Maintaining the Sales Machine
In their November 2013 Harvard Business Review article Dismantling the Sales Machine Brent Adamson, Matthew Dixon, and Nicholas Toman of the Corporate Executive Board (CEB) assert that “Leaders must abandon their fixation on (sales) process compliance.” In place of “disciplined sales process” they favor a flexible approach to sales in which salespeople rely on their own insight and judgment. That they find sales process discipline and a sales force capable of insight and judgment incompatible seems untenable.
The CEB has long brought much to the sales space with its research. They have been at the forefront of recognizing the new sales environment and helping define the new buyer. In their article, they rightly point to many significant developments:
- The new sales environment favors creative and adaptive salespeople.
- Deals vary from one to the next.
- Performance trumps protocol.
- Salespeople must have latitude.
- Managers’ roles are to guide, support, and serve as coaches rather than enforcers.
- The new world of selling demands greater collaboration among team members.
They also acknowledge that many average performers benefit from clear direction regarding their activities and being held accountable for specific milestones, which are primary goals of sales process.
This is all true. But contrary to the assumptions and conclusions the authors make, the sales machine/sales process discipline does not work against the above trends, but it enables them. I believe far from dismantling the sales process, sales organizations need to embrace it and make it part of their sales DNA.
The predominance of research I have seen from firms such as Salesforce, Aberdeen, and CSO Insights shows that there is a high correlation between best-in-class sales performance and the discipline of sales process. This correlation is supported by everything I know from my client work and specific feedback from the managers at my sales management program at Wharton. Rather than most sales organizations operating as well-oiled sales machines, we learn from Aberdeen that too many organizations lack a defined sales process, and according to McKinsey, many of those that do have adoption problems.
Having a defined sales process that spells out objectives, best practice activities, customer actions, sales tools, and models for each stage does not have to suppress creativity and flexibility. Dashboards provide valuable
information and don’t by nature dash creativity. An effective sales process serves as a critical guidepost for salespeople to follow and managers to coach and track to. The goal of a sales process is not only to be efficient but to be effective.
A good process replicates the best practice performance of star performers. This eliminates the need for each salesperson to reinvent the wheel or operate without the knowledge the wheel exists. One salesperson in a team I am working with shared a “secret” (best practice) to reengage with prospects who have gone dark. Using this best practice, team members increased their ability to reengage by 50%. This shared best practice did not strip away the use of judgment by members of the sales team, some who at first resisted it and others who use the tactic judiciously.
I have found over the past two years that when salespeople and sales managers are provided with a clear sales process that is linked with formal, but even more importantly informal, coaching, coaching conversations become easier and more productive. I have gone so far as to align coaching questions to each phase of the sales process — not to confine but to support manager, peer, and self-coaching. Having the right questions provokes judgment and creativity. And while a lot of the coaching is around deal review, deal review is more than numbers and includes developing insights and judgment and the strategies and skills needed to execute. Effective coaching is coaching by asking, not telling, and it is important not to conflate what to coach with how to coach: one is knowledge and one is skill. Both are needed for dialogue.
Maybe we are just speaking different languages. If a sales machine/sales process operates as the authors describe it, “inflexible governance that works through formal rules,” meaning that salespeople are turned into robots, then the sales machine indeed is in destructive overdrive and should be turned off and repaired. If this is the case, the problem is in the design. But generalizing that the sales machine/all sales processes should be dismantled is a huge step backward for sales. The key is to make sure that the sales process mirrors and influences today’s customer buying cycles and buying habits and is supported with a collaborative coaching methodology.
Provocative titles grab attention. Just as the customer need dialogue (solution selling) is not dead, neither is sales process. Both must evolve, and have but they should not be abandoned. An effective sales process does not prevent a salesperson from exercising judgment and being creative in dealing with highly knowledgeable customers. Indeed, an effective sales process is an indispensable tool for sales force development and productivity. The world in which salespeople operate with judgment and creativity that the authors describe is a world I subscribe to, but with sales process in it.
Today, in the sales space, we have the advantage of technology and data not available to us just a short time ago, and we also have research into the new buyer and what it takes for a salesperson to succeed in the new world of selling. Judgment, creativity, and expertise are essential to selling today. If I had to choose between a sales force run by data and cognitive patterns or what I will call for shorthand “human talent,” the latter would win hands down. But I don’t have to choose. I can have both — and so can you.

The post Maintaining the Sales Machine appeared first on The Richardson Sales Excellence Review™.
I’ve been reading a lot of posts lately about making emotiional connections with B2B buyers, along with reminders not to forget their personal side. But this doesn’t mean to start looking at them as B2C consumers – even though they are when they’re away from the office. In professional mode, “personal” is a bit different.
Hiring is a science right? Well you would think so, but it is shocking how many organizations approach hiring in an ad-hoc, unstructured manner, hoping that results will be positive. Perhaps the one mistake that we most often see companies making that in turn kills their chances of hiring great (or even good) sales people is not defining success criteria. You would think this would be a no-brainer, but apparently not. A surprising number of company don’t even set quota’s, opting instead for a “do-your-best” sort of measurement system. Unfortunately this usually leads to disappointing results.
There’s no better time to set a new goal than the start of a new year. Forget those generic resolutions that you usually break. Instead, commit yourself to success in every sales conversation you have this year.
Have you ever presented a “sales golden nugget” that your audience didn’t understand? It is so compelling, yet your sales training class did not grasp it. Did you look around the room to see if they were still listening? Did anyone wake themselves up with a “snore”?
"WOW Factor”. Use a “WOW Factor” to grab attention in the beginning of your story. Sales people want to hear a compelling reason to listen. Tell them how much money they can make. This almost always works. 
You wake up in the morning and check your email on your phone, tablet, or laptop. You get to work and you check your work email. You delete some emails, save some for reading later, and reply to others right away. But what makes you stop and read some emails versus saving them and forgetting to come back to them until a week later? There are a few things you can do to help your emails get noticed by prospects.





The need for inside sales REPs is constantly growing nowadays with many B2B companies having a strategic change in their sales teams’ structure. InsideSales.com conducted a research with shocking results showing that “inside sales is growing 300% faster than outside sales”. This is happening mainly due to the fact that inside sales increases sales effectiveness, productivity and minimizes costs. “Surveying more than 100 senior-level sales leaders from high technology and business services companies (…)46 percent of respondents reported a migration from field to inside sales models within their organization over the last two years”(Steve W. Martin, Velocify)
In sales we always talk about the importance of getting close to our customers.
















For a lot of people hoping to land a new sales job this year, it is a priority to create a resume that is search engine friendly. Unfortunately this often leads to resumes that are less succinct and are jammed with keywords which distract from the accomplishments and abilities of a sales person.





You just got your new quota and it’s gone up. Now you need to roll it out to your management team. You know there is going to be pushback from your team. Don’t panic, it’s not the end of the world.

