Shared posts

03 Dec 00:03

North Korea Is Not Amused

by Andrew Sullivan
Steve Dyer

Cannot WAIT to see this movie. IRL Hunger Games going on what with propos and such

It appears Kim Jong-Un can’t take a joke:

Sony Pictures Entertainment is exploring the possibility that hackers working on behalf of North Korea, perhaps operating out of China, may be behind a devastating attack that brought the studio’s network to a screeching halt earlier this week, sources familiar with the matter tell Re/code. The timing of the attack coincides with the imminent release of “The Interview,” a Sony film that depicts a CIA plot to assassinate North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un. The nation’s ever-belligerent state propaganda outlets have threatened “merciless retaliation” against the U.S. and other nations if the film is released.

Anna Fifield puts the cyber attack in context:

Although no one but the most elite of the elite has access to the Internet in North Korea, the Kim regime has been building quite a cyber army and it has a record when it comes to devastating cyber attacks. Pyongyang was blamed for a massive hack on South Korean sites – including government, media and banking sites – last year that coincided with the anniversary of the start of the Korean War.

Alan Woodward questions whether North Korea is really to blame:

North Korea quite possibly has motive, means and opportunity to carry out this attack on Sony, but as with any successful prosecution, that isn’t enough. We need evidence. We will have to wait for the detailed forensic work to complete before we stand a realistic chance of knowing for certain.

That may or may not be forthcoming, but in the meantime we should consider what this event tells us about the balance of power in cyberspace. In a world in which major disruption can be caused with scant resources and little skill, all enemies are a threat. North Korea might be the rogue state that everyone loves to hate but there are plenty of others who could have done it.

On the other hand, North Korea isn’t denying that is was responsible. And the WSJ reports that the hackers “used tools very similar to those used last year to attack South Korean television stations and ATMs.” Regardless, the hack could have serious economic consequences for Sony:

So far the biggest tangible result of the hack seems to be the leak of five Sony films. DVD-quality versions of Fury, Annie, Still Alice, Mr. Turner and To Write Love on Her Arms are all now available on file-sharing sites. All of the movies except for Fury have yet to be widely released, so piracy could be a huge blow to their box office take. Over the summer, The Expendables 3 bombed at the box office because a high-quality version of the movie leaked online weeks before it premiered. And a 2011 Carnegie Mellon study found that such pre-release leaks can reduce a movie’s box office take by as much as 19%.


02 Dec 20:52

The View From Your Window Contest: Winner #233

by Andrew Sullivan
Steve Dyer

we fucked up. google "pink hotel california" and it's the first result.

VFYWC-233

A reader snarks:

Saginaw, Michigan. Come on man, challenge us.

Another air-balls:

Ulcinj, Montenegro. Why not? Could be any bit of rocky, pretty coastline, anywhere in the world. Don’t really have an F’ing clue.

Another sighs:

The picture is a needle in a haystack. The view seems to be an island. The colors seem to be a warm island close to the equator. The rocky coast suggest a volcanic beginning. The lighting seems to be late afternoon with a vantage point on the east coast of an island. The foliage seems more Mediterranean rather than Caribbean. All that leaves a lot of islands. I selected the Canary Islands based on the remote coast no boats. Gran Canaria. To pin down a city, my guess would be las Palmas or Santa Cruz. If I am within 1000 miles, I would consider it a win.

Another gets to the right coast:

Well, you picked a photo without my special helper trick: no satellite dishes in this photo! But the instant I saw this, I thought of southern CA, and my wife, who recognized Jefferson’s house, says San Diego, so we’re going with that.

Another is too far north:

Wow, I will tip my hat to the person who gets this without being a local or stayed here. My best guess is that this is the upper Mendocino County coast line, perhaps going further then that and might even be Oregon, but it’s all too familiar as I have traveled the coast often. There’s no frigging clue that would help me to pinpoint this location and I don’t have time to day to start searching the coast line using Google Earth to hunt for images for this building. I’m going for closeness points today: Elk, California. I imagine I’m within 30 miles.

In only 11 minutes after the contest was posted, our first entrant got the region just right: “Big Sur, CA”. Closer still:

I’ll be damned if that isn’t somewhere around the 17 Mile Drive in Carmel in coastal California. The coastline and sunlight look like dead-ringers for it. It looks like the window is facing south with some late afternoon sun.

This guy nails everything:

FINALLY!!!!

Long time Dish-head here. I’ve entered the VFYW contest several times over the years, but never won (… never really even got close). I’ve followed the contest closely since its inception. And I often have jealously read about those people who know a view instantly. Well – finally – that was me!!

The very moment I saw it I knew right away where it was. I live in Carmel-by-the-Sea and this is right next door – about 10 minutes away. I knew immediately that it was shot somewhere in the Carmel Highlands, looking south into the glory that is Big Sur. I assumed right away that it could only one of two places: either the Carmel Highlands Hyatt or the Tickle Pink Inn right next door. After looking around at a couple maps, I confirmed that it is definitely the Tickle Pink Inn:

tickle pink front

The view is looking south out over the stunning Yankee Point. It’s clearly overlooking the row of balcony’s on the top floor (down along the line of them, actually). The umbrella in the bottom of the pic below is on a “cliffside deck” they have that overlooks the Pacific, and further down on the terrace they have a hot tub. Needless to say, it’s an incredible property.

Figuring out exactly which window was somewhat tricky. Actually: I take that back, it’s not tricky; I can point on the map which one it is, but I didn’t know the specific room number, etc. (I live here – so I never stay in these incredible hotels we have!) But … I know VFYW and that I won’t win with just getting the Tickle Pink Inn right. So I decided to take a trip. (Again, it’s about 10 minutes from my house.) After snooping around and bothering the Inn Keepers a bit, I figured it out. The room is at the very end of the building, on the top floor. It is Room 28, also known as the “Crow’s Nest.”:

floorplan-and-window-with-arrows-

(I was informed that the December-March rates are: Sunday-Thursday is $327 + tax and Fridays and Saturdays are $469 + tax a night.)

I can’t believe I finally got it right – and got it EXACTLY right – and got it almost instantly. This is so exciting!

Nice job! Our window-guessing neuroscientist takes a less-local approach:

An easy one for this non-native Californian. The photo screams the CA coast: rough surf, cypress, headlands, breaking fog. There are surprisingly few stretches of the coast that accommodate lodging so close to the ocean yet aren’t in beachy SoCal. Thanks to dramatic coastal elevation but also thanks to successful conservation efforts from the Lost Coast in Humboldt/Mendocino counties to the protected Sonoma Marin county coast, and finally to protected Big Sur further south, most of the pacific coast between Oregon and Santa Barbara is more or less intact and free from development, and open to recreation. Without aggressive efforts to maintain these exceptional coastal areas in their relatively natural state, coastline like this photo would look like Atlantic City. Or southern CA.

In any event, the absence of palms and the coastal rockiness indicate this photo is from either the Sonoma coast or near Monterey Bay / Carmel. A quick scan on gmaps IDs Carmel as the source, specifically the Tickle Pink Inn:

fig1

Another gets misty:

I was fortunate enough to drive up the central California coast this past summer on a flawless, sunny day, and there are few places more beautiful when not covered by fog. Following the map up the coast and after a quick diversion at the Ragged Point Inn & Resort just south of Los Padres National Forest, I lit on the distinctive headland of Yankee Point, the subject of this week’s photo, located in Carmel Highlands, California. Ansel Adams moved here in 1962, drawn by its natural beauty and local real estate prices are some of the highest in the country, no doubt for the same reason.

Meanwhile, Chini is taken back in time:

The first view I found two years ago in Mendocino felt like a minor miracle. Now, finding a view like this, which is only a few hours away, feels almost routine. A few clicks here, a few clicks there and we’re done:

VFYW Carmel Overhead Marked - Copy

But one thing did stand out about this week’s location; it has to have the most unbearably cloying hotel name ever featured in the contest. This week’s view comes from room 28 of the, God-help-us-all, “Tickle Pink Inn” in Carmel, California. Yep, just writing it makes me wince.

Well this reader seemed to enjoy it:

view from-the-room 21

But another keeps his distance:

It’s a very discreet place, so I won’t begin to guess the room number.

A former winner explains the perfectly reasonable story behind the inn’s name:

The suggestively named hotel was once owned by California State Senator Edward Tickle and his wife Bess, who loved pink flowers. Originally from England, Senator Tickle represented California’s 25th district from 1933 to 1943 and chaired the state Republican party from 1942 to 1944.

Another reader laments:

Wish I could offer up graphic tales of a Champagned honeymoon or a wet weekend of teenaged debauchery, but the best I can offer is the weekend afternoon I indulged in a little lifestyle envy and followed an Open House sign on Highway 1 to a glass-and-concrete apparition on Spindrift Road, future home of some one-percenter, vertiginously anchored over the foam, almost visible from here. I thought of calling the Inn’s front desk, but I figured they had taken the phone off the hook and were watching in awe as their online bookings rocketed up once a million Dishers started checking out the photos online.

Many among those million sent visual entries:

VFYWC_233-Guess_Collage

A reader starts to share the stories:

My parents used to go here once a year starting in the late ’60s; they went here the night of their wedding in June 1968. It has always held a place in my mind as a paragon of ’60s fashion (a’la James Bond or the Pink Panther), at least from their descriptions – they never brought me along. Nonetheless, I have two strong memories of it; my folks made a point of the fact that there were no TVs in the rooms (this, sadly, appears to no longer be true), and the motto, in mock Latin “Restabit; fortis arare placeto restat”, which was on the matchboxes my dad would bring home. From the website, it appears to have been significantly gentrified since those days. It was considerably more humble 40 years ago.

Several have stayed there themselves, of course:

Gotta say it looked familiar, but then a lot of the California coast looks a lot like that, and I’ve visited a lot of it over the years. Still it sure looked Big Surish (not the hauntingly gorgeous parts of Big Sur, to be sure, but Big Surish nonetheless). And why would I imagine there aren’t any number of comparably alluring places in the world sharing similar qualities of not-quite-the-most-gorgeous-parts-of-Big-Sur-but-still-gorgeous-in-their-own-right-ness?

I started a Google Image search for “Big Sur” but, just before hitting return, thought better and went for “Carmel Highlands” because it’s the sort of view I remember from my birthday stay there three summers ago at the Tickle Pink Inn (the northern gateway to Big Sur but not Big Sur itself, gorgeous view but not haunting, if you want haunting continue south another hour or so and stay at Post Ranch Inn or the Esalen Institute, both deep in the heart of Henry Miller country).

Don’t bother to imagine my surprise, therefore, when one of the first image results that appeared was essentially the same view as that of the view window, taken from an ocean view room at the Tickle Pink Inn:

Tickle Pink Inn VFYW

Needless to say I was tickled rosy. It turns out that our view photo was taken in room 28, an ocean view room just above the front office, the other end of the building from where my wife and I had shared room 9, a cove view room, with damn-it just about as fine a view.

Another former guest:

I was raised in Salinas which is about 30 miles from there (and as many income groups lower) and my mom had a friend who worked at the place, so as a kid she would show us around the place because god knows we could never afford to stay there. My husband and I finally stayed there years ago and I considered is a great accomplishment – the “little lettuce seed” had finally made it. (Salinas is the lettuce capital of the world). Thank you for making my day.

A few readers have even honeymooned at the hotel:

I am a Dishhead. My husband, on the other hand, is only an occasional reader. Still, he recognised this one rather than me. It is a view from the Tickle Pink Inn in Carmel, California. We stayed there for our honeymoon.

Last but not least, a two-year veteran picks up the win this week with his 15th correct entry (including last month’s difficult Portugal view):

I first looked at this view as a small image on my phone and groaned in anticipation of a long sojourn around rocky coasts. But when I finally got to sit down with my coffee and laptop, itching for a challenge, I was at the hotel in about 5 minutes.

20141129_Carmel_TicklePinkInn

We are in the Room 28 (the “Crow’s Nest”) of the Tickle Pink Inn. Normally I’d have more to add, but this week I’m not feeling that verbose. Tryptophan?

Nope.

This week’s photo came from the in-tray archives, circa 2012:

Carmel Highlands, 6:29 pm on Friday July 6th. View is from the “Crow’s Nest” room (#28) at the Tickle Pink Inn. Delightful place in every possible way (including the pretty absurd name). My boyfriend and I came here for the first time last year and we’re hooked. There’s an awesome guest book in the room filled with entries from people on their honeymoons, anniversaries, and birthdays, many of whom have returned to the same hotel (and room) many times, or after 25 years of marriage. There’s also a seagull who sits on the railing outside and taps on the window looking for food. It’s utterly charming.

She updates us with some fantastic news:

Wow! This is very exciting! My then-boyfriend in 2012 and I got married just a month ago! Somehow being selected for the VFYW contest at this time feels like a little wink from the universe. We’ve continued to go back to our beloved Tickle Pink Inn every year – so we’re on four years running now. That view never gets old and we hope to keep the tradition going for many (happily married!) years to come. Happy holidays to everyone at the Dish! And thank you!

PS: I finally subscribed to the Dish … I’ve been meaning to do so for a long time and the photo being featured got me to make it happen!

Congrats! We’ll be sending our newly wedded couple a brand new Dish mug as a belated wedding gift, which they will hopefully enjoy for many years to come. Bowie sure will:

DSC_0547

For the rest of you, our 234th opportunity for contest-related romance arrives at noon on Saturday. In the meantime, our contest poet returns:

Searchin’ U.S.A.

If everybody had the notion,
Across the USA,
Then everybody’d be searchin’,
On ev’ry Saturday,

You’d see ‘em stuck in their pee jays,
Fuzzy sandals too,
Bushy bushy bed hairdo,
Searchin’ U. S. A.

You’d catch ‘em searchin’ Point Lobos,
On down to Yankee Point,
Big Sur, Cabrillo,
Kim Novak’s old joint,
All over the Highlands,
Off Carmel coast highway,

Everybody’s gone searchin’
Searchin’ U.S.A.

We’ll all be planning that route,
We gotta ID that view,
We’re wearin’ down our mousepads,
Shit, it’s way past noon!
We’re outta touch for the weekend,
We’re on search-fari to stay,
Tell the preacher we’re searchin’,
Searchin’ U. S. A.

If I had plenty of money,
I could chuck this iPad,
And drive a woody with my honey,
Down to that state most rad,

Off the Number 1 Highway,
They’re havin’ Fun, Fun, Fun,
At the Tickle Pink Inn, babe,
Room Twenty One!

Yeah, that’s the Tickle Pink Inn, babe,
Searchin’ U. S. A.!

Thank You! ….. Thank You!

(Archive: Text|Gallery)


01 Dec 23:50

The View From Your Window Contest

by Andrew Sullivan

VFYWC-233

You have until noon on Tuesday to guess it. City and/or state first, then country. Please put the location in the subject heading, along with any description within the email. If no one guesses the exact location, proximity counts. Be sure to email entries to contest@andrewsullivan.com. Winner gets a free The View From Your Window book or two free gift subscriptions to the Dish. Have at it.

The results of last week’s contest are here. Browse a gallery of all our previous contests here.


01 Dec 15:25

Photo



01 Dec 14:46

Photo

Steve Dyer

delightful



29 Nov 21:35

tamaracg: be-blackstar: be-blackstar: christel-thoughts: ursu...

by 90s90s90s
Steve Dyer

Cherv, this is a different list than the other one.



tamaracg:

be-blackstar:

be-blackstar:

christel-thoughts:

ursulatheseabitchh:

50 Songs; 50 Nicki Verses:

// MonsterKanye West // Love MoreChris Brown // LowJuicy J // I Ain’t ThruKeyshia Cole // Make Me Proud Drake // Out of My Mind B.o.B // Raining Men Rihanna // Up Out My Face (Remix) Mariah Carey // Get Like Me Nelly // Roger That Young Money // So Bad Cam’ron // Somebody Else Mario // Take it to the Head DJ Khaled // My Chick Bad Ludacris // Tapout Rich Gang // Woohoo Christina Aguilera // Tonight I’m Getting Over You (Remix) Carly Rae Jepsen // True Colors Wiz Khaifa // Up All Night Drake // Where Dem Girls At David Guetta // Bottoms Up Trey Songz // She Came to Give it to You Usher // Till the World Ends (Femme Fatale Remix) Britney Spears // Whip My Hair (Remix) Willow Smith // #twerkit Busta Rhymes // 5 Star Bitch (Remix) Yo Gotti // 2012 Jay Sean // All I Do is Win (Remix) DJ Khaled // Fireball Willow Smith // Bang Bang Jessie J // Beauty and a Beat Justin Bieber // Give Me All Your Luvin’ Madonna // Teqkilla (Remix) M.I.A. // Clappers Wale // Shakin’ it 4 Daddy Robin Thicke // Livin’ it Up Ciara // Dance (A$$) (Remix) Big Sean // I’m Out Ciara // Entertainment 2.0 Sean Paul // Flawless (Remix) Beyonce // I Luv Dem Strippers 2Chainz // Freaks French Montana // Get Low Waka Flocka Flame // Lil’ Freak Usher // the Creep the Lonely Island // Girl on Fire (Inferno Version) Alicia Keys // Dark Fantasy Kanye West // Hands Up Swizz Beatz // Born Stunna (Remix) Birdman // In My Head (Remix) Jason Derulo //

yes. Yes. YES GAWD.

OH I NEEDED THIS! 

How was I productive before this? I’m reblogging b/c you all need this in your lives. 

Work soundtrack for the day.

29 Nov 17:32

go away ,anna

by frozen1112




















go away ,anna

26 Nov 19:23

elsa!!!!!!!

by frozen1112




















elsa!!!!!!!

26 Nov 19:22

haha

by frozen1112
Steve Dyer

chris kantaloupe is watching frozen for the first time right now

















haha

26 Nov 18:47

Barack Obama, Ferguson, and the Evidence of Things Unsaid

by Ta-Nehisi Coates
Noah Berger/AP

In a recent dispatch from Ferguson, Missouri, Jelani Cobb noted that President Obama's responses to "unpunished racial injustices" constitute "a genre unto themselves." Monday night, when Barack Obama stood before the nation to interpret the non-indictment of Darren Wilson for the killing of Michael Brown, he offered a particularly tame specimen. The elements of "the genre" were all on display—an unmitigated optimism, an urge for calm, a fantastic faith in American institutions, an even-handedness exercised to a fault. But if all the limbs of the construct were accounted for, the soul of the thing was not.

There was none of the spontaneous annoyance at the arrest of Henry Louis Gates, and little of the sheer pain exhibited in the line, "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon." The deft hand Obama employed in explaining to Americans why the acquittal of George Zimmerman so rankled had gone arthritic. This was a perfunctory execution of "the genre," offered with all the energy of a man ticking items off a to-do list.

Barack Obama is an earnest moderate. His instincts seem to lead him to the middle ground. For instance, he genuinely believes that there is more overlap between liberals and conservatives than generally admitted. On Monday he nodded toward the "deep distrust" that divides black and brown people from the police, and then pointed out that this was tragic because these are the communities most in need of "good policing." Whatever one makes of this pat framing, it is not a cynical centrism—he believes in the old wisdom of traditional America. This is his strength. This is his weakness. But Obama's moderation is as sincere and real as his blackness, and the latter almost certainly has granted him more knowledge of his country than he generally chooses to share.

In the case of Michael Brown, this is more disappointing than enraging. The genre of Obama race speeches has always been bounded by the job he was hired to do. Specifically, Barack Obama is the president of the United States of America. More specifically, Barack Obama is the president of a congenitally racist country, erected upon the plunder of life, liberty, labor, and land. This plunder has not been exclusive to black people. But black people, the community to which both Michael Brown and Barack Obama belong, have the distinct fortune of having survived in significant numbers. For a creedal country like America, this poses a problem—in nearly every major American city one can find a population of people whose very existence, whose very history, whose very traditions, are an assault upon this country's nationalist instincts. Black people are the chastener of their own country. Their experience says to America, "You wear the mask."

In 2008, Barack Obama's task was to capture the presidency of a country which historically has despised the community from which he hails. This was no mean feat. But more importantly, it was not unprecedented. And just as Léon Blum's prime ministership did not lead to a post-anti-Semitic France, Barack Obama's presidency should never have been expected to lead to a post-racist America. As it happens, there is nothing about a congenitally racist country that necessarily prevents an individual leader hailing from the pariah class. The office does not care where the leader originates, so long as the leader ultimately speaks for the state. On Monday night, watching Obama both be black and speak for the state was torturous. One got the sense of a man fatigued by people demanding he say something both eminently profound and only partially true. This must be tiring.

Black people know what cannot be said. What clearly cannot be said is that the events of Ferguson do not begin with Michael Brown lying dead in the street, but with policies set forth by government at every level. What clearly cannot be said is that the people of Ferguson are regularly plundered, as their grandparents were plundered, and generally regarded as a slush-fund for the government that has pledged to protect them. What clearly cannot be said is the idea of superhuman black men who "bulk up" to run through bullets is not an invention of Darren Wilson, but a staple of American racism.

What clearly cannot be said is that American society's affection for nonviolence is notional. What cannot be said is that American society's admiration for Martin Luther King Jr. increases with distance, that the movement he led was bugged, smeared, harassed, and attacked by the same country that now celebrates him. King had the courage to condemn not merely the violence of blacks, nor the violence of the Klan, but the violence of the American state itself.

What clearly cannot be said is that violence and nonviolence are tools, and that violence—like nonviolence—sometimes works. "Property damage and looting impede social progress," Jonathan Chait wrote Tuesday. He delivered this sentence with unearned authority. Taken together, property damage and looting have been the most effective tools of social progress for white people in America. They describe everything from enslavement to Jim Crow laws to lynching to red-lining.

"Property damage and looting"—perhaps more than nonviolence—has also been a significant tool in black "social progress." In 1851, when Shadrach Minkins was snatched off the streets of Boston under the authority of the Fugitive Slave Law, abolitionists "stormed the courtroom" and "overpowered the federal guards" to set Minkins free. That same year, when slaveholders came to Christiana, Pennsylvania, to reclaim their property under the same law, they were not greeted with prayer and hymnals but with gunfire.

"Property damage and looting" is a fairly accurate description of the emancipation of black people in 1865, who only five years earlier constituted some $4 billion in property. The Civil Rights Bill of 1964 is inseparable from the threat of riots. The housing bill of 1968—the most proactive civil-rights legislation on the books—is a direct response to the riots that swept American cities after King was killed. Violence, lingering on the outside, often backed nonviolence during the civil-rights movement. "We could go into meetings and say, 'Well, either deal with us or you will have Malcolm X coming into here,'" said SNCC organizer Gloria Richardson. "They would get just hysterical. The police chief would say, 'Oh no!'"

What cannot be said is that America does not really believe in nonviolence—Barack Obama has said as much—so much as it believes in order. What cannot be said is that there are very convincing reasons for black people in Ferguson to be nonviolent. But those reasons emanate from an intelligent fear of the law, not a benevolent respect for the law.

The fact is that when the president came to the podium on Monday night there actually was very little he could say. His mildest admonitions of racism had only earned him trouble. If the American public cannot stomach the idea that arresting a Harvard professor for breaking into his own home is "stupid," then there is virtually nothing worthwhile that Barack Obama can say about Michael Brown.

And that is because the death of all of our Michael Browns at the hands of people who are supposed to protect them originates in a force more powerful than any president: American society itself. This is the world our collective American ancestors wanted. This is the world our collective grandparents made. And this is the country that we, the people, now preserve in our fantastic dream. What can never be said is that the Fergusons of America can be changed—but, right now, we lack the will to do it.

Perhaps one day we won't, and maybe that is reason to hope. Hope is what Barack Obama promised to bring, but he was promising something he could never bring. Hope is not the naiveté that would change the face on a racist system and then wash its hands of its heritage. Hope is not feel-goodism built on the belief in unicorns. Martin Luther King had hope, but it was rooted in years of study and struggle, not in looking the other way. Hope is not magical. Hope is earned.

This article was originally published at http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/barack-obama-ferguson-and-the-evidence-of-things-unsaid/383212/








26 Nov 17:38

Jurassic World

Steve Dyer

this is the ***Flawless (Remix ft. Nicki Minaj) of webcomics

Hey guys! What's eating you? Ha ha ha it's me! Oh, what fun we have.
26 Nov 17:01

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Heart Surgery

by Sean Mandell
Steve Dyer

Notorious RBG's "routine exercise" is deadlifting 500 lbs for 100 reps

6a00d8341c730253ef01b8d06c011f970c-200wiSupreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, leader of the high court's liberal wing and beloved by many as the 'Notorious RBG' after her scathing dissent in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, underwent heart surgery this morning after experiencing discomfort while exercising Tuesday night. CNN reports:

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 81, underwent a heart procedure Wednesday morning to have a stent placed in her right coronary artery.

A blockage was discovered after Ginsburg "experienced discomfort during routine exercise" Tuesday night and was taken to the hospital, according to a release from the Supreme Court.

Ginsburg is resting "comfortably" at MedStar Washington Hospital Center and is expected to be released in the next 48 hours.

As The Wall Street Journal notes, Justice Ginsburg is the court's eldest member and has also faced two bouts with cancer, having recovered from each. She previously balked at speculation that she would retire during President Obama's tenure so Obama could fill her vacancy with a liberal judge:

Who do you think President Obama could appoint at this very day, given the boundaries that we have? If I resign any time this year, he could not successfully appoint anyone I would like to see in the court. [The Senate Democrats] took off the filibuster for lower federal court appointments, but it remains for this court. So anybody who thinks that if I step down, Obama could appoint someone like me, they’re misguided. As long as I can do the job full steam...I think I’ll recognize when the time comes that I can’t any longer. But now I can.

25 Nov 23:49

speedlimit15: *pronounces “hors d’oeuvres” as “horse divorce”*

by 90s90s90s

speedlimit15:

*pronounces “hors d’oeuvres” as “horse divorce”*

25 Nov 22:59

The Prosecution’s Weak Case Against The Media

by Andrew Sullivan
Steve Dyer

the most significant challenge

Last night prosecutor Robert McCulloch complained that “the most significant challenge encountered in this investigation has been the 24 hour news cycle and its insatiable appetite for something, for anything, to talk about, following closely behind with the nonstop rumors on social media.” Poniewozik protests:

I suspect part of what’s behind the frustration of people like McCulloch is that social media makes everyone a critic. Thousands and thousands of people are watching over your shoulder to see if you slip up, checking what you missed, judging whether you were thorough enough, questioning your agenda. Good. Having everyone watch you do your job, or not do it, may be a pain, it may be stressful, but in an imperfect justice system, it’s not exactly a bad thing.

Tim Mak Arthur Chu agrees:

“Blaming the media” for always distorting the story, for making a big deal out of minor misunderstandings, for drawing attention to things that “aren’t any of their business”—it’s the favorite rhetorical trick of powerful people who want to be left to continue doing what they were doing. Sure, the media frequently make terrible mistakes. But a kneejerk rejection of “the media” and a demand for those of us in the audience to “mind our own business” is an implicit statement that the people the media make miserable—business owners, politicians, police chiefs, celebrities—don’t make mistakes. It’s an implicit call to trust them to do the right thing without fear of external scrutiny.


25 Nov 21:26

The View From Your Window Contest: Winner #232

by Andrew Sullivan
Steve Dyer

"Chini circled a window on the wrong side of the hotel this week"

VFYWC-#-232

A reader scans the photo:

I have no idea where this week’s VFYW is taken and I am so glad I don’t live there.

Another heads down the yellow brick road:

I was lost on this one until I started watching The Wizard of Oz last night. It’s obviously “The Amethyst City” – the Emerald City’s less known, contrasting and under-appreciated rival.

Another seizes upon the right clue for the wrong city:

Sure looks like that street sign at the bottom of the picture says Grand. So I’ll say Chicago. But I realized I now need to delve deeply into the exact block of the exact street, and my OCD doesn’t work that way. So I’ll let somebody else figure that out.

Another reader flags Grant Street in Dallas. Or is it in Asia?

Millions of empty balconies … dumbfounded by searching Hong Kong high rises. Let’s go further south for better air and patio palm trees to guess … Singapore? I bet they have windows there.

Other incorrect locales with windows this week include Perth, Miami, Bangkok, New York and Panama City. But this reader wrongs his way to the right country, at least:

Toronto would be my best guess.

Our northern neighbor is right, but that’s the wrong side. Another reader just wants “a mention as an also-ran if I have the right city.” Done:

Every time I see the contest, I almost always think that it’s Montreal unless some feature makes that impossible. But today, I was certain that it was Toronto at first. The tall buildings look like the condo buildings that stand along Highway 401, but I’ve seen structures like these in images from Vancouver as well. Looking at the street sign at the bottom of the image, it seems to announce Granville and that made me think of Granville Island, which is across from Vancouver. Google says there’s a Granville Bridge in Vancouver, so that is likely what the sign is announcing. So my money is that we are looking at Vancouver, British Columbia.

Ok, I got a little excited and started looking at Google Maps and even downloaded Google Earth, but that’s when I decided to pull back on the crazy. I’ll let someone else go through the trouble of providing photo evidence and finding the right window if that is the correct city.

Another correct guesser seems pretty happy:

Huzzah! Huzzah! Huzzah!

Another reader lets us know how much they appreciate the contest “even when it’s boring”:

IMG_2614

I look forward to this contest every week. I love exploring new places (even virtually) and the VFYW has led me all over the planet on a quest for victory. It’s a great way to kill a few hours each weekend.

So it’s with that qualifier that I proclaim my disappointment in this week’s challenge. Is there a major city less architecturally interesting than Vancouver? It seems that every high-rise in the city is more boring than the next. Can you imagine coming home drunk to this complex of buildings? Would you even be able to figure out which was yours?

There’s a name for it, too:

I immediately recognized the buildings in my hometown, which are very typical of our city. There is even an architectural style that has been coined “vancouverism” based on the glass towers and urban design principles. Vancouver is a fantastic city and with a great downtown for a mid-size city. That is what makes it one of the of the most attractive places to live and unfortunately one of the most expensive.

Another reader floats another term: “One look at this photo and you can’t miss the Vancouveriness of it.” Another channels Lionel Richie to nail the hotel:

vfywc-232-jlg

We are looking out of a window of the Best Western, 718 Drake St, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. This side overlooks Granville Street. I’m not going to bother the good employees at the hotel to find out the exact room number. Leave those poor people alone.

I was tearing my hair out for a while on this one. Looks like America, but not enough markers to identify. Not big enough to be New York, too new to be other Northeastern cities, trees not tropical enough to be southern, but that patio to the left has some tropical-looking plants, and the satellite dish is pointed way flat. The tiny bit of street sign taunted me – Gran___, Gram___, maybe even Grar___? Finally, like a thunderbolt, I thought “maybe Granville?” because it looks like there might be an I or L hiding behind those leaves. Thus Googling “granville street” gave me Vancouver, and following along Granville on street view brought me to the mansard roof of the old Yale Hotel, newly renovated.

The lesson? When it kind of looks like America, but you can’t quite put your finger on it, try Canada.

This reader notes another helpful clue:

Tricksy Dish! You present us with a sunny, verdant urban scene and a slightly odd-looking (to American eyes) traffic light with a street sign beginning “Gran.” Southern Hemisphere? “Gran” could be Spanish or Portugese … maybe Sao Paulo? Buenos Aires? Or perhaps English, “Grand” or “Grant” or something. Melbourne? Johannesburg?

The light is the giveway. Only one bunch of weirdos puts up yellow traffic lights with yellow frames: Canadians! Assuming the photo is roughly current, the lack of winter hellscape tells you it must be Vancouver. Which happens to have a Granville Street – the original main street downtown, in fact – on which there is one building with a mansard roof, at the corner with Drake Street.

vfyw-11-22-14 (1)

Of course, we got a deeper explanation as well:

I’m sure there were a hundred ways to solve this, but my reasoning went like this:

1. It’s a cold weather, North American city during the summer, based on the new construction, street lights the fact that residents appear to actually enjoy opening windows.

2. Speaking of street lights, what idiot would put bright yellow on the traffic light backplate? Isn’t the whole point of those to provide a nice, dark background to give contrast to the signal?

A search took me to this thrilling read, “Making Intersections Safer: A Toolbox of Engineering Countermeasures to Reduce Red-Light Running: An Informational Report” (pdf):

In British Columbia, Canada, an evaluation was conducted of high-intensity yellow fig316retroreflective tape on the backplates of signals at six intersections on an arterial in Saanich (36). The authors hypothesized that the framed signal heads would be more visible to motorists at night and the safety of the intersection would improve. Figure 3-16 shows a daytime photograph of a signal head with the high intensity tape around the backboard.

A comparison of crash frequency for a three-year period after installation, compared to one year before, showed that the number of night crashes stayed the same the first year (14 crashes) but decreased significantly (five and three crashes) in the subsequent two years. Volume levels actually increased in each of the four years (36). The use of retroreflective tape on the backplate is contrary to the MUTCD standard requiring a dull black finish. Hence, its use in the United States would require experimentation approval from FHWA.

3. The only big city I know of in British Columbia is Vancouver.

A Vancouverian shares his team-up process:

Now, when you said that it was going to be an easy one this week, I didn’t expect it to be this easy … especially as it’s just down the street from my office. The window this view this week is taken from the Best Western Plus Hotel at 718 Drake Street (at Granville Street) in Downtown Vancouver. The “Granville” sign is barely visible in the left hand corner. I’m going to guess the 9th floor, let’s say Room 904 – but I’m never very good at pinpointing the exact window:

vfyw-2014-1122

Anyway, when this week’s VFYW contest came out, I had to hurry over and text my friend, fairly recently relocated from Vancouver to Toronto to check it out. You see, the contest has been part of a weekly ritual which inevitably sparks a round of texting before we either find the solution, give up in frustration, or otherwise go about our daily business. Now, I think this might be the first one he’s actually written in with an answer (I’ve got maybe 4 or 5, with perhaps 3 or 4 where I’ve found the window but been too lazy to actually email). He was going to write about the famous jazz bands (and Jeff Healey) at the Yale Hotel across the street, maybe the strippers at the Drake next door (now demolished and replaced by a rather forgettable condo building), maybe Yaletown and its yuppie denizens.

I said I was going to write in about the fact that the Best Western is located above a “White Spot”; he responded that he would have no way of describing why British Columbians seem to have an unnatural affinity for “O Sauce”. For those not in the know, White Spot is a local chain of restaurants where people my age seem to bring their white-bread grandparents for burgers and fettucine alfredo in this town where Asian food dominates. It’s also the place where you can get a Pirate Pak. Every year, thousands of Vancouverites line up for Pirate Pak day, which is the one day when adults can get your hamburger in a cardboard boat (I believe some of the proceeds go to charity), reliving the times our parents would drive up to the White Spot and we’d wait for our Pirate Pak to sail into the waiting car on a long wooden plank (50’s drve-in style). But sadly, my friend grew up in Toronto, where they do not have such Pirate Paks and therefore his gustatory senses are ill-developed and lacking.

In any case, we’ve been doing this VFYW thing on and off for a few months now, but the contest has been a nice little way of keeping in touch – even with 3,000 miles between us, it’s nice to know that we can still share the same view from our windows.

A history lesson from a reader:

Since many VFYW entrants tend to share some trivia about the current week’s city, I’ll assume that George Vancouver will be well covered, and will do some research on John Sebastian “Cross-street” Helmcken. A ship’s surgeon for the Hudson Bay Company, Helmcken settled in colonial British Columbia in the 1850’s, and rose to relative prominence as a businessman with a political savvy, eventually chosen to join a group of British Columbians to negotiate terms of confederation with Canada. At that time, the US and Canada were both suitors for British Columbia’s statehood/provincehood, but Canada offered to forgive the colony’s debt AND give them a railroad. I wouldn’t kick that offer out of bed, either, though as a Seattleite, I’d likely ask for more monorail.

Another invents his own game-show prize:

If I get close enough and win the contest this week, I hereby promise – on my motherLine-of-sight and fathers’ good names and reputations – that I will finally do that which I’ve wanted to do for a long time and visit Vancouver within six months of Tuesday’s reveal. I will also don a Dish shirt while there and buy a beer for any self-identified Disheads I cross paths with when visiting the local pubs (two beers if they sport a beard). I will send photos to prove I made the journey.

Meanwhile, Vancouver is clearly a favorite city for many:

There are so many nice things about Vancouver that it’s hard to list them all here – Stanley Park, Gastown, the skyride up to Grouse Mountain, the Granville Island Farmers Market. What I love most about the city is its unparalleled setting among the inlets and bays of the Salish Sea with the dramatic backdrop of the mountains towering above the city just north across the harbor. My favorite memory of the city, though, is awakening on a boat sailing north just off the city’s west side and witnessing an escort of killer whales just off our beam. That is a sight you never forget.

Also:

I’ve been to Vancouver a million times (usually before and after a week of snowboarding at Whistler). It is one of the most beautiful, most livable cities in the world and among my favorite places to visit.

Another fan:

I’m no good at the Google Earth searches that your other readers like to do. I wanted to respond, however, because of my love for Vancouver. My husband and I visited the city in the summer of 2010 as part of our “baby-moon” (the trip you take before your first child arrives), and it immediately became the city where we would move in the event someone like Rick Santorum ever got elected president.

And another shares her shadier memory of the city:

The lovely street view of the Yale Hotel across the street reminds me of a story: When I lived in Seattle (mid 90s-mid 2000s), my friends and I used to drive up to Vancouver to go to this club that hosted a monthly goth/play party (light BDSM, if you must know). It was a ton of fun and one of the highlights of my misspent youth.

On one occasion, we decided to go up at the last minute – there must have been a convention or a Canucks game going on, because every. single. hotel. was booked. So we decided to chance it and stay at a hostel-type place in Gastown (mistakes #1 and #2). In the mid-late ’90s, this area was total crap – hookers, needles, the works. Yet we pulled up to the place and said, “to hell with it” and gave it a chance. We climbed the creaky staircase to our room: dirty blankets, dirty carpet, no towels, one light bulb, a couple of cots, and a smelly twin bed with a deep, deep impression in the center of the sagging mattress. I still can’t recall who drew the short straw for the twin bed, but the door locked securely so we stayed. The bathroom down the hall, however, was a different story: Trainspotting had nothing on this disgusting, feces-strewn hole. There was vomit everywhere and the floor was flooded from a backed-up toilet.

Needless to say, we held it. Later, when we returned during the early hours of the morning, we collapsed – fully dressed – on our crusty beds and listened while the sirens passed by. Fun times.

More on the neighborhood as it was:

VFW 3

This is a real mix of the old and new cities. Until 30 years ago, the land all those condo towers are on was at the seedy end of Seymour Street. When I lived in Vancouver as a young adolescent, that was a noted part of the red light district. Next door to the Yale Hotel was the equally legendary Cecil, noted for its strip club. If memory serves the Best Western itself stands on the site of another hotel with another strip club. That one I remember hazily from my university days – I can’t recall the club’s name, but I do remember that it served one of the best – and cheapest – hamburgers in town.

Redevelopment started in the mid 1980s with the Expo 1986 project, and soon enough the neighbourhood filled with shiny new towers. But the old city is still there – the Yale Hotel survived despite the demolition of the Cecil for another condo tower, and when I lived a couple of blocks away at Seymour and Helmcken, the concierge at our condo would routinely shoo the sex workers away from the front doors.

And more on the hotel in the above photo:

The heritage building in the foreground is the old Yale Hotel, one of Vancouver’s oldest and most distinct buildings: “The historic building was built in 1888, when the City of Vancouver was just two years old. The Yale’s red brick façade, mansard roof and neon signs make it one of Vancouver’s most distinctive buildings.” For many years The Yale housed a famous, world-class blues club which is now closed, but the building just underwent an extensive historical renovation as part of a condo project (everything in Vancouver these days is a condo project).

Chini reveals that easy weeks like this one just give him time to pursue his white whales:

VFYW Vancouver Sim City View Marked - Copy

A confession; I’m not really annoyed when we get easy ones like this. Sure, you look forward all week to the contest and then on Saturday, wah-wah-wah waaaaaaaah, it’s a 60-second special. But rather than pout, I simply go back to old views that I’ve never found. In fact, for over a year now I’ve been looking for one view in particular and, based on this weekend’s results, that search is far from over. So congrats to the newbies who got their first win in Vancouver. I was elsewhere, Ahab-like, hunting for the view that got away.

If it makes anyone feel any better, Chini circled a window on the wrong side of the hotel this week, but clearly his mind was elsewhere. Speaking of which, a reader sent this in too:

A guy asked a gal to Best Western Hotel,
She eagerly joined the amorous rube.
By midnight his prospects were shot all to hell,
She’d come to see “Shane” and “High Noon” on the tube!

While we’re off topic:

As a side note to Andrew following his post on “lumbersexuals”, have you seen the logger and Coat_of_arms_of_Vancouverfisherman on the City of Vancouver Coat of Arms? Would you initiate a campaign to persuade the City Council to restore proper beards on these hardy fellows? They’ve been clean-shaven since 1969 and someone with your influence is needed to address this error in judgment. I’d do it, but I’ve got to finish eating the tray of Nanaimo bars that I made last week.

Amazingly, one of the only readers to nail the right window just happened to be a long-winless veteran:

Well, going into this Saturday, I knew that if I wasn’t able to find this week’s window that the responsibility would be all mine. Two weeks in from surgery, I’m completely tied to my bed at home as I’m hooked up to IV and monitors, so I knew I’d have the time with nothing else to do. Seeing the photo, I was sure it would be a quick one, but sloppy searching meant it took a day longer than it should have.

My initial thoughts looking at it was that it was obviously a North American city that isn’t too temperate. My gut was that it was a Canadian city, or maybe one of the newer construction areas on the north side of my own city, Chicago. That little bit of the street sign that was showing told me it probably wasn’t Chicago — most streets in Chicago have information such as the block number and direction on the left of their signs — but I knew that some larger thoroughfares in New York had a similar layout. I had a distinct feeling that it was Vancouver, but the significant amount of new construction since my last visit and a sloppy Google Earth trip down the only street beginning with “Gran” meant I wrote it off and spent the next full image1day going down the list of every large major city in North America and their “Gran” streets. After striking out again and again, I went back to what my gut originally said and spent some serious time searching through Vancouver. It was ultimately finding the Grace Tower, which is seen in the background but wasn’t existing last time I was in the city, that confirmed Vancouver as the correct city. From there, I took a much more careful look at Granville St., and was able to find the location that I had so carelessly blown past 24 hours earlier.

The picture is taken from the Best Western Plus Downtown, located at 718 Drake St in Vancouver, BC, V6Z (note: that’s pronounced the correct way, “zed”!) 2W6 Canada. The window is on the southeast side of the building, looking over Granville St and facing out toward the Grace Tower. I was unable to find a map of the hotel, so I will circle where I think the picture was taken from. It’s truly a guess, as I estimate that the photo was taken between 65 and 80 feet above street level.

Awesome guess and a well-earned win. Meanwhile, the reader who sent us this week’s photo says she was was once an aggrieved player:

You used my photo of Vancouver for this week’s contest! Thank you. I guess that means I must forgive you for mocking me for identifying Mexico City when the photo was taken in a city in China. For that particular contest I was the only one who thought it was in the western hemisphere, having completely missed the Chinese writing on the wall.

The particulars on this photo: I took it facing southeast (I believe) in the early morning from room 708 at the Best Western Downtown Hotel, 718 Drake Street, Vancouver, BC. The street sign that is partially visible in Granville Street. My son and I were in the city for the SIGGRAPH conference, an international gathering of folks in the animation industry.

I’ve been subscriber for over a year. Thanks for the great blog.

And thanks for the great submission. Also, for the 150+ readers who entered this week, see if you can spot your guess in this week’s collage:

VFYWC-232-Guess-Collage

See everyone on Saturday!

(Archive: Text|Gallery)


25 Nov 18:45

The View From Your Window Contest

by Andrew Sullivan
Steve Dyer

Oh yay a real place!

VFYWC-#-232

You have until noon on Tuesday to guess it. City and/or state first, then country. Please put the location in the subject heading, along with any description within the email. If no one guesses the exact location, proximity counts. Be sure to email entries to contest@andrewsullivan.com. Winner gets a free The View From Your Window book or two free gift subscriptions to the Dish. Have at it.

Last week’s results are here. You can browse a gallery of all our previous contests here.


25 Nov 18:22

glowcloud: when ur trying to act chill

by 90s90s90s
Steve Dyer

WHEN DOES THIS SHOW COME BACK

also this is a fun story

My first kiss was in middle school drama club with Sarah Mak. We were doing The Diary Of Anne Frank. I was Mr. Van Daan, she was Mrs. Van Daan, and I had to kiss her at one point when I got home from the store, and we had to practice getting it right. I was in seventh grade and it's weird that the drama coach made us practice so much? The drama coach was the same gym teacher that gave us extra credit for showering naked.

Anyway Sarah Mak got cast in Orange is the New Black last week and she's gunna be in the upcoming season!

glowcloud:

when ur trying to act chill

image

25 Nov 16:56

Mental Health Break

by Andrew Sullivan
Steve Dyer

literally me on wednesday, my mom texted me today from costco. also i'm rolling in with brybry and jdbk so it's gunna be hella tight

An epic rap about regressing with the folks:


25 Nov 15:37

'SNL' Review: A Step Back with Cameron Diaz

by Erik Voss
Steve Dyer

uhh which episode did this guy watch

by Erik Voss

camerondiazsnlWell, that didn't last long.

Just one week after seemingly proclaiming its transitional era to be over, SNL reaffirmed viewers' perennial skepticism with an episode that made Woody Harrelson's excellent outing look like that much more of a fluke. Cameron Diaz's hosting gig wasn't quite the disaster the show is capable of, but it exhibited all the symptoms of a bland episode that no one will remember by the end of the season: a game-for-anything host that the writers didn't know what to do with (despite this being her fourth time), a dependence on watered-down recurring bits that the actors seem to love more than audiences do, and a general miscalculation by producers on how to use the show's various strengths to create a cohesive night of exciting sketch comedy.

Yes, inconsistency has been an issue throughout every one of the show's 40 seasons — even the ones we remember as being perfect. I still believe SNL possesses all the ingredients it needs to win us over again — a well rounded cast, vibrant writers, an excellent film unit — but Lorne Michaels is still figuring out the recipe (to borrow his metaphor). Whereas last week witnessed a show that clearly understood its strengths and strode confidently from sketch to sketch, this week felt like a series of nervous dice rolls that settled into a sad parade of stock characters that don't contain anywhere near the stamina that previous generations' crutches did.

Still, some of those dice rolls paid off. Still in transition or not, this SNL is at least willing to experiment. And that's something to be thankful for.

Capitol Hill Cold Open. It's unusual to see the night's most daring premise in the first few minutes — and by "daring," I mean opening the show with Kenan Thompson re-enacting the Schoolhouse Rock "I'm Just a Bill" song in costume as immigration reform legislation, with Jay Pharoah's President Obama smugly shoving him down the capitol steps in favor of a less-complicated executive order. These days, this is the closest SNL will get to Thomas Nast, making it far more interesting commentary than the show's political cold opens normally give us. After last week's fun "Obama / McConnell" sketch, I hope the writers continue to think outside the box in this way.

Monologue. There's really not much to say about Cameron Diaz's totally pointless and humorless monologue, other than that it foreshadowed the problems the show would have with her throughout the night. The lame "cast members in audience asking dumb questions" shtick exposed Diaz as a host that the SNL team struggled to draw inspiration from, resulting in her being cast in forgettable throwaway roles.

Back Home Ballers. In this follow-up to "Twin Bed" (arguably the best sketch of last season), Aidy Bryant led the ladies of the cast in another sexy music video (directed by Matt & Oz) about going home for the holidays. But what made "Twin Bed" so awesome was the painfully relatable premise of trying to have sex in your childhood bedroom, and the perfectly catchy music they composed for it. This version, meanwhile, lost that strong hook by broadening the concept, with the women retreading the random aspects of hometown trips that the show has already covered in more coherent detail. And while the joke about crazy-long WiFi passwords and Leslie Jones' Missy-Elliot verse about bowls provided enough solid laughs to please viewers, the novelty of this image has worn off, turning a once-wonderful hit into a less-thrilling recurring staple.

Black Annie. Between this Annie parody and the decision to book Cameron Diaz in the first place, I think SNL may have overestimated how much its viewers actually care about the upcoming Annie remake – which will undoubtedly be a box office success, but probably not in the zeitgeist-y way that the Hunger Games franchise is (or Frozen, for that matter… a megahit SNL has largely ignored). Also overestimated was how funny we would find this character sketch built around how silly Leslie Jones looks in the classic "Little Orphan Annie" getup, which depended a little too much on the comedian's eagerness to exploit her own larger-than-life-ness: "I'm an orphan. I'm a veteran. I did a half a season in the WNBA."

Nest-Spresso. This amusing commercial directed by Rhys Thomas introduced an espresso machine that instantly incubates chicken eggs and pops out a freshly hatched chick — or, if you do it wrong, "a cup full of bones." Mostly I just enjoyed this for Vanessa Bayer's casual ignorance of the device's inner workings ("How does it work?" "I don't know that part.") and for its treatment of urban farmers as a market you would even advertise to.

Student Show. This ensemble sketch parodying excruciatingly preachy, avant-garde amateur theatre seems like a subject matter SNL has mocked many times over (I can think of at least once in recent years), with the biggest laughs coming from Vanessa Bayer and Kenan Thompson as bored parents watching from the audience: "Which one is your daughter?" "I'd rather not say."

Weekend Update. The news segment brought some much needed edge to the episode, with Michael Che's bold take-down of Bill Cosby: "Pull your damn pants up!" Following Hannibal Buress' set (which arguably triggered Cosby's downfall), Che presented yet another powerful statement from a black comedian trying to reconcile with the Cliff Huxtable values he was raised with. While many in the comedy old guard remain reluctant to render a verdict on their generation's icon, it's good to hear a voice on SNL bucking the norm. Kate McKinnon returned as Angela Merkel (III), working harder than usual to make the bit's weaker jokes land, including sharing a heaving "German kiss" with Colin Jost. The segment closed with Taran Killam and Cecily Strong as Charles Manson and his new wife Star Burton, which struggled to make Manson's violent insanity something we're willing to laugh at. Though I did enjoy Strong's starry-eyed portrayal of Burton: "We finish each other's…" "Spider penis!"

Baby CEO III. Beck Bennett reprised his breakout character from last season, smartly taking him out of the office to a dinner at home with his wife and employee. The location change gave Bennett more gags to work with, sliding down stairs, sitting in a big rolling baby seat, tasting his first lemon, etc., but I worry that this setup is transforming from an amusing one-off physical bit into a stale predictable character that's going to look pretty hacky in a couple years.

Dr. Dave & Buggles. It may just be the joy I feel upon seeing a live animal in a sketch, but this animal show featuring Kenan Thompson alongside an adorable monkey who "ripped his dong and balls off" the week prior was the clearest and most enjoyable original premise of the night. Blue humor aside, the sketch's steady unpacking of the physical and emotional torment Dr. Dave went through, mixed with his resentful insults and Buggles' clueless reactions, resulted in a surprisingly amusing dynamic, in a "Mark Wahlberg Talks To Animals" kind of way. Best of the Night.

The Fight. Dave McCary directed this return of Kyle Mooney's high school punk Chris Pitzpatrick (II), this time making a fight video with his nemesis, Andy Rydell (Beck Bennett). The piece fell somewhat short of last season's superior "Chris for President," but this follow-up was yet another example of Good Neighbor's excellent take on the raw immaturity of adolescent males, which is expressed both in the actors' mumbled deliveries and in the video's sophomoric editing.

Miss Meadows III. This overlong reprisal of Vanessa Bayer's barky substitute poetry teacher (a reliably humorous performance, but never one that's going to bring the house down) dragged on endlessly before using Cameron Diaz as an amateur poet unaware of how hot her erotic ode to her UPS guy is. As happy as I am to see Bayer get so much to do in an episode, it's difficult to justify this sketch's return, especially when it forces Diaz to rely on little more than her sex appeal.

Night Murmurs. This 10-to-1 phone sex ad parody featured Cecily Strong, Kate McKinnon, and Cameron Diaz making unnatural poses and sultrily asking men to perform odd tasks, like holding packages and scaring grandmas away from trailers. The details were hilariously specific, but the distracting poses seemed like a misguided attempt to give the sketch more out-loud laughs… which the studio audience was mostly out of at that point in the night. SNL normally finds success in its subversions of late-night sex commercials, but this go-to seems to be running out of steam.

Additional Thoughts:

  • To those of you who were thankful for my inclusion of script authorships last week, I'm afraid have nothing for you this week. While SNL lists video director credits, I really only have social media to rely on for writers — and they only tend to take credit for sketches they feel particularly proud of, while remaining curiously silent during rough weeks, or when sketches are accused of plagiarism. Surprising, I know.
  • This was a showcase episode for Vanessa Bayer — she was in nearly every sketch in the episode's first half, while popping up as Miss Meadows later in the night. Bayer had the most screen time this week, along with Kate McKinnon, while Pete Davidson was nearly absent, with small roles in "The Fight" and "Miss Meadows." Since I started keeping track of cast member screen time a few years ago, I've noticed the show will occasionally "throw a bone" to cast members who haven't gotten many roles in recent weeks. Vanessa Bayer and Kate McKinnon were examples this week, and this happened for Pete Davidson in the third episode of this season. I'm not sure if this role distribution is a conscious effort by the show, or just a random coincidence in the very non-scientific data I collect, but it's nice to see sidelined cast members get their days in the sun.
  • On that note, Bobby Moynihan is long overdue for a showcase episode. His cameo in the cold open as Obama's immigration executive order was perfectly concise: "I'm an executive order, and I pretty much just happen."
  • Best: "Dr. Dave & Buggles." Worst: Monologue. Worth It For The Jokes: "Nest-Presso." You'll See It Online: "Back Home Ballers."
  • The video thumbnail for the above Hulu embed of "Miss Meadows" depicts another character with glasses. (A teacher played by Kate McKinnon? An alternate version of Cameron Diaz's character? It's hard to tell.) This makes me wonder if there was a different version of this sketch at some point. I shudder at the idea of this sketch being any longer.
  • I'm enjoying the sub-narrative involving Aidy Bryant's mom's friend Jean (a name that only exists among mothers' friends), who often shows up in Bryant's sketches as someone her mom is feuding with, or engaging Bryant in awkward conversation.
  • I've made long cases for why musical guests shouldn't be in sketches, but I truly wouldn't have minded Bruno Mars popping up somewhere. After his standout episode two seasons ago, he earned a cameo.
  • Bill Simmons' podcast interview with Lorne Michaels last week is worth a listen, if for no other reason than Michaels politely shrugs off online recappers as "people who are passionate about comedy." Nice to hear that from a guy who once warned against "academics getting ahold of comedy." Or maybe he's just thankful to be left off the pie chart.

I'll see you on December 6, when James Franco will host with musical guest Nicki Minaj.

Erik Voss is a writer and performer living in Los Angeles. He hosts the Evil Blond Kid podcast and performs on the house teams Wheelhouse and It Doesn't Have to Be This Way at the iO Theater.

0 Comments
25 Nov 15:25

Photo

















25 Nov 04:01

Photo



24 Nov 23:14

Angela Merkel: The Real Conservative

by Andrew Sullivan
Steve Dyer

This is a very interesting profile of Kate McKinnon. I should know, because I am German now.

GERMANY-VOTE-MEDIA

I’ve long been fascinated by Angela Merkel, and not entirely sure why. She’s been German Chancellor for nine years now, is the most powerful politician on the continent, and has approval ratings of over 70 percent. And yet she somehow eludes easy characterization and her studied affect of dullness deflects any serious scrutiny. And so she has hovered around the edges of my brain – a Thatcher who is also an un-Thatcher, a woman in power for a decade who somehow doesn’t prompt the polarization and drama of the Iron Lady.

George Packer’s long but rich profile manages to crack this puzzle a little. Merkel’s strain of tedium is mostly of the good kind. She’s so thoroughly a pragmatist that she has largely overcome the left-right ideological battle in Germany. And, partly because she was in East Germany at the time, she missed the culture war battles of the late 1960s and 1970s. And so she has risen above the fray – while never veering very much from the dead center of German politics. And yet, she is also a brilliant, revenge-seeking pole-climber of the first order (and I mean that very much as a compliment). This story is eye-opening:

Angela was physically clumsy—she later called herself “a little movement idiot.” At the age of five, she could barely walk downhill without falling. “What a normal person knows automatically I had to first figure out mentally, followed by exhausting exercise,” she has said. According to Benn, as a teen-ager Merkel was never “bitchy” or flirtatious; she was uninterested in clothes, “always colorless,” and “her haircut was impossible—it looked like a pot over her head.”

A former schoolmate once labelled her a member of the Club of the Unkissed. (The schoolmate, who became Templin’s police chief, nearly lost his job when the comment was published.) But Merkel was a brilliant, ferociously motivated student. A longtime political associate of Merkel’s traces her drive to those early years in Templin. “She decided, ‘O.K., you don’t fuck me? I will fuck you with my weapons,’ ” the political associate told me. “And those weapons were intelligence and will and power.”

She bided her time but delivered a ballsy coup de grace to her party leader Helmut Kohl. And I loved this story of how she actually won the Chancellorship after a close election which her main rival, Gerhard Shröder, assumed guaranteed his victory over the schlubby, gray woman seated next to him:

On Election Night, Merkel, Schröder, Fischer, and other party leaders gathered in a TV studio to discuss the results. Merkel, looking shell-shocked and haggard, was almost mute. Schröder, his hair colored chestnut and combed neatly back, grinned mischievously and effectively declared himself the winner. “I will continue to be Chancellor,” he said. “Do you really believe that my party would take up an offer from Merkel to talk when she says she would like to become Chancellor? I think we should leave the church in the village”—that is, quit dreaming. Many viewers thought he was drunk. As Schröder continued to boast, Merkel slowly came to life, as if amused by the Chancellor’s performance.

She seemed to realize that Schröder’s bluster had just saved her the Chancellorship. With a slight smile, she put Schröder in his place. “Plain and simple — you did not win today,” she said. Indeed, the C.D.U. had a very slim lead. “With a little time to think about it, even the Social Democrats will come to accept this as a reality. And I promise we will not turn the democratic rules upside down.”

Two months later, Merkel was sworn in as Germany’s first female Chancellor.

In this deft political style and in her post-ideological politics, she reminds me of Obama but with far less rhetorical skill and far more political success. Packer is too kind, I’d say, about the consequences of her austerity program for the entire euro zone, but he captures something deeper about Merkel’s significance. The country’s strength perhaps needs this undemonstrative figure wielding it; it defuses opposition and calms neighbors’ fears. But her stolidity, complacency and risk-aversion at the helm of a satisfied and prosperous country also taps a deeper German longing and an old German past:

“West Germany was a good country,” Georg Diez, a columnist and author, told me. “It was young, sexy, daring, Western—American. But maybe it was only a skin. Germany is becoming more German, less Western. Germany has discovered its national roots.”

Diez didn’t mean that this was a good thing. He meant that Germany is becoming less democratic, because what Germans fundamentally want is stability, security, economic growth—above all, to be left in peace while someone else watches their money and keeps their country out of wars. They have exactly the Chancellor they want.

She is the very model of a modern German politician, a woman whose empiricism and skepticism makes her arguably the leading conservative figure of our age. And by “conservative”, I don’t in any way mean “Republican.”

(Photo: Photos of German Chancellor and Christian Democratic Union (CDU) candidate Angela Merkel are seen on the front pages of German newspapers on September 23, 2013, a day after general elections. By Barbara Sax/AFP/Getty Images.)


24 Nov 19:52

Photo

Steve Dyer

same







24 Nov 18:47

My “Scorn Of Feminism” Ctd

by Andrew Sullivan
Steve Dyer

TAKE ME TO CHURCH

The in-tray keeps getting flooded with feedback on this subject:

Here is my take, as a long-time reader, on the reason so many of my fellow Dishheads have written in to express disappointment with the coverage of feminist issues on the Dish. I read articles such as the recent expose of the culture of silence and tacit acceptance of rape at UVA in Rolling Stone and am outraged but also moved and emboldened by the recent attention that sexual violence has gotten in the media.

Then I go to the Dish, my daily source for news and analysis, and read that the real pressing issue is the “demand that men be gentlemen, rather than something other than men,” as presumably you believe feminists do.

I can’t help but feel that you have your priorities way off. We’re living through a major shift in the way our culture deals with gender, rape, and sexuality, in large part led by a new generation of feminists (men and women), and the impression one gets from the Dish on this is a sense of annoyance and a worry that masculinity as a whole is being unfairly indicted. This strikes me as an analysis not worth my time to read – something I rarely feel about the blog, even (or especially) when I disagree.

Thanks so much for your work. I hope to see more coverage of issues that actually matter when it comes to gender politics today, such as the sea change in how we address rape as a culture.

Another critic:

Andrew, your stances in the Gender Wars threads are disheartening. As passionately as you’ve argued your causes, surely you must know there is not “always a debate to be had,” and that sometimes debates get good answers on questions that are essentially settled. The endless “debate to be had” is one thing that frustrates feminism and its good cause, because it constantly has to solve the same problems over and over for every new person who comes to the table. Frankly, every feminist contradiction you’ve covered in this thread has been debated within feminism since its beginning. It’s not feminism’s burden to educate.

If I may share an anecdote: in my very first job at an entertainment news TV show, I was endlessly harassed. By men. I’m a cis-gendered straight white male.

My ass was grabbed, my nipples were tweaked, and “playful” advances were a constant. It helped me see that sexual harassment really is a problem with men, of any orientation, and gave me some meaningful context for when feminist women describe an inescapable environment of harassment. It’s real. I believe them. If “feminist bullies” always seem to “make everything about gender,” it’s probably because the world treats their gender as everything about them.

Love the Dish, but the conservative mean streak to irrationally hate old canards (The Clintons! Those Damned Feminists! Cigarette Police!) still runs strong in you, and it’s a shame. Feminism’s core values and goals are so much in line with yours.

Another reader quotes a previous one:

You are not a woman, you will never understand what it is like to grow up as a female, work as a female, experience life culturally, interpersonally, electronically as a female. Perhaps it is time you learn to defer a bit on those topics to those that do.

Oh give me a freaking break. Well guess what? I’m a woman (born that way!). I’m damned successful at my job, I’m the breadwinner of my family of four (by a wide margin) and I’ve worked in a male dominated field for 15+ years. I “understand” what it’s like. You want to know how I got where I am? Not by crying about how victimized I’ve always been or blaming men for getting in my way or by buying into the myth that every man just wants to either sleep with me or ignore me. I got to where I am by actually buying the argument that men and women are equal and then comported myself accordingly. I don’t get walked on at work. I don’t get talked down to or ignored or sexually harassed. I demand respect and I get it, from men and women.

Feminists don’t care about equality for women. They want domination for women. Feminists don’t want to have an open and honest discussion about how men and women really ARE different and they can’t always be the same – they want to lambast people for daring to say that testosterone matters. They don’t want girls to have choices about what to be when they grow up; they want to make sure that girls never want to be the things that feminists don’t approve of. They don’t want men to have opinions that haven’t been vetted by a feminist and they sure don’t have a sense of humor about ANYTHING. Feminists make a conscious choice to take everything as an insult and to find the man’s fault in every situation. Why on earth any reasonable person would want to be labeled a feminist is beyond me.

There are legitimate problems for women in our society, violence against women being the top of that list. But the solutions are not going to come from feminists telling every man that he is at heart a rapist or telling every woman that they cannot trust a man. The sooner they get beyond spewing bile at 50 percent of the human race the sooner they might actually make some helpful contributions to the problems.

Another female reader:

While I may agree in principle that the politically correct/language police in our society has gotten out of hand on many fronts, I think you are missing the point behind many complaints. While the language used by many is very absolute and unforgiving, it is simply true that there’s a long way to go until men and women are treated equally by society. Rather than focusing on the unfairness of the language police and lamenting about how rigid feminists are in their definitions, or how they “eat their own,” I think it would move the conversation forward to focus on those who are trying to redefine the word and the movement to include everyone. I’ll point to two things that happened this summer while you were on vacation.

First, the discussion about feminism on your blog that was started by your guest blogger, Elizabeth Nolan Brown. She wrote a post called “This is why men need feminism,” where she pointed to a response that Joseph Gordon Levitt stated when asked about calling himself a feminist. I think his response is perfect, and Elizabeth’s response to it equally perfect. He first states that his idea of the word means that you don’t let gender define who you are. He then follows by acknowledging the long history of abuse of women in societies throughout history. Elizabeth wrapped up the post by stating:

What’s great about Gordon-Levitt’s definition is that it shows why feminism is directly relevant to men’s lives as well as women’s. We’re all in this mess of gender expectations together. Feminism isn’t just about raising women up but helping us all – men, women, cis, trans, whatever – get to a place where we’re a bit more free.

This is important because gender equality is not just a fight for women, but for anyone interested in a freer, more equal society.

But the anger and absolutist attitude held by some in the feminist movement wasn’t formed out of thin air, but in response to thousands of years of oppression. While women’s liberation has made important strides in the past 100+ years, it in no way has eliminated the structural and institutional imbalances in society that perpetuate that inequality. I’d like to argue that the problem of gender inequality has been enshrined in our institutions similar to the institutionalized racism many refuse to recognize. These structural imbalances place women at an automatic disadvantage, even though our society has attempted fixes here and there. It’s important to acknowledge that, even if you disagree with the tactics and language of the feminist movement in its current form, which I know you do.

You point to the balance of security of women from assault and rape against due process of those accused. Yes, there’s a portion of those accused falsely. There’s so many more who have been raped who have not received due process under the law due to the structural imbalances I point to, whether it be a policeman who didn’t believe her story, or the prosecutor more concerned with their track record than prosecuting a crime, or the college that protects the boy while leaving the girl vulnerable to attack and exposure, or the high school sports team that won’t bench their players after gang-rape accusations. You fail to recognize that the recent, and seemingly extreme, action on college campuses is perhaps a response to 30+ years of incremental steps that have not curbed the problem of rape anywhere in our society.

If you want to argue that we should be worrying about this small percentage affected by this problem, tell me how we do that without displacing the thousands of women who have had no ally in prosecuting the crime against them, i.e. the massive storage warehouses throughout the country that are holding backlogged and untested rape kits? To me, worrying about the smaller percentage of those falsely accused displaces the massive amount of women who have been violated twice, first by her rapist, followed by the societal institutions that should be protecting her.

Second, I’d like to point to a UN speech given by Emma Watson this summer in launching her initiative “HeForShe.” Her speech discusses gender stereotypes that both girls and boys suffer from. It’s her task to get as many as possible to recognize that these stereotypes of BOTH boys and girls inhibit society from moving forward towards greater gender equality. It’s a great speech, and it also asks all people to buy in to the feminist idea that no matter who you are, you deserve equal treatment under the law and in society. It asks all of us to fight towards this goal, not just one half.

Here is a link to the full speech for you to read, but one of my favorite sections is the following:

I was appointed as Goodwill Ambassador for UN Women six months ago. And, the more I spoke about feminism, the more I realized that fighting for women’s rights has too often become synonymous with man-hating. If there is one thing I know for certain, it is that this has to stop. For the record, feminism by definition is the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. It is the theory of political, economic and social equality of the sexes. I started questioning gender-based assumptions a long time ago. When I was 8, I was confused for being called bossy because I wanted to direct the plays that we would put on for our parents, but the boys were not. When at 14, I started to be sexualized by certain elements of the media. When at 15, my girlfriends started dropping out of sports teams because they didn’t want to appear muscly. When at 18, my male friends were unable to express their feelings.

What I appreciate about this part of her speech is that it highlights that gender discrimination flows both ways. It’s not just a problem for girls, it’s a problem for everyone.

My main point is that rather than harping on the “feminist left” and their rigid ideology, why don’t you focus the attention of this blog towards those who are trying to move this conversation forward in a new and meaningful way? It’s simply true that we have a long way to go on this front and we all can participate in moving gender equality forward, or we can sit on the sidelines and bitch about the tactics and language. Your choice.

More criticism from a reader, who sends along the above video:

At the end of that reader dissent you linked to, you pulled a paragraph from the post she was addressing and used it to defend yourself, as though the reader hadn’t acknowledged that you’d condemned misogyny. I don’t want to nitpick, but to say this dissent was totally unqualified isn’t quite accurate – you still had the last word.

And that post speaks the problem I’ve had (as a straight white male) reading a lot of your posts about #Gamergate, masculinity, and feminism the last few weeks – you repeatedly start with a paragraph or two saying something along the lines of, “Of course harassment and violent threats against women are wrong…”, but then spend the rest of the post explaining how you have sympathy for people that have been picked on or those who may feel their masculinity is under attack and how feminists have gone too far and are unfairly targeting certain individuals. You put an awful lot of energy into defending men and gamers from the “femi-left,” so I think it’s understandable why some readers think you just don’t get it when it comes to feminism and women’s issues and have suggested you defer on some of these issues just as you have with race.

I think they have a point. Is it too much to ask that you occasionally write a post that says nothing more than, “Catcalling is primitive behavior that objectifies and degrades women and it should be condemned,” and then leave it at that? Instead, you continue with a nuanced view of this behavior and end with something like this:

And so I think we just have to live with a certain amount of straight-very-male homophobia and sexism, and leave it be. Young men want to live out fantasies of rescuing big-boobed women while being encased in a steroidal muscle culture (precisely because, for so many, it is utterly beyond their actual day-to-day lives). And my inclination is simply: give them a break.

I’m sure you can see why a lot of women (and men) might find this sort of language dismissive, but in a weird way I think the problem is just the order in which you reveal your thoughts/opinions. I expect many of these posts have given readers the impression your loyalties lie first and foremost with men (or gamers) who believe their masculinity or identity is under attack. I’d bet that you wouldn’t have received so many angry responses if you began these posts acknowledging your sympathies with male culture (or whatever) first and then aggressively condemned the tactics used to silence and/or demean women. Because at the end of the day, the point that you end on is really all that matters.

And come on, Andrew, you are a feminist, right?

Lastly, a female reader looks back at my views on Hobby Lobby (full Dish coverage here):

I love reading the Dish and became a subscriber as soon as you offered your readers a way to support your work. As so often happens with the familiar people in our lives, I feel as if I can predict your response to issues centering on women’s experience, whether it is your response to Hobby Lobby or #Gamergate. I wouldn’t write if I didn’t think there were potential for you to treat women’s issues with the same nuanced, well-argued, and fundamental empathy that you bring to so many other subjects.

I am disappointed that your posts employ so much dismissive, glib, or minimizing language when you address events in the culture that center on women and women’s issues. These issues may have passed you by, both as a virtue of your gender and your sexual orientation, but that is a profoundly limiting lens and one that I do not see at play in your otherwise aggressive, curious, and serious coverage of issues that are not part of your autobiography.

As a woman living in the Deep South, many of the issues about women’s rights and status are not theoretical. The stakes are quite real for women’s autonomy over their bodies and women’s equality in professional and civic life. I would like you to consider the demoralizing effect you send your readers about women’s issues when you repeatedly use this language to introduce these subjects:

“The obvious damning answer is that I am a man and no one has taken anything away from me – indeed the all-male majority who upheld Hobby Lobby’s religious rights specifically barred any procedure other than female contraception. If they did that for prescriptions for Truvada, for example, I might react differently.”

“And so I think we just have to live with a certain amount of straight-very-male homophobia and sexism, and leave it be.”

My frustration as a reader is intensified when I see you tackle similar issues of straight-male homophobia and sexism when the instigating event does not center on women. You really bring it in the Alec Baldwin thread, for example. I do not ask for emotional identification, but for a professional, intellectual recognition that maybe Hobby Lobby is alarming for many and that perhaps women in tech or gamer culture do not deserve to be patted on the head and told “leave it be.”

I do not agree with a number of your positions, but, man, you are a great writer and thinker who pushes me and surprises me. To quote you: Know hope.


24 Nov 07:17

literallysame: mexi-cant: Does it trip anyone else out that “G” is just an arrow going in a...

by africant

literallysame:

mexi-cant:

Does it trip anyone else out that “G” is just an arrow going in a circle?

honestly fuck this post

22 Nov 16:52

Photo



21 Nov 00:25

I Don’t Feel Weak When I’m Angry

by Erin Zwiener
Steve Dyer

What did I just read?
confidential to cherv: #sullybait

I went on a date tonight with this cute anthropologist. He has blue eyes, a beard, and his online dating profile says he’s good with knots, but not in a creepy, kidnap-y way, more in a handy, Boy Scout-y way. I was trying really hard not to rant about feminism and misogyny during our date, because he seemed nice and listening to me rant isn’t that much fun. Besides, I was pretty sure that he wasn’t anti-feminist because it says right on my profile that I’m a feminist and that I’ll yell at you if throw around “slut” or “pussy,” and I’m usually enough of a pain in the ass that the real assholes don’t consider me worth their time. I wanted to rant about feminism because four days ago this other guy shot people because he thought women owed him sex and they didn’t give it to him so he wanted them to die. He left videos all over the internet telling us about it. Since this guy shot those people I’ve been reading and ranting about misogyny, but that’s not really the best thing to talk about when you’re on a date with a dude. I mean, even the best of them start to get defensive after a while.

But ranting is sort of a habit of mine so instead I ranted about the misrepresentation of science in this novel by this famous author about a group of ecoterrorists faking environmental disasters to convince people that global climate change was real. The novel cited real science, but I’m trained as a forester, and every bit of forestry science the book cited was explained incorrectly or taken so far out of context that it made no sense. Also, the ecoterrorists tried to fake a tsunami, which is bullshit, because there’s not really any science to suggest that a warming planet would cause tectonic plates to move and create an underwater earthquake, at least in a human timescale.

Ecoterrorist is such a crappy term, anyways. Ecoterrorists hate it, because most ecoterrorists consider themselves to be nonviolent. They pour sand in the crankcases of logging equipment, break into mink farms and set the minks free, and burn down empty ski lodge buildings that are encroaching into lynx habitat. They don’t hurt people, or at least they try not to. There was this one time when a spiked tree was run through a saw mill and the saw blade hit the spike and the tree jumped and killed a mill worker. He didn’t deserve to die, but at least it was an accident. Tree spikers have been more careful since. Now they warn the logging company or the Forest Service where the spiked trees are, so that the company or the Forest Service has to check each tree with a metal detector. It makes it much more expensive to log, which really is the theory behind ecoterrorism, to make it too expensive to do whatever bad environmental thing someone wants to do.

So, I was ranting about this novel to this cute anthropologist and I can’t remember why or what exactly the context was but he made a little joke: “Well it’s not like you’re an ecoterrorist, are you?” And I shook my head, of course, and said no, which wasn’t exactly a lie, but it would have been a lie ten years ago.

Read more I Don’t Feel Weak When I’m Angry at The Toast.

20 Nov 21:45

John Cameron Mitchell to Play Broadway's 'Hedwig' in January

by Naveen Kumar
Steve Dyer

omfg

JCM

John Cameron Mitchell will take over as Hedwig in the Broadway production of Hedwig and the Angry Inch beginning January 21 at the Belasco Theatre, Towleroad can reveal.

Mitchell, who wrote the musical with Stephen Trask, created the role of the East German trans rocker in the show's Off-Broadway debut in 1998, and immortalized Hedwig on screen in the 2001 film he adapted, directed and starred in. His performance at the Jane Street Theatre made him into a downtown star, and the acclaimed film launched him into cult fame, earning him Best Director at Sundance and a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actor. 

The show's creator will step in at a time when Broadway box office usually dips, giving the show a surge in sales over his eight-week run ending in March, but he said he's been considering returning to the stage since the production geared up last spring. "To be honest, it's a great excuse to get in shape," Mitchell says. "The people who love Hedwig love it forever, so there's a responsibility to doing this right and being honest on stage. I’m excited about reuniting with those people—the last 15 years of their lives will inform the show as much as the last 15 years of my own." We spoke to Mitchell about his experience writing the show, making the hit film and reentering the world of Hedwig next year.

Stay tuned for a revealing Q&A with Mitchell on Towleroad shortly....

The current Broadway production of Hedwig and the Angry Inch, directed by Michael Mayer (Spring Awakening, American Idiot) won Best Musical Revival at this year's Tony Awards, and took home awards for its original stars Neil Patrick Harris and Lena Hall. Mitchell will take over for Michael C. Hall, who's been performing the role since October 16 and will depart on January 4. 

20 Nov 19:24

The Brand New 'Pitch Perfect 2' Trailer Goes for the Side-Splitting Notes: VIDEO

by Andy Towle
Steve Dyer

did you watch this yet

Bellas

Anna Kendrick, Rebel Wilson, Brittany Snow and the Barden Bellas are back along with Skylar Astin and Adam DeVine in Pitch Perfect 2, the sequel to the 2012 teen comedy hit directed by Jason Moore. This time around, Elizabeth Hanks is helming the film in her directorial debut, and it's scheduled for release in May 2015.

Check out the brand new trailer, AFTER THE JUMP...

Devine

20 Nov 17:16

popiscle: Bro come on just tuck me in bro you know I can’t sleep unless someone tucks me in man

by 90s90s90s

popiscle:

Bro come on just tuck me in bro you know I can’t sleep unless someone tucks me in man