Shared posts
7-Up Fuelled 12 Year Old Beats Greg Shahade
AndreweroseI'm amused by this video (as context the older guy is some chess champion). The comments from the kid are hilarious
Bath Planetarium
Andreweroseimagining having this as a kid...bath time would be even more epic




The waterproof planetarium floats in water and contains a bright light that projects out into the room, or even into the tub itself when flipped over.
Top 10 Very Deadliest Spiders
AndreweroseSharing for the monster mosquitos - ughh (5th from bottom)




Cicada Recipes: Bugs Are Low-Carb, Gluten-Free Food
U.N. Urges Eating Insects; 8 Popular Bugs to Try
Cockroaches evolved to avoid sugary baits
Weird pirate ant comes with an 'eye patch'
Butterflies: Masters of disguise
Honey bees could help to clear dangerous land mines in Croatia
Ant studies to aid design of search and rescue robots
UK's rare spring butterflies make a late show
Malaria parasite lures mosquito to human odour
I've often seen bees infested with mites, but rarely one so heavily laden
The moth that made mobile phone companies sit up and listen
Top 10 Very Deadliest Spiders
Ants Ring Woman's Doorbell Repeatedly
How Do Mosquitoes Survive Rainstorms?
Giant pink slug discovered in Australian mountains
10 Surprising Uses of Insects in Medicine
Monster Mosquitoes Emerge in Central Florida
Hive of honeybees does 'the wave'... with their butts (Video)
Short-haired bumblebees to be released on nature reserve
Pangbourne sprays to kill oak processionary caterpillar 'dangerous'
The Last Butterfly: Saving an America Beauty From Extinction
King drops in-game ads
Andrewerose@all you Candy Crush addicts
Xbox One: A flawed plan, well executed
Andrewerosesharing not for article - but for this quote:
"But instead of the future being that every room in the house will have a screen, it is that every person in the house will have a screen. The future battle is not for the control of the living room: it is for control of the direct relationship between creator and consumer via this personal screen"
Seems true that the battle for the living room is the wrong battle. Might explain why Google and Apple have put such little focus / effort on it.
There is a famous (unfortunately apocryphal) psychological experiment involving ten monkeys, a banana and ice cold water.
Five of the monkeys were placed in a cage with a banana at the top of some steps in a corner. One monkey heads for the banana and gets soused with ice cold water. So do the other monkeys. The next time a monkey goes for the banana, the others, remembering the ice shower, restrain him.
Now one monkey is taken out and a new, naive monkey added. He sees the banana, runs for it, and the other four monkeys stop him forcibly. Gradually every monkey who has experienced the ice cold shower is removed and replaced by one who has not. Eventually, not one of the monkeys in the cage has ever experienced the ice water. A new monkey is added and goes for the banana. He is attacked. No monkey knows why, but “that’s not how we do things around here”.
I fear that senior Microsoft executives are those monkeys, carrying on a strategy while losing sight of why they were trying to do it in the first place.
Why the Xbox even exists
Three years ago, I wrote these words as part of a proposal for a book on why the console era is coming to an end.
“[The Xbox is part of a] grandiose strategy. Microsoft built its dominance through the ubiquity of its operating systems on PCs. Initially with DOS, and subsequently with Windows, the company established itself as the platform for users and developers. Now it is vying to control access to information from the living room. Three pieces of hardware have long been perceived as potential winners in this battle: the PC, the video game console and the satellite/cable set-top box. Microsoft already dominates the PC market. In 1997, it invested $1 billion in a 7.3% stake in Comcast, the US cable company, in an attempt to build a “Windows-based gateway to the television [although it subsequently sold it]. And the Xbox is designed to cover the third potential route to the market, to make sure that whichever of the three pieces of hardware win the battle, Microsoft has a place at the table.”

Against that background, the Xbox One reveal makes sense. It was all about following that grand strategy of owning the living room. The focus on television ahead of games makes sense if the job of the Xbox One is to own the living room. Yet the strategy that Microsoft seems to be following (TV! Sports! Space!) seems misguided, both tactically and strategically.
Tactically, Microsoft needs to get an installed base fast. To do that, you need a product that solves a need. The problem the Xbox One solves best is a gaming one: “how can I play great games on my 42” screen?” The other problems it solves (“how do I control my television with my voice?”, “how do I stream television content through the same box I play my games on?”) are not problems that consumers know they have, so they are unlikely to rush out to spend several hundred dollars to solve them. The Xbox 360 was a games device first and foremost, yet more than half of the time spent on the console is now spent consuming other media. Score one for the Trojan Horse tactic. That’s why it seems so odd that Microsoft have abandoned the tactic so well in the last generation.
But the real problem with the Xbox One is about the strategy, not the tactics.
Xbox One is a 1990s strategy
The Xbox One is the latest step in a strategy conceived in the 1990s. The ambition was to control the living room. That seemed like a laudable objective back when the world seemed likely to be heading towards bigger, more dominant, more impressive screens in every room of every house.
That’s not what’s happening any more.
Since Bill Gates first set out the control-the-living-room strategy, two things have upended the old order. Firstly, all of us have a powerful computer within 5 feet of us at every hour of every day. The smartphone has altered how we consume content . The second is the emergence of the tablet as a media consumption device.
Smartphones and tablets are often called the second screen. I think we can expect that to flip over time. The first screen, the screen we turn to first, the screen that is personal and connected to us, will be a portable, personal screen. It will be a phone or a tablet or both. Households will still have huge TV screens for sports events, for shared TV experiences, for HD gaming. But instead of the future being that every room in the house will have a screen, it is that every person in the house will have a screen. The future battle is not for the control of the living room: it is for control of the direct relationship between creator and consumer via this personal screen.
It’s like Microsoft is fighting to be the person who controls the fixed line phone in an age of mobile telephony.
Corporations versus startups
I am a big fan of The Lean Startup by Eric Ries. One of the most depressing things an advocate of the Lean Startup approach can watch is a talented team executing flawlessly against a plan chock-full of wrong assumptions. Entrepreneurialism is about figuring out how to adapt your plans rapidly to changing information. Bill Gates was an entrepreneur. I fear that no one left at Microsoft is. They are executing against a 15 year old strategy that assumes that the living room is at the heart of where value lies for content consumption in the twenty-first century.
I’m not saying that HD experiences have no place. Far from it. But I am saying that Microsoft is fighting a three-way battle for the living room against set-top boxes and the PC. Meanwhile, two other contenders – the phone and the tablet – have waltzed in and said “Hey, you guys. That’s fine. You go and spend billions of dollars on controlling the living room. We’ll sit that fight out. Instead, we’ll build a strong, personal relationship (complete with one-click purchasing) with every consumer on the planet. You can have the rooms. We’ll have the people.”
The assorted criticism of the Xbox One from the web (“we didn’t see the games”, “MS doesn’t care about indies”, “it’s all about telly”, “it’s all about the US”, “it’s all about 15-34 white male Americans”) are all part of the same story. Microsoft is fighting to control the living room. It might yet win.
And then it will stop. Look around at a living room filled with four family members each engrossed in their own personal device, buying and sharing and playing and watching, glancing up occasionally at the big screen.
And they will realise that a strategy forged in the late 1990s might not be so relevant in 2013.
Dropcatch Magnetic Bottle Opener
Andreweroseso smart
Giddy Up
AndreweroseI'm trying to dissect why this makes me laugh. I think really I just want to ride the tiny horsey / pony
Mobile Is Eating The World
AndreweroseI really liked the simplicity of the presentation - date spoke for itself
Benedict Evans is quickly becoming my favorite Internet analyst. I follow his blog and twitter religiously. This slideshare he posted a few weeks ago is an example of his excellent work:
Sloth Finger Ring
Andrewerose@andrew - don't you have a thing for sloths
The highest-paid CEO in America is some dude you’ve never heard of (infographic)
Andreweroseyou know you've made it when you're making 6 figures a day
Ever heard of John H. Hammergren? Or a company called McKesson?
Me neither.
But Mr. Hammergren is the highest-paid CEO in America, according to a CEO compensation study by Bolt Insurance, pulling in a not-too-shabby $131 million last year for his health-care and pharmaceuticals company. That’s thanks to cashing in a significant number of stock options in addition to his base salary.
McKesson had sales of $122 billion in 2012, so apparently there are a lot of pesos in pain.
By comparison, Ralph Lauren (the brand) CEO Ralph Lauren pulls in a relatively paltry $66.6 million — how will we buy that small European nation now, darling? — and third-place finisher Michael D. Fascitelli of the Vornado Realty Trust banked $64.4 million.
One good trend in recent years: CEO pay is getting tied more and more to company performance.
As recently as 2009, for instance, CEO pay was only 34.7 percent related to how much money a company made. In 2012, however, the last year for which statistics are available, a slight majority of companies — 50.5 percent — have shifted to at least some form of performance-based compensation. And 60 percent of the companies in the Standard & Poor’s 1500 stock indexes have linked equity awards to company track record, up from just 20 percent in 2002.
Other tech notables on the list include Priceline.com CEO Jeffery H. Boyd, who pulled in just over $50 million last year.
All the data, in visual form:
photo credit: alles-schlumpf via photopin cc
Filed under: Business, OffBeat
Microsoft Believes Next-Gen Consoles Will Sell Over a Billion Units
AndreweroseUh, you know those times when you can see a train wreck in motion. Current xbox install base is <100m.
Password Problems
Andrewerosesort of like when you tell your tenants that your alarm password is *6969
Supporting the Scripture
Andrewerosethe f u made me laugh
EA bets on single-player experience with The Sims 4
Andrewerose@lau - uh oh
Develop Quiz: How many games has Mario starred in?
Andrewerosesharing because of the question, my guess wasn't anywhere close
$10,000 App Store gift card up for grabs as Apple approaches 50bn app downloads
AndreweroseMy estimate is we'll hit it in about 8 days from now
Sciency Tentacles
Andrewerosereal or fake? If real I need to try this
* sand * alcohol or lighter fluid
* sugar
* baking soda
1. Mix 4 parts powdered sugar with 1 part baking soda.
2. Make a mound with the sand. Push a depression into the middle of the sand.
3. Pour the alcohol or other fuel into the sand to wet it.
4. Pour the sugar and baking soda mixture into the depression.
5. Ignite the mound, using a lighter or match. thefuzzydave
Dog Dance Gif
AndreweroseThis amuses me to no end.
No need to get off the couch. Gamers can order Pizza Hut using Xbox Live
Andrewerosethere's something disturbing but also amazing about this
Gamers love pizza.
So it’s about time that they can finally order Pizza Hut pizza from within Xbox Live itself. Microsoft and Pizza Hut have announced that U.S. members of Xbox Live (which now has 46 million users worldwide) can order pizza using an app on the Xbox Live dashboard. It works with a game controller or Microsoft’s Kinect motion-sensing system.
That means you can use voice command, gestures, or a game controller to order your pizza. All you have to do is link your Xbox Live account with a Pizza Hut account. When you log in, you’ll see a menu for a local region and pick the nearest pizza place. For the first two weeks, Xbox Live users will receive a 15 percent discount on orders placed from the Pizza Hut app.
“Who doesn’t like pizza?” said Larry Hyrb, also known as Major Nelson and the voice of Xbox Live, in an interview with GamesBeat. “You can directly place the order on the console and queue it for a future delivery time that works for you.”
Professional Halo player David “Walshy” Walsh is helping to promote the partnership. Pizza Hut launched its first Internet ordering app in 1994. Formal online orders were available via the web in 2001, and in 2008, Pizza Hut enabled ordering via text messages and launched an iPhone app. In 2011, Pizza Hut launched apps for the iPad, Windows, and Android.
Filed under: Games
|
Supercell's Q1 profits hit $104m as IPO mooted
AndreweroseShit blows my mind. They have 2 games and less than 100 people and they're raking in 2.4m in revenue a day
Vintage Tandy Computer Ads
AndreweroseSharing for the third link from the bottom - Youtube sensations
@Lindsay - hide your mom guy is now apparently a recording artist




The Story Of Apple's Confusing, Inconsistent Rules For App Developers
10 Secret Features Hidden Inside Mac Software
How Apple lost its cool (and how it can win it back)
It’s Super Easy To Try Facebook Home on Your Unsupported Android Phone
Want to Block Common Passwords? Sorry, That is Patented
Facebook’s Latest Home Commercial Is Just The Right Amount Of Weird
13 Types Of Facebook Couples You Should Never Become
The “Nuclear” Option for Total Facebook App Privacy
North Korea Pirates Spy Tools and Pr0n on BitTorrent
A beginner’s guide to building botnets—with little assembly required
Map of the internet could make it stronger
Bing Vs. Google Edition: A Comprehensive List Of What Americans Want To Know
Google Retail Stores Planned In Los Angeles And San Francisco
Vintage Tandy Computer Ads
What It Was Like Using A Computer For The First Time
Google publishes – then removes – a post stating that Fiber will launch in Austin, Texas next
Google Paid This Man $100 Million: Here's His Story
Google chief urges action to regulate mini-drones
Google reveals Glass specs: one-day battery life, bone conduction audio, 16GB storage
Youtube Sensations - Where Are They Now?
Where The Free Software Movement Went Wrong (And How To Fix It)
The History of Photoshop as Told by Its Founding Fathers
























