Shared posts

15 Apr 14:03

Goodbyes

by Justin Boyd
Dan Jones

Oh no! All those Britney songs I listened to!

Goodbyes

I always worry that everyone around me can hear every weird song I listen to. Hey, sometimes I just want to listen to a ukulele cover of Meshuggah, ok? =)



bonus panel
15 Apr 13:15

Retro Mario Playing Cards

by elssah12

retro-mario-playing-cards-2Retro Mario Playing Cards!

15 Apr 12:23

School play goes horribly wrong as teens’ throats are slashed with real razor

The show must go on

15 Apr 12:22

Google Play Music is launching Podcasts on April 18

by Nick Sarafolean
Dan Jones

Yeah, I've heard this before.

Months back, we got word from Google that the company would be launching podcast support directly within Google Play Music. Well, that was back in October, and the company has maintained radio silence since then, with the only updates being random testing of the interface for some users. But today brings in new hope for those awaiting Google Play Music Podcasts. Android Police has received a tip showing an embargoed email from NPR to its members, which provided the news that Play Music Podcasts will be launching on April 18.

While we can’t be absolutely sure on this date, it seems likely, considering the amount of time that’s passed since Google announced the feature. Additionally, some customers have been able to test the new interface, showing that Google has continued to work on it in the background. With any luck, interested users will be able to access Play Music Podcasts by Monday.

We’ll keep you informed if it does happen to launch on Monday. Stay tuned.

15 Apr 11:10

Our existence is one of those game glitches the Great...







Our existence is one of those game glitches the Great Programmer didn’t account for but it turns out is worth a few hours of entertainment.

15 Apr 11:10

It all makes sense. BUY MY BOOK - Patreon- Facebook - Twitter -...







It all makes sense.

BUY MY BOOK - Patreon- Facebook - Twitter - Subreddit

15 Apr 00:14

Aw yiss

Everyone loves Fruit Rollups

14 Apr 22:03

Microsoft Sues U.S. Justice Department Over Secret Customer Data Searches

by John Gruber

Brad Smith, Microsoft’s president and chief legal officer:

We believe that with rare exceptions consumers and businesses have a right to know when the government accesses their emails or records. Yet it’s becoming routine for the U.S. government to issue orders that require email providers to keep these types of legal demands secret. We believe that this goes too far and we are asking the courts to address the situation.

To be clear, we appreciate that there are times when secrecy around a government warrant is needed. This is the case, for example, when disclosure of the government’s warrant would create a real risk of harm to another individual or when disclosure would allow people to destroy evidence and thwart an investigation. But based on the many secrecy orders we have received, we question whether these orders are grounded in specific facts that truly demand secrecy. To the contrary, it appears that the issuance of secrecy orders has become too routine.

The urgency for action is clear and growing. Over the past 18 months, the U.S. government has required that we maintain secrecy regarding 2,576 legal demands, effectively silencing Microsoft from speaking to customers about warrants or other legal process seeking their data. Notably and even surprisingly, 1,752 of these secrecy orders, or 68 percent of the total, contained no fixed end date at all. This means that we effectively are prohibited forever from telling our customers that the government has obtained their data.

Kudos to Microsoft to taking a strong stance on this.

From the NYT story on the lawsuit:

In its suit, filed Thursday morning in Federal District Court in Seattle, Microsoft’s home turf, the company asserts that the gag order statute in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 — as employed today by federal prosecutors and the courts — is unconstitutional.

The statute, according to Microsoft, violates the Fourth Amendment right of its customers to know if the government searches or seizes their property, and it breaches the company’s First Amendment right to speak to its customers.

Microsoft’s suit, unlike Apple’s fight with the Federal Bureau of Investigation over access to a locked iPhone, is not attached to a single case. Instead, it is intended to challenge the legal process regarding secrecy orders.

14 Apr 21:40

Photo





14 Apr 18:40

Last Week Tonight: Abortion Laws

John Oliver explains American abortion laws

14 Apr 15:19

Snarcasm: The ‘Doctor Strange’ Teaser Is an Insult to Humanity

by Jon Negroni

doctor strange trailer

Snark + Sarcasm = what you’re about to read.

Hating everything in sight for no good reason is just the Internet thing to do these days, and that point is not lost on Megan Purdy, editor-in-chief of Women Write About Comics.

Upon the release of Marvel’s first teaser for Doctor Strange, Megan and her band of professional YouTube commenters decided to get together with their favorite thesaurus and write about how much it sucks.

Tagged under RaceRacism, and several other SEO boosts, Megan writes:

That Dr. Strange Trailer Sure Is Awful

Gosh darn it! It’s just the most awful thing, and Megan’s roundtable (don’t worry, that’s tagged, too) is here to spell out why.

The Dr. Strange trailer. So… it’s here.

Yikes. AWKward.

We hated it.

WHAT?! The headline was accurate?! Let’s begin with Megan talking.

This seems like a trailer for four movies in one: The Matrix, Inception, Eat Pray Love and a watery wuxia ripoff for white America.

Wow, a brief teaser is vague enough to have similar imagery to a few movies. The nerve. Also, where does the Eat Pray Love movie fit in? What, because he travels? Is that how low your bar is?

doctor strange trailer
It’s basically plagiarism.

Interesting that your “water wuxia ripoff for white America” couldn’t just be summarized with an actual movie to get your point across, by the way. I mean it’s a thesaurus, not a existing knowledge of actual films.

It’s visually confused and so derivative that it makes no argument for its own existence.

Yeah, that teaser is such a tease. I mean what other movies are about a doctor who travels the world in search of a cure for his broken hands, only to stumble across a mystical force that transcends dimensions? Too many to count! Remember when Neo’s soul got punched out by Tilda Swinton in Matrix ReCumberbatched?

It relies entirely on exoticism and flash

Yeah, whatever happened to uninteresting and boring comic book movies?

here is a proud white man brought low, walking into the East to meet his destiny, and inevitably, become not just any old magician, but the Sorcerer Supreme.

It’s almost as if they’re making a movie based on an existing comic book. But Megan would know that if she wrote for Women Write…About Comics.

And is Doctor Strange a proud white man? Well, first of all, his value as a character has nothing to do with his skin color, so that’s irrelevant. Is he proud? Sure, which is what makes his forced humility an interesting point of the movie. Making him perfect and politically correct would be like having Anakin Skywalker not become Darth Vader in Revenge of the Sith.

doctor strange trailer
Or worse.

He finds greatness by searching outside of himself, presumably. But why is this a bad thing? And how does this relate to that dreaded “exoticism and flash” you were bemoaning a sentence ago?

First Benedict Cumberbatch was Khan Noonien Singh — not just any old nemesis of Captain Kirk, but an Asian warlord who ruled a future territory spreading from South East Asia to the Middle East — and now he’s a white doctor learning magic in Tibet.

“First, he played a white character. Then he played another white character. Can you believe it?”

Seriously, I have no idea what Megan is trying to say here. Khan was never Asian, just a perfectly bred human played by a white actor who ruled much of Asia and the Middle East. And that’s not even how he’s presented when Cumberbatch plays him in Into Darkness. And why is this even being discussed, anyway?

You have a problem with white people learning superpowers from people who aren’t white? That’s too specific of a complaint, even for Megan Purdy..

The Ancient One, a Tibetan mystic and sorcerer played by fellow white Brit Tilda Swinton, is his Morpheus, who we meet in a scene that’s straight ripped from The Matrix.

Yeah, straight from The Matrix. Because they were in a room, and there were some vaguely Asian aesthetics. And…that’s about it. Oh, wait! Neo groveled “Teach me!” after being shown incredible mystical powers outside the realm of his understanding!

What? Oh, that didn’t happen at all. He just fought Morpheus in a computer simulation. But let’s not bring up the fact that over half of The Matrix pays homage to dozens of movies. You know, because that’s what lots of great movies do.

doctor strange trailer
Go on, then.

What do I know about this film, based on this trailer?

That you weren’t really paying attention because you were triggered from the first frame?

It’s, well, pretty damn racist,

It’s not a little racist. It’s not even just racist. It’s pretty damn racist. Impressive for a two minute teaser.

and it doesn’t seem to have a clear purpose or audience in mind.

No audience! Not even Doctor Strange fans, Marvel fans, comic book fans, movie fans, Benedict Cumberbatch fans, Tilda Swinton fans, film buffs, or (breath) people who don’t read anything on Women Write About Comics because clearly that’s a website where they don’t bother to also like comics. Well, the Doctor Strange ones at least.

I mean seriously, how are you the editor-in-chief of a website about comics, and you can’t even judge from a comic book movie teaser WHY said movie exists?

Why is there a Dr. Strange movie?

Because everyone is out to hurt you.

Because Marvel could make one?

Uh, yeah. And that’s a good reason. Marvel has gotten to the point where they’ve had so much success with niche comic book movies like Guardians of the Galaxy and Ant-Man, that they can now present the Doctor Strange story in a way deserving of the character based on trust from the bankrollers.

But according to Megan, Marvel simply said, “Eh screw it. We can do this thing, so let’s do this thing.” Because that’s how Marvel makes multi-million dollar decisions.

Why would they do this after all the criticism from their fans?

Yeah, remember when all the fans criticized Marvel for making good movies based on their favorite comics they never thought they’d get to see on the big screen?

Well. Because they don’t care.

Hmmm…well, that’s the kindergarten reaction to the question you presented. The first-grade answer is, “Because Marvel is gross!”

doctor strange trailer

Next, we have Ray Sonne commenting on this winning roundtable.

Okay, putting aside how horrifyingly offensive this trailer is because I’m not the best person to discuss it, what the hell?

Easy, Ray, it’s a teaser trailer. It’s just a bunch of moving pictures that aren’t real and you’re going to be fine.

A trailer, as an effective marketing tool, is supposed to give the audience a basic idea of the movie’s story and characters without spoiling any surprises.

Yeah. Did you, uh, see this teaser? Did you…did you watch it, Ray?

But when you watch this trailer, you’re basically receiving a bunch of scattered details that make zero damn sense.

Look, I can sort of see how someone completely unfamiliar with Doctor Strange might be a little confused by specific moments in this teaser. But how is someone who writes for Women Write About Comics not understanding what happens in a Doctor Strange teaser that aligns almost exactly with the origin story for this character?

doctor strange trailer

Seriously, this teaser was not that complicated. Benedict Cumberbatch plays a skilled doctor in search of something greater, and he stumbles upon something much, much greater than he could have ever predicted. That’s plenty to tease the audience with, especially for fans who can fill in the blanks.

So Benedict Cumberbatch is a doctor who did good doctor things?

WHAT IS THIS WEBSITE?

But then something bad happens to him and, oh no, he has bruise makeup on his face?

The most humorous thing about this entire piece is that there are plenty of valid criticisms of this teaser, like the “I don’t know if I like this” accent Cumberbatch has. But Ray is so far removed from reality right now, she’s criticizing a character with bruise makeup as if that’s the biggest cinematic insult since “I hate sand. It gets everywhere.”

So he goes to… some undefined part of Asia, which other people need to tell me is Tibet? Why does he do this? I suppose I would have some idea if I had an inkling of this guy’s personality or background, but alas.

“Trailers shouldn’t spoil the story! Now someone tell the people who made this trailer to give us tons of information on this character’s personality and then spell out the whole plot.”

This trailer didn’t need to give us all of the details. We can see glimpses into who Stephen Strange is, based on the tragedy that begins the teaser, his journey to overcoming these problems, and then a strong desire to learn the art of mysticism. You can’t even complain that these are only discernible from knowing the comic because most of these tidbits are delivered via narration.

He meets Tilda Swinton, who is living in Tibet and knows “Tibetan” magic because… what?

Please stop talking until you understand that the Ancient One uses sorcery, not “Tibetan magic.”

And then…Cumberbatch learns magic and shit? And apparently he has potential, but why does he want to explore his potential in corny magic instead of, like, dog-training?

Seriously, stop.

If you were expecting some big bad villain who hammers home the theme and the main source of conflict, haha joke’s on you.

Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised at this point if Ray outright said that she’s never seen a trailer. Or a movie.

Ray goes on to complain that this teaser recycles “last year’s blockbusters,” clearly admitting she has no idea when Matrix or Inception were released, and then Angel Cruz takes the stage.

This trailer is less infuriating than it is a lazy, inconsiderate piece of cinema being offered to people who are much smarter than Marvel gives them credit for.

Burn it! Burn it alive before it kills the smart people like us!

 It’s 2016, and we are still being fed orientalist stereotypes that are given free rein to continue damaging people with Asian heritage–

…You…you do realize that saying “oriental” is extremely offensive, right? Like you have to know that because you’re the Earth Politics Warrior of Cinema, Angel Cruz, right?

And yes, she’s actually claiming that this two minute teaser featuring a white woman who tells a white man about magic is damaging to Asian heritage…for all of the wrong reasons.

doctor strange trailer

I can understand complaints about Marvel whitewashing the Ancient One just to avoid these stereotypes that are obviously lost on Angel Cruz. But these commenters aren’t even complaining at this point because nothing they’re saying even connects with the teaser they’re criticizing, as evidenced by the fact that they keep calling it a “trailer.”

for what? Reaffirmation that white narratives will always be more valued?

You’re the only person saying that, but hey, if Nancy Grace can get away with it, so can you.

A reminder that Hollywood still believes that Asian stories have no validity without a white person at the center, controlling and living that narrative better than any Asian person ever could?

Except that Doctor Strange is not an “Asian story.” It’s about an American who goes to a fictionalized place in Asia to become a powerful sorcerer. He has always been the central figure of this story and that hasn’t changed. In fact, there have been Sorcerer Supremes in countries all over the world, and it just happens that the Ancient One resides in the Himalayas.

But hey, why let facts get in the way of pure, unbridled outrage?

It’s exhausting, yes, to see Benedict Cumberbatch and Tilda Swinton slinking into roles that so clearly appropriating Chinese, Tibetan, and South Asian cultures. Their acting abilities aren’t in question here, just their acceptance that they have the right to tell these stories instead of Asian actors.

I’m not even sure what else to say at this point. Angel clearly has no idea what she’s talking about or what Doctor Strange truly is as a comic. Now, we can debate, as I mentioned earlier, whether it was right or wrong for Marvel to sidestep the offensive Asian stereotypes that were present in the original comics with the Ancient One by casting an androgynous actor.

I see why they did it (the “wise” minority stereotype comes to mind), but it’s still cringeworthy. But is it the defining mistake of Hollywood? Not even close thanks to The Last Airbender.

It’s likewise exhausting to see all the nods to Asian art and motifs set in the background against white faces.

I’m 100% positive Angel would lose her mind if she walked inside a Panda Express.

She continues this tirade, citing that Marvel doesn’t care about her at all (oh, they’re so mean!) until Laura shows up to keep this all going.

I’m pretty convinced at this point that any Cumberbatch role is just Sherlock in a nicotine-haze trying to solve some nefarious crime, because it’s the only explanation for a Cumberbatch Strange.

Your inability to understand how actors can act in two separate roles because they’re good at acting says way more about you.

A Victorian England setting would also explain the over-the-top mystic orientalism, because there’s no way that’s a reasonable thing to propose in 2016 after getting slammed with criticism for the usage and treatment of The Mandarin, Black Sky, the Hand, and Iron Fist.

I’m guessing they were only “slammed” with criticism by readers of Women Write About Comics. All six of them.

And yet, here we are, and people are arguing on Twitter

NOOOOO, not Twitter! Not the last bastion of civil discussion and thoughtful conversations!

about how Strange needs to be white, but that the casting of The Ancient One is a problem, totally missing the point that a white person out-Asianing Asians is an issue no matter what character we’re talking about.

Is Stephen Strange out-Asianing Asians in this teaser? Nope, just doing the exact opposite, which is not doing that. Logic is a funny thing. Not haha funny in this case.

OK, but what does Desiree have to say in order to bring this whole thing home?

 I understood the trailer because I know Dr. Strange’s origins, and backstory.

Gird your loins everyone. They’re finishing this article with someone who claims to know what they’re talking about on a website about comics…presumably.

 I’ve written about them, and since then, Dr. Strange, as a movie, has only seemed to have gotten worse and worse.

Desiree links to another article worthy of Snarcasm, in which she complains that Marvel cast a white guy to play a white superhero from a comic book. She’s basically the inverse of those people who complained about Human Torch being played by Michael B. Jordan, as well as having a black stormtrooper in The Force Awakens.

doctor strange trailer
Or this guy.

It’s a bunch of modge-podged East and South Asian cultural references pieced together to look magical and exotic without any Asian people shown.

These “cultural references” without any Asian people shown include a guy walking through a village in the Middle East with natives all around him, establishing shots of exotic locations with no people in them by design, Chiwetel Eijofor walking through an Asian city with Asians all around him, Benedict Cumberbatch walking through another Middle Eastern location with Middle Easterners all around him, Tilda Swinton standing in a temple, an unrecognizable character using magic in a temple, more unrecognizable characters in an unrecognizable location, and…do I need to go on?

Each character in the trailer has adopted some bastardized form of East and South Asian cultural style yet none of them are Asian. Another movie that’s portraying an exotic, vaguely Asian culture entirely through the lens of white people.

And Chiwetel Eijofor.

Are there enough Asians in Doctor Strange? Well, how is anyone supposed to know based on a teaser marketed to American audiences?

Strange, in the comics, is an arrogant, skilled surgeon who loses the ability to use his hands and basically falls off the wagon.

And by “falls off the wagon,” you must mean “searches the world in search of a cure.”

 Strange then is seemingly “chosen” to be a candidate for Sorcerer Supreme because…reasons? Really, it was because it was the 70’s and white guys could do anything!

Or because you didn’t read the comics (since the first comic came out in 1963, not the 70s). Strange was an idealist, though arrogant. He was chosen because Baron Mordo (his rival) was corrupted by power, and Strange had proven to be a more selfless person who would use the authority of Sorcerer Supreme to protect, not to put his power over others.

That doesn’t make this an inoffensive story, obviously, but it was, in fact, the 60s. But to suggest that it was this simplistic is a straw man.

Yay, white male power fantasies!

Yay, I’m nearly done with this Snarcasm!

Seriously, we’re almost there, folks.

So Strange goes to Tibet and learns humility and magic and boom! Excels at magic so much he gains the title of Sorcerer Supreme.

No, Strange sacrifices his quest to heal his hands in order to serve the greater good, earning him the title. He’s not even that much better than everyone else at first, as Baron Mordo is more experienced and a true threat later on. His real skill lies in ingenuity and heart and please let this end soon.

That story is now so dated it’s laughable.

True. Which is why they’re probably updating the story.

Can anyone truly provide me with an argument that proves Stephen Strange needs to be white?

Wow, we’re actually going there. Well, first of all—

Other than, “that’s how it was in the comic.”

OK, so can I name a reason beside the main one that’s the most convincing? Hmmm, well yeah, I still can.

Doctor Strange has a very particular look and social class that affects his character. Shifting his appearance for the sake of it would alter his backstory, his ties to Western culture, and what makes his motivations work as a character. It would be like making Luke Cage a white guy.

doctor strange trailer
Or played by Carlton.

Strange’s embellished appearance, and even his whiteness, lends to his arrogance gifted from the epitome of privilege. He has to humble himself in order to find meaning outside of what he could achieve as a skilled surgeon in New York. Altering his appearance would just come across as forced and doing more harm than supposed good, because making him Asian would mean rewriting a significant portion of who he is and what has gotten him to this place.

In other words, writing a character is very complicated. Rewriting a character without losing much of what makes him who he is in the first place can be even more challenging. These things do matter, and Marvel is right to preserve essential aspects of this character moving forward.

Spider-man once had eight arms in the comics. Tony doesn’t drink (anymore) in the comics. Bucky was a child when he was teammates with Steve. Sam was originally a gang member. Don’t tell me Dr. Strange and Iron Fist have to be white because of comics canon when the movies change things all the time.

The difference is that none of these niche examples you provide are woven into what makes the character iconic. Spider-Man isn’t known for having eight arms. Tony is known for having a drinking problem. It’s one thing to make updates to the source material, and it’s another to reinvent the character in order to suit an unrelated agenda. Didn’t we just go through this with Synder’s nonsensical take on Superman?

I’m not arguing that the Doctor Strange story couldn’t use some major tweaks in order for audiences to find it relevant and inoffensive. But we haven’t gotten any real indication from just one teaser (as all of these “writers” admit) what this movie is really going to be about and how these characters will be presented.

So, there you have it. The Doctor Strange trailer is bad, bad, and also bad. Is it possible to find something good in the movie itself? Is it even worth trying? 

sigh

Yes, Megan. It’s worth trying to find good in something related to comics. You know, your blog’s namesake. If you have to ask whether or not it’s worthwhile being optimistic about movies, then maybe they just aren’t for you.

doctor strange trailer

Hey! If you’ve come across a silly article that deserves the Snarcasm treatment, send it my way via Twitter or the comments below!

I’m Jon and thanks for reading this. You can subscribe to my posts by clicking “Follow” in the right sidebar. Or just say hey on Twitter! @JonNegroni


Filed under: Editorials, Snarcasm
14 Apr 14:48

This Is How You Do ‘Star Trek’ Redshirt Cosplay

by Geek Girl Diva

main 3.31.29 PM

Oh my gosh, I’m in love!

Meet cosplayer Timothey Adam. Timothy went Emerald City Comicon as a Star Trek Redshirt and asked to be “killed” in multiple ways. The results are just fantastic. Especially when you consider how many Star Wars cosplayers got in on the fun.

See Also: One Redshirt’s Deadly Comic-Con Adventure

The deadliest away mission! My goal was to get as many cosplayers as possibly to kill me, thus usually only getting a single picture of each person. I was using my camera on a tripod with a 10 second delay – that’s why there’s weird cropping at times. Surprisingly, only one or two pictures were too blurry to be usable. I really appreciated how some people really got in character with their choice of “kill-or-maim-me” :)

Check out more pics below.

11246363_10209194492800227_6506032712489058729_n

12512733_10209194491640198_889051664297267998_n

12718217_10209194510520670_4802071364864542357_n

12932818_10209194489000132_5652394809640853499_n

12933053_10209194490600172_6516953479248867789_n

12936754_10209194493600247_878022622351886753_n

12938074_10209194504360516_3788546214497713165_n

12973613_10209194504400517_7005891570051719788_o

12991127_10209194497000332_7522032618846971988_n

12994569_10209194490920180_6922856711790979163_n

12998633_10209194494720275_7411134206696133151_n

13001161_10209194487840103_718912515321119258_n

You can see even more pictures on his Facebook page.

(via CBR)

14 Apr 14:22

Mark Twain

"A human being has a natural desire to have more of a good thing than he needs."

14 Apr 12:57

Vurtego V4 Pro Pogo Stick

If you're looking to put some spring in your step...you'll have to look beyond the Vurtego V4 Pro, because you won't find a single metal coil in this pogo stick. But. If you'd settle for pumping 90 psi underfoot, hop right on. And get ready to bounce, bound, and even flip up to 10' in the air. Down the stairs. Over the rail. Nothin' but Oh. Hell. Yeah. The Vurtego V4 pro isn't your cousin Ricky's rickety pogo stick from the summer of '86, it's a veritable portable trampoline. A serious sporting good for serious athletes.

Or for your kid. Or your girlfriend. Your marginally coordinated IT guy. Your 300-pound barber. The V4 Pro pogo stick is powered by self-adjusted air pressure, so anyone taller than 4'8" and over 75 pounds can learn to kangaroo around on it at their desired level of leap.

Pumped to a low pressure--say, 30 psi--the V4 Pro will treat you gently, bouncing with a soft, limited-height spring. Jacked up higher, and higher, and higher will stiffen the stick's air spring, and jack up your jumps proportionately. Until you pump too high, at which point Vurtego says the stick's slide shaft will explode out from the traction piston and probably impale your foot. Just kidding. Really the air spring will become so hard it won't budge at all until you give it some release.

Vurtego makes the V4 Pro in sizes Small (recommended for people 5'3" and under), Medium (5'4" to 5'11"), and Large (6' and up).

14 Apr 12:57

If you don’t have anything nice to say double-post out of...



If you don’t have anything nice to say double-post out of impatience

If you don’t have anything nice to say double-post out of impatience

14 Apr 12:56

Texts From SuperheroesFacebook | Twitter | Patreon

Dan Jones

Why is Hawkeye so lame?
Why did Marvel choose to rip off the lamest member of the Justice League?



Texts From Superheroes

Facebook | Twitter | Patreon

14 Apr 12:53

#1313 – Talk (No Comments)

by Chris

#1313 – Talk

13 Apr 21:23

Photo

Dan Jones

Always how I feel. Whenever things are going really well, that just means something's around the bend to kick you down.



13 Apr 20:47

Weird 80s font convergence

by Jason Kottke

Just learned/realized that the old logos for Reebok, Apple, and Trapper Keeper all use the same typeface, Motter Tektura.

Motter Tektura

Motter Tektura

Motter Tektura

(via @pieratt)

Tags: Apple   design   logos   Reebok   Trapper Keeper   typography
13 Apr 19:39

Should I use Grid or Flexbox?

by Robin Rendle

Two sentences from Rachel Andrew that explain when to reach for which layout choice:

Flexbox is essentially for laying out items in a single dimension – in a row OR a column. Grid is for layout of items in two dimensions – rows AND columns.

Flexbox can wrap, making it sorta-kinda two dimensions, but it still flows in a single dimension.

Direct Link to ArticlePermalink

Should I use Grid or Flexbox? is a post from CSS-Tricks

13 Apr 19:39

Live in slow mo

by The Awkward Yeti

Live in Slow Mo

13 Apr 19:19

Photo

Dan Jones

I stop at step 0, so I never get to two or four.



13 Apr 18:33

Comic for 2016.04.13

13 Apr 17:33

Algorithms

There was a schism in 2007, when a sect advocating OpenOffice created a fork of Sunday.xlsx and maintained it independently for several months. The efforts to reconcile the conflicting schedules led to the reinvention, within the cells of the spreadsheet, of modern version control.
13 Apr 17:30

B. F. Skinner

"The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do."

13 Apr 17:03

Better CSS Drop Caps With “initial-letter”

by Ian Yates

Drop caps are a form of decoration sometimes used at the beginning of a block of text; the initial letter running several lines deep and indenting the body text within these lines. 

Example of a drop cap by The Walrus
Drop cap example, as found on The Walrus
Drop cap example as found on Nautilus
Drop cap example, as found on Nautilus

It’s a typographic tradition as old as the history of typesetting itself, and these days we can emulate it with CSS using the ::first-letter pseudo element. Styling that first letter, however, is notoriously clumsy, but the proposed initial-letter property aims to fix that. Let’s examine what it is, what we can do with it, and what we can expect in the future.

The Current Approach

Let’s begin with a demo; a paragraph of text.

Now we target the first character in that paragraph using the ::first-letter pseudo element. The current styling approach would be to float that character with p::first-letter { float: left; }, pulling it out of the flow within the paragraph, and then to size it accordingly:

This isn’t bad, and can be further tweaked with line-height, positioning and so on. It’s also very well supported. But it’s certainly not perfect; to properly enjoy what drop caps can give us we need more precise control, and flexibility.

A New Solution

The initial-letter property, currently being discussed as an Editor’s Draft by the W3C (about as early on in the standardising process as it’s possible to be), aims to give us the precise typographic control we want. It’s used in combination with first-letter.

The first value it takes determines the size of the initial letter, in terms of how many lines it occupies.

p::first-letter {
  initial-letter: 3;
}

Here’s what that looks like:

Caveats

Sorry, stop right there. Support for this is still very poor. At the time of writing, the demo above will only display correctly if you’re using Safari OS X, or an iOS browser, and only because we’re using the prefixed webkit syntax: -webkit-initial-letter: 3;

Here are some screenshots if you can’t see what I’m seeing:

Initial letter demo in Safari OS X
Initial letter demo, in Safari OS X
Initial letter demo in Safari iOS
Initial letter demo, in Safari iOS

The first thing you might notice is the different fonts. No browsers seem to play nicely with initial-letter and web fonts. Any fonts installed on your system work fine, though they must be explicitly declared; using a general serif or sans-serif; at the end of the font stack doesn’t appear to have any impact. You’ll need something like font-family: "my web font", arial; to beat the browser fallback.

The second thing you’ll see is the top line of text shooting off the right of the page. This is a bug, so for the time being we’ll need a workaround. Happily, it’s possible by forcing the boundaries of the initial letter beyond the top of the containing paragraph (thus making the browser understand that the top line shouldn’t equal the width of the whole container). A nice big margin-top value will sort things out:


@jensimmons here’s a non-browser-engineer’s attempt at explaining what I *think* is happening ^Ian pic.twitter.com/tODqdaKX40

— Envato Tuts+ Web (@wdtuts) April 14, 2016

Second Value

Okay, let’s carry on. The second value initial-letter accepts is optional. It determines by how many lines the letter sinks in, for example: 

p::first-letter {
  initial-letter: 3 2;
}

Here we’ve declared that the letter is three lines deep, but sinks just two.

This is known as a “sunken initial”, rather than a true “drop cap”. Again, here’s a screenshot if you’re not seeing the desired result:

Sunken initial-letter

Going Responsive

Big drop caps can look fantastic, but on a narrow viewport you should consider drop caps to be a part of your responsive typography. You’ll likely have smaller body copy on small screens, so consider using a proportionate drop cap too.

/* set base paragraph styles */
p {
    font-size: 1em;
}

/* set base drop cap styles */
p::first-letter {
    initial-letter: 2;

    color: #c69c6d;
    margin: 1em .2em 0 0;
}

/* mobile first media query */
@media only screen and (min-width: 800px) {
  
    /* set paragraph styles for larger screens */
    p {
        font-size: 1.25em;
    }
  
    /* set drop cap styles for larger screens */
    p::first-letter {
        initial-letter: 3 2;
        margin: 1em .5em 0 0;
    }
  
}
More readable initial-letter
Keeping things readable on smaller screens

Fallback

If you’re looking at these demos in an unsupported browser, you might wonder how best to avoid the absurd-looking result:

Unsupported initial-letter
Initial-letter styling, when unsupported

We’re getting all the styling except the stuff which makes the letter actually behave like a drop cap. Using CSS feature queries you can apply your styles selectively. Wrap your drop cap styles in a @supports condition like this:

@supports (initial-letter: 1) or (-webkit-initial-letter: 1) {
 
 /* your initial-letter styles here */
 
}

If initial-letter is supported, the styles will be applied–if not, they won’t.

Note: not even CSS feature queries have universal support, so take this with a pinch of salt. Modernizr would be a safer bet.

Taking things further, you may even want to apply the dropcap.js JavaScript polyfill by Adobe, but we won’t be covering that here; Dudley Storey does a great job of that over on his blog.

Conclusion

It’s very early days, but initial-letter shows great promise. Keep an eye out for further properties such as initial-letter-align, which will help with non-roman alphabets, and initial-letter-wrap which will allow more tightly-fitting surrounding text.

The demos used here are very functional, but imagine the doors to decorative typography this could open up! In principle we’ll be free to use many familiar properties on the initial letter, including:

  • All familiar font properties
  • Color and opacity
  • Text-shadow and other text decoration
  • Transform properties
  • and how about some background-clip action?

For updates on its progress your best bet is to follow @jensimmons (she’s all over this stuff).

Further Reading

13 Apr 17:03

Google Calendar now offers ‘Goals’ to help you reach your next milestone

by Evan Selleck

For the folks out there that lead busy lives but still want to find the right time to reach their next goal, like biking, or running, or working out three times a week, Google Calendar is here to help out.

Google is officially launching “Goals” within its Calendar app. With it, Google Calendar users will be able to input something like “run three times a week” and Calendar will figure out the best possible times for you to achieve that goal, based on the variety of different meetings and important dates on your schedule.

Inputting something as general as “work out more” will have Calendar offer up a few questions, including “how often?” or “best time?” and from there Calendar will figure out the best time slots for you to get the job done. And if you add another event at some point down the road that conflicts with that goal’s allotted time, Calendar will automatically find you another time slot that works.

Google says Calendar will get better at scheduling your goals every week the more often you use the feature, so as time goes on it will get more precise and work even better with your schedule.

Goals for Google Calendar is available right now, both for Android and iOS.

What do you think of the Goals feature?

13 Apr 15:17

Pearls Before Swine: Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Dan Jones

Seems legit

Pearls Before Swine
13 Apr 15:16

Charmander Lighter

by elssah12
Dan Jones

So clever

charmander-lighterPokemon Charmander Lighter – Charmander used burn!

13 Apr 15:16

Life Sentence

by Steve Napierski
Life Sentence For some reason, this comic reminds me of a video by GradeA UnderA about stupid phrases you should never say again. I embedded the video below and keyed it up to the one I was thinking about.

Stupid Phrases You Should Never Say Again


Here is a funny side note, for anyone who follows GradeA UnderA. The name GradeA UnderA stands for the fact that its host was a grade A student in school, but when he graduated and wasn't a student he couldn't get a job and was an underachiever. Hence, GradeA UnderA. Now you know.



See more: Life Sentence