Shared posts

19 Nov 17:40

Gaia Goes to Court

by Clarice Feldman

Eijsden-Margraten, a Dutch municipality with about 30,000 residents, voted to have nature "have its say" in court before licenses to construct housing are granted. Interests of  nature and wildlife will be represented by a guardian, "which could be a combination of scientists, environmental organizations and perhaps artists,” according to the mayor. Apparently, the proponents believe the town “is following in the footsteps of 30 states in the United States and two districts in Northern Ireland which have made all nature and wildlife a legal entity in court.”

I’m not aware of any such rulings in the U.S. nor can I find one, though elsewhere this has been the case and it’s not inconceivable that the march to insanity has made footfall somewhere in there. There are examples elsewhere though. "The New Zealand parliament voted to give legal personhood to a river and provided for the appointment of two guardians to represent it. In India a court extended legal personhood to the Ganges and Yamuna rivers and the glaciers that feed them."

Domestically, the impetus for such things here seems to have been  set in 1972 by the late Christopher Stone of the University of Southern California law school:

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

It is not inevitable, nor is it wise, that natural objects should have no rights to seek redress in their own behalf. It is no answer to say that streams and forests cannot have standing because streams and forests cannot speak. Corporations cannot speak either; nor can states, estates, infants, incompetents, municipalities or universities. Lawyers speak for them, as they customarily do for the ordinary citizen with legal problems... Protection from this will be advanced by making the natural object a party to an injunctive settlement. Even more importantly, we should make it a beneficiary of money awards.

Another law professor, Hong Kong based “bioethicist” Eric C. Ip, has argued much the same with the endorsement of The Lancet:

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

The right to a healthy environment cannot be found in the texts of important environmental treaties, such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement. Nevertheless, this right has been enshrined in the constitutions of over 100 nations, located mostly in Africa, Europe, and Latin America, and in regional treaties ratified by at least 130 countries. Such widespread recognition constitutes evidence that this right is becoming part of customary international law.

Per the Stone “guardianship” proposal of the rocks, streams, rivers, forests, wildlife (and Ip’s "the planet"), which the Dutch town accepts, the “guardians” not only will be engaged to represent these entities, but will be entrusted to manage any damages that the administrative authority or court awards -- forever, it seems. No longer will the people through their elected representatives decide such things.

Personally, I prefer the part of Genesis where God grants man dominion over the fish, the fowl, the cattle, and all the earth to a system in which publicly-funded-in-perpetuity guardians of rocks, rivers, streams -- indeed, all of the “interconnected planet” -- have dominion over man.

The post Gaia Goes to Court first appeared on The Pipeline.
17 Sep 21:33

Staying Found

by Craig Smith, CFP®, CFA®, ChFC®, CLU®

Staying Found

Years ago, Melinda and I hiked the Pacific Crest Trail (PCT) from Ashland, OR to Manning Park, British Columbia. We learned a lot about ourselves during the roughly 900 trail-mile trip, celebrated our first wedding anniversary sleeping on the dirt (can only go up from there!), and learned many life lessons. We also fell in love with spending time in the wilderness.

Being in the backcountry is life-giving and rejuvenating for the two of us. It’s also something we want to expose our children to. As such, Melinda and I pack up our backpacking gear and the kids each summer and head into the wilderness for an adventure. Many people will think we are a little crazy (okay, okay, a LOT crazy!) taking three young kids into the forest for a week at a time, and they might just be right!

This year, our end-of-summer tradition found us in the Mount Jefferson wilderness. This is the fourth summer we’ve gone backpacking with three kids. The first time the kids were aged 5, 3, and 1. Now with the crew being 8, 6, and 4, it is getting much easier logistically!

One of the many essential life lessons we’ve learned from our backpacking adventures is the need for thorough preparation and planning. Part of that preparation was the acquisition of basic wilderness skills. The most important of which was “staying found.” Especially when things go “wrong,” how do we stay found?          

Staying “found” may be as simple as slowing down, pausing, and giving yourself a moment to recalibrate. Or put another way, rather than the reflexive need to “do something,” it might be wise to “just sit there.”

For Melinda and me, one of these “staying found” moments occurred during our PCT hike in Washington. We had just crossed the Packwood glacier in the Goat Rocks Wilderness (a harrowing crossing itself). The day was gorgeous, but the sun was beginning to set. Just north of the glacier crossing is the “Knife’s Edge.” As you might expect, it has steep sides and can be disorienting in good conditions.

As luck would have it, as we were crossing the Knife’s Edge, a dense fog rolled in, making seeing 5 feet in front of you a significant challenge. We were fatigued, stressed by the conditions, didn’t feel safe to go back across the glacier, and knew that we needed to turn east “soon” and that an old trail diverged in the area and would take us in the wrong direction. So, what did we do? We did nothing. We called it a day. Set up camp then and there on the trail itself.

A picture of Knife’s Edge on a better day!

Topo map showing Packwood Glacier, Knife’s Edge, PCT, and “wrong trail.”

In early 2021, the financial markets dropped more than 15% from their previous highs. This event was “normal” in the grand scheme of how markets work, but the event itself is never predictable. While this event may have elevated our emotions, we followed the script. We stayed the course. We “just sat there” rather than “doing something.”

That’s not entirely true. We DID do something. We started withdrawing from the “conservative bucket” to meet cash flow needs. We rebalanced as appropriate. And more importantly, we followed the plan created while in an “unexcited” emotional state. We have once again executed the plan a year and a half later. Now we work to replenish the “conservative bucket” to prepare for the next downturn that will inevitably come.

Or, to put it another way, we stayed “found.” Rooted. Focused on the long-term outcomes, in good times and rocky ones.

It is easy to lose the “forest for the trees” in the wilderness and in life. Wayne and I preach the mantra “Systematic, Unemotional, and Diversified.” It helps us “stay found.”

We understand that our capacity for making good decisions drops dramatically in stressful situations. This is just as true when encountering disorienting conditions in the wilderness, dealing with health crises of loved ones, or navigating financial bear markets. If we’ve put the effort in to create the plan before the event, it is much easier to go step-by-step through the process and execute one thing at a time.

This summer, Emilia, Isabel, and Josiah continued to work on their map reading and compass skills while on our wilderness adventure. They can identify features on a map and get their bearings. All with the intent of “staying found.”

Finding our “True North,” our purpose, your purpose is what we’re all about. That’s why we plan. That’s why we listen.

Aligning Values, Vision, and Wealth™. That’s what the tagline says. But it is much, much more than a slogan.

Sincerely,

CRAIG R. SMITH, CFP®, CFA®, ChFC®, CLU®

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing.

The post Staying Found appeared first on von Borstel & Associates.

30 Jan 00:41

My Books of 2021

by John Hinderaker
(John Hinderaker)

An old friend texted me last week to ask why I hadn’t done a post on books I read in 2021. There is no particular reason; I did such a post in 2019, but I don’t think I did one last year. But it is fun to think back and try to reconstruct my reading over the last year, and some of our readers may be interested in my reactions to books I have read recently. So here goes.

I am getting old enough that I want to re-read books that I read a long time ago. Sometimes I enjoy them as much as I did the first time, or more; other times, not. In 2021 I re-read Anna Karenina, traditionally one of my favorite books. It is terrific, but this time I thought it was marred by a flawed ending, i.e., everything following Anna’s death.

I read Nabokov’s Ada when it came out in 1969, and have re-read it once or twice since. I returned to it in 2021 and found it still highly enjoyable, especially the early chapters. If you haven’t read Ada, you should check it out.

Thomas Hardy is one of my favorite writers. I hadn’t read Tess of the d’Urbervilles for a long time, so I picked it off the shelf and read it again. It is fantastic.

George Eliot is terrific, too. I read The Mill on the Floss for the first time–not sure if that was 2020 or 2021–and thought it was great. A few months ago I re-read Silas Marner, which is really good. It is probably wasted on a lot of high school students, but with hindsight I am impressed that public high schools thought it was suitable for us.

The Charterhouse of Parma is an old favorite. Did I enjoy it as much as the first time, 25 years or so ago? Not quite, but I still recommend it if you haven’t read it.

Lament For a Maker is a terrific murder mystery by Michael Innes that I read 35 years ago. To call it a murder mystery sells it short; I enjoyed it almost as much the second time as I did long ago. I read a couple of other Innes books in 2021 that were not as substantial.

When I was a kid I loved O. Henry’s short stories. I bought a volume of them last year and read quite a number. My impression now is that there are some gems in the collection, along with some dross. But they are well worth dipping into if you are not familiar with them. “Shoes” and “Ships” are a good place to begin, along with many more famous tales.

Of the books I re-read in 2021, my favorite is Kristin Lavransdatter, the trilogy that won the Nobel Prize for Sigrid Undset in 1928. Set in Norway in the 14th century, Kristin is not only one of the greatest works of historical fiction ever, but, in my opinion, one of the foremost novels of world literature. Why did Undset set her books in the 14th century? I think because she wanted to depict life that is more intense, and in some ways more serious, than what we experience today. In my opinion, the four central characters of the books–Kristin; her father Lavrans; her husband Erlend; and Simon, to whom she was once betrothed and who later becomes her friend–are among the best-drawn in all of literature.

Of course I read a lot of new books too in 2021. I finally read the Aeneid in a lively translation by Robert Fagles. It is a tremendous book, with the familiar problem that the first half is considerably more engaging than the second.

I have been absorbed by ancient history in recent years, so for Christmas 2020 my wife gave me Mary Beard’s history of the Roman republic and early empire, SPQR. It is excellent, and the subject is endlessly fascinating.

My high school debate coach has one of America’s more remarkable book stores in Watertown, South Dakota. A couple of years ago I got a bargain price on a complete set of the Harvard Classics there, and last year I read The Autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini. It is great, and it probably accounts for much of how we remember the Italian Renaissance. Among other things, I learned that Shakespeare’s plays set in Italy–most notably Romeo and Juliet–were ripped from the headlines. An insult in the streets, swords drawn, cousins summoned, a brawl, someone is stabbed and dies, our hero is exiled from the city: this happened, and Cellini was in the middle of it.

I don’t read a lot of books about current events–too much of a busman’s holiday. But Mollie Hemingway spoke at my organization’s Fall Briefing, and I read her book Rigged, about the 2020 election. It’s not about voting machines, but it gives a clear sense of why and how the election was, in various ways, fixed.

When I was a kid I read a great many books. Some were classics, like The Story of a Bad Boy–still a favorite, many years later–but most are not remembered as serious literature. I devoured the Hardy Boys, and read countless sports books. I can still remember the titles of some of them–Circus Catch, Rookie at the Hot Corner, Southpaw Jinx, Full Court Press, and many more.

Those books were not great literature, but I am forever grateful that I read them. Much of what I learned about life came from relatively humble children’s books that may now be forgotten, but to which I owe an eternal debt.

That habit of reading a lot of popular fiction alongside great works has persisted. In 2021, popular fiction included returning to some authors from the past. For example, Agatha Christie. I read 10 or 15 Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple mysteries last year. They are good, and offer a fascinating window into English culture over a period of several decades. The mysteries, as such, are entirely intellectual puzzles–Who had the necessary 30 seconds to commit the crime? Who is actually a person from 20 years ago who has a motive to kill the decedent?–with little or no emotional coherence. But they are fun, as evidenced by the fact that Christie has outsold every author other than Shakespeare and the Bible.

I read several P.D. James books as well. My reaction is pretty much the same as when they were newer several decades ago. They are pretty good, but don’t really grab me. But a pretty good murder mystery is worth reading.

I have followed several popular series for a number of years. Thus, as Penguin has translated and published Simenon’s Inspector Maigret books, considered by some to be among the classics of modern French literature, I have downloaded and read them. The pace has slowed a bit, but I read five or six Maigret novels in 2021. If you want to understand France, Simenon is a good place to start.

C.J. Box–Chuck to his friends–is a novelist whose books immediately rocket to the top of the best-seller lists. His principal character is Joe Pickett, a Wyoming game warden whose commitment to doing the right thing often lands him in trouble. The Pickett books come out once a year, and in 2021 it was Dark Sky. As always, I digested the latest Joe Pickett in a matter of hours.

Chuck’s Cassie Dewell series is also excellent. Watch for a new installment in 2022. Or start from the beginning with Back of Beyond and The Highway, one of the more riveting books I have ever read.

Gillian Bradshaw is an ancient historian and also a novelist. I read her first two books, The Lighthouse at Alexandria and The Bearkeeper’s Daughter, about the Empress Theodora, many years ago, and enjoyed them. I learned last year that she has written quite a few historical novels in the intervening years, and read four or five of them. My favorites were The Sand-Reckoner, about Archimedes, and Render Unto Caesar.

Bernard Cornwell is probably the greatest historical novelist now working. In 2020 he published War Lord, the 13th book in the Last Kingdom series, featuring a tenth-century Saxon warrior named Uhtred. I read War Lord last year. I have greatly enjoyed this series and highly recommend it. Cornwell also returned to the Richard Sharpe franchise with the first new Sharpe book, Sharpe’s Assassin, in a number of years. It is set just after the Battle of Waterloo and is very good, as you would expect.

Brad Thor is one of the most popular thriller writers. He is in the category of writers about whom I say, “It ain’t Shakespeare, but…” There is a reason why his books, starring the lethal Scot Harvath, have sold many millions of copies. In 2021 Thor published the latest Harvath book, Black Ice, set in the far North. As usual, Thor is one step ahead of the headlines.

Michael Connelly has sold many millions of books featuring Los Angeles police detective Harry Bosch. The Bosch books have been turned into a very good television series on Amazon Prime. A few years ago Connelly introduced a new character, a woman detective named Renee Ballard, whom I like a lot. She has several times teamed up with the now-retired Harry Bosch, as in 2021’s The Dark Hours. It’s good.

No doubt I am forgetting some, but that is probably enough.

One more note–I didn’t read as many history books as usual in 2021, in part because I spend a lot of time listening to history lectures through The Great Courses, via Audible.com. I have a rather long commute to my present office, and after a couple of years of listening to top 40 country, news talk and sports talk for at least an hour a day, I decided I needed to make better use of my time. So I started listening to history lectures. It was one of the most lifestyle-enhancing decisions of recent years. I think all of the lecture series I have listened to have been good, but if you are new to the Great Courses and looking for somewhere to begin, I would recommend anything by Professor Kenneth Harl of Tulane.

08 Oct 15:35

Guardian: UK Industry Facing Climate Policy Winter Shutdown

by Eric Worrall
People who lived through the blackouts and economic chaos of the 1970s must be experiencing a strong sense of deja-vu, with Boris Johnson starring as the spiritual successor of the weak, ineffectual Conservative leader Edward Heath.
02 Feb 01:09

2021 COP26 Climate Conference Hosts Authorise a New Coal Mine

by Eric Worrall
Britain, the host of the upcoming COP26 climate conference, is getting slammed by climate activists for authorising a new coking coal mine in the politically sensitive national electorate of Whitehaven. But environmentalists should be celebrating - coking coal is an essential ingredient in the production of solar panels.
29 Jan 19:00

The River of Forgetfulness

by Victor Davis Hanson
Victor Davis Hanson // American Greatness Riotous rogue Trump supporters who broke into the Capitol on January 6 were properly and widely condemned by conservatives. They were somewhat reminiscent of the mobs of fanatic leftists and union members that a decade ago stormed the Wisconsin state capitol at Madison, or …

Read more →

12 Jan 15:34

The Deep State Is Rattled

by Steven Hayward
(Steven Hayward)

I had a conversation over the weekend with a senior career lawyer (who is a Trump supporter) with a federal agency who passed along some interesting information. He said career federal officials in Washington he spoke with on Thursday and Friday are seriously rattled by last Wednesday’s events. Among other things, the fact that apparently some Capitol Police were friendly with the protestors who entered the building have federal bureaucrats wondering whether they can fully trust their own security personnel. Will the feds start trying to screen security personnel by ideology? Oh, that’d be just great. Pretty sure there are a bunch of German names for a fully politicized police force, but I forget what they are right now.

Beyond the security question, this person told me the mob action has been a psychological blow on the DC bureaucracy which didn’t think such an open expression of tangible disrespect for the government was possible. In other words, the capitol mob was a blow to their status, and Washingtonians believe the entire protest represents more than just anger at the election outcome: the disrespectful spirit of the day represents a real threat to their power going forward. This is one reason for the paranoia of Democrats at the moment, and they worry that more such protests are not only possible but likely. Part of the reason there is such fury on the left to run Trump out of office right away is that DC is genuinely afraid of him and his followers. Machiavelli might approve. Hence the calls to deploy national guard units in DC in large numbers for Inauguration next week.

Right away a few observations come to mind. First, if you squint the right way, you can see that our leaders don’t really take BLM and Antifa protests very seriously, and hence the kid glove treatment they get. The property damage may be significant, but our government likely doesn’t think Antifa and BLM amount to a significant political threat. Hence the leniency of the government response at all levels to riot season last year. But if the government at all levels now tries to crack down on pro-Trump protestors, won’t they have to also tighten their rules of engagement with Antifa, or will there now be a political litmus test for rules of engagement? There is, this person said, a lot of hand-wringing going on about the fact that of the hundreds of people who invaded the capitol building, only about 50 arrests were made. (There may be more as law enforcement goes about identifying people.) But the point is: from the perspective of the Deep State, the mob largely got away with it.

Second, there is a lot of controversy and conflicting reports on whether a national guard presence had been requested for last Wednesday. Here’s a certainty: if Trump had requested deployment of the national guard beforehand to stand by at the capitol, the left would have screamed that this show of force was all part of Trump’s plan to stage a military coup to stop the certification of the election.

UPDATE: Sure enough, it seems the government is going to apply stricter justice for the Wednesday protestors:

Prosecutors weigh ‘heavy hammer’ — felony murder — for rioters in Capitol officer’s death

. . . While most murder investigations focus on the person or persons who caused the fatal injury, former federal prosecutor Tim Heaphy said prosecutors could charge many rioters with felony murder, even if they were nowhere near Sicknick.

13 Dec 17:51

U.N. trots out phony sinking island claims after rejection of it’s exaggerated climate alarmist report

by Guest Blogger
Guest essay by Larry Hamlin The United Nations trotted out phony claims of sinking pacific islands after the COP24 climate conference failed to adopt the IPCC grossly exaggerated October climate report alleging global impacts from a 1.5 degree C temperature rise.   The L. A. Times published a story presenting scientifically disproved claims of sinking…
25 Oct 04:10

Here Comes the Caravan!

by John Hinderaker
(John Hinderaker)

In an amazing coincidence, thousands of Central Americans, most, apparently, from Honduras, are making their way toward the southern U.S. border two weeks before the midterm elections. Someone has organized this “caravan,” and–evidently because it won’t otherwise arrive in time for the election–someone reportedly is paying for bus rides for many of the caravaners. Who? That question is met with the studied incuriosity we have come to expect from the liberal media.

Most assume that the “caravan” is one of the Democratic Party’s several October surprises. I suspect that is probably true. But so far, it doesn’t seem to be turning out well. We know this because some Democrats are now suggesting that the caravan was organized by Karl Rove. Whose superpowers have never abated, apparently.

One wag has dubbed the caravan the Committee to Re-Elect the President. Heh. There is evidence that this assessment is correct. Rasmussen finds: “Voters Say Government Should Stop Hondurans At the Border.”

Voters agree with President Trump’s efforts to stop the horde of Hondurans marching through Mexico from entering the United States illegally.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 51% of Likely U.S. Voters believe the U.S. government should stop all the Hondurans headed this way from entering the country. Thirty-eight percent (38%) disagree and say the government should allow them to enter temporarily until each of their cases can be individually reviewed.

The Democrats’ internal polling must show similar results, as their candidates are strangely tongue-tied: WE ASKED 20 DEMS IN KEY RACES WHAT THEY WOULD DO WITH THE MIGRANT CARAVAN. NOT A SINGLE ONE HAD AN ANSWER. Read and enjoy:

The Daily Caller News Foundation contacted the campaigns of 20 Democrats who are currently up for re-election in battleground states or in tight races. None responded or gave their views on the caravan.

The DCNF reached out to the following Democrats about the migrant caravan, asking them how the U.S. should respond to the matter:

Florida Sen. Bill Nelson
Montana Sen. Jon Tester
New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez
Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams
North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp
Nevada Rep. Jacky Rosen
Indiana Sen. Joe Donnelly
Arizona Senate candidate Kyrsten Sinema
Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill
Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin
Tennessee Senate candidate Phil Bredesen
Minnesota Sen. Tina Smith
Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine
Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow
Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey
Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren
California Sen. Dianne Feinstein
Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy
Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono

Democratic Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke’s campaign was the only one that responded after The DCNF contacted them, however, the campaign said he has not made a position on the caravan yet.

Hey, he’s in Texas. The caravan will be there soon! It’s time for Beto to make up his mind, but don’t hold your breath.

Then, of course, there is Elizabeth Warren. Hey Elizabeth, have you considered that pretty much everyone in the “caravan” has 100 times as much Indian blood as you do, or more? Why aren’t you sticking up for your fellow Native Americans?

Just kidding. No one expects principles from Democrats. I think we all know what they really believe about illegal immigration, but there are certain times when it makes sense for them to keep their mouths shut. Like two weeks before an election.

17 May 02:47

Cities are the new Galapagos

My Times column on the evolution of urban wildlife:

 

Easter Monday bank holiday feels like a good moment to put aside politics and consider something far more portentous: evolution. Recently I was walking alongside a canal in central London, surrounded by concrete, glass, steel and tarmac, when I heard the call of a grey wagtail. Looking to my right I saw this bold, fast, yellow-bottomed bird, which I associate with wild rocky rivers in the north, flitting into a canal tunnel. Later that week I stared up at two peregrine falcons circling high above parliament — and got funny looks from passers-by.

Like other cities, London is increasingly home to exotic wildlife and is as biodiverse as some wildernesses. Mumbai has leopards, Boston turkeys, Chicago coyotes and Newcastle kittiwakes. Suburbs are already richer in wildlife than most arable fields in the so-called green belt, making environmental objections to housing development perverse. Gardens, ledges, drains, walls, trees and roofs are full of niches for everything from foxes to flowers and moths.

Two Czech scientists counted the species of plants in the city of Plzen compared with a similar area of surrounding countryside. In the city the number of species had risen from 478 in the late 19th century to 773 today. In the countryside it had fallen from 1,112 to 745.

Since most animals have shorter lifespans than us and no welfare state, they are genetically adapting faster to the concrete world than we are. A fascinating book by a Dutch biologist, Menno Schilthuizen, called Darwin Comes to Town, documents just how wide and deep this urban wildlife evolutionary pulse is. We have unleashed an unprecedented burst of natural selection.

Once a species thrives in a man-made habitat, it may find itself giving up living elsewhere. This must have happened to swallows and sparrows a long time ago: they became so successful nesting in buildings that the genes of their tree or cliff-nesting cousins died out. Today it is probably happening with peregrine falcons and herring gulls: urban ones are having more young than rural ones, so will soon swamp the whole species with their genes.

Urban landscapes present new evolutionary pressures. Street lights confuse and massacre moths and cause songbirds insomnia. Metal concentrations can be toxic. Noise drowns out birdsong. Instead of remaining insuperable, however, these novelties bring out the ingenuity in evolution. Urban insects may be changing their genetic  make-up so they no longer fly towards lights: suicide as a selective force. One Swiss study found that ermine moths from the countryside are almost twice as likely to fly towards a light as their cousins from the city of Basel.

Parakeets are common in London and have become used to human contact
Parakeets are common in London and have become used to human contactALAMY

 

Other examples of urban evolution abound. Killifish in polluted American harbours have developed genetic resistance to the effect of polychlorinated biphenyls, an industrial pollutant. Acorn ants in Cleveland, Ohio, can withstand high temperatures better than ants from the country — which is necessary because city temperatures tend to be higher. Mexican sparrows that incorporate cigarette butts in their nests have fewer bloodsucking mites feeding on their chicks because nicotine is a pesticide.

Birds sing higher-pitched songs in cities — the ones that stayed low having attracted fewer mates over the sound of traffic. In the countryside, the opposite is true: female great tits mated to high-pitched males are more likely to stray. So the species is splitting into soprano town-tits and bass country-tits. In the Netherlands, chiffchaff warblers and grasshoppers both sing higher-pitched songs if they live near busy roads. Pigeons in big cities have darker plumage because melanin pigment binds zinc, excreting it from the body and improving the birds’ health.

Human beings, too, have been forced to evolve by urbanisation. For centuries cities such as London were population “sinks”, killing more people with disease than their birth rates could match and sustaining their population only by immigration from the countryside. That put a premium on genetic mutations that resisted urban diseases. People with long histories of urban living tend to have genes that resist tuberculosis and leprosy, for example. It would not be a surprise to find that an ability to tolerate continual noise may also be partly genetic as well as learnt.

Walking to the Tube in London each morning at this time of year I hear goldcrests and goldfinches, parakeets and dunnocks, wrens and long-tailed tits, none of which lived in the middle of cities in my youth. Experiments show that urban tits, finches and sparrows are less “neophobic” than rural ones: they have evolved to be less fearful of the appearance of new objects on bird tables, for example. Compared with the egg-stealing, catapult-wielding youths of previous centuries, young people today simply do not pester animals as much.

Blackbirds first showed up in London in the 1920s, later than in continental cities. Studies in France and the Netherlands found that urban blackbirds were rapidly diverging from rural ones. They tend to have shorter beaks and wings, longer intestines and legs, as well as higher-pitched songs. They may soon count as a separate species, just as town pigeons are very different from their rock-dove cousins. Dr Schilthuizen argues that “as the urban environment expands its reach, it will become more and more an ecosystem in its own right, writing its own evolutionary rules and running at its own evolutionary pace”. Wildernesses experience very slow rates of species formation because they are already mature ecosystems. Cities, like archipelagos of islands, experience a much faster rate of change.

The immediate reaction of many people to this tale of urban biodiversity might be to lament the human interference in nature and discount urban wildlife as artificial. We sometimes despise rather than admire creatures that become urban: town pigeons are “feathered rats”, urban foxes “mangy vermin”.

An increase in urban wildlife cannot compensate for the extinction crisis in wilder spaces. But thanks to increased awareness and new techniques, we have shown we can halt extinction if we try.

In recent centuries we have lost 61 of 4,428 species of mammals and 129 of 8,971 birds. Thanks to the genetic change that is happening in the urban Galapagos, we can create new species too, albeit unwittingly. A small cheerful thought for a festival of chicks and bunnies.

15 Nov 01:05

The far left’s war on Sean Hannity

by Paul Mirengoff
(Paul Mirengoff)

Sean Hannity is under fire from left-wing smear artists like Media Matters. They are trying to force Hannity off the air by pressuring advertisers to boycott his show. Peter Hasson has the details.

The current smear campaign claims, in the context of the controversy over Roy Moore, that Hannity defends child sex abuse. In reality, as Hasson notes, Hannity has explicitly (and repeatedly) said that anyone guilty of what Moore is accused of doing has no place in politics.

Moreover, Hannity did an immense service by conducting an interview of Moore that was anything but soft. Even some on the left praised the talk show host’s questioning of the candidate.

Hannity did several things well. First, he got Moore to admit that if he did the things he’s accused of, these would be serious, and even disqualifying, offenses. Securing such admissions does two things.
It closes the door on Moore if it later becomes clear that he engaged in the misconduct and it paves the way for those who already think he engaged in it to turn against his candidacy.

That’s why this kind of question is among the first that a competent lawyer asks when deposing someone who, for example, is fired for serious misconduct.

Hannity also pressed Moore on the specific allegations against him. Moore’s answers were not stellar. Indeed, they helped cause more than a few conservatives I know to doubt the candidate’s veracity. Scott has the details.

The smear campaign against Hannity strikes me as a case of no good deed going unpunished. Initially, Keurig said it would pull its advertising. It has since relented.

However, Volvo and Hebrew National say they will pull their ads from Hannity. Unless they relent, conservatives should boycott Volvo and Hebrew National.

21 Jun 14:05

Quotation of the Day…

by Don Boudreaux
(Don Boudreaux)

Tweet

… is from page 186 of Tom Bethell’s 1998 book, The Noblest Triumph:

It is exceedingly difficult to create property rights that are legitimate, and respected by all, by expropriating the property of some purely on the grounds that they are the wealthiest owners.

20 May 03:33

California surrenders their economy to Texas (and climate worries)

by Eric Worrall
Guest essay by Eric Worrall Governor “Moonbeam” Jerry Brown has just signed what might amount to an economic death sentence for California, by signing California up to the bleeding edge of international green agreement lunacy. According to Reuters; May 19 California and leaders of 11 states and provinces signed an agreement on Tuesday to limit…
17 Jan 20:59

The picture will tell you your age

by James Lileks
Really!
17 Jan 20:59

Best shopping app: your head

by James Lileks
Real simple.
22 Jul 01:42

Logical, But I Never Thought of it – Cool a drink in 2 mins

by Food Dude

Sometimes you just need to cool something really quickly, like a beer on a hot day. This short video shows you a really good way to do it.

This post appeared first on Portland Oregon Food and Drink, by Food Dude. Visit Portland Oregon Food and Drink for the latest in Portland Oregon Food and Drink.