Shared posts

08 Oct 16:41

Free contraceptives reduce abortions, unintended pregnancies. Full stop.

by Sarah Kliff

The idea that contraceptives prevent unintended pregnancy is, well, pretty intuitive. That’s the whole point of contraceptives.

Except that’s not how it always works: About half of all unintended pregnancies are the result of contraceptive failure, where a condom breaks or birth control pills aren’t taken at the right time. The least expensive methods of contraceptive tend to be the least effective.

That got a team of researchers at Washington University wondering what would happen if women had access to all contraceptives at no cost. IUDs, for example, are about 20 times more effective than birth control pills – but also tend to be significantly more expensive.

Over the course of three years, they gave over 9,000 women in the St. Louis area access to free contraceptives. Study participants could choose from birth control pills or more long-acting contraceptives, like the implantable IUD. Three in four women chose the latter.

The researchers published their results Thursday and saw some dramatic differences between those in the study, and those outside of it.

Teen pregnancies – 80 percent of which are unintended – plummetted. They stood at 6.3 per 1,000 teens in the study group, compared to 34 per 1,000 teens nationally.

Abortion rates were significantly lower, too. In the St. Louis area, 13.4 per 1,000 women had an abortion in 2010. Among the women involved in this study, the rate stood at 5.9 per 1,000 women. 

The study authors attribute a lot of those differences to the widespread use of long-acting contraceptives. Such birth control – used by 75 percent of the women in this study – is only used by 8.5 percent of women nationally.

The Affordable Care Act will expand this experiment nationally by making contraceptives no-cost for all insurance subscribers. The study authors estimate that could have a marked effect on abortion rates, “preventing as many as 41–71% of abortions performed annually in the United States.”

08 Oct 16:37

September 30, 2012


For law geeks, there was an awesome AMA on reddit recently.


05 Oct 15:45

quit it

05 Oct 14:34

jumpropejellyfish: omfg i’m dying this was actually on cnbc

by pekingduck

jumpropejellyfish:

omfg i’m dying this was actually on cnbc


04 Oct 18:30

Ring













04 Oct 15:40

buzzfeed: Existential Here Comes Honey Boo Boo is the best...









buzzfeed:

Existential Here Comes Honey Boo Boo is the best thing to ever happen to the internet.

04 Oct 12:19

Hark, a Vagrant: A Medieval Film



buy this print!

Gee whiz! These guys are just terrible at making a Medieval film. Don't they know anything???

Just kiddin' you guys, no one would ever try to shoot a movie in Chaucer-y English like the 4th comic, and if they did they probably wouldn't know their way around the actual grammar if Chaucer himself had a Dummies book explaining it. That shit is hard!

I think most people who like to nit-pick historical inaccuracy in films do it for a few reasons:
- it's fun
- it's silly to think that movies aren't "important" because they're entertainment, movies are the way most people come across with representations of histories they don't know much about! So I can't blame anyone for caring that they get the details right.
-it's... fun.

If you don't believe me, take a look at one of my favorite terrible movies, The Norseman starring Lee Majors. It's got it all! Bad Viking movies somehow earn a trophy for being even more bad than most bad movies. How DO they do it??

03 Oct 19:36

amani992: Oppa. Lol

by pekingduck


amani992:

Oppa. Lol