Ronald.phillips

Pregnancy often gets referred to as “the most natural thing in the world” and becomes a stage required by society in any woman’s life. In fact, if a person with working ovaries chooses not to have children, they go so against the expectations of their gender that they will be labeled as strange, selfish, or even suffering from tokophobia: the fear of pregnancy. Now any pregnancy will have some anxieties and discomfort but using ‘phobia’ indicates that a woman who chooses not to get pregnant has an exaggerated and unrealistic fear when in reality there are several reasons to not want kids.

When a woman goes against their supposed natural calling to become a mother, then everyone from loved ones to medical professionals or politicians needs to step in and tell her why she’s wrong. With the world premiere of CLOCK at the Overlook Film Festival, director Alexis Jacknow looks at the loss of self when a woman is no longer viewed as a person, but as a possible baby-making machine with a broken biological clock.

For a movie revolving around the anxiety of making children, Jacknow chooses an odd location for us to witness the suicide of a would-be mother: a playground. The playground represents childhood and helps form so many cheerful memories within the formidable years of a person’s life. But that is during the daytime. At night seeing the empty equipment, hearing the creaking swings, and just witnessing a normally pleasant place connected with children now completely void of life creates a feeling of abject terror. This brief cold opening sets the stage tonally but also introduces the viewer to themes exploring how closely children and terror become associated.

Childbirth and women exist so synonymously with each other, often the assumption arises that women without children must be sad, alone, and even broken. Ella Patel (Dianna Agron) is 37 going on 38, has a loving marriage, a successful career, and loads of hobbies, but regardless of what she thinks is best for her, her friends, family, and doctors all pressure her to have children. Despite telling people she feels no need to procreate, everyone dismisses her thoughts and insists she must start having babies. Now! People in her life start assuming Ella has nothing to fill her day. Or that she is letting down her ancestors who survived the camps by not carrying on their lineage.

Not only does the film heavily focus on the pressures society places on women to give birth, but + also discusses intergenerational trauma. As a grandchild of Holocaust survivors, Ella feels guilt for not continuing on her family line as she betrays every one of her ancestors who fought to survive. But at the same time, she fears bringing a child into a world that allows genocide to exist. Even though it takes two to make a baby, women still receive the brunt of the ‘baby talk.’ At a Sabbat dinner with her husband Aiden (Jay Ali) and her father Joseph (Saul Rubinek), Ella’s father puts all the pressure of grandchildren on his daughter. He behaves as if Ella is somehow choosing to not spontaneously self-inseminate herself and ignores the fact her husband holds just as much say in the manner.

There are numerous people (mostly women) in Ella’s life, and they all believe a woman not wanting a baby just needs to be reminded she is a woman. This misguided and childless person just needs to be reminded her mother gave birth to her. If all this excessive nagging and pressuring doesn’t work, then medical intervention is the only solution. Due to the pressures, Ella (contrary to her character) checks herself into a clinic that claims to be able to “fix” her broken clock. The clinic involves a 10-day hormone regimen paired with cognitive behavioral therapy. Because here, the medical professionals compare the decision to not have children to a chemical imbalance in the brain.

So now, Ella becomes chemically and emotionally altered in order to fit standards she has no desire to fulfill. With Melora Hardin (“The Office”) as the conniving head of the clinic, Dr. Elizabeth Simmons, Ella becomes further dragged into the baby-crazy world (which turns out not to be all cuteness and Pampers). Instead, CLOCK winds up the audience for an intense journey through female bodily autonomy and Jacknow shows how pregnancy is the ultimate real-life body horror.

CLOCK will debut exclusively on Hulu on April 28 and Disney+ internationally at a later date.

The post [Overlook Film Festival Review] CLOCK appeared first on Nightmarish Conjurings.

Though it was only published 15 years go (which isn't all that long ago by Marvel Comics standards), "Secret Invasion" is one of the most beloved and impactful events in Marvel's storied history. Now, it's coming to the Marvel Cinematic Universe and, somewhat amazingly, it's not as a movie. Rather, it's going to be a big event series on Disney+ this summer, giving us something to do between "Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3" and "The Marvels." A new trailer has dropped, setting up Samuel L. Jackson's return as Nick Fury, letting him take the spotlight arguably for the first time ever.

For those unfamiliar, the story centers on the shapeshifting aliens known as the Skrulls, who we met in "Captain Marvel," planning to invade Earth. They have been replacing people on the planet in anticipation of a takeover, making it difficult for Fury -- or anyone else for that matter -- to know who to trust. Those interested in reading it beforehand can find our reading order guide right here. Given the importance of this story, we're going to take a much closer look at the trailer, breaking it down frame-by-frame to see what we can learn. Let's dig in, shall we?

Nick Fury Returns

The teaser opens with a shot of a very suspicious Nick Fury walking through an unknown location in the woods. We get some voiceover from Ben Mendelsohn's Talos reminding us that he's been gone in space for quite some time, which we initially learned in the post-credits scene attached to "Spider-Man: Far From Home." Yet, he's been called back to Earth. Why, exactly? Well, it's all got to do with the Skrulls -- even though nobody actually says as much in the trailer. There's an air of caution in everyone's voice, and in the way everyone is acting. It's espionage and mystery.

A Light In The Woods

To serve as an inciting incident of sorts for the trailer, we have this mysterious light appearing in the woods, seemingly the very same woods that Fury was walking through moments before. Only now it's nighttime and, as anyone who has ever seen a science fiction movie knows, aliens love to come to Earth at nighttime whilst implementing mysterious lights.

A figure is seen standing at the entryway of a ship, though their image is obscured just enough so that we can't tell who it is. Is this Fury returning to Earth? One of our evil Skrulls, perhaps? Again, mysterious.

Reunited, But It Doesn't Feel That Good

We cut to a shot of Talos speaking with Fury, and it's pretty clear they haven't seen one another in a while. Let us not forget that "Captain Marvel" takes place in the '90s, so these guys are old friends. Unfortunately, they are not meeting under the best of circumstances.

Talos says things have gotten "much worse." But what is he talking about, exactly? Where is this isolated safe house they are meeting at? One might expect they know the Skrulls have been coming to Earth but, again, very little is being said explicitly. They're really leaning into the mystery of it all.

Skrulls Are Terrorists Now

This is where we start to understand the "worse" that Talos was getting at, as we see peaceful people going about their day, seemingly in Russia based on the flags, right before it literally gets blown to hell.

We cut to a shot of our first look at Kingsley Ben-Adir as the Skrull Gravik, who appears to be our main villain of the piece. He detonates a bomb in an act of straight-up terrorism. So yeah, things are bad.

The Old Nick Fury

Not of critical importance, but the next shot shows us Nick Fury looking a lot more like the Nick Fury of old, with his eye patch on, shaved head, and that ever-serious look on his face. This looks like a Fury that is ready for action, which certainly explains him delivering the line, "Why do you think I came back?" at this moment.

A Skrull Inspired Logo

Marvel is really leaning into the whole Skrull thing here, as the Marvel Studios logo that comes up about a quarter of the way through the trailer is decked out in green, not unlike the skin of the aliens in question.

Welcome To London

Not a ton to say here, but it very much looks like this show is going to be taking us to London. So this may well be a globetrotting adventure, not unlike "Captain America: The Winter Soldier," which was easily the best spy adventure in the MCU to date. But why is Fury going to London? What's waiting for him there? That may be the bigger question.

Hello, Olivia Colman!

And would you look at that! We get our first look at Oscar-winner Olivia Colman joining the MCU here as an ally of Fury's by the name of Sonya Falsworth. She's a special agent of sorts who, by the looks of it, has an important job, given her fancy office.

But she's also pretty skeptical right off the bat, telling Fury he's in no shape for the fight ahead. Admittedly, at this stage, he is looking a little worse for the wear.

A Whole Lot Of Graviks

Here, we see Talos getting very upset at Gravik, one of his fellow Skrulls. As soon as Talos grabs him though, we see everyone else in the room mirror Gravik. This is the first indication we get that there are a lot of the shapeshifters about, and learning who to trust is going to be difficult. The look on Talos' face says it all, really.

Nick Fury's Grave

In a rather intriguing moment, we see Fury and Falsworth visiting his grave ... which, of course, is not actually his grave. It's here where Fury explains that "this is personal," which is why he's doing his thing despite the shape he's in.

It's also worth looking at the wording on his tombstone. "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." That could be a bit of foreshadowing, but we'll get to that in a minute.

Fury Gets Down To Business

We have a couple of quick shots here that signal this is, indeed, personal for Fury, and he's getting down to business. He grabs himself a gun from a pretty cool stash he had set up, letting us know he's ready to rock and kick some alien ass.

We also see him once again partnering up with Talos who, admittedly, looks a little nervous here. He knows what his people are capable of though, and if anyone should be nervous, it's probably him.

Friends From The Shadows

Falsworth then delivers some pretty cool spy movie voiceover here with the line, "Very few of us know about the wars fought in the shadows that have raged on this planet." This is almost certainly my love for the movie talking, but I am getting some "Skyfall" vibes from that particular line. Aside from that, we then catch up with some old friends who do, indeed, deal in wars in the shadows.

We get some quick shots of Martin Freeman's Everett Ross and Cobie Smulders' Maria Hill. These are both hardened vets of the spy game who have been part of the MCU for a long time. It makes every bit of sense to have them along for this particular ride.

An Alien Discovery

This might be one of the most intriguing shots in the whole trailer, as we see a room filled with glowing bodies on tables. Are these Skrulls? Who is harboring all of these bizarre, seemingly incapacitated bodies in a clearly secretive location? More importantly, it is Emilia Clarke's G'iah who discovers them.

Indeed, the former "Game of Thrones" star is joining the MCU as well, and she's actually playing the daughter of Talos, who we see briefly in "Captain Marvel" as a child. But she's all grown up now, and she's made a pretty compelling discovery.

Nick Fury Therapy

Here, we get a bit more of Fury speaking with Falsworth in her office. This almost feels more like a therapy session, with Falsworth asking him, "Do you feel responsible?" Responsible for what, exactly?

That remains a bit unclear, as does almost everything else going on in this trailer, but it's clear that Fury may have had a hand in the mess that needs cleaning up based on his reaction to that question.

Where Are The Avengers?

Another really intriguing shot is a newspaper while some voiceover questions, "Where are The Avengers?" And it's a fair question, as this seems like precisely the kind of thing that they would be called in for.

It's also, again, getting at the idea that this is going to be a globetrotting affair, largely in Europe it seems, as this is a French newspaper -- one that is referencing the Battle of New York from 2012's "The Avengers." Are we going to be going back in time? And who was that stranger in the rain outside that window under the umbrella? So many questions, precious few answers.

A Mysterious Device

Adding in more mysterious elements to this alien plot, we got a shot of someone from behind (possibly Gravik?) approaching what appears to be some new, secretive tech -- a large device with a completely unexplained purpose. Is this Skrull tech? Or is this something that a shady government agency has put together?

Nick Fury Has To Fight

We get yet another example of Nick Fury explaining to someone off camera that this is a fight he must take on personally. Yet, this time, he makes it clear that this is something that he must do alone, which is an interesting wrinkle.

Is he not going to team up with Talos? Why does he feel he must do this alone? Is he worried about putting others at risk? Sorry to keep asking questions that currently don't have answers, but that's a lot of what this trailer seems to be doing. 

Convoy Goes Boom

Now we're getting to the action! Not to make light of people dying, but would a spy thriller be any good without big explosions? A helicopter swoops in, loaded down with artillery, launching a missile at a convoy. Who is this convoy protecting? We don't know! More questions. It looks expensive and cinematic, particularly by TV standards.

What's most important is that we see G'iah in the aftermath of the attack huddled over a body looking really, really upset. Who bites the dust? And how pissed off is that going to make her?

The Most Wanted Man

Perhaps Nick Fury needs to be doing this all by himself because he's on the wrong side of the law this time around. Case in point, we see a straight-up small army of agents holding him at gunpoint, while a familiar voice let's us know that he is the most wanted man on the planet.

And look at that! That voice is none other than Don Cheadle's Colonel Rhodes, aka Rhodey, aka War Machine. Again, it makes every bit of sense for him to be here, but he seems pretty nervous as well, and appears to be warning Fury of what he's getting himself into.

What's The Plan For Fury?

We once again catch up with G'iah, this time interacting directly with Fury. She comes with a warning, letting the former director of S.H.I.E.L.D. know that he doesn't know "what they have planned for you." Who is the "they" in this situation? Is she talking about the Skrulls? Someone else? That would appear to be a very big question.

Specimen Sample

Another very intriguing shot here as we see a foggy briefcase carrying a "specimen sample" that is not actually shown to us. Also of note, this is coming from Damage Control, an organization we've seen in the MCU before, like in "Spider-Man: Homecoming" and "Ms. Marvel." This is the same group tasked with handling the aftermath of superhero-centric disasters. So what specimen are they carrying?

It does seem like Falsworth might have something to do with it, as we quickly cut to a shot of her brandishing some sheers, getting ready to "talk" to someone who is tied to a chair. Clearly, she's not the type to f*** around.

The Great Nick Fury

Here, we get some voiceover from an unidentified individual referring to our main man as "The great Nick Fury." It is said with a healthy dose of sarcasm, so one can only assume this is someone he's crossed in the past.

Acion, Action, Action!

We've arried at the point in the trailer where it's a lot of quick cuts, and lots of action. This feels like a standard issue sequence for any blockbuster trailer, with lots of intense imagery coming at you lightning fast. We start with a chase sequence on some rooftops. Who is chasing who? They leave us pretty much no time to tell.

We then get some well-disguised henchmen breaking into an undisclosed building, and they don't appear to be doing by-the-numbers work here. Are these bad guys? Are good guys operating in the grey? We've also got a pretty cool shot of G'iah back-to-back with another unidentified person getting ready to rock, guns in hand. And oh yeah, a big helicopter crash. Is this connected to that convoy sequence from earlier, perhaps?

Talos Doesn't Look So Good

Towards the end of the action sequence, we see Talos lying on the ground with some wounds, mostly in human form. Though his green, Skrull skin is starting to show, and he doesn't look too good. Is he going to make it out of this alive?

Also of note, a few frames earlier, we get a shot of a Skrull in the flesh, which isn't too present here as they are mostly trying to stay hidden. It makes sense, given the premise. So what draws this one out?

The Final Showdown

Near the climax, we get a little glimpse at what might be the final showdown between Nicky Fury and Gravik. What's interesting is that they are duking it out in that mysterious device we saw much earlier in the trailer. So it's pretty clear that, whatever this device is and whatever it does, it's rather important.

Super Skrulls?

As we bring the trailer in for a landing, we get this wild shot of Gravik using a power we've yet to see a Skrull use before, with some Groot-like vines shooting from his arm. Also of note, there are some human soldiers behind him (or are they human?), signaling that some of the armed men we've seen in the trailer may be working for the Skrulls.

Another shot from a few seconds earlier in the trailer also shows this power at play. This could be our first look at a Super Skrull, which is a Skrull who has an advanced power within the species, granting them abilities beyond what might be typical for their species.

One Last Fight

Lastly, we conclude with a shot of Fury leaving the cemetery from earlier in the trailer. Most importantly though, he says the words "one last fight." That is a huge deal, as much of the imagery in the footage seems to be hinting at a conclusive arc for Samuel L. Jackson, who has been part of the MCU from the very beginning nearly 15 years ago. Is he going to go out in a blaze of glory? Are they setting up the death of Nick Fury? Maybe that would be a little too on-the-nose, but we have some reason to believe this could be Fury's big goodbye.

"Secret Invasion" premieres on Disney+ on June 21, 2023.

Read this next: The Most Powerful Aliens In The MCU Ranked

The post Secret Invasion Trailer Breakdown: Nick Fury Is Ready For A Skrull Showdown appeared first on /Film.

If you are looking for a way to share files between two Android devices, one of the best ways you can do this is by using Nearby Share. The feature also works on Chromebooks, making it an excellent offering for those who just want to have a seamless experience sending files from one device to another.

Well, Google has finally decided to release Nearby Share for Windows. The app is currently in the beta process, but I have downloaded it and used it, and yes, it works really well if you are looking to transfer files from your PC to your Android or the other way around. It is simple, and most importantly, it is super-fast.

Nearby Share on PC works like a charm and takes a few seconds to setup

Now, it is worth noting that Nearby Share is not available in all regions of the world. For those who are interested in trying it out, you can download it from here. Install it, and you are good to go. You do not really need to go ahead and make any settings adjustments to how the app works.

At the time of writing, this Nearby Share app's functionality is limited at best. You can adjust settings such as your device's visibility, renaming your PC, and changing the download location, but that is about it. Even the interface is pretty simple. You can have a look at it below:

Moving onto the process of sending and receiving files, this is perhaps one of the smoothest. I managed to send a few files in mere seconds. However, it is worth noting with apps such as this that this highly depends on factors such as device, connection speed, and even the file size you are sending, but if you have used Nearby Share in the past, you should know that it actually works really better.

Sadly, the Nearby Share is currently not available in a few regions, and if you are running an Arm device, you are out of luck because, in its current stage, the support simply is not there. However, we are sure that Google will be updating the app further as we move forward, and hopefully, we will have all the features necessary in this otherwise excellent app.

Written by Furqan Shahid

The first release this year for OpenRCT2, the open source re-implementation of RollerCoaster Tycoon 2 has landed with version 0.4.4.

Ah yes, launchers and external online services, what a nuisance they can be for Steam Deck and Linux desktop players. Thankfully, Valve keep working away on Proton to fix up issues.

The first trailer for "Blue Beetle" is here, and while the latest superhero movie from DC and Warner Bros. is set to serve as an origin story for a young hero -- Jaime Reyes / Blue Beetle -- whose name isn't exactly as well-known as Batman or Superman, the movie already looks like it's got some fighting words for DC's big guys. Or at least, Jaime's uncle Rudy -- played by George Lopez -- does.

/Film's Jenna Busch attended a trailer launch event for "Blue Beetle," with director Angel Manuel Soto and star Xolo Maridueña in attendance. There, "Cobra Kai" star Maridueña spoke about the ways in which "Blue Beetle" may or may not intersect with the larger DC universe, particularly when it comes to Rudy's declaration that "Batman is a fascist."

"I can't reveal if more superheroes are mentioned, but the Batman one is obviously in the trailer," Maridueña shared, "and I think we will experience certain superheroes and opinions through the eyes of the family." The actor clarified that just because a hero is name-dropped in the movie, it "doesn't necessarily mean that someone's going to show up." Rather, it sounds like the Reyes family will have some honest takes on the heroes that, at least in the case of Rudy's Batman comment, may not be particularly flattering.

"Funny as it is," Maridueña said, "the Rudy character, the uncle character, George Lopez's character, has, I think, a really interesting arc" that relates to his hot take on Batman. "You're getting to witness what someone like Rudy thinks about Batman, and you're getting to see what someone like Jaime thinks about these characters," Maridueña continued, referencing the teen hero he plays in the film. "I think it contextualizes it in a way that feels honest to these characters."

'That Hero's Journey Is One That's Different Than Batman And Superman'

The first-ever DC film to star a Latino actor, "Blue Beetle" will feature a family that co-star Harvey Guillén previously said feels authentic and welcoming. "If you're a part of the Latino community ... you're going to feel like, 'Oh my gosh, my culture is on screen. That is how we talk at home,'" Guillén told /Film last December. In Uncle Rudy's case (played by George Lopez, seen above), that means calling out the Caped Crusader, who, to be fair, does hoard wealth, enforce a hyper-violent criminal justice system, and sometimes dabbles in NSA-like surveillance. Actually, I might be Team Rudy on this one.

Xolo Maridueña put it a little more kindly at the trailer premiere, and also related the Batman critique back to the point of "Blue Beetle." As he explained, "Jaime might think Batman is super cool, but at the heart of it, maybe what Batman stands for is a bit flawed." The actor said that "Blue Beetle" gets to "create our version of what we feel a superhero is — albeit different from Superman, who has no fears and who is the guy, in the face of no matter what, will get the job done." Instead, he points out, "we're meeting a person who, almost at the beginning, doesn't want this destiny" and is "resistant to his calling."

"That hero's journey is one that's different than Batman and Superman, but is unique and special in its own regard," Maridueña says of Jaime Reyes's path to becoming Blue Beetle. Audiences will meet him when "Blue Beetle" hits theaters on August 18, 2023.

Read this next: Every Batman Movie And The Real-World Fears They Highlight

The post Blue Beetle's 'Batman Is A Fascist' Line Isn't Just A Throwaway Joke appeared first on /Film.

Twitter's handling of verified users continues to shift after a number of developments over the weekend. Last week, Twitter said it would start winding down the legacy verified program on April 1st, but that was limited to specific cases including one called out by CEO Elon Musk. Meanwhile, a new report indicated that around 10,000 of the top-followed sites would retain their legacy checkmarks, even if they didn't subscribe to Twitter Blue. And now, Twitter is displaying the same status for both legacy verified and Twitter Blue subscribers, making it difficult to tell them apart. 

Verified legacy Twitter users were expecting to lose their white-on-blue checkmarks over the weekend, after the Twitter Verified account tweeted it would start stripping them on April 1st. For the most part, however, that didn't happen, reportedly because un-verifying users is a painstaking manual process (Musk tweeted in a now-deleted message that legacy users would be given "a few weeks grace"). However, Twitter did strip a verified badge from The New York Times after the site said it wouldn't pay for Twitter Blue, in an apparent fit of pique by CEO Elon Musk. He later labeled the site as "propaganda."

Speaking of the NYT, it reported that 10,000 of the top-followed sites and 500 leading advertisers would retain their verified badges without the need to subscribe to Twitter Blue. That follows tweets from a number of top users like LeBron James and The White House that they would never pay for a subscription. 

"It is our understanding that Twitter Blue does not provide person-level verification as a service. Thus, a blue check mark will now simply serve as a verification that the account is a paid user," White House digital strategy director Rob Flaherty told staffers in a memo. Numerous other accounts tweeted a similar sentiment, with some noting that celebrities, journalists and other influential users are the primary drivers of Twitter traffic.

Topping off the drama, Twitter just changed the tags that appears when you click on a verified badge. Before, it gave separate messages for Twitter Blue subscribers ("This account is verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter Blue") and legacy verified users ("This is a legacy verified account. It may or may not be notable."). Now, it displays the same message for both: "This account is verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter Blue or is a legacy verified account."

Engadget

Some users applauded the revised tags as more egalitarian, but others said the message would make it harder to tell if users were genuine accounts or impersonators. That was the exact problem that delayed the rollout of Twitter Blue back in November, if you'll recall. For those on desktop who still want to know, a Chrome extension released last year can still tell you who paid for Twitter Blue, as shown by the different symbols above. 

Twitter recently said that Twitter Blue would cost $1,000 per month for organizations, plus an additional $50 per month for individual affiliates in the US. The program has reportedly met with limited success to date, and Elon Musk recently told employees that Twitter was worth less than half what he paid for it, according to several reports. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/twitter-stokes-confusion-as-verified-drama-continues-104321432.html?src=rss

The Italian data protection watchdog, Garante per la Protezione dei Dati Personali (aka Garante), has imposed a temporary ban of OpenAI's ChatGPT service in the country, citing data protection concerns. To that end, it has ordered the company to stop processing users' data with immediate effect, stating it intends to investigate the company over whether it's unlawfully processing such data in

Consumer loan provider TMX Finance is informing over 4.8 million individuals that their personal information was stolen in a data breach.

The post 4.8 Million Impacted by Data Breach at TMX Finance appeared first on SecurityWeek.

There's no doubt of NVIDIA's popularity among gamers and that can be seen on Steam's Hardware Survey where GeForce GPUs continue to secure the top spot as the most popular options with the latest statistics showing the RTX 3060 as the top choice.

NVIDIA GeForce GPU Market Share Continues To Rise Against AMD Radeon In Steam As RTX 3060 Becomes The Most Popular Graphics Card

As per the latest Steam Hardware Survey figures of March 2023, NVIDIA commands 82.63% of the share while AMD commands just 10.82% share amongst almost 135 Million users of which around 26-27 Million users were actively concurrently (at its peak). If you look at the more detailed figures, the vast majority of these GPUs are now DX12 compliant (94.47%), and full DX12 systems running a modern-day GPU now amount to 76.15% share.

This aligns with the operating systems used by the gamers as 73.95% of Steam's userbase is now running a Windows 10 64-bit while 22.41% are running Windows 11 64-bit. Considering that Steam has officially announced the end of support for Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1 systems, they're now meant to go on a decline as users upgrade to the latest OS.

So coming back to GPUs, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 has now replaced the GTX 1650 as the most popular graphics card on the platform. This means that a vast majority of gamers are running this graphics card on their PC. A 10.67% share is also much higher than that of 1650 which had a 6.12% share by the end of February 2023.

The most important thing to note here is the pricing of the card which is also much higher than 1650. This shows that gamers are willing to pay for a higher-end and costly graphics card if it provides value and given just how many RTX 3060s were dumped into the used market and discounted after the crypto crash, this was to be expected. Over the years, we have seen the NVIDIA 70, 60, and 50-tier cards be the most popular solutions on the market. The GeForce GTX 970 was the last 70-series card to take the top spot and that was all the way back in 2016. Since then, cards such as the GTX 1060, RTX 2060, GTX 1650/1660, and now the RTX 3060 have been the most popular options.

Even higher-end cards such as the GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 show up in the top-10 list. None of AMD's modern-day GPUs show up in the Steam Hardware Survey but NVIDIA's RTX 4090 do show up though they are definitely not going to show up at the top any time soon as they are more recent releases and will take years (like the RTX 30 series) to make their way to the top spot.

Other interesting statistics show that Intel leads in terms of CPU usage compared to AMD. The blue team has a 74.46% share compared to AMD's 25.54%. If you look at the core-count distribution, the 6-core, 10-core, and 12-core CPUs are on the rise but 8-core CPUs have remained flat this month.

It is likely that 8-core chips don't offer as much value as they once used to but at the same time, chips such as the 5800X3D have been selling like hotcakes though that is but just one processor.

Written by Hassan Mujtaba

Two highly-anticipated comedy series are hitting streaming platforms this week, the excruciatingly relatable "Beef" on Netflix and the musical prequel series, "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies" on Paramount+. Meanwhile, there are films like "The Drop" and "Mayhem" available to stream that might help viewers get ready for a series like "Beef." Both flicks are exclusive to their prospective streaming platforms, so hopefully you've got Hulu and Shudder in addition to Netflix. There's also the Netflix series "Julie and the Phantoms" and the oft-forgotten "Grease 2" on Paramount+ to serve as the perfect companion pieces to "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies." Last-up, there's also the Prime Video series "Paper Girls" which manages to capture the girl-power energy of the new prequel series while boasting a stand-out performance by one of the stars of "Beef."

Beef Is About To Become Your Latest TV Obsession

Where to Watch "Beef": NetflixWhen "Beef" Releases: April 6, 2023

It might sound like a huge claim, but if our review of the new Netflix series is to be believed, "Beef" is the funniest and boldest dark comedy since "Atlanta." Created by Lee Sung Jin who was recently tapped to rewrite the upcoming Marvel movie "Thunderbolts," the Steven Yeun and Ali Wong-starring series is a collaboration between the streaming giant and A24, and it shows. The story follows the duo, who play an unlikely pair whose conflicting lives cross during the type of road rage incident in a parking lot you'd normally see passed around on social media.

The magic of the series lies with Yeun and Wong, who effortlessly capture the type of self-destructive, chaotically messy characters you can't help but love, warts and all. It captures the same fractured, heartfelt, and unhinged comedy most A24 vehicles are known for. At its heart, "Beef" is about exploring the themes of rage, grief, betrayal, and undirected sorrow, while also examining how all of our own personal hangups directly impact how we relate to one another. It's certainly not a "feel good" comedy like "Ted Lasso," but for people who benefit from tough love or are the type of folks who use humor to get through terrible moments, "Beef" is a show that will speak directly to your twisted soul.

Grease: Rise Of The Pink Ladies Has Too Much Heart To Hate

Where to Watch "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies": Paramount+When "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies" Releases: April 6, 2023

I'll be the first to admit I was really apprehensive when "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies" was first announced. As one of the foremost advocates for the cult cinema treasure known as "Grease 2," I've lost count of how many "Grease" or "Grease 2" articles/podcasts/think pieces I've put out over the years. When the trailers first arrived, boasting a beautifully diverse cast that was definitely not a part of the first two films, I was still worried. If this is a prequel series about the formation of the Pink Ladies, whose canonical origins would now mark that the social club was founded on intersectionality ... it implies something seriously sinister happened if the Pink Ladies of Rydell High seen in the feature films wound up exclusively white.

Fortunately, "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies" is not a bit of revisionist history, and manages to tackle the uncomfortable realities of the 1950s while boasting some seriously killer musical numbers that are sure to delight anyone still recovering from years of watching "Glee." The series refreshingly pulls a lot of the feminist subtext of the films to the forefront, but has a lot on its plate trying to juggle themes of racism, sexism, xenophobia, gender nonconformity, and the cruel politics of high school, often to uneven results. But despite the obvious missteps, "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies" has so much heart, you can't help but root for its success. Did anyone ask for this? No, not really, but I'm certainly not upset by its existence.

The Drop Is A Masterclass In Cringe Comedy

The Movie: "The Drop"Where You Can Stream It: Hulu

Sarah Adina Smith is known for her surreal films like "The Midnight Swim," "Buster's Mal Heart," and "Birds of Paradise," but her sensibilities are well suited in the darkly comedic Hulu feature, "The Drop." Starring Anna Konkle ("Pen15"), Jermaine Fowler ("Superior Donuts"), and Jillian Bell ("Brittany Runs a Marathon"), the film takes a downright horrific premise and finds a way to make it skin-crawling and hilarious. Konkle and Fowler play a young couple named Lex and Mani who are attending a destination wedding at a tropical resort when the unthinkable happens — Lex drops their friend's baby. Don't worry, the kid is fine, but the adults from this moment forward are very much not fine.

The film was produced by Mark and Jay Duplass, so you expect the same kind of indie weirdo vibes found in films like "Creep," "Jeff, Who Lives at Home," or "Baghead." While the film was written by Smith and co-writer Joshua Leonard, "The Drop" takes a mumblecore approach by having the actors largely improv their own dialogue. The result is an uncomfortably natural comedy that feels less like watching "a comedy movie" and instead captures the sensation of being in a public place and witnessing strangers have total meltdowns. If a show like "Beef" works for you, "The Drop" will feel right at home.

Julie And The Phantoms Sing A Sweet, Spooky Song

The Series: "Julie and the Phantoms"Where You Can Stream It: Netflix

Tragically canceled after only one season, the teen musical dramedy series "Julie and the Phantoms" is the perfect appetizer for a show like "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies." The series follows a musician named Julie Molina (Madison Reyes) who is having a hard time creating new music after her mother passes away. One day, Julie listens to an old CD and summons the ghosts of a band from 1995. Naturally, Julie becomes the band's lead singer, and if you guessed that she'd develop feelings for one of her new ghostly bandmates, you're absolutely right. "Julie and the Phantoms" is somewhat of a paint-by-numbers teen musical series, but the music is legitimately fantastic (they won an Emmy!) and all of the characters are so charming, it's hard not to immediately get on board with the ridiculous premise.

The series was executive produced by musical mogul Kenny Ortega, the choreographer turned director behind beloved projects like "Newsies," "Hocus Pocus," "Descendants," and the "High School Musical" trilogy. The series has a very vocal and dedicated fanbase, so if you watch the show and fall in love with it like so many others and need a place to vent about its untimely cancellation, don't worry. You're in good company. Here's hoping "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies" doesn't suffer a similar fate.

Steven Yeun And Samara Weaving Tear It Up In Mayhem

The Movie: "Mayhem"Where You Can Stream It: Shudder

Steven Yeun's breakthrough role came when he was cast as Glenn Rhee on "The Walking Dead," but if you ask me, it was in 2017 when he appeared in both Bong Joon-ho's "Okja" and Joe Lynch's "Mayhem" that he truly came into his own. The latter, especially, was a fantastic showcase of the balls-to-the-wall commitment Yeun has when entering the genre sphere, and his chemistry with co-star Samara Weaving is off-the-charts fantastic. "Mayhem" is about a fictional pandemic known as ID-7 aka "Red Eye," that turns people into impulse monsters.

While the infected aren't zombies by any means, the disease attacks the neural pathways and absolutely obliterates any sense of inhibition or a moral compass. People are operating on their most intrusive thoughts, throwing the world into, well, mayhem. While "Beef" is certainly nowhere near the high-octane thrill ride as "Mayhem," there's a level of commitment in Yeun's performance that has evolved from his role in this flick. The film is a twisted, social satire set in a cutthroat law office, but with plenty of dark humor to keep things from ever feeling too heavy. If you ask me, "Mayhem" is the perfect appetizer for "Beef."

Grease 2 Is The Word

The Movie: "Grease 2"Where You Can Stream It: Paramount+

Look, no one needs me to tell them to watch "Grease" because it's one of the most recognizable IPs in history, but "Grease 2" has been treated like the Cousin Oliver of the franchise for far too long when in reality, the controversial sequel has always been the Marcia Brady. The film is most well-known for giving Michelle Pfeiffer her first leading role, but the raunchy, feminist, dance-forward musical sequel has only gotten better with time. Is a song like "Reproduction" or "Do It For Our Country" as accessible as "Summer Nights" or "We Go Together"? Absolutely not, but "Grease 2" has better choreography, snappier humor, and might be too weird for your grandma to want to watch with you.

"Grease 2" focuses so much more on the Pink Ladies and their leader, Stephanie Zinoni (Pfeiffer), and rightfully portrays the T-Birds as a bunch of corny try-hards in leather jackets. This is a film about a woman taking control of her own place in the high school hierarchy, and bucking the so-called "rules" of young women's required allegiance to their boyfriends. In fact, I'd argue that without "Grease 2," a show like "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies" wouldn't have been possible, because the film serves as a bridge between the squeaky clean original and much more progressive prequel series.

It also has Lorna Luft in the world's greatest pair of gold lamé pants and a song about paying sex workers. You love to see it.

Paper Girls Deserved Better

The Series: "Paper Girls"Where You Can Stream It: Prime Video

Another show canceled way too soon is "Paper Girls," based on the comic book series of the same name. The show was billed as "Stranger Things" for girls, which did a disservice to the genuinely phenomenal series. /Film's own Valerie Ettenhofer called the series "a singular, satisfying take on girlhood and time travel" in her review, and pointed out how it is a "rare comic book adaptation that both honors and improves upon the source material." The show follows four paper delivery girls on their post-Halloween routes, who get caught in the middle of two warring factions of time travelers. They end up thrown into the future, coming face-to-face with their older selves, which is a severe mind melt for a group of girls who haven't even really hit puberty.

"Paper Girls" fits a bit more in line as a recommendation with "Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies," but features a fantastic supporting performance by "Beef" star Ali Wong as the adult version of one of the time-traveling tweens. Wong is an incredibly gifted stand-up comedian, as shown in her Netflix specials "Baby Cobra," "Hard Knock Wife," and "Don Wong," which made her a shoo-in for comedic projects like "Tuca & Bertie" and "Always Be My Maybe," but "Paper Girls" really lets Wong shine as a complex, emotional character, something well on display in "Beef."

Read this next: The Best TV Shows Of 2022, Ranked

The post The Weekly Watchlist: Netflix's Beef and Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies Bring Humor and Heart in Wildly Different Ways (April 3, 2023) appeared first on /Film.

ASRock seems to have integrated full support for PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSDs on its newly released AMD A620 motherboard lineup.

Budget-Friendly AMD A620 Motherboards From ASRock Fully Support PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSDs

AMD and its partners recently introduced the A620 chipset and the respective motherboards that are aimed at the entry-tier segment. These motherboards start at $85 US which is 32% lower than the starting price of B650 motherboards, allowing budget gamers and PC builders to make some really cost-effective PC builds using loads of CPU options available within the Ryzen 7000 family.

In our AMD A620 motherboard roundup, we disclosed how the chipset featured support for an all-Gen 4.0 hardware design with the base specs including a single PCIe Gen 4 x16 and PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot.

However, as it turns out, that isn't entirely the case based on what we have been able to find within testing done by our sources who managed to secure one of the latest ASRock A620M Pro RS WIFI motherboards which should cost around $100 US and comes with a very decent design that houses two M.2 slots (1 with heatsink). The motherboard was paired with an AMD Ryzen 5 7600 & CFD's Gaming latest Gen 5 NVMe SSD which is rated at up to 10 GB/s speeds.

In CrystalDisk and ATTO tests, the CFD Gaming Gen 5 NVMe SSD can be seen fully supporting the PCIe Gen 5.0 x4 interface and ATTO even shows the drive putting out its rated performance figures of 10 GB/s without an issue. As we know, the PCIe Gen 4.0 x4 interface allows a maximum of 8 GB/s transfer rates through the protocol while Gen 5.0 x4 supports up to 16 GB/s. This is definitely super interesting and we have been told is even more interesting.

Talking to motherboard vendors, it is revealed that A620 motherboards can support Gen 5 NVMe SSDs. ASRock's Pro offerings come with the necessary hardware to support that so you can simply slot in a Gen 5 SSD and use the advantages associated with it.

However, the restriction comes from AMD itself and while Gen 5 SSD support might be enabled on A620 motherboards for now, future AGESA updates may limit that once again. And while having this support is definitely great, it does not make sense to have a Gen 5 SSD running on an entry-level platform like this since the SSDs are priced around $300-$400 US, more than what you'll be paying for an entry-level Ryzen 7000 CPU.

You can see from the listed builds above that AMD is specifically targeting A620 as a PCIe Gen 4.0 platform and you can also note that from the configurations mentioned above. As expected, AMD suggests a Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU be paired nicely with the A620 platform, and for good reason too. The CPU has a lower TDP, aims solely at gamers, & doesn't benefit a lot from overclocking though you still get PBO and Curve Optimizer tuning options. For users who want higher multi-threaded performance, they can go with one of the 65W Ryzen 9 7900 CPU options.

Written by Hassan Mujtaba

The Tor Project, the organization behind the anonymous network and browser, is helping launch a privacy-focused browser that's made to connect to a VPN instead of a decentralized onion network. From a report: It's called the Mullvad browser, named after the Mullvad VPN company it's partnered with on the project, and it's available for Windows, Mac, or Linux. The Mullvad browser's main goal is to make it harder for advertisers and other companies to track you across the internet. It does this by working to reduce your browser's "fingerprint," a term that describes all the metadata that sites can collect to uniquely identify your device.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

It’s normal to feel overtaxed by your job once in a while, but when that feeling becomes persistent no matter what you do to pull back or redirect your efforts, you may be experiencing burnout—and the problem probably lies with your employer.

According to a study by the University of California, Berkeley, Rutgers, and …

Read more...

Despite only being out for a year, there are already some great Elden Ring mods out there. Talented modders are making FromSoftware's biggest game even bigger, and now you can even take a trip back in time to one of the developer's proto-Souls games, King's Field, by turning Elden Ring into an FPS game - no, I'm not joking.

MORE FROM PCGAMESN: The best Elden Ring builds, Elden Ring bosses, The best Elden Ring classes

Graham (RPS in peace) text me yesterday and, with little warning, launched into what were clearly pre-prepared paragraphs of complaints about games he'd tried playing in his free time at the weekend and not enjoyed. I shall draw a veil of discretion over the names of the actual games, but his chief complaint was that none of them had, actually, very robust design or tutorialising fit for purpose (i.e. teaching you how to play the game), especially for people who aren't able to give games their singular attention for hours at at time. I agree with him, although his attention is divided by, e.g., having a child in need of stimulation, and mine is divided by, e.g., being a child in need of stimulation.

It's probably turning my brain into cottage cheese, but I often do things at the same time as playing a game, like listening to music or a podcast. I understand that podcast games are sort of a genre now, but I've started doing it with regular games. Is this a me problem? Sure. Does it mean I want games to bring back that thing where NPC quest givers will just explain the quest again to you if you ask? 100% also yes.

Read more

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announced the first batch of astronauts that will fly around the Moon as part of the agency's Artemis 2 mission. NASA's Artemis 2 is expected to take to the skies next year, and it will see the crew fly inside the Orion spacecraft in a lunar orbit before returning to Earth. The crew unveiled today includes astronauts who have flown to space before, and the space agency was joined by officials of the Canadian Space Agency as part of today's announcement. NASA Administrator Bil Nelson announced the crew to members of the press and other guests at the agency's Johnson Space Center in Houston.

NASA Selects Fresh Crew of Astronauts For Maiden Spaceflight

As it announced the crew for the Artemis 2 mission, the space agency is already making progress with the rocket that will fly them to the Moon. After launching the SLS last year as part of a highly anticipated test flight, NASA has already assembled the rocket's core stage that will power the Artemis 2 mission. NASA teams joined the rocket's engine section to the four other sections of the center core in mid-March. Following this, teams will mate the rocket's massive RS-25 engines to the engine stage and then prepare to complete the vehicle by adding the two solid rocket boosters.

The four astronauts selected for flying the Artemis 2 mission are Christina Koch, Jeremy Hansen, Victor Glover, and Gregory Wiseman. Koch will be a mission specialist, Glovter will be its pilot, Hansen, another specialist and Wiseman will command the crew for their maiden voyage around the Moon. Not all of the crew selected have spaceflight experience.

Koch has spent more than 328 days outside the Earth, Glover spent more than five months on the International Space Station (ISS) as part of SpaceX's Crew-1 mission and NASA's Expedition 64/65 and Weisman took the skies on Russia's Soyuz spacecraft in 2014. On the other hand, the Artemis 2 mission will mark Hansen - an astronaut of the Canadian Space Agency - fly outside Earth for the first time. Koch is the most experienced astronaut on the crew, with the Artemis 2 mission being her third spaceflight.

Addressing the crow as part of his selection speech, Glover stated:

Wow, what a day. And look at all of this. This is amazing, isn't it? I mean after all of that, I feel like Denzel Washington should be up here talking to you. But you just got us. I want to thank God this amazing opportunity. And I think I speak for all of us, I want to thank our families for the amazing support. It is your love and support that has made this journey possible. Please give them a round of applause. And to all of the folks who made this celebration possible, thank you for your hard work. They are the real ones in here sweating with all of us. But this is a big day, we have a lot to celebrate, and it's so much more than the four names that have been announced. We need to celebrate this moment in human history. Because Artemis 2 is more than a mission to the Moon and back. It's more than a mission that has to happen before we send people to the surface of the Moon.

It is the next step on the journey that gets humanity to Mars. Yeah you can clap for that. That's real. And this crew will never forget that. Now we have a lot of work to do before we get there. And we understand that. And when talking about that work you may often hear people say, human spaceflight is a marathon, not a sprint. But we have watched the people that worked so hard to make our mission possible, and I can tell you it is a series of sprints that's called a relay race. Human spaceflight is like a relay race, and that baton has been passed generation to generation and from crewmember to crewmember. From the Gemini, Mercury-Gemini, Apollo, Apollo-Soyuz, Skylab, Mir, the Shuttle, International Space Station, Commercial Crew, and now the Artemis missions. And we understand our role in that. And when we have the privilege of having that baton, we're gonna do our best to run a good race, to make you proud.

After Glover returned from the space station in 2021, he shared more details about the importance of the mission to Mars exploration with actor Tom Cruise, leaving him stunned by the experience of flying SpaceX's Crew Dragon to and from the space station and performing spacewalks.

Astronaut Hansen appreciated America's "deliberate choice" to form a global team for lunar exploration, expressing his and Canada's gratitude for the decision. He added that Canada is a crucial part of the international partnership to make space exploration possible, and this has led to his journey to the Moon.

Astronaut Koch stressed that her mission is an important part of the Artemis mission since the crew will be the first to test the spacecraft around the Moon before future missions attempt a landing. Astronauts will land on the Moon with SpaceX's Starship lunar lander. Commander Wiseman thanked all the participants, the politicians, NASA teams and others. He also made a special shoutout to astronaut Frank Rubio who is currently on the space station as part of a record-setting stay.

Written by Ramish Zafar

America's Department of Defense "is gearing up for a future conflict in space," reports the Wall Street Journal, "as China and Russia deploy missiles and lasers that can take out satellites and disrupt military and civilian communications." The White House this month proposed a $30 billion annual budget for the U.S. Space Force, almost $4 billion more than last year and a bigger jump than for other services including the Air Force and the Navy.... A key aim of a stand-alone force was to plan, equip and defend U.S. interests in space for all of the services and focus attention on the emerging threats. For the first time, the spending request also includes plans for simulators and other equipment to train Guardians, as Space Force members are known, for potential battle.... Just as it is on Earth, China is the Pentagon's big worry in space. In unveiling a defense strategy late last year, the Biden administration cast China as the greatest danger to U.S. security. In space, the threats from China range from ground-launched missiles or lasers that could destroy or disable U.S. satellites, to jamming and other cyber interference and attacks in space, said Pentagon officials. China has invested heavily in its space program, with a crewed orbiting station, developing ground-based missiles and lasers as well as more surveillance capabilities. This is part of its broader military aims of denying adversaries access to space-based assets. China is "testing on-orbit satellite systems which could be weaponized as they have already shown the capability to physically control and move other satellites," Gen. Chance Saltzman, chief of space operations for the U.S. Space Force, told a congressional hearing this month. "There's nothing we can do in space that's of any value if the networks that process the information and data are vulnerable to attack," Gen. Saltzman said. A central part of the Space Force's next tranche of military contracts for rocket launches is protecting them from attacks by China and other adversaries. The hope is to make satellites tougher to approach by adversaries' equipment as well as less susceptible to lasers and jamming from space or the ground, said Space Force leaders. The article also notes the US Defense Department "is moving away from a small number of school bus-size satellites to a planned constellation of hundreds of smaller ones. "The larger number of targets makes any one satellite less crucial to the network but also requires changes in the capabilities of the satellites themselves, the rockets that put them into orbit and the communications systems they host."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The sexless, violence-free world of the 1993 Sylvester Stallone-starring science fiction movie "Demolition Man" is a pretty fascinating satire of our own corporate dystopia. Cities have become mega-cities (much like 1995's "Judge Dredd," also starring Stallone) and the corporations that survived the Franchise Wars rule all, which means that all restaurants are now owned by one franchise: Taco Bell. Some people might be thrilled to discover that all dining establishments are now Taco Bells, while others get heartburn just thinking about it -- but what about the film's writer, Daniel Waters? Waters had the not-enviable task of picking up a script penned by Robert Reneau and Peter M. Lenkov and turning it into something palatable for 1990s audiences. And while it turns out the whole Taco Bell thing wasn't his idea, he absolutely loved it.

In a 2020 interview with Vulture, Waters was asked about his feelings regarding Taco Bell being the only restaurant left in the world, and he revealed that there were originally other restaurants written into the script, but the film's public relations folks refused to sign off. Just imagine: In another timeline, we might have seen a "Demolition Man" where Stallone and Sandra Bullock dine out at a Jack in the Box or Waffle House! That last one doesn't really sound so bad. I'll have mine scattered, smothered, and covered, please!

All Taco Bell, All The Time

Vulture asked Daniel Waters if he was a "Taco Bell person," which I assume means a fan of the Mexican cuisine inspired fast food chain and not an actual human made of Chalupas. The writer affirmed that he does like to "Live Más":

"I am a Taco Bell person. We have great Mexican food out here in L.A. People are like, 'Oh, Taco Bell is not real Mexican food.' I'm going, 'Yes, we know. Much like 'Demolition Man,' it's its own genre.' To be quite honest, my original draft was Burger King, and then Burger King scoffed and McDonald's scoffed. When Taco Bell came around, it was like, 'Of course! Taco Bell! The greatest thing that's ever happened to this movie.'"

In the film, Sylvester Stallone's character is cryogenically frozen in the '90s and then thawed decades later in order to hunt down a vicious killer (played by Wesley Snipes). When Stallone's character goes out for dinner with his handler (played by Sandra Bullock), he discovers that all restaurants are now Taco Bell. Fast food? Taco Bell. Fine dining? Taco Bell. Brunch? Taco Bell. The Taco Bell thing works because of the franchise's place in pop culture. Taco Bell is typically the food of late-night excursions or college students trying to cure their hangovers, whereas McDonald's and Burger King are more family-focused. Every restaurant being Taco Bell is funny, but every restaurant being McDonald's would be downright depressing.

But Wait... What About Pizza Hut?

Readers outside of the United States might be wondering what the heck I'm talking about, and that's fair. You see, in the European version of the movie, Taco Bell was replaced with Pizza Hut. The international version of "Demolition Man" doesn't feature anything new in terms of footage, mind you. It simply dubs over the dialogue mentioning Taco Bell and digitally replaces the Taco Bell logo with the one for Pizza Hut. Apparently, the film's executives were concerned that international audiences wouldn't recognize Taco Bell. U.S. audiences ate it up, of course, and "Demolition Man" even had a Taco Bell pop-up fine dining experience at San Diego Comic Con in 2018. 

There is one lingering problem, however. We all know what eating lots of Taco Bell does to one's south of the border, and that involves some time in the restroom. With only the three seashells to take care of business and no toilet paper or bidets in the "Demolition Man" universe, things would inevitably have to get weird. Oh well, at least there's no war!

Read this next: Sci-Fi Movies That Accurately Predicted The Future

The post Demolition Man Writer Daniel Waters Thinks Taco Bell Was A Perfect Match appeared first on /Film.

Today a warning was published from the editorial board of the San Francisco Chronicle. "Experts say post-pandemic woes stemming from office workers staying home instead of commuting into the city could send San Francisco into a 'doom loop' that would gut its tax base, decimate fare-reliant regional transit systems like BART and trap it in an economic death spiral...." Despite our housing crisis, it was years into the COVID pandemic before our leaders meaningfully questioned the logic of reserving some of the most prized real estate on Earth for fickle suburbanites and their cars. Downtown, after all, was San Francisco's golden goose. Companies in downtown offices accounted for 70% of San Francisco's pre-pandemic jobs and generated nearly 80% of its economic output, according to city economist Ted Egan. And so we wasted generous federal COVID emergency funds trying to bludgeon, cajole and pray for office workers to return downtown instead of planning for change. We're now staring down the consequences for that lack of vision. The San Francisco metropolitan area's economic recovery from the pandemic ranked 24th out of the 25 largest regions in the U.S., besting only Baltimore, according to a report from the Bay Area Council Economic Institute. In the first quarter of 2023, San Francisco's office vacancy rate shot up to a record-high 29.4% — the biggest three-year increase of any U.S. city. The trend isn't likely to end anytime soon: In January, nearly 30% of San Francisco job openings were for hybrid or fully remote work, the highest share of the nation's 50 largest cities. Amid lower property, business and real estate transfer taxes, the city is projecting a $728 million deficit over the next two fiscal years. Transit ridership remains far below pre-pandemic levels. In January, downtown San Francisco BART stations had just 30% of the rider exits they did in 2019, according to a report from Egan's office. Many Bay Area transit agencies, including Muni, are rapidly approaching a fiscal cliff. San Francisco isn't dead; as of March, it was home to an estimated 173 of the country's 655 companies valued at more than $1 billion. Tourism is beginning to rebound. And new census data shows that San Francisco's population loss is slowing, a sign its pandemic exodus may be coming to an end. But the city can't afford to wait idly for things to reach equilibrium again. It needs to evolve — quickly. Especially downtown. That means rebuilding the neighborhood's fabric, which won't be cheap or easy. Office-to-housing conversions are notoriously tricky and expensive. Demolishing non-historic commercial buildings that no longer serve a purpose in the post-pandemic world is all but banned. And, unlike New York after 9/11, San Francisco is a city that can't seem to stop getting in its own way. So what's the solution? The CEO of the Bay Area Council suggests public-private partnerships that "could help shift downtown San Francisco's focus from tech — with employees now accustomed to working from home — to research and development, biotech, medical research and manufacturing, which all require in-person workers." And last week San Francisco's mayor proposed more than 100 changes to streamline the permitting process for small businesses, and on Monday helped introduce legislation making it easier to convert office buildings to housing, expand pop-up business opportunities, and fill some empty storefronts. This follows a February executive order to speed housing construction. The editorial points out that "About 40% of office buildings in downtown San Francisco evaluated in a study would be good candidates for housing due to their physical characteristics and location and could be converted into approximately 11,200 units, according to research from SPUR and the Urban Land Institute San Francisco." But without some action, the editorial's headline argues that "Downtown San Francisco is at risk of collapsing — and taking much of the Bay Area with it."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

This week we start out digging all the way in to the probable death of E3 and the repercussions likely to make their way through the games industry, and then we talk about a lot of games, including Terra Nil, Dredge, Storyteller, Midnight Ghost Hunt, Remnant 2, and a lot more.  This week's music:  Transviolet - Run Towards the Monster

Around 4 in the morning one Tuesday night in San Francisco, an autonomously-driven Cruise vehicle stopped at a red light — and was rear-ended by a Honda. But then "the Honda driver reversed backward several feet, stopped and drove forward again, making contact with the Cruise vehicle a second time," reports NBC News. After damaging the car and injuring its two test drivers, according to a collision report the Honda then "left the scene without exchanging information." It's just part of "a pattern bedeviling tech companies that are trying to make driverless cars a reality," reports NBC News, after reviewing collision reports from the California Department of Motor Vehicles: The reports, which were written by employees of the tech companies, describe 36 instances in 2022 in which a person driving a car or truck left the scene of a crash involving their vehicle and an autonomous vehicle. The problem has continued at a similar pace this year, with seven examples as of early March.... "My best guess is that the drivers think they can't be held liable," said Anderson Franco, a personal injury attorney in the city. "If you are operating your own vehicle and you crash into an autonomous vehicle, the correct thing to do is take photographs, call the police and have it documented," he said. But it's not always clear from the outside of a Cruise or other autonomous vehicle what to do if there's a problem. Cruise said in a statement to NBC News that it was in the process of making its phone number more prominently displayed on the outside of vehicles, so drivers in a crash know who to call.... The human drivers who have hit autonomous vehicles appear to be getting away with little accountability. Autonomous vehicles are usually equipped with a variety of external cameras that could record the license plate numbers of hit-and-run drivers but it's not clear how often the companies have gone down that road.... Cruise said in a statement that the hit-and-runs are usually minor. It said it works with San Francisco police "when necessary" and searches its videos for the license plate numbers of other cars "if needed." Cruise declined to comment on specific cases. Waymo said it has kept its options open about how to respond to hit-and-runs. California's Department of Motor Vehicles pointed out that because of the limited data available, "it's unclear if the rate of hit-and-run incidents involving autonomous vehicles is higher or lower than the rate involving conventional vehicles."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Let's be real—gaming is awesome. Whether you're slaying dragons or racing cars, there's no denying the appeal of the gaming lifestyle. But, as with all good things, there are some risks and challenges that come with it.

They say the eyes are the windows to the soul -- which is exactly why a creature without eyes can be so disturbing. What else are you supposed to look at when talking to them? How can you guess what a stranger's intentions are, or what they want from you, if you can't look at their eyes for some sort of hint? For all we know, the eyeless man in "Yellowjackets" (played by Brahm Taylor) doesn't actually have an evil bone in his body, but because he doesn't talk and Taissa's terrified of him, the odds of him being a nice guy admittedly seem slim. 

So, who is the man with no eyes? Is he real, or just a projection of Taissa's own dark half? Much like "Lost," which mastered the art of the puzzle box show, "Yellowjackets" spent its first season playing around with the idea that there's some deeply supernatural stuff at play. But whereas "Lost" eventually veered hard into its sci-fi and fantasy elements, it seems like "Yellowjackets" is sticking to a more psychological, ambiguous route. As showrunner Jonathan Lisco recently explained:

"It's not about an external monster in the woods who is going to eat our teens. And it's not exclusively about some supernatural force in the present which is making them do things. The question of whether or not it is imposed by some dark force -- and I'm not saying that's not possible -- or whether or not it is alchemically generated by the proximity of these specific women together in the world, I think that's a really interesting question to continue to mine."

We might not ever know if Lottie's psychic powers are genuine, just as we might never know for sure if the man with no eyes is an real entity that can interact with the living world. But much like Misty, I'm happy to use my citizen detective skills to figure things out. 

'Nothing To Be Afraid Of...'

The first time we see the strange figure (outside of the "Yellowjackets" opening credits, at least) is in a flashback to Taissa's childhood in the show's third episode, "The Dollhouse." The first flashback establishes that young Taissa had a strong, loving connection with her sick grandmother, who taught her to have a fairly comforting view of the afterlife. "Dying is nothing to be afraid of," she tells young Taissa. "The Lord gives us our time here, then he calls us back." Back to where? "To him. To heaven ... With the angels."

In the next flashback, though, things take a darker turn. First, Taiss's grandmother freaks out at some unseen presence in the room. Taissa asks if the angel is there, but her grandmother responds to the presence, "Don't you come over here. I mean it, stay away." When Taissa asks her who she's talking to, she says, "That man with no eyes! Don't let him take me! Don't let him take my eyes!" 

In the final flashback, we see Taissa approaching her grandmother's casket and curiously prying open her eyelid, only to discover that her grandmother's eyes are gone ... or at least, so it appears. What Taissa actually sees is an eye cap, a kind of contact lens that funeral homes use to ensure the eyelids remain closed and reduce the sunken appearance of the eye. But between her grandmother's horrid vision and the grim discovery at the funeral, it's no wonder that Taissa is haunted by the idea of a man with no eyes.

Everyone's afraid of death, but death is even scarier if you experience what seems like clear-cut confirmation that the afterlife is real, and it's horrible. Instead of the comforting idea that angels come to peacefully take the deceased away to heaven, this moment seems to confirm for Taissa that the afterlife is a far, far darker place than the living world.

Real Or Not Real?

Considering how the latest episode of "Yellowjackets" features a seemingly sentient gust of wind dropping a bunch of snow on Jackie's funeral pyre, it's easy to imagine a version of the show where another character ends up seeing the man with no eyes too. But for now? It seems more likely that the man with no eyes is a personal demon rather than a literal one.

The big piece of evidence in favor of this is that Taissa doesn't actually see the man until her grandmother describes him to her; the first time Taissa looks across the room, expecting an angel, she doesn't see anyone at all. This implies the eyeless man is a figment of Taissa's imagination, something her young mind creates as a result of her grandmother's genuine terror. If someone you love and trust insists there's a man with no eyes in the room with you, it's easy to see how your mind could see what you're told to see, if even just for a moment. 

The rational explanation for what happened is that her grandmother is having a vision of her own, and it scares Taissa to the point where the idea of a spooky eyeless man ingrains itself into her mind. But why did something like this stick with Taissa for so long, even into her middle age?

Taissa's Biggest Fear

Van and Taissa have the most wholesome relationship in the show, but sleepwalking issues aside they've got one big problem: Van believes in otherworldly things, and Taissa does not. As Lottie's cult-like influence on the group grows and grows, this is likely to cause more friction between the two, and could be the main reason they aren't together in the present-day storyline. But why is Taissa so adamantly against the idea of the supernatural? 

Perhaps it's because if she acknowledges the supernatural exists, she'll be forced to grapple with the implications of that horrifying childhood memory. If Van truly saw a glimpse of the afterlife during her near-death experience, then maybe there was more to Taissa's grandmother's words than just a confused old woman seeing something that wasn't there. 

This all points to the idea that the eyeless man is the personification of Taissa's fear of death -- or maybe just her fear of not being able to have any control over the world around her. There's a comfort in believing that you're the one who decides how your life ends up, but the existence of the supernatural — not to mention the statistically improbable incident of the plane crash in the first place — serves as a painful reminder that control is just an illusion. It's an unpleasant yet undeniable fact, and one that only reveals itself to Taissa in short, terrifying bursts. 

A Family Ghost

There's also the possibility that the man with no eyes simply represents generational trauma, which Taissa inherited from her grandmother, and which she is now passing down to her son. This is just one way in which Taissa and Shauna mirror one another: they're the only two survivors (so far) to have had kids of their own, and they're both doing a questionable job at it. Just as Shauna accidentally ends up dragging her daughter into her own messy extramarital affair (and now, the aftermath of Adam's murder), Taissa has unknowingly traumatized her son Sammy many times when "the bad one" took control of her body.

Neither of them intended to harm their child, but both of them brought some darkness back from their time in the wilderness, and their kids are paying the price for it. Sammy is seemingly aware of the man with no eyes as well, as evidenced by the drawings on his window. The mixed time settings of the show emphasize that the events of the past are always lurking under the surface of the present, and Sammy is not safe from them. If he ends up with his own sleepwalking problem down the line, it wouldn't be a huge surprise.

In the second season of "Yellowjackets" season 2, the connection between Sammy and Taissa's demons deepens when she comes home to discover her son has snuck out of school and is waiting for her ... or so it seems. When Simone arrives to pick him up, Sammy is gone, and a stern call from his school confirms that he never left. The vision creates an opportunity for Taissa to get into a car crash, incapacitating Simone and leaving the real Sammy with no one to protect him from Taissa's mysterious, malevolent alter ego.

What Will Make It Go Away?

If "Yellowjackets" was simply about how trauma is an endless cycle that only gets worse and worse, that would be a little too depressing, even for a show about cannibalism. With several seasons to go before the show concludes, it seems likely that Taissa will eventually figure out a solution to this issue before it completely wrecks her life beyond repair. But how?

Although their exact relationship with each other still isn't clear, it seems like "the bad one" and the man with no eyes are deeply linked. If Taissa wants to get to the bottom of the eyeless man, she'll have to get to the bottom of her sleepwalking self. But if we've learned anything from other shows and movies about characters with alternate personalities, it's going to take a lot to take care of this. Whether it's with Kevin from "The Leftovers," Elliot from "Mr. Robot," or the narrator of "Fight Club," getting rid of the personality that takes over your body in your sleep requires some drastic measures. 

Luckily, adult Taissa has something none of those other characters had: childhood friends who know about her issues, who can help her without the usual judgment she'd get from other people. As we've seen so far, teenage Van is a pretty ride-or-die girlfriend, someone completely uninterested in judging Taissa for whatever the other Taissa gets up to. With the reveal between seasons that adult Van will be making an appearance, it seems likely that the answer to Taissa's problems — adult Taissa's, at least — lies partially with Van. 

New episodes of "Yellowjackets" premiere in the Showtime app on Fridays and air Sundays at 9/8c on Showtime.

Read this next: The 30 Scariest Horror Movie Monsters Ranked

The post Let's Explore The Biggest Mystery In Yellowjackets: Who Is The Man With No Eyes? appeared first on /Film.

When I was a kid, my parents rented a wood-paneled CRT TV from the electronics store down the street. It had a dodgy remote control that only worked half the time and the picture quality was whatever the total opposite of 8K HDR is. The first time I ever saw a movie was on its curved glass facade. But what I remember most about that tube TV is that it was the first screen on which I saw Michael Keaton's Batman. 

Over the course of my life, I've tried at various points to figure out just what it was about the sculpted black rubber of Keaton's cowl that resonated so deeply. It felt elemental in some way, like it had existed long before Tim Burton brought it before a camera, and its image exists as a fundamental layer of developmental sediment in my mind. There were motor skills, then language, then Michael Keaton's Batman. 

Now, 30 years after this character had such a profound impact on me, they're dredging him up to help sell the latest attempt at making a good DC movie with "The Flash." Michael Keaton walked away from Batman after 1992's "Batman Returns," leaving behind two perfect movies as the Dark Knight. Now, that legacy is under threat. Am I being a tad dramatic? Yes. But it's only out of my love for these movies and the potential for this nostalgia play to sour the whole thing. And even though "The Flash" isn't out for months, test screenings suggest it's going to be great, and DC Studios co-head James Gunn says "The Flash" is one of the best superhero movies he's ever seen, I'm about to tell you why the whole thing might be a terrible idea.

Keaton's Casting Controversy

In all honesty, there's a part of me that's excited to hear my childhood hero is returning, but there's also something that just isn't sitting right with me about it. In order to understand why bringing Michael Keaton back for "The Flash" is worrying, you have to start at the beginning of the "Beetlejuice" star's run as the beloved icon. So bear with me while we delve into the genesis of "Batman."

By now, most know the story of how, after years of the Caped Crusader struggling to shake the campy image of Adam West's '60s TV show, Tim Burton's "Batman," successfully returned the character to his roots as a mysterious lone vigilante. It's also well known that Burton was inspired by artists and writers such as Frank Miller, whose seminal graphic novel "The Dark Knight Returns" had similarly revitalized Batman for comic book readers in 1986. But the director wasn't just seeking inspiration from outside sources. With the box office smash that was 1989's "Batman," Burton brought to life a singular vision, crafted with the help of a cast and crew who couldn't have been more in sync.

That included his leading man. Michael Keaton's casting as Batman caused a now-infamous uproar among fans, who somewhat understandably questioned whether the star of "Night Shift" and "Mr. Mom" could project the pre-eminent power of as iconic a figure as Batman. The controversy had Burton fighting for Keaton after the pair had worked together on the director's then-most recent film, "Beetlejuice." And although this may have seemed like the filmmaker was just sticking up for his pal, there was more to it.

Shared Vision

What outraged fans hadn't realized was that Keaton had an angle on who Bruce Wayne was, and exactly how to play him. As he told the In The Envelope Podcast, "I always knew from the get-go it was Bruce Wayne, that was secret. It was never [...] Batman [...] It's about Bruce Wayne — who's that guy? What kind of person does that?"

But it wasn't just that Keaton knew how to play Bruce Wayne/Batman, it was that his director saw things the same way. In Les Daniels' book "Batman: The Complete History," the actor explained how he went into a meeting with the director thinking, "I have my interpretation of what this movie is, and I have an idea for what I would do, but I can't imagine that anyone would share that." But they did. He continued, "As I was talking to Tim, he just kept nodding, and then I saw his face actually getting more excited [...] I knew that he and I were headed down the right road."

Meanwhile, writer Sam Hamm worked closely with Burton to craft a script that truly represented their dark take on Batman. And when Jack Nicholson agreed to play a truly scary version of The Joker, Burton found himself with yet another artistic comrade. As he explained in a 1989 interview, "The thing with Jack is that he won't do a movie unless he feels like everybody's in sync and making the same thing. So before we ever walked on the set, I knew what he was gonna do." With actors, the director, and writers aligned, "Batman" was shaping up to be a rare instance of a truly singular artistic vision manifesting through a collective effort.

Can The Flash Do Keaton And Burton Justice?

There was still one piece of the puzzle left before Tim Burton could bring his Batman universe to life — more on that later. But by now, it should be obvious that "Batman" was a unique movie in the sense that so many of the creatives involved were on the same page — even if Burton found making "Batman" completely torturous. That was crucial to making it such a memorable and influential film. So what does any of that have to do with "The Flash?" Well, by bringing Keaton into the upcoming film, director Andy Muschietti and the powers that be at Warner Bros. have tapped into a legacy they might not be fully prepared, or worse, aren't concerned about continuing.

This isn't to say that "The Flash" is going to be a bad movie in any way. It's simply to say that a project designed around another character, which features Ben Affleck's Batman, two versions of The Flash, introduces a new Supergirl, and involves the return of villains from "Man Of Steel" can't possibly do Keaton's Batman the justice he deserves. More importantly, it can't do justice to Tim Burton's singular artistic vision. All it can ever hope to do, given such a cramped cast — and that's to say nothing of the narrative leg work this film is doing by resetting the multiverse and teeing up James Gunn's "Superman: Legacy" — is to mimic that vision. All I'm saying is, I truly hope it does a decent job. My lingering question, however, is "how can it?"

Digital Dark Knights

We've already seen how many factors had to fall into place in order for Tim Burton to create as effective a film as he did back in '89. Unhappily, what we're likely getting with "The Flash" is what we've gotten with other modern attempts at leveraging the popularity of classic blockbusters. That is to say; uncanny confections of beloved characters, close enough to the original to look convincing but not close enough to have any of the cultural impact or artistic meaning. How many CGI 1980s Arnold Schwarzeneggers will it take to convince us that this digital necromancy is folly?

I know we'll at least be spared a CGI Michael Keaton who will, of course, be returning in full flesh and blood form. But did you see "The Flash" trailer? There's a point at which an obvious CG version of his Batman dives into some sort of industrial pit to take out a group of thugs, and there's something genuinely jarring about seeing the hero we all know for his awkward Bat-turn and stilted gestures move with the unnatural slickness of a modern digital double.

But even if there were no CGI Keaton in "The Flash," it wouldn't matter. The question with all these ungodly resurrections of beloved characters from a bygone time is this: what do they mean removed from their original context?

Gotham City And The World Of The Burtonverse

In terms of context, Michael Keaton's Batman was somewhat defined by Anton Furst and Bo Welch's production design on "Batman" and "Batman Returns" respectively. Saying that Gotham City is a character in these movies is beyond cliché by now, but there is a symbiotic relationship between Gotham and Batman. It's a complaint you hear about Christopher Nolan's Gotham in "The Dark Knight," where the director mostly used Chicago as a stand-in, or "The Dark Knight" rises and its heavy use of Pittsburgh cityscapes — none of these places felt like Gotham City. And often, Batman felt out of place within them, especially when he was shot fighting Tom Hardy's Bane in broad daylight.

Production designer Anton Furst's creative approach to Gotham City, on the other hand, was, you guessed it, completely in line with Burton's grim conceptualization of Batman's world. This made Keaton's Batman all the more believable. He was the human manifestation of Burton and Furst's industrial hellscape. His black rubber and perma-scowl represented the decrepit Gotham of the Burtonverse in human form — as if a gargoyle had pried itself from the side of a gothic edifice, become flesh, and waged war on the criminal activity it had seen play out for decades on the street beneath. How, if at all, will that fit into the world of "The Flash" — a movie made in the age when blockbusters have increasingly shed any artistic ambitions in favor of appeasing fan expectations? Do I know that Muschietti has no artistic ambitions with this movie? Of course not. But what's the likelihood that whatever artistic ambitions he does have will put Keaton's Batman at the center? Or not be overshadowed by the need to please fans and set up the next phase of DC's cinematic saga?

Loner To Mentor?

You might say, "Why should Michael Keaton be the center of a movie about The Flash?" But that's the point. He makes sense as one element of Tim Burton's overall artistic vision. Yanking him from that context and dropping him somewhere in the twisted wreckage of the Snyderverse and its various offshoots just seems kind of sad.

All of this wouldn't be so concerning if "The Flash" trailer didn't suggest we might be in trouble. Aside from a scene in which Keaton appears Batsuited up in the middle of the day — a big Batman-on-film faux pas — there's the slightly too tongue-in-cheek delivery of his legendary line "I'm Batman." It comes as Keaton emerges from the shadows of the Batcave, with Ezra Miller's two versions of Barry Allen looking on. After which, it becomes clear that Keaton's Dark Knight will be playing some sort of support role in their quest to reset timelines following Allen's multiversal adventure gone awry.

But the Keaton Batman/Bruce Wayne was always a loner, and that's how he worked best. The actor even played up the brooding loner angle by cutting more than half of his own dialogue from "Batman Returns," and it worked brilliantly. To have him in some sort of Tony Stark-esque role — which was rumored to be one of the original plans for future DC movies before James Gunn took over — just seems to undermine much of the mystery that made this character what he is. Perhaps this Bruce Wayne has evolved in the time he's been away. And that's fine — intriguing, even. I just really hope that element is addressed and it makes sense within the framework of the film.

The Flash And Burton's Films Are Very Different

In a "Batman" making-of featurette, Michael Keaton said that before he took on the lead role, he became very aware that, "if this character doesn't work this movie doesn't work." But that goes both ways. If the movie around Batman doesn't work, then Batman doesn't work. And with "The Flash," it seems we're talking about a wholly different approach than "Batman" and "Batman Returns" — both of which were tailored around Batman himself.

"The Flash" looks set to be a fun blockbuster outing with some truly emotional moments stemming from Barry Allen and his mother's relationship. The "Flashpoint" storyline on which it's based is one of the best-known DC story arcs of the modern age, and for good reason — though, the film does feel too small for its source material. It should make for "Spider-Man: No Way Home" levels of entertainment, and DC certainly needs that boost right now. I can't wait to see it.

It's just that, and this isn't an exaggeration, Tim Burton's Batman films, Michael Keaton's performances in them, and Anton Furst and Bo Welch's Gotham Cities helped shape who I am, and I know I'm not alone. They spoke to some aesthetic sense in me so profoundly, and at such a young age, that I feel protective of them, and maybe that's unfair. These aren't my movies. But what I do know is that they weren't just entertaining. They weren't just fun. What those two films have to say from an artistic standpoint is the topic of an even bigger article. Suffice it to say that "Batman" and "Batman Returns" represent the unlikely realization of the kind of artistic vision you don't see in the blockbuster space anymore.

Hoping For The Best

In his controversial New York Times piece, Martin Scorsese wrote that modern film franchises, "lack something essential to cinema: the unifying vision of an individual artist" As a kid, I thought I was just watching cool Batman movies. Now, I realize "Batman" and "Batman Returns," by smuggling in that "unifying vision of an individual artist," were really making me fall in love with art.

In that sense, my concern about bringing Keaton back is more a concern about the direction of popular movies in general. There's plenty of incredible artistic expression to be found in movie-making today, arguably even more so than when I was a kid. Just in the last year, I've already been blown away by films the cutting-edge liminal nightmare that was "Skinamarink" and the hauntingly brilliant "Aftersun." But there's something to be said for sneaking some of that artistry into blockbuster filmmaking — and I guess I'm saying it.

I hope there's at least an element of that in "The Flash." I hope some kid sees Michael Keaton's Batman in that movie and his iconic image hits them as profoundly as it did me. I worry that without the rest of the artistic vision surrounding him, it won't. But I'm hoping. And I'll be there on opening night to catch a glimpse of my childhood hero back in the suit after 30 years. It'll be weird seeing it play out in the sharp digital light of IMAX and not projected by a tube across glowing scanlines, obscured by layers of grain, but we've come a long way since my parents rented that TV. I just hope it's been in the right direction.

Read this next: Every Batman Movie And The Real-World Fears They Highlight

The post Why The Flash Bringing Back Michael Keaton's Batman Has Us Very Worried appeared first on /Film.

While the exact origin of the trend cannot necessarily be pinpointed, something calcified in the popular consciousness with the release of Gary Ross' 2012 film "The Hunger Games." It seemed that archery was the hippest way for an action heroine to defend themselves. 

In "The Hunger Games," Jennifer Lawrence plays Katniss Everdeen, an impoverished teenager living in a dystopian future carefully segregated by class. Katniss enlists in the titular Games, a televised fight to the death. Luckily, Katniss is skilled with a bow and is be able to defend herself from other teen attackers. Katniss became part of a cadre of pop culture archers that included Neytiri from "Avatar," Merida in "Brave," Mulan in "Mulan," Hanna in "Hanna," Ygritte in "Game of Thrones," Eva Green's character in "The Golden Compass," Bae Doona's character in "The Host," the 2005 version of Guinevere, and Hawkeye from "The Avengers." Also, one might loop in the archer elf Legolas in the "Lord of the Rings" movies, and whichever version of Robin Hood you prefer. 

While one may only theorize why archery became such a popular movie activity, it was certainly embraced by audiences, and "badass archer" briefly became a dominant cinematic archetype. Some studies even pointed to the "Hunger Games" movies as being directly responsible for young women taking archery lessons in real life. 

On a 2015 episode of NPR's "Fresh Air," interviewer Terry Gross asked Jennifer Lawrence about archery and its prominence in the "Hunger Games" movies. Lawrence revealed that her archery training for the films was extensive, to the point where her entire physique changed. Indeed, as the film's continued, she required costume alterations to accommodate her musculature. 

Khatuna Lorig

To learn archery for "The Hunger Games," Lawrence had to privilege of studying under Olympian athlete Khatuna Lorig, a Georgian-born athlete who competed for the United States in the 1992 Summer Games in Barcelona. She won the bronze medal that year. Holding dual citizenship, Lorig also competed for Georgia in the 1996, 2000, 2008, and 2012 Olympic Games. She would continue to win medals at other world tournaments for years, having most recently won a gold and a silver at the Pan American Games in 2019. 

As a teacher, Lorig was effective at instructing Lawrence on how to operate a recurve bow (that is: the type of bow that curves away from the archer when the bowstring is removed). Lawrence was given a crash course, and Lorig was hard on her student. Regardless, Lawrence says she found the experience positive, even if one of her arms, it seems, became longer as a result. She said: 

"I really, really enjoyed archery. I had an amazing instructor, Khatuna. She was Georgian. She was an excellent instructor -- very, very strict. If I had bad form, she would pinch my ear. She didn't really put up with anything. It totally changed my body. It was so crazy, when I went back for the fitting for the second movie for 'Catching Fire,' my shoulders were two inches broader and my right arm is one inch longer than my left arm, permanently, I guess. But I really enjoy it." 

Lawrence also admitted on "Fresh Air" that a blockbuster like "The Hunger Games" wasn't on her radar as an actress, more often opting for smaller, indie dramas. Katniss was a big shift for her, but a big one. Lawrence holds the Guinness World Record for highest grossing action heroine.

Read this next: The Most Controversial Scenes In Sci-Fi Movies

The post The Hunger Games Archery Training Left Jennifer Lawrence's Body Changed Forever appeared first on /Film.

Wired pays a visit to a half-finished Microsoft data center that rises out of the flat North Holland farmland — where the security guard tells a local councillor he's not allowed to visit the site, and "Within minutes, the argument has escalated, and the guard has his hand around Ruiter's throat." The security guard lets go of Ruiter within a few seconds, and the councillor escapes with a red mark across his neck. Back in his car, Ruiter insists he's fine. But his hands shake when he tries to change gears. He says the altercation — which he will later report to the police — shows the fog of secrecy that surrounds the Netherlands' expanding data center business. "We regret an interaction that took place outside our data center campus, apparently involving one of Microsoft's subcontractors," says Craig Cincotta, general manager at Microsoft, adding that the company would cooperate with the authorities. The heated exchange between Ruiter and Microsoft's security guard shows how contentious Big Tech's data centers have become in rural parts of the Netherlands. As the Dutch government sets strict environmental targets to cut emissions, industries are being forced to compete for space on Dutch farmland — pitting big tech against the increasingly political population of Dutch farmers. There are around 200 data centers in the Netherlands, most of them renting out server space to several different companies. But since 2015, the country has also witnessed the arrival of enormous "hyperscalers," buildings that generally span at least 10,000 square feet and are set up to service a single (usually American) tech giant. Lured here by the convergence of European internet cables, temperate climates, and an abundance of green energy, Microsoft and Google have built hyperscalers; Meta has tried and failed. Against the backdrop of an intensifying Dutch nitrogen crisis, building these hyperscalers is becoming more controversial. Nitrogen, produced by cars, agriculture, and heavy machinery used in construction, can be a dangerous pollutant, damaging ecosystems and endangering people's health. The Netherlands produces four times more nitrogen than the average across the EU. The Dutch government has pledged to halve emissions by 2030, partly by persuading farmers to reduce their livestock herds or leave the industry altogether. Farmers have responded with protests, blockading roads with tractors and manure and dumping slurry outside the nature minister's home. Farmers object that Microsoft is building its data center before it's even received government permits certifying that it won't worsen the nitrogen problem, according to the article. In response the Farmer Citizen Movement has sprung up, and last month it became the joint-largest party in the Dutch Senate. One party leader tells Wired, "It is a waste of fertile soil to put the data centers boxes here." And Wired adds that opposition to datacenter development is also growing elsewhere in Europe.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Plus: A major new supply chain attack, Biden’s spyware executive order, and a hacking campaign against Exxon’s critics.

As of this writing, actor Vaughn Armstrong still holds the record for the most number of characters throughout "Star Trek." Jeffrey Combs technically might have Armstrong beat, but that's only if you count multiple identical clones as separate roles. 

Of the main cast, however, Brent Spiner currently holds the record for playing the greatest number of characters. Apart from his central role as the android Data on "Star Trek: The Next Generation," Spiner also played his own evil twin brother, Lore, a Data prototype named B-4 (in "Star Trek: Nemesis"), and the androids' creator Dr. Noonien Soong. On "Star Trek: Enterprise," he played Dr. Arik Soong, an ancestor of Noonien, who was a villain keen on eugenics. In "Star Trek: Picard," he played an even more distant ancestor Dr. Adam Soong, who lived in the year 2024. In both the first and third seasons of "Picard," he also played Dr. Altan Soong, Noonien's biological son. That's seven roles in all. 

This number doesn't count the "Next Generation" episode "A Fistful of Datas" wherein a holodeck malfunction transformed the population of an entire artificially created Old West town into Data. In that episode, Spiner played at least four additional characters. 

Spiner recently returned to "Picard" to play an amalgam character. It turns out that Altan created an android that contains the brain of Data, Lore, Dr. Soong, B-4, and even Data's daughter Lal. Spiner, who has been ambivalent about playing Data in the past, clearly welcomed the acting challenge of playing so many characters at once. 

In a recent interview with Comics Beat, Spiner, now 74, floated the idea of playing Noonien again. His ideas are tantalizing.

Often Wrong Soong

At the start of "Star Trek: The Next Generation," Data had no memories of his earliest days alive; he was discovered abandoned in pieces on a remote Federation outpost and reassembled by Federation scientists. His creator, Dr. Soong, was presumed dead, a fact confirmed by his brother Lore. By the show's fourth season, Data and Lore would be remotely summoned by Dr. Soong, now incredibly old and eager to give Data an emotions chip; Data was incapable of feeling because of the missing chip. Data, rather logically, asks Dr. Soong why he was created. They have a brief exchange about how humans are fascinated by the past and are eager to perpetuate into the future. Having children, Soong argues, is a way of assuring immortality. 

But little was revealed about Soong's life and philosophy at large, though it was implied that he inherited his interest in androids from several previous generations. The details of Noonien himself, however, have yet to be explored. Brent Spiner suggested finally covering Soong's life in a standalone "Star Trek" series. When asked if he'd even play all seven of his characters at once, Spiner quipped:

"One can only hope! It's high time, don't you think? I don't think that's ever going to happen. I think this one's as close as you're going to get. You know, I think I'm too old -- but I would like to see the ultimate Soong episode, or series or miniseries. Just finding out who this family is. Where they came from, really. Because you always have to ask yourself: "How did this guy get a Chinese last name? Who was he, really? Why are all iterations of him so into eugenics and creating perfect species?"

Eugenics?

As was iterated in "Picard" and "Enterprise," the Soong family was weirdly fixated on "the perfect being," and both Adam and Arik were eager to manipulate genetics to that end. Indeed, it was Arik's genetic tinkering with Klingon DNA that caused them to more closely resemble humans for a few generations. That was the in-canon excuse as to why Klingons looked human in the original "Star Trek" series, but why they had pronounced alien foreheads in "Next Generation." Arik, when apprehended for his genetic crimes, announced that a positronic being might be the way to go, and that it would only take a few generations to make an android. The genetic manipulation would also explain why multiple generations across the centuries all happen to look exactly like Brent Spiner.

It was never explained, however, why the Soongs started on that path the begin with. Spiner wanted to look at that more closely.

While Spiner clearly has a knack for playing multiple characters in a scene -- or perhaps the scripts he was handed allowed him that opportunity -- he did say that he wouldn't necessarily want to play Dr. Soong in a spinoff series. "It's a really intriguing story of a family," he said. "It could even be told without me. There could be other actors who do it."

Not only would this allow Spiner's acting legacy to continue in "Star Trek" for perpetuity, but it would allow other, newer performers to step in. Also, seeing as how the androids are essentially immortal, but human actors are not, shunting Data's brain into new bodies would make sense in canon. 

Just about anything can be explored in "Trek" right now -- there are six shows at once! -- so why not a Soong miniseries?

Read this next: Every Star Trek Series Ranked From Worst To Best

The post Brent Spiner Wants A Star Trek Spin-Off Series About Data's Creator Noonian Soong appeared first on /Film.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC: China's chip industry will be "reborn" as a result of U.S. sanctions, a top boss at Huawei said Friday, as the Chinese telecommunications giant confirmed a breakthrough in semiconductor design technology. Eric Xu, rotating chairman at Huawei, issued fighting words against Washington's tech export restrictions on China. "I believe China's semiconductor industry will not sit idly by, but take efforts around ... self-strengthening and self reliance," according to an official translation of Xu's comments during a press conference. "For Huawei, we will render our support to all such self-saving, self-strengthening and self reliance efforts of the Chinese semiconductor industry." The U.S. is concerned that China could use advanced semiconductors for military purposes. Huawei's Xu said these developments could boost, rather than hamper China's domestic semiconductor industry. "I believe China's semiconductor industry will get reborn under such sanctions and realize a very strong and self-reliant industry," Xu said. Last week, Huawei claimed to have completed work on electronic design automation tools for laying out and making chips down to 14nm process nodes. "But Huawei ideally needs chips of a much smaller nanometer size for more advanced applications, which they are currently finding it difficult to obtain," adds Reuters. "The company is still reeling from the effects of U.S. sanctions -- on Friday, it said net profit dropped 69% year-on-year in 2022, marking the biggest decline on record."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.