Shared posts

09 Jun 05:07

A Computer Has Reportedly Passed The Turing Test For The First Time

by Michael B. Kelley

A computer program named "Eugene Goostman" has convinced a third of human judges into thinking it is a 13-year-old boy, becoming the first machine to pass the Turing test, Hannah Furness of The Telegraph reports.

Computer science pioneer and World War II codebreaker Alan Turing created the test in 1950 in a paper which opens with the words: "I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think?'"

He argued that if a machine dupes 30% of human participants during a series of chats, then it is exhibiting intelligent behavior that is indistinguishable from that of a human. Passed that threshold, according to Turing, the idea of a "thinking machine" would no longer be contradictory.

Here is the standard interpretation of the Turing Test, in which the interrogator (Player C) is tasked with trying to determine which player - A or B - is a computer and which is a human based on responses to written questions.

 

Turing_Test_version_3

Eugene Goostman, an artificial intelligence program developed to simulate a 13-year-old Ukrainian boy, convinced 33% of the judges that it was human at the Royal Society in London.

Alan TuringUniversity of Reading Professor Kevin Warwick told the Telegraph that although there have been previous claims of passing the Turing test, this was the first instance where the test "does not set the questions or topics prior to the conversations ... We are therefore proud to declare that Alan Turing's test was passed for the first time.''

Warwick added that having computers with this level of intelligence has ''implications for society'' and would serve as a ''wake-up call to cybercrime."

Turing studied mathematics and later taught quantum mechanics at Cambridge University, where he developed and proved the idea that automatic computation cannot solve all mathematical problems. The concept, known as the Turing machine, is the basis for the modern theory of computation.

Despite helping the Allies win WWII, Turing was arrested for being gay in January 1952. 

Check out the full report at The Telegraph >

SEE ALSO: The Incredible Story Of Alan Turing, Who Helped Beat The Nazis But Was Then Persecuted For His Sexuality

Join the conversation about this story »


09 Jun 04:24

Book: No Place To Hide

by Brad Feld

Amy and I were going to have a bunch of friends over to our house today but we got rained out. So, I read Glenn Greenwald’s book No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State instead.

It was outstanding – 5 stars.

Let’s start with the punchline from Warren and Brandeis in their 1890 Harvard Law Review article The Right to Privacy where they assert that the right to privacy is primarily a “right to be left alone.”

Ponder that for a moment.

It’s a hot topic in my household since Amy did her thesis at Wellesley on the right to privacy. At the same time, I’ve been very open with my belief over the last decade that there is no more privacy, that the government tracks everything we do, and if you build your worldview around the notion that you have privacy, you are going to be disappointed. I guess I’ve been watching too much 24.

Now, this doesn’t mean I don’t think one should have a right to privacy. If I believed that, the philosophical arguments in our house would escalate dramatically. Rather, I gave up my own belief that I have privacy. And, I’ve felt for a long time that society is in a very unstable situation with regard to data, data privacy, and personal privacy. And I think this is going to get much, much worse as the machines further integrate themselves into everything we do.

So I view the problem of privacy at a meta-level. And as a result, I find books like Greenwald’s fascinating, powerful, and deeply insightful into the cause, effect, reaction, and second-order effect of humans trying to process what is going on, defend their position, and advance their perspective.

I thought Greenwald did a particularly good job of three things in this book:

  1. Painting a clear picture of Snowden, his character, and Greenwald’s experience interacting with him.
  2. Addressing the actions of the NSA that should cause outrage, or at least a deep, thoughtful conversation about what the appropriate boundaries for government surveillance in the United States.
  3. Demonstrating the tactics of the US government, especially through media which is sympathetic to the US government, in shifting the story from the main event (the NSA disclosures) to a continual campaign of discrediting the participants (Snowden and Greenwald).

It doesn’t matter which side of the issue you are on. If you feel like calling Snowden, and possible Greenwald, a traitor, you should read this book carefully. If you believe they are whistleblowers, or even heroes, you should read this book carefully. If you believe the government never lies, or always lies, you should read this book carefully. If you believe journalists aren’t caught up in the game, are objective, and have integrity, you should read this book carefully.

I’ve felt for a long time that it’s a real cop-out to call Snowden a traitor or just react to the surface of what is going on here. There are some really profound forces at work that will impact the United States, our notion of democracy, and privacy, for many years. And the second order effects, including how other nations view the United States and the other four of the Five Eyes or the implications on global companies headquartered in the United States, will impact us for many years.

And, as a bonus, there are lots of revealing PowerPoint charts in the book from the NSA documents which, in addition to driving Snowden and Greenwald’s points home, demonstrate that the US Government needs some courses in making PowerPoint slides nicer.

The post Book: No Place To Hide appeared first on Feld Thoughts.

06 Jun 22:38

Panasonic A500 Wearable Tech Shoots 4K Video

neymar.png
Were you wondering how you can shoot 4K video without even having to use your hands? Well, Panasonic has the answer… A wearable 4K camera that straps around the arm and is connected to your head. In situations where you want the world to see what you do, this is one way to do it.

Check out Neymar trying on and using the A500

The Panasonic A500 retails for $399 and includes a level shot image stabilizer and a built-in LCD so you can see what you are filming – I mean recording. In addition it is dustproof and can record 30 minutes of video in 3 meters of water.

Accessories_1_140311_400.jpg

The lens weighs 31 grams and the unit comes with NFC and WiFi built-in meaning easy one-touch syncing with your access point. Myriad mounts and cases are available as well as you can see below.
Accessories_2_140311_400.jpg

To learn more about wearable tech, be sure to come to Wearable Tech Expo July 23 & 24 in NYC.

Tags: 4k, nfc, panasonic, video, wearable tech, wifi Related tags: wearable, video, panasonic

Related Entries
  • Verizon MiFi and Boingo Indispensable - Feb 08, 2013
    mifi2.JPG
  • ITEXPO Hashtag is #ITEXPO, Receptions and More - Jan 23, 2011
  • Did Skype Just Kill Cisco's UMI Telepresence? - Jan 05, 2011
  • Gadgetize the Man in Your Life - Jan 05, 2011
  • Skype Video For iPhone a 2011 Killer App - Dec 30, 2010
  • What if Someone is Trying to Steal This Data? - Oct 25, 2010
  • Book ITEXPO Now to Save Hundreds - Aug 04, 2010
  • Skype Upgrade Supercharges iPhone 4 - Jul 21, 2010
  • Our WiFi Future - May 02, 2010
  • Cablevision Shows CTI stands for Computer-TV Integration - Feb 24, 2010
  • TrackBacks | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | Communications and Technology Blog - Tehrani.com Home | Permalink: Panasonic A500 Wearable Tech Shoots 4K Video Copyright Communications and Technology Blog - Tehrani.com

    Apex Technology Services
    Sponsored by Apex Technology Services, a leading IT Services company

    06 Jun 22:36

    Apple Has A New Plan To Keep You Away From Carriers That May Hit Apple Stores This Month (AAPL)

    by Lisa Eadicicco

    apple storeApple will reportedly kick off a new system in its retail stores that would give iPhone shoppers more flexibility when selecting a data plan, according to 9to5Mac's Mark Gurman.  

    The effort is likely a push to create a one-stop shop for Apple fans, eliminating the need to go to a carrier store and boost sales within Apple's own retail locations

    With the new system, a shopper could choose a new iPhone and then opt for a pre-paid plan or a month-to-month plan within the store if he or she buys an unlocked phone at full price.

    The initiative could launch in the last week of June. 

    Previously, buyers would have to purchase a SIM card at a carrier store rather than Apple's if they wanted to purchase an iPhone at full price without a two-year carrier commitment.

    Now, Apple is making the process easier for customers by offering the option to do so directly in their own store.

    Apple is said to be partnering with AT&T and T-Mobile for the new project. Apple stores will soon stock up on AT&T GoPhone activation kits and T-Mobile SIM cards, according to Gurman.

    The company will begin training Apple Store employees on the new month-to-month plan options in the coming weeks.

    Options will include a $60 per month plan from AT&T, which includes 2.5GB of data and unlimited talk and text, and a $70 per month plan from T-Mobile that gets users 5GB of data and unlimited talk and text.

    The new options would bypass the need for iPhone shoppers to visit carrier stores, meaning they'll be more likely to stay in Apple's retail stores to buy their cases, accessories, and extra chargers as well. As Gurman notes, it could also help Apple boost sales of its current iPhones as it prepares to release its next smartphone in the fall. 

    SEE ALSO: The Most Important Features Coming To Your iPhone That Apple Didn't Tell You About Yet

    Join the conversation about this story »


    06 Jun 17:26

    Google To World: Encrypted Email Is The New Black

    by Adriana Lee

    Google has a message for the world: Insecure, unencrypted email just isn't cool any more.

    On Tuesday, the tech giant released code for an early alpha version of an "end-to-end" Chrome encryption plugin—basically, software that will let users send encoded messages to one another using any Web-based email provider. It also added some interesting new data to its "Safer Email" transparency report—namely, the fact that about half of email received by its Gmail service arrives with no encryption that would protect it from prying eyes on the Internet. Its report also calls out the worst offenders among other major email providers—among them, cable giant Comcast.

    That dig apparently got a rise out of Comcast, which piped up to announce that it, too, has plans to protect emails from unauthorized snooping. The company said it will offer more information next week in Brussels at a meeting of the Messaging, Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group.

    There's a chance this is just a wacky coincidence, but that seems unlikely, considering Comcast's encryption will focus specifically on messages moving between Comcast servers and Gmail.  Now, we're bracing for the throngs of "me-too" announcements hailing a greater push toward more secure email delivery and transmission.

    At least, we hope.

    Google Outs The Encryption-Challenged

    Users might be fearful about hackers—or the NSA—digging into servers and looting email storage. Certainly spying or government surveillance concerns in a post-Edward Snowden world is shining a light on secure practices. But that's only part of the picture. Google's report focuses on the security of email as it transits the big, bad Internet.

    There's great potential risk for messages being intercepted as they travel to your inbox. Encryption essentially scrambles them, ensuring that, even if outside parties get their hands on messages, they wouldn't be able to read them without specific decryption codes. So to keep email shielded from outsiders, both sending and receiving services have to use secure encryption protocols.

    Google, which started encrypting Gmail by default in 2010, uses Transport Layer Security, or TLS, to safeguard messages in transit. It's a pretty standard type of encryption. Problem is, not all that many other email services are using it, which means Gmail has to send and receive email from those providers in an insecure fashion.

    Roughly 69 percent of emails sent by Gmail are encrypted in transit, which means those recipients' email services also support it. But inbound messages to Gmail are much less secure. Only half are encrypted during delivery.

    In its report, Google broke out "the percentage of email encrypted for the top domains in terms of volume of email to and from Gmail" worldwide:

    Most all of the providers shown in the right-hand chart, for messages from Gmail received from other email services, scored 90% or better for encryption. The exceptions were Russian email provider Mail.ru and Comcast. (Me.com is Apple's now-defunct, pre-iCloud domain.)

    Overall, it appears that the major free email providers—like AOL, Hotmail, and Yahoo and MSN/Hotmail—are paying attention to encryption. So are social networks like Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. Most Internet service providers, however, have some work to do.

    Less than 1% of Gmails sent to Comcast recipients are encrypted. Likewise Verizon and Cox, though certain searches for AT&T fared a bit better. 

    A Trend In The Making

    Comcast—the country's largest cable and broadband services provider, now poised to grow even larger—should waste no time locking down this consumer service. And it isn't. Encryption will be rolling out in the next few weeks, though it's not clear whether it intends to encrypt both incoming and outgoing messages. That will likely be the case, though, as though anything less than that hardly seems worth it.

    As for other providers, with Google's veritable outting of this security hole could prompt others to step up and encrypt.

    They will, if Christopher Soghoian has anything to do with it. The American Civil Liberties Union's resident technologist told the Wall Street Journal that "Google's naming. We can shame ... and we will." As soon as the report went public, he started hitting up Internet providers, asking if they'd secure their services.

    It's important to note, however, that this type of in-transit encryption doesn't prevent the provider on either end from rifling through your email, since your messages get decoded upon receipt. (Otherwise, your correspondent wouldn't be able to read them, either.) Gmail, in fact, makes a business of automatically scanning email and selling ads against certain keywords in your messages, although most users have long since gotten used to that.

    So it's sort of intriguing that Google also released some early code for a new Chrome browser add-on that would improve email security further—in fact, to such a point that it could both frustrate government requests for email data and undercut Gmail's ad business.

    The "End-to-End" extension is intended to make the "Pretty Good Privacy" (or PGP) encryption standard super simple to use. “End-to-End” refers to data that remains encrypted until the recipient decrypts it. In this case, it would apply to messages sent from your browser and decrypted in the recipient's browser.

    Google released the early code so developers can get some hands-on time to work with it and create their own Chrome plugins. Theoretically, if it works as described, even Google wouldn't be able to break the encryption.

    Feature image courtesy of Flickr user Quinn Dombrowski

    06 Jun 16:20

    Brilliant 11-Year-Old Designs An Unbreakable, Spill-Proof Cup For Her Ailing Grandpa

    by Caroline Moss

    Lily Born is not your average kid.

    At just 11-years-old, the Chicago-based youngster has designed an unbreakable, spill-proof cup after she noticed her grandfather (who has Parkinson's) was having trouble drinking out of regular glasses.

    Lily Kangaroo

    It's called a Kangaroo Cup, and it's easier to hold than the average drinking glass.

    The 9oz cup stays stable on uneven surfaces, while contoured handles provide a comfortable one- or two-handed grip.

    Kangaroo CupsKangaroo CupsIt's both microwave and dishwasher safe.

    Kangaroo Cups

    The above version of the Kangaroo Cup is the most recent, and it's made out of BPA-free polypropylene.

    But, years ago, it started out as a ceramic cup.

    Kangaroo Cups 1.0

    "We were using hand-moldable plastic at home and then clay at a pottery studio," Lily tells Fast Co.Design. "I could hand those cups right over to my grandpa to use, and it was very easy to see if it was comfortable or not."Lily Cup

    But the ceramic was breakable, so Lily asked her father, an inventor, for some additional help. He hooked her up with some designers and marketers to make a new version.

    Lily

    The 11-year-old businesswoman

    Now the young entrepreneur has launched a Kickstarter for the cups and she's already raised over half her total goal of $25,000.

    Donors who pledge over $25 get their own set of 4 Kangaroo Cups.

    "Just because you're a kid doesn't mean you can't do big and great things," Born says in her Kickstarter video.

    You can visit her Kickstarter here.

    Join the conversation about this story »








    06 Jun 04:24

    Grab the remote: Chromebooks can now watch Play Movies, TV shows offline

    by Kevin C. Tofel

    After what seemed an eternity, Google Chromebook owners can finally watch Google Play video content offline on their devices. Earlier last month Google announced this requested feature was coming and on Thursday night, the company launched it with a short post on Google+. Chromebook users will first need to install a new Google Play Movies and TV extension in order to download video purchases or rentals for offline playback. Of course, if the screen on your ChromeOS device isn’t big enough, there’s a Chromecast button to send video wirelessly to a larger display.

    Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

    05 Jun 16:02

    Donald Sterling Agrees To Sell The Clippers To Steve Ballmer And Drop His Lawsuit Against The NBA

    by Karyne Levy

    steve ballmer

    Former LA Clippers owner Donald Sterling, who was banned for life from the NBA, has agreed to sign off on selling the team to former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, the AP is reporting. 

    Late last week, news broke that Ballmer had inked a deal to buy the team for a record-breaking $2 billion. 

    A source told the LA Times that Ballmer outbid LA-based investors Tony Ressler and Bruce Karsh, as well as a group that included David Geffen and executives from the Guggenheim Group, which owns the Los Angeles Dodgers. The Geffen Group reportedly offered $1.6 billion for the team, with Ressler bidding $1.2 billion.

    But the deal was held up because Sterling was going to sue the NBA for a whopping $1 billion for allegedly "forcing" him to sell the Clippers. He accused the NBA of breach of contract, violating his constitutional rights, conversion, and breaking antitrust law.  

    But Sterling's attorney, Maxwell Blecher, told the AP that Sterling "has made an agreement with the NBA to resolve all their differences." Blecher says that the suit will be dismissed.

    Sterling was banned from the NBA for life last month after an audio tape of him making racist remarks to his girlfriend was leaked to the press. 

    There's one more hurdle for the deal to go through: at least three-quarters of the 29 other NBA team owners must sign off on it. They're expected to approve the deal, however, if Ballmer agrees to keep the team in Los Angeles, which he has stated publicly that he will do. Ballmer lives in Seattle, but he told the Wall Street Journal, "If I get interested in the Clippers, it would be for Los Angeles."

    Join the conversation about this story »








    05 Jun 15:46

    Google invests $1B on satellites to bring WiFi to the world

    by Zeus
    The project is scoped to provide internet to areas around the world without wired connections. Google plans to spend over $1 billion on a fleet of satellites that will be used to provide internet to parts of the world that currently lack digital connections, according to a report from Wall Street Journal. According to “people […]
    04 Jun 19:06

    GoPro Names Ex-Microsoft Executive Tony Bates as President (Bloomberg)

    Bloomberg:
    GoPro Names Ex-Microsoft Executive Tony Bates as President  —  GoPro Inc., the maker of cameras used by surfers, skiers and sky divers to record their adventures, recruited former Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) executive Tony Bates as president and added him to the board.

    04 Jun 14:47

    Netflix Is Shaming Verizon For Its Slow Internet (NFLX)

    by Steve Kovach

    netflix slow verizon service

    The above screenshot is a notification from Netflix tweeted out by Vox Media's Yuri Victor Tuesday night.

    It seems like Netflix is making a move to shame internet service providers (ISPs) that don't offer speeds fast enough to provide reliable streaming for Netflix videos.

    Netflix has had a tepid relationship with ISPs recently. It now pays Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon for direct access to customers using those providers. In theory, that should provide more reliable video streaming. It seems to be working, at least with Comcast, but this is Netflix's not-so-subtle way at showing its customers that ISPs may not be doing enough to provide reliable streaming.

    The image is real, by the way. A Netflix spokesperson tweeted that the company is "always testing new ways to keep members informed."

    Join the conversation about this story »








    04 Jun 13:11

    Google ups the ante on email encryption

    by Jonathan Vanian

    Google unveiled a new security tool for email encryption Tuesday called End-to-End, as well as a new section to the company’s Transparency Report that details which email providers are taking the necessary precautions to ensure that email is being encrypted in the open web.

    The new tool, still in its alpha stage, is a plug-in for Chrome that works by encrypting the email sent between two parties and leaving it encrypted until a user actively decrypts the message in his or her browser. While there are other tools out there that do similar functions, such as Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) and GnuPG, Google claims that those tools are more complex than the average person can handle.

    While Google said that online security “has always been a top priority,” it’s interesting to note that this service seems catered to folks who are generally nervous about email and feel they need an extra layer of protection. In May, the company teamed up with Zix Corporation on a cloud-based email encryption service targeting the enterprise and users of Google Apps.

    To add to that general sense of fear over email invasion, Google’s new addition to its Transparency Report explained that around 40 percent to 50 percent of email sent by Gmail users to other email services are not being encrypted; remember, email encryption is a two-way street and it requires all email providers to accommodate.

    Google Email Encryption Chart 1

    Google gathered data going back a year that details the rate at which email is being encrypted and was able to generate a list of the world’s top domains that support email encryption. Kudos to you if you use Yahoo, Twitter, or Facebook, as those companies’ domains are at the top of the list. As for users of Comcast, Constant Contact, and Groupon, you might want to start looking at security plugins.

    Screenshot of Google Email Encryption Chart 2

    Google now joins the list of big-name tech companies–including Facebook and Twitter–that are actively calling out email providers to make sure they are doing all they can to ensure the safe-and-secure delivery of messages.

    Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

    04 Jun 13:08

    Google Hangouts go corporate with integration into business apps

    by Barb Darrow

    If you’re not quite sure how serious Google is about wooing business users, here’s another indication that it is: the company is working with enterprise-y software companies to put the Google Hangout button on their websites or applications. So for example, if you’ve got a problem, bam — you’re in a hangout with customer support. It’s basically a replacement to the live chat buttons you see on most web sites these days, but with video.

    Partners here include Zendesk and Zoho. For a quick demo of Hangouts’ integration with Salesforce.com check out the video below, although Salesforce.com is not mentioned as a participating partner.

    Business customers already incorporating the Hangouts button include The Weather Channel and Jeni’s Splendid Ice Cream, Google said. In much the same vein, the comopany launched Chromebox for meetings, which also runs Hangouts, earlier this year.

    Making Hangouts ubiquitous can promote collaboration, customer service, employee recruiting and other tasks, Stephen Cho, head of Google Apps and Hangouts technology partnerships, said in the blog post announcing the news.

    Given Microsoft’s continued dominance with Office and integration of Skype with those bread-and-butter apps, this makes perfect sense.

     Feature photo courtesy of Flickr user The Daring Librarian

    Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

    03 Jun 17:37

    The Doctor Will See You on Your iPhone Now

    by Lauren Goode

    American Well

    Lauren Goode

    Mobile phones have revolutionized the way we conduct business, maintain personal relationships and consume entertainment. But they’re also changing things up in another critical area — the way we manage our health.

    For the past two weeks, I’ve been using two new “telehealth” apps — American Well and Better — that promise on-demand medical services.

    These apps are similar in that they are looking to disrupt the traditional U.S. health-care experience, where you might have to search for a doctor who accepts your insurance (assuming you even have insurance), wait forever in the doctor’s office and never really know what you’re going to end up paying. And that’s on a good day.

    But the apps approach mobile health in different ways. One lets you video chat with doctors, while the other links you up with a personal assistant who will manage all your health stuff. Bonus: That includes figuring out which doctors are in your insurance network.

    I tested American Well and Better by expressing a variety of ailments to the health-care professionals I spoke to. I always identified myself as a journalist, and I never faked an emergency, which would be irresponsible. Overall, I had positive experiences.

    But whether the apps will work for you depends on your own comfort level and what you’re willing to pay, as well as the type of medical situation you’re dealing with. In a nutshell, they’re good for acute care, but not for serious medical issues or emergencies.

    And, of course, they’re not free. American Well visits are covered by some health-insurance providers (Aetna, Cigna, MVP, United and Blue Cross Blue Shield Rhode Island). Otherwise, it costs $49 per visit, which doesn’t include follow-ups and prescriptions. Better eschews the complicated labyrinth of health insurance, and has its own tiered-pricing model: The free version of the app offers Mayo Clinic articles and a “symptom checker,” and for $49 per month, the app puts you in touch with human health-care professionals.

    I first tested American Well on an iPhone 5s. Later on, I tested it on the web and an iPad as well. The company has been around for eight years, but just launched a mobile app last fall. The doctors available through the app aren’t working directly for American Well; instead, the service accesses a network of physicians that are part of an independent organization.

    After creating a profile, I was able to choose from a list of five physicians that were available at that time for video chat, and to connect with one of them within 15 minutes.

    The first doctor I picked is based in Pennsylvania, but is licensed to treat patients in California. She was helpful and informative when I asked her about potential ailments like eye infections, bronchitis or sinus problems. She said she doesn’t find video chatting impedimental when it comes to asking patients to cough, or to show her a rash.

    She said she does do short-term prescription refills. For conditions such as a spiking blood pressure, complications from diabetes, or a request for a narcotics prescription, she said she’d likely tell video patients to go see their regular physician or even get urgent care.

    I felt surprisingly comfortable video chatting with this doctor. But the biggest surprise came when a one-minute warning popped up; the app hadn’t made it clear that American Well appointments last only 10 minutes. The doctor said she could extend it by a few minutes on her end, but I was mid-sentence when the video chat abruptly ended. It was as if a doctor had walked out of the room and shut the door while I was describing my symptoms.

    Fortunately, she rang back, and we chatted for a few more minutes on the phone. Later on, I received a message through the app that included a copy of her appointment notes.

    [Sorry. This video cannot be displayed in this feed. View your video here.]

    With the Better app, I really did feel as though I had a nurse in my pocket. Unlike American Well, Better doesn’t hook you up with physicians through video chat. Instead, it’s a kind of concierge service for your health, connecting you at all times to a “Personal Health Assistant” via in-app messaging or phone calls. This assistant is an actual person (a real, live human!) who will help you navigate health-insurance issues, find you local doctors or send you articles that are relevant to your concerns.

    Better is currently only available on iPhone. For the sake of this review, the company gave me temporary access to its premium service.

    My “PHA” was a registered nurse named Ninette. We had one long, thorough introductory call, during which she asked me about my health history, habits and concerns. I also sent her snapshots of my insurance cards through the in-app messaging system.

    Next, she sent me detailed emails as part of my “Better Action Plan.” These included links to articles from the Mayo Clinic — Better’s app partner: Tips for getting more sleep and referrals for local eye doctors that accept my insurance.

    One morning, I told Ninette via text message that I felt a cold coming on, and asked her for some home remedies. She responded within a few minutes, and offered to book me a primary care appointment, connect me with a Mayo Clinic nurse over the phone, or send me some resources — again, Mayo Clinic articles. Ninette and I exchanged nearly two dozen texts over the past week and a half, and she was helpful each time.

    I was especially curious about a few aspects of this app: Would the virtual interaction feel impersonal compared with an in-person visit? And how private are these consultations?

    It turns out that they can feel pretty personal. Of course, the doctor can’t see you, look into your ears and throat, press a stethoscope onto your chest, or examine you in other physical ways. But I’ve never had the kind of relationship with a doctor where I could just call or text when I had a non-urgent question about something and get immediate guidance. (Usually I end up searching online, and end up pretty convinced that I’m dying.)

    With these apps, especially Better, I was able to establish an ongoing dialogue with a health-care professional and get personalized information within minutes.

    In terms of privacy, both companies say the apps are compliant with the federal health privacy standard called HIPAA, and that patient information is kept private unless explicit permission is given to share it. American Well says it doesn’t record or store its video chats, though it keeps a record of the appointment itself. And the doctors take notes, just as they would be with normal visits.

    These aren’t the only mobile applications that promise to offer immediate health guidance or connect you with doctors. Apps like Doctor on Demand and myMD work similarly to American Well. Some offer mental-health care as well. And there are plenty that simply provide medical information — although, again, self-diagnosing can have its pitfalls.

    “Telehealth” apps have their limitations, but I think they also have the potential to make non-urgent health-care visits less onerous.

    03 Jun 15:07

    FCC’s System Crashes After Net Neutrality Video Goes Viral

    by Amy Schatz

    John Oliver comments

    HBO/YouTube

    Comedian John Oliver’s hilarious net neutrality video and call for people to flood the Federal Communications Commission with protests worked: The agency’s comment system crashed Monday.

    The FCC’s creaky Electronic Comment Filing System couldn’t keep up with the hordes of people trying to weigh in on the agency’s net neutrality proposal on Monday.

     

    The 13-minute video explaining net neutrality first aired Sunday night on Oliver’s HBO talk show “Last Week Tonight,” and has received more than 770,000 views on YouTube since then.

    Despite being down for much of Monday afternoon, the FCC’s system logged 1,506 comments yesterday. About 94 percent of them — or 1,414 — were about net neutrality. So far, the FCC has received more than 45,000 comments on its net neutrality proposal.

    If you couldn’t get through yesterday, the system appears to be back up this morning. You can either use this link (it’s number 14-28) or shoot an email to openinternet@fcc.gov.

    03 Jun 03:06

    T-Mobile confirms WiFi calling arriving for iPhone users with iOS 8 (Jordan Kahn/9to5Mac)

    Jordan Kahn / 9to5Mac:
    T-Mobile confirms WiFi calling arriving for iPhone users with iOS 8  —  Earlier today we pointed out that Apple quietly announced WiFi calling would arrive in iOS 8 despite not actually talking about the feature on stage.  Now, T-Mobile has confirmed that it will soon enable the experience …

    30 May 18:32

    Oregon governor wants to sue Oracle over healthcare site debacle

    by Barb Darrow

    This is not the press any vendor wants. On Thursday, Oregon governor John Kitzhaber asked the state attorney general to take legal action against Oracle, which he blames for the embarrassing roll-out (or non-rollout) of the state’s health exchange site.

    This is just the latest spat in a long-festering saga. The site launched October 1, but pretty much fell on its face, becoming the butt of jokes on late-night TV well beyond Oregon. Oracle has blamed the state for not using its consultants to build the site — the state acted as its own general contractor. Kitzhaber also asked the U.S. Department of Health and Services to penalize the company, according to OregonLive.

    Oregon hired First Data to figure how things went so bad. That company found Oracle’s performance “lacking” in a February report which went on to say:  “[Oracle's] inability to adhere to industry standards and professional software and project management tenets warrant further review”

    The state, which has paid $130 million for work on the site, is withholding another $25.6 million.

    Responding to a request for comment, an Oracle spokeswoman said via email that:

    Contrary to the story the State is promoting, Oracle has never led the Oregon Health Exchange project. OHA and Cover Oregon were in charge and badly mismanaged the project by consistently failing to deliver requirements in a timely manner and failing to staff the project with skilled personnel. The Governor admitted as much in his statement, and these facts are supported by extensive documentation. We understand the political nature of the announcement just made and that the Governor wants to shift blame from where it belongs. We are proud of the work that we have done to enable over 420,000 Oregonians to enroll in health care. We look forward to an investigation that we are confident will completely exonerate Oracle.

    One thing is clear in all this: The episode is bad news for the state, for Oracle and possibly for healthcare reform in general.

    This story was updated at 7:26 a.m. PST with Oracle comment.

    Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

    29 May 04:52

    In Chile, mobile carriers can no longer offer free Twitter, Facebook or WhatsApp

    by David Meyer

    The Chilean telecommunications regulator Subtel has banned mobile operators from offering so-called zero-rated social media apps – services like Twitter and Facebook that, through deals with the carriers, can be used without having to pay for mobile data. Subtel says such practices are illegal under Chilean net neutrality law.

    These offers are particularly popular in developing markets because they give the carriers a way to get people familiar with the mobile internet, which is something they may have previously avoided due to high perceived cost. The user will get to see and use Twitter, for example, for free, and will then be encouraged to move across to paid data so they can click through the links.

    I saw this in action when I was in South Africa recently. Here’s a screenshot from when I was using Twitter on my pre-paid MTN SIM card:

    MTN zero rated Twitter

    The problem with such tie-ins is that they fly in the face of net neutrality — they treat certain services differently than others in an anticompetitive way. If you’re a wannabe Facebook or Twitter competitor, you’re severely disadvantaged by the fact that those services are essentially offered for free, while your potential customers will need to pony up cash to even check your service out.

    Subtel said on Tuesday that carriers in Chile will need to stop this practice by 1 June or face fines.

    Chile was the first country to enshrine net neutrality in law, back in 2010. Europe is currently in the process of doing the same, though some argue that the new rules, which are very clear on the kind of net neutrality abuse that involve fast lanes for paying content providers, are less clear when it comes to zero-rated content. In the U.S., where there is no net neutrality law, AT&T is keen on offering zero-rated services.

    Bad for Facebook

    Facebook is no doubt hoping that the Chilean interpretation of net neutrality doesn’t catch on, because zero-rated content is crucial to the social network’s growth strategy.

    Facebook and Google both want to be the ultimate portal to the internet – the average person’s starting point – and their best chance of playing this role for new customers is in emerging markets, where most people’s first internet experience is through the handset.

    Through deals with carriers in such markets, Facebook can to all intents and purposes be the internet, or at least the service new users most associate with being online. This was a major reason for Facebook’s $19 billion WhatsApp takeover – WhatsApp plays a similar role for many new internet users, and Facebook needed to both neutralize the threat and ride on WhatsApp’s own growing popularity.

    If the carriers can’t use Facebook as a way of upselling voice and SMS users to data, then Facebook is back to being a normal “over-the-top” service that – certainly through the wildly popular Facebook Messenger app – takes away valuable SMS revenue. In other words, Facebook is back to being a threat rather than a partner.

    It’s not all bad news for the social network — net neutrality law at least stops the carriers from blocking or throttling Facebook Messenger traffic. Broadly, though, it has the makings of a strategic disaster, stopping Facebook (and any other social network or messaging service) from entrenching itself in the mobile market in an unassailable way. And in the long term, for consumers, that is a very good thing indeed.

    Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

    29 May 02:27

    The 20 Highest-Paid CEOs In America

    by Richard Feloni

    Larry Ellison

    Average CEO pay at the biggest companies in the U.S. has been increasing at a moderate rate with the majority of wealth concentrated in fewer hands over the past several years, according to a new annual survey by the Wall Street Journal and the Hay Group.

    Total annual compensation for the top 301 CEOs in America increased by a median 5.5% to $11.4 million from 2012 to 2013. The top 10% of earners made 23% of the total compensation, according to the report.

    Meanwhile, wages and salaries for private sector employees in the U.S. increased by 1.8% during the same period, a growth discrepancy also indicative of a trend since the recession.

    Notably, none of the CEOs in the top 10 lead companies ranked in the top 10% for performance. Larry Ellison is the highest paid CEO in the U.S., but Oracle ranks as No. 152 in performance. Similarly, Disney CEO Robert Iger is the sixth highest paid, but the company's performance ranks at No. 165.

    Total direct compensation consists of salary, annual incentives, stock option grants, restricted stock grants, and performance awards. Most of those in the top 10 made their money from stock options and cash.

    Here are the top 20 highest paid CEOs:

    1. Lawrence J. Ellison, Oracle

    2013 Compensation: $76.9M / One-Year Change: -18.7%

    2. Leslie Moonves, CBS

    2013 Compensation: $65.4M / One-Year Change: 11.1%

    3. Michael T. Fries, Liberty Global

    2013 Compensation: $45.4M / One-Year Change: 248.2%

    4. Richard C. Adkerson, Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold

    2013 Compensation: $38.9M / One-Year Change: 125.1%

    5. Philippe P. Dauman, Viacom

    2013 Compensation: $36.8M / One-Year Change: 11.0%

    6. Robert A. Iger, Disney

    2013 Compensation: $33.4M / One-Year Change: -8.1%

    7. Jeffrey L. Bewkes, Time Warner

    2013 Compensation: 32.4% / One-Year Change: 26.9%

    8. Mark T. Bertolini, Aetna

    2013 Compensation: $31.2M / One-Year Change: 174.9%

    9. Fabrizio Freda, Estee Lauder

    2013 Compensation: $30.9M / One-Year Change: 140.1%

    10. Jeffrey R. Immelt, General Electric

    2013 Compensation: $28.2M / One-Year Change: 262.1%

    11. Lloyd C. Blankfein, Goldman Sachs

    2013 Compensation: $28.0M / One-Year Change: 16.7%

    12. Rex W. Tillerson, ExxonMobil

    2013 Compensation: $27.6M / One-Year Change: 3.2%

    13. Rupert K. Murdoch, 21st Century Fox

    2013 Compensation: $25.8M / One-Year Change: 16.9%

    14. David N. Farr, Emerson Electric

    2013 Compensation: $24.9M / One-Year Change: 284.5%

    15. Kenneth I. Chenault, American Express

    2013 Compensation: $24.4M / One-Year Change: 10.9%

    16. Laurence D. Fink, BlackRock

    2013 Compensation: $24.0M / One-Year Change: 11.6%

    17. Charles W. Scharf, Visa

    2013 Compensation: $23.4M / One-Year Change: N/A

    18. Brian L. Roberts, Comcast

    2013 Compensation: $22.6M / One-Year Change: 5.7%

    19. Alan Mullaly, Ford Motor

    2013 Compensation: $22.5M / One-Year Change: 11.2%

    20. Trevor Fetter, Tenet Healthcare

    2013 Compensation: $22.4M / One-Year Change: 146.4%

    Among the lowest-paid CEOs are company founders John Mackey of Whole Foods Market, Richard Kinder of Kinder Morgan Inc., and Larry Page of Google, who each earned "effectively nothing."

    See the Wall Street Journal's full report here.

    SEE ALSO: The 10 Highest-Paid Female CEOs

    Join the conversation about this story »








    28 May 19:33

    Apple now offers education discounts on iPads. Is that because of Chromebooks?

    by Kevin C. Tofel

    Apple’s iPad line now qualifies for educational discounts for the first time. The company has long discounted its Mac computers for educators and students, but the tablet, which debuted in 2010, was never part of that promotion. Both the full-sized iPad and iPad mini qualify for $20 to $30 price cuts for eligible purchases according to Mac Rumors.

    ipad air wide

    The timing of the discount is interesting. I’ve seen an increasing number of school districts adopt Google Chromebooks for reasons such as cost and simplicity. My stepdaughter came home from middle school last week telling me that her class just started using Chromebooks. Back in January, research firm FutureSource said Chromebooks suddenly counted for 1 in 5 education purchases.

    I have to wonder: Has Apple decided to stem the growing tide of Chromebooks in schools with this pricing promotion?

    Granted, the iPad is a very different device from a Chromebook. The iPad can run hundreds of thousands of apps, has a well-established accessory ecosystem, is intuitive to use and is a tablet. The Chromebook has far fewer apps, focuses mainly on web activities while online, is also easy to use and is a laptop. Regardless of the device differences, it’s clear that both can work in the classroom. It depends on what activities are done and how much money one has: You can buy a capable Chromebook for less than half the cost of the entry-level iPad which could sway some parents, kids and teachers to opt for a Chrome OS laptop.

    It’s certainly possible Apple simply figures it’s time to bring the iPad into the educational discount fold. Perhaps it sees no threat to the iPad when it comes to educators and students. But the growing number of Chromebooks making their way into the classroom, combined with iPad sales that are still rising overall but at a slower rate, make Apple’s decision to reduce iPad prices intriguing. Let’s see if Apple puts even more emphasis on education at next week’s WWDC; if so, that would be telling.

    Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

    28 May 19:32

    Mary Meeker's Big Presentation Shows That Something Has Changed In America

    by Joe Weisenthal

    Internet analyst Mary Meeker is out with her big annual slide presentation on the state of the internet. She comes out with one every year, and it really is a great product to click through, filled with charts and stats on all the big trends about the web.

    In addition to focusing simply on the internet, Meeker always devotes some time to other big economic trends, and it's here that we learn something interesting.

    In recent years, she has been concluding her presentation with some ominous charts about the deficit and the debt.

    For example, last year this was one of the final charts in the deck.

    jpg

    Also last year, she devoted one chart to warning about how terrible American health statistics look.

    jpg (1)

    In recent year, this has been the Zeitgeist: No discussion about the future of America is complete with out serious warnings about the healthcare system and the deficit.

    But that's changed in 2014.

    As Conor Sen points out, this year there's no big sectioning warning about the deficit. There's still a slide in there about the budget, but it's much less ominous.

    And as for healthcare, this year there's a whole section devoted to reasons for optimism, and "green shoots" in the industry, with slides like this one.

    slide (2)

    If nothing else, this represents a turning point in the thinking of the elites. Stressing about the debt is tired. Talking about how we're actually solving our big problems is hot.

    SEE ALSO: Mary Meeker's epic presentation on the state of the web

    Join the conversation about this story »








    28 May 17:51

    Millennials Are Quitting Live TV

    by Jillian D'Onfro

    More bad news for the floundering television industry: Millennials officially spend a majority of their time watching TV either online, on-demand, or via DVR, leaving only 41% of their time allocated for live TV. 

    Millennials (ages 15 to about 34, depending on how you define the group) spend 34% of their time watching TV online, which is about three times more than non-millennials do. 

    This slide comes from Kleiner Perkins partner Mary Meeker's massive "state of the internet" presentation. 

    Here's the breakdown of how millennials and non-millennials are spending their TV time:

    TV Watching

     

    SEE ALSO: 9 Clever Techie Business Cards That You'd Want To Have In Your Wallet

    Join the conversation about this story »








    28 May 03:40

    An Open Letter To Lenovo

    by Michael Graves
    In January of 2013 I bought one of your X1 Carbon ultrabooks. It’s a lovely machine. Splendid hardware design. You should be proud. I gather that others have come to share my opinion of your wares. However, given your apparent aim at business class customers, at least with respect to the more costly models, I […]
    28 May 03:33

    Microsoft’s Skype “Star Trek” Language Translator Takes on Tower of Babel

    by Ina Fried

    microsoft-skype-translator

    Ina Fried

    Remember the universal translator on Star Trek? The gadget that let Kirk and Spock talk to aliens?

    Microsoft will demonstrate onstage at the inaugural Code Conference on Tuesday a version of Skype that will accomplish much of the same — real-time language translation — without a new device.

    Although the Redmond software giant’s real-time language translation tool was demonstrated a few years ago as a concept, it is finally scheduled to reach beta stage in an update of Skype some time later this year.

    Gurdeep Singh Pall

    Ina Fried Gurdeep Singh Pall

    Microsoft will start with a handful of languages and will only be available for the Windows version of Skype, though Microsoft hopes to add more languages quickly, as well as support for the many types of computers and mobile devices that Skype customers use.

    Both it and rival Google have had smaller-scale translation features. Google, for example, has the ability within its mobile apps to do speech-to-speech translation for a number of languages, though not for an entire conversation.

    [Sorry. This video cannot be displayed in this feed. View your video here.]

    Microsoft, meanwhile, featured a service much like the Skype translator as part of a concept video several years back put together by the Office unit. Microsoft Research founder Rick Rashid gave a speech two years ago in which Microsoft’s machines translated his English into Chinese as he spoke.

    “Every piece of technology was there, but it’s never been put together,” Microsoft VP Gurdeep Singh Pall told Re/code.

    In the demo Tuesday, Singh Pall spoke with another Microsoft employee, Diana Heinrichs, who spoke German. The two discussed Singh Pall’s plans to move to London to join the Skype team.

    “London is so international, you are going to love it,” Heinrichs said in German, which a female voice translated into English. “The Indian food is great.”

    Pall said Microsoft chose to let each person finish speaking so that people could hear each other talk before hearing the translation.

    One of the key things that Microsoft is still working out is how to use the massive amount of conversations taking place on Skype to make the translations better. Being able to use the real language that people speak would help the translation engine get significantly better, but also raises big potential privacy issues.

    “We are working through that,” he said.

    Pall noted that Skype handles more than three quarters of a trillion minutes of conversations annually. Even if a tiny fraction of people were willing to let Skype use their conversations, it would get more data than it needs or could even possibly process.

    The Skype feature represents what Microsoft hopes is a turning point in the company’s efforts to make sure that its technological know-how doesn’t remain trapped in its labs.

    For years, Microsoft has had trouble making its lab innovations translate into commercial success. Pall said the key is getting the technology out of the labs and into products.

    “There’s a lot of ‘moonshot’ going on in our world,” Singh Pall said. “You’ve got to make it land.”

    As for the Skype translator, Singh Pall said the goal is to get it out there with whichever languages it can do well and go from there. For sure, it won’t initially work with one language that Bing Translate supported — Star Trek’s Klingon.

    “We can get to it later,” Singh Pall said.

    27 May 22:41

    Hackers demanding ransoms by locking iOS devices through Find My iPhone

    by Kevin C. Tofel

    A number of iOS owners in Australia have lost access to their devices courtesy of a digital hack, according to The Age. The first incident appeared on an Apple support forum on Monday and was soon followed by dozens more. Owners of the iPhones and iPads are finding that their devices are locked and will only be unlocked if they send money to a specific PayPal account. While the original issue was constrained to Australia, a U.S. iOS device owner claimed to be hacked in the same manner on Tuesday.

    can't find my iphone

    The hack appears related to Apple’s Find My iPhone app, which assists in finding a lost device. It’s not clear if the hacked devices are locked due to an exploit in the app or because the hackers have access to certain iCloud or Apple accounts. The devices can be unlocked through a factory restore process reports one forum poster who worked through this process with Apple support:

    “Turn off your phone. Plug your cable into the computer and have itunes up (do not plug into the phone yet). Press and hold the home key on your off phone (I did mine for about 10 seconds). If nothing happens, plug in the cable into your phone (keep holding the home key). What you want to see come up is the picture of itunes and cable on the front of the phone. Your itunes should then recognise the phone as an unidentified phone. Select restore factory settings (it should down load some software) ~15 mins and automatically install

    The phone should go through some of the standard reset screens (usually black screen with apple icon and loading bar). You will be prompted to restore the phone…. do this from itunes not the phone. Throughout this process you must not let the phone or computer go into sleep mode…. and don’t disconnect.”

    We’ve reached out to Apple for comment and will report back with any response. Given the recent rash of online account theft of late — think eBay just five days ago — my suspicion is that this issue may be related as some people still use the same account credentials for multiple services. One of the affected forum posters in fact noted that he did use the same ID and password for both eBay and Apple’s iCloud service.

    Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

    27 May 22:39

    Marc Andreessen Gives The Career Advice That Nobody Wants To Hear

    by Rob Wile

    andreessen

    This weekend, Jim Carrey gave the commencement speech at a small university in Iowa, doing a variation on the "Follow your passion" speech. Even if you fail at what you love, he said, you'll have fewer regrets than if you fail at the thing you weren't passionate about.

    Mac Andreessen disagrees. In his latest series of Tweets, Andreessen explained why following your passions is actually a terrible idea. 

    Too often, people follow their passions into fields that are simply too competitive for where their skills actually are in those things.

    Instead, Andreessen believes one should "do what contributes" — follow the thing that provides the most value to others.

    Check it out:

    1/Thesis: "Do what you love" / "Follow your passion" is dangerous and destructive career advice.

    — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) May 27, 2014

    2/We tend to hear it from (a) Highly successful people who (b) Have become successful doing what they love.

    — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) May 27, 2014

    3/The problem is that we do NOT hear from people who have failed to become successful by doing what they love.

    — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) May 27, 2014

    4/Particularly pernicious problem in tournament-style fields with a few big winners & lots of losers: media, athletics, startups.

    — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) May 27, 2014

    5/Better career advice may be "Do what contributes" -- focus on the beneficial value created for other people vs just one's own ego.

    — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) May 27, 2014

    6/People who contribute the most are often the most satisfied with what they do -- and in fields with high renumeration, make the most $.

    — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) May 27, 2014

    7/Perhaps difficult advice since requires focus on others vs oneself -- perhaps bad fit with endemic narcissism in modern culture?

    — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) May 27, 2014

    8/Requires delayed gratification -- may toil for many years to get the payoff of contributing value to the world, vs short-term happiness.

    — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) May 27, 2014

    Andreessen isn't the first to reject "follow your passion." Two years ago Marc Cuban suggested you should "follow your effort." There's also the classic, "Don't do what you love, love what you do."  And still others have suggested a more complicated if more realistic calculus of doing what you're good at so long as it gives you some satisfaction.

    The consensus best commencement speech of the season still appears to be the one delivered by Adm. William McRaven, the head of U.S. special operations, at the University of Texas.

    His advice: You can't follow anything until you've made your bed. 

    SEE ALSO: Click Here To Read More McRaven

    Join the conversation about this story »








    26 May 05:28

    The Author Of 'The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy' Perfectly Captured The 'Rules' About How We React To Technology

    by Jillian D'Onfro

    hitchhikers guide to the galaxy

    Today, Douglas Adams fans are celebrating "Towel Day," the commemorative holiday created after his death and inspired by his science-fiction series that began with "The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy."

    Adams fans will carry a towel with them all day, because the Hitchiker's Guide says that a towel is "the most massively useful thing an interstellar hitchhiker can have."

    Adams died in 2001, but has the perfect, tongue-in-cheek quote about the way that people view technology that's still applicable today:

    "I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technology":

    1. Anything that is in the world when you're born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
    2. Anything that's invented between when you're 15 and 35 is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
    3. Anything invented after you're 35 is against the natural order of things.

    (Hat-tip to investor Chris Dixon, who recently posted the quote on his blog.)

    SEE ALSO: How A Gay Social Network Turned Itself Into A Billion Dollar E-Commerce Site, Then Fell Apart

    Join the conversation about this story »








    26 May 03:01

    Boulder's Zayo pays $293 million for Geo Networks' optical fiber

    by By Andy Vuong The Denver Post
    Internet network consolidator Zayo Group paid roughly $293.5 million for its latest acquisition, London-based Geo Networks.
    26 May 02:56

    It’s Time To Get iMessage On Android

    by Selena Larson

    Since Apple introduced its own text-messaging system, iMessage, in 2011, it's had a dirty little secret: Users who ditch iPhones for Google's Android smartphones may lose messages people send to them.

    It’s hard to assess the extent of the problem, because it involves messages that don’t find their way to their destination. By definition, it’s difficult to count what’s missing. But anyone who has switched, or had a friend or contact switch, from Apple to Android has probably experienced this problem.

    It’s frustrating, to say the least—for Apple, too. While the company's engineers have reportedly tried numerous times to fix the issue, different bugs keep derailing a fix. 

    Apple suggests users disassociate their phone number from their Apple ID—the login system used for Apple’s iTunes and App Store—and turn off iMessage on all their devices if they’re switching to Android. Even this doesn’t always work.

    As an iPhone owner, I use iMessage to chat more than any other messaging application because it’s so convenient—but it only works for iOS users. The people I chat with the most are other iPhone users, and I can see their messages on both my MacBook and iPhone, depending on which device I’m using. But when one of those people switched to Android, we didn’t talk for a few days. It wasn't because of a feud: She just stopped getting my texts

    Why Are The Messages Stuck?

    Unlike traditional SMS text messages, Apple routes iMessages through its own secure servers, bypassing carriers like AT&T or T-Mobile. Each message is encrypted—scrambled with a digital code so it can't easily be snooped on in transmission.  

    Most of the time, iMessages whiz from sender to receiver. The problem happens when they get stuck. According to this Apple security document, iMessages are queued for delivery to offline devices and are stored for up to seven days on Apple's servers. If an Android user doesn’t disconnect her number from her Apple ID, the messages linger in the cloud, with nowhere to go—because Apple's servers are looking for an iPhone, iPad, or Mac to deliver it to. The only reason why Android devices can't receive iMessages is they don't have software that lets them.

    Is iMessage For Android The Answer? 

    Apple isn’t in the habit of building software for operating systems outside its own, but occasionally—as with iTunes for Windows and Safari for Windows—it’s willing to share. Apple cofounder Steve Jobs compared iTunes for Windows to “giving a glass of ice water to someone in Hell."

    With iMessage for Android, Apple could solve the problem of iMessages ending up in limbo, and add millions of potential customers—all while keeping users tethered to its cloud services, like iTunes. While Apple would prefer otherwise, it’s not uncommon for people to mix and match—using an iPad tablet and an Android smartphone, for example. It makes sense for Apple to give defectors an opportunity to stay loosely attached to the Apple system, rather than lose them all together.

    Android has its own analogue of iMessage: Google Hangouts, a chat system that's tied to the Google+ social network. As iMessage does on iPhones and iPads, Hangouts comes preinstalled on Android devices, and keeps users in the Google ecosystem. (Android phones also have a basic text-message app that doesn’t require a Google login.)

    Google’s app is a bit younger than iMessage—the Hangouts messaging app, which unified Google Talk, Google+ Messenger, and Hangouts video chat, launched last May. And it’s still competing with other apps like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, which work across Android and iOS. 

    iMessage, like most other chat apps, sends messages over Wi-Fi or data connections, so it doesn’t count as a text message on your phone bill. At Apple's shareholder meeting earlier this year, CEO Tim Cook said Apple sends billions of iMessages per day, though he didn’t get more specific in his numbers.

    iMessage on Android would not only be convenient for cross-platform chatting, but it would also provide more security to your private communications. Apple’s iMessage system is reportedly difficult, if not impossible, for federal authorities to crack. (Popular apps like WhatsApp and Snapchat can’t claim that.) Even Apple itself has said it's not able to read the content of iMessages, thanks to its encryption scheme.

    It might be a bit of a technical undertaking. It will also be a political one, given Google and Apple’s salty relationship. But if Apple can build iMessage for desktop Macs, which are very different in their hardware architecture from iPhones and iPads, it seems like it should be technically possible to port it to Android.

    Apple has promised to fix the iMessage bug, though it hasn’t given any details as to when, exactly, that fix might come. Considering this has been a problem since the launch of iMessage in 2011, the resolution might not come for a while. In the meantime, Apple is facing a lawsuit launched by a disgruntled user whose important messages have disappeared into the cloud. 

    iMessage for Android will likely not come soon, if ever, but it could help solve a problem that’s plagued it for years. And as messaging apps continue skyrocketing in popularity around the world, adding on more to the mix—while keeping millions tied to the Apple ecosystem—might not be such a bad idea.

    Lead image modified from the original by Kārlis Dambrāns on Flickr

    25 May 07:38

    Should You Buy A Chromebook?

    by Lisa Eadicicco

    google desk

    Computer shoppers now have more choices than ever when it comes to finding a new device, but that can also make the buying process all the more difficult.

    Between traditional laptops, tablets, and Chromebooks, it can be challenging to decide which gadget best suits your needs.

    The Chromebook is Google's take on mobile computing. Chromebooks have gained a lot of attention since they were introduced in 2011 because they offer a basic computing experience for a fraction of what some high-end notebooks cost.

    Chromebooks don't run on a traditional operating system like Windows or OS X. Instead, they use a software  made by Google called Chrome that relies on an internet connection for most of its functionality. A Chromebook is essentially a laptop made for browsing the web and running simple apps. 

    The switch from Windows or OS X to Chrome OS shouldn't be confusing or jarring. The interface is bare bones and simple, consisting of just a standard desktop with a small icon in the corner for accessing the app menu. Just like regular PCs, the date, timestamp, and battery indicator can be found in the lower right hand corner. 

    But Chromebooks aren't for everyone, and it's important to consider their limits before purchasing one. Here's a quick guide to help you decide whether or not a Chromebook is right for you.

    How do you use your computer?

    If you're a PC gamer, then you probably already know that a Chromebook isn't for you. Similarly, if you regularly use desktop media editing software such as Photoshop, Final Cut, Adobe Premiere,  or Pro Tools, you'll need a full-bodied computer with a an operating system capable of running hefty offline programs. Basically, if you use any desktop software regularly, a Chromebook probably isn't the right choice.  

    Toshiba ChromebookIf your computer use is more casual and you most frequently check social media sites, browse the news, and work in online office suites like Google Drive, then a Chromebook may be an ideal option.

    Do you fire up your laptop a couple of times a day to check Gmail and Facebook and then leave it for a while? Is your entire life stored in Google Drive? Then a Chromebook is probably perfect for you. 

    In a sense, the purpose a Chromebook serves isn't much different than that of a tablet. Like tablets, Chromebooks are built for casual web browsing, running apps and light productivity on-the-go. But Chromebooks are more optimized for productivity since you get the full benefit of a laptop form factor.

    The advantages of buying a Chromebook

    ChromeOSIf you don't download software very often and primarily use your computer for web browsing, there are numerous benefits to buying a Chromebook.

    The lower price is the most obvious of these advantages. The only exception is the $1,299 Chromebook Pixel, which comes with a super-high resolution 2560 x 1700 12.85-inch display and more internal storage than most Chromebooks. 

    On average, a Chromebook costs between $200 and $350 depending on the model, manufacturer and storage capacity.

    It's difficult to find laptops at that price, and the ones that are priced that low are either extremely old, refurbished, or cheaply made unless you spot an unusually good bargain. 

    Chromebooks are also extremely secure. Chrome OS apps and web pages run in a restricted environment called a sandbox. This means that if you're accidentally directed to a malicious website, the dangerous content won't be able to affect or access any other apps on your Chromebook.

    Google also encrypts all of the information stored on your Chromebook or in the cloud, and given that Chromebooks automatically update, they're less susceptible to bugs. 

    Since Chrome OS is so reliant on Google's apps and service, the company bundles 100GB of free storage in Google Drive for two years after purchasing your Chromebook. 

    And the disadvantages...

    The biggest drawback to the Chromebook is its limited functionality. If you don't have a solid internet connection, your Chrome experience will be severely restricted. 

    That's not to say the Chromebook hasn't come a long way since it debuted in 2011. Google now dedicates an entire section of the Chrome OS app store to offline apps for the desktop. Most Chrome OS apps run within the Chrome web browser, but these offline apps are capable of running in a full screen mode on the desktop. Just bear in mind that in order to use apps such as Google Drive and Gmail offline, you'll need to make sure they're enabled first.

    Remember, you won't be able to use any desktop software with a Chromebook. So say goodbye to iTunes, Microsoft Word, and Skype among other common programs you may use often. Of course, Google promotes its alternatives in place of these, such as Google Hangouts and Google Play Music. And you could always use Pandora or Spotify in place of iTunes. But if you're digital library of movies and music is already stored in iTunes, the switch may be difficult.

    Which one should you buy?

    AcerC720PIf you do decide to purchase a Chromebook, there are several models worth considering.

    The Dell Chromebook 11 appears to be the critics choice at the moment, with reviews praising its sturdy keyboard, portable design and long battery life. The$279  Dell Chromebook 11 runs on one of Intel's Haswell processors, which means it should be able to sustain a charge for relatively long periods of time.

    Both Acer's $249.99 C720 and $329.99 C720P 11-inch Chromebooks have also recieved positive reviews. The C720 is Acer's basic Chromebook, while the slightly pricier C720P is the higher-end version with a touch screen. Reviewers have lamented both devices for their sturdy keyboards, long battery life, and generally low price.

    Be advised—there aren't many apps in Chrome OS that are work with touch input yet, so it may be best to save the extra cash and opt for a standard non-touch model. Chrome OS doesn't have a tiled mobile-inspired interface like Windows 8, so you may not find yourself actually using a Chromebook's touch screen very often. 

    If you're looking for something with a slightly bigger display, the 13-inch $299.99 Toshiba Chromebook is a solid choice. It's got a larger screen and a roomier keyboard which may be preferable for getting work done, and reviews have also agreed that the battery life is strong. 

    The bottom line

    Chromebooks are an excellent choice for anyone seeking a portable cheap computer for browsing the web. If you're a heavy Google user and fit this description, a Chromebook would be perfect for you. But, if you find yourself using a lot of desktop software and need a more powerful rig for editing media or gaming, a Chromebook won't cut it.  

    SEE ALSO: Essential Tips For Saving Time In Google Search And The Chrome Browser

    Join the conversation about this story »