers said in a court filing Wednesday that during a discussion about digitizing and organizing the documents prosecutors said that up to 200,000 pages of materials may be involved.

29 Sep 23:03

This underwater camera operates wirelessly without batteries

by Jennifer Ouellette
James.galbraith

impressive

MIT engineers built a battery-free, wireless underwater camera that could help scientists explore unknown regions of the ocean, track pollution, or monitor the effects of climate change.

Enlarge / MIT engineers built a battery-free, wireless underwater camera that could help scientists explore unknown regions of the ocean, track pollution, or monitor the effects of climate change. (credit: Adam Glanzman)

MIT engineers have built a wireless, battery-free underwater camera capable of harvesting energy by itself while consuming very little power, according to a new paper published in the journal Nature Communications. The system can take color photos of remote submerged objects—even in dark settings—and convey the data wirelessly for real-time monitoring of underwater environments, aiding the discovery of new rare species or monitoring ocean currents, pollution, or commercial and military operations.

We already have various methods for taking underwater images, but according to the authors, "Most of the ocean and marine organisms have not been observed yet." That's partly because most existing methods require being tethered to ships, underwater drones, or power plants for both power and communication. Those methods that don't use tethering must incorporate battery power, which limits their lifetime. While it's possible in principle to harvest energy from ocean waves, underwater currents, or even sunlight, adding the necessary equipment to do so would result in a much bulkier and more expensive underwater camera.

So the MIT team set about developing a solution for a battery-free, wireless imaging method. The design goal was to minimize the hardware required as much as possible. They also wanted to keep power consumption to a minimum, so they used cheap, off-the-shelf imaging sensors; the trade-off there is that such sensors only produce grayscale images. The team also needed to develop a low-power flash as well, since most underwater environments don't get much natural light.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

29 Sep 22:30

Billions likely needed for roads and bridges ripped up by Hurricane Ian

by Alex Daugherty, Tanya Snyder and Oriana Pawlyk
James.galbraith

Have some bootstraps and self reliance. Otherwise, fuck off. See De Santis' vote against Hurricane Sandy relief and flood insurance expansions.


Hurricane Ian's rampage across Florida disabled two major bridges, severed access along an interstate, canceled thousands of flights and destroyed untold numbers of homes and businesses — all of which will likely need billions in federal aid to piece back together.

The hurricane, which made landfall as a powerful Category 4 storm, is expected to cause major travel disruptions for weeks to come in the region, and emergency officials are still trying to assess the damage to I-75 near Fort Myers, where the sheer amount of devastation has made access difficult.

“As you know, some of those areas, Cape Coral and the city of Fort Myers, they got really inundated and devastated by this storm,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said. “The hope is all of [I-75] will be open. But most of it is open and gives us what we need to be able to continue to move supplies into the area.”

Flooding is also a major concern farther inland, with major airports in Tampa and Orlando shuttered, thousands of flights canceled and some airlines suspending operations through Saturday.

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Thursday on MSNBC that some airports will probably remain closed for some time and urged people not to fly recreational drones in damaged areas, so emergency personnel are left free to operate.

Airlines have canceled thousands of flights into and out of Florida, and though that will ease as the recovery begins in earnest, the disruptions to aviation are causing headaches around the country, with delays cropping up at other airport hubs in Charlotte, N.C., Atlanta, Chicago and New York.

At least two major bridges have been decimated — photos showed a chunk of the Sanibel Causeway missing — that together mean some 20,000 people will be cut off from road access for the foreseeable future. The state will need to assess an untold number of other bridges.

Congress is poised to enact a stopgap government funding bill by midnight Friday, but it doesn't include disaster relief funding specifically earmarked for Hurricane Ian.

Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the Senate’s top GOP appropriator, said it wasn’t possible to include additional disaster aid to respond to Hurricane Ian at the last minute, but that the Disaster Relief Fund should have adequate reserves for the immediate term, including for Ian.

The stopgap measure, which funds the government through Dec. 16, provides billions of dollars in extra disaster assistance for states across the country. It also allows FEMA to spend through the Disaster Relief Fund, which currently has about $15 billion, at a higher rate to respond to the hurricanes that have slammed into Florida and Puerto Rico.

“You’ve got to assess it all first,” Shelby said.

Additional disaster aid could end up in a year-end government funding deal, he added. “It’s possible. But sometimes it takes a while to assess the damages,” he said.

“The Senate will stand ready to provide further assistance if needed,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said on the Senate floor Thursday.

Devastation in southwest Florida

The Sanibel Causeway is the only road link to the Sanibel and Captiva islands, carrying more than 3 million vehicles per year over two spans and two man-made causeway islands. A piece of it has washed into the sea.

“I anticipate there likely will be other bridges that have suffered damage,” DeSantis said. “But once bridges are inspected and determined to be safe they will be reopened as soon as possible. But we know Sanibel Causeway and we also know Pine Island Bridge — those two are not passable and will require structural rebuilds."

“We'll find out” how transportation infrastructure is holding up, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said Thursday in an interview on Capitol Hill. “That's one of the issues you deal with, and especially the bridges — all the bridges have to be checked. You saw the bridge in Sanibel was hurt. The other thing that happens is with all that water, all the roads close to the coast, there's a lot of risk.”

In Naples, slightly south of Ian’s landfall location, the fire station was flooded and Scott said “there’s water from the bay to the Gulf.” He said the top priority is rescue efforts, followed by getting roads open and the power back on and third is keeping shelters open so people with flooded homes have somewhere to stay.

“You got to keep the shelters open, for people who need places to live, because even in a place like Naples, there's going to be a lot of people that need places to be because of how much water there was,” Scott said.

DeSantis said more than 100 engineers working in teams of two are inspecting bridges in Southwest Florida.

Disruption throughout Florida

Airports, transit agencies and roads scattered throughout Florida remained closed on Thursday, though many pieces of critical infrastructure will begin to reopen on Friday. Ian’s southward shift spared Florida’s Gulf Coast ports from a direct hit.

Orlando International Airport, the state’s busiest, Tampa International Airport and Jacksonville International Airport were closed on Thursday, which led to the cancellation of thousands of flights around the country.

Miami International Airport and Fort Lauderdale International Airport remained open as Ian made landfall, though both airports recorded delays and cancellations. Tampa International Airport said Thursday afternoon it will reopen at 10 a.m. Friday.

Amtrak services on the Palmetto, Silver Star and Auto Train routes were canceled on Thursday and Friday, and when they might reopen depends on the condition of tracks owned mostly by CSX, which operates the majority of Florida’s freight rail network. CSX suspended services ahead of Ian’s landfall across most of the state but had not provided a damage assessment as of Thursday afternoon.

Amtrak spokesperson Marc Magliari said that in addition to potential track damage, rail crossing gates are removed ahead of major hurricanes to prevent them from becoming projectiles. Gates will need to be put back in place and power restored so they can operate before trains resume service, Magliari said.

In the Tampa area, the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority and the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority shut down regular service, and service was not expected to resume normal operations until Saturday. The LYNX transit system in Orlando and Central Florida is also shut down.

Ports reopening

Port Tampa Bay, the largest on the state’s Gulf Coast, opened for land-side operations on Thursday afternoon, which allows fuel terminal operators and fuel trucks in and out of the port. The U.S. Coast Guard determines when a port’s docks can reopen.

South Florida’s largest seaport for fuel deliveries and storage is open as of Thursday morning, allowing for crucial fuel deliveries via boat. Other ports on the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts remained closed.

Port Everglades is in “good shape from a fuel perspective” according to Florida Ports Council spokesperson Edie Ousley. The Fort Lauderdale facility was spared a direct hit from Ian and was not closed by the Coast Guard. Two tankers were held offshore from Port Everglades as Ian approached but were able to deliver their fuel on Thursday morning.

Ousley said it was too early to tell if truckers from parts of the state that suffered a direct hit from Ian are able to make it to the ports for fuel deliveries.

Caitlin Emma and Bruce Ritchie contributed to this report.

29 Sep 22:22

A harsh ad hitting Herschel Walker shows a way forward for Democrats

by Paul Waldman, Greg Sargent
James.galbraith

actual politics, what a fucking concept

It unites abortion and gun violence into a single message.