Shared posts

08 Sep 18:57

What's On Tonight: Say one last goodbye to “Stephen Colbert” and say hello to The Late Show With Stephen Colbert

by Alasdair Wilkins
Rachel

yes.yes.yes.yes.yes.

Here’s what’s up in the world of TV for Tuesday, September 8. All times are Eastern.

Top pick

The Late Show With Stephen Colbert (CBS, 11:35 p.m.): After several months away from our TV screens, Stephen Colbert returns, ready to leave behind his gleefully satirical, Bush-skewering late night persona for a more earnest, network-friendly persona that … that’s actually still pretty damn good at being gleefully satirical and skewering the Bush family, if that last promotional video about opening night guest Jeb (Jeb!) Bush is anything to go by. Also, George Clooney is going to be there, being all handsome and stuff, as is his wont, and new Late Show bandleader John Batiste is going to perform. It all figures to be a revelation for late night television … or, you know, just kind of more of the same, albeit presided over by the format’s reigning ...

05 Sep 03:33

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director (Roseville Public Library and the City of Roseville, California)

Rachel

Leslie Knope would not approve.

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director (Roseville Public Library and the City of Roseville, California)
The City of Roseville, CA Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Position Advertisement The City of Roseville, CA (approximate population 128,382) is located in Placer County along the eastern edge of the Sacramento Valley, at the base of the Sierra Nevada foothills.  The City of Roseville’s is now seeking a Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director.  If you want to work in a community that values and celebrates the work of Parks, Recreation & Libraries, this might be the job for you.  Our mission is to enhance lives and the community by providing exceptional experiences.  We accomplish this by providing a variety and programs, services and facilities for the community. The successful Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director is a creative visionary who can identify opportunities to leverage available resources to get things done. A typical candidate will possess a Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university and have seven years of increasingly responsible experience in parks, recreation and/or library administration, including three years of administrative/management responsibility.  A CPRP (Certified Park and Recreation Professional) certification is desirable.  Possession of a valid California driver’s license is also required. The annual salary range for is $134,751 to $180,580; placement within the range is dependent upon qualifications and experience. If you are interested in this outstanding opportunity, please apply online at www.roseville.ca.us/jobs.  Please contact Human Resources at (916) 774-5475 should you have any questions.  The final filing date is October 5, 2015.
04 Sep 19:15

Combining Star Trek and The Guide to Troubled Birds is Our New Favorite Thing

by Stubby the Rocket
Rachel

These headline/picture mashups are my new favorite thing on Tumblr...the Onion/Jane Austen is gold.

Star Trek + The Guide to Troubled Birds

There’s a great book out there called The Guide to Troubled Birds, which adds snarky/creepy text to flowery wallpaper next to pictures of very serious avian faces.

But it turns out that doing the same thing with Star Trek characters is way better.

Tumblr user magnass is responsible for this amazing crossover. Here are just a few of our favorites:

Star Trek + The Guide to Troubled Birds

Star Trek + The Guide to Troubled Birds

Star Trek + The Guide to Troubled Birds

Star Trek + The Guide to Troubled Birds

Star Trek + The Guide to Troubled Birds

You can find the rest over at their Tumblr!

01 Sep 14:56

BMW 3 Series: 40 years old, and still the ultimate driving machine

by Ars Staff
Rachel

BOOM.

The BMW 3 Series throughout the ages, with the F30 and E21 in the foreground.

19 more images in gallery

BMW’s sector-defining 3 Series has turned 40, so the start of the story is in 1975—except it isn’t. You have to go back much further: past the early '70s when work began on the first 3 Series, and even back beyond the 1966 predecessor that set the pattern for compact BMWs. You have to reverse all the way back to 1959.

In the 1950s, BMW’s curiously bipolar range of cars had grand, expensive "Baroque Angel" saloons at one end, tiny two-cylinder BMW Isetta bubble cars at the other, and almost nothing in between. In 1959 German industrialists Harald and Herbert Quandt took control of the company and gave it the cash injection it needed to create a new medium-size saloon, the 1961 Neue Klasse (new class).

With monocoque construction, independent suspension, and peppy overhead cam engines, the Neue Klasse sold well and quickly spawned both larger-engined derivatives and a smaller, cheaper car based on the same engines and running gear. The two-door 1.6-litre 1600-2 arrived in 1966, followed in 1968 by the definitive 2.0L 2002. More than 800,000 were built in the 1960s and 1970s, and they established a blend of compact size, tidy handling and swift performance which would become the cornerstone of the 3 Series' appeal.

Read 18 remaining paragraphs | Comments

01 Sep 14:30

This beautiful Tintin tome is full of all wonderful things Herge

by Bob Knetzger
Rachel

Want.

If you're a fan of Tintin comics and of Hergé (Georges Remi), this is one book you’ll want to own. Nothing “comic book” or throw away about this beautifully produced volume.

Read the rest
25 Aug 18:38

How Quentin Tarantino Would Fix It Follows (and Other Outtakes From Vulture's Interview)

by Lane Brown
Rachel

"It's horrible. What do you expect me to say?" lol.


Quentin Tarantino has spent most of 2015 making a movie of his own, so he hasn't had time for many other ones: “I didn’t see anything this year,” he told me in our interview for New York's Fall Preview issue. “I loved The Kingsman. I really liked It Follows.” The latter, David Robert Mitchell's thriller about a young woman who contracts a sexually transmitted curse that has her pursued by a slow-walking supernatural villain that assumes random human forms, features “the best premise I've seen in a horror film in a long, long, long time,” says Tarantino. “It's one of those movies that’s so good that you start getting mad at it for not being great. The fact that he didn't take it all the way makes me not just disappointed but almost a little angry.” So, how would Tarantino have made It Follows better? Allow him to explain—and then stick around for a few more bonus questions and answers from our interview that didn't quite make the print edition, including Tarantino on what he's reading, his plans for retirement, and who he's not friending on Facebook. (And if you haven't already, be sure to check out our full interview here.)

How could It Follows have been great? Would you have done something differently?
He [writer-director David Robert Mitchell] could have kept his mythology straight. He broke his mythology left, right, and center. We see how the bad guys are: They're never casual. They're never just hanging around. They've always got that one look, and they always just progressively move toward you. Yet in the movie theater, the guy thinks he sees the woman in the yellow dress, and the girl goes, “What woman?” Then he realizes that it's the follower. So he doesn't realize it's the follower upon just looking at her? She’s just standing in the doorway of the theater, smiling at him, and he doesn’t immediately notice her? You would think that he, of anybody, would know how to spot those things as soon as possible. We spotted them among the extras.

The movie keeps on doing things like that, not holding on to the rules that it sets up. Like, okay, you can shoot the bad guys in the head, but that just works for ten seconds? Well, that doesn't make any fucking sense. What's up with that? And then, all of a sudden, the things are aggressive and they're picking up appliances and throwing them at people? Now they're strategizing? That's never been part of it before. I don't buy that the thing is getting clever when they lower him into the pool. They're not clever.

Also, there’s the gorgeously handsome geeky boy — and everyone's supposed to be ignoring that he's gorgeous, because that’s what you do in movies — that kid obviously has no problem having sex with her and putting the thing on his trail. He's completely down with that idea. So wouldn't it have been a good idea for her to fuck that guy before she went into the pool, so then at least two people could see the thing? It’s not like she'd have been tricking him into it. It’s what I would've done.

Are there any filmmakers you don't think get enough respect?
When people in America talk about the great writer-director auteurs, they don't talk about Pedro Almodóvar enough. For 30 years, he has dwarfed almost all of his American peers. He went through a slightly weak period around the time of Kika and All About My Mother. I didn't get Broken Embraces, but it was still okay. But the things he's been doing the last seven years, he's been on a magnificent roll. He's a fantastic director. His scripts are wonderful, and he's just money in the bank. And he's so specific, but as opposed to a lot of these specific art-film directors that you're going to get tired of, like Wong Kar-wai, you never get tired of Almodóvar. Because as much as he has these recognizable elements, it never just seems like the same movie over and over again.

I loved The Skin I Live In.
That was him doing a horror film, and it was fucking amazing. I totally got the impression that — and I'm fairly sure I'm right about this — Pedro was watching The Human Centipede and thinking, You know, I know how to do this. I could do something really special with this. And that was The Skin I Live In.

What have you been reading lately?
I just finished Five Came Back, by Mark Harris. I think Mark Harris may be the best film writer ever, when it comes to these historical, slightly critical books that he does. They're fantastic. Pictures at a Revolution is probably one of the best books I've ever read in my life. I really wasn't into the subject matter, but because he wrote it, I decided I'd give it a shot. I brought Five Came Back and that Harper Lee book with me when I went to Prague, and I ended up voraciously reading his book. I actually have a lot of those war documentaries at home, so I came back and watched the Why We Fight series and The Memphis Belle. It got me on a big William Wyler kick, too.

You’ve talked about making a sci-fi movie. What would it be like?
I’m not really interested in doing a sci-fi film, but there’s one thing in particular that I would be interested in. I can’t tell you what it is, though, because I would literally be telling you exactly what it is. And then I wouldn’t be able to do it, because everyone would talk about it, because it is one thing in particular. It might be science-fiction, but it wouldn’t involve spaceships.

You haven’t made a movie set in the present since Death Proof in 2007. Is modern life not that inspiring?
No, it's not that. I would really like to do a movie set in the present. It just keeps working out that that’s not the case. I do feel that I need to do at least one more Western — I think you need to make three Westerns to call yourself a Western director. But it would be really great to do another movie where a TV’s on in the background, or somebody turns on a radio, and then I can score my scene that way, and then turn it off when I want the music to stop. Or they get into a car and drive for a while, and I can actually do a little montage of them driving to some cool song. That would be really great. I haven’t done that in a long time, and I’m really looking forward to it.

In Django Unchained, the villains were slave owners. In Inglourious Basterds, they were Nazis. If you were to make a similar movie in 2015, who would the bad guys be?
Those two movies are very specific and kind of stand alone from the rest of my filmography, so that question is jumping from the assumption that it would be something cut into that mode. I think it would be something closer to either Reservoir Dogs, Jackie Brown, or Pulp Fiction, or something even realer than that. 

Ennio Morricone wrote the score for Hateful Eight. How does it sound?
It's horrible. What do you expect me to say?

Well, I'm excited about it. Yours is the first Western he’s scored since 1975.
I know, and I'm not going to say shit about it. You'll hear it when you see it. It's absolutely abysmal.

Is Morricone bringing back his whistler for this one?
No. There’s no whistling in this score. That guy is still alive, though.

This is the first time one of your movies has had a score. Does that mean there won't be any pop songs on the soundtrack?
I didn’t say that. 

Film directors like Steven Soderbergh and Cary Fukunaga have defected to TV. You’ve been making noise about doing a mini-series. Are you jealous about what directors can do in that medium now?
No, I’m not jealous at all. I’m in a lucky situation. However, no writer-directors have taken that mini-series format and really done what could be done. You don’t have any writer-directors that write all six episodes, and then direct all six episodes. You have a guy like Soderbergh or Fukunaga who directs everything, or you have somebody like Aaron Sorkin who writes everything, but you don’t have the guy who does everything. If ever there’s been a chance for somebody to truly do a filmed novel, it’s in this area. I always write these movies that are far too big for any paying customer to sit down and watch from beginning to end, and so I always have this big novel that I have to adapt into a movie as I go. So to actually be able to take one of my stories and just do it as long as it is, the completely unfiltered manuscript, that sounds really, really exciting. And unless we can turn back the tide on digital projection in movie theaters, then I might as well go to television.

How serious are you about retiring when you're 60?
Well, if film goes away, I might not even make it to 60, so we’ll see.

What would you do in retirement? 
It would probably be split between working writing novels, writing film criticism, and writing and directing theater.

Theater? Have you seen any good plays lately?
Not really, but that’s because I haven’t gone to the theater a lot. The last big play I saw was — I just happened to be in New York — the revival of You Can't Take It With You

Do you spend much time on the internet?
Not really. Like everybody else, I'll get on the internet, and the next thing I know I'm clicking on something, and clicking on something else, and clicking on something else, but it's not like I have websites that I check. It's not like I check the Huffington Post every week, or I check — this is an old reference — Ain’t It Cool News, or The Daily Beast. I don't do that. I’m definitely not on Twitter. I do have a Facebook page and Facebook friends. It’s a lot of fun, especially if you don't just start friending people you don't know. I got into Facebook late, and I think if you get into Facebook late, you tend to use it the right way, as opposed to the people who got into it sooner and friended everybody and now have a thousand friends. I keep it at about 80 or so, and they're all people I know. Just because I do a movie doesn't mean I friend everybody in it.

Read more posts by Lane Brown

Filed Under: quentin tarantino ,it follows ,the hateful eight ,movies ,tarantino week

25 Aug 18:09

Newswire: Outlander begins the search for its Brianna

by Kayla Kumari Upadhyaya
Rachel

This can only mean one thing....Roger is next!!!!!!!!

The premiere date has yet to be set for Outlander’s second season, but a recent casting call gives some insight into exactly where that season will go. (If you haven’t read the Outlander books and don’t want to be spoiled for the show, we suggest you stop reading now.)

TV Line reports that Outlander has sent out a casting notice for the character Brianna, who is introduced in the second book in the series, Dragonfly In Amber, from which season two will take its cues. In Dragonfly In Amber, there’s a major time jump that brings Claire to Jamie’s 20-year-old daughter Brianna, also called Bree. But her name isn’t Brianna Fraser; it’s Brianna Randall.

Because she is her father’s daughter, she’s described as ginger-haired and tall. The official character description also notes that she’s an American twentysomething who’s “strong-minded ...

25 Aug 14:12

Were Fans More Disappointed by the Finale of Lost or How I Met Your Mother?

by E. Alex Jung
Rachel

Speak of the devil. I'm much angrier at HIMYM. And Newhart wins in my book.


There have been a lot of disappointing series finales — ones that make you seriously question your life choices (I stopped going to work to watch this?). But which ones were the absolute dregs of the barrel? Reddit user ChallengeResponse made a series of charts graphing the IMDb user ratings for series finales against the average rating for the show. So, for instance, the first chart shows the shows that had the biggest gaps between the average episode's ratings and the finale's. Meaning, the shows at the top of this list aren't going to be ones like Six Feet Under or The Sopranos, but ones that benefited from soft expectations: Well, that was surprisingly good for Charmed. Take a look:

And here are the finales organized by the rating of the finale. The people have spoken: Breaking Bad had the best TV series finale. And on the other end of the spectrum lies Two and a Half Men.

Read more posts by E. Alex Jung

Filed Under: series finales ,best series finale ,breaking bad ,six feet under ,charts

25 Aug 01:06

Video Evidence That Daniel Was the Real Villain in The Karate Kid

by E. Alex Jung
Rachel

I'm pretty sure Barney already called this back when it was still ok to reference HIMYM as suitable pop culture canon.


When we think of The Karate Kid, we remember a coming-of-age tale of a scrawny white boy named Daniel (Ralph Macchio) who defeats his bullies with kick-based magic. But what if we considered the the story from the other side? Sure, tall, Teutonic Johnny (William Zabka) isn't as likable, but maybe he's been unfairly maligned for his good looks. Actually, you know what? You're right, YouTuber J. Matthew Turner! Daniel was always picking fights with Johnny. Johnny is just defending himself! It really is true: History is written by the victors.

Read more posts by E. Alex Jung

Filed Under: the karate kid ,ralph macchio ,villain revealed ,movies

23 Aug 14:00

Let's Check In On What Aaron Rodgers Is Up To

by Timothy Burke
Rachel

Oh my. That was amazingly dorky.

OK, well, this is... something:

Read more...










22 Aug 20:51

Cary Fukunaga Talks Departure from Stephen King’s IT Remake

by Eric Diaz
Rachel

I read It in 1991. When I read it I felt like I was digging deep into the King backlog but it was only 5 years old at the time...ugh, I'm old.

Fans of Stephen King’s classic 1986 novel It were heartbroken to find out that director Cary Fukunaga, the man who directed every episode of the good first season of HBO’s True Detective, had departed the big screen adaptation of the book being developed over at New Line Cinema earlier this year. The hiring of Fukunaga was seen as a positive sign that New Line was looking at making this a quality adaptation, and not another cheapie cash grab like the remake of Poltergeist or Ouija; this could have signified a return to bigger budget, prestige horror movies—like the kind we had back during the halcyon days of The Exorcist and Stanley Kubrick’s adaptation of The Shining.

Sadly, Fukunaga departed the project in May with no concrete reason given, though the rumor mill said it had to do with a variety of things, including budget cuts, casting choices, and even the underperformance of the Poltergeist remake (the movie’s marketing centered around an evil, scary clown, similar to the one in King’s novel). Now for the first time since exiting the project, Fukunaga has opened up a bit on just what went down in an interview with Entertainment Weekly. Here’s what he had to say:

“It’s never easy; Chase (Palmer) and I had been working on that script for probably three years. There was a lot of our childhood and our experience in it. …Ultimately, we and New Line have to agree on the kind of movie we want to make, and we just wanted to make different movies. It’s like a relationship: you can try to make the other person who you want them to be, but it’s impossible really to change. You just have to work.”

With Fukunaga gone, New Line is allegedly starting from scratch with the project, which they are still committed to making. They are said to be sticking to Fukunaga’s original ideas for this movie in one respect at least: splitting it up into two films. The first would focus on the “past” sections of the novel—where the protagonists are still children—and the “present” portions of the novel featuring those same kids as adults as a second film. How they plan to do two films telling one epic story on a shoestring budget I have no idea, but that still seems to be the plan.

It was made once already as a two part television mini-series way back in 1990—a mini-series that had one truly memorable element: actor Tim Curry as the demonic Pennywise the Clown (a part that was cast with 22-year old actor Will Poulter for this new version, although it’s up in the air if that’s still the plan). The rest was, to some, mostly cheap and forgettable, leading us to believe that the definitive version of King’s novel has yet to be made. It’s unfortunate that Fukunaga—someone who seemed to have true passion for the material—won’t be the one who gets to make it, but we’ll be interested to see who helms the project next.

What do you think about Fukunaga’s departure? Let’s hear it in the comments.

HT: EW via HitFix

 

 

22 Aug 11:54

Newswire: Stephen Amell to wear his Arrow costume for WWE SummerSlam

by William Hughes
Rachel

I've never had a desire to watch WWE in my entire life, and now there are two reasons to watch? o_0

Non-fans of the sport might not know this, but the WWE’s annual SummerSlam isn’t just a place for retired political pundits to hide from the baying crowds and their demands for even-handed debate moderation. It’s also a massive wrestling event where costumed characters melodramatically pretend to kick each other in the teeth. So it’s fitting that Arrow star Stephen Amell’s upcoming appearance at this year’s Slam—where he’s set to face off against social-media feuding partner Stardust—won’t be happening in civilian clothes.

Instead, it’ll be Arrow himself who leaps into the ring, with Amell releasing a promo video showing that he’s packing his costume for a trip to one of the only places on Earth where “leather Robin Hood costume” barely scratches a “4” on the “weird things to walk around in public in” scale. Amell’s video didn ...

22 Aug 04:49

Study: Psychopaths Don't Catch Yawns

by John Farrier


(Photo: vmiramontes)

Yawns are contagious. Or at least they're supposed to be.

So here's a quick test: yawn. If the person next to you--whether a stranger of someone you've known and loved all of your life--doesn't yawn, then he might be a psychopath.

That's how I'm misinterpreting a new study by researchers at Baylor University. They found a positive correlation between people who don't yawn when other people do and scores on questionnaires for psychopathic characteristics. Shaunacy Ferro writes for Mental Floss:

The higher the participants rated on measures of cold-heartedness, the less likely they were to catch another person’s yawn. Granted, people are less likely to feel empathy with a stranger they’re watching in a video than with someone they know, and the sample size was pretty small, so Baylor University probably isn’t full of a bunch of raging psychopaths. And not yawning when others do it doesn’t mean you should run off for a psych evaluation. "But what we found tells us there is a neurological connection—some overlap—between psychopathy and contagious yawning,” study author Brian Rundle says.

-via Joe Carter

21 Aug 17:21

17 Graphs Introverts Will Totally Understand

by John Farrier
Rachel

Nailed it.

Today, I was at a large workplace lunch. It required great concentration because I had to pretend to be normal for over an hour. I think that I did reasonably well. At one point, my boss insisted that I engage in interpersonal communication in this professional setting. Thankfully, I am always prepared to talk about anime.

That's one of the challenges of being introverted in an extraverted world. Anna Borges of BuzzFeed understands. She's doodled 17 graphs that illustrate the introverted experience.

-via Pleated Jeans

21 Aug 17:20

CDC Says: Most Contact Lens Wearers Aren’t So Great With Hygiene

by Mary Beth Quirk
Rachel

I was a model contact wearer -only the best contact solution, never slept in them, replaced them regularly-- and my eyeballs still rejected them. Angry.

If you wear contact lenses, you’ve probably had that moment when you wake up and realize you fell asleep with your lenses in, making your eyes feel gluey and dry. Or perhaps you’ve got extended wear contacts and have gotten accustomed to leaving them in for long periods of time. The Centers for Disease Control says you’re not alone — most contact lens wearers aren’t always so great with hygiene, and many wear their lenses for longer periods than they’re supposed to.

The CDC says that a recent survey shows that out of the 41 million estimated contact lens wearers in the U.S., almost everyone has broken the rules of contact care and hygiene: 99% of those surveyed are at risk for serious eye infections because of poor hygienic behaviors.

Out of 4,269 respondents to the online survey of contact users, 50% reported wearing their lenses while sleeping, and 82.3% of contact wearers keep their contact lens cases longer than recommended. Some of those people might also just top off the solution in the case instead of dumping it out, a process that can cause infection in the eye.

One-third of the respondents reported seeking medical help for red or painful eyes related to wearing contact lenses.

One contact user spoke to USAToday about how he developed a corneal ulcer infected with Pseudomonas bacteria, after sleeping in extended use contacts for almost a week.

“Halfway through the day my eyes started itching, and I thought it was probably allergies, so I popped them out,” he said. “The next morning the vision in my left eye started to turn cloudy.”

After a few days he could no longer see out of his left eye, and his doctor said he’ll likely need a corneal transplant to restore his sight.

“The kind of contacts I have are called “Night and Day” contacts, and it was my impression you could leave them in for 30 days straight,” he said. “I figured the less I was messing with my eyes, the better.”

Experts advise removing contacts when you sleep, even if it’s meant for extended wear. The reason being, the lens can act as a barrier, preventing oxygen from reaching the cornea.

“Honestly, if patients ask the safest thing to do I would say take the lens out [when sleeping,]” Thomas Steinemann, a clinical spokesman for the American Academy of Ophthalmology told USAToday. “When you have the plastic contact lens over the eye, you are depriving the eye of oxygen but also increasing the risk of germs attacking the cornea.”

Other good rules of contact lens care to abide by: Replacing old contacts in a timely manner, avoiding water when wearing lenses, using clean solution each time you store your contacts and replacing lens cases every three months.

Contact Lens Wearer Demographics and Risk Behaviors for Contact Lens-Related Eye Infections — United States, 2014 [CDC.gov]

19 Aug 15:19

Hear This: Why did Billie Joe McAllister jump off the Tallahatchie Bridge?

by Gwen Ihnat
Rachel

I have a huge, well thought out, fanfiction story for this song. I keep meaning to write it because it's awesome, but I haven't yet....

In Hear This, A.V. Club writers sing the praises of songs they know well. This week: songs that tell a story.

Bobbie Gentry, “Ode To Billie Joe” (1967)

As I’ve mentioned before, I am a ginormous fan of the story song, popularized in the 1960s and ’70s, where entire sagas were spelled out in simple verse-verse-chorus-verse construction. One of the genre’s most popular examples, however, raised more questions than it answered. Bobbie Gentry’s biggest hit was “Ode To Billie Joe,” in which the young narrator tells the story—against a backdrop of biscuits and small-town Mississippi gossip—of how Billie Joe McAllister jumped off the Tallahatchie Bridge. It became Billboard’s No. 3 song of 1967.

A few things are frustrating about this legendary song, and not just that it leaves lingering questions. Gentry lobs verse after verse our way as the narrator and her family ...

19 Aug 03:10

Newswire: Syfy cancels Haven after 5 seasons

by William Hughes
Rachel

I just learned today that this was based on a Stephen King story. Huh.

Syfy has announced that it won’t be renewing its small-town science fiction series Haven for a sixth season. The show, which stars Emily Rose as a former FBI agent who finds herself at the center of the supernatural ailments afflicting a small New England town, will conclude after a final 13-episode run beginning in October.

News of the cancellation came after the the second half of the show’s fifth season was already shot, and apparently didn’t catch showrunner Gabrielle Stanton off guard. Talking to The Wrap, Stanton confirmed that the show would have some kind of definitive conclusion, saying that the thought process in the writer’s room was, “If we were indeed going to end, what would be the best ending we could possibly do for Haven?” (It probably doesn’t hurt that the show’s 78-episode run was already reaching a pretty epic length for ...

18 Aug 13:55

Tame Impala Packs All Your Fears About Flying Into One Paranoid Video

by Dee Lockett
Rachel

I'm going to admit to giving this band a chance only for their name, but the music has turned out to be pretty good.


What's worse: kicking the bucket on a plane mid-flight, or while still waiting at the gate? Tame Impala investigates.

Read more posts by Dee Lockett

Filed Under: videology ,tame impala ,music

17 Aug 13:30

Annabeth Gish Returns as Agent Reyes on Fox’s X-FILES Revival

by Eric Diaz

Filming on the six-episode revival of The X-Files on Fox is well underway, and now Chris Carter has added another familiar face to the cast. Now, actress Annabeth Gish is returning to play her role of FBI agent Monica Reyes. Gish played the part of Reyes in the last two (arguably less popular) seasons of the series that no longer included David Duchovny as a series regular anymore.

Gish’s character appeared in twenty-three episodes of the original series’ eighth and ninth seasons as an agent who worked with Gillian Anderson’s Dana Scully and Robert Patrick’s character of John Doggett. She was seen last in The X-Files‘ series finale after she and Doggett helped Mulder and Scully go on the run. She was a recurring character in the show’s eighth season before being promoted to series regular in the final year of the show.

Annabeth Gish first came to prominence in the 1988 film Mystic Pizza, starring alongside a then-unknown Julia Roberts. Gish would then feature in several movies and TV series before landing the role of Monica Reyes on The X-Files. Fans expected that she and Robert Patrick would become the new leads after Gillian Anderson left the series, but the Reyes/Doggett partnership and chemistry didn’t capture the hearts and imaginations of fans in the same way that Scully and Mulder did, and Fox decided to end the series after nine successful seasons instead. Still, it’s nice that Chris Carter is acknowledging her contribution to the show and including her in the revival series. Could Robert Patrick be next to return?

Gish joins returning stars Anderson, Duchovny, Mitch Pileggi and William B. Davis. The new series has also has recruited new guest-stars Robbie Amell, Lauren Ambrose, Joel McHale, Annet Mahendru, Rhys Darby and Kumail Nanjiani.

The X-Files returns Jan. 24, 2016.

HT: The Hollywood Reporter

07 Aug 03:00

Arby's to Jon Stewart: Thank You for Being a Friend

by Miss Cellania
Rachel

:'(

Jon Stewart has made fun of Arby’s on a regular basis for years on The Daily Show. Arby’s took it rather well, and in fact sponsored last night’s episode. That meant a couple of custom ads for the occasion.

(YouTube link)

You can see the other, called "Arby's Last Sandwich," at Uproxx.

Tonight is Jon Stewart’s final appearance as host of The Daily Show.

06 Aug 17:23

How The Daily Show Progressed From Fart Jokes Into a Lean Satire Machine

by Brian Feldman
Rachel

Ugh, I can't believe it's almost over. :(


On June 26, Comedy Central began streaming every single episode of The Daily Show under Jon Stewart’s tenure, an event it deemed the Month of Zen: an uninterrupted deluge of satirical news running 24/7 for more than a month. In that time, I managed to catch 100 episodes of Stewart’s nearly 17 years as host, charting its rapid maturation from unfocused finger-pointing into the lean, mean satire machine it is today.

1999

I first opened the stream at 1:12 p.m. on June 28, during an episode from its first season, on September 30, 1999. The show was in the midst of a segment making fun of Garth Brooks’s ill-fated journey into rock music under the pseudonym of Chris Gaines. As dated as that segment was, the early episode then transitioned into what would become the program’s calling card: a segment on media responsibility. Three correspondents — Vance DeGeneres, Mo Rocca, and some guy named Steve Carell — were all setting up media-watchdog organizations. DeGeneres introduced News Activism Means Better Living for All (N.A.M.B.L.A.), Rocca founded Fair and Accurate Reporting on Television (F.A.R.T.), and Carell conjured up the Very Accurate General Interest News Association (V.A.G.I.N.A.). This was the state of The Daily Show’s media criticism in 1999: pedophilia, fart, and vagina jokes. Funny? Yes. Trenchant? Not quite.

These nascent episodes of The Daily Show, viewed in hindsight, have an odd whiplash effect, moving back and forth between amusingly outdated segments and universally relevant ones. For instance, in that September 30, 1999 episode, Stewart expressed skepticism towards Jeff Bezos’s claim that “Amazon.com will be a place where you can find and discover anything.”

Two days later, on October 7, 1999, Stewart was covering Donald Trump’s decision to enter the 2000 presidential race. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

There are also some artifacts best left in the ’90s. One particularly odious field report from Mo Rocca focused on Ara Tripp, a transgender woman:

It hinged on the repeated phrase “tower-climbing, fire-breathing, topless transsexuals” as a punch line.

2000

By the evening of June 29, the Month of Zen stream had moved into the current millennium. It was late March 2000: Pope John Paul II was visiting Israel, providing an excuse, for the first time since I had started watching the stream, for Stewart to trot out his trademark Jewish accent. Elsewhere, Hilary Swank forgot to thank her husband during her Oscar speech, and a small Cuban boy named Elian Gonzalez was the subject of an international custody battle. In a special-edition segment of Indecision-sky 2000-slav, a former KGB agent named Vladimir Putin was running for president of Russia.

It’s worth pausing here to examine just what Stewart’s role is in all of this. In hindsight, the early Daily Show seems like a fairly rote satirical newscast, heavily segmented with recurring bits. Stewart begins the episodes running through “Headlines,” “Other News,” and “This Just In,” and then recapping all of the episode’s topics at the end with a send-off joke. Though clearly liberal, Stewart never takes much of a stance on anything, other than “[Insert topic] is ridiculous,” and he plays the straight man to far more animated correspondents like Carell, Stephen Colbert, and Nancy Walls.

Stewart’s oft-repeated analogy is that he’s not political but instead at the back of the class shooting spitballs at targets deserving of ridicule. That positioning soon became irrelevant, but at the start of Stewart’s tenure, it was very true. At the top of every episode, the show introduced itself as “The Most Important Television Program … Ever,” a designation that worked precisely because, well, it was far from it.

Bet then came November 7, 2000, Bush versus Gore, and Indecision 2000. “It is too close to tell, and I just don’t know what to do,” Stewart says towards the end of the broadcast, which also featured a segment in which Lewis Black made fun of Bush’s articulateness, or lack thereof. Viewers were also invited to head over to news.yahoo.com and take a poll.

The show returned the next day with the election still undecided, a bigger fiasco than any of them could have anticipated. “Calling this thing Indecision 2000 was at first a bit of a lighthearted jab,” Stewart says at the top of the broadcast. The entire team acted as if they had been trapped in the studio all day, waiting for the election to be called: Stewart chain-smoking at his desk, Walls and Rocca looking delirious “outside” the Gore and Bush headquarters, and a harried Colbert trapped in a decisionless purgatory.

Closing out the show, Stewart signs off, “Good-night, and help us.”

With the election undecided, the show focused on other topics. Pets.com goes under in mid-November, and in an odd bit of promotion, the show devotes an entire week to interviewing the cast of Little Nicky.

But there’s still a lot to be mined from the situation in “big ol’ retarded Florida.” Colbert heads up a panel of old, indecisive Jews and Stewart interviews “the world’s foremost authority in mathematics,” Sesame Street’s Count (a sort of precursor to the show’s recurring “Gitmo” segment, consisting of a puppet-resembling Elmo). Stewart also takes time to speak with tireless legal expert Greta Van Susteren, who was working for CNN in 2000 as, in Stewart’s words, “a voice of reason” amid partisan commentators.

The show’s 2000 election coverage is the first hint of the type of righteous indignation that Stewart would eventually become famous for. “The final margin in the state of Florida: 5 votes to 4 votes,” Stewart says of the Supreme Court decision, adding that, with the support of Clarence Thomas, Bush won “100 percent of the African-American vote.”

2001

At this point, the Month of Zen stream had been covering Indecision 2000 for eight hours, and I decided to take a slight break during the first half of 2001, knowing that the show was nine months out from … you know. Most of the show’s presidential commentary during the early 2001 period focused on Bush’s ability to conjure up new words and speculation that Cheney was pulling the strings, a joke that was old even in 2001.

By the morning of July 3, the stream had edged up to August 2001. Vance DeGeneres had left the show, and at some point, Matt Walsh (sans mustache) joined. The nation’s teenagers were injuring themselves trying to imitate Jackass, and Kevin Smith and Will Ferrell dropped by to promote Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.

On August 23, 2001, the show signed off and took a two-week break. It returned on September 10, 2001.

There’s not much notable about the show’s last pre-9/11 episode, other than an ominous feeling that exists only because I knew what was next. They Might Be Giants were on to promote “Mink Car.” The show’s Moment of Zen was of Bush performing a terrible coin-toss.

The show ceased production after 9/11 and returned on September 20. That first episode following the tragedy rolled in without an intro, without Bob Mould’s theme song, and without an announcer stating the date of the broadcast. It just faded up on Jon Stewart’s now-famous shaken monologue. “Our show has changed,” Stewart says. “What’s it’s become, I don’t know … ‘Subliminable’ is not a punch line anymore.”

The show’s Moment of Zen is Stewart reaching under his desk and pulling out a puppy.

There are a number of visible changes that appear over the course of the week. For one, the show’s intro and outro music is acoustic, a conscious choice to put the audience at ease. Stewart’s first three guests are all journalists: Frank Rich, CNN reporter Aaron Brown (who at that point was still tirelessly anchoring the network’s coverage), and Jeff Greenfield. Up until this point, Stewart’s guest roster had been almost exclusively composed of Hollywood celebrities. Following 9/11, there’s an obvious broadening of guests on the show. Though still dominated by celebrities, there’s a conscious effort to include more journalists, and Stewart, even at this early point in his career, is great at asking questions on behalf of his audience and admitting that he doesn’t know what he doesn’t know. On October 18, 2001, Fareed Zakaria made the first of what would be many appearances on the show, discussing his Newsweek cover story, “Why They Hate Us.”

Which is not to say that Stewart’s show became deadly serious. On his third show back from the tragedy, September 25, 2000, Stewart and Colbert ridiculed the latest early-00s Fox reality nightmare: the prime-time special Who Wants to Be a Princess. By September 27, the standard date announcement intro had returned, but without the proclamation of The Daily Show being “The Most Important Television Program … Ever.”

2002

On July 5, the stream had reached June 2002. Some new faces, Ed Helms and Rob Corddry, had joined the cast. A particularly exceptional Even Stevphen segment from June 19, 2002 begins with a debate on the so-called “death tax” and ends with Carell and Colbert negotiating a hit job:

The summer of 2002 also featured the first I had yet seen of what would later become a Daily Show trademark: a series of clips in which the subject of ridicule digs his own grave. In this case, it was just-expelled Ohio congressman James Traficant. It was around this time that The Daily Show team seemed to be sharpening its research and compilation skills.

When I picked up the stream again, it was the fall of 2002, WMD inspections in Iraq were dominating headlines, as well as a certain windsailing senator. On a November 12, 2002 episode, a week after the midterm elections, Stewart noted: “One beacon of hope is potential democratic president John Kerry.”

2003

The episodes of early 2003 find The Daily Show crystallizing the political identity that it showed briefly post–Election 2000 and more frequently post-9/11. The show knows when to poke fun at the ridiculousness of the situation, like when Republicans wanted to shift from French fries to “freedom fries.” But Stewart’s interviews -- an aspect of Stewart’s showmanship that has been exceptional since the beginning -- show a host perfecting a style both genial and confrontational. When he interviews Dick Gephardt just over a week before “shock and awe” began, Gephardt at one point voices the oft-repeated idea that Bush is “a uniter, not a divider.” Stewart forcefully but slyly replies, “Europe is pretty united right now.”

The shows immediately preceding the start of the War in Iraq positions Stewart as an almost calming presence amid the uncertainty of a military operation far more dubious than the one in Afghanistan. On March 17, 2003, Stewart leads off his show by telling viewers, “This show is taped, so as far as I know, right now, we are not at war,” advising them to “check the other live stations right now.” On March 20, the day the war commenced, Stewart simply promised to “keep you informed of any late-breaking humor.”

The day that the Iraq War began, Stewart rolled out a perennial favorite: Fox News criticism, sarcastically referring to them as, “Fair. Balanced. AWESOME!”

Perhaps most telling in all of this is that, by March of 2003, the audience response to Stewart’s jokes has changed. More than ever before, Stewart’s quips about the shakiness of the case for war in Iraq are met with claps of agreement, not laughs. The week following the start of the war, in a segment examining Dick Cheney’s close ties to Halliburton, Stewart at one point remarks: “Hearing that does make me feel like the government just took a shit on my chest.” That’s not really a joke, is it?

Stewart solidified his place in the national consciousness not by making his audience laugh but by voicing concerns they agreed with. By early 2003, Stewart had seen egregious politicking (the Supreme Court handing the 2000 election to Bush), staggering, era-defining tragedy (the 9/11 attacks, from New York City), and watched as the executive branch launched a widely criticized military operation (Iraq). For Stewart to stick to spitballs from the back of the class, and not become a liberal advocate of sorts, seems nearly impossible. But Stewart framed his arguments not as a liberal TV host speaking against a conservative government (and 24-hour news channel), but as a rational TV host against irrational foes.

2004

The Daily Show had so solidified its political and cultural voice that by 2004, the Month of Zen stream had become less interesting to watch. It was fascinating to see Stewart come into his own (and somewhere along the way acquire a suit that actually fit him). The rest of it — with still more than a decade to go — became less about watching the show develop and more about appreciating how it maintained such a high plateau.

Stewart himself references this in a late October 2004 episode, just before the election. Leading off the show, he remarks that that night’s episode was, “Bush said this, Kerry said this, Lewis Black is angry.” Stewart seems to already be feeling a slight malaise on November 1, 2004, when he asks voters to “make these next four years difficult for me” by electing Kerry into office, ostensibly robbing the show of its main villain, the Bush administration.

The next night, Election Night 2004: Prelude to a Recount, Colbert kept an abundance of survival supplies near his desk. Ed Helms declared Bush an early winner without having official results: “Waiting for official results is a sign of weakness.” And in case you thought the show had outgrown easier comedy, Rob Corddry reported on voting-booth handles covered in poop bacteria. The show was such a phenomenon at that point that Comedy Central actually sold DVDs of their 2004 election coverage.

2005–2007

Midway through July, the Month of Zen stream had reached December 2005, and another Daily Show trademark made its first appearance in my monthlong endeavor: the secular War on Christmas. For a decade, Bill O’Reilly bloviated about the show’s supposed mission to stamp out religion, and for a decade, Stewart respond with, basically, this:

The next day, another staple in the Daily Show bag of tricks made an appearance. Earlier that month, an air marshal shot a passenger in a plane parked at a Miami airport. “The silver lining, at least,” Stewart argued, “is that the 24-hour networks were up and running, to bring us information and context.” Cue the montage of rampant, unconfirmed speculation from CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC.

It’s nearly a minute long, and you can practically hear the audience realize what it is they’re watching midway through. Remember, this was a period before supercuts, and YouTube was only one year old at the time. Nobody had seen a format quite like this before, laying out the media tricks and vamps so plainly and succinctly. The Daily Show made media critics out of every single one of its viewers.

It would be unfair to say that The Daily Show in this mid-00s period was on autopilot, but the Iraq War and the Bush administration supplied them with so many moments and quotes to ridicule, it allowed Stewart to keep the four-year-old war at the forefront of public consciousness. In early 2007, as the Bush administration tested the waters of a confrontation with Iran by claiming they were supplying Iraqi fighters with weapons, Stewart let Bush dig his own grave in a mid-February installment of the long running MessO’Potamia. “Here’s my point: Either they knew or didn’t know,” Bush said. “What matters is, is that they’re there.” Later in the segment, Stewart informs John Oliver that the U.S. has a long history of supplying fighters, like the Taliban, with weapons. “We son of a bitch!” Oliver exclaims in a realization at once funny, sad, and, in a way, vital in its distillation of American foreign policy.

2008

The Month of Zen gets a bit of rejuvenation when I tuned in on July 20 for a batch of episodes from July 2008. The run included one covering then-candidate Obama’s trip to Iraq — the trip where he nailed a three-pointer in front of a crowd of troops and media cameras. In a part-parody of the media’s hagiographic coverage, part-genuine celebration of Obama’s perceived “coolness,” the show pretends to send four overeager correspondents who talk about Obama like overexcited teenagers to Iraq.

Later in the episode, Wyatt Cenac heads down to Florida to get old Jews to bicker about the election. If that sounds familiar, it’s because Stephen Colbert did practically the exact same thing during the 2000 recount. The show was reusing old premises, and though I can’t really fault a four-times-a-week news show that produced thousands of episodes for recycling a premise eight years later, its redundancy was tough to ignore during a monthlong marathon-watch. The show was a well-oiled machine at this point, and it knew the best ways to get people to embarrass themselves.

2009–present

The Daily Show as we’ve known it for the past half-decade or so is a much more focused endeavor than its beginning years. In its early days, the show’s gonzo cast of correspondents ping-ponged between disparate topics with Stewart as their ringleader. (Did you know The Daily Show used to regularly review movies? It’s true!) Sometimes the guest interviews happened in the middle of the show. By 2009, the show’s format had been honed to a three-part formula separated by commercial breaks: a quote-unquote big opening segment on the dominant news topic of the day; a second shorter segment, often on a topic with less immediacy; and lastly, a guest interview.

Of the episodes I watched, the most emblematic of these A-block “big” pieces was a segment from January 2013, a month after the Sandy Hook shooting that killed 26 children, in which Stewart combines archival footage and righteous outrage to trace the government’s widely dysfunctional implementation of gun control. Stewart often tends to eschew having specific political ideologies attached to him, but the segment is the show at its best on two levels: Stewart, a man clear in his political stance, backed by a research apparatus that informs about the ways in which government has failed while also satirizing it. I can’t imagine The Daily Show even touching a situation like Sandy Hook in its early years.

One episode during my month of viewing stuck out to me as a perfect example of The Daily Show firing on all cylinders: October 2, 2006. “Late last week, Congress approved a new detainee bill that gives the president sweeping authority. He’ll have the power to interpret the Geneva Conventions, it’ll suspend habeas corpus for non-citizens. We spent all of Friday talking about this issue, knowing that it would be our headline today. ’Cause, really, what else could happen that would be big enough to change out coverage of non-citizens losing the right of habeas corpus—”

“Oooh, right.”

The Mark Foley congressional-page scandal was a sort of perfect storm for The Daily Show. It featured a disgraced Republican congressman sending explicit sexual messages, and indicated that Republican leadership knew of it. It featured hypocrisy, as Foley had been the chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. It had members of the media forced to read the sexts with gravitas. It had the setup for a great/groan-worthy pun, “Foley Erect,” and a Caligula reference.

On top of it all, the guest that day was Mississippi Republican Senator Trent Lott, whom Stewart flat-out asks, “What’s wrong with the House of Representatives? And I’m not trying to excuse the Senate, but is that the little bus that they take to the statehouse?” Later in the conversation, Stewart drops the joker façade and tells Lott, “It just keeps giving the American public the sense that no one’s in charge.” He also gently criticizes Lott for referring to Foley as having been “overly friendly.”

It’s a remarkable episode for The Daily Show and for Stewart in particular, who has his cake and eats it, too. And what’s more amazing is it’s not unique. There are countless episodes like this in Stewart’s oeuvre; an immense body of work that in many ways defined the first decade and a half of the new millennium. Jon Stewart found his groove quickly — larger events forced his hand in that regard — but that he managed to sustain that level for more than a decade is perhaps even more of a feat. Just the prospect of watching the Month of Zen was exhausting to think about. I can’t even fathom having to star in it.

Read more posts by Brian Feldman

Filed Under: the daily show ,the daily show with jon stewart ,marathons ,jon stewart

30 Jul 01:24

The Average Car On The Road Is 11.5 Years Old

by Laura Northrup
Rachel

11 years...pfh. That's nothing, try 30 years. Ha. (crying in corner. damnit, I need a new car).

My car was manufactured about eleven and a half years ago, which I thought was relatively old. That’s why I was surprised to learn that it’s perfectly average. According to data compiled by the consulting firm IHS Automotive, cars that are registered and on the roads have an average age of 11.5 years, and there’s a record number of cars registered right now.

Why does this matter? First, it’s interesting, because the trend of older cars began during the recession, and the average age of cars on the road has been increasing since 2008. People wouldn’t be keeping their cars for longer (or acquiring older used cars) if the cars themselves weren’t more durable, though, and that indicates that cars are more reliable than they use to be and staying out of the scrap heap.

IHS_Automotive_-_Length_of_vehicle_ownership_q1_2005-2015

IHS are business consultants, though, and one important implication of this data for repair shops, dealerships, and auto parts manufacturers is that with more cars that are in or approaching their teens in circulation, there will need to be more parts for those vehicles and mechanics able to work on them.

Cars that are more than ten or eleven years old used to be thought of as an anomaly by some aftermarket repair shops, and that’s not the case now: eleven-year-old cars are perfectly average.

Average Age of Light Vehicles in the U.S. Rises Slightly in 2015 to 11.5 years, IHS Reports (via Fortune)

30 Jul 01:22

Newswire: Venice lineup confirms that all film festivals must include Jake Gyllenhaal

by A.A. Dowd
Rachel

I will go one step further and say that everything should include Jake Gyllenhaal.

Is Jake Gyllenhaal the official star of the fall festival season? Yesterday, the programmers of the Toronto International Film Festival announced the first batch of movies that will be screening there in September, including opening night selection Demolition, featuring Gyllenhaal as a bereaved husband. Today, the programmers of the Venice Film Festival followed suit, laying out their own lineup, and as it turns out, they’ll be kicking things off on a Donnie Darko-ish note, too: Venice, which overlaps with TIFF by two days, will commence with Everest, a mountain-climbing drama starring (you guessed it) Jake Gyllenhaal. How you going to chase that trend, New York Film Festival? Does the actor have a secretly shot Nightcrawler sequel you can slot into opening night?

One Southpaw star isn’t the only point of overlap between Venice and Toronto, the latter of which will screen new films from Atom Egoyan, True ...

29 Jul 13:49

Announcing NPR’s Summer of Love: The List of 100 Swoon-Worthy Romances

by SB Sarah
Rachel

Flowers from the Storm! I can't believe it took me so long to find and read that one. (I've read quite a few of these but should really step up my game)

I was part of a four-person committee force (or task-ittee?) with Michelle Monkou, Sherry Thomas, and Bobbi Dumas to determine the NPR’s Summer of Love list of 100 Swoon-Worthy Romances. After a ton (a TON) of nominations via Google and two very long (whoa long) conference calls, the list has been announced.

Have a look at the NPR top 100 Romances!

AND ALSO THE GRAPHIC which I LOVE SO MUCH, and was created by Mary McLain at NPR. Applause and champagne for Ms. McLain!

Illustration of two people on a romantic date, both reading books. The man is reading a pink novel and the woman, who has beautiful braids and a long dress, is reading with a GIANT stack of books beside her

We tried to build a list that would show the variety of the different types of romance while highlighting titles that readers love to recommend. If you’re curious as to why a particular book didn’t make it, Petra, one of the NPR Books editors, write about that part of the process, too.

I’m sure there’s a book of six you think should have been on the list – and I know NPR wants to hear about it (and so do I if you’re inclined). This was a lot of fun – so thank you to NPR for inviting me.

And apologies to everyone who might have to add a bunch of these to the TBR. Oh, the dangerous temptation of lists.

24 Jul 13:38

Great Job, Internet!: Batman V Superman trailer perfected by adding It’s Always Sunny’s “Dayman”

by Rob Dean

Sometimes things in pop culture align perfectly. Whether it’s synching up Pink Floyd’s “Echoes” with the end of 2001: A Space Odyssey, or a bunch of anime clips cut to “The Becoming” by Nine Inch Nails, a combination of seemingly disparate elements can come together and perfectly distill both to reveals their true essence. Such is the work of Albert Lopez, who has revealed that beneath all of the sturm und drang of the trailer, Batman V Superman: Dawn Of Justice really comes down to the simplest of oppositions: Nightman versus Dayman (champion of the sun).

Using the amazing song from It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia, as performed by Charlie Day and Glenn Howerton, Lopez reveals the simplistic core at the heart of the conflict. By recutting the trailer around the song, suddenly it all becomes clear this is nothing more than a big screen adaptation of ...

23 Jul 14:42

Kit Harington Is Slowly Realizing That the Next 9 Months of His Life Are Going to Be Hell

by Nate Jones
Rachel

lol.


If you read the Game of Thrones books, you know that Jon Snow is probably coming back from the dead. If you look at Kit Harington's hair, you know that Jon Snow is probably coming back from the dead. And if you saw the pictures of Kit Harington arriving in Belfast (where GOT season six is currently in production) this week, you know that Jon Snow is probably coming back from the dead. But, of course, like Schrödinger's cat, we won't know for sure that Jon's back until Thrones returns next spring, which means that for the next nine months, every single one of Harington's movements will be obsessively scrutinized for clues towards Jon's status. And he knows it, too: As you can tell from the photos fans have been snapping, he's absolutely miserable about being spotted — and not just because that's the way his face looks. Are we going to be doing this every time I step out in public? he seems to be saying. Yes, Kit. Yes we are.

Read more posts by Nate Jones

Filed Under: kit harington ,jon snow ,jon snow theories ,game of thrones ,game of thrones season 6

23 Jul 00:53

The Hitler Trollface And Other Photos Banned By The Nazis

by Zeon Santos
Rachel

Holy fuck that second picture is scary.

The Nazis were incredibly thorough when it came to whitewashing their public image, and any images that cast them in a humorous, ridiculous or strangely sexy(?) light were simply not allowed.

Meanwhile, Hitler and the Nazis tried to live normal lives, carrying on like normal folks and occasionally cheesing it up for the camera.

These fun photos were the bane of the Nazi’s propaganda department, and they were strictly verboten by Der Fuhrer himself even though he seemed to be enjoying himself while he posed for the pics.

Vintage Everyday has put together a collection of The Secret Photographs Adolf Hitler Wanted to Ban from the World Forever, which includes this sinister moment:

-Via Dangerous Minds

17 Jul 14:25

Wilco Released a Free Album Called Star Wars

by Pretty Much Amazing
Rachel

This is a thing that makes my sad life a little happier.

Surprise! Wilco just busted a Beyoncé in tremendous fashion with Star Wars—that title! That cat on the cover!—the band’s 11th album and their first since 2011’s great The Whole Love. The best part is that you can download the album for free “for a limited time” over at the band’s ...

Continue reading

17 Jul 14:24

Tiny Toesday

by Brinke
Rachel

Awwww, I wish my kitten was this size forever. :'(

unnamedJessica L. took this photo for the CHOTK FB page.


Filed under: Uncategorized Tagged: kitteh, Toesday
16 Jul 02:14

Stephen Colbert Chats With Neil deGrasse Tyson About New Pluto Information

by Matt Delhauer
Rachel

I'm never going to get tired of sharing this shit. :)

The new pictures and information that NASA has gathered on Pluto over the past week from the New Horizons probe have been all the rage on the internet, and Stephen Colbert has set out to discuss this topic with none other than Neil deGrasse Tyson. Stephen’s reason to reach out to Neil isn’t just because he is the coolest man in the science game, but because good ol’ NdT was one of the biggest supporters of demoting Pluto to Dwarf Planet status a few years ago.This new information from NASA’s probe has now called that decision into question.

pluto-new-horizon-07152015

[Image: NASA]

The discussion begins with Colbert looking to see Neil change his stance on Pluto with the newest information about Pluto being bigger than we had thought a few years ago. Tyson, however, explains that the 20-30km increase in Pluto’s estimated size is in no way big enough to truly change the decision on Pluto’s status as a Dwarf Planet. What he is excited about, like so many others, is finally having the first detailed images of the planet ever, and knowing that even more high resolution pictures will be coming in from day-to-day over the next year. Check out the whole video and see if Colbert can get Neil to finally admit that Pluto should be a planet. SPOILER: He doesn’t.

They do, however, enjoy a delicious snack and have a nice chat about Neil’s planetary rating system– also known as his tie– and the the relative perspective of what is or is not a “dwarf” planet based on who is the one measuring. It is interesting to think of how life on Jupiter would be quick to consider Earth a dwarf planet based on the standard Earth’s scientists use against Pluto. The real take away, though, seems to be that Tang is disgusting and no one should drink it.

Have thoughts on the new Pluto pictures and info? What about thoughts on the powdered drink mix Tang? Let us know in the comments below!