19 Nov 10:35
by Gui‐Liang Xu,
Hui Sun,
Chao Luo,
Luis Estevez,
Minghao Zhuang,
Han Gao,
Rachid Amine,
Hao Wang,
Xiaoyi Zhang,
Cheng‐Jun Sun,
Yuzi Liu,
Yang Ren,
Steve M. Heald,
Chunsheng Wang,
Zonghai Chen,
Khalil Amine
A solid‐electrolyte interphase resulting from rational cathode design and optimal electrolytes enables solid‐state lithiation chemistry for Li/S and Li/Se‐S batteries, which can directly bypass the formation of highly soluble polysulfides/polyselenides, and hence significantly improve shuttle effects and long‐term cycle stability.
Abstract
Lithium/selenium‐sulfur batteries have recently received considerable attention due to their relatively high specific capacities and high electronic conductivity. Different from the traditional encapsulation strategy for suppressing the shuttle effect, an alternative approach to directly bypass polysulfide/polyselenide formation via rational solid‐electrolyte interphase (SEI) design is demonstrated. It is found that the robust SEI layer that in situ forms during charge/discharge via interplay between rational cathode design and optimal electrolytes could enable solid‐state (de)lithiation chemistry for selenium‐sulfur cathodes. Hence, Se‐doped S22.2Se/Ketjenblack cathodes can attain a high reversible capacity with minimal shuttle effects during long‐term and high rate cycling. Moreover, the underlying solid‐state (de)lithiation mechanism, as evidenced by in situ 7Li NMR and in operando synchrotron X‐ray probes, further extends the optimal sulfur confinement pore size to large mesopores and even macropores that have been long considered as inferior sulfur or selenium host materials, which play a crucial role in developing high volumetric energy density batteries. It is expected that the findings in this study will ignite more efforts to tailor the compositional/structure characteristics of the SEI layers and the related ionic transport across the interface by electrode structure, electrolyte solvent, and electrolyte additive screening.
19 Nov 10:35
by Kun Liang,
Licheng Ju,
Supriya Koul,
Akihiro Kushima,
Yang Yang
In this work, a self‐supported tin sulfide porous film is fabricated as a flexible cathode material in Al‐ion battery, which delivers a high specific capacity of 406 mAh g−1. The self‐supported and flexible SnS film also shows an outstanding electrochemical performance and superior stability during dynamic and static bending tests.
Abstract
High‐performance flexible batteries are promising energy storage devices for portable and wearable electronics. Currently, the major obstacle to develop flexible batteries is the shortage of flexible electrodes with excellent electrochemical performance. Another challenge is the limited progress in the flexible batteries beyond Li‐ion because of a safety concern for the Li‐based electrochemical system. In this work, a self‐supported tin sulfide (SnS) porous film (PF) is fabricated as a flexible cathode material in an Al‐ion battery, which delivers a high specific capacity of 406 mAh g−1. A capacity decay rate of 0.03% per cycle is achieved, indicating a good stability. The self‐supported and flexible SnS film also shows an outstanding electrochemical performance and stability during dynamic and static bending tests. In situ transmission electron microscopy demonstrates that the porous structure of SnS is beneficial for minimizing the volume expansion during charge/discharge. This leads to an improved structural stability and superior long‐term cyclability.
19 Nov 10:35
by Mohammad Mahdi Tavakoli,
Michael Saliba,
Pankaj Yadav,
Philippe Holzhey,
Anders Hagfeldt,
Shaik Mohammed Zakeeruddin,
Michael Grätzel
The bulk and surface defects of perovskite films are suppressed by using SnO2/TiO2 double layer oxide, addition of methylammonium chloride (MACl) as a crystallization aid to the precursor solution, and surface passivation of perovskite films with iodine solution, due to the formation of high‐quality large‐grain perovskite films and retardation of radiationless carrier recombination.
Abstract
The presence of bulk and surface defects in perovskite light harvesting materials limits the overall efficiency of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). The formation of such defects is suppressed by adding methylammonium chloride (MACl) as a crystallization aid to the precursor solution to realize high‐quality, large‐grain triple A‐cation perovskite films and that are combined with judicious engineering of the perovskite interface with the electron and hole selective contact materials. A planar SnO2/TiO2 double layer oxide is introduced to ascertain fast electron extraction and the surface of the perovskite facing the hole conductor is treated with iodine dissolved in isopropanol to passivate surface trap states resulting in a retardation of radiationless carrier recombination. A maximum solar to electric power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 21.65% and open circuit photovoltage (V
oc) of ≈1.24 V with only ≈370 mV loss in potential with respect to the band gap are achieved, by applying these modifications. Additionally, the defect healing enhances the operational stability of the devices that retain 96%, 90%, and 85% of their initial PCE values after 500 h under continuously light illumination at 20, 50, and 65 °C, respectively, demonstrating one of the most stable planar PSCs reported so far.
19 Nov 10:35
by Younes Ansari,
Sonia Zhang,
Bohua Wen,
Frank Fan,
Yet‐Ming Chiang
A stable lithium sulfur battery is enabled by a multilayer encapsulated sulfur nanocomposite electrode. The inner coating layer is a metal‐oxide capable of anchoring long‐chain polysulfides and the outer coating layer is a conductive porous polymer resulting in a battery with more than 500 cycles.
Abstract
Advancements in portable electronic devices and electric powered transportation has drawn more attention to high energy density batteries, especially lithium–sulfur batteries due to the low cost of sulfur and its high energy density. However, the lithium–sulfur battery is still quite far from commercialization mostly because of incompatibility between all major components of the battery—the cathode, anode, and electrolyte. Here a methodology is demonstrated that shows promise in significantly improving battery stability by multilayer encapsulation of sulfur particles, while using conventional electrolytes, which allows a long cycle life and an improved Coulombic efficiency battery at low electrolyte feeding. The multilayer encapsulated sulfur battery demonstrates a Coulombic efficiency as high as 98%, when a binder‐free electrode is used. It is also shown that the all‐out self‐discharge of the cell after 168 h can be reduced from 34% in the regular sulfur battery to less than 9% in the battery with the multilayer encapsulated sulfur electrode.
19 Nov 10:29
by Kaiyun Chen, Junkai Deng, Xiangdong Ding, Jun Sun, Sen Yang, Jefferson Zhe Liu
Journal of the American Chemical Society
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b09247
19 Nov 10:14
by Artiom Magomedov,
Amran Al‐Ashouri,
Ernestas Kasparavičius,
Simona Strazdaite,
Gediminas Niaura,
Marko Jošt,
Tadas Malinauskas,
Steve Albrecht,
Vytautas Getautis
In article number 1801892, Steve Albrecht, Vytautas Getautis and co‐workers demonstrate a novel promising concept for the formation of a hole selective monolayer in perovskite solar cells. A low temperature dopant‐free technique makes it suitable for different substrates.
19 Nov 09:08
by Matthew O. Reese
Increasing markets and decreasing package weight for high-specific-power photovoltaics
Increasing markets and decreasing package weight for high-specific-power photovoltaics, Published online: 05 November 2018; doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0258-1
Although rigid silicon panels dominate the solar power market, they are unsuitable for niche applications such as portable charging or drones, where thin-film and flexible technologies would be advantageous. This Analysis examines the needs of niche markets and the packaging weights that would be required to enable such photovoltaic devices to enter them.
29 Oct 13:51
by Mun Sek Kim
Langmuir–Blodgett artificial solid-electrolyte interphases for practical lithium metal batteries
Langmuir–Blodgett artificial solid-electrolyte interphases for practical lithium metal batteries, Published online: 24 September 2018; doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0237-6
A well-designed artificial solid-electrolyte interphase (ASEI) could help resolve multiple problems associated with the use of metallic Li anodes in batteries. Here, the authors develop a Langmuir–Blodgett method to produce an ASEI composed of functionalized graphene oxide with a compatible electrolyte formulation, which facilitates a stable cycling of Li metal batteries.
29 Oct 13:50
by Baobing Fan
Fine-tuning of the chemical structure of photoactive materials for highly efficient organic photovoltaics
Fine-tuning of the chemical structure of photoactive materials for highly efficient organic photovoltaics, Published online: 22 October 2018; doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0263-4
Materials design rules play a key role in enabling high performance in organic photovoltaics. Here the authors achieve 12.25% efficiency on 1 cm2 non-fullerene solar cells by tuning the side chains’ branching point and the fluorine substitutions in donor and acceptor materials.
29 Oct 13:49
by Tuula Teräväinen
Visions of energy futures
Visions of energy futures, Published online: 22 October 2018; doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0279-9
The recent German energy transition has been taken as an exemplary case for a new, decentralized and renewable-energy-based approach to energy policy worldwide. New comparative research shows, however, that its national-level interpretations outside of Germany vary considerably, reflecting country-specific contextualization and visions of a good society.
30 Aug 07:47
by Shaozhuan Huang, Ye Wang, Junping Hu, Yew Von Lim, Dezhi Kong, Yun Zheng, Meng Ding, Mei Er Pam, Hui Ying Yang
ACS Nano
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b04857
10 Aug 10:43
by Dechao
Geng
,
Hui Ying
Yang
Recent advances in the growth of novel 2D materials beyond graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides are comprehensively reviewed. The in‐depth and balanced growth methods of these novel 2D materials are presented. The daunting quest for novel 2D materials poses great potential in electronics and other applications.
Abstract
Since the discovery of graphene just over a decade ago, 2D materials have been a central focus of materials research and engineering because of their unique properties and potential of revealing intriguing new phenomena. In the past few years, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have also attracted considerable attention because of the intrinsically opened bandgap. The exceptional properties and potential applications of graphene and TMDs have inspired explosive efforts to discover novel 2D materials. Here, emerging novel 2D materials are summarized and recent progress in the preparation, characterization, and application of 2D materials is highlighted. The experimental realization methods for these materials are emphasized, while the large‐area growth and controlled patterning for industrial productions are discussed. Finally, the remaining challenges and potential applications of 2D materials are outlined.
10 Aug 10:41
by Marco
Agostini
,
Jang‐Yeon
Hwang
,
Hee Min
Kim
,
Pantaleone
Bruni
,
Sergio
Brutti
,
Fausto
Croce
,
Aleksandar
Matic
,
Yang‐Kook
Sun
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 26, September 14, 2018.
10 Aug 10:40
by De‐Shan
Bin
,
Yunming
Li
,
Yong‐Gang
Sun
,
Shu‐Yi
Duan
,
Yaxiang
Lu
,
Jianmin
Ma
,
An‐Min
Cao
,
Yong‐Sheng
Hu
,
Li‐Jun
Wan
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 26, September 14, 2018.
10 Aug 10:39
by Jonathan
Lau
,
Ryan H.
DeBlock
,
Danielle M.
Butts
,
David S.
Ashby
,
Christopher S.
Choi
,
Bruce S.
Dunn
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 27, September 25, 2018.
23 Jul 09:18
by Sanjay
Nanda
,
Abhay
Gupta
,
Arumugam
Manthiram
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 25, September 5, 2018.
23 Jul 09:18
by Bin
Cao
,
Qing
Zhang
,
Huan
Liu
,
Bin
Xu
,
Shilin
Zhang
,
Tengfei
Zhou
,
Jianfeng
Mao
,
Wei Kong
Pang
,
Zaiping
Guo
,
Ang
Li
,
Jisheng
Zhou
,
Xiaohong
Chen
,
Huaihe
Song
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 25, September 5, 2018.
23 Jul 09:18
by Min
Yan
,
Hao
Chen
,
Yong
Yu
,
Heng
Zhao
,
Chao‐Fan
Li
,
Zhi‐Yi
Hu
,
Pan
Wu
,
Lihua
Chen
,
Hongen
Wang
,
Dongliang
Peng
,
Huanxin
Gao
,
Tawfique
Hasan
,
Yu
Li
,
Bao‐Lian
Su
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 25, September 5, 2018.
23 Jul 09:13
by Shuai
Wang
,
Di
Zhang
,
Bin
Li
,
Chao
Zhang
,
Zhiguo
Du
,
Haoming
Yin
,
Xiaofang
Bi
,
Shubin
Yang
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 25, September 5, 2018.
23 Jul 09:13
by Ulderico
Ulissi
,
Seitaro
Ito
,
Seyed Milad
Hosseini
,
Alberto
Varzi
,
Yuichi
Aihara
,
Stefano
Passerini
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 26, September 14, 2018.
23 Jul 09:12
by Matthew
Li
,
Zhongwei
Chen
,
Tianpin
Wu
,
Jun
Lu
Li2S is largely overshadowed by S as a cathode material. Some of the potential benefits of using Li2S over S in terms of electrode packing and cycle stability are discussed. The overarching benefits may reside in the ability of Li2S to conveniently act as the Li‐ion source for Li2S‐based lithium‐ion batteries.
Abstract
While members of the Li–S battery research community are becoming more conscious of the practical testing parameters, the widespread commercialization of S‐based batteries is still far from realization. Particularly, the metallic Li used as the anode poses potential safety and cycle stability concerns. Alternatively, other S‐battery configurations without a Li anode, i.e., lithium‐ion, Li2S, or S batteries, do not suffer from the same safety concerns and can possibly serve as better methods to bring room‐temperature S‐based battery technologies to industry. However, whether Li2S or S will be used as the initiating cathode material remains unclear as each offers their own unique advantages and disadvantages. Here, both S and Li2S as cathodes are briefly discussed and the key benefits of Li2S are highlighted.
23 Jul 09:12
by Francis Amalraj
Susai
,
Hadar
Sclar
,
Yuliya
Shilina
,
Tirupathi Rao
Penki
,
Ravikumar
Raman
,
Satyanarayana
Maddukuri
,
Sandipan
Maiti
,
Ion C.
Halalay
,
Shalom
Luski
,
Boris
Markovsky
,
Doron
Aurbach
Advanced Materials, EarlyView.
11 Jun 12:21
by Henghui
Xu
,
Shaofei
Wang
,
Arumugam
Manthiram
Advanced Energy Materials, EarlyView.
11 Jun 12:20
by Yan
Wang
,
Zexiang
Chen
,
Tao
Lei
,
Yuanfei
Ai
,
Zhenkai
Peng
,
Xinyu
Yan
,
Hai
Li
,
Jijun
Zhang
,
Zhiming M.
Wang
,
Yu‐Lun
Chueh
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 16, June 5, 2018.
11 Jun 12:20
by Liangliang
Zhu
,
Minmin
Gao
,
Connor Kang Nuo
Peh
,
Xiaoqiao
Wang
,
Ghim Wei
Ho
Advanced Energy Materials,
Volume 8, Issue 16, June 5, 2018.
11 Jun 12:17
by Maohui
Bai
,
Keyu
Xie
,
Kai
Yuan
,
Kun
Zhang
,
Nan
Li
,
Chao
Shen
,
Yanqing
Lai
,
Robert
Vajtai
,
Pulickel
Ajayan
,
Bingqing
Wei
Advanced Materials, EarlyView.
01 Jun 12:58
by Seongrok
Seo
,
Seonghwa
Jeong
,
Changdeuck
Bae
,
Nam‐Gyu
Park
,
Hyunjung
Shin
Advanced Materials, EarlyView.
01 Jun 12:58
by Haoxuan
Sun
,
Kaimo
Deng
,
Yayun
Zhu
,
Min
Liao
,
Jie
Xiong
,
Yanrong
Li
,
Liang
Li
Advanced Materials, EarlyView.
01 Jun 12:58
by Hong
Shang
,
Zicheng
Zuo
,
Le
Yu
,
Fan
Wang
,
Feng
He
,
Yuliang
Li
Advanced Materials, EarlyView.
01 Jun 12:57
by Xin
Xu
,
Ruisheng
Zhao
,
Wei
Ai
,
Bo
Chen
,
Hongfang
Du
,
Lishu
Wu
,
Hua
Zhang
,
Wei
Huang
,
Ting
Yu
Advanced Materials, EarlyView.